The War on White Australia: A Case Study in the Culture of Critique, Part 2 of 5

Brenton Sanderson


The History of Judaism in Australia

Jews have been present in Australia since the beginning of European settlement. Around a dozen Jewish convicts came with the First Fleet in 1788. When the transportation of convicts to eastern Australia ended in 1853, around 800 of the 151,000 convicts to have arrived were of Jewish origin. The first free Jewish settlers arrived from Britain in 1809, and there were three subsequent waves of Jewish immigration to Australia between 1850 and 1930 – mainly German Jews arriving during the gold rushes, refugees from Tsarist Russia from 1880 to 1914, and Polish Jews after 1918. The numbers arriving with each of these waves were, however, comparatively small and Australian Jewry remained a tiny isolated outpost of world Jewry until the 1930s.[i]

Unlike in Britain where Jews were gradually emancipated through Parliamentary Acts in 1854, 1858 and 1866, in the Australian colonies they enjoyed full civil and political rights from the beginning: they acquired British nationality, voted at elections, held commissions in the local militia, were elected to municipal offices and were appointed justices of the peace.[ii] Jews were well integrated into the political and administrative structure of the colonies. Sir John Monash (1865-1931) became a general in the Australian army and was, according to Goldberg, “the only Jew in the modern era outside Israel (with the exception of Trotsky) to lead an army.”[iii]  Sir Isaac Isaacs (1855-1948) became Australia’s first native-born Governor-General.  In Australia under the Immigration Restriction Act of 1901 these highly assimilated Anglo-Jews were regarded as “White,” whereas Jews of middle-eastern origin were regarded as Asian and therefore barred from entry.

Sir Isaac Isaacs

Jewish academic Jon Stratton points out that the high level of assimilation of Anglo-Australian Jewry was reflected in the relatively high levels of intermarriage through the 19th century and the first half of the 20th. In 1911, some 27 per cent of Jewish husbands in Australia had non-Jewish wives and 13 per cent of Jewish wives had non-Jewish husbands. In 1921 these figures had increased to 29 per cent and 16 per cent respectively. However, by the 1991 census there had been a decline to an overall rate of 10-15 per cent.[iv] Stratton notes that “the acceptance of intermarriage signifies a lack of racial difference. Jews were thus caught on the horns of a dilemma. If they were accepted as marriage partners by gentiles this was a crucial step in the process of national assimilation but, in marrying gentiles, they destroyed the endogamous basis of Jewish particularity.”[v] This is an acknowledgment of the essentially incompatibility of Judaism and Western culture in the tendency of individualistic Western cultures to break down Jewish cohesiveness.

The Ashkenazi Jews who migrated from central and eastern Europe between 1930 and 1950 created an identity crisis within the established Anglo-Jewish community. In their political radicalism, avowed Zionism and intense ethnocentrism, they differed greatly from the Anglo-Australian Jews. The new migrants had the effect of making the Anglo-Jews more visible as a group through their association with the new European Jews. They also provoked hostility from significant sections of the Australian community, who correctly sensed that the psychologically intense and politically radical newcomers posed a fundamental threat to their nation.

Advertisement

In 1933 there were still only 23,000 Jews in Australia. Between 1938 and 1961 this number almost trebled to 61,000. The 2011 census indicated a Jewish population of 97,335 out of an overall population of 23 million.[vi] Currently ranking ninth in worldwide Jewish communities, the Jewish historian Suzanne Rutland laments that today Jews only “constitute only 0.5 per cent of the overall population” and ascribes this to “the hostility that was expressed towards Jewish immigration” in the 1930s and 1940s. From Hitler’s assumption of power in 1933 Jewish representatives in London and Australia lobbied the Australian government to allow more Jews to settle, but until 1936 such requests were met with a negative response. In that year the Assistant Secretary of the Ministry of the Interior, T.H. Garrett, opined that “Jews as a class are not desirable immigrants for the reason that they do not assimilate; generally speaking, they preserve their identity as Jews.”[vii]

Following the German Anschluss with Austria in 1938 the Jewish refugee problem worsened as a further 180,000 Jews came under National Socialist rule. President Roosevelt convened an international conference to discuss the refugee crisis. Held in Evian, France in June 1938, thirty-eight countries, including Australia, were represented. The position of the Australian government, which announced that it would not liberalize its immigration policy from an annual quota of 5,000 was mirrored by the other participating nations. Only the Dominican Republic altered its immigration laws to increase the flow of Jewish immigrants. Australia’s delegate, Thomas W. White, expressed the popular view when he declared that “as we have no real racial problem, we are not desirous of importing one by encouraging any scheme of large scale foreign migration.”[viii]

Supporting the Australian government’s stance, the influential publication The Bulletin argued that “Australia cannot be expected to imperil its existence or to receive vast numbers of alien refugees for the gratification of German Jews, New York politicians and editors, and is not going to do it, either.”[ix] Referring to Jewish immigration, the weekly Truth asserted in 1938 that “As a racial unit they are a menace to our nationhood and standards.”[x] A similar view was reflected by one concerned citizen who wrote to the Minister for External Affairs in 1938 insisting that the Jewish immigrant was: “unBritish in his dealings, he is unscrupulous, unprincipled except towards his kith and kin – he’ll stop at nothing in his mercenary and spineless tactics to gain his own ends. …  God help us if something is not done to block these scurrilous and designing people from gaining a stranglehold which all the laws imaginable will not prevent.”[xi]

When the Australian government announced in December 1938 that 15,000 more refugees would be admitted over the following three years, the Catholic Advocate warned that:

If the present policy of admitting large numbers of Jewish immigrants is continued, we are likely to be confronted by a rapid increase in anti-Semitism. … The Jews are not simply an international religious body like the Catholics: they are a nation with well-marked characteristics, both mental and physical, with their own virtues, vices and talents, and with their peculiar loyalties. … It is the sense of this difference which has caused friction between the Jew and his hosts throughout the ages, and which has constantly brought tragedy to the Jews.[xii]

Another leading voice of opposition to Jewish immigration to Australia around this time was the patriotic Australia First movement which was inaugurated by the Sydney businessman W.J. Miles. When the movement was constituted in 1941 it issued a manifesto which declared that: “The Jewish practice of racial segregation and exclusiveness makes the assimilation of Jews into the Australian community an impossibility; … people who are determined to remain racially aloof should never be admitted in large numbers to Australia.”[xiii] Following Miles’ death in 1942, the Australia First movement came under the leadership of P.R. Stephensen, an Australian cultural nationalist, literary figure and Rhodes Scholar. In an article in the Australian Quarterly in 1940, Stephensen observed that “Wherever Jews wander they take not only Semitism, but also anti-Semitism with them. … As has been said elsewhere, ‘they chose to be Chosen, and must take the consequences.’ … It is solely because the Jews insist on preserving their racial identity that they are a problem in every country in which they settle.”[xiv]

Stephensen noted that Jews always exerted disproportionate influence in the countries they resided in because, unlike their neighbors, they are highly-organized, which “guarantees their survival and prosperity wherever they go” and “undoubtedly supplies the inspiration and model for Communist Party organization in all countries, including Russia and Australia.”[xv] Given that Stephensen started his political life as a founding member of the Australian Communist Party, he was well placed to comment on the significance of Jewish influence within Communist Party organizations. The Communist Party of Australia itself was to be dominated throughout the Cold War period by Jews like Laurie Aarons, its secretary between 1965 and 1976.

P.R. Stephensen

Deeply concerned at increasing Jewish power and influence in Australia, Stephensen declared:

The answer to Semitism is anti-Semitism; and when Jews gain too many advantages for themselves, by their practice of self-segregation, they invariably find (and surely should expect to find!) that the majority of non-Jews will resent, and eventually will curb, the privileges which the Jews have won for themselves by concerted sectional action. That is what will inevitably occur in Australia sooner or later, if a large colony of self-segregating Jews is allowed now to establish itself in our community.[xvi]

For Stephensen, Jewish ethnocentrism and endogamy were at the heart of the Jewish problem, and the solution to this problem was simple:

It is well known that there are many Jews who are good citizens, honest and cultured, despite the reputation of the generality of their kind of being financially “tricky”, unscrupulous, and parasitical. That there are intellectual and sensitive Jews is also as well-known as that there are many “Flash Yids” who degrade and debase public culture. No case can be made against Jews generally, except … that their insistence on racial self-segregation is anti-social, considered from the point of view of the community as a whole. We cannot concede to them in Australia a right which, if conceded in perpetuity to other types of immigrant … would lead to the sectionalizing of the community and its disunification. … The remedy is that the Jewish Race should abolish itself, by becoming absorbed in the common stream of mankind. [Otherwise] we others, who are so strictly excluded from the Jewish community, have at least a reciprocal right to exclude them from ours.[xvii]  

In retrospect, Stephensen accurately predicted the fragmentation of Australian society that was to occur under the malign influence of multiculturalism – a Jewish-originated and promoted ideology designed to preserve Jewish particularism, while demographically, politically and culturally weakening the majority White Australian population. In the Jewish promotion of racial and cultural “pluralism” in Australia, Jews have, exactly as Stephensen predicted, caused the “sectionalizing” and “disunification” of the Australian community.

In 1939, Stephensen successfully sued a Communist Party newspaper for libel when it accused him of “being a propagandist for the Nazis.” When asked in court whether, through his writings, he had “sedulously endeavoured to stir up anti-Semitic feeling in this country” he replied: “Not as you put it; but as a Gentile, I am opposed to Jewish influences in Australia.”[xviii] Stephensen was the editor of the Australia First publication Publicist which published articles by a range of distinguished writers who were forthright in their views about the dangers of substantial levels of Jewish immigration. One of these contributors, Rex Williams, wrote that

Australians would be silly to ignore the warnings of 5000 years of Jewish history – a history of penetration by guile, followed by expulsion by force from almost every land in which Jews have settled. It is no use blaming gentiles for “persecuting” Jews! The Jews, by their malpractices, ask for it – and get it. They are never loyal to any country in which they settle: they are loyal only to their “international” and “non-national” Race. And that is how they get themselves into trouble, in Australia, as everywhere else.[xix]    

Another leading voice of opposition to Jewish immigration was Henry Baynton Gullet, the Liberal member for the electorate of Henty in Victoria. In 1947, in a letter to the Melbourne Argus he observed that the Jews “are European neither by race, standards, nor culture… In 2000 years no one but Britain has been successfully able to absorb them, and for the most part they owe loyalty and allegiance to none… They secured a stranglehold on Germany after the last war during the inflation period, and in very large part, brought upon themselves the persecution which they subsequently suffered… These are the people who at the direction of international Jewish organisations, are being foisted upon us who are to become the dumping ground for the world’s unabsorbable.” Gullet concluded his letter by declaring that, “The arrival of additional Jews is nothing less than the beginning of a national tragedy and a piece of the grossest deception of Parliament and the people by the Minister for Immigration.”[xx]

Cartoon in Smith's Weekly, February 1947 — State Library of New South Wales

Another group opposed to Jewish immigration was the Returned Services League (RSL), whose president in New South Wales, Ken Bolton, called for the immediate and total cessation of Jewish immigration to Australia in the national interest. In 1946 Bolton declared: “let us not beat about the bush. … they are German Jews of the same ilk as those who have come before.” The president of the Australian Natives Association, P.J. Lynch, stated in 1947 that Australia must not become a “dumping ground for European refuse now causing trouble in Palestine … as Jews in Palestine were murdering and flogging British subjects.” Lynch, like many Australians, was outraged by the terrorist attacks on the British Mandatory forces in Palestine by Zionist terrorists. These included the assassination of Lord Moyne in 1944, the dynamiting of the King David Hotel in July 1946, the flogging of a British officer and sergeants, the kidnapping of a judge in December 1946, and the hanging of two British sergeants by the Irgun in July 1947. As a result of the anger generated by these events, and the backlash suffered by the Chifley Labor government for accepting a quota of Jewish refugees in 1945-46, restrictions on Jewish immigration were introduced in 1947 and maintained until 1952.[xxi]

Jewish motivations for opposing the White Australia policy

Jewish interest in the liberalization of Australia’s immigration policies thus stemmed, at least initially, from a desire to provide sanctuary for Jews fleeing Europe. Indeed memories of the Australian government’s opposition to expanded Jewish immigration prior to and immediately after World War Two was undoubtedly a prime motivating factor behind the Jewish campaign to end the racially-restrictive White Australia policy and establish support for multiculturalism as a central pillar of Australian government policy.

Furthermore, these memories continue to drive Jewish ethno-political activism in contemporary Australia. For the prominent Jewish intellectual (and self-appointed moral conscience of the Australian nation) Professor Robert Manne, “One of the most powerful stories to emerge from the Holocaust, which meant a lot to me, concerned the unwillingness of almost all the Western nations to offer homes to significant numbers of Jews who fled from Germany in the 1930s. The defence of refugees has been for me and for many post-Holocaust Jews, a permanent feature of the political landscape.”[xxii]

Professor Robert Manne

The disgraced former judge and leading representative of the Australian Jewish community, Marcus Einfeld, expressed a similar sentiment, declaring that “Australia has long held the sentiment that it offers a good quality of life to those within its borders, free of problems and conflicts. It seems that opening its doors to save thousands of Jews from wholesale murder in the approaching Nazi storm was thought likely to bring unwanted problems and imbalance and to disturb the peaceful Australian lifestyle.”[xxiii] Einfeld was especially angry that even after the war “protests from trade unions and the conservative side of politics amongst others, forced the government of the day to limit the number of Jews on any one ship to 25 per cent, thus leaving many to wallow in camps in Europe until the birth of Israel or the willingness of other countries to take them.”[xxiv]

In response to these views, one is prompted to observe that the same rationale for restricting Jewish immigration to Australia in the 1930s and 1940s (i.e. national and ethnic self-interest) has been, and continues to be, invoked by Israel and its supporters to justify its racially-restrictive immigration policy, and for its recent deportation of “enemy infiltrators” from Africa. Jewish intellectuals hypocritically condemn the Australians of the 1930s and 1940s for having refused to subordinate their group interests to those of a hostile out-group – when Jews and the state of Israel resolutely refuse to do the same. Only European-derived peoples have opened their doors to the other peoples of the world and now stand in danger of losing control of territory occupied for hundreds of years, as in Australia, Canada and the United States, or, in the case of Europe itself, many thousand years.

Another source of Jewish hostility to White Australia was their belief that “Nazi collaborators” and “war criminals” were given sanctuary by the Australian government. 200,000 European displaced persons were accepted into Australia between 1947 and 1950, including from nations that had been German allies during the war. According to the Jewish historian Suzanne Rutland the Australian selection procedures were inadequate, with the focus on excluding “enemy aliens” such as Germans and Italians “rather than on Eastern European collaborators, many of whom had joined the Waffen SS.”[xxvi] She claims that the small number of Jewish displaced persons in migrant camps “often experienced anti-Semitism, and in some cases even recognized a camp guard.”

The “Jewish Council to Combat Fascism and Anti-Semitism” was formed to follow up these claims. Rutland claims that “When data of Nazi and anti-Semitic activities in the migrant camps was presented to the Department of Immigration, it was disregarded because of the communist links of the Council to Combat Fascism and Anti-Semitism” and because the government believed the charges were “activated by religious or national bias.”[xxvii] Interestingly, Jewish leaders have never expressed any corresponding concern that Jewish communist criminals from the former USSR and the Eastern bloc were able to freely migrate to Israel and the West following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The cover of Sanctuary (1989) by Jewish and Australian Communist Party activist Mark Aarons

Jewish organizations in Australia lobbied energetically for Germans to be excluded from the Australian post-war migrant intake. In 1950 the Australian Jewish Council issued a booklet entitled German and Volks Migration Will Flood Australia With Nazis. It depicted an arrogant army officer as the type of German migrant Australia would be likely to receive.

The Nazi Germans who are likely to come to this country will be bad migrants and … will endanger the living standards of the people. … There are certain people in Australia who are anxious to abolish the 40 hour week, and destroy the independent trade union movement. How much better can this be done with a horde of Nazi migrants accustomed to working a 48 hour week and hostile to trade unionism?[xxviii]

White Australia is widely regarded by Jews (together with the United States, Canada and Britain) as having been an accessory to the “Holocaust” by limiting the number of Jewish refugees it was willing to accept from Europe, and also by accepting thousands of “Nazi war criminals” as migrants after the war. Given this perception, it will come as no surprise that Jewish ethno-political activism was fundamental to ending White Australia and in establishing support for ‘multiculturalism’ as a central pillar of Australian government policy.

An added stimulus was the sense of Jewish insecurity that accompanied the 1967 and the 1973 wars between Israel and the Arabs. Throughout the Jewish world there was a spontaneous and immediate response to the 1967 crisis, and the Australian Jewish community was no exception. In Melbourne, 7,000 out of a community of 34,000 attended a public rally called at the outbreak of the fighting, and 2,500 attended a youth rally in the same week. In Sydney, over 6,000 people crowded into the Central Synagogue and its surrounds. In both cities, hundreds of Jewish youth volunteered to go fight for Israel. A 1967 study of Melbourne Jewry found that most people interviewed reacted with deep emotional upset, staying glued to the news from Israel, and seeking social contacts with family members and other Jews.[xxix] Australian Jews who were more “assimilated” or not active in communal organizations were equally affected. These feelings were reinforced by the Yom Kippur war of 1973. Professor Robert Manne’s response to the 1967 war was typical:

My most intense political feelings about Israel occurred when I was in my second year of university, at the time the war between Israel and the Arab world in June 1967. Shortly after the war broke out I attended a large meeting somewhere near Albert Park Lake in Melbourne. At the time no one knew whether or not Israel would survive. Neither before nor since have I experienced such an atmosphere charged with political emotion. This was the only time in my life when I felt the visceral power of nationalism which took hold of me and of much of the audience of mainly post-Holocaust young Jews. Like many others I was determined to go to Israel to fight. Twenty years after the Holocaust, I felt that I could not remain in the safety of Australia while the Jewish people in Israel were destroyed.[xxx]  

This was the intellectual and political context for Jewish ethno-political activism in Australia (and throughout the Western world) between 1967 and 1973. This activism centered around three main objectives: to ensure the ongoing existence of Israel as an ethnically homogeneous Jewish state; to ensure the safety of diaspora Jewry by reforming Western immigration policies to promote racial and ethnic diversity (high levels of White racial homogeneity being regarded as potentially dangerous to Jews); and finally, to ensure the continuation of Jewish ethnic separatism and endogamy (and counter assimilation) in the West through promoting the official adoption of “multiculturalism.” This unanimity of opinion among Australian Jews with regard to these key objectives continues through to the present day. Historian William D. Rubinstein notes that

Politically, the Jewish community is strongly united on a limited number of goals on which there is consensus or near consensus, especially support for Israel, fighting anti-Semitism and endorsing multiculturalism, and stemming assimilation through Jewish day-school education. It has been fairly successful in achieving these goals, probably because it is unusually united and also because the quality of its secular leadership has been very high. The contemporary world Jewish situation, formed chiefly by the Holocaust and the re-emergence of the state of Israel, has produced a near universal consensus on similar goals through the Jewish world.[xxxi]     

The “Holocaust” and Zionism continue to be “the magnetic poles for the compass of Australian Jewish identity.”[xxxii] Anti-Semitism and intermarriage are still regarded as the two most ominous threats to Diaspora Jews. The liberalization of Western immigration policies and the institution of state-sponsored “multiculturalism” throughout the West are almost universally regarded by Jews as the most effective ways to counteract these threats. The next part of this essay will look at the crucial role of the leading Australian Jewish activist Walter Lippmann in establishing multiculturalism as a central pillar of Australian government policy.

Go to Part 3.

REFERENCES

Einfeld, M. (2006) ‘We Too Have Been Strangers: Jews and the Refugee Struggle,’ In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski, Black Inc., Melbourne. pp. 305-315.

Fagenblat, M., Landau, M. & Wolski, N. (2006) ‘Will the Centre Hold?,’ In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski, Black Inc., Melbourne. pp. 3-16.

Goldberg, D. (2006) ‘After 9/11: The Psyche of Australian Jews,’ In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski, Black Inc., Melbourne. pp. 140-152.

Manne, R. (2006) ‘The Holocaust and Political Identity: A Personal Account,’ In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski, Black Inc., Melbourne. pp. 46-55.

MacDonald, K. B. (1998/2001) The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth‑Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Westport, CT: Praeger. Revised Paperback edition, 2001, Bloomington, IN: 1stbooks Library.

 

Rubinstein, H.L. (1991) The Jews in Australia – A Thematic History, Volume 1: 1788-1945, William Heinemann, Melbourne.

Rubinstein, W.D. (1991) The Jews in Australia – A Thematic History, Volume 2: 1945 to the Present, William Heinemann, Melbourne.

Rubinstein, W.D. (1995) Judaism in Australia, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.

Rutland, S.D. (2005) The Jews in Australia, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.

Rutland, S. (2006) ‘Why Does Australian Jewish History Matter?,’ In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski, Black Inc., Melbourne. pp. 293-304.

Stratton, J. (2000) Coming Out Jewish – Constructing Ambivalent Identities, Routledge, London.

Tavan, G. (2005) The long, slow death of White Australia, Scribe Publications, Melbourne.


[i] Rutland p. 22

[ii] Stratton p. 201

[iii] Goldberg p. 151

[iv] Stratton p. 207

[v] Ibid.

[vi] Rutland p. 51

[vii] Stratton p. 208

[viii] Rutland p. 57

[ix] H.L. Rubinstein p. 507

[x] Stratton p. 209

[xi] H.L. Rubinstein p. 503

[xii] Ibid. p. 505-506

[xiii] Ibid. p. 496

[xiv] Ibid.

[xv] Ibid.

[xvi] Ibid.

[xvii] Ibid. p. 496-497

[xviii] Ibid. p. 497

[xix] Ibid. p. 498

[xx] W.D Rubinstein p. 386

[xxi] Tavan p. 50

[xxii] Manne p. 53

[xxiii] Einfeld p. 307

[xxiv] Ibid. p. 310

[xxvi] Rutland p. 72

[xxvii] Ibid. p. 73

[xxviii] W.D Rubinstein p. 413

[xxix] Rutland p. 87

[xxx] Manne p. 50

[xxxi] Rubinstein 195 p. 7

[xxxii] Fagenblat et al. p. 6

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

63 Comments to "The War on White Australia: A Case Study in the Culture of Critique, Part 2 of 5"

  1. Noble Lord's Gravatar Noble Lord
    August 16, 2012 - 9:23 am | Permalink

    FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH:

    It would be nice and helpful if the said “Free Jew laws” were expalined, as opposed to stating “ACTS”, which in no way, as far as i am aware negate the 1290 edict!

    “Unlike in Britain where Jews were gradually emancipated through Parliamentary Acts in 1854, 1858 and 1866.”

    As far as i am aware there is no Royal edict which overturns Edward I ruling, let alone Rothschild being in England to take hold of the Bank of England and create more wars!

    Me thiks WN’s need to take another look at the “Fire of London” to see the confusion and fingers pointing in allll the wrong directions as to how Jews came back into the England.

    Just a view WN’s would not consider, after all IT WAS THE BAKER THAT DUNNIT, WASN’T IT/

    Just sayin, just sayin and it will be the last time i reveal something you don’t know and there is much you don’t know.

    On the other hand, i could be wrong and an n word who is here to cause you all to be even more proud of your race and dismissive of all truths, less they be inculcated in your being by a Jew! lololoolol

    Oopes the USA was not invented yet, so how the heck can youyr so called researchers consider what is, by Caucasian standards.?

    Sorry to be like that Jew cop, i always thought was Italian, namely Columbo, but y’all DO need that “Er one more thing” interjection, less you become a bit er er, i cannot recall what Cisero is allegedly supposed to of said about SOME people.

    iT would be nice and helpful if someone would elaborate on these free Jew laws in the said “

  2. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 16, 2012 - 10:06 am | Permalink

    Very interesting series, thanks.

  3. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 16, 2012 - 10:37 am | Permalink

    So the Jewish ethnic interests in Australia are :
    1) An open immigration policy so that Jewish refugees always will find asylum.
    2) Multiculturalism so that Jewish identity will not stick out.
    3) Multiracialism and even miscegenation so that Whites will never become a “Nazi threat”.
    4) Political, financial and even military support for the Jewish ethno-state.

    Add to this the Jewish propensity to financial swindle and the promotion of moral and cultural degradation and the presence of this intensely motivated, highly organized ethnic group will only bode destruction to the nation that is foolish enough to accept them.

    As long as these people can only pursue their ethnic interests at the cost of others (and not as a reasonable give-and-take), their very existence is a threat to the world. There is no possibility of a “peaceful co-existence” between tigers and sheep, unless the tigers will become vegetarians, and that will never happen. So what are we going to do with the tigers?

  4. Craig's Gravatar Craig
    August 16, 2012 - 11:21 am | Permalink

    Very interesting essays Thank you so much.

    From a Vet(Also a gentile) I know he was involved in the 1967 war. He married a Jewess in Australia, she dragged him back to Palestine, and unbeknown to him it was a requirement of a husband to fight for Israel in the military, if he was married to a female officer. On arrival he found out she was a Capitan…He reckoned,”The Muslims would run away, leave their rifles and sandals behind so they could run in the sand faster.”.

    What is curious, is that Robert Manne is one of the main activists who is helping bring in 10000′s of illegal Muslim immigrates, not huge numbers, but still significant. Legal cognitive immigration is brining in the Muslims that can organise these groups. In fact demographically Muslims now out number Jews, so the Jewish political bloc and intellectual influence is being challenged, evident by the BDS.

    So how ironic is it that Jews are bringing their conflict from the ME desert to our shores?

    IMHO this is not going to end well for the Jews or the Muslims, as we remember before them our country was peaceful and laid back.

  5. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 16, 2012 - 1:30 pm | Permalink

    With all those politicians and political groups who were rightfully opposed to the semites and other non-Whites flooding into Australia, how did the tribe eventually manage to get their way?

  6. dc's Gravatar dc
    August 16, 2012 - 2:18 pm | Permalink

    Pierre de Craon
    I am a little upset by our recent disagreement in re Helvena. Perhaps you could establish a temporary email account with one of the enormous providers so that we can talk plainly. I am convinced that a peaceful exchange will bring peace of mind.

  7. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    August 16, 2012 - 2:44 pm | Permalink

    I can’t even bring myself to read this article I am just so enraged by the whole situation. Australia is importing Chinese who will be a fifth column for a nearby superpower with a population fifty times its own. This is either (1) insane, or (2) a deliberate, calculated and treasonous decision to sell the country out to the Chinese. I think we all know which it is. I am just disgusted I could spit.

  8. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    August 16, 2012 - 2:47 pm | Permalink

    The only thing that gives me comfort is that the Chinese and high-caste Indians may leave the Australians some breathing room to preserve their own communities as they are not hopelessly inferior like our own Negroes who impose on whites because they cannot build anything decent of their own.

  9. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    August 16, 2012 - 2:56 pm | Permalink

    That Stephensen chap had more cojones in his little finger than Romney in all his body. He was to Australia what Charles Lindberg was to the USA. Shame that their could not impose their views in their respective countries. Their were up against a vast and sinister machinery though.

  10. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 16, 2012 - 3:20 pm | Permalink

    @Noble Lord:

    You said:

    On the other hand, i could be wrong and an n word who is here to cause you all to be even more proud of your race and dismissive of all truths, less they be inculcated in your being by a Jew! lololoolol

    Oopes the USA was not invented yet, so how the heck can youyr so called researchers consider what is, by Caucasian standards.?

    For what it’s worth:

    Just so you know, from a creationist true Christian perspective; the reason why the “Jews” and European-white peoples have been so successful,so dominating, so bountiful, lacking crime (before) and having peace, prosperity with ever increasing numbers (until lately) is because the European-whites have the physical-spiritual promises and blessings of Israel/Judah while the “Jews” have the physical promises of Esau. Both are from Isaac and before him, Abraham.

    Here was Isaac’s blessing from Abraham:

    And, behold, the LORD stood above it, and said, I am the LORD God of Abraham thy father, and the God of Isaac: the land whereon thou liest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed;
    14 And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed.
    15 And, behold, I am with thee, and will keep thee in all places whither thou goest, and will bring thee again into this land; for I will not leave thee, until I have done that which I have spoken to thee of.

    I am sure you have noticed that for about 2000 years white Christian Israelite peoples and nations have been a blessing for the whole world. It seems you resent that.

    Here was Isaac’s blessing to Jacob- Israel/Judah (White-Christians)

    3 And God Almighty bless thee, and make thee fruitful, and multiply thee, that thou mayest be a multitude of people;
    4 And give thee the blessing of Abraham, to thee, and to thy seed with thee; that thou mayest inherit the land wherein thou art a stranger, which God gave unto Abraham.

    And here,

    28 Therefore God give thee of the dew of heaven, and the fatness of the earth, and plenty of corn and wine:
    29 Let people serve thee, and nations bow down to thee: be lord over thy brethren, and let thy mother’s sons bow down to thee: cursed be every one that curseth thee, and blessed be he that blesseth thee.

    I am certain you have noticed that the “Jews” have been an unbelievably successful people, as a curse that is, to every peoples, language, nation and race on this planet; especially for white-Christian peoples and nations.

    Here is was Isaac’s blessing to Esau was:

    And Isaac his father answered and said unto him, Behold, thy dwelling shall be the fatness of the earth, and of the dew of heaven from above;
    40 And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck.

    In summary, who is it that is that in all four corners of the earth? Esau “Jews” and Christian-white Israelites. We white Christian nations have had the dominion and all of the blessings detailed above as the Esau “Jews” have recently broken the yoke off their neck and have dominion now as detailed so well in Kevin MacDonald’s write up on the “Jews” concerning Christian-white Australia.

    As I am sure you know, the “Jews” have dominion in the land (Middle East) right now but as scriptures also details, their time will come to a swift end as Europeans-whites-Christians (Israel/Judah from Jacob) will be gathered from the 4 corners, flooding that land and taking back the blessings-birthrights and dominion from this “blessed”/cursed people from Esau.

    You keep speaking about our “pride” but whatever “pride” we have is common to all people. If we rightly handle that “pride” correctly, we give credit where credit is due for all our blessings past or present; to Jesus Christ/God, humbling ourselves so we might be once again exalted above all peoples on this planet.

  11. August 16, 2012 - 3:32 pm | Permalink

    Many years ago, prior to the floodgates opening, I had a discussion with an Aussie “republican”. He was a strong proponent of a White Australia, a stronger opponent of multiculturalism he believed it necessary for Australia to become a republic and remove itself from the British Commonwealth. When asked why, his answer was short, and to the point: divided loyalties. Multiculturalism encouraged divided loyalties. The British Commonwealth required divided loyalties. Only a White Australia requiring assimilation could defeat divided loyalties.

    The overwhelming majority of Jews do not have devided loyalties. They are loyal to the tribe, not the country of residence.

  12. Steve's Gravatar Steve
    August 16, 2012 - 3:39 pm | Permalink

    Excellent series articles thus far by Brenton Sanderson. Easy to read and understand and well documented for the average layperson to comprehend about Jewish power and control. I look forward to the following related articles.

  13. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    August 16, 2012 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

    An excellent series of articles. It pains me to see what has been done to my country and how it was done. Australians, like most Whites, are a fair minded people. We in many ways were lambs to the slaughter for the highly ethnically conscious tribe. The naive seem to over rule the intelligent and then perhaps cowardice overules intelligence as well.

  14. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    August 16, 2012 - 5:32 pm | Permalink

    Einfeld was especially angry that even after the war “protests from trade unions and the conservative side of politics amongst others, forced the government of the day to limit the number of Jews on any one ship to 25 per cent, thus leaving many to wallow in camps in Europe until the birth of Israel or the willingness of other countries to take them.”[xxiv]

    Jewish Zio power was bent on the formation of Israel. The rank and file Jews were not so keen on the discomfort of creating a new country in a very hostile land.

    This would beg the question of how much of it was being the scenes Jewish power that restricted immigration to Australia etc etc. ?
    And, How much was it Jewish power in NS Germany that made inspired Jews to leave?
    My educated guess is that it was Jewish power to a very large degree.

  15. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    August 16, 2012 - 5:35 pm | Permalink

    Repost :

    Einfeld was especially angry that even after the war “protests from trade unions and the conservative side of politics amongst others, forced the government of the day to limit the number of Jews on any one ship to 25 per cent, thus leaving many to wallow in camps in Europe until the birth of Israel or the willingness of other countries to take them.”[xxiv]

    Jewish Zio power was bent on the formation of Israel. The rank and file Jews were not so keen on the discomfort of creating a new country in a very hostile land.

    With the usual suspects…
    This would beg the question of how much of it was behind the scenes Jewish power that restricted immigration to Australia etc etc. ?
    And, How much was it Jewish power in NS Germany that made inspired Jews to leave?
    My educated guess is that it was Jewish power to a very large degree.

  16. StuckInBetween's Gravatar StuckInBetween
    August 16, 2012 - 5:46 pm | Permalink

    What has happened to Australia has happened to all the Western countries since the White Australian policy was abolished due to the Jews, as has been noted before. I’d like to share my personal story and would like some feedback.

    As a person of mixed culture I abhor multiculturalism. I am born to a immigrant Turkish father a first generation mother of German/French descent. Multicultural has provided me with a schizophrenic or fragmented reality. Both sides of my family are half way around the world from each other, and the culture and language are not compatible. My father came to Canada not because he wanted to, but for economic opportunity, which is the fault of the money controlling Jews and Zionism, which through parasitism is controlling the world and putting each country it controls in the gutter.

    I am not accepted from my Canadian side because I am not “Canadian” enough, and I am not accepted from the Turkish side because I don’t speak tip top Turkish and don’t act “Turkish” enough. Multiculturalism is a failed experiment and I would tell anyone that wants to marry outside of their race/culture to NOT do it. It creates a dysfunctional family and a person’s identity is greatly affected. I am currently living in Turkey because I hate multiCULTuralism and prefer to live in a homogeneous society.

  17. Snowhitey's Gravatar Snowhitey
    August 16, 2012 - 6:41 pm | Permalink

    This article is dynamite as are most articles on the OO. However, they always send my blood pressure into the stratosphere. I often encounter inner conflict as to whether my health should take a second seat to the satisfaction gained from reading such insightful and thoroughly-researched information.

    I cannot for the life of me understand why so many white Christian Europeans sell out their own people and their own lands. Surely they must understand that any reward the Jew offers will be rescinded once the task is completed and they too will be victims. These traitorous actions defy all logic and go against the primal instinct of self-preservation. Until I can understand the actions of these traitors, I cannot remove them from being my #1 target of wrath with the deceitful and maniacal Jew being my #2 target of wrath.

    Eventually, all of us whites who are very aware of who is to blame for our decline are going to reach the collective boiling point. We are going to have to vent and I firmly believe we are almost there….

    Perhaps we should beat the Jew at his own game and start making definitive alliances with these minorities the Jew innundates us with. Are they also not the victim of the treacherous Jew? The “friend” of my enemy can be my “friend” too!

  18. mari's Gravatar mari
    August 16, 2012 - 10:03 pm | Permalink

    The ADL has recently established a huge headquarters in Australia. It’s interests are fighting racial prejudice by which it means Australians objecting to immigrants on welfare who rape and abuse White women because they are not dressed in muslim shrouds.

    Like the ADL everywhere, they always side with muslims except of course in Israel. The new ADL symbol BTW, is a globe. This shows ADL and Jewish intention.

    In every country, it was the Russian commie Jew immigrants who started problems from the 1880′s to the present time.

  19. mari's Gravatar mari
    August 16, 2012 - 10:19 pm | Permalink

    I am of the opinion that Israel will not last for more than 200 years. Israel is basically not Jewish. They are global parasites and nations need to be productive. A nation cannot exist indefinitly without producing something. Look at the Jewish commie Soviet Union. 70 years.

    Europe and the Americas are filled with dual Israel citizens who move back and forth but are always careful to keep citizenship of a country other than Israel.

    Right now, uncle sucker and we the taxpayers support Israel.
    I believe that the GNP of Israel is equal to the amount of direct US goverment money given every year. Then of course there is the vast amount of tax deductible money given every year by American Jews.

    Although, the zionists and AIPAC constantly complain that the American Jews pledge millions during the fund raising campaigns but never come through with the money.

    I have observed Jews all my life. I am very familiar with their martyrdom social justice c**p used to convince both rich idealists and the average worker to follow thier politics into ruination.

    If you look at their history, they are like American Indians who hunted and gardened until they exhausted the soil and animals and moved on to another area. Or they are like gypsies, pillage a village and move on to the next.

    Look at what they have done to city neighborhoods in the 20th century. Ever noticed that from the S side of Chicago to San Francisco’s Fillmore to NYCs Brooklyn and Bronx every early 20th century Jewish neighborhood became a crime ridden black slum?

    For what it’s worth, I think the Jews are preparing the rest of the civilized better parts of the world to accept Jews when Israel falls apart. It is not just military, life in Israel is just too hard for Jews to cope.

  20. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 16, 2012 - 10:25 pm | Permalink

    @Snowhitey:

    In response to your post above, I explained what happened to White Christendom. They were brainwashed over a series of generation into believing an identity theft scheme perpetuated by the Jewish media as well as the abomination called the Scolfields bible.

    Once the “Jews” took on our rightful identity, it was almost impossible for the Christian whites to oppose them. This dilemma was accentuated by the “Jews” as they pinned all of their historical sins upon white Christians. It crushed us psychologically rendering ALL whites defenseless.

    The way out of this is to restore to white Christendom their truthful identity while exposing the real identity of the so called Jews. This will have a reversal affect within Christendom while also acting as a weapon of truth to pin the “Jews” down as to who they are and what their crimes have been.

    Given the political, religious, economic and ethnic realities/trends of the world today, there will come a time when whites-Christians will be forced to flood the ME; if for no other reason than because we, they believe, are the only population left that they maintain some sort of control over. Because they know we would not kill them on the spot like the Arabs, Chinese or blacks if they flooded into the land. They know the military and creative capabilities of us whites-Christians and we will be indispensable to them as the West crumbles while the eastern and Muslim powers rise to challenge them for world dominance. Then, when this happens, they will have to let us in and then we will be in a position to dismantle their insane leadership- deport the psychos among them, prosecute the criminals in their population and take over the reins of “Israel” which will be key to taking back complete control of all western white/Christian nations.

    Attacking Christian whites is not wise for a number of reasons. Besides those listed above, we are the majority and there is simply no getting rid of us. The answer is to educate all whites/Christians about our true biblical identity as well as the “Jews” biblical identity while spotlighting the “Jews” crimes in the past and present. The rest will take care of itself.

  21. neville's Gravatar neville
    August 16, 2012 - 10:25 pm | Permalink

    “the re-emergence of the state of Israel” ?

    Most ALL of the Biblical History ( King David , Solomon etc etc ) is magnificent invention.

    The Davidic kingdom of the bible is just another myth and or tribal legend.

    “There is little to suggest that Jerusalem, touted by the Bible as David’s capital, was little more than a village during the time of David and of Solomon, and Judah remained little more than a sparsely populated rural region, until the 7th century BCE.

    Careful examination of the archeology of the period shows that the mighty Davinic empire as described in the bible could not have existed. Judah at that time was a backwater. Jerusalem the supposed capital of this mighty empire would have had a population of around 1,500 and was a small hamlet.

    Where are the remains ? There is NO Archaeological evidence No examples of the construction of cities or historical records.
    Yes the great kingdom of Biblical Israel is just another myth and or tribal legend.

    http://www.amazon.com/The-Bible-Unearthed-Archaeologys-Ancient/dp/0684869136/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top

  22. mari's Gravatar mari
    August 16, 2012 - 10:36 pm | Permalink

    A major reason why no nation wanted to accept any immigrants of any kind during the 1930′s was the depression, unemployment and the enormous cost of welfare when taxes were so low due to unemployment and the depression.

    Even the commie Russian jew dominated Roosevelt administration severely restricted jewish immigration during the 1930′s.

    Roosevelt filled his administration with commie jews. When confronted with clear and present evidence by Adolph Berle deputy in charge of security for the state department Roosevelt told him to get out of the office.

    But even the pro commie jew Roosevelt administration refused to allow millions of new comers during the depression.

    Today Roosevelt gets no thanks from jews for filling his administration with commie jews which let them influence this country for the worst ever since.

    Roosevelt is now conisdered “anti semite” because his administration did not allow immigrants during the depression.

  23. JA's Gravatar JA
    August 16, 2012 - 10:38 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    “With all those politicians and political groups who were rightfully opposed to the semites and other non-Whites flooding into Australia, how did the tribe eventually manage to get their way?”

    Because Australia is owned by foreign banks and multinational corporations.

    Jewish and other academics/elites, Zionist organisations and other proponents of “cultural change” operate in the context of that very favourable overarching economic power which needs to Cosmopolitanise the Globe and extinguish or radically attenuate Nations.

    The history of capitalism has delivered circumstances in the last 30 or so years where the technical possibility of globalising the World economy has been achieved. Included in that is the Multicultured flooding of Western nations with Third World labour and forcing the free movement of everything that is moveable.

    The banks and multinational corporations dominate that in the context of the decline in other industries. That’s where ethnicity comes into it. Guess who ‘owns’ (dominates in) the banks and multinationals? Guess who were once better situated in the declining industries?

    Social-political agendas of Jews or any other ethnic group are always going to be subordinate to the overarching trends in economics, in the World Economy. Their success will vary with that and if they are to be made to fail an alternative economic direction is essential. It cannot be defeated by tampering at the edges or – solely – by projecting alternative cultural positions.

  24. JA's Gravatar JA
    August 16, 2012 - 11:03 pm | Permalink

    @StuckInBetween:

    Come back home mate we need ya!

  25. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 17, 2012 - 12:45 am | Permalink

    @neville:

    All archeology is strictly controlled by the “Jewish” authorities in the land. The “Jews” know that about 95% of their population is atheist/secular so the only ones who would be inspired by revealing the evidence (which by the way, much has gotten out but it gets NO media attention) would be the European/White Christians. Simply speaking, they can’t have that. The elite among the “Jews” know they are Esau and Ashkenaz, and they also know they are not Judah/Israel – the titles they usurped from Christians.

    But to a greater point- who cares if you don’t believe? Don’t believe for God’s sake! I present things and you present things and everyone here does. At the end of the day it is up to every individual to believe it or not, end of story.

    You want to help the cause instead of damaging it?

    1. If you don’t believe a Christian pro white perspective- then shut your mouth and stop trying to create divisions among us

    2. This is very important. When speaking with Christians who believe in the Jewish identity nonsense- set them straight by telling them that you don’t believe in the bible or creation but one thing is for sure. If it is true, then the white-European Christian peoples would definitely be Israel and Judah and not the “Jews” if for no other reason than if God is love, and Christ is King- why would he proclaim a population that rejects him almost to the man, women and child his “chosen”? Why would he call his people a population that is almost 100% atheistic like me?

    3. If they still are not convinced tell them “why in the hell are you a Christian in the first place? Why not just convert to Judaism and become one of the “Chosen”?

    THAT sir is how you can help. If you keep speaking this nonsense it just makes everyone here suspicious of your ethnic identity and ideological loyalties.

  26. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    August 17, 2012 - 12:51 am | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom:

    Don’t spit mom, just blame the Catholic church. Everybody else does on here!

  27. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    August 17, 2012 - 2:11 am | Permalink

    @JA:
    Do alot of its Minerals / Commodities go to China?

  28. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 17, 2012 - 2:49 am | Permalink

    @TyronRobertParsons:
    Y.O.U. A.R.E. A.N. I.D.I.O.T.

  29. JA's Gravatar JA
    August 17, 2012 - 3:55 am | Permalink

    @TyronRobertParsons:

    “…whites-Christians will be forced to flood the ME…”

    It’s going to be a bit of a tight squeeze, isn’t it?

    Or is this a sleight of hand for validating some Biblical prophesy?

  30. Noble Lord's Gravatar Noble Lord
    August 17, 2012 - 4:57 am | Permalink

    @TyronRobertParsons:

    As I am not sure how much I am allowed to say in response to your post without being censored, or posting with held, I shall respond thus, saving any misunderstandings!

    YOU SAID:

    “Just so you know, from a creationist true Christian perspective; the reason why the “Jews” and European-white peoples have been so successful,so dominating, so bountiful, lacking crime (before) and having peace, prosperity with ever increasing numbers (until lately) is because the European-whites have the physical-spiritual promises and blessings of Israel/Judah while the “Jews” have the physical promises of Esau. Both are from Isaac and before him, Abraham.”

    You are joking aren’t you?

    Next minute you’ll be telling everyone England didn’t deport its criminals to Australia, because there was very little crime in the UK!

    “You cannot be serious” John McEnroe.

    Your peoples have ONLY been successful in enthroning the Jew and at the same time committed genocide on others in the process! The dust has settled and I can see how you feel, to justify your folly you cleave to a doctrine, as soccer fans pledge loyalty to their club of choice!

    If your belief maintains a civil behaviour within you, “it’s all good” as they say.

    It appears to me that you are blinded by your brand of “Christianity”, be that as it may, Isaac had an elder brother Ishmael of who many “Christians” dismiss.

    “And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation.” Genesis 17-20.

    I am not a biblical scholar and I am certainly not against scripture being quoted, but I will say to you, be careful, the truth is not colour coded.

    Many will profess to know scripture, yet be blinded by the truth, as well as the blatantly obvious!

    YOU SAID:

    “I am sure you have noticed that for about 2000 years white Christian Israelite peoples and nations have been a blessing for the whole world. It seems you resent that.”

    I SAY:

    The story of humanity is not to be resented, it is to be known, taught without strictures place upon it and “lessons learned”, so as not to repeat the ignorance of the past!

    I ASK:

    Are Catholics Christians?

    With a wave of a sword Emperor Constantine created a brand and although Martin Luther exposed the brand, it only meant others created their own and thus obscured the word. You have company in not being able to see it, but at present I think you mean no harm.

    YOU SAID:

    “I am certain you have noticed that the “Jews” have been an unbelievably successful people, as a curse that is, to every peoples, language, nation and race on this planet; especially for white-Christian peoples and nations.”

    I have noticed that the Jew has been successfully devious and deceptive and he couldn’t have done it without Caucasian help! He has relied on your ignorance and penchant for colour first ideology, the perfect Igor for the demon.lol

    YOU SAID:

    “You keep speaking about our “pride” but whatever “pride” we have is common to all people. If we rightly handle that “pride” correctly, we give credit where credit is due for all our blessings past or present; to Jesus Christ/God, humbling ourselves so we might be once again exalted above all peoples on this planet.”

    I have no problem with humans being proud of acts done by humans in these trying times, if they be white great, if they be black great, yellow, red fantastic.

    Proverbs 16:18 “Pride Goeth Before Destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.”

    WN’s often moan about their plight and status in the world, yet it takes a black man to explain it to you!

    THE TRUTH IS NOT COLOUR CODED, NEITHER IS IT A SINGLE, NUBILE, YOUNG LADY WAITING FOR YOU TO PASS BY. IT JUST IS!

    Would I be correct in stating that you believe man has been to the moon?

  31. JA's Gravatar JA
    August 17, 2012 - 5:53 am | Permalink

    @90404:

    A lot, and of course it has grown with China’s selection by multinationals as their principal manufacturing “platform”.

    Along with that we have a common pattern and that is that Trade Agreements have been made and these include (for some strange reason) mass immigration rights to Chinese. Strange because the same didn’t exist in the 1930′s when Japan was overtaking declining Britain as the principal importer of our – then – main export, Merino wool.

    Japan (God bless their effective mono-culturalism!) is still the main export recipient but, failing deeper cracks in the Western Economies (the real cream market for China’s manufactured goods), likely China will overtake it. This has significantly kept Australia out of the world decline – till now.

    All mineral booms of the past have collapsed, however, and this one, which is huge, will also do so. Resource exporters in the past have been hardest hit by Depressions and Australia was no exception in the 1930′s where we had the second highest unemployment in the World. As Brenton Sanderson’s article and letters have pointed out: this impacted heavily on the reaction of the people against immigration. But governments and businesses and immigration and multicultural proponents have other ideas.

    With the special position of Australia as a supplier to China, the Australian dollar has risen considerably in the last couple of years in relation to the US (from a value of less than $.70c US a few years ago it is now around $1.05) and the Euro. This and the longer standing de-industrialising plans of the Multinationals is radically restructuring the Australian economy.

    “Australia Exports
    Australia exports were worth 26629 Million AUD in June of 2012. Historically, from 1971 until 2012, Australia Exports averaged 8145.1 Million AUD reaching an all time high of 28040.0 Million AUD in August of 2011 and a record low of 435.0 Million AUD in October of 1971. Rich in natural resources, Australia is a major exporter of agricultural products, particularly wheat and wool, minerals such as iron-ore and gold, and energy in the form of liquefied natural gas and coal. The agricultural and mining sectors account for 57% of the nation’s exports. Australia’s largest export markets are Japan, China, European Union, South Korea and United States. This page includes a chart with historical data for Australia Exports.”

  32. shark's Gravatar shark
    August 17, 2012 - 8:10 am | Permalink

    @TyronRobertParsons
    Stanley I really like how you have that propeller attached to your yamaka like that. It really looks good on you!

  33. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 17, 2012 - 10:34 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    I refuse your judgement. Bless you Franklin…. ;)

  34. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 17, 2012 - 10:38 am | Permalink

    @JA:

    No, it will not be a tight fit since most of the people in the ME by the time we get there will be gone due to the wars that will continue toward “greater Israel” over he next 15 or so years. Also, keep in mind, America’s white Christian population will have been greater reduced due to the war that we will see on our own soil over the same time frame.

    Both are already in affect but have not gone full blown yet.

  35. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 17, 2012 - 11:08 am | Permalink

    @Noble Lord:

    You said:

    You are joking aren’t you?
    Next minute you’ll be telling everyone England didn’t deport its criminals to Australia, because there was very little crime in the UK!

    Answer:

    I am not joking and the “criminals” deported were really (many times) to help colonize areas. And then through high birthrates, our number increased everywhere. To deny the level of peace and prosperity and creativity in European Christian based nations (before the “Jews” took over), and all of this in comparison to other nations-races-belief systems, is to deny reality.

    You said:

    Your peoples have ONLY been successful in enthroning the Jew and at the same time committed genocide on others in the process! The dust has settled and I can see how you feel, to justify your folly you cleave to a doctrine, as soccer fans pledge loyalty to their club of choice!

    Answer:

    Name someone we “genocided” I will show you a Jew trick.

    You said

    It appears to me that you are blinded by your brand of “Christianity”, be that as it may, Isaac had an elder brother Ishmael of who many “Christians” dismiss.

    Answer

    Christianity allows for adoption of other folks but ONLY through belief and faith in Christ and adopting in full (which means not opposing the white man on a physical/racial basis) his Christian culture. We have always allowed strangers to live among us but it is the “Jew” who’s behind flooding us with people who will not assimilate.

    You said:

    “And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation.” Genesis 17-20.

    Answer:

    And exactly how many Arab Muslim/Islamic nations are in the ME that make one great nation as a whole?
    You said

    Are Catholics Christians?
    Yes, many are but like all “Christian” groups, many are not.

    You said

    With a wave of a sword Emperor Constantine created a brand and although Martin Luther exposed the brand, it only meant others created their own and thus obscured the word. You have company in not being able to see it, but at present I think you mean no harm.

    Answer:

    The origin of the term “Christian” is given in Acts 11:25-26 as follows:

    Then departed Barnabas to Tarsus, for to seek Saul, and when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.

    The Christians were also called simply “the way”

    You said:

    I have noticed that the Jew has been successfully devious and deceptive and he couldn’t have done it without Caucasian help! He has relied on your ignorance and penchant for colour first ideology, the perfect Igor for the demon.lol

    Answer:

    I would not call us the Igor, but it is true we have been duped and duped in mass whether one is a believer in the way or not.

    You said:

    Proverbs 16:18 “Pride Goeth Before Destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.”
    WN’s often moan about their plight and status in the world, yet it takes a black man to explain it to you!

    Answer:

    It takes a “black man” to explain it to us? I will grant you black man that you have added some good things here but beware of hypocrisy because any more than acknowledging that you have added to our discussion is EXACTLY the kind of pride spoken of in proverbs.

    You said;

    THE TRUTH IS NOT COLOUR CODED, NEITHER IS IT A SINGLE, NUBILE, YOUNG LADY WAITING FOR YOU TO PASS BY. IT JUST IS!

    Answer:

    Ultimate truth is Christ Jesus (our kin) and his way. He is truth, the way and the light and his bride are those (regardless of race) who believe and have faith in him.

    You said:

    Would I be correct in stating that you believe man has been to the moon?

    Answer:

    Let’s not get off track now. That is an entirely different discussion and I could go on for hours about it.

  36. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 17, 2012 - 11:10 am | Permalink

    @shark:

    Stanley,

    It obvious you’re slandering for lack of intelligent retort. I refuse your judgement. Bless you.

  37. Faustus's Gravatar Faustus
    August 17, 2012 - 11:29 am | Permalink

    Superbly done. Perhaps, when this series is over, you might print a small booklet for distribution in the US and Australia.

    Looking forward to the rest.

  38. Andrew Joyce's Gravatar Andrew Joyce
    August 17, 2012 - 1:40 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert – rarely does this site bring a smile to my face, but your response to Tyron brought forth a chuckle! As soon as I read Tyron’s little theological musing I thought “Franklin won’t stand for this!” Marvellous!

    On a more serious note – what a superb, detailed, reasoned, and utterly comprehensible piece of work from Brenton Sanderson.

  39. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    August 17, 2012 - 2:16 pm | Permalink

    @Craig: “What is curious, is that Robert Manne is one of the main activists who is helping bring in 10000′s of illegal Muslim immigrates, not huge numbers, but still significant. Legal cognitive immigration is brining in the Muslims that can organise these groups. In fact demographically Muslims now out number Jews, so the Jewish political bloc and intellectual influence is being challenged, evident by the BDS.

    So how ironic is it that Jews are bringing their conflict from the ME desert to our shores?”

    This what happened in Europe.

  40. STARSCREAM's Gravatar STARSCREAM
    August 17, 2012 - 3:15 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    Why and how are you worried about moral degradation when you refuse to acknowledge an objective moral law giver? Do you believe in Good and Evil? If so, how do you tell the difference between the two? And if you do not, why worry about moral degradation since morality doesn’t exist?

  41. Noble Lord's Gravatar Noble Lord
    August 17, 2012 - 3:26 pm | Permalink

    @TyronRobertParsons:

    I thank you for your reply and as we do agree on some weighty issues, I can see we disagree on, what I would term minor issues.

    Do not blame the messenger in this case, or suggest that I have it in for Caucasian people, because I dare bring to your notice what, perhaps you are very unfamiliar with.

    YOU SAID:

    “I am not joking and the “criminals” deported were really (many times) to help colonize areas. And then through high birthrates, our number increased everywhere. To deny the level of peace and prosperity and creativity in European Christian based nations (before the “Jews” took over), and all of this in comparison to other nations-races-belief systems, is to deny reality.”

    You really ought not to try to pull the wool over the eyes of anyone who cares to witness our discussion. Even YOU should know that the internet/library is full of evidence that supports what I have to say on this issue. You give me the impression you haven’t bothered to even read up on the History of Australia, let alone pass comment!

    The Aristocracy couldn’t give hot dog about the deported crimz, they just made great cheap labour! So much for your very little crime Caucasian nations, here’s a little ditty Caucasian children sang;

    “Oranges and lemons” say the Bells of St. Clement’s
    “You owe me five farthings” say the Bells of St. Martin’s
    “When will you pay me?” say the Bells of Old Bailey
    “When I grow rich” say the Bells of Shoreditch
    “When will that be?” say the Bells of Stepney
    “I do not know” say the Great Bells of Bow
    “Here comes a Candle to light you to Bed
    Here comes a Chopper to Chop off your Head
    Chip chop chip chop – the Last Man’s Dead.”

    Caucasians hung people for debts!

    YOU SAID:

    “Name someone we “genocided” I will show you a Jew trick.”

    The Carib Indians, The Arawaks, perhaps the Mowhicans, I’m sure there is more, especially in your homeland, now show me the Jew trick!

    Oh by the way feel free to read the link, it seems there is some debate about the fate of the ORIGINAL TASMANIANS!

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/oct/14/australia.features11

    YOU SAID:

    “Christianity allows for adoption of other folks but ONLY through belief and faith in Christ and adopting in full (which means not opposing the white man on a physical/racial basis) his Christian culture. We have always allowed strangers to live among us but it is the “Jew” who’s behind flooding us with people who will not assimilate.”

    Really?

    Those who err in the truth and are living in the mode of the beast/adversary must be opposed full stop! I sense your brand of Christianity harbours a little “Chosen people/supremacy” to hide behind… no matter!

    I will pray you wake up.

    I ASKED:

    Are Catholics Christians?

    YOU SAID:

    “Yes, many are but like all “Christian” groups, many are not”

    Gottcha!

    They are Catholic, Roman Catholic, I will add nothing more, albeit much can be said!

    YOU SAID:

    “The origin of the term “Christian” is given in Acts 11:25-26 as follows:

    Then departed Barnabas to Tarsus, for to seek Saul, and when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.”

    The less said the better at this point.lol

    YOU SAID:

    “The Christians were also called simply “the way”
    Strictly speaking you are wrong, but I can see why.
    Personally I try and follow The Way and I am learning as I go.

    YOU SAID:

    “Ultimate truth is Christ Jesus (our kin) and his way. He is truth, the way and the light and his bride are those (regardless of race) who believe and have faith in him.”

    HOWLER ALERT!

    There you go again claiming Jesus Christ (your kin=Caucasian)

    Fair enough have him, all Michael Angelo makeover of him, but know this the letter J is approximately 388 years old, so personally I’ll stick with Yesua the Messiah.

    HE SAID:

    “I am the way, the truth and the LIFE” John 14-6

    A little different to what you quoted, but hey we all make mistakes as no man is perfect.

    Proverbs 16:18 “Pride Goeth Before Destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.”

    I practice challenging my ego, such is my way to find The Way.

    Please do not think I think black people are superior in any way, we are as a human family in error and thus we must communicate and rid ourselves of worthless trinkets and comfort blankets.

    I see no need to stomp, a win is a win and both of us learn in the process.

  42. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    August 17, 2012 - 4:12 pm | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom: “importing Chinese that will be a fifth column for a nearby superpower…….etc.

    Yes!!, absolutely possible. How many times I’ve pointed this out in various blogs, where Chinese immigration is concerned, not only in Australia, but in Canada and the U.S.

    In the U.S. there has already been suspected spying and passing on secrets at sensitive research compounds by Chinese scientists working there. This syping for China, can go on in Canada, Australia, the U.S., literally any Western nation whos treasonous elite are now engaged in massive Chinese immigration like Canada, U.S. etc.

  43. August 17, 2012 - 4:33 pm | Permalink

    Hello to America and to KevinMcDonald.

    I am a farmer, aged 56, in Germany, in the town of Frankfurt.
    I agree to your political analysis.
    To my opinion the situation in Germany is comparable, but much less catastrophic than in the USA.
    Hereunder you will find some music from Germany and the neighbour-countries. This music does express our European soul und I hope that it is similar to Your`s. Again a Thank-You to this site. In Europe we do very similar work.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEQ_KtuUFew
    Andrea Berg: Kilimanjaro

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXYux2pyqZk&feature=related
    Andrea Berg: Die Gefühle haben Schweigepflicht.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYcENhb05tY&feature=related
    DJ Ötzi: Ein Stern, der deinen Namen trägt.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMTi0qUElb4&feature=related
    Jürgen Drews: Ich bau dir ein Schloss

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b06F-l88s48&feature=related
    Andreas Gabalier – I sing a Liad für di

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-S3lDuWHmvU
    polka in valček. skupina navihanke

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxjJFB-j5RU
    Helene Fischer – Ave Maria

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yu5xG60lmBg&feature=related
    Helene Fischer: The Power of Love

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHSu4g6WJjg&feature=related
    Helene Fischer: Die Sonne kann warten

  44. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 17, 2012 - 5:29 pm | Permalink

    @STARSCREAM:
    Morality does exist, the difference between good and evil does exist and man can chose between them by listening to his own conscience. The main rule is simply not to harm others, but I do acknowledge that there are sometimes moral dilemmas that are difficult to solve ( for example : euthanasia in case of a painful terminal disease, abortion in case of a pregnancy due to rape or incest, letting die a few in order to save many in time of an emergency, how far may one go to use violence in self defence etc etc).

    I guess with the term “objective moral law giver” you mean the “God” of the OT who is supposed to have descended ( in “smoke and fire”) on a little mountain in a little desert on our little planet to “reveal” his moral commandments to a little Semitic tribe. Doubts about the “objective” existence of this “law giver” arise not only when considering the way he made himself known ( he had hidden himself in a burning bush on the wayside) but also when considering the rest of the story. In order to “always be with his people” this deity had to be “transported” and for this purpose an “ark” was constructed. This chest had two sticks, one on each side so that the “Lord of the Universe” could be transported on the face of our little planet by two men. On the way this entity had to be fed with “sacrifices” : cows, goats, sheep, birds etc ( all slaughtered in the cruel “ritual” way) which shows that this “objective law giver” was at least no vegetarian! As for the “moral” character of this deity, though he commanded his chosen tribe not to murder or to steal, he ordered them to do just that in order to conquer the land of Canaan that he had “promised” them : genocide and plunder was their assignment.

    Considering the primitive and morally repulsive character of this deity, I think we better not accept this figment of imagination as an “objective moral law giver” and trust on our own conscience and reason for moral guidance even if that means that we cannot easily solve all moral dilemmas in life.

  45. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 17, 2012 - 5:44 pm | Permalink

    @Noble Lord:

    You said:

    You really ought not to try to pull the wool over the eyes of anyone who cares to witness our discussion. Even YOU should know that the internet/library is full of evidence that supports what I have to say on this issue. You give me the impression you haven’t bothered to even read up on the History of Australia, let alone pass comment!

    Answer:

    I have read upon it but the winners of the wars (in this case the “Jews”) have written those history books of late and they are mostly nonsense and easily disproven.

    You said

    The Aristocracy couldn’t give hot dog about the deported crimz, they just made great cheap labour! So much for your very little crime Caucasian nations, here’s a little ditty Caucasian children sang;

    Answer:

    The Crown was always desiring dominance and yes they had their crimes as did the Christian peoples but if you deny how noble and crime free we were in comparison to others before the “Jews” took over; like I said, you are denying reality.

    You said:

    The Carib Indians, The Arawaks, perhaps the Mohicans, I’m sure there is more, especially in your homeland, now show me the Jew trick!
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/oct/14/australia.features11

    Answer:

    first off, the Mohicans did not die out. Secondly, many integrated with other Indian tribes. 3rd- one cannot call someone “genocided” when there is a race/culture war and the loser started it!

    The UK Guardian is a leftist rag and a Marxist “Jew” blow horn that pushes BS.

    The Arawaks and Carin were savage cannibals and were taken as slaves and slaughter by the “Jews” who came there with Columbus after being expelled from Christian Europe for about the 70th time at that point.

    I am not saying that the British Monarchy does not have its sins nor am I saying that the white man does not have sins; what I am saying is that I can point out much worse sins done by other races and religions- most not even comparable to whatever can be correctly pinned on white Christians.

    You said:

    Really?

    Answer:

    All races and nations have areas of inferiority and superiority one to another. Each race has its glory, wonder and accomplishments.

    You said:

    Gottcha!

    They are Catholic, Roman Catholic, I will add nothing more, albeit much can be said!

    Answer:

    All who call on the Lord Jesus Christ will be saved. You “got” nothing.

    You said:

    The less said the better at this point.lol

    Answer:

    You can think whatever you wish

    You said:

    Strictly speaking you are wrong, but I can see why.
    Personally I try and follow The Way and I am learning as I go.

    Answer:

    There is no other way to the Father than through Jesus Christ.

    You said

    Fair enough have him, all Michael Angelo makeover of him, but know this the letter J is approximately 388 years old, so personally I’ll stick with Yesua the Messiah.

    Answer:
    iosus Isos Yahushua- Messiah- Jesus Christ- it does not matter how the name is spelled per say, it matters what personality/spirit, one belongs to.

    Call Christ how you like but you simply do not understand that the earliest accounts of his features, even by Pontius Pilate show him to be a white man. I have posted these ancient documents here before.

    You said;

    Please do not think I think black people are superior in any way, we are as a human family in error and thus we must communicate and rid ourselves of worthless trinkets and comfort blankets.
    I see no need to stomp, a win is a win and both of us learn in the process.

    Answer:

    Black people have natural abilities in certain areas that no other peoples possess. Hence, black peoples have areas of superiority over other peoples just like they have areas of inferiority with other peoples. All races have their glory and their place in this world. We whites-Christians simply take issue with the ‘Jewish” program to flood us out of existance in our own lands. This is not right in any way shape or form.
    I agree that if we learn we do win.
    Blessings….

  46. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 17, 2012 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    Stop characterizing the white people’s Christian belief system in the slanderous ways you do. As a person who does not subscribe to how white Christians interpret the OT through the spirit of Christ in the NT, sealed and expressed through our conscience- why is it that you constantly throw up these straw man interpretations as if they are ours? They are not Franklin and you know this. I have repeatedly corrected you in your characterizations and you simply ignore them and keep the slanders up and this so you might later shoot down what you have wrongly attributed to our belief system.
    You win NOTHING in this Franklin. The only thing you win is a heavy dose of hypocrisy to be rightly pinned on you since you speak of law being in conscience and then you violate all a healthy conscience through your repeated slander of white Christian’s interpretation of scripture. VERY Jewish behavior btw!

  47. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 17, 2012 - 7:48 pm | Permalink

    @dc: What you suggest is not possible for me at this time, given my health (I know that yours is none too fine either, unfortunately). If it helps in any way, please know that I have never felt any resentment towards you nor borne you any ill will, certainly not when we were disagreeing on that other thread. You stood up for someone you admired; I disliked what that person said about me. There’s an end on’t. No harm done; certainly, not so far as I’m concerned.

    I hope you feel the same way. I ask your forgiveness for anything I said to offend you.

  48. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    August 17, 2012 - 8:20 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: @dc:

    You gentlemen make me proud to be in such fine company. Feel better. You are in my thoughts and prayers.

  49. Free Thinker's Gravatar Free Thinker
    August 17, 2012 - 8:32 pm | Permalink

    When you destroy a countries ethnicity you destroy the natural vertically integrated meaning that transcends all intellectual theories that come and go .The natural inbuilt protective and self interested mechanism . You destroy this and you replace it with Elite Jewish Bankers controlling the legal/military machine that serves what theory ? Serves who ?
    We already see a plethora of ridiculous laws in Australia created by ‘the system’ of bureaucrats and University indoctrinated dimwits . We see the the extremely tenuous theory of global warming turned into a ‘hard scientific’ fact . And what about the convolutions of Genetic Industries and the Pharmaceutical industries (Retalin anyone ? ) . Scientific studies are easy to manipulate and in the end they have to be interpreted by a human .
    When a society becomes fractured and unable to protect itself it will/is virtually impossible to monitor the complexity of these systems .Legalism certainly won’t be able to pin down the malefic factors (we already see this now) . So how does a society and its people protect itself from corporate and intellectual experimentation ? How does a society get people to act with genuine honorable concern ? I think its obvious that the only way is if all individuals feel a genuine connection with those in their country . Where the CEO or Gov Department head , or the Plutocrate when dealing with others all over a country feel a sense of kinship , NOT just a media manufactured social mannerism of pretense .
    This is where ‘the Jews’ fall down . For all the lip serve they give to the other (the degradation of Aboriginal Australia by alcohol/drugs and welfare and Negro’s in the US are a couple of prime examples ), as these and many other articles on TOO show , their real concern if for Jews and anything that benefits them (ie we should be fighting wars in the ME ) and if that is a disaster for the country they have colonized (the USA is a prime example ) then their ‘intellectuals’ create convoluted theories or explanations (say communism) that are propagated within the Jewish Ghetto Press (derogatory intended ) , to excuse or invert the pernicious effects of a philosophical position eg Multiculturalism on Democracy . Essentially most Jews hid in their Ivory Towers with a mote of phoney intellectual theories and refuse to listen to anything that doesn’t serve their interests .

  50. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 17, 2012 - 8:49 pm | Permalink

    @Karlfried:

    “Hereunder you will find some music from Germany and the neighbour-countries. This music does express our European soul und I hope that it is similar to Your`s.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEQ_KtuUFew
    Andrea Berg: Kilimanjaro”

    How does this express the European soul? Negroid tribal drums and from what I can tell, lyrics about an African mountain…nein, danke.

  51. STARSCREAM's Gravatar STARSCREAM
    August 17, 2012 - 8:56 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    So it seems your disbelief in God stems more from a moral complaint rather than scientific doubt. That’s logical since, scientifically speaking, even Stephen Hawking admits that one cannot say for sure that there “is no God,”(Even the one from the ot)
    And I don’t understand how you can once again make a statement only to contradict yourself in the next sentence!lol
    You’ve just admitted that morality through “feeling” leads to a “value” problem. Without God man loses “inherent value” and things like Abortion, Euthanasia, gay rights, and big government oversight become easily rationalized. Maybe thats why the socialist agenda is to wipe away Christian morality for a post-modern belief in moral and cultural relativism as the belief in “nothing” leads to acceptance of everything…aka tolerating the intolerant. What do you think?

  52. Martin's Gravatar Martin
    August 18, 2012 - 5:38 am | Permalink

    @fender:
    As always: by persistence, by sticking at it, by playing a long game.

    When white nationalist parties emerge they get a bit of support for a while but then because “they haven’t done anything” voters desert them and go back to the other parties.

    It’s a bit like the tale of hitting a big rock in order to break it apart. You hit it a thousand times and nothing happens but on the 1001st your effort in weakening it bears fruit.

  53. Noble Lord's Gravatar Noble Lord
    August 18, 2012 - 5:44 am | Permalink

    @TyronRobertParsons:

    It is with great respect for the art of debate that I respond to your latest response to my own, whereby I make it plain that, in terms of a winner and loser in the debate between you and myself, it was pretty much a done deal.

    I do not wish to gloat, or run around as if I scored the vital all important goal in a soccer match, so with all due respect to you and to keep the dialogue open and civil to the point that we may have another debate on an issue of opposing views, or perhaps share the same view against another foe, I have deliberately held back.

    I do so now, but I will just like to correct you on a few issues you have mentioned, as some of these misconceptions can be read by others and without fair challenge, they could be repeated in other company, which would not help the cause of spreading the truth and elevating the minds of the many who are subject to Jew lies and ethnic divisions.

    YOU ASKED ME TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF GENOCIDE CAUCASIANS HAD CAUSED TO OTHERS AND I CITED THE ARAWAK, THE CARIBS and said PERHAPS THE MOHICANS!

    YOU SAID:

    “first off, the Mohicans did not die out. Secondly, many integrated with other Indian tribes. 3rd- one cannot call someone “genocided” when there is a race/culture war and the loser started it!”

    Firstly I did not mention anything about dieing out, I mentioned GENOCIDE caused by Caucasians, of who you wish to lay no blame, as if the history books are not littered with evidence. A peculiar position to take, but be that as It may, myths and legends do get passed around in certain circles.
    The MAHICANS and the MOHEGANS resided in the New York area and around the Hudson river, as I understand it. Those peoples are no more a viable community and we all know who is living in New York today.

    Just recently I watched a documentary of the Irish and how they came to the US and in what condition. I love studying the history of America, good bad and ugly, pardon the borrowed term.

    If one set of people cause the demise of another, it is genocide, albeit the term was created by the Jew Samuel Lemkin. The facts are they are no more, their culture, their language and their homeland!

    It quite possible a few families escaped with their lives and integrated in other tribes, as I understand the scholars, that is highly possible, but to deny it is ridiculous!

    1 – 0

    I POSTED THE LINK BELOW:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/oct/14/australia.features11

    YOU SAID:

    “The UK Guardian is a leftist rag and a Marxist “Jew” blow horn that pushes BS.”

    WHOOOPS!

    It appears as though you have adopted the old Jewish trick, which is NOT TO READ THE ARTICLE, but attack the paper and its owners.

    Unfortunately for you, you would have done better had you read it and passed comment on it, as opposed to dismissing it, because you deem no truth can come from the Guardian, for that is your contention.

    My friend, when I was a youngster, Jews and their helpers used to tell us blacks, not to read the Daily Mail, because it’s racist and in deed we fell in line and missed out on a lot of information and propaganda, we needed to know about.

    The Times is owned by the Jew Rupert Murdoch, but it has an excellent Educational Supplement.

    In case you didn’t know, the Jew will have truthful articles in amongst the lies and deceptions and I should ought not to have brought that to your attention.

    I should take TWO points for that howler, but I’ll settle for a comfy.

    2 – 0

    YOU SAID:

    “The Arawaks and Carin were savage cannibals and were taken as slaves and slaughter by the “Jews” who came there with Columbus after being expelled from Christian Europe for about the 70th time at that point. “

    Here you are doing the Jewish work for him, by perpetuating a myth, which has no evidence to back it up. I speak of your confident allegation and slander to those Arawaks and Carib peoples…Says who?

    Here’s an article you OUGHT to read and when you have, read the RESPONSE by a concerned descendent, correcting the author.

    http://www.webster.edu/~corbetre/haiti/history/precolumbian/tainover.htm

    Columbus, or rather the Jew Cristobal Colon did indeed bring disease and death to these people, but it was not only Jews and you know this full well.

    And please cease this “They started it” narrative, it really isn’t tasteful. Surely you recognize much narrative of history is written by those who wish to justify their crimes, if you do not and see no need for revision on many subjects,

    Hey Presto!

    3 – 0

    I ASKED YOU IF CATHOLICS WERE CHRISTIAN AND YOU FELL FOR THE OKEY DOKEY, IT WAS CLASSIC!

    YOU SAID:

    Yes

    I SAID:

    “Gottcha!

    They are Catholic, Roman Catholic, I will add nothing more, albeit much can be said!”

    To argue against this point is high folly and a TWO pointer!

    YOU SAID:

    “All who call on the Lord Jesus Christ will be saved. You “got” nothing”

    I think your response is a case of Ignorentio Elenchi!

    5 – 0

    YOU SAID:

    “There is no other way to the Father than through Jesus Christ”

    Whilst I agree with the sentiment and not being a perfect person following in “The Way”, which is his way, through him I must give you a quote to consider.

    “Many will say unto me in that day, Lord Lord, have we not prophesised in thy name? and in thy name cast out devils?

    And in thy name done many wonderful works?

    And then I will profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity!

    YOU SAID:

    “iosus Isos Yahushua- Messiah- Jesus Christ- it does not matter how the name is spelled per say, it matters what personality/spirit, one belongs to.”

    It is for that reason I try to train myself to refer to my savior as Yesua, as opposed to what I was taught as a child, which is akin to calling him Oliver, or Ricky Martin.

    You may wish to stand by your, what’s in a name ideology, I just thought I’d share that with you.

    No points scored still 5 – 0

    By the way, you may find this wikipedia link interesting, of course I recognize Wikipedia is not an authoritative source, but there is plenty one can obtain on the net and in libraries, which speak of Caucasian crimes against each other and to other races.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_major_crimes_in_Australia

    I needn’t tell you about the “Wild West” and the Silver mining towns, Gold prospecting towns and the outlaws aplenty and the Jew did not have total power then!

    You want to know about Caucasian crime in England, when Jews didn’t have total power?

    Be my guest!

    My point is that the human family has made errors and one tribe used another tribe, to conquer another tribe, HE COULD NOT on his own have conquered.

    Now he has free reign of the chess board.

    If I can look into issues of historical nature, leaving my ego on the door mat before I enter the house of truth, why can’t WN’s?

    If I can critique black scholars, who in many cases perpetuate myth created by the Jew, why is it WN’s only want to hear what makes their flimsy ego feel good?

    Until you open your mind and are critical of all things narrative and colour coded, that 5 – 0 scoreline will be a regular occurrence, should we debate on issue we have differing opinions on.

    Here’s hoping you still have a sense of humour!

    Emmanuelle!

  54. JA's Gravatar JA
    August 18, 2012 - 7:40 am | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon:

    “Republicanism” in Australia is a non-issue.

    What Republicans effectively want is to replace the Heads of State (the “Governors General” – one federal, 6 state) nominally answerable to the Queen of England (how strange a left-over this seems today!) with 7 Heads of State answerable to the Australian legal system.

    The current appointment by the Queen is purely nominal and she doesn’t intervene – despite the possibility of her doing so in national crises. She didn’t intervene one way or another against the CIA Coup against the Whitlam Government in 1975, so that proves it. The CIA orchestrated the demise of Whitlam’s Australian Labour Party (Federal = Australian) Government because they wanted to “buy back the farm” = the mineral deposits and were doing so by seeking Arab oil money to by-pass the Jew York banks – horror of horrors! – as well as to re-negotiate the terms of the US military and surveillance bases.

    The GG then, Kerr, having been a plaything of the Catholic Groupers – as a lawyer representing their interests in the unions – was also a CIA bum boy. He dismissed the Whitlam government at the behest of the American CIA/State Department; he would also have had the powers to do so as a “republican” appointee or as a head of state nominally appointed by the monarch.

    They want to get rid of the Australian flag with its embarrassing reminder of our British heritage (1938 Commonwealth Yearbook revealed that 98% of Australians had ancestry from the British Isles) – and replace it with some polyglot banality .

    The real issue that the 95% Multi-culti “Republicans” don’t touch is that Australia is owned by foreign Banks and Multinationals. As long as that is the case, “independence” is purely nominal.

  55. Marvelous Spirit's Gravatar Marvelous Spirit
    August 18, 2012 - 9:16 am | Permalink

    @Martin: What about skullduggery , duplicity , terrorism and fanaticism ? You make it sound as if it’s all just hard work . Home bred and ethnic indoctrination and fanaticism is what drives them .

  56. Blake Watts's Gravatar Blake Watts
    August 18, 2012 - 10:06 am | Permalink

    Someone mentioned that learning about this stuff wreaks havoc with one’s health. I’m afraid this is true. When I first discovered the Jewish shenanigans and dug deeper, I became engulfed in horror, disgust, and fierce anger. It’s hard to know what to do with this information in terms of constructive action.

  57. MOB's Gravatar MOB
    August 18, 2012 - 11:42 am | Permalink

    In my comment here, I referenced a 2003 Australian Jewish News article entitled “Jewish Donors Back Main Political Parties.”

    Recently a person not involved in WN said to me, rather impromptu, “if you had to choose a place to relocate to, where do you think it might be?” It’s not difficult to figure out that this person sees the writing on the wall. I waffled.

    In Australia and Scandinavia, the ever forward-thinking Jews are settling themselves into the control positions — staking their claim — against any future arrival of fleeing Whites, an eventuality that they will have anticipated and formally strategized against well in advance.

    That’s my impression.

  58. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 18, 2012 - 2:27 pm | Permalink

    @Noble Lord:

    You said:

    The MAHICANS and the MOHEGANS resided in the New York area and around the Hudson river, as I understand it. Those peoples are no more a viable community and we all know who is living in New York today.

    Answer:

    Yes, and they don’t call it Jew York City for nothing! Besides, you fail to realize the Indians were genociding themselves well before the white man showed up. We inoculated the Indians. We spread the word of Christ to them and all of this in the face of their continued genocidal wars, STARTED BY THEM, against us. We were the first people of the Americas, not they! When we returned with the British Colonies, they genocided the first two settlements and tried a 3rd time but we maintained ourselves. Indians in America NEVER numbered more than 2 million by the time Europeans arrived again. 2 million is not anywhere near a number a peoples can make a claim to 1/5th of the entire land surface of the planet.

    You said

    If one set of people cause the demise of another, it is genocide, albeit the term was created by the Jew Samuel Lemkin. The facts are they are no more, their culture, their language and their homeland!

    Answer

    Yes, they are no more and this is because of their genocidal wars against one another as well as against the white man. Had they accepted the religion of peace and love, had they stopped eating and mass murdering everyone, they would still be a distinct people today. The Mohicans were named by the Mohawks. Mohican means Cannibals in the Mohawk language.

    You said;

    It appears as though you have adopted the old Jewish trick, which is NOT TO READ THE ARTICLE, but attack the paper and its owners.

    Answer:

    I read the article but you are again speaking about man eating savages who’s only known method of warfare is mass murder without distinction of race, gender or age. All of these tribes were notorious slave practicers as well so please stop with the dramatics and start being fairminded about things.

    You said:

    In case you didn’t know, the Jew will have truthful articles in amongst the lies and deceptions and I should ought not to have brought that to your attention.

    Answer;

    Yes, I know that and I am filling in the truth among the lies for you.

    You said:

    Here you are doing the Jewish work for him, by perpetuating a myth, which has no evidence to back it up. I speak of your confident allegation and slander to those Arawaks and Carib peoples…Says who?

    Answer;

    It is well known fact that both were CANNIBALS, just like some of the North American Indian tribes were as were the notorious man eating savages- the Aztecs and others down south
    .
    It is well documented that Jews were on board with Columbus in flight from yet another purging of their slave trading, economic strangling, culturally polluting ways from Christian Europe (in this case Spain again). FYI, 95% of the black transported to the Americas went to Caribbean (word derived from Cannibals), Central and South American JEWISH plantation owners. Only 5% went to America (uSA) and of them, only 1% of northern and 3% of Southern whites owned any. Those who came to America GREATLY benefitted from this Christianizing situation in comparison to their destiny in Africa or in the Jewish plantations to the South of the uSA.

    I present this well documented history of the race war between the Reds and Whites as my final rebuttal to your genocidal white man nonsense.

    http://www.barnesreview.org/index.php?main_page=document_product_info&cPath=89_105&products_id=464

    You said;

    I ASKED YOU IF CATHOLICS WERE CHRISTIAN AND YOU FELL FOR THE OKEY DOKEY, IT WAS CLASSIC!

    Answer:

    Are you trying to say that all people who identify as Catholics are not Christian? Christ will do the separating between those who really belong to him or not. It is not up to me or you to do that especially in a broad brush fashion which is exactly what you are attempting to do.

    You said:

    I needn’t tell you about the “Wild West” and the Silver mining towns, Gold prospecting towns and the outlaws aplenty and the Jew did not have total power then!

    Answer:

    Actually, during much of the settlement of the West the “Jews” did control a lot of the press and they also controlled America financially with the Crown through the Corporation UNITED STATES 1871. It is then American whites were enslaved to the Banking Jews/Crown alliance as they directed their newly aquired colony to break all the treaties and push the remaining Indians into Reservations.

    Yes, under and under predominately white rule in our States and Communities it sure was a grand time…your point?

    You said:

    You want to know about Caucasian crime in England, when Jews didn’t have total power?Be my guest!

    Answer:

    I have continually repeated how whites do have their sins. I have continually repeated how we did have crime. I continually repeated that I am saying our peace, creativity and prosperity IN COMPARISON to all other races, cultures and nations is the context in which I am speaking; so stop trying to muddy the waters. If we were so horrible and crime ridden and backwaterish, why do all the races, nations and cultures continue to want to come here? Why are YOU here?

    Blessings…

  59. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 18, 2012 - 3:23 pm | Permalink

    @Blake Watts: Truer words were never written.

  60. STARSCREAM's Gravatar STARSCREAM
    August 18, 2012 - 5:05 pm | Permalink

    @Blake Watts:
    “Let us therefore animate and encourage each other, and show the world that a free man, contending for his liberty on his own ground, is superior to any slavish mercenary on earth.” George Washington, July 2, 1776

  61. Noble Lord's Gravatar Noble Lord
    August 18, 2012 - 5:38 pm | Permalink

    @TyronRobertParsons:

    I find your thinking fascinating, yet at the same time disappointing, which is a shame, but I’ll explain.

    You appear to forget that our debate is being watched, read and considered by anyone interested in witnessing this debate, remember, a negroid/me and a Caucasian/you.

    The score thus far is a comfortable 5-0 in my favour, with regards to points levelled against your position of which you haven’t managed to muster a single point!

    YOU ALLEGE:

    “Indians were genociding themselves well before the white man showed up”

    Really, so who were the peoples they genocided and can you cite a reference or two?

    YOU ALLEGE:

    “We inoculated the Indians”

    Really, against European Caucasian Smallpox and other diseases? How nice, again post thum there references for thum thur mighty claims of yours!

    YOU ALLEGE:

    “We spread the word of Christ to them and all of this in the face of their continued genocidal wars, STARTED BY THEM, against us.”

    I see you REEEEALLY need to believe this, so I’ll allow you to continue rocking to and fro with your comfort blanket.

    YOU ALLEGE:

    “We were the first people of the Americas, not they! When we returned with the British Colonies, they genocided the first two settlements and tried a 3rd time but we maintained ourselves.”

    At this point you begin to sound EXACTLY like some of those fake, Jew troll, misinformers who claim to be Afro centric, or some weak morals, flimsy ego Garveyites, that need to create a fake history, like being the first here there and everywhere!

    I get the feeling you’re still rocking to and fro, with all those man eating cannibals, who happen to genocide themselves off, as they resist the benevolent hand of a people who wish to inoculate them from, from, from er er er Malaria, naaaah Aids!

    YOU SAID:

    “I present this well documented history of the race war between the Reds and Whites as my final rebuttal to your genocidal white man nonsense”

    THEN YOU POST THIS!

    http://www.barnesreview.org/index.php?main_page=document_product_info&cPath=89_105&products_id=464

    Hey presto, the pied piper of propaganda buried deep within The Barnes Review, well he’s featured actually!lmao

    Hmmmm Arthur Kemp, did you read his article TYRONE, DID YOU?

    REMEMBER YOU SAID THIS!!!!!

    “I present this well documented history of the race war between the Reds and Whites as my final rebuttal to your genocidal white man nonsense”

    If you consider that bloke a serious academic researcher, then really any joker can wind you up with their flights of fancy!

    No questions asked, just believe, no source references, just propaganda, akin to Iraqi’s throwing babies out of incubators, wmd, 6 million murdered Jews, loch freakin Ness monster!

    I think anyone reading this will feel a bit peeved at your performance here and if like you, they too were easily lead!

    LASTLY PHEEEEEW!

    I ASKED YOU IF THOUGHT CATHOLICS WERE CHRISTIAN AND YOU FELL FOR THE OKEY DOKEY, IT WAS CLASSIC!

    YOU CLEARLY DON’T GET IT, SOOOOO

    YOU SAID:

    “Are you trying to say that all people who identify as Catholics are not Christian? Christ will do the separating between those who really belong to him or not. It is not up to me or you to do that especially in a broad brush fashion which is exactly what you are attempting to do.”

    Roman Catholics call themselves Roman Catholics, if you are a Christian you call your self a Christian, Mormons call themselves Mormons!

    The word Catholic means throughout the whole, i.e., universal, hence Constantine merged many pagan customs bringing them all into a brand!

    Anyone can leave a brand and seek The Way, through Yesua, but some reeeeeally need their rituals and comfy blankets.
    I condemn no man, we all start some where.

    Finally, YOU SAID:

    “I have continually repeated how whites do have their sins. I have continually repeated how we did have crime. I continually repeated that I am saying our peace, creativity and prosperity IN COMPARISON to all other races, cultures and nations is the context in which I am speaking; so stop trying to muddy the waters. If we were so horrible and crime ridden and backwaterish, why do all the races, nations and cultures continue to want to come here? Why are YOU here?”

    Your caveat “In Comparison” is without merit and if the source you posted has anything to go by, dang, you are in serious trouble!

    India had a band of murderers that used to rob and strangle strangers and that is where the word Thug comes from, as they were called Thugees.

    I’m sure King Shaka killed his enemies, as he is said to have been a military genius.

    Mao Tse Tung sacrificed millions of his own people in order to rid his nation from the grip of those who forced his nation into being hooked on opium and under the boot.

    NO NATION IS PERFECT AND I AM HERE TO WAKEN YOU FROM YOUR DREAM.

    We need the Caucasian grassroots to be awake for this one and right now your response above sounds like a teenager telling his mum he doesn’t want to wake up yet!lol

    There have been tribes of people, for reasons I cannot fathom who have cannibalized their enemies, even ex homosexual boyfriends, but the convenient demonizing of people one juuuuust happens need out of the way, well….

    I forgot to ask you in my last post, please provide a reference for Pontius Pilates description of Jesus/Yesua, I’m sure you were pulling my leg there.
    I think you get my point.

    Emmanuelle!

  62. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    August 19, 2012 - 12:34 am | Permalink

    @Noble Lord:

    I have my source and you can believe them or not. I am not going to post a 5 page relay- you have your mind made up and think you’re “winning something”- no skin off my back. Last post to you on this board.

    Nuff said…
    Blessings

  63. Werner Fischer's Gravatar Werner Fischer
    August 29, 2012 - 8:29 pm | Permalink

    Importent message :

    “But if a stable foundation is to be laid for a great future, one on which coming generations may build, ancient tradition must continue effective. That which we have in our blood by inheritance – namely wordless ideas – is the only thing which gives permanence to our future.”

    Oswald Spengler in “The Hour of Decision”

2 Trackbacks to "The War on White Australia: A Case Study in the Culture of Critique, Part 2 of 5"

  1. on August 17, 2012 at 3:47 pm
  2. on August 25, 2012 at 2:21 am

Comments are closed.