Dawn of the Deplorables: Trump, Trauma and the Triumph of Hate

Tobias Langdon

The left’s recipe for a happy, harmonious society has been simple: tribalism and greed are compulsory for all groups except Whites in general and White men in particular. Minorities must be worshiped, majorities demonized. This recipe has now blown up in their faces with the election of Donald J. Trump as forty-fifth president of the United States. American Whites have begun to recognize themselves as a tribe and vote accordingly.

Spoil and victory

“But Trump is a beast!” the left are wailing. Well, yes: you could say he’s Nietzsche’s schweifende blonde Bestie — the roaming blond beast, “avidly rampant for spoil and victory,” who strikes fear into the hearts of the civilized and effete. The Marxists and Frankfurt-Schoolers who wrote the left’s recipe for society certainly seem to have made a close study of Nietzsche. They’ve then done the opposite of what he recommended, elevating the inferior over the superior, the diseased over the healthy, the parasitic over the productive.

Blond Beast: Donald J. Trump

Blond Beast: Donald J. Trump

To see the difference between a parasite and a producer, compare Barack Obama with Donald Trump. Obama has coasted on affirmative action throughout his entire life. He won the presidency because he had very powerful forces on his side. Trump won despite having the same powerful forces against him—indeed, the forces against Trump were more formidable as the White percentage of the electorate continues to decline. Trump has built things and succeeded in the tough world of business; Obama has been a part-time lawyer, a part-time “community organizer,” and a full-time narcissist. Trump is narcissistic too, but it’s quite justified.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Eradicating the Irredeemable

A comparison of their wives tells about which man has healthier instincts and tastes. Melania Trump is intelligent, beautiful and happy. Michelle Obama is intellectually mediocre and full of resentment against White America (Feb. 18, 2008: “For the first time I am proud of America”). As for the fascinating Hillary Clinton: she reminds me of a Dalek, one of the power-crazed robotic salt-shakers in the children’s TV series Dr Who. She has the same megalomaniac psychology and the same rasping voice. The Daleks are famous for their battle-cry of “Exterminate! Exterminate!” I think extermination was the logical subtext of these comments by Hillary:

You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people — now have 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive hateful mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks — they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America.

If these hate-filled folk are “irredeemable,” it follows logically that something must be done to stop them from poisoning the America to which they do not belong. I think that’s why Hillary made that odd choice of words: “basket of deplorables.” A basket is where you put things to have control over them. For example, a gardener can put uprooted weeds in a basket before throwing them on a compost heap or burning them. That’s why Hillary’s comments remind me of Grigory Zinoviev‘s  forthright condemnation of the irredeemable: “We must carry along with us ninety million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia’s inhabitants. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated.”

Sisterly Solidarity

For the left, the trauma of that victory has been immense, not just in America, but right around the world. Hillary proclaimed that “Love Trumps Hate” and found out that a lot of people weren’t inspired. Eve Ensler, author of the Vagina Monologues, also attempted to rally the troops with high-flown idealism:

Rise, sisters, rise. Defeat Donald Trump

Dear women of America and men who love women,

All week I have received emails, texts and calls from my sisters around the world. They were as diverse as you get — sisters in Congo fighting an epidemic of rape and brutality, and sisters in Iceland striking across the country protesting pay inequity. Sisters in Kenya fighting against genital cutting, and sisters in Iraq building safe houses as fast as women are being taken and enslaved. Again and again there was one panicked question: is it possible that Donald Trump could become president of the United States? …

… This election will determine whether we stand against blatant misogyny, or whether we reward it. It is an election which has unleashed the subculture of sexual violence in America — and that could be our breakthrough, or our breakdown. …

If we send Trump back to his gross phallic tower, we will be saying we want these horrifying woman-hating days to be over forever. Defeating him will give us ground to fight the last dirty gasp of the patriarchy which is built on a conviction that subordinated people must stay in their assigned place. (Rise, sisters, rise. Defeat Donald Trump, The Guardian, 5th November 2016)

Eve of Defeat: Jewish feminist Eve Ensler

Eve of Defeat: Jewish feminist Eve Ensler

It’s interesting that although the left worship diversity, it appears that women aren’t diverse at all. According to Ensler, they’re a monolithic bloc all suffering under the lash of the patriarchy, whether they’re being raped in the Congo, genitally mutilated in Kenya or paid less in Iceland or by the Clinton Foundation. White women have much more in common with Black and Brown women than they do with White men.

Shocking election results

Or so Ensler wants White women to think (and it’s probably not irrelevant that she is Jewish, since her message fits well with the general thrust of activism by the organized Jewish community where White women are supposed to be part of the Rainbow Coalition of the left). Alas, her message failed: the sisterhood didn’t rise in sufficient numbers to defeat Trump, proving once again that other interests trump the sisterhood as a voting bloc. In fact, 53% of them voted for him, prompting howls of anger and disbelief from the left. “Dear Fellow White Women: We F**ked This Up,” raged Sarah Ruiz-Grossman at the Huffington Post. “White women sold out the sisterhood and the world by voting for Trump!” wailed L.V. Anderson at Slate. She went on:

The shocking results of the election prove that most white women don’t consider themselves part of the coalition of nonwhite, nonstraight, nonmale voters who were supposed to carry Clinton to a comfortable victory. Most white women still identify more with white men than they do with black women, Latina women, Muslim women, transwomen, and every other woman who will have good reason to fear for her physical safety under a Trump regime. And while it’s nonwhite and queer women who have the most to lose under Trump, white women will have to live with the consequences of their own actions in a country without a right to abortion, without access to health insurance, without an adequate family leave policy, and with a head of state who values them only insofar as he wants to fuck them. (“White women sold out the sisterhood and the world by voting for Trump,”Slate, 9th November 2016)

Writing like that seems to justify the appallingly sexist origin of the word ‘hysteria’, which comes from the Greek hysteron, meaning “womb.” Despite L.V. Anderson’s wailing, there are very good reasons for White women to “identify more with white men than with black women, Latina women, Muslim women, [and] transwomen.” White men and White women have all kinds of shared interests: genetic, cultural and social. White men are far more likely to protect White women than to harm them. Although the left are constantly talking about “rape culture,” they identify it in entirely the wrong places: among White men and in White institutions. The most recent (and risible) example has been at the magazine Rolling Stone, where the Jewish journalist Sabrina Rubin Erdley promoted a goyophobic hoax about gang-rape on broken glass at the University of Virginia.

But rape-culture certainly flourishes among Blacks, Muslims and Hispanics. Donald Trump was correct to say that Mexico exports rapists to the United States. That’s why he was condemned so hard for saying it. The left are not interested in reality, but in feeding their own narcissism. Their politics do not start with an attempt to understand how the world is, but with the settled conviction that their own hearts are pure and their motives noble. As C.S. Lewis pointed out, those who believe that virtue is on their side are capable of enormous cruelty and selfishness. The Clintons are notorious for seeking revenge on their enemies, even as they pursue money with all the decorum and ethical restraint of hungry piranhas. They’re criminals who think of themselves as saints.

Jo’s Principle

So are Tony Blair and many others in the British Labour party. The Labour council that covered up the Rotherham horrors was convinced of its own virtue. But the virtuous left don’t have to be actively criminal to do great harm and encourage great foolishness. When the Labour M.P. Jo Cox was murdered before the EU Referendum, the Guardian issued this hagiography:

Jo Cox, however, was not just any MP doing her duty. She was also an MP who was driven by an ideal. … “Our communities have been deeply enhanced by immigration,” she insisted, “be it of Irish Catholics across the constituency or of Muslims from Gujarat in India or from Pakistan, principally from Kashmir. While we celebrate our diversity, what surprises me time and time again as I travel around the constituency is that we are far more united and have far more in common with each other than things that divide us.”

What nobler vision can there be than that of a society where people can be comfortable in their difference?  (The Guardian view on Jo Cox: an attack on humanity, idealism and democracy, The Guardian, 16th June 2016)

The Labour party has subsequently tried to apply Jo’s Principle — “We have far more in common with each other than things that divide us” — to the feuding between the Corbynistas and the Blairites. Guess what? It hasn’t worked, even among the liberals. Jo’s Principle is in fact fatuous posturing devised by someone who preferred warm feelings to cold realism.

White Tribe Rising

And it didn’t work. The verbal venom that has served Jews and their left-wing allies so well for so long is losing its efficacy. After encouraging tribalism in non-Whites for decades, they’ve now triggered it among Whites. As the New York Times Paul Krugman phrased it (with a great deal of exaggeration), Trump voters were motivated by “blood and soil, patriarchy, and racial hierarchy.” From the standpoint of the left, Trump’s victory represents the triumph of hate when it’s really a triumph of White people beginning to stand up for their interests. In a way Hillary was right when she said that the basket of Trump-supporting deplorables “are not America.” If they were Jewish, they’d feel right at home in Israel — a country that puts its own people first and builds massive walls to keep predatory Blacks and Muslims out.

Is that hate? No, it’s rational self-interest. Israel would be harmed by the mass immigration of Blacks and Muslims, so it doesn’t permit it. Meanwhile, Jewish Zionists like Barbara Lerner Spectre promote the same kind of immigration into White nations. That is hate: Spectre is not doing it because she thinks Whites will benefit.

We can be sure that Ms Spectre didn’t like the election of Donald Trump. It demonstrates that Whites are beginning to think and act in their own interests, rather than against them. For Jews, that’s hate. For Whites, it’s rational self-interest.

First came Brexit, then the Blond Beast. The White Tribe is rising.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

34 Comments to "Dawn of the Deplorables: Trump, Trauma and the Triumph of Hate"

  1. Mr Curious's Gravatar Mr Curious
    November 22, 2016 - 12:33 pm | Permalink

    “sisters ((sic)) in Congo fighting an epidemic of rape and brutality.”

    Umm, (((Eve)))…

  2. Víctor Andrés Piña González's Gravatar Víctor Andrés Piña González
    November 22, 2016 - 12:53 pm | Permalink

    Pendulum swing is on our side.

  3. Bernard's Gravatar Bernard
    November 22, 2016 - 1:43 pm | Permalink

    Statistics say it all: 11% of women in the UK are on anti-depressants, twice that of men, and the disparity continues to widen. (It’s even worse in the US).
    With social scourges like Ensler, Grossman and Spectre driving the miscegenist, feminist agenda, the plight of women in the West looks grim indeed.

  4. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    November 22, 2016 - 1:48 pm | Permalink

    Re Jo Cox: The print media in the Ukay noted that her accused murderer had searched “The Occidental Observer” on his website.

    Re Trump: If we take Spengler’s WW1-dated analysis of the Faustian Western Civilization to its logical conclusion rather than his own, the final Caesar would arise not in Germany but in the USA; and therefore he would have the American characteristic of a business-man rather than a soldier challenging the ruling political elite.

    Why have white workers turned to the anti-globalists of the “Right” rather than the “Left”? Not because their consciousness is so “unraised” that they scapegoat colored immigrants instead of big-business but because they have been the cultural and political targets of the New Left, which since WW2 has deliberately used “wimmin”, “students”, blacks, immigrants, sexual minorities and the “disabled”, to break down their legitimate attachment to their national heritage, their family values, their religious piety and their free enterprise.

    See also e.g. “Something will Crack”: supposed prophecy of Donald Trump goes viral, “The Guardian”, November 19, online.

    The workers have no country, said Marx long, long ago. In these days of Chinese competition and emergent robots, the country has no workers! Yet another “Specter” is haunting the Euro-American civilization!

    • T.J.'s Gravatar T.J.
      November 22, 2016 - 10:35 pm | Permalink

      The law firm of Specter, Spectre, and Spector.

  5. Caryn Goddard's Gravatar Caryn Goddard
    November 22, 2016 - 2:30 pm | Permalink

    Great news !!!!!
    So tired of defeatism on the Right.
    Thanks !

  6. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 22, 2016 - 3:35 pm | Permalink

    I just wanted to comment on Mr. Langdon’s very first sentence, to wit, it sums up leftist lunacy perfectly as far as aware whites are concerned.

  7. peter's Gravatar peter
    November 22, 2016 - 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Looks like Trump has disavowed the ” alt right ” . What was Richard Spencer doing ending his speech with ” Hail Trump” . The MSM had a field day with the attendees giving Nazi salutes. The suspicion has been that Spencer works for the ADL or FBI his silly antics at the weekend would seem to confirm this.

    • Peter's Gravatar Peter
      November 23, 2016 - 12:22 am | Permalink

      Obviously Hitler is dead and no one is expecting him to rise from the grave. The salute is a mocking of the Jews for seventy years of lies and hate. Even non-whites are having their eyes opened. People don’t want to be oppressed and keep their thoughts to themselves like JFK did, for instance. Also, many of these people don’t believe Hitler or the Germans were the monsters Jews claim they were (are?). So, if they don’t believe in the Jews tales (which were disproven long ago) of soap made from fat and lampshades from skin then they don’t believe the stiff arm salute is as evil as Jews claim.



      Unfortunately, it might be too early for this and it could hurt the movement. But I hope there won’t be any apologies. They shouldn’t (and don’t need to) apologize for anything.

    • Luke's Gravatar Luke
      November 23, 2016 - 5:15 am | Permalink

      I’ve never really liked Richard Spencer. I read a posted comment or two over on Amren where one guy noted that Spencer is always trying to treat the pro-white movement as some kind of comedy act and he wants to be the designated clown that is the star of the comedy routine. I think that is a perfect analysis of Richard Spencer’s behavior. Either the guy is unbelievably immature for an almost 40 year old White male, or he simply does not take the survival of White European people as seriously as a mature pro-white activist should.

      This is not the face that we need to have painted on our movement. We need to instill fear and respect in our opponents. They need to understand that we are deadly serious about our survival and to us this is not a comedy routine.

      This struggle is not a game. It is deadly serious and the enemy we face is one that needs to be taken seriously by sober minded, determined and when necessary, ruthless, White men who will do whatever is necessary to crush our enemies.

      Spencer’s antics, i.e. his Sieg Heil Trump Nazi Salute for the enemy controlled TV cameras – might have been a light hearted attempt at humor or Spencer’s typically juvenile clownism enhanced by too many beers – but, it certainly played right into the hands of our enemy.
      (Mod. Note: Since when does raising a glass to toast your people and a (somewhat) respected leader constitute a “Sieg Heil Trump “Nazi” salute” ? Or did you actually believe the MSM “The Atlantic” story line?)
      This is the sort of breakdown in discipline in the supposed leadership of the alt right that cannot be tolerated, if we are hoping to be taken seriously by our fellow White Americans.

  8. The Bagman's Gravatar The Bagman
    November 22, 2016 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

    I’d like to see more granular data on which whites voted Trump. Slate Star Codex with the recent “You are still crying wolf” makes much of the fact that Trump increased his White share only 1% over Romney. Considering the number of Romney voters who died since or who stayed home, I wonder what the real number of whites who are now voting tribally is. It’s clearly not all of them or none of them, or even very few of them.

    This number will matter going forward, and it behooves us to discover it.

  9. Hammerheart's Gravatar Hammerheart
    November 22, 2016 - 4:11 pm | Permalink

    This has all happened before. They know exactly how to manage the wayward child. Things will all be back the same in 10 years. This ludicrous triumphalism over the Trump victory is totally unjustified. These gains can & will all be reversed in a few years as fast as they happened, & any honest person, certainly the PhD etc set at TOO knows it. Please moderate your language.

  10. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    November 22, 2016 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

    Most importantly, Melania Trump is a real lady.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      November 22, 2016 - 6:42 pm | Permalink

      I hear you.

      I wonder how long it will be till the (((Establishment))) proudly trumpets that like the tennis-playing Williams “sisters,” Michelle/Michael Obama is a tranny. Or that Barack wasn’t born in the USA. I can see the New York Times headline: “Obama’s Legacy Demonstrates Need to Eliminate ‘Native-Born’ Racism from the Constitution.”

      Ten years, maybe?

  11. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    November 22, 2016 - 6:00 pm | Permalink

    So, while Trump was reasonably careful to not insult, or demean, or demonize or excessively condemn the Alt-right as a candidate – now that, with their absolutely critical support and help and votes, he won on November 8th – Trump decides its okay for him to morph into a Mitt Romney-Paul Ryan-Jeb Bush cuck and start spewing his true feelings about the very group who helped put him in the White House?


    “Donald Trump: ‘I Disavow’ Alt-Right Groups

    President-elect Donald Trump disavowed an alt-right conference in Washington, D.C. over the weekend led by Richard Spencer that celebrated the election of Donald Trump.
    Asked directly about the event that was widely covered by the mainstream media, Trump replied, “I condemn them. I disavow, and I condemn.”

    Trump denied that he had energized the alt-right, but again disavowed the movement.”

    “I don’t want to energize the group, and I disavow the group,” Trump said. “It’s not a group I want to energize. And if they are energized I want to look into it and find out why.”

    See that last sentence, Professor MacDonald? You can read it many ways, but knowing the enemy we face as well as I do – I see that as a hint that this guy might be the stooge the jews have been longing for who will clamp down on pro-White, alt-right speech on the Internet and shut down websites like this one.

    Is this one of the early signs that the alt-right has fallen for a gigantic jewish con job?

    • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
      November 23, 2016 - 1:18 am | Permalink

      On the other hand, can Donald Trump, not yet being the president nor being in the position of a despot or monarch, allow himself at this stage of the battle to act otherwise than he has currently done? That is, show his deck of cards to all and sundry? I would like to think not, and it would be perhaps a bit premature for the Alt+Right to force him into a certain direction, which would weaken him in the long term. He has to keep his options open.

  12. Sylvie's Gravatar Sylvie
    November 22, 2016 - 6:12 pm | Permalink

    First came Brexit, then the Blond Beast. The White Tribe is rising.

    That’s what we all hope.
    But be careful, Trump already bowed to the Jew York Times, distancing himself from the Alt-Right movement.

    • November 22, 2016 - 7:53 pm | Permalink

      That’s class. Look at what Obama did in 2008 and 2012. He like Judah Iscariot denied all of Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and all other seasoned Black racists. He presented himself like the clean face that happens to be Black, Whites voted him in droves. He even bragged that White women are voting for him because he is a Black stud. This kind of people do the most damage. Trump can do the most damage by taking distance from us actually. Should he have presented himself as White, he would have lost soundly. We know dog whistle. We all have to occupy different niches in our struggle for White interest. There is Casapound, there are all kinds of fringes that we lip-service condemn. They also do cultural services. They say obvious truths that a “clean face” cannot say. Why should we give Jew York fodder to character-assassinate some more of us? They’re only too happy to do that. It’s not about truth, it’s about F*ing figuring out how to survive. As they say in Italy, in love and war, all is fair. Let’s just keep pushing from all directions.

    • Realist's Gravatar Realist
      November 23, 2016 - 1:50 am | Permalink

      What you say is true. And the only two talking heads on Fox News with a semblance of support for Trump are Dobbs and Hannity both of which are promoters of US hegemony and Israel. And they have made it known they are very much against the Alt Right.

  13. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 22, 2016 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

    I can’t believe the insanity, the shear arrogant stupidity—“Most white women still identify more with white men……..” Hehehehee.. What a sin. She’s insane. We are supposed to believe that the women of other cultures, races don’t still identify more with their men. But then, some people will believe anything!!

  14. November 22, 2016 - 8:31 pm | Permalink

    It is completely mind blowing that we import these people and despite lacking all qualifications, make them city counsellors. Just go to Somalia and present yourself in the local elections. Tell them that you are educated and mean them well.

    When I was in France in 2004-2006, it was completely surreal how hard it was for a foreign productive White scientist to integrate, and how easy it was for all kinds of ragtag and bobtail. They never expelled a Muslim criminal, ever.

  15. Lou's Gravatar Lou
    November 22, 2016 - 9:41 pm | Permalink

    Off topic but important,

    all should check the links and talks here, if you dont already know. NY Times denies ‘pizza gate.’


  16. November 22, 2016 - 10:16 pm | Permalink

    “sisters in Congo fighting an epidemic of rape and brutality, and sisters in Iceland striking across the country protesting pay inequity. Sisters in Kenya fighting against genital cutting, and sisters in Iraq building safe houses as fast as women are being taken and enslaved.”

    Vat? No white European sisters fighting against their enslavement in Israel? No Palestinian sisters fighting their Jewish oppressors and murderers? Typical Jew hypocrisy.

  17. Tony More's Gravatar Tony More
    November 22, 2016 - 10:59 pm | Permalink
  18. Peter's Gravatar Peter
    November 23, 2016 - 12:00 am | Permalink

    Like Barbara Specter, so many Jews with influence are openly hypocritical and continue to get away with it. Eve Ensler is disgusting with her statement “send Trump back to his gross phallic tower”. What does a penis have to do with a New York City skyscraper? New York City has the largest Jewish population in the world and Jews express great love for New York, but when it’s convenient a dirty Jew reminds people its skyscrapers could be compared to a penis. There is no doubt that dirty woman could make a similar association with anything else. Will anyone call for that pig be fired from her job or blacklisted? Of course not. Then many Jews would be out of their jobs.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      November 23, 2016 - 11:21 am | Permalink

      Her mind is not different from that of her co-tribal Sigmund Freud :

      “… All elongated objects,” wrote Freud, “such as sticks, tree-trunks and umbrellas (the opening of these last being comparable to an erection) may stand for the male organ – as well as all long, sharp weapons, such as knives, daggers and pikes…” Independent, Monday 21 September, 1998, Anthony Stevens, Psychological Notes.

  19. Starving's Gravatar Starving
    November 23, 2016 - 12:44 am | Permalink
  20. November 23, 2016 - 2:28 am | Permalink


    Professor Kevin MacDonald gave a 50 min speech at the NPI 2016 conference in Washington D.C. about organized Jewish influence. A Q & A session followed the talk.

    Looking for volunteers to help proof the rough transcript.

    Kevin MacDonald — NPI 2016 Conference — TRANSCRIPT

  21. TheDruid's Gravatar TheDruid
    November 23, 2016 - 6:16 am | Permalink

    I am more a reader than a commentator, but have followed the issues like those on TOO for decades and I am of sound European stock. Here is how I see the situation. First of all I think the US Election is an excellent result for European Americans (or Whites if you prefer). Celebrations are indicated. The central premise of TOO is that Western Culture is under critique and that it is being out-competed by determined foes. On the issue of critique, I want to say that we should not allow the fact that we are over criticized be a cause for no self critique. TOO has done this in terms of pathological altruism and some other areas. Notice that this is pointed out by TOO but not the usual critics. That’s because they would prefer if we left out weaknesses undiscovered so they could continue to exploit them. With regards to pathological altruism, I would like to say that I am not sure it’s genuine altruism in many cases. I think there are many incentives to favor others over ones own group. There are few incentives to stand up for ones own, but perhaps with this election that is beginning to change. And that could be one of the best outcomes of all. In terms of weaknesses I think one of our greatest weaknesses is actually in the areas of business and finance. Almost every successful culture has a means of providing capital to its members. One only has to look to the China, Korea, Japan or the Arab world to see that Whites are unique in having virtually no access to intelligent capital. Like our entertainment and religious world we have largely outsourced it to those who do not have our best interest at heart. I have seen no articles yet on this very important issue. Every White I have known since high school seems focused on being a worker bee. This means being dependent on those with the access to capital. If we do not solve the problem of providing investment capital to White Europeans we will not prevail even if we make progress in all other areas such as jobs. In addition to Pathological Altruism (Or Fake Altruism in many cases), I would like to add Financial and Fiscal Immaturity to our current list of weaknesses. Finance is based on trust and loyalty. I understand we may have determined enemies but we must take some responsibility here. How many of us have friends or relatives who will not provide funding. How many of us who have means like to share thoughts on websites but not contribute towards the business success of European families? I think the answer is ‘a lot’. This in my opinion is part of the Achilles heel of our society. I only mention it because I think our adversaries fully well know it. We have no plan for a culture without money yet we have no plan for managing or sharing capital successfully among Europeans. I know some will say that this would be opposed etc etc etc. But I think the fact is many cultures except ours are achieving it. Meanwhile we have no system of financial loyalty at all. We are content to criticize you know which groups for having this system of loyalty but we never ask why we do not have such a loyalty system. Sharing articles and opinions are a great start. I would like to see articles and opinions that address this very serious flaw in our position. Keep railing on about issues like Whites marrying outside their group etc, but you know full well that if we are always the ones that are underfunded this is not going to turn around. Being worker bees is not the option either because it encourages political conformity and dependence on an often hostile higher ups at our workplaces. We need a 100 year strategy to create a system (formal or informal) of capital for Europeans. This must be done. Just think if you did everything else but this was not done. We would still continue to be at a gross disadvantage to others. We would continue to lose out. That’s why there is really nothing lost to those who oppose us within our own group, and nothing (materially) gained by those among us who support each other. This is just not how successful cultures operate!

  22. Gene's Gravatar Gene
    November 23, 2016 - 7:30 am | Permalink

    Let’s put this election in perspective and not give in to hyperbole. The demographics of this election were the same as the last couple of presidential elections with small variances. The only reason Trump won is because he courted the blue-collar white working class vote in the Rust Belt.

    Let us not be too exuberant. Now is the time for prudence not celebration. Here’s a possibility: Trump’s presidency is used as a vehicle to energize the decades-old strategy of the hostile elite: consolidate the nonwhite vote, and split the white vote. It’s quite possible, if Trump does not plays his cards correctly, his presidency could irreversibly seal the deal for the hostile elite and secure their strategy for the foreseeable future.

    So what should Trump’s strategy be:

    1. Overall strategy: Focus all efforts on the Rust Belt and significantly build on the coalition of white working-class folks in those states.

    2. Quietly enforce immigration law… Do not proclaim it too loudly. The focus should be to remove the immigrant population from key states containing blue color white working-class folks.. I.e. rust-belt states. Who cares about the other states, they’re too far gone…i.e. California. By removing immigrant populations from key states, one ensures a white majority in those states for years to come.. This is key.

    3. Continue to propagandize the virulent anti-white protests and groups… Specifically the black groups. This will at least subconsciously force White folks to think about their own self-interests and continue to foster White identity politics. Less focus on Hispanic groups protesting, so as to generate more negative views amongst Hispanics of the black groups. It is of the utmost importance that every and all wedge issues be pushed to pit the black vote versus the Hispanic vote… I.e. use the hostile elites non-white racial identity politics against them.

    4. Then there are the policy issues… Trade, Jobs, taxes, welfare, war, healthcare, etc. Policy issues are the least important to corral voters, but are of course important for governing. Specific policy issues should center around trade and jobs in order to increase employment for the blue collar white working class in the Rust Belt.

    5. Underground and non-mainstream propaganda should focus more directly on exactly what white identity politics should be… Because this subject will continue to be taboo in the mainstream first some time to come. Phrases like “white interests” or “White self interest” and continued focus on the double standard of non-white racial identity politics.

    6. Of the utmost importance, are appeals to the white female. White females are the key demographic… They will determine the failure or success of white identity politics. White females are much more susceptible to emotional propaganda of the hostile elite. proponents of white identity politics should appeal to the sympathy, empathy, fear, and security of especially their children. For instance, propaganda which portrays white children as victims of black gangs in public schools… That type of thing plays very well to the white female mind. White females do not respond as well to the overly intellectual arguments of white nationalism.

    7. Emotional propaganda trumps logical propaganda. Phrases like “White nationalism” are too direct. All propaganda should appeal to the least explicit notions of White identity politics. Phrases like “White working class” or “White self-interests” represent examples of the limits of the most explicit notions.

    8. Define “whiteness” to be as inclusive as possible… I.e. no pedigrees. Whiteness is an ethnicity. Many so-called “Hispanics” consider themselves to be white. Some in the white identity movement Will oppose this. That opposition is ideological. Politics does not work that way however… And one must be pragmatic in one’s political strategies.

    These are just some of the things that need to happen during the Trump administration in order to maintain an ongoing opposition to the hostile elite.

  23. November 23, 2016 - 9:43 am | Permalink

    I wish Trump would not grovel to the Jews so much.
    I suspect that they, sorry we, despise him as much as our ancestors despised President Wilson. While in New York planning WW1they would occasionally express their contempt for Wilson, the Congress and the American people.
    It took about 20 minutes.
    I am the black sheep of the family who likes every living thing except rats and politicians.

  24. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    November 23, 2016 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

    It is always wise to keep an eye out for the enemy camera and reporter.

    As for the Alt.Right “scandal”, Trump’s Advisor, Hedge-Funder and LGBT-Enthusiast Anthony Scaramucci, pointed out in a recent BBC TV interview that Bannon was a Zionist, that “waves of immigration” would be welcome and that Donald would end up as the savior of globalism.

    Re the Middle East, see e.g. a pro-Israel and an anti-Israel comment: (1) “The president-elect has not only promised a new era in US-Israeli relations, but shows every sign that he means it. He may even recognise Jerusalem as the capital….” (Editorial, “Standpoint”, Dec/Jan, 2016/17).
    (2) Brandon Martinez, “Zionist Infighting Over Bannon Appointment”, Non-Aligned Media, November 21, online.

  25. Winston Smythe's Gravatar Winston Smythe
    November 25, 2016 - 11:50 pm | Permalink

    Also don’t forget Hanson in Australia as part of this most deplorable populist revolt.

    The Brexit, Trump, Hanson phenomenon has been covered extensively in our national (conservative) newspaper. It was described in a recent headline as ‘Grievance Politics’, and is characterised by people on the outer fringes of suburbia who have no economic prospects living in poverty, and apparently not identity politics.

    “They see climate change, same-sex marriage and multiculturalism as indulgent playthings of inner-city voters, irrelevant to their daily lives. They are wary of immigration not because of an inherent racism but because of a fear it will see their jobs go to outsiders. Globalisation and free trade are seen as job stealers rather than economic liberators”.

    The are a series of articles featuring the chronically underemployed, living in their cars, getting lunch from a local church, having ten kids, missing a tooth, in bad neighbourhoods. Apparently that’s the only real reason behind Trump-ism, etc, based on these articles.

    Interestingly, concern about Muslim immigration is barely mentioned, even though Trump, and Hanson more overtly, campaign on this issue. It’s almost as though these editorials are turning a blind eye (giving a free pass?) to the anti-Islamic sentiments these voters may have, and just explaining it away through economics. Basically saying: see lefties? we’re not a racist country after all. Of course it isn’t particularly ‘Muslims’ or ‘extremist Islamist ideology’ that are taking our jobs, it’s other foreigners, often Asians who aren’t Muslim at all.

    The divide seems to be as follows: conservative media says ‘it’s not racism it’s the economy’ (subtext: if it were racism it would be a bad thing).
    Left wing media says ‘it is racism’ (subtext: and that’s evidently a bad thing).
    We say: it is race and identity politics, (subtext (or overtly): that’s allowed, it’s self preservation, a warranted reaction and a necessary part of the human condition).

    Conservatives seem to be the most ‘anti-racist’ in the most genuine sense of the term, always speaking in terms of human universals like we’re all just ‘grey blob’ citizens with ‘equal rights’ whenever they try and defeat the Left / hate speech laws, and ignore the underlying majority White vs parasitic minority narrative, which the Left seems to actually understand better, they’re just on the wrong side.

  26. Prester John T's Gravatar Prester John T
    November 26, 2016 - 3:16 pm | Permalink

    This popular vote that the other side keeps talking about.
    Not all the votes have been counted.
    Donald Trump is behind by about 1.7 million votes. HIllary Clinton won California by 3.5 million votes ( about 2.5 million have yet to be counted here.) That means that Trump won the popular vote in the other 49 States by 1.8 million votes.

Comments are closed.