“The Help”: Courageous, Color-Blind Strivers Overcome Racist Nitwits

Penelope Thornton


“Looking after White babies, that’s what I do,”  answers Abileen, the long-suffering Black heroine of  The Help when asked by Skeeter, the courageous budding journalist from the right side of the tracks, how it feels to raise someone else’s children while leaving your own at home.  And we’re off to another two hours treat from Hollywood on one of its two favorite themes, the suffering of Black folks.  You know the other one.

Viola Davis, who plays Abileen, says in an interview that she had a chance to act in a movie ‘depicting a part of our history we have a tendency to be silent about.’  Say what?  Did she say we have a tendency to be silent about the South and Blacks?  Does she live in the United States?  Am I deaf?  Is she deaf?

White boys, move over, because when it comes to vicious racism, pettiness, cruelty, and all over mean-spiritedness, you ain’t got nothin’ on your women.   And this is theme of The Help. When it comes to obsessing on the evils of racism in the South, no effort is ever spared in Hollywood and certainly not in this joint effort of Blacks, Jews and self-loathing liberals.

The Junior League set depicted in this movie about Black maids in Mississippi in the early 60s are uniformly despicable.  They are shallow, vain, lazy, as well as largely dim-witted and completely petty. Their brittle little personalities are acted out with malicious delight.     They play bridge and order the Blacks around.  And that’s all they do.

Thank God we have Hollywood to teach us the evils of racial stereotyping.

Advertisement

They squeal with delight over knowing jokes at the expense of the poor little poor girl who happened to have married one of “their men.” The character of Celia Foote is so over-acted it’s almost painful to watch.  She is pathetic in her over-the-top efforts to gain either the love of her husband or be invited to bridge.  Her maid Minny is wise, warm, and wonderful; in other words, she’s Black.  And, of course, it takes Minny the Wise to point out to her that it is because she is “poor White trash” that she is routinely rejected by the Junior League, evidently something Celia can’t figure out on her own.  But then you know, them little White gals ain’t so smart.   And it also takes Minnie to feed her so she’ll stop miscarrying one child after another.

And who is it that trots out an endless parade of oversexed and underfed baby starlets—the underlying reason for the anorexia of so many girls in our society? It’s the fashion industry, an outgrowth of the garment trade in New York, run by, which other poor oppressed minority is it?  Oh but Lord, am I being petty?

So how does it feel to toss your baby into the hands of the help?  It’s a question I need to ask my White liberal friends who work for the World Bank and hire Haitians to raise their children while pursuing a career seeking economic equality for the Third World, the politically correct choice over marriage.  Painful, no doubt.

And I do want to ask another liberal friend if she just isn’t a tad uncomfortable hiring an “Hispanic “ to clean her house.  I think we all understand that Hispanics are the “non-racist liberal’s” race of choice when it comes to cleaning the place up.  Wouldn’t it be better to hire a White woman in the interests of appearing non-racist?

Skeeter the Sincere is the only decent White person in the movie—except for Mom, who comes around at the end.  She sends her material—the stories told to her by the Black maids of Jackson, Mississippi to an editor in New York named Stein, no surprises there.  I do recall the story of a would-be liberal appointee to the Cabinet, a nice Jewish lady, who had to withdraw after it was discovered that she had hired illegal immigrants and not paid their Social Security. I’d love to hear the stories of Hispanic maids in Beverly Hills, Palm Beach, and the Hamptons. But that’s a movie that won’t be made.

Hilly the Horrible is the meanest of the mean.  She’s the one who proposes in her genteel little Southern voice, the Home Health Sanitation Initiative, which would require every home to have a separate bathroom for the help because they have “different diseases than we do.”  Oh those Southern Whites, ain’t they jus’ somethin’?

And thank God we have Hollywood to point that out.

Here’s another story that won’t get the Hollywood treatment. It’s the story of Khaled, who worked ten hours a day for the Israeli settlements in Gaza before the “disengagement.”        His meager income, a third of the minimum wage in Israel, had to support 20 people in his extended family, after his own home had been bulldozed by the Israelis.

“The settlers treat us like animals … We are watched all the time,” Khaled says, “and we are not allowed to speak.”  He has to ask permission to go to the restroom and eats lunch where he sits.  If he is ill he is not allowed to leave; the checkpoint only opens to allow workers in and out . . .

Khaled is hired on a daily basis so work is never guaranteed. “Sometimes the checkpoint is closed for weeks and then we receive no wages.”

As a matter of fact, I think Khaled would find singing and cracking jokes at the expense of his dim-witted employers kind of fun compared to what he’s used to.  And imagine what a luxury having his own toilet would be! Wouldn’t you just love to see the settlers eating Khaled’s shit? Like in this clip where a maid in The Help gets her employer to do just that–to the great amusement of another White woman in the scene (and presumably all those liberals in the audience).

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogClyp6614s

The reviews of The Help, even the critical ones, were favorable (with the notable exception of our own James Edwards’).  After all, no one would dare be negative about the central religion of multicultural America. Actually one critic spotted the central absurdity:

In the end everyone fits neatly into the film’s view of a world filled with racists and nitwits on one hand, and courageous, color-blind strivers on the other.

The rest of his review is tepid.  Not a good career move to get too far off the reservation.

How Hollywood loves to hate the South!  I can honestly say I’ve never seen a depiction of a Southerner ground out by the Hollywood movie machine that wasn’t blatantly insulting.  Vicious racists, slick womanizers, sanctimonious-out-of-touch reactionaries, moronic hillbillies, hypocritical preachers, greedy oil men—each one more repulsive than the last.

Where would we be without Hollywood’s unique gifts of insight into the failings of others?  Why frankly, I just can’t imagine.

The Help was brought to us by Dreamworks, founded by Hollywood super producer Steven Spielberg. I don’t doubt for a minute that Spielberg is at home Hoovering the Orientals and sprucing up the silver in his 20,000 foot mansion as I pen this.   I just know he wouldn’t stand for the exploitation of another human being, most particularly not another oppressed minority like himself.

Misrepresenting the past is one thing, but being completely oblivious of what goes on in front of you is another.  The New World Order, or whatever your pet name is for the emerging global economic regime derives its staggering wealth on, well, what else could you call it, but slavery.   Skeeter, who wants us to hear the perspective of Black domestics in the South might want to travel to China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Peru or some other Third World plantation and talk to The Help.  And if her funds are a little tight — and we all know money’s a little tight these days — she could just stay home and walk over to McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Kmart, etc. and talk to The Help.

And one last thing before I wrap this thing up, and that’s this.  One of the subplots is this;  it is at last revealed that Skeeter’s mother fired their beloved Constantine after 29 years of loyal service and never told Skeeter the truth.  And worse yet, when she sent Skeeter’s brother to fetch her back from Chicago, Constantine had already died, broken hearted and alone.

I have another story.  My mother was raised with a Black girl in the house.  They remained life-long friends.  Ginsie worked for my family through the next generation, when she worked for my uncle’s family.  And no, she wasn’t handed down in the Will.     She had her own free will and plenty of it.  She could have been a kindergarten school teacher but chose instead to work as a domestic.  In between stints with the Holders, she worked as the dining room manager at my grandmother’s women’s club.  She took pride in her work and enjoyed her life.

She and my mother were both funny women.  I remember listening to their voices after they’d have a double and laugh by the hour remembering the old days.   There was no rancor and no hatred, only genuine humor and affection.  But if your Bible is brought to you by Hollywood, you’ll never believe such a thing was possible.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

77 Comments to "“The Help”: Courageous, Color-Blind Strivers Overcome Racist Nitwits"

  1. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    February 26, 2012 - 11:38 pm | Permalink

    PUBLICITY FOR THIS PIECE OF S***
    Better to deconstruct it for White purposes …YES!!!!

  2. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 16, 2011 - 9:53 am | Permalink

    Mel Gibson should make a film about the Maccabean revolt from an hellenistic point of view : an enlightened hellenistic monarch Antiochus IV Epiphanes wants to bring a higher culture to a fanatic, narrowminded Semitic tribe whose religion is centred around the worship of a petty little demon-god called “Jahweh”.In order to civilize the barbarians he places a statue of Zeus in their temple,not only to teach them proper worship but also appreciation for Greek sculpture.The barbarian Ioudaioi however are unable to understand higher culture and revolt,ultimately reverting to their primitive ways where they have remained ever since.
    That would have been a major chance for Mel Gibson!

  3. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    September 15, 2011 - 1:28 am | Permalink

    Mel Gibson to Make Film about Maccabean Revolt.

    I was hoping he would reverse the usual situation; for once interpreting Judaic history through White eyes instead of a twisting of history to support the current Jewish agenda.

    It seems he’s signed up with Warner Brothers so I expect it will be uncontroversial.

  4. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    September 7, 2011 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Palestinians have not suffered any demographic decline or total loss of land, the Palestinian population has exploded and they have Jordan. It suits Arab counties to have teeming masses of Palestinians as hereditary ‘refugees’ in miserable camps.

    There is a place for criticism of those pro Israel Jews who are destroying white identity and promoting the interests of non whites in white countries (ie displacement of whites) while backing Israel’s Jewish identity to the hilt. But it should always be made clear that there is nothing wrong with Israelis or Diaspora Jews backing Israel’s right to remain a Jewish state, it’s the Jewish assault on white identity that is unacceptable. It is morally bankrupt for any Jew who supports Israel’s right to remain a Jewish state to cast aspersions on the motives of white nationalism.

  5. fender's Gravatar fender
    September 7, 2011 - 2:26 am | Permalink

    @John hearns:

    “Supporting Palestinian nationalism reveals jewish hypocrisy and weakens jewish power .”

    No it doesn’t. For one, diaspora Jews routinely pretend to agree with Palestinian nationalism as well, which means that Jews would not look hypocritical. Second, and more importantly, if we support Palestinian nationalism AND routinely criticize Jews then it just makes us look like rabid antisemites as opposed to people who simply like their own race.

    Again, the central idea behind WN is (or at least, should be) love, not hatred. Love of your own people. WN should not be defined by hatred of others. That is bound to fail. Jews may hate us but they still like themselves more. A philosophy based only on negativity and criticism is bound to fail.

  6. Julian Curtis Lee's Gravatar Julian Curtis Lee
    September 7, 2011 - 1:21 am | Permalink

    “To put it very simply …Supporting Palestinian nationalism reveals jewish hypocrisy and weakens jewish power. I think we all know about jewish power. Let’s just say jewish power is not good for the cause , to make an understatement extraordinaire.

    Exactly, yes.

    Also , although, IMO , the left tends to be very misguided or more like misled, the left is not all bad so that if there is common ground with WN then any common ground is
    helpful.

    And yes.

    Now, we all know that anybody can post here. And we all know that Jewish activists posts here for their purposes. The poster “Someday” is just one more anonymous web handle, and at this point I have to assume he is a Jew. Taking that as the assumption, it becomes very interesting to analyze his post. You can see a great deal of “game” in it.

    When I first scanned the post (10:13 am / “The Palestinian population has exploded…anti white leftists of the academic community”) I had several reactions:

    – The poster at least ostensibly regards anti-White attitudes as a negative.

    – The person avidly discourages pro-Whites of this TOO type (who come here) from being supportive of the Palestinians.

    – The post felt like it contained more strategy than sense.

    The more I read it and responded to it, the more I saw its game and strategy. If my assumption is correct, it provides a useful lesson about methods. Here is how I analyze the strategy of “Someday’s” post. While I do, I will use a term that seems crass, “Jew awareness.” It’s unavoidable that a conscious, unapologetic “Jew awareness” is what defines sites like The Occidental Observer.

    STRATEGY:

    1) Posit two different groups of Whites, the liberal Whites (including “anti-White” whites) or “them,” and the pro-Whites who post here.

    2) Draw the two type of Whites as at irreconcilably at odds with each other. The first group likes environmentalism (“tree huggers”!) and has humanitarian impulses towards other peoples. (And some anti-White programming.) The second group is the “good” pro-Whites like “us” here at TOO.

    3) Advocate a particular template for this TOO pro-White crowd in that has boundaries well set and defined. The impression was that of placing a “Tea Party” template over ourselves. (‘Oh, yes, we dislike those environmentally conscious and charitable type of Whites.’ Not.)

    4) Firm up a sense of distance between the two groups, with the objective that none of them find common ground in the form of Jew awareness.

    – Forestalling the avalanche that would follow the trashing of the taboo against criticizing the Jewish state, plus dynamics that would spread against the wider taboos, must also be among the motives for such posts.

    I think Jews see the possibility — and it is a likely one — of these two great factions of Whites coalescing. They dread seeing this in general, but more particularly any coalescing on a basis of shared Jew-awareness. That is Nightmare B and Nightmare A. Posts like the above are an administration to the Gentile mind to keep these two vast White camps separate.

    But it’s too late. I posts at TOO, and I was always an environmentalist. I post at TOO, and I was always a humanitarian. (I was sponsoring two children, one Indonesian and one African, by the time I was 17 with the Christian Children’s Fund.) Plus I’m Jew-aware and see the obscenity of Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. I’m just one guy. So it’s too damned late.

    One imagines the daily round of a poster like “Someday” at various sites. On a liberal/leftist site he says:

    “You don’t want to be criticizing Israel or crying about the Palestinians, now. You know, that’s what all those rightwing and racist type of Whites do at places like Occidental Obselver. Anti-semitic people criticize Israel and worry about the Palestinians. You don’t want to be associated with that. That stuff’s not for you. Your platform doesn’t go for things like criticizing Jews. Remember the holocaust.”

    Then the activist hops here and writes:

    “You don’t want to be criticizing Israel or crying about the Palestinians, now. That’s what all those tree-huggers and and multi-culturalist Whites do. You don’t want to be associated with that stuff. And you know they are even anti-White! (Like I care.) That stuff’s not for you. Your pro-White platform doesn’t go for things like environmentalism, ‘compassion’ for the downtrodden, etc. Don’t embarrass yourselves.”

    There are sometimes posts like the above at TOO that seem like nothing more than this. I pick that one as an exhibit.

    Their goal is to keep Jew awareness from freeing itself up in either side, plus to keep vast groups of Whites polarized in case the first does not work. Worst-case scenario, clearly, would be watching Jew-awareness develop on both sides and it actually becoming a unifying agent. It’s: “Keep the Jew awareness out of the Tea Party, plus out of The Huffington Post.” And for best safety, exacerbate their differences in case the germ spreads throughout both.” It was a noble effort. But Big job!

    Problem for them is: Environmental consciousness and compassion for peoples are pan-White qualities, and only falsely a “left/right” dichotomy. The more evolved forms of those will come to abide with pro-White. Because it’s really not natural or psychologically healthy to hate yourselves or for peoples to suicide themselves.

    I predict we’ll be seeing environmental and peoples-friendly Whites who also have racial self-respect and see the madness of rejecting their own ethnicity and giving away their nations. In fact, preservation of species has such resonance with White ethnic preservation that it’s blindingly obvious. So that’s what’s coming.

    I remember in the 1960s and 1970s how all the “progressive” hippie health food stores, serving the most enlightened and wholesome foods, were young White European men and women with long hair. They thought they were rebelling against their forefathers and mothers, but they were actually being just like them; following in their idealistic footsteps. It’s only a short jump for propagandized Whites to realize these things and think “White People are Cool, hating your own ancestors seems unnatural.”

    Whether an emerging pan-White consensus of both types will also be troublingly “Jew aware,” you people can just stew about that. But I’d try reining in your tribesmen and all the subtle, clever-couched hate and leaving the minds of our young people the hell alone — for good starters.

    Long live the beautiful White Europeans, who worry about trees, whales, and Palestinians, too. Long may we shine.

  7. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 6, 2011 - 10:50 pm | Permalink

    To put it very simply …

    Supporting Palestinian nationalism reveals jewish hypocrisy and weakens jewish power .

    I think we all know about jewish power . Let’s just say jewish power is not good for the cause , to make an understatement extraordinaire .

  8. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 6, 2011 - 10:27 pm | Permalink

    @Julian Curtis Lee:

    For one class, yes. But for the pro-White class, no. Pro-Palestinian views are their way of saying “Shut up about your so-called ‘holocaust,’ Jews. You are not the world’s authentic pre-eminent ‘victims!’

    Very accurate account of why WN’s would support Palestinian nationalism.

    I would add that it not just that Jews are not the victims their PR has made them out to be , it is that jews are the worlds greatest VICTIMIZERS ! Israeli aggression is a globally revealing illustration of this .

    Also , although , IMO , the left tends to be very misguided or more like mislead , the left is not all bad so that if there is common ground with WN then any common ground is
    helpful .

  9. Julian Curtis Lee's Gravatar Julian Curtis Lee
    September 6, 2011 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

    (Webmaster: Please delete duplicate.)
    _______________________

    “…‘genocide’ could (much more accurately) applied to what happened to Native Americans,…

    Native American tribes were experts at genociding each other long before we came. And we were more benign by comparison to the Indians’ brutal competing tribes, giving them land and merely demanding that they live there instead of where they were. When Native Americans genocided other native Americans, they did it up “right.” They left nobody living. Whole tribes were wiped out (extinct) before we even got here. Read David Yeagley’s quote about about the red man’s comparative brutality to the red man: http://goo.gl/u0ROM

    Pro-Palestinian views are part of the white culture of self hate.

    Hmm. I would observe that bringing up “Native Americans” and “genocide,” as you just did is part of the culture of self-hate. You even named the term “accurate.”

    …indeed I think that you will find that sympathy for the Palestinians goes along with sympathy for Native Americans and the native population in Tibet, Guatemala and the rain-forest.

    These are often found together because of the noble, humanitarian, compassionate nature of Whites long nurtured by their Christianity (that last not apprehended by many).

    But I think you are dissembling here. Many pro-Whites bring up the Palestinian issue for a very different reason: Because bringing up the Palestinians serves as a direct attack on the people (the Jews) who are attacking them.

    The Jews’ “persecution” meme and especially their “holocaust” (really, “genocide”) meme are linchpins of their perch from which they’ve long attacked White racialism and ethnic nationhood. Aware Whites know this. Thus they have a different motive in Palestine-pointing: To discredit Jews’ victim status, destroy the validity of the “no talk” rule they erected around themselves, and weaken the Jewish power gained by 6 decades of victim status and no-talk rules.

    I know I do. Hey, I never fussed about Tibetans or Guatemala. But I do spread the news about what Israel does to the Palestinians. Why? Because it serves to discredit their un-examinable status, plus reveals Jews’ own genocidal instincts as ink reveals the parts of a cell. I want every White person to register:

    “Next time you see something on TV attacking Whites relative to their past, or some race-mixing propaganda, realize Jews have fostered this sort of propaganda, using a “holocaust” as their rationale. Now, think of Israel and how the Jews treat the Palestinians, my White brothers and sisters. Think of Iraq. Think of 9-11 and who appears to have actually done that mass murder. Think of Libya right now. Take Iraq alone. Did we White Europeans ever kill so many Native Americans so brutally. Zionists created that war. Now look at all the anti-White propaganda on your television! Think of the people who control the media and foster this anti-White self-hate message based on past ‘wrongs.’ Now think of what Jews do to the Palestinians!”

    To summarize:

    Pro-Palestinian views are part of the white culture of self hate.

    For one class, yes. But for the pro-White class, no. Pro-Palestinian views are their way of saying “Shut up about your so-called ‘holocaust,’ Jews. You are not the world’s authentic pre-eminent ‘victims!’

    But I bet you actually knew all that.

    The Jews are holocausting the Palestinians, and the Jews are holocausting us. Here, this song says it all: They’re Holocausting Us (You can download the MP3 for free there. Spread it around.)

    And hey, what’s wrong with the White eco-instinct and caring about the rain forest? After all, White People Are Cool!

  10. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    September 6, 2011 - 10:13 am | Permalink

    @Julian Curtis Lee:
    The Palestinian population has exploded due to subsidies from UN institutions so ‘genocide’ could (much more accurately) applied to what happened to Native Americans, indeed I think that you will find that sympathy for the Palestinians goes along with sympathy for Native Americans and the native population in Tibet, Guatemala and the rain-forest. But not Europe because the natives there are white. Pro-Palestinian views are part of the white culture of self hate. The calls to boycott Israel come from people viscerally opposed to nationalism, from the rabid anti white leftists of the academic community. Academic boycotts of Israel

    Proposals for an academic boycott of Israel have been inspired by the historic academic boycotts of South Africa which were an attempt to pressure South Africa to end its policies of Apartheid.[1]

    Proposals for this boycott have been made by academics and organisations in the United Kingdom to boycott Israeli universities and academics.[2] The goal of proposed academic boycotts is to isolate Israel in order to force a change in Israel’s policies towards the Palestinians which opponents claim to be discriminatory or oppressive [...]Most recently, and in a contribution viewed as historically significant owing to comparisons between Apartheid South Africa and Israel, an academic petition supported by more than 250 academics was launched in South Africa in September 2010 with prominent supporters such as Professors Breyten Breytenbach, John Dugard, Antjie Krog, Mahmood Mamdani and Achille Mbembe.[9] Most recently, and in a contribution viewed as historically significant owing to comparisons between Apartheid South Africa and Israel, an academic petition asking the University of Johannesburg (UJ) to end its ties with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and supported by more than 250 academics was launched in South Africa in September 2010 with prominent supporters such as Professors Breyten Breytenbach, John Dugard, Antjie Krog, Mahmood Mamdani and Achille Mbembe.[9] In March, 2011, the Senate of the University made a “landmark decision” to end that connection. [10]

    Anti white churches:- Disinvestment from Israel.

    Do you see ? Self hating whites make up the opposition to Israel and they are doing a hell of a job of isolating it. But don’t think for one moment that those academics, doctors, student associations or religious bodies will lift a finger to help white people. It doesn’t matter if they are the original inhabitants of the country, as in Europe, or built the country into what it is today, as in the US. Whites are never deserving in the eyes of the holier-than-thou deluded leftists who campaign for nonwhites like the Palestinians.

    Does anyone think the Palestinians would altruistically help white Europeans, help themselves to naive white women more like:

    (Norman Finkelstein, who is hardly a friend of Israel, confirms in writing that this is in fact the case.) Having just spent several months perusing Mahatma Gandhi’s collected works, and deeply inspired by his commitment to living the life of the impoverished masses, I had resolved to rough it in Gaza. But this was easier said than done. Along with several other delegates I volunteered to stay at a Palestinian family’s home rather than a hotel. Dressed to the nines, hair gelled, and reeking of cologne, several Palestinian youths met our group to select their home-stays. They departed with first one young female member of our delegation, then another, then another. The only candidates left hanging at the end of the evening were middle-aged men. We checked into the hotel.

  11. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 5, 2011 - 11:55 pm | Permalink

    @Julian Curtis Lee:
    Truly, the off-the-charts violence against Whites (minimized in media, but real) can be laid at the feet of Hollywood and the rest. That includes the off-the-charts rapes of White women by Blacks.

    You could go through 75 years of hollywood movies and show time after time after time how the story was ” evil mean whitey mistreats poor blackey ”
    The hollywood hate fest against whites has caused untold numbers of violent black on white crime . It is not even possible to make a case otherwise . It is not debatable !

  12. Julian Curtis Lee's Gravatar Julian Curtis Lee
    September 5, 2011 - 10:33 pm | Permalink

    “I think you could make a concrete case that hollywood has inflamed blacks to violence by demonizing whites as being evil and worthy of black revenge. I would call what hollywood has done when it comes to blacks: inciting a riot on a national level.

    Truly, the off-the-charts violence against Whites (minimized in media, but real) can be laid at the feet of Hollywood and the rest. That includes the off-the-charts rapes of White women by Blacks.

  13. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 5, 2011 - 9:25 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    In court cases you always have to point to concrete, weldefined facts.In the case of the negative influence of Hollywood you can only point at such vague things as the creation of a “cultural climate” that would have caused “moral decay”.

    I think you could make a concrete case that hollywood has inflamed blacks to violence by demonizing whites as being evil and worthy of black revenge. I would call what hollywood has done when it comes to blacks: inciting a riot on a national level.

    But, I think your idea is a good one too. And it is another avenue for the cause.

  14. Julian Curtis Lee's Gravatar Julian Curtis Lee
    September 5, 2011 - 9:15 pm | Permalink

    “Anyone who thinks that criticism by white nationalists is bad for the state of Israel is totally deluded about how white nationalism is perceived.

    Most Whites are not even familiar with the term “White nationalist.” So the evolution of its perception has not even started yet, much less reached a standstill.

    Hey, perceptions continually change. (You know that.) You think the present miasmic stage-managed perceptions of White Nationalist are unchanging law? (Or you just saying they should be, or hoping they are.)

    Israel wants to brand its liberal- left critics as anti Semites;

    Let me ask you something. Wouldn’t Kevin MacDonald and most who post here be labeled anti-semites by Jews? Anybody who even speaks of Jews as though they exist gets labeled that way, right? Is it really a meaningful term?

    …it wants nutzis to take up the cause of the Palestinians…

    First, this “nutzi” term. I don’t think I know what one is. Maybe you meant they want to brand them as Nazis but that’s going out of style. (This long-haired astrologer who loves yoga did his meme-busting duty when the local “antifa” postered my town with my face and a “Nazi” headline. I was happy to do my part to make the word absurd.) What, “Nazi” is losing it’s sting so they have make it “nutzis” now? (I supposed that’s useful new coinage because it alludes to the “nuttiness” of 9-11 investigators. Clever.)

    …to take up the cause of the Palestinians so that the Jimmy Carters of this world get branded as fellow travelers of the nutzis.

    – Does little old Jimmy Carter even have “Nazi” status now? I had not heard that. Or is he just a “nutzi” in Zeitgeist land? Anyway, you think either slur is proper for Jimmy Carter?

    – Is everybody who speaks up for the Palestinians labeled a Nazi/nutzi now? I hadn’t heard that one either.

    – Is the cause of the Palestinians not a just cause? White people tend to think: What should it matter how one is vilified if the cause is just.

    Hey, but thanks for informing us about all these pitfalls and dangerous possibilities, man! All us here would never risk getting called “anti-semites,” “nutzis,” or heaven forbid, getting associated with Jimmy Carter or anybody who speaks up for the genocided Palestinians! /;o)=

  15. Old Glory's Gravatar Old Glory
    September 5, 2011 - 7:29 pm | Permalink
  16. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 5, 2011 - 6:39 pm | Permalink

    @John hearns:
    In court cases you always have to point to concrete, weldefined facts.In the case of the negative influence of Hollywood you can only point at such vague things as the creation of a “cultural climate” that would have caused “moral decay”.That will bring you nowhere.A better idea would be to hold an annual conference on Jewish Privilege,pointing to the disproportionate numbers of Jews in key positions of the economy,politics,the media, education, medicine,the judiciary and entertainment.That is easily and concretely demonstrable.Not only Whites but also minorities would resent Jewish overrepresentation.You can do this all in the name of fairness,equality and the defense of the underdog,the major weapon of the Jews themselves. The Jews would not have a real defense against such an approach.If they would assert that it is not ethnic nepotism but their “higher intelligence” that brought them where they are,then that would “sin” against the equality principle which they themselves have promoted so much.It is the same leftish ideology that criticizes Israel and against which they have no real defense,that can also delegitimize their extraordinary power in the diaspora.

  17. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 5, 2011 - 2:49 pm | Permalink

    @Overagainst:
    As I have said before, Overagainst is “of the Tribe”.I have also said before that Overagainst is most probably a sock puppet of Someday.The task of Someday/Overagainst is to push WN in the direction of support for Israel. Therefore you see him/them arguing against support for the Palestinians.WN and Palestinians however have a common ennemy in the Jew who is an existential threat to both of us.It is absurd that we should support an ethnostate for the Jews while they are passionately denying one to us.

    And BTW Mr.Overagainst/Someday “nutzis” is not exactly a respectful term for National Socialists.Here your Jewish hatred shines through.

  18. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 5, 2011 - 2:11 pm | Permalink

    @Overagainst:

    Anyone who thinks that criticism by white nationalists is bad for the state of Israel is totally deluded about how white nationalism is perceived. Israel wants to brand its liberal- left critics as anti Semites; it wants nutzis to take up the cause of the Palestinians so that the Jimmy Carters of this world get branded as fellow travelers of the nutzis.

    So let me see if I have this right ….
    Do not criticize zion central because it might make lefty look bad because jews will portray it as ” nutzi” to do so .

    Whose side are you on ? and why do you want to let them divide and dictate ?

    Personally , I think that the Palestinian cause is a natural one for WN , we want the same thing , freedom from the dictates of zion in a nation free of the jewish claws .

  19. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 5, 2011 - 1:46 pm | Permalink

    @Curt:

    – I in turn, am wondering how far such a lawsuit would go in our country? Consider that every court in the land is influenced by Jews, staffed with Jewish lawyers and Judges. Not much chance there, methinks!

    I agree that it would not be a cake walk . But , just making the case and having the legal system exposed as being unjust would be worth the price of admission … big time .
    It would be most satisfying to see lawyers exposing hollywood’s long history of anti-white programming . Also to show the jewish supremacist aspect of this anti-white gentile agenda , and then to make a case that is translates in to high rates of black on white violent crime . It would be golden .

    I think it is a very worth while endeavor .

  20. Old Glory's Gravatar Old Glory
    September 5, 2011 - 1:13 pm | Permalink

    A little off topic…….Promoting multiculturalism from a business standpoint certainly benefits the jew (in the financial industry at least). Example – one of the large financial companies I had previously worked for commonly noted that 4 India employees’ (in their offshore location in India) salaries equalled one U.S. employee. So when companies such as Goldman Sachs or UBS set up shop in India, top management (mostly jews – banks, financial corps and investment banks) benefit most. With labor expenses on the rise, many large corporations are looking to offshore to Mexico and Africa (I believe some companies such as GE have already started this madness). So in conclusion, the jew has much to gain financially (as well as from an ideological and political standpoint) from pushing the globalism/multiculturalism agenda….

  21. Overagainst's Gravatar Overagainst
    September 5, 2011 - 12:56 pm | Permalink

    @Diana:

    Anyone who thinks that criticism by white nationalists is bad for the state of Israel is totally deluded about how white nationalism is perceived. Israel wants to brand its liberal- left critics as anti Semites; it wants nutzis to take up the cause of the Palestinians so that the Jimmy Carters of this world get branded as fellow travelers of the nutzis.

  22. Curt's Gravatar Curt
    September 5, 2011 - 11:44 am | Permalink

    @John hearns:
    “I’m wondering if it would be possible to sue hollywood for making such hate films .”
    – I in turn, am wondering how far such a lawsuit would go in our country? Consider that every court in the land is influenced by Jews, staffed with Jewish lawyers and Judges. Not much chance there, methinks!

  23. Curt's Gravatar Curt
    September 5, 2011 - 11:40 am | Permalink

    @Whiteawake:
    Whiteawake;
    In a way it does serve a purpose as some of us (myself, for sure) stopped going to movies or even watching TV long ago and would not be aware of this garbage otherwise. The Net has been my source of info and a little entertainment for 10 years now. Plus, it does give our outlook some “press” so to speak. Where else but here are you going to find anyone “telling it like it is” about a piece of cinematic offal like this?
    ” Jews thrive on stirring up controversy and raking in the profit from it. ”
    – Yes, they surely do, but it has the overall purpose of destablizing yet another (once great) civilization (the West) and another nation run by the hated Goyim. After all, it is all just part of “the Plan”:
    “(the)
    first stage in
    Europe was in 429 B.C. in Greece, where, about the time of Pericles, the Snake first
    started eating into the power of that country. The second stage was in Rome in the
    time of Augustus, about 69 B.C.. The third in Madrid in the time of Charles V, in A.D.
    1552. The fourth in Paris about 1790, in the time of Louis XVI. The fifth in London
    from 1814 onwards (after the downfall of Napoleon). The sixth in Berlin in 1871 after
    the Franco-Prussian war. The seventh in St. Petersburg, over which is drawn the head
    of the Snake under the date of 1881. This “Snake” is now being drawn through the
    Americas and in the United States of America, it is been partially identified as the
    “Counsel on Foreign Relations” (C.F.R.) and the “Tri-Lateral Commission”…
    Yes I know- it is from that “forgery” called “The Protocols”, but isn’t it odd how “insightful of the events of the future” (I don’t want to use the word “prophetic) that this approximately 127 year old document is? Now we hear that China is currently having discussions with the state government of Idaho and wants to buy 50 square MILES of land North of Boise to build a “city”. What do they have in store for us next?

  24. Julian Curtis Lee's Gravatar Julian Curtis Lee
    September 5, 2011 - 4:24 am | Permalink

    What the attitudes you described above is, I believe, much more normative for Jews than for Gentiles. It is my impression that Jews look down on Blacks much more so than the average White, even a southerner.

    Jews are bad enough in their attitude toward non-Jewish White. (Man, did I get an education on that being around the Jews of Santa Barbara and Ojai, California.) If Whites only knew — including the truth about themselves relative to others — it would make the reality-distortion of the present movie all the more offensive. The only time I like that Elton John song Burn Down the Mission is when I think the “mission” is this Jewish propaganda colonization of the White mind. Let’s burn it all down!

  25. john sumner's Gravatar john sumner
    September 5, 2011 - 1:50 am | Permalink

    I was acquainted with a very bright and sensitive woman who had quite a few decades on me. She told me that she had befriended a Jewish girl from the South while she, a Northerner, was at school. They had gotten close, and she visited her friend over a lengthy break.

    The Jewish girl’s family had a black maid who was sweet and hardworking, and who had been there for years. In spite of that, the girl’s family made it very clear to the maid that they did not trust her, and they treated her with rudeness and abrasiveness.

    The woman shared with me that that experience impacted her deeply. She was so disgusted by the family’s treatment of that decent and faithful black lady that she became a firm supporter of the civil rights movement for years.

    Thankfully, with age and wisdom, that support waned, and her mistrust of Jews increased.

  26. Julian Curtis Lee's Gravatar Julian Curtis Lee
    September 5, 2011 - 12:56 am | Permalink

    The “White Southern women” behave like wealthy Jewish women.

    True and good point. And yet it probably would have been hard to find many southern Gentile women who actually acted that way.

    “Jews always displace their bad bahavior, and what ought to be shame on to Whites.”

    Hah! Yes. These moves are actually Jews projecting themselves onto Whites! Perfect notification.

    “…I haven’t had a lot of direct experience with this as most of the Jewish people I have known were not the practicing type…there is an enclave neighborhood of Jews that prefer to keep themselves separated…many friends have seen the look of disdain presented if you happen to take the streets which run thru there on the way to downtown.

    I hate to be the one to break it you, but being Jewish is not about practicing a religion. The behaviors you describe, plus the behaviors of the “wealthy Jewish women” cited — are ethnic Jewish behavior. (The California Buddhist, Hindu, and Advaita Jews included.)

  27. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 4, 2011 - 7:34 pm | Permalink

    I don’t believe that there is any inconsistency between supporting the legitimate Palestinian cause and supporting your own people.

    There certainly is not an inconsistency . Palestinian nationalists and white nationalist share a common enemy !

    Nationalists all over the world share a common enemy ! That’s not news !

  28. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 4, 2011 - 7:30 pm | Permalink

    Some people have an obvious agenda that is very much at odds with this site . They should not be here .

    Supporting nationalism does not mean that a person should support Israeli nationalism as we know it today . Quite the opposite ….
    A nationalist would be inclined to support Palestinian nationalism since a Palestinian state would not act as a world headquarters/ home base for the people who are hypocritically spreading multi-cult on the rest of the world , not to mention being a rotten and blood thirsty nation of criminals of various types .

  29. Diana's Gravatar Diana
    September 4, 2011 - 6:14 pm | Permalink

    @Someday:
    I think that the story of Khaled points out the that Israelis treat Palestinians much worse today than the Southerners ever treated blacks in the Old South.
    It underscores the hypocricy, the incredible blindness.
    We don’t see the world via an objective lens but through a Jewish one
    I don’t believe that there is any inconsistency between supporting the legitimate Palestinian cause and supporting your own people.
    The point is that the media always make whites look like the bad guys!!!!

  30. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    September 4, 2011 - 4:11 pm | Permalink

    Saying that the plight of Khaled, working ten hours a day for the Israeli settlements in Gaza, is as bad or worse than that of black domestics in the old South makes the point that Israelis are as bad as the old South. It will do nothing to exculpate the South or white identity in the eyes of the average white.

    Most whites will take Khaled’s story as confirming that the concept of a Jewish state is as inconsistent with their values as the old South was, not that the racial politics of early 60′s Mississippi were justified.

    Ginsie was a product of a different era, blacks have changed and nobody wants to employ black domestics today, least of all Jews, that’s why the maids in Beverly Hills, Palm Beach, and the Hamptons are Hispanic. It’s a good point that modern US Jews who make anti white movies about the oppressed ‘help’ in the old South are very likely employers of non white domestic help much like the old Southerners were.

  31. Voir Dire's Gravatar Voir Dire
    September 4, 2011 - 2:47 pm | Permalink

    @Henry Baxley:

    “The prostitute Emma Stone “Skeeter” (black shit-eater two) will forever be remembered, if at all, not as the actress Emma Stone, but merely “shit-eater’”

    Excellent post, Henry!

    Poetic justice I suppose. The price of success in Hollywood is extracted in the form of treason to one’s own.

    “…movie makers were up to the same brainwashing,

    anti-gentile work then. a bit more subtle at times but

    still permeating most movies of the period.” – gdj

    Absolutely! I just watched “The Apartment” recently with Jack Lemon & Shirley MacLaine. Same theme. White males – all hearty-partiers, philanderers, & degenerates. After Shirley MacLaine attempts suicide in Lemon’s “den of iniquity” apartment, the good Jewish doctor and his wife next door come to the rescue and save her and his noble wifey nurses her back to health wilst lecturing Lemon about his degenerate proclivities. Jewish author Samuel Roth of “Jews Must Live” fame (or notoriety from the Jews’ standpoint) would have had a hard time swallowing the absence of any payments demanded for services rendered by the good doctor.

  32. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    September 4, 2011 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Glenn Beck and his relation with Jews is a far better example of how the racism works under the table.

    On his return from Israel as a PR stunt, Beck could not control himself and made the following ‘anti-Semitic’ statement:

    ”I love the Israelis, he said. “I love the Jewish people. But they drive me out of my mind when they talk over each other. They’re constantly talking!”

    Beck compared being around Jews in Israel to a family that had eight children. “Eating dinner at their house was like having dinner in Israel,” he said. “Everybody is just talking at the same time, you can’t even think!”

    The said statement seems to have touched some of Beck’s Jewish cheer-leaders’ nerves. For example, Joe Klein, in response, asked Glenn Beck in TIME magazine on Friday…..

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/08/30/glenn-beck-and-his-bigot-critic/

  33. Southlander's Gravatar Southlander
    September 4, 2011 - 1:01 pm | Permalink

    @Ciaran: Yes they absolutely do and projecting it onto screens across the nation will surely hammer the message in once more. We can only hope that the slow but obvious awakening of White Americans will continue to climb and will soon begin to see thru the holes of this sinister veil.
    I imagine you are right on the mannerisms of wealthy Jewish women, I haven’t had a lot of direct experience with this as most of the Jewish people I have known were not the practicing type, I would never have known they were Jewish had it not come out in simple conversation but in my small hometown city there is an enclave neighborhood of Jews that prefer to keep themselves separated except in business and local law. Myself as well as many friends have seen the look of disdain presented if you happen to take the streets which run thru there on the way to downtown.

  34. Mark's Gravatar Mark
    September 4, 2011 - 10:41 am | Permalink

    I can just hear some black malcontents saying, “What makes this privileged White bitch think she can write strong, black women?!

    More than a tale of White racism and black progress, the author’s own personal tale of racial and ethnic rootlessness, being domestically abandoned by her White mother and raised by a black maid, and then being educated by a hostile, anti-White and anti-Southern alien elite to hate her own is far more dramatic and tragic. She should write a book about that, but somehow I don’t think it would be as well received.

  35. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    September 4, 2011 - 10:29 am | Permalink

    @Southlander:
    “I don’t doubt for a second that in the era depicted here that there may have been some upperclass overprivileged housewives with the tendencies of racial hatred and banding together in small clubs to vocalize together on such things but I’m sure they were quite small and for the most part these women would hate each other just as well for competition reasons as far as my experience has been around such people.”

    Jews always displace their bad bahavior, and what ought to be shame on to Whites. The “White Southern women” behave like wealthy Jewish women.

  36. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    September 4, 2011 - 10:24 am | Permalink

    @Felix Grubel:

    Don’t whisper. Say “Jews”

  37. Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
    September 4, 2011 - 9:23 am | Permalink

    Change begins with a whisper…

    …just like whispering that we’re now ruled by a hostile “elite” intent on subordinating the nation and the rest of the world to their interests.

  38. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 4, 2011 - 6:07 am | Permalink

    @john sumner:

    Just after driving by and admiring a beautifully tended welcome sign surrounded by flowers, I noticed two fellows walking up the sidewalk. They were two black men, in their twenties.

    They looked like thugs. Both were wearing their pants halfway down their buttocks. They were also doing the “I don’t care, and I may just attack you for no good reason”
    mosey.

    So much for having pleasant thoughts driving through a lovely town.

    Anyway, I seriously doubt they will be taking themselves, their mothers or their “hoes” to see The Help. ,

    That’s true , they probably are not the popcorn , milk duds and pop at the friday night flick types . But this kind of anti-white hate film does trickle down to them and that makes them more apt to attack whitey for ” no good reason ”

    If justice were to be done , Jewish hollywood should have their a**es sued pennyless by a pro-white legal team .

  39. john sumner's Gravatar john sumner
    September 4, 2011 - 1:27 am | Permalink

    I took a trip recently that brought me through a very pretty and successful small town. The place is not wealthy. It is just a nicely functioning town, where the homes, streets, sidewalks, the park and the square are well-kept, and where the downtown is not just one failed and vacant store after another. Like most such places, it is almost entirely white.

    Just after driving by and admiring a beautifully tended welcome sign surrounded by flowers, I noticed two fellows walking up the sidewalk. They were two black men, in their twenties.

    They looked like thugs. Both were wearing their pants halfway down their buttocks. They were also doing the “I don’t care, and I may just attack you for no good reason”
    mosey.

    So much for having pleasant thoughts driving through a lovely town.

    Anyway, I seriously doubt they will be taking themselves, their mothers or their “hoes” to see The Help. That’s for us good white folk who should continue feeling ashamed for noticing that thug behavior and black behavior are, very often, the same thing– oh, and for noticing that Jews have ridiculously inordinate amounts of representation and power, and that what they do with this is not all that admirable.

  40. pnxaw's Gravatar pnxaw
    September 4, 2011 - 12:50 am | Permalink

    Today many white children in southern California are raised by the mestizo “help.” The parents spend “long, arduous hours” in the cubicle each day to afford a large home in the hills, drive ritzy automobiles, make payments on the RV and racing boat, take two- or three-week vacations to Cancun, etc. Knowing many of them as I do they are a narcissistic group. So the movie has a point in terms of today and yesterday. Not recommending the movie, mind you, but it isn’t difficult to find shallow, superficial white people among wealthy trust funders and upper middle-class.

  41. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 3, 2011 - 11:04 pm | Permalink

    “Change begins with a whisper”

    Yeah , so true …

    “Psst, have you checked out the internet site called occidental observer? It explains a lot!”

  42. Nordic's Gravatar Nordic
    September 3, 2011 - 8:45 pm | Permalink

    Mom had a Mammy in the house in the 30′s and 40′s, and they all loved her. Then she would sometimes driver her back to her ‘hood’ in Chicago. Mammy would have to tell the Bucks to ‘Git away from dat ca’ all the time. Mullatos were the worst in terms of attempted kidnappings etc. One time, they were getting off a bus at night, and a Black Buck tried to get off with them (middle of nowhere, 2 white teens, 1940′s) and the bus driver kept the doors closed and drove off with the black male pounding and screaming on the door. Not gonna find too many White Men willing to do that (common sense) nowadays. How de times have changed.

  43. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    September 3, 2011 - 7:44 pm | Permalink

    >>>Odd coincidence that Professor Kevin MacDonald teaches at the university from which Steven Spielberg is an alum<<< Also odd that Spielberg is one of my fraternity "brothers" (I hereby renounce brotherhood with Spielberg). And my link to the rest of Theta Chi is marginal. . .

  44. Southlander's Gravatar Southlander
    September 3, 2011 - 7:19 pm | Permalink

    I have not seen this film and most likely never will but as a middle-aged lifelong S.E. Georgia native I can honestly say I’ve never witnessed the kind of behavior as described of this film.
    I don’t doubt for a second that in the era depicted here that there may have been some upperclass overprivileged housewives with the tendencies of racial hatred and banding together in small clubs to vocalize together on such things but I’m sure they were quite small and for the most part these women would hate each other just as well for competition reasons as far as my experience has been around such people.
    For the most part I have seen the strife from school integration high school riots of the 70′s, the trying to get along of the 80′s (sort of), the black gang violence spurred by what I consider to be a terrorist form of music back then the almighty rap of the 90′s(there’s still an underground movement of this but thank God not like then), and now the tolerance between Blacks and Whites as we both watch the South turn into a Mexican refuge in the 2000′s.
    I’m going to have to say that although the South gets a bad rap for being the most racist section of America I have to strongly disagree. Look at the trend of flash mobs going on in the country, it’s not here, not even in Atlanta where you would expect something like that to happen and I don’t dispute that it probably eventually will, I’m just using this as a for instance that out of all of the news stories of “wildings” and other large disturbances across the country it’s way worse elsewhere than down South.
    I have traveled the country and seen firsthand racism at it’s worst in the Northern states as well as out West to be far more extensive than down South.
    We have our differences here but we have learned to get along through the years and like anywhere else we naturally segregate to our own preferences and identities, when there is news of Black/White, White/Black violence it’s usually a gathering of likeminded people where alcohol is served and directly contributes to the cause and of course there’s the criminals of both races that hamper any community around the nation.
    Yes there is racism here, there is everywhere different races and cultures collide but Hollywood and other MSM outlets would have the world think that Southern people carry a torch for it, that’s not true but the liberal left will continue to use this stereotype as long as it fits into their agenda.

    Anti-racist is code word for anti-White.

  45. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    September 3, 2011 - 5:31 pm | Permalink

    @Masculinity:
    I agree. Most actors are utter whores. They will do ANYTHING for fame and attention. Actual prostitutes have more honor. The females, agreeing to debase themselves, ans their Race, are beyond hope. Beyond “help”.

  46. gdj's Gravatar gdj
    September 3, 2011 - 1:08 pm | Permalink

    “The Help” is the latest Jew supremacist Hollywood

    bashing of whites and glorifying Negroes that has been

    going on for decades in our Jew-supremacist occupied

    country. My wife and I, tired of recent Hollywood’s

    trash bashing whites and spewing vulgarity, stopped

    going to cinemas and started watching old movies from

    the 1930s anbd 1940s. Surprise, surprise! The Jew

    movie makers were up to the same brainwashing,

    anti-gentile work then. a bit more subtle at times but

    still permeating most movies of the period. For example,

    “Mr. Skeffington” stars a Jewish actor, Claude Rains,

    portraying a saintly, hard-working Eastern European

    Jewish immigrant who has become rich by honest

    determined effort. Whites in the movie are portrayed

    as spoiled, rich degenerates who drink too much and

    have destroyed themselves. I have never met a Jew

    that resembled the character Mr. Skeffington (a

    misspelling attributed by the charcter to a stupid

    immigration clerk who couldn’t spell). These

    decades of propaganda and civil rights agitation have

    one goal to promote race warfare so Jews can rule

    among the chaos and anarchy following such

    civil unrest. What the Jews are doing is racist,

    demonic, and destructive of European civilization.

  47. De Maistre's Gravatar De Maistre
    September 3, 2011 - 11:41 am | Permalink

    Can’t we just have the Third World hordes now living i California to pillage Hollywood? It shouldn’t be entirely impossible. The privileged evil White racist oppressors live there, we can tell them in some suitable way.

  48. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 3, 2011 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    I’m wondering if it would be possible to sue hollywood for making such hate films .

    You can’t tell me that this kind of film will not result in many white women being assaulted by blacks out of revenge .

    It’s not just white women , of course , it is all whites who suffer black criminality because of the hatred of whites that the cesspool known as hollywood creates .

  49. No Zog's Gravatar No Zog
    September 3, 2011 - 9:47 am | Permalink

    Don’t forget folks , that there is all probability a EVIL ZIONIST producer , deliberately sowing the seeds of hate to drive Whites against Jews and blacks against white and so keep the flock well anchored to the Zionist State , whilist attacking their enemies–Us.
    The makers of these movies are diabolical and more attention should be focused on their lives and less on the movies themselves .

  50. September 3, 2011 - 8:58 am | Permalink

    @Vernoa-”Letting God’s chosen people take a dump on my soul.”

    LOL. That’s pretty accurate isn’t it. How ironic they have such a skill for the destruction of the soul, when the evidence suggests they do no posses one.

    @Penelope – This is the first post from you I am reading and it was delightful and interesting. This was the best review of The Help I have ever read.

    Did you go to Rotten Tomatoes? The reviews stand at a high 70%. I am surprised it’s not higher.

  51. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    September 3, 2011 - 8:57 am | Permalink

    @John hearns:
    Whites get in trouble for NOT hiring Blacks and when they do they get villified anyway. Servants never carry a grudge against their employers nor do they ever have to behave deferentially unless they are Blacks forced into working for Whites.

  52. William's Gravatar William
    September 3, 2011 - 8:47 am | Permalink

    What we loosely term “political correctness” worked by schisming White women from White men by stereotyping the women as victim group of White male oppresors along with gays, lesbians and ethnic minorities.

    This is a propganda stratagy known as cooption.

    This has been a succesfull strategy for the cultural marxists (essentially Jewish feminists) however race trumps gender in the world of PC.

    It is now the turn of White women to become the explict targets of anti-white hate (though they have long been held in cotempt (shicksa means unlean animal) and unknowing victims in the form of affirmitive action and sexual assault).

    Its worth pointing out that women when involved with nationalist parties help make them far more succesfull and accessible.

    I think this marks a knew phase of the attack in Whites.

  53. Henry's Gravatar Henry
    September 3, 2011 - 7:31 am | Permalink

    The Jewish women make up the starlets in Hollywood, and White girls make up the Whores in the porn valley. They really give me no choice in the matter but to hate, it is the only logical and healthy response. Whites are to blame for this too. I my self am to blame. They force fed Whites tolerance, and they accepted it, and now we tolerate White women being destroyed in the Jewish filth. Hollywood is the ultimate symbol of the Jew. Everything about Hollywood is corrosive, gaudy, ugly and fake. The whole thing must come down, or at the very least, it must have some competition. This society is creating monsters.

  54. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    September 3, 2011 - 6:26 am | Permalink

    Maybe Redford’s portrayal of the South, unsatisfactory though it may be, is the exception that proves the Hollywood rule. http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/nowicki_conspirator.htm

  55. September 3, 2011 - 5:51 am | Permalink

    Well said, Penelope. Hollywood continues to serve us hate propaganda dressed up as morally-uplifting entertainment. What a cruel hoax. And brainwashed Americans continue to buy it. Incredibly, it is we whites who are being trained, via entertainment, to hate ourselves. Pathetic.

  56. Henry Baxley's Gravatar Henry Baxley
    September 3, 2011 - 4:07 am | Permalink

    The author of the book, Kathryn Stockett (to be known as black shit-eater one) is being sued by her brother’s black maid for 75,000, this is an obvious publicity stunt for the movie..
    “They come to me and told me, Ablene we love you, we care about you, thats why I got to do what I got to do.”
    The prostitute Emma Stone “Skeeter” (black shit-eater two) will forever be remembered, if at all, not as the actress Emma Stone, but merely “shit-eater’
    In the Classic silent film “Birth of a Nation” the actors all wore black-face because blacks refused to play themselves in a negative role…with identity comes pride. White people have lost their identity and any semblance of pride

  57. Masculinity's Gravatar Masculinity
    September 3, 2011 - 3:44 am | Permalink

    That scene is just sick. Absolutely sick. The way the black actress says ‘shit’

    The actresses should be shamed. I will no longer watch any movie that these women appear in.

    Emma Stone is dating a jew. The Howard girl is married to a jew.

    These women are traitors.

  58. Julian Curtis Lee's Gravatar Julian Curtis Lee
    September 3, 2011 - 3:06 am | Permalink

    “I wonder, why does this site keep giving this miserable crap more publicity?…Jews thrive on stirring up controversy and raking in the profit from it.”

    The thing’s out there and heavily promoted. Better to deconstruct it for White purposes and create some mental tools for Whites to be less damaged by it (send these articles to your kids and friends who might watch this sort of thing) — than to just let the propaganda sink into their minds unexamined. These articles, and the comment section too, are a resource I plan to soon be sending to family members who tend to be seduced by these sort of productions. It will provide them with some alternate views and help neutralize some of the poison pods contained in it.

    For individuals your point has merit: Ignore the stuff; don’t pay for it or promote it. But a site like this needs to be actively challenging anti-White memes, not ignoring the culture.

  59. Philip's Gravatar Philip
    September 3, 2011 - 2:25 am | Permalink

    Odd coincidence that Professor Kevin MacDonald teaches at the university from which Steven Spielberg is an alum.

  60. Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
    September 3, 2011 - 2:12 am | Permalink

    I wonder, why does this site keep giving this miserable crap more publicity? So more of the unthinking witless can run give their money to the jew producers? Sorry, but it makes no sense at all to me. Jews thrive on stirring up controversy and raking in the profit from it.

  61. Philip's Gravatar Philip
    September 3, 2011 - 2:12 am | Permalink

    Sounds as if it is yet more debased Jewish scatology.

  62. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 3, 2011 - 12:37 am | Permalink

    Of course now that I think about it lust does cover envy ,
    so agreed .

  63. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 3, 2011 - 12:35 am | Permalink

    @Julian Curtis Lee:

    Good post . Yes those are the real problems in the world .
    I would add … ENVY
    This modern world is drenched in envy .

  64. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 3, 2011 - 12:20 am | Permalink

    For me , the world would be a much better place if the only negro I ever saw again was in a national geographic dressed in a grass skirt . I might just look quickly and think ” wow they really are primitive people ” and then I would put that magazine deep in the pile of magazines that I won’t be looking at again for a long time – if ever .
    lol

  65. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 3, 2011 - 12:14 am | Permalink

    My feeling about negroes is that I just would not like to see them or hear about them or read about them . I don’t really like their music or anything about negroes . They are just not interesting to me . They get pushed on us white people just because they are negroes . You can’t get away from them and just looking at their faces is not a pleasant sight . I would much rather see a nice white face than a negro face . Negro faces look primitive to me . I find their faces offensive because I know that they are just tools .

    This all might sound simplistic and it is . Negroes are simply not people that I want to know so much about or to see so much of on tv /movies or hear in music or to read about or to see them in sports etc etc .

  66. Julian Curtis Lee's Gravatar Julian Curtis Lee
    September 2, 2011 - 11:27 pm | Permalink

    I find it funny that the film’s promo mines Obama’s tired “Change” slogan. As if it the very word hasn’t become a term of mockery in association with him. Was the movie conceived during the Obama campaign and they just couldn’t surrender their original promotional copy concept?

    How, truly, does the word “change” still ring bells for liberal Whites and self-haters? Isn’t slavery already already ended long ago? What “change” do they want now? The end of all human differences? Blacks and Whites kissing each other in the streets?

    Maybe “change” is really a subconscious cry of Whites: “Please! No more movies and media villifying us!” For me, when I say “Change,” it always means:

    1) No more whipping or mocking the White race in media.
    2) No more mindless race-mixing.
    3) No more blacks attacking or murdering Whites.

    That’s Change I can really get behind.

    The real “world problems” are not “lack of White/Black equality.” We live in world of differences and always will. I spent my entire youth being taught a false set of “world problems” by Jews, with no word about life’s Real problems (the ones sages like Buddha and Christ pointed to). I was fed and a concept of “world problems” designed to serve Jews.

    The real problems of the world are the same as they have always been:

    – lust
    – lack of interest in God
    – addictions and impurities
    – lack of family harmony, plus service and attentiveness to your own family, clan, village, and people.

    And now a new one:

    – Lack of positive racial identity and pride for young White people.

  67. fender's Gravatar fender
    September 2, 2011 - 9:18 pm | Permalink

    A quick look on its imdb page will show that blacks really don’t like the movie either. They consider it to be another degrading “whitey coming to lift up the helpless blacks” kind of film. Which I guess it is.

    What they don’t understand is that it’s not really a “black” film at all. It’s not made for a black audience. Black audiences want Tyler Perry and Terminator 7. They don’t care about this kind of stuff. This film is made for whites, and only for whites.

  68. Venona's Gravatar Venona
    September 2, 2011 - 9:02 pm | Permalink

    Great review, although I must confess I haven’t seen the movie. Come to think of it, I haven’t seen a Hollywood flick in many a year. I just walked out of a cinema one day and swore I would never again willingly let God’s Chosen People take a dump on my soul.

  69. Henry Baxley's Gravatar Henry Baxley
    September 2, 2011 - 8:42 pm | Permalink

    Just goes to prove what I have been preaching for 20 or 30 years…There is no such thing as equality. Your either in power, or your out.
    When whites were still in power (more or less) we poked a little good natured fun at “Amos and Andy”, but never anything so vile and hatefull as this. In comparison, Amos and Andy were depicted as genious saints!
    A class action law suit is in order the next time ANY white is killed by a black. Because of the hatefull message of this movie Steven Spielburg should undergo the same treatment Tom Metzger got. and the settlement could be divided up among us white trash, just as all of Metzgers belongings were sold off and given to blacks

  70. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    September 2, 2011 - 8:22 pm | Permalink

    How come your mother had a “Black girl” in the house? I come from a big family and we had no servants at all! There was a family a few miles from us who had 20 (twenty) children – and they had no servants either. To tell the truth, I don’t know anyone who had any outside help. I must’ve come from a different planet.

  71. September 2, 2011 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

    A devastating review of what sounds like a hideous movie. You have saved Ex-Army from accidentally watching it. He riffs on this review here:
    http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2011/09/review-of-help.html

  72. Julian Curtis Lee's Gravatar Julian Curtis Lee
    September 2, 2011 - 8:04 pm | Permalink

    Webmaster: Sorry, please delete above two posts. )o:\=
    ___________
    A basic theme and device of this trash is obvious: Blacks looking down on Whites, with moral justification.

    Hmm. When’s the last time you saw a movie featuring Whites looking down on Blacks with moral justification to do so? Even once in your life?

    Of course, they try to give it moral justification by setting it up in the old South, with “bad White oppressors of Blacks” as a substrate. (Oh, but don’t think we don’t see “blacks mocking Whites” proffered everywhere today, even T.V. commercials from mouthwash to hamburgers.)

    The Jews won’t be making many movies about the decent and giving Whites — I mean slave owners — and how much they gave or how much they cared. The phrase “White man’s burden” developed because Whites experienced blacks as a burden, always having to lift them up, help them out, get them rolling. Is it any different today? Did not the phrase likely contain truth?

    My guess is for every “obnoxious” or “vapid” White female in the south there were thirty kind ones who had the respect, even deference, of blacks. You’ll see few Jewish movies about them.

    And that for every “cruel slavemaster” there were 10 or 20 who acted as charitable benefactors to their Blacks. It’s because of that reality alone that so many Blacks ended up thoroughly Christian, reading and writing, and adopting the White Southern Culture. It was not an easy job to bring Blacks into that culture, and behind it was an impulse that was utterly charitable and giving.

  73. Voir Dire's Gravatar Voir Dire
    September 2, 2011 - 8:00 pm | Permalink

    @icr:

    Lol! Or accuracy.

    Beautiful critique, Penelope!

  74. lyko's Gravatar lyko
    September 2, 2011 - 7:32 pm | Permalink

    White libs hire non-whites to be their maids and nannies to provide a buffer zone between their personal life and their community, because these non whites are not part of their community and they know the non-white couldn’t care less what these ‘crazy crackers’ do, anyway.

    It’s sorta like why the Gov stuffs government jobs with blacks and other non whites. By placing them in these positions the Gov secures/covers their fraud. They know blacks(especially) won’t pick up on their thievery and paper trails & will simply do as they are told, asking no questions – but more importantly they know they wouldn’t give a crap even if they DID notice it. Where as, if white Americans were in these positions they’d pick up on it, start to ask questions and eventually out the crooks to the American people.

    Well, that’s my take anyway. I’m not a very good writer, but you get my drift.

  75. john sumner's Gravatar john sumner
    September 2, 2011 - 6:17 pm | Permalink

    I do not have time to write anything substantial about this wonderful article right now. I will just say that Penelope Thornton is friggin’ awesome. Sincerely.

  76. icr's Gravatar icr
    September 2, 2011 - 6:14 pm | Permalink

    No one has ever accused Hollywood of subtlety.

  77. Julian Curtis Lee's Gravatar Julian Curtis Lee
    September 2, 2011 - 6:12 pm | Permalink

    Sad. My summary: More Jewish anti-White propaganda.

    For newcomers, some good analysis of this new “White guilt/White hate” propaganda fests is taking place at this Occidental Observer Thread:

    Driving Miss Ditzy: Review of “The Help”

    The insidious thing about this movie is how it’s so targeted to White European women to firm up already inflated “White Guilt” ideas. On one hand, they are the most vulnerable to the programming, especially if if features lots of “pretty but flawed” females. On the other hand, they are the ones most needed for waking up and joining with the men in the racewar — long only mental but real and becoming physical — against their own people.

    Hopefully a lot of them will realize that the patent demonization of southern Whites and nimbus-i-fication of Blacks is just cynical anti-White propaganda.

    Whites were the ones who, in historical time, flirted with things like slavery only briefly (after Jews, who bankrolled this movie, created slavery here). In historical time, we outlawed it fast and even worked to eradicate it world-wide (while it still exists in Africa and Israel). Loving your own people, presenting their nobility and greatness, and fighting for the positive self-image Whites are fully due — should become the new morality of White women. Let them worry about their own oppressed people now, not fictional blacks of a garishly distorted past.

2 Trackbacks to "“The Help”: Courageous, Color-Blind Strivers Overcome Racist Nitwits"

  1. on September 20, 2011 at 3:50 pm
  2. on September 7, 2011 at 2:48 pm

Comments are closed.