Vogue's Brit Anna Wintour: Performing A Cosmetic Function
Friday was Fundraising disclosure day for the Presidential aspirants – and the winner was Barack Obama. He won because of the Jews.
Reminding us that Rupert Murdoch’s injection of U.K. Tabloid style has its uses, The New York Post has the most succinct account: O’s pals pony up $68 mil by Geoff Earle July 16, 2011
Obama’s huge $68 million campaign-money haul in the last quarter came with a big assist from an array of big-money donors — 27 of whom raised more than $500,000 each for his re-election campaign…
The 244 big-cash bundlers raised at least $37 million, or more than half of Obama’s total fund-raising haul for the quarter…
By contrast, Mitt Romney, the top fund-raiser among GOP candidates, brought in $18 million…
The Obama campaign has released a list of these 244 “bundlers” – parties who undertake their own fund-raising efforts for a campaign. It is here.
By my count (which is still rising) 120 of these individuals are Jewish. No other ethnic or social group (such as the Gays) can be identified as supplying more than a handful.
Occidental Observer readers will be interested in my methodology. A number of these bundlers, like Chicago’s Penny Pritzker (“$100,000- $200,000”) or Hollywood’s Jeffrey Katzenberg (“$500,000+”) are very well-known. And a large number have obviously Jewish names (is it really necessary to spend much time, on, for instance “$100,000-$200,000” category bundler Israel Roizman of Lafayette Hill Pennsylvania?).
No doubt one or two of these Jewish-surnamed people will turn out to have inherited or converted to Christianity. In the context of supporting Obama, this may be less significant to evaluating Jewish influence than in other situations. But far more important, there are a considerable number of names not obviously Jewish which upon investigation turn out to be, in fact, held by Jews.
For example Mark Gilbert of Boca Raton ($500,000+) has been discussed by Mondoweiss for his demanding Zionism. And Marc Stanley of Dallas ($100,000-$200,000) is Chairman of the National Jewish Democratic Council and wrote Why Jews Overwhelmingly Support Obama for the Huffington Post back on March 25 2009. So far, I have found rather more than a dozen examples of this.
One of the pleasures of blogging for Occidental Observer is the frequency of constructive contributions by some of our commentators. Googling deep enough on a name often produces proof of ethnicity, but it takes time. I invite OO friends to look into the non-Jewish names on the Obama Bundler list and send me any interesting results.
After an initial celebration, Obama’s MSM friends are in Spin mode. Emphasis is being laid on the presence on the of some non-Jewish celebrities such as Vogue editor Anna Wintour ($500,000+) and of Gays (there are three male couples on the list and one of the $500,000+ bundlers is Democratic National Committee Finance Treasurer Andrew Tobias – who is of course also Jewish). A press kit has obviously gone out emphasizing the large number of Obama’s small donors (no surprise: there a lot of Jewish doctors and dentists out there).
But it is increasingly obvious that the 2012 is going to pit a coalition of colored voters, managed and financed by the Jews, against White America. Obama delights the Jews because they see his being President as a humiliating defeat of the ethnicity which built this country. Particularly if the Republicans nominate an explicit Christian like Michele Bachman (whose groveling to Israel will count for nothing) rage will explode and the coffers will open.
Jewish money is the poison of American political life. The pattern of Obama fund raising is going to make this difficult to hide.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
John Graham seems to be really concerned about the financial contributions of “others” to the causes they support. Out of simple curiosity, I would like to know his record of financial contributions.
Mr. Graham, to what political campaigns/candidates/propositions have you contributed and in what amounts….over, say, the past ten years?
And you do know, I assume, that Whites and Christians are free to contribute under the same rules and laws as Jews and gays?
No doubt you would also like my address, Social Security # and employment details?
What I do is completely irrelevant to the facts discussed here, which are
1) Jews purchase themselves hugely disproporionate influence in the American political arena
and
2) That influence is used deliberately and aggressively to harm the historic American nation.
The mystery here is why “Whites and Christians” don’t “contribute under the same rules and laws as Jews and gays?” America is the muscle of the NWO and so far only the Jews seem to have the ability to organize enough to control the beast. Will the “Whites and Christians” ever sober up and become what they were? Place your bets gentlemen.
Winston -
People are free to give and people are free to point out and discuss the giving, its effects and purposes. Are you trying to have a chilling effect on free speech, say, like, laws against historical research into the holocaust? In fact the only contribution records not available that I know of are those of AIPAC. Why should there be a different set of rules for Zionists?
Way to miss the point, Sherlock… then again, you obviously did get the point… and are merely trying to, in the usual internet cognitive dissonance operative smarmy manner, deflect the peanut gallery’s attention, lest they become wise.
Avaunt, fool.
Winston seems really concerned with Israel, and has taken pains to point out how much we supposedly have in common with them, to applause from Jason Speaks, who has also shown great concern for the Zionist entity.
Perhaps your efforts would be better directed at urging those with whom you share similar views to donate to your favored candidates/causes…….as opposed to whining about the fact that Jews or gays are very heavily involved on the field of political battle.
I don’t take away the as the meaning of your piece that “we must give to xyz because those “others” are raising more money than we are and we need to contribute more to insure our ideas don’t get drowned out. I just take away a sour grapes envy of the motivation and involvement of those with whom you disagree.
Don’t you really just wish that you could have more of that “Poison of American political life” on your side?
I thought Jews had pioneered the method of critiquing the ethnic dimension of power and influence in America (for example, their deconstruction of WASPs). Why is the simple analysis and discussion of Jewish influence and political power deemed “whining”? Why is it acceptable to speak of “White privilege” but when the lens is turned toward Jews it suddenly becomes illegitimate?
Can I assume you have written lengthy letters to Jewish organizations and activists denouncing their whining and endless complaints about White Gentiles and White cultural influence?
Sour grapes of envy? lol
hahahah
The jews give tons of money to the other side because they hate the traditional American nation.
The end.
“Perhaps your efforts would be better directed at urging those with whom you share similar views to donate to your favored candidates/causes…”
What good would that do? The Jews and their manufactured allies (the various left wing interest groups) have been actively quashing white ethnic organizing since WW2. Every time whites put their weight behind legislation that counters the prevailing insanity, such as SB1020 or Proposition 187, it gets quashed by the judiciary or other government body. The status quo does not allow whites to organize themselves as a political force.
@ Sam Davidson: “The status quo does not allow whites to organize themselves as a political force.”
Exactly. And I would add, the government-engineered status quo prevents this, with Jewry pulling the strings of government by buying and corrupting it, and using it largesse to buy off other minorities, pit them against Whites and/or Christians with jobs programs and “affirmative action,” make sure they stay cohesive with ideological multiculturalism (which keeps Jewry from sticking out like a sore thumb), and instructing them about how racist Whites and Christians are and have always been.
Of course, Jewry is the most racist, dangerous and oppressive network in the history of the world, with Israel’s increasingly naked fascism as just the latest bit of proof.
I wonder when the “Winstons” of the world will go after organized Jewry for its pernicous and destructive warmongering influence and modus operandi of perpetually violently pitting groups against each other?
It’s not “sour grapes” to resent and seek to counter such a self-serving, dangerous wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Perhaps Winston’s efforts would be better directed towards helping the Jewish community overcome their hostile attitude towards the founding people of America.
Jason Speaks says:
I couldn’t agree more, Jason Speaks. I nominate you to assist Winston in this endeavor.
Chris Moore & Sam Davidson,
If Whites are not allowed to organize themselves as a political force…as you and several others believe….then what’s the point of this 3rd Way organization?
And, then, why aren’t you all real revolutionaries? (If you are, I’m in.) There are only three choices here….political action, revolutionary action or doing nothing.
The only reason I posted here is because I suspect most of you guys really prefer to do nothing but whine about Jew power. You say political action is impossible and you clearly aren’t into any revolutionary activity…..are you just content, as I suspect, to see your seed destroyed by the current political dispensation?
The general point is that Jewish interests contribute 50-60% of the campaign contributions to the Democratic Party and about 20-35% to the Republican party. For an ethnic group that is only 2% of the country this is astounding and smacks of double or triple disparate impact in terms of the influence this creates in elected officials. This is not something that is widely known but seems like it should be. It is always nice to know who is calling the shots.
I mean that’s the point isn’t it, to discuss freely who wields influence in our free speech democracy?
Mr. Tom,
Agree with you completely (except your %’s are a little conservative). Yours is the point I would like to have seen Mr. Graham dwell on and elaborate about…..not some ranting about the “Poison of Jew money” in US politics.
Can I emphasise again how extremely important it is for us to donate to web sites such as The Occidental Observer a regular and significant proportion of income as well as to be engaged in influencing established organisations. If only 20 million White Americans donated 10/ month it would generate the income needed for hundreds of scholarships, legal challenges, study and lobby institutes.
Donate now!
This is a case of both sides of the (faux) debate being controlled.
The US Congress, virtually without opposition it seems, has passed a $725 billion defense bill. The biggest in 60 years. Is Obama going to provide a war on the zionists’s secondary nemisses: Iran?
I think it would be very hard to determine the amount of funds the Republican Party receives from Jews. After all, much of their support comes from Zionist-Christians, who are, for all intents and purposes, honorary Jews.
Tom, these facts are know by anyone involved in the political process at any level higher than precinct chairman…..and most of them know as well.
One of the real questions is …… why are Protestants, particularly, so unwilling to engage. Why have they quit and given up? What happened and how can it be reversed?
“Yours is the point I would like to have seen Mr. Graham dwell on and elaborate about…..not some ranting about the “Poison of Jew money” in US politics.”
I think Mr. Graham’s phrasing was apt. Really, the Jews are the same people who, like Susan Sontag, have called the white race “the cancer of history.” Jews like Noel Ignatiev have issued an appeal to “abolish the white race.” (Not the concept of “race”, but whites specifically.)
Winston, the points Graham is making about the amount of Jews contributing to Obama goes hand in hand with the enormous amount of money Jews contribute to both Republicans and Democrats. Graham could have focused on that larger issue, but that has been discussed in the past, and this is a more “current” event. I do think he should have added as a side note the estimated amount of money Jews contribute to both the Democrats and Republicans to put matters in context…
Just a note. I come from a rather wealthy family. All of my uncles are millionaires. We’re not talking massive wealth like hedge fund manager money, but they are all doing very well. Only one of them is political in any manner, and he would not give a red cent out. The fact is, he’s just too greedy, and hates the idea of losing any money for any reason. You would really have to meet the guy to understand. Another uncle is a moron. And the third is pretty hard to pin down, but he has never given any money for any political cause ever, as far as I know.
Many Whites just don’t care. The ones who are poor are too poor or too dumb to do anything and the wealthy ones are often politically ambivalent. Look at two of the wealthiest, Buffet and Gates, and you get the idea. Trust me, there is no shortage of wealthy WASP and Catholics out there.
Almost no wealthy whites with the exception of Mr. Johnson of American 3P are putting serious money for nationalist causes. In Europe, that is not so much the case.
It’s the psychological makeup of the jews that is much of the ‘why’, the reason, behind their putting so much of their energy into politics, so much of their money into politics. They are a hive culture. Literally a hive entity, period. Their mentality is in fact alien to that of whites, who are individualistic. The flip side is put whites in the wilderness, they’ll build a society. Put jews in the wilderness with no one sending money, no one to do the work for them, a la Israel, and they would starve to death or fall prey to the elements, even being as group oriented as they are.
Jews pour everything into movements against whites because that’s they way they are. They hate whites, fear whites, and deep down plainly envy whites. On the other hand, most whites, to their detriment, pay little attention to politics between election cycles. Or until there’s a huge economic collapse, fast, slow or otherwise. And in the end, this will be the undoing for the jews. Again.
“Jewish money is the poison of American political life” is a true statement.
Nobody called in in question the legality of these activities, which of course, are a form of indirect bribery, of buying of political office.
Jewish money power is only one aspect of this many headed poisonous Hydra. The rest was thoroughly described and analyzed by Prof. McDonald in his “Culture of Critique”.
The only real cure for this as far as I’m concerned in the short term is to make campaigns publicly funded. You are right to say that this campaign cash nonsense is bribery. Money in politics corrupts politics even outside the whole role of Jews.
In Washington earlier, a $25,000 to $35,800 per couple dinner was held at Mandrin Oriental Hotel, organized by “Obama Victory Fund 2012 Dinner with the President in support of a strong US-Israel relationship” – Obama told the 80 attending Jewish donors that Israel and United States must assess the new Middle East with “fresh eyes“.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/obama-looks-at-me-with-fresh-eyes/
As I suspected…
The point is that there are lots more Whites and Christians than Jews and gays, and collectively they have much more money than the Jews and gays in this country. So why do we have this problem of Jews being responsible for 60/70% of all the money in US politics, and reaping the subsequent rewards of that participation in the process?
The posters and writers here only complain about Jew and gay money in politics and don’t ever give any indication that they themselves give generously, or at all, to the other side(s).
This is the reason you are loosing/have lost your country. Your beliefs are apparently not worth a few percent of YOUR wealth. Your beliefs are apparently only worth the occasional rant or free posting….but real engagement in the process…nope. And if the writers on this site and the chronic posters here don’t participate and have no history of parting with THEIR money and spending real efforts to save THEIR homeland, then I don’t take them very seriously. Just barber shop/cracker barrel chatter.
So, Mr. Graham…..the reason Jews and gays so dominate politics here is because they put their money where their mouth’s and interests are…….and nothing would prevent you and your White Hetero brothers from doing the same.
Perhaps you and your mentor should spend some efforts to urge your kind to do 1/10 of what the Jews and gays do….then you mite save your country. I do realize that flaming on about Poison Jew Money is more fun and less costly.
Winston,
I am not quite sure where your attitude is coming from. You are probably fully aware that most of us who are fortunate enough to have jobs struggle to pay the bills, even when we avoid purchasing things that are frivolous. How can we give a lot of money to any cause that may or may not be working for our best interests?
Also, you probably recognize that if there were a candidate for a significant office who had the beliefs and principles of Charles Lindbergh, that person would not have a snowball’s chance in Hell. Can you imagine somebody like Marine Le Pen (or Mark Weber, for that matter), having a shot at significant political power in the US? What are we supposed to do? Hold our noses and go out and support a possible political leader who seems to be slightly less unreasonable and evil than what we are used to?
I do not claim to have any viable answers at this point, either. It is no fun feeling powerless for very real reasons. However, it is a good and constructive thing to create a space where people can address these matters, and try to come up with solutions.
“This is the reason you are loosing/have lost your country.”
Look at my response above. The reason why whites do not organize themselves politically is because of massive social repression (discrimination, loss of income, personal attacks, etc) coupled with the fact that any political gains we make by voting will be undone by the federal government. Rehmat posted something about an “Obama Victory” dinner. Yet when whites try to organize tame conferences like American Renaissance, they get shut down by death threats and defamation.
Winston,
In order to encourage White Gentiles to donate as you say they should, we first have to make them aware that their culture and group interests are under siege by an organized opponent. Most White Gentiles are in the dark as to the ethnic component of struggle going on … that’s what this article helps illuminate. If you want White Gentiles to organize explicitly as a group, then why would you characterize education as “whining”?
@Sam Davidson. Immagine if “American Renaisance” had enough money to buy the Hotel and its conference center in 5 cities. A $10/donation from 5 million Whites would do it.
Exposing the influence of eZ money in politics and its effect on our miserable little lives exercises some gentiles more than exposing the fact that jews are purchasing Obama. Why is that, I wonder? Could it be that these gentiles are into the same game themselves?
It’s not the first time the Jewish pro-Israel elites are buying Ben-Obama – the corruption have long been a major part of American political system. Based on their financial contribution and media monopoly, the Jewish elites have been able to create a cadre of Christian politicians who are more loyal to Israel than the dual citizen Jews.
Here is the latest example of Zio-treason. A congressional panel is preparing ground for Hillary Clinton to delist an Iranian terrorist group MEK, so that it with US taxpayers’ money can terrorize Iranian nation and bring-in a pro-Israel regime in Tehran.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/07/15/zionisms-favorite-iranian-terrorists/
Bloomberg just gave the maximum millions to the GOP critters who voted for homosexual marriage in New York. Right out of Hornbeck’s review of CoC:
More proof that the jews are not nearly as smart as they think they are: Since the US is the most pro Israel country in the history of the world, and we are the most powerful, at least for now, why would you dilute the population with third world poor who hate the jews – or at least are coming from countries that do not slavishly kiss their asses? Any jewish person wishing to make this pro Israel, zionist loving Christian nation into something different is risking a disaster they will regret.
DUMB JEWS!
I know your question was largely or entirely rhetorical, Scooter, but I think it can also function neatly as a question with an actual answer.
I don’t think it’s disputed that the Jews have paid close attention to the past 150 years of American history. Their conclusion from their observations, I believe, is as follows: (1) Hispanics (by which I mean those of Latin American or Caribbean origin or descent) are by and large incapable of large-scale, long-range political organization. Not so much appetite-propelled as appetite-governed, they are, whatever their age, children, albeit children whose primary governing appetite is lust and whose primary moral and intellectual characteristic is sloth. Tell them what they want to hear, and give them ready and abundant access to what satisfies their appetites, and they will obey. (2) What is true for Hispanics is true for blacks, except that “by and large” needs to be emended to “virtually all.”
In short, I think that Jews have no fear of blacks and Hispanics, no matter how large their numbers or how small the percentage of Jews pulling their strings. To the Jews, they are all members of the subspecies homo tractabilis: manipulable man. Anyone dubious about this proposition need only look at politicians, a group virtually all of whose members exhibit baseness and lust for power. Yet within that group those who combine baseness, foulness, and stupidity to the most egregious degree are blacks and Hispanics.
I do not think, however, that the Jews are necessarily correct in their estimation of the situation (assuming that my analysis of their calculations is correct). That is, there is no reason to believe that mass egotism and solipsism—traits that have been the Tribe’s undoing in centuries past—are any the less a part of the Jewish character and mind-set today than they were in the first century, the fifth, the fourteenth, or the nineteenth. Thus, their destruction of white Christian America may, as they calculate, augment their already unprecedented dominance of world politics and finance, or else it may, as you suggest, Scooter, end in their near-complete destruction—and perhaps that of everyone else into the bargain!
Since things could play out either way and since either outcome would be pretty dreadful for us and our descendants, some sort of victory—and soon—on the immigration-control front, both here and in Europe, strikes me as essential to our survival. In Aristotelian terms, as a first step it might not be sufficient, but it is necessary.
In 2005 the share of income going to the top quintile (one-fifth) of all households increased to 50.4 percent. The bottom quintile simply cannot compete with the political influence multimillionaires-billionaires can buy with eZ money.
Anon, there are maybe 8 million Jews in this country. Even if they were all rich and engaged, which they are not…..small donations from 140 million White Christians would swamp the impact of large Jewish contributions. (And, about twenty percent of Jewish political money goes to causes/candidates you would find little to disagree with.)
I still say…..I don’t take any of you seriously when you don’t engage financially in the process. You claim to realize how important money in politics is…..just so long as it’s not yours. Making hyperbolic statements for free on a website is one thing, pitching in and doing the real work of changing our country is quite another.
I didn’t realize we were interested in the approval of a pro-Israel internet poster?
Winston you seem to forget that jews create US dollars out of nothing and loan them to each other thousands of times a day. Your direct deposit offers free checking so they can immediatly loan some company they own 9 times your paycheck every week.
Couple free cash with control of the media and it is not to hard to see that our money is better spent waking up white people.
Ignoring the jews control of the media and money supply on this issue is foolish. Speaking truth in public is the best thing we can do.
Winston continues the tactic of letting us know how few jews there are in the US. All of the numbers quoted, 2% of the population etc. do not jibe with what is actually seen. There are in fact more jews in the US and everywhere else. Go ahead and look at what jews did early in the 20th century, leaders instructing the rest of the tribe to lie to census takers and the like to hide jewish numbers. Even Mark Twain engaged in some apt sarcasm regarding the jews and their population claims. If you look at heavily jewish areas in the US, look at their numbers, look at occupations filled with these aliens, schools filled with their spawn and more, the numbers are all lies.
There are probably twice to three times as many jews in the US as admitted. Laugh now, but you won’t be laughing later when the masks come off. They’re already starting to come off in some public arenas.
Jews make up nearly 2/3 of big dollar contributors to Democrat party and a little over 1/2 to Repubs. This was covered by J.J.Goldberg years ago.
With the recent takeover of GOP by recovering trotskyites of zio-con variety and their useful idiot armageddonite foot soldiers from the Christian Right, the flow of cash into Repub coffers from kosher sources is likely to intensify.
It’s not a matter of donations. The Jews can quickly nullify and demonize any White/Christian/Secure borders movement via their control of the MSM, Hollywood and their legal attack dogs such as the ACLU, ADL and $PLC. And for example they have been very successful derailing anti-illegal immigration legislation at city and state level. Even a when a small town mayor does a prayer breakfast it’s enough to send out the attack dogs of the ACLU or ADL to extort money from them.
Or the Jews will infiltrate a movement under aegis of being friendly and helpful. Take for example the EDL of Great Britain, basically a political party nationalist in nature and a movement to stop the importation of Muslims and roll back all the MC tyranny now gripping the country. Enter one Jewish fanatic Roberta Moore who joined it and when the EDL didn’t support her extreme zionist positions, she screamed anti-semitism along with the American uber Zionist and Jew Pamela Gellar to turn the entire anti-Islamic/Shariah movement against the EDL. Now the party is radioactive thanks to a few loud mouth Jewish fanatics who used the anti-semite club to scare people.
Gellar is also doing a fine job splintering the anti-Jihad movement in the U.S.
Even on the internet Jews patrol more popular political sites like Dkos monitoring the postings to shutdown those who talk about the religion of the Neocons.
Bottom line: Jews play dirty and hard. They will use any and all tools should any Goyim politician stand up to them and their Neocon thugs in Washington.
In the end we may need to take a page from the Islamic playbook. Just ignore the PC/MC insult labels from the Jews and get our own legal organization to tie the ACLU and ADL up in court.
Keep all organizations church or local based and avoid bringing in people with ulterior agendas or friendly to Zionists.
AIPAC hides the source of much of the Jewish money, which is likely reimbursed by Israel from US aid. Many of the really big donors have special biz deals and concessions in Israel.
Why would there be any need to hide the donations?
What proof is there that any of the money comes from Israel?
The flow of funds is actually in the opposite direction.
@ Winston: You keep mentioning the need of the majority to organize and express itself, however that would be a monumental task! Getting a large segment of the population (White and Christian in this case) to agree to a basic socio-political program would be very difficult, if not impossible and would be akin to herding cats
Luckily however the current hard times may be working in Whites favor! White Racial attitudes are certainly hardening (Prof. MacDonald has blogged about the Racialization of politics) and a vehicle like the American Third Position Party may begin to make serious in-roads.
W writes:
“I would like to have seen Mr. Graham dwell on and elaborate about…..
I don’t take any of you seriously when you don’t engage financially in the process…”
First, it is not about what you would or would not like. When someone writes an article, it is about what interests them. This should be obvious, and should not have to be explained. I suggest you write something, and submit it for review.
Second, how can you know who does or does not give, and to whom? But as others have pointed out to you, before one can give, there has to be someone able to receive. Right now, within this context, there are not many choices, are there? Perhaps you could list some likely candidates, for us? Just so that we can know.
As far as taking people seriously? When someone argues is such a shallow, naive, and narcissistic manner, it is difficult for serious people to take them seriously.
So your point is that since there are no candidates/causes 100% to your liking there is no reason for you to give. OK, so all is lost and the game is over.
If this is the case, what’s the point of complaining about Jewish money going to Obama, or anyone else? If you say that there is no political path to change you are left with no reason to complain about the Jews dominance of the system.
Winston,
Would you be very happy to see the emergence of a full-blown Native Born White American Racial Patriot Movement that takes on Jewish Power?
The Dmocatic Party is the party of race-replacement and social-cultural filth.
The Republican Party is the party of race-replacement and social-cultural filth. So why is vdare.com trying to save the Republican Party. Let’s get it in with the Native Born White American Racial revolt against race-replacement and social-cultural filth.
Why not? Because your fellow travelers aren’t willing to part with one thin dime to support such a movement (Radical revolt). They have an aversion to any actual action to save their culture and country. They do like to rant about the perfidy of the Jews…..but actually do something, no so much.
They always have reasons for their non action….can’t afford it, won’t really do any good anyway, too busy….
Winston, you speak the truth. All the American fatsos still have it too good to revolt – they have been bought off with fast food, suburban homes, air conditioning, beer and sporting events and other forms of meaningless entertainment. We need pain and suffering on a wide scale to get change we can believe in.
I think vdare is trying to ‘save the Republican Party’ on the basis that it believe a new party is unlikely to succeed but that an existing party can be transformed.
Once an independant flow of money is created independant communication and action is also possible.
One option that has had some influence in the UK is legal restriction of election expenditure to a maximum per constituency and per election.
It is encouraging for democracy that in the USA the names and totals of donations are published.
Another option, though one that is more problematic for the introduction of new ideas into debate, is public funding of political parties.
Public Funding? And just who do you think will be in charge of deciding who gets what money under what circumstances?
Limit Expenditures? So Kevin MacDonald runs against Barbara Boxer and they are both allowed to spend the same limited amount of money…who wins that race? Limits only protect the well known and the incumbents, which is why they tend to support this unconstitutional idea.
How bout just getting down to the hard work of participating in the system that we have or deciding to go revolutionary or just giving up?
In the UK – which is where I’m writing from – there are three main political parties at Westminster, but another six have representation there. So if you wish to influence debate by forming a new party then limitation of expenditure – preferably at state level – is one method that might work for you.
We got the best Democracy money can buy-for Jews.
The problem with the current system isn’t that YKW has a lot of money to buy politicians, but that it is too easy to buy politicians. This isn’t because current politicians are especially venal, but because there are too few of them. As originally constituted, congressional districts corresponded to a few tens of thousands of citizens, but now they correspond to many hundreds of thousands of citizens. As a result, instead of having to buy ten thousand congressmen, YKW only has to buy a few of the hundred congressmen currently “representing” us. Further, to stretch YKWs money even further, they are continually encouraging the federal government to widen its sphere of influence beyond that permitted in the constitution. For example, what gives the Federal Government any right to have any say in the education of the nation’s youth? This seems like it should be a local function, especially in view of the fact that the states have widely diverse populations who disagree on what children should be taught. Since the federal government is a creature of the states, and since the constitution can be amended without participation of the federal congress, whites would be better advised to seek to amend the constitution to significantly limit the power of the federal government. Lets see how successful YKW can be when they have to buy 50 state legislatures to accomplish their agenda!
Excellent comment. Anything that works against centralization weakens the grip of Organized Jewry.
They are many directions which these comments are taking and Graham himself joins in the fray. While all comments take account of the Jews and some of them of the homosexuals, none addresses women in this context.
Here I will have to be unscientific, because I have not read numbers on this, but I wonder, in the “leading women” category, what is the percentage that supports Obama. And in women with power and influence, how many oppose Israel; are not most all of them closet Zionist?
White males are leading a losing battle if their women are mostly pro-Israel, pro-Political correctness, pro-Homosexuality etc…
Yet, in most of the conversations here, women are never considered as a distinct force; with their own set of ambitions, their own ethnocentric dynamics.
On this subject, I witness a usual phenomenon on TVO (Canada’s Ontario public television). At a public affairs show called “The Agenda” this week they had a Behavioural Economist, Dan Ariely (Duke University), who was commenting his work. On discussing the different tests he was doing on Honesty and Dishonesty economic theory, he betrayed, on the guise of vulgarizing, his own work. In fact, when reading his work, it is interesting that while the tests his team conduct on behaviour are quite revealing and interesting, his solutions are only adapted to a multicultural landscape. Guess what? Dan Ariely is a Jewish citizen.
He is very intelligent and very interesting, his works even covers the attitude of Self-deception, yet he does not put himself in this category. Naturally, the woman interviewer had this “Oprah Winfrey” smile every time he would make an affirmation that felt politically correct. Example: He was explaining that systems may be structured in a fashion that they encourage subjects to deviate from good behaviour. In that sense, he said you can take people who are basically honest yet, put them in an environment where they will progressively cheat. This is explained by his behavioural work where most humans will have a tendency to slitly deviate from honest behaviour. His tests indicated that they are mechanism that can inhibit deviation, such as self-awareness, but that in front of self-deception, they are no winning solutions except to transform that environment that allows for cheating.
Where Ariely deviates from his own work is when he says: “you can take perfectly honest people and put them in a “system” that does not prevent cheating and they will progressively cheat, but it is not their fault, it is the systems’. People Care, human beings are caring people.”
When he states in the show that people care, therefore implying that they are good, remain good and are innocent, it’s the system, he was addressing the situation in the financial crisis of 2008. Yet, caring is a word he used to express Altruism. But caring and altruism do not mean the same thing. If people express altruistic behaviour, it is because they are part of a system where they have learned that being altruistic benefits the group, and this will benefit you. In a context of subgroup structures with differing subgroup ambitions, universal altruistic behaviour is a losing solution. But by using the word “care” Ariely purposefully puts the dilemma in another dimension. He puts it away from our capacity to understand altruism as a biological survival response, and shifts it into a politically correct “moral” code, you are a good “person” you care; you are an evil person, and you do not care. And care becomes associated with accepting and tolerating anything and everything away from any self or group interest.
Ariely is also not honest when he says that his tests prove that you can take perfectly honest people, put them in a system and they will progressively become cheaters in an increasing fashion, simply because of the system. This is false. His research should make him understand that people become complacent, they understand their game, and they understand that they can blame the system, therefore no one can be held accountable, and from being self-deceptive they play self-deception, which is not the same thing.
Aryel comments demonstrate even more ill faith when he says that as a consultant he offers advices to corporations of tools that can improve environment by investigating programs such as making commitment statements to the organisation to create self-awareness, and construct codes of ethics; he explains that in most cases this solves the problems.
Ariely should consider this: Wall Street has been inundated with codes of practice and ethics for the past 20 years, and public critic pressure should make Wall Street sufficiently self-aware that bad behaviour should be quite inhibited. Yet bad behaviour remains and persists. Also, Canada has been at the head of corporate ethics for some time now in terms of implementation, yet Canada, according to a 2009 Price Waterhouse Coopers Global Economic Fraud Survey Report on corporate corruption Ranks fourth (4th) worse country in the world in terms of corporate corruption behind Russia, South Africa and Kenya. Ariely being an expert in his field of work should have known this, and this should demonstrate the inefficacity of most of his solutions; especially when addressed in a fragmented manner.
The mechanism on Wall Street when the system collapses every 10 years is always the same, it follows Ariely’s framework:
Stage 1: Convince the public and authorities that: It is not the People, it is the System.
Stage 2: Convince authorities that: The system works perfectly in most of the cases, it does not need to change.
Stage 3: Accept to put “self-corrective systems” such as new codes of ethics to fix the “few” problem areas.
And Things Never Change!
Where do most North American women stand on these issues: human beings care, people are good, ethics work, women have more ethics than men, women are more honest than men, women are more intelligent than men, and the system only needs more women, less White American European males; Everything has “Changed”….
So, the above post is some attempt to practice prose style? It sounds eerily familiar to posts we’ve read before, especially the anti-Woman line, which is anathema to White Advocacy. Sounds like a variation on all the other disruptive tactics we have seen before.
Regulation is no solution to the evils of Wall St. The banking system presided over by the Federal Reserve is where the money growth occurs. Only where there is rampant money growth can bubbles occur. Crooks always gravitate to where the money is, and the Wall St crooks are all lawyered up.
End the Fed and fractional reserve banking!
@Jason Speaks,
It is not as much vilifying women as asking ourselves: what do European American women want? Women are hardly considered in the debates we have on this site, yet strategically, they should be. Do the majority of European American women have conflicting views with those of men in terms of vision? For example, in Quebec, which I have described as a test tube for Harvard social PhD’s, women’s discussions are now revolving around Polygamy, that it may be good to make it legal. This is a symptom typical of an Alpha/Beta social structure akin to tribal organizations, with all its proximity to social structures of multicultural and multi-subgroup dynamics. Now, I would hope that some academic paper would present the subject of male competition in the fashion that in traditional cultures it is always to women’s advantage, as a group, when men compete heavily between themselves, but in a society where women are changing roles, will this offer a better or worse outcome for the group?
@Trenchant
What I thought was interesting is that Ariely explains that in front of self-deception, you must change the environment, because self-awareness and commitment will have no effect. Eliminating the source of self-deception for Wall Street would mean to separate commercial banking activities and investment banking activities and put an end to propriety trading. And most people know that this is the only thing which will work. Which means re-instating Glass-Steagall, and there is currently a Bill on the floor of the Congress, HR 1489 introduced by Kaptur (OH) and sponsored by 23 courageous representatives. But MSM does not speak of it at all. This is not more “regulations”, it is a Structural event or proposition, it changes the landscape, it prevents Banksters of taking their client’s money for their own trading and benefit, which is at the heart of the current 20 year crisis. This would better America. But Ariely believes that having companies adding a few articles on their ethics charter will fix everything, which it never will. And the thing is that a majority of women think the same.
And Ariely believes that people are fundamentally “good”; that is what Wall Street believes of itself also. We are dealing with the people who are among the brightest of society, which are trained to understand and decipher opportunities in very complicated setups, yet when they come to congress as witnesses we let them walk away playing the 5 year old child self-deception act. What they have learned is that self-deception works; they have made it an institution, schools teach these future protégés the fine art of self-deception. And you cannot attack self-deception because you become guilty of making a “trial of intent” which is not allowed in the “Free World Democracy” we live in.
Thank you guys for reading my comment.
Organized Jewry essentially owns the Democratic Party at the national level and has taken control of large components of U.S. left-liberalism:
http://www.judeofascism.com/2011/07/organized-jewry-essentially-owns.html
And yet, it’s amazing to me how idiots on the Right and in the Republican Party insist on feeding the Zionist beast with wars for Israel.
With leadership too stupid to add 2 + 2, it’s no wonder Jewry runs circles around the Right.
Not stupid, venal.
Yes, venal. Or even evil, if you want to be totally honest. Which starts going to my point from a previous thread that large factions of Whites are totally cut throat when it comes to money and “getting ahead,” even against their own people and at the risk of long term White genocide.
I think insatiable greed is why Jewry has always had such small numbers and hence has to turn operationally fascist, and that’s where Whites are headed on the current trajectory.
In fact the organized Jewry own all three major American political parties, Republican, Democrat and Tea Party, the last being a political marriage of the Zioncons in the other two parties. Leaders of all three parties are at the mercy of AIPAC and Zionist-controlled mainstream media. Just remember how pro-Israel Rep. Ron Paul was ripped apart by the organized Jewry for suggesting that annual USAID to Israel be cut-down?
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/01/30/ron-paul-irks-jewish-lobby/
If American Jews exercise political influence disproportionate to their numbers they certainly aren’t the only group in our society to do so.
Consider for illustration the Cuban exiles — those wonderful folks who brought you the **Elian** Affair. Simply because Cuban exiles and their descendants hold the balance in the swing States of New Jersey and Florida, and with great loss to American business, relations with Cuba have gone nearly nowhere the past fifty years with a Castro still holding the reins in Havana.
Cuban exiles work closely with the Colombian drug cartels in cocaine importing and distribution through south Florida. Though not notably antisemitic their politics are somewhere to the right of Ghengis Kahn, to the benefit of big business and damage to the working people of the USA.
It is not that Jews exercise influence out of proportion to their numbers that is the problem. If you’ve read this blog, it is far more the anti-American, anti-White, anti-family, anti-Western nature of that influence. And it legitimate in a free society to discuss this influence.
Jewish activists have spent generations condemning the supposedly outsized influence of WASPs, at a time when WASPs were the vast majority in this country. Yet, when the lens of critique is turned back on Jews, it suddenly becomes illegitimate?
@ Caleb
{ “…their politics are somewhere to the right of Ghengis Kahn…”}
Caleb makes a typical “Freudian slip” that betrays – once again! – his Jewish identity by misspelling the name of Ghengis Khan as Ghengis Kahn.Kahn of course is a variant of the Jewish name Cohen (Kahn,Kohn,Kan).Khan is a Mongolian word meaning “chief” and has of course nothing to do with the name for Jewish priests.
As is to be expected his comment is an attempt to exculpate the Jews,this time by pointing to others who “do it also”,a typical Jewish trick if everything else fails.Nice try.
How many of the exiled Cubans living in the US are Jewish?
Sorry, Jason. There is no cash value to being WASP. You can’t pay your mortgage with it. It won’t even get you on the bus.
I must wonder how many Jews you have ever seen [on tv doesn't count]. Even the John Birch Society has renounced antisemitism and reached out to Jews as true conservatives.
Suggest you do some reading, “Capitalism and the Jews” by Jerry Z. Muller for a start. The “review” appearing here, being just a rehash of old hates, has nothing to do with this short and elegantly written book.
OK, Franklin. I guess their politics also are to the right of Ghengis COHEN.
Caleb,
I don’t understand your point you made in rebuttal. I am saying that it isn’t so much that Jews have more influence than their numbers would suggest, it is that the activist Jewish community uses its influence to undermine and subvert the US and White culture in a way no other group does. That’s the point. And there is nothing out of line about discussing Jewish power, just like Jews themselves attacked WASPs for generations.
And I am talking about the organized Jewish community, the most activist wings, especially the Leftist portion. Yes, I have known several Jews in person and as coworkers – their personalities and IQ were all over the place, although they all tended toward liberalism and usually had a certain disdain for middle class Whites. But I don’t attack all Jews, we are talking about the large patterns of influence by activist Jews.
If such discussions bother you, I assume you spend time writing every university in North America that critiques so-called “White privilege”? I didn’t think so.
Jason, as Prof. Muller’s book points out, antisemites have flourished wherever in the world there was an attempt to hold on to inherited privilege, whether it was in East European societies of lords and peasants or “restricted” admission to Yale and Princeton. All the same, Jews have never that I have heard of attacked WASPS as a group the way Jews have been attacked, politically and physically, just for being Jews.
Did you mean the White culture of General Motors and Countrywide Mortgage?
@Caleb. Your statement “All the same, Jews have never that I have heard of attacked WASPS as a group the way Jews have been attacked, politically and physically, just for being Jews” is fatuous and typically mendancious.
How about the following “attacks” on “WASPS”
1 The concept of “White Privilidge” which which you just used and is used to delegitimate the fruits of White labour.
2 How about Sontags “The White race is the cancer of human history”
3 How about Ignatiefs “Abolish the White race”
4 How about the whole “culture of critique”, the frankfurt school, political correctness, the “white male patriarchy” perjoratives.
5 How about the immigration scam, designed to achieve a genocide of Whites if not just replace them in the workforce.
7 How about extending the cost of affirmitive action to an immigrant group: Hispanics.
8 How about two decades of incompetant finacial and indistrial deregulation designed to favour jewish speculative efforts, shift investment of shore: culiminating in ENRON, Bernie Maddof, Goldman Sachs Bailouts and the Global Finacial Crisis and its junk loans sold all around the world.
9 How about dragging the nation into several expensive zionist related wars and attacking anyone that disagrees as an anti-semite.
10 How about cultivating resentments and colluding alleigences of minorities against those hideous WASPs.
The chutzpah and duplicity is sickening.
Caleb, do a little research, google “Jewish middlemen,” and you’ll see that large factions of Jewry have always feathered their own nests as parasites off of larger civilizations.
Some Jews are innovators, but most Jews exist as mooches off of the stability of civilizations built by non-particularistic religions. They are in no way more victimized than any other obnoxious minority, and probably less than they have earned.
Step outside your cult. There’s a whole other world out there, and its liberating relative to the stifling “freedom” of parasitic grifting and a “chosen” sense of entitlement.
And yes, “entitled” Whites should do the same.
Caleb,
There are people motivated by envy – and they have attacked all sorts of groups historically – White, Jewish, Asian, Arab, the Rich, the Beautiful, etc. But none of that in any way diminishes the legitimacy of critiquing Jewish influence inside the US or Europe. Why would it? You are trying to say there is no such thing as an analysis of Jewish influence.
And the vast majority of White middle class people in Europe and the US are not a group of landed gentry, lazily living off some “privilege” they inherited. To put it in those terms is illegitimate. They work hard, make sacrifices, and try and pass something of value on to their children (like a country).
@ Caleb july 18,2011-11:20 am.
{“…Even the John Birch Society has renounced anti-Semitism and reached out to Jews as true conservatives…”}
Either you are totally ignorant or totally dishonest.As Revilo Oliver discovered the whole John Birch Society was a fake organization controled by Jews to make conservatism ineffective and harmless to Jews.Oliver left the John Birch Society and started on his own.He has written an insightful book about the Jews called “The Jewish Strategy”.
You speak about “renouncing anti-Semitism” as if anti-Semitism is something morally wrong.In reality it is as moral as “anti-Mafia-ism” would be in Italy, since Jews are in effect an ETHNIC MAFIA.
Jews are a kind of “inverted humans”,their morality is the opposite of that of normal humans: lying,cheating,robbing of others is “good” as long as the others are non-Jews.When the others try to defend themselves they call that “persecution”and whine about “anti-Semitism”.Of course such “anti-Semitism” has followed Jews throughout history wherever they have lived,because they cannot change their destructive-parasitic behaviour.”Anti-Semitism”(read: anti-Jewish-Mafia-ism) therefore should not be “renounced” it should be actively promoted.
Ah, Franklin, even if you are as insane as Revilo Oliver I feel there is little danger of suicide. It’s hard to get killed jumping out of a basement apartment!
Bear, your thinking is disordered, your spelling atrocious. “Incompetant”? “Privilidge”? Don’t they teach you anything in nutter school?
Let me get this straight: everything about the modern world you don’t like is the fault of the Jews (always in the plural).
As for certain statements by avant-garde writers who happen to be Jewish, intended to shock and provoke, Irish-American columnist Jimmy Breslin after the 1968 Democratic convention in Chicago” “All cops are pigs”. Should that be taken as an official position of the Holy See, Breslin being Catholic?
“Caleb” says:
Are you threatening us, Caleb? Do you happen to have an Israeli passport, by any chance?
http://rememberbuilding7.org/
Jason, you will find as much “analysis” on this site as on Russia Today’s coverage of the Georgian claims to Abkhazia.
Half truths should be balanced off with the rest of the truth [Jews stick together and try to work the U.S. political system, just like Cubans, Armenians, Koreans, gays and the copper industry (why do we still have one cent pieces?)].
Though some of the world’s most advanced and productive agriculture is found in Israel, there are other ways to create wealth than pulling turnips out of the ground. Prof. Muller’s book explains this much better than I could but the general concept is that the gathering and analysis of information has economic value. It is only in pre-industrial societies with no notion of economic expansion or growth that the gains of one group must come at the expense of everyone else.
Caleb,
Comparing this site to Russia today is unfair. I know there are a few posters that come off that way (and most of us argue with them), but that is not the caliber of Kevin MacDonald’s work and most of the articles are not like that either.
There are a handful of people that post here that come off as bigoted or envious or a bit loony. And as you may have surmised, many of them are doing it on purpose, because they want to undermine the effectiveness of the site. They want to scare off new readers.
But the massive well researched work of people like Kevin MacDonald cannot be dismissed. And there is growing research that supports many of the ideas promoted of this site (the genetic basis of ethnic differences, the concept of genetic interests, the problems with diversity, etc.)
Rich, my passport is green and says “United States of America”–my ONLY passport.
It is a true statement that Revilo Oliver was certified insane. You seem to read a threat in the most innocuous, humorous remark. Do you have access to explosives or to large amounts of fertilizer? Do you own three or more operable firearms? And who is “us”, anyway?
@ Caleb,
“As for certain statements by avant-garde writers who happen to be Jewish, intended to shock and provoke, Irish-American columnist Jimmy Breslin after the 1968 Democratic convention in Chicago” “All cops are pigs”. Should that be taken as an official position of the Holy See, Breslin being Catholic?”
Your rhetoric won’t work here, your question is a false dilemma. Breslins comments are clearly not representative of Catholic attitudes.
The noticeably and measurably higher preponderance of hostile statements and undermining ideologies promoted by Jewish individuals and groups does expose a consistent pattern of Jewish hostility towards Whites.
Your styling these Jewish gender ethno Marxist polemicists as ‘avant guard writers’ (i.e. mere artists trying to explore innovative prose) who just ‘happen to be Jewish’ really stretches credulity.
Pro-Israeli posters like “Caleb” should be reported to the authorities. The moderators of this site should consider whether to allow terrorist “chatter” such as Caleb’s. Remember the context – “Caleb” is a pro-Israeli/Zionist, who is now introducing discussions about specific violent/terrorist activities.
http://www.dhs.gov/
It is YOU who should be reported, Pearson. People, here is the link:
http://disney.go.com/disneyjunior/mickey-mouse-clubhouse
Jason, it can be hard to separate science from mumbo-jumbo, but here’s one little trick from my college anthro professor: beware of any “research” that proves the researcher’s own ethnic group is superior and should rule over all others.
Chris, all the hate sites say the same thing, often word for word, indicating how small this group really is.
Why don’t YOU Google “Jewish Nobelists”, among which is Albert Abraham Michaelson, the first American except for Theodore Roosevelt so honored but hardly the last.
: “beware of any “research” that proves the researcher’s own ethnic group is superior and should rule over all others.”
Beware of the Torah.
Another jew bragging about advanced agriculture! A true example of one sided advocacy. I remember when the jewish guide bragged about how in Israel they get 8 times as much cotton per acre as West Texas, basically a racist self congratulation. So, i went up to him and asked about it.
“Drip irrigation, don’t you see, little holes in the plastic tubes (which are not reuseable, but I’m sure they recycle, lol) they lay down before planting.”
“Wow,” I said, “that sounds expensive.
“It is, but because we have so little arable land, and water is valuable, we are forced to innovate.”
So, is it cheaper or better quality?” I asked.
“Of course not, but it makes us self sufficient,” he said.
In other words, because we give them so much money they are able to survive planting subsidized cotton in the desert, and take all the credit for their “advancement” which is little more than irrigation and excess labor and wasteful use of equipment and use it as proof of their superiority, when the good old boys in Texas do it cheaper and easier because they picked a better place to plant!
The Torah or “Old Testament” on which Christianity is based is not a work of scientific research. It does not even say anywhere that it is true but only that it is a story men should listen to.
Scooter, what a sore head you are!
The Israelis raise a crop on land that previously yielded absolutely zilch and all you can do is invent reasons to criticize. There is no “excess labor” in Israel and unlike in Egypt no **felaheen** earning $3.00 a day.
Look at a satellite image of the middle east. Where the green starts, that’s Israel.
Well, I can see how you think I’m being a sore head but perhaps I explained the comment about excess labor poorly. In West Texas, one man plants with a machine, hand weeds (ok, I’ll admit a Mexican gentleman or lady is sometimes interposed at this point) from time to time, and harvests with a machine, hundreds of acres. With the Israeli irrigation system and tight bunching of crops, hand planting and irrigation is highly labor intensive, thus “excess labor”. They have “innovated” with a secret that has been known for centuries! (Reminds one of Leonard Bernstein) I’m sure I don’t have to explain the law of comparative advantage when I say they should buy cotton from us at a cheaper price than they can make it on their own scarce arable land, most of which they should give back to the 1967 pre war lines. Most of all, they should quit crowing about it!
Those little hoses with holes have been around before Israel was lovingly imposed on the Mohammadists.
P.S. That area of the desert has been agricultural for thousands of years. I should have said “planting cotton in the desert region”.
Scooter, it gratifies me to learn that Negro slaves no longer are “employed” in the cotton fields of Texas. As for “loving imposition”, I believe there was something rather unilateral in the way Texas was separated from the rest of the Mexican Republic. Are there any plans to give it back?
I can assure you that prior to the arrival of the first Jewish settlers, that area of the Negev Desert along with much of pre-State Palestine had reverted to wilderness, barren, treeless and unproductive. [The Ottoman Turks levied a tax on every tree.]
Caleb,
With regard to Texas and Mexico, you should be aware that Texas was not the only territory in rebellion against the dictator Santa Anna. Several other states in Mexico rebelled against him, but were unable to sustain their resistance due to the proximity of military troops.
The population density of Texas was very low prior to the arrival of the Anglo settlers.
@ Caleb,
It needs to be empahsised that Palestine had a vibrant trade in fruits and vegetables by steamer ships in the late 1800s (eg the famous Jaffa Orange) prior to the succesfull Zionist conquest. Zionists put in a great deal of effort lobbying the Turks, the Germans (who were influential with the Turks due to their Peacefull Imperialism in the East policy) and the British to prevent Palestinian independance. Its fairly obvious that an independant Palestine would have acted cut of any further Zionist immigration.
The Turks had become great maladministrators no doubt supressed development by their policies in some areas such as the Negeve ( a fertile dessert like Rajistan in Indian) but its wrong to suggest all of Palestine was an undeveloped dessert.
I strongly suggest that you view photos and film footage of Palestine before the establishment of Israel, and the arrival of “The Chosen” hordes.
May the memory of Truman fill us all with shame, anger and disgust. The damage he did to our country and the world is nearly beyond description.
Jason–The population density of Palestine was very low before the arrival of the European (Jewish) settlers. Even the British Mandatory authorities had to concede that agricultural production skyrocketed once the Zionists had established their settlements, called **Kibbutzim**.
The Jaffa orange had been an exotic curiosity. Later and especially after independence it became a commonplace on every breakfast table in Europe.
Calab,
I’m not an expert on population density in Palestine, nor am I as interested in the sundry Middle Eastern squabbles as some. But, it seems fair to say the Israelis have been a wee bit pushy in the region. In fact, the behavior of Jews in the region is the kind of thing Jewish “intellectuals” have spend generations excoriating Whites for … gosh, it’s almost like a glaring double standard.
And which is “our country”, “Mark Hess”, Japan?
The films of Palestine around World War I that I saw show a land of primitive Bedouin outside of Jerusalem which was a city (just a town, really) of religious shrines and hucksters selling holy oil.
Caleb – you are making quite a few friends here!
Texas would never had succeeded in declaring and achieving independence from Mexico without the brutality and injustice of Santa Anna providing a just cause to fight.
As far as giving it back, well, it has almost been overtaken by illegal immigration – perhaps tha Arabs will succeed in doing the same in your beloved Israel.
Along those lines – I have another good jewish story for you. I was taking a tour deep in Mexico, somewhere near an ancient ruin, more or less the middle of nowhere. After the tour, the guide took us to a shop selling “local handmade authentic Mexican crafts”. The jew running the store forgot to remove the “made in China” labels on the goods, and was rather pissed off at me for pointing it out to everyone!
l’chaim
Ah, Scooter, you are evidently a man of many prejudices, full of years and hate, and I fear it is YOU who are not so smart as you think you are. That story about the souvenirs “Made in China” sounds a bit apocryphal. How do you know the storekeeper was Jewish, because **all** storekeepers are Jewish?
Are you sure it wasn’t more a hunger for land and a wish to expand the slave power that motivated the Texicans, rather than any great “injustice and brutality” on the part of the dictator Santa Anna. The former motivation might better apply to the **Tejanos**, indispensable allies in the struggle but soon forgotten once the main enemy became the Indians.
Jason, I think the double standard is operating right here, too.
Despite some ludicrous accusations that Israel is behind the wars in Iraq and even Afghanistan (!) not one U.S. soldier has died in defense of Israel nor has been asked to. What is happening in the Arab world from Libya to Yemen this very day should indicate what an unstable region it is. And none of these violent conflicts has anything to do with the Israel-Palestinian conflict.
While a few outright loonies think Israel actually perpetrated 9/11, and bin Laden paid lip service to the Palestinian Arabs without ever doing anything for them, most Americans realize that it was oil interests that was the root cause. That was why we stationed our soldiers and airmen in Saudi Arabia (“the Land of the Two Mosques”), an unpardonable affront to the Salafi Moslem sect.
For some people the very existence of a Jewish state and more to the point a Jewish army is as the French say **invivable**. Jews aren’t supposed to be a fighting, farming people on their own land who won’t be pushed around — a proud people just like those Texans back in 1836.
Bear (from Londonistan?), as long as there was an Ottoman Sultan, no part of that empire was going to be independent (note the correct spelling).
Following the breakup of the Ottoman Empire on Turkey’s being defeated in World War I, who would have ruled an “independent” Palestine? The Hashemites from across the Jordan? The al-Husseinis? Perhaps the Maronite Christians up in Lebanon?
Britain issued the Balfour Declaration during the First World War to guarantee the Jews a homeland — though not yet a state — in Palestine. The Zionists accepted partition in 1948. The Arabs, outsmarting and overestimating themselves, resorted to war and live with the results today.
Caleb, for the time it was written the Torah is indeed scientific, eg about the best way to slaughter animals and the animals that should be avoided. I think it shows an exceptional understanding of what we would today call genetic interests, group selection and many other things.
You can thank your lucky stars that Christians do not act in accordance with the merciless precepts of the Torah.
Caleb, Jaffa Oranges: They’re Not From Israel Anymore.
Betting on farms: As food prices rise, tillable land becomes hot commodity guess who for ?
Caleb, my boy, it was the yarmulke. So I asked the guide, “¿Quién es este judío?” (Who is this jew)
He replied, “El propietario de la tienda.” (the owner of the store)
Commiserating with him, I replied, “Que mal.” (too bad)
He agreed, “verdad.” (true)
I understand you positing this has “doubtful authenticity” (yes, I did have to look that one up), but it was a delightful moment for me, confirming my cherished, long held prejudices – and quite true, sonny.
To prove I am not hateful, you may have the last word on this comment.
(mobility) Scooter, stories about authentic, local handicrafts reading “Made in Hong Kong” or “Made in Japan” when you turn them over have been around ever since the latter was a sign of cheap, shoddy manufacture. You are old enough to remember those days, I am sure.
Just for grins, where in Mexico was this “tienda”?
I am well aware that Israel is no longer primarily an agricultural country. Even Florida orange growers can’t compete with Mexico and Central America. But in the years just after the State was proclaimed — and preserved on the battlefield — the Jaffa Orange became the most recognizable brand in the Old World.
Seems like everyone wants to invest in farmland these days.
Someday, lots of religions have dietary laws — like the vegetarian Buddhists and Hindus. Eating and mating are the two activities by which groups have segregated themselves since the stone age. ["We eat and mate like human beings. Those others from across they valley, they eat and mate like **animals**." (And they're out after our women, too.)]
It’s pretty evident that the Old Testament was written, or anyway completed, during the Babylonian exile when Judaism became a religion “not at home”. Against strong pressures to assimilate it seems natural that the priests would emphasize separateness.
How about the code of the Greek king Draco? So many offenses carried the death penalty the word “draconian” became a byword for severity.
Caleb, the Torah on agricultural development:-
“See, today I appoint you over nations and kingdoms to uproot and tear down, to destroy and overthrow, to build and to plant.”
Jaffa brand oranges are a symbol of Israelis as primary producers (a lot of the early Zionists were influenced by Marxist thought). But Israelis are Jews, they don’t want to be burnt in the fields like a Palestinian. They’d rather be middle men, licensing the brand. Just like the way their US brethren are speculating on farmland in the US rather than working it .
Someday, what gives you the impression that Jews in particular are speculating on farmland? I see no evidence of it. Of course, some grade school dropouts see Polish or German names and conclude, quite mistakenly, that they are Jewish…
A century of Jewish labor built the Jaffa orange brand and the Jaffa orange when in season still is exported from and grown in Israel. But just as iconic is the Uzi submachine gun with its instantly recognizable silhouette.
If Marxism as practiced in Russia were as productive and non-coercive as it was on the **Kibbutz** the Soviet Union would still exist today and be the Workers’ Paradise it claimed to be.
If I see grade school dropouts with Polish or German names I conclude that they are not Jewish. Jews in particular are leading speculating on farmland Where Soros goes lot of non-Jews follow .
The **Kibbutz** was not productive in the things that matter; marriage rates among communally raised children were extremely low. Of course being lefties they probably agreed with Freud that members of the same family naturally lust for one another . So they did not see a problem. Unfortunately for them Marxism and Freudianism are nonsense and their communally raised children grew up miserable. Westermarck effect
Well, look who’s concerned for the happiness of Jewish children! Dumbday, I’m all choked up.
The eventually abandoned experiment of raising of children in a separate “children’s house” was neither Marxist nor Freudian. It was rather stupid, though to think the bonds of maternal love could be suspended. The mothers kept sneaking over to be with their children and since this was the **Yishuv** not Red China no one was going to punish them for it.
Ironically, the institution of the overprotective Jewish mother is now seen as a desirable “investment in human capital” which the Kibbutz should not have tried to interfere with.
Caleb goes on about his anthro class and the danger of research pointing to the superiority of one group over another, and yet it is implicit in his praise of Israeli irrigation, that he is participating in Jewish Supremacism. This is the way Jews operate, they try to belittle their competitors, Whites in this case, and praise their own race.
Furthermore, you cannot compare Palestinian population densities and agricultural output from the 19th century to today…you moron. Of course there are more people and more produce coming out of land occupied by the Israelis in the 21st Century. It doesn’t hurt that over a hundred billion in U.S. taxpayer dollars have been funneled into that pariah state.
Just ban this doofus. He’ll scream about freedom of speech, but I lost count of how many times my legitimate criticisms have been banned from the New York Times and other major media outlets. Freedom of speech only applies to those criticizing White interests, when it’s the other way around, those “fringe” voices are shut out of the discourse.
O John, poor John! Everyone’s out to get you, to silence you, right?
The striking productivity of the **Kibbutz** system dates from before any substantial foreign aid from the US was forthcoming — WAY before. Sure, a few John Deere tractors, lovingly maintained, with the handshake symbol on them but no cash grants all through the Eisenhower and Kennedy years. Was Foster Dulles, that right-wing tool of the oil companies, going to support the Jewish State?
When the World War I Doughboys were tested for intelligence there was no political correctness. The rankings of different white ethnic groups were published for all to read. East European Jews scored quite low on the IQ scale, refuting the “myth”, it was said, “that the Jew is highly intelligent”.
Now, either Jews have gotten a lot smarter in under a hundred years or those tests weren’t very reliable.
Caleb, you said:
Now, either Jews have gotten a lot smarter in under a hundred years or those tests weren’t very reliable.
What’s the real problem here? Those were the very early days of IQ testing, and like any serious science it improved dramatically as it developed. All those issues have been addressed decades ago.
Wait, so all of those times I’ve been censored on various websites, that didn’t happen? Hardly anyone is out to get me, but your hook-nosed brethren are certainly insistent about trying to limit any dissenting opinions.
For example, many of my comments have been removed from the Times website. But I’m delusional, there are no Jews at the Times who might have an agenda against Whites. I mean, NY Times is owned by a Jewish family, and virtually every Op-Ed writer on the regular rotation is Jewish: Friedman, Cohen, Brooks (formerly Safire), Frank, Krugman, Kristof. There is only one White European male, Nocera. But wait, the Times is all about diversity. They want as many voices as possible! But then again, one of the largest groups in America barely has a voice on the powerful Times editorial page? Yes, that’s because that group happens to be White males. One of the smallest groups in America is absolutely loaded to the gills on the NY Times editorial board? Wonder why that is.
I’m not sure what your yapping on is all about. You are trying to say Jews are not intelligent based on some (probably questionable) World War I IQ tests, and yet you keep railing on about how great Israeli agriculture is? Are you basically saying that Jews are superior to Palestinians? I’m pretty sure that’s what you’re saying.
Israel usually reveals the true nature of the Jewish mind. You would think the Jew thinks one thing, but then when you hear their opinion on Israel you realize that they actually have the exact opposite opinion. In fact, the only real consistent opinion of a Jew behind all their obfuscating is their relentless pursuit of what is good for the Jew, even if that means their two viewpoints (one on Israel and one on America) have absolutely nothing in common with each other. In the end, Jews such as yourself are complete phonies, supporting multiculturalism in the U.S. and bemoaning White supremacism, while in Israel, most of your Tribe would like nothing more than to get rid of all the Palestinians while promoting how superior you are to them. Do you not see the contradictions in this thought process? Of course you do, but you’d never admit it. But even a cursory glance at your comments reveals that you’re solely interested in maximizing your power as a Jew, and it’s quite transparent.
John, what is this great love you profess for the Palestinian Arabs [Israeli Jews are Palestinians, too]? What is it about them that you find so admirable?
Maybe the **Times** just doesn’t think expressions of racism and hate “add to the discussion”.
You must be one of the dumber Jews Caleb. When did I ever say I care about Palestinian Arabs? They are just useful in revealing the double-standard Jews apply. This website provides plenty of evidence of that. You’re simply here attacking posters because you do not like when Whites get organized, you view it as a threat to Jews and their own organizing against White interests. It isn’t too hard to pick apart the Jewish mind, just realize that no matter what argument IT tries to make, it is purely for ITS benefit. You don’t like White Supremacism or White Separatism, because those are two concepts dangerous to Jews. However, you probably fully support the apartheid that Israelis partake in, which is very much of a form of racial supremacy and separatism.
You say:
“Jason, it can be hard to separate science from mumbo-jumbo, but here’s one little trick from my college anthro professor: beware of any “research” that proves the researcher’s own ethnic group is superior and should rule over all others.”
You talking about the superiority of Israeli agriculture certainly fits the bill. Israelis are doing an age old White trick, simply pointing to the superiority of what you believe your group has in order to justify your occupation of a land or enslavement of a people. It was called White man’s burden. Whites have been guilted out of such behavior, but Jews continue to try and play the Lover of All Races Card while participating in one of the most recent and glaring cases of colonization in the modern world. I could care less if you’re more efficient at growing turnips, just keep your hook nose out of White interests, stop bilking tax payers the world over, stop dragging the U.S. into wars for Jewish interests, and stop trying to destroy White interests in White countries the world over.
In your eyes, hate speech is bad, unless it’s directed at Arabs, who Jews consider their enemy. If you really think that your moaning and groaning on these boards is going to change anyone’s opinion in the face of an avalanche of facts regarding the harm Jewish interests have had on White interests, you’re sorely mistaken.
The bottom quintiles of households haven’t the discretionary income to compete with the top quintiles in purchasing influence among politicians or the media. This is a mathematical fact. What we’re seeing in this thread is an ideological-based refusal to accept reality on par with townhall.com, Rush Limbaugh, or Amren.com. That is unfortunate.
I don’t accept that Anon. $1/month from 1% of the adult US White population amounts to about $18 million per year. Fund raising is an issue for us however.
Bear
The Republican Party can not be transformed because the Repubican Party is owned by Corporations. It is magical thinking to thinl that the Republican Party can ever be transformed.
Forget about a new party. Thid is all wonkish beltway thinking. A new party could never reverse race-replacement. It one minute before midnight for White Americans. At the national level we can not vote against it.
The only thing that can reverse race-replacement at this point in time is sponataneous combustion. Tbe gasoline has already been poured into the basement….we are only few matches away from ignition.
People who play the wonkish DC Beltway party game such as Brimelow, Sailer numbersusa.com are so incredibly naive. There has to be some very deep thinking about politcs and real authentic democacy. Heirarchical potical structures must be eliminated…ultimately. In the meantime, political structures hace to be created that allow a highly vigilent White population to decide their own fate independent of Corporate interests and post-1965 nonwhite interests.
Sailer and Brimelow are ultimately clueless. The rot is so very deep. The framework in which they think is no longer viable…considering what is at stake.
Just look at what has happened to the BNP. Nick Griffin became the party, and the BNP develped undemocratic tendencies within the party…and now the BNP is a joke.
At the most fundamental level it comes down to this:a recognition that Corporate Power is the funfamental great evil in America that is the force of race-replacement. White American racial suriva requires stipping Corporations of all legal standing. Sailer and Brimelow think in terms of a poltical framework that is oblivious to this. And quite possibly they have this massive blind spot because they are hostile to the idea of a highly racialized White peasant revolt against Corporate ownership of the poltical system, the economy,the legal system… and America as a whole.
Since the BNP now has to allow members of any race it needs structures to avoid being “White anted”.
Anyone who still advocates working within the political system is either the enemy or totally useless to us, for their hopeless naivete’.
John Normon Howard, I agree at this point. Right now we have a great opportunity to wake US citizens up to the jew 5th column. If half the people realized who is responsible for the state of the USA we could take back the country through the current system. The current two parties are not set in stone and have been replaced many times in this countries history. It will happen again soon, probably to both parties.
Now is the time to speak out loudly in public to strangers who have to listen. Think of how often you are trapped in a line or waiting room with strangers. I use these opportunities to outline the jew syndicates responsibility for our current political/social/economic nightmare.
I have never had a bad confrontion after telling my tale and have made several converts. Now is the time to speak because things are so bad on all fronts that striking up a conversation that leads perfectly into the truth is super easy.
Again, these are obvious disruptive posts. “Scott” says:
Now is the time to speak out loudly in public to strangers who have to listen. Think of how often you are trapped in a line or waiting room with strangers. I use these opportunities to outline the jew syndicates responsibility for our current political/social/economic nightmare.
It’s satire, I get it. He’s having fun, encouraging us to act like idiotic Lyndon LaRouche supporters in public. But it is a good lesson for those few that think acting like thugs in public is the way to win over support.
The folks working within the system lead a lot of people on their first steps to awakening, that ends with ways of changing the system both from within and without.
Jewish activists have implicitly learned to opperate on both sides of the debate eg the Democrats and the White anted Neocon republicans. On certain key issues they implicitly agree. On non-issues they put on a performance. We must learn this as well. I keep saying; keep the arguments directed at the enemy and the real turncoats at all times. So long as someone isn’t attacking us here at TOO he’s a friend or potential friend or someone that hasn’t come out yet.
Talk, you say?
What has WN accomplished by talk, besides the steady decline of White America over the past three generations?
Is there anyone with half a brain who DOESN’T know our government and media are dominated by Jews and their lackeys?
How many more heinous instances of Negro crime have to occur before YT stops buying NBA jerseys?
As long as there are 150 channels on the dish and a McD’s on every corner operating until 1:00am, the average White American couldn’t care less about how much of his money the ZOG system robs from him, or how many of his daughters are raped by simians in somewhat human garb.
Someone once said, it’s an awkward time these days, because it’s too late to change anything, but too early to start shooting.
That said, do you prepare for the past, or for the future?
Too bad that “explicit Christians” are pseudo-Jews.
Oh, you mean places where Jews live?
Bear
Those of us in the Native Born White American Patriot Movement need to unerstand what the limitations of working through the Republican Party are. Now on a local level, things can be done…up to a point. We see this happenng in Alabama. And what is happeninig in Alabam- without a doubt- will lead to massive racial polarization which is just what we want. However , Republican Nationional leadership would never tolerate this.
But at some point in time, there have to be reasons given why there are laws against illegal entry into America. And if the reasons are completetly in terms of a economic-cost benefit analysis…the race replacement enthusiasts win the “debate” and larger battle…and this is exactly what has been happening for the past 20 years. Illegal immigration must be opposed for explicitly racial reasons….after all, the race-replacement enthusiasts oppose laws against illegal immigration for explicitly racial reasons…they are very open about this. This will be the litmus test for the Republican Party at the local level.
So I will state my basic point again:what would be so terrible if the Republican Party expired? Absolutely nothing. Ultimately, it is all about White American vigilence against race-replacement. The Republican Party is not crucial for the revolt against replacement. At the present time, the Republican Party is a friend of race-replacement.
The poltical framework that Sailer and Brimeow work in is one where massively powerfull and deeply entrenched corporate interests remain in place in the Republican Party. To think for a second, that race-replacement can be reversed through the Republican Party is magical thinking. Reversing race-replaement will require deep anarchist thinking about political structures. The Rich and Powerfull should never be trusted, and they should have o influence over the poltical process. It is a epic battle between the greedy cheating few against the many. Race-replacement is driven by class warfare.
People working within the system will not racially radicalize millions of White Americans. Economic,ecological and foreign policy siesmic events are the only things that will racially radicalize millons of White Americans…the racial radicalization of the White popilation is the only thing that can reverse race-replacement. Anyone who thinks otherwise is engaging in magical thinking.
Interestingly enough, immigracion de Mexico seems to have dramatically slowed down due to a slow US economy, greater worksite enforcement, and high costs of getting here. As Mexico’s economy improves, not only are more staying home, some believe Mexican’s may return, leaving us with a negative net illegal migration! Can you imagine everyone in your neighborhood actually mowing their own lawn, and cleaning their own house?
Small price to pay for a whiter country.
Yeah, Scooter. Raising their own children, too!
Well – Jews have once top the list of contributions to Ben-Obama. The Republican ‘House-Black’, Rabbi Cain told Jewish Lobby on Monday that he can serve Israel better than Ben-Obama – by bombing Iran without UN blessing.
I can see Abraham Foxman jumping on his …… you know what!!
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/07/16/israel-irans-missiles-pose-great-threat-to-us/
The entire system is bought by and works for jews, this shouldn’t be a suprise to anyone here?
Caleb says,
Jason, it can be hard to separate science from mumbo-jumbo, but here’s one little trick from my college anthro professor: beware of any “research” that proves the researcher’s own ethnic group is superior and should rule over all others.
Here is another trick to sniff out bad thinking: Any research or theory that supposedly shows there are absolutely no differences among any human population. That would violate everything we know from evolution, history and experience. James Watson himself talked about the poor outcomes Africa faces due to intellectual deficiencies (before politically correct zealots like you made him “apologize”).
Steven Gould was the biggest exponent of the view you hold and he was a total fraud.
Not only was Gould a Fraud, so was Boas and the possibly still living Marxist Psychologist Leon Kamin.
Leon Kamin attacked Sir Cyrill Burt’s findings that intelligence was heritable (after Burts death of course). If you google Kamins or Burts name you will hit on many politically correct web sites which claim that Kamin proved that Burt had fabricated his data. Yet Burt was exonerated and succesfully defended, though it seems someone destroyed some of Burts data. You won’t find the exoneration on the hundreds of ‘confirmation biased’ ethno-marxist web sites out there.
http://www.heretical.com/miscella/burt-jpr.html
Truth and facts don’t count unless they fit the agenda and in the 1960s the Jewish radicals were pushing the spiel that the Black White gaps were caused by White discrimination.
It should be noted that Burt was somewhat of a ‘liberal’ only looking for ways that intelligent young men and women could be identified in disadvantaged areas and given a level of education they could absorb.
Yes, Jason, it seems Steven Jay Gould was all wrong about the Morton skulls, as reported by the (Jewish owned) New York Times. Some are willing to afford him the benefit of the doubt and say he was “mistaken”. The Ku Kluxers and Jew haters obviously are not.
Marxist or Nazi, I don’t approve of politically informed science, either. There are those today who are so eager to abolish all racial differences that they stretch the meaning of “intelligence” to include ability to play basketball! That’s wrong.
But whatever the late Dr. Gould did, he never claimed that scientific research confirmed Jews to be a master race and that is the difference between him and you-know-who.
Caleb,
I hardly think most people who suspect Gould of malfeasance are members of the KKK – now you are just being silly. One prominent person who doesn’t think Gould was guilty of mere “unconscious manipulation” is John Haws, an Associate Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (that hub of KKKers and Jew-haters!)
Look, the ideas put forward by Gould are just wrong, some glaringly wrong, and it’s hard to believe they were “mistakes”. The guy was politically motivated as anyone on the scene. I think it behooves people like you to concede the obvious. Here is John Hawks take on Gould:
http://johnhawks.net/weblog/topics/meta/gould-morton-lewis-2011.html
Well, Gould may have fudged the figures as John Hawk alleges.
But he’s advanced some pretty far-out theories himself. He shows them right at the top of his blog in the form of the red-haired neanderthal with the oddly modern-man features.
Being somewhat red-haired myself, apparently I’M a neanderthal!
@ Caleb: “all the hate sites say the same thing”
Another common Jewish tactic: describing documentation of organized Jewish conspiracy and subversion to be “hate.” Jewry is also behind the anti-free speech “hate speech” push all over the West, which is yet another Jewish tactic right out of the Jewish Bolshevik play book.
People with nothing to hide have no problem with free speech, which is why Jewry seeks to shut it down wherever it goes, using authoritarian government as its mechanism.
Caleb, I fear you’ve been brainwashed by your cult, but maybe you already know that, as so many Jews do, and simply decide to join the racket.
That’s why its called “free will,” and why every Jew who chooses to continue with the racket is ultimately accountable, either in this plane of existence or the next.
But it’s still possible to renounce.
Caleb the Zionist Israeli accusing White people of “hate!” That’s what they call “chutzpah.” Doesn’t he know that Zionism = Racism? His violent, hateful rhetoric should be repudiated and denounced by all so-called “moderate Jews.”
Here is something interesting about the activities of the Israelis.
Published 23:27 19.07.11 Latest update 23:27 19.07.11 Report: Israeli killed in New Zealand earthquake was Mossad agent
Local media reports Ofer Mizrahi, killed in the Christchurch earthquake in February, was part of a team trying to infiltrate sensitive computer systems.
By Sefi Krupsky
New Zealand security officials suspect Israeli Mossad agents were trying to obtain sensitive information from the state’s databases, reported the local Southland Times newspaper on Tuesday. Authorities suspect that one of the agents was Ofer Mizrahi, one of three Israelis killed in the earthquake in the city of Christchurch last February.
Authorities have launched an investigation into what a senior security official called “suspicious activities of several groups of Israelis during and immediately after the earthquake.”
Ofer Mizrahi, one of the three Israelis killed in the earthquake.
Photo by: Reproduction
There was extensive local media coverage of the search teams that were sent from Israel after the earthquake. The two private search parties were sent without prior coordination with officials in Jerusalem, and were met with difficulties after the local authorities prevented them from searching in the area.
The report claims Israel’s reaction to the casualties and missing Israeli citizens was unprecedented. For example, Prime Minister John Key, who is Jewish, spoke with his counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu four times the day of the earthquake. The report also claims that Israeli ambassador Shemi Tzur , who is posted in the capital Wellington, immediately ordered plane tickets to Christchurch. Furthermore, Home Front Defense Minister Matan Vilnai also left immediately for the disaster-struck city.
The three Israelis who survived the car crash that killed Mizrai fled the scene and left him behind, the report continues, saying Mizrahi had five passports. New Zealand security services suspected he was a Mossad agent after the Israeli search party took interest in his many passports and after his three friends’ quick departure back to Israel. Security services also took note that a Facebook page set up in remembrance of Mizrahi has only five “likes.”
Shemi Tzur, the Israeli ambassador in Wellington, denied the allegations and dismissed them as “science fiction.”
In the preposterous, Jewish tale by Caleb that informs us that Revilo Oliver was certified insane, what was the name of the Jewish psychiatrist who signed the alleged document?
His name was Earl Warren, Al. [Changed from Wolfowicz?]
In 2002, American author Greg Palast published his book, titled “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy”. The book is a compilation of his investigating reports. The book exposes various powerful foreign, religious and industrial lobby groups which runs the government in United States through investing in the political parties by funding candidated for the White house, Senate and Congress. The book proves beyond any doubt that the US administration is not elected by the public but the interested lobbying groups. However, Washington, like many other myths – has kept its ‘world champion of democratic system’ myth through mass propaganda. Tragically, in most of the cases the “free elections” helped the anti-USrael got elected, i.e. in Occupied Palestinian Territoties, Lebanon and Iraq.
Any political aware person will tell you that the US or any of other major western nations – are not ‘democracies’ but run by industrial and econonic fuedal lords.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/it-is-not-a-democracy-stupid/
What feudal lord or corporation owns Barack Hussein Obama? His campaign was funded by small donations powered by the internet.
The struggle to get money out of politics goes on, led by such groups as the Jewish-dominated Common Cause.
Would it be better to have a Qaddafi or al Assad in power in the USA? How about a Grand Ayatollah in the White House? That would be funny at first. Then the nightmare would begin, like on the streets of Teheran last year.
Jews contribute over 60% of the funding for the Democratic National Party.
You’re a lying Hebe.
@ Caleb,july 22,2011-9:45 am.
{“…Obama’s campaign was funded by small donations powered by the internet…”}
Typical big Jewish lie.Obama was funded by Big Money such as Goldman & Sachs. I don’t think “Goldman” is an Irish name. His campaign was managed by Jewish David Axelrod and dual citizen Rahm Emanuel, son of an Israeli terrorist. Both became wire pullers of president-puppet Obama.
{“…Would it be better to have a Qaddafi or al Assad in power in the USA?…”}
Qadhafi (right spelling of his name) not as president, but as Chairman of the Commission for the Final Solution of the Jewish Problem, yes.
{“…The struggle to get money out of politics goes on,led by such groups as the Jewish-dominated Common Cause…”}
Should that reassure us? For an “awakened” Goy such as me that smells immediately of the age-old Jewish trick of “controled opposition”. Just as there exists a Jewish “pro-gun” lobby, same old trick.
You now have told a couple of typical Jewish lies, and you simply cannot imagine that there exist Goyim who are smart enough to see through them. That too is typically Jewish. But go on, you are a good illustration of how the Jewish mind works. As such you have a useful function, just as Rehmat is a good illustration of how the Moslim mind works. Shalom/salaam to both of you.
Psst…Franklinstein, check this out (from Wikipedia)…
On October 19, 2008, Obama’s campaign announced a record fundraising total of $150 million for September 2008. This exceeded the campaign’s single-month record ($66 million) for August 2008.[51]
The campaign raised much of its cash in small donations over the internet, with about half of its intake coming in increments of less than $200.[52]
Since Muammar Kadaffi may be looking for a new job soon, maybe he could be your State’s Commissioner of Mental Health. Then, following one of his three hour rants, the ex-Colonel could sign the papers so you don’t have to take those pills any more and could leave the group home on weekends and alternate Wednesdays.