An Un-Civil War: Part I, The Mueller Conspiracy

Lincoln’s first famous speech on June 16, 1858 has become known today for one memorable quote, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” The phrase was taken directly from the Bible, Gospel of Matthew 12:25, KJV: “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand.”

This “house divided” quote has been used repeatedly in various political contexts by Americans before Lincoln, including Thomas Paine, Abigail Adams, and Sam Houston. I invoke it again here because I believe that there are greater divisions between Americans today than at any time in the Republic’s history, greater than the Vietnam era, equal in intensity but different from the Civil War.

Americans who have not been living under a rock have some intuition of this divide and could provide their own answer to the question: What divides us? Radical Islamic terrorism, immigration, sanctuary cities, Antifa, LGBT, Black Lives Matter, White privilege, Obamacare, taxes, and many other polarizing issues. We are divided as never before over how to interpret the Constitutiond Bill of Rights, how to teach our children about American history, how to preserve our values, etc.

President Trump often acts as a national lightning rod — but he did not create these existing divisions. The culture storm was already building towards a climax long before his election with major offensive campaigns conducted by mainstream journalists, the courts, the universities, Hollywood elites, AM and PM talk show hosts, to name a few of the cultural crusaders. Fundamental divisions and intolerance (remember “Deplorables”?) permeated the culture before Trump’s election and may well have been a key reason for his decisive defeat of Hilary Clinton one year ago. Since his election it has all gotten much worse. We have just witnessed 12 months of the greatest show of sour grapes on earth.

The New and Improved MSM

The mainstream media (MSM) has led the Resistance with non-stop anti-Trump vitriol substituting for investigative journalism. The new rules of the MSM are quite simple. Report and repeat anything bad, or anything that might be construed or imagined as bad, as long as it can be linked to Trump. As many have noted, all the news stories that turn out to be false show Trump in a bad light, and they are given wall-to-wall  coverage while the retraction is given minimal exposure. And above all else, do not report anything good about Trump or his policies.

Nobody has a better understanding of the tactics employed by the MSM against the President than his former adviser, Steve Bannon:

Every day you hear this drumbeat from the nullification project — and that’s what it is, folks; it’s the nullification project.” … “And here’s who they’re trying to nullify. They’re not trying to nullify President Trump or Donald J. Trump. They’re trying to nullify you. You put him in office. You’ve had his back through thick and thin — and by the way, there’s been both thick, and there’s been thin, okay? — and you’ve had his back the entire time. They hate that…This nullification project that the mainstream media, the establishment, the Democratic left, the progressive community, and the Republican establishment — they’re all out there to shut down your voice. But just look at the guy’s actions and the result of the actions.

But many Americans caught on quite quickly that the press was out to destroy Trump. As early as May 2017, The Hill reported, “Nearly two-thirds of Americans say the mainstream press is full of fake news, a sentiment that is held by a majority of voters across the ideological spectrum. According to data from the latest Harvard-Harris poll … 65 percent of voters believe there is a lot of fake news in the mainstream media. That number includes 80 percent of Republicans, 60 percent of independents and 53 percent of Democrats.”

It is difficult to say which aspect of MSM coverage is worse, their sins of commission or sins of omission. In this brief article I will cover some of both, beginning with the sins of commission or what Trump likes to refer to as “fake news”.

Three Amigos: Comey, Mueller, Rosenstein

The Mueller Conspiracy

For the past nine months the mainstream media has breathlessly reported every twist and turn in the longest running, most boring sitcom ever aired on TV. Robert Mueller’s investigation into alleged Trump-Russian collusion has dominated MSM coverage of Trump since his election. After all that reporting what do we now know? “To anyone with legal insight, the Flynn indictment was the barefaced admission by Special Counsel Robert Mueller that, after nine months in charge of an investigation that had already been underway for eight months, he has absolutely nothing to justify continuing this charade within its original mandate to explore a Trump-Russian connection.”

Radio host Mark Levin reviews the latest developments from the investigation and shows how the widening scope of Mueller’s probe — and its increasing detachment from its original purpose — is proving his original theory right. None of the charges made thus far against Trump associates are related to any sort of collusion with the Kremlin.

“The very day after the election, I went on the air and I said the Democrats are going to seek to criminalize their differences with President Trump. They’re gonna seek to get a special counsel. They’re gonna seek to impeach him because they feel he’s illegitimate and they were counting on winning,” Levin said.

The politicization and misconduct of Mueller’s investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government has a long and convoluted history that begins 18 months ago. The key players in this masquerade of justice are the Obama administration, the Clinton Campaign, the DNC, and the FBI. We begin this tawdry tale chronologically with the role of Obama.

Obama’s Role

Obama’s exit strategy was two-fold. Maintain a false front of cordiality and cooperation, while carefully putting in place a series of landmines for the incoming Trump administration before leaving office.

In early March of 2017 Levin, drawing on sources including the New York Times and the Washington Post, initially described the case against Obama.  Summarizing his lengthy and detailed account, Levin established that the Obama administration sought, and eventually obtained, unprecedented authorization from FISA to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign; continued monitoring the Trump team even when no evidence of wrongdoing was found; then relaxed the NSA rules to allow evidence to be shared widely within the government, virtually ensuring that the information, including the conversations of private citizens, would be leaked to the media. Here’s a more detailed timeline of these events.

More recently (12-4-17) Washington Examiner columnist Byron York added to this case, arguing that the lame-duck Obama administration abused the obscure Logan Act (which prohibits private citizens from acting on behalf of the United States in disputes with foreign governments) as a pretext for investigating the incoming Trump administration and “to entangle the new administration in a criminal investigation as soon as it walked in the door of the White House.”

The Logan Act had never been enforced, York points out, in 218 years of its existence. Democrats began referencing it over the summer of 2016 just as they began accusing the Trump campaign of colluding with Russia. They returned to it again after the election, when President Obama took a parting shot at Israel at the UN Security Council, and President-elect Trump opposed him. York points out that Obama had a habit of punishing those who opposed his Israel policy and his outgoing administration took dead aim at Trump’s defense of Israel. The Logan Act was the perfect weapon to exact political revenge against Trump.

York writes:

From today’s perspective, nearly a year later, it has become apparent that, farfetched as it might seem, the Logan Act made it possible for the Obama administration to go after Trump. The ancient law that no one has ever been prosecuted for violating was the Obama administration’s flimsy pretense for a criminal prosecution of the incoming Trump team. And by the way, when it finally came time to charge Flynn with a crime, did prosecutors, armed with the transcripts of those Flynn-Kislyak conversations, choose to charge him with violating the Logan Act? Of course not. But for the Obama team, the law had already served its purpose, months earlier, to entangle the new administration in a criminal investigation as soon as it walked in the door of the White House.

Attorney Robert Barnes when asked about the campaign of leaks designed to damage the Trump administration by remnants of the Obama administration, said,

As I mentioned the other day to a liberal lawyer friend of mine, the worst thing ever accused concerning Nixon was about using private resources to try to illegally spy on people. Here you had Obama’s people using the NSA to spy on his adversaries, and apparently include the CIA, the FBI, and members of the Department of Justice in that loop, in a manner that was not approved of by any court, that was not approved by even a FISA court — the special court that monitors certain kinds of surveillance.

It’s a dangerous, precarious path that Obama has opened up, and hopefully there is a full investigation into that activity. There are people willing to leak the most sensitive national security secrets about any particular matter, solely to have a one-day political hit story on Trump. These are people who are violating their oath, and violating the law. Hopefully there is ultimately criminal punishment.

Further evidence of Obama’s close association with efforts to oppose President Trump have recently been uncovered: a group of former top lawyers for the Obama administration have formed an organization aimed at utilizing legal advocacy methods to oppose Trump’s policies. They started by submitting 50 Freedom of Information Act requests in December, 2017 and will use whatever information they acquire to begin filing more lawsuits.

The new group provides further evidence to back up Trump’s assertion that Obama is tied to the protest movement targeting the Trump administration. The  Daily Mail reported that Obama’s top adviser, Valerie Jarrett, has moved into Obama’s multi-million dollar rental home in the nation’s capital. The newspaper claimed Obama is turning his home “into the nerve center of the mounting insurgency against” Trump. “Obama’s goal, according to a close family friend, is to oust Trump from the presidency either by forcing his resignation or through his impeachment.”

Finally, just last week Obama made headlines for ominously invoking Hitler in thinly veiled criticism of President Trump. While speaking to the Economic Club of Chicago, Obama said, “We have to tend to this garden of democracy or else things could fall apart quickly. That’s what happened in Germany in the 1930s, which despite the democracy of the Weimar Republic and centuries of high-level cultural and scientific achievements, Adolph Hitler rose to dominate. Sixty million people died. So, you’ve got to pay attention. And vote.”

The Clinton Campaign and the Origins of the Anti-Trump dossier

It was recently reported that in April 2016, attorney Marc E. Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained Fusion GPS to conduct the questionable research on behalf of both the Clinton campaign and the DNC that ultimately resulted in the now infamous dossier claiming that President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia.

Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research. Fusion GPS then hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community. Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained the company in April 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Before that agreement, Fusion GPS’s research into Trump was funded by an unknown Republican client during the GOP primary. The Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm, continued to fund Fusion GPS’s research through the end of October 2016, days before Election Day.

CNN reported that in private interviews with Congressional investigators prior to the report revealing Perkins Coie’s reported payment to Fusion GPS, former Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and former DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz both denied that they were aware of any arrangement to fund Fusion GPS’s opposition research. Elias was seated next to Podesta during the private interview, but declined to comment, and Podesta did not respond to an inquiry.

This prompted former CIA Director Leon Panetta to advocate for the Senate Intelligence Committee to investigate both the Clinton campaign and the DNC about whether they had any knowledge of the payment to Fusion GPS to produce the dossier. “Well, it certainly makes the situation very awkward,” Panetta said of Elias’s alleged involvement. “If you’re testifying and saying you have no knowledge, and the attorney sitting next to you is one of those that knew what was involved here, I think it does raise an issue that the committee is going to have to look at and determine just exactly who knew what.”

The DNC-funded Anti Trump dossier became the cornerstone of the FBI investigations into the Trump campaign’s possible connections to Russia. In early January, then-FBI Director James B. Comey presented a two-page summary of Steele’s dossier to President Obama and President-elect Trump. Comey, testifying before the House in March, described the dossier as a compendium of “salacious and unverified” allegations against then-candidate Trump and his associates.

Trump has adamantly denied the allegations in the dossier and has dismissed the FBI probe as a witchhunt. Officials have said that any criminal accusations have not been verified and may never be. This hardly matters as it would be an understatement to say that it is politically advantageous to continue the investigation against Trump indefinitely, even if there is no hope of finding something with which to charge Trump.

Speaking to reporters, Trump called the Clinton-DNC funding of the dossier a “disgrace”, and a “very sad commentary on politics in this country. Hillary Clinton always denied it, the Democrats always denied it,” he added.

House Speaker Paul Ryan said that he was “frustrated” to learn of these latest developments of the dossier through the media and not from the DOJ or FBI firsthand. “It’s really frustrating. We’ve had these document requests for a long time and they’ve been stonewalling, the FBI and DOJ needs to give Congress the documents its been requesting and do so immediately,” said Ryan.

The Strzok Affair

Yet another damning development that had been successfully suppressed by the FBI has just surfaced regarding the Mueller investigation. The Justice Department’s inspector general discovered last summer that lead FBI investigator Peter Strzok exchanged numerous text messages with his mistress bashing President Trump and supporting presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016. When the inspector general notified Mueller’s office last August, the FBI removed Strzok from the Russia probe and demoted him. This critical action was then kept secret from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) for five months.

Strzok had been selected in July 2016 to oversee the Russia probe and was also a key agent in the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails and use of a private server. He interviewed Clinton and her aides about the server, which contained classified material. But, unlike his later interview with Flynn about the Russia investigation, Clinton was not under oath. Revealingly, Strzok had the transcript of a secretly wiretapped conversation involving Flynn while he was questioning him under oath about that very same conversation — quite a difference in treatment and entirely in line with Strzok’s political views.  When Clinton and her aides lied repeatedly to the FBI no charges were made. They were not under oath and the answers to the questions being posed to them were not already in the possession of the FBI. Based on Strzok’s carefully crafted double standards, Flynn was arrested while Clinton and her aides were cleared of all criminal charges.

Based on these and other disparities, Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) alleges that the FBI took a much more forceful approach to investigating Trump than they did when Clinton was being probed for her use of a private email server as secretary of State.

“The data points we have regarding politicization are damning enough but appear all the more problematic when viewed against the backdrop of investigations whose ferocity seemed to depend on the target: the Clinton case was investigated with an eye towards how to exonerate her and her associates, while the Russia investigation is being conducted using scorched earth tactics that seek to find anything to use against Trump associates. The wildly divergent ways these investigations have been conducted appear to dovetail with the political bias that has been uncovered.

Beyond Strzok himself, many of Mueller’s prosecutors have made campaign contributions to Clinton and other Democratic political candidates.  But this only confirms what has been known and said all along: that this investigation had nothing to do with collusion (a crime with no strict definition) or other possible infractions such as obstruction, but was rather about, first, sinking Trump’s candidacy and then, when that failed, his presidency.

Finally, yet another senior Justice Department official was demoted this week amid an ongoing investigation into his contacts with Fusion GPS responsible for the anti-Trump “dossier”. Evidence collected by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), indicates that Bruce Ohr, associate deputy attorney general, and director of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF), met during the 2016 campaign with Christopher Steele, the former British spy who authored the “dossier.”

Additionally, House investigators have determined that Ohr met shortly after the election with Glenn Simpson, the founder of Fusion GPS — the firm that hired Steele to compile the dossier with funds supplied by the Clinton campaign and the DNC. By that point, the dossier had been in the hands of the FBI, for five months, two months before FBI surveillance began on Carter Page, an adviser to the Trump campaign.

The Nunes panel has spent much of the past year investigating whether DOJ, under then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch, used the Clinton/DNC Anti-Trump dossier to justify a foreign surveillance warrant against Page. The Nunes panel has issued numerous subpoenas for documents and witnesses related to the dossier but claims DOJ and FBI have “stonewalled”.

The Wall Street Journal (12-5-17) increased the pressure on embattled FBI Special Counsel Robert Mueller with a scathing op-ed from its editorial board, calling on Mueller to resign over the controversy surrounding a lead investigator’s anti-Trump texts. They called attention to the fact that Mueller and the Justice Department had kept the information from investigators in the House for five months, and have refused to allow Strzok to be interviewed.

The WSJ also cites Mueller close friendship with Comey, whose firing by Trump triggered his appointment as special counsel. The reluctance to cooperate with a congressional inquiry compounds doubts related to this clear conflict of interest. The WSJ also argues that there have been a number of other examples of resistance from the FBI to congressional oversight, particularly Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s role in ignoring House subpoenas. Rosenstein appointed Mueller to his role.

Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy agrees. As he recently opined in the National Review,

Mueller’s investigation is a semblance of law-enforcement disguising the brute reality that Trump is being punished for winning the election and defying Obama policy. We are on the record long ago calling for an end to this travesty of an investigation. Mueller should be fired, Comey reprimanded, and the investigation, which has now gone on for 1-1/2 years with nothing to show, shut down. More and more, it looks as if this has nothing to do with justice, and everything to do with a group of rogue bureaucrats trying to get Trump impeached.

33 replies
  1. Alex S.
    Alex S. says:

    stopped reading at “Obama’s anti-Jisreal policy”

    this NY Times style op-ed is really not up to TOO standards

      • Alex S.
        Alex S. says:

        Yes Peter,
        I was not being precise; the impulse to respond in that manner was “triggered” purely by emotion and my lack of impulse control at that moment.

        I call, “BULLSHIT!”

        I love the higher level of intellectual analysis of this site, I truly do, but after watching, studying, analyzing “the jew world order” for 30 years, I really have no patience for WWE nonsense.

        I apologize to all the Drumpf sycophants for stirring the pot, but do you really believe, if Donald J. Trump were one of us, he would even be known to us? A guy who rose to the heights of power as a Capo di tutti Capo in the international gambling syndicate is one of us? Part of the Goy rabble? At the top of a crime syndicate controlled by (((whose)))? Are we supposed to believe that wherever he is, at work, in the White House, even with his family, that he is the only Goy Patriot in the room? I’m sorry, but I don’t see any difference in his persona today as POTUS than that of his performance/character on the hit jewish tv series “The Apprentice”.

        And I don’t think we have to wait till after his presidency to do the forensic analysis and show how “da jews” have benefited more with Trump in the (((White))) House than any of the other possible scenarios.

        Every four years I watch this fruitless cycle. I honestly don’t believe that the POTUS is much more than a script reader. I think it humanly impossible for the POTUS to really be what we are lead to believe. If anything, the whole Trump fiasco should make it clear to any thinking being that the POTUS does not really have a whole lot of power.

        To say it in plain American, “He ain’t runnin shit.” (not even his own twitter account)

        Business as usual, fake news, distraction, marching always toward (((Totalitarian Communist Hell))).

        If you don’t treat the cancer, IT WILL FINALLY KILL YOU. (((with unimaginable sufferingk until then)))

        And thank you Peter Baggins, over the hills and far away…

        • Troy
          Troy says:

          Couldn’t agree more. The 2016 Trump carnival seemed to generate so much power that even those who ought to know better have been caught in it’s vortex. I’ve zero scorn for TOO though – I appreciate the slightly more ‘moderate’ commentary from time to time.

          • Goy Goddess
            Goy Goddess says:

            I agree as well…the last thing this site needs is one more mealy-mouthed essay of the AmRen variety. This continuous semantic dance around the (((elephant in the room))) is probably attributable to decades of cucking Boomer complacency.

            Look, we no longer have ANY demographic wiggle room. Our race is being deliberately genocided by Jews, and our effeminate/brainwashed White men have simply thrown in the towel. They’ve tossed their own women to the wolves. They’re content to make mendacious YouTube videos and compose endless essays as we further descend further and further and further into unlivable Jewmerican HELL.

            American White kulaks will be consigned in a decade or two to nonstop South African-style ethnic cleansing as the (((targeted))) minority demographic. What are you doing to fight back against this and protect White women, Peter Baggins? THAT’S what you need to write about – not this.

            ——-

            (Mod. Note: “G.G.”, rather than hysterically accusing a TOO author, why don’t YOU tell our readership about what YOU have done to make “change”. You may assume that everyone here agrees with your interpretation, i.e. that this is a “man problem”, but I assure you that many don’t.)

          • Sam J.
            Sam J. says:

            “…our effeminate/brainwashed White men have simply thrown in the towel. They’ve tossed their own women to the wolves…”

            You need to stop this attack on Men right now. Men have by VERY LARGE numbers supported stopping mass immigration and the pozzing of our country far more than Women. So stop.

            Don’t tell us what to do. If you want to take up arms against the gov. then a AR-15 only weighs about 9 lbs. I sure you can lift it yourself and do your best.

            All we hear is “equality, equality, equality” but when the trash needs taken out or bad things happen it’s,”You Men must do something”. Do it yourself.

        • Rerevisionist
          Rerevisionist says:

          The Trump situation has helped me lean to the idea that Mussolini and Hitler were also Jew pawns, just as the perpetual holohoax agitation may have modelled Jews inventing or taking over both Christianity and Islam.

        • Curmudgeon
          Curmudgeon says:

          Alex S.
          Trump is not perfect, by any stretch of the imagination. However, I think some context is in order.
          You correctly identify the process as a circus, but it is a freak show within the circus. Any politician, in any country, who seeks the highest offices in the land, will invariably be a narcissist and ruthless. How the politician presents him/herself as being likeable is an entirely different question. Similarly, virtually all politicians are “owned” by someone or some thing.
          Trump presented himself as not being likeable to the political class. He poked his finger in their collective eye every chance he got. The political class hated it, the electorate lapped it up.
          Before the first primary, I predicted Trump would win, and most of my friends thought I was nuts. To me it was a no brainer. His campaign was a simple message to which, people across political and racial lines, could identify – dishonest politicians and dishonest media have denied and tried to hide the devastation globalism has wrought on the US. Anybody paying attention could see the ad hominem attacks about race and misogyny were bogus, and the only way to slow the juggernaut.
          After the nomination was secured, I again predicted Trump’s victory, but added that it would make no difference who was elected, it would be business as usual. Phoney Baloney Bernie was the only candidate with a chance to beat Trump, but Crooked Hillary had better connections to the “business as usual” crowd.
          Look at your history. Kennedy, Nixon, and even Reagan started to go rogue. It ended badly for them. Even Bush 41 went soft on Israel once, and that made him a target. Nixon and Bush were fortunate note to have had assassination attempts. Trump’s campaign message was rogue from the start. Any attempt he has made to implement any of his meaningful campaign promises that would actually benefit the US, have been blocked by all branches of government.
          There is no question that Trump is flawed. However, if Clinton were President, the minute she went off script she would be done. It’s not just Jews, although they play a disproportionate role. The people behind the curtain are psychopaths who believe they are God/gods. They prey on our weaknesses to manipulate us, and virtually all politicians are easy to manipulate when they seek power and influence. If that fails, accidents or assassinations happen. Trump already had power and influence, and that is what makes him dangerous.

  2. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    This circus would disappear overnight if Comey, Mueller, Rosenstein, Strzok, and Ohr were charged with sedition and held without bail.
    Interfering with the election process is part of undermining government institutions.

  3. Jason
    Jason says:

    THE RUSSIA CONTACTS SCAM THE MEDIA AND THE DEMS HAVE FABRICATED.

    Thanks for the great article, Sir. You are so right.

    This whole story of Russian contacts is classic fake news, a manufactured fake scandal by the Dems and the liberal media to MANUFACTURE a scandal when there is none in reality. Hillary’s servers and Bengazi are the real crimes.

    They are saying that Trump and his people talked to the Russians as private citizens before the election, so it is illegal.

    What? Talking to Russians is illegal? Really?

    Says who?

    They will not tell you the law that was allegedly broken, because the law that was allegedly broken itself is a hoax.

    It is the Logan Act which attempts to criminalize contacts between private citizens and foreign govts.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act

    There is only one big problem with the Logan Act—it is unconstitutional.

    That is why nobody has been prosecuted under it–for decades!

    So any American who posts on rt.com or on an Iranian website suggesting peace is technically violating the Logan Act.

    Any newspapers that publishes articles about Iran or Russia or Syria and suggesting peace or war is technically violating the Logan Act.

    Any American tourist who applies for a visa to Russia or buys a ticket at the Moscow metro (which is Russian govt. owned) and says shalom (peace) to the clerk is technically making contact with a foreign govt. and must be put in jail, under the Logan Act?

    So lets put all American tourists who ever visited Russia or Iran or other non-friendly foreign countries or ever posted on rt.com or presstv.com, etc. in jail, shall we?

    So why are all they not in jail?

    Because the Logan Act is unconstitutional and it violates the first amendment.

    What a joke! The Liberal media will use any scam they can to fool the gullible public.

    Mueller should be fire and this fake investigation shut down. Hillary should be the on in jail.

    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      If this were pre and post colonial America, half the Democratic Party would have been flogged publicly and jailed for life. The majority would have been hanged. If the legal system would not have done it, the people would have directly.

      Before we became wimps and pimps, not so long ago punishments were a real deterrent. as in off-the-scales pain and neck stretching, lead projectile poisoning, etc.

      Today, only Asian (gosh, again?) countries punish by flogging and specify the death penalty for the worst crimes. Perhaps when China takes over the Jewessay the “New Sheriff In Town” will start to equalize the equation.

  4. Stritchplatte
    Stritchplatte says:

    All the jews involved need to be call out, as being jews. Then stripped of US citizenship and sent to Iran. They can pay their own way to the promised land. Trump has these morons where he wants them, digging a deeper hole for themselves. Once they hit hardpan he will make his move and destroy them all. No way Trump is just sitting back for nothing, he knows these types of scumbags from many years of his business dealing with, scumbags. Hillary will face the death sentance for TREASON. The “Mackdaddy” obamer will be deported to his country of origin in a loin cloth and bare feet. Comey? he just disappears. The rest get jail time, real jail with “He did it to US!” Bernie Madoff.

    • Bennis Mardens
      Bennis Mardens says:

      I sure hope that you are right but….the other possibility is that they have threatened his life and the lives of his family members.
      They surely have something on Jeff Sessions, as he seems to be petrified as well.

      The ridiculous witch hunt has gone on waaaaaaaaaay too long.

      You’re right that it’s Jews, and it becomes more obvious by the day. I keep thinking that my dumb friends that call me a “conspiracy theorist” will soon realize that I’ve been right all along.

      • Karen T
        Karen T says:

        Woodrow Wilson
        “Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” -Woodrow Wilson

        • Charles Frey
          Charles Frey says:

          Nor could HE HIMSELF speak above his breath since Untermeyer lent him 25k to pay to the husband whose wife he could not keep his hands off: in return for letting Untermeyer chose the next Justice of the Supreme Court: Brandeis.

          How depressing, that those whose tool he was, can not classify him as just another conspiracy freak for his above utterance.

      • Sam J.
        Sam J. says:

        “…They surely have something on Jeff Sessions, as he seems to be petrified as well…”

        There’s no doubt that they have done something to Sessions. He looks like he has PTSD. His whole demeanor has changed. I believe they threatened him and his family. I don’t believe they have a lot of blackmail info on him but I concede they might.

        Trump acted the same way after the election. Did you notice his very strong change in demeanor right about the time he fired Flynn? It was striking to me. He eventually came back a little but after that they packed the whole administration with Jews. I think the story by the girl who says she was raped by Trump at 13 might be true. She was one of Jefferies models and supposedly has collaborating witnesses. Of course it could just as easily be lies. She could have been paid.

        Interesting speculation, is all the big to do about sexual harassment a lead up to unleashing the girls story that Trump raped her????? After all this hue and cry about sexual harassment if a girl testified and had collaboration that Trump raped her, what do you think would happen? Impeachment that’s what and next…war with Iran. Which could possibly lead to atomic war with Russia and China. If this looks like it’s going to happen the best plan of action it would seem to me is to attack the Jews with such force they are driven out. Otherwise we may all die. I mean it.

        I believe the Jews are a tribe of psychopaths or at least a large amount. They’re having trouble controlling their colony of the US. A psychopath would think nothing of starting a war that would take out China, Russia and the US while nuking the Europe and the Middle East during the war and coming out whole in Israel. If you look at events and how the press is managing them they all seem to lead up to this sort of show down between the powers.

  5. John
    John says:

    I just got an alert that Disney is buying the assets of Fox News’ parent company, 21st Century Fox for $52.4 billion. I’m pretty sure that means Fox News coverage will move to the left politically.

  6. ariadnatheo
    ariadnatheo says:

    Hollywood is the lab whose experiments, if successful (i.e., box office draw), are then reproduced in politics. Life imitates art.
    Obama said, “We have to tend to this garden of democracy or else things could fall apart quickly.”
    Yes indeed, “as long as the roots are not severed all is well. Growth has its seasons, first comes spring and summer, but then we have fall and winter…” Now, Chance, add a warning about “Germany in the 30s” and it will be perfect.
    “That’s what happened in Germany in the 1930s….”
    Excellent, Chance, I mean Obama, that wraps it up.

  7. Irish Savant
    Irish Savant says:

    Mueller’s ‘bona fides’ can be judged by his being appointed FBI Director just before 9/11 and then facilitating the subsequent cover-up.

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      You mean like the bona fides of Dov Zakheim, the son of a Russian Rabbi immigrant:

      Boss of the renovation company in charge of the 93 damages to the WTC; giving him all the blueprints; and

      Boss of the company for whom the e-bola virus expert woman worked, who died, along with her daughter, on the German Airwing’s flight from Barcelona to Duesseldorf; a mere two-hours drive from the International Court of Justice at the Hague; and

      Boss of the Alexandria, Va. company marketing their FLIGHT TERMINATION SYSTEM, that overrides all pilot controls, capable of directing those four planes on 9/11, or downing Airwing’s or any other flights, including the two losses of Malaysia Airlines, whose head of state Dr. Mohammad Mahathir had openly called Soros a dirty little Jewish speculator after he had damaged their economy; and

      Boss of Edward Snowden; and

      Boss, CFO of the Pentagon, when Secretary of Defense Gates announced a missing mere 2.3 TRILLION dollars [ 10 % of the National Debt ] ONE DAY BEFORE 9/11; [ You Tube ]; thus introducing a novel new approach to the International Accounting Principles; and

      Boss of the network peddling perfectly in-tact US fighters to Israel at surplus prices.

      Certainly a patriot [ for someone ] who warrants far greater attention than Kasper the loudmouth, prepared to die for his cause, only to ignominiously disappear into bourgeois private life to raise a family. How come his parents were registered in Quebec by their Church and State census ? How come his Greenwich Village book-shop catered to a Negro crowd and Negro-phile Whites, while he had a Negro girl-friend [ before he was sent on his mission to cozy up and report on Pound ?]

      I am afraid we are owed a Part 2 to this story.

  8. Alex S.
    Alex S. says:

    Peter Baggins,
    Just to clarify, this bend in the road was where my tolerance gave out:

    “They returned to it again after the election, when President Obama took a parting shot at Israel at the UN Security Council, and President-elect Trump opposed him. York points out that Obama had a habit of punishing those who opposed his Israel policy and his outgoing administration took dead aim at Trump’s defense of Israel. The Logan Act was the perfect weapon to exact political revenge against Trump.”

    I truly apologize for attacking you in a less than intellectual fashion. Couth and proper manners are not my strengths. To be fair, I feel I owe you the benefit of the doubt that you are an honest, sincere man. I realize you put quite a bit of work into this piece and maybe, it’s not deserving of my immediate volley.

    That said, sir, we are in a war, low intensity guerrilla conflict at this stage, but intensifying every day.

    I, like many others, respect and admire the theories of Kevin MacDonald as a way of expressing/defining a subject that is truly, purposefully, baffling, insidious and elusive to most human minds. I am attracted to this site and the work of Mr. MacDonald, et al, because the thinking presented here usually cuts through the smoke and mirrors of the media theatrics that is presented to us.

    Please take my crude criticism in a constructive way and not an insult. I want a better world for all of us, Honor and Justice for all creatures.

    Oh, and Peter, sir, I can’t help, but mention. Were you aware that a possible source for your sir name is “a bag man”?

    🙂

  9. Junghans
    Junghans says:

    An anti-Trump political witch hunt it surely is. Bannon pretty well summed it up with his nullification concept; as the intellectually poisoned establishment is out to smother the last remaining self preservation instincts of the declining White American population, as well as anyone (a la Trump) who even meekly espouses them. Therefor, and it can’t be stressed enough, Jewry, and their demented melange of system operatives, are clearly bound & determined to neutralize, or take out Trump, and to stifle the last conventional political gasp of White America’s will to live.

    TRUMP AND THE JEWS

    Trump is a floundering hostage in an office, in which he, as titular head of the captive American nation, is presently lacking in real power, (and/or ability) to deal with. Unless Trump was a planted Golem to begin with, the (((deep state))) presently has him compromised, so the question is, will he continue to ‘deal’ with his (((tormentors))), or openly call them out and fight to the finish?

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      If ‘ he called them out ‘ he would probably get the support of the majority of the electorate, slightly skewed, but he would also pass away in a ‘ New York Minute ‘.

      How ? Perhaps by the Mossad agents, resident in the US; as suggested by Mr. Adler, editor of the Atlanta Jewish paper, in his fourth Editorial choice of doing away with Obama.

      Here the famous Secret Service, with all of its cavorting in Latin American hotels, had incontrovertible evidence as to the suggested assassination of a US President.

      Guess it would have been openly anti-Semitic to also prosecute Adler for this prosecutable act.

      His paper’s subscribers immediately feigned distancing themselves from this man for his breach; but rumblings were also heard from his supporters, that the majority of the subscribers privately agreed with their editor.

      What a fitting end to this term. Another Disney Investigation into the assassination of yet another President.

      • Trenchant
        Trenchant says:

        The difficulty of re-financing partnerships in which the majority of Trump’s wealth lies and many other commercial hurdles would suggest that nothing of the sort will ever happen. His loyalty to Israel may or may not be absolute, but to Mammon…

  10. ariadnatheo
    ariadnatheo says:

    The fiercer the attacks against him from the Jewish “Left,” the harder Trump tries to please his allies on the Jewish “Right,” hoping to buy himself kosher protection.
    Is he too dumb to realize, after a lifetime among them, that a Goy (a mere tool) cannot use a Jewish shield to protect himself against a Jewish attack? That there is no such thing as “left” and “right,” only Chosen and Goyim? That the likes of Schumer and Feinstein are in fact delighted by the services he renders to “Bibi” and Adelson? That he is being maneuvered like a hapless ball in a pinball machine by very dexterous players?

    • Lucy
      Lucy says:

      You’re absolutely right, Ariadnatheo. This is exactly the case in Sweden. That the top figures in the “nationalist” party, Sverigedemokraterna (Sweden Democrats) are fervently kissing the chosenite derrieres – and embrace every step (((their))) true homeland takes – has not soften the chosenite
      outlook on the Sweden Democrats. Having abandoned all of the former pro-Swedish traits in their politics, the Sweden Democrats have not gained anything, as they still are painted as Nazi – or at best – racists.
      Since Sweden’s entire public room, even the alternative media, is thoroughly kosherized, there is no point to rack one’s brains about the matter of chosenites’ being “left” or “right”. Even though (((they))) might have different opinion on the matter of the most effective way to fool the naive Swedes (and probably even many of ordinary Jews) into the delusion of Sweden’s being a democracy, (((they))) definitely harbour the by “the anti-racist love” inspired desire of burying the remains of the Swedish national state.
      In a country where 95 % of the media is owned by the eternal sufferers’ elite , and the rest has more or less adopted a kosher view on ethics, the divide between left and right hardly can be more than a useful facade.

  11. AvitoR77Icep
    AvitoR77Icep says:

    (Mod. Note: Comments posted in Greek language will not be approved. TOO is an English language blog. Thanks.)

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      Moderator, you astonish me. Some of the splitting of already sub-atomic particles here, on ancient philosophies, history and theology, are already Greek to me. So from my point of view, with a magnificent handle like his, why not let him comment in Greek in the first place ?

      ——-

      (Mod. Note: Charles, I did give it a second thought before zapping it, but wasn’t sure the “joke” of imposing an essay in Greek on TOO readership would be as funny to some as it would have been to me. The positioning of your tongue in your cheek is no less amusing! (grins))

  12. Sam J.
    Sam J. says:

    To the web the administrator. I have a Firefox browser with noscript (blocks scripts) add-on. When I load your page it loads but then the “page loading indicator” shows that it continues to try to load…something I have no idea what. This may be using up your and my bandwidth doing nothing but continuously trying to load whatever it’s trying to load. When I hit the stop button it stops trying to load, whatever.

Comments are closed.