Where is the historical West? Part 1 of 5

Kevin MacDonald

Over a year ago I completed a 5000-word draft offering an answer to this question.  A few months later, after recurrent visits to VDare, American Renaissance, The Occidental Observer, and Counter-Currents my answer seemed naïve, adolescent; one more paper carved out under the “tyranny of liberalism” and the belief that the Western world was different from the Rest in its cultivation of universal values and transcendence of ethnic identities.  I no longer accepted the claim that humans around the world could become Western through proper guidance in the merits of civic equality, free markets, and tolerance.

I had been inching my way in this direction for some years, but never to the point of allowing the word ‘race’ to enter into my writings. In the draft I emphasized the ancient and medieval pre-liberal social context upon which the historic success of liberalism was predicated, but the convergence of my view with liberalism was obvious: the triumph of universalism was the high point of the West. I thought that identifying the location of the West was a matter of tracing the historical evolution of this ideology, beginning with the rise of citizenship and rational discourse in ancient Greek times, through the Roman invention of the legal persona, the Catholic fusion of reason and faith, the discovery of the individual in Renaissance times, the Newtonian Revolution, the Enlightenment, and so on, until the Allied victory in 1945 or even the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.

What concerned me above all (in the draft) was challenging the leftist liberal idea that the historic West was a social construct without definite geographical and cultural boundaries. I rejected the view that all cultural expressions were equally valid and that a proper liberal attitude required an egalitarian view of world history. I was reacting to an academic environment in which the teaching of Western civilization had been replaced by a new curriculum emphasizing “the unity in diversity” of the world’s peoples. Only a handful of universities were still teaching the history of Western civilization. Everyone was captivated by the postmodernist claim that “no concept is by itself, and consequently in and of itself”: ergo the West must be conceived only in relation to the rest of the world.   Ancient Greece was an outgrowth of the Near East, or, as Martin Bernal put it, “Afroasiatic”.  Greek civilization was not founded by Aryan settlers but was instead the product of Egyptian and Semitic influences.

Even the landmass of “Europe” was found suspect. How can a small straggling peninsula on the western end of a much larger and richer Asian landmass be called a “continent”? The “the racist privileging of Europe” (on Mercator-derived maps) should not be allowed; accordingly, the Peters projection was promoted, where Europe was “considerably downgraded.”   The TV serial drama, The West Wing, created by Aaron Sorkin, endorsed this new projection as a great way to raise the status of the Third World against Western privilege. A variety of other projections were soon announced; the one world historians were most enthused over was the “Hobo-Dyer Equal Area Projection Map,” in which the world was turned upside down with  Europe occupying a marginalized corner in the south east. No one cared to mention that Europeans were the ones who discovered and mapped the entire geography of the earth.

The Hobo-Dyer Projection

Facing this challenge, I thought it was important to identify the West as the birthplace of liberal universalism. The key was to delineate geographically the expansion of Western liberal values and institutions. I concluded that Western Europe, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand were currently the most deeply Western; whereas Eastern (Catholic) European countries were  closely Western but not entirely due to their lack of well-developed democratic institutions. Latin America was unevenly progressing in a Western direction but was not yet quite ready to be allowed in the universal club. So were the Orthodox countries, Russia and the Balkans.  


On what grounds did I exclude countries such as Japan, South Korea, and India with their established representative institutions, scientific inquiry, and market economies? By insisting that those non-Western countries remained culturally different in the degree to which they lacked the Western background of Greco-Roman humanism, Christianity, and European high culture. Their histories were very different. At the same time I was persuaded by Francis Fukuyama’s “end of history” argument that there was a convergence in the world toward a liberal democratic culture. Samuel Huntington’s observation that the world was becoming more modern and less Western seemed inconsistent with the fall of the Soviet Union, the spread of Western popular culture, and the opening of China. Non-Western countries needed to Westernize in order to modernize.

Yet, not long after completing the draft, I was agreeing with Huntington’s thesis that the very success of modernization in non-Western countries was encouraging indigenization and ethnic confidence, rather than Westernization. Upon learning about “cultural Marxism,” I concluded that Western liberalism had undergone a major ideological change away from its earlier “Victorian” commitment to middle class family values, national pride, and high culture. Present-day liberals were not only devotees of the doctrine that “working men have no country,” they were avidly promoting the idea that Western nations had become places with indefinite ethnic boundaries founded on discursive statements for the benefit of humanity.

This Marxist takeover of liberalism was so sweeping that no one was even asking: what about the liberals in the nineteenth century who were fervent supporters of nationalism and the essential importance of being part of a community with shared traditions, language, and customs? Eric Hobsbawm’s claim, in The Age of Capital (1975), that nations were “ideological constructs” created without a substantial grounding in immemorial lands, dialects, folkways, and ethnos, should be contrasted to the ideas of such liberal nationalists as Camillo di Cavour (1810–61), Max Weber (1864–1920), and even John Stuart Mill (1806–73) and Ernest Renan (1823–92). While these liberals emphasized a form of nationalism compatible with liberal values, they were firm supporters of national identities at a time when a “non-xenophobic nationalism” was meant to acknowledge the presence of white ethnic minorities within European nations. None of these liberals ever intended to endorse mass immigration from Africa. Hobsbawm directed his argument specifically against the peoples of Europe, the very same people who contributed the idea and practice of nation-building, one of the West’s most neglected contributions to the world.

The “patriotic” emphasis on education and assimilation left me totally unsatisfied. I kept thinking about the Muslims who already made up 25 per cent of the population in Marseilles and Rotterdam, 20 per cent in Malmo, 15 per cent in Brussels and Birmingham and 10 per cent in London, Paris and Copenhagen. Calmly identifying Europe as “Western” when “a fifth of Europeans will be Muslim by 2050” made no sense. My apprehensions went far beyond “radical” Islam; I was coming across the writings of forbidden authors never mentioned in academia, and one of them, Guillaume Faye, persuaded me more than anyone in his valuation of Muslim immigration:

Islam corresponds to nothing in the European soul and temperament. Its massive introduction into Europe would disfigure a European culture already damaged by Americanization. An assertive dogmatism, an absence of the Faustian spirit, a fundamental denial of humanism (understood as the autonomy of the human will) in favor of an absolute submission to God, an extreme rigidity of social obligations and prohibitions, a theocratic confusion of civil society, religion and the political State, an absolute monotheism, a profound ambivalence toward artistic freedom and scientific inquiry — all these traits are incompatible with traditional European patterns of thought, which are fundamentally polytheistic. Those who believe that Islam can be Europeanized, can adapt to European culture, can accept the concept of secularism, make a dreadful error. Islam, essentially, does not understand compromise. Its essence is authoritarian and bellicose.

I was also wondering about “Black flash mobs,” “the color of crime,” “race and IQ,” but it was Paul Kersey’s Escape from Detroit: The Collapse of America’s Black Metropolis (2012) which brought home the knowledge that a place is a function of its current racial makeup more so than even its previous (Western) institutions or current politics. I could not help asking: was Detroit with its 82.7 percent black population, or Jackson, Miss. (79.4 percent), or Baltimore (64.3 percent), or New Orleans (67 percent), or Flint, Mich. (56.6 percent) places that could seriously be identified as Western? Were these cities “the end of history,” showcases of liberal-democratic achievement? How about the intense demographic transformation of Los Angeles, with its 48 percent Mexican population), of Houston, (41 percent), San Antonio (61 percent), Phoenix (42 percent)? Were these places better identified as future members of the Nation of Aztlan?

The liberal elites would have us believe that anyone can become American simply by accepting liberalism and the same multicultural ideology which, by its nature, cannot envision the American nation except as a culture that is inclusive and celebrates the traditions of everyone and, in effect, says that the Europeans who founded the nation have no other identity but to open themselves up to the rest of the world.

With these new thoughts, reading the “conservative” liberals I used to favor not long ago, it was crystal clear that they were not really for the West. Rather, they were promoters of a borderless civilization without heritage. I could now see that what Niall Ferguson was sponsoring in his bestseller, The West and the Rest (2010), was that historians and schools should appreciate Europe merely for being the first place to witness industrialization, mass consumption, and democratic institutions. The West was a showcase for a future world in which different ethnic groups would co-exist and interbreed in an atmosphere of liberal affluence.  The West was a construct, a discourse with “borders that [were] blurred in the extreme” (p. 15). Less conservative but typically liberal and “scientific,” Ian Morris, in his highly acclaimed book, Why the West Rules – For Now (2010), brushed aside all prior identifications of the West with Europe, claiming that the Islamic world was not less central to Europe’s identity, celebrating the rise of Asians, and telling Westerners not to worry about their eventual demise since, after all, “wherever you go, whatever you do, people are all much the same;” “humanity’s biological unity rules out race-based theories” (p. 61). Books I had welcomed enthusiastically two years ago — Walter Laqueur’s, The Last Days of Europe (2007), Pascal Bruckner’s The Tyranny of Guilt, An Essay on Western Masochism (2010) — for their criticism of multiculturalism, were evidently defending a thoroughly multiracial Western universalism against those who were “hostile to the diversity of physiognomies and the plurality of ways of life…the great mixtures of [Western] cities.” Muslims and Africans need not fear the West, Bruckner insisted: “monochrome Europe, which was mostly white, is gone” (p. 154). Immigrants should be educated to join the melting pot, Laqueur said, instead of perpetuating their “separateness…by not mixing with the local population, only seldom marrying outside their community” (p. 71).

In short, today I no longer deny that the West was a civilization consisting of nations with similar “genetic” unities. It is very simple, race, the one factor academics were compelled to ignore except in opprobrium, was/is central to the West’s historical identity and geographic location. Traditions, customs, and national particularisms are also important to the long term preservation of Western countries in the face of relentless globalization.

Go to Part 2 of 5.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

87 Comments to "Where is the historical West? Part 1 of 5"

  1. The Goy Chevalier's Gravatar The Goy Chevalier
    December 8, 2012 - 2:12 am | Permalink

    @A Swain: What, exactly, does the Catholic cult have to do with Orthodox Christianity?

  2. Exoplanet Finder's Gravatar Exoplanet Finder
    December 6, 2012 - 6:01 pm | Permalink

    One of the best parts of reading your writing is the sense of honesty in it, as in the intro statements about a transformation that every one of those who cares, who really cares, has to make. We need more of that. I will try to see what got me interested too. And your emphasis of the right magazines and e-zines is nice cause it links us all through a frame- and hints at people who are not reading this stuff where to go. And seeing it spelled out that the academy refuses to see the West in and of itself is powerful. Why do they not? Why have 2 or 3 generations of people been denied the truth of what they really are, if not to benefit the forces carrying out their own disintegration? Bernal’s term Afroasiatic is a nullity, it exists in the minds of morons only. I also despise the term Bentley always uses in our textbook, Afro-Eurasian. God, I hate that term.

    Greeks were ‘founded and influenced’ by Egyptian and Semitic influences, but when the real story is told, that Alexandria etc. were Greek cities, an example that the opposite is actually true, it is ‘cultural imperialism’. I have in my class this year a boy whose parents were Copic Egyptians. I asked what they were so she could explain it to me and so I could hear her take. She knew next to nothing about them. I asked if she knew about the persecution at the hands of Islam? She only very vaguely did. She also did not know these people have the clearest link to the non-Arabic pyramid builders of ancient times. But… she does have a personal trainer that helped her lose 30 American pounds.

    The Hobo-Dyer map is indeed in idiocy. It would not even exist except for those whom it marginalizes- and on purpose- something that cannot be done to anyone else a chorus of liberal-universalist hypocrite anger rises. That is why the University of Antarctica came to be, to expose that crap by making fun of it yet being somehow uneasily in hoc to it, which represents a very real oppression by it.

    Your Fukuyama- Huntington discussion is pleasant because you take the though process itself and describe it. I really like that. I can compare it to mine and see what I missed, or what I had that was congruent. You know your writing hits home when it generates the same reaction (re: the marxist takeover of liberalism) in a human eye as the movement of a small animal does in a cat’s eye- a dilation of the pupil- an ‘I agree with this.’ (as a side-note, I could say that my wife asked “why is our cat so fat? To which I replied in a Darwinian way: “because like all females, it knows how to extract resources from males. That is what it is expert at.”)

    Thank you for smashing these liars who say that 19th century liberalism was a direct predecessor of today’s, for they did not EVER even think about the wholesale invasion of their lands by, if I may use the term, ‘Afroasiatics’. That may be the only correct use of the term. No, they were all liberal then, but today they would all, each and every one, but so far right they would lose their jobs.

    The Islamic 5th column is the biggest disaster that has happened in Europe in 1000 years. Or maybe more. It will be worse than WWII when enough Europeans have been displaced by Semitic and Turkic ethnics to equal the number killed in the maelstrom of Hitlerean Euro-suicide. The Muslims of today should be worshiping that one man more than Kohemeni. He did what they could never do, and now they reap the reward.

    The questioning of Detroit and the cities of Atzlan as Western was great. It is a perfect example. No one in Detroit feels like they are in a Western country. They feel like they are in an African hell-hole, that is why no one visits there as tourists unless it is to take pictures of the shit that has been wrought for shock value (which indeed it has). No, this is a conquest, pure and simple. A good book to write or concept to think about is what is “In the back of the black man’s mind” or “In the back of a red man’s mind”. Explore that and we will see: the most anti-liberal thoughts anyone can’t imagine: the cleansing of the white race through mixture and expulsion.

    Defending multi-racial universalism as you say is the pesticide of the white nations. There are white nations and just like all mixtures (in the chemical sense), they have some toleration for absorption of foreign substances. But they are all being polluted to a level of toxicity unprecedented now since the 1960s, and defending the order that brought that on will just not do. I like your demand to dig deeper to the root reason that the West is the West. And the reason the West is the West is because the West appears wherever the white race is predominant.

    How about telling anyone else in this world that ‘Monochrome Africa… is gone’ or ‘Monochrome Asia… is gone’. You couldn’t do it. And if it were true, it wouldn’t make a big difference for the world anyway. Conversely, the West is the land of the white race, and when it is attacked in this way, it would/is making a big difference in the quality of life on the planet earth. It is our job to reinvigorate the West, and this article makes clear what that means.

  3. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 6, 2012 - 2:15 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Oh, gee, Mickey, I had forgotten how my generation is responsible for all of the evils now attendant to contemporary Western societies– and, how I am personally responsible for any and every such trend supposedly carried out by my own generation!?! Exactly which blameless generation do you belong to, by the way, Mickey?

  4. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    December 6, 2012 - 4:46 am | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    Don’t you know who you are…don’t you know what you are? What you have done? The legacy to the West of your generation will be its greatest existential crisis for 10,000 years. Do you begin to envisage how hated and cursed your generation will be? All of you….your gravestones will be broken to rubble and your exhumed bodies thrown on the pyre. You don’t deserve association with the Revolutionary War. You were defeated without firing a shot. You gave it away. You were the custodian only you did not own it.

  5. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 4, 2012 - 10:00 pm | Permalink


    We apparently live in parallel universes, Alexander. On my planet, Earth, in the Milky Way Galaxy, in the only universe that I know of for a fact, rather than as through theoretical speculation, my ancestors fought a war against the British Crown. Fourteen and a half months into it, their thirteen then-British colonies declared their independence, issuing a joint Declaration of Independence, to that effect, outlining their major beefs with King George III and his imperial regime. The war dragged on; but, thanks to the intervention of French forces of King Louis XVI, my ancestors won. The British acknowledged as much in a treaty, agreed to in Paris, and called, fittingly enough, The Treaty of Paris (admittedly, only one in a long line of treaties bearing that name, before and since). That is a significant portion of what is known– in my country, on the planet Earth, in the Milky Way Galaxy, in this universe– as American history.

    I am aware that I speak English, as do most of my countrymen (by which I mean, retrogressively, my fellow American citizens, male and female). That does not make me an Englishman, any more than speaking Spanish makes a an illegal alien in my country a Spaniard (unless, of course, he or she came over from Spain, which most such most assuredly did not). I can love the language without loving the British, just as I may love French fries without loving the French.

    My name is for the N.S.A. and the Mossad to know, and for others to figure out on their own, from the clues that I have liberally dropped, hither and yon. If my (true, but incomplete) initials bother you, feel free to just think of me as ‘Decay’– which is close enough to the truth, at this late date.

  6. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    December 4, 2012 - 5:02 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows: @D. K.:
    Good evening,

    D.K.(Do you have a first name, friend)

    There was no revolution between the USA and Britain!

    A protest about taxation is more appropriate. It was bloody at times. It was by fought by Englishmen in the colonies against Englishmen back in England. Protesting the injustice of not have represention in Parliament.

    You speak English, D.K , I think you will agree, the ultimate tool to control a people, and we still speak English in the USA . Our Congress, the Senate are modeled after the House of commons and Lords. The President is our king.

    We have much in common, D.K. Let’s celebrate our common bond.

  7. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 4, 2012 - 5:00 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    I was merely replying to someone, Mickey, who has stated here that American citizenship rightfully belongs only to those who are purely White Anglo-Saxon Protestants, and that the United Kingdom should be considered for admission to the Union as the 51st state! The fact that my own Dutch ancestors settled in (what became) New York in the 1630s may be dated, but it remains relevant to whose country this was and is. Feel welcome to explicate just what “dated nonsense” of mine you are referring to, and why it is nonsensical. Otherwise, I will assume that you just mean that I have opinions and values that you do not wish to see expounded upon here, simply because you do not share them. Regardless, that you somehow find my posts here “of late” to be nonsensical, rather than those of Alexander (the Not-So-Great), speaks volumes….

  8. A Swain's Gravatar A Swain
    December 4, 2012 - 4:07 pm | Permalink

    @The Goy Chevalier:

    I’m not so sure about Christianity being our rock any longer!

    Consider the following:

    “All of the six new cardinals are under 80 years old and thus eligible under Church law to enter a conclave to elect a new pope. The elite group is known as “cardinal electors”

    All are non-White and non-European.

    That’s right, they have the power to elect a non-White from amongst them and undoubtedly will when the present incumbent pops his clogs.

  9. A Swain's Gravatar A Swain
    December 4, 2012 - 3:49 pm | Permalink


    We White peoples are both being outwardly attacked, raped and murdered by the Third World hordes invited into our motherlands by design as well as witnessing our cultures, histories and achievements being denigrated, vilified and obliterated in the process.

    I have no doubt that this current attempted physical extermination at the hands of the proxy armies of Third Worlders, will eventually greatly intensify in the shape of Islam.

    In America, concentration camps have been under construction for decades. The same will, almost certainly, materialize in Europe too, in the not very distant future.

  10. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    December 4, 2012 - 3:27 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    Oh for goodness sake D.K. what unhelpful dated nonsense you talk of late.

  11. A Swain's Gravatar A Swain
    December 4, 2012 - 3:13 pm | Permalink


    Indeed. Ashkenazis hold little or no love/reverence for the native Jew. There is well-know racial and cultural tensions between the two. In fact the latter side with their Muslim co-inhabitants.

  12. A Swain's Gravatar A Swain
    December 4, 2012 - 3:02 pm | Permalink

    @Boris Carlov:

    I am inclined to think that Liberalism (the Classic brand) probably dates back to Greek civilization and elements of it then adopted/adapted by subsequent European Christian- based civilizations right up to our present which is,
    of course, now in the process of waning.

    Jews are responsible for infiltrating Classical Liberalism in the first quarter of the 20th century (some maintain further back, ie, the French Revolution or in the middle to late 1800s) and corrupting it via the Frankfurt School giving rise to Cultural Marxism, insidiously referred to as neoLiberalism.

  13. Free Thinker's Gravatar Free Thinker
    December 3, 2012 - 9:41 pm | Permalink

    @Andrew: I prefer the Swiss model where the individual is the building block of political philosophy .Where the individual feels they have ownership in the political structure . Ofcourse you need a topnotch education system to run such a state .

  14. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    December 3, 2012 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    @Sir Winston Londonstan: Was? Or is? Could it be you are visiting the wrong clubs, or getting “behind” in your research?

    The only “Winnie” I ever registered was the b*tch who was once married to Nelson Mandela. I had hoped to give her a “necklace” … you know the kind: something hot and with plenty of glow.

  15. Sir Winston Londonstan's Gravatar Sir Winston Londonstan
    December 3, 2012 - 9:30 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon: Winnie the Poo was a scatological hamster for sure !

  16. Ignorent Miscegenators's Gravatar Ignorent Miscegenators
    December 3, 2012 - 9:15 am | Permalink

    @HolyHoaxer: Yes HH many a devious deed is coming to the surface with the advent of the internet .

  17. The Goy Chevalier's Gravatar The Goy Chevalier
    December 3, 2012 - 7:12 am | Permalink

    Dostoievsky wrote: “And, note a general trait: our whole problem resolves itself into the first step–to practice–whereas everybody, to the last man, is shouting and busying himself about principles; and practice, willy-nilly, has slipped into the hands of Jews alone.”

  18. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    December 3, 2012 - 6:40 am | Permalink


    Thanks. I haven’t kept up with A3P, but I’ve heard the same thing before: they avoid being explicitly pro-White. I don’t understand it.

  19. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    December 3, 2012 - 5:24 am | Permalink

    @Bobby: I would go further Bobby, and describe England (and thus the bulk of its inhabitants) as the sickest ‘nation’ on the entire planet.

    Clues for “how and why” can be found by careful examination of its peculiar history, not to mention the early domination of England by a Central Bank.

    The role of rampant homosexuality amongst England’s so-called ‘elite’ is also central to the wider sickness that has long dominated the “Rule Britannia” crowd. You must also understand that it was England — under its bankrupt, sexually deviant, and alcoholic Jewish Prime Minister, “Sir” Winston Churchill — that started World War Two.

    For some overwhelming and damning evidence, study (after preferably downloading) this video carefully.

    And ignore the silly “warning” attached to this video by YouTube (now under Google ownership). Just click through.

  20. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 3, 2012 - 5:20 am | Permalink

    @The Goy Chevalier:
    Goy Chevalier – pleonasm? ☻

  21. John's Gravatar John
    December 3, 2012 - 5:08 am | Permalink

    Alice Teller: “I am often surprised by the desire we all have to find the one single cause of our current plight. I do not think it is either/or. We were simply dazzled by our own light. It made us a little dizzy and we lost our balance.”

    There are single causes and there are conditions sine quibus non.

  22. HolyHoaxer's Gravatar HolyHoaxer
    December 3, 2012 - 2:09 am | Permalink

    I have recently been doing a bit of noodling into Mesopotamia & Sumer and this statement in this article jumped out of the page :
    Ancient Greece was an outgrowth of the Near East, or, as Martin Bernal put it, “Afroasiatic”. Greek civilization was not founded by Aryan settlers but was instead the product of Egyptian and Semitic influences.

    The very interesting thing about the Sumerians is that they were not Semites and it appears to me that they made a point in their art of showing their noses as not Semitic but even the opposite . I could well imagine that the Sumerians described the Semites as hook noses because after all it is the most obvious peg to hang on .
    Who believes in this day and age that if a cuneiform tablet was translated that positively stated that ‘We the Sumerians came from the north’ that this information wouldn’t be suppressed .
    When one looks at the logic of the MEast and knowing that it is the temperate climate zone that threw up the most intelligent people , then this naturally leads to the inevitable conclusion that it was Europeans and Indo Europeans that built the civilizations of the MEast having migrated their to escape the Ice ages .
    And what happened to Sumerians and Egyptians ? I think they were most probably overrun by low IQ Semites and the sand swallowed them up .
    Many of the Early Egyptians are also shown as white and through slow inbreeding they went brown and to extinction :-) .
    Of course all these sort of conclusions are heretical in the suicide called Multiculturalism .

  23. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 3, 2012 - 2:00 am | Permalink


    Have you ever heard of the American Revolutionary War, Alexander? Do you know who was fighting whom, and why? I am 3/32nds English, by descent, but I am 100% American, by birth. I also am Irish (5/32), Scottish (3/32), Welsh (2/32), Dutch (1/32), German (1/32), and (Alsatian) French (1/32), by descent– and each of those six national groups has plenty of grudges to bear against the bloody English! I am an Anglophone, but certainly not an Anglophile.

  24. Liz's Gravatar Liz
    December 3, 2012 - 1:32 am | Permalink

    @ Andrew: “Post-enlightenment Europe is exceedingly weak…” Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say “Post-WW1/WW2 Europe is exceedingly weak..”? Do you not agree that the Western spiritual and intellectual classes suffered the same fate – albeit more slowly – as their Russian bourgeiose counterparts? (and at the hands of the same perps, btw, the difference being that the Russians were shot or starved while we are still being slowly strangled)

  25. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 3, 2012 - 12:14 am | Permalink

    A second point I’d like to mention that is briefly alluded to by the author is some of the latest writings by leftists in England. It is clear to me at least, that they are even crazier than some of our leftists in the U.S., as impossible as that sounds.

  26. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 3, 2012 - 12:09 am | Permalink

    A brilliant piece that I need more time to ponder and only write this comment to beg others to consider it closely. This author is spelling out what might by called axioms on globalism, nationalism, race, as well as the importance of place.

  27. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    December 2, 2012 - 10:59 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    Why the disbelief?? Were you or family members subject to English dominance and still bear a grudge against England.

    A 2000(not 2008. Sorry) census supports my claim that 8 out ten last names are of English ancestry.

    Please check out the article entitled, English-Americans at American renaissance, written by Robert henderson.

  28. The Goy Chevalier's Gravatar The Goy Chevalier
    December 2, 2012 - 10:47 pm | Permalink

    I can’t understand how any White-conscious person of European decent who identifies as “Christian” could follow any other form of Christianity than its purest; Orthodoxy. Tradition is vitally important (I believe that much we agree on), and if any have broken from tradition it is the churches and their followers who do not identify as Orthodox. As might be expected, the history of these derivative, secular “Christian” movements appear to stamped with the Kosher seal of approval.

    The history of modern constitutions (from the 17th century onward) does not paint a pretty picture for traditional European society.

    The diehard attachment to the United States by an overwhelming majority of America’s White population is a prime demonstration of the failure of unification between the practical and theoretical mechanisms of the White identity movement.

    No human organization can ultimately be successful without the proper ingredients, of which include homogenous tradition, ethnicity, culture, history, spirituality, and science, to name a few.

    Different branches of the same tree will develop independently of one another, but ultimately constitute, when considered together, the whole. Advancement on a practical front is not necessarily indicative of future success, nor does it demonstrate coordination with a theoretical counterpart.

    The movement cannot be communist in nature, i.e. the prole both manages and labors. A good management team is crucial for the security and development of the organism “people.” Dostoievsky wrote over 1,000 pages to this effect in his little-discussed “Diary of a Writer.” The only legitimate translation (of which I am aware) by Boris Brasol is hard to find, but its out there. Obviously, future versions, with any hope of being taught in contemporary classrooms, have been “abridged”, obviously at the behest of Kosher pillow biters.

    Rene Guenon, in a similar, but more abstract manner writes in the conclusion of his “Introduction to the Hindu Doctrines,” that if the West doesn’t make fundamental metaphysical changes soon, it is doomed.

    I do not necessarily identify with a particular religion, but those “atheists” who are quick to trash “religion” discount the important role in plays in unifying and solidifying a group of people. Any objective student of culture and history will discern this only a short way along their path to realization. Theology (or pure metaphysic, as in the case of the Orient according to Guenon) is successful when it becomes infused in the every day life and tradition of the people who follow it. From the perspective of Christian Orthodoxy, the theological tradition remains the same, while the traditions of the peoples who adopt it begin to change accordingly (while also necessarily adding their own cultural particulars to the overall doctrine).

    I’m not necessarily convinced by those — who I consider more plebeian cogitators — in the White-identity movement who are quick to trash religion. I don’t think the fruit borne by a group of atheists with a basic desire for White solidarity will possess enough pulp for long term sustenance.

  29. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 2, 2012 - 10:31 pm | Permalink

    Alas Sir, it is you who is misinformed regarding both Maryland and Catholicism. I did not say state, I said colony. I am no johnny come lately.


  30. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 2, 2012 - 10:16 pm | Permalink



    “In 1629, George Calvert, 1st Lord Baltimore in the Irish House of Lords, fresh from his failure further north with Newfoundland’s Avalon colony, applied to Charles I for a new royal charter for what was to become the Province of Maryland. Calvert’s interest in creating a colony derived from his Catholicism and his desire for the creation of a haven for Catholics in the new world. In addition, he was familiar with the fortunes that had been made in tobacco in Virginia, and hoped to recoup some of the financial losses he had sustained in his earlier colonial venture in Newfoundland.[40][41]

    “George Calvert died in April 1632, but a charter for ‘Maryland Colony’ (in Latin, ‘Terra Maria’) was granted to his son, Cæcilius Calvert, 2nd Lord Baltimore, on June 20, 1632. The new colony was named in honor of Henrietta Maria of France, wife of Charles I of England.[42] This however, is in dispute as many scholars believe it was named after Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ. They point to the fact that the first capital of Maryland was St. Mary’s. In addition, no colony or territory has ever been named in honor of someone’s middle name. The territory was also consecrated in honor of the Virgin Mary on St. Clements Island.[43] The specific name given in the charter was phrased ‘Terra Mariae, anglice, Maryland’. The English name was preferred over the Latin due in part to the undesired association of ‘Mariae’ with the Spanish Jesuit Juan de Mariana.[41][44]”



    Rhode Island, today, has a Roman Catholic majority, and Massachusetts is close to having one.

  31. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 2, 2012 - 10:05 pm | Permalink


    Are you flashing back to the good doctor himself, Gayle, or to some other character in the film of that name? Personally, I prefer to flash back to ‘Miss Scott’ (Tracy Reed– cousin of Oliver, and step-daughter of Carol!).

  32. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 2, 2012 - 10:00 pm | Permalink


    “American” is a nationality, not an ethnic label; it has never been otherwise.

    I am unaware of anyone here who denies the historical demographics of this country, which have evolved over time– sometimes slowly, sometimes not. Nor am I aware of anyone here who is an anti-Anglophone.

    Please feel welcome to provide us with a link to support your claim that 80% of all surnames in the United States, as recently as four years ago, were of English descent– which strikes me as highly unlikely . . . especially in light of the fact that there was, of course, no census taken in 2008! By the way, over half of the current American states are named after Indian tribes– which rather puts the lie to your claim that “the landscape of the usa [sic] is English.”

  33. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    December 2, 2012 - 9:32 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    There has never been a catholic state in the USA. You are misinformed fair lady.

    Boston was 40% Irish catholic in the later 18th century, but has declined since. Maryland admitted to the United States Union in 1788 was protestant, as is most of the nation today. Religious trends may change in the next 20-30 yrs, however, especially with catholic sanctuary cities popping up in the USA for destitute latin american immigrant catholics who have never heard of condoms.

    Catholicism is a cult, like mormonism, or judaism. Catholicism specifically, is intellectual submissiveness of the highest order and offensive to christianity. It requires a submission of the mind and body and worships witchcraft and trickery even today. It also has created an enormous illegal population boom, even warren buffet is horrified.

    Henry V111 expelled the Catholic church from England in the 15th century so he could divorce his wife. Catholic tradition prohibits divorce, abortion, contraception, self-pleasure, etc and is at odds with the american protestant faith.

    Readers who are catholic may convert, most of you are probably cafeteria catholics anyway, picking and choosing what suits you, so you will fit in with the free thinking protestants you pretend not to be.

  34. Gayle's Gravatar Gayle
    December 2, 2012 - 8:48 pm | Permalink


    Why is it when I read your comments I get Dr. Strangelove flashbacks?

  35. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 2, 2012 - 8:36 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: I live in fear that someone will try to supply your question with an answer.

  36. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 2, 2012 - 8:33 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: I’d never seen that map or heard of the projection till I saw this article yesterday. Had I seen it all by itself, I would have taken it as a gag perpetrated by a computer-savvy Australian coming off a three-day bender following a big win by the football team he supports. Without the tedious PC baggage identifying and justifying its raison d’être, it does seem to make Australia the center of attention, doesn’t it?

    Of course, had it really been an Ozzie gag, there would have been a computer-generated image of an oversized Ozzie standing in the middle of the country and, ahem, micturating into the South Pacific.

  37. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 2, 2012 - 6:37 pm | Permalink

    @Heather Blue:Abolish the intellectual monopoly regime, period.

  38. Andrew's Gravatar Andrew
    December 2, 2012 - 6:30 pm | Permalink

    “Europeans are the highest race of man and are not barnyard animals; we are not just breeding stock!”

    Each organism from the lowest form of life to the highest must reproduce, and must maintain its genetic quality to survive. Humans are not above Nature’s laws.

    “We do not function well when we are told what to do in an absolutely dictatorial way.”

    Human beings are born with their understanding of the world a tabula rasa, a blank slate. We are primarily non-rational beings that rely on the indoctrination and education we receive beginning at childhood to fill our minds, which motivates our behavior through our lives. If we are not indoctrinated purposefully, we will receive it from the media around us, and we will live our lives with television, movies and video games as the fundamental basis of our understanding of the world.

    Unrestricted freedom is chaos, a lack of order with a hugely destructive potential that gravely endangers any social order. Freedom of expression and speech are therefore dangerous to any society, the greater the freedom, the greater the danger. Figures like Socrates, going about questioning the gods, questioning authority, questioning everything function as termites, weakening social structures and institutions. For a society to be stable, it must have authority and legitimacy, it must be authoritarian to a degree. Medieval society maintained its stability in part by enforcing its institutions through strict punishments for questioners and heretics.

    “there have always been those that questioned the imposed dogma, those that have resisted the prevailing opinion, those that have rebelled. This rebelliousness, this curiosity, that manifests itself in certain individuals, has always been a hallmark of our race and no other.”

    A healthy society, which will last over the eons, cannot tolerate significant rebellion against its order. Societies that have lasted through the centuries had this right. The tolerant ones have naturally perished, and those that cling to tolerance presently have numbered days.

    “Freedom of thought is a cancer? Was that your doctoral dissertation? Did you arrive at that conclusion by something other than free thought? Here you are using the Crown Jewel of the Enlightenment- the first amendment. For shame.”

    Nature has commanded that each and every organism’s two imperatives are to survive and propagate the species. This applies to all subspecies of humans, including Europeans. Our laws, customs, traditions and institutions must therefore be judged primarily on whether it is helping our hindering our survival. The ideal society is an intolerant and strict one, which enforces a social order designed to achieve nature’s two imperatives. It does not tolerate criticism, and does not provide for excessive freedom and all of the inherent chaos and destruction that results from it.

    The “enlightenment” occurred 3 centuries ago, a blink of time in the span of mankind, and what has been the result? Post-enlightenment Europe is exceedingly weak, spiritually bankrupt and demoralized, lacking willpower, confidence, unity and even seemingly the instinct of self-defense. Humans are not designed to live in complete freedom, faced with limitless choices. We crave rules, laws and leaders, and fail to thrive without them. Traditionally, this need was satisfied by an alliance of political and religious figures, the chieftain and shaman in the hunter-gatherer era to the duke and bishop in the middle ages. What we have now are effeminate politicians and coddling religious figures. Islam, authoritative, dominant, vital and healthy, finds it easy to colonize an anemic, spiritually sick, leaderless Europe. Nature’s laws include the dictum that the strong will dominate the weak, and eventually displace them.

  39. December 2, 2012 - 6:29 pm | Permalink

    @STARSCREAM: How about, “In your opinion I’m a racist, you only say that because I’m white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
    Africa for Africans.
    Asia for Asians.
    White countries for everyone?

  40. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 2, 2012 - 6:16 pm | Permalink

    @Alexander: ‘
    As a WASP in good standing, descended from the WASPs who were welcomed into this country in the Catholic colony of Maryland, I have one thing to say. Taradiddle!

  41. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    December 2, 2012 - 5:57 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.: @D. K.:

    Please keep your responses civil.

    My point is ethnic definition.
    Whether the readers like it or not, we are an English speaking, white, christian nation, and protestant, not catholic. That is our ethnic core.. I don’t oppose catholic immigrants provided they are of caucasion extraction-again definition is critical-and we as americans need to expressly make the point and enshrine it into law.

    8 out of 10 last names in the USA according to the 2008 census are of English descent. Take a look at a map of the USA-her rivers, counties, etc are all English. the landscape of the usa is English.

    The USA is soaking in English culture and history and none of you can change that. So embrace it and be proud of it.

  42. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    December 2, 2012 - 5:29 pm | Permalink

    @Heather Blue:
    USA cultural i-cons [emphasis on ‘con’] :
    Ann Frank
    Saint Einstein
    Doctor Fraud
    Holocaust [tm]
    Holocaust Museums [tm]
    Feel free to add to hat short [but all too long] list.

  43. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    December 2, 2012 - 5:14 pm | Permalink

    @Heather Blue:

    Gentiles lack conviction of principles. Asserting that Sunday is a day of rest for prayer and worship, for example, would be obvious especially since” we are a christian nation”-Woodrow wilson.

    American christianity is incapable of defending her right to assert herself.

  44. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 2, 2012 - 5:01 pm | Permalink


    What percentage of native-born American residents are pure WASPs, and thus, by definition (i.e., the one that you just pulled out of your ass), Americans? Which laws passed by Congress, and signed by presidents (or else passed over one’s veto), are valid? Do you need to go back and figure out which one’s were passed and signed by sufficient majorities of WASPs? . . . the same with Constitutional amendments? . . . and petitions from territories or foreign states, like Texas and California, to become states of the Union? What about naturalization laws that are incongruent with your definition? Does an all-WASP Congress have the Constitutional authority to grant naturalization to anyone who fails to meet your definition?

  45. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    December 2, 2012 - 4:41 pm | Permalink

    @stamrscream, normally I would say there is no bad publicity, but such a low rent spectacle offers little to no benefit.

  46. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    December 2, 2012 - 4:39 pm | Permalink

    Fender said: jews shouldn’t be allowed to have opinions on European history, culture, or identity. It needs to be made illegal in all European and European-derived societies. If they don’t like it they can either move to Israel or the inside of a jail cell.

    My views exactly. I am so tired of listening to Jewish garbage. Why should it make any difference to us what they have to say about anything? EXCEPT Jews have monopoly control of the main stream media. Movies and TV are the most powerful. Why are the anti trust laws not applied to an alien group having monopoly control over our communications system? If we are not allowed monopoly control over our own property why should the Jews have tribal control over something as valuable as the main stream media?

  47. Axon's Gravatar Axon
    December 2, 2012 - 4:00 pm | Permalink

    @rick dimbath: @rick dimbath:

    Gibson is the man!

    I will leave the Protestant/Catholic hair ball for others to
    Go on about

    10-4! Double that back at you, brother!

    Too many serious faces here,
    when all they need to do is cheer:
    We are good!
    We are great!
    In our hands is our fate!
    Go Europe!!! Go Europe!!!

  48. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    December 2, 2012 - 3:09 pm | Permalink

    @cecilhenry: I want solutions for the English speaking White race, so I want to identify the problems and solutions as I see them. Firstly,
    The character of the american WASP is that he/she lacks conviction of principles. The word conviction is conspicuously absent from much contemporary american thought and dialogue. Conviction of principles matters because it solidifies in cement a set of beliefs and values. People die, but our principles pass on. So, ensuring their integrity is critical to future generations.


    Most of you reading assume you are American because you are born on american soil. A mistake on your part, because you are actually born to blood.
    We need to define Americans: A white anglo-saxon protestant,English speaking people. Our constitution, bill of rights, are essentially evolutionary improvements from our Mother country, England. In fact we could make a case for the UK becoming a 51st state– a different subject, however.

    Today, American law foolishly allows any person born on US soil to be considered a citizen. The unwashed masses have secured safe passage to the USA and exploited this law. We need to change this law, and allow only those born to US citizens(WASPS)a right to citizenship.

  49. rick dimbath's Gravatar rick dimbath
    December 2, 2012 - 2:40 pm | Permalink

    Went from Citizens to Consumers in the 70’s

    bunch of other stuff was being dumped on us


  50. rick dimbath's Gravatar rick dimbath
    December 2, 2012 - 2:31 pm | Permalink

    Way to much poison in our schools, Hollywood,
    Media, textbooks, everywhere,

    Shield your Children from all that anti-Euro-Anglo poison

  51. rick dimbath's Gravatar rick dimbath
    December 2, 2012 - 2:26 pm | Permalink


    Right on

    Mel Gibson is Cool!!!!!


    I will leave the Protestant/Catholic hair ball for others to
    Go on about

  52. Axon's Gravatar Axon
    December 2, 2012 - 2:07 pm | Permalink

    @rick dimbath:

    HURRAH! – for the Europeans!

    HURRAH!! – for the Europeans!!

    HURRAH!! – for the Europeans!!!

  53. rick dimbath's Gravatar rick dimbath
    December 2, 2012 - 2:00 pm | Permalink





  54. rick dimbath's Gravatar rick dimbath
    December 2, 2012 - 1:58 pm | Permalink



  55. rick dimbath's Gravatar rick dimbath
    December 2, 2012 - 1:55 pm | Permalink

    We are not racists

    We love Europeans

  56. rick dimbath's Gravatar rick dimbath
    December 2, 2012 - 1:53 pm | Permalink


  57. cecilhenry's Gravatar cecilhenry
    December 2, 2012 - 1:36 pm | Permalink

    Great article. Can’t wait for part 2-5;

    Every wakes up in their own way I guess. Better hurry!

    December 2, 2012 - 1:08 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    It just aired last night so I was unable to locate a utube clip, but still highlighted on the a3p site…http://american3rdposition.com/?p=8621

  59. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 2, 2012 - 12:55 pm | Permalink

    Is there a link to the interview? Thanks.

  60. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 2, 2012 - 12:53 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Gayle. Perhaps you should write an article? There is enormous value to first hand, honest accounts. BTW, if you allow your cursor to hover at the lower right hand corner of the comment you are replying to the magic word will appear and allow you to link to it. It is our secret handshake.

    December 2, 2012 - 12:47 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    Jason you’re a smart guy and I’ve always respected your viewpoint. AS SUCH, maybe you can shed light on why Bill Johnson of the A3P went on Russell Brand’s show last night and made a complete mockery of white rights?
    -Russell instantly mopped the floor with him having the crowd call him “racist” as he sat there and smiled like a simpleton peasant.
    -Instead of using clever arguments such as: “If I’m a racist, then the entire non-white world is racist as they refuse to diversify…Japan, China, Middle East, etc ad infinitum…
    -He re-inforced anti-white stereotypes that places any white person with an ethnic identity in the “Stupid-Racist Camp”
    -If this is the best A3P has to offer, a bumbling simpleton representing no one but shame and mediocrity, then throw the towel in now.

  62. Gayle's Gravatar Gayle
    December 2, 2012 - 12:17 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    “You are certainly right that time is of the essence. What forced you to face reality? We all need to get better at sharing the truth that helps those indoctrinated by the system to see the light. ”

    Actually, it was moving into a mostly-black neighborhood 10 years ago, as an idiotic liberal intent on “urban pioneering”. 10 years of witnessing black apathy, passivity and tolerance of decay, blight, and chaos. Witnessing first-hand the fact that whites have the ability to make beautiful houses, neighborhoods, cultures; and blacks, quite frankly, do not – on the whole (there are exceptions, of course) do not even have the ability or wish to maintain said infrastructure.

    My experience is actually not an education that I would wish on anyone ;)

  63. Axon's Gravatar Axon
    December 2, 2012 - 10:38 am | Permalink

    We are the “good guys”!!!

    Simple as that.

  64. Noble Lord's Gravatar Noble Lord
    December 2, 2012 - 8:56 am | Permalink


    “There are more questions than answers” and thus the human family struggles in its long journey of its own “Evolution” of thouht, action and understanding.

    If perfection was colour coded, then the Caucasian family of man would be very content, but the true thinkers and philosopers know different, hence the revisionist footprint is essential for the survival of all.

    For the record Mongoloids are happy making babies with Mongoloids, Asians with Asians and if a certain cabal would cease using thieir influence over Cacasians, Negrods too would be happy creating babies with themselves.

    Thus i put it to YOU, do you think life began with yourselves and if so, and you are so blessed by God, or right of intelligence, why are you irked by what you see and experience today?

    Could it be that YOU were not told the whole truth?

    No man is superior to his brother on this demension of life, whereby he sees his himself as having a privilege over and above the life and livety of his kin.

    Unless you truly believe the be all and end all is your colour and that means superior intellignece!

    If that is the case, why is it that in my university it is CAUCASIANS teaching Talmudism, via Marxist clap trap and mentally harming my Caucasian brothers and sisters?

    Can it truly be about the money and temprary status that follows?

    By the way, Martin Beranal was challenge by Mary Lefkowits a Jew “Not out of Africa”, Martin had her number, as did many other scholars, but such is the Jew and his intent on pushing the “Bell Curve” to those who need a comfort blanket!

    Love cannot be weighed, quantified, expected, predicted, placed in a Petri dish, it is of the METAPHYSICAL realm to which we all live by and have no control over.

    There is a an intelligent designers i refer to as God almighty and in his map and son Yesua all answers can be found, but hey keep up the game if it suits and satisfies you.


  65. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    December 2, 2012 - 6:23 am | Permalink

    That spirit that promotes that map on West Wing is what we can call Anti-White. The whole purpose of it is to diminish Whites culturally, politically and psychologically. The anti-Whites couldn’t care less about it’s impact on Africans or Asians. positive or negative.

    Their sole concern is yet another assault on White children in school

  66. George Herouvis's Gravatar George Herouvis
    December 2, 2012 - 4:36 am | Permalink

    Fortifying ourselves and our children with pride for our ‘quilted’ but united European culture is key to or survival. European man is nature’s most evolved species: it would be a shame to see it wiped from the Earth. Breed people!

  67. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 1, 2012 - 10:32 pm | Permalink

    @Boris Carlov:
    I am often surprised by the desire we all have to find the one single cause of our current plight. I do not think it is either/or. We were simply dazzled by our own light. It made us a little dizzy and we lost our balance. Jews merely did what they always do, encourage any and all weaknesses and vices. Find a way to make a profit, no matter how small, and always, always gain advantage.

    The real challenge we face is learning to live with our own limitations. There are no new frontiers. We cannot bring the entire world up to our standards. We decided that Reason had freed us from religion and then tried to fill the emptiness with everything from sex to drugs to long-distance compassion. We are so damn good at war that we scared ourselves. There are too many causes to list. The only real question we must address now is whether we still have it in us to adjust and find our balance again – or shall we simply join the fairy-folk and fade into the west rather than live with all these unpleasant people who resolutely refuse to play well with others. For far too many of our folk it seems to be a tough call.

  68. Seattle's Gravatar Seattle
    December 1, 2012 - 9:34 pm | Permalink

    OT but important-
    Will Kevin MacDonald be commenting on Ron Unz’s latest piece at the American Conservative?

  69. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    December 1, 2012 - 9:12 pm | Permalink


    Freedom of thought is a cancer?

    Was that your doctoral dissertation?

    Did you arrive at that conclusion by something other than free thought?

    Here you are using the Crown Jewel of the Enlightenment- the first amendment. For shame.

  70. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 1, 2012 - 8:32 pm | Permalink

    @Andrew: Which other of Nature’s organisms writes comments on blogs?

  71. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 1, 2012 - 7:37 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: That’s a pretty good definition Franklin of where the West is. It seems it should be debatable, but I cannot yet formulate a reason as to why.

  72. Boris Carlov's Gravatar Boris Carlov
    December 1, 2012 - 7:32 pm | Permalink

    “This is very true, but the above was also once a valid description of Europe and Europeans, not so long ago in the course of human history. That was a Europe brimming over with strength, power, vitality, virility and confidence.

    European liberalism, freedom of thought and universalism is not part of the “soul of Europe”. Rather, it is a cancer. The essence of Europe is its genepool. The historic land area, culture, language and traditions are generally all very good things, and it behooves Europeans to honor and value them, and to pass them down through the generations to their progeny. ”

    Europeans were much stronger than than they are now, when they lived in an authoritarianm medieval society, only in the sense, that they had a higher rate of breeding and perhaps a greater pride in their race. Europeans are the highest race of
    man and are not barnyard animals; we are not just breeding stock! We do not function well when we are told what to do in an absolutely dictatorial way. In any society of Europeans that have been unfortunate enough to live under this type of regime, there have always been those that questioned the imposed dogma, those that have resisted the prevailing opinion, those that have rebelled. This rebelliousness, this curiosity, that manifests itself in certain individuals, has always been a hallmark of our race and no other. We thrive best in a society while not the liberally decayed one, that we live in today, but one that has a balance of tolerance for other opinions, but but is healthy enough to weed out the racially and socially destructive opinions that have got us into the mess we are in today. It would be an interesting thought experiment, to speculate on what Western Society would be like today, if Jews had never lived amongst us or influenced us in any way. Would we be the healthy gleaming society some would imagine us to be or would Liberalism of reared it’s ugly head and done it’s damage anyway. The question would be: Is liberalism the final manifestation of some of our weaknesses as Europeans and Jews have just taken advantage of it to destroy us; or is Liberalism something that comes about when Jews infest a society? The answer would be very interesting to know.

  73. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 1, 2012 - 7:21 pm | Permalink

    You are certainly right that time is of the essence. What forced you to face reality? We all need to get better at sharing the truth that helps those indoctrinated by the system to see the light.

  74. Dirk's Gravatar Dirk
    December 1, 2012 - 5:53 pm | Permalink

    I must admit that I have been through exactly the same process. In universities they try to let you believe that it is institutions and politics who define history. But even if you take that into account, it is telling that there are no true democracies in Africa or Asia, which evolve around parties and ideas. Nothing of this kind.

  75. Andrew's Gravatar Andrew
    December 1, 2012 - 5:49 pm | Permalink

    The author notes that Islam is “dogmatic” and exhibits “an extreme rigidity of social obligations and prohibitions,” and further that “Islam, essentially, does not understand compromise. Its essence is authoritarian and bellicose.”

    This is very true, but the above was also once a valid description of Europe and Europeans, not so long ago in the course of human history. That was a Europe brimming over with strength, power, vitality, virility and confidence.

    European liberalism, freedom of thought and universalism is not part of the “soul of Europe”. Rather, it is a cancer. The essence of Europe is its genepool. The historic land area, culture, language and traditions are generally all very good things, and it behooves Europeans to honor and value them, and to pass them down through the generations to their progeny.

    But those are nonessential elements. The race, the genes, the DNA is what truly matters. What is good is that which safeguards the race and ensures its survival. What is evil is that which endangers the long-term survival of the race. The Jews are exactly correct in evaluating everything for its moral value based only on “what is good for the Jews”. That is what Nature intended for all organisms.

    The author is correct that Islam does not belong in Europe, and is alien to everything European. But the characteristics that the author sees as faults in Islam – authoritarianism, dogmatism, rigid social structure and unwillingness to compromise – are actually virtues, areas of strength that should be admired and emulated. These things are “good for the Arabs”, they result in strong, fertile, stable societies. Whatever the problems of the populations of Islamic nations (typically low-IQ), none of them have trouble with low-fertility, homosexuality, feminized males, theft, adultery, immigrants, an internal culture of critique or the loss of their historic traditions and culture.

    To survive, Europe must return to its roots, to authoritarianism (to some extent), to a strong social fabric (including obligations), to dogmatism and to real religion. It must expunge the poisons of liberalism, universalism and unrestricted freedom. Europe must adopt a more primitive culture that views morality from the perspective of “what is good for the Europeans”, which returns to Nature, recognizing Nature’s imperatives of surviving and propagating the species as the central goals that should form the basis for organizing society and inspiring its institutions, traditions, culture and policies.

  76. Gayle's Gravatar Gayle
    December 1, 2012 - 5:46 pm | Permalink

    Like you and Donar van Holland, I too have been dragged to these conclusions kicking and screaming. These realizations go against everything I have believed my whole life, and I resisted them wholeheartedly. I wonder how many others are making this journey right now?

    I fear, however, that this incipient great awakening is coming too late; we are running neck-and-neck with demographic critical mass in Europe and America, and we have much educating to do.

  77. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    December 1, 2012 - 5:38 pm | Permalink

    Question : Where is the West?
    Answer : Any place where the population is in the majority of European descent and determines its fate according to its innate capacities and traditions …is the West.

    Try to apply this definition not only on countries but even on cities and you will see that it is right.

  78. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    December 1, 2012 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

    @Sanjay: I associate myself with the previous comments.

  79. fender's Gravatar fender
    December 1, 2012 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

    @C. C. Conrad:

    I think non-Whites can have opinions on us as long as they aren’t designed to fit into a larger anti-White historical narrative. A lot of races dislike our history but only the jews actively twist our history to suit a larger agenda.


    From what I’ve read, jewish fertility in the diaspora is about as low as it is for Whites, but yes, the israeli jewish fertility rate is alarming. From what I understand it’s mostly the orthodox jews that are breeding like rabbits. If they ever gain control of Israel I suspect we’re in for a long nuclear winter.

    December 1, 2012 - 3:23 pm | Permalink

    Great historical analysis. I appreciate the time you spent deconstructing the official “historiography” of “pro-communist” revisionist historians of the present. I think any mainstream historical work should come with the disclaimer, “Propaganda of the ruling class” Under this lens one can see why it doesnt matter whether “you” dutifully research against the “status quo” since “he who pays the piper names the tune.” Therefore, if you research expecting hard core revisionists to “change their tune” and accept your analysis, you’re smoking crack. However, if your goal is to provide a European perspective of OUR history for OUR people, I think you’re doing a swell job and should keep up the good work!!
    FYI- Historical indoctrination is top-down passed from Ivy league schools down to state school peasants. So when you posit “liberals were not really for the West” does this include “traditionalist” American liberal historians who were anti-Communist? Because if they’re anti-Communist doesn’t that place them in a pro-nationalist camp to some degree? I say this because it is widely understood in historical circles that Liberal historians, prior to the Vietnam war, were actually pro-West and anti-Communist.

  81. December 1, 2012 - 3:19 pm | Permalink


    jews shouldn’t be allowed to have opinions on European history, culture, or identity. It needs to be made illegal…. If they don’t like it they can either move to Israel or….

    A better way is to recover our cohesion, high culture and fertility, without which any attempts to make things illegal will be futile.

    Jewish fertility rate (Israel) is double that of Whites in North America and almost triple that of White Europeans.

    Without a return to our Nordic, Roman, and Greek heritage, and a love for family and children, all this talk is puerile.

    We must reject all recreational sex, and embrace reproductive sex.

    We need a collectivist individualism. All for one, one for all.

  82. torgrim's Gravatar torgrim
    December 1, 2012 - 3:00 pm | Permalink

    @C. C. Conrad: I agree with Fender, ie., “jews shouldn’t be allowed to have opinions on European history, culture, or identity”, the case being, Russian history, for one, with many, many more. Past behavior is prologue and many of us of European heritage understand the subtle “game” of ethnic cleansing that is now obvious in Western Nations. Yes, hate laws should be used against those that created them, as it is only, …”fair”.

  83. December 1, 2012 - 1:48 pm | Permalink

    @fender: I very much agree, in fact, I don’t think that any non-white or anti-white should be allowed to express their genocidal ideas. The hate laws that they have made for us must be turned against them with a vengeance. Think de-nazification only substitute liberal, communist, anti-racist (actually anti-white) or anarchist.
    Anti-whites just hate this book – Jack’s War

  84. Mace's Gravatar Mace
    December 1, 2012 - 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Did you not notice that this is part 1 of 5? Show some patience; maybe he’s building up to a larger point. There’s no need to jump the guy’s ass at the end of the first part!

  85. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 1, 2012 - 1:25 pm | Permalink


    Oh! I was afraid that you were saying that it was “o[d]ious . . . !?!”

  86. fender's Gravatar fender
    December 1, 2012 - 1:24 pm | Permalink

    jews shouldn’t be allowed to have opinions on European history, culture, or identity. It needs to be made illegal in all European and European-derived societies. If they don’t like it they can either move to Israel or the inside of a jail cell.

  87. Donar van Holland's Gravatar Donar van Holland
    December 1, 2012 - 1:16 pm | Permalink

    Congratulations, and welcome to the club! You made it, through an arduous journey, like many of us. I too used to be a liberal only a two years ago. You are a brave man, holding on to what you have found to be right. Now, your worst enemy is not the Jew or the liberal, but your own conscience, for you go against current morality with your “thought crimes”. Your feelings will often tell you that you are evil. You will have to live with that, but I hope you will find some support in websites and groups. Stay strong! I Thank you for your article, I enjoyed it very much!

Comments are closed.