Silent Sisterhood Revisited: Another Vibrant Rape Gang, Another Liberal Lie-Fest

Tobias Langdon

When you’re studying the behaviour of animals, it’s pointless to look for motives like “truth-seeking” and “compassion.” Animals aren’t interested in discovering the truth and Making the World a Better Place. They’re interested in survival — in eating and not being eaten.

“All white women are only good for one thing…”

Something similar applies when you’re studying the behaviour of liberals. Whatever they might claim, they’re not interested in truth or world-improvement: they’re interested in power — in dominating and not being dominated. As I pointed out in “The Silent Sisterhood,” feminists prefer to ignore sex-crimes committed by non-White men, because such crimes contradict their insistence on the Omnipotent Evil of the Stale Pale Male. Now more proof of feminist double-standards has arrived, because another Muslim rape-gang has hit the headlines in Brave New Britain.

It’s vibrant up north: the Newcastle rape-gang

Newcastle, in north-east England, was the vibro-centre this time. Seventeen Muslim men from “backgrounds” of dazzling diversity — “Bangladeshi, Pakistani, Indian, Iraqi, Iranian and Turkish” — have been found guilty of the “rape and human trafficking” of more than 200 “vulnerable women and girls.” One of those men, Badrul Hussain, is reported to have espoused a shockingly toxic mixture of racism, misogyny and male supremacism. His alleged words, addressed to a White female ticket-inspector, should have set feminist keyboards rattling right around the world. They went like this: “All white women are only good for one thing. For men like me to fuck and use like trash. That’s all women like you are worth.”

“Horrific, yet tragically familiar…”

It’s hard to imagine a clearer expression of Patriarchal Toxicity or a more unrepentant celebration of Rape Culture. Those words were alleged by the ticket-inspector at one of the four trials required to deal with the large gang and its many offences. Have feminists followed their own principles and believed a female witness without question? Have they been condemning Hussain’s Hate ever since it first met their appalled gaze?

In fact, they’ve ignored it. After the ludicrously implausible “gang-rape on broken glass” allegations at the University of Virginia in 2014, the feminist Jessica Valenti insisted at the Guardian that “Rolling Stone’s rape story is about a person — and I believe her.”

Jessica and her “This Week in Patriarchy” column haven’t bothered with Hussein’s Hate and the years of real, fully proven rape in Newcastle. Nor has the rape-fest been discussed in the Guardian’s special sections for “Women” and “Rape and Sexual Assault.” After all, the U-VA allegations were directed at Stale Pale Males. The proven rapists in Newcastle are Males of Vibrancy. It makes all the difference.

But the Guardian couldn’t ignore what happened in Newcastle, because it has been reported too widely elsewhere. As the Feminist of Color Sonia Sodha lamented, “It’s a horrific, yet tragically familiar, story that has played itself out in every corner of the country, from Rotherham and Rochdale to Oxford and Bristol.”

Hand-wringing vs honesty

Can you feel vibrant Sonia’s concern and compassion for the non-vibrant victims in all those places? I hope so: as “chief leader writer at the Observer,” the Sunday version of the Guardian, she is an expert at hand-wringing and virtue-signalling.

But I suggest she isn’t so good at logic and honesty. The headline to her piece ran like this: “Victims of child abuse gangs are the first to suffer — and the last to get our attention.” But why have the victims been ignored for so long? The Labour MP Ann Cryer could have helped Sonia answer that question. When Cryer learned “almost 15 years” ago that Muslim rape-gangs were at work in her heavily enriched constituency in Yorkshire, she tried to publicize what was going on:

Once I had overcome my initial disbelief that large-scale paedophile abuse was the norm for a section of the community — in some parts of Britain, it went back to the Eighties [or the Sixties?], when it was first reported to police — and that it was an open secret, I took my concerns to West Yorkshire police and social services. I expected they would have a hard time believing the claims — but I didn’t think I’d be flatly ignored by everyone. It was as if this crime was so toxic, no one could acknowledge its existence. (How I was branded a racist — for trying to save girls from their vile abusers, The Daily Mail, 11th August 2017)

But surely Britain’s foremost progressive and feminist newspaper rushed to join her campaign against the vile abuse of “vulnerable women and girls”? Unfortunately not. Cryer goes on to say this: “I couldn’t get The Guardian interested. Its reporters seemed paralysed by political correctness.”

Racism and religious hate

Some Guardian-readers were far from paralysed: they were among those who attacked Cryer for campaigning against the rape-gangs and against “forced marriages” among Muslims: “When I wasn’t being openly accused of racism and religious hate — my name was on the website Islamophobia Watch — I was painted as someone who didn’t understand Asian culture.” As Sonia Sodha was wringing her hands about victims being ignored, did she mention the Guardian’s prolonged refusal to help Ann Cryer and other whistle-blowers? Did she mention that Labour councils full of Guardian-readers presided over the horrors in Rotherham and Rochdale?

Of course not. She couldn’t discuss the Guardian’s complicity in the crimes, let alone apologize for it, because admitting error isn’t good for those seeking to win and retain power. The victims were ignored because the authorities were applying Guardianista principles of “anti-racism” and “diversity.” Sonia Sodha condemns behaviour that her own newspaper has supported for decades:

Thanks to the many independent reports into child sexual abuse in various places, we know that the disgustingly prejudiced attitudes towards the vulnerable girls who are abused are not limited to the perpetrators of these heinous crimes. In Rotherham, Alexis Jay’s report reveals police officers believed children as young as 11 capable of having consensual sex with groups of men three times their age. The police arrested young girls found in the company of older men in strange flats for drunk-and-disorderly behaviour, leaving the perpetrators free to continue their abuse. In Rochdale, three council employees expressed the view that the victims were “making choices”, as if children forced into sex by adults can be anything other than victims of abuse. (Victims of child abuse gangs are the first to suffer — and the last to get our attention, The Guardian, 10th August 2017)

The police in Labour-controlled Rotherham and the council employees in Labour-controlled Rochdale were being “anti-racist” and “sex-positive.” They were celebrating diversity, facilitating inter-communal outreach, and rejecting hate-filled stereotypes about predatory non-White males preying on vulnerable White females. In short, they were doing exactly what the Guardian wanted them to. Their “disgustingly prejudiced attitudes” were the result of decades of propaganda from the Guardian, BBC and other liberal outlets.

Think Ink

Sonia Sodha obviously couldn’t admit this. Nor could she admit other important things. She also wrung her hands about the “prejudiced attitudes” of the perpetrators, but she left those attitudes unexplored and didn’t mention Badrul Hussain’s Patriarchal Toxicity: “All white women are only good for one thing. For men like me to fuck and use like trash.” Badrul Hussain seemed to think that “race issues” were central to his offending, but what does he know? Sonia Sodha put race in its proper place: “by endlessly raking over this second-order question — is race or religion a factor? — we never seem to make any progress on the first-order issue: how do we prevent this from happening again?”

Octopuses squirt ink when they want to evade predators. Liberals squirt ink when they want to evade hate-facts. And that’s exactly what Sonia was doing in her waffle about “second-order questions” and “first-order issues.” Is the role of mosquitoes and protozoa a “second-order question” in the “first-order issue” of preventing malaria? Of course not. Prevention depends on understanding causes. But Sonia Sodha and her fellow liberals can’t admit the causes at work in Newcastle. That’s why they squirt ink and waffle:

We also need a better understanding of who perpetrates these crimes. In some places, it has predominantly been men of Pakistani origin, but in Bristol, the abusers were predominantly Somali; in Peterborough, they were also of Czech and Slovak Roma and Kurdish backgrounds. A report for the children’s commissioner in 2012 found that around a third of perpetrators were white. … In Newcastle, most of the perpetrators were second-generation immigrants, which may tell us as much about our school system as the communities and families in which they grew up.

Newcastle is still majority White. If the “school system” were to blame, White offenders would outnumber non-White offenders. They don’t. And they don’t form rape-gangs. Sonia Sodha had already noted that, on official statistics, White British men are hugely under-represented and vibrant non-British men are hugely over-represented. And that’s after decades during which vibrant non-British men have been allowed to offend with impunity, thanks to “anti-racism” and other causes dear to the Guardian’s heart.

Our “understanding” of the rape-gangs is already more than adequate. We could have prevented them altogether by not allowing mass immigration from the Third World. We can prevent them getting worse in future by banning Third-World immigration.

Sayonara, Sarah

But no more Third-World immigration would mean no more guaranteed votes for the Rainbow Alliance that unites feminists and Muslims in the fight to topple the Stale Pale Male. A ban would help “vulnerable women and girls,” but would it help liberals consolidate and increase their power? That’s the only question that matters to the Guardian. When liberals are faced with vibrant sex-crimes, their ideal is to ignore them and punish anyone who speaks out. When they can’t do that, they squirt ink and obfuscate. Happily for them, they did manage to apply the second half of their ideal after the Newcastle rape-gang hit the headlines. Sarah Champion, the Labour MP for Rotherham, was forced to resign after she published a “racist” and “Islamophobic” article in the Sun. The vibrant logician Areeq Chowdhury responded to her article like this:

Sarah Champion MP, I think you’re racist. There. I said it. Does that make me politically correct? Or am I just prepared to call out this horrifying problem for what it is?

If you think I am being over the top, have a quick read of the column in the Sun written by Labour’s Shadow Equalities Minister, Sarah Champion. It’s entitled “British Pakistani men ARE raping and exploiting white girls… and it’s time we faced up to it.” She inexplicably opens with the line “Britain has a problem with British Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls. There. I said it. Does that make me a racist? Or am I just prepared to call out this horrifying problem for what it is?”

Well to answer what I’m sure was a rhetorical question Sarah, yes, it does make you a racist. … (Sarah Champion, I Think You’re Racist. There. I Said It., The Huffington Post, 14th August 2017)

Chowdhury then went on to explain why Sarah Champion was a racist. By claiming that there was “a problem with British Pakistani men,” she was, according to him, claiming that “child sexual exploitation is a problem unique to the British Pakistani community.” No, she was claiming that “British Pakistani men” are overrepresented, which is clearly the case—indeed they vastly overrepresented. She didn’t say their overrepresentation was caused by their race: she merely stated a statistical fact.

Vibrantia ex nihilo

Alas for her, “Reality is Racist.” Chowdhury wanted her punished for speaking the truth and she has been. As the Spectator noted: “Sarah Champion’s resignation over Muslim comments bodes ill for state of debate in Labour. … [O]ther Labour MPs are now unlikely to make a similar point again.” Champion’s resignation is a perfect example of a central liberal principle at work: “Don’t debate — defenestrate!” Minorities must be worshipped, never criticized. For decades liberals have ignored the vibrancy of rape-gangs “in every corner of the country”; now that they can no longer do so, they seek to minimize that vibrancy.

But when it suits them, they will manufacture vibrancy out of nothing. As part of its relentless campaign against the White British and their right to a homeland, the BBC created a “schools video” that showed “Life in Roman Britain as seen through the eyes of a typical family nearly 2000 years ago.” The parents in this typical family are a “high-ranking black Roman soldier” and his White wife. There is no evidence that anyone of high rank in Roman Britain was Black, let alone that such a family was “typical.” The BBC was conjuring vibrancy ex nihilo. When the alt-right and others criticized the video, a fatuous classical historian called Mary Beard hastened to the BBC’s defence: “One thing is for sure, the Roman empire, Britain included, was culturally and ethnically diverse, from the Syrians in Bath to Quintus Lollius Urbicus, the Ethiopian who met Septimius Severus on Hadrian’s Wall, and the wonderful couple from South Shields, Barates and Queenie [Regina], he from Palmyra, she an Essex girl. There is no doubt about that.”

Prehensile tails

She waffled on: “Even in the case of Septimius Severus, the first Roman emperor from Africa [Libya], we don’t actually know the colour of his skin, how far he was ‘native’, how far the descendent of Italian settler[s]. The same goes for Quintus Lollius Urbicus, often claimed to be Berber, which he may well have been, but it isn’t certain.” Professor Beard is perfectly correct: we don’t know whether Severus and Urbicus were Black, because no record of their skin-colour has come down to us. Similarly, we don’t know whether Severus and Urbicus had prehensile tails or could clear tall buildings in a single bound. History is silent on these topics too.

But we can legitimately infer something from the silence and from the sharp racial distinction existing today between the Arabs and Berbers of northern Africa and the true Blacks of sub-Saharan Africa. The BBC’s “typical family” was nothing of the kind, as the BBC itself admitted by silently altering the text that introduces the video. The introduction now reads: “Life in Roman Britain as seen through the eyes of one family nearly 2000 years ago” (my emphasis). In pursuit of power, liberals will minimize vibrancy here, maximize vibrancy there. The vibrancy of non-White rape-gangs is minimized; the vibrancy of Roman Britain is maximized — indeed, manufactured from nothing.

Diversity = rape + death + misery

But Mary Beard and other fans of the BBC’s propaganda didn’t comment on one glaring historical fact: Diversity in Roman Britain was the result of conquest and outside control. It was imposed on the native British Celts entirely against their will and strongly to their detriment:

Boudica (alternative spelling: Boudicca, also known as Boadicea) (d. AD 60 or 61) was a queen of the British Iceni tribe who led an uprising against the occupying forces of the Roman Empire. Boudica’s husband Prasutagus ruled as a nominally independent ally of Rome and left his kingdom jointly to his daughters and the Roman emperor in his will. However, when he died his will was ignored, and the kingdom was annexed. Boudica was flogged, her daughters raped, and Roman financiers called in their loans. (Boudica at Infogalactic)

What happened next is still visible beneath the streets of London in a layer of soot. Boudica led an army to sack and burn what was then the Roman capital, Londinium, before her non-vibrant rebellion was brutally suppressed by the vibrant Romans. Diversity meant rape, death and misery “nearly 2000 years ago.” It means the same today.

And unlike the Romans, today’s invaders do not bring an advanced civilization with them. Newcastle is the largest city in north-east England, which was once a high centre of Christendom. Stale pale males like the Venerable Bede used the Roman legacy of literacy and architecture to create glories like the Lindisfarne Gospels and Durham Cathedral. Today Newcastle is enriched with Third-World culture instead. So are Rotherham and Cologne. That’s why they’re now remarkable for rape and misogyny, not for rood-screens and the Magnificat.

Liberals promised paradise and have delivered dystopia. Mass immigration is a curse, not a blessing, and one day the native British will remove the curse. Boudica’s rebellion failed because the Romans held all the strategic advantages and were better-organized and better-equipped. That will not be the case when the native British rise once more against a hostile elite and the alien invasion it has overseen.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

85 Comments to "Silent Sisterhood Revisited: Another Vibrant Rape Gang, Another Liberal Lie-Fest"

  1. Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
    August 27, 2017 - 5:55 am | Permalink

    Since when have gypsies from the Czech Republic and Slovakia, and Kuds, are white? This is ridiculous. It reminds of the time that back around 2000 when there was a crime wave in Italy whereby and the poor Romanians were blamed for it and all the media was talking about Romanians, then the local Italians burnt down the settlements from whence the crime wave emerged and they were gypsy settlements. Gypsies from Romania, not Romanians. Poor Czechs and Slovaks who will now be labelled as rapists in England though they were gypsies from their country who did it. Unbelievable how the leftist and liberal SJWs manipulate these issues for their cause.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      August 27, 2017 - 3:37 pm | Permalink

      @ Pero Ercegovac

      Within the same few months in north Norfolk, England, a gang of “Rroma” (i.e. gypsy) pickpockets managed to run off with my wallet, and a Romanian (i.e. white) nurse proved to be the most efficient and kindly nurse in my hospital ward.
      I don’t know whether the marauding “travelers” in this part of the world who put seaside Cromer in “lockdown” were foreign or just criminals, but they were treated with much more consideration than the local victims by the increasingly politically correct (i.e. political) police. In true liberal-marxian lockstep, the safety of property owners is less important than the “celebration” of “diversity”. We are now told in “England” that English-speaking white people come second in attention to crimes reported to the police.

      • Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
        August 27, 2017 - 10:41 pm | Permalink

        @ David Ashton

        Do they mention who comes first? I bet you they do not. The shrine of multiculturalism is more important now to the gel of social cohesion than is law. We are in a dark place.

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        August 28, 2017 - 3:28 am | Permalink

        David Ashton – the good news is that the left going too far with all this nonsense (eg police siding with the travellers, and another example is sudden mass immigration Merkel style instead of inviting them in more slowly over a longer time and playing a longer game) is finally awakening the apolitical, who, in their genetic makeup are actually right wing, even if, for the present. they are being fools and keep voting for the far left. A better tactic of the left would be to play slowly slowly as they have until now, but recently they just cannot control their urges any more. Eg threatening to take down the statue of Nelson.

        The right-wing-genetically but voting left for now types have to experience the effects of their voting left personally before they wake up and stop voting for those with the opposite views to their own. Occupation of the town you describe and the reaction of the police provides such an awakening to rich pampered fools who now vote left.

        Eg take Eastbourne. White and rich and safe. You can spend weeks there and only ever see white people and no muslims. At the last election there are so many rich fools living there that they voted for a LIBERAL MP ie the party most keen on mass immigration and the rights of criminals. This is how they voted in a place with virtually no criminals or immigrants! The only way these people will wake up is when the diversity reaches them personally. Until then they are just examples of fools voting for MPs who are intent on destroying everything these voters value (security and money). Unfortunately, things have to get worse before they can get better.

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          August 28, 2017 - 4:01 pm | Permalink

          You have a point. Remember Lib-Dem leader Ashdown (MP for Yeovil, South Somerset) madly suggesting that the population of Hong Kong should be resettled in England? We want the good burghers of inner Dorset and upper Cumbria to wake up before everyone is trapped in the swamp.

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          August 31, 2017 - 12:32 pm | Permalink

          @ pterodactyl

          Yet Mutti marches on, with Schulz – what is it about that face? – as the “Alternative”. How do they do it?

      • August 28, 2017 - 6:38 am | Permalink

        As always, you forget to mention this is deliberate Jewish policy.

        • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
          August 28, 2017 - 8:38 am | Permalink

          Certainly, many influential Jews live in Chicago. But, tracing and exposing their culpability is difficult. I would like to see a document which lists the Jewish policies promoting the sexual abuse of children and the ethnic cleansing of Catholics. Also, the dominant political power in Chicago is exerted by the Irish, especially, the Daley clan.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            August 28, 2017 - 2:53 pm | Permalink

            The Daley clan and the mostly shanty Irish who worshiped it haven’t been a force to be reckoned with in Chicago politics for close to thirty years—perhaps even a good deal longer than that. The days when an Irish American mayor could arrange to have ballot boxes set adrift in the Chicago River (memorably in 1960) are long, long past. The balloting is still rigged, of course, but the riggers sure ain’t Micks.

            What I don’t understand, George, is why, in the face of the evidence to the contrary, you persist in believing that voters have any real say as to what happens anywhere in this country and in the so-called democracies of Europe.

          • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
            August 29, 2017 - 6:21 am | Permalink

            The most powerful man in the Illinois senate is Michael Madigan. His daughter is the attorney general for the state. Ann Burke, the wife of a powerful alderman, Ed Burke, is on the supreme court of Illinois. The Irish are all over Chicago government and get lucrative contracts to work for the city.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            August 29, 2017 - 1:44 pm | Permalink

            All the people you name serve the (((true masters))) of Chicago and serve only at their pleasure. Mere voters don’t influence what they say or do, how they think or act.

            What’s more, as you seem to bear the Irish a measure of ill will, can you offer any evidence whatsoever that the ordinary Chicago Irish have, as a group, benefited in proportion to their numbers from the relatively lofty political attainments of the sellouts you’ve just named since, say, the eighties?

          • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
            August 29, 2017 - 3:25 pm | Permalink

            Do you have any evidence that the Madigan machine serves the real masters as opposed to the real masters serving the infamous Chicago Machine? No, I cannot say that the Irish outside of the Daley clan accrue any benefits from their Irishness. However, that does not stop them from politically supporting their brethren.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            August 30, 2017 - 8:10 am | Permalink

            … that does not stop them from politically supporting their brethren.

            So what? Thickheadedness, an equal-opportunity affliction if ever there was one, butters no parsnips.

            George, the hall monitor left the door to Plato’s cave unlocked and ajar. Please consider getting out whilst the getting is good! The old Production Code Hollywood films that fascinate you are available here on the outside as well—not to mention multiple dead-tree editions of the Bible, at least one of which everyone who calls himself a Catholic should have within easy reach.

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          August 31, 2017 - 12:27 pm | Permalink

          @ Rerevisionist

          As always, you never to forget to “mention” that almost everything you don’t like is Jewish. So my comments do not come off a one-track mind. I trust this reply will not be considered as impolitely personal as your four repetitive and redundant attacks on me.

  2. conradcgaarder's Gravatar conradcgaarder
    August 27, 2017 - 7:12 am | Permalink

    The BBC school video is even more outrageous than Budweiser’s 1970’s Great Kings and Queens of Africa calendar promotion, which depicted Hannibal as George Foreman on an elephant. Back then it may have been laughable, but we’re not laughing now.
    The people of Europe and Britain are faced with a stark choice between two tragic courses of action; either eliminate these invaders or be eliminated by them.

  3. Captain John Charity Spring MA's Gravatar Captain John Charity Spring MA
    August 27, 2017 - 8:05 am | Permalink

    They are all going away one way or another.

  4. Sally's Gravatar Sally
    August 27, 2017 - 8:42 am | Permalink

    Well, at least OO is now admitting Roman colonization wasn’t fun for the celts, especially the women.

    I’d be interested in hearing from the english about how the BBC Life In Roman Britain video went over among whites. Is the roman conquest considered some positive era in english history? I hadn’t thought so but why would the jewish-run BBC take such an angle?

    • royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
      August 28, 2017 - 8:18 am | Permalink

      The Insane Jew in Chief directs and orchestrates the actions of the Jew World Order Cadre.
      All actions that contradict common sense must be attempted to be viewed from the “…top down…”.

      Try this sometime and you will see how easily you will begin to answer all your own questions about why Jew Surrendered Globalists behave the way they do.

  5. RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
    August 27, 2017 - 8:55 am | Permalink

    “…When you’re studying the behaviour of animals, it’s pointless to look for motives like “truth-seeking” and “compassion.” Animals aren’t interested in discovering the truth and Making the World a Better Place. They’re interested in survival — in eating and not being eaten.”

    I beg to differ. You give animals too little credit.

    My personal theory goes something like this:

    In nature, living organisms from plants to the most sentient animals, tend to follow common sense principles.

    Top predators tend to favour prey that is malformed from birth or becoming so old that even the prey itself…,
    having fulfilled a complete and fruitful life cycle and is at that stage of life where pain and the struggle to keep up are more than they can bear…,
    or even wish to bear…,
    and are contented to pass on to the next life..,
    that they willingly migrate to a location that is a known point of making the final self-sacrifice so that the younger members of the herd may have a better chance of surviving into adulthood and complete their own fruitful lifecycles.

    This behavior has been documented to occur in the wolf and buffalo ecosystem or the lion and wildebeest symbiosis and I suspect it also occurred in the hunter gatherer societies of prehistoric European man.
    In other words…, this type of behavior was probably more evident before the International Race of the Retarded [Redacted] Jew began to force its version of “…human nature…” upon the rest of all planetary life.

    due to “…commodification…” and “…industrial management-harvesting…” of all life on the planet…,
    a lifestyle predominantly rammed down the throats of the rest of Planetary Life…,
    via a kind of “…trickle down…” reaction that originates with “…Insatiable Ravages of the Race of [Redacted] Perpetrators…”,
    Modern man is no longer in tune with the natural harmonic flow of the universe, but is merely a reactionary, dystopian, confused mass of lie that has been instilled with a sense of panic and short sightedness that was previously absent during the more “…Spiritually In-Tune…” times of the planet.

    Once the [Redacted] Race of Jews is first identified by the masses, then confined by the sword and finally cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, there will IMO reassert itself a period of natural common sense in all life that will heal the present state of turmoil.
    (Mod. Note: “Roy”, do this moderator a favor and save me some time by [Redacting] your comments like above, so I don’t have to. This site’s PTB don’t appreciate that terminology.]

    • Lucy's Gravatar Lucy
      August 28, 2017 - 1:51 am | Permalink

      Very well said, Roy. Those fewer and fewer “morons” among the “racists”- like myself – who vent their concern over what you accurately call industrial management-harvesting of all life on the planet not seldom put themselves at risk to be ostracized even by close relatives.

    • royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
      August 28, 2017 - 8:08 am | Permalink

      Since I am unable to find an expletive that aptly describes the depths of depravity that this Race of Perpetrators will stoop to,
      having the phrase “…[Expletive Redacted]..,” inserted into where I might otherwise insert my own expletive spurs the reader into unlimited speculation as to what the “…perfect expletive…” might be!

      Furthermore, it actually looks good as well…

      I will adopt this from now on.

      Thanks for the idea.


      (Mod. Note: “Roy”, glad you’re picking up the idea!)

      • Kelly's Gravatar Kelly
        August 28, 2017 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

        Mr. Moderator, What must one say or write to express the otter disgust while our vernacular does not offer an acceptable, and yet deserving but deeply profane, expletive describing the perversion of the (((trube))). Judging by his comment, Roy’s [Expletive Redacted] must have been very well chosen and yet it failed your censorship.

        For one, I demand to know what [Expletive Redacted] offended your delicate sensibility.
        (Mod. Note: “Kelly”, thanks for asking. It’s not important that readers know the term which was redacted because the redaction didn’t harm “Roy’s” message; and saying the redaction was due to my so-called “delicate sensibility” is silly. The TOO site owner I serve has requested that UNNECESSARILY inflammatory invective not drag TOO comments into the word-sewer. My choices when I see “Roy’s” comment in queue are to either NOT APPROVE any of the comment, or to insert [Redacted] and approve. I feel “Roy” should have his say, but also respect the TOO site owner’s point of view. “Roy” seems to express his points quite well without the term that was redacted. Does this note help?)

        • royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
          August 29, 2017 - 9:31 am | Permalink

          1) I’ve been commenting here at TOO for a few years now…, it is one of THE ONLY…, if not THE ONLY…, site where they do not simply delete my comments outright.
          Vdare, Political Cesspool, Amren, even the old VNN…,
          the list is long believe me…,
          none of them allow my comments to stand.
          Only Hr. Dktr. Prof. K. MacDonald’s site generally allows my comments to stand.

          2) In the beginning a few of my posts at TOO were deleted outright…, or I was asked to rewrite them to improve their understandability…, and after a long period of cooling off and reflection
          (believe me when it first happened I was pretty pissed off)
          I realized that in many cases the mods were actually doing me a favour, because the posts were rather base and not up to the literary standards that are typically shown at this site. Remember, H.D.P. K. Mac is a professor and the people who post here are extremely well written much more so than am I.
          So in essence, TOO has helped me to improve my writing style and,
          “…word smith wise…”,

          3) IMO, the expletive that is usually redacted is not an issue.
          There is no expletive that is debasing enough to describe these Globalist Jews, so redacting the particular expletive that happened to be redacted on that day of the week…, and they are often redacted…,
          is usually more or less a failed experiment in expletive selection and makes me think of even better ones to use in the future.

          4) The phrase “…[Expletive Redacted]…” is in itself a kind of “…open ended…” expletive that spurs the imagination of the reader to conceive of just what the expletive may have been that was redacted and thereby will,
          in the long run,
          expand the creative base of expletives that are applied to the Blasphemous Globalist Jews and hopefully one day, together, we will hit upon the “…Perfect Expletive…” !

          5) Although I do not agree with the “…unnecessarily inflammatory…” argument posited by the mod,
          because inflammation is welcomed by me…,
          but that is just my opinion and I may not always be as wise as I think I am.
          Furthermore, I do regard the Professor as a Superior Teacher and in some respects to have WAY MORE EXPERIENCE THAN ME.
          I think it is a good exercise for me to sometimes swallow my pride and defer to their good judgment.

          6) The site has both legal technicalities as well as other “…high brow…” readers who may not appreciate my language.
          These readers supply plenty of valuable commentary that might be lost if low brow expletives are left to stand.
          This is important.

          7) In any event, I can assure you it was probably just another of the many base adjectives that I use whenever I think back on my life and what these morally depraved beings have put me through.
          Nothing to lose sleep over to be sure.
          But I would especially like to thank you for thinking of me and having the courtesy and kindness to,
          kind of,
          come to my assistance in what looks like to me a defense of my right to express myself.

  6. August 27, 2017 - 9:35 am | Permalink

    It’s simple sexual selection at work in the limbic system of girls:

    “Let’s you and him fight.”

    It’s a 600 million year old predisposition baked into sexual behavior by the need for females to select sires for their children.

    The problem is that civilization is so new that female behavior doesn’t account for the fact that their coethnic, native males, are hamstrung in an unfair fight by group enforcement of “laws” against individual combat: Intrasexual selection among males.

    This, of course, didn’t originate with civilization, nor with humans but goes back to the group selective pressures starting with the common ancestor between chimpanzees and humans according to E. O. Wilson’s book-length commentary on the evolution of eusociality in humans: “The Social Conquest of Earth”.

    Military theorist, and occasional consultant to the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, John Robb, has recently come out with a short essay distilling the conflict in US politics to “Bad Boys Vs Mean Girls”:

    This narrative is likely to become influential in some of the more heterodox halls of power — but its failure to incorporate the evolutionary psychology of sexual selection nullifies much of its predictive power.

    Here is my response to Robb, with which he agreed:

    The Mean Girls have no moral or scientific legitimacy since they impose experimental social treatments on vast human populations without anything resembling meaningful consent — and do so without having any meaningful experimental controls so as to evaluate the efficacy of their unethical experimental treatment of human subjects.

    They do have safety in numbers and control of the centers of power from which they issue emotional rhetoric of shaming that mothers use on their children — as well as downright abusive treatment that, in the manosphere, is called the “shit-test” used by females in their fertile years to test the mettle of potential mates. Islamist intellectuals are fully aware of this sexual dynamic in the West and are financing it in a brilliant strategic maneuver that the “aristocracy” can’t even begin to think about since they are used to winning these “shit-tests” by throwing around the money and power of civilization. This means the “bad boys” have but one option:

    Tear down civilization.

    This is exactly what the Islamists are planning and our military is playing the useful idiot for them.

    • Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
      August 29, 2017 - 11:43 am | Permalink

      There may be a useful plan to save Whites from destruction by building a habitat for them free from the SJW’s and oither races. Jim Bowery’s brilliant essay(extremely brilliant!!!).

      Exponential Remediation of Civilization’s Footprint

      What about an all White kickstarter? If half the White Americans kicked in $20 then we would have $2,230,000,000. I wonder of that would be enough to build the first Island, power plant. One thing I don’t see him addressing is what happens when high winds blow out the cyclone power generator? It would seem you would need a back up. Could use oils made with extra energy and stored. Lots of extra cost. Another cheap power storage method might be large flywheels. Big and a bit cumbersome but cheap if all the materials are made from the sea.

      Tells you how to build a high energy contained environment in the tropics with great condo style living.

      I would be interested in James or Jim, whatever’s, opinion on whether the above amount would be sufficient to build a self sustaining system?

  7. George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
    August 27, 2017 - 9:54 am | Permalink

    Islam is self-consciously and unapologetically patriarchal. Islam also is dynamic and not bothered by warnings of overpopulation. In contrast, the various Christian churches have become feminized and are dying. Socio-fascism (a/k/a liberalism) offers no resistance and also runs on a trajectory of extinction.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      August 27, 2017 - 3:40 pm | Permalink

      Disagree with the use of the term “fascism”. Read Mosley and Mussolini on preserving the white population of Europe.

      • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
        August 28, 2017 - 6:06 am | Permalink

        In the US, the Democrat Party has taken on elements of fascism and socialism. Of course, they deny it and blame racial and social strife on conservatives and Republicans, who advocate a Constitutional government with limited powers. Fascism does not promise or guarantee limited powers.

      • August 28, 2017 - 6:59 am | Permalink

        You’ve forgotten to mention ‘Jews’ and ‘fascism’

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          August 30, 2017 - 9:14 am | Permalink

          @ Rerevisionist

          We can always leave “Jews” to you every time, but also refer to my comments on other blogs. For the record, Mosley’s meetings were attacked by Jewish Communists before he raised any major Jewish issue in public and after private attempts at a modus vivendi had failed. He also denounced their prewar agitation for economic and military action against Germany, and again over the Suez issue in 1956. Enough for now.
          (Mod. Note: “Ashton”, you didn’t seem to “get” my point about not attacking other commenters for the thoughts they express, however snakily you’ve encoded it. Encapsulating an ad hominem directed at another commenter, rather than addressing the topic of the article where you comment is very easy to see. If I see another such ad hominem from you, it will be your last.)

  8. George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
    August 27, 2017 - 12:52 pm | Permalink

    “let’s you and him fight,” reminds me of what I learned about Saul Alinsky and his tactics of community organizing.

  9. A Mayer's Gravatar A Mayer
    August 27, 2017 - 1:51 pm | Permalink

    The guardian and the BBC run in tandem, both well presented but both evil on analysis. An employee, new to the BBC was handed a copy of the Guardian and was told ‘ you will find our policies in there’. He found he was the only conservative there. Every day we hear the daily vituperation against Mr Trump to the point that I ask myself whether their US editor; Sopel; doesn’t feel ashamed of his daily vindictive attacks. Recently the BBC reporter Whewell interviewed a Belgian left wing MP on Islam when the MP expostulated ‘There was no protest against the Rotherham 1400 rapes gang’ to which Whewell
    stridently shouted ‘no; because that’s racist’. These Pakistani Moslems in the reports are like animals. It is apparent that the reptilian part of the brain only concerned with food and sex is prevalent among this tribe.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      August 27, 2017 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

      There have been a few sporadic studies of Guardian-Leftism at the BBC, but no comprehensive publication. I started one myself back in the later 1960s -covering policy statements (e.g. “no ‘racism'”), program contents and authors from documentaries to drama, personnel, and much more. At every stage I contacted politicians I thought might be interested, or supportive of publication, with no positive response. Some fifteen large cardboard boxes of my notes and cuttings from “Radio Times”, “The Listener” and newspaper reports, were unfortunately largely damaged by sudden massive floods in a garden lock-up in the 1990s, but there can be absolutely no question of the political slant of the national broadcaster.

      • August 28, 2017 - 6:59 am | Permalink

        You’ve forgotten to mention Jews in Britain

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          August 31, 2017 - 11:11 am | Permalink

          @ Rerevisionist.

          Please Sir, I am sorry I didn’t “mention Jews in Britain”, but the Headmaster has confiscated my exercise book. There are a rather large number of Jews in Britain to choose from, past and present, but you will get a better idea of their grossly disproportionate influence from their own publications, and from books from Jewish writers like Robert Peston’s “Who Runs Britain?” or Tom Bower’s biographies of Robert Maxwell and Tony Blair, rather than from (say) William Joyce’s content-thin “Twilight Over England” (my copy came from Revilo Oliver’s library). Peter Oborne’s important report on the Zionist lobby in Britain is online.

          Anyway, Sir, if I promise to do better next time, please may I now come off the naughty step and join the class?

  10. Lynda's Gravatar Lynda
    August 27, 2017 - 2:17 pm | Permalink

    The cadres of Cultural Marxism are presently organised into a Victim Hierarchy. The feminist cadre knows its position on the food chain of Political Correctoid social influence and the gravy train of Soros money.

    In fact, the femocrats (especially White wimmins) know they are on the bottom of the hierarchy. The Blacks, the Muslims, the Coloured / Indigenous peoples, the LBGTQIwhater are all stacked above them. In the command structure they have to support the predations of the their superiors against the common enemy: the White male who is the figurehead of the post Christian population and in Europe its nation state.

    Like good comrade soldiers on the Long March, the feminist cadre is required to be silent and accommodating to their superiors in the victim hierarchy. They are not allowed to play the Victim Card on the Black insurgencies. They have to reserve their righteous indignation and guilt script for White males only .

    This is co-ordinated from the Apex of the Victim Hierarchy : the apple of g_wdz eyeball and the eternal, suffering victims and their victim entitlement schtick they are running on all White post Christian nations and populations.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      August 27, 2017 - 4:10 pm | Permalink

      Herbert Marcuse started the main ball rolling with his explicit claim to politicize “blacks, immigrants, women and ‘students’ for a “revolution” that has incrementally colonized major academic, media and policy-institutes of the western world, culminating in Britain for instance with the 2010 Equality Act. “The victims have become the totems” (Oswald Mosley).

      And now – “‘Victims’ Rule”.

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        August 27, 2017 - 4:19 pm | Permalink

        PS. Bruce Bawer’s “Victims’ Revolution” (2012) is worth noting as an intelligent homosexual’s critique of “identity studies” that fill the “safe spaces” between the ears of US “students”.

  11. Reverend Leo's Gravatar Reverend Leo
    August 27, 2017 - 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Tobias have you any explanation for the total failure of the victims male family members to protect them. Newcastle and Yorkshire are among the main recruitment areas for the British Army and must be full of experienced men. The Sikhs were quick to dismember a few loverboys when their girlfolk were targeted initially. The bodies were found in sections in kebab shop freezers. It rather took the fun out of grooming until they zoned in on white girls. Can’t see them targeting Polish kids in UK just yet. They certainly won’t be trying it in Northern Ireland any time soon.

    • August 31, 2017 - 5:30 am | Permalink

      I have an explanation. The ‘experienced men’ knew that any action against nonwhite invaders would be investigated and punished very severely by the jew-controlled ‘justice’ system. People in the British Army do what they’re told (including enforcing the Jewish system overseas). It’s not that difficult to understand.

  12. Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
    August 27, 2017 - 11:06 pm | Permalink

    Tommy Robinson is a dope. He was chosen to focus on the symptoms, not on the causes. As he outlives his usefulness, they will put him in a position to be killed. Then he will be useful for few more years as a hero.

    If Muslims were smart, they’d not kill Tommy, they’d allow him to relegate himself to irrelevance and do damage to his cause in the process. One big laconian “If”.

  13. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    August 28, 2017 - 5:58 am | Permalink

    How vocal have the Christian churches been in the U.K. been about the rape of indigenous British women and girls? Here, in the U.S. the churches (and media) have silent about such gangs although they are known to exist.

    • August 28, 2017 - 7:02 am | Permalink

      The churches are all under the thumb of Jews. They have been since they were invented. They follow Jewish policies, including child abuse.

      • Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
        August 28, 2017 - 8:32 am | Permalink

        @ Rerevisionist

        This is not true for the RCC on Continental Europe. In the Catholic Church since I was a kid we were taught that the Jews are responsible for the death of Jesus and are the major enemies of the Church. Pope Pius XI even told the Zionists prior to WWI who came and asked for his blessing for the formation of a Jewish nation-state in Palestine no. Jews and Catholics in Europe are still at war except now the Jews manifest this through masonry and her child the globalist EU who are now fighting the Church as the Church is behind many of the ethno-nationalist and right-wing conservative movements from the Basque Country to Poland. Priests on the ground are not pro-Israel. Essentially European Catholics, unlike bible belt protestant Americans, cannot stand the Jews. Obviously, there is a cultural divide between the peoples of continental Europe and the people of America. Interestingly though in Europe the only thing that the right and left agree on is their joint dislike of Jews. No one likes them. On every other issue they are 180 opposite one another.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          August 28, 2017 - 12:32 pm | Permalink

          I have admired much of what you’ve written previously, and I also admire almost all of this most recent comment. But with this sentence,

          Essentially European Catholics, unlike bible belt protestant Americans, cannot stand the Jews.

          I respectfully disagree. When I was a boy (the 1950s), there may well have been a great deal of truth in the quoted sentence (not being a European, I can’t speak with your authority about Europe, however). But surely now, fifty-plus years after Vatican II, the gullibility of neo-Catholics and effectively all Protestants is a wash.

          Thus, I think, except where matters of doctrine and related moral practice are in question, Protestants and Catholics who have shed their illusions or escaped brainwashing entirely ought to cooperate with one another in awakening their coreligionists to the truth of who the enemy is and what his aims are.

          Once our societies have been retaken—is it overly optimistic to say once rather than if?—the time will have come for active missionary efforts within the wider Christian ranks (and of course outside them, too). As conversions to the Old Faith were widespread both here and in Great Britain in the decades prior to the mid-sixties, I see in this course of action much that is to be encouraged and nothing that is theologically uncharitable or impractical or burdened with Pollyannaism. Besides, given the long-standing Catholic principle of subordination, it is, I think an implicit conclusion that charity alone requires us to do what is in our power to maximize cooperation and minimize dissension in whatever does not amount to theological indifferentism.

          • Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
            August 28, 2017 - 2:14 pm | Permalink

            @ Pierre de Craon

            You know I could be wrong ;o) But let me put my case…

            Did you notice that I did not say the whole of Europe but South Western, Central and Eastern Europe? Why? Because, including France, the whole of North Western Europe is lost. Vatican II has destroyed them. They willingly embraced everything liberal, as they willingly embraced de-germanisation from 1945 onwards. Europe has a huge cultural divide. Honestly? I believe that, when North Western Europe is concerned, an alliance should be formed between the remnants of conservative patriotic forces and the neo-pagans of the Norse nationalist movements. They will have to rely on white nationalism like in the USA and the old British colonies because they have lost their ethnic homogeny. But the rest of Europe is in a better state and have never lost their Catholic nor Orthodox roots. And I put that down to the fact that these cultures are more insular and tribal at one level and many were repressed by various totalitarian regimes or Islamic occupations because of the ethno-national identities. Hence, while the Northern priests became liberal, following trends and becoming uniportant, in the south and east the priests were the intellectual elites who kept national identity. Look at the role of the Orthodox churches in Greece or Serbia. They are the same roles that the Catholic clerics played in keeping national identity alive in say Croatia and Poland. I am all for co-operation, but it has to have a fertile base. My greatest concern is not for us in Central Europe, we will not lose our identities. My greatest fear is for the North and West of Europe. There, for a lack of better word, both the Catholic and Protestant churches produced cuckservatives and made themselves obsolete. A new form of alliance must emerge in the North West. In many ways they are more akin to your situation in the USA as they are multicultural. We are not. That is our advantage.

            Concerning Catholic subordination, which is a good point of yours, it is still a misunderstanding what it means to be a Catholic of Europe. We are subordinate to the Church but not to the other. The Catholic faith is not pacific, if it was it would not have a Swiss Guard today nor the Knight of St John, or the Teutonic Knights or the Templars in the past. All military orders. In fact we were taught from early on that if a communist, muslim, jew or orthodox person pressures you. Hit at them ten fold. This is what I mean by masculine Catholicism. We were taught to be tolerant to our own, but definitely to defend ourselves against the other with all our strength. From without it could look different, but from within we know who we are and we know our role. As one priest told me as a kid… “Jesus only turned the other cheek in the garden whilst being arrested as it was what he had to do to complete the story, but in the temple amongst the Jews and moneylenders of the temple he violently overturned the tables and threw the merchants out. Hence son, there is a time to turn the other cheek and there is a time to kick the mongrels out”… good advice really. Btw during our war for independence from 1991 to 1995 we all war rosaries around our necks as signs of resistance, identity, protection and solidarity.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            August 28, 2017 - 8:05 pm | Permalink

            Your outlook and experience are refreshing and very interesting, but a few of your conclusions embody perspectives and interpretations I can’t share. Since I don’t wish to give the impression that these differences are either especially numerous or determinative, I’ll confine myself to one of them: what I consider the incorrect use of “militant” and “pacific” as polar opposites in referring to Catholicism or indeed any of the Christian faiths.

            Though there exists centuries-old terminology that distinguishes the Church Militant, the Church Suffering, and the Church Triumphant, the militancy referred to is metaphoric: it likens the daily struggle of the living Christian in his relation to the ills and temptations of corporeal life to the struggle of a soldier against a foe’s hostility. It was never meant to encourage or support reflexively aggressive conduct, especially when (unlike today!) the product of forbearance is no more than inconvenience or a tolerable measure of discomfort. (This is, of course, the essence of Just War theory: that the certain harms of war must never be embraced when they exceed the harms attendant upon war’s avoidance.)

            For that reason and with due respect, I find the words of the priest you refer to as unsound and as so ill considered as to be unorthodox. The far apter and far more widely applied lesson to be drawn from comparison of the two Gospel incidents the priest cites is that morally righteous anger finds better and juster expression when its aim is to protect or defend others (i.e., rather than oneself) from harm, corruption, or scandal. Turning the other cheek, in other words, is a divine counsel of personal piety; it isn’t meant to suggest that one may or must stand idly by while his neighbor is robbed or his wife is attacked.

            I hope it’s evident that I’m not saying that Christians or others should look approvingly on secular or religious “leaders”* who deceitfully call what they do tolerance, fairness, compassion, and even charity while they in fact knowingly work to destroy a largely homogeneous and more or less functional society via weaponized immigration and willful misapplication and distortion of legal and civic structures. Even less should they extend notional tolerance to (((society’s))) multifaceted and ubiquitous sex-linked abominations and its reality-distorting aberrations of gender “selection,” homosexual “marriage,” and transgenderism.

            Acting to protect loved ones, kin, friends, and (authentic) countrymen from present and future harm, both material and spiritual, is not truly a mark of religious masculinity or militancy, nor is failing to act thus a mark of femininity, passivity, or submissiveness. Rather, the former is somewhere on a spectrum extending from common sense to courage, the latter, from stupidity to cowardice.

            Viewed from a related perspective, no system of transcendent belief fit to be called religion preaches self-justifying warfare, enslavement, parasitism, or subversion. And yes, I’m talking to you, Judaism and Islam!
            *Joseph Sobran used to say that we should call them rulers, not leaders, and call ourselves the ruled, not the led, the governed, or some other misleading euphemism.

          • Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
            August 29, 2017 - 5:17 am | Permalink

            Sure I understand but I did not use the term Church militant on purpose as it is defined as all those Catholics who are alive today on the planet and their internal battles with their faith. It has nothing to do with the masculine Christianity I am talking about. It cannot have anything to do with it as it is a theological concept, not a political one. No I am talking about the robust pre-council priests who simply put used their religion as a gel to push forward the national goals of the people from whence they came. They gave courage to their flock and supported them to the hilt when they physically stood up to foreign encroachment. Nowadays we have kumbaya priests in the West. Too effeminate and willing to accept the other at the expense of their own. It is a ridiculous situation.

          • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
            August 29, 2017 - 9:38 am | Permalink

            Certainly, the priests and bishops before Vatican II were tough guys. They succeeded in guarding their flocks from the immorality of Hollywood with a production code, a code which inspired some of the best movies ever made.

          • Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
            August 29, 2017 - 11:02 am | Permalink

            @ George Kocan

            Exactly, and here is an example of what we have been discussing. Do you know what I just read in the Sydney Morning Herald net edition today? That the two top Jesuit high schools in Australia, St Ignatius of Sydney and Xavier of Melbourne, have decided to nod their heads tacitly for pupils over the age of 18 to vote at a plebiscite for gay marriage?! Even though Cardinal Pell, a staunch conservative, said no. The excuse was that the younger generation were so enamoured with egalitarianism it would be wrong to go against such a wave of brave activism?!?!! Could you honestly imagine pre-VII priests, especially principals of elite Catholic high schools doing this? They would have been the first to get out there, round the kids up and say, now listen here young lads this is the way it is… An infusion of Central European priests is definitely needed, and the consequence will ironically be that they will also infuse the youth with a good dose of patriotism if not nationalism as they have done here in Central Europe.

        • August 31, 2017 - 5:40 am | Permalink

          @Pero — you’re not imho thinking deeply and broadly. Puppets and puppet organisations, run more or less secretly, naturally tend to develop their own momentum, and often think they are independent. It’s similar psychology to many Americans who really seem to believe they are ‘individualists’. But they tend to run into problems; look at the C of E for example, which has knuckled under to Jew wars since it was founded. A problem is that talk is cheap – no doubt Catholics may say Jesus was murdered by Jews, the Church deplored ‘usury’ and so on; but what do they do in practice? However; maybe it’s pointless saying these things. If people relying on scribbles ascribed to ‘Jews’ think the scribbles are sacred, there’s not much a rational person can do. If such people won’t face simple facts about the organisation(s) they’ve been propagandised in to, the future lies with the small proportion of sceptical types – assuming they have time to head off the Jewish steamrollers.

          • Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
            August 31, 2017 - 11:57 am | Permalink

            @ Revisionist

            I think that I am looking broadly but we are seeing things from a completely different cultural experience. Look, I presume you are British or Anglo American. If I am wrong then I apologise in advance. Nevertheless, you cannot compare the two situations. Lets face it if you are either British or American your countries are lost. Mine is not. Croatia is a 99.9% white country. We are 93% Croat. We have survived communism because of the Catholic Church in Croatia, not despite of it. Our priests are hard core nationalists who do not push the liberal line. They see it as their duty to defend their nation at all cost. They are very open about the Jews to their flocks, but naturally talk double speak to the media which is still run by former communist hacks. As are the Orthodox Churches for example in Greece and Bulgaria. You forget we went to war from 1991 to 1995 liberate our country, and we did so as soldiers with rosaries around our necks which lets say did not please the UN nor the EU. But we did not give a damn. Each part of Europe is different. In our country the priests openly talk with their flocks about how we rightfully sided with Germany in two world wars as on the other side were the atheistic communists sponsored by the Soviets and the London City. As one Bishop back in 2007 told me when we went for a walk just after he got his new bishopric, “when you had to choose between the God fearing Germans and the atheistic Soviets the choice was easy, we always chose the right side even if it cost half a million lives as punishment after the world”… now the fact that in the west the priests have become effeminate is not our story, but theirs and have you thought that it is maybe one of the reasons you have lost your countries to the Jews. When there is no strong social gel built on metaphysical values then there is no nation. Having said this, Jews in our country ain’t the issue. The issue are the communist traitors as after 45 years of rule they are the ones who whilst we fought entrenched their bums in all the institutions, changed their coats and are now anti-nationalist, globalist, liberals espousing antifascist clap trap in the name of the EU. But that is another story and we will defeat them again one day… me thinks very soon be it by the ballot box or more likely via bullets.

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        August 28, 2017 - 4:11 pm | Permalink

        @ Rerevisionist

        Why did the Jews who you say controlled the “churches” from the outset get John 8.37-46, Matthew 27.25 and I Thessalonians 2.14-16 into the Christian scriptures?

        • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
          August 29, 2017 - 6:16 am | Permalink

          Unfortunately, as a Catholic, I have not memorized the Scriptures to appreciate your citations. Please quote the relevant passages.

          • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
            August 29, 2017 - 11:11 am | Permalink

            (Mod. Note: “David”, earlier today I approved a comment by another commenter, and [redacted] a snide reference to yet another commenter because we don’t need intramural wars at TOO. Be polite, stick to issues and thoughts related to the article you are commenting on, and do NOT engage in slick ad hominem. This “Mod note” is posted over your comment precisely because you did that. Got it?)

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            August 29, 2017 - 1:35 pm | Permalink

            There are roughly a score of Bible-in-English sites on the Web—by which I mean full-text sites, not fan sites. You can find the citations above at this site in any of the thirty-odd translations the site offers.

        • August 31, 2017 - 3:37 pm | Permalink

          @David Ashton — you ask Why did the Jews who you say controlled the “churches” from the outset get John 8.37-46, Matthew 27.25 and I Thessalonians 2.14-16 into the Christian scriptures?
          Jews tell lies. Jewish media insert stories all the time to try to justify things. There are no ‘Christian’ scriptures; early Christianity was killed off by Jews, and the insertion of the hoax Yeshu figure.

          • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
            August 31, 2017 - 4:45 pm | Permalink

            @ Rerevisionist

            Well, on your theory, the Jews themselves tell us that they tell lies in the Fourth Gospel. After nearly a lifetime studying the origins of Christianity from diverse viewpoints, including currently renascent myth-theories, I am not, and I hope the Moderator will bear with me, prepared to defer to your “research” into this matter. Your view in many respects seems to be read into your “evidence” rather than arising from an objective analysis.

    • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
      August 28, 2017 - 7:36 am | Permalink

      Here in the US, the Democrat Party for the most part controls the Catholic Church and probably a lot of other churches. We are unlikely to hear anything negative about the ethnic cleansing of Catholics from the big cities, abortion, contraception, homosexuality and transgenderism.

      • Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
        August 28, 2017 - 8:23 am | Permalink

        @ George Kocan

        Catholicism prior to Vatican II is not the Church of today. We are in apostasy today. The Church in the USA and North Western Europe is under control of the Catholic priest version of the hippy revolutionaries of the 1960s and have turned it from an aggressive pro-native population masculine Church into an effeminate leftist SJW organisation. Thankfully in Southern, Central and Eastern European the Catholic Church is conservative, nationalist and in the vanguard of the revival of white European identity, i.e., they are of and from the people. Cardinal Gyula of Veszprem of Hungary, for example, is one of the loudest speakers against the Islamic invasion of Europe and calls it an invasion. Unfortunately we have a gaucho as head in Rome now days. I pray for his soul.

        • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
          August 28, 2017 - 10:51 am | Permalink

          In recent years, I have noticed priests from Poland serving in the suburbs of Chicago, some even assuming the status of pastors. Unfortunately, they apparently have assimilated to local norms by allowing altar-girls, lay ministers of communion, and so on.

          • Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
            August 28, 2017 - 2:20 pm | Permalink

            @ George Kocan

            Well that is a positive that they are there (though I also do not like having altar girls), but I have a feeling that will be doing some subversive neo-catacombist stuff in our favour on the sly. Our priests also have some churches where girls are at the altar but on the side, when they hold their youth groups they very much push the conservative nationalist line. They are playing the game to appease Rome openly so behind the scenes they can do what they always do. Wait and see how these Polish priests act in the underground once they set their roots. Polish priests are very good at setting up secret oppositional structures to systems of power. Without them and their parallel systems communism would never have been defeated.

          • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
            August 29, 2017 - 6:25 am | Permalink

            The trend in recent years seems to have been more doctrinally orthodox young priests serving in our parishes. Since Vatican II, however, the power of priests to direct parishes has diminished and the power of womens’ organizations increased. The women, generally, seem infused with feminism instead of orthodoxy.

          • Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
            August 29, 2017 - 8:57 am | Permalink

            Then the return in your parish toward orthodoxy is a positive move. Lets hope the young priests do not fall by the wayside nor come under the influence of feminism alas post-VII.

          • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
            August 29, 2017 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

            Unfortunately, my official parish is a disaster. I go to a parish far away to assist at the traditional, Latin Mass.

        • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
          August 28, 2017 - 12:28 pm | Permalink

          “The Church in the USA and North Western Europe is under control of the Catholic priest version of the hippy revolutionaries of the 1960s and have turned it from an aggressive pro-native population masculine Church into an effeminate leftist SJW organisation.”

          Let’s start calling them what they really are, hipsters!

          • Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
            August 28, 2017 - 2:15 pm | Permalink

            @ Michael Adkins…

            Ahaha… brilliant :o) I agree!

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          August 30, 2017 - 4:21 am | Permalink

          @ George Kocan

          One extract should be enough:
          “The Jews…killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out. They displease God and are hostile to all men in their efforts to keep us speaking to the Gentiles…. The wrath of God has come upon them at last.” – I Thessalonians 2.14-16 NIV. Other translations had “enemies of mankind”.
          This is just one passage among many in the NT that Liberal Christians and Zionist Jews currently claim as ultimately responsible for “The Holocaust”.

          • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
            August 30, 2017 - 7:39 am | Permalink

            Thanks. These quotes are most convincing. But, I wonder. Do “Jews” exist anymore? The Talmudic religion appears to be inhabited by a small minority of “Jews” who seem to have little impact on world affairs. I place the word in quotation marks because I doubt that they are the children of Abraham, after all these centuries living in Europe and the Americas and interbreeding with the host population. For the most part, those that identify as Jews seem to have been Christianized and Westernized.

          • Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
            August 30, 2017 - 8:02 am | Permalink

            @ David Ashton

            I agree. Criminals who seemingly get away with their crimes tend not to like it when people point out the truth as it could bring the investigation back toward them when they thought that they had got away with it ;o)

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        August 28, 2017 - 10:30 am | Permalink

        Here in the US, the Democrat Party for the most part controls the [institutional] Catholic Church and probably a lot of other churches. [bracketed gloss added]

        Not so, George. It is not in the nature of one marionette to pull the strings of another. Rather, both frolic in response to tugs from a (((higher power))).

        • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
          August 29, 2017 - 6:14 am | Permalink

          Perhaps, but that higher power exerts its influence through the Democrat Party, mainly.

  14. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    August 28, 2017 - 2:56 pm | Permalink

    The historical mistakes of European societies – allowing businessmen to determine the labor, financial, and immigration needs of their societies. And the female suffrage that allowed men and women to fashion society into a gigantic nursery overseen by the uncritical emotional fancies of matriarchal nurturing. Short of separatism, European man is doomed.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      August 29, 2017 - 4:18 pm | Permalink

      Tom, I hope it will not be seen as a inter-mural warfare to disagree with your opinion that European man is doomed. It might be considered impolite to suggest that there is a note of premature defeatism in a view that requires the prompt disenfranchising of women, who have in early times and in certain countries exerted a conservative and family-friendly effect on government. Take as exemplars Agnes Baden-Powell in Britain, or modern publicists like Lana Letkoff and Lauren Southern. I hope this comment doesn’t hurt anyone’s feelings, but I prefer debate to “safe spaces”.

      • Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
        August 30, 2017 - 3:36 am | Permalink

        I am a big fan of Lana because she puts her money where her mouth is. She is an example of a European woman who is wiling to commit her career to her man’s whilst bring much needed European babies into the world. Essentially, a tough minded yet committed European woman. Very good for the cause. Lauren is still young. We have to see how she will develop. So far so good.

  15. T's Gravatar T
    August 29, 2017 - 12:47 am | Permalink

    They made a serious attempt in the mid 19th century to replace the bulk of the populations of both the US and Australia with Chinese wage slaves (aka ‘cheap laborers’) and they were quite blunt and open about it…perhaps too open and blunt about it. People in both the US and Australia became wise to it and put a stop to it by the latter 19th century. The Chinese, after their country had been ruined by being flooded with drugs (opium) and been defeated in the two opium wars propagated by the same type of elites now pushing their exploitation as cheap labor, were then fleeing their country in great numbers.

    Pg 98 of the 1853 book The New Rome

    ’…the day will not be far distant when America will num-
    ber more Chinese than Caucasians.’

    ‘From these relations we may calculate upon an emigration of American business
    men to China, in return for that of Chinese laborers to California.’

    Pg 511 of the 1870 book One Hundred Years Progress of the United States

    ‘The Chinese question, viz., whether
    the Chinese and other oriental nations shall
    be allowed to swarm into our territory and
    take the place of our present laboring classes ; and whether, if, as is probable, this right is conceded,’

    From a Spring 1874 edition of the Pall Mall Gazette…they note their is growing opposition to this phenomena and identify what is at the root of it. It is that people don’t wish to be genocided. It would be over a hundred years yet before the perfect ideological vehicle would come about to make the world safe for cheap labor…or so they would think. They would call this ideological vehicle multi-culturalism.

    “A dread of what might happen if capitalists could command and control these vast hordes of workmen as against men of their own race, has made the labouring class, at any rate, blind to their good qualities.”;cc=livn;rgn=full%20text;idno=livn0121-2;didno=livn0121-2;view=image;seq=00134;node=livn0121-2%3A1

  16. royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
    August 29, 2017 - 10:15 am | Permalink

    1) I do not think that there is anyone that is not on the “…inside…” of this clique of Top Predatory Jews that can precisely identify who the Top Jew is.

    2) But I am a 56 year old German, born into the lowliest position of an extended family of high ranking German power players in an environment replete with some of Canada’s most powerful Jews, Turn Coat Limeys and Freemasons.
    At age five, I knew more about Jews than most people who were ten times my age…,
    other than high ranking Jews themselves…,
    knew about them.

    3) By virtue of the above, I was driven from my birthplace to roam the planet,
    mostly on a bicycle and a lot of it as a practicing Yogic Monk,
    always with one eye on the things that I knew and the other eye on the things that I might become in the future.

    4) Without getting into precise details at this juncture, suffice it to say that entirely before the advent of the internet era, I had already deduced through a balance of probabilities that the Top Jewish Hyena must come from the Rothschild Family.
    Now who the Present Head of this rather large extended and extremely (monetarily speaking) wealthy family is I really could care less…,
    suffice it to say that in the 1700’s they were already controlling the bulk of the wealth of Europe and their fortunes have only gotten larger since then…,
    as glimpsed by the frequent snippets of tell tale signs slipping out of their extremely well guarded information wall of privacy.

    5) It matters little who the Head of the Race of Blasphemous Jews is, because we have at present at our disposal a large network of KNOWN JEWS whom we can target and “…Bind…”…,
    as the Bible says.
    Once bound, the duties the particular ensnared Jew will naturally fall to other lesser, but still high ranking, Jewish Cretins whom we may further target in our, “…shooting gallery of corrupt Jews…”.
    If we continue along in this manner, we will do to the Jew what he has done to the White man…; namely to isolate and eventually expose the Top Jewish Agent.
    So for now…, although the Top Jew goes to great lengths to obfuscate as to who he may actually be…,
    if we continue to “…whittle our way towards the top…”,
    we will eventually reach him one way or another.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      August 29, 2017 - 11:27 am | Permalink

      Your last sentence reminded this “sniveling Limey” of Norman Spinrad’s 1972 novel “The Iron Dream” (title used in 1999 by Harold Covington, on whom see e.g. “Setting the Record Straight”,

      • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
        August 31, 2017 - 11:06 am | Permalink

        Just to set the record straight…

        Although I had a lot of bad experiences with English descended Canadians who willingly cooperated with Jews in whatever criminal, immoral, licentious, or “…targeted undertakings…” they were into at the time,
        I find “…upper crust..” English people to behave, on the whole, without loyalty or honour toward even their fellow “…Lower crust…” English countrymen,
        I am also fully aware that there are some English people who are actually praise worthy and deserving of the highest respect (in this regard, Dr. Andrew Joyce springs to mind).

        Moreover, as much as I sometimes would like to, I can never quite bring myself to wholly loathing the English people.
        For some, possibly Racially Related Reason, and the fact that I did have a few VERY positive experiences with English people in Canada, not to mention experiencing their sometimes exceptionally brilliant mental and athletic capacities, I cannot but have an almost ambivalent opinion of the English.

        On the one hand I despise their often spineless, sniveling and cowardly behavior just to maintain the few shekels they have accumulated, but on the other have to admire their ingenuity, genius, and at times chivalric behaviour.

        The bottom line is that if I come off sounding ill mannered towards the English it is more due to reasons of tough love than spite or hatred.

        I read almost everyone’s comments here…, including yours…, and I have found you to be, like most of the English who comment at TOO to belong to the part of the English Race that still retains its honour and integrity and I have absolutely no ill will toward you.

        |t is the English that have allowed themselves to be wholly swallowed up by Inverted Jewish behavior that I especially dislike.
        But I have the same opinion about the plethora of Germans who have given into the Jewish Junk Kultura…, however to a lesser extent,
        if only because of the constantly directed propaganda assault on them from all sides of the “…Allied…” spectrum.

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          September 1, 2017 - 4:55 pm | Permalink

          @ RoyAlbrecht

          Thank you for that comment – goodwill is reciprocated.

          It takes all sorts to make up a nation, and unfortunately all sorts to ruin one.

  17. Mr Curious's Gravatar Mr Curious
    August 30, 2017 - 8:17 am | Permalink

    Voyeuristic GeordieTards Backpfeifengeseicht&Mortimers should be more concerned aboot greasy kebabs putting your chavettes in greaay kebabs than your pussy creepy obsession with where I work, what supermarket I go to, what I do at wirk, the plqces I go etc…

    (((Guarianystard Freedland))) no we can’t have Celtic comedians. Must have total tards who don’t get anythin & think Beckett amounts to saying poncey GT words like eraru & uvavoo. ‘Yes Mr Yento, arm reet modern like, R,loov all the diversitee but R canny oondastand anythin leek.
    Perfect ((handclasp)).

  18. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    August 31, 2017 - 3:09 am | Permalink

    “Diversity in Roman Britain was the result of conquest and outside control. It was imposed on the native British Celts entirely against their will and strongly to their detriment:”

    This is the difference between then and now. Then the conquest was by force of the STRONG over the WEAK (Romans strong, natives weak). We have to admit that today the conquest is the WEAK over the STRONG. The weak from the third world are being invited over – lured over even – by our governments with the OVERWHELMING VOTING ASSENT of the people (Did they not just vote for Macron? Did the British not just reject UKIP at the last election and embrace open-border Tories?)

    As soon as the strong no longer wish to be conquered by the weak, within a VERY SHORT TIME the conquest can be totally stopped and reversed even without much bloodshed. The first thing to do is to form a colony in Africa. The second thing to do is to send everyone there who hates this country for being white and civilised (although the level of civilisation is rapidly decreasing as we strive to become third world and corrupt and to encourage crime and to politicise the police and allow our teachers to give extreme sex education to infants in state schools, and as the people do not care as Google begins the clampdown and purge of the internet). Most of the BBC employees would end up being sent. These people have bad genes that make them hate us, so why should we tolerate them? Those Jews who fell malice towards other tribes (us) will also have to be told to live in whatever country they identify as ‘theirs’ and we all know where that is. The problems can therefore EASILY be dealt with. Only two things could stop us – our own white enemy within, and the armies of other white self-hating nations, such as the way Nato turned on the Serbs.

    The only thing stopping the STRONG natives in the West expelling the WEAK invaders is that for now the native people TOLERATE the invasion. That is not to say they want it, but they TOLERATE it to the extent that they vote for it. About 15% of the white indigenous STRONGLY WANT IT – but this minority is very committed and vocal and although they are 15% of the total they are over 90% in all the institutions where they can put into practice their malice – parliament, the legal system, education, academia and the MSM.

    But this 15% could not order the other 85% to lie down and be trampled on by the third world EXCEPT THAT THE 85% ALLOW IT. The 85% KNOW they could EASILY STOP and REVERSE the nonsense simply by doing one thing. Not to be brave. Not to spend money. Not to inconvenience their selfish selves. They need to do none of these things. All they need to do is put an ‘X’ in a different box at election time to the one they have voted for their whole lives up till now. And the reason they do not is that their thought processes are too limited. They cannot get away from the notion that you vote by the group identity you feel – working class versus posh people for instance – and as they feel working class they use this as a basis for voting. So they end up voting for the Party (Labour) with the OPPOSITE views to their own. So the white working class of Gorton Manchester just voted for Mohammed Afzal Khan to represent them in parliament because he is the LABOUR candidate, and these fools place their group identity (Labour) above all else. (There is a large muslim voting block also but I doubt it is over 50%, but only 1 in 20 voted Tory or UKIP in largely white Gorton).

    The middle class are also to blame. In places where Farage stood as candidate in elections, these middle class fools always voted mainly Tory, even Tory candidates who are clearly open border, and despite most of these Tory voters wanting a closed border.

    So democracy is not working because, due to the way humans do not think logically, they tend to vote in the main for Parties with the OPPOSITE views to their own. I know someone who supports ALL UKIP’s manifesto, and NONE of Labour’s, yet always votes LABOUR. These types would still vote Labour even after Labour evicted them from their own council house to make way for a family from Somalia.

    So the solution lies in the hands of the people and is an easy one. Stop voting for enemy-within traitors who hate your country and want to make it third world. As the people seem intent on not doing this, and instead vote for the 15% who hate them, surely they deserve what is coming to them?

    I would like to see populations start to move and relocate according to politics. Otherwise, we are ALWAYS going to have our 15% bring us down. They are ALWAYS going to gravitate towards government jobs. They are ALWAYS going to gravitate towards social work and education. They have bad genes and they really need to live with other liberals/lefties in their own places.

    “That will not be the case when the native British rise once more against a hostile elite and the alien invasion it has overseen.”

    This could be rephrased:

    That will not be the case when (a) the rich native British stop thinking selfishly about their house price for one minute, and when (b) the poor native British stop thinking selfishly about their welfare bribe and put aside their working class identity and associated hostility to posh people for one minute, and then …. bravely rise up – actually, change that – bravely put a X in a different box – actually change again – JUST VOTE FOR THE PARTY WHOSE POLICIES YOU AGREE WITH YOU STUPID FOOLS.

    Until them most of the 85% really do deserve what is coming to them. They really need to stop using the part of the brain to vote that they use to watch TV adverts and then choose which chocolate or car to buy – a process in which image is all and logic has zero influence.

    Just to give one example of the majority allowing the small vocal minority to order them to lie down and get trampled on. There was a sign about girls and boys (boys get dirty, girls play girls’ games etc) at a garden centre. ONE person objected. The sign was taken down. I suggest over 90% of the people approve of the sign, yet they submit to the 10% who do not.

    Every aspect of this story of the sign, who objected (a very small minority) and who is clearly in charge (the very small minority), every aspect sums up what is happening in the country as a whole. Just as the garden centre immediately submitted prostrate on the floor to the very small minority, so do the people of this country willingly submit prostrate to their 15% far-left. As soon as they stop doing this, all the things they want to stop can be stopped (crime, immigration, excessive sex education for infants, handing over the housing stock to Somalians etc, London becoming Islamic, Halal meat in schools, no discipline in most schools).

    • August 31, 2017 - 3:32 pm | Permalink

      You’ve forgotten to mention Jew control of the media, and Jew control of political parties. Try again.

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        August 31, 2017 - 4:35 pm | Permalink

        @ Rerevisionist

        If this is addressed to me, let me just note that my comments on Jewish influence on the print, television and internet media was more than “mentioned” in a comment that, how shall I put it, failed to appear on this thread.

        The political parties are covered sufficiently by the Oborne and Peston books cited, and I have been working on a monograph covering especially the manipulation of Blair (following Wilson, then Thatcher, and the recent Corbyn/”antisemitism” crisis). To write this all up here would be impracticable.

        Your strictures are directed at me rather than what I have written. I admit that I do not consider that all Jews are evil, nor that all evils are Jewish. Is this the difference between us?

Comments are closed.