Anders Breivik as a Nordicist

It’s been noted, particularly on the racialist, paleoconservative right, that Anders Breivik’s ideas closely resemble the ideas usually associated with the neoconservatives: Strong support for Israel and opposition to Islam. For example, in his book, Breivik cites Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch, and he includes several excellent articles from the Gates of Vienna site. My article, based on his web comments, may have contributed to this perception.

However, unlike the great majority of neoconservatives who are focused mainly on supporting  Israel and for whom any other conservative attitude is a position of convenience, Breivik comes across as someone who is mainly motivated to preserve Europeans and their culture. (For example, neocons are typically very soft on immigration (see here, p. 26 and passim, including Muslim immigration; Breivik includes an article  by “Fjordman” that questions neocon Daniel Pipes‘ idea of promoting moderate Islam.)

And, despite condemning cultural Marxism as the main villain, in the end Breivik realizes that it’s a biological battle. In his book, Breivik comments several times on the eventual extinction of the  Nordics if something isn’t done. Breivik’s view is that a poisonous, maladaptive culture may result in evolutionary death just as surely as a genocidal military invasion. His ideas imply what I take to be correct, that evolutionary conflict is now mainly taking place in the arena of culture—the view of The Culture of Critique. Because cultural Marxism has resulted in natural selection against the Nordics, Breivik views it as a racist ideology of hatred toward Nordics: “Multiculturalism IS as evil and racist as Nazism and as brutal as Stalinism.” This strongly suggests that his web comments where he condemns ethnocentrism are strategic and don’t go to the heart of his thinking.

Advertisement

The following quotations reveal Breivik as a proud Nordicist—someone who is strongly motivated to preserve the Nordic physical type (of which he is an exemplar). “Be proud of your ethnic group – be proud of belonging to the Nordic tribe.” Breivik seems well acquainted with the idea of ethnic genetic interests, and, as often noted on this site, he is aware of a huge double standard where the only people in the world whose ethnic interests are claimed to be illegitimate are Europeans. He opposes race-mixing, noting that Nordic racial characteristics are typically genetically recessive so that they are quickly lost by race-mixing. He notes the paradox that Nordic media superstars who engage in race mixing would never have achieved fame and fortune without their Nordic looks.  But “thanks to their parents’ carelessness, their offspring will be cut off forever from their ‘extended ethnic family.'” He also has a section on the decline of Nordic physical traits like blue eyes as a percentage of the population in the U.S. and elsewhere—the basic logic of natural selection in the biological world.

So there you have it. Europe is heading towards cultural and demographical suicide due to the absence of nationalistic doctrines. Nationalism is the anti-thesis of multiculturalism/internationalism. In order for nationalism to succeed, multiculturalism must be deconstructed and vice versa. The cultural Marxists/humanists/globalists will do EVERYTHING in their power to prevent nationalists from succeeding as we have witnessed now for several decades.

Campaigns of psychological warfare (anti-nationalism) have been integrated into the school curriculums and all intellectual public frameworks. Europeans have been psychologically conditioned into a state of denial and self contempt. A majority of Europeans are therefore in a permanent state of psychological trauma, some nationalities more than others.

The most severely affected are of course the Germans and the Nordic countries; Sweden, Norway, Iceland, Finland and Denmark. The justification for demonising their forefathers is a mixture of portraying the evil crusaders, the evil colonisers/enslavers and of course Nazi Germany’s policies of nordicism. The clear message from our cultural elites is that we are by definition evil and unworthy of life. And that we will do the world a big favor by contributing to our own extermination through third world colonisation. The self loathing runs deep through most aspects of society. To quote one of the most influential professors in Norway, Thomas Hylland Eriksen:

“Our (the Marxist elites of Europe) most important task ahead is to deconstruct the majority, and we must deconstruct them so thoroughly that they will never be able to call themselves the majority again”.

Later quote

“This will contribute to understanding and liberation”

The problem in our societies isn’t primarily that individuals like Eriksen exists (and believe me, every country has their share of these highly influential anti-nationalist intellectuals) but rather that they are allowed unrestricted access to broadcasting networks, state channels, the main stream media in general to spread their hate-speech. They are allowed this access because 80% of politicians and 98% of journalists (category A and B traitors) are aiding and abetting them in the ongoing genocide. This while people like myself, who are trying to warn people of this extremist hate speech, are systematically ignored and demonised as, guess what; racist, fascist extremists… It is nothing less than insane and it borders to an advanced level of psychopathic absurdity. A majority of Europeans are still susceptible to this brainwashing although this is gradually changing.

Parenthetically, Breivik includes a wonderful article by Fjordman dissecting Eriksen and other high priests of White genocide. Eriksen is described as “a career multiculturalist and intellectual celebrity” who, by his own admission, lives in a “boring, monocultural part of the city, insulated from the effects of cultural diversity.”

Eriksen has clashed with Ole-Jørgen Anfindsen, who runs the bilingual quality website HonestThinking.org  and warns against the effects of uncontrolled mass immigration. … What are the problems presented by Mr. Anfindsen? Well, he has published numbers indicating that if the current immigration continues, native Norwegians will be a minority in their own country within a couple of generations. Given the fact that ethnic groups who become minorities in their own lands usually have a hard time, and always get persecuted when the newcomers are Muslims, one would assume that this would be interesting information. But for self-proclaimed “Multicultural cosmopolites,” it is “petty and irrelevant” to even consider that this could represent a problem.

Eriksen, writing in The Guardian in the wake of Breivik’s actions, lamented the fact that the Internet allows people to get divergent opinions:

Had [Breivik] instead been forced to receive his information through a broadsheet newspaper, where not all the stories dealt with Europe’s loss of confidence and the rise of militant Islam, it is conceivable that his world would have looked slightly different. Perhaps one lesson from this weekend of shock and disbelief may be that cultural pluralism is not necessarily a threat to national cohesion, but that the tunnel vision resulting from selective perusal of the internet is.

Sounds like a recipe for a completely controlled media–an attitude quite appropriate for a cultural Marxist.

Back to Breivik: From Section 3.84:

Within approximately 100-150 years or within 4-5 generations (if the current development is allowed to continue) the Germanic/Nordic race in several countries will be diluted or annihilated to such a degree that there will be no one left with Nordic physical characteristics; blond hair, blue eyes, high forehead, sturdy cheekbones. As such, the Nordic tribes will become extinct if we do not resist and seize political and military control of our countries. To illustrate the ongoing demographic annihilation of the Nordic peoples; in 1900 there were 50% Nordics in the US (blonde hair, blue eyes). But now, as a result of primarily non-European immigration, there was in 2008 ONLY 16%.

I don’t see why we shouldn’t actively strive for the establishment of a Nordic League propagating Nordic interests, following the design of the Arab League. After all, why shouldn’t we, Scandinavians, Nordics, Germans and to a large degree Brits, Americans, Polish, Czechs, Swiss, people from Benelux and Balticum be allowed to feel pride in our ethnic heritage and fight for our ethnic interests? Shouldn’t WE have the EQUAL right to actively pursue and protect our interest based on ethnic origin when Arabs, Pashtuns, Africans, Kurds, Tibetans, Aboriginals, Native Americans, Rom/Gypsies are allowed to?

Why are we labeled as Nazi monsters when we do and they are tolerated, encouraged and even supported financially? The answer has been explained in this compendium on multiple occasions. It is because the current US/EU cultural Marxist hegemony is a racist and evil empire which has embraced a hate ideology equal to Stalinist Communism and Nazism. Multiculturalism IS as evil and racist as Nazism and as brutal as Stalinism. They don’t use the same persecution methods, instead they ratify hate laws and get their propaganda machine (MSM) to character assassinate people, ridicule them resulting in conservatives losing their jobs, family and committing suicide. Multiculturalism must be destroyed as soon as possible, or we, all European tribes, will seize [sic] to exist within 100 years! …

Race-mixing propagandists: Heidi Klum, Elin Nordgren, Madonna, Brangelina, Lady Gaga etc – An irreversible action, the eternal loss of your extended ethnic family

The witty comment stating; “if you go black, there is no turning back” actually underlines the severity of the decision involved in race-mixing. It is quite a paradox as specific European entertainment stars (including but not limited to Heidi Klum, Elin Nordgren, Madonna, Brad Pit & Angelina Jolie, Lady Gaga chooses to propagate and glorify race-mixing either through direct or indirect (adoption) choices. The only reason that many of these individuals became famous in the first place was specifically due to their Nordic/European physical characteristics, rare characteristics that have been acquired through an evolutionary process which has taken more than 1 million years. These characteristics, both physical and psychological are then wiped out forever, due to their miscalculated decision. Obviously, the offspring of these entertainment stars will never receive the same opportunities as they, themselves, once did. It is obvious that Nordic entertainment super-stars like Scarlett Johansson (60-70% Nordic purity), Gwyneth Paltrow (70-80%), Pamela Anderson (90-95%), Paris Hilton (70-80%), Taylor Swift (80-90%) would have never been where they are today hadn’t it been for their distinct Nordic physical characteristics. They would have never, in a million years, managed to reach their current status of fame had they belonged to another ethnic group. Same can be said about several other superstars with Nordic physical features such as individuals from Marilyn Monroe to Megan Fox. So why not embrace their Nordic gift by contributing to preserve Nordic culture instead of throwing it away and robbing their children of the same opportunities they once received? It should be noted that the US was composed of 50% with blue eyes in 1950 but this number has been reduced significantly and was in 2008 only 16%. By 2020 it is estimated to be less than 8%.

Recessive vs. dominant genes

Blue eyes and blond hair (and possibly many psychological traits) almost never survives a race-mixing process due to the fact that Nordic genotypes are recessive unlike for example African, Arab or Oriental genotypes which are considerably more genetically dominant. In order to dominantly dilute an African individual it would require 5 individuals of Nordic descent. Thanks to their parent’s carelessness, their offspring will be cut off forever from their “extended ethnic family”. They will become, tribe-less individuals and many are likely to either swear allegiance to extreme cultural Marxism/multiculturalist ideological views (90%) or choose the extreme right (>10%). They often hate their parents for what has been done to them, as they are neither European, African nor Asian.

The Nordic ideal – our tribe counts 200 million individuals as of 2010

There are many non-Nordics who try to mimic Nordic beauty by dying their hair blond and wearing contacts. So why not offer our children the actual genetical gift instead, through repro-genetics, rather than spending thousands of Euro and thousands of hours on make-up trying to mimic the Nordic ideal?

As the Nordic ideal obviously is still prevalent in this multiculturalist world it may not be too late to prevent the extinction of the Nordic tribes. We are still a strong tribe, representing the most numerous in Europe, counting more than 200 million individuals worldwide. …

A 2002 study found that the prevalence of blue eye colour among European-Americans in the United States to be 57.4 percent for those born from 1899 through 1905 compared with 33.8 percent for those born from 1936 through 1951. Blue eyes have become increasingly rare among American children, with only one out of every six – 16.6 percent, which is 49.8 million out of 300 million (22.4% of European-Americans) of the total United States population having blue eyes. The plunge in the past few decades has taken place at a remarkable rate. A century ago, 80 percent of people married within their ethnic group. Blue eyes were routinely passed down, especially among people of Western and Northern European ancestry. …

Be proud of your ethnic group – be proud of belonging to the Nordic tribe

The current cultural Marxist world order lead by Western European and US elites acknowledge and tolerate that most ethnic group’s fight for their interest and are proud of their ethnic group. The Arab League, Kurdish Rights Movements, Rom (Gypsy) Rights Movements, Tibetan Rights Movements, Native American Rights Movements and Aboriginal Rights Movements, to name just a few are all interest groups based on race or ethnic affiliation. They are among those interest groups that propagate interests based on race/ethnic origin. They are all tolerated, encouraged and even often supported by the current US/EUSSR cultural Marxist hegemony. If I were to create a Nordic or an even broader European Indigenous Rights movements with the goal of propagating rights and interests for the indigenous Europeans we all know what would happen. It has been done before and the result of the former efforts (resulting in persecution from the establishment) just underlines the hateful and destructive agenda of multiculturalism. The evil nature of this hypocrisy is so deliberate and it clearly tells us that multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) is an anti-European hate ideology designed to deconstruct European culture, traditions, Christendom, ethnic groups and even nation states. We cannot defeat multiculturalism until we defeat Marxism as it is two sides of the same coin. Multiculturalism is Marxism, Marxism is multiculturalism. Do not have any doubt about this. A liberal right winger might claim that he is not a cultural Marxist but a globalist. He should however know that a globalist is the exact same thing as a cultural Marxist. Because there are only two cultural poles; if you are not cultural conservative then you are a cultural Marxist. …

Countries ranked after historic concentration of the Nordic genotypes

Country 1900 – % 1950 2010 2040 2070
Iceland 90 80

60

30 15
Finland 85 75 55 35 25
Sweden 85 75 45 20 10
Norway 85 75 45 20 10
Denmark 85 75 45 20 10
Germany 75 65 35 17 8,5
Baltic 75 65 35 25 18
Czech Rep 75 65 35 25 18
Poland 75 60 30 20 15
UK 70 60 30 15 7,5
US 57,4 33,8 16,6 8 4
Benelux 55 47 30 15 7,5
Australia 55 45 30 15 9
Slovakia 55 45 30 20 15
Belarus 55 45 30 20 15
Russia 35 45 25 18 13
Canada 40 35 25 15 7,5

As you see, the future projections of the extinction rate are based on current immigration policies. Eastern European countries will have a slower extinction rate due to more conservative immigration policies.

Political correctness/cultural Marxism causes the extinction

The countries included in the current EUSSR/USASSR hegemony refuse to discuss these topics due to the fact that political correctness paralyzes and prevents all meaningful debate. So the only chance we have to prevent the complete and utter extinction of the Nordic genotypes and other genotypes for that matter is depending on what policies the future cultural conservative European Federation countries choose to implement.

A solution which seems to be the only option which could work in this modern world would be to commercialise positive reprogenetics programs on a state level. This will obviously not be possible as long as the cultural Marxists dominate our regimes due to the fact that they are bound by political correctness/cultural Marxism. Anyone who suggests a program like this would immediately be labeled a Nazi and racist which subsequently would end anyone’s career (character assassination). No Western politician, which is a part of the current EUSSR/USASSR hegemony, will take this chance. It is therefore up to the politically incorrect cultural conservatives to take responsibility when we seize power within 30-70 years. And when we do we should refrain from committing the same mistakes of the past. We must reject negative eugenics and instead focus on positive eugenics or so called reprogenetics.

Political correct individuals will say:

“Who cares if blonde people with blue eyes are extinct? We are all going to be dark skinned in the future anyway.”

Wrong. We are only going to allow the indigenous peoples of Europe to be indirectly exterminated if we allow it, which we have no intention to allow. The hypocritical thing is that the same individuals stating this is likely to support animals that are facing extinction, the preservation of rare species in the animal kingdom etc. Why should we preserve the polar bears, when we have brown bears?

According to the logic of the cultural Marxist – blonde, blue eyed people have lesser value than animals.

There are absolutely no valid arguments for propagating political views which indirectly result in the extinction of ethnic groups. The mentality just underlines that multiculturalism is in fact an anti-European hate ideology created to exterminate everything European. If a rare African or Asian ethnic group was found with distinctive physical characteristics the current cultural Marxist hegemony (lead by EUSSR and USASSR) would have no problem at all to allow and fund a group which goal was to preserve it (they are in fact doing this in Tibet who is being invaded by Han Chinese). They have no problem to justify their support to Tibet which makes them nothing more than hypocrites.

Solutions to prevent the extinction of the Nordic genotypes

There are basically two realistic solutions:

1. The commercialisation and state/media encouragement of reprogenetics favoring the Nordic genotype- See “reprogenetics and the future” for more information.

And/or

2. The usage of large scale surrogacy facilities as a secondary reproduction option for countries to compensate for non-sustainable fertility rates. The donors of eggs and sperm will then exclusively carry the Nordic genotypes. See “National reproduction policies” for more information.

Both solutions are possible and realistic if the political will is there.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

121 Comments to "Anders Breivik as a Nordicist"

  1. IndianaJohn's Gravatar IndianaJohn
    August 14, 2011 - 2:07 pm | Permalink

    @Lew: Jew agenda opened western countries to arab immigration.

  2. IndianaJohn's Gravatar IndianaJohn
    August 14, 2011 - 1:58 pm | Permalink

    If Anders Breivik were protesting moslem presence in Finland he would have shot-up a moslem gathering.
    Why am I the only one who sees Breivik as Manchurian Candidate whose assignment is to discredit nationalism?
    His method was clever in making our jaw go slack so that we would better hear the media telling us the what and the why.

    Some of us are even lionizing the sh!thead when we ought to be examining his handlers and enablers.

  3. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    August 12, 2011 - 7:40 pm | Permalink

    Every nation has its racist and bigot Breiviks. In Europe one can find Wilders; in America Pat Robinson; in Britain Tony Blair and David Cameron (the idot believe Tehran alread poseses nuclear bomb which it’s going to use against Israel) and Israel is full of creepy Rabbis.

    These Rabbis believe the Wailing Wall was part of Temple Mount – while in fact it was part of Roman fortress built by Herod.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/08/12/the-%e2%80%98wailing-wall%e2%80%99-is-not-jewish/

  4. Mark's Gravatar Mark
    August 4, 2011 - 12:26 pm | Permalink

    He is very Nordic in the Scandinavian sense, both ethnically and culturally, however racially he is more of an UP-Nordic blend, as many are, his features are broader and more robust. Race is not just about pigmentation.

    Calling him a “Nordicist” is a bit vague and counterintuitive. I think most people would hesitate to say someone is a racialist or White nationalist if that person went on to mass murder his own people, especially innocent youths.

    Some of what he claimed to advocate is Nordicist, but his actions obviously weren’t. It’s just another example of misspent energy and a terrible tragedy. His targets were all wrong and only assisted the multicult in its propaganda.

    He has been diagnosed as having a narcissistic personality disorder. A mental disorder you unfortunately find among White nationalists.

    His beliefs are more universalist as he sees himself as an ardent Christian crusader and pan-Europeanist.

    His motivation was more from hatred of his own than love of his race, as is often the case with White nationalists. He comes from a dysfunctional family and was abused in his youth by Pakistanis, one of whom was his teenage best friend.

    Breivik confessed to using testosterone supplements in the days before the attack, which according to him made him more aggressive.

  5. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 2, 2011 - 7:50 pm | Permalink

    @Carolus: You are certainly correct. One needs to be willfully ignorant to conflate the Cross and the Trowel, and as certain of Mr. Johnson’s comments and other writings sadly suggest, Christophobia as it worsens tends to lead inexorably to a more ecumenically generalized blockheadedness.

    What’s next? Hyperlinks to Z.O.G.-style “proof” that Jesus and the Twelve are a Jew fiction? Quod absit!

    How hard, really, is it to see the plain truth of what Matt Parrott puts so epigrammatically: “One can be in communion without being in cahoots”?

  6. Michael Hardesty's Gravatar Michael Hardesty
    August 1, 2011 - 2:10 pm | Permalink

    Lew, your an ignorant Zionist Racist who indulges in the worst sort of stereotypes. Muslims are not raping people on a vast scale in the USA, Christian Blacks are.
    Israelis are raping us on a higher level, a quarter trillion in US tax funds since 1967 and total control of the Congress and the White House.

  7. Carolus's Gravatar Carolus
    August 1, 2011 - 1:49 pm | Permalink

    @Greg Johnson:

    Please, Breivik is no Christian. His actions are those of a murderer which is totally inconsistent with St Augustine’s just war teaching. As a Norweigian he would normally be a Lutheran but a nonobservant one. If he were observant he would know about St Augustine and the just war teaching and hesitate to kill innocents especially of his own kind.

    As for the Crusades being genocidial, that is false history, they were not.

    His misuse of Jack de Molay is back ass wards too. De Molay was accused of religious indifferentism. Religious indifferentis, is what lets Muslims into Europe in the first place.

    Religious indifferentism is also what tolerates Jewry and it was a specific policy of the freemasons in France who were the agents of revolution. A revolution as specifically aimed at harming the Roman Catholic Church as it was aimed at harming the aristocracy. Not Christian in any sense. Anti-Christian. A revolution that ended with Napoleon and his violent promotion of egalitarianism and enfranchisement for Jewry.

    I can hardly believe Greg Johnson the scholar would conflate Christianity and Freemasonry. Bizarre.

    Just as bizarre that this confused murderer would think more religious indifferntism would somehow help Europe out of a fix caused by religious indifferentism. This is the ironic, stupid and self defeating liberalism of the contemporary parliamentary right in Europe that has so cravenly sunk to pandering for a few votes that it sucks up to Jewry.

  8. Carolus's Gravatar Carolus
    August 1, 2011 - 1:39 pm | Permalink

    Some kind of Nordicist, he sires no children but is responsible for the deaths of seventy some, most of whom were teenagers who had no offspring themselves. Pathetic, the only way he could have killed more Scandanavians was by being an abortionist.

    With friends like Breivik Norway has no need of enemies.

  9. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 30, 2011 - 3:55 pm | Permalink

    Comment Formatting
    BOLD
    UNDERLINE
    ITALIC
    HYPERLINK

    BLOCKQUOTE

    Dear Professor M., Mr. Parrott, and/or other tech wizards: Isn’t there supposed to be a slash preceding “blockquote” in the close-blockquote element?

    Otherwise, these instructions are the best and most helpful noncontent addition to the site since the redesign. Thank you.

    I am still hoping, however, that you will provide the html codes that automatically transform commenters’ mindless retorts of the “You’re a retard; drop dead” ilk into something more appropriate to an out-of-the-gutter context and less embarrassing to the commenters’ somewhat more evolved friends and families. Or will those codes not be standard issue till we get to the beta of Windows 46 Alpha Prime?

  10. Thomas Mallon's Gravatar Thomas Mallon
    July 30, 2011 - 1:59 pm | Permalink

    He writes, “in 1900 there were 50% Nordics in the US (blonde hair, blue eyes). But now, as a result of primarily non-European immigration, there was in 2008 ONLY 16%”

    Hardly only “as a result of primarily non-European immigration”. What about our contracepting and aborting ourselves? This development was of no small consequence in making WASPS and other whites slide into soon-to-be minority status in the US.

  11. Lew's Gravatar Lew
    July 29, 2011 - 8:12 pm | Permalink

    KMD wrote:

    the only way that the tensions created by multiculturalism will be controlled is by very heavy-handed authoritarian means–Gulags and bullets in the back of the head.

    Speaking of heavy-handed authoritarianism…

    news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20084939-281/house-panel-approves-broadened-isp-snooping-bill/

  12. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    July 29, 2011 - 4:39 pm | Permalink

    Mr, Rychaert, right, nail on the head department. Humor aside, Machiavelli is in and Culture is out.

    Winning is our goal, not niceness. Secondly, speaking of Winning, Greg Johnson’s diction in his title Confessions of a Reluctant Hater, is not good politics for us. It is even a bad psychodynamic in general. Personally, I don’t waste time hating, it is a waste of energy and not a good guide to action.

    First, intellectually, socio-biology cannot fault jews, muslims, and blacks and browns for their parasitism and breeding strategies, etc. They are good traits for them. It does not make sense for Darwinians to mouth platitudes or emotionalisms when intellectually we validate socio-biological traits.

    War is not hatred. War is competition for resources, and/or redress of grievances. The grievance may include hatred, but the solution, if all else fails, war, cannot be deployed with hatred because emotionalism makes for mistakes.

    Every action must be evaluated on the criterion of ..Is it good for Whites.
    Terrorism can only be justified if it moves the cause forward. Then the type of terrorism, for example killing kids, OR their actual enemy-status parents, also becomes clear. Right now , no terrorism seems justifiable.

    If our enemies start killing us, or locking us up sans habeas corpus, then the game changes. Joe

    We need to counter those traits with our own traits of intelligence, political savvy, and war-making ability if it comes to that. Whites are starting to awaken, and they do not like hate talk. They will respond to reason, and their own feelings toward our racial enemies. Those feelings may contain an element of hatred, but we must appeal to their more rational faculties, and let our enemies appeal to their nascent hatreds.

    We just have to keep on with our rational approaches which include endorsements of Everybody in their own countries, and re-Segregation if it comes to that, with regard to our own Blacks.

    We must not be identified as haters. Whites do not go for that. Jews are very careful not to appear as haters, in general.

    We need to tar our enemies with the hatred brush. Hatred of Whites by our enemies is an easy case to make. Plus, their parasitism.

    Joe

  13. Lew's Gravatar Lew
    July 29, 2011 - 2:51 pm | Permalink

    So ABB was pro-Zionist. So what? It doesn’t mean that Muslims are not a grave threat to Europe.

    The Muslim ball washing by some on this site is pitiful.

    The Muslims are always happy to slit White throats and rape White women when given the opportunity to do so.

    But the Muslims oppose Jews, so hey, who cares, right?

  14. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    July 29, 2011 - 1:22 pm | Permalink

    Anders Breivik as a Ultra-Right-Wing-Zionist and Jew worshiping Freemason..

    He is not one of us by any stretch of the imagination.. This was clearly a false flag attack by a Golem gone amok..

    Beware of the Shabbes Goyim and Golem makers, whom 9 out of 10 are Jews! Inciting White Nationalist to violence against Muslims, whatever minority, leftists, etc., will surly backfire and will not serve our cause. War is to be waged on the battlefield against soldiers, not against civilians. Violence is useless in a war of ideas. These kids were murdered because Israel wanted to punish Norway for it’s pro-Palestinian stance.. and the World should know this.

  15. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    July 29, 2011 - 11:07 am | Permalink

    “When I hear the word ‘culture’ I release the safety catch on my Browning”

    From the play Schlageter by Hanns Johst

  16. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    July 29, 2011 - 7:34 am | Permalink

    David Horowitz along with FrontPage magazine’s editors and columnists including Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Steve Emerson, Mark Steyn, etc. – were among the twevlve most racist Jewish and Christian writers and talk-show personalities voted by the FAIR magazine as top American Islamophobes in 2008.

    The latest of their victims is no other than late Professor Manning Marable for authoring Malcolm X’s biography based on his ten years of research. The Zionist pigs are not mad at Manning because he is an Afro-American or a former communist or a Christian – but because he had praised Malcolm X, who stopped hating Whites after his pilgrimage to Makkah but never ceased his criticism of Jewish occupation of Palestine.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/07/29/malcolm-x-judged-by-a-christian-and-a-jew/

  17. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    July 29, 2011 - 1:02 am | Permalink

    To Matt Parrott, up above aways you claim that Universalism and Particularism are not necessarily incompatible.

    In the words of Ronald Reagan, There you go again. You keep “philosophizing.” You also say as long as they are not in “cahoots”, something like that.

    Excuse me but you are damaging the English language, like Humpty Dumpty, ( “a word means exactly what I say it means, nothing more , nothing less”)

    I have asserted, not posited, that philosophy is more or less dead. I will go further, it IS Dead. What takes its place in socio-biology, biohistory, and history.

    Particularism is scientific, and Universalism is abstracted nonsense, the business of liberals, communists, and scribblers.

    ONe could theoretically salvage the term “Universal”, if one went in for a host of qualifiers. Forget it. It wastes time.

    We don’t need the word, it leads to confusion. It is not even useful in the context of Whites and our history. We can do without it just fine.

    Universalisms are the toys of adolescents thinking without facts.

    We can easily describe our problems and concerns with the language of biology and history. “Culture” is another word that is almost completely useless, especially since it has become the debased coin of the liberal realm.

    LIke the stock market, when your barber starts recommending stocks, it is time to sell everything, and when blacks start using the word “culture” or ‘universals” , it is time to run.

    When I hear the word “culture” or “universal” I take out my revolver.

    J

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      July 29, 2011 - 6:07 am | Permalink

      @ Joe Webb

      {“…When I hear the word “culture” or “universal” I take out my revolver…”}

      Well as a “universal” judgement I would say that is not very “cultured”.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 29, 2011 - 7:24 am | Permalink

      Ronald Reagan was an actor and a Holloywood puppet played by the Jewish Lobby. He had himself photographed with leaders of Afghan Mujahideed and told them that they remind him of the ‘Fathers of America’ – meaning that they were all butchers working for the Zionist elites.

      Culture cannot be universal – but a religious doctrine could be. The Ottoman empire proved that. While it did not rule Indian sub-continent, Afghanistan, Burma, Indo-China and many parts of Africa – tens of millions of Muslims respected and obeyed Turkish Sultans as leaders of universal Muslim Brotherhood (Ummah).

      Russian-Israeli writer Israel Shamir had cried: “Ottoman Empire, please come back!”

      http://www.israelshamir.net/English/Ottomans.htm

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      July 29, 2011 - 4:18 pm | Permalink

      For the record, Joe Webb wasn’t being crude or primitive in writing “When I hear the word ‘culture’ or ‘universal’ I take out my revolver.” He was ironically paraphrasing a remark (minus the “or ‘universal'”) that had been widely attributed to Hermann Göring long before it appeared in the Wikipedia-sourced play cited, below, by TabuLa Raza.

      Say what you will about Göring, he was no fool. Indeed he is proof positive, if anyone needs further proof, that moral rectitude and intellective firepower need not go together like a horse and carriage. Graham Greene, one of many people who loathed Göring’s actions and politics, quoted the remark approvingly in one of his volumes of autobiography. That fully eighty years ago the word culture should already have suffered a thoroughgoing revolution within the form—in Germany of all places and in precisely the dimensions that Joe alludes to—is something that ought to give us all pause. (It has certainly given me pause, as my TOO essay of last month made evident.)

      Like Göring and Greene, Joe Webb is no fool either, needless to say. He may chide Matt Parrott for being too much of an owl, but he ain’t fooling us into thinking that he himself is no more than a plain old garden-variety starling. Not that he means to or would wish us to, I think.

      All in all, I believe that a fair capsulization of Joe’s opinion of Breivik and his interminable philosophizing is less that he is too clever by half than that he is simply not clever enough.

    • Blue Devil's Gravatar Blue Devil
      July 30, 2011 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

      Joe Webb lay off the juice before you post.
      “Universalisms are the toys of adolescents thinking without facts”
      Lol Joe….And what are facts? Is objective truth possible?LOL You need to go back to your first semester in philosophy before making a fool out of your online avatar!haha And you pull out your gun when you hear…… Dude Shut the F@#$ up. You’re a poser attempting to buttress your argument via existential threats of violence. Who is this guy and who does that!? You’re a complete tool.

    • Richard IV's Gravatar Richard IV
      July 30, 2011 - 4:15 pm | Permalink

      Any man that talks about culture, is the enemy of my race.

  18. Lookaroundu's Gravatar Lookaroundu
    July 28, 2011 - 11:25 pm | Permalink

    @Athanasius

    “Aren’t Amish Christian?”

    Yes they are, but it’s a special sect of Christianity. It’s not one of the main line denominations that I was referring to. I should have explained myself more clearly.

    As for Breveik, there’s a logical disconnect between his hatred for the (Jewish-created) Frankfurt School and cultural Marxism on one hand, and his love for Jews on the other. A majority of Jews, in the US at least, consistently vote for this multicultural and cosmopolitan lunacy. Perhaps Breveik is using his “affection” for Christianity as a cover. When European rightists (like Geert Wilders) go out of their way to demonstrate their lickspittle groveling to the Jews and Israel, perhaps that’s a cover as well. It could be a defense mechanism to avoid being called an anti-semite or being lumped in with the Nazis.

  19. mari's Gravatar mari
    July 28, 2011 - 8:43 pm | Permalink

    Living in Los Angeles I am very familiar with people who have had plastic surgery. I think most of the women I know have had plastic surgery. From looking at his pictures, especially the one of him in a car with his lawyer it is obvious he has had plastic surgery. His skin is as stretched looking as any 60 year old actress.

  20. mari's Gravatar mari
    July 28, 2011 - 8:30 pm | Permalink

    Systemic

    The White “barbarian” tribes of Europe converted to Christianity because their Kings told them to. In most cases, the missionaries selected the elites, especially elite women and quietly converted them first.

    When the Kings converted they usually proclaimed that from now on the tribe would be Christian whatever Christian meant at the time.

    The Church wisely allowed most pagan practices except harmful ones like human sacrifice to continue. The average person was probably not all that aware of the change.

    The missionaries also quietly converted the pagan clergy at the same time they were quietly converting the elite.
    When Constantine decriminalized Christianity 330 Ad many clergy men of the old Roman religion turned out to be secret Catholics.

    All of Russia became Greek Orthodox Christian because the chief warlord traveled to Constantinopol and liked the Greek Orthodox style of decorating churches.

    Duke Rollo’s the viking leader who invaded and took over Normandy France became Christian as part of the peace settlement between Rollo’s Norwegian invaders and the King of France. He accepted Christianity and got Normandy. He ordered his Norwegians to become Christians and they did without fuss.

    Clovis ordered the Christianization of France when he converted. There is no evidence that there was much objection.

    The Christian clergy offered the warlords and Kings of the Barbarian tribes accountants, attorneys, Judges, builders, archeticts, engineers and other skills important skills that the clergy possessed.

    The Kings got an entire beaucracy when they converted.

    The land reclamation project that created the Netherlands from the sea was undertaken by monks starting in 600 AD.

    The “barbarian” tribes followed their leaders in religion. When Christianity offered the Kings more than paganism did, the Kings converted and brought along the tribes.

  21. The Iron Boot's Gravatar The Iron Boot
    July 28, 2011 - 1:39 pm | Permalink

    INTERRACISM is RACISM. It too is Supremacist. It says a person of mixed-blood is SUPERIOR to a person of ‘pure blood’. INTERRACISM is also unequal. The men of one race preavils over the women of another race: White men and Asian women, Black men and white women.

  22. The Iron Boot's Gravatar The Iron Boot
    July 28, 2011 - 1:38 pm | Permalink

    If blacks can say BLACK IS BEAUTIFUL, whites can say WHITE IS BEAUTIFUL.

  23. Tom Brown's Gravatar Tom Brown
    July 28, 2011 - 12:59 pm | Permalink

    The Jews set EU immigration policy as they’d done in the US. There would have been no need to bring in cheap immigrant labor had the countries of Europe not been economically castrated by the IMF and central banks. At one time in the USA, dad could support the family, then it was dad and two jobs, then dad, two jobs and mom part time, mom full time, then mom and dad with two jobs each…you get the picture. This economic slavery–via unbridled usury–is done to create a world of obedient mulattoes who slave for the elitist masters. Brievik’s ethnocentrism is blind to the Zionist hand at the economic levers. Default, kill the banks, deport immigrants, blow up MSM transmitters are but a few steps in the right direction. As long as the Jews and their monetary system rule the world, a stinking mess is all you will get, as well as self hating Norsemen like Breivik

  24. Eva's Gravatar Eva
    July 28, 2011 - 12:34 pm | Permalink

    Forgotten in the discussion about Breivik’s racialist writings is the horrible fact that he is a mass murderer of the worst sort – he has killed the young of his own kind. The children and grandchildren of the murdered young Norwegians will never be born. Why even discuss the pieced together, plagarized comments of a lunatic, (whether he acted alone or not), who enjoys admiring his uniformed physique in the staged photographs of various men’s organizations, including the homosexual Knights Templar? If Norwegians, particularly the fathers of the murdered young, still retained the instincts for revenge of their Viking ancestors, they would drag the monster out of protective custody and violently administer tribal retribution. Jews and Moslems, whose tribal instincts are still intact, would surely have done so.

  25. point blank's Gravatar point blank
    July 28, 2011 - 12:31 pm | Permalink

    K.MacDonald wrote : The following quotations reveal Breivik as a proud Nordicist—someone who is strongly motivated to preserve the Nordic physical type (of which he is an exemplar).

    K.MacDonald is referring to the earlier(5-10 year old) photos taken of Anders Breivik. In those photos you can clearly see that Anders was a healthy, normal looking Norwegian man. The more current photos of Anders Breivik show a much different looking man –– soft , plump, and effeminate
    in appearance. Also, he seems to have become more detached from reality , as these photos (Here Here Here
    ) of him in role playing costume garb would indicate.

    It’s a real travesty that this once strong, healthy Norwegian man chose the poisons of kosher conservatism/neoconservatism and Christian Zionism. It’s appalling to see a once fine, good quality white man become so depraved and deranged by the poisonous influences of a rotten and malevolent Judaized culture.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      July 28, 2011 - 4:05 pm | Permalink

      @ point blank

      { “…the Nordic physical type (of which he is an exemplar)…”}

      For those who like to describe Breivik as a pure Nordic,on the picture in this article and on others too,he has something distinctively mongolian.First of all he is not dolichocephalic,then he has that flat broad face that is typical of mongolians and he has also slightly mongolian eyes.He looks somewhat Eskimo-like,though in his case admixture with Lappish blood is more probable.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      July 28, 2011 - 4:34 pm | Permalink

      I don’t think the ‘Nordic subrace’ was what was meant. Breivik ‘s features are wholly Scandinavian – Teutonic so he is an exemplar of the Nordic type in the sense of being a typical of a recognizably Norwegian-looking man. As far as I know he is of 100% Norwegian ancestry.

      For a Norwegian he isn’t at all unusual, it is quite ridiculous to call him “distinctively mongolian” or “Eskimo-like” (!)

    • Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
      July 28, 2011 - 5:27 pm | Permalink

      Indeed, it is ridiculous to call him “mongolian”. It is not, however, impossible that he has some Finno-Ugric ancestry, since his father descends from Northern Norway. His mother’s surname (Behring) reveals aristocratic, partly Danish, ancestry.

  26. Shawn's Gravatar Shawn
    July 28, 2011 - 12:16 pm | Permalink

    How many adolescents are liberal because of liberal parents or because of liberal indoctrination in schools? Such adolescents are victims. I was once such a victim of this and thus was once liberal, as were scores of others.

    As one gains experience and becomes well-read and logical one can distance him/herself from intellectual brainwashing and come to more sensible conclusions. Recent scientific research tells us that the brain is not fully developed until age 25 or so.

    What percentage of the red diaper babies would turn out to be conservative? My guess would be 10% and another 15% would turn out to be moderate.

  27. Shawn's Gravatar Shawn
    July 28, 2011 - 12:08 pm | Permalink

    If your house is flooding you can bail out the water with buckets or you can first turn off the faucet.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      July 28, 2011 - 3:25 pm | Permalink

      The faucet is the “hostile elite”,but there is a faucet behind the faucet and that is the Jews.

  28. July 28, 2011 - 11:44 am | Permalink

    The only force opposing Jewish domination is the Muslims. The Jews by way of their ideology have us by the throat even our traitorous elites can not oppose them without having their children murdered. I WILL NOT attack the Muslims as my parents attacked the Nazis only to result in the diminishment of the forces against the Jews. The winners of the WWII were the Jews and their speculative capitalism and social engineering.

    • dc's Gravatar dc
      July 28, 2011 - 12:19 pm | Permalink

      Bravo!
      This incident has succeeded in putting the focus on the invasion by foreign immigrants. Quite forgotten are the jew string pullers who arranged the invasion.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      July 28, 2011 - 3:22 pm | Permalink

      @ Helvena

      {“…the winners of the WW ll were the Jews…”}

      Exactly,and the bizarre thing of it all is that they convinced the whole world that they were the great “losers” with their Holocaust story.Part of their supremacist strategy is to appear as eternal victims.It has worked wonderfully for them.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      July 28, 2011 - 7:15 pm | Permalink

      The only force opposing Jewish domination is the Muslims.

      But Muslims aren’t opposing Jewish domination. They oppose Israel in their backyard, but they represent no serious obstacle to Jewish influence anywhere in the world. In the US and Europe, they almost slavishly follow the lead of Jewish activists.

      It is only on the narrow issue of Palestine and Arab conflicts that they put up some (feeble) opposition. Beyond that, they are more or less lapdogs. They fully support multiculturalism.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      July 28, 2011 - 7:27 pm | Permalink

      And by the way, I don’t think Muslims should be unfairly tarnished or attacked. It isn’t Muslims who spearhead the war-on-Christmas, that would be a Jewish project, almost without exception (even when they are atheist Jews).

      But I’m also aware that Jews feel as comfortable in a Muslim culture as they do a Christian culture, so they have no problem with the Islamization of Europe.

  29. Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
    July 28, 2011 - 11:30 am | Permalink

    The alleged desire to preserve the Nordic race can be taken at face value, or not. Considering the choice of targets and the timing of the attacks, not to mention the Masonic fantasizing, it looks like 3.143 lays out the real agenda:

    – Assist Israel in deporting all Muslim Syrians (also referred to as “Palestinians”) from the Gaza strip, the West bank and Jerusalem. These territories will be included in Israel. However, Jerusalem will come under joint Christian-Jewish administration.

    – Demolish the abomination known as the Al-Aqsa mosque and the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem and rebuild the Temple of Salomon – the Third Temple as described in the Book of Ezekiel, chapters 40-42. The Third Temple will become a place of worship for both Jews and Christians. The Dome of the Rock is regarded as occupying the actual space where the Temple once stood.

    – Jerusalem will once again become a city shared by Christians (50%) and Jews (50%).

    The New Solomon’s Temple and Jerusalem will be shared by Jews and Christians, I wonder what the Jews will say about that?

    It’s clear it’s not the Nordic people he’s concerned about, it’s his mix of pseudo-Christianity and Masonic Solomon’s Temple nuttiness. White Europeans must put their lives on the line fighting Muslims for Israel and the Jews, and supposedly the Jews will play nice and share Jerusalem and the Temple with them.

    His attacked pro-Palestinian Nordics, on the eve of Norway’s recognition of Palestine, for the goal of protecting a Jewish Israel, in such a way as to discredit ethno-nationalism. Just like the 911 attacks and the various attacks that followed, this attack kills Whites, demonizes Muslims, and is good for Israel.

    Nordics are expendable, Jews are not. It’s pretty clear what the actual agenda is.

    • Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
      July 28, 2011 - 11:43 am | Permalink

      Interesting that he talks about Nordic features:

      Nordic physical characteristics; blond hair, blue eyes, high forehead, sturdy cheekbones.

      Perhaps his forehead wasn’t Nordic enough, that’s why he got plastic surgery.

      From Time:

      The friend alluded to the fact that Breivik went under the knife a few years ago in the U.S.: “He was very pleased. He had had surgery on his forehead, nose and chin.”

      I wonder if he looks more Nordic now than he did before the surgeries.

    • dc's Gravatar dc
      July 28, 2011 - 12:15 pm | Permalink

      Indeed!
      What would motivate someone to fly half-way round the world to the most expensive location for medical care to get vanity surgery? If the story is true, where are the hospital records? Where are the photographs of the unmodified Anders? If the story is untrue, what possible motive might there be for creating it?

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      July 28, 2011 - 1:33 pm | Permalink

      Rich Pearson, Breivik looks very Scandinavian/ Teutonic, I dare say he always has.

      dc, I can tell you the motive, vanity surgery is about looking more attractive to the opposite sex.

    • dc's Gravatar dc
      July 28, 2011 - 6:04 pm | Permalink

      Someday,
      Except for cases of severe disfigurement, the number of heterosexual men who would even think of ‘improving’ their appearance through surgery must be vanishingly small. There are also rumours that he has never been seen in female company. If true, interest in the opinion of the “opposite sex” is doubtful.
      Everything about this pretty boy is phony, not to say queer. When an issue is for the present unresolved, and of no great importance, one may as well embrace the most entertaining solution. I therefore claim that mad Anders is a Mossad agent and raving poofter who has had surgery to hide Hebrew features. I predict that he will be ‘sprung’ from confinement by a team of fellow tribesmen.

    • Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
      July 28, 2011 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

      @dc

      When an issue is for the present unresolved, and of no great importance, one may as well embrace the most entertaining solution. I therefore claim that mad Anders is a Mossad agent and raving poofter who has had surgery to hide Hebrew features. I predict that he will be ‘sprung’ from confinement by a team of fellow tribesmen.

      Entertaining to be sure, but I prefer truth.

      The ambiguous sexuality, the disordered upbringing (abandoned by father at 16, perhaps a bastard?), extreme narcissism, alleged use of “mind altering steroids” (never heard that formulation before) since his adolescence, surgeries done in foreign nations – these do not fit the profile of a Mossad agent. They do fit the profile of a drugged up patsy though. He was also a big fan of some FPS game, which seems to involve just the shooting scenario that played out. The US Army uses just such games as training devices.

      The fact that this event does not benefit Norway patriots against immigration, but benefits imperialist Zionism instead, gives one pause in embracing the Knights Templar Lone Wolf Nut scenario we are being presented with.

      It’s astonishing how many new posters in the pro-White blogosphere showed up to defend this terrorist and embrace the scenario. Unfortunately, it’s probably impossible to know if that’s a typical online marketing campaign, or just a sad example of wish fulfilment by ostensible pro-Whites.

  30. July 28, 2011 - 11:04 am | Permalink

    @Kevin MacDonald July 27, 2011 – 7:32 pm
    As Edmund Connely, Patrick Cleburne and yourself, have all suggested, the Bolshevik with the leather jacket in the basement of some HQ. Peter Brimelow hints at that with his references to GULAGS, from time to time.
    Does anyone doubt, for an instant, that genocidal hunger, does not dwell within the hearts of the people that shall dwell alone?

  31. July 28, 2011 - 9:04 am | Permalink

    Most people find it difficult to understand that someone with nationalist ideas and anti-multicultural attitudes could, at the same time, be pro-Zionist. The problem is that many opponents of multiculturalism do not understand that it is not just Marxism and Leftists and leftist Jews who are the problem in this whole game. They do not see Zionism as a danger because they do not know it. Moreover, because Israel is involved in a conflict with Muslims and so many conflicts in the world involve Muslims, they automatically see Israel as their ally. One might say that Breivik was a knowledgable man, familiar with different thoughts and ideas and so he should have known what was what. Unfortunately it is a fact that sometimes the wisest people fail to see the most obvious.

    I had this experience back in the 90s when I was at university and the Yugoslav conflicts began. For some reason, right from the very beginning I could see that what they were showing in the media was propaganda, anti-Serbian propaganda, by and large. The problem was that no-one around me saw it that way. Not just ordinary students but also the academics believed the TV was showing the truth. A similar situation repeated itself a few years later with the war for Kosovo.

    But coming back to the Breivik issue. Some anti-multiculturalists have been influenced by books by authors such as Mrs Bat Yeor who is Jewish and also pro-Zionist. She has been warning Europeans about the effects of massive immigration especially from Muslim countries fir very long time. She also defended the right of Serbs to defend themselves against the Muslims. Whatever her intentions, she wrote interesting texts about the fate of Christians in Muslim countries and the dangers of Islamization in countries with large numbers of Muslims. The reality, however, is that among the Jews Mrs Bat Yeor has been the lonely voice. The overwhelming majority of the Jewish people – regardless of their political tendencies – support multiculturalism. More than that, they have been playing the major fiddle in promoting multiculturalism.

    I agree with you, Richard IV. I once briefly talked about it on this forum. Islam is very similar to Judaism in this respect. Muslims do not easily assimilate. Muslims are loyel to the Ummah, they are first Muslims and then something else. Moreoever, like traditional Judaism, Islam is a way of life and it encompasses all areas of life. In his writings an ex-Muslim Anwar Shaikh describes Islam as an Arab national movement, as an Arab copy of Judaism that developed some universalist elements and tendences in the course of its conquests but never lost its original Arabic “nature”. During the first two centuries of its dominance the non-converts were discriminated against by the Arabs. That was also partly the reason why Arabs eventually lost their power in Spain. Muslims in Spain were not only involved in contstant wars against Christians but they were constantly fighting against each other. Non-Arab converts, morever, resented the fact that settlers from coming from as far as Yemen were given better land or better treatment.

    mark green, yes, there are many blue-eyed Muslims. The original Turkic invaders did not look like the Turks of today. They were similar to Uyghurs in China. They mixed so much with the Europeans and Middle Easterners that they lost their original looks. Moreover, since the day one of Islam Muslims practised slavery. During the first two centuries of Islam most slaves were brought from Europe. With the rise of Christianity this trend generally stopped Christianity did not generally support slavery and it was no longer possible on the European continent to trade in people. The only way slaves the Muslims could get from Europe was through raids or occassional wars.

    • Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
      July 28, 2011 - 9:24 am | Permalink

      You missed a big distinction between Islam and Judaism. Islam’s doors are wide open to converts.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 28, 2011 - 10:39 am | Permalink

      PITY – Amnesty International claims that 5,000 White Christian women are still sold in sex-slavery in Jewish Israel for the kikes – each year.

    • Richard IV's Gravatar Richard IV
      July 28, 2011 - 4:37 pm | Permalink

      Marianne
      July 28, 2011 – 9:04 am
      “Muslims do not easily assimilate. ”

      As I am a racialist not a wordist. So I think this is a good thing. I do not want white people to assimilate with non-whites and turn brown. Why?

      All Brown Countries are Poor – unless white people find oil under their feet and pay them a fortune for it.

      So never complain that Muslims do not integrate. Integration would mean the destruction of the European genome and that would be a disaster for humanity.

  32. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    July 28, 2011 - 8:23 am | Permalink

    ‘Jihad Watch’ is an anti-Islam racist website run by Zionist Jews like Spencer and Shoebat. Spencer has posted a statement by SIOA and SIOE on Jihad Watch denouncing Breivik as a “disgusting neo-Nazi”.

    The ‘neo-Nazi’ is the term Isreal-Firsters usually apply to those who add to the delegitimization of the Zionist entity and to cover Israeli crimes. However, the historical facts speak loudly that Jews played a significant role in helping Nazis. There were 150,000 German Jews in Nazi Army and Adolph Eichmann gave special priviliges to Jewish terrorist groups to run military camps in Germany.

    The ‘Jihad Watch’ is no friend of White Supremacists. The group is using the ‘sheep’ among them to do dirty work to demonize Islam and Muslims to serve the interests of Israel. Since Breivik could not hold his pride being pro-White supremacist and his love for racist Israel – he is now being demonized as ‘neo-Nazi’ and a ‘mental case’.

    Interestingly, it is not the first time the Whites are taken on a free-ride by the cunning Jews …..

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/how-the-west-got-fooled/

    • Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
      July 28, 2011 - 9:21 am | Permalink

      @ Rehmat

      Please provide a source for your claim that 150,000 Jewish Germans served in the German Army under the Nazis.

    • July 28, 2011 - 11:08 am | Permalink

      Rehmat is right. There is a book, replete with photos, entitled IIRC: HITLER’S JEWISH SOLDIERS. They ranked from GENERALS on down to the lowly private in the Wehrmacht.

    • Gabor's Gravatar Gabor
      July 28, 2011 - 2:34 pm | Permalink

      It’s true, but they were half- or quarter-Jews (Mischlings). The highest ranking was Generalfeldmarschall Erhard Milch, however, Göring (who thought his expertise necessary to build the German air force) produced fake papers proving that he was a full-blooded Aryan. I think half-Jews were in general rare in the officer corps (in 1933, when Jews and half-Jews had to retire, I think only three junior officers were forced to retire from the army, all three of them reactivated in 1939 when more officers were needed), most of the 150 thousand were rank and file or non-commissioned officers.

      However, I don’t think any full-blooded Jew ever served in the Wehrmacht.

  33. Tatt's Gravatar Tatt
    July 28, 2011 - 7:07 am | Permalink

    Now I’m having my doubts about Anders.

    I have become very outspoken with some of my friends. VERY OUTSPOKEN.

    With my white friends I have become openly Pro-Kevin McDonald. The email I sent a married couple I sent last week was Really Bad. Full court press all the way.

    I talked to the wife tonight. No problem whatsoever with our friendship. (I’ve also lectured them on the USSR in person)

    So if I had to choose between “killing white traitors” and getting the guts to go Full Court Press with all the white friends in your life.

    I’d definitely say Go Full Court. Come out of that closest. Have that discussion.

    They won’t hurt you, they won’t kill you. They may no longer speak to you but then they weren’t your friend anyway. But I haven’t lost any friends to the JQ yet, which is surprising.

    So that’s why I am suspicious of Who Anders Really Works For. Because being open about the JQ and Racial Matters has worked so well for me.

    • Tatt's Gravatar Tatt
      July 28, 2011 - 7:28 am | Permalink

      Another example….I was at a public event with a Christian Group where I openly said ‘I don’t watch any tv shows with interracial couples’ Furthermore at one point, I turned my back to (literally I stood backwards) and didn’t clap for something, and I was standing next to the mother of the person on the stage.

      No one did anything to me. Instead, they invited me to the wedding at the Christian Church.

      I even made a “we all know who owns hollywood” remark.

      Seriously, Big Brass Balls over Violence.

    • Luke's Gravatar Luke
      July 28, 2011 - 9:21 am | Permalink

      Tatt: I have a cardinal rule regarding the tiny number of people who I consider as friends. They do not necessarily have to be as passionate or outspoken as I am, regarding the legitimate ethnic interests of whites and the right of whites to survive – but if anyone starts spouting any of that jewish media induced white guilt or white self-loathing, they are gone from my world immediately. I shun these kinds of self-hating white idiots – and that is what we all should do.

  34. July 28, 2011 - 6:44 am | Permalink

    REVENGE, REVENGE, REVENGE

    JULY 22 In Jewish History
    22/07/1099 : During the First Crusade Godfrey of Bouillon elected first Defender of the Holy Sepulcher of The Kingdom of Jerusalem. Having driven out the Muslims and Jews (including the slaughter of innocent) the Soldiers of the Cross settle in for what they think is an eternity.

    22/07/1209….: Forces that included the fanatical monk, Arnold of Citeaux, stormed the city of Beziers as part of the war aimed at destroying the Albigensians. The destruction of the Jewish community, including the murder of two hundred Jews, was “collateral damage

    22/07/1306……..(10th of Av): Philip the Fair of France arrested all the Jews, confiscated their property, and expelled them from his lands. Most Jews left to the next Duchy. Gradually they were allowed to drift back.

    22/07/1320…….: King James II of France – in reaction to the excesses in southern France, proscribed support for the Jewish survivors, including an exemption on taxes. At the same time he refused to allow forcibly baptized children to be returned to their parents

    22/07/1456…….: During the Ottoman attempts to expand its power in Europe John Hunyadi, Regent of Kingdom of Hungary defeats Mehmet II of Ottoman Empire during the Siege of Belgrade. Mehmet’s reign was friendly to the Jewish people including opening his empire to refugees from Christian Europe. On the other hand, John Hunyadi enjoyed the support of the Italian Monk Jean de Capistrano who had previously convinced King Ludwig of Bavaria to expel his Jewish subjects.

    22/07/1598……:; The Merchant of Venice is licensed for printing. However, it would be two years before the play featuring Shylock would be printed for the first time.

    22/07/1648…..: Ten thousand Jews of Polannoe were killed in the Chmielnicki massacres.

    All tragedies, until the time of Gentiles is over and after French Revolution starts the era Judaica :

    22/07/1833: the House of Commons passed a bill for the emancipation of the Jews of England. The House of Lords would reject the bill.

    22/07/1917…. : In Russia, Kerensky, the Jewish former Minister of War became the premier (Jewish childhood friend from the half-jew Lenin, whom he would give the power some months later).

    22/07/1918….: British General Allenby approves a town-planning scheme for Jerusalem complete with an expanded road network, new parks and municipal and residential buildings.

    22/07/1921….: Winston Churchill, Lloyd George and Lord Balfour met with Chaim Wiezmann at Balfour’s House in London in an attempt “to reassure Wiezmann that British policy in support of the Balfour Declaration and the Jewish home in Palestine had not changed.”

    22/07/1922…. : The League of Nations Council confirmed the British Palestine Mandate. The Balfour Declaration is part of the terms of the mandate.

    22/07/1939 ….: Eichmann’s Central Office for Emigration, (of Jews) in Prague, officially opened.

    22/07/1946 : : The Irgun bombed the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.

    22/07/1976: The visiting governor of the Bank of Spain, Luis Coronel del Palma, expressed hope of “a considerable improvement of relations between Spain and Israel.” (Coronel, apellido converso).

    22/07/1976 : 1976: Mossad hit teams were reported to have been waging a concerted assassination program against all Palestinian terrorists who murdered 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympiad.

    22/07/1980 : The Knesset voted by ninety-nine votes to fifty-one to annex east Jerusalem declaring that ‘Jerusalem, complete and undivided, is the capital of Israel.

    22/07/2002: Israel assassinates Salah Shahade, the Commander-in-Chief of Hamas’s military arm, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades.

    22/07/2006: Israel ousted Hezbollah guerrillas from a stronghold just inside Lebanon after several days of fierce fighting, the army said, as it bombarded targets across the south of the country.

    22/7/2008: Senator Barack Obama begins his visit to Israel where he is expected to meet the country’s top leaders: President Shimon Peres, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Likud Party leader Benjamin Netanyahu.

    22/7/2011 – Oslo killing. Quo prodet ?

    • July 28, 2011 - 12:05 pm | Permalink

      825 AD — Holy Roman Emperor Louis (son of Charlemagne) issues a Charter of Protection to Jews, encouraging Jewish trade (including slave trade) and relaxing political restrictions, allowing some juridical autonomy-action was due to his needs for Jewish money, which in turn, makes him beholden to Jewish merchants
      http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/italytime.html
      Corrupt elites are nothing new and the Jewish willingness to serve them isn’t either. Revenge is a matter of when you start the clock.

  35. Rafael's Gravatar Rafael
    July 28, 2011 - 5:21 am | Permalink

    Hi guys,
    For they talking about “basque” fighters, you have to know that they got political autonomy already in 1978, and Spain has the most developed federal state of all Europe, they are almost independent.

    The “basques” fighters have killed 900 White people in name of basque tongue (that is already official from 1978), and they are internationalist and race-traitors; they are marxist-leninist and wants an open-border policy.

    The nationalist basquian parties support a linguistic identity , and reject the idea of an ethnic identity already from 1968.

    Those “basque” fighters have killed 30 inocent White children as well as some pregnant White girls.

    Do you think is worth to kill White pregnant women and children just to establish a marxist-leninist dictatoship in Southern Europe ? The level of some comments from this blog are from extremly low level , some times it seems that they don´t really care about the future of our children, but just are cheering about any crazy who takes a gun and mass-murder children.

  36. mark green's Gravatar mark green
    July 28, 2011 - 3:56 am | Permalink

    How did Brevik miss the Jewish angle to multi-culturalism and cultural Marxism? After all, the Jews invented the Frankfurt school. Are we to believe that he’s unaware of this?

    I suspect that Jewish activists in Europe have helped open the national borders there just as they have here. Thus, I’m perplexed by Brevik’s apparent warmth towards Israel and naive disdain for only for ‘Muslims’ since most Muslim immigrants in Europe are Caucasian and some are even blue eyed! Breivik should be talking directly about race, not religion. After all, people can change their religious view in an instant, but not their DNA.

    • Richard IV's Gravatar Richard IV
      July 28, 2011 - 5:55 am | Permalink

      Breivik identifies the core of the problem as white traitors. Without white traitors, people that betray and sell out their own kind, Jews and other groups could not take advantage.

    • Richard IV's Gravatar Richard IV
      July 28, 2011 - 5:57 am | Permalink

      You need to read his manifesto if you want more information. He says Islam is not a religion that coexists with others. It takes over nations and destroys all competitors.

    • Bear's Gravatar Bear
      July 28, 2011 - 10:31 am | Permalink

      I suspect Breivik was at some level about developing European ethnic consciousness. Taking on the Jewish tendancy to promote a corrosive counter culturalism would be simply too big a task with too low a chance of success given their media supremacy. In addition any hint of anti-semitism would completely derail the core message he believed he was delivering and bring in the whole power of the holocaust narrative. The media would be talking about anti-semitism…..blah blah blah. Besides, the Jews are begining to worry that they will become dhimis, which they definetly will be, they’ve pushed it way to far.

      Islam “takes no shit” (pardon) from Jews and never will. Mohamed made sure of that, the Koran doesn’t change and a Jewish spiel won’t deflect them.

  37. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    July 28, 2011 - 2:55 am | Permalink

    This Norwegian’s problem is the same problem many Nationalist get into. He thinks that by depicting Islam as a beast he is actually building a strong case. You can tell from the Knights Templar video uploaded here what I mean by a beast. The image presented as Islam is a human monster. It also shows the steroetypes many Europeans have of the arab nomad. Here Muhammad is a murderer, slave trader, rapist, thief, pedophile, plagiarist. liar etc. A beast. The message this sends to the public is “we are against Muslims migration because Muslims are beasts”. What people don’t know is by doing so you already lost the argument as the other side now all he has to do is show everyone that Muslims are not all beasts.

    Now you have no case. It turns people off and distracts from the issue.

    • Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
      July 28, 2011 - 9:12 am | Permalink

      I think you are driving at an important point. The value of Norwegian continuity to Norwegians can probably be argued on its own terms. The dishonesty in distorting Islam and the wrong of demonizing an innocent people (Muslims) weakens his position.

  38. Andrea D. Merciless's Gravatar Andrea D. Merciless
    July 28, 2011 - 2:06 am | Permalink

    Breivik is right to attack Nazism. The problem with National Socialism was it didn’t remain National. It became Imperialist. Had it been contained in Germany, it would have been a more or less decent and functional ideology. Germans ruling their own nation. National Socialism betrayed its ‘nationalist’ ideology when it trampled on the national rights of other peoples: Czechs, Serbs, Poles, Russians, etc.
    So, Breivik’s beef with National Socialism isn’t the issue of nationalism or even its race-ism. The problem is the Nazis invaded and attacked other nationals and races in non-German nations. Nazism came to violate the national and racial rights of non-Germans in non-German nations. That’s where it went wrong. Breivik is saying that a genuine nationalism must remain confined within its borders. Unlike Nazis, he’s not trying to impose Nordicism on non-Nordic nations. All he wants is for Norwegians to own and control their own nation and destiny. He knows that for 1000s–if not 10,000s–of yrs, Nordic peoples have fought for their land, lived and died on their land, birthed new generations on their land, and buried the bones of their ancestors on their land. Breivik, unless so many idiot kids today addicted to Jewish-controlled pop culture, has a sense of his people’s history and heritage, something he loves and values very deeply. Norway is sacred to Norwegians, Germany is sacred to Germans, Poland is sacred to Poles. Europeans must respect each others’ nations–a rule violated by Hitler, the Imperialist Socialist than a National Socialist–, and Europeans must respect the rights, lands, and cultures of non-Europeans. Let Arabs be free in Arabia, let Chinese be free in China, let Egyptians be free in Egypt. The West shouldn’t invade other nations, and other peoples shouldn’t invade Europe. This is the nationalism that Breivik believes in. He’s opposed to Open Borders globalist-imperialism and for Secure Borders cultural-nationalism(which includes the ideology of blood).

    For many people, Nordicism is associated with Nazism. Since Nazism was imperialist and invaded other nations and committed massive genocide, Nordicism got smeared as ‘white supremacism’. But Breivik’s Nordicism is the proper and moral kind. It is neither supremacist nor imperialist but nationalist. He’s not trying to export or spread it around the world. He’s not saying Nords are better than everyone else and has a right to rule the world. He is trying to preserve in his own country, the land of the Nords. Better for Norway to regain its status as a nation of proud Nords than remain a globalist whore owned and ruled by multi-culti nerds.

    Regarding Jews, there would have been far less of a problem if Hitler hadn’t invaded the East. There weren’t many Jews in Germany itself, and before WWII, very few were actually killed by Nazis. The mass murder of Jews began when Germany invaded other nations and came in contact with Ost-Juden. Again, the problem arose because Hitler, though claiming to be a German nationalist, didn’t respect the nationalisms of other peoples. He’d done everything correct up to the annexation of Sudetenland, but then he did everything wrong when he converted to imperialist mode and began to trample on non-German peoples.
    Breivik is a national Nordicist; thus, his Nordicism is completely justified.
    A true patriot must be willing to die for his country. And also to kill for his country. (Btw, if Norwegian leftists and multi-culti people don’t believe in national borders, what are they doing in Norway? They should move to Africa or the MIddle East with all their children. If they are so eager to live in a ‘diverse’ society where most people are non-white, why wait? They can have it right away by moving permanently to Venezuela, Uganda, Egypt, or Pakistan.)

    What Breivik did was nobler than what the US government does. Washington DC is owned and controlled by the Jewish Cabal and their handpicked mulatto thugs–many of them the product of black men having sex with white women. (Jews love sports where black men beat white men and Jews love/control porn where black men hump white women.) What did Eric Holder the mulatto supremacist do recently? He gave guns to Mexican druglords, and those guns are now killing decent law-abiding Americans!!! That is the much greater outrage, but the Jew-run MSM looks the other way. But then, Jew-run music industry promotes gangsta rap music that promotes black hatred, murderousness, and vileness. Jewish Hollywood makes movies like MACHETE that call for the mass murder of ‘racist’ whites.
    In contrast to these scum, Breivik can be said to be a true man of the hour.

  39. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    July 28, 2011 - 1:15 am | Permalink

    First , I have not read the any of Breivik’s material except that which has been published by Kevin. Therefore I have a question. In terms of content analysis, if one has read all or most of Breivik, how much space does he devote to the preservation of Nordic and more general White stock?

    My impression is that he takes his anti-racist stand as a General Principle, and that Whites and Nordics therefore have a right to their own genetic interests, just like blacks and browns. Now that is an unassailable position in a Liberal context. However it obviously falls very short of an adequate defence and championing of White interests.

    Thus, Breivik is actually a liberal, not a White Nationalist, if a WN is one who believes that Whites have a right to Total domination of their homelands, and at least N. America since the ‘facts on the ground” are compelling.

    Or , maybe I am wrong. Maybe B. says ALL coloreds out of Europe. Does he?
    Kevin’s quotations from B. on Nordics, etc. make good sense as far as they go, but does he demand a White Europe and N. America?

    I and others have pointed out his problems with regard to the Universal Christianity…just who get to be a Christian and live in Europe? B. is not logical. On the one hand he claims to be anti-racist, and “culturist”, meaning that leopards can change their spots thru culture, and yet his entire (I think) corpus suggests the very opposite: Muslims don’t change, Blacks don’t change, and so they should be kicked out.

    If he is merely demanding that Nordics have their place in the sun, alongside of Somalis, in Norway, or Europe, he is truly a liberal. If he thinks Muslims should be removed from Europe he is not a liberal. If he thinks Muslims can convert to Christianity, and become good Europeans, he is a liberal. Apparently he does not so think, therefore his culturism is either a kind of lie, or he is just confused, or he is temporizing with multi-culti.

    I think the guy is confused intellectually. To be anti-racist, zionist, Christian, Culturist, and zenophobic (at least with regard to Muslims…I assume that would also include White Muslims), he has a very confused intellectual position.

    He sounds to me (like I said before) like a Crusader in love with the jews, a PeeCee anti-racist hustler who is probably not sincere but is cynically deploying his anti-racism for liberal respectability (fat-chance), and probably psychologically unbalanced. (His lawyer says he is insane. That lawyer is a member of the Liberals B. wants to destroy…funny.)

    On the other hand, his anti-racism may be sincere, and if it is, then he just has some kind of religious weirdness going and is useless to us.

    His zionism is surely a signal that something is very strange here. As a zionist, he might be thinking to take the Muslim fight all the way to Jerusalem and Beyond, to vanquish the Muslims for Eretz Israel, Euphrates to the Nile.

    If this is the case, then he is truly nuts, and more importantly, wants to broaden the start of World War Three. God and Israel first.

    Of course, I again note that I have not read all of him, and maybe I am way off here. I do note that the JMSM has not reported his zionism.

    Strange bird, any way you look at it. Joe

    • Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
      July 28, 2011 - 12:00 pm | Permalink

      As a zionist, he might be thinking to take the Muslim fight all the way to Jerusalem and Beyond, to vanquish the Muslims for Eretz Israel, Euphrates to the Nile.

      That’s pretty close, please read my post below where I excerpt from the supposed manifesto. His actions DO NOT in any way help the cause of preserving a European Europe, or the Nordic people, and discredits nationalists as terrorists.

      But this sure does help the Jews and Israel.

  40. Bubba's Gravatar Bubba
    July 27, 2011 - 10:35 pm | Permalink

    You’ve convinced me that ABB’s anti-racism was tactical.

  41. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 27, 2011 - 9:35 pm | Permalink

    Does anyone know if that table included in the excerpt is accurate? Are only 35% of Germans now considered Nordic? What are the other types in Germany if not Nordic?

    • July 27, 2011 - 10:19 pm | Permalink

      Jason,

      A large subset of Germans are and historically have always been “Alpinic”. To speak broadly and unscientifically, Central Europeans (Alpinics) tend to have heads which are more rounded and noses which have lower bridges.

      I’m generally dismissive of Nordicists in the American context, as they tend to drive a wedge between a more intuitive and practical definition of our ethnic identity which is broadly “White” and “European”. Norway is; however, definitively Nordic, and I believe Norwegians are justified in concerning themselves about the influx of Alpinic, Mediterranean, Slavic, or whatever White racial groups.

    • Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
      July 27, 2011 - 10:33 pm | Permalink

      I think Nordic is also used to refer more broadly to Northern Europeans and Americans of Northern European derivation: people from the British Isles, Germans, and Scandinavians.

    • Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
      July 28, 2011 - 8:37 am | Permalink

      Nordic does not equal Germanic. When ABB refers to Finland, he probably means south-western Finland (dominated by Swedish immigrants from medieval times). He does, however, seem a bit confused since he tends to include Poland and the Baltic countries. These populations are to my knowledge closer to Slavic genepools.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      July 28, 2011 - 1:00 pm | Permalink

      It depends what you mean by Nordic, if that that term is being used for the type found in Scandinavian countries as suggested by Breivik’s reference to “Nordic physical characteristics; blond hair, blue eyes, high forehead, sturdy cheekbones” (slav and nordic It can be seen that the cheekbones on the ‘average Nordid’ are not prominent) . I would say he is talking about a specific blend of European which is largely confined to Scandinavia. He seems to think that originally northern Europeans all had blonde hair and blue eyes ( like other races all have have black hair and eyes). I doubt that myself.

    • Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
      July 28, 2011 - 5:15 pm | Permalink

      My previous contribution was edited by force majeure… What I meant to say was that even if ‘Nordic’ diminishes outside the Germanic world. Slavic (Eurasian) and Celto-Atlantic populations have a different physiognomy (and genepools). Within Scandinavia, the core Germanic population is located in Central and Southern Scandinavia, as opposed to the Finno-Ugric North (in Finland, it’s south-west vs. north-east).

    • Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
      July 28, 2011 - 5:31 pm | Permalink

      To those who, like Sunic, believe that the Nordic racial element is prominent in Eastern Europe, I would recommend a few weeks of extensive travelling through countries like Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, etc.

    • Carleton's Gravatar Carleton
      July 28, 2011 - 9:43 pm | Permalink

      Does anyone know if that table included in the excerpt is accurate?

      Jason,

      There’s no reason to think it is given that the table is both unsourced and makes claims which are beyond belief.

      Why would there have been a 15 point decline in those of the “Nordic” type in Poland from 1900 to 1950?

      There was very little immigration into Poland in those years.

      And then he makes the same implausible claim of a 10 or 15 point decline in those of the “Nordic” type for all these other countries in the same time period; it’s really laughable because he didn’t even try to hide that he was pulling the numbers out of thin air.

  42. ps79's Gravatar ps79
    July 27, 2011 - 9:22 pm | Permalink
  43. Lookaroundu's Gravatar Lookaroundu
    July 27, 2011 - 9:21 pm | Permalink

    @ Greg Johnson

    “…he [Breivik] seems more concerned about Christendom, which he defines as a universal ideology.”

    Supposedly Breivik is pro-Christian. If he acknowledges that Christianity is universal, how can one conclude that is not a detriment to Nordic genetic interests? The Christian Churches typically will let every race under the sun into their congregations. The same goes for Communism and Islam. Both are universal in nature, and more concerned with members following the idealogical script, as it were, regardless of what race you are or what you look like. Bottom line: Universalism is bad for promoting white interests! What’s required is active discrimination and exclusion implemented as policies for Nordic genetic survival, similar to what the Amish (or Jews) practice to keep their community pure.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      July 27, 2011 - 9:46 pm | Permalink

      Aren’t Amish Christian?

    • July 27, 2011 - 10:10 pm | Permalink

      Universalism and particularism aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive.

      One can be in communion without being in cahoots.

  44. Dedalus's Gravatar Dedalus
    July 27, 2011 - 9:21 pm | Permalink

    I didn’t read all of it. But I’m curious to know if he took time to point out that the same people responsible for the Politically Correct Multicultural Police State we live in today were also responsible for the 3,000 murdered at the WTC on September 11th, 2001.
    Of course no one is going to condone his behavior. But they are able to get away with what they’ve been doing for decades because they hold all the cards, from Finance to Information and everything in between.
    That and the fact that they are good at hiding and we’re not good at looking.

    I have to say that I find the response to this to be largely silence. This is very good. Also, I have seen, many times, a person who responds to events like this one with typical media-inspired, pc directed, robot-like knee-jerk “horror” only to be convinced in a matter of minutes, or less, when confronted by someone in a calm, rational, and respectful manner, that the event in question is in fact part of something much larger, designed for the purpose of bringing their life as they know it to an end.

    Now, there’s a difference between foolhardy and brave.
    It’s better not to talk to a group, even if they agree they might turn on you. Unless you too are surrounded by like-minded people.
    But one on one it’s worked 10 out of 10 times, because they simply have nothing to counter it with.
    If you can keep it short, and to the point, ie; that your concern is more cultural and biological than political, they’ll get it. They almost seem relieved in a way, as if you’ve done them a favor.

    A note on the celebrities mentioned above.
    The celebrity lifestyle is probably the most shallow and insecure way of life there is. If Martians inhabit the earth and can made politically correct the Pitt’s and Jolie’s and Madonna’s and Bullock’s of this world will exchange black babies for green ones.

    It’s hard to imagine a more tenuous hold on reality than that of a celebrity, except perhaps their fans. But that fan base is dwindling fast, and with it celebrity worship, and, thank goodness, celebrities. They are regressing to dinosaur status as fast as the MSM. And needless to say the celebrities and msm are two of the most important agents of the multicultural police state.

    So, toward that end, though serious concern and direct action or needed, group panic, hysteria, and compulsive awfulizing are not.

    • Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
      July 27, 2011 - 10:41 pm | Permalink

      If you can keep it short, and to the point, ie; that your concern is more cultural and biological than political…

      What is “it”? And can you provide us with an example or two of cultural and biological concerns/arguments versus political ones, for purposes of one-on-one discussion?

  45. Jonathan's Gravatar Jonathan
    July 27, 2011 - 9:12 pm | Permalink

    I would suggest that a lot of the celebrities he mentions (and doesn’t) as being “nordic” only appear so due to hair die and/or lots of plastic surgery eg Pamela Anderson has brown eyes, her hair color is probably naturally brown.

  46. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    July 27, 2011 - 8:12 pm | Permalink


    Islam doesn’t need ‘Enlightenment’ because it gave that ‘Enlightenment’ to the West during its Dark Age, when Church’s favorite hobby was chasing Jews – just as now the racist Judeo-Christian racists are chasing Muslims in the name of ethnicity and nationalism.

    Rehmat , you make sh*t up . That’s annoying .
    And using one ” racist ” is too many here . You’re at the wrong site for gawds sake .

    Rehmat would love to be Nordicist , but , he had to settle for Islamicist who makes sh*t up and annoys people generally .

  47. bob johnson's Gravatar bob johnson
    July 27, 2011 - 8:11 pm | Permalink

    Alex Jones was talking about the DHS report on blue eyed terrorists and the next day Breivik went, well, he went “Breivik”on those young Communists. Weird.

  48. July 27, 2011 - 7:37 pm | Permalink

    I think that Breivik is trying to appeal to ethnic genetic interests of Nordics, perhaps as a step to bringing them around to his way of thinking. But ultimately, Breivik’s own Christian/Masonic universalism undermines Nordic ethnic genetic interests in at least two ways.

    First, Breivik makes it clear that Christians of any race have a place in Europe and in his European crusade. Which makes one wonder: Would he have any objection to the Pakistanis and other Muslims in Norway if they all converted to Christianity?

    Second, Breivik envisions extending his crusade into the Near and Middle East in the name of helping the local Christian populations against Islam. But these Christians are genetically the first cousins of the Muslims who persecute them. So Breivik advocates spilling European blood to help non-European Christians in the Near and Middle East.

    Now Breivik might be sincerely concerned about Nordics. But he seems more concerned about Christendom, which he defines as a universal ideology. And when Nordic blood-brotherhood conflicts with the spiritual brotherhood of the church, Breivik seems choose Christianity. Holy Water, apparently, is thicker than blood.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      July 27, 2011 - 7:40 pm | Permalink

      Do you think that most Pakistanis would convert to Christianity?

      Let me flip the question back at you. Turks undoubtedly have a very large Indo-European genetic component. Do you favor allying and mixing with them? Do you think that Muslim Albanians and Bosnians are a good fit in Europe?

    • July 27, 2011 - 7:52 pm | Permalink

      Good questions.

      I don’t think most Pakis would covert, but that is beside the point really. Even if one converted, would Breivik really think he now belongs in Norway? He might be forced to by the logic of his own thinking. But as a racist first, last, and always, conversion does not matter to me. For me, blood is thicker than holy water.

      As for white muslims, that is a good question. I have met Turkish and Bosnian Muslims who are as Nordic looking as Breivik. But I do have a problem with them moving to a country like Norway, simply because I think that increased religious diversity is almost as bad as increased racial diversity. It still creates conflict in society, even though it might not really undermine Nordic genetic interests.

    • Luke's Gravatar Luke
      July 28, 2011 - 9:13 am | Permalink

      Greg Johnson: I have become finally convinced that unless Whites are able to recognize the harsh reality that the “Christianity” of today’s times has basically adopted the Communist ideology of egalitarianism – and is therefore, the mortal enemy of every man, woman and child of European descent on this Planet and that Whites absolutely must abandon Christianity before it helps the jews genocide them into extinction – if Whites cannot come to grips with this somber reality, then Whites are doomed to become extinct on this Earth. It is through this suicidal religion of Christianity that Whites develop this weak-kneed, wimpish attitude of self-defeatism and adopt this insane notion that there is something ‘immoral’ or ‘evil’ or ‘repugnant’ about fighting for their own survival.

      Believe me, whenever I encounter one of these kinds of wimpy White Christians and engage them in a conversation about race and immigration of non-whites into White homelands – it is almost a guaranteed certainty that these suicidal, white-guilt-ridden idiots will refuse to take the side of their own race in any ethnic conflict. These people literally make my flesh crawl whenever I’m around them and I cannot wait to put as much distance between myself and them, because I view them as carriers of a deadly disease that is 100 percent fatal.

    • July 28, 2011 - 11:11 am | Permalink

      “But these Christians are genetically the first cousins of the Muslims who persecute them.”

      “Arab Palestinian Christians and Arab Palestinian Muslims lived side by side for the past 1400 years, and for anybody to say that the Arab Palestinian Christians have been persecuted recently by Muslims is absolutely another big lie, like the big lie that spoke of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq.”
      Riah Abu El-Assal, Christian Bishop of Jerusalem

    • Systemic's Gravatar Systemic
      July 28, 2011 - 1:20 pm | Permalink

      @Luke
      . It is through this suicidal religion of Christianity that Whites develop this weak-kneed, wimpish attitude of self-defeatism and adopt this insane notion that there is something ‘immoral’ or ‘evil’ or ‘repugnant’ about fighting for their own survival.

      How do you explain the conversion of White Barbarian tribes such as the Saxons to Chrstianity and Christianities eventual takeover of White pagan tribes…..if Christianity is marked by weak-kneed whimpish attitudes? Because if you are correct, then why is Christianity inherently tied to past phases of European hegemony? It just doesn’t make sense when viewed through your respective lens. In fact one can argue that Europe’s turning from Christianity laid the foundation for the hegemony of Cultural Marxism throughout Europe as Secularism leads directly to Totalitarianism.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      July 28, 2011 - 2:12 pm | Permalink

      I think it’s easy to get the wrong impression about Breivik’s motives as there is such a disconnect between his writings and actions. In the excepts that Kevin MacDonald has given us I would say that Breivik shows himself to be a racially orientated nationalist. I don’t see how those views mandate his actions however, quite the opposite.

      The writings demonstrate Breivik had some sensible ideas but his actions were those of someone who had ‘lost the place’ in the worst possible way. He illustrates the danger of being secretive and reclusive in that there is no feedback and chance to rethink things. I think that the real key to Breivik’s motivation lies in his personality not his ideology.

    • Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
      July 28, 2011 - 2:19 pm | Permalink

      The best thing Dr. MacDonald floated out in this article is the meme …

      “high priests of White genocide”

      Never forget to label those promoting the anti-White story-line with this.

      Always call them the “High Priests of White Genocide” when writing comments, especially in local papers’ comment streams.

    • Scott Mollett's Gravatar Scott Mollett
      July 28, 2011 - 8:14 pm | Permalink

      I agree with Luke 100%.
      Christians like muslims are simply demi-jews. You people are following a jew invented god. Why?
      If your brain works well enough for you to see that we have a jew problem why can’t you see the stone cold truth about the fake “christian” god?

      If you can’t understand that jews made up their god and had him choose them as special you have no business claiming anyone else is low IQ. They networked their god till he had a big following and then, just like they always, they overplayed their hand and lost control. After Jesus died people used him as a figurehead/marytr to take the jew gods power away from jews and christianity was piggybacked in.
      Again, if you are smart enough to know we have a jew problem the concept above should be easy to grasp.
      Not one christian has ever been able to counter the above claims without invoking faith or the bible. which leads me to one of my favorite sayings.

      Using the bible to prove the existence of god is like using the book The Hobbit to prove that Hobbits exist.

    • Blue Devil's Gravatar Blue Devil
      July 30, 2011 - 12:06 am | Permalink

      @Scott Mollet
      It really was difficult to suffer through your childish rant.

      Gee Scott, in all honesty no one knows the secrets of life namely purpose and origin. As such Christianity and every other religion will be around until we find these answers.

      So who are you to make a judgement call on metaphysics?LMAO Its always a wise policy to respect religious beliefs so as not to prove your own stupidity.lol In the end no man can speak with absolute authority on ANY SUBJECT. Also to be precise, Christianity is based on faith thus making the act of “proving” utterly ridiculous! Hello! See my above comment.

      Look at the reality of the situation. The majority of American Whites are Christian. The purpose of this site is exposure and by making childish statements that slap people across the face dissing their religion is moronic when the goal is to persuade. Wake-up Jacka**. In addition, say you do destroy their faith(which is impossible btw) what would you replace it with, Scott Mollet worship?lol Ok Robespierre-

      The bottomline is: A Christian can’t prove Jesus exists just as YOU cannot prove that he doesn’t exist. Therefore your argument negates itself. And since a Christian isn’t going to listen to you anyways, and the majority of Whites are Christian, you should OBVIOUSLY respect people’s beliefs. Unless you’re scared that your subjective opinion is really a subjective opinion.

  49. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    July 27, 2011 - 7:20 pm | Permalink

    Daniel Pipes’ definition of ‘moderate Islam’ is not much different than the ‘subveted Christian’ whose leaders are willing to sell even their mothers for Jewish money by supporting Israel.

    Daniel Pipes was one of the America’s top ‘Dozen Dirty Islamophobes’ selected by FAIR magazine in 2009.

    Islam doesn’t need ‘Enlightenment’ because it gave that ‘Enlightenment’ to the West during its Dark Age, when Church’s favorite hobby was chasing Jews – just as now the racist Judeo-Christian racists are chasing Muslims in the name of ethnicity and nationalism.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/islam-doesnt-need-enlightenment/

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      July 27, 2011 - 7:25 pm | Permalink

      One of my favorite stories of Islamic enlightenment is how the Caliph al-Hakim had a big black slave named Masoud, whom he would command to publicly sodomize deceptive merchants and other people he didn’t like.

    • Jonathan's Gravatar Jonathan
      July 27, 2011 - 9:15 pm | Permalink

      This is one of the dumbest things i’ve ever heard. The Muslim world was already way behind the West by the time of the Enlightenment. The only reason they had a slight edge until about the 13th century was b/c they conquered most of the wealthier Eastern Roman and Persian empires; by the time those areas became overwhelmingly Muslim they became stuck in time, and remained so until Europeans discovered oil in the 20th century.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      July 28, 2011 - 4:42 pm | Permalink

      @ Rehmat

      { “…Islam doesn’t need ‘Enlightenment’ because it gave that ‘Enlightenment’ to the West…”}

      Islam got its ‘Enlightenment’ entirely from Greek philosophers whose works were translated in Arabic by Syrian Christians.At its best Islam acted as a conductor to the West of that what came originally from the West itself.
      Plato (“Flatun”) and Aristoteles (“Aristut”) were the great teachers (“mu’alima”) that thaught the Muslims to think.But Aryan rationalism never really suited the Semitic mind.Ultimately religious dogmatism prevailed and Islam sunk into its Medieval stupor from which it never awoke.

    • Danny Walker's Gravatar Danny Walker
      July 29, 2011 - 10:07 am | Permalink

      Read Plutarch’s biography of Crassus, particularly his impression of the ancient Persians. He depicted them as cruel, barbaric, slavish, and slaves to their passions. They were honorless both in victory and the pursuit of it.

      He paints a similar portrait of the ancient Arabs in the same biography. An Arab guide of good standing with the Romans betrays them for the gold and honors of the Persian king.

      My point is that the peoples that would become Muslims have always been as they are today; treacherous and unenlightened. These Eastern Caucasoids adopted the only religion that could possibly govern them, one of brutality, submission, fear, and repression. Islam is an expression of the inherited biological psychology of the Eastern Caucasoid peoples.

  50. Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
    July 27, 2011 - 6:45 pm | Permalink

    Professor MacDonald,

    If you think it worthwhile, I for one would be interested in an explanation of the meaning of “Stalinization.”

    • Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
      July 27, 2011 - 7:21 pm | Permalink

      Professor MacDonald,

      I think I misspoke. My question refers to the phrase “Stalinist” (not “Stalinization”) in the part of Behring Breivek’s manifesto that you excerpted. Of course I am familiar in general with who Stalin was. I am interested in understanding what meaning you intend to give the phrase “Stalinism” and in how your theory works that multiculturalism leads either to implosion or “Stalinism.” Why?

      Here’s the statement you made that I am referring to:

      Indeed, one of his insights is that in the long run “the multi-cultural neocolonial regimes will either have imploded or have become very Stalinist.” I agree.

    • Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
      July 27, 2011 - 7:45 pm | Permalink

      ^ Thanks.

      If European-derived peoples are sufficiently weak and neutralized (as seems to be the case increasingly), I wonder if police state controls would even be required. Aren’t small powerless minorities, one of which “Whites” may well become within a generation, usually so cowed by the power structure of a society (not exclusively police control, but demographic numbers, economic opportunities, social ostracism, the threat of non-state violence) that they essentially self regulate?

    • Greg's Gravatar Greg
      July 27, 2011 - 11:16 pm | Permalink

      This is not always the case (outside of white populations). Kurdish militants and Tamil peoples are two good examples of ethnic minorities that fought despite being outnumbered. In Europe, the Irish, Basques, and Corsicans are also minorities that fought for autonomy. You also saw the FLQ in Montreal very active in the 60s-70s. It is interesting that all of these groups were fighting against other “whites.” The French vs. Anglo Saxons, Irish vs. Anglo Saxons, Basques vs. Spainards. Furthermore, while these groups were very very violent, they often had support from the Left and intellectual circles. These groups were acceptable because they were whites killing whites, and they appealed to the desire for Leftists/white universalists to root for the perceived underdog in conflicts.

      All of these movements have dissolved, except the Real IRA is still semi-active. One thing is very clear, police controls have become vastly more sophisticated and much smarter than ever before, this is mostly due to technology but also sea changes in culture as well. It is a part of the campaign against whites having an ethnic identity. If you’re a Basque, you should not see yourself as a Basque, but as a white person.

      Basques are a good example of effective police controls. That movement was neutered through very aggressive police actions and infiltration to the point that ETA has basically declared a ceasefire and a desire to join the peace process (and this time it looks like they will have a permanent ceasefire). This was no doubt brought about by the overwhelming success of the Spanish police force at dismantling the organization.

    • Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
      July 27, 2011 - 11:50 pm | Permalink

      @ Greg Johnson,

      I question the aptness of the analogies you make to French-Canadians, Irish, and Basques. All those groups were arguably “majorities,” not minorities, in the territory at issue. They had a fairly well-established demographic edge in a fairly well-defined territory. If the United States were to occupy and exert jurisdiction over, say, Iraq, Arab Iraqis don’t suddenly become “minorities” because we should now compare their numbers against a denominator that includes all peoples under the control of the sovereign.

    • Greg's Gravatar Greg
      July 28, 2011 - 1:14 am | Permalink

      My last name isn’t “Johnson.”

      That depends on how you define the territory. Obviously they were majorities in small geographical area they occupied, but the Basques were considered a part of Spain, and are a minority in that country. Same as the Corsicans in France and same as the French in Canada. The Irish in Northern Ireland were a majority, but not by much at the time of the Troubles. It was however projected that due to their reproductive rate, they would far outstrip Britons in the country, part of the reason why Britain was so reluctant to give them political powers in a democracy, as they could vote based on their outsize numbers. This is the same reason Israel is still worried about a Palestinian population becoming too large in their country.

      Your argument would be like saying Blacks are a majority in Detroit and extrapolating that they are a majority in the United States.

    • Denys Picard's Gravatar Denys Picard
      July 28, 2011 - 5:50 am | Permalink

      @Greg,

      I notice more and more reference to French Canadians as a minority which refuses to assimilate. And we are offered comparisons with other minorities in different historic and political context.

      One of the specificity of the French People in Canada is that Canada is recognized as being founded by 2 “Peoples”; those of French colonial origins and those of Anglo-Saxon origins. This confers to the French culture an equal status in the Constitutional tradition independent of the ratio of French to Anglo Saxons. Yet, because Anglo-Saxon nostalgic monarchist sentiment mixed up with Canadian led Jewish instituted multiculturalism, the attempts over the past half century has been to reduce the French as a simple cultural or ethnic minority. It’s what new comer migrants that land in Canada outside of the Province of Quebec are taught. Having lived 5 year in the cesspool of Toronto, most black people will argue with you that the French do not have a different status than the blacks as a people culturally or ethnically in historic terms.

      That is why in the context of the French Canadians, a good comparisons would be more around the likes of Belgium, where there is no definite majority/minority division, just the reality that they are 2 different people, the Flemish and the French Walloons that founded the country. And obviously they have the same problems or difficulties that Canada use to have. But French Canada is losing its battle, and that is why, even if they are 2 official languages in Canada, to reflect the historical status of both originator Peoples, the French speaking communities outside of Quebec are being assimilated quickly; and Quebec has become the only strong entity representing French origins, but probably not for long, because French elites, like elites all over the western world are more and more globalist whores.

      But because the French Canadians have had to fight strongly to preserve their culture, they will have a great level of complicity with the People of Ireland for example who have also put an endless fight for survival as a People, and their mutual belonging to the Catholic Faith is a pillar of this complicity.

    • Greg's Gravatar Greg
      July 29, 2011 - 1:51 pm | Permalink

      I’m not saying I don’t support French separatism, what little is left of it. The French and the Anglo-Saxons are a very different people, and the French have a right to preserve their heritage/culture, etc. I was just pointing out instances where a minority population fought despite being outnumbered. In that particular case, the French have mostly lost.

  51. Mandela's Gravatar Mandela
    July 27, 2011 - 6:28 pm | Permalink

    I feel very grateful to this website for presenting the Anders story as the media has put so much sickening spin on this news that it is hard to know just what happened. I am sorry for Anders. Something had to be done and he was concerned enough to do it. I especially note in his writing the bit about the Africans being the representitives for Norway this year at Eurovision. What a mess the Multicults have made as they seek to exterminate Europeans.

  52. Tatt's Gravatar Tatt
    July 27, 2011 - 6:06 pm | Permalink

    Yes I read all this in the manifesto and was very pleased. Not only that, but he advocates all of the right working together. The christians, the christian atheists, the far far right etc etc.

    We must not be so quick to condemn others as long as the ultimate goal is the same. This is the biggest lesson for ‘the entire right’ to learn. The mainstream media does much to prevent it.

    Have as many biological children as possible and do a little surrogacy on the side if you have the money. Take advantage of science to increase our numbers.

    • Tatt's Gravatar Tatt
      July 27, 2011 - 6:19 pm | Permalink

      When I mean ‘pleased’ I do not mean pleased with ‘him’ as he is cruel and evil who would murder me in a heartbeat, and frankly is a very very scary man who I hope they lock up tight (and not in that ritzy palace jail either!)

      But I realize that the manifesto is a compendium of all of the ideas on all of the websites across the internet. The man just put already existing ideas into one PDF file. He was not so much the ‘author’ of the manifesto, but more like the ‘bundler.’ And in that manner, in reference to the true ‘authors’ (aka the anti-jihad intellectuals who wrote the material sighted) I am pleased with their ideas.

  53. Lancashire lad's Gravatar Lancashire lad
    July 27, 2011 - 5:50 pm | Permalink

    I appreciate the information and analysis. May I ask:
    1. Is it possible to download the four part video?
    2. What is the music on it – it sounds Serb?

    • Volksverhetzer's Gravatar Volksverhetzer
      July 28, 2011 - 1:39 am | Permalink

      The music is from the Norwegian made computer game “Age of Conan”, and the lyrics are from Voluspa

      “Völuspá (The Sibyl’s Prophecy) centers around the forecast of a seeress whom Odin, the king of Gods in Norse Mythology, consults to foresee the future. The sibyl goes into trance and tells Odin how the world was created at first place and casts predictions about Odin himself and the future of mankind. According to the Oracle, the “Fate of the Gods”, Ragnarök, leads to the final battle between the gods and their enemies which will lead to the destruction of both yet from their ashes a new world shall arise. The 45th stanza is among those that depict Ragnarök vividly:

      45. Brœthr munu berjask | ok at bönum verthask,
      Munu systrungar | sifjum spilla;
      Hart er í heimi, | hórdómr mikill,
      Skeggjöld, skálmöld, | skildir (e)ru klofnir,
      Vindöld, vargöld, | áthr veröld steypisk;
      Man engi mathr | öthrum thyrma.

      45. Brothers shall fight | and fell each other,
      And sisters’ sons | shall kinship stain;
      Hard is it on earth, | with mighty whoredom;
      Axe-time, sword-time, | shields are sundered,
      Wind-time, wolf-time, | ‘ere the world falls;
      Nor ever shall men | each other spare.

      The track begins with a deep string chord which is adorned by the accompaniment of lyr and ethereal vocals that go:

      “Athr veröld steypisk
      (‘Ere the world falls)
      mun engi mathr öthrum thyrna.”
      (nor ever shall men each other spare.)

      Knáttu vanir vígspá völlu sporna.
      (And the field by the warlike Wanes was trodden.)
      Skildir ro klofnir.
      (Shields are sundered)
      fyllisk fjörvi feigra manna.
      (Drains the life-force of doomed men.)

      http://www.phantasmelodia.com/the-dreaming-ere-the-world-crumbles-knut-avenstroup-haugen-feat-helene-boksle/

    • Rob's Gravatar Rob
      July 28, 2011 - 2:50 pm | Permalink

      YouTube videos, DailyMotion videos and many others can be downloaded and saved in various formats using the YouTubeDownloader program. It’s free, simple and works like a charm: http://www.youtubedownloadersite.com/

    • Lancashire lad's Gravatar Lancashire lad
      July 28, 2011 - 4:05 pm | Permalink

      Marvellous – I’ve downloaded it. The next thing is, what to do with the imagery of the cartoons and the crusaders. I’m a bit past it to wear T-shirts with screen shots on most occasions, but there must be a more subtle way to make use of the crusading imagery.

7 Trackbacks to "Anders Breivik as a Nordicist"

  1. on December 3, 2011 at 2:25 pm
  2. on September 26, 2011 at 4:17 am
  3. on August 5, 2011 at 6:27 pm
  4. on August 3, 2011 at 3:17 pm
  5. on July 29, 2011 at 4:42 pm
  6. on July 28, 2011 at 3:32 pm
  7. on July 27, 2011 at 11:19 pm

Comments are closed.