The New Nullification

On July 1st, 2015, 32 year old Kathryn Steinle was shot and killed walking on Pier 14 in the Embarcadero district of San Francisco. Her killer was a convicted criminal and a five-time deported illegal alien from Mexico, Jose Zarate. Zarate first claimed that he had fired at a sea lion but later changed his story and said that the gun had gone off when he picked it up after finding it wrapped in a cloth beneath a bench on which he was sitting at the time. The shot ricocheted off a piece of concrete and struck Steinle in the back; she died two hours later of her injuries.

The case was a sensation containing as it did all the necessary factors: a criminal and many-times deported “illegal alien,” a young and innocent victim and, of great interest in these days of demands for gun control, a mysterious hand gun. Further, this “gun crime” was committed in a state and city with very strict—some say unconstitutionally so—gun laws. Zarate was tried for second degree murder, considered an “overreach” by the San Francisco prosecutor given the ricochet nature of the wound! He was found not guilty. Since the trial, the Federal Government has sought custody of Zarate to prosecute him on any number of secondary crimes, but as a “city,” San Francisco is decidedly unwilling to cooperate with the Department of Justice. It is said, however, that prosecution for violations of the city’s and state’s gun laws is in the works. But whether or not Zarate ever pays for his crimes—and they are many—nothing will restore life to Kathryn Steinle.

As a final “icing” on this wretched cake, California and the City by the Bay have proven more hostile to President Donald Trump’s condemnation of the crime and the criminal than they ever were against Zarate, especially given his numerous convictions and insistence on returning to the United States to commit further mayhem. After the murder and while much of the country was mourning Steinle’s death as an unnecessary tragedy, California ensured that there will be more such incidents by doubling down on its madness by becoming a sanctuary state.

What the eventual outcome of the matter will be is unknown because Zarate is now in federal custody awaiting charges. But as long as large cities and even a very large state are determined that the laws of the rest of the country do not apply to them, we may consider Kate Steinle the first of many casualties resulting from the insanity that grips this country. While in Chicago, legal citizens—doubtless with illegal guns—kill more people in a year than are killed in many small wars, our broken immigration system simply opens the floodgates for more killings while “law enforcement” and local and state governments protect and serve not their citizens, but the criminals involved for the simple reason that they represent first, liberal ideology and second, the next wave of liberal Democrat voters.

Still, it is interesting to note the gun laws in California in general and San Francisco in particular. After all, we know any time a gun is used in a crime, liberals en masse begin their siren call for “gun control.” All intelligent and rational arguments regarding the facts that such laws only affect lawful citizens and that criminals are seldom daunted by the law mean nothing to our liberal friends. However, in the case of Zarate, it would seem that not only did the law mean nothing to this repeat offender, but it meant nothing to California or San Francisco! How else can anyone explain why this “gun crime” — officially so terrible in the eyes of the minions of California government — seemed of such little concern? The gun laws of California are among the most restrictive in the nation and include a five-year Firearm Safety Certificate requiring a $25 fee and the applicant having to pass a written test proctored by a Certified Instructor from the Department of Justice. And the list of regulations only gets worse. The City of San Francisco adds their own laws on top of California’s cumbersome gun regulations.

Consider all of this legal falderal in light of the unattended, unlicensed and fully loaded gun that Zarate claims he found under a bench! Not only does he take possession of that gun—illegally!—but proceeds to discharge it in public whether it be to shoot a sea lion or a woman. You would think that the prosecution would have added these very serious gun charges when he was tried for the murder of Steinle, but he was only convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, and the sentence for that violation was reduced to time served. I suppose we should be happy that the judge rejected the absurd defense argument “that he didn’t know he was holding a gun when it fired.”

There can be only one reason why Zarate’s crimes—ranging from his drug convictions and his numerous illegal entries coupled with the death, however unintentional, of Kathryn Steinle—are viewed seemingly very differently than would have been the case had they been committed by an American citizen; that is, the fact that Zarate is not a citizen of the United States, but a protected, cossetted and welcomed illegal (non-White) alien. Instead of his crimes making the killing of Kate Steinle of greater consequence, his status has virtually nullified her death, at least as far as the California legal system is concerned.

Jefferson once wrote, “The care of human life and happiness and not their destruction is the first and only legitimate object of good government.” Jefferson was, of course, speaking of the citizens of that government. It would seem that the State of California and the City of San Francisco have turned that truism on its head, bestowing care and happiness not on one of their citizens, but on a man who has proven unworthy of that protection. Sadly, there seems no end in sight of this particular governmental perversion.

23 replies
  1. Valerie Protopapas
    Valerie Protopapas says:

    Zarate was indeed convicted of his “gun violation” crime and sentenced to TIME SERVED! In other words, the author of the above was quite right to suggest that he might not be punished for ANY of his crimes. And so it goes, and so it will CONTINUE to go until the various establishment governments are made to comply with the laws as is required for ORDINARY (actual) citizens.

  2. John D. Horton
    John D. Horton says:

    When the federal government starts charging California state government officials with treason and sedition and starts executing them, then the California state government officials might come to their senses?

  3. James Bowery
    James Bowery says:

    If the left had any integrity, the whole “nullification” thing would permit States, that have some prayer of surviving cultural Marxism, to deport everyone who voted for Clinton to California, and erect walls at State boundaries to keep them from ever coming back with whatever diseases they picked up in the human ecology of their “dreams”.

  4. Pickle Rick
    Pickle Rick says:

    Let’s hope Zarate makes it to Federal prison, where he is put in a cell block with the Aryan Brotherhood.

  5. Michael Adkins
    Michael Adkins says:

    There is another part to the story; and that is how fast this crime disappears from the corporate media.

  6. Irene
    Irene says:

    All that publicity nationwide bc one single woman was killed by a foreigner? Americans don’t know how luck they are!
    Two weeks ago trucker Catalin C. from Romania was condemned for raping and killing two German women – hardly newsworthy for the luegenpresse! If the German media were honestly reporting the amount of crime committed by foreigners – Eastern Europeans taking the lion’s share – Germans would be out on the streets demanding globalist Merkel’s head to be stuck on a pike or stick

  7. Mark O'Leary
    Mark O'Leary says:

    Please consider the idea that this was a hoax. This sort of psyop conditions white people to accept injustice and powerlessness. It’s easy to fake these things. Logically, if someone has the clout to control the prosecutor’s office to prevent effective prosecution, they might just as well have faked the whole thing. Fake events allow more precise control of the message. Think about it. Credit goes to Miles Mathis for uncovering many of these psyops; for example, see /tate.pdf
    It sounds crazy, but keep an open mind.

    • Sawtelle
      Sawtelle says:

      Mark O’Leary

      Pardon me for not understanding what you wrote. Was Kate Steinle not murdered? Did the trial not happen?
      What would be the purpose of a hoax like this? The only purpose I can see is to make it clear to Americans that we can be murdered by immigrants and they won’t be punished. Doesn’t Miles Mathis claim that OJ Simpson, Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman never existed?

      • Mark O'Leary
        Mark O'Leary says:

        I am proposing Kate Steinle is the fake identity of an actor. The trial took place, but the defendant was another actor. I make this speculation based on the event’s similarity to other proven hoaxes. The motive would be as you state.
        MM doesn’t claim stated people don’t exist. He does present photographic and logical evidence that Nicole and Ron’s murder was faked.

      • Lorenz Kraus
        Lorenz Kraus says:

        The purpose of the hoax was to validate Trump’s campaign. Mexicans are rapists and murderers, and what do you know, here’s an example just a week or two later. That helped Rabbi Trump get into office.

        It would be wise for white nationalists to go deeper than surface news. America is a masonic-Jew theocracy. You need to know the patterns that the system uses. Renegade Tribune has done the best and only work on that. Zachary Hubbard has done a lot of work on the sports, news, and political hoaxes and the cults numerology. MrE has done a lot of work on trannies in politics, Hollywood, and celebrites. Schism206 has done critical work on revealing the JEWISH DEATH CULT’s occult vision.

        The same Kabbalistic motif of the Jewish tree of death was at Dealey Plaza and the Twin Towers. The same star alignment of Pluto and Saturn in Saggitarius and Gemini were on 911 and July 4, 1776. The Twins, Gemini were blown up and replace with the monad 1776 feet tall.

        The reason the elites are pushing trannies and race-mixing is to take the many created by the demiurge and return man to the mud from which he came. It serves the Jews because the jews are hysterical half-breed trannies when no one is looking.

        You must up your game to defeat this JEWISH DEATH CULT. We are in a de facto theocracy. Once it is widely understood we are in a theocracy, it can be dissolved.

    • Mark Hunter
      Mark Hunter says:

      Mark O’Leary,
      Miles Mathis is a talented graphics artist and writes well about the degrading influence of art criticism. However in physics and mathematics “he doesn’t know what he doesn’t know.” That is, he is ignorant without being aware of it; he pretentiously blunders ahead lecturing about what he doesn’t really understand. He’s too boastful. Still he’s an interesting character. Maybe some of his psyop allegations are true (certainly not in the case at hand), I haven’t looked into that part of his website. If you read him do it very critically.

      • Mark O'Leary
        Mark O'Leary says:

        Thanks, I always read critically.
        Most of his science papers I can’t comment on because I don’t understand them. But, for example, I’ve made a study of his special relativity papers and conventional special relativity, and I believe he is correct. He proposes that the relevant transform is not between moving and stationary coordinate systems, but between distant and local coordinates. His explanation is compelling, and his analysis resolves the twins paradox. He derives a very slightly different mathematical form of the Lorenz transform. I think any disinterested reader would agree with his logic.
        As for his “conspiracy theory” papers, I find most of them totally persuasive. Particularly so to anyone familiar with the discussion on crypto-Judaism in Anti-Semitism and Its Discontents. BTW, MM appears to be unfamiliar with Kevin MacDonald’s magnum opus, and I disagree with MM’s theory of motive for these “conspiracies”. He believes a secret financial elite, either crypto-Jewish or descended from Jews, exercises power (i.e. controls media, intelligence agencies, and large swathes of industry) in pure pursuit of wealth. Anyone familiar with MacDonald knows the reasons are more complex than that, though desire for wealth is a factor.
        Anyway, thanks for the warning.

    • Sam J.
      Sam J. says:

      Thanks for the Miles Mathis. This guy is really interesting. I don’t follow all his math but I had calculus, long time age, and it does seem plausible. I’ve only read a little of his conspiracy stuff and what I have read does seem to add up.

      So I’m thanking you for the link and…damning you at the same time I can see me spending way too many hours reading his stuff.

      • Sam J.
        Sam J. says:

        After reading some of this…well supposedly everything, everywhere, every time is fake. Doesn’t add up unless you wanted to make everyone believe that everything is fake and there is no truth, ever.

  8. Sawtelle
    Sawtelle says:

    She wasn’t the first in San Francisco 3 members of a family, the Bolognas were murdered by an illegal alien felon recently released from San Francisco jail despite an immigration hold. The illegal became annoyed because Mr Bologna made a left turn. He shot Mr Bologna and his 2 teenage sons.

    San Francisco liberals wept and wailed that the illegal had every right to shoot the Bologna family because the boys were wearing baseball caps and appeared to be gang members
    The illegal was convicted of murder.

    But when Mrs Bologna sued the city for wrongful death caused by the city violating the immigration hold her. See was dismissed at the first hearing.

    A 17 year old boy in Los Angeles, Jamel Shaw was shot walking along the street by an illegal who had been released in violation of an immigration hold about 18 hours before the murder.
    Jamel’s Mother was in the national guard and was in Iraq at the time.

  9. Sawtelle
    Sawtelle says:

    One more thing, the gun was stolen, possession of which is another felony
    If an American was found to have a stolen gun in his or her possession they would be arrested

    The gun was stolen from a federal government employee who left it in a back pack in his car. The suit will probably be dismissed because the federal employee followed standard procedure by leaving it concealed in the back pack. I wish car manufactures had not installed those pop the trunk levers in cars. You have to lift the trunk door anyway. Anyone who can break into a car can get into the trunk.

  10. Ger Tzedek
    Ger Tzedek says:

    Certainly the death of a young, beautiful White woman is regrettable. Looking at the reaction of her brother to the reaction of Trump to the verdict of California judges, I can assume that Steinle was yet another liberal piece of shit. Evolution at work: you hold unsuitable beliefs, you are taken out of the gene pool.

  11. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    In my view, the prosecution erred in its approach to the case. Consider the following:
    If someone is killed during the commission of a crime, the law considers anyone connected with the crime, even if not armed, guilty of murder, unless they did not know what was happening.
    Zarate committed a crime in illegally entering the US. Every day he remained in the US illegally was a new crime. Steinle was shot during the commission of a crime. Zarate was holding the gun while committing his crime, and he knew he was committing a crime. Therefore, the law requires that he be convicted of 1st degree murder.
    This removes all the noise about whether the gun was stolen, and whether it was accidental.
    That would have forced the jury, if they so chose, to direct the law be ignored, which is real jury nullification.

  12. T
    T says:

    The elites and their hangers on knew quite well beforehand what would be the murderous results of their actions. Don’t let anyone tell you different.

    The below excerpt is a message from the past to the future. It is from an 1870 US book called One Hundred Years Progress of the United States. Towards the end of the book in a section entitled Marvels That Our Grandchildren Will See the writer attempts to project the future one hundred years forward. The excerpt below is from the concluding chapter starting on pg 521of this section entitled ‘The History Of A Day In 1970’ and describes a day in the life of a wealthy ‘progressive’ US business man of the future and what he observes rather nonchalantly of the inner city of a million strong metropolis in present day Utah. In this projected world North America as a whole has been integrated economically and politically into a single unified state, its population now numbering in the hundreds of millions, high speed rail travel (120 mph) has been achieved and is the order of the day, and wage slavery (ie chattel slavery and its trade monetized in the form of cheap labor/mass immigration) is the primary source of labor, much to the ultimate expense of the founding Anglo-Saxon stock general public as the excerpt makes plain. It is, almost needless to say, all rather quite ‘multicultural’. In a scene that would fit well in any of the 1970’s US produced inner city based police detective television series such as Kojak or Baretta the drug and hate fueled random act of ultraviolence directed at crowds of innocent bystanders or at the lone individual on the street in the form of knife slashing is a common everyday occurence.

    pg 526

    it would not surprise us to know, that in one of his fits of jealousy against Englishmen and Americans, he [a discarded ‘immigrant’] had assassinated some friend of ours.

    ..we have entered the purlieus of the lowest classes of the Chinese, Hindoo, and Malay population. Here is an opium shop, and on benches under the verandah lie ghastly -looking men and women, under the influence of the potent drug. They seem dead, and to
    have died in horrible agony; but soon one of them, and presently another, raises his head, and propping it up with one hand, looks around with an idiotic expression, and calls in utter wretchedness for more of the poison. If denied he presently raises up again, and may
    commit murder or become a violent maniac. A little farther on a crowd are gathered, who suddenly start and fly for their lives. A stalwart Malay, whose face is so malignant with all evil passions that it would make a capital study
    for Gustave Dore in his next picture of Satan, and who is maddened with vile liquor and opium has rushed out and is running amok, striking and stabbing with his gleaming Kriss every one in his way. Yet farther on the Hindoo,
    sleek, graceful, and eminently handsome in form and feature, but treacherous and deceitful, bows very humbly and obsequiously, but it would not surprise us to know, that in one of his fits of jealousy against Englishmen and Americans, he had assassinated some friend of ours to whom he had been equally obsequious and polite.

  13. angstry
    angstry says:

    The “Sanctuary City/State Financial and Criminal Accountability Law”
    Every politician that votes for or endorses the mythical “sanctuary” from Federal Immigration Law shall be subject to obtaining and providing a Surety Bond to secure 100% Reparations to any Legal Citizen injured, murdered, raped, robbed, or in any way harmed, including mental distress, by said Illegal persons in the area. By their refusal to honor their oath to uphold the Constitution and the Law of the land the said politicians have negated any “governmental immunity”. Said politicians are Personally Criminal Accomplices to any crimes committed by the Criminals they are Harboring. Said politicians are Personally Financially Liable for damages, reparations, and to “make whole” any Legal Citizen harmed by the Criminals they are Harboring.
    Yes, “sanctuary implementors” DO OWE DAMAGES for any harm their law breaking leads to. By the way, why is a clerk jailed for refusing to do her duty and register homosexual marriages,but these politicians and police are not jailed for allowing sanctuary cities and refusing to do THEIR duty?
    Cannot say it often enough, these politicians took an oath to uphold the CONSTITUTION of the United States and therefore cannot whine that they do not have to enforce Federal Law. Every judge or politician blocking that wall is providing material aid and support to Narco Terrorists. Anyone who provides “sanctuary” to an illegal is harboring criminals, PERIOD. And if that illegal commits a crime the sanctuary providers is a ACTIVE ACCOMPLICE to the crime and is PERSONALLY Financially Liable for FULL restitution and gets to serve time for the crime…………… BOOK’EM DANNO. If the “Appointed Defenders” of Our HOUSE refuse to do their duty, they are accomplices and personally responsible for the results. “Public Officials” That refuse to enforce the immigration laws and provide “sanctuary” to ILLEGALS automatically assume personal financial responsibility for ANY crimes and any damages created by said ILLEGALS. They also are accessories to any crimes committed by their ILLEGALS and should be JAILED as Accomplices. Same applies to any priest/church that provides “sanctuary”

  14. angstry
    angstry says:

    Since congress Says walls are racist hate, we can just take down the 25′ wall we have been paying to build all around Israel. In October 2003, the UN General Assembly approved a resolution condemning Israel’s so-called “security barrier,” a grotesque thing, parts of it much larger and more formidable than the Berlin Wall, that Israel has built on occupied Palestinian territory. But YOU do not “deserve” protection.
    Americans, YOU, are paying to build a 25 foot tall WALL all around Israel ……. but if You ask for a wall to protect your Families from ILLEGALS you are told you are a RACIST BIGOT By GUESS WHO —– Jewish directed LIBERALS like Franken, Schumer, Feinstein, Sanders, Schiff, Pelosi
    It is Jewish controlled ACLU, SPLC, ADL, and other “civil rights” organizations that do not give a FIG about YOUR Civil RIghts that twist the Law to force these Invaders in on you. You have NO RIGHTS to live in peace in their eyes.
    Meanwhile — http://www.barenakedislam.c
    Meanwhile after calling you a racist bigot HATER ….. This is how Jews like Franken, Schumer, Feinstein, Schiff, Pelosi deal with Israel-
    YOU are racist? Here is the Jewish Netanyahu has just called for blacks in Israel to be sent back to Africa: “We will return south Tel Aviv to the citizens of Israel, they are not refugees, but infiltrators looking for work. If needed, we will legislate an amendment to the law or change the agreements with the African countries, or both.”
    YOU paid for this wall :
    YOU pay for walls, gates, locks, ARMED guards, all around the very slimeball politicians who deny Your Family basic protection. Why? If Your Family is not “worthy” of protection you should not be protecting them and Their Families.

  15. Sam J.
    Sam J. says:

    It may be that there are plenty of Whites leftist whose polices are driving the collapse of the US but if they did not have the financial, propaganda and moral support of the Jews their positions would collapse. There’s only one way to save ourselves. [Sentence redacted]. They must have no control over the fate of our nation in any way. We would love to get this peacefully but no matter how they must go.

Comments are closed.