The War on White Australia: A Case Study in the Culture of Critique, Part 1 of 5

Brenton Sanderson


Results from the 2011 Australian Census reveal that, for the first time in that nation’s history, the majority of migrants are now arriving from Asia instead of Europe. Indians and Chinese have become the fastest growing sections of the Australian population. Between 2006 and 2011 the number of Australian permanent residents born in India increased by 100 per cent, those born in China increased by 54 per cent, while those born in the Philippines by 42 per cent. These startling figures do not even include those born in Australia to Indian or Chinese parents. The Census also revealed that other non-White immigrant groups are also expanding rapidly, including various African groups. All of this is dismal news for White Australians and, indeed, for White people everywhere. Unfortunately, these figures only mirror what is happening throughout the West, where White people are under demographic and cultural siege from race-replacing levels of Third World immigration and the official embrace of “multiculturalism.”

In just a few decades these malignant policies have transformed Western societies to the detriment of their European-derived populations and culture. It is a remarkable fact that this revolution in immigration and social policy throughout the West occurred at around the same time (1962-1973), and that in all countries these changes reflected the attitude of elites rather than the great mass of citizens. Changes in immigration policy and the imposition of multiculturalism were imposed on resentful European populations despite overwhelming popular opposition to non-European immigration. The driving force behind this totally undemocratic shift in policy was the Jewish intellectual movements and ethno-political activism that Kevin MacDonald documented in The Culture of Critique. For those aware of the pivotal role of Jews in driving the demographic and cultural transformation of the United States, the story of the Jewish role in radically reengineering Australian society will have a depressingly familiar ring to it.

Advertisement

Australia was the last habitable continent settled by Europeans. In 1901 the British colonies of Australia federated to form an independent nation. The first Act passed by the new federal parliament was the Immigration Restriction Act which, through imposing a dictation test in any European language (usually English), effectively barred non-White immigration to Australia. Until the cultural revolution of the 1960s, Australia remained an unashamedly White Christian nation with a strong Anglo-Celtic ethnic base. Indeed the long-running (now defunct) news magazine The Bulletin maintained the slogan “Australia for the White Man” on its masthead until 1961. By 1947 the non-European population, other than Aborigines, was measured at 0.25 per cent of the total. As a result of the Immigration Restriction Act, Australia had become, by this time, one of the Whitest countries in the world. Ian Cook makes the point that “The ‘White Australia’ policy was a fairly self-conscious and explicit attempt to protect a particular genetic inheritance from being diluted by other genetic lines.”[i] The policy was extraordinarily successful in this endeavor, and the historian Eric Richards observes that, in retrospect, it is extraordinary that so remote a settlement could maintain such a homogeneous population composition.[ii]

Australia and New Zealand were also the two most “British” societies outside the United Kingdom, and Australia was, proportionately, the most Irish society outside Ireland. The imperial loyalties of the Australian colonists were often explained by reference to the “crimson thread of kinship” that existed between Britain and Australia. Australian identity was founded upon three distinct yet interrelated components: racial Whiteness, “Britishness,” and “Australianness.”[iii] The attempted Japanese invasion of northern Australia in WWII proved that the longstanding fear of an Asian invasion (the “Yellow Peril”) was far from the neurotic, xenophobic anxiety disparaged by today’s politically correct historians. In the 1960s there was no popular movement for ending the White Australia policy, a policy that had retained the bipartisan support of Australia’s political class since its inception in 1901. Indeed, Richards notes that “Australia’s adherence to ‘Whiteness’ was its defining characteristic,” and that “None of the other great immigrant countries was able to sustain such a degree of homogeneity.”[iv] Hawkins makes the point that

the primary and identical motivation of Canadian and Australian politicians in trying to exclude first the Chinese, then other Asian migrants and finally all potential non-white immigrants, was the desire to build and preserve societies and political systems in their hard-won, distant lands very like those of the United Kingdom. They also wished to establish without challenge the primary role there of her founding peoples of European origin. … Undisputed ownership of these territories of continental size was felt to be confirmed forever, not only by the fact of possession, but by the hardships and dangers endured by the early explorers and settlers; the years of back-breaking work to build the foundations of urban and rural life. … The idea that other peoples, who had taken no part in these pioneering efforts, might simply arrive in large numbers to exploit important local resources, or to take advantage of these earlier settlement efforts, was anathema.[v]     

Tied in with these natural and legitimate expressions of racial and ethnic solidarity, were concerns hordes of non-White immigrants would drive down the wages and living standards of White Australians. This was a key part of the original rationale for the White Australia policy as articulated by Alfred Deakin, Australia’s first Attorney-General, who argued that

a white Australia does not by any means just mean the preservation of the complexion of the people of this country. It means the multiplying of homes, so that we may be able to defend every part of our continent; it means the maintenance of conditions of life fit for white men and white women; it means equal laws and opportunities for all; it means protection against underpaid labour of other lands, it means the payment of fair wages. A white Australia means a civilisation whose foundations are built on healthy lives, lived in honest toil, under circumstances which imply no degradation; a white Australia means protection.”[vi]  

An analogous view had been expressed as early as 1841 by James Stephen, the powerful head of the British colonial office in London, who declared that Australia should be a land “where the English race shall be spread from sea to sea unmixed with any lower caste.” He maintained that the introduction of Indian “coolies” into New South Wales would “debase by their intermixture the noble European race… bring with them the idolatry and debasing habits of their country… beat down the wages of poor laboring Europeans… [and] cut off the resource for many of our own distressed people.”[vii] Charles Pearson, a British scholar who migrated to the colonies in the late nineteenth century, published a book entitled National Life and Character in 1893. In it, he described Australia as “an unexampled instance of a great continent that has been left for the first civilized people that found it to take and occupy. He warned, nevertheless, that it was still questionable whether the white races would be able to hold on to it in the face of the Asiatic threat:

We know that coloured and white labour cannot exist side by side; we are well aware that China can swamp us with a single year’s surplus of population; and we know that if national existence is sacrificed to the working of a few mines and sugar plantations, it is not the Englishman and Australian alone, but the whole civilized world, that will be the losers.[viii]

Such concerns echoed through the decades of the White Australia policy, where the country explicitly defined its nationhood in terms of Whiteness and a policy of economic protectionism designed to benefit the entire group by preventing, say, Australian capitalists from importing cheap labor that would undercut the standard of living of other White Australians. The policy reflected the desire of Australians to build a strong and prosperous society founded upon the principles of racial and cultural homogeneity and fairness within the racial group. Gwenda Tavan notes that the White Australia policy was a “morally imbued affirmation of the type of society Australians wanted to build: white and British-Australian as well as cohesive, conformist, liberal-democratic and egalitarian.”[ix] One commentator reflected this view when noting in 1939 that “The Australian prides himself on his high standard of living; he wishes to do nothing that will endanger it. Neither does he wish to bring into being a colour problem such as he sees in South Africa.”[x]

 

Early twentieth century Australian poster

Rather than being driven by any shift in public opinion, the impetus for the progressive dismantling of the White Australia policy, and the move from assimilation to multiculturalism between 1966 and 1975 came “from a small group of reformers that began appearing in some Australian universities in the 1960s” who, like their counterparts in the United States and Britain, soon comprised a hostile intellectual, academic and media elite who “developed a sense of being a member of a morally and intellectually superior ingroup battling against Australian parochial non-intellectuals as an outgroup.”[xi] In the changing ideological climate of the 1950s and 1960s, the moral foundations of Australia’s British history were subjected to radical criticism, and once foundational patriotic works like Keith Hancock’s Australia (with its maxim that “among the Australians pride of race counted for more than love of country”) were no longer compulsory reading for students. [xii]

Boasian anthropology and the fall of White Australia

The Boasian ideology of racial egalitarianism (discussed in Chapter 2 of The Culture of Critique as a Jewish intellectual movement) was a critical weapon in opening Australian immigration up to non-White groups. Jewish academic Jon Stratton notes that the dismantling of the White Australia policy and the ultimate adoption of multiculturalism was a direct result of “internal and external pressures related to a general turning away from biological racialism.”[xiii] The Australian Jewish academic Andrew Markus articulates the standard critique of “white racism” that became prominent in the 1960s when he asserts that it was based on the notion that

(i) as a result of some (undefined) “natural” process, national groups (or ‘races’ or ‘cultures’) have inborn (‘essential’) qualities which will never alter; and (ii) there are inherent characteristics in such groups which interpose barriers against harmonious co-existence, not least against interbreeding of populations. Such ideas give rise to closed forms of nationalism which restrict membership to those qualified by birth or descent, in contrast to open forms which grant citizenship to individuals on the basis of residence and adherence to the governing principles of the nation. They justified European colonial rule; the denial of basic human rights and citizenship; segregation in the workplace, housing and education; and policies of genocide culminating in the “factories of death” established in the period of Nazi domination of continental Europe. Rarely challenged in western societies prior to 1940, the idea of biological racial difference lost much of its legitimacy in the aftermath of the Holocaust.[xiv]

It is obvious from this statement just how closely acceptance of the myth of racial equality from the 1960s onwards was bound up with Jewish post-Holocaust ethno-political activism. Note also the outright lies and hypocrisy in the above paragraph. The “(undefined) ‘natural’ process” that Markus claims is the wholly irrational basis for “racism” is the very well-defined process of human evolution itself. The differential evolution of human groups in response to selection pressures imposed by diverse environments, resulted, after thousands of years, in differences in external morphology and psychological traits—including intelligence as measured by IQ tests. The average intelligence of a group will profoundly influence the society that will be created by that group. There is nothing undefined, irrational, or pseudo-scientific about this whatsoever.

Professor Andrew Markus: Propagating “noble lies”

 In his description of “closed” forms of nationalism which restrict “membership to those qualified by birth or descent” Markus could be describing traditional Judaism, with its strict endogamy and built-in assumptions of Jewish racial, intellectual and moral superiority. As always, however, Judaism is outside the critical frame of reference of such reflexively anti-White Jewish intellectuals. Jewish ethno-nationalism (exemplified in Israel’s racially restrictive immigration laws) is tacitly held to be legitimate and uncontroversial (indeed a moral imperative), while White nationalism is inherently illegitimate and morally corrupt.

The rampant hypocrisy of this is particularly striking given that Australian Jews have “been at the forefront of support for the right of the state of Israel to exist as a Jewish state, to determine its own security agenda, and to do what is needed to ensure its own survival.”[xv]  Indeed, the academic and Australian Jewish activist Danny Ben Moshe points out that Australian Jewry is fiercely Zionist and “outdoes all other Diasporas in their commitment to Israel.” A 1993 survey of Melbourne Jewry found that 63 per cent had visited Israel with over 40 per cent having done so two or more times. This is compared with 36 per cent of American Jews. Australia also has the highest rate of aliyah in the world.[xvi] While strongly in favor of non-White immigration and racial-mixing among the non-Jews in Australia, a publication like the Australian Jewish News can openly express the view that for Jews, “Intermarriage has always been and will always be an individual, spiritual and communal tragedy. No amount of petty rationalising will ever change that.”[xvii]

Noting the incredible hypocrisy involved in simultaneously condemning white racialism while defending the Jewish ethno-nationalist state of Israel (and traditional Jewish prohibitions against intermarriage), Kevin MacDonald observes in The Culture of Critique that:

Ironically, many intellectuals who absolutely reject evolutionary thinking and any imputation that genetic self-interest might be important in human affairs also favor policies that are rather self-interestedly ethnocentric, and they often condemn the self-interested ethnocentric behavior of other groups, particularly any indication that the European-derived majority… is developing a cohesive group strategy and high levels of ethnocentrism in reaction to the groups strategies of others. …  A Jew maintaining this argument should, to retain intellectual consistency, agree that the traditional Jewish concern with endogamy and consanguinity has been irrational. Moreover, such a person would also believe that Jews ought not attempt to retain political power in Israel because there is no rational reason to suppose that any particular group should have power anywhere. Nor should Jews attempt to influence the political process … in such a manner as to disadvantage another group or benefit their own. And to be logically consistent, one should also apply this argument to all those who promote immigration of their own ethnic groups, the mirror image of group-based opposition to such immigration.[xviii]  

Since the academic world is international and hierarchical, it was inevitable that intellectual movements originating in elite American universities spread throughout the West (see “Liberal Bias in Academia: The role of Jewish academics in the creation and maintenance of academic liberalism“) As a consequence of the growing influence of the Jewish intellectual movements described in The Culture of Critique, and direct Jewish activism in Australia, “Such views [i.e. the assumption racial equality] became standard within schools and universities and provided the intellectual basis for campaigns against racial discrimination in the late 1950s and 1960s.”[xix] Tavan notes that: “As a result of these shifts, universities in particular became ‘hotbeds of resistance’ to White Australia during the late 1950s and early 1960s. … The emergence of a body of Marxist-inspired social theory in Europe and the United States at that time also reinvigorated radical left-wing political theory in Australia.” For Tavan, the new critical theory of the Frankfurt School “played a crucial role in exposing the racist underpinnings of many of Australia’s key institutions and values.”[xx] The Frankfurt School abandoned the White working class because they were insufficiently radical and had succumbed to fascism in Germany and Italy. This caused them to reject the orthodox Marxist emphasis on class struggle, replacing it by advocating non-White immigration and multiculturalism, as well as recruiting Whites who had complaints against the traditional culture, particularly feminists and sexual minorities, into a new coalition of the left.

With the adoption in 1963 of the UN Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, member governments were urged to eliminate racial discrimination from their society altogether. Internal intellectual currents were thus augmented by mounting external political opposition to the White Australia policy, especially during the years of European decolonization in Africa and Asia. Eric Richards notes how

Prime Minister Menzies [1949-1966] was increasingly vexed by the intrusion of racial and immigration issues at meetings of Commonwealth Heads of Government. Menzies (and even more vehemently, one of his successors, John Gorton) loathed the way in which he was lectured on the “principle of racial equality” by newcomer members of the Commonwealth. Menzies and Gorton [1968-1971] believed that Australia’s immigration policy was perfectly defensible and, in any case, none of their business. But the die was already cast. Australia in the 1960s felt pressure from within and from beyond, and its immigration policy was a growing embarrassment.[xxi]    

Senior Australian public servants serving on a committee formed to respond to the changed situation agreed in 1964 that “there was an urgent need to remove, as far as practicable, instances of racial discrimination in Australia in order to ensure Australia’s international reputation and influence are not to be seriously endangered.”[xxii] In response to these internal and external pressures, the administrative apparatus of the White Australia policy was gradually dismantled from the mid-1960s, until, in 1974, the then Labor Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam (1972-1975), declared in a speech that: “On Immigration, we have removed the last remaining pieces of legislation which could be described as discriminatory on racial grounds.”[xxiii]

According to the Australian academic and multicultural activist Bronwyn Hinz, this policy change merely formalized shifts in policy approach that had begun in the 1960s in response to reforms to the United States migration policy.[xxiv] Richards observes that this “hesitating shift towards a non-discriminatory Australia” triggered “a social and demographic revolution” in Australia[xxv] In both America and Australia, Jewish intellectual movements and political activism were pivotal in driving this revolution. The national editor of the Australian Jewish News, Dan Goldberg proudly acknowledges this, noting that: “In addition to their activism on Aboriginal issues, Jews were instrumental in leading the crusade against the White Australia policy, a series of laws from 1901 to 1973 that restricted non-White immigration to Australia.” The exact nature of this crusade will be explored in subsequent parts of this essay. 

Go to Part 2. 

REFERENCES

Ben-Moshe, D. (2006) ‘The End of Unconditional Love: The Future of Zionism in Australian Jewish LIfe,’ In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski, Black Inc., Melbourne. pp. 108-125.

Cook, I. (1999) Liberalism in Australia, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.

Curthoys, A. (2008) ‘Indigenous Subjects,’ In: Australia’s Empire, Ed. Deryck Schreuder & Stuart Ward, Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 78-102.

Fagenblat, M., Landau, M. & Wolski, N. (2006) ‘Will the Centre Hold?,’ In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski, Black Inc., Melbourne. pp. 3-16.

Hancock, W.K. (1930) Australia, London.

Hinz, B. (2010) ‘Ethnic associations, networks and the construction of Australian multiculturalism,’ Paper presented at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, Corcordia University, Montreal, 1‐3 June.

http://www.bronwynhinz.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Hinz-2010-Australian-multiculturalism-paper-for-CPSA-v4.pdf 

Jupp, J. (2002) From White Australia to Woomera – The Story of Australian Immigration, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.

MacDonald, K. B. (1998/2001) The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth‑Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Westport, CT: Praeger. Revised Paperback edition, 2001, Bloomington, IN: 1stbooks Library.

Markus, A. (2001) Race: John Howard and the remaking of Australia, Allen & Unwin, NSW.

Pearson, C. (1893) National Life and Character: A Forecast, MacMillan & Co., London.

Richards, E. (2008) ‘Migrations: The Career of British White Australia,’ In: Australia’s Empire, Ed. Deryck Schreuder & Stuart Ward, Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 163-185.

Stratton, J. (2000) Coming Out Jewish – Constructing Ambivalent Identities, Routledge, London.

Szego, J. (2006) ‘Marry Identities,’ In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski, Black Inc., Melbourne. pp. 39-45.

Tavan, G. (2


[i] Cook p. 4

[ii] Jupp p. 9

[iii] Tavan p. 13

[iv] Richards p. 163

[v] Hawkins in MacDonald pp. 301-302

[vi] Cook p. 179

[vii] Richards pp. 167-168

[viii] Pearson p. 16

[ix] Tavan, p. 19

[x] Richards p. 173

[xi] MacDonald p. 302-303

[xii] Hancock p. 56

[xiii] Stratton p. 223

[xiv] Markus pp. 5-6

[xv] Fagenblat et al. p. 10-11

[xvi] Ben Moshe p. 108

[xvii] Szego p. 41

[xviii] MacDonald p. 311 & pp. 324-325

[xix] Markus p. 7

[xx] Tavan p. 116 & 168

[xxi] Richards p. 179

[xxii] Curthoys p. 99

[xxiii] Stratton p. 223

[xxiv] Hinz p. 3

[xxv] Richards p. 182

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

153 Comments to "The War on White Australia: A Case Study in the Culture of Critique, Part 1 of 5"

  1. Peters's Gravatar Peters
    August 13, 2012 - 7:58 pm | Permalink

    …Between 2006 and 2011 the number of Australian permanent residents born in India increased by 100 per cent, those born in China increased by 54 per cent, while those born in the Philippines by 42 per cent. These startling figures do not even include those born in Australia to Indian or Chinese…

    Unfortunately, it is impossible to learn the seriousness of the problem from these numbers. It is unclear if lots and lots of Indians arrived or just there were not that many to begin with back in 2006. It also remains unclear if the country’s demographic profile was altered much as result. For example, one additional Martian alien arriving would double the population of Martians but is not a significant change in real numbers or as percentage of population.

    This comment is not meant to belittle the problem, which most likely is significant.

  2. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    August 13, 2012 - 9:16 pm | Permalink

    In my opinion, those who willfully reject policies which protect and favor the survival of their racial population deserve the hardships and injuries they bring on themselves. Those members of the population who do not want or approve of these radical demographic changes, however, do not deserve the tragic results of the folly of other members of their own population group. But the Law of Nature does not discriminate on the personal level, so that, sadly, there will always be innocent people who suffer when callous and cruel leaders hold the reigns of state power.

  3. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    August 13, 2012 - 9:32 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article, I look forward to the rest of the series. We see the exact same process we see described here repeated in every single White country on earth – and only in White countries.

  4. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    August 13, 2012 - 9:45 pm | Permalink

    @Peters:

    Just out of idle curiosity, who is the currently resident Martian alien to whom you are alluding?!?

  5. saxon's Gravatar saxon
    August 13, 2012 - 11:20 pm | Permalink

    I guess the real question is.. Why isnt the Jews forcing the white man into Congo Zaire or any other nation in Africa that is 98% black… OH hell, why arent they forcing the blacks and whites into Japan, China, even North Korea would love to have black and whites in the country,, LOL… Well i guess those nations are not drunk on Jewish propaganda like these white nations are,,, Good luck fellow goy wake up…

  6. Thora's Gravatar Thora
    August 13, 2012 - 11:45 pm | Permalink

    It is no coincidence that television became ubiquitous during the period of Western decline. Socrates, acting as lawgiver, warned his Republic of the evils of such media control. Plays, poems, and even music, were to be censored and reviewed by the guardian-elders of the society. Where are today’s censors? Mocked and put aside.

    Instead pimps, cheap-jacks, and nihilist cowards are celebrated as paragons of virtue in this age. Larry Flynt and Mark Zuckerberg’s lives are romanticized in film while America and Australia’s founding heroes are reviled and revised out of the vocabulary of future generations.

    Shut off the TV and wake up!

  7. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 13, 2012 - 11:52 pm | Permalink

    The irony of it all is that the South African Jews, who were central in the dismantling of the Apartheid system in their own country ( and thus its subsequent destruction), have fled in droves to Australia. There their ethnic brethern ( or perhaps even they themselves) are engaged in the same anti-White policies that destroyed their own country in the first place. By destroying others the Jews ultimately destroy themselves, but try to explain that to compulsively destructive parasites!

  8. Steve's Gravatar Steve
    August 13, 2012 - 11:56 pm | Permalink

    Now the missing pieces are coming together;
    Congress of Vienna
    Council on Foreign Relations
    United Nations
    Bilderberg Group
    Treaty of Rome
    Trilateral Commission
    Group of Thirty
    European Union
    UN Declaration on the Elimination of of Racial Discrimination

    I always wondered how Australia was set upon by the Jews, seeing that it’s an island nation and only policy, not illegal border crossings, would help dilute the White majority. I wasn’t sure how much a role the UN played as compared to Australian Jews in political and media roles when it came to non-White immigration policy.

    As a side note, Robert Rothschild was instrumental in the 1957 Treaty of Rome, which led to the EU. He directed the Jew Robert Schuman to initiate the creation of the Treaty of Rome. Prior to the Treaty of Rome were the League of Nations and Congress of Vienna, which I’m assuming were other attempts by Rothschild geared toward world domination.

    All roads lead to Rothschild.

  9. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    August 14, 2012 - 12:21 am | Permalink

    USA, 1965
    Australia, 1974

    its a ’1984′, yes?

  10. Thora's Gravatar Thora
    August 14, 2012 - 12:34 am | Permalink

    I always wondered how Australia was set upon by the Jews, seeing that it’s an island nation

    Are you better than Thebes
    that sat by the Nile,
    with water around her,
    her rampart a sea,
    water her wall?
    Ethiopia was her strength,
    Egypt too, and that without limit;
    Put and the Libyans were her helpers.

    Yet she became an exile,
    she went into captivity;
    even her infants were dashed in pieces
    at the head of every street;
    lots were cast for her nobles,
    all her dignitaries were bound in fetters.
    You also will be drunken,
    you will go into hiding;
    you will seek
    a refuge from the enemy.
    All your your fortresses are like fig trees
    with first-ripe figs—
    if shaken they fall
    into the mouth of the eater.
    Look at your troops:
    they are women in your midst.
    The gate of your land
    are wide open to your foes;
    fire has devoured the bars of your gates
    .

    Your shepherds are asleep
    O king of Assyria;
    your nobles slumber.
    Your people are scattered on the mountains
    with no one to gather them.

    -Nahum 3

    …The bible – particularly the Old Testament – is a hearkening toward the fate of nations. So long as the West feared the “God of Nations”, the West feared for their nations. The Jew never forgot the intense nationalistic rivalry depicted in the above curses against Assyria. While Jews fantasize about dashing the brains out of the children of enemy nations, Americans and Australians have been watching game shows, situation comedies, and “updated” history specials created especially for us by people sharing the same essence as the prophet Nahum.

    The tragedy of the West’s turning away from religion is that it blinded the West to the intense, religious, nature of national conflict.

  11. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    August 14, 2012 - 12:40 am | Permalink

    Jews wrecking nations? Who would have ever thought! Thora’s point about the advent of visual media in subverting White societies is well taken. Television is a very dangerous tool of mind control in the wrong hands, and guess who grabbed this new technology right of the bat? This does indeed coincide with the racially destructive, Jewish inspired, “intellectual revolution” of the 1960′s.

  12. Brenton Sanderson's Gravatar Brenton Sanderson
    August 14, 2012 - 12:48 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    Absolutely correct. I mention this later in the essay.

  13. August 14, 2012 - 1:34 am | Permalink

    @saxon:

    Even if the Jew forces the white or yellow man to go to Africa, the birth rates of Africans are so high that white and yellow man simply cannot dilute Africa.

    Sub Sahran African women produce 6 or 7 kids in their lifetime.
    Whereas white man only 1 kid, yellow man only 1 or 2 kids.
    And Japan, Korea, China, Philippines are already full of people, so white man cannot dilute those lands. Perhaps Black man?

    The problem is not just mass immigration, but low births for white man. Whites will be extinct in 50 years. probably 70 years, but not longer.

  14. Andrew Joyce's Gravatar Andrew Joyce
    August 14, 2012 - 2:12 am | Permalink

    An excellent piece of scholarship. Looking forward to the remainder of the essay.

  15. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    August 14, 2012 - 2:41 am | Permalink

    Multiculturalism is rooted in Kabbalah.. Communitarianism is also an expression of Kabbalah. If you’re not too familiar with this Jewish Mysticism, I am including a link below to a series of clips on Kabbalah to get you started. I think that to understands Jews is to understand Kabbalah. Know thy enemy PEOPLE! It explains a whole lot and why people like Jared Taylor are on a Dead End Street. There is no compromise with Jews on the question of multiculturalism. As long as Jews remain Jews, they will not allow us to have our own white countries. PERIOD!

  16. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    August 14, 2012 - 2:42 am | Permalink

    The following is the link to Kabbalah:

  17. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    August 14, 2012 - 2:50 am | Permalink

    To get a full grasp of who we are dealing with, you must watch the series in its entirety. Especially clip 4 and 16 (where he talks bad bad things being good and about correcting the world, respectively.) That is what they think they are doing – correcting the world.

  18. Matthias's Gravatar Matthias
    August 14, 2012 - 3:03 am | Permalink

    Herald Sun

    September 27, 2000

    Multiculturalism not for Israel – Leibler

    By John Masanauskas

    Melbourne – Jewish leader Isi Leibler, a staunch defender of Australian multiculturalism, says the policy has no place in Israel.

    “This is a country which was set up and created as a Jewish country for the Jews,” he told a Jerusalem newspaper.

    Mr. Leibler has previously said that multiculturalism in Australia was something that “we are all proud being part and parcel of.”

    The founder of Jetset Travel moved to Israel two years ago as chairman of the World Jewish Congress. He recently published an essay arguing that Zionism, or Jewish nationalism, was under threat in Israel by “post-Zionists”.

    “A post-Zionist is someone who actually looks positively towards the end of the Jewish people in ethnocentric terms, as a national group, and no longer sees the Jewish people as one united people,” he told the Jerusalem Post.

    Mr. Leibler said post-Zionists were pushing a universalist agenda in schools aimed at eliminating Jewish nationalism and creating a multicultural state.

    But Mr. Leibler, 65, has the opposite view of multiculturalism in Australia.

    During the Pauline Hanson debate in 1993, he warned that multiculturalism was under threat by extremists.

    “There is a need to sit together and establish a way in which Australians can recapture that spirit of multiculturalism which I think we are all proud being part and parcel of, and which is really under threat,” Mr. Leibler said.

  19. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 14, 2012 - 4:03 am | Permalink

    This article besides making me aware of what is happening in contemporary Australia, reminded me of my childhood. My father was friends with an ex- Marine Sergeant, who was in fact called Sarge by all of his drinking buddies including my Dad. He was an older man than my Dad, old enough to be his father etc. Being very fond of my Dad, Sarge would send all kinds of souvenirs to our house when he was on one of his world cruises. The guy was a retired military man, and wasn’t married but apparently had the proverbial “girlfriend in every port”, etc. He would save his money by renting super cheap lodging and would then go on a world cruise.

    I remember one postcard and a package, that came from Australia. The postcard had a picture of his cruiseship, the S.S. Canberra. It was a beautiful ship. In the package he sent was a set of pillow cases for my mother. It had scenes of Australia on them. The combination of pillow cases and the postcard of the ship Canberra, sparked my boyish imagination about this far-away place, Australia and how wonderfull it would be to see it. What has this to do with the above article? Perhaps nothing, perhaps everything, in that, that Australia pictured in my adolescent mind years ago, has probably disappeared forever.

  20. Lombard's Gravatar Lombard
    August 14, 2012 - 5:10 am | Permalink

    Honestly, although this article is correct factually, the situation on the ground right now is Shangri-La. Perhaps it will soon fall off the cliff but if this was the poster child for the Jew World Order, there probably wouldn’t be many complaints. All the credit obviously goes to the early anglo/irish pioneers/settlers and later, America for military protection. Unfortunately, these current generations have it so good you wouldn’t think of rocking the boat. A few of the major differences with the USA are; No major Slave/ghetto population or slave labor hordes. Even the immigrants are generally from the privileged class of the 3rd world. Plus a culture that’s nowhere near as ‘predatory’ as Americans (Jew or non-jew) so the socialist system doesn’t strain like it might.
    Perhaps the real issue (that I;m sure the author will cover later) is the difficulty for other ‘whites’ to move here.

  21. Sindbad's Gravatar Sindbad
    August 14, 2012 - 5:32 am | Permalink

    @Thora:
    Touch in a TV ( or other public) debate the issue of christian faith, right of nations, racial homogenity of societies or ilusion of holocaust and you’ll discover that censorship is very alive and more powerfull than ever. Those who control the media are the same who control censorship.

  22. JA's Gravatar JA
    August 14, 2012 - 6:00 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    “There their ethnic brethern ( or perhaps even they themselves) are engaged in the same anti-White policies that destroyed their own country in the first place.”

    I haven’t met a South African of whatever ethnicity who doesn’t support plenty of Third World migration. It seems they parasitised and grew fat on it, it’s in their bones.

    On the same basis, the SA Jewish organisations never once opposed Apartheid.

    South Africans are also Zionists and the symbiotic relationship between Israel and SA is well documented.

  23. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    August 14, 2012 - 8:07 am | Permalink

    @Thora: “Shut off the TV and wake up!”

    I stopped watching mainstream TV 20 years ago when I first noticed the propagandistic and manipulative nature of most of the shows I had at first thought funny or “dramatically realistic”.

    The only things I watch now are classic movies on DVD, the odd “reality” show like “Rocket City Rednecks” and the Cooking Channel occasionally when the cooks mirror my own ethnic interests.

    In that 20 years I have noticed a perceptible shift away from their own ethnic interests in those of my casual friends who eagerly look forward to the latest installment of the usual perverted media slop that passes for wit and substance these days.

    And don’t get me going about our corrupted MSM’s “News” or I’ll be here all day…

  24. Craig's Gravatar Craig
    August 14, 2012 - 8:55 am | Permalink

    As an Australian I’m sad to report 12% of Australia is now Non-white. Large parts of Western Sydney and Western, North Melbourne have become majority non-white enclaves in some suburbs. Most shockingly since 2007 black Africans have been given the go a head to colonise to.

    Unintended consequences of the Black Africans as they are now engaging in a race war against the Aborigines, as they compete for the same welfare grants, and housing commissions, in the same suburbs and country towns.

    For a long time White Australians have been calling for a referendum on immigration, no politician has the guts to do so as they know the public would vote for Zero immigration, or Zero non-white immigration.

    Even with the liberal MSM polls report 51% of Australians want no immigration at all now.

    My Grandfather is disgusted and my Great Grandfather is turning in his grave.

    Europeans of the old and new world need to respond to this global problem and we need to organise pronto. I believe there is a great chance of this great white awakening to start in the USA and to spread globally. We need to get to work on it, not just on the internet, but professionally in the real world, we need to form a white Union, to fight for our rights, and to spread information on how to organise, locally, state, nationally and globally wide in scope.

  25. JA's Gravatar JA
    August 14, 2012 - 8:55 am | Permalink

    @Lombard:

    “Honestly, although this article is correct factually, the situation on the ground right now is Shangri-La. Perhaps it will soon fall off the cliff but if this was the poster child for the Jew World Order, there probably wouldn’t be many complaints. All the credit obviously goes to the early anglo/irish pioneers/settlers and later, America for military protection. Unfortunately, these current generations have it so good you wouldn’t think of rocking the boat. A few of the major differences with the USA are; No major Slave/ghetto population or slave labor hordes. Even the immigrants are generally from the privileged class of the 3rd world. Plus a culture that’s nowhere near as ‘predatory’ as Americans (Jew or non-jew) so the socialist system doesn’t strain like it might.
    Perhaps the real issue (that I;m sure the author will cover later) is the difficulty for other ‘whites’ to move here.”

    If you and yours are well set up yes.

    And as long as the minerals boom persists, a boom that has totally distorted the Australian economy. And the housing boom too.

    And you ignore the fact that homelessness amongst of Australians is very high and getting worse. And the casualisation of the workforce and the ever-present threat of displacement of Australian labour with immigrants and/or outsourcing.

    And those better off Chinese/Indians are monopolising the well paid professions.

    And the criminal activity in and from immigrant communities – several shoot-ups each week in SW Sydney which is now a Muslim ghetto.

    And the universities have become mere factories for the recruitment of Indian and Chinese immigrants. Immigration factories.

    And you think the “boats” (each one who arrive/get residency bring 5 on average) aren’t a problem! And the huge stresses on the welfare system, particularly from immigrant groups that parasitise it – even after being here for 5 years still are unemployed.

    And the same goes for the stresses on the medical and other infrastructures.

    Do you actually reside in Australia?

  26. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    August 14, 2012 - 9:19 am | Permalink
  27. Athling's Gravatar Athling
    August 14, 2012 - 9:41 am | Permalink

    I am following along with much interest in this series. We see various key points in the timeline for our current hideous state of affairs. We see key people who think differently than we do and sought to make changes in policies designed to protect our racial heritage by influencing White people in high places.

    I remain struck by how pathetically spineless those White imbeciles were. Sold their entire nations down the river because a few key individuals thought that would be a good idea.

    Sounds to me like these pathetic examples of White manhood didn’t need much convincing. Our women certainly don’t since they are by nature already predisposed in that direction by virtue of being women.

    Where was the counter-revolution? Why were Whites not taught from an early age, and publicly, the importance of racial solidarity and the consequences of racial dilution?

    I look forward to the second installment on this important topic. I am still more outraged at us than them at this point though.

  28. Athling's Gravatar Athling
    August 14, 2012 - 9:55 am | Permalink

    I do wish Kevin, at some point in time, would make his “Culture of Critique” available online so that the masses could have ready access to it.

  29. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    August 14, 2012 - 10:28 am | Permalink

    @Craig:

    One thing that doesn’t make any sense to me, is the early and vigorous opposition to the White Australia policy by the Roman Catholic church. What does the Catholic church have to gain by importing pagans into Australia? Here in the USA the Catholics do gain by importing unlimited numbers Roman Catholics from Latin America. But, that’s not the case in Australia. Is it just the Catholic animus for White Protestants?

    Btw, is there a recording of the White Australia March on the web?

  30. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 14, 2012 - 10:47 am | Permalink

    @D. K.: Damn right. Hillary is an American Martian.

  31. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 14, 2012 - 11:00 am | Permalink

    The world and my health being what they are, there aren’t many things that are guaranteed to raise my spirits. Seeing Brenton Sanderson’s name is one that invariably does, however, and that TOO has now begun featuring a five-parter on Australia by him is an occasion for an attempt at a handstand!

    As Andrew Joyce already wrote, Mr. Sanderson is a true scholar. Like what he says or not, his veracity, his intellectual rigor, his reliance on none but verifiable sources—these are things one can take to the bank.

    How all the more distressing, then, to see the reflexively cheap bigotry of a commenter such as Tom, above, for whom any occasion is a ripe one for a lie or two or a dozen as he urinates on his favorite hate object.

  32. European's Gravatar European
    August 14, 2012 - 12:35 pm | Permalink

    @Thora:
    The tragedy of the West’s turning away from religion is that it blinded the West to the intense, religious, nature of national conflict.

    Reply
    Precisely!

  33. Reality Check's Gravatar Reality Check
    August 14, 2012 - 2:08 pm | Permalink

    The Jewish role in “altering” America is well documented including by the owner of this site. The Australian experience is now being analyzed in this series. Very illuminating.

    I’m wondering if there exists a similar academically rigorous treatment of the Jewish role in altering South Africa in particular.

    There are some clues here and there. For example, 3 African nations honors Jews who fought Apartheid by issuing special postage stamps:
    - http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?id=210275
    - http://www.jewishjournal.com/passover/article/african_stamps_honor_jews_who_fought_apartheid_20110412/
    - and others
    - http://www.legendaryherosofafrica.com where you can purchase these stamps and further bios of the honorees

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    The irony of it all is that the South African Jews, who were central in the dismantling of the Apartheid system in their own country ( and thus its subsequent destruction)…

    • August 14, 2012 - 2:13 pm | Permalink

      The best article I am aware of is:
      The Role of Jews in South Africa since 1948, by Sam Davidson. The Occidental Quarterly, Summer, 2011. 59-88. This is available at the TOQ website.

  34. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 14, 2012 - 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Any White government that allows jews to exert influence over their people is begging to be destroyed.

    We’ve been dealing with this insectile race for 2,000 years and we still haven’t figured out that their one purpose in life is to destroy.

    WTF is wrong with Whites?

  35. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    August 14, 2012 - 2:51 pm | Permalink

    Jews are “Correcting” the world. That’s what multiculturalism is all about. It’s all about Kabbalah and it’s very root.. and Jews are on a mission to unite with God.. They actually think that they will be God (collectively, of course!). Kabbalah explains many things.. I’m curious what is our position on the subject of Kabbalah and does the slogan of WHITE UNITY enough to counter something like that? It seems like a powerful ideology at a first glance! I mean, having looked into it a little, I can see how so many people can be attracted to it ( for example, Madonna).

  36. Paul Hausser's Gravatar Paul Hausser
    August 14, 2012 - 2:55 pm | Permalink

    The Jew obviously made it a major major project after WW2 to destroy White Nations so “it can never happen again”.

    Germany’s loss to the USSR was a tragedy that made this whole change possible

  37. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 14, 2012 - 3:10 pm | Permalink

    @Facio Libre:

    It’s not about kabbalah. Stop this crap. It’s Jews being Jews. It’s what they do, it’s who they are. Stop trying to pin their behavior on some kind of “belief.” Jews destroy, it’s their raison d’etre.

  38. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    August 14, 2012 - 3:10 pm | Permalink

    @Steve:

    Apologies for trolling but I do believe Schuman to be a Catholic. Is the EU a bad idea? I have no problem with Polish plumbers and I have moved through several EU countries. In fact, I was born in one EU country of parents from another.

  39. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    August 14, 2012 - 3:33 pm | Permalink

    @fender

    If you don’t know what your enemy believes in, than you don’t know your enemy! So how do you expect to win?

    Kabbalah is the reason why they do what they do and have been doing since time began. If you are not familiar with it you should look into it. I’m not excusing their behavior, as such that if they just stopped practicing Kabbalah, than everything will go back to normal. To be a Jew is to be a Kabbalist. It’s the same thing. Go ahead and check out the links I included above and tell me that is not what is going on. Seriously! To the T.. You have to watch all 16 clips though.. It’s a bit lengthy!

  40. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    August 14, 2012 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Consider the Jew Star of David.. It consists of two triangles.. As above so below.. So the top triangle represents the world above and the bottom relates to the world below.. Number 6 is sacraed for Jews – number six refers to the 6th sense that you need in order to cross over from the world below to the world above.. The 6 sense is all about emotions and feelings.. It reveals their AGENDA! Of course they destroy things.. check out Clip FOUR – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h67mDcpTuc&feature=relmfu ! IT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING!! If WHITE NATIONALISTS WANT TO WIN THIS FIGHT- KABBALAH SHOULD BE A MANDATORY READING!!!

  41. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 14, 2012 - 4:00 pm | Permalink

    @Facio Libre:
    The Qabalah arose in the 12th or 13th century in Southern France and Spain and can therefore not be the “cause” of Jewish destructive behaviour that goes back according to the Bible itself to Abraham himself. But of course the Qabalah will surely contain elements of the Jews’ own destructiveness that they already posessed. I will take a look at the videos.

    @ Fender,

    WTF is wrong with Whites?

    Short answer : naïveté. Its the same reason Whites do not understand that the various non-white groups of the world are psychologically fundamentally different from themselves.

  42. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    August 14, 2012 - 4:13 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    NOT EXACTLY TRUE.. I mean I’m not an expert but the people who speak on it on youtube claim that it originated much earlier than that.. In any case.. It’s what they believe in.. Know THY enemy.. That’s all I’m saying.. It fits in the “correcting” the imperfect goyim in it and the environment. What else it is something that is being used to get celebrities to spread it’s influence – Antonio Gramci – Cultural hegemony.. It explains feminism, homosexuality, multiculturalism, the GREEN AGENDA, etc etc.. I’m telling you that’s their MOJO! and they been using that to beat us over the head.

  43. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    August 14, 2012 - 4:20 pm | Permalink

    Regarding this news clip:

    http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/2012/08/13/german-neo-nazi-group.cnn?iref=allsearch

    What do you guys think? Are these guys real White Nationalists? or are they Anti-Fa pretending to be Neonazis in order to scare the crap out of the ordinary Germans? I’m not sure what to make of this.. But it looks to reminiscent of the OWS and the Anonymous protesters/crowds.

  44. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 14, 2012 - 4:30 pm | Permalink

    Possibly I am a political lightweight, but there is something I don’t understand in all of this talk of a war going on to destroy “white nations”. It’s claimed that the army on one side consists of far leftist Jews and Anglos,etc. But where are the soldiers on the other side, which should presumably be Caucasians? Doesn’t it take two opposing forces to make a war? I’m not being facetious here. I’m trying to get some clarity on the terminology that is used on these posts. Unless leaving comments on various blogs is considered the “return fire”, against the destroyers of white nations, how can it be considered a battle? It’s more like shooting fish in a barrel, as far as the destroyers go, isn’t it?

  45. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    August 14, 2012 - 4:44 pm | Permalink

    Since we can never stop immigration by opposing it on the grounds of racial preservation, which would probably help further support for non-white immigration by those who hate us, we should frame it as an economic issue, which it is and is hinted about in the article we are commenting about.
    The United States has a policy in place called EB-5 in which you can come to this God forsaken country (why would you want to, but people do) if you create 10 permanent jobs and have a minimum capital available of 1,000,000 USD. The two tired plan could be to make this plan more widely available and known, and then restrict all immigration to this program.
    All immigration is economic (except for a few war refugees, which all nations should help with) and unless someone coming to this country contributes, why should we allow them to come here? With this program, we could radically curtail immigration. Sure, some would be non white – but compare that to the million non whites who come here each year.
    In a nod to the topic, I suggest Australia do the same thing.

  46. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 14, 2012 - 4:51 pm | Permalink

    @Facio Libre: I think they are simply Germans utterly fed up with the prevailing system. It’s no secret that German youth, as well as others in Germany, feel as alienated from their politicians and government as millions of Americans obviously do. There is joblessness in Germany, of German youth and others, because billions of dollars are spent on inanities instead of on German citizens. It’s interesting to hear, that their beef is against the “democrats”. But it’s not a surprise. The left is losing ground in Europe as well as in the U.S. regardless of what the elections imply.

  47. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    August 14, 2012 - 4:57 pm | Permalink

    “Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are not even capable of forming such opinions.” — Albert Einstein

    Whites are in serious trouble because White Race Loyalists do not control public discourse on subjects vital to White Survival.

  48. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 14, 2012 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

    @Facio Libre:
    It is not unusual for religions to develop new systems of thought and then claim – falsely – that they are a “secret” tradition going back to the origin of the religion itself. Thus in Buddhism later developed Zen is claimed to go back to the Buddha himself, while in Islam later developed Sufism is claimed to go back to Muhammad himself. The same happened with the Qabalah in Judaism, developed in the 12th or 13th century, but claimed to hail from Moses himself.

    The Jews see it as their task to “repair the world” (tiqqun olam ). For that purpose all differences and inequalities between the peoples of the world have to be obliterated ( hence the promotion of internationalism, open borders, miscegenation and cultural Marxism). Over a mass of equalized zombies the Jews will then rule as their “masters”. In concrete terms it means the destruction of all higher values and the enslavement of humanity.
    But the Jews see that as an “ideal”.

  49. August 14, 2012 - 5:25 pm | Permalink

    Australia will feel all of the love that Canada has for the past 40 years. It is predicted that our 2 largest urban areas – the greater Toronto area and the lower mainland around Vancouver will be a majority non-white in the next 5 years. Toronto. Both cities had a relatively small Chinese population and a smaller black population until the late 60s, then the floodgates opened. I avoid going to visit friends and family in both cities now.

  50. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    August 14, 2012 - 5:29 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: I believe that the battle is cultural and involves the mind and its instincts. The Left is trying (and succeeding in) to suppress the instinct that “birds of a feather flock together.” They are, in other words, working against our natural desire for racial and ethnic solidarity and community by creating forced conditions of life, including continuous propaganda, calculated to inhibit and render ineffective the natural desire people have to protect and make prosper their ethnic nation and its culture — and the wider race of which it is an integral part — the European nations.

    At this point, the warfare is psychological. It amounts to a belief in racial nihilism for Whites — a belief that leads to racial death for Whites in the long run.

  51. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 14, 2012 - 5:36 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    @ Fender,

    WTF is wrong with Whites?

    Short answer : naïveté. Its the same reason Whites do not understand that the various non-white groups of the world are psychologically fundamentally different from themselves.

    One of the wisest statements you have ever made. The good news is we are learning fast. Few things have provided better grounds that the Obama administration. White folks, nor matter how brain washed, cannot avoid the clear demonstration that is does not matter how well mannered, well educated, well rewarded, well respected, or free from the ‘legacy of slavery’ or articulate a black man is – he is not white. Mr. Obama cannot get the job done, he blames whitey, and he will not follow the universal rules, such as reciprocal respect of societal taboos. It is human nature to be free and easy when the living is good.

    It is time to change the conversation. Instead of endless concern about black on black violence and illegitimacy, simply point out that those folks can’t even put up with each other.

    Liberals are desperately hanging on to power, despite obvious and no longer hidden failure. Some wag likened them to the aging members of the Politburo. Change is in the air, we should be figuring out how to lead it.

  52. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    August 14, 2012 - 5:41 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: White have been taught that it’s “very naughty” and “impolite” and “wicked” to speak of White racial interests. It is high time to change that, if we can. Whites must declare to the world that we are a worthy and beautiful people who have a right to defend our genetic interests and maintain our racial integrity.

  53. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 14, 2012 - 5:52 pm | Permalink

    @Adeimantus: I like the name, Adeimantus. I have a degree in philosophy and have probably wasted more hours on the topic than I care to remember. Materially speaking, studying philosophy has never been of any material benefit to me. In fact, it broadens your perspective so immensely that if one is not carefull, it can as the the Rene Descarte said, “only serve to confuse, rather than enlighten the mind”.

    Thank you for your thoughtful reply. I wan’t expecting your answer, but agree with it. It is indeed, ALL ABOUT THE MIND, as is every single aspect of human life. I needed this reminder involving the mind and thank you for replying in the way you did.

  54. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    August 14, 2012 - 6:00 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Point of order: As I merely was asking a question (albeit, a tad rhetorically), rather than asserting an alleged fact, or stating an opinion of my own, I surely cannot have been right– nor wrong– about the particular issue at hand!?!?! Regardless, as Hillary (N.B.: I am assuming, here, that you are referring to the current U.S. Secretary of State, rather than to, say, the late, great Sir Edmund Hillary!?!) is a native-born American, still legally residing in her own country of birth, I believe that the proper term (if astronomically accurate) would be Martian American (hyphenated only when used as a complex adjective), rather than American Martian– which, to my mind, connotes a Martian resident who nonetheless originated back here, on “The Late, Great Planet Earth” (1970)!?!?!

  55. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    August 14, 2012 - 6:11 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    That’s exactly my point. I got no quarrel with you there. I pretty much agree with everything you just typed. On a side note, I don’t think that it matters a whole lot with regards to the when, who, or where of kabbalah, it’s origin, conception, or flavor, etc. All I am saying is that this is what they believe in now and it’s worthwhile for us to know this info. They are heavily promoting it and it spells out their agenda and tactics for us. I believe it to be one of the key pieces to the puzzle of figuring out how to win this fight.. I know that there are plenty of delusional Whites who think that they can have a White country and that Jews could stay, etc.. (i.e. Jared Taylor). If you know what Kabbalah teaches you know different. It’s not the case. They spell it out for us in the teachings of Kabbalah that the world (humanity) must unite, i.e. code word for multiculturalism. The making of the androgynous – feminine men/ masculine women, homosexuality, and million other things stem from that belief system.. Every soul is a piece of one whole and that we all must unite to become God.. etc.. I’m not saying we must adapt these beliefs. But that it is important that we know what Jews believe.. Jews are following a certain road map. Knowing what Kabbalah is, our enemy becomes predictable.. no longer invisible.. less deadly..

  56. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    August 14, 2012 - 6:11 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for this series of essays Mr Sanderson. I’m looking forward to someone finally taking this subject on from a pro-White perspective.

    Today the dismantling of White Australia is promoted by right and left mainstream parties; the Labor and Greens alliance and the mandated “conservative” party the Liberals.

    The left are opposed to all forms of nationalism, only utilising “victim” nations/nationalisities in order to promote one world government. Thus they promote Palestinians and Aboriginal grievance. The latter movement is strongly dominated by Jewish leadership. The former is opposed by that very same Jewish leadership, with a division forming between the White leftists and the Jewish leftists over the BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions against Israel).

    The right opposes White Australia on behalf of large corporations, multi-national companies and the mining sector. Recently our opposition leader, who will probably win the next election, affirmed Australia’s shame at ever having had a White Australia policy:

    ”The first Commonwealth governments tried to stop further immigration from China and from other parts of Asia,” Mr Abbott will say. ”This is a deeply embarrassing feature of Australia’s history … a reminder of the mistakes which even the best countries can make.”

    (http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/abbott-speech-laments-white-australia-policy-20120723-22kou.html)

    Of course, the Liberal party seeks investment from China and is willing to sell our land, large stake in national infrastructure like the mining and communications sector, and open our immigration intake to facilitate what is, in effect, a Chinese invasion.

    The former Liberal Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser, who opposed South African apartheid and is a close friend of Mugabe, tweeted re illegal-immigration:

    “The policy proposed is racist. [re-opening Nauru detention centre] Ask yourselves what Gov & Opposition would do if they were white farmers from Zimbabwe”

    (http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/fraser_plays_the_old_racist_card/)

    I would be surprised if the govt or opposition made any allowance for the dispossessed farmers of Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, those very same farmers that Fraser helped to destroy by bringing Mugabe to power. Yet, the point is made here: both left and right hate White Australia and both seek our eradication in order to further their own agendas.

    Still, today, I know that the majority of White Australians would willingly and happily return to that great White Australia policy. We didn’t vote for its removal, and we have no say on it yet. The first attempt to regain a semblance of White Australia was by Pauline Hanson’s One Nation party in the late ’90s.

    Ms Hanson had a sudden and rapid rise to national prominence reaching approx >10% in voting at the party’s peak, a similar level that the Greens hold today.

    Ms Hanson was decried as a racist and pilloried and lambasted by all sides of politics, with ritual denunciations in our mainstream media. Eventually, members of the Liberal party at the instigation and organisation of current opposition leader Tony Abbott, had Ms Hanson prosecuted under trumped up charges for which she received a gaol sentence.

    That conviction was later quashed and Ms Hanson and others released from gaol. The damage was done though and with her imprisonment any resurgence of a national Australia was destroyed.

    Today Australia is a corporation. It is not a nation and any person who claims a national Australia (that is racial/ethnic basis) is decried as a racist with possible racial vilification charges that may result in a prison sentence.

    The Jewish involvement in all of this is large and efforts by Mr Sanderson are welcome in exposing their mendacity. However, one should not dismiss the role of fellow White Australians whether of the marxist bent in the Labor and Greens parties or the socialist-capitalists (privatise profit, socialise losses) of the Liberal party.

    Our media is dominated by only two strands of political thought: one world leftism or neoconservatism. Either way, the Jews win and White Australia is destroyed.

  57. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 14, 2012 - 6:18 pm | Permalink

    @Adeimantus:

    “Whites must declare to the world that we are a worthy and beautiful people who have a right to defend our genetic interests and maintain our racial integrity.”

    It’s not a question of “rights,” because there are no such things as rights. Whites don’t need any external justification to live as Whites and maintain their nations as White nations. Like everything else, it’s a question of power and drive.

  58. August 14, 2012 - 6:19 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    “@D. K.: Damn right. Hillary is an American Martian. ”

    At the risk of offending, I would like some clarification. According to the propaganda, “Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus”. Did you mean to say that Hillary is an American Venusian, or do you know something that we don’t?

  59. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 14, 2012 - 6:41 pm | Permalink

    @Adeimantus:
    Like any other myth, the myth of equality, defined as interchangeability, must serve the majority of the people in a culture in order to sustain support. Look at any white group in the country, defined by any criteria you like, career, ethnicity, geographical region, etc.. There is not a single one who have truly benefited by diversity.

    Millions of well meaning people applauded Obama’s election, even if they did not vote for him. In return we have had his supporters show blatantly that they are willing to play the race card and call us nasty names.

    Young women face not the high powered, stylish career of feminist fantasies, but dull, boring jobs to pay student debts. Motherhood is becoming, like the whimsy of eccentricity, open only to the rich and poor.

    All in all it is time to ask “what is in this for us”?

  60. JA's Gravatar JA
    August 14, 2012 - 6:43 pm | Permalink

    @Tom:

    One word: the Vatican.

    Walk around Rome today and see the Third World in clerical garb.

    Italian and other European and Australian nuns today are in very short supply.

    The issue is that the Catholic Church is – very – Big Business. Labour costs in all their business enterprises – all with Irish “Catholic” “CEO’s” are critical. In the Globalised economy, the Catholic Church has brand stretched commercially into all the service industries if Australia – where the domestic demand base is stable or growing. Guess who gets most of the jobs there, without losing at all in the government and other employment fields?

    Finally – bums on seats – churchgoing by Catholics has drastically declined…who wants a Filipino priest anyway? Filipinos?

  61. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    August 14, 2012 - 6:45 pm | Permalink

    As example of the ongoing psychological war being waged on White Australians by our media are the following three current or recent documentaries. These docos run on the state owned TV station SBS whose mandate it is to promote multi-culturalism (and of course, multi-racialism):

    “Dumb, Drunk and Racist”

    An assertion that White Australians are dumb and drunk, as well as racist is explored under the guise of a question:

    “Are Australians Dumb Drunk & Racist?”

    Of course, it is not racist to ask that question, whereas it would be to ask a question of a similar nature about Jews, Indians or Asians.

    (http://www.abc.net.au/tv/dumbdrunkracist/)

    “Immigration Nation”

    Noting that the great majority of White Australians oppose their racial inheritance being squandered, and our lands invaded by violent non-White scum, this documentary operates under the lie that all immigration is of an equal nature. That White immigration is the same as non-White immigration, and that our past success is really one of deep shame. A proposition that Tony Abbott obviously agrees with.

    (http://www.sbs.com.au/immigrationnation/)

    “Go back to where you came from”

    Again, noting that White Australians are in the whole angered by their impending eradication, this documentary is a guilt tripping excercise to shame us into throwing our own children to non-White dogs.

    (http://www.sbs.com.au/goback/)

    These are but a few of a long list in the ongoing assault on White Australia.

  62. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    August 14, 2012 - 6:50 pm | Permalink

    JA and Tom: why fixate on the Catholic Church?

    Of course it has been over run by cultural-marxists, just like every other Western institution.

    The pre-Vatican II Church is a vastly different entity to that we have today. That revolution came from within via Jewish manipulation, and without via American occupation of European nations, after destroying European nationalism in WWII.

    Given that it is the U.S.A. that is the world power which mandates, at the threat of military intervention, multi-culturalism and multi-racialism for White nations, why focus on a deracinated Catholic Church?

    The Catholic Church didn’t win the war – you did.

  63. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    August 14, 2012 - 6:53 pm | Permalink

    Comment in moderation. Here it is without the links:

    As example of the ongoing psychological war being waged on White Australians by our media are the following three current or recent documentaries. These docos run on the state owned TV station SBS whose mandate it is to promote multi-culturalism (and of course, multi-racialism):

    “Dumb, Drunk and Racist”

    An assertion that White Australians are dumb and drunk, as well as racist is explored under the guise of a question:

    “Are Australians Dumb Drunk & Racist?”

    Of course, it is not racist to ask that question, whereas it would be to ask a question of a similar nature about Jews, Indians or Asians.

    (link)

    “Immigration Nation”

    Noting that the great majority of White Australians oppose their racial inheritance being squandered, and our lands invaded by violent non-White scum, this documentary operates under the lie that all immigration is of an equal nature. That White immigration is the same as non-White immigration, and that our past success is really one of deep shame. A proposition that Tony Abbott obviously agrees with.

    (link)

    “Go back to where you came from”

    Again, noting that White Australians are in the whole angered by their impending eradication, this documentary is a guilt tripping excercise to shame us into throwing our own children to non-White dogs.

    (link)

    These are but a few of a long list in the ongoing assault on White Australia.

    Addendum: these documentaries are not at the behest of the Catholic Church.

  64. Mother Trucker's Gravatar Mother Trucker
    August 14, 2012 - 7:34 pm | Permalink

    Inequalities erased only in cemetery.

    “Heal the world” means kill all.

  65. Mother Trucker's Gravatar Mother Trucker
    August 14, 2012 - 7:40 pm | Permalink

    It’s more like shooting fish in a barrel, as far as the destroyers go, isn’t it?

    It would be, without the second amendment.

  66. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    August 14, 2012 - 7:45 pm | Permalink

    @fender: That may be so, but Jews generally claim a “right” to occupy Palestine because of historical persecution, when really they are determined to have that land for political purposes. After all, Jews could build a Jewish state elsewhere, I’ve no doubt, without the terrible price that’s now involved. Do you, Fender, support the Zionist occupation of Palestine on the “might makes right” basis?

  67. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    August 14, 2012 - 7:49 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: I agree. I was counseled to choose a supposedly lucrative career — though I think that the pay-scale would have been far less than what one might really receive — that catered to Jewish interests — because “Jews have the money.” I refused because I did not want to enslave myself to the morally questionable interests of a people not my own. There were other reasons as well, but that was the primary one.

  68. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    August 14, 2012 - 7:58 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: You are right, sir. Philosophy must be approached with the greatest care. Much of the speculation in the field is so wildly abstract as to be nearly meaningless. Mental confusion will be the result of advanced study, unless a solid foundation in basic good sense has first been built.

    Too little logic is bad; too much abstraction causes poor thinking and reasoning as well. I find more wisdom in Shakespeare than in some of the more modern “philosophers.”

  69. Burrhus's Gravatar Burrhus
    August 14, 2012 - 8:18 pm | Permalink

    Rarely challenged in western societies prior to 1940, the idea of biological racial difference lost much of its legitimacy in the aftermath of the Holocaust.

    White gentiles will continue to lose the battle to save our race and ethnic nations from the devastation they are currently experiencing until we take the super-weapon of the holocaust lie out of the hands of the jews. Anytime that we speak up for racialism or nationalism they will scream from the mountain-tops, “It’s another holocaust!!!”

    There cannot be ‘another’ holocaust if there never was a first one.

    Which there was not.

  70. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 14, 2012 - 8:20 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.: Your argument is not without merit. Of one thing I am certain, however: she is one woman who is certainly not from Venus.

    I never got to visit Sir Edmund’s homeland, alas, though a good friend of mine lived and taught in Christchurch for several years. But one of the happiest weeks of my life, starting on Thanksgiving Day 1968, was spent in Sydney and environs. Thus, I lament what’s happened in and to Oz as much as what’s happened here in the States.

  71. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 14, 2012 - 8:28 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: I hadn’t seen your comment/question when I replied to D. K. As I said above, wherever she’s from, it certainly ain’t Venus.

    She does, however, remind me of the old joke that went thus: “Before God made her, He broke the mold.”

  72. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    August 14, 2012 - 8:31 pm | Permalink

    @Athling: There are versions floating around the net, legal sanctions notwithstanding.
    http://is.gd/oTaGq2

  73. August 14, 2012 - 8:36 pm | Permalink

    One of the comments above states that the immigration fiasco started along with TV (and I suppose colour TV, paperback books etc). But the point is that there was censorship, very heavy censorship, but only of the white viewpoint.
    .
    Can I ask if anyone has a copy of Israel Cohen’s 1912 book A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century? (Possibly spelt Programme). And if so, could you please publish it on Internet in a way that makes it clear that it’s genuine, and give the full text of what it says?
    .
    The APP (Australian Protectionist Party)
    http://www.protectionist.net
    shows what some Australians are doing.

  74. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    August 14, 2012 - 9:13 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan:

    I don’t like to rush a good story, but, I’m talking about Patrick Francis Moran the first Roman Catholic Cardinal of Australia who was an early and strong opponent of the White Australia policy.

    Some of Cardinal Moran’s criticism is available on-line, if anyone doubts his efforts to overthrow White Australia.

    We are talking about the head of the Catholic church in Australia…not some minor character.

    But, I’m sure the author will cover Cardinal Moran and much more.

  75. Istvan's Gravatar Istvan
    August 14, 2012 - 9:25 pm | Permalink

    Australia’s citizenship oath has been watered down through the years and makes no requirment that new citizens swear their alleigance to Queen Elizabeth and swearing alleigance to God is optional. If the newcomers will not swear alleigance to your monarch and your god what makes you think they will really: (the Pledge)

    I pledge my loyalty to Australia and its people,
    whose democratic beliefs I share,
    whose rights and liberties I respect, and
    whose laws I will uphold and obey.

    They take away your monarch, they take away your god and soon they take away your nation. Look what the Jews did to Russia and Germany. A sensible nation would tell newcomers that you accpet our head of state and god or don’t bother showing up at our door.

    Like Cananda, like New Zealand, like the UK, you are all doomed.

  76. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 14, 2012 - 9:29 pm | Permalink

    @Adeimantus:
    Well done! Imagine what all those kids who sold their soul for crumbs feel like?

  77. Lookaroundu's Gravatar Lookaroundu
    August 14, 2012 - 9:48 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan: “The Catholic Church didn’t win the war – you did”
    That wretched truth is like vomit in the mouths of those who understand the white 20th century fratricide of World War. Yet so many ignorant white Americans, Brits and yes, Australians think their “free” world was saved. Thus “saved” Australia is on a path to going down and under. The Good War made the world safe alright. Safe for the parasitic purveyors of communism, multicultural socialism, welfare democracy (a sick joke), Wall Street banksters and their New World Order friends.

  78. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 14, 2012 - 9:50 pm | Permalink

    @Adeimantus:

    “That may be so, but Jews generally claim a “right” to occupy Palestine because of historical persecution, when really they are determined to have that land for political purposes.”

    The Jews took the land because they had the power and ability to do so, and no one was able to stand up to them. Powerful people couldn’t care less if they had the “right” to do something or not. All this talk about “rights” is media theatrics to keep the goyim confused and bickering about “right” and “wrong.”

    “After all, Jews could build a Jewish state elsewhere, I’ve no doubt, without the terrible price that’s now involved. Do you, Fender, support the Zionist occupation of Palestine on the “might makes right” basis?”

    What does it matter if I support something or not? It doesn’t. At the end of the day the Jews still have control of Palestine as well as the entirety of the West, whether I like it or not. My opinion about the “zionist” (why can’t you just say Jewish?) occupation of Palestine is that they won the land fair and square, just as Europeans at one point won North America.

  79. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 14, 2012 - 9:57 pm | Permalink

    @Lookaroundu:
    I cannot resist pointing out that is took next to no time for us to descend into ‘who’s fault is it’. An article like this should simply strengthen our sense of solidarity and determination to fight back.

    There is not one single, perfect way to do that. We must each find the best way to inform and encourage our own circle of influence. Instead we quibble about which subset of white folks is most at fault. It doesn’t matter right now, we are going under here folks.

  80. torgrim's Gravatar torgrim
    August 14, 2012 - 10:23 pm | Permalink

    @Mother Trucker: “it’s more like shooting fish in a barrel as far as the destroyers go, isn’t it?

    MT, “It would be without the second amendment.”

    reply; And hence, the Jewish Organs financing the attack on the 2nd.

  81. Craig's Gravatar Craig
    August 14, 2012 - 10:37 pm | Permalink

    @Tom:

    As in our Meta institutions Jews and there helpers would take over from the top, down. Essentially this is a managerial top down revolution, of small steps at a time. The White Australia policy was essentially taken down by agitators in the minority groups bought over after WW2 in sufficient numbers. Mainly Jews, Italians, and Greeks, then the minorities already here Aboriginals, and women joining first wave feminism.

    Catholics have always had a bad name here, starting from the Anglican/Catholic divide. The Irish the largest Catholic group assimilated into Anglo Celtic culture. So the Catholic church needed more faithful patrons that would not assimilate into our Anglo Celtic culture. A lot of Irish and Scottish were and still are in the police force so the Catholic and Anglican priests were known for a long time in the community for their pederasty, even with out newspaper coverage back then. Word of mouth in a very socially tight knit community. The Scottish tied the Irish and Germans together so we were a good counter balance to the Anglo culture.

    My Grand father tells me of the ways he would chase Catholic and even Anglican priests out of town for such activities, as back then the Churches also had Political and media complicity.

  82. Blake Watts's Gravatar Blake Watts
    August 14, 2012 - 11:35 pm | Permalink

    I sit in amazement, stunned that this small tribe has been able to totally subvert the will of the majority in white nations all over the world. It sickens me. The Jews’ filthy money buys their influence, and our white “leaders” have sold us out worldwide. I still believe that if people actually knew and understood the truth of these matters, there would be immediate hell to pay. And you don’t have to go to the Kabbalah to locate Jewish supremacism, as the Talmud is steeped in it. They think it’s their divine duty to enslave us.

  83. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    August 14, 2012 - 11:36 pm | Permalink

    @Istvan: We never pledged allegiance to a Monarch here in America until Obama. We became a great country without a Monarch.
    By the way, the monarch in question is just a tourist attraction, anyway.

  84. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 15, 2012 - 12:19 am | Permalink

    @Blake Watts: Blake, my brother, it can not have been the “will” of the majority. I have grappled with this question for a long time. Notice that no one tied the majorities(European-Americans) hands for a long time in this nation. Instead, so many things were accepted by that majority without so much as a whimper. I lived through much of it as a baby boomer. I saw the carelessness, unconcernedness, and “tolerance” of the vilest things by the parents of the boomers. Not content with that, the boomers decided to outdo their parents. They threw every value that was already weakened by the weakness of their parents, completely out the window during the sixties. I clearly remember when the stupid and transparent TV show “All in the Family”, came out. I remember how most of my friends just thought it was swell. They laughed at Archie, not realizing it was a putdown and a parody of their own parents. They ever questioned anything but their own “freedom” to do what they wanted to do, while seeing their friends overdose on drugs, float about despondently, and continue searching for meaning. And meaning they found. They swallowed the pap oftered to them by Hollywood and the clearly(to clear thinking people) subversive left, wholesale. How can anyone with a small degree of honesty, totally blame someone else for their own unwillingness to get involved in righting the things that were clearly wrong. But how can one right anything, when they willingly refuse to see it as wrong in the first place? Just something to think about, now that the situation has become desperate. And speaking of NOW, isn’t it interesting to observe millions of European-Americans, still refusing to see clearly and of course, never even dreaming of getting together to do anything about it, if not for themselves, than at least for their children.

  85. Phil's Gravatar Phil
    August 15, 2012 - 1:27 am | Permalink

    The question that needs to be asked: what are Whites, or more correctly, when are White going to do something about it? It’s clearly a Jewish war against Whites! When I say Jewish war against Whites, I specifically mean those Jews that are responsible for these anti-White policies and not the “little” Jew down the street who owns a deli, etc. and not at fault.

    Wake up White people!

    Phil

  86. Phil's Gravatar Phil
    August 15, 2012 - 1:32 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    “The irony of it all is that the South African Jews, who were central in the dismantling of the Apartheid system in their own country ( and thus its subsequent destruction), have fled in droves to Australia.”

    It’s not an “irony” but blatant hypocrisy! Jews create “diversity” then flee it! It’s simple a plan to destroy all White nations.

    Phil

  87. Phil's Gravatar Phil
    August 15, 2012 - 1:37 am | Permalink

    @Blake Watts:

    “The Jews’ filthy money buys their influence, and our white “leaders” have sold us out worldwide”

    More than that, it’s their media control that has mentally castrated Whites and indoctrinated them with self-hatred, guilt about their Whiteness, etc.

    Phil

  88. Phil's Gravatar Phil
    August 15, 2012 - 1:43 am | Permalink

    @Steve:

    “UN Declaration on the Elimination of of Racial Discrimination”

    Racial Discrimination = preference for ones’ own kind, same way one prefers ones own family over other families. The UN in reality is JEW-N. It’s just another tentacle of international Jewry, hellbent on eliminating White gentiles.

    Phil

  89. Phil's Gravatar Phil
    August 15, 2012 - 2:00 am | Permalink

    @Athling:

    “Why were Whites not taught from an early age, and publicly, the importance of racial solidarity and the consequences of racial dilution?”

    Because that’s “hate” and “intolerancel” and “bigotry” (right, Arrogant Abe Foxman?) that ultimately leads to a mythical holocaust.

    Well, I can honestly state I never had such sick, unnatural feelings. Maybe ’cause I grew up in a city where Whites were not the majority and got a good ‘taste’ of “diverstiy” at a very early age right up to this very day.

    Phil

  90. Phil's Gravatar Phil
    August 15, 2012 - 2:38 am | Permalink

    @Facio Libre:

    “Jews are “Correcting” the world. That’s what multiculturalism is all about.”

    Really? Then why don’t they ‘correct’ matters at home in the Jew-first-foremost and only, apartheid Zionist state, first? Let them open up their borders to hordes of Africans, Mexicans and all sort of goyim and not just show but PROVE to the world just how wonderful “diversity” (non-Whites) and multiculturalism is?

    You know the answer to that!

    In reality, multiculturalism is designed to balkenize and weaken White countries same way as international Jewry is behind the overthrow of the governments in Libya, Egypt and now working on Syria, leaving behind a fragmented, chaotic country with various ethnic, religious and tribal groups competing for power.

    Phil

  91. Phil's Gravatar Phil
    August 15, 2012 - 2:55 am | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan:

    Are Jews Arrogant, Drunk (with power) and Racist (i.e., anti-gentile)?

    Affirmative!!

    Racist = for ones own kind, same way as one is for ones own family, i.e., a familyist. But we all know that Jewish-coined smear term was created specifically and used to emasculate and silence Whites–ONLY IF YOU LET IT!

    Wake up White people! It’s not a ‘crime’ to be White (i.e., “racist”). Stop being scaredy-cats!

    Phil

  92. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 15, 2012 - 3:29 am | Permalink

    @Phil:
    O course it is hypocrisy. But there still is some “irony” here. They ruin a white country and then have to flee to another white country. Then they ruin that white country too and have to flee to yet another white country, and so on. Untill there are no more white countries left and they have ultimately harmed themselves. That’s the irony.

    One could say that they always can flee to Israel, but Israel in order to survive needs support …from white countries. When all white countries have become third world countries they will not and cannot support Israel anymore. That’s why I said : “by destroying others the Jews ultimately destroy themselves”.

  93. JA's Gravatar JA
    August 15, 2012 - 5:13 am | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan:

    You are a good man.

    Who’s fixated????? I’m no bigot and see division as a pox.

    But this is a clear case of division that shouldn’t be there but has to be stated, because it’s too late for anything but the truth.

    Where would you fault anything I have said?

  94. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    August 15, 2012 - 6:01 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: Excellent observation, Brother Ryckaert. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: jews seem to hate White European people more than they love themselves.

    If you look at this from a demographic standpoint, jews are very much like the Palestinian suicide bombers. They are willing to destroy themselves in order to genocide White European people.

    In the end, either White European people – worldwide – wake up and decide to go on offense and remove this cancer tumor from every one of our historic White nations, or else this tumor will kill us. The idea that we can coexist with this tumor inside our nations is complete nonsense.

    Need an example? Look at how vigorously and slavishly these Christian Zionist imbeciles lick the toes and other, even less appetizing body parts, of the jews – but that does not succeed in any compensatory gratitude from the tribe.

    They still want to genocide White European people and destroy Western Civilization, no matter how much Whites lick their toes.

  95. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    August 15, 2012 - 6:08 am | Permalink

    @Phil: That little jew who owns the deli down the street might not be directly involved in the anti-White machinations of the big jews, but I will guarantee to you that that little jew strokes a check and donates to the ADL and SPLC and any other jewish organization that has his name on their mailing list and every one of those organizations are virulently anti-White and they are most definitely responsible for actively participating in this genocide war against White European people.

  96. JA's Gravatar JA
    August 15, 2012 - 6:16 am | Permalink

    @Luke:
    Likely true.

    But why from one so low on the ladder of life?

  97. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    August 15, 2012 - 6:19 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: Mark Dankof did podcast recently where he had E. Michael Jones on as his guest, and prior to introducing Jones – he did an in-depth discussion of Romney, Mormonism and how tightly woven this religion is with Judaism. I was not a big fan of Romney before listening to this podcast, but I am even less so now that I have. In addition, my whole opinion of Mormonism is now very negative.

    The mp3 archive can be found here:

    http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/category/the-ugly-truth-podcast/

  98. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    August 15, 2012 - 6:31 am | Permalink

    @Bobby: I can relate to just about everything the Brother Bobby said in his comment.

    I have observed the same sort of blind, unquestioning, zombie-like acceptance of almost the entire poisonous, clearly subversive, and obviously destructive anti-white jewish agenda by many of my generation, and even from the generation that preceded mine.

    But, what troubles me most – is the nagging question that has always bounced around inside my head. Why was I immune to nearly all of this jewish poison – but my friends and most of my own family members were not? What made me be able to see what so many others could not?

  99. Free Thinker's Gravatar Free Thinker
    August 15, 2012 - 7:34 am | Permalink

    I hear the sound of a very large stone being dropped into a small pond . This is the breathe of reality that will shake to ruling class to reality . What I sense going on now in Australia regarding Multiculti is more lip service than real service . The middle class that run the Gov Structure and business are well aware that resource competition with Chinese/Asian immigrants for prestige schools and institutions and housing is making their life and their children life very difficult ie miserable . Infact the competition pressure will change the character of Australia completely . The Chinese/Asians operate in a very similar fashion to Jews (rental and finance strategy ) , though with infinitely more honesty in the political realm .

    Another comment was posted regarding Propaganda created by Government Media institutions to shame the European Australians into silence . These programs created and promoted in the last year or so are blatant but cunning hate crimes . As usual with the Ziomason rats its ok to hate Whites who won’t submit with smiles to the NWO , which I think is what its all about.

    I live in a small town where half the people are of Anglo decent and a very large Italian/Greek community . One the these shame piece was called “Immigration Nation” , which was a doco about how the Anglo Australian had (verbally )mistreated Immigrants arriving after WW2 with small minded bigotry . Sowhat . But anyway this program was air twice in a 2 month period (due to popular demand ‘they’ said ) . Being something of a sage I can tell you that I notice a measurable shift in the Italian communities attitude . There way of looking , their demure, the less friendly feeling straight after this program was aired was quite discernible particularly from the young , this agit-prop really got their backs up . Which ofcourse was exactly what the ZioMason rats were trying to do . To drive a wedge into the assimilated community to break any ‘racist’ organized objection to the Chinese and Indian influx of professional , that slip into the top echelon schools and housing without having ‘done their time’ or done anything . And ofcourse the newly minted passports for Israeli ‘Australians’.
    I mention the Masons because it is very apparent in small pond Australia , that they are the hidden force that pull the leavers under Jewish direction , they are the x-factor that is systematically promoting this . As the article says , if Australian were asked , if they could work this out they would know who to push against . This is why Masonry operates in secrecy , so that there schemes can’t be blocked . And obviously most of these politically active Jews are Masons.

  100. fnn's Gravatar fnn
    August 15, 2012 - 8:28 am | Permalink

    @Thora:

    Where are today’s censors? Mocked and put aside.

    Except for the highly respected ADL and SPLC !

  101. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    August 15, 2012 - 8:47 am | Permalink

    @Luke:

    You stated: “Need an example? Look at how vigorously and slavishly these Christian Zionist imbeciles lick the toes and other, even less appetizing body parts, of the jews – but that does not succeed in any compensatory gratitude from the tribe.”
    I believe this is a great flaw in the jewish DNA. They don’t extend any gratitude because they believe what they are getting is rightfully theirs. Ultimately, I believe that is what makes Christians receptive to the concept that jews broke their covenant with God, and are no longer his chosen people. Plant that seed, and watch it grow.

  102. shark's Gravatar shark
    August 15, 2012 - 8:49 am | Permalink

    @ Tom
    That is very interesting to know and explains things somewhat to me about Austrailia’s predicament. I know Catholics are complicit with the Jew in immigration reform(amongst other things) here in the US, that’s for sure. In 1960,after 300 years of Proddy rule,there were only a handful of Catholics and one jew in Congress and they somehow managed to open the floodgates. Same thing 50 years later in England after,what,500 years of Protestant rule a Papist takes the helm,Blair,and again the floodgates are opened. The bird of prey in this country has two wings a Kike and a Katholic one. Papists like to blame Vatican II but didn’t Chamberlain say years before that the Catholic was the standard bearer against the Aryan? Wasn’t thier main church father and philosopher Augustine half black? Of course they are as internationalist as the Joo. Only the Joo in the crosshairs here though. Catholics are our fellow Christians and we aren’t supposed to notice.

  103. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    August 15, 2012 - 8:50 am | Permalink

    @Phil:

    I didn’t say I agree with it. I’m just saying that this is the ideology behind multiculturalism. I don’t think Jews see themselves as people needing correcting, otherwise they wouldn’t call themselves “the chosen people.” In my opinion, they indeed need correcting. Someone needs to teach them to mind their own business. According to the Jewish point of view, however, the correction is meant only for the non-Jews. Again, I do not subscribe to this view. I agree with you that it is also done to weaken the White peoples. You see, the major fault that the Jew sees with all no-Jews is that he views us as too egoistical. In other words, he is out to destroy anything that will make you feel proud of our own heritage, i.e. our culture. This explains the introduction of all the deviations into our society. All I’m saying is that we need to understand how this beast thinks if we want to win this fight. Know your enemy. Keep in mind that the Jews get many Shabbas goyim with this ideology – Madonna, for instance. You should take some time to watch those clips I’ve included, it will broaden your perspective. All we need to do to counter Kabbalah (i.e. the Jew) is to work for everything that is opposite of what they are trying to do.. For example, many people here think that we need to abandon Christianity, because they see it as a contributing cause to our predicament. I think it’s a waste of time for us to be fighting about that in the first place. If Kabbalist see Christianity as something bad, than by a default, weather I’m a religious person or not, Christianity is good. We just need to do everything opposite of what they are doing. That’s why I wanted to get an opinion what was our position on the subject. It seems to me that is the key.

  104. fnn's Gravatar fnn
    August 15, 2012 - 8:56 am | Permalink

    Elites always rule-the masses never spontaneously rise up and change anything of consequence. Propagandizing the masses is a fruitless endeavor unless you have already hived off a segment of the ruling elite.

  105. fnn's Gravatar fnn
    August 15, 2012 - 9:04 am | Permalink

    @Vlad Writes:

    Need an example? Look at how vigorously and slavishly these Christian Zionist imbeciles lick the toes and other, even less appetizing body parts, of the jews – but that does not succeed in any compensatory gratitude from the tribe.”

    The slavishness of the Christian Zionists yields even greater contempt from their masters:
    http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/jamesedwards/honey-boo-boo/

  106. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    August 15, 2012 - 9:16 am | Permalink

    @Shark: Blair converted to Catholicism after he left office.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7157409.stm

    He’s all your fault, mate.

  107. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 15, 2012 - 9:30 am | Permalink

    It really doesn’t matter how often we say that their best weapon is divide and conquer, if we keep falling for it. I am among the first to defend white men, but if we have been reduced to a group of old yentas, endlessly kevetching about who is most at fault, I will begin to believe that there is too much estrogen in our water. Pitiful, really pitiful.

  108. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    August 15, 2012 - 9:38 am | Permalink

    @Alice, yes, point taken.

    I was surprised to see this topic at an American blog and am looking forward to the rest of the series. But, whenever reading through the comments the threads inevitably turn into either anti “Xtianity” or Catholic bashing.

    It is frustrating to say the least.

    I am more than interested to read about Catholic involvement in the national disintegration of our formerly White nations so as to understand the causes as completely as possible.

    I was hoping to see some commentary that would add to the post. Hopefully I can do so in the morning.

    As it is though, it pisses me off greatly to see yet another thread devolve into slagging off Catholics. Perhaps K Mac could get an author like, say Greg Johnson or Chechar for instance to write a post “How the Catholics banned sodomy and, along with the Jews, raped English Roses”. We could have an OO Catholic hating free-for-all.

    Till that time, I sincerely wish that commenters could add some value to the posts themselves.

  109. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    August 15, 2012 - 9:54 am | Permalink

    The rot started with Gough Whitlam – Anglican atheist

    Successive PMs:

    Malcolm Fraser – Baptised Protestant. Atheist. Mother was Jewish by way of her father, not that it matters. Mal always was, and always will be, a prick.

    Bob Hawke – Congregationalist. Atheist.

    Paul Keating – Catholic. Probably nominal. “But overall their percentage is probably less than their percentage of the whole population (now over 25%) and there has been only one Catholic prime minister, Paul Keating, in the later period. ”

    http://www.eurekastreet.com.au/article.aspx?aeid=24159

    John Howard – observant Anglican. Increased Australia’s migrant intake dramatically from whenc it has stayed at record highs.

    Kevin Rudd – observant Anglican. Change boat people/asylum seeker policy and dramatically increased illegal immigration.

    Julia Gillard – declared atheist. Massive boat people intake to the point that Oz is no longer a sovereign state.

  110. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    August 15, 2012 - 10:18 am | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan: Correction: Whitlam was baptised Presbyterian. Remains an atheist.

  111. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 15, 2012 - 10:20 am | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan:
    Today it is anti-Catholic. We have frequently descended into blaming whatever group we do not belong to, Anglos, Yankees, Americans, political parties, Christians, modernity, the list goes on and on. All of us had our part in this mess. We must stop blaming each other and work on discovering what we share in common and how we are going to put the situation right.

  112. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    August 15, 2012 - 10:22 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Yes, very true and I concur.

    Still, records need to be set straight and my comments are pertinent to the post itself.

  113. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 15, 2012 - 10:43 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    @Pat Hannagan:

    … the threads inevitably turn into either anti “Xtianity” or Catholic bashing.

    Just so, and very well put, sir. Indeed, I have begun to wonder whether shark, Z.O.G., neville, and Tyron Parsons aren’t simply alternative screen names for one and the same guy. Venomous nonsense is their principal contribution, moral and intellectual dyspepsia its principal and predictable result.

  114. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 15, 2012 - 10:46 am | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan: Right again, sir. I laughed out loud at your term for Mal Fraser’s ultimately decisive [ahem] “ethnicity.”

  115. Thora's Gravatar Thora
    August 15, 2012 - 10:57 am | Permalink

    I grew up is the American Southwest in a small town outside of an Indian reservation. In my teenage years I worked in a grocery store and was privy to the purchases of the local tribal peoples.

    First, an Indian family out shopping would typically take /all/ of the powdered flavored drink mix (Kool-Aid) off the shelves. They would remove both the display box and all of its packets and the unopened boxes behind it. The Kool-Aid would typically overflow the child seating area in the cart. Next, the Indians would fill the basket area of the cart with 20%-fat ground beef. These were the largest trays the store had on hand. The total amount of ground beef amounted to perhaps 150lbs. Finally, said family would enter the alcohol section of the store and purchase the clear-plastic bottles of generic hard alcohol, malt liquor, or whatever was cheapest. Typically there were ten to fifteen liters worth of alcohol riding atop the beef. Such were the culinary habits of the local tribe.

    The local Indians were well aware of their problems with diabetes, alcoholism, and obesity. The tribal elders would speak out about the problem, and the White community even spent its resources assisting the Indians with their health dysfunctions. Those who recognized the issue stood up and loudly fought it.

    And yet they accomplished nothing. The local Indians are still so obese that their arms stick out from their sides horizontally, so diabetic that by the age of forty most of their peers are gone, and so alcoholic that they largely waste away their lives in inactivity.

    The local Whites have written them off, though they do not openly say so of course. It’s common for the locals say that Indians “just need to evolve in order to adapt to modern food and alcohol”. The only solution seems to be a mass die off.

    This post may seem off-topic, but there is a reason for writing it. The local Indians are facing a situation similar to that of Whites. Both groups are actively consuming the things that destroy them. Rather than cheap vodka and Kool-Aid, it is consumer entertainment that has castrated Whites.

    How many here and on other sites have decried the Jewish media? What has that accomplished?

    Is a die off necessary for us to adapt to television? If so, how long will that take? Compare the rates of alcoholism in the Mediterranean with that of the British Isles. The Mediterranean peoples had several thousand more years exposure to alcohol than peoples in the British Isles. The difference in adaptation is still present. The filthy drunks of the Mediterranean had longer to die out whereas those that could handle their alcohol largely survived, the process is still ongoing for the British Islanders. How long will it take the Indians to adapt? How long will it take Whites to adapt to their televisions?

    The only way to win some games is not to play. And yet, who is so respected in White communities that they could take the drugs that kill it out if its hand? Where are our censors, our wise elders, our shephards?

  116. Blake Watts's Gravatar Blake Watts
    August 15, 2012 - 11:05 am | Permalink

    I go back and forth in regards to the fault of Christianity in this mess. I consider myself a Christian, and i do believe that religion has a unifying effect and helps white cohesion. On the other hand, doormat theology and an emphasis on the next world makes it nearly impossible for people of the faith to defend themselves against Jewish psychological warfare. I have Christian friends who are gullible and seem to parrot whatever PC crap is in the air, and I can’t get them to see the truth. A post above asks the question why is it that I can see when others cannot? This is the key to our movement, but sadly the turning point is usually some sort of disaster that forces the initiate to question the validity of long held (unexamined) beliefs.

  117. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 15, 2012 - 11:05 am | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan: @Pierre de Craon:
    Gentlemen, I certainly agree that slurs and lies must be repudiated. We must also learn to avoid the trap of permitting ourselves to be derailed by any bigot who happens to stop by.

  118. JA's Gravatar JA
    August 15, 2012 - 11:15 am | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan:

    “The rot started with Gough Whitlam – Anglican atheist

    Successive PMs:

    Malcolm Fraser – Baptised Protestant. Atheist. Mother was Jewish by way of her father, not that it matters. Mal always was, and always will be, a prick.

    Bob Hawke – Congregationalist. Atheist.

    Paul Keating – Catholic. Probably nominal. “But overall their percentage is probably less than their percentage of the whole population (now over 25%) and there has been only one Catholic prime minister, Paul Keating, in the later period. ”

    http://www.eurekastreet.com.au/article.aspx?aeid=24159

    “John Howard – observant Anglican. Increased Australia’s migrant intake dramatically from whenc it has stayed at record highs.

    Kevin Rudd – observant Anglican. Change boat people/asylum seeker policy and dramatically increased illegal immigration.

    Julia Gillard – declared atheist. Massive boat people intake to the point that Oz is no longer a sovereign state.”

    All correct but a little misleading.

    All ALP federal governments have been dominated by the overarching power of the ethnically Catholic NSW Right. They put Whitlam, Hawke and all the subsequent sellers out into their positions.

    The other Churches (also heavily into the labour intensive service industries, particularly under a privatised economy, in Australia coinciding with and causally related with mass immigration, have given similar support to opening the immigration floodgates, for business reasons.

    Put it this way: we could be pretty sure that were they economically seriously disadvantaged by mass immigration, they’d find the theological basis to oppose it. The same goes – on a personal basis – for the middle class caffè latte sipping inner city atheists and agnostics.

  119. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 15, 2012 - 11:19 am | Permalink

    @Blake Watts:
    All institutions in the west have been infiltrated and subverted. if you can find one that has not, please let me know where to sign up. Only decent people can be made to feel guilt. Okay, we had our guard down, we were snookered. Our job is to use our own values and standards to reclaim our rightful position of self-determination and leadership. In other words, it is going to take a little self-confidence and courage.

    There are encouraging signs abroad in the land. Cher used to be sexy and cool, now she is an old hag, altered beyond recognition by plastic surgery, who tweets ugliness and hate. We must point out that if we follow Cher’s advice, we will wind up sixty, alone and with a child like Chaz Bono. We must change the conversation.

    We are great experimenters and risk takers, some of them don’t work out. That does not require us to resort to self-flagellation, simply to admit our mistake and try to correct them.

  120. JA's Gravatar JA
    August 15, 2012 - 11:23 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    “@Pat Hannagan: @Pierre de Craon:
    Gentlemen, I certainly agree that slurs and lies must be repudiated. We must also learn to avoid the trap of permitting ourselves to be derailed by any bigot who happens to stop by. ”

    No, don’t let the exploration of the truth, even by Australians of Australia, get in the way of your account. Behave like the ADL or the SPLC by all means.

  121. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 15, 2012 - 11:56 am | Permalink

    @JA:
    You seem to be very confused. What you call an “exploration of the truth, even by Australians of Australia” sounds remarkably like the Jews blaming the big, bad, Catholics for their own errors. It is not I who sounds like the ADL. And here was I, believing the myth that Australians had done a better job of preserving masculinity.

  122. Mr Curious's Gravatar Mr Curious
    August 15, 2012 - 12:07 pm | Permalink

    “Such concerns echoed through the decades of the White Australia policy, where the country explicitly defined its nationhood in terms of Whiteness and a policy of economic protectionism designed to benefit the entire group by preventing, say, Australian capitalists from importing cheap labor that would undercut the standard of living of other White Australians” This argument is a complete red herring. You could just as easily import cheap labour from poor European countries. It is a racial motivation, not an economic one.

    “It is obvious from this statement just how closely acceptance of the myth of racial equality from the 1960s onwards was bound up with Jewish post-Holocaust ethno-political activism.” BINGO!

    “But the die was already cast. Australia in the 1960s felt pressure from within and from beyond, and its immigration policy was a growing embarrassment.” Embarrassment to whom? It’s only embarrassing if you have had a parasite infect the body politic for years and then bought the nonsense propaganda it propagates.

    Peterhead.
    When you have spent all the debt money on deep fried mars bars and hamactsy kensit.

  123. fnn's Gravatar fnn
    August 15, 2012 - 12:11 pm | Permalink

    Hungary’s Jobbik party calls for the keeping of crime statistics by race- just like Israel !-and is denounced as racist:
    http://budapost.eu/2012/08/willi-jobbik-split/

    On August 2, Jobbik MP Ádám Mirkóczki announced Jobbik’s plan to submit a bill to Parliament on crime statistics. According to the proposal, to be modelled on US and Israeli crime records, authorities would classify criminal offenders by their race. The Fidesz Parliamentary faction in a press release rejected this ‘racist proposal’, and noted that discrimination on an ethnic, racial or religious basis is ruled out by the new Basic Law.

    Writing in Népszava, Iván Andrassew finds it extremely tasteless that Jobbik announced such a disgusting racist proposal on the anniversary of the Roma Holocaust. The left-wing columnist regrets that Jobbik was not banned “by the cowardly Socialists and Free Democrats,” for their nasty racist statements made under the former government.

    Referring to a brief article in Magyar Nemzet, the main pro-government daily, Andrassew ironically notes that Fidesz, “the only hope of Hungarian antifascists” have realized the need for bashing the scandal-torn Jobbik by provoking their unpleasant and racist proposals. Andrassew hopes that Fidesz will in the future openly confront the racist party. Ádám Tompos, a correspondent for Magyar Nemzet asked Mirkóczki in which of the proposed racial categories the Jobbik MPs would fit. Mirkóczki refused to answer such a ‘derogatory and disgusting,’ request and said that racial categorization should be reserved for anthropologists.

  124. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    August 15, 2012 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

    @shark:

    I expect devious behavior from the Jews. But, I don’t understand the behavior of the Catholic religious & political leadership, when they act against their own interests.

    Maybe, all of the lovey-dovey relations between the Catholic church, and, the Anglican church have something to do with their mutual support for immigration, and destruction of the White Australia policy etc.

  125. George's Gravatar George
    August 15, 2012 - 2:32 pm | Permalink

    I see we whites are going to become a minority a lot more quickly here in the USA thanks to Obama’s “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” program. He is busy building up his democrat party voter base to assure his reelection. If that is successful (and I can’t see a reason why it won’t be), there will never be another republican president in this country and white’s will be a minority a lot faster than was previously thought. I know the whole democrat/republican thing is really just two sides of the same coin since both parties serve the Jews interests, but I am just saying that if this is the outcome, then the whole “democracy” charade will be over. Those whites that had their heads in the sand up to this point will be confronted with the new reality of being a minority in their own country and suddenly many of them may come to see the urgent need to cleave to the interests of their own race- too late, however. But at least those of us who have been sounding the alarm for years will at least be proven right, for all the good that does.

  126. A Swain's Gravatar A Swain
    August 15, 2012 - 3:03 pm | Permalink

    An excellent essay and very a enlightening one with regards to the anti-White Jewish-led assault on Australia’s political, religious and cultural system.

    Personally, I am currently campaigning for the removal of Jewish hegmony and ethnonationalism in Israel and have made my opinions clear in various Jewish tabloids with regards to the dire need for total acceptance and the compulsory implementation of multiracial diversity in Israel via mass Third World immigration.

    White ethnonationalists must continue pushing for Israeli co-operation in the Jewish-founded global diversity programme by strongly encouraging and even forcing Israel to become multiracial and thus also multicultural herself if she doesn’t want to become abandoned by the West and thus prey to the growing power of various non-White nations who would be only too pleased to facilitate the invasion of limitless hordes of Third World non-Whites, simply demolishing Jewish borders as they proceed.

  127. August 15, 2012 - 3:03 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    “Before God made her, He broke the mold.”
    This may be cultural. Do you mean mold as in what grows on bread, or what I would spell mould: a hollow container used to give shape to molten or hot liquid material when it cools and hardens?

    Either one would be applicable in my view.

  128. August 15, 2012 - 3:15 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    “@Alice Teller:
    @Pat Hannagan:
    … the threads inevitably turn into either anti “Xtianity” or Catholic bashing….”

    Indeed Pierre. As you well know, I have posted on other articles opposing the view of the Z.O.G.s of the world.
    The constant chirping about Christianity not being valid is a distraction.
    Should we care whether a Hindu or Sikh offers honest support to the continued existence of Whites? Many of them are opposed to interracial unions. If that helps us, then I welcome the help.

    To borrow a phrase from an old children’s song, “Watch the doughnut, not the hole.”

  129. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    August 15, 2012 - 3:57 pm | Permalink

    This is what is being put in place across the planet, Australia included. Mass third world immigration into the White countries is part of the program.

    http://rescueyourmind.wordpress.com/2012/08/11/communitarianism-and-a-hidden-agenda-21/

    http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com/2012/08/is-communitarian-law-matter-of-faith.html

  130. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    August 15, 2012 - 4:26 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: I like how you put it. Yes, to serve the Jewish International political cause explicitly and openly take sides against the Jews’ “enemies” is indeed to sell one’s soul for crumbs. A White American or European should not take sides in foreign disputes between two peoples and religions which are alike not his own. This is what American politicians are reduced to doing in these times. They defend the Jewish Cause while they attack the White Cause and work against the interests of their own people. They even work against the interests of other non-Jewish people, including Blacks and others. Blacks (and others) also fight and die for International Jewry in these senseless Mid-East wars.

  131. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 15, 2012 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

    @Facio Libre:

    You said:

    Consider the Jew Star of David

    Comment

    The Kabala comes out of Babylon as does the “Star of David”. As Franklin rightly noted, none of this can be traced back to Moses. The Babylonian system is associated with a satanic system in the bible that seeks to dominate the world.
    This is the system that Christ condemned as he also charged these so called “Jews” as being son’s of the Devil. These so called “Jews” from Esau infiltrated Judah (after the northern tribes were dispersed) and stole the real ethnic peoples from Judah’s identity, usurping their religious system and Government away from its rightful owners and away the bible into Kabala-Talmudic ways.

    They are doing the SAME EXACT THING TODAY as they did 2000 years ago. These so called “Jews” have infiltrated our white Christian nations calling themselves “white”. They set up everything against us and everything for them. The way they got away with this is by brainwashing the white Christians people into thinking that they the “Jews” are Israel and Judah (both ethnically and spiritually) when in fact the exact opposite is true. The first thing that has to happen is that whites-Christians MUST come to understand our true identity and their true identity. Once this is accomplished, Christianity can once again take on these “Jews” and take back everything that was and is rightly ours – the blessings and birthright ownership of our nations as well as the World Government they are creating in the land that is NOT theirs, but was given to us.

  132. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 15, 2012 - 5:18 pm | Permalink

    @fnn:
    There seem to be a lot of demands that we do not even look for truth. It must be a powerful thing, keep spreading it.

  133. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 15, 2012 - 5:24 pm | Permalink

    @Adeimantus:
    I’m afraid I was not thinking on such a lofty level. I had in mind all those people out there who have given in, an inch at a time, to the hivemind. We are asked to do it in school, at work and all too often in our private life. For a while, at least, many were distracted by the material toys it provided. Now many of those folks are out of work, scared of the future, and looking for someone to blame.

  134. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 15, 2012 - 5:25 pm | Permalink

    @Facio Libre:

    You said

    For example, many people here think that we need to abandon Christianity, because they see it as a contributing cause to our predicament. I think it’s a waste of time for us to be fighting about that in the first place. If Kabbalist see Christianity as something bad, than by a default, weather I’m a religious person or not, Christianity is good. We just need to do everything opposite of what they are doing. That’s why I wanted to get an opinion what was our position on the subject. It seems to me that is the key.

    Comment:

    EXACTLY and in promoting what I TRUTHFULLY claim above you will be supporting the concept that is absolutely KEY to ending Jewish domination of our nations and the world.

  135. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 15, 2012 - 5:32 pm | Permalink

    @George:
    Obama’s every action makes the sense of urgency stronger. The good news is that we are still a solid majority. The open appeal to implicit whiteness by the Romney/Ryan team is a welcome sign. More and more people are reexamining things like birthright citizenship and if they came here they can be sent home someday. It may hearten you to know that even the Amish are a growing group. All we have to do is have more babies.

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2010-09-14-amish-population_N.htm

  136. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    August 15, 2012 - 5:33 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon:

    The irony, not lost on Irish immigrants to Australia, is that anti-Catholic prejudice was widly flaunted by the country’s WASP hegemony up until the 1970′s. Now look at them!

  137. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    August 15, 2012 - 5:44 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: There seem to be a lot of demands that we do not even look for truth. It must be a powerful thing, keep spreading it.

    THAT is the single most important thing that everyone (from whatever culture) who wants to be fully human must do.

    Don’t just walk away from a person (or a people) who think “truth” is malleable or doesn’t put the search for it at the centrality of their being, run like hell.

  138. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    August 15, 2012 - 6:35 pm | Permalink

    @Lookaroundu:

    That wretched truth is like vomit in the mouths of those who understand the white 20th century fratricide of World War. Yet so many ignorant white Americans, Brits and yes, Australians think their “free” world was saved.

    Indeed, there was something very rotten in the elites of the anglo countries way before the 1960s. They though they had won the war, the idiots, when in fact they only managed to murder their older brothers. Peter Brimelow famoulsy wrote that immigration was Hitler posthumous revenge against the USA (and the UK and Australia as well) for brutal crimes like Dresden et al. Well it is simpler than that, the Jews won the war and then proceeded to get rid of the anglo useful idiots via “democratic-liberal” policies in immigration, abortion, contraception, etc. The sad true is that the anglos were really asking for it.

  139. George's Gravatar George
    August 15, 2012 - 6:53 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    “The open appeal to implicit whiteness by the Romney/Ryan team is a welcome sign….”

    – Alice; although I appreciate your positive attitude, Romney’s “appeal” will be like all others made to white’s by all other administrations in the past. His interest in us would end the day he was announced President (if that were to happen). Surely you know by now that it is simply not possible to be elected to that office without the approval of the Jews in power? This is what I meant by “two sides of the same coin”. And even if he (Romney) were to be elected President and went against Jewish wishes he would run up against powerful opposition as did George Bush the elder:
    “Bush had opposed the loan guarantees as long as Israel continued settlement in the West Bank and Gaza. The president finally agreed to a loan guarantee package in August 1992, requiring as a set-off any funds Israel spent to build housing or infrastructure in the territories. Despite this action, the political damage was done. The loan guarantee controversy later motivated Jewish opposition to President Bush, who received no more than 12% of the Jewish vote in the 1992 election (down from close to 35% in 1988). While some claimed that Jewish opposition to Bush caused his 1992 defeat, there is little evidence that this was the case. Other actions had caused problems with the Jewish community as well. In March 1990, Bush expressed objection to “new settlements in the West Bank or in East Jerusalem.” His reference to eastern Jerusalem and his suggestion that it was not a sovereign part of Israel created a furor and added to strained feelings between Israel and the U.S.” (from http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0004_0_03769.html). And if his infraction were sufficiently offensive to those who really run this country (Jewish elite), he could end up as did John Kennedy.

  140. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 15, 2012 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

    @Felix:
    I certainly agree that they are dangerous. I see all around me people who have truly lost the ability to see reality and make a cause and effect connection. There are days when I truly wonder if all of Orwell worst predictions have come true and we really have become incapable of thought.

    Sadly, I know quite a few women whose lives have been devastated by feminism and the empty promises that liberalism made. The resulting bitterness and unhappiness which results is all blamed on bad luck and tough breaks. They seems to be completely incapable of grasping that some of the choices they were encouraged to make had any part. We have become a people without dignity.

  141. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 15, 2012 - 7:15 pm | Permalink

    @George:
    I’m sorry, I did not phrase that well. I certainly agree that both parties are bought and paid for. The part that I take hope from is that the powers that be recognize how many will respond to the appeal to implicit whiteness. There is a clip on the web in which some shrill woman demands that Ryan forbid “racist and sexist language” . I have seen grown men tremble and fall at those works. Ryan calmly says everyone deserves to be heard. Just like that the charge of heresy loses its power. All those complaints of dog whistles have truth in them. It is a change in the rules that we should take advantage of. It also shows that we are not as alone as we sometimes feel.

  142. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    August 15, 2012 - 8:15 pm | Permalink

    “Governments don’t protect people; people protect governments” – Morris Tannehill.

  143. Lookaroundu's Gravatar Lookaroundu
    August 15, 2012 - 8:46 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: I agree with your points here. We must be united if we are ever to save our white European inheritance, our wonderful extended family. The evil destruction of the World Wars was not the fault of the white common folk, any more than massive third world immigration into their countries. Think of Christmas 1914 on the Western Front, where German and British soldiers only wanted to act like civilized men in the midst of madness. The blame lies with government and the chosen ones who use it to further our destruction.

  144. George's Gravatar George
    August 15, 2012 - 10:03 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: true!

  145. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 15, 2012 - 10:06 pm | Permalink

    @Lookaroundu:
    It is important to study and know our history, but it will always be there, we may not be. It will be a wonderful day when we again have the luxury of debating the fine points at our leisure.

  146. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 15, 2012 - 10:26 pm | Permalink

    @Luke: @Blake Watts: @Thora:
    In different ways you have each asked why we see the light and others don’t. Does it matter? The point is we have done so and therefore have an obligation to lead others. If the first attempt does not work, think of another approach. We are in serious danger of suffering from analysis paralysis. I don’t believe we must always begin hitting hard with old, tired language. We must be innovative, devise a new vocabulary. For those not able to be open, hit the liberal order any way you can. Start asking questions – it is surprising how few people have answers. We can do this.

  147. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 15, 2012 - 11:09 pm | Permalink

    @Luke: How come you were aware when others were asleep? I don’t know Luke. The answer remains elusive. One of my best friends was like you. While we were growing up, he never fell for any of the B.S. others did. He wondered about how the Holocaust was described,(gas chambers,etc.) he wondered about the so called “evil” Germans, he wondered about the Cold War, and the “evil” Russians, whos women supposedly were ugly and didn’t shave under their arms,(what a shock Americans got when watching the olympics they saw all those beautiful “ugly” russian girls,) he wondered why the Egyptian leader of the time, Nassar, was considered “evil” by the U.S., in fact, he was the steadiest, most level headed All American kid I ever met in my whole life.

  148. shark's Gravatar shark
    August 15, 2012 - 11:59 pm | Permalink

    Blair was taking communion while in office, a closet Catho if ever there were one. Also Proddys are Calvinists. Technically this disincludes Anglicans/Episcopals and Lutherans. The right wing of the Anglican church call themselves Anglo-Catholic. I think the old Quakers knew they were Roman/Augustinian internationalists all along which is why they left England and Holland to get away from them. Most Anglicans would trade thier Pope in Cantebury for the one in Rome in a minute probably. Turncoats from the get go..
    Where the jew through brain power and money tries to get non-whites into the country the Papists greatly lacking in brains and funds does the same thing. That he is broke and too mentally challenged to work the legal/political system like the jew is immaterial to him. They won’t let a minor thing like sovereignty stand in the way.
    We are being destroyed by the invisible empire,yes the KKK. Kikes,Katholics and Kapitalists. The equation can’t be reduced to one variable. Occam’s knife still gives three variables.

  149. JA's Gravatar JA
    August 16, 2012 - 2:31 am | Permalink

    @shark:

    “We are being destroyed by the invisible empire,yes the KKK. Kikes,Katholics and Kapitalists. The equation can’t be reduced to one variable. Occam’s knife still gives three variables.”

    Colourful shorthand but generally correct in substance.

    My experience is that if you open a conversation on immigration with Anglicans or Irish Catholics, secularised or not, you will likely get much more resistance than with secularised Protestants. Church going Protestants are in between.

    But in Australia, unlike in the USA, Catholics who resisted Vatican II are in short supply.

    The healthy thing is that there are Catholics on this site who strongly oppose what is happening.

    And there are Jews who oppose what is happening but they are unfortunately in short supply. It isn’t “in their DNA”, but in their culture. After all Jews have long had big problems “emigrating”, though they have serially experienced what we could call “assisted emigration”.

  150. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    August 16, 2012 - 6:17 am | Permalink

    @fender: Ditto, Brother fender’s observations.

    Made me remember Dr. Pierce’s old radio podcast that he titled ‘The Scorpion and the Frog’.

  151. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    August 18, 2012 - 2:20 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Hi Fender

    You wrote:

    “My opinion about the “zionist” (why can’t you just say Jewish?) occupation of Palestine is that they won the land fair and square, just as Europeans at one point won North America.”

    You didn’t write the whole thing, just the bolded part.

    My comment or question (whatever it turns out to be) is for you and anyone else who is interested in thinking about or answering.

    Lately I have seen a lot (more than a lot) of comments that go something like this:

    It’s not Jews… It’s Zionists.

    Or

    Jews aren’t the problem. Zionism is the problem.

    Or

    Most Jews aren’t Zionists.

    Like I said, I see those comments all the time, especially among the Alex Jones crowd.

    My question is…

    Are they right?

    Is there some effort being made (by Jews or some other group) to get people to stop focusing on the Jews, and instead focus on “Zionists”?

    Anyway, I hope anyone reading this has a good Saturday. The other day I was thinking about how great it is that people care about the issues featured on this site.

    I hope Australia preserves all the good things about it, and creates even more good things.

  152. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    August 18, 2012 - 2:22 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:

    I want to clarify something from my comment.

    I wrote:

    “Like I said, I see those comments all the time, especially among the Alex Jones crowd.”

    I wasn’t referring to this site. I haven’t seen anyone on this site make those kinds of arguments / comments.

1 Trackback to "The War on White Australia: A Case Study in the Culture of Critique, Part 1 of 5"

  1. on August 25, 2012 at 2:17 am

Comments are closed.