The Cousinhood on the World Stage.
In 1847, London’s Jewish community had produced a statement for public consumption stressing that the election of Lionel de Rothschild would represent nothing more than the election of another politician who would work for “the welfare of the nation, and the prosperity of his country.”[33] However, later actions by members of the Cousinhood who had taken places in the legislature and in government would provide cause for pondering precisely which nation was being referred to. David Feldman has revealed that entry into the legislature facilitated greater Jewish involvement in the administration of the British Empire, and that the Cousinhood was involved in a succession of financial and political scandals which had at their root “family and religious connections,” “the pursuit of profit,” and attempts to “influence colonial affairs when it deemed [global] Jewish interests were at stake.”[34]
By 1900, through a process of ethnic and familial networking, the Cousinhood had secured many of the most significant administrative positions in the Empire. Feldman notes that the Nathan family alone had by that date secured the positions of Governor of the Gold Coast, Hong Kong and Natal, Attorney-General and Chief Justice in Trinidad, Private Secretary to the Viceroy of India, Officiating Chief Secretary to the Governor of Eastern Bengal and Assam, and Postmaster-General of Bengal.[35] In Parliament, Lionel Abrahams was Permanent Assistant Under-Secretary at the India Office, working under his cousin Edwin Montagu who was then Parliamentary Under-Secretary for India.[36]
The first signs of the Cousinhood working for global ethnic interests came in the early 1890s. The Cousinhood, particularly the Montagu and Cohen families, had been instrumental in forming and leading the Russo-Jewish Committee throughout that decade, and as a branch of the aforementioned Anglo-Jewish Association, the Committee was also operating under the watchful eye of the Montefiore and Rothschild branches.[37] Readers of my previous work on the “pogroms” in Russia will be aware of the highly significant role of the Russo-Jewish Committee in sensationalizing and misrepresenting events in Russia, and their attempts to smother accurate reporting of those events. Acknowledgments of this elaborate fraud in mainstream scholarship are rare, although the truth has found some form of expression among a small number of non-Jewish scholars. For example Katherine Knox has described the tale of Jews fleeing pogroms as “classic mythology” and following close examination of the origins of “refugees” Knox was able to declare that millions of migrants left from areas entirely untouched by any form of disturbance.[38] Although Cousinhood funding, via the Russo-Jewish Committee, was directed at Russian Jews under the guise of aid, no historian has yet been able to provide evidence that this funding was used, or was ever intended to be used, in any way other than the facilitation of mass migration. Thus, it was Cousinhood financing that tapped what Lloyd Gartner called “the biological reservoir for the entire Jewish people” and, with the help of the wealthy American Jews led by Louis Marshall of the American Jewish Committee (see here, passim), brought about “American Jewry’s ascent from 260,000 in 1880 to 1,704,000 in 1907 and 3,197,000 in 1915″[39]. And of course, without this tremendous numerical ascent, it is difficult to conceive that there could have developed an AIPAC or an ADL which would be anything other than a noisy nuisance — but I lose myself in the “what ifs”…
Another example of the Cousinhood’s increasing grip on the direction of British politics came with growing Rothschild involvement in South Africa. Feldman states that during 1890s the Rothschild branch became “heavily involved in diamond and gold mining on the Rand.”[40] When the German-Jewish diamond and gold mining magnate Alfred Beit floated Rand Mines in 1893, he was crucial in ensuring the House of Rothschild received more than 25% of the shares. By 1899, Britain found itself at war with the Boers of the Transvaal over the vague cause of securing political rights for foreign gold miners.[41] Because of the obvious shared ethnic heritage of the mine owners and the diplomats who trod the path to war, “the view that the war was a Jewish war was commonplace among its opponents.”[42]
This opinion was reinforced by the fact that one of the conflict’s earliest supporters was J.H. Hertz — Chief Rabbi in South Africa. Hertz would later be rewarded for beating the war drum with an appointment to no less a position than “Chief Rabbi of the British Empire.”[43] In February 1900, Members of Parliament were openly acknowledging the Jewish complexion of the hostilities, with John Burns emphatically declaring before a full House of Commons that “Wherever we examine, there is a financial Jew operating, directing and inspiring the agonies that have led to this war…the British army which used to be used for all good causes…has become the janissary of the Jews”[44] — a comment that rings true today as a description of the American armed forces as a tool of Israel and its powerful American lobby in the war in Iraq and the looming war with Iran.
The same year, the Trades Union Congress issued a statement that the war was being fought to “secure the gold fields of South Africa for cosmopolitan Jews who have no patriotism and no country.” Justice, the newspaper of the Social Democratic Federation pointed out the involvement of “unscrupulous Jewish financiers” and the “Semitic-capitalist press.”[45] It is difficult to conceive of such free public expression today in the mainstream media.
The year 1912 saw another two scandals which would reveal the hypocrisy of the Cousinhood’s emancipation-era appeals to humanity, justice, and equal opportunity. In the summer of that year, allegations began to surface that a number of Liberal Members of Parliament stood to gain from insider trading with the English Marconi Company, which was at that time under the direction of Cousinhood member, Godfrey Isaacs. Accusations centred in particular on two Liberal politicians who had shares in Marconi as well as advance information on the terms of an extremely lucrative government contract for the installation of an Empire-wide wireless network — the two politicians concerned were none other than Godfrey’s own brother Rufus, and their cousin Herbert Samuel.[46] British historian Colin Holmes has stated that the scandal had an “irreducible core of Jewish involvement,” and notable contemporary Hillaire Belloc saw the scandal as evidence of a fundamental conflict between the “Anglo-Judaic plutocracy” and the English “national interest.”[47] Although the Cousinhood were successful in a subsequent libel suit, deft political and legal manoeuvring ensured they avoided a situation where they adopted the burden of proof, with the result that while Jewish historians such as Bryan Cheyette have crowed that the scandal was a figment of anti-Semitic imagination and that all involved were entirely innocent,[48] more sober and notably non-Jewish historians have maintained that the innocence of Isaacs and Samuel was “never finally elucidated.”[49]
The Cousinhood was of course multi-branched and quite busy. While the Samuels and the Isaacs were busy trying to disentangle themselves from one of their own webs, the houses of Montagu, Abrahams and Samuel (again) were caught out in yet another political and financial intrigue — the Indian Silver Scandal. Compared to the Marconi Scandal, Jewish historians have largely neglected this particular affair because the outcome was far from obscure and the role of Jews in it was clear-cut and easily proven. In short, because it doesn’t offer the slightest possibility of being turned into an exercise in the psychoanalysis of non-Jews or refuted with some gymnastic variant of Talmudic logic, Jewish historians have decided it is something best minimized or left alone, hopefully to die in a sufficient number of years, with the decay of the last yellowed and torn page to record it.
But let us survey the details. Until 1912, the Indian Government was partly financed by the purchase of silver through the Bank of England. This process was carried out by the Indian Office, and carried with it the benefit of avoiding dealing with a private bank and speculators, who could drive up the price. However, in 1912 Ernest Franklin, a merchant banker from the firm of Samuel Montagu and Co. approached Felix Schuster, then Chairman of the Finance Committee for the Council of India, with an offer to purchase £5 million in silver. The deal proceeded, overseen by senior civil servant Lionel Abrahams. The India Office, which had always carried out these transactions in the past, remained silent and was at that time headed by Edwin Montagu. Edwin’s cousin was Liberal Member of Parliament Stuart Montagu. There was some speculation that Stuart later became involved in attempting to “hush up” the scandal, and this takes on somewhat more significance when it is recalled that Stuart was then a partner in Samuel Montagu and Co. There are very few significant mentions of this affair in mainstream histories, though Anthony Julius states that “all these individuals were Jewish.”[50] Of course, Mr. Foxman would like us to believe that these men were linked by some other means, like a fondness for the color blue perhaps. Or maybe he could argue that it was family, rather than ethnicity that played a role, though this would run into difficulties when one recalls the involvement of Franklin and Shuster, and numerous others who were not part of the Cousinhood, but were certainly part of what appears to be a larger ethnic family.
* * *
To conclude, the history of Jewish ‘emancipation’ and its aftermath in England is a long and sordid one, replete with hypocrisy, behind-the-scenes intrigues, and ethnic self-interest. There is no need for elaborate conspiracy theory here — the established and documented facts speak for themselves in a voice loud enough to bring reason to the honest man if only he will listen. One striking aspect to this history is that the abuse and expansion of power was concurrent with protestations of Jewish weakness and victimhood, a fact that brought to my mind the words of the great Ralph Waldo Emerson: “The sufferance which is the badge of the Jew, has made him, in these days, the ruler of the rulers of the earth.”[51] I should also answer that common critique made of any work dealing with the members of the Cousinhood: “But can you blame all Jews for the actions of a few individuals?” It has been abundantly demonstrated this history involves more than a few individuals, and that it was their Jewishness which linked them.
It is, moreover, arguable that as ‘ordinary’ Jews undoubtedly benefited from the corruption and power of their communal leaders, they themselves should be held accountable. After all, the synagogues, the charities, the communal organizations were all funded from the same corrupt source.
This type of logic, that the people should be held responsible for their leaders and their past actions, is of course a favorite among the Jews themselves. Does Stephen Brockman not typify the Jewish view on “collective guilt” when he writes: “Even Germans who had not themselves committed specific misdeeds were, at the very least, accessories to and had knowledge of them, since they had probably known about the crimes of their government and done nothing to stop them.”[52]
If I indict the Jews who supported Lionel de Rothschild, the Jews who received Cousinhood funding for their international voyage to the west, the South African Jews and their Rabbi who beat the war drum against the Boers, and the Jews of London who benefited from the philanthropy and the ethnic networking of their higher ups, then let it be known thatI am merely taking Jewish logic to its logical conclusion.
End of Part 2 of 2.
NOTES
[33] Bound and printed booklet entitled ‘Hymn and prayer to Almighty God on the occasion of the election of Baron Lionel de Rothschild as Member of Parliament for the City of London’. nd. RAL 000/375/2. Available at: http://www.rothschildarchive.org/ib/?doc=/ib/articles/BW2bPrayer.
[34] D. Feldman, “Jews and the British Empire c1900″ History Workshop Journal, 63 (1), pp.70-89. Available at: http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/655/2/655.pdf.
[35] Ibid.
[36] Ibid.
[37] J. Glass (ed) Sephardi Entrepeneurs in Jersusalem: The Valero Family 1800-1948, (New York: Geffen, 2007), p.123.
[38] K. Knox, Refugees in an Age of Genocide: National and Local Perspectives (London: Routledge, 1999), p.20.
[39] L. Gartner, History of the Jews in Modern Times, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p.215.
[40] D. Feldman, “Jews and the British Empire c1900″ History Workshop Journal, 63 (1), pp.70-89. Available at: http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/655/2/655.pdf.
[41] Ibid.
[42] Ibid.
[43] Ibid.
[44] Ibid.
[45] Ibid.
[46] D. Feldman, “Jews and the British Empire c1900″ History Workshop Journal, 63 (1), pp.70-89. Available at: http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/655/2/655.pdf.
[47] B. Cheyette, Constructions of the ‘Jew’ in English Literature and Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), p.172 & 174.
[48] B. Cheyette, “Hillaire Belloc and the Marconi Scandal 1900-1914: A reassessment of the interactionist model of racial hatred” Immigrants and Minorities, 8 (1): pp. 128-139.
[49] H.J. Hanham, The Nineteenth Century Constitution 1815-1914: Documents and Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969), p.79.
[50] A. Julius, Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism in England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), p.285.
[51] R.W. Emerson, Selected Essays (London: Penguin, 1982), p.381.
[52] S. Brockman, “The Consciousness of German Guilt” in German Literary Culture at the Zero Hour (London: Camden, 2004), p.26.
The Joys of Jihad: Islamentable, Isatrocious, Isbetrayal
Nordics versus Implicit Jews in "The Switch"
When Heidi went to Heaven 
I don’t know the details, but even the great grandchildren of russian commie jews admit that the reason the jews left russia and polish russia after 1880 was because of the draft.
For centuries russian jews had been exempt from the draft. In the reforms after 1860, jews were granted come civil liberties. But they became subject to the draft and vatious taxes in exchange. Jews soon became notoriius for bribing the draft boards, assuming false identities and other means of avoiding the draft. It was when the Russian goverment cracked down on the corruption of the jews draft dodgers that they swarmed enmasse to Britian, America and S. Africa.
Jews consider themselves the chosen people, entitled by G-d to all the benefits without all the work. I think that may be one reason they hate Arabs so much. In biblical terms, G-D
gave the Arabs huge underground oceans of oil including the sulpher free sweet Saudi crude. In the 20th century, G-d sent
angels, aka geologists and petroluem companies to find the oil and shower the Arabs with wealth.
Very interesting piece. I learned a lot, thanks!
@Andrew
You said
If I indict the Jews who supported Lionel de Rothschild, the Jews who received Cousinhood funding for their international voyage to the west, the South African Jews and their Rabbi who beat the war drum against the Boers, and the Jews of London who benefited from the philanthropy and the ethnic networking of their higher ups, then let it be known that I am merely taking Jewish logic to its logical conclusion
Comment:
LOL- can’t help but agree.
@mari: Mari, some of the political views of Jews may be anathema to me, but I have known quite a few Jews that worked hard. Furniture store owners, shoe stores, electricians, and clothing store owners,etc. etc. It would not be fair to say that many Jews have had businesses that didn’t involve them in a lot of labor. My working mother, many years ago, used to buy special shoes from a Jewish man, who was 88 years old and still climbed up and down a huge ladder to retrieve a box of shoes some customer needed,etc. It’s their political views that burn me more than anything else.
Jews have rarely been legitimitely “oppressed” during their history. Oppression, to jews, means that they aren’t in charge of something.
@Bobby: You said, “but I have know quite a few jews that worked hard.” Sure, I can agree, they work hard, but from my life long experience, you might be ok when dealing with shoe sales, a tailor, grocery, even a liquor store, but that’s where I stop!.. I will not do ANYTHING, that involves contracts, promissory notes,( speaking of which, I would like to stop using their debt, promissory notes, called dollars), real estate, used cars, investment schemes, construction labor, (ALWAYS been are screw job for me), escrow companies, (such as Acceleration Clauses), coin grading, with jews, period!
@torgrim: excuse the typos,
should read (ALWAYS been a screw job for me)…
> Jews consider themselves the chosen people, entitled by G-d to all the benefits without all the work. I think that may be one reason they hate Arabs so much. In biblical terms, G-D gave the Arabs huge underground oceans of oil including the sulpher free sweet Saudi crude. In the 20th century, G-d sent angels, aka geologists and petroluem companies to find the oil and shower the Arabs with wealth.
@mari
Precisely. Jews are not spirtual, rather they are extreme materialists. Part of their aversion to Christ stems from their materialistic expectations of the Messiah figure. For Jews, the Messiah will be someone that gives them “stuff”.
The Hebrew Messiah will be a conqueror that takes from other nations. Materialistic Judaism sees this as God’s way of punishing others. Conversely, the Hebrew Messiah will ingratiate himself to the Jews by giving them material prizes. It really is as infantile as that. The Hebrew God is depicted as petty and partial, and hence, unjust.
@torgrim: I bow to your experience on those issues sir, of which I admit my experience is limited.
@Thora:
You said
The Hebrew Messiah will be a conqueror that takes from other nations. Materialistic Judaism sees this as God’s way of punishing others. Conversely, the Hebrew Messiah will ingratiate himself to the Jews by giving them material prizes. It really is as infantile as that. The Hebrew God is depicted as petty and partial, and hence, unjust.
Comment:
This “Hebrew messiah” of the “Jews” is neither Hebrew or the Creator/Savior of the Hebrews-Israelite/Judaites. He is anti Christ, and he will come first as Chist explained saying “the one who comes in his own name- is he who you will accept”.
thanks. I did not know there were so many Jews working behind the curtains in India during the Raj.
I have a gut feeling most of the atrocities in India were committed by Jews and philo-Semites whereas most of the good and noble things were done by Patriotic White British.
It may be that Indians should start blaming Jews and not Britain for any negative consequences of imperialism.
Great work Mr Joyce, but you didn’t mention the Opium Wars, another conflict instigated by Jewish business interests, especially of David Sassoon.
FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH:
Now this is what i call worthy research, filling in historical gaps with crucial hidden truths!
The author is a champion and has passed the baton, reminding all, who care, it is your duty to carry the baton further and win your leg of a larger race to save humanity.
Salute Andrew Joice!
@Thora:
My take is this: God did not give the Arabs oil, White men did. That oil had sat there for thousands of years and had no value whatsoever, until White men figured out a use for it, engineered how to get it, transport it, and refine it. And we pay them trillions for it.
In the most general sense, of course, you can say any “resource” was provided by God in some general sense, but oil had almost zero value for 5,000 years, until White men, and only White men, made it valuable.
“I Am An Anti-Semite”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVsHI_2wP4Y&feature=player_embedded#!
The saddest places for brown people on earth or those that were never “exploited” by White men. The more White men “subjugated” a people, the better off they were. In South America, the areas that have the most “White oppressors” are the best places for browns to live.
Go deep into the jungles of South America or Africa to see life free of Evil White Men™
Thanks Mark White for bringing up the Opium Wars and the Sassoon clan. That entire event is another chapter in history the jews love to keep buried.
A Chinese fellow from Taiwan made a short video which illustrates the jewish involvement in the opium trade/wars.
http://www.bamboo-delight.com/pops/The_Taiwan_Question.html
@Jason Speaks:
There are some exeptions to this “rule”, the case of Thailand comes to mind. It has never been colonized ( it was allowed to remain independent as a “buffer” between British and French spheres of influence) but it is more advanced than for example Birma ( now : Myanmar) that was a British colony or Camboja that was a French colony.
We must also keep in mind that many ex-colonies began to develop in earnest only after their independence. This is true for Singapore, Malaysia, India and even utterly corrupt Indonesia. Colonialism wasn’t about “development” it was about exploitation. Eventual development during colonial times was an unintended side-effect. When former colonies begin to concentrate on development they mostly reach a higher stage than they ever had during colonial times, no matter how “beneficient” the colonial regime might have been. There were also cases of egregious mismanagement, injustice or even genocide by European colonial regimes. King Leoplold’s private colony of the Congo killed an estimated 6 million Africans during its reign of terror to sqeeze money out of its rubber wealth. The British didn’t allow the Indians to develop their own cotton industry. The Dutch didn’t care to educate the Indonesians ( there were no more than two indigenous academics at the time of independence) etc etc.
Western nations are no doubt the most developed on earth, but colonialism was not the best way to spread that develpoment to the rest of the world.
Pace Rudyard Kipling but the correct White Man’s Burden would have been to advise but not to rule the rest of the world.
@Franklin Ryckaert:
I take your points. I will say, I don’t think White countries had any obligation to develop brown countries. Some of the brown countries had resources, and arrangements were worked out to secure them. I don’t see that the brown countries were made worse by the process, and that is key for me.
If we had needlessly knocked them back in their standard of living, that would be regrettable, but I’m not aware of brown countries’ standard of living going down as a result of White men.
There may be brown countries that were untouched by Whites that developed better than White-occupied brown countries, but I suspect underlying factors of things like IQ were in play. Thailand is a bit higher IQ society then the others I believe. I would also argue that they were only able to develop as a result of tapping into the world economic system that Whites had created.
One area in which we needlessly delayed development may have been our pushing of socialism and central planning on many Third World nations. But – and anyone correct me if I’m wrong – all these countries were very backward before we arrived. We didn’t drive them below their previous level.
I think the concept of “civilizing missions” for most black and brown countries is a pointless endeavor. If a black country has something that White men have made of great value (say, we find a way to make energy out of some special soil in Kenya – and so now it is a “resource”), I don’t particularly feel a need to share the trillions of wealth with them. Something should be worked out where they benefit, but I don’t think we need to give them the lion’s share.
On King Leopold, I don’t know enough about the details, but apparently it was a rough reign. As a counter, all I can say is the population of Africa overall went from about 100 million in 1900 to about 1 billion today. So, in the aggregate, they’ve grown faster than ever.
As you can tell, I am not a fan of the Avatar Narrative of how the world works. If a black or brown primitive country has resources that we’ve figured out a use for, I don’t think we can just wait for them to figure out how to even get it out of the ground. We have to do the work. And to do that, we need a stable regime, and that means dealing with illiterate chieftains or dictators … and so on.
The better approach may be like the Chinese. No pretense that you are their “friend” or “big White Daddy” there to help them. You are there to work out a business deal with whatever local warlords there are, and that is it.
@Franklin Ryckaert:
Sorry for the long-winded response. My real concern is this: There is no reason to act like Whites have some unique guilt on their hands with regard to the treatment of non-Whites. Zulus murdered and conquered Hottentots, Asians killed each other, Native Americans slaughtered each other. The Japanese were extremely brutal.
But we don’t find Asians or Africans feeling the need to apologize to the world or take on some guilt. Only Whites are asked to do that – and in the case of the article I mentioned, by a pro-White!
Sanjay, I tend to agree with you. How many people know that the opium business between India and China was in the hands of some Baghdad Jews. This trade destroyed millions of lives, yet the British bear all the approbrium while the Jews preen as moral superiors.
CRACKLING good history! I hope to see this and other material I have read here from Mr. Joyce in one or more books, one day.
FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH:
the fact or state of having committed an offense, crime, violation, or wrong, especially against moral or penal law; culpability:
@Jason Speaks:
It’s important to stand back from our feelings and look at these matters purely in terms of their potential strategic value.
Since time immemorial GOLD has symbolized the intellectual-foundation of commodity-based money and Jewish USURY. By monopolizing it, Rothschild and his cronies were able to control the banking “reserves” underlying the creation of money (as DEBT), and therefore maximize their money-manipulation and ability to appropriate wealth. The Boer War was conducted by the “English” to get their hands on the Gold and monopolize the “reserves” underlying the gold-based monetary system of the day. As Christ said: Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing, but whosoever shall swear by the GOLD of the temple, he is a DEBTOR. The agenda of the moneychangers may cause them to set aside their Gold for a while — the case today — but they eventually return to it.
Reference my previous comment, read “The Gold Standard Goes Mainstream” by Seth Lipsky (member of the Brotherhood) in today’s (8/30) Op-Ed page of The Wall Street Journal. Talk about perfect timing. Seth must have been reading my mind, or interpreting my dreams.
“This type of logic, that the people should be held responsible for their leaders and their past actions, is of course a favorite among the Jews themselves.”
I first heard this expounded by a Jewish person at a cocktail party. He had no shame making this assertion but explained himself in thoughtful, measured tones. I nearly gagged.
@Thora:
“The Hebrew God is depicted as petty and partial, and hence, unjust.”
The more people learn about Judaism, the less they respect it, the more they recognize what abhorrent beliefs it embraces.
@Jason Speaks: “We didn’t drive them below their previous level.” It depends Jason. When Clinton essentially raided the whole banana industry in places like Jamaica or the Dominican Republic for U.S. big agra, he left these people without a serious resource. However, “humanitariain”leftists never seemed worried about this,etc. European-Americans have been screwed by their own traitors for the most part. That is why radically new political parties are often much more cruel to their own traitors, than to outsiders. The corruption always, ALWAYS, comes from within. Yes, even in Washington D.C.
The more people learn about Judaism
I thought we were about biology, not ism.
This is obviously a critical topic. Editor Kevin MacDonald, John Graham and I have posted numerous articles and blogs here on the TOO site discussing Jewish financial power, manipulation of host societies with that power, and the prevalence of Jewish fraud and theft.
I wonder, however, if such a disjointed approach suffices. Can readers think of some way to bring these essays together into a cohesive form? If a book, would that reach an audience that might make a difference? Would some kind of podcast or video be better?
The information is out there — but Jewish propaganda and control of culture ensure that most people don’t get that information. Or are even afraid to consider it.
Here’s just my short list of works on Jews and money in America:
Connie Bruck, The Predators’ Ball: The Inside Story of Drexel Burnham and the Rise of the Junk Bond Traders. The book has more than enough information to convince the average reader that Jewish financial mischief is rife—and has a massively negative effect on the greater non-Jewish world.
James Stewart’s book is even better, beginning with its title, Den of Thieves.
Here is a brief bibliography of books dealing with the topic of Jews and money:
Stephen Birmingham, Our Crowd: The Great Jewish Families of New York (New York: Harper and Row, 1967); and The Grandees: America’s Sephardic Elite, (New York: Harper and Row, 1971); Jean Baer, The Self-Chosen: “Our Crowd” is Dead—Long Live Our Crowd (New York: Arbor House, 1982); Judith Ramsey Ehrlich and Barry J. Rehfeld,The New Crowd: The Changing of the Jewish Guard on Wall Street (New York: HarperPerennial, 1989); Richard L. Zweigenhaft and G. William Domhoff, Jews in the Protestant Establishment (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1982); Gerald Krefetz, Jews and Money: The Myths and the Reality (New Haven and New York: Ticknor and Fields, 1982); Dennis B. Levine, An Insider’s Account of Wall Street (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1991); Benjamin J. Stein, A License to Steal: The Untold Story of Michael Milken and the Conspiracy to Bilk the Nation (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1992); and J.J. Goldberg, Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment(Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1996) Finally, there is the promise of a new book on capitalism, with due attention to its Jewish roots, by prolific author E. Michael Jones. His tome The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (order it here), shows the value in honestly discussing Jewish power and behavior.
See also James Petras: Rulers and Ruled in the US Empire: Bankers, Zionists and Militants; The Power of Israel in the United States; Zionism, Militarism and the Decline of US Power; and Global Depression and Regional Wars: The United States, Latin America and the Middle East.
More than half the anti-jew bloggers on the net turn out to have some bloodline connection. This cousin-hood goes pretty deep.
.
“…the American armed forces as a tool of Israel and its powerful American lobby in the war in Iraq…”
Official History of the Iraq War
.
@Bobby:
How did we raid Jamaica’s banana trade? I’m not denying it, I’m just unaware of the whole thing. I should say, I don’t doubt that Whites have at times hurt non-Whites at times; of course they have. What I really deny is that Whites somehow destroyed their hopes and dreams, that brown people had a paradise until we showed up.
I especially deny that there was anything unique about our actions. It is specifically a kind of Marxist theory of exploitation that I deny.
I agree totally about traitors being treated worse than anyone, even avowed enemies. That is how it should be. Someone in California might hate a Japanese soldier who got through to bomb them, but if a White person helped the Japanese do it, the White person deserves the most severe punishment.
When will the White World ever stop being duped by jews?
Every white country, tiny New Zealand, has had jew Prime Ministers.
Why is it that White People always trust the new after the new stabs them in the back repeatedly.
CORRECTION: JEW
Not new
franz
August 31, 2012 – 8:01 am | Permalink
When will the White World ever stop being duped by jews?
Every white country, tiny New Zealand, has had jew Prime Ministers.
Why is it that White People always trust the new after the new stabs them in the back repeatedly.
—————————-
franz, your dismay is clear.
The answer to your questions lies not in White ‘gullibility’ but rather in the depth of skill and deception that our enemy possesses. Jews have attempted to control what Whites ‘think’ going back to the suicidal memes of Christianity.
In modern times the jewish headlock on information (let alone finance) via the media and education systems has given them the to ability to brainwash and program Whites to engage in self destructive thoughts and behavior.
They have organized all the major modern wars to get us to kill each other.
It’s like a pyramid sales system. The jewish head brainwashes, programs and rewards the body through nonstop propaganda to repeat its mantras. It goes on all the way down the line until the mass of society believes its lies and suffers its losses.
That’s where we are now. An international jewish scam, centuries in its making.
For all my life, until a couple of years ago, I have always thought that as a whole jews were an intelligent but misunderstood people. Now I think they are an intelligent but evil people.
Shocking isn’t it? But that is where my reason leads me, after a long debate between reasoned facts and propagandized emotion.
But the cat has escaped the bag via the internet. More and more of us are figuring out the massive deception going on. Talk to your family, friends and whoever to get people aware and curious.
That is how we will stop ourselves from being duped by jews.
@Edmund Connelly: The Creature of Jekyll Island chronicles the foundation of the Federal Reserve System at the instigation of primarily Jewish banking families. 1913 marks the beginning of the secular decline of the West. Central banking has effectively institutionalized erosion of the currency. Localized banking crises have been transformed into systemic crises.
http://archive.org/details/Creature_From_Jekyl_Island
@Edmund Connelly: To understand the mechanics of how the Money Power usurps the sovereign prerogative of creating money and sets up a privately-controlled system of debt-based money
to practice Usury against the general population, read: “Human Ecology: The Science of Social Adjustment” by Thomas Robertson (published in the 1940s but perfectly relevant today). The easiest way to find the book is to google “Thomas Robertson Human Ecology” and choose the Amazon entry and buy it through a book seller. The two volume red hard-bound copy for $9.94 is a good choice (I own it). Read the book twice to deepen your understanding of the subject. There is no way to understand Money from the perspective of Power — i.e., to grasp the distinction between Honest Money and Parasitic Money — than to make a technical study of the subject. It can’t be done anecdotally. Robertson is a good place to start. Note: the book is not dry — it’s not a textbook; it’s a fascinating read.
“By 1900, through a process of ethnic and familial networking, the Cousinhood had secured many of the most significant administrative positions in the Empire. ”
Fascinating revelation. Maybe just a coincidence but 1900 is roughly the point Empire went into steep decline, never to recover.
Perhaps just more coincidence…but the US – the amazing USA – seems to have gone into steep decline roughly at a similar juncture.
R.R.- Social credit. This started with Major Douglas. Douglas was an adviser to none other than J. M. Keynes-
These folks are Keynesian inflationists with the fractional reserve taken out.
Robin hood printing press for the poor instead of the rich. Ellen Brown is a latter day version. She took Bernanke’s side in 2010. None of these folks (Zarlenga, Brown, Douglas) are economists. . .
Robert Skidelsky (1983: 166) actually points out a very interesting fact:
“[sc. Keynes] …
never did take an economics degree. In fact, his total professional training came to little more than eight weeks. All the rest was learnt on the job.”
The greatest economist of the 20th century (at least in my opinion) had no formal economics degree. Are there lessons from this?
http://socialdemocracy21stcentury.blogspot.com/2012/03/keynes-had-no-formal-economics-degree.html
Excellent historical template of how the Jews manouvered in England…Of course, we must go a little further back, to Oliver Cromwell and his Jewish financiers, who destroyed the Catholic foundations of England, to get the full picture.
Ironically, the law expelling Jews from England passed in the 13th century has never been repealed.
Off Topic, found this at Drudge:
Reuters) – Israel’s leading rabbi has warned Dutch populist politician Geert Wilders that his party’s support for a ban of ritual slaughter of animals in the Netherlands is “anti-Semitic” and could drive away the country’s Jewish community.
Wilders rose to prominence in the Netherlands denouncing the growing influence of Islam in the West, calling for a ban against Muslim immigrants, a halt to the construction of mosques and a ban on Muslim face-veils.
Some of his most outspoken supporters are in the conservative, pro-Israeli movement in the United States. Wilders calls himself Israel’s “greatest friend” and has also proposed creating a national Dutch holiday to commemorate the victims of the Auschwitz concentration camp.
In a letter to Wilders on Tuesday, a copy of which was obtained by Reuters on Wednesday, Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger called on Wilders’ Freedom Party to stop backing a ban on ritual slaughter.
It is the strongest public condemnation yet of Wilders’ position on the policy and comes two weeks before the Netherlands holds a general election September 12 in which he is expected to take a sizeable portion of the vote.
“It is obvious that one cannot be at the same time a friend of Israel and the Jewish people and on the other hand support an anti-Jewish law,” Metzger wrote.
@Edmund Connelly:
Baruchs ‘My Story’ is a classic!.
He proudly relates the tale of his family’s plantation and slaves.
@90404:
“and could drive away the country’s Jewish community.”
If the Dutch have any brains, they’d welcome this.
Excellent exposure to the light for dumbed down whites to see just how they have been successfully duped by the tribe for what seems to have been forever.
Clever Jews live the double life being ruthless , pushy & arrogant on one hand & on the other the helpless poor victims.
The ruse is called into play as required & nobody dare call them out — ever. Remember when Marlon Brando , Mel Gibson & Oliver Stone tried to speak out ?
A defining moment was In 1895 when J.P. Morgan & Co. supplied the United States government with $62 million in gold to float a bond issue and restore the treasury surplus of $100 million.
Although his name was big, Morgan owned only 19% of Morgan assets. The rest was owned by the Rothschild family following a series of bailouts and rescues attributed by some to Morgan’s stubborn will and seemingly “non-existent” investment savvy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPMorgan_Chase#History
A Passive victims & oppressed minority narrative that Jews have managed to purport as historical truth is really mind boggling.
Jewish lies have been believed from the Bible to the holocaust & beyond , from their creative biblical history of King David who was in reality a nobody in a small village to the not to be mentioned Moses & Solomon etc. All marvelous fairy stories & history for ALL . Especially those “believe anything Christians” who laughably even “study” all these myths & fairy tales.
The stockborkers that recently went bankrupt, Lehman Bros.
started out as New Orleans slave traders around 1800. They were the 2nd largest slave brokerage in the south.
Then there are the slave traders who brought africans to Brazil.
@Edmund Connelly: What has Government done to Our Money? is a good primer on the alliance, to the detriment of all other parties, between the commercial banking cartel and government.
http://is.gd/eDzxJh
@neville: This is a family tree of the world of commercial banking. As you say, J.P. Morgan was the facade of a far larger edifice.
http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html
@mari: I suspect Lehman Bros. wouldn’t have been let fail if they hadn’t refused to participate in the Greenspan-coordinated LTCM buyout in the wake of the latter’s meltdown.
I enjoy the insights of Jewish conspiracy blogger Henry Makow but also his sense of humor. I recommend the following exchange from http://www.henrymakow.com/romneys-mormon-faith.html
… and Henry’s response to a query to do with Ayn Rand’s focus on ‘reason over religion’ and why Jews change their names. The following:
Ayn Rand’s wiki [nee: Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum]:
Rand advocated reason as the only means of acquiring knowledge and rejected all forms of faith and religion.
(can u explain to me why the Jews always change their names when entering the public sphere?)
Thanks Mark,
Reason is another word for pragmatism and self interest.
Jews change their name in order to pass as Gentiles. I’m an exception. My real name is Bob Fraser.
henry
Henry Makow is on You Tube as a contestant on “What’s My Line as an eight year old advice columnist for parents who were having troubles with their children. He was published in dozens of newspapers a half century ago. I congratulated him on his confounding of Tony Randall and company by email. His response, “Thanks Sean, my line is that much like Egypt and Greece, I peaked too early.” A fine broth of a Jew is he.
@Trenchant:
Trenchant , thanks for the link.
Christians are def dumb & blind as California Passes Resolution Equating Criticism of Israel With Anti-Semitism.
http://antiwar.com/blog/2012/08/30/california-passes-resolution-equating-criticism-of-israel-with-anti-semitism/
It is important that we Europeans think collectively, using the words ‘We’ and ‘Our’ is perhaps the most powerful statement Europeans can make; we Europeans must support our people wherever they choose to live.
Jews can do no wrong. They are their own messiah. They are g-d.
A guy named “Gar5″ has created a VERY USEFUL little website for pro-White advocates who are into doing search and destroy missions against anti-Whites.
It’s a list of all the fine whines that anti-Whites present, and what to come back with. Enjoy! http://mantra.awardspace.us/
@mari:
joos?
Remember Baruch College?
Read ‘ My Story, Bernard Baruch’, they too had slaves.
@fender:
After decades of CONDITIONING, they probably do not have much common sense.
[common sense is not so common].
@katana:
‘For all my life, until a couple of years ago, I have always thought that as a whole jews were an intelligent but misunderstood people. Now I think they are an intelligent but evil people.’
Yes, the narrative runs 24-7. Not just at these ‘holocaust museums’
Did ya know at one of them , no mention of the Native Americans….100,000,000? dead or put on reservations!
Saint Einstein, Saint Ann Frank, the holocaust, the un holy land..Israel.
@Neville:
WTF???????????????????????????????????????????
GAWD.
@Neville: Oh, yes. California is as lost, as mismanaged, and as delusional as any U.S. state or any modern state for that matter, could possibly be. It will completely collapse from its former glory,(before leftists controled Sacramento) and I dread to think what form this collapse will take.
@Bobby:
http://antiwar.com/blog/2012/08/30/california-passes-resolution-equating-criticism-of-israel-with-anti-semitism/
As California leads the way so the other states will follow ?
Isn’t that how it goes ?
ALL those Jewish/Zionist talking heads will lead the sheeple to their true allegiance to one country and one only…..
That little country the size of New Jersey that controls the US.
@Neville: Neville, it boggles the mind how a country so huge and famous, could fall so unfathomably low.
@Franklin Ryckaert:
Your scholarship is poor. Hong Kong was a rock and Singapore was a swamp.
@katana:
The majority, if not all Jews are sociopaths, but cunning and extremely devious with it.
One has to learn to operate at their level in order to defeat them.
@Ben Ami:
Singapore developed after independence from a poor corrupt third world country to one of the most stable and prosperous countries of the world under the capable leadership of Lew Kuan Yew.
Hong Kong became independent only in 1997 but was already highly developed before. But even here we have to ask ourselves whether that was due to British colonial rule or the talent of the local Chinese themselves. Anyway Hong Kong has the highest average IQ of the world : 107.
For the rest my thesis still stands : most ex-colonies developed only in earnest after independence. I think the world would have been a better place if Europeans had only settled in the scarcely populated regions of North and South America and Australia and New Zealand and had never colonized the rest of the world, let alone engage in slavery.
Great read. I have been thinking about the Anglo-Hebrew connections for some time – it is nice to see others applying logic to this problem that plagues the world from that wretched city of London. I have written thus far two pieces on the Anglo-Jewish connection found at realheavyshit.com
Like his previous OO piece on “pogrom” atrocity propaganda this new Joyce article is on the money.
Disraeli’s ethno-supremacism and his willingness to parade it publically in his novels is typically portrayed as exceptional by Jewish writers like Hannah Arendt. In fact Dizzy’s ethno-supremacism needs to be seen in the context of British-Israelism: the belief in Jewsih Choseness for World Rule had taken root centuries earlier among people like Sir Isaac Newton so that by the 19th century Victoria and her family believed they were direct descendants of King David!
Arendt also pretends that Disraeli was inflating the the power of secret societies of which he spoke gloatingly!
Joyce also touches on Jewish instigation of the Boer War which I believe is related to their involvement in sparking WW1. Neither the Kaiser’s note of congratulation to Kruger on his crushing of the Rhodes-orchestrated Jameson Raid nor Germany’s own claims on the Transvaal were ever forgiven by the Rothschild-led British imperialists.
The Rhodes Round Table Group controlled the Times which published a constant stream of anti-German propaganda up to WW1. Rothschild was involved with the Group along with political assets like Grey, Lords Esher and Roberts, Charles Harding. Edward VII negotiated the secret alliances with France and Russia that were key moves in the plot to encircle and trap Germany into WW1. Like the Boer War WW1 was orchestrated by the Cousinhood and their Milner Group assets.
The execrable disinformationist, Kissinger, cites the Crowe Memorandum of 1907 as evidence that Britain
saw Germany as bent on establishing a world empire at any cost.
Guess what?
Eyre Crowe was another Milner Group Cousinhood Shabbaz Goi!