Reflections on the History of the Jewish Hoax

Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.

The Times’ accounts of what took place at each of those places contains the greatest exaggerations, and the account of what took place at some of those places is absolutely untrue.”
British Consul-General Stanley on the Russian ‘pogroms,’ January 1882.


The 19th-century humorist Josh Billings once wrote that “there is no greater evidence of superior intelligence than to be surprised at nothing.” Demonstrating its superior intelligence on Jewish matters, few events shocked the Alt Right less than the recent arrest of a Jewish teenager in Israel for hoax bomb threats against Jewish community centers in the United States, Australia, and New Zealand. Although we are now some weeks removed from the epicenter of this hoax, the sheer scale of its attending political and media hype are deeply significant and deserve further discussion and contextualization. Of particular interest are the actions and posturing of the Anti-Defamation League, shameless in its immediate assertion that the perpetrator was a White anti-Semite, again demonstrating great tenacity in the exercise of its considerable political and cultural influence. Employing the flimsiest of narratives, underpinned by an equally suspect “history of persecution,” the ADL was able to disseminate the myth of Jewish victimhood in the media, secure top-level consultation with the FBI, and even publicly chide the President of the United States for his “inadequate” response. In particular, Trump’s refusal to automatically assume that the bomb threats were a “hate crime” was met with bitter rebukes from several Jewish organizations.

After the “US-Israeli” culprit was apprehended, the naive might have expected some humility and soul-searching from these groups. Yet, in a development that will again fail to surprise the Alt Right, the ADL was unapologetic and intransigent. With extreme arrogance, the organization issued a statement reading: “While the details of this crime remain unclear, the impact of this individual’s actions is crystal clear: these were acts of anti-Semitism.”

Although Jews themselves seem to have learned little from the episode, it does provide us with some food for thought. From beginning to end, the episode perfectly revealed in microcosm the Jewish relationship to anti-Semitism, the construction of narratives through which Jews understand themselves, and the importance of myth and deception in sustaining Jewish identity. In short, the episode revealed the core of a singular phenomenon — the quintessential ‘Jewish hoax.’ Since no language better grapples with the concept of the compound noun than German, we may even coin a term for this phenomenon — the Judenscherz.

The Judenscherz

For many centuries Jews have engaged in the construction of false narratives that act to reinforce in-group identity while simultaneously disarming or disinhibiting out groups. The most powerful of these narratives can be grouped under the broad heading of the ‘victimhood narrative.’ Victimhood narratives are important in a group context because, even though they may be in large part fictional, they allow the problems and challenges of the group to be blamed on an outgroup, absolving the ingroup of agency in its own misfortunes and thus obviating the need for internal change. A further use of victimhood narratives is that they nurture the building of resentments, which can in turn provide the impetus and energy for aggressive acts against competitors. Although many ethnic and national groups have flirted with victimhood narratives, Jews are distinctive in their particularly strong aversion to changing their own version of victimhood. They have thus repeatedly had recourse to victimhood narratives throughout their history, and have adopted a unique worldview in which the entire non-Jewish world, the goyim, is presented as hostile — a case of ‘Jews versus the World.’ Most remarkable of all, Jews have been unique in their success in persuading competitors and opposing groups to adopt the Jewish victimhood narrative, disarming and disabling the more natural instinct of non-Jews to compete.

For these and lesser reasons, Jewish culture has come to master the art of the victimhood narrative and one often finds it remarked that the entire history of Jews is a history of constant suffering — the “lachrymose history of the Jews.” Although general acceptance of this over-arching historical narrative is a fairly recent development — not much older than half a century, its now mainstream position stands stubbornly opposed to overwhelming evidence that Jews have been a privileged, protected, and economically and politically powerful group throughout recorded history. Indeed, one struggles to find a group of comparable size, at any place and in any point in time, enjoying the same level of wealth and influence. The most obvious weakness of contemporary academic and cultural treatments of Jewish matters is that they fail to adopt even a remotely critical approach to Jewish narratives. The alleged age-old victimhood of the Jews is simply taken at face value, digested, and deeply internalized, particularly in the West where Whites of Anglo and Germanic lineage have rarely, if ever, adopted a victimhood narrative of their own.

Because the Jewish victimhood narrative is, at heart, a compound of self-interested fabrications, the details that punctuate this over-arching narrative are themselves a rich constellation of exaggerations, bluffs, swindles, and hoaxes. As explored in detail in a previous article, perhaps the earliest example of the Judenscherz is the Book of Exodus, an effort at refuting a Greek and Egyptian consensus on the undesirable behaviors of the Jewish populations in their midst. In any event, the Book of Exodus was, and remains, crucial in providing a foundation myth for Jewish victimhood narratives and thus a foundation for the Jewish hoax. The putative ‘liberation’ of enslaved and persecuted Hebrews from Egypt is commemorated by Judaism every year, in the form of the Pesach, or Passover festival. Historian Paul Johnson remarks that Exodus “became an overwhelming memory” and “gradually replaced the creation itself as the central, determining event in Jewish history.”[1] Exodus has a power that exists independently from the trappings of religious myth, acting through the centuries as a defining narrative of victimhood, group vindication, and self-validation. Exodus is a foundation upon which Jewish identity is built.

It is interesting that Josephus, the first Jewish ‘historian’ to attempt an intellectual defense of the Exodus narrative, provides us with another very early Judenscherz. In one of his more famed works, Wars of the Jews (c. 70 A.D), Josephus recounted the 66 A.D. Alexandrian riots. According to this sanitized and embellished account some 50,000 Jews were killed (Jos., Wars, Book 2). The relevant sections of Josephus are worth citing directly:

The sedition of the people of the place against the Jews was perpetual. … They were also permitted not only to kill them, but to plunder them of what they had, and to set fire to their houses…They were destroyed unmercifully; and this their destruction was complete, some being caught in the open field, and others forced into their houses, which houses were first plundered of what was in them, and then set on fire by the Romans; wherein no mercy was shown to the infants, and no regard had to the aged; but they went on in the slaughter of persons of every age, till all the place was overflowed with blood, and fifty thousand of them lay dead upon heaps. … And this was the miserable calamity which at this time befell the Jews at Alexandria.

One of the more noteworthy aspects of the Josephus account is the emphasis on alleged external agitation. The animosity against the Jews in this narrative does not arise in any way from Jewish behaviors, but rather from apparently spontaneous, unwarranted, and perpetual “sedition of the people of the place against the Jews.” The violence is described as savage and sadistic — infants and the elderly are murdered in brutal fashion — and damage to property is alleged to have been extensive. Finally, the reported death toll is both remarkably ‘neat’ and remarkably high.

The narrative of Josephus was entirely fictional. Firstly, the full context of inter-ethnic hostility in the region is missing. Not only were the Jews of Alexandria at that time busily engaged in a military and diplomatic conspiracy against Roman rule, but their economic affairs and political power were also a cause for significant disquiet among the non-Jewish populace. Louis Feldman concedes in his Jew and Gentile in the Ancient World: Attitudes and Interactions from Alexander to Justinian (1993) that most of the hatred against Jews was “due to the importance of the positions occupied by Jews in the vast bureaucracy … especially as tax collectors.”[2] Feldman adds that Jews in Alexandria had secured a dominant position at the upper levels of the Alexandrian shipping industry, as well as monopolies in the sale and traffic of several products. In 38 A.D. a protest against Jewish power had been provoked by “displays of Jewish wealth and power,” and by “the privileged position and influence of the Jews.”[3] Jews were also accused of dual loyalty. The extremely high international level of Jewish influence during this period was demonstrated when the Roman governor of Alexandria, Flaccus, was recalled, exiled, and then executed by order of the degenerate Emperor Caligula for allowing the protest to proceed.[4] The affair would be immortalized in yet another masterwork of Judenscherz, the ancient Jewish philosopher Philo’s In Flaccum, which used the fate of Flacco as a veiled threat to non-Jews considering a challenge to Jewish power.

The level of violence recounted by Josephus was also a total fabrication, with no modern historian supporting a death toll even remotely approaching the 50,000 claimed by the Jewish author.[5] In a pattern that would re-emerge in Western Europe in the Middle Ages, evidence shows that the Roman authorities were very much opposed to wholesale action against the Jews, preferring to protect the wealthy community and punish its prior agitations with a half-shekel tax rather than the sword. Jews were seen as too financially useful to be left at the mercy of popular retribution — the recurrent theme of Jewish history in which Jews make alliances with non-Jewish elites in opposition to popular interests. One might then ask why a wealthy and powerful community would, even in ancient times, assert a victimhood narrative. As described above, the Jewish victimhood narrative has a dual function — to reinforce aspects of Jewish identity and to manipulate competitors. In this regard it is interesting to consider the remarks of historian Ellen Birnbaum on Philo’s In Flaccum: “Philo may, on the one hand, wish to bolster the spirit of his fellow Jews; on the other hand, he may wish to sound a warning to Gentiles.”[6]

Early narratives like Exodus and the works of Josephus and Philo provided the template for later interpretations and revisions of certain historical and political realities. For example, references to these earlier ‘persecutions’ provided a false justification for the self-segregating practices of the Jews that were more palatable, especially to outsiders, than frank admissions that Jews felt themselves superior to the nations they dwelt among. We find this particularly during the Middle Ages in explanations for the ghetto experience. Indeed, one of the most remarkable omissions from the majority of mainstream accounts of the Medieval Jewish experience is the very privileged position of Jews during this period. To be clear, Jews had no automatic right of settlement in Europe. This was an age long before the concept of ‘immigration’ distorted the human instinct, and the settlement of foreigners in one’s midst was still perceived as usurpation of more or less severity depending on the numbers involved. Jews were able to form settlements in Europe only because they were given assistance by the Christian Church in the form of Papal decrees that approved their residence, as well as granting them freedom from efforts at conversion and protection against ‘maltreatment.’ Without a Christian theology that taught that Jews possessed a special role in the history of humankind, it is unlikely that Jews would have been able to settle in Europe in the manner they eventually did. (Some of the most influential treatises in this regard were formulated by Bernard of Clairvaux and Thomas Aquinas.) We may therefore consider the Christian settlement decrees to be the primary privilege that underlay the rise of the Jews in Western Europe in particular.

The Jews of the Middle Ages pleaded persecuted status while simultaneously enjoying unparalleled access to wealth and power. This Judenscherz has been passed down through the centuries and remains in robust condition even today. Jews were entirely dominant during the period. The Jews of France and Germany were allowed to transact business without restriction from the ninth until the eleventh century — three centuries of growth in financial influence during which, in the euphemistic language of Jacob Katz, their “involvement in the provision of credit was considerable.”[7] Jews were allowed complete judicial control over their own communities. Further, as Katz states: “A feature of the high political standing of the Jews was the permission to bear arms … This fact is perhaps to be viewed less as providing a means to self-protection than as a sign of political status. As a result of the permission, the Jews ranked with the knights and the feudatories who belonged to the upper strata of medieval society.”[8] Jews stood over the masses, working solely for their exploitation. The Jews of the Middle Ages engaged in no productive labor, almost all of them living parasitically from moneylending. Katz writes that; “The picture of the Jew waiting at home for the Gentile to come to borrow money or to pay a debt is a realistic one.”[9]

The reality of the tradition of Jewish power and economic exploitation during this period has been smothered by an extremely effective Judenscherz based, like the accounts of Josephus and Philo, on fictionalized accounts of extreme violence. Historian Jonathan Elukin writes that “violence is traditionally perceived to be at the core of the Jewish experience in Medieval Europe.”[10] Like the earlier accounts, we see multiple references to spontaneous “rising levels of anti-Jewish polemic, accusations of atrocities, physical attacks, and finally expulsion.”[11] However, contrary to the Judenscherz, violence was in fact extremely rare, and even its alleged high point, the Second Crusade, “brought with it little actual violence against European Jewry.”[12] The much-lamented ‘blood libel,’ supposedly the arch-provocation for much of this alleged violence, was in reality so sparse and ineffectual against entrenched Jewish power that “most Jews lived their entire lives without direct experience of those accusations.”[13]

All of this is of course very reminiscent of the Judenscherz of the Russian pogroms of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, also of alleged atrocities committed by the German armed forces during World War Two. In these instances, allegations of extreme violence played a key role in galvanising Jewish cohesion and manipulating non-Jews — in the case of the Russian ‘pogroms,’ manipulating Western Whites into accepting millions of Jewish economic migrants masquerading as ‘refugees.’ Then, as during the current invasion of Muslims and Africans, Europeans were inundated with stories of suffering, resulting in an outpouring of empathy. During a British parliamentary consultation on the ‘pogroms’ in 1905, a Rabbi Michelson claimed that “the atrocities had been so fiendish that they could find no parallel even in the most barbarous annals of the most barbarous peoples.”[14] The New York Times reported that during the 1903 Kishinev pogrom: “Babies were literally torn to pieces by the frenzied and bloodthirsty mob.”[15] A common theme in most contemporary atrocity stories was the brutal rape of Jewish women, with most reports including mention of breasts being hacked off and mothers were raped alongside their daughters. Modern-day Jewish intellectuals and academics play a key role in the Judenscherz by repeating, reinforcing, and affirming it. For example, Joseph Brandes in his 2009 Immigrants to Freedom alleges that mobs “threw women and children out of the windows” of their homes, and that “heads were battered with hammers, nails were driven into bodies, eyes were gouged out … and petroleum was poured over the sick found hiding in cellars and they were burned to death.”[16]

It was only in the 2000s that the Judenscherz of the Russian pogroms came under systematic attack when Catholic scholar John Doyle Klier (1944–2007) began publishing on the subject, in turn revealing the mechanical and procedural elements in the development of a Jewish hoax. Whether we are talking about the ancient pamphlets of Philo, the tomes of Josephus, or the activities of Jewish scribes in the Middle Ages, control of media and the means of communication are crucial. Klier pointed out that the pogrom hoax gained momentum in the West mainly because the then-influential British Daily Telegraph was at that time Jewish-owned, and was particularly “severe” in its reports on Russian treatment of Jews prior to 1881. According to Klier, one of its specialities was the spreading of “sensationalized accounts of mass rape.”[17] Other influential reporting came from a “Special Correspondent” for the Jewish World.  Klier remarked that the alleged itinerary of this ‘journalist’ around Russia “raises intriguing problems for the historian.”[18] While his itinerary of travel is described as “plausible,” most of his accounts are “flatly contradicted by the archival record.” His claim that twenty rioters were killed during a pogrom in Kishinev in 1881 was proven to be a fabrication by records which show that in that city, at that time, “there were no significant pogroms and no fatalities.” Furthermore, Klier argued that the atrocity stories compiled by the Jewish World correspondent must be treated with “extreme caution.” The reporter “portrayed the pogroms dramatically, as great in scale and inhuman in their brutality. He reported numerous accounts where Jews were burned alive in their homes while the authorities looked on.” There are hundreds of instances where he references the murder of children, the mutilation of women, and the biting off of fingers.

Klier stated that “the author’s most influential accounts, given their effect on world opinion, were his accounts of the rape and torture of girls as young as ten or twelve.”  Klier found that “Jewish intermediaries who were channeling pogrom reports abroad were well aware of the impact of reports of rape, and it featured prominently in their accounts.” All such accounts were wholesale fabrications. Provoked by atrocity propaganda, the British Government undertook its own independent investigation.  The most notable aspect of the independent inquiry was the outright denial of mass rape. In January 1882, Consul-General Stanley objected to all of the details contained within reports published by the media, mentioning in particular the unfounded “accounts of the violation of women.” He further stated that his own investigations revealed that there had been no incidences of rape during the Berezovka pogrom, that violence was rare, and that much of the disturbance was restricted to property damage.

Vice-Consul Law, another independent investigator, reported that he had visited Kiev and Odessa, and could only conclude that “I should be disinclined to believe in any stories of women having been outraged in those towns.” Another investigator, Colonel Francis Maude, visited Warsaw and said that he could “not attach any importance” to atrocity reports emanating from that city. When these reports were made public, states Klier, they represented “a serious setback for the protest activities” of Jewish organizations.” The Times of London was one of the foremost propaganda merchants during this period, a fact that is hardly surprising given that it was populated by influential Jewish journalists like Lucien Wolf, the anti-Russian foreign affairs ‘expert’ operating behind the scenes of several major newspapers. The Times was forced to backtrack on many of its claims, but responded spitefully by stating that the indignation of the country was still justified even if the atrocities were “the creations of popular fancy” — a retort that is more than a little reminiscent of the ADL’s response to the exposure of the recent bomb threat hoax.

The Consuls were outraged by the response of the Times and the ongoing influence of the Jewish hoax. Stanley reiterated the fact that his intensive investigations, which he carried out at great personal cost with a serious leg injury, illustrated that “The Times’ accounts of what took place at each of those places contains the greatest exaggerations, and that the account of what took place at some of those places is absolutely untrue.” Enraged by Judenscherz circulating in Britain and America, Stanley “went right to the top,” interviewing state rabbis and asking for evidence and touring pogrom sites. In Odessa, where a wealth of atrocity stories had originated, he was able to confirm “one death, but no looting of synagogues or victims set alight.” There was no evidence that a single rape had taken place.


Despite Stanley’s best efforts the Jewish narrative remained unalterably attached in Western perceptions of the ‘pogroms,’ and the ‘pogroms’ themselves take their place alongside a litany of other Jewish hoaxes in the Western imagination – an imagination in which the Jewish victimhood narrative still holds great sway. It is difficult to formulate effective responses to such frauds. Exposures of individual hoaxes are almost inevitably smothered by the more visible, audible, and oft-repeated tales of the Jewish propaganda moguls. As elating as it can be to see one of these fakes exposed, and the bomb threat hoax is certainly no exception, it should be understood that it is the narrative of Jewish victimhood is what underpins and supports the collective strength of the Judenscherz. Indeed, these phenomena are now mutually reinforcing – hoaxes derive their credibility and initial believability from an alleged history of persecution — a history that is itself built on hoaxes. The government, the media, many members of the public, and even many Jews believed that the recent bomb threats were real because they have literally been indoctrinated in the idea that Jews are constantly under threat of violence — a threat of violence that is said to have long historical precedent.

Ultimately, the key to bringing down the phenomenon of the Jewish hoax will not lie in the exposure of single incidents or historical events, but in the conclusive elimination of the narrative of Jewish victimhood. Jews are a powerful, protected, and very privileged elite — and they always have been. Their appeal to victimhood status would be laughable but for the fact it is one of the key strategies behind our decline.

[1] P. Johnson, A History of the Jews (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1987), p.26.

[2] L. Feldman Jew and Gentile in the Ancient World: Attitudes and Interactions from Alexander to Justinian (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993), p.424.

[3] Ibid, p.425.

[4] Ibid.

[5] See, for example, A. Harker ‘The Jews in Roman Egypt: Trials and Rebellions,’ in The Oxford Handbook of Roman Egypt (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), p.282.

[6] Quoted in P. Van der Horst, Philo’s Flaccus: The First Pogrom (Brill: Boston, 2003), p.16.

[7] J. Katz, Exclusiveness and Tolerance: Jewish-Gentile Relations in Medieval and Modern Times (Schocken: New York, 1975), p.5.

[8] Ibid, p.6.

[9] Ibid, p.38.

[10] J. Elukin, Living Together, Living Apart: Rethinking Jewish-Christian Relations in the Middle Ages (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007), p.89.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Ibid, p.96.

[13] Ibid, p.99.

[14] A. Heywood, The Russian Revolution of 1905: Centenary Perspectives (New York: Routledge, 2005) p.266.

[15] “Jewish Massacre Denounced,” New York Times, April 28, 1903, p.6

[16] J. Brandes, Immigrants to Freedom, (New York: Xlibris, 2009) p.171

[17] J. Klier, Russians, Jews and the Pogroms of 1881-82 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), p.399.

[18] Ibid.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

57 Comments to "Reflections on the History of the Jewish Hoax"

  1. Leaven of the Jews's Gravatar Leaven of the Jews
    April 8, 2017 - 10:16 am | Permalink

    The problem is gullible goyim. We just put one in office at their beck and call.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      April 8, 2017 - 9:25 pm | Permalink

      Trump has dealt with Jews all of his life, but does not seem to have become Jew-wise. In fact he seems to admire them and not to see them as an “enemy” at all.

      Besides, except in business, he seems not to know how the world works. I don’t think he has ever read a book about alternative history.

      He has courage, but is superficial and ignorant.

    • April 9, 2017 - 5:24 am | Permalink

      I think this is genetically determined. Whites evolved in a region which is quite difficult, quite divided up by natural barriers (so sweeping invasions are difficult), and subject to long winters, which must have helped evolve concentration, specialisation, and planning. Chimping-out in winters would not have been helpful. So whites tended to exist in rather isolated local groups, more or less expert, often absorbed in activities which may (or may not) turn out to be helpful, and somewhat tied to their lands. Sitting ducks for parasites with a co-operative, secret language, top-down, approach, who have a hilltop overview of whites. Whites have been too dim to understand their ‘news’ comes from tainted sources, designed to control and shepherd them.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        April 9, 2017 - 11:19 am | Permalink

        The smartest, most competent people on Earth are too dim?

        Or the information monopoly is too airtight.

        The brightest can be thought-controlled if the monopoly is complete.

        The monopoly has been severely wounded. jew truth is everywhere except university and msm- those two should enter the T-bird and fly into the Grand Canyon:

        • April 9, 2017 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

          Well, I developed that line of thought in response to: “If whites are so clever, how come they’ve been taken over by Jews, and most of them can’t see through it?” — fair question.

        • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
          April 10, 2017 - 6:34 am | Permalink

          It is not a matter of stupidity, it is a matter of naivety. Whites are mostly honest, and they build “high trust” societies, in which all institutions are trustworthy. They cannot imagine that there exist people who spend their whole life lying and who build institutions (such as the press) that are lying all the time.

    • Henry's Gravatar Henry
      April 9, 2017 - 6:18 am | Permalink

      Levy died in 1888 and never owned “The Times”. He controlled the ‘Sunday Times’ which had no connection with The Times during Levy’s lifetime.

      • Graham Booth's Gravatar Graham Booth
        April 10, 2017 - 5:43 am | Permalink

        Not only that, but my copy of ‘The Encyclopedia of the British Press’ informs me that Levy, having acquired Colonel Sleigh’s ‘Daily Telegraph’ in early September 1855 (less than three months after it was launched on 29th June), and having turned it into the world’s most popular newspaper, was unable to devote the necessary time and resources to the ‘Sunday Times’, and thus sold it to the theatrical impresario E T Smith in 1856. Thus neither ‘The Times’ nor the ‘Sunday Times’ were in Levy’s hands beyond 1856 – a very different situation from that painted by the guest poster above, who claimed that ‘The Times and the Daily Telegraph were in Levy’s hands from 1856 to 1928’.

        • Henry's Gravatar Henry
          April 10, 2017 - 12:16 pm | Permalink

          Yes he had The Sunday Times for less than a year but The Times was never in Levy’s hands. In fact those two newspapers didn’t come under ‘common’ ownership until 1966…78 years after Levy’s death!

          For me the most interesting owner of The Times was Alfred Harmsworth (Lord Northcliffe) who died in very strange circumstance while in direct conflict with the Jews over Palestine. Douglas Reed, as a young Times employee, attended the ailing Northcliffe in France and later wrote of that experience in The Controversy of Zion. Since reading that book in the 1980s I have found additional information placing one of Jacob Schiff’s (Jewish) partners in the company of the dying Northcliffe; though he may have left before Reed arrived in France as Reed does not mention him in the book. Northcliffe, who claimed he’d been poisoned, tried to rally and did return to England where he died not long after.

    • April 9, 2017 - 7:18 am | Permalink

      His opponent was not gullible. SHE connived actively with Jewish interests.

  2. Guest's Gravatar Guest
    April 8, 2017 - 10:19 am | Permalink

    It is worth noting that both The Times and The Daily Telegraph were under the ownership of Joseph Moses Levy from 1856 to 1928. The DT was founded by Colonel Arthur B Sleigh in 1855 and his paper was printed by Levy who already owned The Times. After only one year of operation and unable to pay Levy’s print bill, the Colonel was forced to sell the DT to Levy. Thus, during the most significant period in British history, in terms of Jewish propaganda, two of the major London papers, The Times (the ‘quality’ newspaper) and the Daily Telegraph (the cheaper tabloid) were used as central ‘clearing houses’ for this unquestioned propaganda.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      April 8, 2017 - 3:32 pm | Permalink

      The tax was Levied.

    • April 9, 2017 - 7:45 am | Permalink

      The Times did publicise the Protocols though. And it had some interesting articles about Jews during the Bolshevik revolutionary period. There is one about the Bela Kun regime in Hungary that you could never see today. I forget the exact wording but it was something like “A Jewish Mafia terrorises Hungary”.

  3. Last Saxon's Gravatar Last Saxon
    April 8, 2017 - 11:14 am | Permalink

    So-called pogroms were often self-defence measures against unsavoury Jewish practices. A prime example is the Edict of Expulsion in England. The background was the death of Little Hugh of Lincoln, since canonised by the RCC, as well as ursury. The Statute of Jewry of 1275 forbade them from extortionist moneylending that was being used to grab land from the locals, but they continued secretly resulting in the edict of 1290. They moved onto Scotland, France and elsewhere.

    Ever vindictive, they have re-written history with Steven Berkoff’s Ritual in Blood that is a kosher version of the death of Hugh.

    • Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
      April 9, 2017 - 5:31 am | Permalink

      NOTHING in the Bible forbids Christians from practicing usury! It was just another mass deception foisted upon the early Catholic Church by Crypto-Jewish infiltrators, to keep the money supply in their own hands for centuries. The only ones forbidden to practice usury in the Bible are the HEBREWS, who are forbidden to charge interest to other Hebrews, but free to charge the goyim. Muslims practice a similar outrageous Taqiyya deception, pompously denouncing “usury” while practicing it themselves, simply by changing the name of “interest” to “COMMMISSION”.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        April 9, 2017 - 10:35 am | Permalink

        Truly an error of “COMMMISSION.”

  4. Rickie's Gravatar Rickie
    April 8, 2017 - 11:51 am | Permalink

    I’ve never met a poor Jew, or even one who could be considered lower-middle class. In fact, although I live in a very diverse area, I’ve only known one “blue collar” Jew in my lifetime. He was actually my supervisor in a warehouse, and stood around doing nothing all day. He also ran a chimney sweep business on the side, which is a line of work notorious for being filled with scammers.

    Yet, every Jew has the same tale of woe, about how their grandparents showed up on the shores of America with nothing but a suitcase, and worked their way up from nothing. From a seamstress to a movie studio head in one generation. They are the hardest working, dedicated, decent, honest people to ever live. Hahaha. Jews have no sense of shame or honor.

    • m's Gravatar m
      April 9, 2017 - 4:38 am | Permalink

      The “poor” Jew is an interesting thing. I’m guessing some may be out there, but I’ve not heard or met any. Anecdote: I know a Jewish lady who is comfortably middle class bourgeois, but can’t manage money at all. At the same time, the idea of “moneyed status,” and her lack of it consumes her psychology with resentment and a lot of envy.

      She once told me that she was applying for German dual citizenship. She told me that because her dead father was a holocaust survivor(TM) she could get some money. I asked whether he was interned in a Death Camp(TM)? She said no, that he was living in New York City during the war. But she heard of an angle she can work to get some money for herself in her dad’s name, since her father was evidently born a Jew in Germany. I never followed up with her about it. True to form, she tells anyone who will listen how she’s the daughter of a holocaust survivor(TM). My impression is that lying and money grubbing victimology consumes these people.

  5. Bernard's Gravatar Bernard
    April 8, 2017 - 1:01 pm | Permalink

    Splendid Exposé. Nothing more I can add.

  6. Shannon's Gravatar Shannon
    April 8, 2017 - 1:32 pm | Permalink

    Speaking of Judenschertz….. Here is a very funny skit by Alison Chablotz precisely drawing attention to how ingrained the victim myth making is within the Jewish psyche. Either that or they genuinely don’t care what you think anyway as long as there is advantage to be made of it I.e. Reparations

  7. m's Gravatar m
    April 8, 2017 - 1:45 pm | Permalink

    OK. But how does any of this help the innocent babies that were recently gassed, having the life choked out of them by Syrian Hitler(TM)? I mean, we just got rid of that other Hitler(TM) in Iraq, and before him, Serbian Hitler(TM). It’s like the “Boys from Brazil” out there. There’s a mini-holocaust going on over there, and it was enough to bring a tough New York City real estate developer to tears. A regular Hindenburg of a catastrophe. Oh, the Humanity! And all you folks want to do is talk about Jewish lies. By the way, God’s people, to you, And would God put up with this sort of lying from his people? Think it through, guys.

    Moral: you have to mock the Jews and their fellow travelers. Laugh in their faces when they lie to you. Make them realize that you don’t believe their fantasies. That will make them even more crazy, and soon, if we are lucky, their heads will explode.

  8. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    April 8, 2017 - 5:34 pm | Permalink

    The Jewish strategy of faked victimhood is a form of aggressive mimicry, which is defined thusly :

    “…Aggressive mimicry is a form of mimicry in which predators, parasites or parasitoids share similar signals, using a harmless model, allowing them to avoid being correctly identified by their prey or host…”

    Wikipedia, aggressive mimicry.

    In this case the Jews are that kind of parasites, called “parasitoids” that ultimately destroys its host :

    “…A parasitoid is an organism that spends a significant portion of its life history attached to or within a single host organism in a relationship where the host is ultimately killed. Thus, parasitoidy is a similar evolutionary strategy to typical parasitism, except for the more serious prognosis for the host…”

    Wikipedia, parasitoid.

    This analysis is the answer to the eternal question : “Why, if they are so intelligent, do the Jews always try to destroy their host, that allows them a comfortable parasitic existence ? ”

    Needless to say that at present the Jews are in their full destruction mode of their current host America.

    • April 8, 2017 - 8:41 pm | Permalink

      Arguably, another part of parasitism is a modified fight/flight response. Most creatures when frightened move away, probably for ancestral evolutionary reasons. But some don’t; they play dead and (again, probably) do better on average.
      I think Jews evolved a ‘chutzpah’ aggression behaviour. Most men/women are chary of claiming to be always right, especially when there is evidence that they aren’t. The Jewish response it to simply declare they are absolutely in the right every time. My best guess is this behaviour evolved when forensics and detection were not at all well developed. In such circumstances, a bold determined lie by a skilled actor will leave observers in doubt; so the perpetrators may well escape. But we have entered a more scientific era, in which evidence is more difficult to evade than ever before. I’m hoping this fact will have a similar effect on Jews to exposure of their amulets and lucky charms as frauds.

  9. Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
    April 8, 2017 - 9:24 pm | Permalink

    Excellent study of the perfidy of the Jew.

    “…Jews have engaged in the construction of false narratives…”

    Like the one that got us to vote for Trump(the deceiver)?

  10. Tim Howells's Gravatar Tim Howells
    April 8, 2017 - 11:22 pm | Permalink

    OT (Re Syria) Kevin MacDonald is almost always 100% right, but I still hold on to some hope here. First the Kremlin and hence Assad were given <a href="; sufficient advance warning to evacuate men and equipment, so the actual damage was quite minimal, and completely insignificant in the context of the whole war (see the Salon article below). Similarly, the Bannon thing was played up as a huge internal power play, but when the dust settled he simply stepped down from the Principals Committee of the NSC, while remaining Trump’s top strategic advisor. Again completely insignificant, and a smart move for appearances sake given the developments re Susan Rice’s political activities on the NSC under Obama. It’s very possible imo that Trump is manoeuvring here to get sufficient support from the Neocon wing so that he can actually govern. Putin is no stranger to power politics at the highest levels, so If this is the case, I’m sure he will understand. Fingers crossed. I also think that this is quite a healthy signal to North Korea.

  11. Lynda's Gravatar Lynda
    April 9, 2017 - 1:04 am | Permalink

    Thank you for the addition to the lexicon needed to analyse and understand the history and sociology of the Jews.

    As Borat famously quips of Khazakstan: “Our leading social problem is jew.”

    Der Judenscherz is close in meaning to der judenschmerz (pain). So many of the pogrom ‘reports’ (judenscherz) examined in this essay ascribe atrocities of judenschmerz that are in fact signatures of jewish brigades in action: crucifying people by nailing them to barn doors, driving nails through skulls etc. The Red Terror of the Jewish brigades during the Spanish Civil War has many accounts of this nature, as does the account of the Polish, Russian NKVD Jews in their attacks on Danzig before WWII.

    A lot of the judenschmerz ascribed to Gentile pogroms against Jews is in Solzhenitsyn’s work on Jewish Bolshevik atrocities against White Russians. And it enters the British records of Jewish ‘sacred terror’ practiced under the Mandate.

    Two Hundred Years Together is now online. People will now be reading this masterpiece of historical witness with the thought tools of judenscherz.

    • Alicia's Gravatar Alicia
      April 9, 2017 - 8:56 am | Permalink

      Right, Linda, they appear to be eager to ascribe their own atrocities to others. I was a few weeks ago called Polish anti-Semite of the Jew-hating nation just because I have a critical outlook on ritual slaughter’s being legal again in Poland. As my father’s elder brother actually had a terminal taste of their “Judaeo-Christian” way to express compassion, I was shocked. What I see as a biggest problem is that they do not reveal their true identity, if the (((cause))) isn’t helped by such revelation. I was all these years, until autumn 2015, totally ignorant of the fact that they are not as few in Poland as they want us to believe. My own brother is married to one. As the lady didn’t reveal her true colours until quite recently, I had no idea. Naturally, I do not mean that every single one of them is evil but they seem to have inherited (been brestfed) with a special ability to disguise their motives, etc.

      • Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
        April 10, 2017 - 3:35 am | Permalink

        Your mention of your brother’s wife reminded me of other cases, in which the strongest, most intelligent, gifted young Europeans are “targeted” by (((Tribal))) women, to either take them out of the gene pool, degrade their morals or traumatize them for life. Some examples are one who abused her high position at a college to seduce a long succession of young male students, another who seemed “planted” by the landlord in a house full of young female students to corrupt their moral standards, dissuade them from marriage and children, and challenge them to show they were not “racist” by introducing them to ethnic minority men as “dates”. There were others who latched onto successful young academics to insure that they never had children, by marrying them, draining away all their money and refusing to bear children, or by traumatizing them with such toxic, parasitic, violent relationships that they were put off marriage and children altogether. Though I know of many such cases involving female (((Tribal))) members, I haven’t yet heard of any involving males targeting European women with these methods of “stealth genocide”.

        • Don's Gravatar Don
          April 10, 2017 - 8:50 pm | Permalink

          Frightening and insidious and probably completely true. Taking white women out of the white gene pool by race mixing is openly acknowledged in much explicitly anti-white propaganda. Check out this link entitled “Whiteecxtinctionon tumblr.”

          Be forewarned, it is quite pornographic. It’s an artful and evil adaptation of hard core interracial porn to the pro-white genocide theme. “Breeding black” i.e. white women breeding with blacks and producing black babies, is explicitly identified as a genocidal tool. This stuff is soul killing, but it must be confronted. You can find more of this stuff by doing a google search for “white genocide” and “white castration.” The latter is really sick.

          I take no pleasure in bringing out this stuff. But we have to realize how openly genocidal these people are. Remember, the searches that brought this stuff to light were “white genocide” and “white castration”, not interracial porn.

        • Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
          April 11, 2017 - 3:50 am | Permalink

          @Don-Another Stealth Genocide method is to destroy the European gene pool by flooding it with cheap “zombie” drugs such as “Spice”, the synthetic marijuana made by spraying tea leaves & tobacco with toxic chemicals, packaging it in colourful bags, and selling it for next to nothing to EUROPEAN YOUTH, who now litter the pavements of western cities. Muslims are the main drug dealers, poisoning European youth while reserving the pure hashish for themselves, making the hashish syrup they quietly add to their coffee in coffeehouses, while plotting jihad and pompously sneering at Europeans for drinking alcohol.

          “Muslim drug ring flooded NYC with a ton of synthetic pot aka “K2” [“Spice”]”

          “Horror footage of homeless Spice addicts in Manchester”

        • Lou's Gravatar Lou
          April 11, 2017 - 8:05 pm | Permalink


  12. April 9, 2017 - 1:10 am | Permalink

    There is a large number of either banned or untranslated books, authors, academics, poets, writers, scientists, prior to the NS take over in 1933, who dealt with the victimhood mindset of Jews, or what the Germans call “Judenopferlehre” (Jewish victimhood narrative)– all the way from the Babylonian times to the modern Warsaw ghetto times. This topic is still poorly covered in the departments of psychology, philosophy and linguistics in US/EU academia One could cite just a handful of German authors who focused on victimological proclivities of the Jewish sacred and secular texts; Arno Schickedanz (Das Judentum, eine Gegenrasse, 1927), who coined the term “counter-race” for Jews, Mathilde Ludendorff, the poet Ernst Moritz Arndt, the German katzenjammer kids creator Wilhelm Busch, Hans Hauptmann, André Jolles, etc. Critical remarks about Jewish self-denial and their frequent messianic do-good phantasies can be spotted among practically all European authors; from Antiquity to Modernity, from Tacitus to M. Luther, to A. Schopenhauer, all the way to the modern and banned French LF Céline’s political satires, Henry Coston’s works, etc. According to the present day legislations in the EU and USA regarding the nebulous legal definition of “hate speech” the entire European literary legacy may soon be declared “racist” and “anti-Semitic.”

    • Alicia's Gravatar Alicia
      April 9, 2017 - 8:31 am | Permalink

      Than you, Dr Sunic. In Sweden we hardly can say anything negative about the mass influx of migrants without the mandatory mentioning of the Jewish suffering. Even on a website that MSM call “hate site” people seem to feel obliged to express their compassion for the Jews, despite the main topic has no (direct) links to Jews.

    • April 9, 2017 - 5:29 pm | Permalink

      @Tom Sunic — … large number of either banned or untranslated books, authors, academics, poets, writers, scientists, prior to the NS take over in 1933…
      Are you suggesting books of this type ceased from 1933? There’s a school of thought re-examining Hitler as partly pro-Semitic, at least to the extent of not going the whole hog (or even part of it), so I suppose it’s possible NS books had different angles.

  13. April 9, 2017 - 6:54 am | Permalink

    Scherz is more like a fun, prank-style hoax. It also means “joke”. For serious fraud, the word Schwindel is better. Thus: Judenschwindel, a word used by the German conservative revolutionaries of the 1930s.

    It does some to me that almost every constituent element of the story of Jewish peoplehood is fraudulent. The Purim story about Haman is no more real than the Harry Potter books, yet Jews still get emotionally worked up about it today. Even the whole notion of exile following the Roman conquest is a fabrication. The Romans exiled very few people and Jews were already widely dispersed even before the war with the Romans.

    We need a serious anti-history of the Jews to be written. I might even do it myself.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      April 9, 2017 - 4:25 pm | Permalink

      Even without my complete agreement, you are entirely correct with your connotation of ‘ Scherz ‘. We know what Dr. Joyce is searching for, but I too tripped over that translation.

      Relying on German to provide compound nouns, one could not be happier with the triple-compound of Dr. Sunic’s
      ” Judenopferlehre “. Even there one would have to be familiar with its intended context, since Opfer as a noun can mean either victim or sacrifice; similarly when used as a verb, where ‘ to sacrifice ‘ can mean an altruistic offering up.

      Scherz has too much of a department store Santa pulling a trick on a kid. Judenschwindel can encompass the very nucleus of this article, but also ‘merely’ getting ripped off at the deli. So the search continues. Bored yet ?

      While we frequently discuss the control of the MSM, from a perspective of Jewish ownership, we should not ignore the life or death power over every publication, exercised by the choice of placing advertising. As we just witnessed again.

      An ” anti-history ” is certainly required. But beware, that in some jurisdictions librarians are required to produce a list of books you check out, if so ordered. Before you even plan your chapters, make an exhaustive list of precautions to keep your body and soul together.

    • April 9, 2017 - 5:22 pm | Permalink

      If you do this, and I hope you and others do, please give evidence carefully and thoroughly. Remember there are huge numbers of naive whites who believe the ‘chosen people’ narrative and will carry out their bidding, apparently until death.

    • Don's Gravatar Don
      April 10, 2017 - 8:35 pm | Permalink

      Bold talk. I think you’re right and I hope you do it. I’ve tangentally chipped away at Jewish mythology and I find most of it is phony. This article by Joyce is great. We need more exposes like this. Hard painstaking work, but essential. A Jewish “anti-history” is very much needed. Pieces like this are a start.

    • Hieldner's Gravatar Hieldner
      April 12, 2017 - 9:04 am | Permalink

      I agree. Scherz isn’t really the right word. A German would expect to find a Jewish joke or a funny prank involving a Jew under that headline, Schwindel is much better. (Example: Aprilscherz = April fool hoax).

  14. April 9, 2017 - 7:18 am | Permalink

    Both “gas attacks” in Syria were false-flag attacks from Israel, as were the bombings of churches in Egypt this Palm Sunday.
    It just goes on and on, and no doubt would even if no sovereign Jewish theocracy existed anywhere in the world.

  15. Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
    April 9, 2017 - 7:52 am | Permalink

    The liar group was older, on average, and had significantly higher mean verbal-to-performance IQ ratios than the two control groups.

    • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
      April 12, 2017 - 9:32 am | Permalink

      That shekelnazis

  16. monty's Gravatar monty
    April 9, 2017 - 8:55 am | Permalink

    David Straub the Jewish Berkeley’s Lawyer-Logic or Lawgic is truly atrocious… and laughable

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      April 14, 2017 - 5:51 pm | Permalink

      Your link is excellent and cannot be over recommended for reading.

  17. Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
    April 9, 2017 - 1:03 pm | Permalink

    Dr. Joyce’s exposure of the fact that very few Jews were EVER attacked or killed at any time in history extends to the Islamic world, in which Jews have provided invaluable aid and financial backing for Muslim Invaders down through the ages, beginning with Mohammed’s army of conquest funded by his first wealthy Jewish Yemeni wife Khadija, who wrote the Koran for her illiterate young husband, based on the Talmud/Torah. Jews also functioned as treasurers, administrators, overseers and slave traders for the Islamic world, controlling everything behind the scenes and trampling the Christians underfoot, while keeping the sultans well-supplied with blond Christian European child sex slaves and castrated boys as eunuch harem guards, which continues to this very day.

    • April 9, 2017 - 4:39 pm | Permalink

      Jewish academic Dr. David Wasserstein: “Islam saved Jewry. This is an unpopular, discomforting [discomfiting] claim in the modern world. But it is a historical truth. … First, in 570 AD, when the Prophet Mohammad was born, the Jews and Judaism were on the way to oblivion. And second, the coming of Islam saved them, providing a new context in which they not only survived, but flourished, laying foundations for subsequent Jewish cultural prosperity&mdashalso in Christendom—through the medieval period into the modern world.”
      Islam does seem to have been a Jewish invention, like Christianity. NB Bramble – how certain is it that Khadija wrote the Koran? There are assorted stories about caves and ‘scholars’ etc.

  18. Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
    April 9, 2017 - 1:15 pm | Permalink

    Dr. Joyce says of the Papal Decrees, “We may therefore consider the Christian settlement decrees to be the primary privilege that underlay the rise of the Jews in Western Europe in particular.” It is important to realize the influence of Crypto-Jewish infiltrators within the churches and the papacy from the very beginning. “Despite the fact there was no such office or word as “pope” until about the fourth century and that Peter was neither Roman Catholic nor pope, commencing with Peter, the first ten popes were “Jews” of some description” (Philip I by William Thomas Walsh, Shead & Ward London, 1938).

    Some “Jewish” popes previous to Malachy’s prophecy include, Zephyrin (199-217), Siricus (384-399), Hormidas (514-523), and Analdet II (1130-1138). (Gert Haendler: Kirchengeschichte, Evangelische Verlagsanstalt Berlin, 1980).
    Pope No. 211: Callistus III (1455-1458) Jew [18]
    Pope No. 216: Alexander VI (1492-1503) Jew [18]
    Pope No. 217: Pius III (1503) Jew [18]
    Pope No. 219: Leo X (1513-1521) Jew [18]
    Pope No. 221: Clement VII (1523-1534) Jew [18] (cousin of Leo X)
    Pope No. 222: Paul III (1534-1549) Jew [18]
    Pope No. 227: St. Pius V (1566-1572) Jew [18]
    Pope No. 228: Gregory XIII (1572-1585) Jew [18]
    Pope No. 262: Pius XII (1939-1958) Jew [19]
    Pope No. 264: Paul VI (1963-1978) Jew [20]
    Pope No. 266: John Paul II (1978-2001 or 2005) Jew [21]

    • April 9, 2017 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

      A very valuable comment. Perhaps readers might consider whether the alleged Catholic dislike of usury might have been a cover for Jewish monopoly. I.e. maybe, in exchange for the preventing of non-Jews from money dealing, the Church was funded or supplied with money by Jews. Two (or more) obvious control experiments include the Greek/Byzantine Church, and the later Russian Orthodox Church.

      • April 10, 2017 - 5:15 pm | Permalink

        I Googled William Thomas Walsh. Unfortunately his 1938 book on Philip II is not online, as far as I could find, though he was evidently an American Roman Catholic. Some of his online presence sounds learned and lucid; he dealt for example with the Inquisition and Spain. But I couldn’t find him on early popes.

    • m's Gravatar m
      April 10, 2017 - 4:53 am | Permalink

      @ Bramble: Do you have any definitive evidence that popes you listed were indeed Jewish? I didn’t find the two links you provided very persuasive, and certain of the links within those links were dead. Some of the links within the links had nothing to do with popes at all. Some of the links within the links were simply speculation based on hearsay.

      The point is, if you make a seemingly outrageous statement or seriously overstate your position, it’s difficult for serious people to take you seriously. On the other hand, if you have some legitimate proof for your allegations, you should offer it up so we can fact check. I am certainly willing to modify my world view in light of facts.

      That being said, E. Michael Jones, in his Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Effect on World History adequately shows that during the Middle Ages, when Jews were “threatened” by non-Jews as a reaction to their usurious ways, they frequently begged the Church for protection, and often received it.

    • m's Gravatar m
      April 10, 2017 - 5:14 am | Permalink

      For what it’s worth, I did a quick review and found that Peter (no surprise) and Anacletus II were Jewish. One might expect how in the early days of Christianity that would be the case. There is speculation (but it is not definitive) that Gregory VI and VII were descendants of a Jewish family. I’m not saying that there have not been more, but I’d just like something more positive as confirmation than a link to a couple of “bible believer” and “illuminati” Web sites (that also push UFO and alien abduction stories).

  19. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    April 10, 2017 - 5:16 am | Permalink

    Regarding Jewish hoaxes and rationalized victimization claims, one also needs to look at where the Jewish population came from that dispossessed the Palestinians when Israel was created. Obviously the millions of “Holocausted” Jews who poured out of war torn Europe into British mandated Palestine, (1945-1948), were still alive and well, or the ethnic cleansing of Palestine could have never happened. Amazingly, some historical events are evidently stranger than fiction !

  20. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    April 10, 2017 - 7:28 pm | Permalink

    It’s a blessing that our security services, domestic and international, haven’t been infiltrated by Jewish players, otherwise who knows what hoaxes would be appearing on the nightly news?

  21. Guest's Gravatar Guest
    April 12, 2017 - 9:13 am | Permalink

    My apologies for a hastily typed comment with error and insufficient explanation. There apparently is some dispute as to whether Joseph Moses Levy actually owned the Sunday Times or was merely its manager and printer. He certainly owned the Daily Telegraph but the actual year of purchase date is also in dispute and, as part of obtaining the DT from Colonel Sleigh, “on February 17th 1857 for a further and final payment by Levy to Sleigh, the remaining portion (50%) was transferred for the sum of Pounds Sterling 2,000, and that Sleigh was forbidden to publish a 1d (one penny) newspaper within a 50-mile radius of London.” Obviously, this was to pre-empt any further competition from Col Sleigh. After purchasing the Daily Telegraph, Levy appointed his son and another journalist as editors, and Levy himself provided articles for the paper on arts and music. Levy’s son was raised to a baronetcy as 1st Baron Burnham and in 1928 his son (grandson of Moses Levy), sold the DT to the 1st Viscount Camrose, in partnership with his brother Viscount Kemsley and the 1st Baron Iliffe. Both the Camrose (Berry) and the Burnham (Levy-Lawson) families remained involved in the management of the Daily Telegraph until Conrad Black took control in 1986 (whose wife was, I believe, also Jewish and wrote for the paper). So, the jewish ownership and influence on the DT was for at least 130 years; also, anyone who reads the present DT will know that it is emphatically pro-jewish and strongly committed to ensuring its readership has at least a weekly dose of instruction on ‘anti-semitism’, ‘neo-nazism’ or neverending victimhood (implying also unceasing evil of European peoples).

    Also, whilst reading up on the above, the pattern emerged clearly of strong jewish representation and ownership of British media: Reuters (Paul Julius Reuter, born Israel Beer Josephat); a member of the Sassoon family owned and edited the Sunday Times (1894-1904); Harry Marks founded the Financial Times; another controlled the English Review and published the Westminster Gazette and Harry Oppenheim held a major interest in the Daily News. With regard to The Observer, it appears there was also ownership or editorship by a Sassoon family member. As to the name Levy-Lawson, it seems a brother of Joseph Moses Levy changed his name to Lawson and double-barreled it. In summation, I still stand by part of my original comment, that at a critical point in British history, from mid-19th century on well into the 20th (and it seems, continuing into the present days), Jewish ownership and management of major media has played a crucial role in directing, and probably, misdirecting, British public opinion.

Comments are closed.