National Action, Islam, and Britain’s Lamentable Terrorism Priorities

Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.

The failed improvised explosive device claimed by ISIS

The irony couldn’t have been stronger, nor the despair it engendered more stinging. For ten days the British government, the media, and hostile anti-White social elements had binged on feigned panic and self-satisfaction following the arrest and charging of seven young ethno-nationalists for ‘terrorism’ and ‘race hate’ offences (see here and here). During the course of this Orwellian ‘Ten Day Hate,’ few paused to consider the fact that none of the alleged activities of these individuals met any dictionary definition of terrorism. They were allegedly members of the non-violent, and dubiously proscribed organization ‘National Action.’ They had allegedly engaged in ‘racist’ online conversations. It was claimed they had placed ‘offensive’ stickers around a university campus. But were they terrorists according to the Oxford Dictionary, and most legal understandings of the term? Had they engaged in “the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims”? No such charges had ever been made by the British criminal justice system against National Action, and they have not been made against the recently arrested men.

But you wouldn’t have guessed that from the hyperbolic government statements that poured forth in the hours and days after the arrests. We were told that jailing these young men was a matter of grave national security. The Guardian enthusiastically waded into the fray, reporting that, because some of those arrested were soldiers, the nation should beware a mass ‘neo-nazi’ infiltration of the British armed forces. Interested parties began agitating for yet more non-violent White advocacy groups to be banned. The nebulous threat of ‘racist extremists’ was everywhere and yet nowhere.

And then, just we were reaching peak hysteria about the ‘terrorism threat’ from the ‘Far Right,’ reality reasserted itself, and the stickers and pranks were forgotten. A Muslim terrorist, later claimed by ISIS, left an improvised explosive device on a busy London train at Parsons Green with the intention of causing mass death and destruction. A further rebuke to the delusions of the masses, and the manipulations of the elite arrived in the form of the growing realisation that the bomber may have been working with a former ‘child refugee’ from Syria, a man who had been taken into the home of an elderly and cartoonishly altruistic British couple.

In the final act of this Islamic plot, the device failed to activate as its designers had intended. But in the chaos which followed the burst of flame and rancid smoke, Britons received a perfectly-timed reminder of what terrorism really is, and from which quarters it truly emanates.

The question remains, however: How did we arrive at a situation in which the priorities of the British police and security services are diverted with appalling illogic away from Muslim terrorism into the pursuit of White, non-violent political activists? It is my contention that it is absolutely essential to place the failure of security services and police to prevent this attempt at mass murder within the context of their activity over the last couple of years and their activity in the preceding ten days in particular.

The first point of note is the apparently extensive and wasteful use of police, security service, and armed forces resources in order to chase the paper tiger of ‘far right extremism.’ This fixation and waste of resources can, at least in part, be attributed to the growing influence of bodies promoting multiculturalism within these spheres. As I noted in my analysis of ADL-police co-operation before, during, and after Charlottesville, such groups are very keen to pursue and promote a narrative in which the advocacy of White identity and ideas contrary to their interests and intentions are officially recognised as ‘extremist’ and even ‘terrorist’ by nature. Achieving such a scenario via legislative means has proven difficult, but by encroaching into the educational and policy-forming aspects of these non-governmental (but very powerful) bodies, pro-multicultural groups can advance their agenda quite effectively.

The most common pattern appears to be that existing Leftist multicultural groups will invite police and prosecution officials to conferences or seminars that they arrange, in order to promote their ideas about ‘hate crime,’ ’unconscious White privilege,’ or ‘institutional racism.’ Alternatively, these multiculturalist groups will form offshoot organisations that will adopt a more consciously academic veneer. This pseudo-academic offshoot then attempts to penetrate the formal educational apparatus of police departments or prosecution bodies, eventually gaining influence in the direction and formulation of policy on issues surrounding race and the protection and promotion of the multicultural idea. An excellent example in this regard is the Canadian Anti-Racism Education and Research Society, which is closely allied to the more informal, and avowedly Leftist, Stop Racism Canada. In Britain, the body most closely fitting this pattern is Hope Not Hate, which started as the side project of an editor of Searchlight, a self-styled ‘anti-Fascist’ magazine founded by the Jewish Communist Gerry Gable. If American nationalists don’t have enough opposition already, in the form of the ADL and the SPLC, Hope not Hate has recently announced it plans to expand its activities to the United States.

Such developments can also be accelerated with the assistance of hostile elites. In April, London Mayor Sadiq Khan launched an “online hate crime hub,” which brought various bodies together in order to attack free speech, promote the idea of ‘thought crime,’ and actively hunt for ‘racist’ transgressors on social media. Hope not Hate gleefully reported that “The Hub will be made up of five specially-trained Met police officers who will work with social media organisations, academic hate crime specialists and criminal justice partners to investigate online hate crimes in London [emphasis added].” ‘Academic hate crime specialists’ are invariably Leftist, often Communist, and frequently Jewish — an excellent example being Judy Katz, who formulated a program called ‘White Awareness Training,’ which was imbibed in true ‘Kool Aid’ fashion by American law enforcement and legal professionals. Katz’s program was built on the premise that “racism is a pathological condition from which white people suffer, and by which they are subsequently immobilized. The program concentrates on enabling white people to take responsibility for tackling their own racism and that of other whites at a personal level, and to act on this in their subsequent lives.” This is the kind of anti-White poison one can expect from Mr. Khan’s ‘academic hate crime specialists.’

Aside from direct intervention by hostile bodies in the policies and operations of law enforcement, another reason for the ongoing waste of terrorism resources is the prevalence of the ‘myth of the right wing extremist’ — the subject of my 2016 essay of the same name. In that essay I argued that although violent ethno-nationalists have existed, they are both extremely rare and often very much disengaged from the heart of the movement. Despite recurrent breathless claims, such as Kurt Eichenwald’s Newsweek article claiming that right-wing extremists are more dangerous than ISIS, the reality is far different.  FBI agent Michael German, who spent years undercover with White identity groups remarked that “There are millions of racists in the United States. There are hundreds of thousands of people who are with organized white supremacist groups. Very few actually commit acts of violence.”

But the myth of the “right-wing extremist” is always greater than the sum of his parts. The ‘danger’ he poses is always said to have the implication of violence, but even a cursory analysis reveals that oppositional action is directed solely at his freedom of speech and his ideas. The ‘myth of the right wing extremist’ thus represents an attempt to take attention away from violent non-Whites, and also crucially to silence, discredit, and even criminalize White advocacy.

Disinformation is crucial to the maintenance of the myth. The Southern Poverty Law Center is one of the world’s leading producers of propaganda in this regard, primarily through its Intelligence Report and Year in Hate and Extremism. In the words of Alexander Cockburn, SPLC President Morris Dees “has raised an endowment of close to $100 million [now $302.8 million], with which he’s done little, by frightening elderly liberals that the heirs of Adolf Hitler are about to march down Main Street, lynching blacks and putting Jews into ovens. The fundraising of Dees and the richly rewarded efforts of terror mongers like Leonard Zeskind offer a dreadfully distorted view of American political realities.”

Such distortion is a defining feature of the myth of the right-wing extremist. Faced with increasing violence from immigrants and ethnic minorities, interested parties in government, the media, and academia have been forced to heighten the level of distortion still further, in order to maintain the pretense that a greater threat emanates from the Right. In Britain, this pretense led to the absurd banning of Richard Spencer on the same legislative grounds that had been developed to deal with Muslim preachers calling for jihad and the beheading of non-believers.

The myth of the right wing extremist has become ever more important because there is a palpable conscious straining by the government-police-academia-media nexus to present a narrative in which Muslims are not the sole terroristic threat on British soil — despite overwhelming evidence, in the form of body bags, suggesting that they are. Hope not Hate, and their friends at the Guardian, have been at the forefront in provoking a falsehood-fueled social panic about the Right in order to protect the image and status of multiculturalism and maintain the fashionable trend of being ‘tolerant’ — a task made more difficult when each new Muslim atrocity unhelpfully conflates the message of ‘tolerance’ with images of eviscerated children.

Faced with such a problem, the multiculturalists resort to lies. In the United States, the most egregious example was that of the Center for Investigative Reporting, which released a report in June claiming that there were more ‘right wing’ terrorists than Muslim terrorists in America [the Executive Director of that organization is one Robert Rosenthal, while its executive Chair is named Phil Bronstein].

In the UK, The Guardian led with a piece in November 2016 claiming that “a top counter-terrorism officer has said police fear the threat of far-right violence is growing and poses a similar danger to communities as other forms of extremism.” The officer made no such statement. In response to loaded questions in the wake of the murder of MP Jo Cox he had merely stated that “currently just under 10% of all Prevent [a government ‘anti-extremism’ education program] referrals relate to the extreme right-wing.” It is understood that these involved teenagers engaging in stickering and handing out pamphlets. Far from posing a “similar danger to communities as other forms of extremism,” the officer further elaborated that “the overriding threat remains from Daesh-inspired groups,” that is to say, groups derived predominantly from the Guardian’s much-cherished immigrant populations.

In late 2016 I made a prediction:

Faced with a White identity movement that remains, frustratingly for its opponents, law-abiding and peaceful, we can expect an elaboration on existing tactics. The meaning and definition of words like ‘terrorism’ and ‘extremism’ will themselves be expanded to encompass non-violent entities and individuals in an effort to drag them into hastily constructed spheres of illegality and, thus, deeper social opprobrium and even prison sentences.

Unfortunately, in the wake of the ‘National Action arrests’ my prediction appears to be coming true much faster than I imagined. Young men who might once have been taken into the Orwellian ‘Prevent program’ (to have their capacity for independent thought annihilated) are now more likely to be summarily arrested, charged, and jailed as ‘terrorists’ — their innocence of any form of terrorism being inconsequential in the context of their assumed political beliefs. Influenced by the above-mentioned ‘educational’ efforts of hostile groups, charging and sentencing procedures are likely to be much harsher for those identified as ‘racists.’ [See the London Court of Appeal’s recent admission that the four year sentence of nationalist Lawrence Burns for Facebook comments had been “manifestly excessive.”]

An excellent example of the disparity between the treatment of nationalists and Muslims in alleged cases of terrorism concerns possession of the bomb-making manual The Anarchist Cookbook. Although available for purchase in the UK via Amazon, the British police have developed a habit of going on ‘fishing exercises’ whereby they raid the home of a ‘Far Right’ activist on the slightest available suspicion, in the hope that the individual will have been curious enough to have this publication in his possession. They then use the context of the individual’s political beliefs in order to construct a terrorism narrative.

Consider the case of EDL supporter Ryan McGee, a British soldier, whose home was raided “in an unrelated matter” before police found The Anarchist Cookbook — enabling them to arrest him under terrorism legislation and subsequently jail him for two years. Now consider that when two young Muslims were found with copies of “Anarchist Cookbook, 3.5kg of potassium nitrate and a quantity of calcium chloride,” as well as documents glorifying 9/11 and an apparent plot to “blow up” members of the British National Party, they were released without conviction after complaints of racism and Islamophobia.

Such events provide all the context and precedent required to understand how Britain could indulge in a week of arrests targeting Whites while simultaneously sleepwalking into an attempted Muslim-perpetrated atrocity.

Despite lingering material comfort, Europeans are currently experiencing warfare in both direct and abstract forms. Muslim terrorists continue to plan and perpetrate acts of large-scale violence against Whites. This is the visible war, the one that impacts most obviously and directly in our lives. But Whites are also under attack from another form of warfare — warfare waged in the realm of ideas and concepts. This latter form of warfare interacts with the former, making the violence more digestible or ‘tolerable’ for the host population. This abstract ideological warfare offers an unsophisticated but effective set of apologetics for Islamic violence — ‘not all Muslims,’ ‘don’t look back in anger,’ ‘beat violence with kindness,’ and yes, ’Hope not Hate.’ And perhaps most effectively, this set of apologetics has come to offer an alternative, if entirely fictional boogeyman — the White advocate. The White advocate as ‘folk devil’ has been decades in the making, of course. But he is now undergoing a further evolution — becoming a true social leper, a criminal, a ‘terrorist.’ He has had to undergo this discursive transformation because of the prevalence of real terrorists and murderers. In a way, he is made to atone for their sins.

It is unlikely that Britain will learn from Parsons Green, or see the irony in the Nationalist Action panic of the ten days previous to it. Most Britons will carry on with their lives, and will probably be untroubled even if the two Muslims suspects are released while the seven nationalists remain jailed for years to come. Altruistic old British couples will continue to adopt and nourish ‘child refugees’ from Syria. People will continue to believe that ‘right wing extremists’ are a dire threat to their safety. The masses will continue their failure to question how stickering, and talking with friends, became ‘terror offences.’

This is what happens when a people confuses full stomachs and nice cars with freedom. This is what happens when a people allows its narrative of self to be dictated by foreign tribes and treasonous psychopaths. This is what happens when all checks and balances fail.

I leave the last word to Alex Deakin, the young graduate who, when charges of terrorism were put to him days ago, replied: “I believe I am innocent. I am a prisoner of conscience.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

52 Comments to "National Action, Islam, and Britain’s Lamentable Terrorism Priorities"

  1. Pero Ercegovac's Gravatar Pero Ercegovac
    September 21, 2017 - 9:19 am | Permalink

    The biggest mistake was allowing the SJWs in the 1980s to slowly work their way through the various HR and psychology offices with the armed forces and police. Most of the boys are on our line, they just know that those on top are there as they curried up to the polies and to keep their positions they play the game.

    • September 25, 2017 - 4:01 am | Permalink

      Pero, I hope you are right. If you are, then the armed forces will not turn against us if (when) the SJWs and their zionist pushers decide that we need purging. I wish you could guarantee this. :)

      But then, I am being unreasonable, for there is historical evidence (e.g., Hungary in 1956) of armed forces refusing to act against leftist-besieged nationalists. I hope the enemy has not succeeded to breed the national instinct out of them.

  2. Bob's Gravatar Bob
    September 21, 2017 - 10:07 am | Permalink

    One of the greatest handicaps affecting White resistance in the West is the lack of understanding of the kind of warfare being waged against them… Violence, at least in this phase of the struggle, is not a particularly effective way to defend ourselves.

    The core problem, contrary to what many believe, is not that Muslims are attacking us, or even large scale non-white immigration. The core problem is that Whites have lost control of their own narrative. The (((establishment))) across the West has displaced the White narrative with a Jewish one.

    This is, at its core, a struggle for the hearts and minds of our people. The simplest and perhaps most powerful weapon we have in this struggle is the ability of each and every one of us to speak out openly, honestly and often about these issues to those in our own personal lives and most important of all, to teach our children to embrace OUR narrative and reject all others.

    • Fred Mertz's Gravatar Fred Mertz
      September 21, 2017 - 9:02 pm | Permalink

      With every day that passes the punishment for “speaking out” increases. Moreover, the computer creates a permanent record of one’s statements and software can sort through the haystack to find the offending needles. What is needed is a serious and systematic attempt to destigmatize right-wing ideas. Right wing journalism is remarkable for almost never discussing what can be done to fix things. Is that because we don’t want enemy spies diving our schemes? No, I think it’s because we don’t have any. We’re content to blow off steam and go back to the ball game or at least a comfy couch. While I don’t agree with the young Alt Rightists on much, at least they take themselves seriously and try to actually get something done. Okay, I need my glass of warm milk now.

      • September 22, 2017 - 7:18 am | Permalink

        With respect, you still haven’t grasped that ‘right wing’ is itself a Jewish construction, intended to distinguish from what they call ‘left wing’, ie jewish, attitudes.
        All societies have to have some sort of balance between social attitudes and individual ones; it’s just as legitimate to be left wing (IN THE GENUINE ORIGINAL SERIOUS SENSE) as ‘right wing’.

  3. September 21, 2017 - 11:20 am | Permalink

    On Friday, a bucket inside a train exploded near the Parsons Green tube station during the morning rush hour, panicking the passengers resulting in minor injuries to 29 of them but no one was killed.

    As usual, the US-Israel created terrorist group ISIS took responsibility for planting the ‘bucket bomb’. This is the second London train bombing since July 7, 2005 – a MI5-Mossad false flag operation which killed 56 people including the so-called four terrorists.

    Donald Trump, the Judas goat, claimed on twitter that “those responsible had been in the sights of Scotland Yard.” He also advised PM Theresa May to be tougher and more protective in the fight against terrorism (by whom?). A 2015 British poll had claimed that 2.7 million British Muslims are far more loyal to the country than 300,000 British Jews – many of whom carry Israeli citizenship.

    It is also the fifth faked terrorist attacks since the so-called anti-Israel Jeremy Corbyn secured opposition Labour Party leadership.

    US-based Aanirfan, news website has claimed the Parsons Green incident being a false flag.

    • Reverend leo's Gravatar Reverend leo
      September 21, 2017 - 1:26 pm | Permalink

      Trump was right. The patsy was under obs, as usual. The only thing missing was a throwdown passport and someone who had “survived” Manchester or Barcelona.(that one went down the memory hole at warp speed)

      • September 21, 2017 - 8:43 pm | Permalink

        Both Manchester or Barcelona terrorist events were false flag operations.

        Even before the local police call it a terrorist act – Richard Verber, senior vice-president of the Board of Jewish Deputies, said: “We utterly condemn this brutal attack by terrorists intent on murdering and maiming innocent pedestrians in Barcelona. People of all faiths and none must come together to defeat this evil.”

        The Jewish media had reported that Barcelona attacker took hostages in a nearby Turkish restaurant, however, the claim was dismissed by the local police.

        As expected, ISIS, a US-Israeli creation, took responsibility for the attack – just like Charlie Hebdo, Paris terrorist attacks, and all the recent terrorist attacks in London.

        Pity, ISIS didn’t exist in 2004 to take blame for the Madrid bombing which had Israeli Mossad fingerprints all over. The train bombings occurred one year after one million Spaniards joined up to 30 million other people around the world in protesting the imminent Iraq invasion, an Israel’s proxy war, and in the context of the Spanish people’s overwhelming rejection of the presence of Spanish troops in Iraq.

    • September 21, 2017 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

      Absolutely true. ISIS and al-Qa’eda were both created by the United States. See 4:26

      U.S. Soldiers are ISIS Terrorists
      For al-Qa’eda see
      I have much more on both of these organisations. Just ask.

  4. Reverend leo's Gravatar Reverend leo
    September 21, 2017 - 12:04 pm | Permalink

    Dr J.
    You were reared in the North. This is not a bomb. It is a hoax , a myth, a media event; most likely a drill portrayed as reality. The provos were not poisoning themselves grinding up fertiliser and mixing it with diesel in sheds for fun. Bombs are hard work. This is, according to the narrative a failed TATP bomb synthesized from peroxide hair bleach and chupatti flour. Taking The Piss more like. People are injured by a guttering candle that cannot scorch it’s bucket or burst a wet paper bag, LIDL bag actually. The next terror event will involve a teacup which causes a fireball details a train and scatters shrapnel without actually cracking. We’re heading into that place (((Dalrymple))) described “In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose ofcommunist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better.”
    The media fakery is limitless. You have bravely attacked the fakers without hesiation. Why leave their work untouched.
    Check out the gorgeous red haired colleen in the pink suit with spotless white blouse and the head bandage last seen in the Beano when Dennis had a toothache. There weren’t many like that coming out of the La Mon house.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      September 21, 2017 - 6:40 pm | Permalink

      Yes, I did notice that lady and her bomb-proof make-up!

      Even in genuine false flags like 7/7, actors seem to be used to deliver the iconic shots about which a media narrative will be created. Case in point: the lady-in-the-mask of 7/7, with her dramatic but unreal First Aid treatment and recovery.

      These Islamic terror psy-ops are staged by Big Brother and directed at whites. After Cameron’s speech, one imagines that doubting the Official Story will at some stage be criminalized.

      • Reverend Leo's Gravatar Reverend Leo
        September 21, 2017 - 10:02 pm | Permalink

        Look again at 7/7. Dr Kollerstrom has ripped it apart. Just more fakery. Dr Joyce and I were reared in a heavily bombed country. We saw smelt and felt them all too often. Highly intelligent lads got degrees in inorganic chemistry and electronic engineering for one reason, to make bombs from scratch.
        TATP the go to explosive for these “events ” is stated to be homemade quite easily. It would be, if your home contained a vacuum assisted fractional distillation unit, to concentrate the peroxide and had suitable handling facilities thereafter. In other words you can’t brew it up in the bath. This narrative is given just in case a real life delusional Muslim actually tries to copycat the fakery.
        You can rest assured that if train carriages could be blown apart with homemade TATP the entire tube network would have been demolished by the IRA many years ago.

        Oh and it seems like the CCTV wasn’t working either. FFS!

  5. Reverend leo's Gravatar Reverend leo
    September 21, 2017 - 12:17 pm | Permalink

    Israel Eretz cannot occur without huge exterminations or ethnic cleansing. ISIS have largely accomplished the tricky bit by getting the Christians out. The anti Islam animus they provoke is heartily amplified by having hordes of invading Muslims here raping bombing and pillaging us. The Israelis will make their move when they are sure we are both thoroughly sick of Muslims and powerless to refuse delivery of the final cargo.

  6. m's Gravatar m
    September 21, 2017 - 3:19 pm | Permalink

    I believe that most on the right are interested in order. As such, they tend to be reactionaries, more traditional, and anti-violence. Unlike the left. For their part, Jews have always been on the forefront of revolutionary activity. Rightist neoconservatism is essentially a very violent Jewish thing. Bolshevism, also a Jewish thing–very violent, too.

    Right wing violence will only happen on a large scale if the left (i.e., every current Western regime) completely outlaws the right, leaving rightists with no peaceful means to argue their point. That is happening now, by the way, yet rightist violence has still not appreciably manifested. Who knows how it will go?

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      September 22, 2017 - 5:41 am | Permalink

      There is no “Left” and “Right” today. People with the slightest smattering of nationalism are labeled “Right”, or more comically extreme right and Fascist. Anyone paying attention would recognize that today’s so-called Fascists of the “extreme right” would only be “right” compared to a Communist, whether Marxist/Leninist, Stalinist, or Maoist. Both the “Left” and the “Right” require adherence to traditional dogma, but seldom actually follow it.
      Similarly, violence is neither “Left” nor “Right”, but is is, most often, reactionary, and most of today’s event violence is staged. You have IMO rightly identified those stage managing the events.

    • September 23, 2017 - 3:08 am | Permalink

      “Jews have always been on the forefront of revolutionary activity.” Jews are interested in power, and since they are uncreative, this means comparative power over rivals. They have persuaded many stupid people that they were ‘revolutionary’ when they were raping Russia. These days they are more likely to get other people to fight wars which are only ‘revolutionary’ in the sense of causing damage. How anyone can call the Jewish ‘neocons’ in the USA and their clones elsewhere ‘revolutionary’ suggest either continued failure to look at things clearly, or the presence of yet more funded liars.

  7. Thought Criminal's Gravatar Thought Criminal
    September 21, 2017 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

    What is described here, has been going on for decades. Consider the Duke Lacrosse case as compared to the ignored 10’s of thousands of black on white rapes. We are governed and oppressed by a hostile elite that dances for joy at our demise. We need to band together, avoid violence, speak softly, acquire resources and constantly nibble like termites at the establishment. We must never give up, we can succeed if we chose to, If we believe we can.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      September 22, 2017 - 6:45 am | Permalink

      “We are governed and oppressed by a hostile elite that dances for joy at our demise.”
      There is no-one forcing the people to lie on the floor as ordered to so that they can be trampled over by the third world that the elite have invited/enticed over. The solution is in the hands of the people starting from the moment that they have had enough of the current hostile elite now working in collusion with our various enemies. All the people have to do is put a X in a different box at election time and all the problems can be (a) stopped (b) reversed.

      But for now the people of Europe clearly have not had enough – hence LePen was rejected. Hence Farage has never been put in parliament.

      The people are basically being slapped in the face by the elite who own the MSM and are begging for more. Very odd. And very selfish, as the problems they cause by voting for the hostile elite are going to be visited on the next generation. So this stupid and selfish and pampered generation can continue to live in their white middle class areas and vote Labour and Liberal or for traitors like T. May whilst they spend their time contemplating their house price.

  8. September 21, 2017 - 4:41 pm | Permalink

    “We do it because we find it rewarding” the ‘cartoonishly altruistic’ couple are stated to have said. Google helpfully provides further information: ‘We offer allowances of £420 – £750 per week per child. Plus additional allowances and tax exemptions.’ That’s real atruism.

  9. September 21, 2017 - 6:38 pm | Permalink

    Interested parties began agitating for yet more non-violent White advocacy groups to be banned.

    Here! Here! I’m all for Jews banning non-violent, white advocacy groups because that leaves only one option open and it’s about time.

  10. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    September 21, 2017 - 7:28 pm | Permalink

    Accepting the State’s anti-Muslim propaganda is counterproductive for nationalists. Expedient though it be now, it will strengthen the hand of the neo-conservatives when the next opportunity arises for military intervention in the Middle East.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      September 22, 2017 - 12:51 pm | Permalink

      Trenchant – I do not see how you interpret what the state is doing as being ‘anti-muslim’. People like Tommy Robinson are arrested for saying things against muslims. Someone who said ‘all muslims must be killed’ on Facebook after the Manchester bomb has been sentenced to 12 months in prison. The state is clearly on their side. And see the arrest a couple of days ago of ‘Britain First’ leaders also in connection with criticising the muslims. The British government spends 9 billion a year monitoring the more extreme muslims and never objects or makes a fuss or releases ANY MSM stories about this expense – the government simply reduces the rest of the police numbers to save money and closes down most police stations to save costs.

      After every terror attack Theresa May comes out and tells us that Islam is a religion of peace.

      We must not throw away reason and logic just in order to befriend a group that is hostile to the Jews. You cannot say that because they are enemies of the Jews they must be our friends.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        September 22, 2017 - 8:51 pm | Permalink

        Neither the Jewish nor the Muslim community are monolithic, though both historically tend towards authoritarian leadership. What the average Muslim or Jew thinks doesn’t necessarily inform the decisions of the Elders, so while “non-professional” Jews and Muslims distrust or loathe each other, workable and mutually advantageous (albeit underplayed or covert) relations exist between Organized Jewry and the Islamic organizations in Western nations, bopth united against the white Christian majority. On this animosity towards whites, minority leaders are aligned with their respective bases.

        Of these two hostile entities, only Organized Jewry presents an existential threat in the short term, by virtue of its sway over the apparatus of State, media and money. Muslim immigration in the West plays an important role not only in the obvious, gradual demographic replacement of autochtones, but also – as inferred by “Reverend Leo” – in the Eretz Israel agenda. The State creates the terror event, attributes blame to “radical Islam”, and can be satisfied that neither Joe Average nor Mohammed Median will see or accept that notional distinction. The staged event will exacerbate the existing tensions between Joe and Mohammed, but in a way functional to Zionist objectives. The indulgence with which the State and media treat Mohammed and the harshness meted out to Joe doesn’t go unnoticed. It energizes the Muslim, his arrogance on show for all to see. With no outlet in the public domain (“hate-speech”), Joe’s anger is suppressed, and thereby magnified. This repressed white anger, rather than finding expression in domestic politics, can be uncapped and released at an opportune moment against an enemy of Israel’s choosing.

        “Britain First” does indeed merit quotation marks; in reality it’s a distinct second, with rallies awash with azure and white. Tommy Robinson, likewise, enjoys protection at the highest level of Jewry. Despite theatrical arrests, he won’t be treated harshly for stirring up anti-Muslim sentiment. Stand with Israel! never got anyone a long, hard jail sentence.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          September 22, 2017 - 9:00 pm | Permalink

          It’s obvious that staged terror events reinvigorate a sense of identity among non-professional Jews. The sense of being under attack always translates into full coffers for Organized Jewry in the Diaspora. And might possibly see young, fighting-age Jews return to Israel.

        • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
          September 24, 2017 - 3:14 am | Permalink

          Trenchant – thanks for the explanation. The suicide of the West certainly demands an explanation. I suppose this is the purpose of this blog – to discuss why this is happening and who is causing it.

          “both united against the white Christian majority. On this animosity towards whites, minority leaders are aligned with their respective bases.”

          We can see that there is indeed co-operation at the top levels against us, eg the Board of Deputies wants more immigration:

          “Support Refugees was set up and is managed by The Jewish Council for Racial Equality (JCORE) and West London Synagogue of British Jews.Special thanks to JLGB, who helped get the website off the ground and to the Jewish Social Action Forum, where the idea for such a website first arose.
          It is supported across the community, including the following organisations:
          Board of Deputies
          Liberal Judaism
          Masorti Judaism
          Movement for Reform Judaism
          Office of the Chief Rabbi
          United Synagogue”

          The website above has been removed after I kept quoting it on Breitbart before I was banned (I am not sure if the removal was due to this repeated mentioning).

          But this one with the rabbis supporting immigration has NOT been removed:

          So as regards your top comment, yes they share an animosity towards the West and are taking full advantage of the way that in the West the lefty whites have become dominant. The lefty whites hate the West, the lefty Jews do and the more extreme muslims do also. So these are THREE subgroups who wish to bring about our demise. Two declare loyalty to other countries and the third (lefty whites) have no other loyalty and their only feelings are negative ones toward their own country.

          The three groups are hostile for different reasons, the Jews who hate us do so because we are a ‘different tribe’ (the fact that we seek friendship and co-operation and give them money and are their allies in wars makes no difference) and these urges are, in my view, simply genetic, ie they are wired or programmed to be loyal to their own tribe and – going with this trait – hostile to others. THERE NEEDS TO BE NO LOGIC in this as it is a wiring trait. So we do not need to look for other motives (power, money, profits, globalism) and simple racism programmed at the genetic level towards other tribes is sufficient to explain everything they do. Westerners feel little or no such racial loyalty to their own (being individualistic), so they cannot imagine it in others. Being non-racist makes them oblivious to the racism of other races, and indeed to have no objection when the government invites over other races that are racist. And since this racism is at the genetic level, it cannot be educated out of these new arrivals, and cannot be removed. It is so strong that those driven by these inner urges will even seek to bring down the countries that provide them with all their wealth.

          The muslims share this tribal-loyalty gene with the Jews – it is present in Indians who are not muslims as well as arabs – fiercely loyal to tribe and nation/religion. Of course when all external enemies are defeated and removed from their lands, they resume fighting at the tribal level. If there is no tribal fighting, they resume it at the family level. So there is constant strife and conflict. They are programmed to form groups and get into conflict. Africans also have this set of genes. Kevin Macdonald often discusses the differences of race behaviour based on genes – individualistic genes in Westeners and tribal genes in other races.

          I think it is a mistake of many in this forum to focus so strongly on the harm the lefty Jews do that they end up sympathising with the muslims, simply on the basis that the muslims are their enemy, and ‘my enemy’s enemy is my friend’. And a mistake for others to lump all whites together and say they ‘support all whites’ when in fact about 15% of whites are true lefties and who are wired to hate the whites (because they hate any better group – they do not mind pale-skinned arabs). At present whites are being genocided in S.Africa and the Dutch government gives NO RIGHTS for Boers of pure Dutch descent ANY rights to return to Holland – they are more likely to accept black Africans and muslims as immigrants The same applies to Britain and descendants of the British being genocided. How can any patriot identify with or be loyal to this sub-group of whites who now run the authorities and stop these whites returning from Africa to their respective countries? How can any patriot identify with them or feel any affinity with them, simply because they are white? It is like finding a cancer tumor in your body and telling the doctor not to remove it as it is still ‘part of my body’.

          If all the Jews and non-whites left the West, do you think the suicide would stop? In my view it would hardly slow down. The Jews are financiers and promoters of our downfall, but they are only speeding up a process that we are inflicting upon ourselves anyway.

          In this context the dominant culture on the West is one of self-hate, and this originates and is driven by WHITES LEFTIES – a genetic subset of the population who are helped by lefty Jews who cheer on our left and finance them and make films to support the self-hate narrative. But the lefty Jews did not think it up or start it in the first place, it is just that they have the lefty hate PLUS the arab-gene-racsim that makes them even more active over their hate.

          In this context politicians like Cameron and May end up chosen as leaders because they themselves have no opinions and they just reflect the current dominant culture and blow the way the wind is blowing. Our government are a mixture of those who actively hate us and who are responsible for the current culture of self-hate, plus those who just go along with the narrative but do not actively hate us, and would, if another elite took over, switch loyalties. It is hard to say which politicians would switch loyalties and which would work away to undermine us even if a different elite took over and provided a new culture of patriotism and self-interest.

          Having no principles, it does not disturb May the way she presided as Home Secretary over mass immigration and was therefore a complete failure. Because she has no principles and did not mind presiding over mass immigration as Home Secretary, whilst giving the image of being ‘conservative’, that is why the elite chose her as PM – she will have no objection in principle to continuing to allow damage to this country to carry on unabated in her current role. She will let the left carry on inflicting more damage and all the while absorb the votes of conservative people. In other words, she does the bidding of the left, but she presents an image of conservatism to the voters.

          In this contest this COWARDLY and TREACHEROUS prime minister observes that the muslims are getting violent and troublesome. She therefore spends 9 billion a year monitoring the most extreme 3000 of them. The elite are more keen than anyone else that these 3000 muslims do not kick off too soon. If they really wanted to turn the people against the muslims, they would simply do less monitoring and let a few more of them kick off.

          The elite want more of them to come over so that when they do kick off they will be in a stronger position. The left want them to carry on pretending to be a ROP for a longer time. The elite – such as the government and the TV media – are desperately trying to STOP THE HOST POPULATION from being antagonised by the muslims. This is why they down play their terrorism, and why in the US the Fort Hood massacre was called ‘work place violence’. It is why Grenfell is on the news all the time but not the Manchester bomb, which they want the people to forget. In local schools the days after the bomb in Manchester the local heads told the children to respond with ‘love and not be afraid’ ie do not respond with anger. The elite never allowed photos of the Manchester bomb to be released (the bomb itself not even the bodies!). They ‘did not want to upset the victims’ is the reason given, but the real reason is they do not want the indigenous to see thses picures and then be angry and to start objecting to their own replacement, or even to be aware of it. If the authoriites wanted to make the host population angry they would show dead white bodies. They do not. Contrast that with the way they showed the refugee baby on the beach.

          The muslims are kicking off and this is antagonising the host population against them, and the government does NOT want the host population antagonised against the muslims, as if they are so they might stop voting for their own demise and for more mass immigration.

          The left are desperate for the muslims to stop anatagonising the host population and not kick off too soon, so they can bring more over.

          As for who you said can more easily be dealt with – as R Spencer says in his Red Ice interviews, the Jews were firmly entrenched in past centuries with royalty (ie the elite of the time), so that if royalty turned on them they could cause damage – bankrupt the country etc, but the point is that even though they could cause such damage, this did not always stop them being expelled. So they CAN be expelled if you accept the penalty ie the damage. It is like a blackmailer – sometimes the victim continues to pay, but sometimes they expose the blackmailer and suffer the consequences, and then all the power of the blackmailer is then ended and he can be dealt with. In other words, hostile groups can be dealt with if you accept the hardship it will cause. As for dealing with the other enemy within – the extreme muslims – there are ways that do not involve war. If their family benefits continue to be paid for their lifetimes whilst they return to their homelands (and children born here and even 3rd generation refer to Pakistan etc as ‘my country’) they will willingly follow the money.

          • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
            September 24, 2017 - 6:11 pm | Permalink

            Well, yes, we’re in agreement that the hostile coalition would be ineffectual or perhaps non-existent (Muslims a recent and novel phenomenon) without the leftist agenda of centralization of power. Pace Orwell, it was always (((Big Brother))).

          • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
            September 25, 2017 - 6:45 am | Permalink

            While I agree with most of what you assert, I strongly disagree with “the leftist agenda of centralization of power”. The old political paradigms are dead. It wasn’t “the left” that put the Big Brother Homeland Security and Patriot Act in place. They were brought in by a “right wing” President and the “conservative” House, then rubber stamped by both the “Left” and “Right” in the Senate.
            These days, it doesn’t matter whether the label is “Left” or “Right” the centralization continues. It seems only the racist, homophobic, Islamophobic, neo-Nazi Fascists are opposed.

        • September 26, 2017 - 10:34 am | Permalink

          Both Jews and Christians have powerful organized religious/political institutions such as Papacy, Archbishop of Canterbury and Jewish Lobby groups in the US, Canada and every European country. In contrast, there is no Papacy in Islam. Every Believer is his/her own priest or rabbi.

          Some Muslim countries have government appointed Chief Muftis such as in Saudi Arabia and Egypt while Iran has its Grand Ayatullah Ali Khamenei. However, their decrees (fatwas) are for local consumption only.

          The western problem is that while both Pope Francis and Archbishop Canterbury, whose parents were German Jews, work for the organized Jewry – Muftis and Ayatullahs loath organized Jewry and its 70 million Zionist Christians.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            September 27, 2017 - 11:55 am | Permalink

            Every Believer is his/her own priest or rabbi. … Muftis and Ayatullahs loath organized Jewry and its 70 million Zionist Christians.

            What then does this say about the fact that the millions of your fellow raggle-taggle Muslims have come to the lands of the hated kaffir with the full support of the Jews you claim to loathe? And how convenient for all of you independent-minded followers of a sexually degenerate, bloodthirsty, and otherwise squalid desert “prophet” that you arrive at precisely the same conclusion: death or enslavement for all white and Christian men, and gang rape followed by death or enslavement for all white and Christian women, with no exemption given to the Western morons whose tax money is being used to pay for your comfortable relocation in their ancestral lands! Besides, who needs authority figures when every Muslim moron reaches the same conclusions?

            You yourself may hate the Jews, Rehmat, but you’ve made it plain that you hate us even more.

          • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
            September 27, 2017 - 2:24 pm | Permalink

            Please tell us what you really think.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            September 27, 2017 - 8:54 pm | Permalink

            Frankly, Curmudgeon, I regret that I didn’t bottle up my anger rather more before I hit Post Comment. I might easily have made the same points—and made them to better effect—with half the words.

          • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
            September 28, 2017 - 12:46 pm | Permalink

            It was a very gentlemanly anger. One that you do much better than I, so much so, that I do my utmost not to reply to Rehmat’s ramblings, lest I be banned from the site.

  11. September 21, 2017 - 7:39 pm | Permalink

    In Britain, the body most closely fitting this pattern is Hope Not Hate, which started as the side project of an editor of Searchlight, a self-styled ‘anti-Fascist’ magazine founded by the Jewish Communist Gerry Gable. If American nationalists don’t have enough opposition already, in the form of the ADL and the SPLC, Hope not Hate has recently announced it plans to expand its activities to the United States.

    Perhaps whites should form a counter group called “Death not Hate” with the tag line: “Don’t hate! – Eliminate!” Or did a rock group get there first?

  12. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    September 22, 2017 - 12:20 am | Permalink

    A problem this and other websites have in exposing hypocrisy and double standards of the post-war World is that they risk radicalising the wrong people. If I am an unemployed, underachieving Muslim from a sink estate (a project) in London, Paris or Barcelona then anecdotes about the Charlie Hebdo journalists will fuel my contempt for the West. The “alt right” are doing the work of the radicals for them. This was something the British never got during the “troubles” of Northern Ireland where all British journalists including the “left” were consistently “alt right” in their reporting tone throughout the thirty plus years of the conflict.

    • September 22, 2017 - 7:25 am | Permalink

      The (((British))) journalists failed to mention Jew activity throughout the ‘conflict’.

  13. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    September 22, 2017 - 2:28 am | Permalink

    “Despite lingering material comfort, Europeans are currently experiencing warfare in both direct and abstract forms. ”

    There is an ‘internal cold war’ going on, a sort of simmering civil war. Between lefty whites and their allies and the rest – the majority. Although the lefty whites (ie indigenous people, plus their white allies who are not indigenous and who are clearly loyal to another country, but like to pose as being identical to indigenous when it suits them) are perhaps 15% or less, nevertheless they control all those professions to which the left feel called – education, politics and media.

    In the current cold civil war it is striking how suddenly more open the left have become. For example film ‘stars’ joining in enthusiastically to ‘welcome refugees’ etc (a few decades ago this would have been unheard of), and the TV media dropping any pretence of balance. Perhaps this is because these professions are now dominated by a new young generation that have been brought up fully immersed in the lefty narrative, and no longer constrained by attitudes left over from previous times.

    We should not assume that every tactic of the left is drawn from some magic book of ‘ideal tactics to use’. They are acting on their inner political urges, not from some co-ordinated plan. This leads to many bad tactics. For example, the left COULD have held back on mass immigration as slowly slowly was working very well, but they could not help themselves. This is likely to cause a wave of backlash against them. The same goes for the anti-white narrative being so strong at present – this ‘overdrive in the narrative’ is awakening many whites who previously had no interest in politics – awakening them to what the left are doing, ie the way the left hate whites for running more civilised – superior even – countries.

    “Despite lingering material comfort, Europeans are currently experiencing warfare in both direct and abstract forms. ”

    This is the key. For now the young are glued to their expensive phones as they walk around in £150 trainers and have never starved in their lives. The inevitable consequence of socialism is economic collapse, and when this occurs, the people will drop the self-hate narrative currently provided by the left, and instead adopt one of self-interest.

    The people can then vote for a different elite and a new cultural narrative. The left can only sell them the narrative of self-hate whilst they remain safe and pampered.

    People are generally aware that the left have taken over the legal profession and are arresting anyone who commits Thought Crime. They do not actually like this but they are so selfish and apolitical that most assume that provided they nod to the narrative of the left it will never affect them. They have no idea what the left has in store for their country, no idea because of their apathy and selfishness in submitting to the left (ie voting for them). The left want to do to them that which it is doing to white S.Africa. Or, to do it to their descendants – but they are too selfish to care. All they think about is their mortgage.

    So the wealthy and 98% white people in wealthy Eastbourne just elected a LIBERAL MP ie one from the party most keen on mass immigration. This sums up the stupidity and selfishness of the whites, and illustrates just how many genetic lefties we have in our midst, such that wealthy white people would vote this way, even though they themselves chose a safe and white area to live in, where they can spend the rest of their lives basking in thoughts about the value of their property.

    I hope that one day the lefty whites can be identified as the enemy who are causing our downfall in league with others, and can move to their own special countries.

    • September 22, 2017 - 7:35 am | Permalink

      They aren’t ‘lefty’. They are Jews and Jew-run people, including miscellanies like Masons, Common Purpose, everyone (eg actors, social workers) forced to accept the Jew agenda. Similarly ‘liberal’ under Jew terminology doesn’t mean liberal in any traditional sense; it just means Jewish. Similarly, ‘socialism’, ie some sort of attempt to remove great inequalities, doesn’t ‘inevitably’ mean economic collapse – the Jew-run USSR was not ‘socialism’. The category of whites causing damage is those that kowtow to Jews – they may be ‘Labour’ party simple woman or old teachers, or media people forced to sign Equity things, or teachers forced to working to some ridiculous curriculum, or people in some spurious ‘charity’, or local authority people forced to house invaders forced on them, or people in some legal place doing what Jews say as they arrange riots or whatever, or people in the police doing what they’ve been told by some undemocratic secretish group. The white enemy is chiefly those who have an option, but decide to work with Jews.

      • September 25, 2017 - 3:44 am | Permalink

        What you have said here, Revisionist, is spot-on. I have experienced the categories of ‘white enemy’ that you outline. I would imagine that so has anyone who has attempted to raise Identitarian/Nationalist/Revisionist issues with these types, or dared to raise the Jewish question in their hearing. Very sadly, and very dangerously, these people are the ‘average person’, i.e., the most numerous on the broad ‘middle’ social strata. Those of them that I sort-of understand are the still-working professionals: They need their incomes, and would certainly lose those incomes if they dared to speak out against the Jewish-media-imposed social value system. So they keep schtum. But there are other categories:

        There are the powerful establishment figures, like the bishop who defrocks the genuinely Christian priest (I have in mind Revd Dr Stephen Sizer) who pleads the cause of the Palestinians and asserts their right to treatment as people by Israelis, and who refutes the heresy of the Schofield ‘bible’ that interprets the KJV Bible as saying that unless you adore Jews and Israel you will be damned. (The C of E is raddled with this bishop’s calibre of leader.)

        There is also the bigot, like the social worker who reads nothing but ‘knows’ that Nationalists are moral renegades. This bigot frustrates one to screaming point, for it is assertive, opinionated, rude and pig-ignorant. One I know well, whom I tried to engage in a conversation about the appalling harassment by the CAA of musician Alison Chabloz, and the apparent police co-operation in that harassment, told me that the subject I raised is ‘deeply repugnant’ (!) to her. It (this cut of person) is so used to organising people into what is ‘good for them’ that it has become delusional: it actually thinks it is omniscient. That makes it impervious to reasoned discourse.

        (Thank goodness for the Occidental Observer: it is the guardian of our sanity.)

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      September 22, 2017 - 9:02 am | Permalink


      “There is an ‘internal cold war’ going on, a sort of simmering civil war. Between lefty whites and their allies”

      I agree with the statement, but there is a ‘slow burn war’ called reproduction; something the white population (especially males) is going to have to take much more seriously! The left and their allies are very aware of the “SBW” and never mention it, because they know they’re winning it!

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        September 25, 2017 - 5:24 am | Permalink

        Michael Adkins. Agreed; we are living in strange times when the state has been taken over by those who hate better people, and who use their position to divert the nation’s wealth to the breeding of the white underclass, and to other left-wing projects such as luring over the third world.
        But the election in Germany suggests that a small minority are at last beginning, very slowly, to wake up. 13% is a start.
        When the indigenous people, as a result of the policies of the treacherous left and their allies, when they lose their safety and wealth and comforts, and feel they are strongly discriminated against in their own country, they will wake up, and think differently and vote differently. Then changes can be made rapidly once a new and patriotic elite takes over to replace the traitors that the people now vote for.

  14. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    September 22, 2017 - 6:02 am | Permalink

    “Young men who might once have been taken into the Orwellian ‘Prevent program” are now more likely to be summarily arrested, charged, and jailed as ‘terrorists’ — their innocence of any form of terrorism being inconsequential in the context of their assumed political beliefs.”

    This shows the extreme arrogance of the establishment and is a critical and dangerous mistake. The more the opposition (especially in their youth) is driven underground the stronger it becomes.

    When the system is strong, we remain stationery. When the system is weak, we advance.

    Kai Murros

  15. royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
    September 22, 2017 - 6:28 am | Permalink

    Being in Iceland, one gets the feeling that Icelanders are extremely polite…, but also extremely non-committal.

    Getting an Icelandic stranger to give a concrete opinion on a controversial topic**
    [not the usual “..Jew sanctioned..” version of controversial, but “..really..” controversial]
    is practically impossible.

    They tend to smile a lot and,
    like a clever “…buck-passer…” and,
    at the first available opportunity,
    they slip out of the conversation, the room and the building as innocuously as possible never to be seen again.

    However, there are some cases where escapism is not possible.
    One such case is the community centre where I spend my days multiplying my meager but growing fortune by doing on-line Foreign Exchange and Commodities Trading using tactics based on my extensive knowledge of the [redacted] Jew World Order.

    Incidentally, I have looked at the “…advice…” obtainable by on-line (((“…Experts…”))) in the field of ForEx Trading and,
    on the whole, find them to be incredibly fraudulent and totally misleading!

    To continue…, this Community Centre is a Mecca for everything that is wrong with the West.
    The staff is comprised almost entirely of cuck-socking liberals and mixed race defectives, however, as far from reality that they are in their world view, they are clever enough to realize that
    by mal-adapting to the top-down inversion of social mores (treason by any other name),
    they can pull in huge salaries for, in essence, comforting the sensibilities of a plethora of
    second tier “…Actors Leeches…” specializing in the “…genre of mentally or physically retarded mimickry…”,
    genuinely anatomically deformed welfare dependents,
    and a plethora of Northern and Sub-Sahara African Economic “…Crypto Asylum Seekers-cum-Invaders…”.

    However, the one thing they all share in common is the fact that THEY KNOW their “…Free Ride…” is totally dependent on maintaining the prevailing, politically correct, ill-Liberal Paradigm.

    IMO, beside the all-pervasive attack,
    in the attempt to destroy any sentient awareness of the innate Spirit within the White Man,
    one of the primary weapons used by the [redacted] Jew World Order in getting White people to willingly assist in their own extinction,
    is the softening of or the making genteel of the character of White people.
    Everything consumed or produced these days seems to be either refined or processed.
    In this kind of environment, a “…Turn the Tables of the Money Changers’…” guy like me can create a lot of waves.

    I have said this before, but I will repeat it now:
    I am sick of living. I wish I was dead. Yet, without getting into the philosophical reasons for my opinions, committing suicide is just not the “…right…” way to go.
    The most ideal way would be to just fast until one “…Transcends…”…, which is actually what I am doing now.
    Every month I shed a few more Kilograms.
    My weight loss is steady and unrelenting.
    Soon I will just be able to “…leave…”.

    However, besides continuing “…The Fight…” as long as I am still alive, a good second choice method of dying would be to be murdered by someone else…, martyrdom by any other name.
    Hoping long these lines that one day some reactive mental case plunges a knife into my back or some such cruelty, I have begun to express myself in a more and more truthfully obnoxious manner.

    By telling the idiots who attempt to engage me in debate,
    at the first sign of irrationality,
    in an unabashed, unemotional yet very forceful and extremely deep and loud voice,
    that they are in fact retarded, demonically possessed, cowardly, or any other completely offensive truth that I can muster.
    has become a habit I rather enjoy.
    I have turned to brushing them aside like,
    to borrow a phrase from Hillary Clinton,
    the basket of deplorables, that they truly are.

    The men all have these alto soprano voices who feel the need to make up after one of my confrontations by hugging me, and the women are constantly telling me to “…be nice…”.

    My response to both these requests if is often to tell them to go [redact] themselves!

    Mind you, I do not descend to these depths until the opposition has made a “..manifestly obvious yet without proof..” argument that simply cannot be met with reasonable debate.

    I would say that my behaviour is actually a form of verbal violence.
    It is also the point in the discussion where,
    if I were a medieval Viking,
    I would promptly hack off the head of my opponent for being treasonous or dishonourable.

    The remarkable thing about the whole process is that there are several ill-Liberal onlookers who can “…see…” what I am saying and, in private, shake my hand for being strong enough to tell the truth as I see it and to stick to my convictions.

    • Floda's Gravatar Floda
      September 22, 2017 - 4:19 pm | Permalink

      Roy Albrecht: I think you are in need of help. Get out more, marry one of the beautiful Icelander girls and have Aryan children, become better and better at the currency trading caper, set financial goals, stop worrying about the scheming Jews because they don’t give a Rat’s Ass about you!

      Mach’s Gut!
      Bernhard Busch Australien

      • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
        September 24, 2017 - 7:03 am | Permalink

        In lieu of not being able to face my opponent directly, I usually just ignore Retarded Jewish Trolls.

        (((Their))) primary purpose is to distract, inflame, incite anger and generally waste the energy of people who are trying to make a positive difference.

        I thought about explaining the psychotic mind set behind this Jew’s post, but regular TOO readers don’t need an explanation because they see this kind of thing all the time and the new readers of TOO…,
        although new to the Deformed Jew Topic,
        will also no doubt have an innate instinctual understanding as to why this Deformed Life Form should simply be ignored.
        Case closed.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      September 25, 2017 - 5:27 am | Permalink

      Roy – if you go prematurely you might lose the chance to convert a few people to your way of thinking, apart from anything else. So, stay around and make a contribution to mankind by bringing some people to your way of thinking. Now, go to a restaurant and treat yourself to a slap-up meal!

      • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
        September 27, 2017 - 6:55 am | Permalink

        The beauty of , “…going purposefully…” (as opposed to “…prematurely…”) is that not only does one keep working on one’s “…fatally ordained earthly…” task but one optimizes one’s faculties along the Path.
        Ever striving to improve quality while decreasing quantity moves metabolic function toward maximum performance.
        As overall performance increases, efficacy at ones “…ordained earthly task…” will also increase.

        Unfortunately, not being a scholarly type, examples of messages trying to be conveyed are limited to rather base or even dubious sources and this case is not different.
        The good thing about TOO is that there is an ever growing number of “…serious experts..” (as opposed to Jew-created “…Faux-Experts…”) from almost field of academia who will set me straight the moment I step out of line.
        Keeping the above in mind, I am reminded of the movie “…Gandhi…” featuring Ben Kingsley.
        Aside from the usual Anti-White Hate propaganda in the film, I assume the movie to be a largely accurate representation of historical events at the time.
        Specifically, the respect Gandhi garnered from not only the Hindu and Islamic adherents, but from every minority peoples within the entire unified Sub-continent.
        What I found most impressive was the ability of Gandhi to bring a raging civil war to a complete ceasefire through the simple act of fasting to the point of near death.
        His message to the nation was:
        “…Lay down your arms and see the brotherhood amongst yourselves or I am out of here…”.

        I know.., how narcissistic of me to compare my own fed-up feelings with what is happening and the snails pace at which things are changing for the better
        my desire to leave this life
        to the great achievements of Gandhi,
        but it is the principle that I am pointing to not the specific case.

        If David Duke,
        being probably the most well known and widely respected leadership figure within the European Advocacy Movement,
        suddenly decided to pull a “…Gandhi Maneuver…”,
        not only would he energize the entire movement,
        he would probably attract a lot of attention to the cause as well…,
        to say nothing of purifying himself and bringing himself closer to his own Spiritual Essence.

        All the above are only positive things.

  16. September 22, 2017 - 10:48 am | Permalink

    “If you tolerate this without working every single remaining day of your life for a White revolution, you are a sorry excuse for a White man or woman. ” Chris Rossetti, National Vanguard.

  17. September 22, 2017 - 11:19 am | Permalink

    Off-immediate-topic. I just found, by chance, [ie Dandelion] a presumably Jewish outfit to supply actors/’activists’/ written stuff/”increasing life expectancy in Detroit’s hardest hit Zip code”/ ‘non-profit etc. My interpretation anyway.

  18. September 22, 2017 - 4:05 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article and commentaries, but here’s the rub, and it is not getting enough attention: ‘Most Britons will carry on with their lives, and will probably be untroubled even if the two Muslims suspects are released while the seven nationalists remain jailed for years to come.’
    Yes! But these ‘seven nationalists’ are soldiers! It behoves them to be nationalists. So why is the military top brass not giving them muscular protection? Is it because even that top brass is squarely on the Jewish Left? I seriously fear so.
    And some of you might know of Reverend Dr Stephen Sizer. He delivered brilliant sermons condemning the vile Israeli crimes against Palestinians, and pointing out the heresy of the lying perversion of the KJV Bible by the ludicrously pro-zionist Schofield ‘bible’s’ psuedo-explications of it. Dr Sizer’s bishop first gagged him, then fired him, to please the Jewish Board of Deputies, who had complained about Dr Sizer. The silly little mannikin, the present Archbishop of Canterbury, weighed in his puny person by screeching about Dr Sizer’s being ‘a disgrace’.
    Seriously: This is the Church of England top brass! You would think it would have told to the Jews to bugger off when they requested the punishment of Dr Sizer. But the C of E top brass did no such thing. Indeed, it threw itself against Dr Sizer.
    So is the scenario as bleak as I see it … that is, are even our armed forces, like our Christian Church, zionist occupied? If they are (and they sure look as if they are) what good is ‘rational argument’ from us? Then again, what other recourse/resource do we have?
    I make so bold as to suggest one: If you are in Britain, join the London Forum, a consortium of well dressed, well bred establishment types. Or start your own similar forum. Demonstrate regularly, in large numbers, to counteract the skin-head image so long forced upon the Right. Demand to know who in the establishment is serving British and not zionist interests. Condemn the ZOG. Demand the return of the hereditary Lords to the Upper House. (Oh, you all know the sort of thing! Why are we not doing it? I think I know: If you are still in your good professional career, you fear, with good reason, that you will lose it it; if you are retired, you are no longer physically strong enough to go on demos. Or, like me, you are just plain scared of the horrific ruthlessness of the Left/the Jews. God help us. But thank you for this heartening information, Dr Joyce: ‘FBI agent Michael German, who spent years undercover with White identity groups remarked that “There are millions of racists in the United States. There are hundreds of thousands of people who are with organized white supremacist groups… ” ‘)

  19. Michael McCarthy's Gravatar Michael McCarthy
    September 27, 2017 - 4:17 am | Permalink

    If the good folk on this site, counter currents and the altright site’s, could put together a booklet containing the essential essays on the subject. This collection could then be hand delivered to all politicians, senior police officers and military commanders. Build and maintain these relationships. Educate them, work with them. We need them. At present, our people do not have a government, a police force or military that primarily serves us but that is in a death grip of those that are fully intent on our destruction. I work each day to red pill our prison guards. Please, do the same. Thanks.

Comments are closed.