Review of Gilad Atzmon’s “Being in Time”

Being in Time by Gilad Atzmon (Skyscraper Publications, UK, 2017)

…the Radical party, who, to gratify their political prejudices, would join with Satan himself. (George Borrow, Lavengro, Chapter XLII)

In this well-produced and sturdily presented 213-page book the internationally celebrated jazz musician and political commentator continues the analyses of Jewish religion, culture, history and political influence in world politics which he initiated earlier in his 2011 book The Wandering Who?: A Study of Jewish Identity Politics. After reading it twice, I conclude that, among other things, he has provided very strong support for two men, often publicly reviled, whom I have admired and thought much about since 1964: Eric Butler, founding director of The Australian League of Rights, and Captain A. H. M. Ramsay, the British Conservative MP in the 1930s and 1940s.

Butler in 1946 published his book The International Jew which was very strongly attacked by hostile critics as being a deplorable anti-Semitic tract. His unwise use of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as a framework for his study made the book an easy target, though its hostile critics did not successfully come to terms with its overall contents. However, his use as an epigraph of a sentence by Oscar Levy, who in his time was a famed Jewish writer and disciple of Nietzsche, would appear to have been thoroughly justified now by Atzmon, another Jew. ‘The question of the Jews and their influence on the world, past and present, cuts to the root of all things and should be discussed by every honest thinker.’ That could equally be an excellent epigraph for Being in Time.

Atzmon cites Yuri Slezkine’s 2006 book The Jewish Century as a confirmation of ‘Jewish dominance’ in world politics. He writes: ‘I do not care about ethnicity, biology or race, but I do care about ideology…. I see the cultural and ideological impact of Jerusalem on pretty much every aspect of Western life. But, unlike most commentators, I allow myself to voice my criticism of that aspect.’

Butler, following C. H. Douglas, identified the seat of the world’s ills in a corrupt financial system manipulated by a wealthy elite, largely if not wholly Jewish. Atzmon identifies the bad, ‘trade-oriented’ side of capitalism as ‘Mammon: banking, stock market, investment, currency manipulations and so on.’ This, he argues, is the root cause that has led to mass impoverishment of blue-collar workers in the USA and Britain, hence the election of Donald Trump and the British vote to leave the European Union. ‘Mammon… makes the rich richer but leaves them detached from the rest of society…. While traditional manufacturing involves labour on a large scale, Mammon is concerned only with the accumulation of wealth for its own sake and, as such, is impervious to social or ethical issues [including] care for the worker…. At present Mammonism is the driving force behind global capitalism…. As a direct result, production and manufacturing must always gravitate to where labour and production are cheapest.’

Atzmon expresses admiration for the prophetic writing of Henry Ford in his 1920 book, also called The International Jew. ‘Ford didn’t refer to the Jews as a whole, he didn’t criticise the Jews as a race or as an ethnicity…. He did oppose a tiny segment within world Jewry. For him the “international Jew” was a reference to a bunch of oligarchs and Mammonites.’ Atzmon writes in that tradition.

The originality of his analysis of this aspect of Jewish affairs lies in his detailed explanation of how it came about and how it has dominated the discourses of cultural Marxism, identity politics and political correctness to the great detriment of human freedom and living conditions in Western nations. It is, he explains, not so much a matter of conspiracy and secrecy as of centuries of development of relevant cognitive skills and practical marketing abilities in a Jewish elite whose spokesmen have actually been quite open about the success they have attained.


In 1964 I read Captain Ramsay’s book The Nameless War, which is also a manifesto against the dominance of a Jewish financial elite. Especially interesting to me was his account of recent Spanish history: ‘The next revolution to merit our attention is the one that broke out in Spain in 1936. Fortunately for Europe, it was frustrated by General Franco and a number of gallant men, who instantly took the field in opposition to the revolutionary forces, and succeeded in a long struggle in crushing them.

‘This achievement is all the more remarkable in view of the latest development in revolutionary organisation, which was then revealed in the shape of the International Brigades…. They were recruited from criminals, adventurers and dupes from 52 different countries, mysteriously transported and assembled in formations in Spain within a few weeks of the outbreak of disorder, uniformed in a garb closely related to our battle dress and armed with weapons bearing the Jewish five-pointed star. This star and the Seal of Solomon were upon the signet rings of N.C.O.s and officers in this communist horde of ill-disciplined ruffians. I have seen them myself in wear.’ Ramsay explained that German and Italian help was provided to the Spanish Nationalists after ‘Barcelona had been declared in October 1936 the capital of the Soviet States of Western Europe.’ (That was obviously a failed fore-runner of the European Union!)

Ramsay, a Catholic British patriot who sought to keep Britain out of what he could see would be a disastrous war with Germany, was arrested under the infamous Regulation 18B, soon after Winston Churchill assumed power in wartime Britain, and imprisoned without trial until 26th September 1944. In 1998 a detailed study of ‘British anti-Semitism’ in 1939 and 1940 was published, largely focusing on Ramsay. This was Patriotism Perverted by Richard Griffiths, whose hostility to right-wing conservatism had already been exhibited in his 1980 book Fellow Travellers of the Right: British Enthusiasts for Nazi Germany 1933–39. It seems from its index that Patriotism Perverted entirely ignores the above information about the Spanish Civil War which Ramsay had reported. Griffiths, one presumes, was a ‘guardian of the discourse’ (to use Atzmon’s term) and not a ‘guardian of the truth.’

Information in Being in Time, which derives partly from George Orwell’s Homage to Catalonia, seems to clearly justify Ramsay’s defence of Franco. Atzmon writes: ‘Orwell’s experience as a combatant with the Yiddish-speaking International Brigade in 1936 had left him disgusted by the intolerant correctness that was intrinsic to the revolution-motivated warriors around him.’ It made him ‘an opponent of the communist “party line” and crude “red” dogmatism.’ Atzmon states that a quarter of the Brigade were Jewish. ‘The Red Jews who travelled to Spain ended up fighting in Jewish legions because identity politics and Left-orientation are largely a Jewish intellectual domain that is actually quite foreign to working people…. The revolutionary Jews didn’t believe in God or keep the Sabbath but they were killing Spanish Catholics and often burning their churches, something Rabbinical Jews never did.’ Atzmon adds in a footnote the welcome news that ‘a growing number of contemporary historians accept that General Franco wasn’t a ‘Fascist’… [or] a ‘National Socialist’. He was a Catholic patriot.’ Unfortunately, ‘the delusional intent at the core of the Spanish International Brigade… is still a sacred taboo within Left circles.’


Atzmon is a master of iconoclasm within the realm of the political order. He is not always so adroit when seeking to articulate his vision of the good life as the foundation on which a better society can be built. For example, he foolishly sneers at the greatest of the mysteries of Judaism: ‘The Jewish God doesn’t even allow his people to utter his name.’ Those who turn their backs on the tradition in which they were reared often become too severe in their criticism of it. The Jewish commandment he rejects is designed to remind Jews of the nature of the Ain-Soph as an ultimate reality beyond words and forms. All the great sacred traditions attest to that reality in their profoundest teachings.

Atzmon sets up a series of binaries on which to base his discussion and one of these needs to be carefully examined. He writes: ‘Leo Strauss contends that Western civilisation oscillates between two intellectual and spiritual poles – Athens and Jerusalem. Athens … is the birthplace of reason, philosophy, art, science and the logos. Jerusalem … is the city of God where God’s law prevails. The philosopher, the true historian, or the essentialist … is the Athenian, “the guardian of the truth.” The Jerusalemite is “the guardian of the discourse”, the one who keeps the gate, in order to maintain law and order at the expense of ecstasies, poetry, beauty, reason and truth.’

This contrast does less than justice to Jerusalem and Jewish culture. The Old Testament contains many moving celebrations of ecstasy and beauty in most poignant poetry. Think of the Psalms and the Song of Songs. Strauss may have been right to point to an ongoing struggle between defenders and critics of doctrine, but identifying the one with Jerusalem and the other with Athens begs too many questions. It is notable that Atzmon says nothing at all about the magnificent system of the sephiroths in Jewish mysticism.

‘While Islam and Christianity are belief systems, Judaism is an obedience-regulatory system,’ suggests Atzmon. The truth is that all three ‘religions of the book’ contain both those systems, as well as mystical and esoteric traditions that go beyond them.

The phrase ‘guardians of the discourse’ need not always contain a pejorative sense, yet Atzmon usually gives it that. For example: ‘The Jerusalemite cultural Marxism is sustained by an institutional dismissal of the truth and the removal of any method that may result in approaching the truth.’ Such a dismissal is bad; but in other contexts ‘the discourse’ is rightly protected by its adherents, when tides of barbarism threaten to sweep away the garnered and stored wisdom and knowledge of the past.

Philosophy appeals to him more than religion: ‘The Abrahamic religions are founded on a set of counterfactual premises.’ Such premises may from one point of view be susceptible to challenge; but from another point of view they may be part of myths which emerged from the Real. ‘The Hebrew Bible is a chronicle of shunned prophets.’ Yes, but Jewish tradition has maintained them in memory and celebrates them today.

Despite these inadequacies of definition, Atzmon is basically a man of light. Following Martin Heidegger, he acknowledges the existence of ‘the Real’, which he distinguishes from contingent aspects of our mundane world: ‘The Real refers to truth that is unchangeable and absolute. The Real is metaphysical and abstract. Reality… is based on sense perception and the material order. The Real emerges as that which is outside language, within the domain of the inexpressible. The Real resists symbolisations.’ Atzmon adds: ‘Philosophy can be summed up, as Heidegger put it, as a prolonged story of “forgetfulness of Being”, the story of that which is closest to us and yet most mysterious and unattainable. Being and time are like the tip of your nose, so close you fail to see it. The truth is there at all times, all we have to do is open our eyes and contemplate it.’

It is in the light of this approach that Atzmon can write that for him ‘inquiry is a never-ending self-examination’ and note approvingly that for the film director Quentin Tarantino ‘dilemma is the existential essence.’ It is easy to see why Atzmon has become such a powerful defender of intellectual freedom. He is generous-hearted too: ‘An ethical society should care for all of its members, that they live and thrive.’


Being in Time is a devastating attack on the corruption of the political process in Western nations at the present time, as the following quotations show.

‘Left ideology is like a dream.’ It is sustained by ‘the addictive rush of effecting change.’

‘Democracy operates to convey a false image of freedom of choice.’

‘While Western corporate culture is guided by the principle of a strict hierarchy defined by the survival of the fittest, academia, media and culture suppress any attempt to grasp the meaning, the nature and the essence of “fitness”…. [This is] sophisticated institutional oppression.’

‘Interference with language is nothing short of an attempt to limit intellectual freedom.’

‘There is a critical discrepancy in contemporary Left, liberal and progressive movements…. Jewish ethnocentrism and even Jewish racial exclusivity is fully accepted, while other forms of ethnocentrism are bluntly rejected…. The [progressive] discourse is selective, incoherent and unprincipled.’

‘The traditional cosmopolitan Left lacks the political means to replace this rapturous sense of volkish belonging with anything meaningful or popular enough to compete.’ [Atzmon is discussing the attachment of workers to their national icons.]

‘What does [identity politics] have to do with opposition to capital accumulation … mammonism? The answer is nothing.’

‘If the Left ideology is shaped and structured like a dream, then the role of the ideologist is to sustain the slumber.’

‘Cultural Marxism … is a largely manipulative method that is set to diminish or even dismantle the so-called bourgeois hegemonic culture in favour of an imaginary emancipation.’

‘The Jerusalemite cultural Marxism is sustained by an institutional dismissal of the truth and the removal of any method that may result in approaching the truth.’

‘The entire New Left infrastructure [has] … one basic mission: to divert attention from the blunders of Mammonism and from those who benefit most from Mammon.’

‘Since the 1970s America and the West have gone through a radical transition…. The Western worker has been reduced to a mere consumer.’

‘More and more people are losing the means necessary to sustain consumption and are sentenced to deprivation.’

‘Biology does not sit well with the ideas of equality, social change, the dream of what ought to be.’

‘The attempt to break society by means of identity politics also helps hide the fact that, for all our social justice sophistication, our society is subject to crude cognitive segregation.’

‘The reality of cognitive partitioning defies the fantasy of the “ought to be” and the utopian dream…. There is no possibility of full justice or equality.’

‘For the Left elite to tackle their issues, they would have had to transform their entire philosophical and methodological structure. They’d have had to … proceed into an ethical thinking that is dynamically flexible and unpredictable.’

‘Facing reality defies the nature of Left, liberal and progressive thinking.’

‘“After politics” is a tale of the complete victory by one oligarchy. The consequences may be fatal for our planet.’
‘Creating and maintaining dissent in order to control opposition is deeply embedded in modern, Jewish, secular politics.’

The overall picture is of a massive river of ‘useful idiots’ manipulated by a very small minority intent on maintaining their power, wealth and privilege. It would be nice to see some of our local Leftists grasping the nettle and admitting that they have been leading the troops to disaster rather than saving the world and preparing a paradise on earth.


It must be admitted that Atzmon uses a broad brush approach, reliant on many sweeping statements and generalisations. What, however, if his basic thesis is the truth? Then quibbles about exceptions and about inadequate definitions and terminology will not prevent Being in Time from being a prophetic masterpiece containing ‘the word for the day.’

Naturally Atzmon has been attacked as an ‘anti-Semite’, but, although his targets clearly extend across much of the range of contemporary Jewish culture and are not restricted to the mammonist elite, he is not blind to the misplaced idealism of many ‘progressive’ Jews and gentiles, nor does he write in a spirit of malice or hatred.

He has been careful in his discussion of the Jewish Holocaust, which he sees as the most popular ‘Jewish religion’ in our time. He has neither denied it in this book nor affirmed it. However he makes pertinent remarks about it:

Crucially, the Holocaust affirms the uniqueness of its followers. It is devoted to the primacy of Jewish suffering, granting the Jew the crown of thorns as the ultimate sufferer. It is also used to justify every Jewish action, from ethnic cleansing to genocide…. The Holocaust religion has united “The Jew” and “The Jews” within a self-sufficient, comprehensive and independent “God-less” narrative. Jews constitute the victims, the oppressors and the redeemers…. The religion prescribes a manner of speech and a strict set of commandments. Most crucially … it is totally and deplorably intolerant of any form of dissent.

Atzmon adds: ‘Real Jewish power is… the power to silence criticism of Jewish power. It is the capacity to determine the boundaries of the political discourse — and particularly criticism of itself.’ This very brave man has certainly set out to bell the cat!


The book engages in relatively little discussion of the Right, of conservatism. This is because Atzmon sees the contemporary disaster as being the result of a much more powerful Left.

He associates the Right with rootedness, something T. S. Eliot described in his essay ‘Virgil and the Christian World’ as piety. He also associates it with romanticism and nostalgia for a better and vanished past. He hardly attends to the ongoing struggle of those of us on the Right which, essentially, is to ‘redeem the time’ and conserve as much as possible of our heritage while at the same time helping to build a better future in line with sacred tradition and the best elements of Western European culture.

From Gilad’s recently released album “The Spirit of Trane

54 replies
  1. Peter
    Peter says:

    “He has been careful in his discussion of the Jewish Holocaust, which he sees as the most popular ‘Jewish religion’ in our time. He has neither denied it in this book nor affirmed it.”

    I have heard and read Gilad Atzmon make complimentary remarks about the historian David Irving. the most important historian of WW II in my opinion. I don’t want to mischaracterize Mr. Irving’s stance, but I believe it is that the claims about Auschwitz are falsehoods and lies that have been disproven, while mass killing (the “Holocaust”) occurred at another location.

    Gilad is also a friend of the admirable British Jew Paul Eisen, who does not believe the claims about a “Holocaust”. Paul Eisen has a great blog that had to be made inaccessible two or three years ago when his family began receiving threats from other Jews.

    For the record, I do not believe in the “Holocaust” and I believe I stand on solid ground with that opinion.

    • Jett Rucker
      Jett Rucker says:

      I’m with you on that solid ground.

      In The Wandering Who, Atzmon noted how peculiar it is of Jews to celebrate the Holocaust as they do. To paraphrase him, he wondered why Jews were willing to admit how much hatred had been directed against them, since that might point to some flaw or misbehavior on their part.

  2. Peter
    Peter says:

    The Jewish cult has always sought complete control over the entire world. The best proof of this is not to be found in the stupid Protocols – ‘The Jewish Conspiracy for Children of all Ages’ – but in the Unholy Bible. Here are just a few quotes that deserve to be better known:

    “Let people serve thee, and nations bow down to thee” Genesis 27:29.

    “This day will I begin to put the dread of thee and the fear of thee upon the nations that are under the whole heaven, who shall hear report of thee, and shall tremble, and be in anguish because of thee.” Deuteronomy 2:25.

    “For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are on the face of the earth.” Deuteronomy 7:6.

    “and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt rule over many nations, but they shall not rule over thee.” Deuteronomy 15:6.

    “the Lord thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth” Deuteronomy. 28:1. “And all the people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of the Lord; and they shall be afraid of thee.” 28:10. “And the Lord shall make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only and not beneath.” 28:12f.

    “Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.” Psalm 2:1-3.

    “Ask of me and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel. Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth” Psalm 2:8ff.

    “for the Lord most high is terrible; he is a great King over all the earth. He shall subdue the people under us, and all the nations under our feet.” Psalm 47:2f.

    “For thou shalt break forth on the right hand and on the left; and thy seed shall inherit the Gentiles” Psalm 54:3.

    “Arise, O God, judge the earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations.” Psalm 82:8.

    “He shall judge among the heathen, he shall fill the places with the dead bodies; he shall wound the heads over many countries” Psalm 110:6.

    “Let the high praises of God be on their lips, and a two-edged sword in their hand; to wreak vengeance on the nations and to chastise the heathen: to load their kings with chains and put their nobles in irons; to execute the judgement decreed against them – this is the glory of all his faithful servants. O praise the Lord.” Psalm 149:6-9.

    “This is the purpose that is purposed upon the whole earth: and this is the hand that is stretched out upon all the nations.” Isaiah 14: 26-27.

    “For the indignation of the Lord is upon all nations, and his fury upon all their armies: he hath utterly destroyed them, he hath delivered them to the slaughter. Their slain also shall be cast out, and their stink shall come up out of their carcases, and the mountains shall be melted with their blood.” Isaiah 34:2-3. “For it is the day of the Lord’s vengeance, and the year of recompences for the controversy of Zion.” Isaiah 34:8.

    “that men may bring unto thee the forces of the gentiles, and that their kings may be brought. For the nation that shall not serve thee shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.” Isaiah 60:11-16.

    “See, I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build, and to plant.” Jeremiah 1:10.

    “though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee, yet will I not make a full end of thee:” Jeremiah 30:11.

    “For I will make a full end of all the nations whither I have driven thee: but I will not make a full end of thee” Jeremiah 46:28.

    “And the remnant of Jacob shall be among the Gentiles in the midst of many people as a lion among the beasts of the forest, as a young lion among the flocks of sheep: who, if he go through, both treadeth down, and teareth in pieces, and none can deliver. Thine hand shall be lifted up upon thine adversaries, and all thine enemies shall be cut off” Micah 5:8f

    “The Lord is a jealous god, a god of vengeance; the Lord takes vengeance and is quick to anger” Nahum 1:2. [NEB]

    “Pay them back for their deeds, O Lord, pay them back what they deserve. Show them how hard thy heart can be, how little concern thou hast for them. Pursue them in anger and exterminate them from beneath thy heavens, O Lord.” Lamentations 3:64-66. [NEB]

    • Rerevisionist
      Rerevisionist says:

      It’s curious how much effort has been put into using poetic, pseudo-inspired, magniloquent, bombastic, euphuistic etc language. The King James team of scribblers have a lot to answer for. (I don’t know about other translations, but I suspect old high languages are deployed in force). A disgreeable epigram states that turds cannot be polished, but the Bible proves they can.

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      Peter, I hope you have no objections if I file this among my so far only imaginary Statement of Defense if/when charged with hate crimes in Canada; whether in court or The Human “Rights ” Commission.

      After listening to the reading of the charges, probably in that whining cadence, I would immediately move for a summary dismissal of all charges, founded on your comment.

      If they demurred, I would make them a more explicit offer of either summary dismissal, or an identical, subsequent charge against their large Talmud School on Lawrence Avenue West, Toronto, where they teach this moral, loving, unmitigated shit.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      @Peter: Your primary success here is in demonstrating yet again that the cut-and-paste operation requires only a few mouse clicks or a few keyboard shortcuts; that is, it requires nothing describable as thought, comprehension, or mastery of the topic at hand.

      Let’s take a single example to stand for the lot. Anyone who reads the entirety of the Lamentations, a process accomplishable in twenty minutes or less, discovers that Jeremiah’s complaints and curses, whether in your tendentiously chosen quotations or elsewhere, are almost entirely directed toward his fellow Israelites, whom he denounces for abandoning the service of God and thus forfeiting His protection and bringing down upon themselves and their kinsfolk His vengeance. While Jeremiah begs the Lord to put aside His wrath—who wouldn’t?—he never once pretends that his own people don’t richly merit the punishment they are receiving. This attitude, quite characteristic of Jeremiah and the other prophets, goes a long way toward explaining why the Jews of the past 2,000 years have preferred their self-congratulatory Talmudic swill to the pre-Christian Scriptures.

      Indeed, whether one looks at the major or the minor prophets included in your miscellany of misdirection, the pattern of what might be called wilfully implicit deception is unchanged. In this context, you unsurprisingly fail to recall that Christ—who had firsthand knowledge of the contents of all these books—publicly denounced the Pharisees and their antecedents as persecutors and murderers of the prophets God had sent to instruct and chastise the Israelites themselves, not their Gentile neighbors and enemies.

      I don’t know about other translations, but I suspect old high languages are deployed in force.

      This site alone includes 59 English translations of varying antiquity and accuracy. Why not consider doing a few minutes of far from taxing researchbefore you voice an unfounded conclusion?

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          I am very happy to see your name and comments here again, Rosa. May they long be so!

          Thank you for the wish, which I warmly reciprocate.

      • Rerevisionist
        Rerevisionist says:

        @Pierre – I was thinking of other languages such as French, German, and Spanish. I do have a copy of the NT in each of these, but the OT is far longer. As I said, I suspect old high languages are deployed. Probably not ‘unfounded’ therefore.

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          Dear Rerev: Thanks for the clarification.

          Here’s a link cued up to the beginning of Lamentations in La Bible de Jérusalem, the widely used French translation dating from the early sixties. As you’ll see, while polished and dignified, the French diction here is plainly anything but archaizing in grammar, syntax, usage, or mechanics.

          By the way, the Bible Gateway site I linked to above accommodates five German translations, including Luther’s famously plainspoken one; five Italian translations; and four other (i.e., older) French translations. It also has about twenty Spanish translations—who’d ‘a’ thunk it?

          Sad to say, unlike you, I have hardly any Spanish at all, and though I have much more Italian, it gets me around Dante, Petrarch, and the operas of Verdi far better than it would in managing to understand an informed answer to “Come faccio a trovare il Palazzo Farnese?” So I am in no position to evaluate the stylistic characteristics of these languages in available biblical translations.

  3. Poupon Marx
    Poupon Marx says:

    Coherent with conviction. How many can “stand alone” or apart, like this? Where are our Christian pastoral leaders? With Christ as an example, many should be publicly speaking out, getting arrested and going to jail or assuming the worst. “Onward Christian soldiers, matching as to war, with the Cross of Jesus…….etc.” To serve and save their souls, of course.

    Nikos Kazantzakis said God does mind flabby bodies so much, but hates flabby minds.

    Listen to the Buddha.

    • Rerevisionist
      Rerevisionist says:

      @Poupon Marx — Christ, or rather Jesus/Yeshua, was as fictional as the Holohoax, but equally promoted by Jews or people of the same outlook. It’s a tribute to the human mind’s construction that simple repetition without competition can be so effective.

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        @Rere-I see very little value, relevancy, or practical use for miracles, supernatural tricks or wow-factor occurrences as a validation or incentive for belief and commitment.

        In the life of Buddha, one of his disciples while begging for food in the village, came to be mocked by the local rabble of insolent louts. They insulted The Buddha. So one of his disciples performed a supernatural demonstration. The former insipid doubters were awed. When Buddha found out about it, he was disappointed and disapproving. He admonished all his followers to never use such supernatural demos ever. Why? Because the basis for belief will not be reason, enlightenment, and the INNER spiritual journey of Knowledge and Wisdom, but primarily on POWER and AWE.

        This is but one of the chasms of difference (in Buddhism’s favor) between Christianity, the mass marketing, institutional, proselytizing scare tactic machine, and Buddhism’s Inner World knowledge and wisdom primacy.

        I am not even interested enough in Christianity (although I respect it, as I do all religions in varying degrees of conditionality) because I consider it a dead end with fatal inherent flaws. Weak machinery, poor performing, not reliable, nice paint job on the outside, but design and materials are severely lacking.

        Years ago when I lived in West Sonoma County, Califorlornia I was informed by a husband and wife owner of a well regarded winery that great wine MUST have great grapes to be achieved. No amount of process can circumlocute. Christianity cannot be made proper and fit by a few replacement parts or upgrades.

        So, in essence, I agree with you. Whether a dead fish on the beach died of oxygen deprivation or sudden decompression is not worthy of further effort to divine.

  4. Sam J.
    Sam J. says:

    Thank you for the review.

    “…‘While Western corporate culture is guided by the principle of a strict hierarchy defined by the survival of the fittest…”

    This is not true. Those with access to massive amounts of capital are the ones that survive. Has Amazon. Twitter or Facebook ever made a profit???

    Jews own most all of our economy by buying out the corporations with loans they preferably give to each other while the workers of these companies groan under the debt or lose their jobs all together by outsourcing overseas..

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      Sam, not only that, but when Sears declared bankruptcy in Canada recently, their pension funds disappeared as well, while their executives did just fine.

      Ca. five years ago a London {{{ Merchant }}} stripped his department chain-store corporation of assets and went into receivership, leaving his hundreds of employees, many older, holding the bag but no pensions. He had provided a humongous yacht, docked in Monaco, for his destitute wife.

      That mealy-mouthed, {{{ wholly-owned }}} British Government had promised a change in legislation to avoid this sort of robbery in the future. It took all of 2 years to re-run that movie, with a greatly overlapping script.

      When that Mother of all Fraudsters, well, second to Bernie, {{{Robert Maxwell}}} [ Hoch ] bankrupted 401 of his companies, his former employees, looking for their pensions, took to the streets of London with billboards demanding VE VONT OUR MONEY. Now, ‘ hate ‘ laws would even prevent the telling use of that spelling.

      Recently I heard this adage for the first time: Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the whole world !

      [ Still working on ‘that’ photo ].

      • Sam J.
        Sam J. says:

        You’re right it’s very bad. Those that can leverage a company and still make money for themselves. Romney did this with some companies he took over. They piled dept on a perfectly well run company with no debt and then charged them enormous consulting fees. The companies they liked were old line companies that did basic manufacturing and had no debt. Several were destroyed.

  5. Jeff
    Jeff says:

    Gilad is a great guy, and a patriot of REASON.
    His music and that of his wife are both great, and he’s a very personable guy that I’ve had the privilege to meet and chat with.
    And as can be seen here, he is fearless when it comes to defending everyone’s freedom to make statements or ask questions about anything present or past.
    He’s also bold enough to state plainly that Hitler was right about almost everything.
    That’s bold …especially considering he’s a jew and that he makes his living performing and the hostile elites who are actually “his people” turn livid with his tenacious truth spewing and try to destroy him at every turn.

  6. Anthony Clifton
    Anthony Clifton says:

    where specifically do “we” see a PROSELYTE to Talmudic Judaism
    in Genesis 49 ?

    specifically a “Yiddish” speaking PROSELYTE to Talmudic Judaism..?

    Abraham did not have a copy of the Talmud.
    Abraham did not Hate Jesus.
    Abraham was not a “JEW”….never met a “JEW”, and none of
    his son’s were “JEWISH”.

    No Dallas Cowboys at the Alamo…
    No “Jews” in the Old Testament.

    Furthermore :
    … When did “White People” NATIONS “transform”
    into “JEW” worshipping Societies..?

    How exactly do Mass Murderers {{{WHO PRINT CURRENCY}}}
    and {{{PROFESSIONAL LIARS}}}….acquire “Authority”in a
    “Jew” worshipping SOCIETY…?

    Was Jesus a LIAR @ John 8:44 ?

    SEE ALSO : Mackeys’ Encyclopedia of Freemasonry
    Assassin, Babylon, Captivity…look for the word TALMUD.

  7. John Walton
    John Walton says:

    ‘While Islam and Christianity are belief systems, Judaism is an obedience-regulatory system,’ suggests Atzmon. The reviewer dismisses Atzmon’s claim without argument, but I was reminded of something a friend of mine once said. The friend could be described as a philo-Semitic gentile. My friend said his main objection to Judaism is that it is too focused on numerous rules: “Do this. Don’t do that.” as he put it. So maybe Atzmon is onto something. After all, he grew up with it. The koshering of a kitchen is a royal POA and it’s hard for this gentile to imagine that the theological imperative is sufficiently urgent to justify the work. The New Testament features Jesus’ claim that the Law can be reduced to a single principle: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Right there you have a huge simplification, though it’s hard to see how rules related to shellfish could be derived.

    • Nick Dean
      Nick Dean says:

      I have a friend who often reminds me that there is not nearly enough focus on shellfish and women’s wigs in White Nationalism.

  8. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    I am not familiar with Butler’s book and references to The Protocols. Interestingly, Ford is quoted as saying that it didn’t matter whether the Protocols were a forgery, because it fits what is happening now.
    On another note, Atzmon testified for Arthur Topham at his “hate speech” trial earlier this year. Unfortunately, the Canadian Jewdicial system was too much for Atzmon to save the day.

  9. Rerevisionist
    Rerevisionist says:

    Eric Butler’s 1946 book (or, appareNtly, booklet) The International Jew, doesn’t seem to be online anywhere, even the Australian League of Rights – founded by Butler himself. If you find it, would you please post the URL (+Internet address) here, please? (It may be a reprint of Henry Ford, of course).

  10. Nick Dean
    Nick Dean says:

    Where 99% of Jews are at least tacitly zionist yet oppose other peoples’ nationalism, Atzmon is toward the other end of the remaining 1%. He claims to be against all forms ethnocentrism including all nationalisms and to find reason for special objection to Jewish cultural features on those grounds.

    But that’s still a hostile stance toward us.

    He isn’t on our side, he’s against us because we are nationalists. And we have reason to doubt even the sincerity of his total argument on multiple grounds.

    Would not someone who has studied these issues as much as Atzmon see that Jews in a genuinely multicultural world would be the last to give up their ethnocentrism, and also that Jews have uniquely thrived without a dedicated homeland where other peoples are not known to be adapted to survive such a loss?

    And from personal experience he also uses bogus and dishonest argumentation in articles attacking White nationalisms and does not respond even to simple, factual historical correction. I’ve observed this repeatedly, example here:

    It is clear that truth and justice are not paramount with Atzmon, who by the way has colonized England just as his recent ancestors colonized Palestine, over which he cries crocodile tears. Atzmon is focused entirely on the destruction of nation states, whereafter, as I say, one would reasonably suppose Jews will thrive as all other groups fall apart.

    • Franklin Ryckaert
      Franklin Ryckaert says:

      Gilad Atzmon feels very much at home in multicultural Londonistan and he would loudly protest if by chance a British ethno-nationalist government would make Londonistan London again by sending its Third World invaders home. Though Atzmon’s criticism of Jews is welcome, keep in mind that in no way he is on our side. Actually no Jew can be on our side. I had rather see all Jews living in an “Apartheid” Israel than them living among us, even if they would have the same mentality as Gilad Atzmon.

      • Weaver
        Weaver says:

        Mr. Rychaert,

        GK Chesterton wrote some interesting comments on Jews in his taboo book, “The New Jerusalem”. If you purchase it, be sure the last chapter on Zionism is included. It’s a book of published essays & notes except for the last chapter, which was never published until later.

        What’s interesting is he stated that Jews could be given their own little provinces throughout Europe. That way, they could be Jewish and ruled by Jews, trading with Europeans externally. And they’d be known as Jews, not confused for Christians of particular nationalities.

        Chesterton today would likely want the newcomers expelled. His PC fanbase today likes to paint Chesterton as some sort of limp wristed moderate, but I don’t believe he would have caved to the invasion of Europe.

        Chesterton wanted to preserve everyone’s heritage, including and especially Europe’s. Anyway, it’s very interesting.

        I get sometimes accused of being Jewish for mentioning this, but the key point is that Jews wouldn’t be able to manage society from afar if pinpointed in their own societies. It would then become clear who is doing what. All would be brought into the light, and people would work honestly for their bread rather than having continued political conflict and confusion.

        Regarding Israel, I doubt it will endure. Zionists though are willing to wreck all of creation to bring it about… The US is forced to support an empire and Europe is forced to flood itself with Muslims, partly to bring about Greater Israel.

        Whatever the case, I want US foreign policy cut by 95% at least. It would be better that our children had some sort of future than to have this Satanic empire continue. It’s bankrupting us and propelling us towards socialism, socialism being total centralised control and dominance.

        GK Chesterton’s way out, by providing Jews some sort of separated home in Europe (or the US) seems fine by me provided Europeans cease being subordinate. Europeans, especially individualistic Anglos, have largely become a slave caste, which is insulting.

          • Nick Dean
            Nick Dean says:

            Allowing for trade accepts subversion thru compromise.

            With an outgroup uniquely defined by identification with a history (Jewishness) and religion (Judaism), both themselves uniquely defined by having subversion, supremacy, slavery and genocide as essential and general and historical and identifying cultural goals, they play fast and loose who say ‘give Jews their own quarter.’

            No quarter shall be given.

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        @Mr. Dean and F.R.- Your reasoning fails because it logically fallacious. Specifically, the fallacy is the Fallacy of Composition: the fallacy of inferring from the fact that every part of a whole has a given property that the whole also has that property. Because part of Mr. Altzmon’s ideas and opinions might be inadequate or failing does not automatically determine that the whole of his ideas, etc., are as such. The All or Nothing reasoning process can only create vacuum and stagnation. There is no such thing as 100% efficiency in any machine. There are mechanical losses and entropy. That does not justify rejecting a whole machine, process, or person on an inherent and irreducible basis.

        • Franklin Ryckaert
          Franklin Ryckaert says:

          Well, I said : “Though Atzmon’s criticism of Jews is welcome, keep in mind that in no way he is on our side.” Gilad Atzmon has rejected Jewish tribalism and has embraced human universalism in stead. For the West that means accepting multi-culturalism. So how can he be on our side ?

  11. Rerevisionist
    Rerevisionist says:

    This conforms to a standard US style of book review, wherein the target to be sold is praised (‘award winning’, ‘internationally celebrated’). But I see no evidence the jazz player has provided informed comment on international Jew fraudsters, international Jewish mass murderers, assassination by Jews, the FED and Jews, genocides preceded by lies of the Tonkin Gulf type, and other things. Are Americans really that fvcking stupid?

    • Balder
      Balder says:

      Message from Arthur Topham to Khanverse
      June 2, 2016

      Dear Khanverse,

      Undoubtedly your use of the English language is exquisite and your passion indubitable. One could almost image that were there twin souls you and Jonathan Azaziah would be a prime example.

      I am a gentile Canadian citizen who has been in the legal clutches of the state since 2007 when first falsely accused of committing a “hate crime” against “people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin.” In 2012 I was again falsely accused a second time of promoting “hatred” toward the Jews, arrested, incarcerated, my home invaded, all my computers and files stolen along with my firearms and since that time have been fighting to stay out of jail. The charge itself, being an indictable offence here in Canada, holds a maximum jail sentence of 2 years in prison.

      In November of 2015 my trial finally took place and last for approximately two weeks. My “Expert Witness” who appeared in my defence was Mr. Gilad Atzmon. He traveled to central British Columbia direct from Indonesia where he was performing with his jazz group and spent close to 10 days working with my legal team to beat the phoney rap brought against me by B’nai Brith Canada. He asked for nothing other than his airfare to fly half-way around the world to appear on my behalf and a return trip to London.

      While here his efforts to assist the legal team were indefatigable. His presence among the local community of supporters and those who came to assist me in my defence was deeply appreciated. His personality was energizing and his quick wit and sense of humour were openly appreciated. His discernment of the legal issues were highly recognized and helpful.

      On the stand in Supreme Court his presentation was cogent and highly instructive leaving the Crown prosecutor’s cross-examination of his testimony virtually nullified.

      On top of all of that, working late into the evening day after day, it was Gilad who, while going over the Crown’s evidence against me, was able to discover some damning evidence against the Crown’s “Expert Witness” that proved beyond a doubt the person had committed perjury while on the witness stand.

      At the trials end I was found guilty on one count and not guilty on a second count. Both counts were the very same charge. I’m now in the process of challenging the actual legislation being used against me and will be back in court likely this fall. Again, at that time, Gilad will be appearing via video during the Charter challenge.

      With respect to your critique of this man what can I say? Your evidence is basically guilt by association, be it genetic or otherwise, and your vilification of his person based upon little of actual substance. You’ve never, as stated, met Gilad in person yet, like so many others who are militantly fervent in their desire to end the Satanic madness brought on by the Talmudic tyrants, you’re willing to cast forth additional seeds of doubt and discontent upon the barren ground of divisiveness like some agent provocateur.

      How will this help in the long run to end reign of terror and promote peace and unity for all people?

  12. Ger Tzedek
    Ger Tzedek says:

    I am still disgusted by the many scenes of Hollywood desecrating whatever sacred to White man. For example that scene of perfect marriage of Catholic White man, and the Jew who disrupts and runs away with the prize, the shiksa. Can’t we make spoofs in the Monty Python style of these scenes? Like, the perfect Jewish wedding, a Black man that irrupts in takes the Jewish bride.

  13. Weaver
    Weaver says:

    Very interesting, ty. I especially like the definition of “Right” presented here as well.

    There are so many who misrepresent the “Right” today as some Hollywood stereotype, then accuse dissenters of secretly being Jewish, which is quite annoying.

    TOO has become incredible under Dr. MacDonald. It used to be said that the best whites were focused on making money or on other distractions. It really appears that now the best are focusing more on politics, such as the authors of this book and book review. Ty.

    • Nick Dean#
      Nick Dean# says:

      Don’t get over-invested in ‘right,’ Weaver.

      Just be White. You’ll find most Whites there with you. We have no need to divide Whites left vs right, only THEY do.

  14. Karen T
    Karen T says:

    Gilad Atzmon is related to Menachem Atzmon, chairman of ICTS, the Israeli firm in charge of security at the airport from which the alleged hijacked planes left on September 11th. He is also related to Mossad operative Tzipi Livni, and Janet Yellen chairman of the Federal Reserve. The late Nathan Yellin-Mor, co-founder of the terrorist Stern gang which was responsible for the assassinations of Count Bernadotte and Lord Moyne, the Deir Yassin massacre and the King David Hotel bombing, was also a relative. It’s true that we have no control over who our relatives are, but one would think that with his familial connections he would have much more in the way of information and insight to offer us Gentiles.

    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      I’ll take the good and useful of what he has to say. Like most food, 100% is not edible, which would include bone, gristle, excess fat, seeds or outer shell. I doubt that the doubters here could pass the same standard they applied to Atzmon. Since I perceive from the concrete to empirical, I would require the assurance that Atzmon is sincere is his communication of opinions and ideas. No one seems to have breached this ideal. Such comments remind me of running 95 yards down the field but stopping short of the Touchdown line. Therefore: incomplete.

      • Balder
        Balder says:

        You nailed it better than I could have done!
        Thanks for some good posts!

        A lot of crap has been said about Atzmon in this thread.

        The truth in a greater perspective actually is, that many who are much more kosher infected than Gilad Atzmon; let’s say Alex Jones, David Icke and Donald Trump, have done more to spread awareness of the Jewish Problem, than so many well spoken dignified learned White Nationalists, who waste their energy nitpicking on friendly forums about details of limited interest. Paranoia and an eternal all dominating fear of being “cheated by the Jew” seems to be one of the neurosis that has crept into some of our fellow nationalist travellers.

        • Karen T
          Karen T says:

          It seems that like everything else in what could have been a beautiful world, I must retreat in the face of Jewish aggression.

      • Alex S.
        Alex S. says:

        Mr. Marx,
        I see more than once in these comments that you promote this very recognizable philosophy that, “It’s not all JEWS!” “We’re not saying they’re all bad.” “There are GOOD Jewish people, too.”

        All here who are genuinely concerned with ridding ourselves of this horrific parasite should recognize that line of deceptive entreaty is a psychological feedback loop that leads directly back into the mental, spiritual and physical slavery we are trying to break free of.

        I can’t agree more with Mr. Dean,
        “No quarter shall be given.”

        In my opinion, if we, and really the entire world, are to survive, no quarter can be given to the Jews, nor anyone who would reintroduce the disease.

        • Poupon Marx
          Poupon Marx says:

          Alex S-Your line of reasoning is based on your perception, two or three times removed, from what I have actually been writing. You have simply rushed to a conclusion based on a category you constructed. In this process, you have exercised logical fallacy. Your emotional appeal is to the Bandwagon Effect. You seem to be “triggered” by any mention of Jewish anything.

          Of course there are a few Jews that are worthwhile, being almost always deracinated. Drs. Christina Hoff Sommers and Helen Smith are two such people, to name a very few. David Cole of TakiMag has interesting takes on current topics, always disparaging the Hollywood bubbleheads.

          Logic, reason, sincerity, and Spiritual Knowledge determine my thoughts and opinions. THAT is why I exclude Jews as a class. Some one born a Jew, that does to act or think in the amoral/immoral way of the sociopathy and narcissism of Chewry, deserves a hearing; nothing more.

  15. Rosa
    Rosa says:

    WHen I finished reading “The Wandering Jew”, I thought :” this man’s big existential problems could easily be solved by him adhering to our Faith, in believing in Jesus Our Savior. His problems, and his people’s problems. But they preferred not to recognise Him, the Light sent to men. For their arrogance they chose Mammon, and they are cursed and damned. And everyone who dwells with them and acts like them, is cursed and damned too”.
    I’m not too enthusiastic about Atzmon and his ilk.

  16. Smiddy
    Smiddy says:

    ‘The Jewish God doesn’t even allow his people to utter his name.’

    Can we just admit that Judaism has been a Luciferian front (probably) since its inception already?…

    People who think “Jews” are the main problem still haven’t gotten to the core of the issue. We’re ruled by a bunch of psychopaths loyal to nothing but power and wealth, who majorly use Jews as 4th generational cannon fodder.

  17. Old Ez
    Old Ez says:

    There is a major confision in section 3. The “Ain Soph” is not a Biblical concept *at all*. It was invented – at the earliest – in the 3rd Century AD in the book “Sepher Yetzirah” – this is Kabbalah, not Torah. Kabbalah and the pre-Christian faith of Torah are mutually exclusive and hostile religions. The religion of Judaism/Kabbalah was invented after Christianity so rebellious Jews who were going against their own religion (which was transformed into the Church by the Crucifixion) would have a rallying point and weapon with which to attack their formed faith. More to the point, “Ain Soph” does not refer to God or the creator of the universe: it refers to “absolute, infinite nothingness”! That is the “god” of Judaism/Talmud/Kabbalah: “absolute, infinite nothingness”! Shed a lot of light, doesn’t it? Anyway, the author is gravely confused if he is under the impression “Ain Soph” relates to the Torah faith. “Ain Soph” is an expression of the explicit rejection of the Torah faith.

  18. joe webb
    joe webb says:

    Aztman is merely a leftist jew. Any thing he has to say about jews…you can be sure it is like Sharmir….he is basically a commie, both of them actually. Any jewish commie is a trot, by definition.

    Joe Webb

  19. T
    T says:

    From the article:

    Atzmon sets up a series of binaries on which to base his discussion and one of these needs to be carefully examined. He writes: ‘Leo Strauss contends that Western civilisation oscillates between two intellectual and spiritual poles – Athens and Jerusalem…

    Fascinating reading.

    Let’s not forget ‘the muscle’, Rome, a third ancient city whose past military and empire has had a vast influence upon Westerners. This has been the case both historically and presumably at present regarding ‘the global project’ as manifested by an ideology of powerful elements of the Anglo-Saxon elite and hangers on which is termed ‘the New Rome’ and which is outlined below at a now defunct website by a modern day writer…

    Study of the ideas of the leaders of these forces within Freemasonry reveals that their dream, intention and plan was to create out of Britain and America a New Rome, a new World Empire, a new uniformity of thought and lifestyle that would embrace the whole world. To this end, a new state, the United States of America, was established, the first “world state”…

    Both in Britain and in the USA in the 18th and 19th centuries, aristocratic, oligarchical and anti-democratic forces working within the hierarchical structure of Freemasonry ensconced themselves within the political establishments of those countries – to what end? Study of the ideas of the leaders of these forces within Freemasonry reveals that their dream, intention and plan was to create out of Britain and America a New Rome, a new World Empire, a new uniformity of thought and lifestyle that would embrace the whole world. To this end, a new state, the United States of America, was established, the first “world state”, made up of immigrants from all over the world rather than just from one ethnic community – a New Atlantis as intended by the British Elizabethan occultist John Dee, adviser to the Virgin Queen, and by Francis Bacon, James I’s Chancellor, and ruled by a scientific priestly elite. This is how the Freemasons of the Revolutionary and post-Revolutionary generations saw themselves…

    He goes on…

    The Temple and the Roman Imperial Spirit

    The Jerusalem Temple and Imperial Rome: these are what have linked Freemasonry with the New Rome of the New World Order since the days of the Templars, who based their esotericism on the symbology of the Temple of Solomon which they had learned in the Crusades. Their very name was associated with the Temple, and many of Freemasonry’s rites too are based on the Temple of Solomon. The god-given esotericism of ancient Israel was thus conjoined with what was essentially an imperial Roman will to power. Today we see again an alliance between those forces that lead the Jewish people and those that lead the New Rome; indeed the State of Israel today, just as in Herod’s day, is a client state of an Imperial Rome, the only difference being that, unlike Herod’s kingdom, without the aid of the New Rome, the modern State of Israel would very likely not have survived.

    Fitting right in with that last line is the excerpt below from pg 105-107 of a remarkable 1853 geopolitical book entitled The New Rome and its chapter 7 headlined ‘The Jews’.

    It is confidently asserted that the Jews contrive to get themselves smuggled out of the Russian Empire, for the purpose of emigrating to the American world.

    The day of their deliverance has come; the Messiah they had a right to expect, if such was the name of their principle. All the world are now Jews; everybody makes money; and Rothschild is the ‘sixth great power,’ at least coordinate with the other five. The Jews are no longer a peculiar people; and will soon cease to be a distinct one; not, however, until they have reaped the rewards of their former toils.

    The idea for some time entertained of purchasing Judea, and making Rothschild a Jewish national king, was one of those fantastic confusions of form and substance which could obtain but a very slight hold upon so rational a people. They follow a truer instinct in settling in America to enjoy a genuine religious toleration, and an unfeigned equality. Liberty and commerce, the essence of their character, are also the essence of Americanism. It is confidently asserted that the Jews contrive to get themselves smuggled out of the Russian Empire, for the purpose of emigrating to the American world.
    But liberty and commerce, which are the characterisitcs of Judaism and of Americanism, are also those of annexation: every Jew will hasten to claim the protection of the American flag for his operations over the world, and Rothschild will not shut his eyes to the only prospect of enabling the European states to liquidate the debts they owe him.

Comments are closed.