Maureen Dowd on Slithering Neocons: Why Isn’t the ADL Outraged?

Kevin MacDonald

Maureen Dowd recently wrote a column dripping with what is routinely labeled “anti-Semitism” by the ADL and other guardians of political correctness  (“Neocons Slither Back“). Most commentators (see here) focused on her claim that Dan Senor is Mitt Romney’s guru on all things related to Israel. Jeffrey Goldberg weighs in:

Maureen may not know this, but she is peddling an old stereotype, that gentile leaders are dolts unable to resist the machinations and manipulations of clever and snake-like Jews. (Later, Hounshell wrote, “(A)mazing that apparently nobody sat her down and said, this is not OK.”)

This sinister stereotype became a major theme in the discussion of the Iraq war, when critics charged that Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith, among other Jewish neoconservatives, were actually in charge of Bush Administration foreign policy. This charge relegated George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell, Stephen Hadley and the other Christians who actually set policy to the status of puppets.

Of course, no one would say there was anything sinister about saying that Karl Rove had inordinate influence on Bush on domestic issues. It’s only a problem when a Jew is said to have influence; the implicit (ridiculous) theory is that no Jew could ever have a strong influence on a president, especially on issues related to Jewish ethnic interests—prototypically Israel. As usual, the actual facts are irrelevant. Simply saying that a Jew has such influence crosses the line—even though Dowd never mentions that Senor is a Jew.


The fact is that Bush was a naif who had no business being president. The following is from my review of Jacob Heilbrunn’s They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons:

Heilbrunn also has some nice nuggets on George Bush’s naiveté in the area of foreign policy. The first time [Richard Perle] met Bush, he immediately sensed that he was different from his father. Two things were clear to Perle: one was that Bush didn’t know much about foreign policy and another was that he wasn’t too embarrassed to confess it. Like Wolfowitz, Perle admired Bush’s ability, as he saw it, to cut to the heart of the matter rather than become mesmerized by Washington policy talk. (p. 230) The fact that Bush was a babe in the woods on foreign policy was seen as a plus by the neocons. “In August 1999 an excited Wolfowitz told me over lunch . . . that Bush had the ability to penetrate the dense fog of foreign policy expertise to ask a simple question. ‘Tell me what I need to know? [sic]’ Bush, Wolfowitz said, was ‘another Scoop Jackson’” (p. 230)—a comment that certainly doesn’t reflect well on Jackson. Although Heilbrunn states that we can never know for certain what was going on in Bush’s brain in the days and months after 9/11, his comment that Bush “moved further and further into the web that the neoconservatives had woven around him” (p. 235) seems reasonable.

Bush was in way over his head and was a sitting duck for the neocons. And a big part of the web they wove consisted of falsified or cherry-picked intelligence reports engineered by Douglas Feith, David Wurmser and Abram Schulsky, and presided over by Paul Wolfowitz. As to the other “Christians” who actually made the decision to invade Iraq, Heilbrunn notes that “the movement’s non-Jewish members were largely bound to the group by a shared commitment to the largest, most important Jewish cause: the survival of Israel” (p. 69). This may be correct in some cases (quite possibly Henry Jackson). But “it is often quite difficult to separate such sentiments from the personal and professional attractions of being involved in neoconservative networks.”

Quite simply, at least by the time of the Clinton administration, the neocons had become the only foreign policy game in town within the Republican Party. Going with the flow had a lot of benefits and no costs—exactly the reason why the vast majority of politicians support the Israel Lobby. The power of the Lobby stems from their creating a situation where support for their policies is a no brainer for any ambitious politician.

I don’t think that Romney is anywhere near as naive or unschooled on foreign policy as Bush. But neither does he have any strong principles. He is one of the politicians described above—looking for ways to ingratiate himself with the media and the big money, and one-upping Obama on Israel is a natural strategy. I rather doubt it will work. Netanyahu is widely seen as having overplayed his hand in demanding the U.S. wage war on behalf of Israel. As Stephen Walt notes in arguing that the Israel Lobby is still alive and powerful, “That is one hell of an ask, of course, and sometimes when you demand the moon you don’t get it” (“How (not) to hide the elephant in the room.” Wasn’t the 100,000 dead, trillion dollar war in Iraq enough? (BTW, if you think Goldberg is outrageous, check out Walt’s target, David Rothkopf. The good news is that even supposedly sophisticated defenders of Israel (Rothkopf is CEO of Foreign Policy) are so out of touch with reality that they have become deliciously easy targets.)

But there is something else in Dowd’s column that one would think would send the ADL into a tizzy. Describing the foreign policy advocated by Senor, she writes:

A moral, muscular foreign policy; a disdain for weakness and diplomacy; a duty to invade and bomb Israel’s neighbors; a divine right to pre-emption — it’s all ominously familiar.

So an American Jew is demanding a foreign policy where the U.S. has “a duty to invade and bomb Israel’s neighbors.” What happened to all the blather about promoting democracy and freedom that has been the staple of neocon rationales for rearranging the politics of the Middle East in Israel’s favor? You know the line: It’s not about the interests of Israel. It’s about doing good for all humanity.

Dowd clearly crossed a line here, not even mentioning how Senor himself would propagandize his policy recommendations. Instead she implies that Senor is simply trying to advance Israel’s interests. This is a flagrant example of the loyalty issue—that Senor’s main loyalty is to Israel even though he has a powerful position in American politics.

This is exactly the sort of thing that the ADL goes after tooth and nail. We expect to see condemnations and demands that the offending person be fired forthwith. Followed usually by abject apologies.

A search of the ADL’s website does indeed find a complaint about Dowd. It’s a letter to the NYTimes on a column she wrote in 2009 about our predatory financial elite:

While one can agree or disagree with Maureen Dowd’s portrayal of Goldman Sachs and other bankers (column, Nov. 11), her statement that “the bankers who took government money and then gave out obscene bonuses are the same self-interested sorts Jesus threw out of the temple” potentially raises one of the classic themes of anti-Semitism linking Jews and abhorrent money-lending practices.

However unintentional, Ms. Dowd’s invoking the New Testament story to illustrate our current financial mess conjures up old prejudices against Jews.

I rather doubt that the vast majority of Dowd’s liberal non-Jewish readers made the connection. The ADL’s angst was doubtless fueled by the reality that in fact Jews are vastly overrepresented (see here and here) among the predatory financial elite. The ADL operatives are holed up in their bunker assuming that all non-Jews immediately make these connections, when the reality is that such connections are far more likely to be made by Jews than your typical terrified and cowed intelligent non-Jew whose bible is the NYTimes and who loves liberal columnists like Dowd.

So if they were so touchy about any hint that Jews were involved in the financial scandals, why give her a pass on this one?

I don’t know. But it may be that the ADL is hoping the entire thing will just go away. Sometimes the ignoring strategy is best. Since everyone who is paying attention knows full well that in fact Senor and other prominent Jewish neocons are promoting foreign policy that is in their ethnic interest, at some point they lose credibility. And the incredible chutzpah of Netanyahu in more or less demanding that the U.S. go to war with Iran makes it pretty difficult to maintain that Israel has nothing to do with it. Plus the fact that Dowd is notoriously liberal and thus generally on the same side as the Jewish community on domestic issues.

And some people are just too big to bring down easily, so there is a certain risk in attacking Dowd—that such attacks will result in a loss of credibility. There’s definitely an art to continually lying through your teeth that black is white and expecting people to fall in line when the results are completely contrary to their interests. You have to pick your battles and hope that things don’t get too out of control.

But having said that, the fact that they avoided this battle may be a sign that the organized Jewish community is on the defensive on the role of Jews in U.S. foreign policy. It’s about time.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

131 Comments to "Maureen Dowd on Slithering Neocons: Why Isn’t the ADL Outraged?"

  1. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    October 8, 2012 - 1:24 am | Permalink

    @Fred: “Let’s get the (procreative verb) out of the Middle East, and just buy their oil. Israel, save yourself. Jews, get the fork out of my wallet. Christian Zionists and all the rest of you religious whackos, get your miniscule crania out of your collective recti.

    I don’t think my Latin is very good. :-D ”

    Fred, I luv ya!

    What a breath of fresh air you are!

  2. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    October 8, 2012 - 1:13 am | Permalink

    @arthurdecco: I’ve waited literally days for some form of legitimate rebuttal to my white-hot criticisms of the circle-jerkers I have accused of destroying our white struggle for justice on this site with their petty, ignominious grievances and assaults against the opinions of those they don’t like and their narcissistic preening of each other in lieu of practical solutions to our collective dilemma.

    Their silence is telling, isn’t it? I wonder how many of them are actually employed by our hate-filled opponents and therefore, how many of them now find themselves incapable of mounting any form of legitimate defense against my legitimate accusations because “their emperor wears no clothes”?

    “Pitiful” and “lackluster” are two words that come to mind when I think of how these third-rate thinkers deal with the Real Challenges and Ideas that face us.

    Here’s a blast from the past that honestly-concerned readers here may appreciate from one of the many intelligent and perceptive persons no longer dealing with the cabal of petty squabblers who infest this site:

    Hal February 16, 2011 – 4:57 pm | Permalink

    “I probably should have mentioned that in fact White people, and probably only White people, do get motivated by abstractions, as at least one commenter mentioned.”

    Yes, it was I who wrote it, and you’ll note the immediate “thumbs down” swarming the comment. As I’ve mentioned here before, Professor – and I say this not in a smarmy way but with genuine, and respectful, curiosity – why can’t you further apply your excellent research to what you call “Whites”? It is clearly something in them that allows their parasitization and manipulation by everyone’s favorite market-dominant minorities. We all get the Jew by this point – now what about his lackey, his enforcer? Somehow the problem lies in the interface between the two, both biologically and culturally.

    If you ever did pursue such a course, I’d guess there’d be initial problems, since the term “White” is so nebulous, but after dealing with the specific Caucasian subsets that are most susceptible to advancing others EGIs (i.e. Anglo-Saxons, Scandinavians) one would hope that any genetically-based characteristics you discover could be, somehow, bred out. Maybe they’re already being bred out.

    Like Ernst Nolte said, something the revolutionaries in Germany tried to expunge among their own people was the quality of transcendence, the bizarre belief that this world doesn’t matter. Few people on this board want to examine ourselves, note our flaws, and take steps to correct them. They’re content to proclaim something about how great we are – Beethoven! Chartres! Science! – then click a thumbs down button on somebody who asks, “Well, if we’re so great, why in this position?”

    With the exception of a few, this site is a place for complainers, reactionaries, and Christians, all reading an article about Jews, commenting, waiting for the next article about Jews, commenting on that, etc…as they’re scrubbed from the face of the world, fists clenched. They’re the 98 pound weaklings who, instead of taking Charles Atlas up on his offer, just keep getting the sand kicked in their faces day in, day out, and whining, and blaming the bully, and getting the sand kicked in their faces again, and blaming the bully, and so on and so on.

  3. Fred's Gravatar Fred
    October 3, 2012 - 12:33 pm | Permalink

    @mark green: Mark–are you saying Richard Gere isn’t a Hebe? C’mon look at those Upper Incisors. Ever wonder why Hebes “dentalize” their speech? Gere’s is about at Jewish as one can look. Remember Eli Wallach? The rest of what you wrote is flawless. Keep the faith.

    As for the rest of the comments, I would say there is hope for white America, but then, just after I have that thought, I realize what a tiny, almost sub-atomic minorirty you intelligent and erudite readers/writers are. Sic semper any society that lets the untermensch (Sp?) in through the flood-gates. My Scots ancestors, many of whom were Carnegiesque, were revolted by the Eastern Europeans and Hebes that just FLOODED this country. They knew that the single most impactful Jewish invention was socialism/communism. Look at who ran the Russian Revolution! They also equated Freudianism with the fall of the self-assured WASP. Thanks Jews, for all the goodies you gave us. I loath the Marxist Mulatto, but he may yet save us from the Hebes. Of course, he will also kill off all of Olde Phartes in the bargain.

    Let’s get the (procreative verb) out of the Middle East, and just buy their oil. Israel, save yourself. Jews, get the fork out of my wallet. Christian Zionists and all the rest of you religious whackos, get your miniscule crania out of your collective recti.

    I don’t think my Latin is very good. :-D

  4. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    October 2, 2012 - 11:07 pm | Permalink

    …The usual suspects remain silent despite my valid questions…including Professor MacDonald…

    I understand your unwillingness to engage in a lively and honest discussion. How could you? …And win, I mean?…because it’s all about winning with you people, isn’t it? It’s not about exchanging ideas or learning anything you didn’t know before, is it?

    Here we are… A PEOPLE! – a Genetic Singularity Besieged!…and our defenders, (at least on this site), are for the most part cretins, judgmental racists, potential terrorists, whining complainers and screeching hasbarabots.

    Of course there are many contributors here who aren’t remotely the defective personages I have described above. I can’t name you all but intelligent people know who I’m referring to. The problem is that healthy, informed people don’t generally comment and if they do their comments are ignored by the circle-jerkers who have taken over the site.

    I’m guessing that’s why we’re in the fix we’re in – idiots and narcissists control our dialogue, no matter what the venue, no matter what the media…

    By the way, can anyone explain why I no longer receive email notifications about new articles and blog posts?

    Surely it’s not because I have publicly disagreed with the Greek Chorus of sycophants who pollute these pages these days ?

    Tell me it ain’t so…

  5. Eumaeus's Gravatar Eumaeus
    October 2, 2012 - 4:17 pm | Permalink

    Maureen’s no threat except that she did invoke the image of snakelike jew meddlers. it’s a very Catholic image and the idea of red haired irish Catholics hating on jews again makes them wet the bed. The idea one that someone as visible as Maureen would resort to that, in either the case of the slimy jew banksters, or in the case of ratfaced Dan Senor, makes them very uneasy. Its no great threat to them, but it does make their paranoid fantasies of poisecyooshun come to life again.

  6. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    October 2, 2012 - 12:38 pm | Permalink

    A few points I disagree with in the original article by Professor MacDonald:

    Quote: “Wasn’t the 100,000 dead… in Iraq enough?”

    It has been widely reported that the death toll in Iraq approached 1.4 million people. That is actually a conservative estimate based on readily available information and doesn’t include the 5 million who were displaced by the illegal war and the still-ongoing acts of terrorism instigated and encouraged by the USA and Israel and their rag-tag collection of criminal co-conspirators who were themselves afraid of the consequences of ignoring the orders and threats of the Rothschild cabal.

    What is the source of your unrealistically low death figure, Professor MacDonald?

    Quote: “The ADL operatives are holed up in their bunker assuming that all non-Jews immediately make these connections, when the reality is that such connections are far more likely to be made by Jews than your typical terrified and cowed intelligent non-Jew whose bible is the NYTimes and who loves liberal columnists like Dowd.”

    I find it impossible to describe “your typical terrified and cowed…non-Jew whose bible is the NYTimes and who loves liberal columnists like Dowd” as “intelligent”. Indoctrinated, perhaps…

    They may be educated. They may be members of the professional classes. They may be financially secure. They may live in nice neighborhoods and drive expensive cars and have letters after their names but they are not remotely intelligent – not if their “bible” is the NYTImes – a racist, propagandizing rag filled with lies wrapped up in a nice suit topped off with a hand-painted tie.

    We need to define our terms:

    1 a : having or indicating a high or satisfactory degree of intelligence and mental capacity
    b : revealing or reflecting good judgment or sound thought : skillful

    2 a : possessing intelligence
    b : guided or directed by intellect : rational

    (1) : the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations : reason; also : the skilled use of reason (2) : the ability to apply knowledge to manipulate one’s environment or to think abstractly as measured by objective criteria

    Do these definitions of intelligent and intelligence describe a typical reader of a yellow rag like the New York Times?

    Of course they don’t.

  7. October 2, 2012 - 10:19 am | Permalink


    “Never did I EVER imagine I would see white people who looked like that on the streets of Chicago, let alone in small towns throughout the Midwest. ”

    I saw it in the Southwest when I lived there. Not only men, but women, all sleeved out. All over the back. And they would admire each other’s tattoos. Then there were the men who would have nothing to with such women. It was from them I first heard the words “tramp stamps.”

  8. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    October 2, 2012 - 8:42 am | Permalink

    @Athanasius: So you’ve seen such things, too? I’m not sure whether to feel supported or even more depressed by your confirmation of my experience.

    @Athanasius: “Busy” is not a strange or unintelligible word to me, I am glad to say. One of the traditional counsels now widely considered an empty truism is that obligations ought to come first. Indeed they should.

    Whenever your time permits—if indeed it does—I shall be very glad to get your list.

  9. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    October 2, 2012 - 2:37 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: PS- I haven’t forgotten to write something about the Byzantines and their manner of dealing with Jews, but I want to be accurate, and I’ve been rather busy lately.

  10. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    October 2, 2012 - 2:32 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: I’m probably a little older than the “young” posters in here, and I went to primary school in the middle of nowhere, so I remember spending hours and hours pouring over National Geographics in the school library. I was fascinated, to be honest, shocked, by the pictures of tribal african and new guinean peoples and the strange things they did to their bodies.

    Never did I EVER imagine I would see white people who looked like that on the streets of Chicago, let alone in small towns throughout the Midwest.

  11. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 2, 2012 - 1:29 am | Permalink

    @shrug: Good comment.

  12. shrug's Gravatar shrug
    October 1, 2012 - 4:23 pm | Permalink

    Netanyahu wants Romney to lose and has cleverly positioned Obama as the “peace” candidate. Americans were fooled by this same ruse to get the US into world wars 1 and 2.

    Nuttyahoo’s ridiculous cartoon bomb presentation at the UN and repeated insistance that the US attack Iran makes Romney look like Israel’s stooge. Netanyahu deliberately sunk Romney’s chances.

    The ruse is a replay of what the jews did to get Woodrow Wilson and FDR elected. We now know that both men were jew tools but were sold on the promise they’d ‘keep us out of the war.’ Now the media is portraying Obama as the the anti-war candidate standing up to the bully warmonger.

    There is no disagreement or hatred between Obama and Netanyahu. This charade was necessary because Obama was losing and Romney was gaining.

    Jews do not want America to attack Iran, they want a war against white Americans and know Obama is fully onboard with that but Romney isn’t.

  13. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    September 30, 2012 - 10:59 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: Just to be clear, I think the Japanese are going to be facing their own crisis, too. Public debt/GDP > 230% is nose-bleed stuff, especially if interest rates shift from their current near zero levels.

  14. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 30, 2012 - 4:43 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: I would bank on the young to Alice, if it weren’t for one thing. They have nothing to compare their plight to. They think having to pay criminal banks twenty years for their college loans is normal, because they don’t know there was a time that this was NOT NORMAL. They think massive crime, that they will increasingly be victims of, is always how the U.S. was. They think going to fight in the Mid East is the same as their grandparents or greatgrand parents fighting in WW 11. They cannot compare what the left has done to this country the past sixty years, with how the country used to be, and that’s why they accept the things they do.

  15. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 30, 2012 - 4:36 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: No doubt it will be crisis that dictates policy. But what I’m saying is that “crisis” is a relative word, and interpreted differently by different people. For example, let’s look at a physical crisis, the Fukashima disaster. The Japanese government has been lying to the Japanese people on a daily basis, and the people have largely accepted the lies, and despite large portions of Japan being poisened, LIFE IS GOING ON, ISN’T IT?

    Now let’s talk Americans–us. What would define a “crisis”, to the average American? Would it be losing his/her car? Would it be paying three dollars for an apple? Would it be forking out 8 dollars for a gallon of gas? What would it take for Americans to think they are in a crisis, in light of all of the crap Americans have already taken– losing their investments to criminal banks and Wall Street Corporations (401K’s), being forced to accept almost 0 interest rates on the money they have saved, being forced to finance millions upon millions of Mexican Nationals here illegally in terms of Social Services that Americans paid into and now are being eaten up by others that didn’t pay squat, etc.etc.etc.

    Well, I think you know the answers to those question. NOTHING HAS MOVED AMERICANS TO TAKE ANY ACTION AGAINST ANY OF THIS. So therefore, knowing this, the elite will continue to manipulate each crisis in a way they know that the ignorant, McDonalds, Burger King, Coke/Pepsi drinking, football watching, boozed up American public will accept. Can’t you see that Americans will accept almost any abomination, short of having football, baseball ,or basketball cancelled along with their hotdogs, pizza, and beer taken away?

  16. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    September 30, 2012 - 3:49 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:Clinton was not any more attentive to the Israel lobby than Obama is. The difference in Israel’s behaviour back then was caused by Israel’s position being weaker, and subsequently being strengthened by the destruction of Iraq. Look at the career of Dennis Ross (I can’t find it but think I recall Ross being mentioned in one of Professor MacDonald’s articles as being part of an organisation that urged Jews to marry only other Jews). Ross was Middle East coordinator under President Bill Clinton. At the 2000 Camp David Summit Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak made a proposal for a final settlement. Dennis Ross reportedly said that if Barak offered any more he would oppose the deal. Ross was a principal author of presidential candidate Barack Obama’s address on the Middle East to AIPAC in June 2008. He was the official in charge of the Middle East and Iran until a year ago.

    WASHINGTON, Sep 7 2012 (IPS) – The Democratic National Convention erupted in controversy this week over the removal of a clause in the party platform stating that Jerusalem should remain Israel’s undivided capital and only grew worse when the wording was hastily re-inserted.[…] Barack Obama, in a 2008 speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the major pro-Israel lobbying group, said that Jerusalem must remain undivided, but quickly backtracked and has since held to a policy of keeping Jerusalem as a final status issue.

    The ostensible Obama administration policy is the status of Jerusalem remains to be settled as part of a final agreement. The reality is Obama is sticking with what Ross wrote for him. And there is going to be no offer for a final agreement that the Palestinians could accept. What was offered back in 2000 is far more than the Palestinians could get now that so many of their allies like Iraq and Syria have been taken down or tottering on the brink. Obama will take out Iran, and then he’ll find that Israel won’t make any of the meaningful concessions he had been led to expect.

  17. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    September 30, 2012 - 9:29 am | Permalink

    @Bobby: @Trenchant:

    My crystal ball is a bit cloudy this morning so I cannot predict if the decline will be fast or slow. The only thing I know for sure is that the decline will be the real test of our mettle – do we still have what it takes to shape our own destiny or will we meekly submit? Personally, I am banking on the young – they have been patient for far long.

  18. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    September 30, 2012 - 4:01 am | Permalink

    @Bobby:Economic disaster is ineluctable, the bets have already been laid. Markets go up by the escalator, down by the elevator, fear being even more powerful an emotion than greed. Slow, tedious would be lovely but improbable, in the sense that the problems are so widespread and deep-rooted that the political temptation is to attempt no prophylactic action, and therefore it will be crisis that dictates policy.

  19. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 30, 2012 - 1:00 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Very commonsense reply Alice, so typical of your wisdom. Yes, European-Americans have much to blame themselves for, but blame itself will never help them. Only some sort of mass awakening will, and for now I don’t see it. As long as the average person has his brew, football, some pizza, heh, what’s to get excited about? Who wants to leave their comforable couch and go protest the decay of their nation, when all these comforts are around? I disagree with those posters here who say that there will be some catastrophic sudden collapse. The leadership won’t allow that. They are too good at managing chaos by now. The elite saw clearly that Americans 401K’s were lost to the corrupt banks and Wall Streeet to the tune of billions of dollars, they also saw how unconcerned the public was when General Motors was bailed out with Americans taxes, and now is becoming China Motors, and still no outcry from citizens. No, there won’t be a sudden collapse, just a slow, tedious decline in living standards, rights, and overall quality of life, until we are solidly third world. What happens after that is anyones guess.

  20. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    September 29, 2012 - 11:49 pm | Permalink

    I am inclined to think that the ugliness of this year’s election cycle is an indication of the death throes of the current system. We have long been warned that democracy always breaks down when the majority realizes they can vote themselves benefits.

    As to who is most responsible for our current jobless state – I suppose it starts with who you blame first. Our elites have certainly betrayed the country, but unions and everyone who cheerfully gets a bargain at Walmart or the dollar store has a hand in it too.

    Personally, I place the most blame on our loss of a sense of pride. There was a time, not so long ago, when a man would do extraordinary things to avoid having his family undergo the shame of charity. Now, far too many people feel that the one who does not get in line for any possible handout is the fool. We are in a sad state indeed.

  21. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 29, 2012 - 11:31 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Oh, I completely agree with Romney on the 47 percent. But I like to look at the big picture, not just a part of it. For example, WHY, pray tell, is there a 47 percent? Is it entirely because 47 percent of Americans are simply deadbeats, lazy, and stupid? Why not 23 percent? What I’m getting at Mr. and Mrs. American voter is, could it be that since the Republican Party,(yes, the democrats too but Romney is supposedly speaking Republicanese), has been extremely energetic OUTSOURCERS of jobs and factories, as well as INSOURCES of people but no factories, is the reason that at least a good part of the 47 percent are Americans who want to work but cannot now find a job that pays enough to keep a roof over their heads, and 3 square a day.

    Perhaps before the OUTSOURCING OF FACTORIES(read JOBS)and the insourcing of people, by OUR TRAITOROUS ELITE, there was only a 17 percent number of lazy, government dependent types–you know, like the polticians in Washington D.C.!!!

    To my way of thinking, that’s the other side of the coin, THAT NEITHER THE REPUBLI-“CONS”, nor the DEMOC-“RATS” are eager to bring up during this “election”.

  22. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    September 29, 2012 - 10:26 pm | Permalink

    @Tom: I know some jews that are finally aware that the demographic change in America is not good for the jews. Obama “unfriendly” atitude to isreal has been a wake up call to them.

  23. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    September 29, 2012 - 11:39 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: I am grateful for your explanation, Mr. Ryckaert.

  24. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    September 29, 2012 - 10:17 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    I am certainly no fan of Mitt Romney, but his 47% remark was accurate. It is certainly no accident that the majority of those you meet are dependent on government.

    Despite the questionable neighbors, I am delighted to hear you are well enough to go on vacation. It seems to have done you a world of good.

    As both of you have mentioned the sad exhibition of white trash, I would add that this is the inevitable result of the inability to publicly discriminate – on any basis. I cannot tell you how many times I was admonished in my childhood to act like a lady or not to do something because it was trashy. Tiresome as it was then, there was both truth and wisdom in those admonitions.

  25. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 29, 2012 - 10:16 am | Permalink


    I do not have high expectations for the younger generation of Southerners: go to virtually any Walmart and you will see 5-6 fat white sows pushing around their half-breed spawn while daddy (if he’s there at all) is digging for his EBT card. Not to mention big evangelical churches are starting to prominently display posters of happy mixed race couples. Males either ape (no pun intended) the blacks or become hopeless infatuated with wrestling or some other fad. Basically the common whites, who were once proud, hard working people, are merging with the ever expanding black population to form a single, amorphous trash heap.

    I live way north and it is the same.
    It is no wonder since white kids have been completely demoralized. They have absolutely nothing to look up to.

    Just the other day I saw a series of white women who were quite obese carting around a collection of half breeds who had the faces not of their mothers but of the long gone black sperm donors who have graced society with more of their contribution to society. I really don’t know what these women are thinking. Even if they are fat they could try to mate up and not down. You’d think they would have eyes to see what they are producing. It’s not a pretty picture.

  26. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 29, 2012 - 10:14 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    If I may try to answer this question. As far as I know the term Amerikwa denotes America as descended into primitivity ( mostly due to its Blacks). The sound combination Kwa evokes African associations.
    Amerikwa is often shortened to Kwa or the Kwa from which terms such as Amerikwan and kwanservative are derived.

    There is also a term kahnservative denoting Jewish pseudo conservatives of the neo-con sort.

  27. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    September 29, 2012 - 9:45 am | Permalink

    @Mark White: Would you be good enough to explain to me what the significance of such spellings as “kwanservative” and “Amerikwan” is? I see them frequently on these threads, and it took me a while to realize that they weren’t mere keyboarding errors.

  28. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    September 29, 2012 - 9:42 am | Permalink

    @Marcus: How terribly sad. There’s a lot of that here, too. A few days ago I saw a tattoo-covered white trash 18-year-old working at a supermarket checkout counter. Each of his earlobes, pierced and stretched open with cylinders the size of a screwdriver handle, extended about four inches below the body of the pinna. Change his skin color and he might have been an African Bushman.

    I couldn’t keep the dismay and disgust I felt off my face, but he was too thick to notice my reaction. Just as well, perhaps; he might have been pleased to see it.

  29. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    September 29, 2012 - 12:53 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    I do not have high expectations for the younger generation of Southerners: go to virtually any Walmart and you will see 5-6 fat white sows pushing around their half-breed spawn while daddy (if he’s there at all) is digging for his EBT card. Not to mention big evangelical churches are starting to prominently display posters of happy mixed race couples. Males either ape (no pun intended) the blacks or become hopeless infatuated with wrestling or some other fad. Basically the common whites, who were once proud, hard working people, are merging with the ever expanding black population to form a single, amorphous trash heap.

  30. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    September 29, 2012 - 12:15 am | Permalink

    Nuttyahoo made a clown of himself at the UN.

    Even some Amerikwans are understanding that the Iraq war was for israel.

  31. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    September 28, 2012 - 11:34 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: I quite agree with this analysis, Alice. Not coincidentally, it aligns perfectly with Athanasius’s oft-repeated reminder of the importance of controlling the narrative (now that’s a mantra I could get behind). One billionaire with an interest in our narrative and a willingness to buy the requisite media access might turn the tide. But when will he turn up?

    A personal note. I’ve spent most of September on Cape Cod, as the guest of a friend of fifty years’ standing. Most of the people I see are white and Christian, though Jewish numbers and, what is much worse, Jewish influence have grown exponentially hereabouts since I first visited in the early eighties. Yet as decent and neighborly as most of these people are, they have been thoroughly corrupted by a belief in the efficacy, indeed the necessity, of mainstream politics. No parody of the People’s Republic of Massachusetts even comes close to the reality of the situation: political signs (“Vote for Elizabeth Warren”; “Reelect Obama”) disfigure two-thirds of the front lawns, and virtually every overheard conversation reveals people who now work for the government or are retired (usually too bloody early for the taxpayers’ good) from working for it—and all these people are white! They are impossible to dislike on the personal level, yet they are as much our enemies and the enemies of white survival as Obama himself.

    How or whether these people can be “turned,” I do not know. I pray that southerners and midwesterners are made of sterner stuff.

  32. September 28, 2012 - 7:52 pm | Permalink

    @Someday: Yes, leftists get a pass for saying some things that, coming from a non-leftist, would bring down the full wrath of organized Jewry. For example there was the revelation that Christopher Hitchens doesn’t buy the Holocaust gas-chamber story.

  33. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    September 28, 2012 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Revilo P. Oliver wrote that Jews aren’t satisfied with wealthy or a successful social life, they want to humiliate and exterminate their enemies like the ‘Russian” mafia.

    The Apocalyptical writtens in the Bible is about this… Murderous lust for revenge.

  34. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    September 28, 2012 - 5:26 pm | Permalink


    I think you are describing the Bill Clinton situation in the late 90’s. Obama is aware of that tactic and won’t fall for it. Why not? Because trust has been sucked out of the relationship between him and Bibi/Israel.
    They misjudged his personality. They played him all wrong. Obama isn’t doing this because he is a good guy or a couragious guy, so much as he is a stubborn Chicago black guy whose back got put up by Bibi’s undermining behaviour. Obama will dig his heels in because that’s what he does in a scrap. It’s as simple as that.

  35. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    September 28, 2012 - 4:52 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    The only lightening agent I can add to your sobering account is that the same unthinking fools who follow blindly now will be the first to do an about face when the wind changes. We are overdue for a change and the Force is with us.

  36. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    September 28, 2012 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

    @buckle: Just so. The inevitable U.S. refusal to act against Israel in such an event makes of this country an enabler of demonic proportions.

  37. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    September 28, 2012 - 3:56 pm | Permalink

    @Clytemnestra: Thanks for your great comment, which I saw only now. Thanks too to John Hearns, without whose innocent giggle at your extra decimal place I might still not have seen it.

    A few sentences in reply. I could hardly argue with your characterization of the U.S. media as drowning in red ink. Who could? Yet it seems to me that the big prestige outfits—not coincidentally the most influential ones: the Times; the “news” magazines; all the networks, broadcast plus cable, including the BBC and CNN—are still doing pretty well, however many gallons of crocodilian tears they shed, and are still having an incalculable impact since, for the great mass of people, they remain the only game in town. (Note the adroitness with which the Times changed from a newspaper to a conglomerate. It is now bleeding its peripheral investments dry to finance its core business, which is to force lies down the world’s throat in service to the aims of international Jewry. I know this can’t go on forever, but barring a miracle, they have nothing to worry about for another decade at least.)

    Nor can I argue with what you say about the polling data. It’s simply that I don’t believe that the American people tell pollsters the truth. Look at how they act! To take one obvious example, no one has any use for Mitt Romney save the rich Jews who got him the nomination, but once the media told the sheep that Ron Paul was radical and, anyway, unelectable, he was effectively finished. Recall, too, that we are talking about Americans who were educated in Jewish-engineered and usually Jewish-run public schools, as their parents were before them. It’s not unreasonable to wonder whether they can even tell truth from falesehood any longer.

    In short, I fear you are confusing your own wits and insights with those of people around you. (I’d love to be shown to be wrong about this.) What I see are people who truly believe that the “authority figures” whose reports and analyses are force-fed to them (i.e., to us) are probably inveterate liars or stooges working for liars. Yet having insufficient energy or initiative to use the Internet or simply the two eyes, ears, arms, and legs the good Lord gave them to do anything except open the fridge door and reach into it for another cold one, they end up acting upon the lies they are fed as if they were the truth. Put otherwise, their own sloth has, to a certain extent, made sheep of them. (fender says this all the time, of course; I still think he oversells the point and, what is far worse, speaks in a tone where compassion and anger are in precisely the opposite proportions to the correct ones.)

    Your comments upon my second point are harder to dispute, not least of all because I agree with at least 99.5 percent of everything you write in rebuttal of it! Indeed, I’ve written some of those very things. Though I strongly believe that Israel is no more than a storefront for international Jewry, I take very seriously what Martin van Creveld and other Jews and Israelis have written about the Samson option (I am heartened, too, that buckle agrees with me here). Actually meeting Israelis, as I have, can be both an enlightening and frightening experience. Many of them, and not just the Sabras, seem to have a special contempt for the Diaspora Jews, despite (because of?) the fact that their socialist playground could not exist if someone else didn’t pay its bills. In short, I think it’s a country in which Bibi Netanyahu has a clone every hundred yards. No one in the world is safe whilst that man or his clones are within a mile of a nuclear trigger.

    In conclusion, thank you again for addressing the queries that Hooper failed to (so far, anyway). I truly meant it when I said that I’d be relieved if your analysis turned out to be superior to mine.

  38. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 28, 2012 - 3:04 pm | Permalink

    And you really think Obama wants to be the “great peacemaker” (for the Palestinians) by being the great warmaker (by destroying Iran) ?
    You seem to think he is as mad as Netanyahu! Well, he isn’t.

  39. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    September 28, 2012 - 2:18 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: Dowd is being left alone by the neocon part of the Israel lobby (the only part she’s ever attacked) for much the same reason the Israel lobby are not pushing for intervention on Syria: Smashing Iran comes first.

    Obama will be told Israel can’t deal because it’s under threat from Iran, and that only the US can deliver the crushing blow required to remove that threat (without using nukes). The Israel lobby are telling Obama that once Iran is removed as a threat then Israel will be able to come to a final settlement with the Palestinians. Obama wants to be the great peacemaker pres who solved the ME problem, he will hit Iran.

    When Obama takes down Iran it will be clear that the Israel lobby is much more than neocons-who-advised-Bush. Then we will see if Dowd dares name Jews, not Republicans, as a malign influence on US policy. If she does she will be fired. I think she’ll be slowly eased out of her job anyway.

  40. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 28, 2012 - 1:52 pm | Permalink

    Still hoping for “the best”?

  41. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    September 28, 2012 - 1:25 pm | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott: There are a lot of issues that people like Dowd are in agreeement with Jews about; immigration for example. Pointing out the influence of Jews on immigration policy has no effect on the Dowds of this world.

    Attacking the invasion of Iraq as being mandated by Bush’s Israel lobby advisors did not trouble Dowd. Obama’s attack on Iran will be different.

  42. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 28, 2012 - 9:58 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    There are tons of public documents and public facts make the case that Whites are under assault in every country on earth. It’s as if Pearl Harbor had taken place, and you want to talk about whether there is a “Japanese Conspiracy” to do damage to the US.

    I think a better analogy might be that people want to talk about the fact that a fifth column within the US enabled the attack at Pearl Harbor to occur in order to have the US enter the war.

    But I do agree that white activism like posting the mantra is important as well.

  43. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 28, 2012 - 9:46 am | Permalink

    Pierre, I know this post was directed to Hooper, but I’d like to put my own $.002 worth.

    Two one thousands of a dollar. That is cheap.

  44. September 28, 2012 - 9:28 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: Were you unaware that this blog is operated by Professor Kevin MacDonald, whose claim to fame is a series of books about Jews?

  45. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    September 28, 2012 - 3:23 am | Permalink

    Seriously, is anyone on this blog even remotely pro-White? Is everyone here just some version of Jew-centrism? Hardly any of you are actually pro-White. Most are anti-Zionist, but not particularly pro-White. Fine, but if so, the rather misleading description that this site is about White interests and culture, should be changed.

  46. September 27, 2012 - 11:30 pm | Permalink

    This is not the first time for Maureen Dowd. I made this observation in February 2003:

    Maureen Dowd, who won a Pulitzer prize in 1999 for her writing about the scandals of Bill Clinton, names the warmongers around George W. Bush as “Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and Bill Kristol,” and says that they are “Giving a new definition of chutzpah.” Dowd’s use of the Yiddish word chutzpah in this context is clearly meant to signal the importance of the fact that these three leading warmongers are Jews.

  47. fender's Gravatar fender
    September 27, 2012 - 8:58 pm | Permalink


    “I fearlessly predict NO Samson Option.”

    You think that a people who chop off parts of their babies’ genitals at birth and fancy themselves to be the chosen people of god aren’t crazy enough to start a nuclear holocaust?

  48. September 27, 2012 - 8:18 pm | Permalink

    All this ‘anti-Semitism crap’ reminds me of Indian writer M.I. Bhat’s article, entitled ‘Jews and Black Americans: Shaming their own history’, published by Veterans Today on September 9, 2012. Read the article here.

    “For centuries the history of Jews and Black Americans has been one of suffering – Jews for their faith and the Blacks for their poverty and color. Once wounds on the human conscience, both have become either the perpetrators and instigators (Jews) or the tools (Blacks) in inflicting painful wounds on other peoples, particularly Muslims who, ironically, never had any role in their wretched past,” says Bhat.

    “Alas! (Zionist) Jews – with some shining exceptions – turned out to be horrible oppressors. Whatever they claim to have suffered they built up on that and fine tuned the exploitation and torture process, meanwhile continuing to play victimhood,” claims Bhat.

    “Obama, has proved himself one of the Black “tokens” who are willing to prove more loyal to the Zionist cause than Evangelist Pastor John Hagee. American Blacks – again, with some exceptions – seems to be looking for an opportunity to serve their former oppressors…. Obama is on job with Zionists weighing Syrian-Iranian game where America will need lot many Blacks to fight one more Israel’s war. Just keep cheering up for the Friends of Israel and together with Jews keep shaming your history,” concluded Bhat.

  49. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 27, 2012 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: Ms. Dowd will be fired, when the lovablbe Billy Barty comes back and is elected President.

  50. omop's Gravatar omop
    September 27, 2012 - 5:24 pm | Permalink
  51. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 27, 2012 - 2:48 pm | Permalink

    Mr. Somejew, your “prediction” that Dowd will be fired is as much a wish projection as your “prediction” that Obama will attack Iran, and I hope it will fail just as well. The times they are a-changing!

  52. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    September 27, 2012 - 2:43 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    In the first place, many people still will not understand the power of the Jewish lobby when that happens. In the second place the “price” for such an understanding would be extremely disproportionally high : the destruction of Iran (with millions dead), an attack on US forces in the region, the closure of the Gulf, causing a spike in the oil price and an ecomnomical crisis in the world, possible engagement of Russia and China (with the risk of a nuclear Third World War)

    Iran has no such alliance with Russia or China. It will be clear the Jewish lobby is running US foreign policy when Obama attacks Iran, Why? Because the alternatives sources of ME policy (such as fundamentalist evangelical Christian Armageddonites and the Halliburton Corp/Big Oil that were blamed for Bush’s attack on Iraq ) have no influence whatever in the Obama administration.

    At the UN the other day Ahmadinejad cut back on the rhetoric about Israel. It’s begining to dawn on him that Iran is destined to meet the same fate as iraq

  53. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    September 27, 2012 - 12:52 pm | Permalink

    Dowd has opened an account that can never be closed. It ‘s highly unlikely a lone columnist is too big to be taken down. I’ll make a prediction: Dowd is going to be eased out of her job.

  54. Clytemnestra's Gravatar Clytemnestra
    September 27, 2012 - 10:59 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Pierre, I know this post was directed to Hooper, but I’d like to put my own $.002 worth.

    “Two points, Hooper, in qualification of your interesting remarks. (1) The discrediting, no matter how thorough, has been confined to an area hardly larger than a man’s hand. I see no diminution—rather, not even the suggestion of diminution—in their media control or influence for some time to come. As long as they have access to the unheard-of wealth that their media holdings supply them, I don’t see their ability to buy off many of those they can’t bully being hobbled.”

    I respectfully disagree. Newspapers and magazines are drowning in red ink, they are forced to lay off their indoctrinated Marxists posing as journalists all over the damned place. Aside from Fox, the MSM is hemorrhaging viewers across the political spectrum who are disgusted with the Anti-White bias and the pandering to Negros and Mestizos even though they won’t openly admit it, muzzled as they are by political correctness speech codes. The overwhelming number of Americans when polled say they don’t trust the news media to give them honest reporting and rely on the Internet.

    I think the national politicians KNOW that the media has largely discredited themselves with the American people, but since they are paid for by the Jews, they make a big EXHIBITION of acting like they are intimidated by the Marxist press.

    It’s really a big dog and pony show to fool the American public into thinking that our press is really free to report the news a they see fit rather than agents of our globalist-corporate government. Wayward lefty journalists are responsible for the underreporting of White victimization by Blacks and for pushing open borders for illegal, drunk-driving Mestizos. FEDGOV has nothing to do with what gets reported or how it is spun. RIIIGHT.

    (2) Far more frightening than the totalitarian methods and remedies you mention is their access to a very large supply of nuclear weapons. They have demonstrated a willingness on many prior occasions to murder thousands of their fellow Tribesmen to do us harm. I see no reason to think they won’t actually resort to the Samson Option if they feel sufficiently spiteful.

    What do you think about this second point? ”

    Here is what I think of the so-called Samson Option. The West should call Israel’s bluff. Because that is all it is; a big, fat bluff.

    Most of the Israelis, including Bibi Netanyahu hold foreign passports and/or dual citizenship with some European or European majority country, including mean old Nazi Germany. The remainder are all applying for passports and/or dual citizenship with some European country or European-majority country.

    What does that tell YOU, Pierre? It tells me that the Samson Option is merely a BLUFF, not an OPTION with the Israelis. The REAL option is what European or European-majority country they can duck into when Israel has to fold from lack of support because the White Western/European countries are too broke to pay anymore Holocaust extortion to Israel.

    You have to look at it from the JEWISH POV, Pierre. If the Jews lost Israel as a Jewish homeland in the next decade, it would not be the first time such an event has happened. It would not be the first time the Jews lost their homeland. The Assyrians, the Babylonians, and the Romans expelled the Jews before and the area continued to be controlled by the Persians and then the Muslims for centuries to come.

    Oh, I imagine there were some Jews (uncharacteristically filled with blood and soil patriotism) who defended their territory to the death. But the vast majority who were not carried off in to captivity dispersed to parts unknown to wait for the perfect time to return, knowing that only the LIVING could return to take it back again.

    In Israel, the Ultra-Orthodox Jews will ONLY fight to exempt themselves from serving in the Israeli army! Netanyahu tried a compulsory draft for the haredi with no success. Small wonder he has to do all kinds of maneuvers to con the Christian Zionist Rapture Bunnies into cheerfully surrendering their own children to fight Israel’s battles.

    So, when the bankruptcy of the West (thanks to the rapacious secular Jewish banksters on Wall Street conducting crony capitalism) forces the West to stop paying Holocaust extortion to Israel, I fearlessly predict NO Samson Option. I predict very Jew that CAN get the puck out of dodge WILL get the puck out of dodge. I also predict that those nukes will end up in China in exchange for the Chinese allowing a large influx of Jews in to the country to do business there.

    The rest of the Jews will end up back in Europe, Canada, the USA or South America.

    I think the best way to head them off from the pass is to promote Michel Renouf’s Birozhiban Project and encourage them ALL to make aliyah there.

  55. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    September 26, 2012 - 3:27 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for a great column ! I entirely agree with the first comment by Alice Teller.
    Jeffrey Goldberg really writes as a representative of Israel to the American media. He’s an enormous liar and I wouldn’t believe a word he says.
    Dowd is totally right for a refreshing change.
    Someday is doing his usual work for Uncle Abe Foxman.
    Indeed, Mission Failed, Someday. Get a new life.

  56. Kitler's Gravatar Kitler
    September 25, 2012 - 9:39 pm | Permalink

    @Paul Hausser: This is from a Jewish newspaper:

    In an on-camera interview, David Siegel crows that he got George W. Bush elected president. When asked how he did that, the Florida resident declines to give particulars, claiming his actions “might not have been legal.”

    Read more:

  57. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 25, 2012 - 3:35 pm | Permalink

    Report to your ADL boss : mission failed.

  58. Sam's Gravatar Sam
    September 25, 2012 - 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Good theory.

  59. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    September 25, 2012 - 2:43 pm | Permalink

    Ha! Another book indeed.

  60. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 25, 2012 - 2:37 pm | Permalink


    Well it’s a good thing! When Obama hits Iran it will let everyone see who is calling the shots.

    You have tried this bogus argument before, Mr. SomeJew.
    In the first place, many people still will not understand the power of the Jewish lobby when that happens. In the second place the “price” for such an understanding would be extremely disproportionally high : the destruction of Iran (with millions dead), an attack on US forces in the region, the closure of the Gulf, causing a spike in the oil price and an ecomnomical crisis in the world, possible engagement of Russia and China (with the risk of a nuclear Third World War) and finally the destruction of Israel itself ( not that I care), and all this would be “a good thing” because then at last the public would understand the power of the Jewish lobby! There are simpler (and more humane) ways to achiieve that. A second book by Walt and Mearsheimer would be a good idea.

    But as a Zionist agent it is your task to rally us WNs behind Israel, no?

  61. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    September 25, 2012 - 1:58 pm | Permalink

    @buckle: No, Israel’s nukes will never be used; they only exist to blackmail the US: “If you don’t help us we’ll have to use a nuclear weapon” . Iran’s destuction by the US is inevitable. Well it’s a good thing! When Obama hits Iran it will let everyone see who is calling the shots.

  62. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    September 25, 2012 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    In total agreement that Israel could use nuclear weapons tomorrow and there would be minimal objections in the USA.

  63. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    September 25, 2012 - 1:39 pm | Permalink

    Goldberg has been saying that Israel is considering an attack on Iran. Rumsfeld recently said Israel should attack Iran by itself, without warning the US beforehand. Obviously that kind of talk is a ploy by the Israel lobby. The pretext for Obama having the US hit Iran will be that Israel was going to try and do it by itself, and might have used a nuclear weapon.

  64. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    September 25, 2012 - 1:02 pm | Permalink

    But having said that, the fact that they avoided this battle may be a sign that the organized Jewish community is on the defensive on the role of Jews in U.S. foreign policy. It’s about time.

    The only reason for them not going after Dowd is they have something more important to do. Jews are playing safe, they don’t want to draw attention to the influence of the Israel lobby right now. Dowd is going to be astonished when Obama orders a series of massive airstrikes on Iran. And they haven’t forgotten what she said.

  65. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    September 25, 2012 - 9:35 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: A note to remind the TOO community: When we finally manage to get our White Ethnostate established – White liberal race traitors will not be permitted residence within our ethnostate. And, the same rule applies to these de-racinated, White kwanservatives who tend to genuflect at the feet of MLK Jr and who love to spew venom and vitriol at White Nationalist leaders and organizations.

    This issue is not up for debate and this rule must be non-negotiable. Any evidence of race treason in a White man or woman’s past spells automatic disqualification for residency within the White Ethnostate.

  66. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    September 25, 2012 - 9:29 am | Permalink

    @Paul Hausser: I tend to agree with Brother Paul’s assessment of the 2000 election. However, I have a suspicion that the jews in charge probably got both Bush and Gore behind closed doors and issued the same ultimatum: “You want to be prez? Give us a war with Iraq and the rest of the endless list of enemies of Israel, and you will be anointed.” And, both of these cockroaches probably agreed to the deal.

    What drove them to pick Bush was the well known fact that the US Military is usually far more responsive, supportive and trusting of a Republican president than they are towards a Democrat. So, in essence – the jew neo-cons felt that a hand picked stooge with an R next to his name instead of a D would be able to more easily snooker the US Military into going along with all these jewish wars of survival.

    A message to the US Military who might stumble across this website: How’s it feel, to be lied to and snookered into all these wars?

    You know something – had the majority of the US military been tuning into Dr. Pierce’s weekly radio podcasts during the years preceding 9-11-01, and listening to this wise old professor’s advice – or had the majority of the US military read Professor MacDonald’s book “Culture of Critique” – the wool would not have been pulled over their eyes and there might be a lot of soldier’s lives and body parts saved.

    Plus, there would be 1.2 or so million innocent Iraqis still alive.

  67. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    September 25, 2012 - 9:01 am | Permalink

    @Heather Blue: We in the TOO community already know the answer to that question, Sister Heather. Because we are rational, clear thinking, racially aware and racially healthy White people – but in the jews camp, they are not rational thinkers, and neither are they clear thinkers.

    Instead, they are blinded by their vitriolic, all-consuming, pathologically intense hatred of White European people and, as I’ve observed before – they seem to hate Whites with a far higher degree of passion than the narcissistic passion with which they love themselves. This clouds their long term vision and prevents the vast majority of the elite, most obnoxious, most rabidly anti-White jews from realizing that they are committing a grave mistake by weakening and destroying White America.

    On the other hand, the possibility also exists that jews realize that they can’t keep Whites fooled into wearing this jewish dog collar and believing that jews are special little creatures who need to have their toes and other, less appetizing body parts, licked forever – and that sooner or later, even the stupidest White men and women are going to be forced to finally wake up and realize that the jews are behind nearly every subversive, anti-white, nation and race destroying agenda item and so, perhaps this is why jews are so determined to destroy White European people and America along with them? In essence, jews know that they are dealing with an opponent who is both fairly intelligent and also, when provoked, has a history of being capable of administering extremely efficient physical violence upon their enemies.

    Dr. Pierce used to refer to this situation using the analogy that the jews have a grip on the tail of a tiger, and they are terrified of losing that grip – because once that tiger is free, it will most certainly turn and eat them. This old analogy of Dr. Pierce’s came to me about a year ago, when I was visiting one of the major jewish online newspapers which was based in Israel – and in the reader’s comments area, several jews were expressing their fears and unease about what the Americans might do once they finally realized that Israel had engineered 9-11. So, rest assured – jews are scared of White European men, and in my opinion, their fears are both well justified and well earned. Payback day is coming, and they know it – hence, they want to destroy America before it arrives.

  68. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    September 25, 2012 - 12:12 am | Permalink

    I think that organized Jewry is banking heavily on the idea that dumbing down America through race blending will save them from the “emperor has no clothes” moment that Whites will surely have after they’ve shed enough blood over make believe WMDs,etc. The big push to blend us into oblivion is their best pitch. That explains why any image or thought they come up with teaches that race mixing (for Whites) is the best idea since the wheel. All those strategies fall under genocide crimes as far as I’m concerned.

  69. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    September 24, 2012 - 11:35 pm | Permalink

    Hey quit your goddamn conspiracy theory mongering and post the Mantra. Oh wait, that would be productive. Never mind, go back to BSing each other over the deep innards of the Talmud or write a dissertation on interest rate theory.

    And why the hell do you need to “prove” a conspiracy when Anti-Whites have told you they hate openly? There are tons of public documents and public facts make the case that Whites are under assault in every country on earth. It’s as if Pearl Harbor had taken place, and you want to talk about whether there is a “Japanese Conspiracy” to do damage to the US.

    What an embarrassing waste of time this has been.

  70. September 24, 2012 - 10:35 pm | Permalink

    Is Dan Senor the guy that said:

    “Gentiles exist ONLY to serve jews”

    Or was that Netanyahu???

  71. Riley DeWiley's Gravatar Riley DeWiley
    September 24, 2012 - 9:34 pm | Permalink

    Given that all of MoDo’s bosses at the NY Times are Jewish, perhaps the ADL figured the quiet backstairs approach was the best way to handle this impudent Goyess.

    Look for a change in the Times columnist lineup very soon.

  72. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    September 24, 2012 - 9:05 pm | Permalink


    Apparently White Liberals think somehow they will be exempt from the disaster they have promoted for their race. This will be an interesting wrinkle in the near future. Browns and blacks are not going to want to be represented by their Great White Liberal Fathers much longer.

  73. September 24, 2012 - 8:43 pm | Permalink

    @Heather Blue

    “What happens when the Jews make the United States too weak to defend Israel? Just throwing off-the-top of my head question out there.”

    Jews face a crisis. What to do when you dominate something, profit from it, but hate it all at once? Like a serial killer who frequents prostitutes and slays them for immorality after coitus. America is genocidal, racist, and intolerant one day but a light unto nations the next. Constantly shifting rhetoric is actually listed in the “14 Points Of Fascism” pamphlet. I hate to humanize our enemies but it’s lonely at the top. Jews lack the transcendence necessary to dwell on the peaks forever.

  74. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    September 24, 2012 - 7:40 pm | Permalink

    I did not see ‘The Help’ but at Political Cesspool [I think, its been awhile], the reviewer said ‘the films NY jewish agent was true to type’.

  75. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    September 24, 2012 - 7:35 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    Does that include her?

  76. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    September 24, 2012 - 7:08 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    Interesting take, Mickey. We must take advantage of this crisis. There are a lot of angry people out there. For the time being they are still playing by the current rules, but many are questioning. There is danger ahead, but also opportunity.

  77. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    September 24, 2012 - 5:14 pm | Permalink

    @Hooper: @Pierre de Craon:

    I don’t think that our foes are in the midst of open failure, but there are huge cracks which can be exploited. Much of their power has always been bluff. They have the power to attack any one politician who defies them, but do they have the once vaulted unity to oppose an open rebellion? Perhaps that is too much to hope for from our current lot, but the evidence is clear that both parties are in their death throes.

    As more and more of our children spend lengthy periods abroad, many are meeting the genuine article, not merely carefully polished immigrants in college. Any kid who has worked his way around Australia, for instance, is meeting large numbers of Chinese peasants working in restaurants. It does provide a different view.

    The internet remains, for the time being, a priceless outlet for truth. When people are fat and happy it is easy to fool them or at least lull them into compliance. The time is ripe for us to turn the tables and attack them on moral and practical grounds. They will not, like WASPs, simply retreat, but will come out with ever more aggressive attempts to control us. It is an opportunity that we should not allow to pass.

    As for the Samson option, I think young Jews, who are feeling their oats, are aware and afraid of the consequences. It will be their last shot.

  78. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    September 24, 2012 - 4:35 pm | Permalink


    … the once vital intellectual underpinnings of all their movements have been thoroughly discredited and they have had to resort to political correctness and other totalitarian methods to keep the debate under wraps. …

    Two points, Hooper, in qualification of your interesting remarks. (1) The discrediting, no matter how thorough, has been confined to an area hardly larger than a man’s hand. I see no diminution—rather, not even the suggestion of diminution—in their media control or influence for some time to come. As long as they have access to the unheard-of wealth that their media holdings supply them, I don’t see their ability to buy off many of those they can’t bully being hobbled.

    (2) Far more frightening than the totalitarian methods and remedies you mention is their access to a very large supply of nuclear weapons. They have demonstrated a willingness on many prior occasions to murder thousands of their fellow Tribesmen to do us harm. I see no reason to think they won’t actually resort to the Samson Option if they feel sufficiently spiteful.

    What do you think about this second point?

  79. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    September 24, 2012 - 4:09 pm | Permalink


    AH never won a majority in Germany in 1932 – in other words he failed to carry the German people in a democratic election.

  80. George's Gravatar George
    September 24, 2012 - 3:18 pm | Permalink

    I got it, the script has changed & Netenyahoo hasn’t got the update. He’s expecting his jew lobby boys to get the dumb goy U.S. government to jump through there useless butts for him.
    The neocons slither as the Isreali’s tremble behind their Neuclear arsenal… Its all soo exciting…

  81. Hooper's Gravatar Hooper
    September 24, 2012 - 3:07 pm | Permalink

    Good comment about Jewish occupations always eventually failing. I think ‘peak Jew’ power has actually already passed. The owl of minerva only flies at dusk — we might not realize it for a generation or two. Throughout much of the 20th century, Jewish intellectual movements were on the rise and Jews had successfully discarded traditional European structures in favor of their not-yet-discredited socialist theory. They were ensconced in the seats of power in Eastern Europe and the USSR and had substantial and vital followings in the West.

    But now, the once vital intellectual underpinnings of all their movements have been thoroughly discredited and they have had to resort to political correctness and other totalitarian methods to keep the debate under wraps. First socialism/communism was discredited and now multiculturalism is quickly losing steam. Political correctness and shutting down debate are indeed desperate measures which can’t hold out indefinitely. Later generations will point to the introduction of political correctness in the 1980s-90s as the beginning of the end.

    Once the rapidly-fading American empire goes the way of all empires (and it will soon enough), the Jews will have lost their last stronghold of high-level influence. Sure, they have enough high-placed people and enough money to avoid completely losing influence, but they will most likely recede back into more pragmatic and mercantile affairs — and with less of a platform to meddle in political and cultural affairs.

  82. fender's Gravatar fender
    September 24, 2012 - 2:11 pm | Permalink

    @Paul Hausser:

    Elections don’t need to be rigged when all the candidates are jew tools.

  83. Paul Hausser's Gravatar Paul Hausser
    September 24, 2012 - 1:28 pm | Permalink

    I still hold the belief the 2000 Election was Jewish rigged. The three counties in Florida that decided it Palm Beach, Broward and Miami Dade are all under the yoke of the Jews in one form or another. Palm Beach especially. Votes we just thrown out for Gore. Zionist Jews could care less about fellow Jews votes for Gore/Lieberman

    I think Bush was given the nod because he agreed to get rid of Saddam Hussein. Catherine Harris who signed off on the results is a rabid Christian Zionist. Jeb the brother was then then Governor.

    They kept the whole thing in a tight circle of top Jews and Neocons. Bush may have back out of the deal but was then given 9/11(Israeli involvement without a doubt) as a reminder and the perfect pretext for the Iraq war.

  84. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    September 24, 2012 - 12:02 pm | Permalink

    KM – IMO this is a small part of a big shift that we’re about half way into. Look at what is happening to the far right in Europe in terms of a takeover by zionists. Look at the counter productive (for them) tensions between liberal Jews and Israeli interests, and also the strategic goal of stopping the Islamificiation of the West vs the ADL goal of securing mass immigration into the West.

    All of this is going to be resolved into a more coherent strategy for them. They are in the process of doing that.

    Out, will be the liberal Jewish connection. This will be accomplished by simply allowing antisemitism to build up in the liberal ranks, while simultaneously taking over control of the entire Right..that is from the Republicans all the way to the nationalists.
    The Right…what was a neocon vision…but is now gearing up to become a much more broad based vision, is the best vehicle for the across-the-board Jewish movement.

    Out, will be the Jewish support for big government and high taxes. The new ‘philosophy’ will be libertarian, and this will figure as part of the take over of the turf that some of you think you are on. This will be accomplished simply by allowing the left to become antisemitic…they’ll actually drive this effect.
    Sticking, will be anti-white hostility at the same time as support for (non-muslim) non-white group identities.
    In, will be libertarianism and small government (all the easier to control).
    In, will be philosophy that makes support of Israel a moral duty while making patriotism an evil.

    It’s all in the offing in the next few years. They need to do it because the challenges have changed and because they are spending too much time dealing with internal strategic contradictions.

    It’s going to be big, and it’s going to sweept the WN’s right off the table, and seal the fate of our ethnies.

    It’s needs to be understood……because if it can be understood in advance, then it can become the vehicle of the big WN turnaround.

    All to play for. But time to wake up to what is happening, what we are in the midst of. The best way to do this is by regarding the situation as a kind of abstract battle field. Then apply a kind of abstracted military style thinking to that battlefield. That way you’ll start to see what they need to achieve and that will open up what they are in the process of doing.

    all to play for. all to lose.

  85. Jim Jones's Gravatar Jim Jones
    September 24, 2012 - 8:55 am | Permalink

    We can only hope that these “neocons” will quickly curl up in a ball and slide down the sewer where they belong. Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, etc need to be held accountable.

    It’s amazing that 17 of the 24 people on Romney’s foreign policy advisory team worked for GW Bush. Need we say more? Do we really want America to be led back down this path of destruction?

  86. Dan's Gravatar Dan
    September 24, 2012 - 8:25 am | Permalink

    Matthews, Dowd, Russert, ODonnell etc. All like em some blacks. Irish Catholics have a very unsteady relationship with their Anglo Protestant brethren. Actually Matthews out and out hates Whiteness.

  87. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    September 24, 2012 - 8:23 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    “It won’t work.”

    Won’t it? It’s been working for the guys whose dirty work he does—for free probably!—in the years he’s been commenting here at TOO, first as Tom Watson, now as the easier-for-him-to-spell trigram.

    Thanks, nonetheless, for slugging away in the interests of truth and just plain sanity.

  88. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    September 24, 2012 - 8:14 am | Permalink


    You’ve made that anti-Catholic point a thousand times and it leads to nothing good. I can point to tons of people in virtually every major Christian religion today who do not take race seriously.

    The New England Puritans – Protestants – have been on the FOREFRONT of pushing socialism, Political Correctness and Anti-White attitudes. It was the PROTESTANT abolitionists who gave some fig leaf of moral cover to Lincoln to slaughter 700,000 men and destroy a region. Most of the Radical Republicans that carried out the Anti-White policies of Reconstruction were PROTESTANT.

    I can point to a hundred cases in which Catholics and Protestants were both blind to the role of race, or openly Anti-White, but it is NOT the special preserve of one group.

    I don’t mind intelligent discussion of how Catholics, Protestants, or whomever, have messed up on the race issue, or even had nefarious leaders harming their flocks. But what you are doing is purely to rile up divisions, place ALL blame on one group, and divide us.

    It won’t work.

  89. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    September 24, 2012 - 8:02 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    … it’s not about “hate” ( that suggests irrationality), it’s about moral condemnation. …

    Just so. Recommending or decrying hate is a distraction and an irrelevancy in this situation. The underlying issues, the true ones, are Tribal subversion and rank criminality.

    Otherwise, in re the larger point of the ADL’s tactics, I am less inclined toward the views of Mr. Ryckaert and Alice Teller than those of “me”. I persist in thinking that the ADL and with it the great mass of organized Jewry see the Democrats as the more reliable instrument of continued stealth dictatorship than the Republicans and the crass, bling-hypnotized, solipsistic, ludicrously indulged idiot Obama as the surer and more readily manipulable figurehead at the helm of the Haifa-registered Rothschild flagship, SS Kosher USA.

    I do hope, however, that time will prove me wrong in this judgment, since Obama is essentially a dead cert to win what we still risibly call the presidential “election.”

  90. George's Gravatar George
    September 24, 2012 - 7:49 am | Permalink

    Calling the ADL where are you?
    Maybe Maureen has nice legs?

  91. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    September 24, 2012 - 7:35 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    You make my case for me, Maureen Dowd is just another Irish Roman Catholic media personality.

    “A wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not know that a gaggle of white Republican men afraid of extinction are out to trip her up.”

    Btw, did anyone notice the new Roman Catholic Bishop of Orange County, California showed up with his “Virgin of Guadalupe” boots on. LOL. You can see the direction he’s going in…,0,4099859.story

  92. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    September 24, 2012 - 3:05 am | Permalink

    fender September 23, 2012 – 10:05 pm | Permalink

    “Yeah but remember, the majority of White Americans don’t comment on, or even read the news. They watch Fox or MSNBC or CNN, get their opinions fed to them, and don’t go any further. Of course the people who use the internet for research are more aware of what’s happening, but most Americans only use the internet for porn and gaming. ”

    End quote

    But its not the majority that matters but the small active minority. I have been trying to figure just how exactly the Germans changed their attitudes about the Jews that paved the way for Hitler’s rise. There must be a pattern in how gentiles wake up and when.

  93. Starets's Gravatar Starets
    September 24, 2012 - 3:02 am | Permalink

    @mark green:

    Another good example of Hollywood portrayal and manipulation of jewish stereotypes is the TV show Entourage.

    I recently watched a few episodes for the first time. (In my defense, I rarely watch any Hollywood products these days, as I recognize them as mental poison.) The interesting thing is that while the actors appear to be portrayed as non-jewish, the agents and assorted movie business types appear to be portrayed as mostly jewish.

    The jewish agents/business types are portrayed using what a sane culture would regard as very shady business practices, and their personalities are portrayed as obnoxious and in your face with chutzpah. The manipulation of the stereotype in this case is that this unpleasant and morally repugnant business climate portrayed in the show is portrayed as “heroic”.

    Distasteful to see, but laughable nonetheless. To know a people, look to what their heroes are.

  94. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    September 24, 2012 - 2:43 am | Permalink

    Omop, good work. The Talmud says it all.

  95. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    September 24, 2012 - 1:51 am | Permalink

    Great article. As for Dowd, apparently Anti-Whites like her can fight amongst themselves. She may be hinting at the Israel-first attitude among NeoCons, but she still attacks anyone who wants to get a handle on our immigration crisis or even slow non-White immigration.

    A few years ago, she gloated over the rise of a Latina on the Supreme Court and what it said about the decline of White men:

    A wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not know that a gaggle of white Republican men afraid of extinction are out to trip her up.

    She finds the discomfort Whites have over their EXTINCTION amusing.

  96. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    September 23, 2012 - 11:43 pm | Permalink

    I really don’t know what to expect out of Romney, I suspect he is just appeasing Jewish benefactors with his more bellicose rhetoric. Unlike Bush he would not be so easily manipulated into actions that would normally be career suicide, of course another 9/11 type attack would change that.

  97. Todd French's Gravatar Todd French
    September 23, 2012 - 11:19 pm | Permalink

    I think we have reached peak Jew, and KM and Mearsheimer and Walt, and David Duke, and others have gotten the info out to make it possible. The fact that we have NOT as yet attacked Iran is clear evidence that we have reached peak Jew. And they know it. That’s why we are hearing about the purchase of millions of rounds of hollow points, fema camps, and internet censorship. They are scared to death. We kicked ’em out around 100 times in history, and they richly deserved to be evicted every time. They bring it on themselves. If the American people had any idea where all of that money goes that the FED prints, there would be a bloody revolution tomorrow.

  98. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    September 23, 2012 - 11:11 pm | Permalink
  99. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 23, 2012 - 11:03 pm | Permalink

    @J. Maynard Gelinas:

    ” …the anti-Semite hates a people, not a policy” .

    That still sounds too PC to me.
    First of all, it’s not about “hate” ( that suggests irrationality), it’s about moral condemnation. But what if a whole people, throughout its history, has behaved in such a way that it is justified to morally condemn ( not “hate” ) that whole people? The immoral behaviour of Jews is not as recent as Zionism, it is as old as Abraham. ( Read the O.T., the Talmud and the numerous criticisms by gentiles of Jewish behaviour from Antiquity to modern times).

    BTW, if you only condemn immoral policies of Zionists, you will still be called an “anti-Semite” by the Jews. They don’ t make fine distinctions.

  100. September 23, 2012 - 10:57 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Peak Jew!

    That’s precious! And meaningful. And, as a reference to power wielded on behalf of world Jewry and Israel NOT EVEN anti-Semitic. Not in my book, anyway.

  101. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    September 23, 2012 - 10:50 pm | Permalink

    This was another good article by Kevin, exposing the duplicity and deceit of organized Jewry. The comments by Me above are spot on, as well.

  102. fender's Gravatar fender
    September 23, 2012 - 10:05 pm | Permalink


    “If anyone reads Yahoo News, every time there is an article posted about Netanyahu and Iran, the vast majority of the comments are just enraged at Israel, Romney, and the Neocons.”

    Yeah but remember, the majority of White Americans don’t comment on, or even read the news. They watch Fox or MSNBC or CNN, get their opinions fed to them, and don’t go any further. Of course the people who use the internet for research are more aware of what’s happening, but most Americans only use the internet for porn and gaming.

  103. Dan's Gravatar Dan
    September 23, 2012 - 9:41 pm | Permalink
  104. J. Maynard Gelinas's Gravatar J. Maynard Gelinas
    September 23, 2012 - 9:26 pm | Permalink

    There’s a difference between opposing a particular government policy, whether Israeli, French, or Nauruan. For example, to oppose Mr. Netanyahu’s recent Sunday morning television interviews, and rather obvious subsequent promotion of a particular US presidential candidate during an election cycle, is to disapprove of a state actor effecting a policy. To oppose the continued deployment of additional Israeli west bank settlements, regardless of their words otherwise, is to oppose state policy.

    This is not antisemitism. One does not oppose the existence of the Jewish ethnicity and religion by opposing specific policies of the Israeli state. Further, such statements conflating the two only diminish the true and hateful meaning of antisemitism. For the anti-Semite hates a people, not a policy.

  105. StuckInBetween's Gravatar StuckInBetween
    September 23, 2012 - 9:17 pm | Permalink

    Hello friends, I had a moment of clear thought just before trying to go to sleep. I have read somewhere that our clearest and brightest moments of thought come to us right before sleeping and just after waking.

    I have a theory of Western culture called Institutional Suicide.

    I believe that humans in general are searchers of meaning. Our meaning is derived from a cosmology of the world comes from culture. What is culture? It is recognizable and repeatable patterns of interactions and meaning. Why does our society promote suicide? The sociologist Durkheim said that people in society commit suicide when they are estranged from other members of society, and in particular the family. What is happening now? The Zionists are trying their hardest to break down the nuclear family. They have succeeded in breaking up the traditional family and our old tribal ties. The Zionists want us totally divided and conquered down to the individual person. They do not want people to connect with the opposite gender by using feminism to undermine male/female relations and disrupt the traditional complementary order of the male/female. They suck the meaning out of our lives by making the countries that mostly White people lived multicultural. Multicultural melts all that is solid into thin air with its relativism.

    Our communities today are faceless corporations that do not have any accountability to other members of the community. The communities are devoid of meaning. The education system turns out adults that are cookie cutter, that stride the line of the Politically Correct paradigm. The educational system cuts us off from our Species-Being and our ability to manipulate and transform our environment, as the West has turned into an intangible service economy. Speaking from a personal standpoint of a middle-class Westerner, my parents never told me about the monetary system, or fiat money. All I remember my parents telling me is to do good in school and go to University, because the world is evil and really rough without an education, and that going to University would be a great investment. But Humanities made me realize what a shill our society is with its stinking liberal agenda under Jewish influence. Our educational system turns us into drones to fill a seat in an existing corporation. It stifles creativity and makes us dependant on the Machine. Even if we have a decent job we are just a slave on a higher pay-scale. A bigger house to pay usury to the Jew and a nicer car to pay make payments on. Our interests are diverted into activities like sports, where we produce nothing tangible or of value (unless you make it professional). If you become a professional you are a circus entertainer, entertaining the clueless masses, distracting them from their situation while they are being used by the System.

    With a society like this I can only conclude that suicide is built into the system.

  106. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    September 23, 2012 - 9:17 pm | Permalink

    @mark green:
    Why waste yr $ and time on such s**t, unless you are paid to watch?

    KMD, when will you have a column on Randy Newman, and not just his latest ‘song’?

  107. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    September 23, 2012 - 9:14 pm | Permalink
  108. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    September 23, 2012 - 9:13 pm | Permalink

    ‘shiske’ = filthy beast?
    But goys think it means woman.

  109. September 23, 2012 - 9:00 pm | Permalink
  110. Dan's Gravatar Dan
    September 23, 2012 - 7:54 pm | Permalink

    “Arbitrage” is a shocking visual lie. What is the 1% if it isn’t Jewish these days? It’s not blond hair blue eyed wasps.
    I wouldn’t be surprised to find that 1/2 of American billionaires are Jewish either. They are optional whites. They pass as something close to us visually but then turn around and crucify nationalists and mock rural people as inbred. The reality is that orthodox Jews are basically incestuous. Reform not that much better. There are few diseases genetically/congenitaly associated with ethnic whites. Lots associated with Jews.

  111. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 23, 2012 - 7:38 pm | Permalink

    If Walt and Mearsheimer would like to serve their country once more, they should write another book : The Israel Lobby and the Rush to a War with Iran, in which they describe all the intrigues and lies of the Jews to engage the US in yet another disaster. That would earn them of course the epithet of “anti-Semites” even more, but this time the game would become transparent to the American public and help their cause.

  112. mark green's Gravatar mark green
    September 23, 2012 - 7:16 pm | Permalink

    Good one, Kevin. Speaking of stereotypes (and their calculated avoidance), I just saw a pretty entertaining suspense yarn (“Arbitrage”), starring Richard Gere who plays a slithery Wall St. big shot and, true to form, there’s not one Jew anywhere to be seen throughout this entire cinematic expose on the NY it’s-all-and-ONLY-about-money crowd. Not one Jew! Actually, there is one. The one apparent Jew in this entire mega-money financial thriller is a persistent, dutiful, blue-collar cop, played by Tim Roth! Reality, anyone?

    Hollywood never stop spinning reality to protect you-know-who. In fact, more often than not, when there is a Jewish character in a film or TV show, Hollywood prefers to cast a blue-eyed gentile as some yarmulke-wearing Hebe. Big Media wants the goyim to believe that Judaism is a religion, not a racial identity. This is the Jewish Big Lie, and this is exactly where Hitler first applied the term ‘Big Lie’, contrary to modern myth.

    The Hollywood shell game about everything Jewish never ends.

  113. Aditya Barot's Gravatar Aditya Barot
    September 23, 2012 - 6:59 pm | Permalink

    The reason that Neocons hijack Foreign Policy is the same reason that the La Raza has hijacked Immigration policy: the Historic Majority agrees, in substance, with the views espoused by these groups. This is not a conspiracy, its a Weltanschauung. The same blue0blood types who wouldn’t allow anybody called “MacDonald” (and certainly no Barots) anywhere near them after “five o’clock” now harbor a death wish.

    Not a single minority group in the U.S. would have on ounce of power if the original WASP establishment still retained its self-confidence and virility. The fault is not the Neocons, or the La Raza, or the Black Panthers, or any one of sundry groups determined to “fundamentally transform America;” it is in WASP America.

  114. Professor Sutton's Gravatar Professor Sutton
    September 23, 2012 - 6:24 pm | Permalink

    I think that the average person can see that our financial rulers have Jewish names. They do not realize that most of our processed foods have the Imprimatur of our rulers rabbis as well.

  115. Dan's Gravatar Dan
    September 23, 2012 - 6:16 pm | Permalink

    Rahmbo in Chicago might be an example of peak Jew.

  116. Elie's Gravatar Elie
    September 23, 2012 - 6:13 pm | Permalink


    You know, white men should create their own Institute for Social Research so we could study these things and develop more scientific predictions and political strategies.

    Or we could focus on conquering a university in the U.S., like the Commies did with UC Berkeley.

    Heck, why not do both? This is our country.

  117. Elie's Gravatar Elie
    September 23, 2012 - 6:07 pm | Permalink


    I have a feeling that Jewish internal occupations ALWAYS fail in the end.

    And I say this because EVEN the Soviet Union became bad and antisemitic for a lot of Jews.

    Boris Volynov (Jewish) was not allowed to fly on the Voskhod 1 spacecraft because one of the government commissions didn’t like the fact that his grandmother was Jewish.

    Either that or it’ll fail.

    The Hungarians tore down their Communist government that was an entirely Jewish government with Erno Gero, Blea Kun, and Matyas Rakosi.

    I don’t think it is really possible for Jews to establish total rule for more than a few decades.

    There definitely is a critical point where the system becomes unsustainable.

  118. omop's Gravatar omop
    September 23, 2012 - 5:59 pm | Permalink

    The American public suffers from a self inflicted ignorance bordering on being suicidal…..

    The chosen ones have been at their best for thousands of years its in their religious beliefs….

    * “If a ‘goy’ (Gentile) hits a Jew he must be killed.” (Sanhedrin 58b)

    * “If a Jew finds an object lost by a ‘goy’ it does not have to be returned.” (Baba Mezia 24a)

    * “If a Jew murders a ‘goy’ there will be no death penalty.” (Sanhedrin 57a)

    * What a Jew steals from a ‘goy’ he may keep.” (Sanhedrin 57a)

    * “Jews may use subterfuges to circumvent a ‘goy.’” (Baba Kamma 113a)

    * “All children of the ‘goyim’ (Gentiles) are animals.” (Yebamoth 98a)

    * “Girls born of the ‘goyim’ are in a state of ‘niddah’ (menstrual uncleanness!) from birth.” (Abodah Zarah 36b)

    * “The ‘goyim’ are not humans. They are beasts.” (Baba Mezia 114b)

    * “If you eat with a ‘goy’ it is the same as eating with a dog.” (Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b)

    * “Even the best of the ‘goyim’ should all be killed.” (Soferim 15)

    * “Sexual intercourse between the ‘goyim’ is like intercourse between animals.” (Sanhedrin 74b)

    * “When it comes to a Gentile in peace times, one may harm him indirectly, for instance, by removing a ladder after he had fallen into a crevice.” (Shulkan Arukh, Yoreh De ‘ah, 158, Hebrew Edition only)

    * “‘Yashu’ (derogatory for ‘Jesus’) is in Hell being boiled in hot excrement.” (Gittin 57a)

    [’Yashu’ is an acronym for the Jewish curse, ‘May his (Jesus) name be wiped out forevermore.’]

    * Yashu (Jesus) was sexually immoral and worshipped a brick.” (Sanhedrin 107b)

    * “Yashu (Jesus) was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness and refused to repent.” (Sotah 47a)

    * “Miriam the hairdresser had sex with many men.” (Shabbath 104b, Hebrew Edition only)

    * “She who was the descendant of princes and governors (the virgin Mary) played the harlot with carpenters.” (Sanhedrin 106a)

    * “Christians who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.” (Rosh Hashanah 17a)


  119. Elie's Gravatar Elie
    September 23, 2012 - 5:56 pm | Permalink

    If anyone reads Yahoo News, every time there is an article posted about Netanyahu and Iran, the vast majority of the comments are just enraged at Israel, Romney, and the Neocons.

    People definitely are getting upset about it now.

    The Cons are absolutely brazen and daring if they think they’ll take us to war again without damaging themselves.

  120. Dan's Gravatar Dan
    September 23, 2012 - 5:43 pm | Permalink

    Names like Senor show up in Muslim Spain working for the Caliph as tax farmers and sugar cane proprietors and slave brokers.

  121. Dan's Gravatar Dan
    September 23, 2012 - 5:40 pm | Permalink

    Dowd is an Irish Mediawhore. The Jews will give her a pass, as long as she batters the AnglosaxonWhokilledsixmillionblacksandjews Mitt Romney.

  122. me's Gravatar me
    September 23, 2012 - 5:35 pm | Permalink

    What is also scary about Aldeson and Saban is their close ties (certainly true int the case of adleson) to the “Russian” (ha ha) mafia.

  123. me's Gravatar me
    September 23, 2012 - 5:33 pm | Permalink

    Maureen Dowd also said ‘blue eyed bankers’ caused the meltdown – a laughably out of touch with reality statement if there ever was one. No one cared about that, in fact the NYT tried very hard to pass that one off.

    But what she left out of this article is that the democrats have their adleson – in haim saban the israeli billionaire who is super-pro Israel. If Americans could put two and two together, they’d realize that both parties are controlled by a handful of Jewish billionaires, and banks that have majority Jewish ownership (such as Goldman).

    That’s not anti-semtic -though Abe Foxman would say it is – its a simple acknowledgement of reality. It is the same old story that has been going on in European countries for centuries – a jewish elite siezes control of the monetary system, turns the economy into a massive loan sharking operation and then begins to take over the assets as well (We are seeing this in ‘privitization schemes’ which are essentially a repeat of their role as tax farmers – like the Arenda system in Poland.

  124. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    September 23, 2012 - 5:22 pm | Permalink

    Dan Senor may well be a Jew bast*rd—literally. Nothing is known of his father, and his mother is a Jewess living in Canada. LOL.

  125. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    September 23, 2012 - 5:02 pm | Permalink

    What happens when the Jews make the United States too weak to defend Israel? Just throwing off-the-top of my head question out there.

  126. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 23, 2012 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

    Thanks to Dr. MacDonald for doing great things for White people.

  127. September 23, 2012 - 4:51 pm | Permalink

    The problem is not lack of information but a lack of desire and fighting will. It comes from prayer, religious zeal, abstinence, exercise.

    Whites have become so cowardly, passive, paralyzed that even if information and reality stares them in the face, they won’t act.

    Solzhenitsyn talked about it in his Harvard Address.

    Blood sucking Jew just bought 2 Billion hollow point bullets.

    Just imagine what is about to happen to Whites next year.

  128. fender's Gravatar fender
    September 23, 2012 - 4:51 pm | Permalink

    One other thing: one of the best and most effective tactics that the jews have is to label mild statements like Dowd’s as “extremist” and “controversial” even though they’re anything but. They do this so that others wouldn’t dare go any further than her in their public thoughts and comments.

    This is why I think Whites need to be as bold and fearless as possible in their statements. I think a good tactic would be to have some Whites say things that are so extreme they’re almost jewish (like saying that non-Whites are born to serve Whites or something), just so that the idea gets out there. Then other Whites can denounce that rhetoric but still support the idea of White racial unity; after hearing the first quote about non-Whites serving Whites, suddenly the idea of White unity becomes all the more acceptable to people.

    Right now the range of acceptable thought goes from ‘Whites have no right to maintain their majorities in their nations,’ to ‘Whites deserve to be wiped out because they’re evil.’ We need to widen that range as far as possible, because that’s completely unnacceptable. The best range for us would be something like ‘Whites are the master race, born to rule everything’ to ‘Whites are a good people who deserve their own nations.’ Obviously the former is extreme and unrealistic, but it needs to be there to widen that range of common thought.

  129. fender's Gravatar fender
    September 23, 2012 - 4:41 pm | Permalink

    I refuse to believe that Abe Foxman wasn’t engineered in a German laboratory to roll everyone jewish stereotype into one and prove NS propaganda right.

    I don’t know if we’re at peak jew or not. Is their power starting to break? I hope so, but I’m not holding my breath. Remember that they see themselves as an eternal people, and they’ll stop at nothing to maintain their stranglehold on the West.

  130. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 23, 2012 - 3:56 pm | Permalink

    Hopefully there soon will come a “the emperor is naked” moment. The US and the world has suffered already enough from these destructive manipulators.

    Up untill now, the Jewish tactic has always been to describe any negative characterization of Jews as myth (“old canard” in the words of Abe Foxman). You cannot go on for ever committing crimes and then say they are myths.

    Dan Senor was one of the chief manipulators of Operation Iraqi Destruction, he now wants to fulfill the same role in Operation Iranian Destruction.

    The best thing for now is that Obama wins the election, no matter how bad he is in other respects. And Obama has no Dan Senor behind him…

  131. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    September 23, 2012 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

    Thank you for another great piece. I agree, wholeheartedly, that the Jewish control on information, which was the source of much of their power, is falling apart. At best, they are keeping some interesting issues out of the official public conversation. I have heard nothing of the once proud zionest boast the Israelis can and always will do their own fighting. There is very little discussion of the obvious solution for the middle east, a nuclear free zone as proposed by the Saudis. My greatest hope is that we will do away with the central tenet of the holocaust, that Jews were falsely accused and all Jews qua Jews are innocent in all eternity, past and future. If any Jew has ever been accused of something in the past no Jew may ever be accused of that sin again, ever. Facts are irrelevant.

Comments are closed.