Populist-Socialism: The Economy of the White Ethno-State
Abstract
Little consideration is given to the economic foundations of a White ethno-state. While many in the Alt-Right know conceptually what an ethno-state should be like in the abstract sense of demographics, the minutia of public and economic policy to obtain or maintain such a state is lost. While not exhaustive, the following paper is intended to steer conversations into more concrete terms addressing the economy of a White ethno-state. That is, an anti-materialist economy that serves the nation, versus the nation serving the economy in materialistic capitalism and socialist-communism. A Third Position meshing of populist and socialism is proposed.
The demagogues on the left and right both use the terms populist and socialist to malign their political opponents. Populism has become synonymous with right-wing authoritarianism to the left. The same argument is used by conservatives to associate socialism with communism. Indeed, the populist primacy of the people and the socialist primacy of the class are seen as contradictory ideals. In reality, elements of populism and socialism can be complementary to one another in a dynamic economy. Socialism’s securing the welfare of the people and populism’s emphasis on the common man’s economic growth and interests are not antagonistic to one another, but complimentary.
To many, the concept of socialism is distinctly leftist. Historically, Socialism has been associated with Marxism and “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” This Marxist Socialism aims at the elimination of all hierarchy which is natural to man. Communism aimed at the flattening out of wages and elimination of class distinctions altogether.
Socialism’s modern form has taken on a much more egalitarian or cultural-Marxist form. Rather than a flattening of wages, the current mode aims to advance the interests of groups defined by their race or gender. Law schools and Officer Candidate Schools in the military give preference to minority applicants as if they would starve if they did not become a lawyer or lieutenant. A White contractor’s tax dollar goes to subsidize his competitors through the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program and other affirmative action initiatives. Public funds are appropriated to the sexual reassignment surgery and AIDS treatment of prisoners. Cultural Marxism is the onslaught against all remaining Western values.
For most people, the only alternative to socialism/communism is free capitalism and classical liberalism. While the two ideologies are often portrayed as diametrically opposed, the dogma and psyche of their proponents are essentially the same, and often become precursors to one another. Communism and capitalism are both materialistic at their core. Communism and capitalism both believe that the state serves at the will of the economy and not vice versa and both are inherently globalist—consider Marx’s belief that communism could only truly work on a global scale and the capitalist’s disdain for economic nationalism and desire for open borders. Today the Cultural-Marxist ideology of open borders (which will yield greater numbers for the coalition of the aggrieved) fits hand-in-glove with the open borders sentiments of capitalists desiring cheap labor.
Modern political discourse revolves around comparing everyone to Hitler. Liberals liken the inept attempts at traditionalism by Conservatives to Hitler, and Conservatives lob quips about Hitler being a socialist back at the left. This begs to question, was Hitler a Socialist? Yes, he was. Hitler was not a socialist in the Bernie Sanders welfare sense, but more in keeping with rationalism and traditionalism. The economic policies of National Socialism did not elevate the minority at the expense of the organic and indigenous majority, but instead benefitted and ensured the welfare of the Volk. Accordingly, National Socialism is a form of Right-Wing Socialism.
Right-Wing Socialism significantly predates Marx’s Socialism. British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli (of Sephardic heritage) presented Right-Wing or “Paternalistic Conservatism” based on the notion that a people develop organically, and their values form the foundation of tradition and morality.(1) Disraeli correctly promulgated hierarchy as natural—a distinctly right-wing notion. This sense of duty from the bottom to the top and the top to the bottom of one’s people is both distinctly right-wing and distinctly socialist. Instead of dominating or revolting against one another, the English social classes remained intact. The peasantry, working class, bourgeois, and aristocracy had a duty to one another. Under Disraeli, England saw sweeping reform of industrial labor conditions, public health, and the environment.
Disraeli also collaborated with another Right-Wing Socialist, Otto Von Bismarck, to address the decline of the Ottoman Empire and rising Russian influence. Bismarck enacted policies of mandatory insurance for workers to care for illness, injury, aging, and retirement. He aimed at forming a bond and sense of loyalty among the various classes of The Reich.(2) Bismarck’s policies of state-socialism were populist as well. Bismarck supported the Germanization of minorities living on the fringes of the empire and expulsion of others. During the Long Depression, Bismarck enacted Protectionist policies by imposing tariffs on imports to support domestic agriculture and industry.
Right-Wing populism is gaining traction in America and the rest of the West. The sentiment that many Whites in the West feel correctly affirms that their countries have been sold out to international banking, globalism, and the ethnic and gender activists operating under the banner of cultural Marxism. The central tenet of Populism is the empowerment of the working and middle classes. The appropriate response of the West is economic nationalism (where the West itself is seen as a nation), ending immigration from non-Western countries and beginning the process of repatriation, and the establishment of a centralized financial system dedicated to economic nationalism.
Regarding the central bank, a central bank comprised of international investment bankers cannot possibly have the national interest in mind. Accordingly, I propose a state-bank that is run similarly to a Credit Union. Instead of the Fed determining interest rates based on the volume or value of loans, the interest rate will be determined based on the socioeconomic implications and goals set out by the state. Furthermore, the profits of the bank will be reinvested back into the state and subject to annual audit.
The declining percentage of Whites in America has roughly coincided with the decline in American manufacturing jobs. Whites have predominantly occupied manufacturing occupations in America dating back prior to even the Industrial Revolution and Civil-War. Under the current regime, White families have often been forced to sift from manufacturing jobs to lower paying jobs in the service and retail sectors. With hierarchical structure leading to greater opportunities to advance and better opportunities to unionize, it’s no wonder that manufacturing jobs pay an average 20% higher wage than service sector jobs. Additionally, Amazon and online shopping continue to kill retail jobs and the sales tax revenue of White suburbs.
There are two main causes of Western Europe’s demise at the hand of Moslem immigrants: the destabilizing of countries like Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya as a direct result of U.S. foreign policy and the ideology of multiculturalism in which the political and cultural interests of the traditionally dominant White majorities have been denigrated. Socialism in any form is simply incompatible with open-borders and immigration. As Milton Friedman said, “It’s just obvious you can’t have free immigration and a welfare state.” Open borders creates the problem of economic free-riders draining the system and only exacerbates immigration problems by encouraging more. A physical border armed by lethal and non-lethal means along with the means of deportation is wholly necessary to enact any facet of socialism. With closed-borders and immigration, the state is better able to enact socialistic programs that address public health, the environment, and social welfare.
The populist-socialist economy does not aim at the full-on nationalization or replacement of private sector healthcare. Rather, the goal is to supplant and fill in the holes or correct market failures in the existing system. Those with pre-existing conditions should be accommodated through the state plan, assuming they haven’t gamed the system by avoiding paying health insurance until they are ill. Financial incentives based on actual costs to the healthcare system could be built in to discourage unhealthy lifestyles—smoking, drinking to excess, obesity, etc.
The same incentivization process for state sponsored healthcare could be used for those who are applying for welfare. Under the current system, welfare recipients are required to show little to no effort to find employment and receive government assistance in the form of welfare, Section 8 Housing, and food assistance. To receive such assistance, people who are deemed physically capable of working would work—perhaps in public works programs if no other jobs are available—in order to benefit from assistance programs. Such labor could include ditch digging, reforestation, stream and litter cleanup, to the laying of roads. The goal of this program is to develop a work ethic and esprit de corps in the nation while getting the taxpayer some measure of ROI on their money.
In the same vein, I propose a Third New Deal. This jobs program will be largely centered on America’s lagging transit and transportation infrastructure and environmental sustainability. For example, a “green jobs” program could target those in declining industries like coal to retrain them on the construction of wind farms. This jobs program will create a new demand for environmental and civil engineers. Additionally, those on welfare programs will earn their subsidence along with the incarcerated. The creation of work camps for criminals will focus on the production of public goods and occupy the majority of the prisoner’s day in compensation of the victim(s) and society to house, feed, and clothe lawbreakers. Those physically able who refuse to work will be given the cheapest-most meagre rations and living quarters.
Progressive tax policy will continue in the populist-socialist economy. Those with the greatest ability to pay, will do so. However, given the declining birthrate among Whites, government intercession is necessary in tax policy. Tax policy would give tax breaks and grants for children based on the number of children and their ability to afford their family size. For instance, a household with an income of $150,000 could be given a tax rebate equal to 4 children, while a household with an income of $100,000 could be given credit for 3 children. Such a policy promotes larger White families while keeping White kids off the state’s welfare system.
The populist-socialist economy is dynamic in that its interventionism is dictated by the ebbs and flows of the economy. The populist-socialist economy has certain tradeoffs its willing to make when dealing with the unintended consequences of interventionism. Some of these priorities are: (1) the deflation of inelastic goods (i.e., goods, such as basic necessities, that do not show less demand as price increases; (2) prioritization of full employment over the inflation of elastic goods; (3) economic independence and self-sufficiency to the greatest extent possible with regard to imports; and (4) a positive or at least neutral trade balance. As Whites in America are a dwindling majority, whatever enhances and swells the size of the middle class—the majority of Americans by definition, is good for Whites in America. Thus, populism promotes the middle-class interests while socialism protects the middle class from the volatility of boom and busts cycles in the market economy.
What I propose in the populist-socialist blended economy is the primacy of the people, security of the underclass, and welfare of the nation. The state acquisition of industry and private property is not proposed here, but rather the flattening of the wage gap through regulation and incentives. The present economy forsakes the White middle and working classes at the expense of the under and the top 1%. The police officer, infantryman, factory worker, and farmer are to be exalted not just notionally, but practically as well. And most of all, a populist-socialist economy gives the state the tools necessary to intervene for the survival and prosperity of the White ethno-state.
“Primacy of the people” is a euphemism for government control. Summary: Communism = government owns the means of production and “primacy of the people/socialism” = government owns the owners of the means of production. Bottom line of JJ’s economic illusion: Meshing = Mashing. They win, I lose.
It’s your simplicity which drives the motto “we don’t deserve nice things.”
“We don’t deserve nice things that we haven’t ourselves earned.” There you go.
Desert (here meaning “the quality of deserving reward”) seems a curiously ineradicable impulse, doesn’t it? It has survived every cataclysm since the Flood as well as the censuring counsels and commands of authorities human and divine.
The extent to which the impulse is cosseted may be seen in the remarkable displeasure that the use of GBS’s term “the undeserving poor” has provoked among the self-styled great and good throughout my life and for several decades before. It cuts rather too close to the bone for comfort.
Apropos Shaw, I regret that I missed the chance to comment on him briefly last month in the appropriate thread. He was a very dangerous ideologue; no doubt about that. But his plays continue to be produced because actors love his characters and audiences see fellow human beings, not mere stick figures, declaiming all the claptrap Shaw put in their mouth.
Reading you, Pierre, is rather akin to diving into the frothy head on a pint of ale and expecting contact with liquid, which seems to never arrive.
Specifically, what point are you making? We get the wind-up, but now expect the pitch, in order to determine whether it was a strike or ball.
Poupon Marx wrote,
So now we know: PM is a Buddhist who consumes heroic quantities of brew! As self-doxxings go, this one’s a doozy.
It does explain quite a lot, however, about why he can’t understand the meaning of a pretty straightforward comment.
A discussion of the posted article will not be furthered by blurbs and throwaway one-liners. The comprehensive expostulation of this theme and is auxiliaries is treated from concrete experience in the matter of scientific reporting with well grounded deductions.
https://fee.org/articles/the-puritan-experiment-in-common-ownership/
“The economic policies of National Socialism did not elevate the minority at the expense of the organic and indigenous majority, but instead benefitted and ensured the welfare of the Volk. Accordingly, National Socialism is a form of Right-Wing Socialism.”
I vehemently oppose all forms or flavors of socialism and I do not discriminate when it comes to what color the hand is that is trying to pick my pocket.
However, I will concede the reality that it angers and enrages me more, when non-whites are the parasites who feasting off of my hard earned financial resources, but, I still steadfastly abhor the idea of being fleeced, exploited and forced to involuntarily subsidize the needs, wants, and demands of any race of parasites.
I will also confess that I am far more motivated to direct my charitable donations to charities or causes which I feel will benefit Whites more than non-whites. Hence, I do feel a far greater degree of sympathy and compassion for my fellow Whites who are down on their luck – but, this compassion is not without limitations. Or, more precisely – my compassion is accompanied by certain expectations – such as not throwing my hard earned money at Whites who are professional parasites and who are comfortable living on the dole indefinitely. Trust me on this – I have personally known and been acquainted with several ‘White’ free loaders during my life – and I grew to detest them just as much as I detest inner city welfare queens.
We can look at Europe for an example. A number of White nations which were once fairly racially homogeneous – with very tiny percentages of non-whites in them – used to love socialism, as long as the gibs were only being given mostly to members of their extended White family group. But, then the Cultural Marxists seized control of most of those White nations, promptly threw open the borders and started flooding those nations with millions of blood sucking, non-white leeches from Africa and the Middle East and now, those White nations suddenly are not so keen on their socialism and free gibs.
Someone once drew an analogy that is a perfect criticism of socialism: When you smear honey on a fence post, do not be surprised if you return an hour later and find the fence post covered with flies, ants, and maggots.
So, I do NOT support the idea that a future White Ethnostate should try to merge the ideologies of socialism, populism, and race realism into a single system of government. Socialism makes people lazy. It does NOT encourage ambition or fuel ingenuity. It rewards parasitism.
The sad fact is that most White humans are, by default, generally born to be pretty lazy and have to have pressure put on them to overcome that laziness. Fear of starvation is an excellent motivator. Desire for female companionship and the pleasurable benefits that usually accompany female companionship – is another very powerful motivator.
Men who bust their butts, work hard, study and make good grades and learn a skill and become proficient at that skill and wind up making a decent salary – are more appealing to women who are considering marriage and are wanting to have children.
Socialism, as it has been implemented in the Western world during the last century – seeks to steal money from the industrious and use it to give free stuff to the non-productive elements of a society. This has been a recipe for creating generations of lazy White socialists who show up at Bernie “Mr. Free Shyte” Sander’s rallies.
A White Ethnostate must have a system of government that is first and foremost – clearly defined and based on the sanctity of race and structured in such as way as to promote and reward self-reliance, ambition, industriousness and a strong work ethic.
At the same time, there should also be a strong emphasis on the importance of racial solidarity and racial loyalty. This last concept should be part of the standard public school curriculum and every White child should be taught the importance of these concepts as a means of instilling pride in our race and in the history of our people.
You miss the point. Whites are shamed when they are lazy and stupid. Other races love the idea of something being free, since they have no concept of morality similar to Whites. Social trust is non-existent in non-White societies. Orientals simply blindly follow their leaders. Its not the same. Places full of blacks and Mestizos are nothing but corruption.
Socializing the costs of infrastructure and medicine are NECESSARY for a High Civilization. You cannot privatize things like roads. Look at social media. Kicking people off that the owners do not like or agree with. Something like that seems egregious. With something like roads and transit, its not even conceivable.
Of course you can have private roads. The history of the turnpike is as old as the cart.
People dread massive public transport infrastructure and subsidized transport because of the influx of undesirables to their suburb. Limiting, reducing access is good, not bad. (Just as with crossing national borders, unlimited movement within a territory isn’t a right per se, nor necessarily desirable).
Let me know how your Anglo State works out.
Apply and pay for the visa and your application to *visit* will be duly considered.
Irish can apply?
“Of course you can have private roads.”
The ability of a private road, to be of any length for public use, is and has been virtually impossible without government intervention (a form of subsidy) to acquire the land on which to build it.
Depends which public you’re talking about. You can have a large patchwork quilt of smaller publics, each with its own particular priorities and proclivities.
They are trying to harmonize our laws, among other things, with European ones incrementally making a one size fits all-.International Comintern- nomenklatura type a thing and that doesn’t work for some of us. We have our own ways that suit us.
It is sold to different people and groups in different ways- coming both from the nationalist right and the internationalist left.
Private property, sovereignty and other things are subordinated to the State. Central command, Command economy. Individual vs State = bicycle vs Land Yacht.
USA has 200 million fewer people in it than the European Union- yet our economy is larger or roughly the same. We have significantly fewer protections and tarrifs and taxes than they do. We are doing much more with considerably less. We also make up for European budget shortfalls to the tune of more than 130 billion dollars per year. And we carry significantly more social baggage.
Europe has many issues that Americans don’t say because we like them. Or Americans believe European and media propaganda- that our academics and various think tanks are very enamored with as well and we don’t even hear about our own truths anymore.
Americans do much that is right. and we are doing it with both hands tied behind our backs, fat and undereducated. Which doesn’t say much for our competition or ‘partners”.
I am not happy about this harmonization and intermeshing with the European Union or the U.N. that is going on.
Green Jobs.
I like retrofitting structures and houses to generate their own electricity independent of the grid. Wind farms, solar farms etc. are not as green as all that.
And subterranean development.
Some kinds of people function best in what suits them. Russians love their Tzars and their feudalism. And if they don’t have one- they will pull in that direction- no matter what kind of government they have. they get discombooberated if they don’t have their Tzar.
Some Europeans love their castes and closed guilds etc. They like their socialism.
Catholic countries wander into military gub’mints- with Christian clergy taking care of the social needs- and mafia type unionisti groups looking after other things.
my kind- we do better in a different system. But highly urban and multi-culti now- and it’ s not doing us any good.
To each his own.
Laws are for lawless.
This is good. I’ve been watching your site and others like it for a time. I agree with a whole lot of what is said. But one of the things that has bothered me is a tendency I see to romanticize or idealize an old line Anglo Capitalist society. All Anglo’s are necessarily white people but not all European whites are Anglo. If you want people like me, you are going to have to make this a globalist vs nationalist struggle that encompasses values beyond male, protestant, deregulated capitalist. Some kind of national socialism is what is necessary. We can argue about the details but that is what will get me and perhaps a great many others into the movement. Of course it is your show. But without me and my type I think you will end up just be an interesting commentary on our times
Nationalist movements will differ from one country to another reflecting local characteristics, but the desire to return America to a WASPy, “patriarchal” and Christian nation seems natural and admirable. I admit that automation, offshore competition, and crony capitalism are making the Horatio Alger riff sound thin. A Russian nationalist movement would feature Orthodoxy while an Irish nationalist movement would feature Catholicism more prominently — or did back before the MSM succeeded in stigmatizing Christianity. There were Jews who tried to move the IRA in a Marxist secularist direction but they were defeated by Catholic manly men with guns.
Automation is the friend of nationalists for the future.
Reading the comments here creates the impression of too much generalization. These are “all or nothing” dichotomies and black versus white. Taking a PAST form such as National Socialism and glibly asserting that this is what is needed-without qualifiers or modifiers-is DOA and very naive. It’s as if one is contending that the title of the book is all you need to apprehend for understanding.
In the Real World, such proposals are only a primer, where continuous feedback from the field and direct experience provides constant variance of action. Call it feedback loop or governance, if you like.
Vessels of all types go to sea with what they need, what works, and what is proven. The next leg or voyage might result in additions or subtractions or essential equipment. National Socialism has so many holes and weaknesses, that the actual model cannot be taken as a serious proposal.
Just ONE such fatal weakness is The Fallacy Of Socialism, explained very succinctly and clearly by the following: https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/charlie-daniels/fallacy-socialism-and-fools-who-fall-it
And this from a true insider:
The goal of socialism is communism. — Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
“Everyone wants to live at the expense of the state. They forget that the state lives at the expense of everyone.” ― Frédéric Bastiat
“The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else.” ― Frédéric Bastiat
State is the name of the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly it lies; and this lie slips from its mouth: “I, the state, am the people.”-Fredrich Nietzsche
Socialism requires an enlarged State, a separate class that decides how the fruits of individual labor are divided. Some productive individuals will be forced and compelled to give up their earned wealth to some others they disapprove of. This repetitive failure, tried hundreds and thousands of times and always failing, seems to always have adherents and proponents that clutch onto this nonsense on the belief “Just try it one more time”.
Finally there is this quote from someone I know quite well:
Liberalism aka Marxism?: A belief system that enables a chronologically aged adult to remain a juvenile with infantile beliefs and denial of objective reality, by obfuscating the direct data of the senses and creation of magical detached abstractions.
-Poupon Marx
And what kind of reproductive rights would European males have in the National Socialist government you envision?
What are you talking about? Choice? Yes, there would be choice,
JFM
You’re right, “choice” is what we need when it comes to reproduction, but can we say European males have had that under the Abrahamic religions? I don’t believe so. In fact the best that can be said of our males is that they (we) are treated like dogs looking for a master when it comes to choosing their (our) genetics.
What about private charity? If whites don’t have love for their fellow whites, no political system can engender it. Love can’t be forced, and any attempt to do so will be counter-productive.
If they do love, then no government can better direct their charity than they themselves.
“Socializing the costs of infrastructure and medicine are NECESSARY for a High Civilization.”
We’ve had quite enough high civilization for now. After awhile, there is no place to go but down, and that is what’s happening. Whether this occurs violently and quickly, or bit by bit, the reality is that we need a rest. Simple yin & yang, folks.
And I don’t want a cent of my income going to any form of government-approved and -mandated medicine that seem to go hand in hand with high civilization. Medicine today largely consists of suppression of symptoms that ultimately result in serious degeneracy and sufferint. Fortunately, there are some medical practitioners who recognize this and are advising people to take care of themselves and their own children, in ways that don’t result in much worse problems down the line.
Is it just me, or does the New Look seem rather more difficult to read, i.e., print is smaller.
“Is it just me, or does the New Look seem rather more difficult to read, i.e., print is smaller.”
Absolutely, dear B! The odd thing is that the new, wider comment-composing box is easier to work in and copy typed into it is easier to review because of that added width. Then, curiously, when the comment text appears in the thread, it’s been reduced in size by about a third and so has become, as you say, harder to read.
Also, with the reading and writing “surface” no longer being bright white and the font color having gone from black to gray, readability is further impeded. Surely these things could be easily changed without sacrificing the essence of the new look.
Despite my fundamental and thoroughgoing disagreement, thanks to J. J. for the reflection evident in his schema. For, in passing, another man’s views on a society organized along socialist lines, see this old column by Joseph Sobran.
Trenchant’s reflections on the contents of the article and several of the comments are characteristically insightful. That he needed to state them so forthrightly suggests yet again that belief in the possibility of the free lunch will still be going strong when the Tale of the Six Million has been filed in the same cubbyhole with the phlogiston theory. In this regard, especially striking was the comment of JFM, who lays claim to speak for a large but unidentified constituency. The comment seems on its face to be almost a call to be entertained, yet in it there is more than a hint of an “or else” as well.
In fine, an ironic epigraph to the article and the comments supportive of it might be found in the sentence “Laws are for the lawless.” Note, please, that for the present purpose the number or nature of laws is beside the point, though few amongst us here will contend that there still aren’t enough of them. Rather, the peculiarly puritanical notion that one may confidently ascribe vice to the hypothetical Other seems implicit in all socialist-collectivist impulses. Surely, especially in light of the aggressively secularist, anti-transcendent character of most self-styled pro-white socialist theorizing, Burke’s comment that it is folly to base a society on human aspiration rather than human nature is apter today and within our own Reconquista movement than it has ever before been. When the idea that there is a God to be answered to for one’s actions is scorned as a matter of political principle, to plan or, worse, work for a socialist state may be attributed to one or more of many things—quixotism, naivety, self-indulgence, wishful thinking—but not to prudence or wisdom or experience of man’s proclivity to turn his back on his nature’s better angels.
@Pierre. Re: “this old column” that you link to.
Good thing poor Joe died when he did, because if he had to endure what was going on today (only 8 years after he passed on to his reward), well, I don’t know how he would handle it. He was fortunate enough to escape the Tranny Craze. Anyway, that was one of the best articles he has ever written. Each paragraph seems perfect and complete until you read the next, which is even better.
Being a charter member of the Prude Club, I really did not want to bring the following sexual story up (to be found on a hundred different “news” sites) but it perfectly illustrates Sobran’s statement that “so many famous, powerful, seemingly self-sufficient people have never grown up. What had been the secrets of the diary are thrown onto the front page”. Here it is – today’s top story (after the gnashing of teeth and rending of garments over Mexican children taken from their parents).
“Jada Pinkett Smith swears by vaginal rejuvenation treatments. You read that right! Jada Pinkett Smith, 46, may have a 17-year-old daughter, but she’s the one bragging that her vagina looks like a teenager’s. And in case you wanted her to be a little more specific… ‘When I tell you my yoni is like a 16-year-old, I’m not kidding,’ she said during a visit to the Vitality Institute of Agoura on her web show Red Table Talk. ‘It looks like a little beautiful peach.'”
https://hollywoodlife.com/2018/06/19/jada-pinkett-smith-vagina-red-table-talk/
Dear B,
If you send me the application for Prude Club membership, I’ll fill it out and return it promptly.
There was a time when one could read the paragraph you quote with ironically bemused detachment. No longer, I’m afraid. Still, I suppose we ought to be grateful that, with Obama no longer in the White House, we have been spared a certain amount of indignity. That is to say, he would doubtless respond to Ms. Smith’s remarks with praise for the folks in Establishment medicine who developed a rejuvenation treatment for the body part that black women—and mutatis mutandis, black men—tend to overuse the most.
Call it Tommy John surgery for another kind of athlete.
As for dear Joe, amen to all you write. I know for a fact that he had lost the desire to continue living during his final six months,
Different language, distinction of brains. Yours sparkles and tangs! Not so the article. Dull at best. Be aware, you drifted out of the regular three dimensional, return to the squeeze, that’s happiness!
Now as for being understood by the biggest denominator, the article wins. Does it take simple ideas that are context limited to cater to being understood? Then theoretical economics might be out of the realm of comprehension.
To the Moderator and all others it may concern:
The new look of the site is very appealing. Congratulations and thanks.
I hope, however, that the disappearance of the list of coding tools is a temporary glitch. I bet I’m not entirely alone in needing a reminder or helping hand when I wish to embed a link or drop in a quotation block. Apropos which, has the code for italics been changed, or has the option to use italics or boldface disappeared? The usual italic-formatting characters had no effect in my most recent comment.
I second the motion, and hope that the italics will be available again.
This essay is so unintellectual. Haven’t you read Hobbes or Locke?
A certain amount of socialism is a good idea for expediency sake. Some of the really big projects require a little socialism so we all can benefit. but because it is such a dangerous and slippery slope- extreme prudence is good. We don’t believe anyone in the White world has to be uncomfortable. We believe everyone should get an upgrade through the magic of good vision, virtue and the will to implement it. The System must benefit and work for the people. Each group of people are different. What would cause a revolution in one country is nice and comfy for another.
Universities are supposed to be serious places of quiet study and learning. Not noisy, wild waste of time, silly places. My folk do not value debate, social unrest and what have you for the hell of it. Youngsters are sensitive.
You and your Jewish sister site have given over all the wonderful social work and improvement of others to the Jews. and letting me know that it’s grand central station inside my computer. After so many years of this bullshit – it takes more than that to intimidate me. They even rival each other. Some of them like to let me know about the other one and how. I keep the secrets. It’s really all one hell of a thing. Even those participating in it are not aware of the full extent and scope of it.
and all the bad historical stuff is handed over to whites..Way to go guys.
We wouldn’t be able to put on our pants or tie our own shoes without the Jews in your estimation and world view.
I expect many an academic article explaining how fat, undereducated white Americans have had nothing to do with our greatness and it’s all Asians and Jews.
A kind of war has begun. I’m on our side.
You can’t exercise “extreme prudence”. The only check you have on how much tax you pay and where it is spent is through the vote. And today’s situation shows the utility of that.
The question is: what kind of vote? the Athenian kind? the tribal kind where only the “elders” vote and decide? A modification of the Founding Fathers, where only property owners (or other qualification(s) qualify?
Thanks for this interesting article. I too have spent a lot of time thinking about the economic system that will be needed to underpin a 21st century ethno-nationalist state. My attention to this subject stems from the fundamental proposition:: If you are not happy with the state of your nation and feel compelled to pull it to pieces, you had best have a clear vision of what you intend to replace it with; lest you lead your people out of the frying pan and into the fire. That means getting all of the essential elements right, and the economy is close to the top of that list.
One of the outstanding parts of this essay was the observation that an ‘open borders’ policy and a welfare state are mutually exclusive (I paraphrase). That pearl of wisdom should be printed on a billboard and placed beside every freeway in the Western World.
True. Rationally to the highest degree, and assimilable to most.
Another one, maybe, just maybe ethnicity variance is not the most important thing to build an economy around. The distinguished ape could well be class and caste globally. Our White Elites sold out, so white and white might be further apart then other ethny and white working and middle class.
Exponentially so, it might be in the grasp of the last generation to see generational differences larger then even white versus White.
Billboard quality would post it as “The poor Jew of Moskou, and the ignorant white collar worker of Detroit are brothers and doomed.”
OT — Thumbs down on the new format! Why change what wasn’t broken?
You and your Jewish sister site. . .
. . .refers to ??
Surprising no one has mentioned the dysgenic nature of socialism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icmRCixQrx8
The view on economics theory as pointed in the article is “tarty”, gives importance to existing historical blue prints, none of much value. Back to the drawing board with regard to theoretical economics. They should be in essence a social vision of quality for humans standing a-n-d future generations. First to be thrown out is our concepts of value measuring, capital and it’s role. Anything historically molded is disfunctional. A new concept is needed.
By the way, the new esthetics and user functionality is dwarfed by essential flaws. No posting possible using a Tor browser. Go Daddy is the last provider to go to if theoccidentalobserver.com attaches value to some simulacre of independence.
It’s good to talk the hypothetical of an White Ethno-State, but the reality is that we should be thankful even to have a website to express our views. And we might keep in mind our brothers and sisters who suffer in prison. I’ll give an example: in the United States there is an individual serving decades behind bars simply for misspeaking. One doesn’t have agree with his politics or religious beliefs, but one does have to see the injustice.
WHAT did he say?