Life has been disturbing for liberals lately. An American journalist is beheaded by a jihadi with a “British accent.” “Shocking,” says the Independent. At least 1400 White girls are subject to years of rape by men “of Pakistani heritage” in the Yorkshire town of Rotherham. “Shocking,” says the anti-racist campaigner Yasmin Alibhai-Brown.
Yes, it’s another of those occasions when I wonder whether English is really my mother-tongue. I thought “shocking” news had to contain some element of surprise and unpredictability. But that doesn’t seem to apply here. Britain has been enriched by mass immigration from violent and misogynistic Third World nations. Is it surprising when an enricher with a British accent cuts someone’s head off? Is it surprising when other enrichers commit gang-rape?
Not to me. I think it’s utterly predictable. Recall that smarmy liberal phrase: “of Pakistani heritage.” This is part of the heritage:
In the first phase of the war, young men and Hindus, Awami League members, intellectuals, students and academics were targeted for murder. In the second phase of the war, women were singled out. It is thought that at least 200,000 women were raped by the Pakistani forces and their collaborators – 25,000 victims found themselves pregnant, so that is not implausible. There are eyewitness accounts of “rape camps” set up by the Pakistani forces. The numbers, and the names of rape victims, remain disputed. Sheikh Mujib, the first leader of Bangladesh, ordered the destruction of lists so that the shame would not follow the victims all their lives. … It is impossible to know the real death toll. The historian R.J. Rummel, who has looked as deeply into it as anyone, concludes that the “final estimate of Pakistan’s democide to be 300,000 to 3,000,000, or a prudent 1,500,000.” (The war Bangladesh can never forget, The Independent, 19th February 2013)
That was in 1971, when Bangladesh, then called East Pakistan, seceded from Pakistan: the two regions, separated by Hindu India, had become a single Muslim nation at the Partition of India in 1947. So that’s how Pakistani Muslims treat members of their own religion and race: mass murder, mass rape. How Muslims treat members of other religions was seen during Partition itself: mass murder, mass rape. Violence and misogyny are as inseparable from Islam as narcissism and mendacity are from liberalism.
Liberals are well aware of how Muslims have behaved in the Indian subcontinent. That quotation about the Bangladesh genocide is from the Independent. And liberals have just mourned the death of Richard Attenborough, whose Oscar-winning film Gandhi (1982) portrayed the violence of Indian Partition in vivid detail. Despite knowing all this, liberals permitted Muslims to immigrate into the UK in huge numbers. When these vibrant New Britons commit atrocities, the liberals are “shocked.” But that hasn’t been their only response. Denis “The Slug” MacShane got his priorities right: he thought of himself and his bank balance:
Rotherham’s former Labour MP has broken his silence on the child abuse scandal, from the comfort of the Dordogne [a region of France where rich Britons take holidays]:
Or you could just read the 160-page report which covers the time Denis was the local Labour MP and seemingly oblivious to what was happening on his patch and the failings of his friends and allies on the local Labour council.
Far more insightful, and free. (MacShame Uses Rotherham Scandal to Plug New Book, Guido Fawkes blog, 27th August 2014)
MacShane was jailed in December 2013 for submitting fraudulent expenses as part of his tireless pro-Jewish, anti-fascist campaigning. The Jewish Chronicle celebrated him as “one of the community’s greatest champions” and said “we should mourn Denis MacShane’s fall from grace.”
While MacShane was championing Jews and their interests, what was he doing for White girls in Rotherham? Nothing, it appears:
Denis MacShane: I was too much of a ‘liberal leftie’ and should have done more to investigate child abuse
Denis MacShane, the former Labour MP for Rotherham, has admitted that as a “Guardian reading liberal leftie” he shied away from the issue of the oppression of women in the Muslim community. Mr MacShane, who resigned in 2012 over an expenses fraud for which he was later jailed, insisted no-one came to him with child abuse allegations during his 18 years in Parliament, but admitted he should have “burrowed into” the issue.
He told the BBC: “I think there was a culture of not wanting to rock the multicultural community boat if I may put it like that.” Admitting he had been guilty of doing too little, he said he had been aware of the problem of cousin marriage and “the oppression of women within bits of the Muslim community in Britain” but: “Perhaps yes, as a true Guardian reader, and liberal leftie, I suppose I didn’t want to raise that too hard.”
He recalled having a “huge row” with another local MP and council grandees because they were complaining about a newspaper investigation into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham, which unearthed uncomfortable truths they did not want to hear. (Denis MacShane: I was too much of a ‘liberal leftie’ and should have done more to investigate child abuse, The Daily Telegraph, 27th August 2014)
MacShane is a dedicated opponent of Nick Griffin, the former leader of the British National Party. Griffin knew all about sex-crimes by Muslims and made a speech condemning it in 2004, a full decade ago.
What was the reaction of our liberal elite, including Denis MacShane? It put Griffin on trial twice, using secret recordings by the BBC as evidence of his thought-crimes but failing to get a conviction.
Meanwhile, the elite allowed the sex-crimes to continue. Have liberals apologized and admitted that Griffin was right? Of course not. Have liberals admitted their direct responsibility for the horrors in Rotherham? Of course not. In fact, a familiar figure called Sue Berelowitz has reacted with breathtaking chutzpah, confirming my belief that she belongs to the “community” championed by MacShane for so long:
‘Culture of denial’ leaving UK children at risk of serious abuse: Deputy children’s commissioner Sue Berelowitz says, despite Rotherham and gang violence cases elsewhere, police and authorities are practising ‘wilful blindness’
Children are at risk of serious abuse across England because of a culture of “wilful blindness” about the scale and prevalence of sexual exploitation across swaths of local government and in police forces, the deputy children’s commissioner warns. In a highly critical interview given in the aftermath of the Rotherham abuse inquiry, which concluded that hundreds of children may have been abused there over a 16-year period, Sue Berelowitz said she had been “aghast” at the examples of obvious errors and poor practice she found.
Berelowitz told the Guardian she had discovered that police and council officers were in some cases still either looking the other way, not asking questions or claiming abuse was confined to a certain ethnic group – such as Asian men – or a particular social class. Berelowitz is the author of a detailed report into child sexual exploitation in gangs and groups last year following a series of high-profile cases in towns such as Rochdale [involving non-White Muslims] and Oxford [involving non-White Muslims] as well as Rotherham.
On a recent field visit to a police force, Berelowitz was surprised to learn that the officers’ top search on their internal computer profiling system was “Asian male”. When she asked what would happen if the perpetrators were not Asian, the officer in charge replied that the force was “not looking for those”. “I was astonished. I said: ‘I think you better start looking.’” […]
Berelowitz said she was shocked to discover that although “there had been progress” by authorities in the aftermath of the grisly series of gang-rape and trafficking scandals, “there are still instances of not looking, of wilful blindness. We have to be careful none of us is in denial about the terrible reality of what happened in places like Rochdale and Rotherham.” (‘Culture of denial’ leaving UK children at risk of serious abuse, The Guardian, 28th August 2014)
The “terrible reality” is that mass immigration has turned large parts of the UK into the Third World. Berelowitz is still using smoke-and-mirrors to conceal this reality. The “scandals” involve non-Whites preying on Whites and on other non-Whites. White men are under-represented in sex-crime and typically commit their crimes alone, because they know their behaviour is unacceptable to other Whites. Non-White men are grossly over-represented in sex-crime and commit their crimes in large groups, because they know their “communities” won’t stop it. Berelowitz is still pretending otherwise.
You can see more chutzpah in demands by Labour politicians that Shaun Wright, the ex-councillor for children’s services in Rotherham, resign from his current post as police and crime commissioner there. Wright was a Labour councillor. It was a Labour council that allowed rape-gangs to operate year after year. The Labour MP Denis MacShane cared about Jews, not about his White constituents. This scandal is yet another example of Labour’s hatred of the White working-class. The party is best described as a criminal conspiracy, not as a political organization:
Rotherham child abuse: council managers now in senior posts elsewhere after escaping disciplinary measures
Managers who failed to protect 1,400 children from sexual abuse in Rotherham are now working in senior posts at other councils after escaping disciplinary action. A report into the abuse scandal does not name any of the culpable managers, meaning they are unlikely to face questions from their current employers over their “blatant” failings in the past.
Martin Kimber, chief executive of Rotherham Council, urged the anonymous managers to “take responsibility” for their actions, whilst admitting there was not enough evidence to refer any one person to a professional disciplinary body. Mr Kimber suggested the current employers of former senior managers at Rotherham Council should study the report carefully to decide whether they should take any action, without saying how they would identify the unnamed parties.
A report into child abuse in the Rotherham area found that 1,400 children were sexually abused over a 16-year period. The report’s author, Professor Alexis Jay, said failures of the political and professional leadership of Rotherham Council over the first 12 years were “blatant” as the seriousness of the problem was underplayed by senior managers and was not seen as a priority by South Yorkshire Police. The failures happened despite three reports between 2002 and 2006 “which could not have been clearer in the description of the situation in Rotherham”.
She said the first of these reports was “effectively suppressed” because senior officers did not believe the data. The other two were ignored, the professor said. The report said: “By far the majority of perpetrators were described as ‘Asian’ by victims.” But “several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist”. In 2010 five men, described by a judge as “sexual predators”, were given lengthy jail terms after they were found guilty of grooming teenage girls for sex in Rotherham. It later emerged that police and child protection agencies in Rotherham had extensive knowledge of what was going on for a decade, but failed to bring prosecutions. (Rotherham child abuse: council managers now in senior posts elsewhere after escaping disciplinary measures, The Daily Telegraph, 26th August 2014
Like Denis MacShane, these golden-hearted socialists have got their priorities right: themselves and their bank balances. But Labour isn’t alone in its treachery, and the problem of Muslim sex-crime began well before the 1990s. For a detailed study, I recommend “Easy Meat”: Multiculturalism, Islam and Child Sex Slavery (2014), issued by the Law and Freedom Foundation in the UK. The study doesn’t admit the racial aspect of the problem, but it’s an uncompromising indictment of our ruling elite, who have first allowed mass immigration by violent Pakistani misogynists, then ignored the consequences for decade after decade.
But let’s recognize the “complexity” of vibrant sex-crime. It isn’t exclusive to Pakistanis and it isn’t confined to the United Kingdom:
Sydney gang rapes
The Sydney gang rapes were a series of gang rape attacks committed by a group of up to fourteen Lebanese Australian youths led by Bilal Skaf against Australian women and teenage girls, as young as 14, in Sydney Australia in 2000. The crimes — described as ethnically motivated hate crimes by officials and commentators — were covered extensively by the news media, and prompted the passing of new laws. The nine men convicted of the gang rapes were sentenced to a total of more than 240 years in jail. … Conservative commentators such as Miranda Devine categorised the crimes as racially motivated hate crimes. The Sydney Morning Herald reported that the rapists had stated to a victim, during the attack, “You deserve it because you’re an Australian” and “I’m going to fuck you Leb-style”. (Sydney gang rapes, Wikipedia)
You can find similar stories in Sweden, France and every other Western nation enriched by Muslims and other non-Whites. Third World people import Third World pathologies. Mass immigration is societal cyanide. It needs to be reversed and our enrichers need to return home, taking their pathologies with them.