Snow White and the Huntsman

Kevin MacDonald

Snow White and the Huntsman
Directed by Rupert Sanders
Produced by Sam Mercer, Palak Patel, Joe Roth
Screenplay by Evan Daugherty

I realize that if a studio is going to spend $170 million on a movie, they are going to do their best to appeal to a wide audience. Movies with mass appeal necessarily have emotional hooks that draw the audience in. In Snow White, there are two such hooks.


One hook is the image of idealistic romantic love completely divorced from sex. We first see the huntsman grieving for his dead wife. He helps Snow White because of the promise of reward and later because he realizes that she can be the key to defeating the evil Ravenna, a sorceress who has usurped Snow White’s rightful position as queen and whose reign has completely devastated the  kingdom. But there is an obvious romantic tension, as the huntsman, who is personification of a Viking warrior, protects Snow White and teaches her how to fend for herself. (The huntsman is played by  Chris Hemsworth, who starred as the Viking god/warrior Thor in the movie Thor.)

Chris Hemsworth as the huntsman, with Kristen Stewart as Snow White

The romantic highlight of the  movie is not when the prince kisses the dead Snow White, as in the original Grimm Brothers fairy tale. There is indeed a prince, a childhood friend who also comes to fight against the  evil Queen and who kisses the dead Snow White. There is also a romantic/sexual tension between the prince and Snow White. But it’s the huntsman’s kiss that revives her. This is Wikipedia’s account:

The Huntsman maintains vigil over Snow White. He speaks to her about his wife, Sarah, whom he met after the war and how she changed him into a better man. He tells her how he loved her and the guilt he felt when he let her out of his sight, losing her forever. After her death he became himself again, a self that he didn’t much care for, and was lost until he met Snow White. The Huntsman confesses that she reminds him of his wife, that she too has the same heart and spirit and since meeting her notices his change into the man he once was long ago. He apologizes to Snow White for failing her and tells her she deserved better. Before departing, the Huntsman kisses Snow White. After he leaves, Snow White awakes from death and with a revelation. She addresses the Duke and his army, stirring the men into battle and confiding in them that she alone possesses the power to kill the Queen. That night they prepare to do battle the following morning with the Queen and her army.

There is no hint that the victorious Snow White will marry the huntsman. She will probably marry the prince, but that is left to the sequel. So the love between Snow White and the huntsman is a completely pure and chaste love; the huntsman still mourns for his dead wife. It’s the stuff of fairy tales, but it is doubtless a large part of the psychological appeal of the movie, especially for women.

This emphasis on pure romantic love divorced from sex recalls a theme from the chapter on psychoanalysis in The Culture of Critique—the psychoanalytic view that romantic love was merely a sublimation of sexual urges:

[John Murray] Cuddihy (The Ordeal of Civility: Freud, Marx, Levi-Strauss, and the Jewish Struggle with Modernity. New York: Basic Books, 1974, 71) traces Freud’s views in this matter to the fact that for Jews, marriage was completely utilitarian. A disciple of Freud, Theodore Reik stated that the older generation of Jews held the conviction that “love is to be found only in novels and plays.” “Love or romance had no place in the Judengasse [Jewish quarter].” Love was therefore viewed by Freud as an invention of the alien … culture and thus morally suspect. Its true hypocritical nature as a veneer for and really only a sublimation of the sexual instinct would be unmasked by psychoanalysis. … It was a devastating analysis—an analysis with important consequences for the social fabric of Western societies in the late twentieth century. (See here, p. 125)

Movies like Snow White show that despite the psychoanalytic war on romantic love, it is alive and well, doubtless because love and sex are indeed two quite different psychological adaptations. Although romantic love  is a cross-cultural universal even in societies where kinship relationships and property predominate in choice of marriage partner, it is uniquely elaborated in Western societies as a basis for individualist choice of marriage partner (see here, p. 65ff).

The other emotional hook is the fight of good against evil, where good is the  survival and  prosperity of the ingroup. The evil Queen is a usurper whose reign has resulted in poverty and misery for everyone. The people are under alien rule, their fight is just. It is a moral imperative, just as in The Lord of the  Rings. Indeed, Tolkein’s work was an inspiration for the main screenwriter, Evan Dougherty:

 I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t inspired by “Lord of the Rings.” I was in college and my sophomore year “Fellowship of the Ring” came out. My junior year was “Two Towers.” My senior year was “Return of the King.” College was four years of Lord of the Rings fever. (“How “Lord of the Rings’ inspired ‘Snow White

It’s well known that the Lord of the Rings trilogy resulted in a moral panic among some because of its depictions of good White people trying to save themselves and their culture against the forces of darkness. Indeed, Stephen Shapiro, says that “Tolkien’s good guys are white and the bad guys are black, slant-eyed, unattractive, inarticulate and a psychologically undeveloped horde.” There is a long line of critics of Tolkein who see strong overtones of White racialism in his stories (see discussion here).

Sam Spruell as Finn, the evil Queen's brother, dressed in black armor

In Snow White, the good White, bad non-White theme is underplayed but still there. The evil Queen, played by the beautiful Charlize Theron, is blond, and Finn, her brother, appears almost as an albino. But the evil Queen commands the Dark Army, ” an army of invincible glass soldiers who have enslaved several of the neighboring kingdoms” and who are entirely black, from head to toe. The only Black actor in the film is a soldier in Finn’s war party charged with bringing Snow White back  into the clutches of the evil Queen who would eat her heart to ensure her own immortality. When the Queen is attacked as she poisons Snow White, she transforms into a swarm of ravens; when the White Hart is attacked after blessing Snow White and thereby confirming her legitimacy as ruler in tune with all of nature, the magical animal is  transformed into a flock of white birds. And when Finn dies because the Queen can’t save him without imperiling her own youthfulness, we see a pool of black blood exuding from the Queen. She may be blond and beautiful on the outside, but inside she is evil.

Charlize Theron as Ravenna, the evil Queen

Snow White therefore plugs into the  same primeval emotions as The Lord of the Rings—a dispossessed and beleaguered, morally superior White ingroup fighting against overwhelmingly powerful forces of evil. Like post-1965 America, the regime has no legitimacy; it is entirely destructive of all that is good and beautiful. The emotional high point of the movie is the victory celebration when Snow White was surrounded by the cheers of her people—all White. The world was righted. Crops will grow again; the misery and oppression are ended.

Elsewhere (see here, p. 69ff), I have argued that the  construction of morally defined ingroups (rather than extended kinship or coercion) is a critical feature of individualism and basic to uniquely Western forms of social organization. Snow White plugs into the emotional core of this sense of a morally defined ingroup. It is also a racially homogeneous ingroup; the dwarves are little White people; the pixies look like White babies.

In the end, Snow  White is an excellent metaphor for our times, although the message is doubtless lost on the vast majority of the audience.  In general, the movie’s messages tapping into the White subconscious are implicit, not explicit—thus sparing it from ever-present Hollywood sanctions on anything resembling White advocacy. Messages that implicitly tap into the White subconscious, like those apparent in Snow White and Lord of the Rings, are relatively impotent to actually change people’s conscious attitudes, while at the same time they are effective in drawing in a White audience.

Nevertheless, the image of elite Whites who, like the evil Queen and her brother, are eagerly reaping the rewards to be had by dispossessing their own people and allying themselves with the  forces of darkness is an emotionally compelling depiction that plugs into exactly what is happening throughout the West. Indeed, the metaphor of an elite composed of traitorous, evil Whites supported by the the  Dark Army is more appropriate to the  contemporary situation than Tolkein’s image of besieged Whites fighting ugly, violent, mindless, animalistic non-Whites. The movie could therefore have a potent emotional effect on Whites who already have an explicit sense of White consciousness, or those nearing such an explicit consciousness.

Snow White thus manages to plug into two primeval emotions central to the West and relatively weak in the  rest of the world: Romantic love as an ideal—chaste, pure, and desexualized, and the ideal of a morally constructed ingroup fighting the forces of evil. Despite all the ideologically motivated anti-White trash that is put out by Hollywood, movies like Snow White show that  there is an audience for movies that play to these primeval Western emotions. Its box office success speaks volumes.

And it suggests that despite the dire situation we are now in, there is hope for the future, because the reality of what is happening to our people and culture is becoming obvious and will have very negative effects on the vast majority  of Whites in the  very near future. And when Whites  think of themselves as a besieged, morally superior ingroup fighting for their  survival against the forces of darkness, they will be a formidable force indeed.


  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

139 Comments to "Snow White and the Huntsman"

  1. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 27, 2012 - 7:07 pm | Permalink


    I want to add that I watched the movie (Superman) on videocassette, not DVD. So the playback quality of the movie was not high-definition.

    So my opinion about the physical beauty of Superman and Louis might have been affected by that.

    (I don’t mind watching something on videocassette, though. I think high definition is somewhat over-hyped.)

  2. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 27, 2012 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott:

    Hi Hadding

    You wrote:

    They picked rather ugly actors to play Snow White and the Huntsman. They have broad noses and the huntsman looks brutish. I have personal friends that are much more attractive than these people! Compare the appearance of White performers from a few decades ago.

    I agree that the huntsman is not the most handsome man. I don’t think I’d describe either of them as ugly, but I agree that neither of them is extraordinarily beautiful.

    There is a scene in the original Superman movie where Louis Lane is interviewing Superman on the rooftop of her apartment — and they both are beautiful, in my opinion.

    I love the physical beauty of White people. It definitely touches the soul. Even in older people, I see it and appreciate it — I see good genes and a well-lived life.

    I don’t watch many movies these days, and I think it’s been a good thing. But I think there is so much potential for all kinds of great movies, filled with different kinds of beauty. That’s an enjoyable thought.

  3. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    June 26, 2012 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

    It finally came to Australia. It’s good but not great, and I agree it’s psychologically healthy, which is a rare thing.

    Its main drawback is a bad writing technique: explaining what the fight is about (with information from the past) when the fight is under way or about to start anyway. This confuses the audience and muffles the emotion of the scene. The Huntsman winds up with a weak character arc because his story is less shown than explained, and the explanations come at bad times.

    Defending Snow White is a perfectly good reason to fight. Like the great White stag, she has a rightful place in the world and in the kingdom; those who come against her to displace her or destroy her are obviously wrong and should be stopped.

    It makes no sense for a villain to pick this moment to discuss how he lied to the Huntsman or allegedly wronged him in the past. It raises questions like, why is he saying this now, and how can we trust such a rotten person to be telling the truth, and who cares since there has to be a battle over Snow White anyway?

    I don’t think the foreshadowing of the apple scene quite works either.

    The good? Practically everything else. I particularly like the brief and stark presentation of the good queen and her simple desire that her her daughter be beautiful, snow white in complexion, with red lips, and tough as a thorn (which she will need to be), and the good king, at fault in nothing but being a little impulsive and too trusting. There is interest and tragedy but no ambiguity. This is what a good family is like, and thus what a good kingdom is like. When it is ripped apart by Ravenna, her quasi-feminist rage, her treachery and her uncanny powers, nature is affronted. Clearly no effort is too great and no journey is too long if it will restore what was lost: not a paradise, since the queen had to die and the king had to grieve, but a healthy way of life, uncorrupted by exotic deceits.

    Another thing I liked, and I can’t remember this in a Hollywood movie before, is that Snow White and Ravenna represent hostile diversities. Snow White represents the diversity native to the land; the native elites such as her, the common people such as the huntsman, the dwarves and the fairies all have their place, not mingling or clashing, and all are at peace with Snow White’s explicit Christianity. Ravenna represents an exotic diversity hostile to the natives. She and her brother (and their soldiers?) have gone from kingdom to kingdom, deceiving the locals (and presumably blighting the lands). She and her brother cultivate unnatural and deadly appetites. Her most distinctive soldiers are made of dark shards. Hollywood’s mandate that ancient and medieval Europe must have Negroes is met with a Black in her hunting party, and it’s easy to see why he’s there. (He’s formidable.) The uniforms of her soldiers are black, which doesn’t particularly make them evil (they aren’t shown doing very evil things other than fighting for her) but does make them look a bit generic and anachronistic compared to the native troops, whose look is more colorful and culturally rooted. Symbolically it’s a charged conflict, in which Hollywood would usually be on the other side.

  4. William's Gravatar William
    June 19, 2012 - 9:34 pm | Permalink

    The origional tale of Snow White was a Christian alegory that developed before the printing press made the Bible available. The huntsman is the Christ/Saint. Snow White is the soul. The evil queen is the mind. And the 7 dwarfs are the 7 lampstands of Revelation/7 Chakras. I think the story of Snow White was mixed with the story of Rama and Ravana. I suspect the evil queen’s name is derived from Ravana. She embodies the ravenous(that’s where we get the word) nature of Ravana. Both the Christian alegory of Snow White and the Hindu alegory of Rama and Ravana largely represent the same alegory, ie the story of the soul vs the mind.

  5. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    June 14, 2012 - 12:55 am | Permalink




    “Coppola was born in Detroit, Michigan, to a family of Italian ancestry (his paternal grandparents were immigrants from Bernalda, Basilicata).[7] He received his middle name in honor of Henry Ford, as he was born at the Henry Ford Hospital.[8] His parents were Italia (née Pennino) and Carmine Coppola, who was the first flautist for the Detroit Symphony Orchestra. He was the second of three children (his older brother was August Coppola and younger sister is actress Talia Shire). Two years later, Carmine became the first flutist for the NBC Symphony Orchestra and the family moved to New York City, finding a home in Woodside, Queens, where Francis spent the remainder of his childhood.”




    “George Walton Lucas Jr. was born in Modesto, California[1] to George Walton Lucas, Sr. (1913–1991) and Dorothy Ellinore Bomberger Lucas on May 14, 1944. His father was mainly of British and Swiss-German heritage and his mother was a member of a prominent Modesto family (one of her cousins is the mother of former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture and director of UNICEF Ann Veneman) and was mainly of German and Scots-Irish heritage.”



    Do you suppose that the Coppolas named their middle child after Henry Ford just to throw people off of their son’s actual Jewish heritage?!?

    In the words of the late Ronald Wilson Reagan: “Facts are stupid things!”

  6. June 13, 2012 - 11:25 pm | Permalink

    Directors Coppola and Lucas are Jews.

    I agree the bottom line for Hollywood is profit. Pro-white films draw in an all white audience.

    One reason movies about the supernatural are being made is to desensitize the public. Just google Nasa’s Blue Beam Project and check out the 4-prong attack in store for us. #4 is especially interesting. This is not a joke.

    Great article, Professor MacDonald. Again you place everything in perfect perspective.

  7. June 12, 2012 - 1:46 pm | Permalink
  8. Gemjunior's Gravatar Gemjunior
    June 12, 2012 - 12:15 pm | Permalink


    This is some excellent advice. I put it and the comments link to my favorites. I intend to introduce some of this advice around to my circle (which consists of um, about 2 or so people) of hand-wringers. Thanks.

  9. Diablo's Gravatar Diablo
    June 11, 2012 - 10:49 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Dr MacDonald for sharing this wonderful review. Finally a rare, well-done film. Scanning the film’s team on wikipedia – this can be apparently be due to the limited involvement of jews. I will now make it a point to see.

  10. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    June 11, 2012 - 9:50 am | Permalink

    I guess I’d respectfully disagree with A Swain as to the need for a review of Snow White and the Huntsman. If films that innocuously and routinely depict Whites as evil are worth complaining about, why wouldn’t films like this be worth celebrating, to one degree or another?

    Symbolism is symbolism, whether it works against us or for us, and it’s power is undeniable. I’ll make it a point to see this movie because of Kevin MacDonald’s review. I want my kids to see it, as well.

  11. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    June 11, 2012 - 9:28 am | Permalink

    Swain said:
    “What I would like to see turned into a blockbuster movie is the 1917 Russian Revolution depicting and emphasising correctly….

    I’d like to see a movie about the early HCUA as it existed before WW2 (the Dies and Dickstein era).

    Samuel Dickstein is, without a doubt, the most interesting and outrageous American political figure who’s never been portrayed on film.

    Star of David? Sorry, I don’t see that.

  12. Jason's Gravatar Jason
    June 11, 2012 - 4:36 am | Permalink

    These types of movies are not good for us (except for the imagery), and are not popular among women either. These types of fairytale movies are made to keep white men confused and agitated and to amuse women.

    These fairytale movies always have the same theme, a man on his knees trying to win the undying love of a woman. Backward from reality! I would have thought that MacDonald would know more about women than this.

  13. sylvie's Gravatar sylvie
    June 10, 2012 - 11:56 pm | Permalink


    … how jewish (and envious) her evil stepmother/guardian looks by comparison in this Disney adaptation

    Yes, it seems her hairs even form a star of David on her forehead.

    Rapunzel is another German fairytale collected by the Grimms.

    Disney, like many of the great American entrepreneurs, was very suspicious of the Jews. They got him in two steps. During WWII, he had to make nasty, low level anti-German propaganda cartoons and after the war, they bought his company completely.

  14. A Swain's Gravatar A Swain
    June 10, 2012 - 9:40 pm | Permalink

    Nevermind such rancid Hollywood garbage as the movie highlighted in this article. Why are we giving this trash publicity at all?

    What I would like to see turned into a blockbuster movie is the 1917 Russian Revolution depicting and emphasising correctly, the ethicity of the prime architects and orchestrators along with a thorough expose of their innate machinations and capacity for extreme evilness that includes their capabilities in such fields as mindwarping and the inflicting of self-loathing and guilt-tripping pathogens.

  15. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    June 9, 2012 - 10:19 pm | Permalink


    Daybreaker said: “No harsh comments on the actress playing the beautiful but evil queen Ravenna, please. Like other Hollywood Moms such as Angelina Jolie, Madonna, Sandra Bullock and Mariska Hargitay, Charlize Theron has adopted a Black baby. That makes her morally superior – by Hollywood moral standards”

    I guess when you just can’t force yourself to marry a black man, you do the next best thing to prove “race doesn’t matter” – you adopt an African baby.


    Sometimes Hollywood slips up and lets the subliminal message of positive white racial identity slip through. Notice how Nordic/Teutonic the blonde Rapunzel looks, and how jewish (and envious) her evil stepmother/guardian looks by comparison in this Disney adaptation:

  16. Joe's Gravatar Joe
    June 9, 2012 - 3:52 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    All the evidence I know of, whether seen with my own baby-blues or gotten from someone else’s account, points to maximization of fact absorption (of the textbook or newspaper variety) as the object of speed-reading. The extent to which this skill might improve one’s life is an area I’d prefer not to comment upon.

    Why not?

  17. Bohemianh's Gravatar Bohemianh
    June 9, 2012 - 3:21 pm | Permalink

    I went to see it last weekend; the line was long to buy a ticket, and to wait to enter the show? Haven’t scene this response to a film is years! The Germanic white / light against the dark is clearly there for all to see. I enjoyed the movie, the best part was the storming of the castle, the valor, honor, and bravery, display of the leader, leading from the front of a true fighting force. America is lead by jews, non violent, panty waist faggots by and large? No wonder it has the success it does. The jews, and I do know a few as I’m in business are scared of what their tribe has created, being lost in a sea of non-whites is not much to their liking. The average jew is fearful, as is the race as a whole; as the increasing mob of color raises they are unsure of what they have have created. Those super rich elite jews who push the homo, racemixing are leading, just like the pied piper many to early graves, including some of the tribe as well! All the best!

  18. Frank Edwin Stone's Gravatar Frank Edwin Stone
    June 9, 2012 - 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Charlize Theron , the Aryan Nordic beauty from South Africa just adopted a Negro child, following in the footsteps of Madonna and Angelina. Such ultimate proof of one’s anti-racist degeneracy is the best calling card in Hollywood, the epicenter of Jewish power.
    Hopes for a white revival are greatly exagerrated.

  19. dana pallessen's Gravatar dana pallessen
    June 9, 2012 - 2:22 pm | Permalink

    i am seeing this film for all the great reasons you spoke of above. it is about time the hollywood industry made a movie for whites. but i am stumped as to why you quoted jews:freud and shapiro for explanations. why not quote carl jung…he was one of us and knew far better that jewfreud about out way of thinking. are you not aware of the fact that freud’s psycoanalysis was meant for jews only.

  20. Hmmm's Gravatar Hmmm
    June 9, 2012 - 1:49 pm | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott:

    From the same wiki, here’s more on Tolkien’s views, from letters in 1938, before the war began. I checked my own copy of Tolkien’s letters to confirm that this is accurate:

    Tolkien vocally opposed Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party prior to the Second World War. In 1938, the publishing house Rütten & Loening Verlag was preparing to release The Hobbit in Nazi Germany. To Tolkien’s outrage, he was asked beforehand whether he was of Aryan origin. In a letter to his British publisher Stanley Unwin, he condemned Nazi “race-doctrine” as “wholly pernicious and unscientific”. He added that he had many Jewish friends and was considering, “letting a German translation go hang”.[102] He provided two letters to Rütten & Loening and instructed Unwin to send whichever he preferred. The more tactful letter was sent and was lost during the later bombing of Germany. In the unsent letter, Tolkien makes the point that “Aryan” is a linguistic term, denoting speakers of Indo-Iranian languages. He continued,
    “But if I am to understand that you are enquiring whether I am of Jewish origin, I can only reply that I regret that I appear to have no ancestors of that gifted people. My great-great-grandfather came to England in the eighteenth century from Germany: the main part of my descent is therefore purely English, and I am an English subject—which should be sufficient. I have been accustomed, nonetheless, to regard my German name with pride, and continued to do so throughout the period of the late regrettable war, in which I served in the English army. I cannot, however, forbear to comment that if impertinent and irrelevant inquiries of this sort are to become the rule in matters of literature, then the time is not far distant when a German name will no longer be a source of pride.[103]”

    From Tolkien’s letters (no. 294). In a 1968 letter to two journalists who had sent him their draft of an interview with him for comment, Tolkien said the following regarding their assertion that “Middle Earth … corresponds spiritually to Nordic Europe:”

    “Not Nordic, please! A word I personally dislike; it is associated, though of French origin, with racialist theories.”

  21. June 9, 2012 - 8:59 am | Permalink


    Oh, and here’s what J.R.R. Tolkien had to say about National Socialism (from Wikipedia):
    “You have to understand the good in things, to detect the real evil. But no one ever calls on me to ‘broadcast’ or do a postscript. Yet I suppose I know better than most what is the truth about this ‘Nordic’ nonsense. Anyway, I have in this war a burning private grudge… against that ruddy little ignoramus Adolf Hitler … Ruining, perverting, misapplying, and making for ever accursed, that noble northern spirit, a supreme contribution to Europe, which I have ever loved, and tried to present in its true light. Nowhere, incidentally, was it nobler than in England, nor more early sanctified and Christianized.”

    So Tolkien’s position was, Look, I’m a nordicist and this Hitler guy is doing it all wrong! If Tolkien hadn’t already been a respected British author, a distinction like that wouldn’t have been enough to keep him from being called names.

    From the words “in this war” I infer that Tolkien said that DURING the war, in the midst of war-fever. You can’t take anything said under such circumstances as the final word. People were believing all kinds of absurdities.

  22. June 9, 2012 - 8:42 am | Permalink

    @Hmmm: I don’t see any statement there about National-Socialism, only about the man Adolf Hitler. To judge the extent to which Tolkien’s opinion has any relationship to reality, one would also have to know which of the many false stories about Adolf Hitler Tolkien believed when he said that. We can all have a bad opinion if we accept bad information.

  23. Sir Winston Londonstan's Gravatar Sir Winston Londonstan
    June 9, 2012 - 5:52 am | Permalink

    @Hooper: I’m surprised no one has picked up on what I consider the real motive : a palliative, a placative , a tranquilizer or camouflage call it what you like the message is don’t worry fools alls well . I see the same phenomena with historical period pieces pre multiculturalism (excluding the American experience) . The older goyem are allowed to indulge in reminiscences of Agatha Christie etc , that the young would see as curiosities . Eventually the older goyem will die and our masters will stop making films about the good old days .
    The European Peoples of the West now have pricked up their ears . They know something is up , one only has to go to Londonstan to see what a mess these toads have made of the West . Remember the draconian actions taken against anyone who disagreed with the immigration policies of the T Blair regime ? Its all systematic , nothing is left to chance .
    The European Peoples are allowed to indulge in fantasy as long as nothing changes with our ethic disembowelment and destruction.

    Imagine someone going to Scandinavia in 200 years time and asking where are the Scandinavians People ? ..Well they were breed out . Look at the mongrel population that makes up Egypt . Where are the Egyptians ? Breed out .And all along the Nth Coast of Africa ? What happened to the Roman blood ? Look whats left a mongrel multicultural people named after the bits of land the Colonialist chopped up couple of hundred years ago .
    In Egyptian times people like Blair’s had their names removed from all monuments . What a stupid destructive man .

  24. Pavel's Gravatar Pavel
    June 9, 2012 - 2:44 am | Permalink

    A little off topic, but I was rather surprised as to how accurately
    “the Jew” was portrayed on the Sopranos. If anyone here watched the show, the character of Hesh Rabkin, Tony Soprano’s associate and friend, was characterized as greedy, paranoid regarding anti-semitism, and also mentioning the Holocaust . He wasn’t a major character per se, but I’m surprised HBO got away with that.

  25. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    June 9, 2012 - 1:25 am | Permalink

    Rupert Sanders has very little experience; only a few short films and commercials according to his homepage.

    When Hollywood screws up in an ideological sense, that’s the sort of person who will do it. Steven Spielberg is never going to mess up his messaging.

  26. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 9, 2012 - 12:48 am | Permalink


    Thank you for your feedback. Inspiration is very important.

  27. Hmmm's Gravatar Hmmm
    June 8, 2012 - 11:53 pm | Permalink

    According to IMDb, there are only two production companies that were involved in making Snow White and the Huntsman: Roth Films, Joe Roth’s company (he is a very active Jew) and Universal Pictures, whose chairman is Adam Fogelson, also Jewish. It also seems clear from the press coverage that Roth was the lead producer.

    Oh, and here’s what J.R.R. Tolkien had to say about National Socialism (from Wikipedia):
    “You have to understand the good in things, to detect the real evil. But no one ever calls on me to ‘broadcast’ or do a postscript. Yet I suppose I know better than most what is the truth about this ‘Nordic’ nonsense. Anyway, I have in this war a burning private grudge… against that ruddy little ignoramus Adolf Hitler … Ruining, perverting, misapplying, and making for ever accursed, that noble northern spirit, a supreme contribution to Europe, which I have ever loved, and tried to present in its true light. Nowhere, incidentally, was it nobler than in England, nor more early sanctified and Christianized.”

  28. sylvie's Gravatar sylvie
    June 8, 2012 - 11:09 pm | Permalink

    Before the comments get too far off-topic (asking for more advice for speed reading, foot washing and cold showers (:-)), I would like to come back to the central theme: movies that could be eye-openers to our current situation and how to overcome it.

    One of the best films how the ruling elite and Jewish behaviour perverted a sane community is “Jud Suess”.

    Considered NS propaganda, as far as I know, in Europe it is prohibited and the US it can only be shown in small circles, and only with approriate prior “introduction” aka brain washing.

    Contrary to the Hollywood films discussed on TOO, which are largely fiction, Judd Suess is based on historical facts, the original book has even be written by a Jew, Lionel Feuchtwanger.

    The story – happening in the German region of Stuttgart some centuries ago – cannot be closer to our reality. The duke, needing money and jewels for his expenses, secretly asks a Jew – Oppenheimer (!) – for credit.

    He gets all he wants and more, and finally is obliged to make the Jew his finace minister, who invents all kinds of taxes that didn’t exist before and get terribly unpopular.

    One of the best scenes of the film is how – on request of the Jew Oppenheimer – the duke orders to open the – until then well kept – gates of Stuttgart and all kinds of folks enter the city.

    The film can be found on the internet – a must see.

  29. IndianaJohn's Gravatar IndianaJohn
    June 8, 2012 - 10:26 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    One of the most meangful comments on this thread.

  30. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    June 8, 2012 - 10:25 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Seeing Cruella swathed in fake furs, to appease the PeTAheads, however, was akin to our being expected to accept Ellen DeGeneres as a romantic leading lady!?!

  31. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 8, 2012 - 9:37 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Yes, I’ve heard all my life that Hollywood puts money first, yet they roll a continuous stream of movies that offend their target audience, year after year. Well made movies that reflected traditional values would make a fortune, yet we see what they give us. Maybe the short-hand way of saying it is, yes, money is important, but it is what the money buys that is really important.

  32. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 8, 2012 - 9:32 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: One small correction: I was in the publishing racket, until illness halted my Caviezel-like climb to a middle rung on a ladder locked away in the back of the garage. But enough about me.

    Young people can learn to speed-read; there’s no doubt about it. What they can usefully speed-read is another question. All the evidence I know of, whether seen with my own baby-blues or gotten from someone else’s account, points to maximization of fact absorption (of the textbook or newspaper variety) as the object of speed-reading. The extent to which this skill might improve one’s life is an area I’d prefer not to comment upon.

    On the other hand, if your reading-comprehension speed doesn’t slow somewhat with age, you might consider taking the pre-Christmas-spirit-visitation Scrooge’s advice to “reduce the surplus population” by the life-termination device of your choosing. Folks who have used the mind they were born with to acquire formal knowledge and to relate their book learning to their ongoing daily experience of life have inevitably accustomed that mind to react to new information by promptly accessing the old and by then comparing and contrasting the new and the old to see what, if any, sparks are generated by the contact. Finally, the mind proceeds to assimilate the new to the old and, with a new synthesis in place, continues on to the next paragraph or sentence.

    This process, being almost as time-consuming as my account of it, can be short-circuited only by extensive TV and Hollywood film viewing. I hear tell that regular C-SPAN watching (special orders speeches especially) and reading of National Review Online assist older readers with cluttered minds to clear away the rubble of memory and association and restore that glorious tabula rasa feeling that Foxman, Obama, Bush, and several Clintons tell us we should all strive for.

    In other words, JS, thank whatever higher powers you acknowledge that your reading speed now drags a bit. The alternative, perpetual adolescence, is too grim to contemplate.

  33. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 8, 2012 - 9:27 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    You are right. Spielberg produced it though, and it was my impression he had a heavy hand in it.

  34. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 8, 2012 - 9:24 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Thanks for your thoughts on this subject. A short while back I was wondering outloud about that exact question.


    I’d like to watch some of those movies eventually.

    On a totally unrelated note, I want to mention something. You were in one of my dreams last night. I usually dream about people from my real life, not T.O.O. commenters. I don’t even know what you look like, but you were in my dream. I think.

    I mention this because you were a positive presence in my dream. There is something likeable about you.

    Under a different article, I think you wrote about how you believe that some people on T.O.O. probably “hate your guts”. And I want to clarify that I don’t. I disagree with some of your values, and doubt that they are good. (I acknowledge that I’m not omniscient, and that I’m a flawed person myself.) But… I don’t think I hate you or anyone else here. Now I’m wondering, who or what is “you”? What is a person? His body or thoughts or values or actions or all of those things?

    Anyway, I’m not expecting or even wanting a reply. But if you want to reply, that’s fine.

    If anyone who is reading my comment believes that I write too much, I apologize. That is possible. But something inside me figures that maybe I’m supposed to write this comment.

  35. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 8, 2012 - 8:45 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    By the way, a bit off topic, but since we are discussing reading books, what is your view on speed reading? I don’t mean the ridiculous claims of several thousand words per minute, I just mean the ability to read close to a thousand words per minute that I see claimed by many (or at least a few). I cannot read anywhere near that speed, especially if I am to retain any of it. Frankly, I’ve always been a bit of a slow reader, a leisurely reader. The moment I try to go faster, it becomes a bit of a jumble (and I find myself having to reread the same part two or three times because I am in such a rush).

    Can a person really increase his reading time 3 or 4 times (or at least double it) in your experience? I don’t know whether you have any direct experience with all this, but since I believe you are in the publishing business, I thought you might have come across this issue before.

  36. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 8, 2012 - 8:30 pm | Permalink

    In the end, their greed is more important than ideology…

    This persistent myth has been deep-sixed about once every five years since the 1930s, but unlike Dracula, not even a stake through the heart keeps the damn thing down. For the thousandth time, let it be heard that this claim is article 1 in the officially sanctioned, faux-censorious Apologia pro Hollywood that the Tribe wants the suckers to swallow—and as the above comment sadly indicates, that many do swallow.

    Think back to the thirties, when Walt Disney was Goyishe Enemy no. 1. Every one of the big studios could have competed successfully for his audience by making similar pictures. Did they? No bloody way! Better to subvert him than to make animated films that captivate children and dazzle their parents and bring a similar level of genuine artistry to the screen, one that scholars are still poring over. Call the bastard an anti-Semite, get his brother to sell the studio to a Tribal affiliate, and move on.

    Now jump-cut to the present. If pelf were really the bottom line for the Hollwood Jews, why didn’t they encourage their cousins and nephews in the distribution system to pick up The Passion of the Christ when every indication was that it would bring in profits in eight figures? Even assuming that they guessed wrong, why did that film’s success not prompt them to give Gibson carte blanche on any project his li’l ol’ hate-filled heart desired? After all, their greed would get satisfied, wouldn’t it? So who gives a damn about ideology!

    Even more to the point, look at Jim Caviezel. Given the solar orbit into which the careers of such film greats as Adam Sandler and Jack Black and Sharon Stone went after one or two modest successes, wouldn’t the smart money have been on the ascent of the star of one of the top-grossing films of all time? I know Caviezel is not as good-looking a man as Adrien Brody or Jonah Hill [OK, I confess that I had to look up the guy’s name] or as talented an actor as Vin Diesel or David Schwimmer, but with a hit like TPotC under his belt, a guy with a decade’s worth of big-budget films and critical plaudits will certainly get a shot at more than just the odd direct-to-DVD indie film or a six-episode, instantly forgettable, cheesy remake of The Prisoner. Right?

    Wrong. Money may be the name of the game, but ideology is the unbeatable trump card.

  37. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 8, 2012 - 8:06 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    I haven’t seen the movie Gladiator so I can’t compare the two.

    For me, some things that make The Lord of the Rings movies helpful and enjoyable and heartwarming and inspiring are not really the supernatural or fantasy-related things; but rather the sense of genuine friendship and love.

    I love the friendship/love between Frodo and Sam and the other members of the fellowship. I love that they have a common vision and goal, and that everyone has a role to play; they aren’t all equal, but they all are important somehow.

    One of the themes in The Lord of the Rings is the importance of the virtue of hope.

    In the second movie, Aragorn, who is a human (not an elf, not a hobbit), tells a young soldier, “There is always hope.” And that seems important and true to me. That message helped me in a difficult time in my life.

    I have never considered myself a fan of science fiction or fantasy, and I didn’t think that I would enjoy The Lord of the Rings movies as much as I did. I’d like to read the books someday.

    (Maybe I appreciate science fiction or fantasy more than I realized. I don’t know.)

    In a different comment, on a different note, you wrote:

    Ironically, don’t we set our White kids up for being suckered by the corrupt form of power-lusters when we train them to ignore what is prudent or in their long-term self-interest, and let some political or religious figure tell them they ought to give up their lives for some “higher” cause?

    Of course, some sense of group loyalty is necessary for a group to survive, but group loyalty doesn’t work in the long run if it isn’t connected to individual and family self-interest as well.

    I understand what you’re getting at. For me, it depends on what you mean by the words “giving up” and “higher”. (Which reminds me how often people discuss/debate things without having mutual understanding/agreement about the terms being used.)

    If a person (we can call him Dave) decides to give his life to a higher purpose, that does not necessarily mean he should give all his money away or abandon his family.

    Dave might decide to go to school in order to get a high-paying job so that he can donate large amounts of money to pro-White groups. Or maybe he will use his extra money to start up his own pro-White media production company.

    Or on a smaller scale, instead of spending $15 at the movie theater, maybe he decides to buy one of Dr. MacDonald’s books and give it to a friend. “Little” things are often big things.

    There are so many ways to help White people. A little hope, and creativity, and love for something bigger than our individual selves can go a long way. One person can make a huge impact.

    I hope you (and/or others) will forgive me if my post here is too long or flawed in some other way.

    Have a good weekend.

  38. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 8, 2012 - 7:36 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.: Ah, Cruella; she was my first love, you know. Glenn Close in the live-actor (more or less) version was so true-to-celluloid that she should have retired from the screen immediately after the film was in the can and had herself flash-frozen (or whatever it is one does to preserve animation cells).

  39. Faustus's Gravatar Faustus
    June 8, 2012 - 7:12 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller

    Well said. And thanks for your service to our Folk.


    Thank you for sharing those memories and their incumbent life-lessons; it always serves the folk-community to hear these missives from those who have lived long and well.

    Thanks, again, to KM, for all his yoeman efforts on behalf of our Folk.

  40. Haris's Gravatar Haris
    June 8, 2012 - 5:49 pm | Permalink


    I’m starting to understand and appreciate the Nuremberg Laws. They appear cruel, but when you consider the exceptionally cruel nature of the enemy they were designed to control, they are seem rather mild.

    Why don’t we refer to professor MacDonald’s writings:

    The National Socialists enacted a broad range of measures against Jews as a group, including laws against intermarriage and sexual contact, as well as laws preventing socialization between groups and restricting the economic and political opportunities of Jews. These laws were analogous to the elaborate social controls within the Jewish community to prevent social contact with gentiles and to produce high levels of economic and political cooperation.

    MacDonald, “Separation and its discontents: toward an evolutionary theory of anti-Semitism”, page 161.

  41. Haris's Gravatar Haris
    June 8, 2012 - 5:12 pm | Permalink


    I’d also recommend Lars von Trier’s Melancholia from last year. Great cinematography, all-White cast, musical score by Wagner, interesting subtext, etc.

    Not all-white cast tough. One of the two main characters was played by Charlotte Gainsbourg.

    Gainsbourg was born in London to Jane Birkin and Serge Gainsbourg. […] Gainsbourg’s longtime partner is French-Israeli actor/director Yvan Attal, with whom she has three children.

  42. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    June 8, 2012 - 5:00 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    “Back to the Future” (1985) was directed and co-written by Robert Zemeckis, not be Spielberg.

  43. Haris's Gravatar Haris
    June 8, 2012 - 4:56 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    But, I haven’t seen LOTR despite so many people saying good things about. I tried reading the book long ago and couldn’t get past the singing elves.

    Friend of mine has “Lord of the Ring” DVDs and I recall that in one of the DVD’s extras some “tolkienist” (academic researcher) said something along these lines: “Tolkien aimed to create a English epos, because English people doesn’t had one.”

  44. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    June 8, 2012 - 4:55 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    No, I do not recall ever crying at the movies– not even when Cruella De Vil (nee de Vil) was ultimately thwarted, back in 1961, during (I believe) my first such outing!?!

  45. Haris's Gravatar Haris
    June 8, 2012 - 4:32 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    Snow White’s hair for example is not blond but black, while the hair of evil queen Ravenna and of her brother Finn is blond.

    Let’s consider hugely popular “Harry Potter” movies.
    Most evil of Harry’s rivals is Draco Malfoy, strikingly blond. So is his father Lucius Malfoy.

    On the other hand, Harry Potter is portrayed by Daniel Radcliffe, a zealous jew:

    Once more showing maturity far beyond his years and how much he cares about important issues, Dan has recorded the narration for the 2010 Holocaust Memorial Day short film, The Legacy of Hope.

    Daniel Radcliffe Narrates 2010 Holocaust Memorial Day Film

  46. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 8, 2012 - 4:20 pm | Permalink


    There is a measuring stick to all movies/programming that the enemy puts out. It is based upon an accurate understanding of scripture and an accurate understanding of their ultimate goal. To not operate according to this knowledge is setting one’s self and people up to be fooled. I am not going to debate that right now but understand, to entertain the idea that these movies are about “profit/money” and that this is the base motivation that motivates these films, pro white or not, is naive. They print money out of thin air and those who direct issues from top -down have no need of the monetary concerns! No, it is about control/power and eventually establishing a world control matrix that mimics freedom but in reality enslaves everyone in both a spiritual and physical context.

  47. dc's Gravatar dc
    June 8, 2012 - 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Gosh flicks!
    No chance of dealing with the jew when we are so easily amused.

    As usual Helvena has it right. Compare

  48. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    June 8, 2012 - 3:13 pm | Permalink

    All these movies with vampires & people with magical powers are for morons.

    What on earth is it that entices the public to see them ?

    Perhaps religion maybe the answer.

    All the weird scripture stories that religious people believe as being true may lead them to believe or just want to see similar magic & mumbo jumbo nonsense on screen.

  49. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    June 8, 2012 - 11:51 am | Permalink

    @bob sykes: They’ve clearly heavily miscegenated with the Semites that the conquered in the 6th c. BC.

  50. norman sunden's Gravatar norman sunden
    June 8, 2012 - 10:28 am | Permalink

    A utube site with 1,388,265 subscribers which has movies and seems to bypass Hollywood. Is this the future’ See link below

  51. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 8, 2012 - 10:16 am | Permalink

    No one is forcing anyone to watch Hollywood movies. Europe has its own film industry. Its heavily leftist but they’ve done some good stuff: 8 1/2 (Italian), Alphaville (French), Das Boot (German), Valhalla Rising (British-Dutch), The Seventh Seal (Swedish), Pierrot le Fou (French), Zulu (British) etc.

    I’d also recommend Lars von Trier’s Melancholia from last year. Great cinematography, all-White cast, musical score by Wagner, interesting subtext, etc. Highly recommended, although depressing.

  52. katana's Gravatar katana
    June 8, 2012 - 9:41 am | Permalink

    Franklin Ryckaert
    June 8, 2012 – 5:16 am | Permalink
    Off Topic but still important : Ashley Biden, daughter of Vice President Joe Biden has married with Howard Krein, an ear, nose and throat specialist. Piquant detail : Howard Krein is Jewish, as is Hallie, wife of Joe Biden’s son Beau.
For details, go to Haaretz, 8 June,2012. In the photograph Howard Krein looks somewhat like Dustin Hoffman.
    Needless to say that this inmarrying into the dominant elite is also part of the Jewish strategy. It worked wonderfully for them in Britain, as it is in the US.

    I’m starting to understand and appreciate the Nuremberg Laws. They appear cruel, but when you consider the exceptionally cruel nature of the enemy they were designed to control, they are seem rather mild.

    From Jewpedia (aka Wikipedia):


    The Laws for the Protection of German Blood and German Honour

    (September 15, 1935) Moved by the understanding that the purity of German blood is essential to the further existence of the German people, and inspired by the uncompromising determination to safeguard the future of the German nation, the Reichstag has unanimously resolved upon the following law, which is promulgated herewith:
    Section 1
    1. Marriages between Jews and citizens (German: Staatsangehörige) of German or kindred blood are forbidden. Marriages concluded in defiance of this law are void, even if, for the purpose of evading this law, they were concluded abroad.
    2. Proceedings for annulment may be initiated only by the Public Prosecutor.
    Section 2
    Extramarital sexual intercourse between Jews and subjects of the state of Germany or related blood is forbidden.
    ▪ (This concept was unofficially termed Rassenschande – ‘defilement of blood’. Supplementary decrees set Nazi definitions of racial Germans, Jews, and half-breeds or Mischlinge — see the latter entry for details and citations and Mischling Test for how such decrees were applied. Jews could not vote or hold public office under the parallel “citizenship” law.)
    Section 3
    Jews will not be permitted to employ female citizens under the age of 45, of German or kindred blood, as domestic workers.
    Section 4
    1. Jews are forbidden to display the Reich and national flag or the national colours.
    2. On the other hand they are permitted to display the Jewish colours. The exercise of this right is protected by the State.
    Section 5
    1. A person who acts contrary to the prohibition of Section 1 will be punished with hard labour.
    2. A person who acts contrary to the prohibition of Section 2 will be punished with imprisonment or with hard labour.
    3. A person who acts contrary to the provisions of Sections 3 or 4 will be punished with imprisonment up to a year and with a fine, or with one of these penalties.
    Section 6
    The Reich Minister of the Interior in agreement with the Deputy Führer and the Reich Minister of Justice will issue the legal and administrative regulations required for the enforcement and supplementing of this law.
    Section 7
    The law will become effective on the day after its promulgation; Section 3, however, not until 1 January 1936.


    I can well imagine that if jews wrote these laws they would be incomprehensible, probably at least six million words, and require an army of New York jewish lawyers to decipher at extreme expense.

    From a jewish perspective, allowing some jews to out-marry makes sense. It helps to create a emotional stranglehold over the elite of your victims. Making the elites accomplices to the crimes.

  53. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 8, 2012 - 9:24 am | Permalink


    You said “Speaking of fairy tales, isn’t it wonderful in our modern times how anyone, including a Nigerian, can magically become a Pole, a Dutchman, or an Englishman? (Pardon the irony.)”


  54. Lookaroundu's Gravatar Lookaroundu
    June 8, 2012 - 9:24 am | Permalink
  55. Lookaroundu's Gravatar Lookaroundu
    June 8, 2012 - 9:19 am | Permalink

    KM: “In general, the movie’s messages tapping into the White subconscious are implicit, not explicit—thus sparing it from ever-present Hollywood sanctions on anything resembling White advocacy.”

    Then there are some native Poles who don’t shrink from an explicit message of white advocacy. Lest we forget, the standard media reminder of Auschwitz is thrown in. Speaking of fairy tales, isn’t it wonderful in our modern times how anyone, including a Nigerian, can magically become a Pole, a Dutchman, or an Englishman? (Pardon the irony.)


  56. bob sykes's Gravatar bob sykes
    June 8, 2012 - 9:06 am | Permalink

    @fender: Iranians (Aryans) are quintessentially white.

  57. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 8, 2012 - 7:34 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    p.s. people should read the Glick article. Too many reasons to list. Just read it.

  58. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 8, 2012 - 7:28 am | Permalink

    @Ted Riordan:

    very cool

  59. Ted Riordan's Gravatar Ted Riordan
    June 8, 2012 - 7:24 am | Permalink

    I’d like to point out that the confusion here regarding the fact that sometimes pro white films do get made is that Hollywood’s bottom line is money, period. In the end, their greed is more important than ideology, and in the bigger picture greed will be their downfall, as always.

  60. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    June 8, 2012 - 5:32 am | Permalink

    Julian Curtis Lee: “Mysterious fairy tales will have a new birth, and for the same reasons as before.”

    Yes. So people can sort-of say truths that must be said somehow, even if they can’t be said plainly and openly. (And I agree about Rumplestiltskin.)

  61. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 8, 2012 - 5:16 am | Permalink

    Off Topic but still important : Ashley Biden, daughter of Vice President Joe Biden has married with Howard Krein, an ear, nose and throat specialist. Piquant detail : Howard Krein is Jewish, as is Hallie, wife of Joe Biden’s son Beau.
    For details, go to Haaretz, 8 June,2012. In the photograph Howard Krein looks somewhat like Dustin Hoffman.

    Needless to say that this inmarrying into the dominant elite is also part of the Jewish strategy. It worked wonderfully for them in Britain, as it is in the US.

  62. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 8, 2012 - 5:00 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: I realize that I should add that I am talking about the book alone. As for the movies, the first is the best, the truest in tone and development to its printed analog. The second represents something of a falsification, both in plot and in stress, and the special effects, albeit dazzling, have begun to mask the “message” of the tale. The third is a total betrayal of its source. How any admirer of the book can bear to see it more than once bewilders me utterly.

  63. Julian Curtis Lee's Gravatar Julian Curtis Lee
    June 8, 2012 - 4:56 am | Permalink

    “Rumplestiltskin” is obviously a gift from the ancestors, story full of symbolism about a very small creature who had the power of making gold out of nothing. (In the story he could get gold from something useless: straw). A king needed his gold and thus enslaved his own kin to get it, setting her against an impossible burden. And what set her free was simply naming his name. Somehow she no longer knew it. A fairy tale to set us store against the future. Look how subversive it was.

    Mysterious fairy tales will have a new birth, and for the same reasons as before.

  64. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 8, 2012 - 4:51 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: You’ve been misinformed. Yet it’s hardly surprising, since misinformation about this great tale, even among its fans, long since left accurate information in the dust.

    It is absolute power that the book deprecates, not legitimate power or authority as such. Indeed, the necessity of linking the terms legitimacy and power is so plain that it might as well have been painted blue on the page. Any power in Middle Earth or anywhere else in the created world that strives to achieve limitlessness loses its legitimacy in the moment of aspiring to do so. Middle Earth has, thank God, no “democratic” structures whatsoever, but nowhere is there anything but scorn for the notion of a ruler who rules people as a tyrant, especially of a ruler who is a member of a hostile elite. Kinship, consent, heredity, limits established by nature—these are the bases for all legitimate authority in Tolkien’s creation.

    Not everyone will find himself in sympathy with every work of literature, of course, so there’s no reason anyone should browbeat you into picking up Tolkien’s masterpiece. Yet it bears repeating that while The Lord of the Rings is an idealistic and visionary work (in the positive sense of visionary), a work where no one needs to talk about morality because it imbues every moment of the characters’ lives and underlies every one of their actions (especially those actions that are morally culpable and hence carry within them elements that can bring societal chaos), it is also a work that never loses contact with life as it is lived—whether lived in its own world or in the world it is readily and at every moment analogizable to: ours.

  65. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 8, 2012 - 4:35 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    Of course. Everything is about power. Likewise the reason the movement has not found traction is everything to do with power. Power does not come from masses, although sometimes it appears that. But always, behind the scenes in the parts that history does not record, there has been a concentrated effort of determination…sometimes by just one or two people. And always that effort has to create a concentration of power and energy which is used to clear the way for the movement to explode

  66. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 8, 2012 - 4:31 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    I meant to say, gaining power, money, and fame is almost always reproductively advantageous. A person’s life is almost always much better off with those things. Now, obviously, if we are talking about the power of a serial killer, that is something else. The personality that becomes Stalin is psychopathic. But neither Stalin nor the serial killer can be impacted much by moral lessons. And besides, that is just one form of power, which is unhealthy to say the least, but hardly typical of the forms of power to be had on earth.

    Most forms of power that any teenager can actually aspire to achieving are beneficial to him. And especially if by power, we really mean efficacy. How on earth can the pursuit of that be bad, and why would we wish to discourage it? Isn’t the feeling a kid has when winning a game, hitting a ball or acing a test, something we should encourage? Doesn’t it harm their development to confuse them by making them think the feelings of victory they experience in such moments are actually some form of “dark power” that needs to be throttled?

    This is generally my concern with many forms of Christian and deontological or duty ethics, as opposed to a healthier, life-affirming ethical system. The Romans seem to have been onto something in this area from what I can see. The root of virtue is vir, which I understand to be related to the term “manly” in Latin. In other words, the ancients didn’t demand we make our children effeminate or eschew power in order to be moral; indeed, quite the opposite.

    Ironically, don’t we set our White kids up for being suckered by the corrupt form of power-lusters when we train them to ignore what is prudent or in their long-term self-interest, and let some political or religious figure tell them they ought to give up their lives for some “higher” cause?

    Of course, some sense of group loyalty is necessary for a group to survive, but group loyalty doesn’t work in the long run if it isn’t connected to individual and family self-interest as well.

  67. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 8, 2012 - 4:26 am | Permalink

    Enemies to learn from:

    Saul Alinksy

    In her latest piece Glick argues that Jews are now using the same tactics to attack other Jews/jewish-causes

  68. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 8, 2012 - 4:26 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: I remember the same scene and the same words, which I shan’t repeat here. I was as shocked as you were and construed them, along with much else in the movie (which I hated), as a deliberate act of falsification. I also specifically recall that everything about the movie seemed creepily Jewish, not least ET himself, and that was a sensation quite new to me. It all got me thinking—but I kept my thoughts to myself, I’m not proud to say, because I knew even then that saying disapprobatory things, however mild they might be, about the Jews brought heat and hurt down upon you.

  69. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 8, 2012 - 4:02 am | Permalink

    I suppose the message from LOTR that bothers me, if I understand it (I am just going on what I’ve heard others say), is the general idea that the pursuit of power is corrupt or it is usually corrupt. The ring represents ultimate power as I understand it, and it corrupts those who get it, and so I suppose we are to learn that it is best to avoid power?

    This doesn’t strike me as a particularly good message for kids, especially White kids. When on earth do we ever actually confront an issue like that? Almost without exception, gaining power if reproductively advantageous. Being an alpha male, other things being equal, is better than a beta or omega.

  70. Floda's Gravatar Floda
    June 8, 2012 - 3:08 am | Permalink

    @Faustus: I agree with you on the very high standard of commentary on this site, it a genuine pleasure to read. I was born at the end of WW2 in Germany and spent three years in primary school there before our family left for sunny Australia. My Father was a junior officer in the Wehrmacht in the East.

    At around my sixth birthday he gave a me book called ‘Die Nibelung’ which was about the hero Siegfried who slew a bad tempered dragon in the Woods and bathed in its blood which made him impervious to arrows and spears and the like. But as he bathed he was unaware that the evil Black prince was secretly watching him and that he observed a leaf from an Oak tree slowly wafting down and landing on Siegfried’s back. This, deduced the Prince, was Siegfried’s Achilles heel, to do him in, the evil one needed to skulk up behind him and stick something sharp and fatal into that spot.

    This was my first book and looking back, I think the old man could see very clearly what our Jewish friends had in store for little German boys of the post war generation. I think he gave me the book so a part of my inner being would forever remain loyal to the defeated German people which I most certainly am. However, I say almost without exception in my experience most Germans of my generation who endured the post war guilt indoctrination by remaining in German schools succumbed to it. I once made the mistake upon meeting a fellow of around my age who had spent his first 35 years there of letting slip certain of my own views on the swindle which is the alleged holocaust. He would have liked to hit me, but we belong to the same club and these days are nodding acquaintances. When (and if) this movie comes to OZ I will take my English wife to see it.

  71. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 8, 2012 - 3:02 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Funny you mention ET. Or not funny, but it brings to mind how horribly our culture was degraded decades ago. I don’t remember the story itself being horrible, just silly. But what I do remember is Spielberg putting obscene and totally unrealistic words into the mouth of a very young boy in the cast. It insinuated that another boy engaged in homosexual acts. The mother is shown as laughing (despite herself) in the movie.

    This casual mixing of perversion, sexuality and childhood was already common 30 years ago in what ostensibly was family fare. Spielberg did something a bit similar in Back to the Future, in which he promotes the threat of a mother/son sexual relationship (unknown to the mother). The pattern is repeated to often to be an accident.

  72. buck's Gravatar buck
    June 8, 2012 - 2:47 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    No, it’s not a debate I would wish to start. Jews make brilliant movies and I would suggest that Zimmerman does a fine job with “A Man for All Seasons” which is superior to the original play for example.

    My point about Casablanca is the self-confident way in which the script implies there was no mass exterminations by the Nazis. Lazlo goads them about their inefficiency in that regard! They were simply presented as the bad guys. Is that not a curious for a 1943 “Jewish” film?

  73. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 8, 2012 - 2:44 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: And, alas, zero chance that these elementary facts will sink in without seemingly endless repetition.

  74. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 8, 2012 - 2:40 am | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    I am a big fan of “Casablanca”. …

    As Alice Teller just said to JS, nobody’s perfect. Still, if you next tell me that you cry during ET (unless from frustration and rage), you’re toast. Forever.

  75. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 8, 2012 - 2:20 am | Permalink


    Cameron did Avatar and Titanic. There is zero chance he wants to do anything remotely pro-White. Lucas is married to a black woman and did the goofy movie Red Tails. There is zero chance he wants to do anything remotely pro-White.

  76. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 8, 2012 - 1:30 am | Permalink

    @pstreitz: @Faustus:
    Both of you gentlemen have made excellent points. On behalf of my gender may I point out that women have been brainwashed by feminism for two generations now. It starts very young, is pervasive – everything from cartoons to the girl scouts, and it expertly mixes truth with outright lies. Girls are also more compliant than boys. All of this adds up to misery and unhappiness for many women who have no idea why.

    One of the first attacks was on fairy tales. It was announced from on high that all fairy tales were lies which led woman to destruction. There are no happy endings, no one lives happily ever after, there are no knights in shining armor and women don’t need protection. These mythic archetypes of the male-female relationship were replaced with lies about interchangeability, silly movies in which petite women routinely defeat strong men, co-ed martial arts classes in which the taboo against raising a hand to a woman are systematically destroyed, endless repetition of the notion that pregnant women are offended by their husband’s protective concern for their safety in virtually every cop show on TV.

    I sincerely hope that Hollywood’s endless lack of originality will produce lots of copycats of real fairy tales again. They are magic.

  77. Lombard's Gravatar Lombard
    June 8, 2012 - 1:13 am | Permalink

    The LOTR movies water down the idea of moral code=Euro tradition which is expected, especially as Hollywood relies more and more on non-western $ to make bank. So potentially, things should get even worse in the future unless whites become politically aware and use boycott power to make their feelings known.

    The last time a group of whites used that power was the Catholic decency league? but they got paid off and sold out by other whites, as is the norm.

    One possibility is that independently rich directors like James Cameron/
    Lucas decide to use their position and give something back to their culture/heritage despite the obvious backlash they’ll receive. Somehow, i suspect they’ve been compromised by now…you know probably filmed/set-up in some pedo-type ritual.

  78. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 8, 2012 - 1:12 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    That’s okay, Jason. No one is perfect.

  79. Steve's Gravatar Steve
    June 8, 2012 - 1:03 am | Permalink


    What do we do, what do we do?!

    Do what the envirotons advise: Think globally, act locally. All of us have a sphere of influence in our lives. Use it. Seek to expand it. There are multitudes of small ways we can push against the system. Do it. An extemporaneous sample follows…I’m sure others here can think of more and better.

    1) Jury nullification. It’s not just for blacks anymore.

    2) If you’re in a position to hire, then consider only minorities: whites are approx 10% of the Earth’s population.

    3) Barter for services when possible. Buy goods over the Internet. Lower your tax profile.

    4) Support white conservative businesses. Shun liberals in every capacity.

    5) Donate to those few politicians and activists who are with us. You want a strong leader to emerge? Then support them…and not just as a cheerleader.

    6) Foster a healthy racial pride and awareness in your children…and have many of them.

    7) Talk to your friends…many will listen…most don’t have a clue. Remember how you came to this state of awareness. Help others.

    8) Write letters. Tell 365black McDonalds that you’ll only be eating there on leap-years. And tell them why. Write, or better call, your congress-scum. Don’t be explicitly racial, but become loud about everything that impacts our who/whom. Most of these people are cowards at heart and simply want a socially prestigious sinecure without hassles or confrontation. Give them both.

    9) Stop giving Hollywood your money. Stop looking askance in fear when you say something that our enemies don’t like. And stop giving a damn about platoons of negroes in silk pajamas skirmishing over a ball.

    10) Finally, allow the voodoo talismans of “racist!” and “anti-semite!” to have no more power over you. Though I doubt this has much need to be said here.


  80. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 7, 2012 - 10:42 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    Oh, and please, I know Gladiator and LOTR are totally different kinds of movies; when I say what is different about them, I mean in terms of moral tone and worldview.

  81. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 7, 2012 - 10:37 pm | Permalink

    So as far as the movies are concerned, how is LOTR different from Gladiator? I have seen Gladiator and liked it very much. But, I haven’t seen LOTR despite so many people saying good things about. I tried reading the book long ago and couldn’t get past the singing elves. I literally put the book down, so part of it is that I am not a fan of the fantasy genre (I never really liked Star Wars that much for the same reason).

    I may try it again, I just can’t stand midget characters, dragons and that kind of thing, nor am I enamored of the Medievalist worldview.

  82. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 7, 2012 - 10:21 pm | Permalink

    @Celtic Spirit:

    Thanks for sharing that.

    The Lord of the Rings movies really helped me, too, in different ways; they are a good example of the positive potential that movies offer. They show that something seemingly small and unimportant like watching a movie trilogy can actually have a great, positive ripple effect. And that ripple or domino effect moves into the future in unexpected and unseen ways.

    I think it’s likely (or at least possible) that every piece of art (painting/book/music/movie/television) contains a spirit, and in the case of The Lord of the Rings that spirit is a good one. So if a person watches those movies and enjoys/resonates with them, then he has absorbed some good spirit.


    You wrote:

    Mel Gibson does more than Pseudo-whites like Ridley Scott whose latest project features obligatory black on white (Charlize lol) relationship, holocaust reference, evil greco-roman white aliens etc

    A Jew named Lindelof wrote the script, so it might not be fair to attribute all the blame to director Ridley Scott. I know almost nothing about that movie, though, and doubt I will ever watch it.

  83. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    June 7, 2012 - 9:00 pm | Permalink


    I am a big fan of “Casablanca” (sorry, Pierre!) and, especially, its dialogue; but, yes, it was, indeed, a thoroughly Jewish production: executive producer Jack Warner (whose step-daughter played the Romanian newlywed, Annina) of Warner Brothers; producer Hal Wallis; director Michael Curtiz; screenwriters Julius and Philip Epstein (the latter the grandfather of Theo Epstein, late of the Red Sox, now of the Cubs), and, then, Howard Koch; composer Max Steiner. Even the montages were done by a young Don Siegel– who became a well-known director (e.g., “Dirty Harry” and several other Clint Eastwood films). Several of the supporting players were also Jewish refugees (e.g., Peter Lorre, as Ugarte).

  84. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 7, 2012 - 7:33 pm | Permalink

    What is important for me is that when I watch the film it will be through the prism created for me by KMac, and most likely I will come away with renewed spirit and determination.

    There is infinitely more to be had from positives than negatives. We are only human, and although perhaps we feel as though bleak news from the front ought redouble our resolve, in practice it can be very hard…reasons to commit and struggle to make a personal difference need positive envisionings.

    If the negatives and the bleakness are what is real, then we have to keep it real by speaking mostly of that. But I for one welcome pieces like this too. It gives me strength.

  85. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 7, 2012 - 7:33 pm | Permalink

    @buckle: If you are hinting that you consider Casablanca overrated (perhaps even massively or grotesquely so), please know that you may count on me to bear a lance in support of your cause.

  86. Faustus's Gravatar Faustus
    June 7, 2012 - 6:59 pm | Permalink

    I am continually amazed at the cogent and intelligent ‘comments’ here.

    I will be seeing the movie Friday night.

    In the world of ‘today’, many of these primal feelings of love and romance may exist but, sadly, are all too rare; when they seem to exist, it is in furtive ways, accepted, perhaps, in the company of two or three people. I have watched my own children grow up in an ever increasingly pessimistic environment, and yet I was reading LOTR to my own at 10 and 13, around the time I first read it. Their generation, although engulfed with the magic and racial undertones of this magnificent work, seem to go about their daily routines as if nothing extraordinary had happened (this may change with the years).

    Most of us here are Romantics, and then throw in a good dose of decent, intellectual, poetic, nationalistic fervor, and a majority we do not make. Moreover, the need, as was suggested previously, to facilitate and promote ‘professional’ attempts seems, at the outset, to be a hard sell, and I am in the majority who cannot seem to fathom why men like Mel Gibson (and professional men and women of his caliber), has not seen fit to engage some of us, any of us, with these ideas in mind.

    I have made calls to Ron Howard, and Mel for these inroads, but their body of handlers is hard to get through.

    On the matter of ‘romantic’ love, or that which is sundered from ‘physical’ love: Yes, the Western /cultural inflections indicate a predilection for Men to restrain themselves, to promote a more, shall we say, chivalrous attitude toward our sexual partners; this, however, is problematic, as most [white] females seem to contract with such a variety of races and religions (which are predominately the same), that Western men seem to fall by the wayside in numbers that are stark indeed.

    I am sure that most of the men here are, or fancy themselves as being, like the Huntsman – I know I do. Be that as it may, those deep and tender feelings of ‘protection’ and strength when faced with our ‘woman’s’ need of same seems, at first blush, to be rejected for the most part, out of hand, to the detriment of many of my male associates.

    Then, on the other side, one is aware of healthy sexual tension between male/female – and this, also, is primal – and not to be confused with all the present-talk of ‘misogyny’ does, nevertheless, seem to ‘garner the win’, and White men are not winning much these days.

    In his 88 Precepts, David Lane attempted to concisely draw distinctions between ‘Life and Death’, and I would offer several of these for consideration:

    34. The instinct for sexual union is part of Nature’s perfect mechanism for specie preservation. It begins early in life and often continues until late in life. It must not be repressed; its purpose, reproduction, must not be thwarted either. Understand that for thousands of years our females bore children at an early age. Now, in an attempt to conform to and compete in an alien culture, they deny their Nature-ordained instincts and duties. Teach responsibility, but, also, have understanding. The life of a race springs from the wombs of its women (emph. mine). He who would judge must first understand the difference between what is good and what is right.

    37. That race whose males will not fight to death to keep and mate with their females will perish. Any White man with healthy instincts feels disgust and revulsion when he sees a woman of his race with a man of another race. Those, who today control the media and affairs of the Western World, teach that this is wrong and shameful. They label it “racism.” As any “ism,” for instance the word “nationalism,” means to promote one’s own nation; “racism” merely means to promote and protect the life of one’s own race. It is, perhaps, the proudest word in existence. Any man who disobey these instincts is anti-Nature.

    I love a good movie, just like the next person, just remember that ‘real-life’ exists just outside those doors, and it remains a daily obligation to live your life with the highest degree of honour and obligation to your Folk – and this includes one’s ‘love of their life’ – and more importantly, to pass this on to whoever has the ability and spirit to do so. Yes, we need more of Snow White, and we definately need MORE Huntsmen.

  87. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    June 7, 2012 - 6:56 pm | Permalink


    Biggest film industry in the World is in India. Their films are ethnically pure and seemingly impossible to subvert.

  88. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    June 7, 2012 - 6:52 pm | Permalink


    I do believe Curtiz was a Jew as were the script writers. Made in 1943, it contains the memorable line from Viktor Lazlo “that even Germans couldn’t kill that fast” in reference to the “thousands” who would rise up against the Nazis and thus ready to take his place in the event of his own death. An interesting boast when you reflect upon it.

  89. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 7, 2012 - 6:06 pm | Permalink


    Excellent article and I believe you rightly pointed to the subconscious message. I can’t wait to see it to get my own take. I suspect its storyline will mimic the events we all will be sharing in, in the near future. Hollywood loves to do that.

    The Lord of the Rings trilogy mimicked Christian scriptures as it spoke of the end of this particular age. In its second installment, it told of our near future here in America (Rohan) and how we win against all odds. It explains the the power centers of old Europe (The old Royal houses), The Shire (Western Europe) and that of the Vatican (Saruman). What I found most interesting was how they even showed the power of the “Jews” in America (Grima WormTongue) and the role they play.

    Gandolph (Aware Christianity)- Legolis (Power of the Nordic races), Aragorn (Combination of White races) and Gimli (the more barbaric of our races in the east) are featured as a new type of gathering that seeks to save the white race and what we stand for, opposing the old evil corrupt structures in the west.

    The final portion “Return of the King” explains the last battles of WW3 as it centers out of Palestine/Israel (Gondor). It explains the defeat of the Arabs, Asiatics, “bad Jews”, and Indians of the east. This again mimics scripture perfectly as it foretells the events that culminate at the end of this particular age.

    When the “bad Jews” are destroyed and only “good Jews” are left, the west wins the battle of middle earth (Gondor). After the defeat of the white mans foes, the forces who now control middle earth and all of the west go to battle one last time to take down what can best be described as Babylon the Great (Mordor and Mount Doom). After complete victory is achieved, there is an installing of a main “Christ” like figure to rule the planet (Aragon). The end of the story explains how some go to “heaven” and how others inherit the earth (stay home to rule).

    I find it amazing how films like the Lord of the Rings mimic our current and future situations by using biblical symbolism and narratives. I am wondering if I will see the same type of race/religion programming in the movie you just review.

    Keep up the good work…

  90. Celtic Spirit's Gravatar Celtic Spirit
    June 7, 2012 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

    I am encouraged that my grandson, now 15, has been raised on the Lord of the Ring stories. He loved those movies, and when the time comes, he will identify with his people, and fight with everything in his power to preserve them and their way of life. He and others like him, will be formidable indeed.

  91. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    June 7, 2012 - 5:11 pm | Permalink

    @Helvena: I couldn’t agree more. Todays, Hollywood/entertainment industry, is not pro white male by ANY stretch of the imagination. When will some people get that through their thick heads!! LOL.

  92. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 7, 2012 - 4:46 pm | Permalink


    Everyone mentions Mel Gibson as some kind of potential hero of White nationalism. He’s done great films like Braveheart (although I didn’t think it was all that great personally). But while Gibson does support individual freedom and he is concerned with a certain kind of traditional Catholicism, I see zero evidence that he will ever have an interest in White nationalism or promoting pro-White causes in general.

  93. pstreitz's Gravatar pstreitz
    June 7, 2012 - 2:48 pm | Permalink

    Casablanca remains a classic for the reasons stated above. It is Rick Blaine’s willingness to sacrifice his own personal (sexual) interest in Inga? that ennobles him.

    Men have two contradictory impulses toward women, the first is sexual, the desire to copulate and reproduce, the second is to protect. That desire, the notion that is men’s obligation has been much abused in the era of feminism. But it remains fundamental to our species and many other species. It is the male lion’s job to protect females and their cubs against other predatory males. To substitute a male hierarchy of protection for sexual anarchy with females assaulted at every turn. This is inscribed in our culture with the saying, “women love a man with a uniform on.” Because these men, cops, soldiers, firefighters, etc are doing the primal job of protecting the society.

    In The Hunger Games, when it comes down two, and only one can live, it is the man who says, “I’ll die.” Not the young woman. Could it be any other way.

  94. Lombard's Gravatar Lombard
    June 7, 2012 - 2:36 pm | Permalink

    Mel Gibson does more than Pseudo-whites like Ridley Scott whose latest project features obligatory black on white (Charlize lol) relationship, holocaust reference, evil greco-roman white aliens etc

  95. jack's Gravatar jack
    June 7, 2012 - 1:31 pm | Permalink

    I think you are looking too much into the film and seeing a hidden racial connotation that is not there as black has been a long standing visual cue in films to represent a sinister presence like Darth Vader and The Emperor in Star Wars.

    If you want something to analyse you should check out Star Trek Deep Space 9 and the shape shifting race that controls The Dominion an army of genetically engineered soldiers who worship them as gods called The Founders/Changelings that want to conquer universes because they have a persecution syndrome that “solids” want to suppress and kill them.

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    Other countries like Poland have their own film industry as well as Finland that I don’t think have much Jewish influence there so you could just watch their films assuming you don’t mind reading subtitles.

    “All of this only underlines what has been said on this forum before, which is that Whites should create their own film industry.

    People like Mel Gibson who have both the talent and the money to do that still try to suck up to the Jews but so far nobody has come forward to take the initiative.”

    Who would distribute the films for mass commercial release?

    Gibson’s latest film Get the Gringo was a straight to VOD in the US despite getting theatrical releases in Europe and the Mid East including Israel and sinking $20 million of his own money to make it.

  96. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    June 7, 2012 - 12:37 pm | Permalink

    Beatiful blonde woman as the villain, need to say more.

  97. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 7, 2012 - 9:44 am | Permalink

    All of this only underlines what has been said on this forum before, which is that Whites should create their own film industry.

    People like Mel Gibson who have both the talent and the money to do that still try to suck up to the Jews but so far nobody has come forward to take the initiative. We can’t blame the Jews for our own apathy or cowardice.

  98. June 7, 2012 - 9:33 am | Permalink

    @ Franklin, “One wonders, if Hollywood is entirely Jewish (and therefore anti-White) why they would produce a film with such obviously pro-White themes?” – They want a race/culling war. Pump Whites up to fight and the jews can kill two birds with one stone, Whites and Blacks (Muslims, Mestizos, Browns etc.). Think of Band of Brothers that came out in June 2001. The Afghanistan war started in Oct. 2001. Fast forward to today with the preparation for war with Iran, the dark evil empire. We’re being played like a fiddle.

  99. Hooper's Gravatar Hooper
    June 7, 2012 - 9:11 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: I agree, certainly. My only point is that it would make more sense for them to not worry so much about a few fledgling white intellectuals ( the Derbyshire, Buchanan types) who have minimal mass-appeal potential and, instead, clamp down severely on the types of films which have the potential to alter the emotional tenor of the society (a development they surely would rather not risk). To me it seems like an odd oversight for an otherwise ruthless ruling class.

  100. Lombard's Gravatar Lombard
    June 7, 2012 - 8:31 am | Permalink

    5 mins in and I see the first Jewish in-joke. Zio bloodlines marrying off their daughters (evil Queen) to the heroic white Kings/Elites and usurping their kingdoms.

  101. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    June 7, 2012 - 8:22 am | Permalink

    @Snoutsmack: A male friend of my mine was enthusiastic about ‘Deadwood’ when it was on, and kept telling me that I needed to watch it. I refuse to subscribe to cable TV, so eventually my buddy sent me a DVD collection of the first season.

    My impression? I am a huge, really huge fan of Westerns. And, I tend to like the type of Westerns which are as realistic as possible – as opposed to the older TV Westerns where all the characters were clean, wore freshly washed clothes, all the guys were smooth shaven and looked as if they bathed regularly and all the ladies were dressed well and had clean and shiny hair, and none of the streets in Matt Dillon’s town ever had any piles of horse manure. I always thought that sort of Western was pretty unrealistic. Well, I can’t remember the exact number of DVDs that were in the set for season one – but, I made it no farther than the second DVD before I could stomach no more.

    The reason? The unbelievably obnoxious amount of foul language. Every other word was the dreaded f-bomb. From both the male and the female characters. Now, I’m not a prude and under normal circumstances – occasional profanity in the scripts of movies doesn’t necessary always offend me. But, the act of inserting a swear word into the dialog has to ‘fit’. In Deadwood, it never did. It was deliberately excessive and it became such a turn off that I bailed out on the series.

    For an example, when we all were younger – we all probably knew some kid who was close to our age who would try to look older by constantly using every cuss word he had ever heard anyone older ever use. But, being young and immature – these kids didn’t realize that one has to learn HOW to swear. I mean it does take a bit of talent and skill to know how to swear and how to place which words into which contexts and under which circumstances, right? Thus, the comical phenomena of encountering a amateur ‘cusser’ who’s inability and inexperience in the fine art of cussing – passes through each of our lives, and becomes a source of considerable amusement.

    Well, the writers for the cast of Deadwood seemed to me to fit that precise profile.

    Oh, and I also wondered if the entire show was just another attempt by our #1 enemy to insert more sleaze and dehumanizing and disgusting degeneracy into the well-loved ‘Western’ genre, since that type of movie has always appealed mostly to White people. A.k.a, Brokebutt Mountain.

  102. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 7, 2012 - 8:01 am | Permalink

    I’m curious about the story telling abilities of Jews vs. Whites. Obviously, Jews have been involved with many highly influential stories (here I include all sorts of stories, whether fictitious, religious, pseudoscientific, etc)

    Jews have been very involved in our religious beliefs/stories for over 2,000 years, as well various pseudosciences like Freudianism or Cultural Marxism or Feminism for the last century. But those are not held out to be fiction. They rely on being taken as factual for their power to be effective, even though we know that at least some of them are pure flimflam. Jews seem to excel at that kind of parlor game version of making up ideas, although Whites have their own share of goofy stories parading as intellectualism (ex. Transcendentalism).

    But what about pure fiction stories? I ask those who are more well versed in the world of fiction. My superficial guess is that Jews don’t seem particularly good at. When I think of all the great stories of Europe, they were virtually all White Gentile, going back 3,000 years (further if we include Gilgamesh). Of course, every culture produces fiction, but it seems that Whites (or Indo-Europeans) truly excel at it. Do Whites have a special gift in this regard?

    And just to anticipate, yes, I know such things as the Holocaust can be classified as a fiction, but the difference is, they are not sold as fiction. My question is this: do Whites excel at creating fiction stories that are recognized as fiction stories?

  103. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 7, 2012 - 7:54 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: I applaud your skepticism. I regret to say that I share it. I know nothing whatsoever about the movie apart from what I read here, but the description of it alone abounds with far too many culture-of-critique aspects for me to join in the applause.

    Their frequently raw, frightening aspects notwithstanding, the Grimms’ reworkings of the folk and fairy tales with which their names are forever associated all have a moral foundation and a clear pattern of moral development—a moral arc, shall we say. In a purposefully simplified way, of course, so does Disney’s Snow White. Nothing I have read so far, however, points to the present film’s having a moral arc of any sort. High romance, yes; laudable sexual restraint, yes; deeper moral insight and, one hopes, betterment, no. Still, I should be very glad to be told that the situation here is otherwise and that my doubts are unfounded and my fears groundless.

  104. Brahms's Gravatar Brahms
    June 7, 2012 - 7:09 am | Permalink

    Perhaps there is another take. Just as Jewish media influences us, our culture influences them. It is our ideals of beauty and love to which Jewish women aspire. I had a friend who was a semi-bigshot name in the fashion industry and he was completely aware of the Jewish dominance of that industry- in all areas except the actual models. The lack of European beauty is a point of severe annoyance for the Jewish women in the entertainment industry. There is much jealousy of European beauty and culture.

  105. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 7, 2012 - 6:21 am | Permalink


    2)The lack of any explicit pro white motive made it hard to mount a campaign against the film without the motivation of the opposing forces becoming too obvious. i.e. they were afraid to overplay their hand.

    I doubt it. Is this really the way Jews operate?Aren’t they overplaying their hand regularly? Look at their absolutely hysterical reaction to Mel Gibson’s film The Passion of Christ or even Abe Foxman’s campaign against “anti-Semitism” in the New Testament, not exactly ways to endear themselves with the Christian public, yet they did it.

    What exactly the intention of this film is, if indeed its release is Jewish controlled, is not clear. There seems to be some ambiguity here.

    Perhaps that is the maximum that can be reached under the present circumstances : a film with pro-White themes that are only implicit combined with some ambiguity. Still an improvement over the usual stuff.

  106. June 7, 2012 - 5:32 am | Permalink

    @Hooper: It’s also possible that MacDonald’s appraisal of the film is a bit rose-colored, but I don’t know.

    They cast an attractive blonde in the role of the villainess. What more do you want? If they didn’t get enough licks in this time, they’ll more than compensate later.

    Sometimes Hollywood films are not perceived by Whites in accord with Jewish expectations. White people have a strong tendency to ignore whatever parts of a film they find disagreeable, which is why so many racialists enjoyed Falling Down and American History X. I heard a professor of social psychology say once in a lecture that the same problem occurred with All in the Family: Archie Bunker was seen as a sympathetic character in spite of the Jewish writers’ and producer’s intentions.

  107. Hooper's Gravatar Hooper
    June 7, 2012 - 4:26 am | Permalink

    Given that the well ensconced anti-white nomenclature goes to great lengths to nip any and all even mildly expressed pro-white sentiment in bud – silencing and marginalizing political commentators, politicians, relatively unknown columnists who dare to express anything deviating from Acceptable Political Discourse — it’s hard to imagine they would sign off on even an implicitly pro-White film. While the film is far from a rallying cry for whites to unite against the enemy, the potential for great effect at an emotional level (something the Hollywoodites understand very well) is great. It seems to lead to one of two conclusions:

    1) The media/Hollywood elite is actually fractured and control is not as uniformly in the hands of the Jewish elite as many of us fear.

    2) The lack of any explicit pro white motive made it hard to mount a campaign against the film without the motivations of the opposing forces becoming too obvious. I.e. they were afraid to overplay their hand.

  108. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 7, 2012 - 3:41 am | Permalink

    @Julian Curtis Lee:

    I haven’t seen the film, but what I felt KM was doing was demonstrating how a story can be focused onto our situation, regardless of whether that was the intention. The intention of using blond evil people was probably either to neutralize or confuse racial feelings. However…because we are willing to see the White sellouts in power as enemies, we are able to make the film our own.
    But we are able to do so without losing sight for an instant on who is really in power.
    So they just spent 170 million dollars helping us. Not what they hoped to do.

  109. June 7, 2012 - 3:21 am | Permalink


    I stayed in a house in what is left of the old town of Kassel. In this very house had lived the mother upon whom the brothers Grimm had based the mythologised mother from their tales.

    The Brothers Grimm were scholars that collected traditional stories. The stories aren’t supposed to have elements that they invented.

  110. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 7, 2012 - 3:19 am | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott:
    If we had more ugly people like this reproducing we would be in much better shape.

    The ugly actor and his wife.

  111. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    June 7, 2012 - 2:50 am | Permalink

    I stayed in a house in what is left of the old town of Kassel. In this very house had lived the mother upon whom the brothers Grimm had based the mythologised mother from their tales. I mention this because Kassel was razed to the ground between March 1942 and February 1945. Next to nothing was left of what must have been a city of breathtaking beauty other than a few houses of which my temporary residence was one. The population having collapsed from 236,000 in 1939 to under 50,000 in 3 years.

  112. June 7, 2012 - 2:01 am | Permalink

    They picked rather ugly actors to play Snow White and the Huntsman. They have broad noses and the huntsman looks brutish. I have personal friends that are much more attractive than these people! Compare the appearance of White performers from a few decades ago.

    In the old days you could also take as a given that the Evil Queen would have black hair.

  113. June 7, 2012 - 1:54 am | Permalink


    thx. good night.

  114. Family Man's Gravatar Family Man
    June 7, 2012 - 1:45 am | Permalink

    Going to take the wife to see it this weekend!

  115. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    June 6, 2012 - 10:59 pm | Permalink

    No harsh comments on the actress playing the beautiful but evil queen Ravenna, please. Like other Hollywood Moms such as Angelina Jolie, Madonna, Sandra Bullock and Mariska Hargitay, Charlize Theron has adopted a Black baby. That makes her morally superior – by Hollywood moral standards.

  116. June 6, 2012 - 10:55 pm | Permalink

    Here’s a review of the HBO series “Deadwood.” Dr. MacDonald is mentioned in relation to Jewish self deception with regards to the writers and producers of that show.

    “Following the White Rabbit through Deadwood”

    The Review starts May 22 and ends June 03.

    Start with link below (May22) “Deadwood:Prelude to a review.”

  117. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    June 6, 2012 - 10:49 pm | Permalink

    Theron is probably just trying to shove it up her White Afrikaners father. It’s indeed a pity a good movie can’t be boycotted because of her involvement. The looks she trades upon will be ruined by the multiracial future she advocates.

    Another good film with but with the irritating Angelina Jolie is the Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck scripted, directed and produced movie “The Tourist”. Donnersmarck is German and though the characters are English it is set in Europe and Venice so the movie contains little politically correct racially unbelievable casting.

    It recalls the affable style of Cary Grant. (no he wasn’t gay)

    Moreover it contains non of the anti-White subtext that leaves White people feeling alienated. This is really important to me, I was finding many movies were literally making me feel psychically sick. I have Professor MacDonald’s work to thank for allowing me understand and a release from this. I could feel the hate cumming of Hollywood work and didn’t quite understand why. I suppose it’s a sort of battered westerner, codependent, toxic parent syndrome..

    The villains are the Russian Mafia. They however have anglicized names and a haughty English style (English villains with a plumb accent are common these days). Ironically the actors themselves are Jewish in name and appearance, which actually fits reality more.

  118. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    June 6, 2012 - 10:46 pm | Permalink

    After reading the last sentence in the article, all I could think of was, I hope he is right, because it’s been a very long time, and I can’t wait!

  119. Julian Curtis Lee's Gravatar Julian Curtis Lee
    June 6, 2012 - 9:40 pm | Permalink

    When I first saw the ads for this movie I thought: “Oh no. What are they destroying and perverting now?”

    What a happy day to read this review and about the ideas in the movie.

  120. frebolius's Gravatar frebolius
    June 6, 2012 - 7:45 pm | Permalink

    Excellent review!!! and by the way,…why was the latest Lasha Darkmoon article taken down so quikly??? very strange

  121. Ted Riordan's Gravatar Ted Riordan
    June 6, 2012 - 7:04 pm | Permalink

    It’s only “pro white” because it’s a metaphor and not openly pro white. See “The Help” if you want the Jewish outlook on evil whitey.

  122. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 6, 2012 - 6:22 pm | Permalink

    Big thanks to Dr. MacDonald for this article — very encouraging.

    Thanks again.

  123. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 6, 2012 - 6:05 pm | Permalink


    You can rent them from Netflix, and they’re also available on Amazon. If by “kid-friendly” you mean devoid of violence and sex, yes.

    The mountain films were directed and pioneered by Arnold Fanck, a geologist, filmmaker, and German nationalist. His films were huge hits in Germany, and it was he who discovered Leni Riefenstahl, who starred in all of his mountain films, which include The Holy Mountain, The White Hell of Pitz Palu, Storm Over Mont Blanc, and one or two others.

    Of course Riefenstahl took what she learned from Fanck and became a director herself, debuting with her own mountain film, The Blue Light, which is an absolute classic. In fact it’s probably the best of the mountain films. In 2008 Germany made a modern mountain film called North Face, which is a really intense film, based on the true story of two climbers who attempted the north face of the Eiger. It’s recommended as well.

    Thematically speaking, the mountain films are very Nietzchean, but Julius Evola and Plato were other influences. The Holy Mountain and Storm Over Mont Blanc are about male-female differences while The White Hell of Pitz Palu is basically an old-fashioned adventure film.

    I really like them all. They have incredible imagery (especially The Holy Mountain) and are quintissentially White films. Highly recommended to anyone on here for their artistry and intellectualism.

  124. June 6, 2012 - 5:48 pm | Permalink


    Where can I find these films? Are they kids friendly?

  125. norman sunden's Gravatar norman sunden
    June 6, 2012 - 5:42 pm | Permalink

    It’s interesting that in PC land the HuffPost saw only that Filmmakers were accused of ignoring “Little People” for Dwarf roles. As usual Mr MacDonald see’s the real heart of the matter.

  126. Sean's Gravatar Sean
    June 6, 2012 - 5:24 pm | Permalink

    Elite Whites like Charlize Theron like dispossessing her own people and allying herself with Woody Allen types plugs into exactly what is happening throughout the West.

  127. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    June 6, 2012 - 5:24 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: Hollywood/Jews produce pro-White movies when serves their interests, this is my experience.

  128. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 6, 2012 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    “One wonders, if Hollywood is entirely Jewish (and therefore anti-White) why they would produce a film with such obviously pro-White themes?”

    1. It’s only implicitly White.
    2. Hollywood isn’t entirely Jewish-run; think Scorsese, Coppola, Lucas, Jackson, Cameron.

    The credits behind the film are interesting.

    Director: Rupert Sanders (Brit)

    Evan Daugherty
    John Lee Hancock
    Hossein Amini
    (presumably all White, apart from Amini, who’s Iranian)

    Laurie Boccaccio
    Gloria S. Borders
    Sarah Bradshaw
    Helen Hayden
    Sam Mercer
    Palak Patel
    Joe Roth

    Seems like minimal jewish involvement. Plus the film is called Snow White, and it’s based on a German legend. It’s hard de-White-ify.

  129. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 6, 2012 - 4:40 pm | Permalink

    I think that generally prof. MacDonald’s analysis of this film is right. One wonders, if Hollywood is entirely Jewish (and therefore anti-White) why they would produce a film with such obviously pro-White themes?
    Still there seem to be some anti-White elements smuggled into the film surreptitiously. Snow White’s hair for example is not blond but black, while the hair of evil queen Ravenna and of her brother Finn is blond. The Huntsman’s wife, who had such a positive influence on him, is called Sarah, which is a very Jewish name.

    All in all the Jews who “allowed” this film to pass couldn’t resist the temptation to add a little sabotage to an otherwise too positive and too pro-White film.

  130. Brad's Gravatar Brad
    June 6, 2012 - 4:08 pm | Permalink

    It is beyond me why White adults waste their time going to see more Hollywood fantasy nonsense such as this. The mere thought of giving any of my hard-earned Shekels to the dark princes that run Hollywood chills me to the bone.

  131. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 6, 2012 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

    Good article. In case people here want films that were made by Whites about White ideals and psychology, I’d recommend the German mountain films of the 20s and early 30s. Counter Currents did wonderful articles of these films and the meanings behind them.

  132. Arbiter's Gravatar Arbiter
    June 6, 2012 - 3:50 pm | Permalink

    The huge success of the Twilight-series with its desexualised Gothic romance is a similar indicator how much all of this is still alive in Western/White people’s minds…

  133. June 6, 2012 - 3:15 pm | Permalink

    Renegade Whites controlling a dark horde is a painfully apt trope. One present in LOTR as well in the character of Saruman (himself a pawn of an ancient and formless Sauron). Of course the film sticks to the tried and true “evil blonde” rule when selecting villains. A must see piece of modern implicitly White cinema it seems.

  134. June 6, 2012 - 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Great article! What can be more moral than defending a people from extermination and extinction?

    Whites are worth defending and they WILL survive. We should do everything in our power, spiritually, morally, financially, socially to wake our people.

  135. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    June 6, 2012 - 2:56 pm | Permalink

    It is good to read that “love and sex are indeed two quite different psychological adaptations,” because Hugh Hefner seems to believe they are one and the same — which idea he doubtless got from Freud.

  136. Norwegian's Gravatar Norwegian
    June 6, 2012 - 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Great review, dr. MacDonald. I have to buy this film, it goes right into the collection next to Mel Gibson’s works!

  137. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    June 6, 2012 - 2:43 pm | Permalink

    Beautiful article!

    May Whites awaken in such a way that they build strength and strategy, so as wisely to fight for what is theirs!

Comments are closed.