Yes, Virginia, the Jews Stole Christmas

Kevin MacDonald

A new book, Joshua Eli Plaut’s A Kosher Christmas: ’Tis the Season to Be Jewish, documents what we have known all along: The Jews did indeed subvert Christmas.  This book deserves a full review, but Ethan Schwartz’s summary and comment (“Twas the night after Christmas“) deserve scrutiny. First the summary:

Jews have been the vanguard of an effort to “transform Christmastime into a holiday season belonging to all Americans,” without religious exclusivity.  The most important Jewish mechanisms of secularization are comedy and parody, for laughter undermines religious awe.  Take, for example, Hanukkah Harry from “Saturday Night Live”, who heroically steps in for a bedridden Santa by delivering presents from a cart pulled by donkeys named Moishe, Hershel, and Shlomo.  Remarkably, Hanukkah Harry has emerged as a real Santa-alternative for many American Jews.  Plaut sees such things not as attempts at assimilation but as an intentional subversion of Christmas traditions.  “Through these parodies,” he writes, “Jews could envision not having to be captivated by the allure of ubiquitous Christmas symbols.”  And it isn’t just Jews: for Americans in general, Jewish parody helps ensure that Christmas “not be taken too seriously” and that the celebrations of other traditions “be accorded equal respect and opportunity.”

There seem to be two messages here. One is the message of subversion utilizing ridicule among other methods. The other is that Jews are seen as high-mindedly making Christmas  “into a holiday season belonging to all Americans.” The end result is that Christmas is not “taken too seriously” and the Christian religious aspect central to the traditional holiday is de-emphasized.

People who take their religion seriously do not allow their religion to be ridiculed. One need only think of the Muslim reactions to cartoons ridiculing Mohammed. The fact that Jews have been able to ridicule Christianity without any serious negative consequences is an important marker of Jewish power and an equally strong indication of the decline of Christian religious belief. I suspect that the organized Jewish community would react in outrage if non-Jews ridiculed religious Judaism. Indeed, any criticism of Jews as Jews is off limits in the mainstream media. (A topical short list of verboten topics: the loyalties of neocon Jews and their role in promoting the war in Iraq, the Jewish aspect of the Ivy League admissions scandal, how Jewish control of Hollywood influences media content.)


Schwartz doesn’t quarrel with Plaut’s evidence, but wonders if it’s good for the Jews that such a book be written:

There is something disconcerting about this thesis, summoning up classic anti-Semitic images of conspiracy and sabotage.  Without a trace of irony, Plaut recounts incidents in which fundamentalist Christian groups complained that “certain Americans, particularly Jews, were trying to take the ‘Christ’ out of Christmas.”  He adds that “anti-Semitic comments often ensued.”  Those Christian fundamentalists might well feel vindicated by Plaut’s argument; yet Plaut is unfazed by this connection, and rightly so.  It is not inherently anti-Christian, he recognizes, to oppose Christianity’s domination of a secular democracy.  If Jews have helped to make American society more open, they should be proud of it.

So Jews subverted Christmas but their motives were pure and idealistic. But such an account ignores the Jewish role in conceptualizing America as a proposition nation—a major topic of The Culture of Critique. The Jewish stress on cultural pluralism (which has now morphed into multiculturalism) was an explicit rejection of the ethnocultural strand of American identity, an important part of which was Christianity. (Indeed, until the recent wave of immigration resulting from the 1965 law, Jews constituting 2-3 percent of the population, were the only identifiable American group that was not Christian.) Jews were central to building a wall between religion and the public square which has resulted in the “war on Christmas” that we still see raging. Jews were also central to changing U.S. immigration policy to be open to all the peoples of the world, again with an ideology that America is merely a set of abstract principles and has no ethnic or cultural core; therefore it should be open to all peoples and these peoples should be able to retain their own culture as part of the American mosaic.

I realize that many good people shy away from saying it, but the reality is that Jews have very aggressively pursued policies that benefit them and are opposed to the interests of the traditional people of America and the West. And because Jews attained status as an intellectual and media elite, they have been able to have a very large effect on public policy and even on the attitudes of non-Jews.

Plaut emphasizes the difference between the very aggressive behavior of Eastern European immigrants with their hatred of Christianity contrasted with the German Jews who arrived in the mid-19th century and “embraced the holiday.” It’s an important distinction, at least in the American context. But in any case, Plaut’s description of the motives of the Eastern European as stemming from their hatred of Christianity hardly paints them as idealistic crusaders on behalf of an open society.  It bears repeating once again that Jews react with hostility to the idea that Israel should not have a Jewish ethnocultural core while they have led the campaign against the idea that America and the West have any ethnocultural core. As with their promoting non-White, non-Christian immigration, their advocacy has nothing to do with ideals of moral universalism but everything to do with pursuing what’s good for the Jews, motivated by Jewish hatreds toward the traditional people and cultures of the West. The war on Christmas is thus a central example of the theme of Jews as a hostile elite.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

117 Comments to "Yes, Virginia, the Jews Stole Christmas"

  1. Clytemnestra's Gravatar Clytemnestra
    January 9, 2013 - 12:44 am | Permalink

    @Bob Roberts:

    Why, in your view, does Christianity need to be dominant, rather than merely equal? You may very well have an answer to this, but it seldom comes through.

    I would like to answer that question with a question, Bob.

    Why, in your view, is it so damned important to the Grinches that Christmas not be celebrated only as Christmas? The best analogy I can make is a birthday. We all have birthdays, Bob. Many of us consider them our “special day.” So, if your birthday is December 25th and my birthday is April 1st, then where does it make sense for both of us to celebrate our birthdays on December 25th unless the object is making your “special day” not so special.

    Islam is the dominant religion during Ramadan and no one has a problem with it. Judaism is the dominant religion on Yom Kippur and no has a problem with it. But for some strange reason, the media thinks that everyone who is not a Christian has a problem with Christianity being the dominant religion during the Christmas season!

    My own theory is that Christmas is such a joyous, beautiful season in every sense of the word – spiritually, sensuously, and artistically – that it puts the holidays of other religions to shame.

    The petty emotion driving any anti-Christmas sentiment is envy, pure and simple. Otherwise, to throw it back on you, Bob. No one is forcing anyone to celebrate Christmas. I’ve had my own “bah, humbug” Christmas seasons and it is easier to ignore the holiday than one might think.

    Since practically every Jewish holiday on record’s theme seems to be “the evil goyim were trying to kill us, but we triumphed by surviving to kill them … bwahaha,” I somewhat understand. I would be depressed and resentful, too, if I were in their shoes.

  2. Clytemnestra's Gravatar Clytemnestra
    January 8, 2013 - 11:49 pm | Permalink


    Those Whites who want to DEBATE Anti-White POC (people of color) and ethnicities are just as big a problem as those Whites who sheepishly go along with an Anti-White agenda.

    There is a younger (and wiser!) member of my own immediate circle that refuses to be drawn into a debate with anyone opposing her. She does not argue with people, she calmly listens to any unsolicited advice and then does whatever the hell she pleases.

  3. A Swain's Gravatar A Swain
    January 8, 2013 - 8:09 pm | Permalink



    There are far more folk of Jewish or part-Jewish origin in the White ethnonationalist movement than the real Ashkenazim are necessarily aware of.

    It is this element who are helping lay the groundwork that will effect the collapse of the Zionist-controlled political system that’s currently presiding over the West, utilizing similar stealth tactics as was used by them to hijack the West in the first place.

    In the coming years, the goal will be to perform DNA profiling on all Whites aspiring to political, judicial, administrative, educational and fiscal careers as a means of excluding Jews from positions which are critical to the lifeblood of the indigenous White nations of the West.

    Not all likely candidates of the future will bear Jewish names either hence the need for racial profiling.

    Such a policy is indeed an imperative step and is crucial if the West is to have any chance of recovery and ultimately, survival at all.

  4. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 5, 2013 - 3:47 pm | Permalink

    @Jim Summers: JIm, this is so true. I have talked and listened to so many Americans that are still utterly ignorant on WW11. It’s depressing, when even non-whites that you meet, know more truth about WW11, then the stupid whites that simply cannot lose their brainwashed mentality and even pass it on to their kids.

  5. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    January 5, 2013 - 2:18 pm | Permalink

    Rand Paul capitulates to bloodthirsty neocons

  6. Jim Summers's Gravatar Jim Summers
    January 5, 2013 - 8:47 am | Permalink


    Whites in America especially don’t connect NS Germany with anything pro-White. It is strange that the Jewish mass media has been making the connection for them for decades but America’s Whites still can’t put the pieces together. Whites in America think that Hitler wanted to take over the world to kill anyone who didn’t have blond hair and blue eyes.

  7. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 4, 2013 - 12:21 pm | Permalink


    The further we get from the war the more objectivity we’ll have about it, but I don’t see much reason to believe Whites are going to see NS Germany as the good guys any time soon. You have to remember that blogs and the internet don’t reflect the general populace at large.

  8. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 3, 2013 - 10:43 pm | Permalink

    @fender: fender, from reading hundres of blogs on different subjects, it has really surprised me lately, how savy so many in the younger are concerning WW11. I have noticed a definite change from what was thought a mere generation ago, when it comes to Hitler, Germany, the nazi’s. etc. So many of these young folks simply won’t take things at face value any longer because some “authority” tells them to.

  9. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 3, 2013 - 4:26 pm | Permalink


    I agree with a lot of what you wrote there. Their creative abilities are meager at best, which is why they’ve always excelled in the low arts like photography, TV, movies, and comic books. Keep in mind that the jews really never placed value on the arts in general, they were always a people of the marketplace. They don’t need to be good at art.

    There is one thing they do brilliantly however: they utilize grand moral rhetoric in their interactions with non-Jews. You see this in their narrative of the West and the Third Reich in particular. You see it in the words of Eli Wiesel (“the Satanic smiles of the Germans,” etc.), in the films of Spielberg, in every newspaper and TV show, in old newspaper clippings showing enthusiastic jewish support of bolshevism, etc.

    When the jews want something, that something becomes the ultimate good in all the world. When they’re against something, that something becomes the ultimate evil in all the world. Hitler wasn’t just a nationalist leader, he was a sick, insane, genocidal tyrant, as close to satan as anyone has ever come, in their minds. World War II wasn’t just a war, it was a biblical struggle of good against evil: America and the USSR (jews and jew-slaves) against Nazi Germany (free Germans).

    Whites, being an overly moral people, just eat this kind of stuff up. They love it. They’re mystified by it. But in the end it’s simply an advance form of peddling. Jews peddle morality just as they peddle cheap clothing. The sooner Whites learn to tune them out, the sooner we can free ourselves from them.

  10. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 3, 2013 - 4:01 pm | Permalink

    @I am not Spartacus: Yeah, that’s right. Paging protestant advocate Tom.

  11. I am not Spartacus's Gravatar I am not Spartacus
    January 2, 2013 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

    America was founded specifically as a secular state that repudiated the Kingship of Christ and so this complaint rings hollow.

    The Calvinist-Protestants had been thoroughly Judaised in the low countries before they came here to erect their “city of the hill:’ al the Jews are doing is completing the job.

    As for Christmas – one must keep Christ and the Mass in Christmas for it to be truly Christmas- and both the Jews and the Protestants are opposed to doing that.

  12. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 1, 2013 - 3:14 pm | Permalink

    @Lombard: Thanks for this information. Yet it’s clear to me, as it would be to anyone else familiar with the Catilinarian orations, that there are thirty or forty passages in the orations that are as close to (i.e, as far away from) the bogus quote as this passage. The critical bit of information comes from the comment that it was either concocted or mistakenly quoted by the once very popular novelist Taylor Caldwell.*

    Incidentally, what a horrid website that is! Blowhards and weasels and Tribe worshipers galore. One guy with some moxie stands up and says that the quotation looks spurious, and the hordes of the Great Unwashed begin insulting him! What has distinguished the West above all, at least since pre-suicidal Athens and the heyday of the Roman Republic, is a devotion to truth as an imperishable value. For these Liberty Tree cretins, however, truth can’t begin to compare with the ability to shout “we’re number one!”
    * My late mother was a reader of Caldwell’s books; one that was a particular hit was Dear and Glorious Physician. I asked her once what she enjoyed about Caldwell and the other popular novelists she read. She said simply, “They help pass the time.” She was a particular fan of John O’Hara. Her verdict on him was “he’s very dirty, but he writes well.” In light of that estimation, I have often wondered what her reaction to Philip Roth might have been.

  13. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    January 1, 2013 - 8:22 am | Permalink

    Happy New Year to all !

    The year has started here in Finland with rain and exceptionally warm temperature.

    As there is now ample time to be inside the house, I would like to share some of my thoughts on our enemy, the Jew.

    First, they are not so special as it may seem. Yes, they are often rich as they simply are greedy as always has been portraited. But that is all they actually are, rich.

    The Jew is not much of a writer. You have your roths and bergs, but they simply cannot produce any classic literature as they always end up looking at their own navel.

    The Jew is no artist. He is no good in music, except if it is the whining kind, with violin. And even there he is good mostly because Daddy & Mommy can affors unlimited tutoring. Otherwise they leave no mark in the world of Giants like Wagner.

    The Jew is no architect. Enough said.

    He prevails in those professions, where insider-info rules. Finance, media, films. But he is not good there, he just cheats, while we, White Men, play fair.

    So, give them no respect, they are not worth it, quite the opposite. They are like ants, who can build their nests by hard toiling, but they cannot create. They are one-dimensional, shallow.

    Then, it gets better. Much better.

    First, they do not like mountains. They do not like cold. They do not much like snow and ice. They definitely do not like isolation. In a word, they are weak. Deep in there, they are weak.

    They hate countryside, if it far away rom the citadel, i.e. A Big City. So they are not much of a Mensch.

    So, my dear friends, what are we waiting for ? The enemy is nothing much, just a shallow illusion.

  14. European's Gravatar European
    January 1, 2013 - 2:11 am | Permalink


    the right to live in their religious believes without being disturbed and attaced by others”. That meaning of “equality” is meant by the “average American”.
    Karlfried, this is our German understanding of the word equality=eine Gleichstellung, die im/mit Wort einen gewissen bedeutsamen Inhalt/Verstaendnis, oder Bezug in sich traegt. This is not the American understanding of equality. Our translated words or understanding do not mean the same thing here, unfortunatly.
    But I am so glad you are here contributing so clearly and thoughtfuly, since you help me realize some things I could not see before so clearly, or eindeutig. Thank you, and love to read your posts. You are right about the struggles of/ with words, and that a passport matters only little. Language, the vehicle to understanding and influence (media). I hope you can get your/this point across to the broader audience.
    Happy New Year!

  15. Lombard's Gravatar Lombard
    December 31, 2012 - 9:45 pm | Permalink

    RE: The Cicero quote -someone solves the mystery here.

    Seems like someone made it up based on this passage from ‘ The Second Oration Against Catiline’
    “There is not a nation that we fear, no king who can make war upon the Roman people; everything abroad, on land and sea, is peaceful on account of the valor of one man: civil war remains, there are plots among us; the danger is at home, the enemy is within. We shall fight against extravagance, against folly, against crime. “

  16. omop's Gravatar omop
    December 31, 2012 - 7:08 pm | Permalink

    They also want you and your children all to remember what “a white race” did to them… city by city……

    Charleston Jewish center’s atrium memorial to honor children of the Holocaust
    “A million and a half Jewish children were killed in the Holocaust, and I thought it was time we did something to remember them,” Fannie Appel-Rones said.
    With camps, community programs and Addlestone Hebrew Academy, the campus of the Charleston Jewish Community Center in West Ashley has established itself as a place where families gather.

    “This is where children and families come,” said Judi Corsaro, executive director of the JCC. “It would be a crime not to have a Holocaust memorial of some sort here. We’ve got to keep the torch going and keep the story alive.”

    Brad Nettles/staff Fannie Appel-Rones explains to Holocaust survivor Joe Engel the plans for remodeling the atrium at the Jewish Community Center in honor of the 1.5 million children killed during the Holocaust.

    Enter Fannie Appel-Rones, with a vision to renovate the center’s atrium into a garden memorial to the 1.5 million children who were killed in the Holocaust.

    The project will be in the open-air center of the building, which was built in the early 1960s. It will replace a garden funded 50 years ago by an anonymous donor and the now-defunct Kalushiner Society in memory of the 6 million people killed in the Holocaust.

    That garden has been neglected in recent years and is rarely visited.

    “The garden needs restoring and now they have a memorial for the 6 million in Marion Square,” said Appel-Rones. “But there’s nothing for the children. A million and a half Jewish children were killed in the Holocaust, and I thought it was time we did something to remember them.”

    The garden will be the only Holocaust memorial in the area dedicated specifically to the children, she said.

    “It is not enough that we build it,” said Joe Engel, a native of Poland and a survivor of the Warsaw Ghetto and Auschwitz-Birkenau. “Everybody should know about it. I want people to come spend time in it and use it in memory of the kids. A thing like that should never be forgotten.”

    Designed by Charleston landscape architect Sheila Wertimer, the passive garden will be meditative and low-maintenance.

    “I have been in the atrium recently and it’s so relaxing to be in there,” said Masha Kalinsky, president of the Charleston Jewish Federation. “That’s what we want for the children. I think this will resonate more with people because it’s in the memory of the children.”

    The current garden will be removed to make way for the new design, which calls for blue stone ground cover and raised brick beds filled with English boxwoods, Japanese maple and other “shades of green meant to be calming and soothing,” Appel-Rones said.

    “Everything is first-class so this will be here forever and ever, long after we are all gone,” she said.

    The garden will also include a “meaningful” sculpture by North Carolina artist Timothy Werrell, Appel-Rones said.

    “When I say meaningful, I mean you don’t have to think what it is,” she said. “You’ve seen a lot of sculptures and you say ‘What in the world is that?’ But this would have something where, you see it, you know what it is, what it’s for, what it’s meant to be.”

    So far, about $13,000 has been donated to the project, mostly from the Henry and Sylvia Yaschik Foundation and the South Carolina Council on the Holocaust. Appel-Rones said she does not know what the total will be as the project is still in the planning stages, but she hopes the community will embrace it.

    “We want to encourage children to give a dollar, 50 cents, whatever,” she said.

    Work will start once enough money is collected and will take about three months, she said.

  17. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 31, 2012 - 4:42 pm | Permalink

    @Patrick: This alleged Cicero quote has been floating around the Internet for several years. No one has properly sourced it yet, however; certainly no one who has posted it has offered a legit and verifiable source.

    It turned up here in the comment thread of a recent Tom Sunic article. After spending almost a dozen hours going through everything on my shelves and online and finding nothing equivalent to it in Latin or in English translation, I came to doubt its authenticity. I suggest that others do likewise, at least until a proper source is cited.

  18. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 31, 2012 - 4:36 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: It was sort of the other way round, I believe. When the barons’ traditional rights were denied by John, in his move toward a rather more absolute monarchy avant la lettre, they then doubled and tripled their men under arms. Just a friendly way to show him that they were traditional, old-fashioned guys, of course.

    I can just imagine them having a cookout, with roast haunch of Foxman as the main course.

  19. Stan's Gravatar Stan
    December 31, 2012 - 2:11 pm | Permalink

    Has anybody noticed the Jew dominated Wall Street Journal fascination with dead Jews who defiled gentile women? The WSJ of 12/31/12 has an article on some Palewski who screwed the aristocratic Nancy Mitford. A few months ago there was an article on Serge Gainsbourg who screwed Catherine Deneuve and Brigitte Bardot.

  20. Patrick's Gravatar Patrick
    December 31, 2012 - 1:50 pm | Permalink

    “A Nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the Jew moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of Government itself. For the Jew appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a Nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body of politic so that it can no longer resist.

    A murderer is less to fear” —

    Marcus Tullius Cicero 106-43 BC.

  21. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    December 31, 2012 - 11:16 am | Permalink

    Perhaps the best place to ridicule the jews would be the ultra-orthodox. Even many reformed jews despise them. I love to point out how their newspaper edited out Hillary Clinton’s picture in the situation room photo taken during the killing of Osama Bin Laden. They could be ridiculed for the misogynistic aspect of their belief system, for starters.

  22. December 31, 2012 - 11:03 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: If memory serves me correctly, John’s opposition to the Barons was that a number of them were raising “private” armies that were becoming large enough to challenge the throne.
    In Western countries today, the “private” armies take on the form of the ADL (to which I refer occasionally as the Arab Defamation League), ACLU, and SPLC

  23. Rudd's Gravatar Rudd
    December 31, 2012 - 9:45 am | Permalink

    Jesus Christ was an Anti Semite & is still my hero. Goy or not they the Palistinians
    loved him. Jews were just a minor test for him from the father. Look at whos been
    really battling the Talmudic Jew the Christians.
    Christ loves us so much he gave us the talmudic jew to overcome so that we can
    come closer to him.

  24. Karlfried's Gravatar Karlfried
    December 31, 2012 - 4:25 am | Permalink

    @Bob Roberts:

    …of why putting Christmas on an equal footing with other religions’ big days hurts Christians. To the average American, equality resonates as a very important virtue. Why, in your view, does Christianity need to be dominant, rather than merely equal?…

    Bob, we are in the middle of a struggle for our sheer existence as the white race. This struggle has many facets, and one of them is the fight for the right words. The other players in the game of life are trying all the time to twist some words and to taboo other words. In the consequence, the way we see the world, the way we think and the way we speak is biased in the way that the other side wants, because it is to their favour, not to ours. So one of the most important things that we must do, is to watch our own language. So I beg you to re-read your own question. The power of word-twisting (maybe without that you noticed that before) can be seen in the way that you put the question.

    You asked: “Equality is seen as an important virtue. Why is it not enough for Christianity to be equal?” My answer: You are right in the general sense of the words. But in life you must always see the real situation and the circumstances. The word “equality” should refer to “all religions should have the right to live in their religious believes without being disturbed and attaced by others”. That meaning of “equality” is meant by the “average American”.
    But only Christianity is under attac to give away their most holy festdays.

    The next thing: Of course a religion which has 80 or 90% of the population must be dominant and not a religion of 2% of the people. The most that the 2% can get is that they are not disturbed. But they have no right to attac the big religion of the 90%. That should be clear.

    About the importance of “words” Gregor said some very interesting things.

    I am German, and I am proud of it. But in some fields the nationality is not important, we are bound together by our common race and in the process of the survival of our race the passport is not important. —
    I wish a peaceful good year 2013 to Prof. Kevin Mc Donald and all readers of The Occidental Observer.

  25. Jaego's Gravatar Jaego
    December 31, 2012 - 12:20 am | Permalink

    @James O’Meara: Well I don’t agree with him on that – neither did Guenon. And I don’t think either one of them would raise Homosexuality above Heterosexuality.

    I admit the weakness of Christianity on Race. This has to change via Kinism, Identity, or at the very least some kind of National Church once we have our own Nations again as Orthodoxy has.

  26. December 30, 2012 - 11:48 pm | Permalink

    @James O’Meara:

    So what’s your model society?

    Yesterday I watched Pride and Prejudice (the 1995 TV series) and experienced great emotion at the very end during the double marriage of Elizabeth Bennet with Mr Darcy and Jane Bennet with Mr Bingley.

    That’s the world I would aspire to live after the vindictive Day of the Rope and a brief interregnum of Lycanthropes chasing over the naughty feminists turned now into Sabine women in order to found large families. Once the violence is all over after the racial wars the Austen world makes sense in a future ethnostate, except that instead of Christianity we might have something like NS-like Aryanism as the cement for holy heterosexual marriage (as holy as the Austen series I saw yesterday; yes, traditional family values).

    You propose the Athens model of Pericles? Not Spartans, who unlike the Athenians did not commit the mortal sin of mongrelization? What do you propose exactly? (The Burroughs novel you use in your blog depicts an altogether violent and degenerate, non-Athenian homo world that would be easy prey for the enemies of the white ethnostate.)

  27. December 30, 2012 - 11:27 pm | Permalink


    ” I criticize James’ claim that Greco-Romans were “gay” in the modern sense of the word. ”

    You keep saying that, but I don’t understand why you think it’s important. You need to read why I actually say more closely. If by “in the modern sense” you mean, “two happily married middle aged men” then obviously nothing of the sort [pace John Boswell] existed. My point is ENTIRELY different.

    In fact, I never use the word ‘gay’ unless speaking of modern Leftist types. My WHOLE POINT is that the “gay” identity is a modern one manufactured by the Left.

    Same-sexuality in the classical world, or anywhere except psot-Victorian anglosphere, is too complex to sum up in one word or concept (though the Jews think they can: godly or ungodly). That’s my point. Only the Jews have demonized all forms of male affection ( I cite the oddly named Paul Hardman’s book Homoaffectionalism as providing a useful but clumsy term); by applying the “one drop” rule we can infer, and the Jews certainly were did, and were proud to do so, (read The Pink Swastika) that ALL non-Judiaic cultures, however they conceptualized male relations, were a bunch of homos. The Athenians would have exiled or executed any “gay marrieds” but as far as Christians, from St. Paul to the Family Research Council are concerned, they were just a bunch of homos.

    So, yes, Western or Aryan culture was created by societies that the Jews considered to be homos, and by adopting the same standard, modern “conservatives” cut themselves off from their own past (some conservatives!) and give away the future to the Left.

    As for the 50s, anyone who has read my book, or perhaps my recent discussion of Mad Men and Advise and Consent over at Counter Currents, will know that I quite like the 50s. The age of Chambers, Hoover, Roy Cohn, and Cardinal Spellman. And what would the family values types say about them?

  28. December 30, 2012 - 11:06 pm | Permalink

    “But didn’t marriage exist before Christianity, in the Greco-Roman world? ”

    Come now, Chechar, you’re not as stupid as that. Surely you aren’t unable to distinguish marriage, a societal institution, and “family values”, a theory about the nature and value of reproduction? Marriage has been practice from Socrates to Oscar Wilde without any help from the Jews.

    AS I point out in my book, there seems to be a strange stupidity on the Right that leads them to think that homosexuals or bisexuals are sterile, impotent, or otherwise incapable of reproducing. “But society would die out!”

    As for
    ““drug induced mysticism” … is compatible with “Aryan culture.” He also mentioned … that “all these are roots of Aryan culture.” James even spoke of “drugs creating Western culture”

    Well, the evidence is literally overwhelming, although certainly deliberately overlooked or hidden by Judeo-Christian “scholars”. I would suggest a look at Hillman’s The Chemical Muse.

    “The greatest objections that the Spartans could raise against the representatives of democracy were that they talked far too freely and that they used drugs.” Pg. 204

    “The Spartans believed mind-altering substances, like books and art, were a threat to their totalitarian rule”. Pg. 206

    “Spartan society was no friend to the Dionysian concept of ecstasy, and most Spartans would have felt seriously out of place in Athens, where the magical intoxication of wine and strong drugs was just another aspect of daily life. They didn’t like drug-wielding sorcerers either. The Spartans would never have attended decadent and immoderate Athenian festivals that celebrated the out-of-body experience.” Pg. 207

    The shoe is on the other foot, my Judeo-christian friend. Chris Bennett has documented that the first anti-drug laws date to … 6th century Hebrews (Deuteronomy).

    So again, you must choose, brother, you must choose (to quote the MC5, one of the “heavy metal” groups I “love”): you can have freedom, art and democracy, or you can have Spartan Israel, and theological totalitarianism.

    The homo, or the negro. Hey, that would make a great book title!

  29. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 30, 2012 - 11:05 pm | Permalink

    @me: Excellent examples all!

    I think it was Edward I who kicked out our subversive friends. I’m not sure what attitude, if any, John had toward them.

    For what it’s worth, I have never been able to dissociate John from a boyhood love (a love shared with lots of other boys, of course) of tales of Robin Hood, in which John is the archvillain, whereas his irresponsible elder brother, Richard Coeur-de-Lion, is ever the hero. Of course, John did manage to offend the pope so deeply that the whole country was placed under interdict for five years and then did likewise to the barons, such that they gave him the choice of signing Magna Carta or else. Would that we could do the same to our government!

  30. December 30, 2012 - 10:30 pm | Permalink


    I am very grateful to the homosexual men that I know…

    What James O’Meara says is partially right: there have been many homoerotic men (although not necessarily 100% homosexual) throughout history that have influenced the West mightily. But that’s not my point. My point is that James overstates his case. And I doubt it’s good for our movement to bash traditional family values: something that James does at the same time that he claims that homosexual behavior is somewhat superior to traditional American values (e.g., the values of America’s 1950s).

    … So suck it up Chechar they were more important to my son’s identity as a heterosexual than all the pontificating jerks like you who think they have the right to go rape women. I have read your site. I know why you do not have a woman in your life.

    First, you really don’t know if there’s no woman in my life.

    Second, I don’t advocate raping women. The “Lycanthropy” article in my blog was authored by William Ventvogel. A TOO commenter asked me to publish it in my blog and some commenters who post here liked it. But in my lead paragraph to that article I did mention in positive terms the “rape” of Clarke Gable of Vivien Leigh in Gone With the Wind. She deserved it…

    You don’t seem to have read my piece “On classic pederasty” where I criticize James’ claim that Greco-Romans were “gay” in the modern sense of the word. It is written almost in academic tone with scholastic references with no insults whatsoever to James or Greg Johnson. If you did indeed read it, I cannot understand the rudeness of your above reply.

  31. December 30, 2012 - 10:22 pm | Permalink

    Your critical input is always welcome, and valuable. But, please read what I said. I was quoting Baron Evola. One might find him a poor ally in the struggle for the West, but he is hardly considered an enemy of the West!

  32. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    December 30, 2012 - 10:03 pm | Permalink


    “I will not go into details, but I told him being buddies with guys is not necessarily gay. Men are so afraid of other men.”

    This is probably a very complex issue. And maybe at the same time it’s simple, too.

    I think homosexuality is fundamentally wrong. And I believed that even when I wasn’t a Christian, so it’s not really a religious belief.

    I can appreciate the physical appearance (beauty) of other men, but it’s not sexual. I’ve even told other guys (random strangers) things like “You’re very handsome, blessed with good genes.” Something like that. And it felt great to give another person an honest, free compliment.

    (Of course I informed them that I’m not homosexual.)

    I’ve given those compliments to women, too. And I did it because… it’s a spontaneous, free gift to them. In those moments I felt that I had to express my appreciation and admiration of their physical apperance. And they sensed that I wasn’t trying to sleep with him, so they really appreciated it. Which made me feel good. So it was always a win-win.

    We might be living in a hyper-sexualized society. And if that’s the case, then maybe that makes it more difficult for people to express their love and appreciation for others.

  33. George's Gravatar George
    December 30, 2012 - 9:28 pm | Permalink


    “Or maybe, some of the Jewish activist may not be happy with what their Jewish brethren have done to America and are trying to help White Americans open their eyes and see whats happening.”

    That seems VERY unlikely.

  34. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 30, 2012 - 9:16 pm | Permalink

    For the obsessives, here’s a good video to pass on to friends. KM’s got a nice screen presence.

  35. Jaego's Gravatar Jaego
    December 30, 2012 - 8:42 pm | Permalink

    Our Gay pudit tells us that Christianity has no spiritual content. Great – that really helps to unite us. The White Race faces its greatest crisis – that of our very suvival. Our desperate need is for unity not insults against vast sectors of our population. Think it through James, and try to decide what is more important, your insults or White survival.

  36. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 30, 2012 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

    @Gregor: PS: Passing this video around to friends will have way more positive effect than hanging out at TOO and obsessing over who is “right” about “the ****”.

  37. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 30, 2012 - 8:06 pm | Permalink

    Check this out! Some beautiful White women telling it like it is about White Genocide.

    Pass it around.

  38. Taras's Gravatar Taras
    December 30, 2012 - 7:58 pm | Permalink

    @Dark Henry:
    Nay, the Jews will only feel safe after they murdered everyone else.

  39. Sandy's Gravatar Sandy
    December 30, 2012 - 7:57 pm | Permalink

    @rhondda: That’s funny Rhondda. Once when I was laid off and having facing destitution the only guy that helped me out was the gay guy who got me some telephone work. I once went to a party with him and he introduced me with, “This is Sandy, my straight friend.” I kept in touch with him for years afterwards and was one of his last remaining friends. I missed his funeral because his brother disagreed with his lifestyle and didn’t tell his last remaining friend.

  40. rhondda's Gravatar rhondda
    December 30, 2012 - 7:35 pm | Permalink

    I am very grateful to the homosexual men that I know who are professional men and are not the gay pride type. When my son was going through his own identity crisis caused by cultural marxism, these were the men who made him realize that he was not a homosexual. I will not go into details, but I told him being buddies with guys is not necessarily gay. Men are so afraid of other men. So suck it up Chechar they were more important to my son’s identity as a heterosexual than all the pontificating jerks like you who think they have the right to go rape women. I have read your site. I know why you do not have a woman in your life.

  41. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 30, 2012 - 6:26 pm | Permalink

    Works for me! Happy New Year!

  42. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    December 30, 2012 - 6:09 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    In one sense “Tom” is correct when he asserts that most Catholics would put in with the Jews rather than accept O’Meara’s world vision. Personally, and if we are going to get violent, I would rather hire the mafia to whack our opponents. At least we could still listen to some decent music at the end of the process.

  43. me's Gravatar me
    December 30, 2012 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: Your post made me think of Queen Isabel of Spain – she was devout and expelled the jews. Prior to her reign, Castile was corrupt and decadent.
    I also think of European monarchs: when a corrupt one reigned Jewish power soared (as did usury and debt) the ‘middle’ classes (such as they were in the middle ages!) lost power (think of Poland) , when a reformer came the monetary policy was usually restored, the Jews expelled (John in England, I think, who expelled them after numerous attempts to have them ‘go straight’), and the middle classes and the values that uphold them prosper.

  44. me's Gravatar me
    December 30, 2012 - 4:52 pm | Permalink

    @Sandman: What do you suppose the Jews will want from us next? One thing you can count on is that they are never fully satisfied.

    EXCELLENT point. They will NEVER stop behaving this way. A few years ago that nut who wrote “Hilters Wiling Executioners” called for the banning of crosses.
    We know Christmas trees are banned in public in Israel.

    It may sound bizarre, but if they get enough power they will try to do this – they already got a small cross removed from the seal of the City of Los Angeles. We know they destroyed thousands of churches in Soviet Russia. They are drunk with power now.. and more and more stupid rootless americans are behind them (self named “Free thinkers” liberals, young college age whites, etc)

  45. me's Gravatar me
    December 30, 2012 - 4:45 pm | Permalink

    Is it just me or are Jews getting more and more open and aggressive about their true motivations and policies?
    When I was younger, I would watch movies like Scrooge and wonder who could really be like that? Well, we have our answer, don’t we.
    Japanese and Asians love to celebrate Christmas. Most non-Christians either celebrate it, admire it from afar, or say nothing. There is only ONE people in the world who react to a season -a season that was supposed to be a special time for joy, giving and good cheer – with hatred, hostility and contempt.

    Let’s also not forget the Talmudic/religious roots of this: In the Talmud, Jesus is boiling in feces in hell and the Virgin Mary was a harlot who was impregnated by a Roman solider.

    Every other religion in the world views Jesus as a great prophet. As another poster on this forum said “Darkness hates light”
    And sad to say, with Jews as elite, darkness is slowly descending over our lands.

  46. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 30, 2012 - 4:40 pm | Permalink

    The sad truth is that we have never been united. We have always been divided by nationality, religion, regionalism, class and so on. The real reason we have fallen so low is that we do not really take any other group seriously. If we did unite no force one earth could stop us. Those that this site is so obsessed with only have the power of a spoiled and unloved child, one who controls us by guilt, division and temper tantrums. Ultimately, they have only the power to make life very unpleasant for all who must live with them. As life becomes increasingly ugly in any event someone may call their bluff. White loyalty!

  47. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    December 30, 2012 - 4:24 pm | Permalink

    @Dark Henry:

    It is curious to note how what is termed the ‘far right’ attracts homosexuals and pagans. Add to that the on-going divisions between Catholics and Protestants, we can see how a white advocacy program will fail.

  48. The Lavon Factor's Gravatar The Lavon Factor
    December 30, 2012 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

    New Zundel site


    Coming Attractions

    Support the creation of this
    Movie Epic

  49. December 30, 2012 - 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Interesting you raise this Ost/Westen dichotomy within Judaism. Several of my Jewish friends trot this out as an explanation for Jewish anti-White behaviour, which the attribute to ’embittered’ Eastern Jewish emigres, and to them only.

  50. fender's Gravatar fender
    December 30, 2012 - 2:47 pm | Permalink

    @Gerd Reinhard:

    Be proud of those twelve years. They were short-lived, but then again, everything good is.

  51. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    December 30, 2012 - 1:12 pm | Permalink

    @Gerd Reinhard:
    Germany’s effort in the first half of XX century against the Usury Capitalism – Marxism Bochevism UK-USA-USSR Axis of Evil was impressive and we all should be thankful and never forget it. By way of deception, lies and murder the judaized Axis of Evil managed to win that round.
    They think their victory is for ever and so dream aloud of achieving world dominion while submerging everybody else in the new promised land of Gulag-Sodom. They will fail. Nobody has promised them that.
    To revindicate themselves the minimum the USA people of good will should do is to lead the rebellion against the coming Gulag-Sodom world empire. We need one, two, many new Charles Lindbergs.

  52. December 30, 2012 - 1:08 pm | Permalink

    “Be sure to get my new book,” says James O’Meara above, “The Homo and the Negro, where I lay out the destructive consequences to White civilization of the Judaic-inspired ‘family values’ mentality.”

    But didn’t marriage exist before Christianity, in the Greco-Roman world? Just for the record, in his latest interview with Robert Starks, James O’Meara said that “Western culture has been largely created by people who are either homosexual or homoerotic,” and talked of traditional Christian families as corrupted as Israeli families. And in a previous Stark interview James mentioned his “wild boys,” the “heavy metal music” he loves, “drug induced mysticism” and said that all of this is compatible with “Aryan culture.” He also mentioned “androgyny”, “hermaphrodites,” “sexual rituals,” and that “all these are roots of Aryan culture.” James even spoke of “drugs creating Western culture” and that “the great opponent of that is the Jew,” who has hated “the horrible faggotry of paganism.”

    But Greco-Roman pagans were not “gays” in the modern sense of the word (pre-Christian Germans even killed adult homosexuals); only pederasts as we can see in Plato’s dialogues. Hardly can the historical Greeks and Romans be used to support the so-called “gay” agenda of our times. See my article rebutting both Greg Johnson’s and James O’Meara’s idealized views on Greco-Roman homosexuality (here).

  53. omop's Gravatar omop
    December 30, 2012 - 11:10 am | Permalink

    Happy Holidays co-incidences!

    This ad has been off and on Antiwar and Washington Posts web sites for the past 10 days. What a surprise hey?

    Donate Via PayPal
    Donate to the Museum

    Never Again is a promise to past and future generations.

    To keep this promise, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum works every day to rescue Holocaust evidence, educate new generations, and confront hate, Holocaust denial, and genocide.

    Your gift will make an immediate and direct impact:

    A gift of $100 can help digitize more than 1,000 archival documents so that they can be used to support educational programs and be made available to the entire world on our website.
    A gift of $36 can help provide classroom resources for a teacher who will reach 150 students this year.
    A gift of $25 can help translate five to ten photo captions on our website, supplying information that could help someone identify part of their personal history.

    Thank you for your generosity. Never Again begins with you.

  54. Gerd Reinhard's Gravatar Gerd Reinhard
    December 30, 2012 - 10:02 am | Permalink

    @James O’Meara:
    Dear Mr. James O’ Meara
    Americans need to wake up and lead this time the fight.
    We germans expelled the predators from our homeland, but you, influenced by them, stabbed us in our back, so we could`t finish our work. It is also your duty today.

  55. Astraea Shaw's Gravatar Astraea Shaw
    December 30, 2012 - 9:34 am | Permalink

    I am not “anto semitic” I AM anti Judaism. It does no one any good, especially those who are born into it, poor babies! (I mean that – just imagine being born into that terrifying system!)
    But what I find most amazing is that Christianity did NOT come from the Jews or anythign to do with Jews or Hebrews (or Habiru or Apiru) or Canaanites or anyone but the Egyptians. IUSA the KRST was born on the 25th, December, the Winter Solstice, of a Virgin called IsisMery. He taught in the Temple at age 12 and was baptized at age 30 by Anup the Baptizer – who was beheaded. He had 12 companions. He walked on water, healed the sick and raised the dead and he was crucified, died and was buried in a tomb of rock abd he was resurrected – of course. That spiritual tradition is far older than any Hebrews or Jews – or anything else. It come out of Infinity. It comes out of the Human Heart and it is really about our Reality and about Nature and how beautiful and loving it is – the cyclical way of Life. How could anyone have ever believed that it came from one man? Out of all of Space and Time ?
    The Buddha never claimed to be The Teacher of all of Space and Time. He just said he had woken up! HOW did the Jews manage to con the World for so long about anything so vital? They really are good at deception and devious stupid goings on. WHY do people thing they are intelligent? What could be more stupid than lying about something of such deep significance? It just shows that they have NO IDEA what it MEANS!

  56. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 30, 2012 - 4:13 am | Permalink

    @ MODERATOR: Could you put this mangled comment ( #134491) of 4:09 am out of its misery?Thanks.

  57. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 30, 2012 - 4:09 am | Permalink

    @91: The list will be that much longer if Feinstein’s gun-grab gets through.

  58. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 30, 2012 - 4:09 am | Permalink

    @91: The list will be that much longer if Feidnstein’s gun-grab gets through.

  59. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 30, 2012 - 3:22 am | Permalink

    “People who take their religion seriously do not allow their religion to be ridiculed.”

    Doesn’t this say it all? Apparently, the vast majority of Christians, do not take their religion seriously–what I’ve been saying for years and years.

  60. Sector 19's Gravatar Sector 19
    December 30, 2012 - 2:08 am | Permalink

    “their advocacy has nothing to do with ideals of moral universalism but everything to do with pursuing what’s good for the Jews, motivated by Jewish hatreds toward the traditional people and cultures of the West.”

    Precisely. They were pro majority rule in South Africa when the minority was White. Now they are anti majority rule when the majority are White. Not just in the U.S., but even more so in Europe, the ancestral homeland of all European people.

  61. 91's Gravatar 91
    December 30, 2012 - 1:54 am | Permalink

    A topical short list of verboten topics:
    the loyalties of neocon Jews and their role in promoting the war in Iraq,
    the Jewish aspect of the Ivy League admissions scandal,
    how Jewish control of Hollywood influences media content.

    and the number of jews in elected office in USA.
    feinstein, boxer, harman, leiberman, and 100s? of others.

  62. 91's Gravatar 91
    December 30, 2012 - 1:47 am | Permalink

    How was Christmas turned to Xmas?
    According to the John Birch Society, Dutch Atheists ‘created’
    San ta.
    Then there is Rudolph.

    Robert L. May created Rudolph in 1939 as an assignment for Montgomery Ward. The retailer had been buying and giving away coloring books for Christmas every year and it was decided that creating their own book would save money. May considered naming the reindeer “Rollo” and “Reginald” before deciding upon using the name “Rudolph”.[4] In its first year of publication, 2.5 million copies of Rudolph’s story were distributed by Montgomery Ward.[citation needed] The story is written as a poem in the meter of “‘Twas the Night Before Christmas”.[citation needed] Publication and reprint rights for the book Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer are controlled by P\

    May grew up in an affluent, secular Jewish home in New Rochelle, New York.[1] He had a brother and two sisters. One of the sisters, Evelyn May, is the grandmother of the well-known economist Steven D. Levitt, of “Freakonomics” fame.[2] Another sister, Margaret, married (Jewish) songwriter Johnny Marks in 1947.[1] May graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Dartmouth College in 1926.

    Robert May’s parents were hard hit by the Great Depression (1929) and lost their wealth.[1] Sometime in the 1930s, May moved to Chicago and took a job as a low-paid in-house advertising copywriter for Montgomery Ward. In early 1939, May’s boss at Montgomery Ward asked him to write a “cheery” Christmas book for shoppers and suggested that an animal be the star of the book.[1] Montgomery Ward had been buying and giving away coloring books for Christmas every year and it was decided that creating their own book would save money and be a nice good-will gesture.[1]

    May’s (Jewish) wife, Evelyn, had contracted cancer in 1937 and was quite ill as he started on the book in early 1939.[1] May “drew on memories of his own painfully shy childhood when creating his Rudolph stories.”[3] He decided on making a deer the central character of the book because his then 4-year-old daughter, Barbara, loved the deer in the Chicago zoo.[1] He ran verses and chapters of the Rudolph poem by Barbara to make sure they entertained children. The final version of the poem was first read to Barbara and his wife’s parents

    Info from [jewish] wiki

  63. December 30, 2012 - 1:10 am | Permalink

    ha ha. that scary south asian dude looked like one of those gang rapists in India.

    Poor Indian girl. When my ancestors ruled that hellhole there were no rapes.

    The British ended dowry, suteee (widow burning), thugee…

    And look what is happening now.

  64. December 30, 2012 - 12:34 am | Permalink

    More from ZeroHedge, with no reference to “joos” or “whites” but you can easily fill in the blanks:

    “Why are they predators. Because most people are so stupid they’re willing to accept the existence and domination by predators. Period. You don’t see wild animal predators walking the streets of cities any more, because people shot them dead (or caged them and returned them to some wilderness). Once humans realize they need to treat human predators precisely the same way, we won’t see them in cities any more either. Simple as that. Humans just need to wake up and get real. But they won’t, because the predators are in total control now, and the predators are completely awake and know the score. It is the producers who are in denial of reality, which it just so crazy and insane that it must stun any sane human.

    “You are exactly correct. Regular productive people need to be better predators than the predators… in the sense they exterminate the predators quicker and more effectively than the predators enslave them and suck them dry. There is no good reason humans can’t and shouldn’t do that, but the evidence is in, and it not mistakable. The predators are awake, and the sheeple are sheep.”

  65. December 30, 2012 - 12:28 am | Permalink

    From the comments section of the economics blog ZeroHedge; no reference to Jews, since the whole “media” has been judaicized:

    “This type of thing [South Park on “They took our jobs!”] is similar to trash like “the Daily Show” and “Colbert Report”(with their studio audiences of cackling jackals) in that it makes light of things that need to be seriously addressed and ridicules them. To trivialize matters that are of the utmost importance really goes to the heart of why the media is complicit in the ruination of US society. In 500 years will people like Tolstoy and Mozart still be held up as an example of the beauty that man can produce-or garbage from the US shit-mill in Hollywood like South Park and Django Unchained?”

  66. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 30, 2012 - 12:13 am | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas: If you haven’t done so already, you owe it to yourself to check out the page on “Slurs” at Your talking point uses a lot of their techniques.

    Here’s a clip from that page. Just for Alice, it’s a LONG one. :)


    Anti-White Narrative: Slurs

    Slurs are names, labels, definitions, or descriptions of any segment of the diverse white American peoples that demonstrate the state of mind of the speaker as one of bullying, deception, hating, bigotry, dehumanization, or supremacy. Here are six principal themes to use in an attackback.


    Attackback by charging the specific slanderer (not his or her demographic affinity group) with claiming supremacy in naming the other. The defamers are supremacists. Tell them so.


    Call them bullies seeking to push diverse white American youth around. It’s true and it’s powerful.


    Point out that the slur shows a hate-filled mind. Call them haters.


    Call them liars for smothering the diversity and nationality, as well as the continental and regional origins, of those slurred.


    And the proponents of the anti-white narrative with its slurs are bigots. Tell them so.


    In addition, expose them as dehumanizing with slurs that use animal, insect, plant, color, or food names, or by referring to diverse white American youth with a negative label (“non-Hispanic whites”) or with a single point of color label (“whites”), always without diversity and nationality.

    Our all-time favorite dehumanizing hate speech was by the much-lionized critic Susan Sontag who wrote that “the white race is the cancer of human history.” [Partisan Review, Winter 1967, p. 57]

    Susan Sontag was part of the Graetz legacy. He launched a propaganda campaign of “scourging” and “flogging” the majority demographic in his home country (Germany) in 1868, as well as a parallel propaganda campaign “to shatter Christianity.”


    Here are some concepts not to use in an attackback.

    (1) Do not attack the entire demographic affinity group to which the slanderer belongs. We can’t do it because we are fighting an attack on our entire demographic affinity group.

    (2) Do not use “rational” arguments based on logic (logic is dead in public discourse), the double standard (it’s applauded by our adversaries), racism (it’s been defined in a biased way), history (they twist it), fairness (not going to happen), and dictionary definitions (they distract from the state of mind of the slanderer).

    3) Do not use “irrational” arguments based on being offended on the grounds that it is infantile and subjective. Attackback on objective grounds that explain that the slanderer opened his or her mind to us to determine as to whether the slanderer was lying, bigoted, a supremacist, a hater, a bully, or a dehumanizer.

    We have an entire section on the attackback in this syllabus.

  67. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 30, 2012 - 12:07 am | Permalink

    @Richard Williams:

    “… I think posters and commenters who go negative and claim there is nothing we can do are objectively anti-white, and need to be rejected.”

    Richard, I think the above clip identifies a lot of what goes on in so-called “pro-white” blogs and comment streams. Even if we cull out the obvious trolls, of the “concern troll” and “distraction troll” varieties, among others; we’re still left with a lot of demoralized white European Americans who insist that “All Hope is Lost!”.

    You are correct: They are objectively anti-white.

    One more thing. That website you say you stumbled across wouldn’t be , would it? I’ve studied that site for a long time, and it’s a wealth of information and technique for fighting back. Highly recommended.

  68. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 29, 2012 - 11:34 pm | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas: Yup, a sure sign that what you’re saying is working on those “raging liberals” is that it drives them nuts to say things like “There’s nothing DUMBER than an anti-white White”.

    At a deeper level, who is being most affected isn’t those anti-White idiots. We don’t care about them, and the sooner they cease to exist the better. The people we DO want to effect are the “peanut gallery”, which is White onlookers , the ones who know something is “wrong”, but don’t know how to deal with it.

    Every time you say what you say, and make a point; you are giving these demoralized Whites something they can use: a talking point. “In your opinion I’m “racist”. You’re just saying that because I’m white.” is one of them, and as you know there are many others.

    When demoralized Whites log onto a comment stream and see the anti-White haters being handed their ass, like most normal people, they sense the presence of some WINNERS, and want to listen to those who are kicking anti-White ass. They aren’t interested in all the “proof” you have of how great white people are, or how evil “the ****” are. They like a good show, with THEIR TEAM scoring the most points.

    Keep up the good work!

  69. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 29, 2012 - 11:26 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Alice, it scares me too … that there is a possibility that in my mountains of words, someone may have seen what I was saying! :)

    Kidding aside: we are at war, and need to focus on using the weapons at play on the battlefield of that war. Without gettin’ all verbose again, I’ll just say that calling ourselves “anti-semites” is tantamount to shooting ourselves. Doesn’t matter how “true” it is; it’s effect on our demoralized kinfolk is to turn them against us.

    Use the weapons that work, however you can, and whenever you can. Don’t explain, don’t try to “reason”, attack.

  70. Sean's Gravatar Sean
    December 29, 2012 - 10:53 pm | Permalink

    As Professor Macdonald suggests, the Jews don’t have the same easy-going attitude towards religious celebrations when it comes to their traditions. This article is illustrative:

  71. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 29, 2012 - 9:33 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Seconded.

    I wish I knew why the comment of mine to which you refer spent six hours in modera… “review limbo.” I thought it was no harsher than the words of this article’s author, use of whose initials sometimes seems to prompt review, too.

  72. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 29, 2012 - 9:03 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: Thanks. And hooray for Bishop Williamson, whose courage and candour shames many of those who believe that cassocks are for sissies.

  73. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 29, 2012 - 8:48 pm | Permalink

    Satire’s a one-way street. “Fips” Rupprecht cracked rocks for six years proving that.

  74. Mary Thomas's Gravatar Mary Thomas
    December 29, 2012 - 8:42 pm | Permalink

    I use the term “anti-white” constantly. I’m always calling Obama a “hate filled anti-white bigot.” That’s my favorite set of terms and I use them all day long. To be honest, it’s gotten to be a lot of fun, and I’m sure it’s effective because of the huge flak I get from raging liberals.

  75. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 29, 2012 - 8:37 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Send him a note with the following greeting:

    [“at” symbol] followed by the capitalized word [moderator] and a concluding colon.

    Then proceed as you normally would.

  76. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 29, 2012 - 8:18 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: Could you go over again the protocol for having the moderator intervene to remove comments?

  77. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 29, 2012 - 8:12 pm | Permalink

    @sanjay: Someone’s life just took a serendipitous turn for the worse. No more breezing through customs.

  78. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 29, 2012 - 7:20 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: Many thanks. If you get an e-mail from someone calling himself Kwanzaa Ken, that’ll be me seeking to make a fast exit from this tolerant land.

  79. December 29, 2012 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

    Alert! I typed the wrong email and this south asian dude’s twitter or gravatar image appeared. this is not me, BTW. I did not know typos could lead to such dramatic mishaps :)

    To all of you, have a wonderful new year, and hope millions more wake up in 2013, thanks to TOO.

  80. Rudd's Gravatar Rudd
    December 29, 2012 - 5:48 pm | Permalink

    Lets take the sting out of the words anti semite. Its only a words but if we embrace it we take a weapon away & make it a badge of honor in our struggle.
    Anti Semites for a freedom & unity. Say I’m an anti semite & proud of it.

  81. Aquilax's Gravatar Aquilax
    December 29, 2012 - 5:40 pm | Permalink

    @Bob Roberts:

    Your faithful followers are already persuaded. It seems to me that what is lacking in your presentation that might serve to enlarge their numbers is a demonstration of why putting Christmas on an equal footing with other religions’ big days hurts Christians.

    Why? Because when you put things that belong to European peoples on an equal footing with everything else by making them “universal”, it’s like turning off your immune system (ethnic solidarity) which usually protects your body from foreign elements and fever.

    That’s why.

  82. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 29, 2012 - 5:07 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps the Greeks will inspire us. BBC reports that Bishop Seraphim is fighting the building of a mosque in Athens. He said

    “Greece suffered five centuries of Islamic tyranny under Turkish rule and building a mosque would offend the martyrs who freed us,” .

  83. Rudd's Gravatar Rudd
    December 29, 2012 - 5:03 pm | Permalink

    I say every American citizen of the USA that is White & is racially aware of whats going on is an Anti Semite….So lets come out of the closet and take up the banner of Anti Semitism. I even like the sound of it Anti Semites unite.

  84. fender's Gravatar fender
    December 29, 2012 - 4:59 pm | Permalink


    “What do you suppose the Jews will want from us next?”

    Doesn’t matter. When they make demands of us we should rally and make even bigger demands of them. Shutting down all jewish schools and synagogues under the charge that they instill hatred of Whites sounds like a good idea to me.

  85. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 29, 2012 - 4:57 pm | Permalink

    It is a little scary- but you are starting to make sense to me. :)

  86. Rudd's Gravatar Rudd
    December 29, 2012 - 4:38 pm | Permalink

    ..Anti Semitism & Freedom of Speech..
    I am an Anti Semite & feel the jews are discriminating against me. What am I
    supposed to call myself when I see the actions of the jewish zionists & thier
    attacks against my White Race & say something about it. As an Anti Semite which is the label the jews give alot of people aren’t I being singled out & my
    rights as an American to free speech denied.

  87. December 29, 2012 - 4:37 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    Careful Pierre. Quoting a man that questioned another religion (the Holocaust) will have you on a list as a terrorist or subversive.
    If you need help to escape, let me know.

  88. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    December 29, 2012 - 4:35 pm | Permalink

    What do you suppose the Jews will want from us next? One thing you can count on is that they are never fully satisfied. Once they have taught White kids to hate their own heritage it will be time for something else. How about destroying their own bodies? Many already do that now but I’m certain that it’s not enough to make the kosher kids happy. Just like abortion, it’s never enough so long as we live at all.

  89. Richard Williams's Gravatar Richard Williams
    December 29, 2012 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

    Yes, many Jews will try to make the overall society conform to a system more comfortable to them. They call it “tikkun olam” in Hebrew and tell us that it means “repairing the world.” As the survivors of the USSR and Stahlin’s willing executioners (phrase first used by Dr. MacDonald) will tell you, it can be very hard on the peoples whose existence is deemed not necessary to the world.

    But words do matter as well as the other levers of power. The key words that matter are names, labels, definitions, and descriptions. I count myself lucky that I stumbled on a web site earlier this year which teaches these things and how to fight back. We are by no means so powerless as we read about so often…I think posters and commenters who go negative and claim there is nothing we can do are objectively anti-white, and need to be rejected.

    Just in this one area the website in question proposes lots of different words and phrases to use in fighting the anti-white narrative, and in Northern California the results are measurable by noting what words and phrases are now excluded from public discourse.

    In closing, one of the group’s most memorable statements is: “American society no longer has a majority throughout the nation, having morphed from involuntary pluralism to coerced multiculturalism and then to politicized multiracialism, but attacking the anti-white narrative is a key to reversing defensiveness and silence by the diverse white American peoples.”

    And next will come institutionalized multinationalism, so when do we get busy setting up our own nation within a nation?

  90. Steve's Gravatar Steve
    December 29, 2012 - 3:35 pm | Permalink

    This is what I don’t understand, but first let me be perfectly clear. I’m not advocating violence by any means towards anyone, but with all else being equal, why is it that Jews continue to operate with impunity in the US and abroad with no repercussions? The internet has exposed their machinations, yet no high-profile Jews have been targeted by the psychopaths willing to go out in a blaze of glory that we read about from time to time in the media.

    When Chavez came to power, I recall seeing an article depicting Jews fleeing Venezuela en masse. I vividly recall a group of Jews sitting on the tarmac somewhere in Venezuela, eager to flee to the US and other destinations because Chavez came to power wanting to nationalize many of the private industries. And even though I don’t see any future US Presidential candidate appearing as our redeemer, it wouldn’t take much to instill panic and create a public relations nightmare for Jews, God forbid, if some were to befall such a tragic event that we see glorified in the media.

  91. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    December 29, 2012 - 3:12 pm | Permalink


    Not me pal. I put the emphasis right where it belongs. LOL.

    You must be a Catholic seeking justification for your words. As a Protestant my justification is Jesus Christ.

  92. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    December 29, 2012 - 2:34 pm | Permalink

    A short, important article.


  93. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    December 29, 2012 - 2:23 pm | Permalink

    “As a White European American, I object to the traditions and symbols of MY people being forced out of the public squares they’ve been in for generations, and being replaced by the traditions and symbols of other peoples.”

    I would say that I understand that other people very much need to celebrate their traditions and symbols, and they should just as everyone should. That is why it is very important that all people continue to keep their own nations/communities. There is no denying this.

  94. December 29, 2012 - 2:21 pm | Permalink

    sorry wrong email typed. can the moderator delete the previous post.

    i doubt it. we will need to make ethnic conflict and ethnic deception a required reading in college social science classes.

    but first we need to develop skills and a change in attitude towards fertility which will come handy for building a future white ethnostate.

    Unless white behavior towards fertility changes, a white ethnostate, or “re-taking” our countries is impossible, not just improbable.

  95. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 29, 2012 - 2:13 pm | Permalink

    @Tom: Try saying this:

    “As a White European American, I object to the traditions and symbols of MY people being forced out of the public squares they’ve been in for generations, and being replaced by the traditions and symbols of other peoples. Only hateful anti-whites could promote such anti-white behavior.”

    Didn’t need to use the “***” word at all, but there will most definitely be an effect if those words are used.

  96. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 29, 2012 - 2:00 pm | Permalink

    @Gregor: And to illustrate just how insidious our linguistic habits are … look at the final phrase I used: I said “jew-box”.

    While at THIS site and in this comment stream, that doesn’t stick out as a “problem”, but if used among “white and normal” people, it’s a BIG problem.

    I just said something, that three-letter word, and in a critical context. That triggers all the propaganda they’ve been feed their whole lives, and will have the predictable effect of calling me nasty names, and distancing themselves from me.

    If I’d been “smart”, I would have said “… think outside the anti-white box”, or similar. That wouldn’t have triggered the demoralizing brainwashing, and would have possibly opened them up to more discussion and thinking.

    Yes, our linguistic patterns have been “managed”, and they’ve been managed in the direction of leading us to do all the work of destroying ourselves with our own energy … by using enemy-crafted “categories”.

    McLuhan wasn’t kidding when he said “The Mother Tongue is Propaganda”.

  97. omop's Gravatar omop
    December 29, 2012 - 1:59 pm | Permalink

    In some of the 50 states that make up the “home of the brave” its worse than stealing…….

    The Jewish Senator from Minnesota, Terri Bonoff (Democrat) has asked Republican Senate Majority Leader Amy Koch (a Catholic) to remove the words ‘Jesus’ and ‘Christianity’ from the opening session prayers.

    Terri Bonoff said that she feels “highly uncomfortable” when the word Jesus or Christianity is mentioned in the prayer. Several other Jewish Senators, all Democrats, are backing Bonoff’s request.

    What really pissed-off Terri Bonoff was when on Monday, Rev. Dennis Campbell of Granite City Baptist Church in St. Cloud, who mentioned Jesus Christ by name three times and made other overt references to Christianity. Campbell later defended the content of his prayer, like Pope Benedict XVI, while confirming his love for the Jews. “There’s nobody that loves the Jews any more than the Christians, so that was not meant as an insult or disrespect,” Campbell said. “Rather, it was a show of respect to Jesus Christ – just like our founders showed respect to Jesus Christ and the word of God when they built our Constitution”.

    It’s not the first time Jewish legislators have taken issue with how prayers should be conducted in state Capitol sessions. A decade ago, a handful of state representatives unsuccessfully fought for House guidelines similar to what Bonoff is proposing for the Senate.

    Anyone who has studied Jewish Talmud or the Jewish historian, late professor Israel Shahak’s writings would agree that Senator Terri Bonoff’s reaction to Jesus’ name is not unusal – because Jewish childern are raised in hatred towards Jesus, his mother Mary and Christianity.

    The Hawaii State Senate in January ended opening prayers altogether out of concern over possible lawsuits on First Amendment grounds.

    Jews make 2% of America’s total population as compared to 3% Muslim population. More than 90% of Americans call themselves Christian.

    Just imagine if either of the two Muslim lawmakers had made such request.

  98. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    December 29, 2012 - 1:51 pm | Permalink

    @Bob Roberts:

    The Jews, or Jewish front organizations, continue to push Christian symbols out of public spaces, in the same way they have pushed Christian symbols, God, the Bible, and prayer out of public schools.

    The only thing that I have noticed that will stop or slow down this type of Jewish political action, is if the Jews are confronted as Jews in the local media.

    Note that the Jews are using more front type organizations to mask their behavior, but, if you scratch the surface you will see organized Jewery at work.

    Aroused Christians are the Jews worst nightmare.

  99. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 29, 2012 - 1:51 pm | Permalink

    @James O’Meara:

    “These days, though, it would be hard to find a Jew who was not at least “implicitly” anti-White.”

    I doubt that anyone reading TOO would disagree with the above.

    My question isn’t about what’s “true” or not about “the ****”. My question is about how we use and structure our language to deal with “our problem”.

    At this point, I’m convinced that “our problem” has descended on our backs via imposing language and terminology on us which de-structures what structures us. In other words, the “war” really IS a “war of words”.

    One of the comments MacDonald made in CofC that still reverberates loudly in my mind is about “****” influencing the categorization process. What this means is that “they” have achieved positions of influence, cultural niches, which allow them to re-configure what words mean, and via this process, actually change the SHAPE OF REALITY that we perceive, as embedded in the words/names we use.

    If MacDonald is correct about this, and I believe he is, then one realizes that this process is an act of war. What follows is the realization is that we cannot “take back” our cultural being (nor our ethnic-racial being) unless we engage this act of war on the same field which our enemy has chosen to wage war. All else is distraction.

    “Taking Back” is a process of reclaiming control over the “categories”, and a first step is to indentify and STOP USING enemy-engineered terminology embedded in our language.

    In particular, we shoot ourselves in the foot by focusing on an identifiable ethnic group as the TARGET, rather than focusing on how what they do AFFECTS our best interests. That latter “verbal shift” can be accomplished by never using “the ****” as a free-standing trope; but instead adding the magic adjective of “anti-White” or “anti-white”, take your pick.

    So long as we focus on “the ****” as a phrase, we isolate and become a problem for OUR OWN PEOPLE. It’s not their fault that they’ve been demoralized by incessant anti-White propaganda, embedded in phrases like “racist” or “anti-semitic”; but it’s a fact that they HAVE been demoralized by this stuff, and will predictable react against anyone who TRIGGERS what this propaganda has done to their minds. Kind of like cultural SSRI drugs, cultural Paxil: once someone is “on” this anti-white category-shift drugs, no matter how “true” your facts are, they just don’t get inside their heads. Au contraire … they shut down and write you off if you “offend” them by pointing out that they are nuts and on culture-drugs!

    I’m not pointing this out to you because you do this. This is not a criticism. This is “stuff for the board”, which I hope will stimulate some to think outside the “jew-box”. For what it’s worth …

  100. fender's Gravatar fender
    December 29, 2012 - 1:49 pm | Permalink

    The good thing about books like this is that when Whites re-take their countries we won’t need any propaganda of our own; books like Kosher Christmas, The Jewish Century, and other works written by jews will be proof enough of their hostility and hatred towards us.

  101. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    December 29, 2012 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think people make a very simple and rational conclusion from all of this that is very self evident. That conclusion is that since a multi-culti society requires the suppression of things like Christmas then multi-culti is very much NOT desireable.

  102. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 29, 2012 - 1:29 pm | Permalink

    @James O’Meara: You book is on my “must get” list. Now working on “The Way of Men”, which I’m sure you are aware of.

    In case you didn’t notice (grin!), I’m on a roll obsessing about “our use of language”, and feeling kind of pissy about what we keep doing, that keeps not “working” to free us from the grip of enemies. To that end, I’m going to reconstruct and repeat your final phrase …. (grins again)

    ” … ANTI-WHITE Judaic-inspired “family values” mentality.”

    People just don’t seem to be aware of how powerful inserting an adjective can be. It “modifies” something in a way which can re-focus the whole meaning of a statement. At the same time, it eliminates that old problem of “How can you insinuate it’s ALL the “****” that are a problem”. It’s so damned simple, so simple that nobody seems to see how such a simple thing changes everything.

  103. December 29, 2012 - 1:28 pm | Permalink


    Logically, you are correct. After all, the 3 biggest adult influences on Evola, as he admits in his autobiography, were two Jews: Mittlestaedt and Weiniger. He also studied the qabbalah and even argued that this was the source of medieval “Christian” mysticism, since Christianity had no real spiritual content.

    These days, though, it would be hard to find a Jew who was not at least “implicitly” anti-White. They’re usually on both sides of any issue [I call it “the Judaic Two-Step”] but that’s to ensure both are anti-White:
    Invade Iraq — now or soon?
    Homos — exterminate or emulate?

    The real thing to avoid, by not fixating on ‘J-e-w’, is the error of “my enemy’s enemy.” Thus, some on “the right” think we should encourage Muslim immigration, since “they hate Jews like we do.” Again, some Arabs are at least implicitly pro-White, at least to the extent of just wanting to be left alone. Of course, in the Jewish mirror-language of the neo-cons, it’s the Muslims who are bent on world conquest, not the neocons, oh no, don’t look over there.

  104. Bob Roberts's Gravatar Bob Roberts
    December 29, 2012 - 1:25 pm | Permalink

    Your faithful followers are already persuaded. It seems to me that what is lacking in your presentation that might serve to enlarge their numbers is a demonstration of why putting Christmas on an equal footing with other religions’ big days hurts Christians. To the average American, equality resonates as a very important virtue. Why, in your view, does Christianity need to be dominant, rather than merely equal? You may very well have an answer to this, but it seldom comes through. It sounds almost as if you feel that Christianity is instrinsically fragile, too weak to survive unless by imposing itself through government force. Americans are still free to celebrate Christmas, aren’t they? So what’s the problem?

  105. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    December 29, 2012 - 1:21 pm | Permalink

    @James O’Meara:

    The Jew is only comfortable when everyone else is lost in exile, without a homeland.

    This is so true. I believe that it all goes back to their primal rejection of the Logos, as the E Michael Jones work clearly states.

  106. December 29, 2012 - 1:17 pm | Permalink

    Thanks, Gregor. Cuddihy’s book is exactly right, and I usually cite it, though not today for some reason.

    Speaking of me and books, for more of my “excellent commentary” be sure to get my new book, The Homo and the Negro, where I lay out the destructive consequences to White civilization of the Judaic-inspired “family values” mentality.

  107. December 29, 2012 - 1:09 pm | Permalink

    Speaking of ‘dancing to their tune,” Spengler [the real one, not the impudent Jew Goldman who writes neo-con screed under the name] said that “Jazz music and nigger dancing are the death march of civilization.” In a book published in America by Knopf! Now, music and dancing are a bit redundant, though I guess fit the ‘march’ metaphor, but I would amend that to ‘Nigger music and Jew humor”. Think what our culture could be without them! Of course, that’s why “Hitler had to be stopped” and you’ll notice that the whole anti-Nazi rap seems to be “oh, think of the wonderful jazz music they silenced!” Donez moi une fracture…

  108. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 29, 2012 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

    @James O’Meara: Yup, those anti-White Ost-“****” have shown us a pattern of trying to destroy any White culture they get inside of.

    Your excellent commentary reminds me of one of my favorite reads: The Ordeal of Civility.

    Anti-Whites, of any stripe, including “ost-****”, have trouble with adjusting from a Tribal culture to a Civilization. What usually happens, and has happened, is the Tribal Culture forms entities inside the Civilizational Culture, and works to destroy it.

    When a cultural entity which is profoundly Tribal, non-Civilizational, and non-White, enters a White Civilization … it can either assimilate and “melt” itself out of existence, or seek to destroy its Civilizational White host culture.

    Anti-White “things” do not “assimilate”.

  109. fender's Gravatar fender
    December 29, 2012 - 1:03 pm | Permalink

    Again, the point needs to be stressed that Whites need to tune jews out. Don’t respond to them, don’t consider their views, and stop taking them seriously. Whites unfortunately lack the aloofness that other races possess, and this is part of the reason for our misplaced altruism. When non-Whites speak, we listen. Why? Until we learn to be impervious to the semites and their BS, we’re always going to dancing to their tune.

  110. December 29, 2012 - 12:54 pm | Permalink

    “Jewish parody helps ensure that Christmas “not be taken too seriously” and that the celebrations of other traditions “be accorded equal respect and opportunity.””

    Is Umbeto Eco a Jew? Might as well be, he’s advancing their agenda. I’m starting to think that the blind monk in Name of the Rose was right; humor is the enemy. Of course, he’s presented as crazy and WRONG, unlike the skeptical Sir William. As Trevor Lynch says about Hollywood, only madmen are allowed to articulate traditional views. Eco even had the impudence to attack Rene Guenon as ‘paranoid’ for daring to think there was some truth or reality behind endless chains of analogy, a la post-modernism. The Jew is only comfortable when everyone else is lost in exile, without a homeland.

  111. December 29, 2012 - 12:46 pm | Permalink

    “Plaut emphasizes the difference between the very aggressive behavior of Eastern European immigrants with their hatred of Christianity contrasted with the German Jews who arrived in the mid-19th century and “embraced the holiday.”

    Always the ost-Juden. Most bios of Kafka will note how his father, like all assimilated Jews (you’ll notice Kafka writes in German, not Czech) despised the dirty ost-Juden, whilst Franz used to hang out with them and even bring them home for dinner! Sorta like American teens and negroes — guess who’s coming to dinner! Rather than assimilating, which would require them to admit their cultural backwardness, and unlike Arabs or Injuns, who just want to be left alone, these hateful sociopaths set out to deliberately destroy White culture. Same in the Middle East. They won’t be happy — well, they’re never ‘happy’ of course, like all psychos — until all traces of everyone else are gone, and then can lie around their pools [water stolen from Arabs or Injuns), big bellied and hairy, in tight little bikinis, with a huge honking Star ‘o David on their sunken chests, and no on to mock them.

  112. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 29, 2012 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

    Are the problems we face due to changes in the culture that are “jewish”, or due to these changes being anti-White?

    Would anyone care about “the jews” if they were pro-White, and didn’t try to destroy White cultural entities?

    Would a non-jewish demographic which was also anti-White, and had the power to impose their anti-White memes and narratives also be a problem for us?

    Why do so many people tend to focus their ire against “the jews”, rather than focus on the QUALITY which is the root of our problems: the quality of anti-White?

    Why are we not using verbal constructions like “anti-White Jews”, instead of just “Jews”?

    Our problem isn’t a three-letter word, it’s the QUALITY of anti-White — no matter WHERE it comes from. It’s the actions that are anti-White which emanate from anti-Whites. It has nothing to do with a three-letter word, per se. It has EVERYTHING to do with the anti-White actions taken.

    Isn’t it time to re-think and change how we write and speak? Talking about “three-letter words” doesn’t work with White and Normal people. Talking about anti-White perks up ears among white and normal people.

    Is it possible that obsessive focus on a three-letter-word is not really as effective as laying out words like anti-White, as a part of our language? Is it possible that too much “three-letter-word” talk is like an ingrown toenail that serves only to cause more pain, and has little effect in terms of CHANGING the terms of discourse in an effective direction?

    If you say, “It’s the “****”, you haven’t led anyone to the problem, or a discussion of the problem. If you say, “Anti-White ‘****’ are destroying our peoplehood”, you just might be getting somewhere.

  113. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    December 29, 2012 - 12:26 pm | Permalink

    It seems like Jewish activist are feeling more confident that they need not worry no more about hiding their agenda.

    Or maybe, some of the Jewish activist may not be happy with what their Jewish brethren have done to America and are trying to help White Americans open their eyes and see whats happening.

    Its one or the other that is motivating such writing by the likes of Plaut.

  114. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 29, 2012 - 12:25 pm | Permalink

    The fact that Jews have been able to ridicule Christianity without any serious negative consequences is an important marker of Jewish power and an equally strong indication of the decline of Christian religious belief.

    Professor McDonald’s words complement those of Bishop Richard Williamson (11/5/2011):

    Tertullian (160–220) said that the Catholic Faith and Jewish power are like the two pans of a pair of scales: as Catholic Faith goes up, so Jewish power goes down, and as Catholic Faith goes down, so Jewish power goes up. … conspiracies do exist, they have an important part to play and they are not to be merely scorned …

    The publication of a book such as this, with its frank acknowledgment of the Jews’ contempt and hate, demonstrates the extent of their power. It also demonstrates that they are once again in grave peril of overplaying their hand. Of course, their peril is cause for us to rejoice, since only when they stand clear of the shadows will there be even a chance to make the cause of white Western restoration a mass movement.

  115. Gary's Gravatar Gary
    December 29, 2012 - 12:22 pm | Permalink

    No point in trying to reason with Jews. In their opinion
    everything they do is superior even if it is vacuous ugly
    artwork that belongs in the trash. Just ridicule them.
    I mince no words anymore to anyone who will listen.
    We white people are being exterminated culturally,
    economically, and absolutely (by low birth rates and race
    mixing). The end will occur suddenly when the Jew-media-induced race riots start and the FEMA camps fill up with
    defiant whites.

  116. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 29, 2012 - 12:14 pm | Permalink

    Making “America” more friendly for EVERYONE? Making Christmas just another “Holiday”?

    Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White homelands for EVERYONE?

    … and every belief under the sun, especially anti-White beliefs.

    A “country” that includes everything is not much of ANYTHING. Someone who swears loyalty to “not much of ANYTHING” needs psychiatric help.

    Yet more proof that anti-racism is a just code word for anti-White

Comments are closed.