Review of Thomas Goodrich’s “Summer, 1945—Germany, Japan and the Harvest of Hate”

Sometimes a book comes along that changes the way we think.  Sometimes a book comes along that changes the way we act.  Sometimes a book comes along  that changes the way we think and the way we act. Such a book was Hellstorm—The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944–1947. That masterpiece by Thomas Goodrich changed forever not only how we would view World War Two, but it changed how we would view the world itself. For the first time since it happened, because of one bold and breath-taking book, the scales fell from our eyes and we were finally able to see free and unfettered what the abomination called World War Two was really all about. Swept forever into a dark, dirty corner was the filth and disease of seventy years of Jewish propaganda, seventy years of Jewish lies about the so-called “Good War” and the so-called “Greatest Generation,” seventy years of Jewish mendacity about who was bad and who was good. Suddenly, overnight, replacing those lies was an honest, impartial, unbiased, but driving, relentless, and utterly merciless account of the fate that befell Germany in 1945.

As incredible as Hellstorm was, is, and will always remain, we now know it was only half the story. While the bloody obscenity that was World War Two was being acted out against a largely helpless German population by as evil a cast of creatures as ever haunted any hell anywhere, a similar horror show was taking place on the far side of the globe. And what is revealed in Tom Goodrich’s latest book, Summer, 1945—Germany, Japan and the Harvest of Hate, is a story so savage and sadistic as to numb the senses.

While some of the events described in Summer, 1945 will be familiar to readers of Hellstorm, many will not. Clearly, the author did a vast amount of new research for this new book since much material is previously unknown, especially regarding the contributions of the “Greatest Generation” to its already ghastly list of war crimes against Germany.   In fact, what was previously revealed about the Americans in Hellstorm, horrific as it was at the time, was only the faintest foretaste of what was to come in Summer, 1945.  For example. . . .

Massive, monstrous, staggering as was the scale of Red Army rape in Germany, it now seems clear that the Americans were not far behind, if behind they were at all.  Simply put: No one in control cared.  Far from trying to halt the nonstop sexual attacks that their men committed against helpless German females, US officers, like Soviet officers, either ignored them, laughed at them, or actively encouraged them. Upon entering their communities, American officers forced Germans to write the age and sex of all occupants in their homes, then ordered the lists nailed to doors. “The results are not difficult to imagine,” said one horrified priest from a village where women and children were soon staggering to the local hospital after the predictable  sexual assaults commenced.  Some US generals even blamed the victims themselves for their own gang rape when they dared leave their homes to beg for food.  Lt. General Edwin Clarke  went  further when he announced that the thousands of rape reports in his area were nothing more than a conspiracy by die-hard Nazis to belittle and embarrass his well-behaved and totally innocent troops. Clarke apparently believed  that the hundreds of thousands of beaten, bruised and bleeding women and children were all liars with self-inflicted sex wounds.  Also, to drive home German defeat, it was noted that GIs were being ordered by their “political officers” to make the gang rapes as public as possible.  Although such brutal attacks were already common on streets and sidewalks, in schools and shops, an audience of family members was the preferred crowd for gang rape.  Forcing German men to watch was also favored by the Americans, just as it was by their communist comrades.Another hideous American war crime, a despicable act of hate and savagery, was the cold-blooded murder of SS and Wehrmacht soldiers the moment they surrendered their weapons.   “You will not accept the surrender of any German SS,” announced one American general, demonstrating his commitment to barbarity and a criminal contempt for the Geneva Convention.  By the tens of thousands these German soldiers, some of the best fighters the world had ever seen, were shown no mercy by the cowardly US murderers.  In one massacre alone over seven hundred SS men were murdered in a matter of minutes; in another massacre, five hundred died, and so on.

“The Americans forced the Germans to walk in front of them with raised hands,” said an eyewitness regarding one group of fifty.  “Then they shot the prisoners in their heads from behind.”

Additionally, the unbelievably sick and sadistic torture camps operated by the US Army and European Jews in Germany and Poland was on a psychopathic scale beyond belief.  Well over a hundred thousand German men, women and even children suffered brutal deaths in these nightmarish torture pens.  One might have imagined, and one would have certainly hoped, that after Hellstorm nothing more could have possibly been added to this perfectly hellish script of torture—victims buried alive, women forced to lay with and kiss rotting corpses–but one would have imagined wrong.  Those few who survived these demonic camps. where dying was a thing to be postponed, not hurried, could no longer be called human.  Of virtually all German men and boys who somehow survived to reach home, it was noticed all had their reproductive organs destroyed beyond repair.

But horrific as the so-called “peace” in Germany was, perhaps the greatest revelations for readers of Summer, 1945 come in the war chapters devoted to Japan. From the first page forward we readers, especially we Americans readers raised on the mythology of the “Dirty Jap,” will find our world of make believe turned upside down and inside out. Winners do write the history.  And never was this more apt and terribly illustrated than in the case of America’s victory over Japan.

One of the greatest lies to emerge from WWII and survive for over seventy years intact, is the one we have been told over and over ever since December 7, 1941, viz., that the Japanese soldier was a mindless, murderous automaton, that he would never surrender, that he would always fight to the death, that he “lived to die” for the Emperor, that suicide was his second nature, and so on.  There is no truth to any of these fairy-tales.  Such a revelation as I have just stated here should not have come as any great surprise to anyone when they think about it, but it did come as a great shock to me and it will to everyone else, I am sure.  When one has been told a “truth” such as this about the “robotic” Japanese soldier, a truth told for so many years from so many sources, one simply believes it as totally, completely and  mindlessly as that night follows day.  After reading a few pages of Summer, 1945, however, it will be very clear to everyone that never was there a greater falsehood.

While reading what the opposing sides thought, in their own words, it is quickly clear that emotionally there was no appreciable difference between what a Japanese eighteen-year-old wanted and what an American eighteen-year-old wanted.  First and foremost, both wanted to live. Both wanted to survive the war so that each might return home and marry that girl they loved so much, to have kids, to get a good job, to buy a car, to raise a small garden, to play in the backyard with pets. The problem for the Japanese was that Americans were taking no prisoners.  From the very first battle on Guadalcanal when frightened young Japanese began walking forward with their hands held high to surrender muttering the only English word they knew, “Mercy, mercy,” US Marines began mowing them down . . . all of them, not just an isolated few here and there . . . all of them. In countless testimonies, it is readily apparent that Japanese soldiers in hopeless situations would have gladly surrendered, by the thousands, if only they could.  The hatred was so great, however, and the propaganda so virulent following President Franklin Roosevelt’s orchestrated attack at Pearl Harbor that American soldiers, sailors and airmen were simply taking no prisoners, nor did the folks back home or their commanders want them to.

“You will take no prisoners, you will kill every yellow son-of-a-bitch, and that’s it,” yelled a marine colonel as he and his men were about to land on one island.

Thus, the manufactured belief after Pearl Harbor that the Japanese always fought to the death and never surrendered worked perfectly into the deep desire of Americans to kill the “sneaky Japs,” kill them all.  And so, with no option now but to fight fanatically to the death, the Japanese did.  And thus, it was a case where propaganda became a self-fulfilling truth.

Added to the merciless murder of helpless enemy soldiers was the torture and mutilation the Americans inflicted on those who were merely wounded.  Ears, noses, fingers, toes, and other body parts were cut off the dead and dying for souvenirs; heads were hacked off and their “cured” skulls then sold to sailors or sent home to friends and family members; even Roosevelt received a letter opener carved from a Japanese arm bone.

“This is the sort of gift I like to get,” beamed the US president proudly.

The few Japanese who were in fact saved for interrogation were kept alive only as long as their information was useful, then they too were shot, bayoneted or pushed from flying aircraft.

Another falsehood that has existed as fact for the past seventy years is that the US military conducted itself properly during the occupation of Japan and helped the defeated nation gently back to its feet during peace.  Again, nothing could be further from the truth.  From the day they arrived, the Americans took ruthless control of what little remained of the destroyed nation.  Women, children and the elderly were thrown into the streets and forced to shift among the ruins as best they could.  At every available opportunity, Japanese men suffered humiliation and degradation and many were slapped, kicked and beaten in public “for fun.”  All Japanese were treated like third-class citizens for years.  Starvation stalked the land even before the conquerors arrived but though the Americans had a surplus to draw from food was denied to the people, just as it was in Germany.  As a result, it is likely that millions perished during the first years of occupation.  It was noticed that starving children were smaller in 1946 than they were in 1936.

Additionally, just as in Germany, rape reared its filthy head in “peace.”  From the moment American troops came ashore on Saipan and Okinawa—two Japanese islands with large civilian populations–rape of females, and sometimes rape of males, began.   And just as in Germany following its surrender, the violent sexual assaults in Japan continued unabated for years.  No one in power, from General Douglas MacArthur down, was concerned in the least about the despicable, plague-like crime.  Indeed, MacArthur was much more concerned with censoring the news of rape from the outside world than stopping rape in Japan itself.  Goodrich estimates that over a million Japanese women and children were raped after the war.

There are many other shocking revelations that might be lifted from this blistering book but then, after all, this is only a review of the book and not the book itself.  Readers will have to discover the rest of this startling, riveting read for themselves.  Truly, Summer, 1945 is aptly subtitled, “the harvest of hate.”

In closing, a few final thoughts on the author himself.  Anyone who has read anything by Tom Goodrich knows that he is a passionate man who writes with great power, strength and scope.  It is a trademark that sets him apart from others. But his books also reveal the inner writer; a writer within who displays a large heart and soul.  One senses early in a book that Goodrich actually cares about his subjects. There is, of course, the larger focus of each book, the “big picture,” but Goodrich never loses touch with the small, the fragile, the seeming insignificant, the all-but-forgotten. A touching example is offered in Summer, 1945 when a Japanese adolescent, whose face has been melted beyond recognition by the atomic blast at Hiroshima, makes plans to kill herself rather than be chained for the remainder of her life to the face of a monster.  Just as the child is about to commit the final act, she overhears in the next room her anguished father quietly discussing his daughter with her mother.  Sadly agreeing that the child’s face is indeed hideous beyond belief, the man then states with both pain and love in each word that he loves his girl so much that her life, not her looks, is all that matters to him. Stunned, never imagining that anyone could ever love her again with such a terrifying face, the words of love were startling to the child, so startling that she suddenly realized that although death would indeed release her from a life of pain and shame, such a selfish act would only add to the heartbreak of her father.  The girl matures to womanhood when she decides then and there to accept her fate, deal with her problems herself, and simply be thankful for the love that still blesses her life when so many others are now bereft of all.

Generally, to reach an honest and accurate understanding of an event such as World War II, one must be so dedicated to the truth that they are prepared to plow through days, weeks, months, and years of dry, sterile material filled with tedious facts, figures and stats. Few of us have the time, patience or stamina for such research.  Thankfully, there are those like Tom Goodrich who do have what it takes for the long haul. Ultimately, it is the “long haul” that delivers the details of history from which comes what we know as truth.  Without our history, without our truth, we are nothing as a people.  That’s why our enemy is so determined to hide or distort our history; it is also why people like Tom Goodrich are so determined to retrieve our history. Discovering the truth of our history, even after decades of propaganda and lies, is what will ultimately set us free.  These two books—Summer, 1945 and Hellstorm–have gone a very long way toward setting us free.  And this is what makes Thomas Goodrich’s writing style so special. Almost in spite of ourselves, we sense the truth in his words. We, the readers, are drawn into a Goodrich book before we hardly know it. Truth is like that, like a strong magnet. A day or two later, when one emerges from the book–one “emerges” from a Tom Goodrich book, they never “finish” something that stays with them forever—they feel like they are different people; they have been to places that they never knew existed; they have gone to worlds that they were not supposed to go; they have gained knowledge and understanding that they were never meant to gain.  And that, ladies and gentlemen, is an uncanny writing ability.  We call it genius.

Summer, 1945—Germany, Japan and the Harvest of Hate has already taken its place with Hellstorm as one of the all-time most memorable and important books ever written, not just on World War II, but on history in general. If that sounds biased, that’s because it is.  We White Nationalists are extremely fortunate to have one of the world’s finest and most dedicated historians fighting on our side. People like Thomas Goodrich are why we are winning and why our victory is just a matter of time.

Summer, 1945 and Hellstorm can each be purchased at,,, and through the author’s website at For faster delivery, order each book separately via the author’s paypal at ( $20 US / $25 Abroad ) or order both books together as one ($40 US / $50 Abroad )

34 replies
  1. Alan Donelson
    Alan Donelson says:

    Thank you for this insightful review. Even as one aspect of World War II appears to diminish — Ursula Haverbeck and Monika Schaefer among the most recent to prick an overinflated, numerical balloon — Mr. Goodrich brings other horrific facets to the fore, assisting greatly our developing a fuller, clearer perspective. Because the victors write history, we cannot overestimate the value of revisionist historians. I shall order both of Mr. Goodrich’s books mentioned today.

  2. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    Back in the 60s, a friend’s (future) father-in-law, who went through Italy with the Canadian Army, would get drunk (often) and start with his war stories. One of them was POWs. He claimed that it was understood that POWs had to be guarded and fed, thereby taking manpower away from the battle. The procedure was mostly interrogate the few that survived to be captured, then shoot them when they tried to “escape”. Another was that when accusations of rape were made, every man stepped forward to state that the the woman had willingly had sex with them.
    We used to think it was empty bravado, but then the Eisenhower death camps started to gain some traction, and some of us began to wonder just how much truth there was to some of his stories. Years later it dawned on me that the majority of these men were barely out of their teens at the time, whether infantry, seaman, or air crews. They had seen many horrific things from different perspectives. Large numbers of them had turned to alcohol as an unhealthy companion.

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      And what about the tragedies behind the tens of thousands under the questionable care of the Veterans’ Administration ?
      That terrible toll of daily suicides among the nation’s own.

      All posted as a debit on Israel’s current account with the US, in addition to the more immediate wasted trillions requiring billions in annual interest from those American taxpayers not engaged in tax evasion.

      And still these abused, expendable goyim fellows ” serve ” our COMMON VALUES WITH ISRAEL: albeit merely as ex-military consumers for purportedly discounted automobile insurance, preferential mortgage and personal loan rates, selling their insurance policies and throwing away the equities in their homes through reverse-mortgages.

      Greasy Jewish commercials, appealing to Mom and apple pie tickling their egos: assuring their future crop of ‘useful goy idiots’.

  3. Carolyn Yeager
    Carolyn Yeager says:

    I am perplexed by he appearance of this book review here. Was it written by the author himself? Or perhaps his publisher? Did “Thor Magnusson” pay TOO for posting it, rather than the other way around?

    Such paeans of praise! Such over the top, adjective-heavy writing. Even I, who want the world to know how bad were the wrongs and lies of the Allies, with no sympathy at all for the USA, cannot help but feel cynical about what is written here simply because of the overblown style.

    • Earl Oill
      Earl Oill says:

      It does seem overblown. It would be interesting to hear a review from David Irving, for example. The Germans perpetrated great cruelties on the Jews and Slavs as they made their way to Moscow, mass-murdering as they traveled. At least that is what one gets from Irving. Any account that depicts one side as far more savage than the other has a considerable burden of proof.

    • Luke
      Luke says:

      Having been somewhat of a fan of a couple of books written by Tom Goodrich – Scalp Dance (my favorite) and then Hellstorm – I find myself wondering if my initial favorable opinion of Goodrich after reading those two books might be a little premature, now that I have read this ‘review’ of his latest book.

      I would like to point out that there is a very thin line between a historian who seeks to debunk the decades of ‘war time propaganda’ and outright ‘lies’ told to American citizens and to the rest of the world in order to justify needless and unnecessary wars – particularly in the case of going to war against our fellow White brothers and sisters in Germany so as to destroy the only White leader in the last 100 years who had the gonads to stand up to our #1 enemy, the jews – and someone who is increasingly beginning to remind me of a typical, virulently anti-White, self-hating, self-loathing, America hating and relentlessly bashing, sickening SJW White liberal.

      With a broad brush, in this latest book by Goodrich – he seems to be shoveling the most rancid smelling kind of manure upon every U.S. Military man who served during WW2. And, the vast majority of these men who saw combat were White men. This is suspiciously reminiscent of the sort of nauseating hatred we constantly hear coming from the hard core, radical, Cultural Marxist Communist left ever since the 1960s.

      My Father served during in the Pacific Theater during WW2 and not once during his life did he ever utter a single word to me about his experiences during that war. But, knowing my Father as well as I did and being aware of the kind of conservative values that he lived by and which he sought to raise his children by, I take offense at Tom Goodrich’s attempt to impune my Father’s reputation and accuse him of being a unprincipled, cold blooded killer and a torturer and/or sexual predator.

      I am not denying that, in every war, there are horrible things that some men do – but, those men do those things on an individual case by case basis. Trying to condemn the entire US military and convict them on the basis of the sins of a few mentally defective misfits is a gross injustice.

      Tom Goodrich sounds more and more like a typical modern day liberal who hates the old America, and has an agenda to destroy our admiration and respect for our White ancestors.

      BTW: I do not claim to be proud of any White man or woman who participates in wars we were or are lied into by jews and especially wars that pit White nations against other White nations.

      • Arawn
        Arawn says:

        Haven’t read the book either, but when reading the review, the sense of the story seemed to be that American, Canadian and other Western soldiers committed crimes on a large scale because of the propaganda. Two points flow from this:
        1) Propaganda can be devastating, and absolutely mind inverting to the point that men will commit the very crimes against those that they are accusing of such crimes in first place.
        2) Even Western men of nations other than Germany, can be total animals. This is an important fact, not only for admission of truth and guilt/overcoming and bonding with Germany, but also for us to recognize our potential as fighters – all these elements are important to us in order to overcome the obstacles ahead.
        Your father as an honorable man is not directly diminished by this article. We must accept our failures as a nation when they are revealed to us. To move forward we need to learn from those failures, lets not fall back in the bury the evidence propaganda trap.

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:

        Luke, I hear you loud and clear and entirely sympathize with respect to your father.

        You may have read some of my uncompromising, severest condemnations of animals like Ehrenburg. But each such comment was accompanied by an exoneration of those Red Army soldiers, who remembered their mothers’ admonitions before they left home: often forever.

        Despite the correctness of the facts described, one can not deny, that during the collapse refugees and soldiers fled towards the American side: not the other way around.

        I remember the American as well as corroborating German description of the 16 of 32 P-51 fighters escorting the 8th US Air Force over one of its runs over Dresden, being ordered to look for targets of opportunity, which included pregnant women in a maternity hospital gazing out of the windows as well as helpless aged refugees and their children, encamped on the river banks with their horse-, oxen-, even cow-drawn farm wagons.

        But I also remember, as a nine-year-old, rushing to a site where a DC-3 [ Dakota ] crashed into the side of an apartment building, killing three airmen. This was during the 48-49 Berlin Blockade, overcome by the Allied, mainly American Airlift,

        These pilots flew well beyond their endurance, a two-engine Dakota or a four-engine Skymaster landing at Tempelhof AP every two minutes.

        They brought us coal in potato sacks for electricity generation of two hours per day and dehydrated French fries and some other necessities; otherwise we would have starved or surrendered to the Soviets.

        A small memorial at that crash site commemorates those three boys who also never rejoined their families. Never without flowers.

        The German word Schadenfreude, glee over others’ misfortune , has made its way into English.

        But there is a balancing word as well: Mitfreude, or a heartfelt sharing of someone’s happiness and good fortune.

        I have Mitfreude with your described deportment of your father and with what he imbued in his offspring.

        • T
          T says:

          I remember the American as well as corroborating German description of the 16 of 32 P-51 fighters escorting the 8th US Air Force over one of its runs over Dresden, being ordered to look for targets of opportunity, which included pregnant women in a maternity hospital gazing out of the windows as well as helpless aged refugees and their children, encamped on the river banks with their horse-, oxen-, even cow-drawn farm wagons.

          Some years back I heard an interview on NPR (the US equivalent of the BBC) with Kurt Vonnegut Jr, the writer of Slaughterhouse Five, a US soldier whom had been imprisoned at Dresden during the time of the US and British bombing raids. He as well as other Allied POWs whom had survived aided in the grisly cleanup during the aftermath. In the course of the interview it came out that the US pilots had been briefed before the raid that Dresden was a an active and major participant in the Wehrmacht support infrastructure, and hence the need for its bombing. However, this was not in any way true. A fellow US POW at Dresden whom had seen on the ground with his own eyes the monstous untruth of the briefing given the pilots and heard about it after the war was quoted by Vonnegut as stating he would never believe the US government on anything it pronounced ever again.

          • Charles Frey
            Charles Frey says:

            Dresden, according to the authorities responsible at that time, had a mere three 88mm flaks, which had just been sequestered to the encroaching Eastern Front to battle T 34s.

            Germany’s Paris, as Dresden was dubbed, was a sitting duck overcrowded with refugee ducklings. Just the kind of population density Churchill dreamt of bombing into the stone age. [ German Village, Utah ].

            Recall, that this third St. Valentine’s Day massacre in history, preceded by those of the French Revolution and the Chicago Mob, was perpetrated only a few days after Yalta, where Churchill gave away Poland, his very casus belli; in addition to the rest of Eastern Europe.

            He had to demonstrate superior allied air-power to prevent the SU superior ground forces from advancing beyond agreed-on demarcation lines. [ Slow learner ].

            This habitual drunk must have heavily added to his usually unpaid bill of his ” Royal Court-Appointed Purveyor of Fine Spirits ” while he dreamt up ” Operation Unthinkable “: a counter-attack against the SU, using apparently now trustworthy former Wehrmacht units as well. Part of his mobilization to be staged just north-east of the still smoldering Dresden. [ The US, purportedly too busy planning to dresden Nagasaki and Hiroshima, nixed this Operation: guaranteeing Communism’s survival once again: to whose birth Wall Street, Washington and London stood as god-parents ].

            Was it not Vonnegut who described the most ” grisly ” cleanup ? A heavy bomb, probably fitted with a time fuse, had penetrated a reinforced basement shelter of a four-story apartment building, crammed with women and their children [ all men were at the front ], before it detonated in this sealed off enclosure with optimal effect.

            French POW’s were detailed to clean up. They immediately returned to the street, violently throwing up. Germans went in but also rushed back out.

            They were faced by a foot high liquid mass of indistinguishable body parts and blood, mixed with water from broken pipes.

            An old air-raid warden inspected basement shelters and addressed the mothers on the benches, holding their children. Looking normal under the poor lantern light, he discovered that all were mummified by the heat which exceeded 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit, as suggested by molten metal-ware and helmets.

            For me, the most heart-rending photo is of an old bearded man lovingly pulling his still smiling wife into him with his left arm protectively around her shoulder. Also mummified. As I said here many months ago, I often wonder what their last words were to one another which caused her to smile at the moment of death.

            May both those Washingtonians who grinningly chanted
            ” Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran ! ” share an eternal place in Hell: without taking the rest of the West with them in the eternal interest of Eretz Israel.

        • T
          T says:

          I suppose I see Dresden as being largely of a punitive nature in the mentality of those whom ordered it. There is also, in the context of the Dresden raids resulting in the destruction of a major German cultural center, an attack aimed at German identity. Something, similar in nature occurred after the fall of Saddam Hussein due to the US invasion of Iraq and the deliberate allowing of the looting, theft, and destruction of Iraqi antiquities afterwards where US forces and allies stood down and did nothing to stop it. Great harm was done to Iraqi identity in doing so.

          Though they’re quite happy to let people think otherwise, in this regard it doesn’t matter whether the identity a people has is ‘good’ or ‘bad’ per se, but it’s rather merely that the independent identity exist that requires a people’s destruction.

          Theodore Poesche in his remarkable 1853 book The New Rome provides some explanation for the US and British bombing of Dresden in his description of what he sees as the exact nature of the 1776 North American Revolution and its global mission. It also helps to explain the allowing of the looting/destruction of Iraqi antiquities after Saddam’s fall.

          It is the duty of the American party to combat all European traditions which are incompatible with Americanism; but, above all, that of nationality. To vindicate individualism against nationality, is the office of America…When the dominion of nationality is crushed, and the sovereignty of the individual is attained, everywhere and everyhow, the missions of the [1776] revolution and of America will both be accomplished.

          pg 71 – 72

          The revolution is the offspring of the only people which is not a nation. A gathering of all the exiles of the world -and an exile is a man deprived of his nationality, rejected by his nation- an assemblage whose spring of action was disgust at the national cruelties which they had fled; a convocation from all the corners of the world for conscience sake, for the preservation of this individual sovereignty against the encroachments of national traditions; a horde of emigrants who knew nationality in the guise of national poverty; America was, by force of circumstances, the rendezvous of all to whom nationality had been the source of all their sufferings.

          Nations, we have seen, are unions based upon community of speech; this the Americans renounced, in favor of a union based upon a unity of thought; and thus fell nationality, and arose the republic. The native Americans partly have been forced to doff the European part of their title; and they have done wisely. It is the duty of the American party to combat all European traditions which are incompatible with Americanism; but, above all, that of nationality. To vindicate individualism against nationality, is the office of America. This is, at the same time, the whole force and scope of the revolution; thus, the revolution which arose in and with America, must for ever return to it; and America, which began in revolution, must live in it, and end with it. When the dominion of nationality is crushed, and the sovereignty of the individual is attained, everywhere and everyhow, the missions of the revolution and of America will both be accomplished.

          • Charles Frey
            Charles Frey says:

            During this year’s commemoration for the victims, hundreds of Antifa psychopaths appeared with signs of
            ” Everything Good Comes From Above ” and lauding Bomber Harris.

            With respect to the multiple thefts of irreplaceable antiquities from the Bagdad Museum, even the Rothschild-controlled The Economist stated, that they would most likely be for sale in Tel Aviv and New York. They would know; no Jewish Question about it. Objets d’art and de barter, lacking provenance; beyond the taxman’s reach: smuggled in as cheap souvenir replicas. Again: no Jewish Question about it.

          • T
            T says:

            …Churchill gave away Poland, his very casus belli; in addition to the rest of Eastern Europe….

            Churchill may sometimes have ‘played dumb’ about these things, but, I think he very well knew what he was doing regarding Poland and his giving away of that country.

            Below, another past British prime minister, the then British Foreign Secretary Lord Palmerston, as documented and linked below in the lead story on the front page of The Spectator of London, outlines albeit in coded form the 1848 revolutions which are soon to rock the capitals of most of Europe. This was published a little over a year before the events actually took place yet Palmerston clearly indicates foreknowledge. This fits in with what some have thought that those creating these events tell us openly enough beforehand what they are doing if you know where to look and can decipher their message. If so, I suppose its similar in dynamic to how personages such as Jack the Ripper or the Son of Sam also telegraphed their intentions to the public by way of coded messages published in newspapers, thus in the attention gained they self-adulate in their power while simultaneously tweaking society’s nose in its seeming powerlessness. The big difference is the former terrorizes multiple nations, if not the entire globe, and have been involved in the murder of tens of millions, and in the future potentially billions, while the latter type typically makes do with terrorizing mere regions and with the murder of dozens of indivuduals.

            The most striking occurrence of the week is not an event, but some writing, highly Palmerstonian in its savor. According to this characteristic effusion, all Europe is about to be in commotion. A dark intrigue is seen in every region…You would think there was going to be instant war – in Italy, in Schleswig, in Switzerland, in Poland – everywhere.

            The London Spectator – November 21, 1846

            The most striking occurrence of the week is not an event, but some writing, highly Palmerstonian in its savor. According to this characteristic effusion, all Europe is about to be in commotion. A dark intrigue is seen in every region, with France at the bottom of it all. The French government, we are told, has forfeited its position by the Montpensier marriage; must prepare to submit to indignities all round; and is making ready, in its truckling for pardon, to perpetrate a series of international crimes…

            …Thus may France procure assent to her attempted ascendency in the penninsula. “It is true, that to combat such a combination, we have Lord Palmerston at the Foreign Office, and Lord Ponsonby at Vienna.” Too true, indeed. It is an extraordinary coincidence, that no sooner does Lord Palmerston return to office, than this universal conspiring reappears. Perhaps there is something really the matter, though not abroad. The suspicion of being the object for universal conspiracy is one trait of madness, and Lord Palmerston exhibits that symptom with renewed intensity, as though the excitements of office were too much for him. But “we” do not rely altogether on ourselves; “we rely more on the alacrity of the French Opposition to denounce these new tendencies of the policy of their government.” Lord Palmerston then reckons on hubbub in Paris as before 1841; more interpellations, more fuss making about shadowy constructive suspicions of intrigue, more diplomatic turmoil, more despatch writing! If a busy attorney, who wished to seem yet busier than he was, established himself in a country town, and set himself to work detecting flaws in the title deeds and leases all round, or presuming and imputing them all round, with a view to the general litigation that would ensue, the restlessness and turmoil excited in the country would be much like the feeling created in Europe, according to these ministerial accounts, just at the time Lord Palmerston returns to business. You would think there was going to be instant war – in Italy, in Schleswig, in Switzerland, in Poland – everywhere.

            Charles Frey – …he dreamt up ” Operation Unthinkable “: a counter-attack against the SU, using apparently now trustworthy former Wehrmacht units as well. Part of his mobilization to be staged just north-east of the still smoldering Dresden.

            Yes, but was this perhaps simply a cynical feint on Churchill’s part, like his ‘we stuck the wrong pig’ comment after the war, or, on a larger scale, as perhaps took place in the rather weak Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War on behalf of the anti-Bolsheviks?

            Charles Frey….The US, purportedly too busy planning to dresden Nagasaki and Hiroshima, nixed this Operation: guaranteeing Communism’s survival once again: to whose birth Wall Street, Washington and London stood as god-parents.

            The financial centers of New York and London have historically not wished anything too awful to happen to Communism, certainly not its demise. ‘Convergance’ between Capitalism and Communism is what they have strived for. How can this be, though, as Capitalism and Communism have been made to appear (at least on the surface) as polar opposites. The writer linked below provides some explanation, in that according to him, contrary to what many have been told, the British based Scottish Free Rite masonry, and the European continent based Grand Orient masonry, the two branches from whence regarding the former, the United States arose, and regarding the latter, French ‘red republicanism’ came about, ultimately giving rise to the Soviet Union, rather than being perpetually at each others throats, have instead worked hand in hand since the beginning. The writer is an apparent distant relation of Jonathan Belcher, a prominent New Englander in British colonial North America, and the first ‘native born’ freemason in North America. Mind you, he writes what he does not to denounce, or ‘expose’, but, rather as matter of fact, and he’s all for it. It also fits the historic record perfectly. No doubt some will protest loudly about what that writer says, but why, when there has been so much deception and intrigue surrounding Freemasonry, should it be believed that there is a much ballyhooed ‘split’ between these branches, when by logic they have historically had every reason to have worked together while simultaneously having plenty of motivation to go to great lengths to hide the fact?

            Many with good reason it would seem have thought there was a hidden force, a hidden hand driving these happenings from behind the scenes, operated by some one, or depending on how a person might look at it, by some thing . If so, much like the climactic final scene in Rosemary’s Baby , I suspect that soon enough whatever it is that has been driving these modern events will come out of the darkness where it has been in hiding these many hundreds, if not thousands of years, and reveal itself to the light of day and to the world.

            As soon as America gained her independence from Great Britain (with substantial French assistance), first Franklin and then Jefferson went on missions to France where they served as nuclei around which formed a latticework of interrelated or interconnected French revolutionary leaders, one of whom was Marie Joseph Paul Ives Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de Lafayette, who, after fighting in the American Revolution, imported revolutionary ideology into his native France under Jefferson’s guidance and inspiration.

            This study proposes that the end effects of France aiding the American Revolution were both practical and ideological: That to some French philosophes, America literally was to serve as the training ground for future French republicans, and ultimately, to serve as the Great Exemplar of Utopia, Acadia, the New Atlantis–the New World Order–the republican world that France could become once revolution overturned the Ancien Regime. And the American Revolution was a prelude to that French Revolution that was to launch a world-wide revolutionary campaign to free oppressed peoples throughout the world by bringing them republican or democratic government, beginning with a stable, consolidated Concert of Europe, with America as its guiding force, its ideological inspiration–its Trilateral Center.

            During the 1770’s-80’s, certain Enlightened French noblemen and bourgeoisie assisted in the creation of, and then used, the United States of America as France’s revolutionary outpost (and conversely, Americans like Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson were ready and willing to assist France in achieving its goal). The intertwining of French and American foreign affairs occurred with the blessings of prominent Enlightened Americans–particulary Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson–who enlisted the aid of the government of French King Louis XVI (specifically, the Enlightened foreign minister, the Comte de Vergennes) to gain independence for America’s future Republic.

            However, unknown to Louis XVI, creation of the United States was only a prelude to a chain reaction that resulted in a new French polity. Franklin and the ideological example of the American Revolution simultaneously prepared the substrate for the French Revolution that ultimately overthrew Louis XVI and crystallized into a sister republic. As soon as America gained her independence from Great Britain (with substantial French assistance), first Franklin and then Jefferson went on missions to France where they served as nuclei around which formed a latticework of interrelated or interconnected French revolutionary leaders, one of whom was Marie Joseph Paul Ives Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de Lafayette, who, after fighting in the American Revolution, imported revolutionary ideology into his native France under Jefferson’s guidance and inspiration. Products of the European Enlightenment, Franklin and Jefferson were station masters of France’s American depot, as Lafayette was an agent of the French central station trained on the American revolutionary training ground. Seeding the revolutionary cloud was not a one-sided French venture, however. On the contrary: the seedtime of the French Revolution was during Benjamin Franklin’s ministry to France–and that American was the seed-planter.




      • Diane
        Diane says:

        My father was on a Navy Ship in the Pacific and he never ever spoke of his experiences. I only remember once when I was probably around 10 years old and my Mother probably said something that brought up the war. I distinctly had asked what did my Dad do in the war. My Mom said he hoarded Spam sandwiches in his locker and he ran the Gedunk(sic) shop. I remember my Dad saying that he had to fire the AK KAK (sic) gun if they saw an enemy plane. Years later he said he didn’t ever remember telling me that so whether it was true or not who knows. But there is no way I would have known the two terms “Gedunk” or “Ak Kak”.

    • BjørnThorsønn
      BjørnThorsønn says:

      I agree. Just as I want to vomit of the praise of every book that draws a heroic portrait of the allies. Which is probably more than 90% of the books written about that atrocity.
      Both my grandfathers were in German prison camps. They were, like the Germans, fooled by the bastards who wanted the war.

  4. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    Dear Mr. Magnusson:

    Thank you for having the courage to write this article. It is this kind of thing (as well as the books you recommended) that both educates our people and puts us on the path to victory.

    Many years ago (being young and naive) I worked for one of the intelligence agencies for the United States. The little I learned quickly disillusioned me as to the righteousness of this country. I no longer venerate the Pepsi Generation or the Ronald McDonald culture, though there are many people in this country worthy of the attempt to be reached, as you have done with this article.

    But, I won’t buy or read the books you speak of. I’ve had enough conversations years ago with those Germans who had first-hand experience with this ‘American’ nightmare. It was nauseous enough to last me a lifetime, and beyond.

  5. Charles Frey
    Charles Frey says:

    Hate preceded and accompanied WW II throughout.

    How else could one explain the psychopathological endeavor by the British and Americans, expertly advised by German emigrees, at German Village, Utah ?

    There, they constructed precise replicas of German working class housing, to develop ordinary, napalm and phosphorous bombs for the greatest calculable death rates among closely quartered poorer working-class populations.

    One of many of Winnie’s wet dreams.

    They wouldn’t have been considered experts and scientists, had they not imported German furniture, cribs, toys, curtains and bedding to determine their flammability. In addition to German-type timber from the SU, to build typical German apartment houses, bomb them, assess the damage, then rebuild them to start over again.

    Christian values ?

    I have always had a weak spot for people who would use a new, stiff broom to first of all sweep in front of their own front door, such as this author and the no less honest reviewer.

      • tadzio308
        tadzio308 says:

        Why shouldn’t it? Nothing out of the ordinary. Have read uncounted reviews of books “you have to read”, “you must read”, “everyone ought to read:, etc. A book that impresses a reviewer strongly should read like a promotion for it.

  6. Rob Bottom
    Rob Bottom says:

    Well, that explains why so many men who returned after the war refused to talk about their experiences.

  7. Jeff
    Jeff says:

    My farm boy uncle, an only son, participated in the European theater in WWII. His most searing memory was not of any German atrocity but of his unit’s own “Colonel Strawbridge” raping a 16-year-old German girl. It was the most demoralizing event of the war to him. He said he would never forget his name. He also recalled American mistreatment of German POWs, and intervened personally on several occasions to prevent them from being kicked or stomped with impunity. Another time he and his buddy interrupted a German family as they were about to eat lunch, shooed them away from the table, and ate the food they had prepared– in his words “I was so hungry they were the best Irish potatoes I’ve ever eaten in my life.” His buddy wanted to loot an heirloom gold watch from the family matriarch, oblivious to her cries for mercy, and my uncle finally persuaded him to let her keep the watch and they left. According to him, he was shot at the most in towns and cities with large contingents of Hitler Youth—they were like “hornets’ nests” in his words. This Jewish instigated war almost cost him his life several times—which would have taken with it the lives of his three sons, five grandchildren, and eight great grandchildren now living devoted, productive lives. And how did the Jews thank him? With an obligation to pay thousands of dollars in private school tuition for his children to escape the 90% black hellholes the public schools became after the Jews integrated them. One among many agitations and public policies they thanked us with since the end of WWII calculated to devastate and displace the one demographic that proved most decisive in saving them.

  8. Guest4
    Guest4 says:

    I always wondered why American cartoons after WWII were so violent. These GI’s brought brutality towards women home with them. They entered college under the GI bill. College was once the domain of gentlemen.

  9. Barkingmad
    Barkingmad says:

    Long ago, in ninth grade, I had a teacher born in eastern Europe. Even though he was not our history teacher, one fine day he decided to deliver a homily on WW II, which he had personally experienced as a child. He told us especially about the actions of the Germans against his precious nonchristian brethren which he claimed to have seen.

    After this unexpected and shocking revelation (to us in our girls-only class), a new girl of German descent but born here who sat behind me, whispered to me, “Right now I could cheerfully strangle all Germans by the throat.” [sic] It may be more than 40 years but I recall this word for word.

    And this is how it all starts. Bit by bit. By people who have an axe to grind.

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      B, not ” by people who have an axe to grind “, but ” by yet more survivors who have an axe to grind “.

      • Barkingmad
        Barkingmad says:

        @Charles. The teacher telling this story was a Christian, but apparently had much sympathy for those of other persuasions.

  10. Cleavis Nowell
    Cleavis Nowell says:

    Many American GIs proudly boasted of shooting Arabs off haystacks in North Africa. With virtually no sustainable agriculture in islamist countries – the GIs were just removing them from hay exported for American horses. Mr. Ed approved.

  11. PekkaL.
    PekkaL. says:

    Message well understood. Nothing new, though.
    There is a Finnish saying (freely translated): “You will find in front of You what You left behind”. I dare say, for God’s sake, let this be true.
    And then they wonder, why there is “hate”. Keep wondering, keep wondering… They will find the reason just under their (big) nose one day.

  12. PTM
    PTM says:

    Can such things be? What official history says is 180 of what is presented in these books. Has the truth of a holocaust been projected onto innocents?

  13. Karen T
    Karen T says:

    Holocaust, a sacrifice consumed by fire, was perpetrated on the German and the Japanese people, not the Jews. This inversion of fact blatantly demonstrates that Rene Guenon may have been right and we are witnessing the tail end of the Kali Yuga. Kudos to the author for exposing the abomination of WW2, however, the purple prose detracted from the message. Then there was this …”Discovering the truth of our own history, even after decades of propaganda and lies”… when the “truth” that is being ‘exposed’ is that American servicemen were vile and sadistic monsters.

  14. dolph
    dolph says:

    We are headed for another breakdown, I’m absolutely convinced of that. I’ve even had panic attacks because of this realization.

    It’s absolutely incredible that the productivity of America is now dedicated to serving the Jews (and their Negro and immigrant pets) in perpetuity. Trillions and trillions of dollars created out of thin air, just for them. It boggles the mind, it’s so mind boggling that it can hardly be conceived. If you think about it, it will drive you mad.

    Best to withdraw, live whatever quiet life you can, away from the madness.

Comments are closed.