Ethnocentric Critiques of the London Conference on Intelligence

In January 2018, the anti-science Left that dominates British academia descended into spasms of fury. For decades it has done all that was within its growing power to stop scientists who refuse to let emotion stand in the way of their calling to pursue the truth from researching group differences in intelligence, and especially race differences. Researchers who have dared extend the logic of Darwinian Theory to human sub-groups would lose funding and have papers rejected out of hand from journals by increasingly Politically Correct reviewers, and they might even find themselves fired from their jobs.

But in January 2018, it was revealed that precisely these heretical researchers had been polluting the holy of holies for years. They had been holding an effectively secret conference, by invitation only, at one of Britain’s top universities — University College London — annually since 2015.

Toby Young

The evil of presenting the most straightforward theory based on the evidence, regardless of what dogmas this might undermine, had been happening under the Left’s very noses! UCL’s student newspaper, The London Student, revealed that the conference, organised by UCL honorary lecturer Dr James Thompson, had attendees that included Richard Lynn. Prof. Lynn had established that there are consistent race differences in IQ. It was also attended by numerous other academics connected to the race realist academic journal Mankind Quarterly, edited by Dr. Lynn, including one who had made a presentation on eugenics. Indeed, another version of the exposé, in the satirical magazine Private Eye, revealed that one of the attendees was Toby Young, a prominent conservative media pundit in the UK. His attendance insured that the ‘secret racist conference’ or ‘eugenic conference’ was reported in all the national newspapers and was even mentioned on television. The London Conference on Intelligence had ultimately come to the student journalists’ attention because Young had rashly mentioned it in a recently published speech to a leading conference on intelligence held in Montreal the previous summer.

Leftist students protested in front of UCL (see above photo) and petitioned for Thompson to lose his honorary position. UCL responded by launching an investigation, which is on-going, into Thompson’s failure to tell them that the conference would include ‘controversial’ people and topics. UCL stressed, of course, that they defended free speech, but opposed ‘racism’ in all its forms.

The conference presentations are now available online. They are a daring and fascinating mixture of subjects: race differences in intelligence, dysgenic fertility in the West, the impact of national testosterone levels on per capita Nobel prizes and even race differences in prevalence to ethnocentrism.

But there was one heretical theory which none of the presentations explored and which seems to neatly explain why the conference ended up being revealed at all. It is Kevin MacDonald’s theory that people — and especially highly ethnocentric people such as the Jews — will generally act in the interests of the ethnic group to which they belong. Accordingly, MacDonald’s analyses of anti-Western, anti-nationalist philosophies shows that Jewish people are hugely over-represented, especially at the highest levels. Cultural anthropology, which promotes multiculturalism in Western countries, was founded by Franz Boas. Marxism, named after its founder, attempts to undermine religion and tradition. Postmodernism, whose leaders included Jacques Derrida, attempts to foster a sense of nihilistic atomization in which nothing means anything. All of these scholars were ethnically Jewish. They were promoting Jewish interests, whether consciously or not, by espousing their particular worldviews, all of which are founded on dogmas — such as that ‘truth’ is subjective and merely the ‘truth’ of those with power, meaning it must be deconstructed — rather than the empirical method. Clearly, that which undermines a sense of European identity and certainty is good for European Jews, as they will maintain their identity.

Of course, there are variations in how ethnocentric people are and one of the papers at the London Conference on Intelligence explored the reasons for these differences, part of them being genetic. But sometimes you find a case which manifestly embodies MacDonald’s theory and with the London Conference on Intelligence you have it.

The author of the London Student’s expose was Ben Van der Merwe. The article was entitled ‘Exposed: London’s Eugenics Conference and its Neo-Nazi Links’ and the young Oxford native described the conference as ‘dominated by a group of white supremacists.’ Whether or not this descriptions are accurate, the research at the conference certainly seems to imply that immigration is bad for Europe’s IQ, that race differences in intelligence are significantly genetic, meaning that race differences in accomplishment have nothing to do with ‘racism,’ that Europeans are highly accomplished for primarily genetic reasons, that ethnocentric groups always destroy their competitors eventually, that Europeans are a separate genetic group, and that eugenics helps a group to survive and flourish.

And Benjamin Guy Van der Merwe, who was born in 1996, should have some understanding of this, as he is Jewish; his mother’s maiden name being Goldman. Van der Merwe’s co-author on the piece — she is not named on it but has stressed her involvement on Twitter — was Emma Frances Yeomans. She is the daughter of Prof. Martin Yeomans, who lectures in psychology at the University of Sussex, in the southern seaside town of Brighton, famous for its vibrant gay scene. Miss Yeomans seems to be rather conflicted about her identity. She is clearly ethnically Jewish and she writes regularly for Jewish News, with some of her Times of Israel pieces glowingly quoted on pro-Israel websites. However, her less than modest website stresses that she is a ‘Christian’ at what is, seemingly, a rather liberal Christian Church. Her Twitter page, however, emphasises that she is ‘faithfully LGBT’ — this being a support group for homosexual Christians.

So, Yeomans, by acting as she does, is promoting her genetic interests. She advocates for the ethno-state of Israel and writes for a newspaper which helps to maintain a sense of Jewish ethnic separateness. Yet she attempts to damage those involved in research, the results of which might lead to Europeans acting rather like she does. In addition, it has been shown — indeed one of the conference presentations looked at this — that homosexuality is a reflection, in part, of what is known as ‘developmental instability’; of something going wrong early in development. This is, in part, a reflection of mutant genes, explaining why homosexuality positively correlates with other markers of mutation, such as depression, neurological disorders, left-handedness and many more. To the extent that the London Conference promotes eugenics, it promotes the removal of the kinds of genes which Miss Yeomans carries: genes which, if widespread enough, would lead to a society of physically and mentally ill people with no desire to breed. So, shutting down discussion of such issues is in Miss Yeomans’ genetic interests. It makes sense from the gene-eye-view.

These budding journalists interviewed two anti-science scientists, to get official condemnation for the conference into their articles. One was a gentile, but the other, Dr Adam Rutherford, is also Jewish. He told them that ‘there are more differences between two people of the same race than between races,’ and thus James Thompson was a scientific ignoramus for accepting the idea of ‘race.’ Of course is Lewontin’s fallacy: Rutherford ignores proof that when lots of miniscule differences are in the same direction they add up and so lead to a situation where there are demonstrable genetic differences between races — differences which allow important and correct predictions to be made about everything from reaction to certain drugs, to personality, to sporting ability. But, of course, one’s motivation to promote one’s genetic interests — and thus destroy anything which might discourage Europeans from believing that they are an ethnic group just like the Jews — can easily overwhelm logic.

The other journalist who did not merely report, but produced on an Op-Ed for the (left-wing) Guardian on the conference was also motivated by her ethnic interests. Angela Saini is a British journalist who is ethnically Indian. She condemned the conference as eugenicist and racist, for arguing that there are innate race differences in ability. Yet, as James Fulford has noted on V-Dare, in her book Geek Nation: How Indian Science is Taking Over the World, she explains that India is built on “the ingenuity of its people,” which surely implies that non-Indians have less ingenuity; precisely the way of thinking — presented with huge amounts of evidence — she argues is unthinkable when it comes to Europeans. Andrew Joyce, writing in TOO, makes similar points, noting: “Racial hurt seeps from the page [of Geek Nation], and my own instinct suggests that Saini may well be engaged in a form of self-deception, submerging her own ethnocentrism and ethnic grievances in a swamp of superficial egalitarianism.”

The London Conference on Intelligence brought the culture war in British academia into stark relief. The reaction against it was so strong because it was realised that at worst some very eminent and accomplished scientists are on the other side and, at best (perhaps unconsciously) that they are in the right and that their detractors are hypocrites. This is especially obvious when it comes to allegations of eugenics. As Kevin MacDonald has noted, the Jews rigorously practiced eugenics for centuries. Dr Adam Rutherford would not be a scientist and Ben Van der Merwe and Emma Yeomans would not be studying at a top university if the Jews had not. Angela Saini is a product of the Indian caste system, which is little more than a system of eugenics. High caste Angela’s ancestors have only married other high caste — and thus, on average, relatively intelligent — people for millennia.

These people wouldn’t exist without the system they condemn. In fact, does Miss Yeomans really think that her intelligent father married her mother, Judy Pitchford, (who runs the ‘Sussex Godly Play Network’) at random? Of course he didn’t. Evolutionary psychological research is quite clear on why he married her. Martin married Judy because he found her physically attractive (meaning fewer mutant genes than other interested females), because she was genetically similar to him, and because her personality and intelligence level were also relatively attractive, in terms of what he could get from what was available. Miss Yeomans is directly a product of eugenics — as we all are unless our parents made a point of marrying someone they found utterly repellent in every way. And unless we make a point of breeding with those who disgust us, then we are practicing eugenics as well.

But Miss Yeomans won’t care about this because, unlike the scientists at the conference, she is only to a limited extent motivated by reason. She is strongly motivated by her genetic interests, and this is precisely why she reported on this conference and did so in the way she did.

James Andrewes is the pen name of a journalist living in Manchester, UK.

45 replies
  1. James
    James says:

    It is really simple according to the far left. Evolution led to blacks being superior athletes, more noble, less violent, more elegant, and led to black men being better in bed and having ‘huge penises’ “BBC” they say (and dont ask how i know about this any millennial white guy who has grown up in the anglo sphere countries especially US or UK knows about this because black rappers and social media and hip hop etc spread this around and any major porn site advertises and spams it everywhere! it is even on websites like BUZZFEED). Regular white girls on a university campus know about ‘black male superiority’ because the propaganda is shoved down there throats from all angels! HOWEVER!! EVOLUTION did NOT lead to mental differences!!! This is basically what is and has been said by the liberal multicultural cultural marxist left. We are now living in an era of up is down and white is black. At my University and in rap songs, and on major porn websites (i quit porn by the way) and in liberal outlets like huff post you can find articles and literally everything talking up blacks, praising blacks, worshipping africa, worshiping mulatos and talking up black men. Black rappers make songs about banging white girls and talking about there ‘BBC’, white feminists i have witnessed say ‘f#ck white patriarchy’ meanwhile talk about which black rapper they would like to sleep with (and how they like IR porn), i have even heard girls talking about wanting to adopt african babies and in high school knew some girls who wanted halfies! We are so screwed now that if you go to even major ‘masculine’ areas of internet like bodybuilding forums the American and the Anglo speaking guys all know about this wonder and critique it. What is most troubling though is the media has now gone into hyper-drive to portray black men as physically superior in all areas and now many white boys i have met (soyboys and weird quasi conservative guys) now buy into the ‘superior black athletics and penises!). So we now have a generation of white boys who are being cucked and many (the liberals embrace it). look it up there is a HUGE % of this meme (google soyboys) does not exist for no reason it is 100% factual i should know I have been surrounded by these type of guys for a good while and used to have friends who became those very types). And yes it is largely a 100% white thing, as great as some white subracial genetics are this area of ‘altruism’ and self destruction is not known to many others. Again all other races and caucasoid subraces are 100% more ‘redpilled’ and racially conscious and extreme.
    http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1519830319672.jpg
    https://i.redd.it/6hetn9id4ad01.gif

  2. Curtis Mouser I
    Curtis Mouser I says:

    Londonistan is Cuck Central. No identitarian movements like mainland Europe, AltRight + Trump in USA, don’t stand up to EU imposed migrant quotas like East Europe, no AfD like Germany. Instead worshipping dead zio-puppet Churchill. Obsessing over their dindu soccer team, pretending black as coal No Farah is British, and bending over to the worst global media that portrays every White man as an idiot, and black men are cool, intelligent scientists.

    • Irene
      Irene says:

      You’re wrong! Britain dealt the most powerful blow to the globalists by exiting the EU thanks to Nigel Farage and UKIP!
      What’s holding back anti-EU nationalists in Europe are the eastern european EU-members who not only want to stay in the EU but also support its never ending expansion to include even Turkey, a country whose bid for EU-membership is strongly supported by Hungary
      and Poland among others.
      Poland has been particularly nasty with its racist invectives toward Germany despite the tens of billions in financial aid Poland received from the Germans: Like spitting in the hand that give you food- in this case money!

      • Lucy
        Lucy says:

        @Irene. As a person born and bred in Poland under the “dictatatorship of the proletariat” but lives since decades in Sweden,I feel urged to remark on your statements. Since you follow TOO, you hardly can be ignorant of Germany’s being an occupied land. This make me wonder how can you believe that Poland, was spared from the same globalist agenda, just because the ways to achieve it are tuned to the living/financial conditions in the actual country. Without considerable economic differences between these countries, Poles wouldn’t buy so easily into the anti-German propaganda that reigns supreme in close to all media in Poland. Having followed the alternative media in West for two years, I wonder since a while why there is such ignorance about the fact that Poland is not governed by nationalists, but by the politruks that in 1989 – on the round-table conference in Magdalenka – eagerly turned their coats away from communism, anyway in name. The Solidarnosc “hero”, Lech Walesa, and the present leader of the governing party PiS (Law and Justice, by the few true nationalists called PiSrael, Jaroslaw Kaczynski) has participated in the conference that enabled the Soviet-linked power structures to consolidate their power under an anti-communist disguise. Mr Kaczynski and his twin-brother, president Lech Kaczynski, the latter dead in the flight accident over Smolensk, were successful in their highly “patriotic” efforts to sabotage all attempts to carry out a lustration (Pol. Lustracja). Most Poles have no idea of any of it, as they lack access to independent information. Strange enough, it is since three years an open secret in Poland that Lech Walesa acted as agent Bolek, who informed to the feared repression central UB on his comrades in Solidarnosc. No steps to prosecute him have yet been taken.

        Since I regard Germans as a highly civilized people, I actually was shocked by running into so much anti-German propaganda in Poland’s “free” media. Furthermore, according to those alternative media, most media in Poland are German owned. Naturally, I rely on such information as much as I belive in their lies about the president of Russia, the “devil impersonate”.
        I think that the globalists want yet another war between white Christians. (I refrain from pointing out the ethnic dimension in the Polish power structure, simply because the naive Poles are painted as Europe’s arch-anti-Semites.)

        • Curmudgeon
          Curmudgeon says:

          Lucy,
          Your comment reminds me of what I heard from a man, who, during the Prague Spring, had been in Germany at the time of the Soviet invasion. He, and many others I believe, did not return to Czechoslovakia. He ended up in Canada. In the early 90s, he went “home” for about 2 months, to see his aged mother, who was in failing health. During his time there, he said he learned that the “new” government was filled with top communists of the “old” government. His comment was that it seems certain people will always gravitate to power government and have little difficulty becoming something different to achieve that goal.

        • T
          T says:

          You make a fascinating post Lucy.

          There was a Soviet KGB defector to the West in the very early 1960’s (and yes, a person must be quite cautious with these things) who claimed that in the future the Soviet Union acting in conjunction with the Eastern Bloc would do a massive false liberalization campaign up to and including bringing down the Berlin Wall, and bring about a faux ‘independence’ of East European states, the purpose being to lull the West to sleep regarding Communism while draining it of wealth and resources. Golitsyn claimed these things had been planned at a Party Congress shortly before his defection. He also stated the Sino-Soviet split was not real, that Soviet Russia and Red China have always worked together in reality, and that this geo-political ‘false split’ of the 1950’s was done so they could play ‘good cop/bad cop’ towards the world while simultaneously alleviating concerns about how powerful those two powers were and are. If that was so regarding Russia and China I tend to think something much like it has been the case since 1776 regarding the US and UK, and that what took place between Russia and China was something like a consciouse or unconscious mirrored reaction to this…ie thesis, anti-thesis, and ultimately the synthesis of global Multi-culturalism. The defector’s name was Anatole Golitsyn and the book he published in 1984 was called New Lies For Old . I have a copy of the book and a very large percentage of what he described, such as the wall coming down, has come about.

          He wrote extensively in the book about Solidarity.

          Excerpts from pg 327 onward of the chapter entitled ‘The Final Phase’…

          Externally the strategic objectives behind the creation of Solidarity resemble those behind the “Prague spring.” In brief, they were to deceive Western governments, politicians, and public opinion generally as to the real nature of contemporary communism in Poland…

          Among such previously unthinkable strategems are the introduction of false liberalization in Eastern Europe and, probably, in the Soviet Union and the exhibition of spurious independence on the part of the regimes in Romania, Czechoslovakia, and Poland.

          Therefore, the timing of the release of the Solidarity leader and the news of the appointment of Andropov confirm another point in the book: that the “liberalization” will not be limited to the USSR, but will be expanded to Eastern Europe and particularly to Poland. The experiment with “renewal” in Poland will be repeated again. This time, however, it will be with full strategic initiatives and implications against Western Europe and NATO. The appointment of Andropov, the release of the Solidarity leader, and the invitation to the Pope to visit Poland in June 1983, made by the Polish Government, all indicate that the communist strategists probably are planning the reemergence of Solidarity and the creation of a quasi-social democratic government in Poland (a coalition of the communist party, the trade unions, and the churches) and political and economic reforms in the USSR for 1984 and afterward…

          …The conclusion is further supported by the evidence of the Polish Communist party’s involvement in the formation and functioning of Solidarity.

          The Polish Communist Party within Solidarity

          Kania himself revealed that there were 1 million communist party
          members in Solidarity. Forty-two out of the 200 members of the
          party’s Central Committee in 1981 were Solidarity members. Bog-dan Lis, Walesa’s deputy, was a Central Committee member. Zofia Gryzb, another Solidarity leader, was a member of the Politburo.

          These leaders were not expelled from the party for their membership in Solidarity. On the contrary, Solidarity recognized the leading role of the party and the party recognized Solidarity’s existence. Kania and Moczar even made statements in favor of it. Solidarity enjoyed access to the state-controlled media. Obstacles were not placed in the way of Walesa’s extensive foreign travels; indeed, the Polish
          ambassador to Japan, who defected after the introduction of martial law, assisted in arranging Walesa’s contacts with Japanese trade unions.

          Polish trade unions before the “renewal” were suffering from the
          stigma of party control. To have attempted to apply Leninist principles by creating a new trade union organization through governmental action would have failed to remove that stigma. The new organization had to appear to have been set up from below. Its independence had to be established by carefully calculated and controlled confrontation with the government. The origin of the Solidarity movement in a
          shipyard bearing Lenin’s name, the singing of the “Internationale,” the use of the old slogan “Workers of the world, unite” by Solidarity members, and the constant presence of Lenin’s portrait are all consistent with concealed party guidance of the organization. Without that guidance and help, the discipline of Solidarity and its record of successful negotiation with the Polish government would have been impossible. The party’s concealed influence in the Polish Catholic church ensured that the church would act as a force for moderation and compromise between Solidarity and the government.

          Externally the strategic objectives behind the creation of Solidarity
          resemble those behind the “Prague spring.” In brief, they were to deceive Western governments, politicians, and public opinion
          generally as to the real nature of contemporary communism in Poland in accordance with the weakness and evolution pattern of disinformation. More specifically, the intention was to use Solidarity to promote united action with free trade unions, social democrats, Catholics, and other religious groups to further the aims of communist strategy in the advanced countries, and to a lesser extent in the Third World. The name Solidarity is itself symbolic of this intention, which was made plain by Walesa’s state-sponsored visits to trade unions in France, Italy, and Japan and to the Holy See.

          Solidarity’s effort to strengthen its international ties was part of a
          wider effort by the international communist movement to press
          forward with its strategy.

          https://archive.org/stream/GolitsynAnatoleTheNewLiesForOldOnes/Golitsyn-NewLiesForOld-TheCommunistStrategyOfDeceptionAndDisinformation1984#page/n336/mode/1up

  3. pterodactyl
    pterodactyl says:

    “UCL stressed, of course, that they defended free speech, but opposed ‘racism’ in all its forms.”

    They even oppose it when the guilty party is Nature herself. How dare Nature defy the orders of the left that it MUST conform to the equality legislation of the left. But this is not the first time the planet has been defiant when ordered to do things by the left – the insolent earth refused to warm up when the global warming fanatics ordered it to do so.

    “They were promoting Jewish interests, whether consciously or not, by espousing their particular worldviews,”

    and

    “that which undermines a sense of European identity and certainty is good for European Jews, as they will maintain their identity.”

    There is no need for this motive – ie that it benefits them somehow. It is possible they do this even without any benefits. There are many examples of this in nature, of animal behaviour that is AGAINST the interests of the group practising it.

    How could this possibly be the case? ie acting against one’s own interest? The answer is that this behaviour might have conferred advantage in a different environment, and so is left over from a time and place where it did confer advantage. Just because it no longer does, it is not easy to remove it from the wiring of the population. It is not that easy to remove a bad trait that is spread throughout the population.
    Here are other examples of a population acting AGAINST the interests of the group:

    1) Pampered domestic cats fighting each other for territory. Today this behaviour only causes injury and stress. But we can see where it originated, when the environment for cats in the wild was different. In a modern setting the cats cannot shake off or get rid of this behaviour so easily, which means the modern cat is a slave to its wiring and is compelled to follow their wiring even when it is bad for them.

    Perhaps the same applies to the Jews. This explains why they have turned parts of France into places where Jews are no longer safe. This cannot be in their own interests, so they must have simply been obeying their wiring even when it causes themselves harm – one that originated and developed when desert tribes were always at war with each other. This irrational hostility to other tribes that is in their wiring does not seem to diminish for some of them even when the host tribe goes out of its way to welcome them and share its wealth with them and even imprison their own people who criticise them.

    2) White Europeans feeling so non-racist that they welcome with open arms all other races into their lands, whenever their left-wing enemy within wishes it. They never object at election time that the left wishes to do this to them, and continue to vote for open-border politicians such as T May in Britain.

    Most Europeans have no racism themselves, or very little, and so they assume other races are fundamentally the same. How wrong they are. Clearly this lack of racism in their wiring is making the white Europeans very vulnerable to being colonised by other races who really are highly racist. But the non-racist whites cannot see it, so they continue to welcome racist races from the third world into their countries – a path that is ultimately going to lead to their downfall, unless their low levels of racism finally become activated when their standard of living collapses. It is a question of will they ever stop listening to their own left who want their own race to be brought down for the ‘crime’ of being better (s word even?)

    • Forever Guilty
      Forever Guilty says:

      O absolutely, take for example poor Sweden people. They have been always surrounded by White people. They are athletic, intelligent, have a good work ethic and very altruistic. They lived for millennia in the harsh cold climate, so they learn to help each other, plan ahead for harsh winter built houses, boats etc. So they they think every body is Swede, only with different skin color, they have no immunity against devious invaders.

      When syphilis was introduced in European population it killed people very fast. And when plaque come from foreign Asian lands, there were no defense.

      Will there be a time for activation of White social immune system (ethno nationalism) ?

      • pterodactyl
        pterodactyl says:

        Forever Guilty – correct, they need to plan ahead and co-operate to survive. Contrast this with Africa where there is food there for the taking all the year round. Eg suppose there is a lake producing fish. The tribe that ends up owning it can spend most of their time sitting around doing nothing. But they must be good at fighting off rival groups.

        The left insist that these different selection pressures in Africa and Sweden resulted in zero changes to the gene pool in respect of the genes that govern human behaviour.

        Re the Swedes and others – the question that no-one knows the answer to at present is how the whites will behave when they are no longer rich and pampered – including the elite having to join in the misery, as the kings of old had to in the past, when their success was linked to that of the group. They could not just flee like elites today can. For now the elite in S.Africa, for example, know they can use their wealth to just leave when it all kicks off. This means they are less inclined to use their power and money to help their group. But as the white countries topple one by one there will come a time when there are fewer safe havens for the elites, where they can enjoy all their wealth and gated communities whilst preaching to the rest of us about open borders.

        For now the problem in the West is how to stop eating too much, but when their problem is how to get food, it might concentrate the mind wonderfully and switch them into a different mode of thinking.

    • T
      T says:

      “UCL stressed, of course, that they defended free speech, but opposed ‘racism’ in all its forms.”

      They even oppose it when the guilty party is Nature herself. How dare Nature defy the orders of the left that it MUST conform to the equality legislation of the left. But this is not the first time the planet has been defiant when ordered to do things by the left – the insolent earth refused to warm up when the global warming fanatics ordered it to do so.

      Am reminded a lot there of Orwell’s description in 1984 of Winston’s torture/re-education sessions with O’Brien, pterodactyl. Though probably like many here I don’t agree with much of Orwell’s personal political beliefs, he all the same had quite a good grasp of much of the mechanics driving modern society.

      Poor Winston, poor us.

      ‘We control matter because we control the mind. Reality is inside the skull. You will learn by degrees, Winston. There is nothing that we could not do. Invisibility, levitation — anything. I could float off this floor like a soap bubble if I wish to…’

      …What can you do, thought Winston, against the lunatic who is more intelligent than yourself, who gives your arguments a fair hearing and then simply persists in his lunacy?

      ‘But how can you control matter?’ he burst out. ‘You don’t even control the climate or the law of gravity. And there are disease, pain, death –‘

      O’Brien silenced him by a movement of his hand. ‘We control matter because we control the mind. Reality is inside the skull. You will learn by degrees, Winston. There is nothing that we could not do. Invisibility, levitation — anything. I could float off this floor like a soap bubble if I wish to. I do not wish to, because the Party does not wish it. You must get rid of those nineteenth-century ideas about the laws of Nature. We make the laws of Nature.’

      ‘But you do not! You are not even masters of this planet. What about Eurasia and Eastasia? You have not conquered them yet.’

      ‘Unimportant. We shall conquer them when it suits us. And if we did not, what difference would it make? We can shut them out of existence. Oceania is the world.’

      ‘But the world itself is only a speck of dust. And man is tiny helpless! How long has he been in existence? For millions of years the earth was uninhabited.’

      ‘Nonsense. The earth is as old as we are, no older. How could it be older? Nothing exists except through human consciousness.’

      ‘But the rocks are full of the bones of extinct animals — mammoths and mastodons and enormous reptiles which lived here long before man was ever heard of.’

      ‘Have you ever seen those bones, Winston? Of course not. Nineteenth-century biologists invented them. Before man there was nothing. After man, if he could come to an end, there would be nothing. Outside man there is nothing.’

      ‘But the whole universe is outside us. Look at the stars! Some of them are a million light-years away. They are out of our reach for ever.’

      ‘What are the stars?’ said O’Brien indifferently. ‘They are bits of fire a few kilometres away. We could reach them if we wanted to. Or we could blot them out. The earth is the centre of the universe. The sun and the stars go round it.’

      Winston made another convulsive movement. This time he did not say anything. O’Brien continued as though answering a spoken objection:

      ‘For certain purposes, of course, that is not true. When we navigate the ocean, or when we predict an eclipse, we often find it convenient to assume that the earth goes round the sun and that the stars are millions upon millions of kilometres away. But what of it? Do you suppose it is beyond us to produce a dual system of astronomy? The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them. Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that? Have you forgotten doublethink?’

      http://www.george-orwell.org/1984/19.html

    • T
      T says:

      But this is not the first time the planet has been defiant when ordered to do things by the left – the insolent earth refused to warm up when the global warming fanatics ordered it to do so.

      Speaking of global warming, a new play called ‘Kill Climate Deniers’ has opened up in Sydney, Australia financed by $19,000 of tax payers money there. It sounds as though along with certain other subjects that they’re ratcheting up a notch the conditioning effort with psychological violence towards ‘climate deniers’ and are only a single step away from outright physical violence, even the potentiality of the ultra-violence of murder in that realm. They aren’t going to let people disagreeing with them go unpunished if they have their way.

      Chilling: Play titled ‘Kill Climate Deniers’ launches theatrical run

      Global warming skeptics, beware: A play with the alarming title “Kill Climate Deniers” may be coming to a theater near you.

      Written by Australian playwright David Finnigan, “Kill Climate Deniers” kicked off Thursday the 2018 season of the Griffin Theatre in Sydney after a week of previews, with the final show scheduled for April 7.

      The plot? “As a classic rock band take the stage in Parliament House’s main hall, 96 armed eco-terrorists storm the building and take the entire government hostage, threatening to execute everyone unless Australia ends global warming. Tonight,” said the play’s website.

      The brilliant Orwell again. Things like this play are part of the overall global conditioning scheme against the more recalcitrant, first with psychological intimidation/pain, and if that doesn’t work, physical pain and even potentially death…ie the media everyday regarding the psychological assaults and of course the physical assaults of Trump supporters amongst others and the shooting of Steve Scalese, etc.

      Some people, all too many, such as those who would approve of this play’s message, are it would seem more readily responsive to the conditioning. They’ve learned to love ‘Big Brother’. More than a few of these would also probably be quite happy to be in O’Brien’s shoes as chief inquisitor/torturer in regards to those whom whilst minding their own business don’t entirely agree with their premise of global warming and do to them what was done to Winston.

      The old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice. Ours is founded upon hatred…You are beginning, I can see, to realize what that world will be like. But in the end you will do more than understand it. You will accept it, welcome it, become part of it.’

      If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — for ever.’

      The real power, the power we have to fight for night and day, is not power over things, but over men.’ He paused, and for a moment assumed again his air of a schoolmaster questioning a promising pupil: ‘How does one man assert his power over another, Winston?’

      Winston thought. ‘By making him suffer,’ he said.

      ‘Exactly. By making him suffer. Obedience is not enough. Unless he is suffering, how can you be sure that he is obeying your will and not his own? Power is in inflicting pain and humiliation. Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing. Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery is torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress towards more pain. The old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice. Ours is founded upon hatred. In our world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we shall destroy everything. Already we are breaking down the habits of thought which have survived from before the Revolution. We have cut the links between child and parent, and between man and man, and between man and woman. No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer. But in the future there will be no wives and no friends. Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated. Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science. When we are omnipotent we shall have no more need of science. There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — for ever.’

      He paused as though he expected Winston to speak. Winston had tried to shrink back into the surface of the bed again. He could not say anything. His heart seemed to be frozen. O’Brien went on:

      ‘And remember that it is for ever. The face will always be there to be stamped upon. The heretic, the enemy of society, will always be there, so that he can be defeated and humiliated over again. Everything that you have undergone since you have been in our hands — all that will continue, and worse. The espionage, the betrayals, the arrests, the tortures, the executions, the disappearances will never cease. It will be a world of terror as much as a world of triumph. The more the Party is powerful, the less it will be tolerant: the weaker the opposition, the tighter the despotism.

      https://m.washingtontimes.com/

      http://www.george-orwell.org/1984/19.html

      • pterodactyl
        pterodactyl says:

        T it is a puzzle how Orwell was the main expert in the evils of socialism whilst remaining a socialist. I suspect that when many lefties read ‘1984’ they are on the side of Big Brother.

        Here is an extract from Tom Sunic:
        http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/10/17/academic-censorship-and-self-censorship-once-upon-a-time-in-the-land-of-the-free/
        “It is wrong, however, to assume that citizens in former communist Eastern Europe were all starving for Western freedom, all of being ready to overthrow the communist system. Only a few did. It is also wrong to think that anticommunist dissidents were respected species enjoying mass popular support. They were shunned like a plague even by their family members. We can observe the same type of ostracism and self-censorship among prominent White academics in the USA, not just on the official state level, but also within their own family and at their work place.”

        This was a fascinating article and this extract shows that most of the people do not want things like ‘freedom’, or to be ruled by the just and the wise. They are not ‘seekers of truth’ on the question of race differences or communism or on anything else. All they want is to be able to pick up on who is the dominant group, and then they are happy to subscribe to all the required doctrines in order to try and join the ‘favoured ones’.

        If the elite says there are no race differences apart from appearance, then most undergraduates (who are supposed to be the intellectual elite who understand these things) are happy to subscribe to this. An inner part of them (deep down and ignored) knows it is rubbish, but they are still happy to subscribe to it. This is because they are choosing the easy life, and being a sheep. They have decided to follow the lie. For most people this causes no inner turmoil or inner conflict. This is like the people in communist countries described by Tom Sunic accepting communism. They embrace the lies and the reason they are able to do this is because the lying does not offend them. It offends most readers of this blog, but we are the minority, and lies do not offend most people. Most people are not seeking truth, they are seeking to join the in-crowd. If the sociology lecturer says that men and women are the same in behaviour, 95% of their students say ‘okay’, even though this is the biggest and most outrageous and obvious lie of the century.

        We can see why humans are like this. When tribe A is going to war with tribe B it is essential that everyone in tribe A agrees with each other that they are all in the right and B tribe are all wrong. Conversely the other tribe all have to agree the opposite. There is no place for the odd voice to chirp up and say ‘actually we are in the wrong’. When the soldiers in Britain rushed to join up in WWII they
        lapped up eagerly any lies their government told them about the causes of the war and how it was all justified and how Uncle Joe is okay really now we are on his side. All the people needed was three or four sentences to remember and that was that. There were NO debates as the men lined up to join about the history of Poland. So 95% humans are made to latch onto any lies and go along with them, so it is not a question of just showing people the truth and expecting them to want to hear it.

        On a positive note, whilst most of the people in the West currently embrace the narrative set by the left (and vote for mass immigration), it is in fact contrary to many of their instincts. They are like a balloon twisted out of shape. For now they seem happy to be twisted and in practice this means supporting their own demise while they go around in this twisted shape. But note that they are still rich and pampered. if any trigger ever starts the pendulum to swing the other way, the people will readily snap out of this contorted shape that their left have put them in, and change into another shape, ie readily follow new leaders whose message is in alignment with their self-interest, instead of against it.

        • T
          T says:

          T it is a puzzle how Orwell was the main expert in the evils of socialism whilst remaining a socialist.

          I’ve pondered that myself about Orwell. I’ve heard off hand that while as a member of POUM in the 1930’s and fighting in Spain he came close in a certain instance to finding himself nearly ‘purged’ by wild eyed pistol waving fellow ‘comrade(s)’, something that’s only supposed to happen to the ‘other guy’. The very unpleasant experience of nearly making an early, unscheduled, not to mention very violent entry into the great ‘workers paradise’ in the sky is supposed to be in part what turned him off to that manifestation of socialism then predominating and on the march known as Soviet Communism.

          Why he stayed with the collectivist ideology of socialism I’m not certain. As brilliant as he was he didn’t have the benefit that we do of the approximately seventy years since his death and observing what has transpired. He also didn’t have the internet. I very much question if Orwell were alive today if he would retain much of his red leanings as he seemed to be just too smart.

          As a curious aside, the state religion of Winston Smith’s super-state Oceania was ‘Ingsoc’, which stood for ‘English Socialism’.

          I suspect that when many lefties read ‘1984’ they are on the side of Big Brother.

          Hehe. I have thought, only somewhat jokingly, that they could use 1984 as a ‘how to’ manual to be issued to newly appointed government bureaucrats in the present multi-cult paradigm. Much less jokingly, at some future time as things deteriorate I could also see 1984 potentially being banned as ‘hate literature’ as it strikes too close to home.

        • T
          T says:

          This was a fascinating article and this extract shows that most of the people do not want things like ‘freedom’, or to be ruled by the just and the wise. They are not ‘seekers of truth’ on the question of race differences or communism or on anything else. All they want is to be able to pick up on who is the dominant group, and then they are happy to subscribe to all the required doctrines in order to try and join the ‘favoured ones’.

          I’ve heard it said that only a small percentage (about three percent IIRC) of the population of the British colonies actively supported the 1776 Revolution and that everyone else ‘went with the flow’ depending on whomever controlled the local area, whether they at the moment were Washington’s revolutionary army, Loyalists, or British Crown forces.

          People sometimes forget that people are in part animals, ie mammals, and that there is still something present of the ‘herd instinct’ in man. All’s well and good, often whatever the societal construct might be, if the ‘top dog(s)’ are one’s own and acting with benevolence, less good if one’s own, but corrupted in some fashion, and far less so if alien and acting in their own interest or with hostility…ie ‘the golden horde’ of the Mongols and their rule over Russia, amongst other examples.

          It doesn’t help that there seems to be far too little original thinking.

          • pterodactyl
            pterodactyl says:

            T: You are right about Orwell not being able to have our hindsight, and I am puzzled that the left continue to give high status value to his anti-communist books – for now.

            T: “People sometimes forget that people are in part animals, ie mammals, and that there is still something present of the ‘herd instinct’ in man”
            This is the key to explaining everything that goes on, including the current suicide of the West and the hostility of the Jews to the countries that help them and make them rich, ie the key is to consider humans not as logical thinkers, but to consider 95% of humans to be totally controlled by their animal behaviour wiring. This is why TV adverts are only 1% logic and the other 99% is image, emotion, association etc. There is actually very little information in adverts. This shows that people do not make decisions based on information, they base them on whether an attractive person is using the product, ie what the in-crowd is doing.

            This is the approach of Kevin MacDonald, ie to look for the genetic basis of human behaviour, rather than assume we are logical, but surprisingly it is not common generally. Most people when they seek motives for what the left are doing assume they do things to get power or money, but this is not the case. Eg look what the left are now helping to bring about in S.Africa. The left are eagerly devoted to the downfall of the whites over there, but there is no money or power in it for them. Their motive is to bring down the s-group (superior) and that is all. So their motive is an inner hatred of the superior. (This is why the s-word is now largely a derogatory term). When the white lefties see on TV news (in the near future) the black tribes rampaging and burning and looting and worse (if the TV news shows it at all), the white lefties will get an inner glow of satisfaction whenever it is directed against whites, and will be totally indifferent when it is black on black. That is their motive – to bring about the downfall of the whites, not money or power.

            In the collapsed S.Africa, there will be no money for the banks or Jews or anyone else, including any left elites. And the power will be just spread out amongst tribes in conflict with each other. The UN or bankers or globalists will have no power there at all. So money is not the motive and neither is power. So we have to work out why the left are like this and what is the genetic basis for their hatred of the better, and why the masses in the West follow their own lefties and have let them become dominant in the West, even as the left lead them off the cliff.

        • Curmudgeon
          Curmudgeon says:

          For the 100th time: only in the USA are communism and socialism seen as the same thing. The reality is that communism and capitalism are two sides of the same coin. Both seek to concentrate wealth, and both are steered by different players of the same (((commune))).
          Socialism worked, and can work in homogeneous societies where the level of trust is high, and belief in your own kind natural. Note that four (4) US states have the word “commonwealth” in their official titles. The definition of commonwealth at the time these states were formed, was “for the common good”, very consistent with socialism. Thus, the need to change those homogeneous societies working for the common good, to ones working for the benefit of the (((commune))).
          In Orwell’s 1984 case, he was referring to fascism not communism. It was the fascist countries making the technological advances in Orwell’s time, not the communists.

          • T
            T says:

            pterodactyl This is the approach of Kevin MacDonald, ie to look for the genetic basis of human behaviour, rather than assume we are logical..

            No mistake about it. Dr MacDonald has made a massive contribution towards understanding what’s going on.

  4. Jewish Privilege
    Jewish Privilege says:

    Eugenics research has been marginalized and impeded because of a misrepresentation that it requires the extermination of existing human beings rather than the proactive elimination of disabilities from future human beings.

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      Jewish Privilege – the West does implement eugenics – they divert the wealth of the nation to pay their criminal underclass to breed. Shoplifter/druggie/criminal types get paid per child, and often end up with a greater income than the working people whose taxes support them.
      There is a way to reverse this – pay the criminal underclass to NOT breed. Kill two birds with one stone and reduce crime at the same time by insisting that they also move to one corner of the country. ie set aside part of the country where if you get sterilised you can go and live there and have free stuff for life. Added benefits would be a great reduction of crime for the rest of us as the criminal types would all be together to interact and steal from with each other instead of spread out amongst us as at present.

    • Ger Tzedek
      Ger Tzedek says:

      There was no need for proof. Jews call it chutzpah. Accuse somebody else of what you are doing yourself. Jews are the chosen tribe, Whites are supremacists.

  5. ariadnatheo
    ariadnatheo says:

    “Leftist students protested in front of UCL (see above photo).”
    I am sure this is an error. The author must have misidentified the photo, which most likely shows a parody ridiculing the leftist students, organized by the supporters of the conference. Clever of them to have selected the perfect actor to do the bullhorn hectoring.

  6. Rob Bottom
    Rob Bottom says:

    It’s clear that the main objection to anything that promotes white identity and culture is coming from Jews who fear another holocaust should we come together. But while they rush to dispossess us in our homelands through weaponized mass immigration, thinking this will make it easier to crush us, it is forcing young whites to see ourselves as a group for the first time. It’s really strange, but in a way we’ll have Jews to thank for reigniting white identity. Don’t they realize that? I honestly think a huge backlash is inevitable at the rate things are moving.

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      “… Jews who fear another holocaust…”
      In order for “another” to occur, there would have to be a first. There is no known forensic evidence for a first.although there are competing witness accounts.
      This part of your comment, unfortunately, aids the enemy.

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      Rob Bottom “who fear another holocaust should we come together.”
      Whether you mean a holocaust or just an expulsion…

      At present what they observe in the non-muslim West is whites everywhere saying friendly things to Jews, like ‘how awful that you have been persecuted over the centuries for no reason at all except racism’. History in schools is devoted mainly to learning about the H. The West continually pats itself on the back for going to war with Germany ‘to save the Jews’. If you look in blog comments in other sites you will see many friendly posts from Christians to Jews (“How honoured you are to be the custodians of the Holy land. We should stick together’). I should point out also that in the same comments where the Chrstians are continually reaching out the hand of friendship, this is not generally reciprocated – and instead the Jewish commenters like to berate the Christians for things that happened 2000+ years ago – even the fact that the entire Christian West studies their Old Testament and reveres it does not seem to assuage their hostility. This was my experience on Breitbart before I was banned, perhaps partly for asking ones living in the West after an outburst of their hostility: ‘Your post suggests you feel hostile to the West. Do you wish the West harm for what happened 1000 years ago?’

      One way to change this so the West is no longer friendly to Jews is for Jews to do exactly what they are doing – ie the facilitate the downfall of the West. A collapsing West is more likely to result in hostility to Jews. Especially one that is largely Islamic.

      This suggests their motive in bringing down the West and wanting Islam in the West is not self-interest. It is the same motive that makes a divorcing couple spend the entire value of the house on lawyers’ fees so there is nothing left for either of them. Why does the couple do this? It is clearly against their self-interest. They do it because hatred is stronger than self-interest.

  7. Fredrick Toben
    Fredrick Toben says:

    Again I realize how apt Martin Heidegger’s observation is on Jewish group behaviour:
    >>The Jews, with their marked gift for calculating, live, already for the longest time, according to the principle of race, which is why they are resisting its consistent application with utmost violence.<<

  8. Ger Tzedek
    Ger Tzedek says:

    I know that this is manned by resource-poor retirees, but I am of the opinion that more activity in this site would be more helpful to out cause. If comments are updated more often, more activity would result. Also more posts are welcome.

    There is no price too high for survival. Extinction is the highest possible price to pay.

  9. Ger Tzedek
    Ger Tzedek says:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfons_Heck

    He had been taught to believe that living under Bolshevik-Jewish slavery was too horrible to contemplate. The only alternative was German victory.

    He had been taught right. In fact living under Bolshevik-Jewish slavery is too horrible to contemplate, as I know from my US and Eastern European experience.

  10. Philip Smeeton
    Philip Smeeton says:

    One country, one race, one culture, is the only thing that works. Everything else is chaos.

    • HK Wills
      HK Wills says:

      Yes and it is glaringly obvious to anyone who has at least a cursory knowledge of history: all the multiracial empires in history disintegrated. Not some, not most, all.

  11. SCM
    SCM says:

    “But, of course, one’s motivation to promote one’s genetic interests — and thus destroy anything which might discourage Europeans from believing that they are an ethnic group just like the Jews — can easily overwhelm logic.”

    Should that say “Encourage” not “Discourage?”

    Thank you

  12. Gotcha
    Gotcha says:

    More insights into Ben van der Merwe.

    https://medium.com/@_BenvdM

    My problem with Richard Lynn is the fable of Jewish super intelligence of which he has been part of the propaganda machine. Seems like karma that the same Jews are now attacking him.

    On the high intelligence and cognitive achievements of Jews in Britain
    http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-20795-004

    This is a myth. There some intelligent Jews but they are really masters of deceit, tribalism and nepotism plus theft. This is their forte. Take Einstein who stole lots of ideas from among others Morley, Michelson, FitzGerald, Lorentz, Poincaire, Hertz and Planck.

    Theft is also at a national level.

    ISRAEL’S AGGRESSIVE SPYING IN THE U.S. MOSTLY HUSHED UP
    http://www.newsweek.com/israels-aggressive-spying-us-mostly-hushed-250278

  13. Fenria
    Fenria says:

    Ever notice how the ones who scream and whine the most about “eugenics” are also the ones who would never make the cut should an actual eugenics program ever be put in place? Hmmmmm…

  14. Pat Kittle
    Pat Kittle says:

    Whites applaud Black superiority in sports, making multimillionaires out of belligerent thugs.

    Blacks applaud White superiority in brainpower in their own magnanimous fashion.

  15. T
    T says:

    Powerful elements of the elites of the Anglo-Saxon and Jewish people and their hangers on have historically engaged in eugenics due to their heavy involvement with chattel slavery and its trade…ie the breeding of slaves for purpose and desired traits. Some here might have seen the 1851 London Times editorial I’ve posted at this site which had all the ingredients of modern multi-culturalism and which described the immigrants (ie the Plantation) and the resulting ‘mixed’ population in the north of Ireland as being slaves…’more mixed, more docile’ and ‘which submits to a master’. I submit slavery was not in reality ended with ‘abolition’, but that rather chattel slavery and its trade was rather quite literally and simply monetized by slave dealers and merchandisers with the seamless early 19th century intoduction of wage slavery, the systematic theft of labor being much more efficiently taken directly from the person’s pay, this person being called an ‘immigrant’. This monetization manifest itself then and today in the form of the cheap labor/mass immigration system which forms the very economic basis of multiculturalism, an economy which closely parallels the chattel slave holding society which it evolved from. Bearing in mind that the essence of slavery is simply the systematic theft of the value of a person’s labor and that it is never all stolen, the ‘immigrant’ for whatever period of time (days, weeks, months, years) that they are paid significantly below what was or would be the local real time prevailing cost of labor without the immigrant(s) presence is the slave in this arrangement. The noted 1851 editorial was published eighteen years after slavery was supposed to have been abolished in the British Empire and one would have thought the mentality it expressed of callous disregard towards man would have long disappeared. If however slavery in the form of its monetization, ie wage slavery, was still very much present in 1851(and indeed that was the very overall subject of the editorial as it was about ‘cheap labor’), and the powerful people whom authorized such editorials to be written were in reality unreformed regarding slavery, it makes perfect sense that the slave terms would be used.

    And if slavery in the form of wage slavery is still present today, more labor being stolen today than ever, and the powerful persons engaged in this enmasse predation of various peoples to obtain their slaves remain unreformed, it would only make sense that a person would see signs of this in the here and now.

    And indeed one does.

    Any businessman worth their salt likes to keep close track of their property, whether it be in the form of current production or merchandise on hand. The term used by industry for this is ‘stock’ and is defined below in the Oxford Dictionary:

    Stock: the goods or merchandise kept on the premises of a business or warehouse and available for sale or distribution: “the store has a very low turnover of stock”

    synonyms:
    merchandise, goods, wares, items/articles for sale, inventory

    An example of this linked below is the Bluefin Tuna, a much loved seafood in Japan, which has been being overfished in the Pacific. No more Bluefin Tuna stocks, no more fish for that industry to sell to customers. They therefore keep close watch over the supply.

    Warning over Pacific bluefin tuna stocks as Japan meeting ends in stalemate

    A four-day meeting in Sapporo, northern Japan, of countries that monitor stocks in most of the Pacific Ocean, made no progress towards helping fish populations recover from decades of overfishing, according to the Pew. Faced with the collapse of bluefin stocks, last year members of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission decided to halve the catch of tuna under 30kg from its average level in 2002-2004, although conservation groups had called for a moratorium to give stocks time to recover.

    Various grain supplies, too, are kept close watch over by the government in real time so as to aid industry.

    Grain Stocks National Agricultural Statistics Service NASS

    Description: This full-text report, issued four times yearly, contains stocks of all wheat, durum wheat, corn, sorghum, oats, barley, soybeans, flaxseed, canola, rapeseed, rye, sunflower, safflower, mustard seed, by States and U.S. and by position (on-farm or off-farm storage); includes number and capacity of off-farm storage facilities and capacity of on-farm storage facilities.

    A close eye is kept on available fuel availability as well by industry. Want to have plenty of gas for motorists and shippers. This is the heading from a US government site which I’ve linked below.

    Weekly U.S. Ending Stocks of Total Gasoline (Thousand Barrels)

    Slave dealers were business men as well whom also kept close watch of the supply of the available merchandise, ie the chattel slaves, for their industry. Had to make sure a ready and constant supply was on hand to keep their customers happy and the dealer’s coffers full. With chattel slavery’s monetization and the introduction of wage slavery (ie ‘cheap labor’ so called) they continue just as before to keep a close watch on the supply of slaves, the wage slaves, for both industry and individuals. The term used today by the former would be chattel slave dealers for these unfortunate persons, their modern slaves whom they make available to the former would be chattel slave owners, is ‘migrant stock’.

    The heading of a page at the World Bank site

    International migrant stock, total

    United Nations Population Division, Trends in Total Migrant Stock: 2012 Revision.

    And from another site linked below which elaborates further. Note that the article mentions that the US is the largest receiver of ‘migrants’, ie of wage slaves, in the world. Being that the British Empire, of which the US had been a part, dominated the global trade in slaves at the time of chattel slavery and its trade’s monetization in the latter 18th and early 19th century, and that after wage slavery’s initial slow start it has manifested itself since in the cheap labor/mass immigration system that has a strong presence in most of the former parts of the Empire known as the Anglosphere, that ought not to be too surprising. It makes even more sense if Poesche and Goepp were correct in their 1853 book The New Rome that the United States itself is the planned direct continuation of the British Empire, indeed its very center.

    Some have thought that the intent in the future is that most everybody will be a slave. If that is the case the Chinese as wage slaves might be the model for the world. Just as with chattel slaves, a person and people needs to be first broken and reduced to an unnaturally low state of being first to tolerate their labor being systemattically stolen from them, ie in the case of the Chinese their country being first flooded with drugs (opium) and when they attempted to resist this inundation being crushed not once, but twice in the British Empire’s two Opium Wars of the mid 19th century fought against them. After first being ravaged by Capitalism, the Chinese since 1949 have been ravaged by Communism and its accompanying ‘cultural revolution’ losing many millions of their people. It takes a people experiencing events like that to tolerate being paid ten cents to a dollar an hour rather than the twenty to thirty dollars an hour that would be the norm. Of course do the Chinese even know they should be paid that much higher rate? Would we know in the US after having first had society broken down with the massive influx of drugs in the 1960’s and 70’s and the no win war of Vietnam, and then being ravaged by a far greater war than WWII along with a civil war which may well be looming just over the horizon? If the intention is that most people after their first being properly conditioned are to be reduced to being wage slaves, ie ‘migrant stock’ being paid ten cents or a dollar an hour, the former would be chattel slave dealers will know as would the former would be chattel slave owner, that those person’s they prey upon are really due far more for their labor.

    Everyone, what ever their background, ought to naturally resist that state of affairs coming about with every fiber of their being.

    It’s been said rightly that people should beware having hostile elites over them, the corrupt of one’s own and or alien. I would add to that to beware having unreformed slavers over you as well.

    Migrant Flow and Stock

    The number of people migrating within a specific time frame is known as the migrant flow. Currently, international migration flows are at their historic peak. The term stock refers to the total number of persons born in a country other than that in which they reside. It is also known as a country’s “foreign-born population.” (For more information on how these data are estimated, refer to this explanation.) The U.S. is the largest international migrant receiving country in the world in terms of total number of migrants, both historically and today. As of 2005, 38 million of the U.S. population was foreign-born, accounting for about 12% of the country’s total population. This was an increase from a foreign-born population of 9.7 million in 1970, which at that time was just under 5% of the total U.S. population. During the same period, the U.S.’s share of the world migrant population grew from 11.9% to 20%.

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/sep/04/warning-over-pacific-bluefin-tuna-stocks-as-japan-meeting-ends-in-stalemate

    https://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1079

    https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=WGTSTUS1&f=W

    https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SM.POP.TOTL?end=2015&start=1960&view=chart

    http://cgge.aag.org/Migration1e/CaseStudy2_AsiaLatinos_Jan10/CaseStudy2_AsiaLatinos_Jan102.html

    • T
      T says:

      This person has come up with something he calls Migrant Cosmopolitanism and while commenting that there are at present one billion migrants across the world adds that this number is expected to double in the next forty years.

      One can only suppose that the idea may well be that after billions of people have first been culled in future wars, that 99% of the remaining five hundred million will be rootless immigrants, er migrants, to be preyed upon as wage slaves by the remaining 1%.

      Multiculturalism is an attempt to make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear. Nothing good can come out of a slavery based system. It can’t be done.

      If we want to understand the prospects for a truly global community, we have to move beyond the critiques of citizenship, nationalism, and liberalism, and propose an approach that will not structurally exclude the millions of migrants and refugees of the world. We must create what I propose to call a “migrant cosmopolitanism.”

      Few things will affect our future more than the phenomenon of migration. The last decade alone has marked the highest number and rate of migrations worldwide in recorded history. Today there are over 1 billion migrants.[1] The world’s 214 million international migrants alone compose 3% of the world’s population and together are equal to the fifth most populous country in the world.[2] Further, most predictions point to a doubling of these numbers in the next 40 years.[3] These facts alone are cause for practical and theoretical action, but what is even more alarming about this phenomenon is that the rate of irregular or non-status migration is also increasing. The International Organization for Migration estimates that there are 25–32 million non-status migrants worldwide—that is, 10–15% of all international migrants.

      http://www.e-ir.info/2013/04/11/migrant-cosmopolitanism/

  16. M
    M says:

    The Left don’t need facts. They ” believe”. In their own irrational gibberish. If a culture had no wheel, sail, plough, alphabet, numerical system, agriculture, metals, and so on, then everything about intelligence differences become self evident. Not to the believers in irrational gibberish though.

  17. A Mayer
    A Mayer says:

    Rutherford is Anglo-Indian,a dark man who works for the BBC and Guardian and is thus biased. His book ‘A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived’ Its in our genes. is of predictable content and conclusion. Humanity is just a life form. The examination and sub species classifications of generations of scientists are rendered as nought by Rutherford, who is one of a growing number of blacks,Pakistanis, Indians and Jews at the BBC.

Comments are closed.