Quo Vadis Vatican? Jewish involvement in the radical changes of the Second Vatican Council

Add New

Here’s to our murder-less mystery story, where its religious-ecclesiastical background calls for careful threading, though no issues of faith or belief are involved. I am referring to the Second Vatican Council, (1961–1964), some of its deliberations, the shadowy maneuvers that brought them about, and the implications and consequences for the brethren and the world at large. The Council implemented profound changes, of which many faithful are probably not fully aware, and from which the Catholic Church has perhaps not yet recovered.

But first some background. The late 1950s were a time of critical ideological tension. In Italy, Communist governments, provincial and local, ran and administered large swaths of the country. There was a chance that in the next political elections the Communists could win the majority.

Understandably, America was concerned and had disturbing contingency plans should the enemy win. In this, I think, they misunderstood Italy’s collective psychology. For one, many had already perceived the utopian nature of Marxist egalitarianism and sensed that a Communist state would resemble a convent or a prison. But they also knew that, if the Italian Communists won, they would quickly convert the convent into a brothel and the prison into a discotheque. That is, a change in name but not in substance.

Still, Pope Pius XII, who died in 1958, came from a noble family with a long history of service to the Church. Now policy and the political winds called for a Pope with a different background, a “populist” we would say today — one whose humble origins would implicitly raise favor among the discontent, hope in the disenfranchised and sympathy in the downtrodden.

Pope John XXIII filled the bill, for he was the fourth among thirteen children in a family of sharecroppers. And soon he acquired the byname of “good.” From then on, the masses knew him as “the Good Pope.”

Logic is never a friend of mass psychology, for ‘good’ is a relative term. Good compared to whom? In fact, according to a meaningful section of past and current Catholic thinkers, John XXIII was a disaster.

But I digress. Prior to Vatican II, one the Good Friday’s rituals of the Catholic Church features(d) the reciting of a prayer originated in the fourth century AD. That prayer included the words, “Oremus et pro perfidis Judaeis,” meaning “Let us also pray for (the conversion of) the faithless Jews.”

During his last years, Pope Pius XII had received a visit from Jules Marx Isaac, a prominent French Jew who was also a Mason and a Marxist. Isaac asked the Pope to remove ‘perfidis’ from the prayer. Pius XII declined because,  he explained, ‘perfidis’ does not mean ‘perfidious’ but ‘faithless.’ For the Jews do not recognize the divinity of Christ and consequently have no faith. Therefore, ‘faithless’ was not an insult but a statement of fact.

In the turbulent currents of our world, these historic, semi-theological preoccupations seem quaint. For today an obscene Jewish comedienne can claim, on American prime-time TV, that she is glad that the Jews killed Christ. Adding, “If I could, I’d do it again, I’d f…ing” do it again.” And both Catholic and Protestant divines have met such statements (and worse), with a stony yet meaningful silence.

But in the 1950s the Zeitgeist was different. The first signal occurred during the Good Friday rituals of 1959, and we owe this information to Cardinal Bea, right hand of John XXIII. John XXIII reversed the ruling of his predecessor, Pius XII, and ordered the adjective ‘perfidis’ removed from the prayer recited since 400 AD.

Earlier on, in 1937, Pope Pius XI had issued another Encyclical, unusually written in German, and titled “Mit Brennenden Sorge”(With Burning Concern) in which he Pius XI also dealt with the thorny issue of collective Jewish responsibility for the death of Christ. He wrote, “God (the Word) became flesh among a people that one day would crucify him.” In 1959 John XXIII suppressed that sentence from the record of Pius XI’s Encyclical. Nor Internauts will find it by reading the Encyclical online.

There were other meaningful suppressions, for example, in the ritual for the baptism of adults wishing to become Catholics. In the old ritual the priest asked the applicant whether “he held in horror Judean perfidy and superstition.” To which the expected answer from the soon-to-be-Catholic was “yes.” That question-and-answer exchange was removed from the ritual.

John XXIII, like the current Pope, chose gestures over words to express his thoughts. The hierarchy, the subordinates and Catholics at large were to derive, from his gestures, their meaning and implications, as well as the Pope’s objectives and intentions.

On a Saturday in March, 1962 (the Council had begun the previous October), John XXIII made a well-publicized stop, with his car and caravan, in front of the Synagogue of Rome. The stop was timed to occur at the end of a Shabbat, when the Jews came out of the building. And when, from his car, the Pope blessed them.

More meaningful gestures were to come. Ariel Toaff, a Jewish professor at Tel Aviv University, has written an interesting book, in French, titled “La Paque des Juifs” (Easter of the Jews). Toaff examined the records of various trials, through the ages, of Jews accused of killing Christian children — murdered to use their blood in some Jewish Easter’s ceremonies. That book was promptly removed from circulation a few days after publishing, due to Jewish reaction and furious pressure. There was, however, a second edition, where the author added statements of sufficient impact as to reduce the ire of his co-religionists.

Among youngsters allegedly killed for the “Paque des Juifs” were  Simonino from Trent (Italy), Andrea from Rinn (Austria), Lorenzino from Marostica (Italy) and Dominguito del Val (Spain). They had all been declared “Blessed,” their embalmed bodies had been enclosed in glass tombs, under a main altar or in a chapel dedicated to them.

By the way, the difference between a Blessed (Beatus) and a Saint (Sanctus) has to do with the number of miracles performed and their timing.

In May 1961, John XXIII wrote a secret letter to the religious authorities of the Churches or Abbeys involved, ordering to remove the tombs and all records, works of art, ex-voto, paintings and statues of these Blessed from their respective Churches, and to suppress immediately all related celebrations, festivities and processions.

For example, Andrea from Rinn was born in 1459 and beatified in 1751. At the Abbey of Wilten, in Austria, his chapel was renamed, his paintings and statues removed, and his sarcophagus relegated to a dark corner against a wall.  An inscription on the stone masking the sarcophagus asked forgiveness of the Jews, for the veneration of that Blessed had been a cause of anti-Semitism. Finally, in 1985, the Archbishop of Innsbruck had the body removed from the church to a common cemetery — “for his veneration (Andrea-from-Rinn’s) is not substantiated by reliable historical documentation.” Which, in itself, is a remarkable statement, as the proclamation of a ‘Blessed’ follows a lengthy process and trial of canonization.

In fact, after the death of Pope John Paul II, the Vatican PR machinery created the slogan, “Subito Santo” (A Saint Immediately). Where ‘immediately’ infers a break from the traditional years, decades, and at times centuries, required before sanctification. Furthermore, the Blessed cannot be unblessed, depending on the political air of the times, though the Archbishop of Innsbruck clearly thought otherwise.

Back to the Council, where — as per the biography of Cardinal Bea — an important character comes to the stage. He is Nahum Goldmann (1885–1982), a Polish Jew, President of the World Jewish Congress (1951–1978) and editor of the “Encyclopedia Judaica” from 1932 to 1934. Later he was the Representative of the Judean Nation at the United Nations from 1935 to 1940, in Geneva and the US.

From 1939 to 1945 he was the director of the Jewish Spying Service, at a time when the Israel didn’t yet exist, though the Organization was recognized by the US Administration — evidence that the US already considered the state of Israel a fait accompli. In his autobiography, Goldmann writes of having been the first, in 1942, to launch the idea of the Nuremberg Trials.  And he is also associated with the notorious Morgenthau Plan which called for the dismantling of all German industrial concerns, mass transfer of all remaining machinery and industrial tools to England as war reparations, prohibition of any industrial activity, the reduction of Germany to the level of a pre-industrial, medieval agricultural society which would have resulted in millions of deaths.

In his memoirs, Goldmann writes that the Second Vatican Council would not have occurred, but for three events,

— the Shoah
— the Nuremberg Trials
— the foundation of the state of Israel.

Nathan Ben Horin, Israel’s Ambassador to the Vatican, writes in his memoirs, that on February 27, 1962 the draft of the Encyclical “Nostra Aetate” (Our Age) produced by the International Judaic Congress, was delivered to Cardinal Bea, for transmittal to John XXIII.

In 1960, John XXIII through his right-hand Cardinal Bea, had invited Nahum Goldmann for a meeting with the Pope. In the meeting (so Goldmann writes), John XXIII said he wanted to propose, at the forthcoming Council, a revision of the relations between Jewry and Catholicism. To do so, the Pope needed for the Jewish Congress to send him a formal request for the reconsideration of Jewish-Catholic relations.

That is, John XXIII wanted a change, but he needed the Jewish Congress to ask for it.

Then, with another important step, John XXIII excluded the Holy Office from making any input on such an important matter as the relationship between the Catholic Church and other religions — which was the essence of the “Nostra Aetate” Encyclical.

This raised a bitter internal feud, for the Holy Office had been for centuries the official organ of analysis and deliberations regarding dogmas and general matters of faith. John XXIII simply ordered Cardinal Ottaviani, head of the Holy Office, to shut up.

John XXIII had several meetings with another influential Rabbi, Abraham Heschel, who also contributed to the writing of the Encyclical — so writes the secretary of Cardinal Bea.

And finally, in an issue of the French Jewish weekly Tribune Juive, Lazare Landau, a Jewish historian, writes,

In a glacial night of the winter 62–63, I was invited to an extraordinary meeting of the “Communitarian Center for Peace,” held at the Synagogue of Strasbourg.  At the end of the Shabbat, the Directors received in secret, in a cellar of the building, an envoy of John XXIII, Yves Congar, [a Dominican friar who had a critical influence on the ‘progressive’ measures taken by the Council as a whole.]

There were ten of us. Congar, in name of John XXIII, asked us what we expected from the Catholic Church, as regards the millenarian “Jewish Question.” We said that we wanted the complete re-habilitation of the Jews, as regards the death of Christ. “Nostra Aetate” was a total revolution, as Congar later said to me, in the doctrine of the Church, as regards the Jews.

In fact — so I am told by current practicing Catholics who attend Masses and functions in their churches — some priests praise the greatness of Hebraism, assert that Abraham is our common ancestor and that the Jews are our ‘elder brothers’ of the Bible. Forgetting the polygamy of the patriarchs, the gallantries of David, the seraglio of Solomon, the incest in the Leviticus, and a general Old Testament undertone of hyper-ethnocentrism, fear and loathing of gentiles, the desire to dominate gentiles, and revenge against their enemies.

The same priests sermonize on the rights of Jews to the ancestral land of Israel. On the wars in the Middle East, fought for Israel, and on the slaughter of Palestinians, the word is mum. Though various Popes have at times deplored, and generally lamented that war causes death and suffering, which almost equates to saying that a great cause of the night is lack of sunshine.2

In summary, there is sufficient evidence as to who took the initiative and who were the authors of the Encyclical “Nostra Aetate.”

Nevertheless, the debates at the Council on the issue of the Jews’ involvement in the death of Christ were contentious and combative. After all, according to the Gospels, the Jews had asked for the blood of Christ to fall “on their head and that of their children.” The Gospel of St. John made this clear, and St. Paul had declared that adopting alternative Gospels would be anathema.

The bishops of the Arab world, in particular, objected to the appeasement of the Jews because appeared to be an indirect Catholic endorsement of the rape of Palestine. A de-facto endorsement of Israel occurred in 1965, though formal recognition and exchange of embassies had to wait for John Paul II, in 1993.

In the end there was a compromise. The encyclical “Nostra Aetate” would state that only “some,” not “all,” Jews were responsible for the death of Christ.

This did not prevent the (Catholic) University of Notre Dame, in Indiana, from freeing all Jews of any responsibility related to the issue.

Furthermore, as I hear from Professor E. Michael-Jones, the University hired a Jewish psychologist to teach a seminar on “togetherness” and similar topics, to priests and nuns. This had the foreseeable consequence that a number of priests left the ministry and nuns the convent…. to get married. If there is life after death, Boccaccio will laugh his head off.

To conclude, the Second Vatican Council has puzzled many Catholics. Perhaps John XXIII believed that the stream of time was running in favor of the Jews, with the result that he was forced away from the ancient paths by the rough torrent of occasion.3

But some Catholics would like to know where the Vatican is headed. For, when a revolutionary change of religious belief is imposed from above, strength of conviction is weakened and judgment confounded. Resistance shrinks from revolution of beliefs, even if the prime mover of the insurgency keeps wearing the robes of the Prime Minister of God.

At times, the truth may appear grey, but isn’t. It is black and white, at least in patches. And even the blackness and the whiteness of the patches are often debated and debatable. For nothing is black or white, but thinking makes it so.4


References:

  • Hamlet
  • As You Like It
  • King Henry IV, part 2
  • Hamlet
34 replies
  1. PaleoAtlantid
    PaleoAtlantid says:

    Hundreds of lengthly articles and scholarly books have been written about the Second Vatican Council and its aftermath, but ultimately the documents issued by that talk fest and with full papal approval constitute one of the longest suicide notes in history.
    The incredible has happened, a major Church of Christendom is now vocally anti-White, pro-globalist, and pro-Islamic. Perhaps this turn of events should not surprise casual observers. According to knowledgeable ‘Traditional Catholics’, John 23 was a Freemason of longstanding membership, and Paul 6 was a communist fellow traveler, among other things!

  2. Alan Blucher
    Alan Blucher says:

    “Understandably, America was concerned and had disturbing contingency plans should the enemy win. In this, I think, they misunderstood Italy’s collective psychology. For one, many had already perceived the utopian nature of Marxist egalitarianism and sensed that a Communist state would resemble a convent or a prison. But they also knew that, if the Italian Communists won, they would quickly convert the convent into a brothel and the prison into a discotheque. That is, a change in name but not in substance.”

    Can you explain this more?

  3. Robert Keith
    Robert Keith says:

    As usual in encounters with the Jews, one wonders what the Vatican got in exchange for all these concessions. What about all the garbage in he Talmud about Christ and Christians?

  4. Trenchant
    Trenchant says:

    Toaff’s book I believe was originally printed in Italian (he’s Italian) as “Pasque di sangue” (Easters of Blood). In French it is: “Pâques de sang” (Easters of Blood).

      • db
        db says:

        Passover and Easter are not the same holy day. Easter was/is a Roman pagan holy day for the goddess of fertility which is why they have bunnies and eggs. How that day was spent was doing things the Christian God abhors, including, but not limited to sacrificing children, since the fertility being celebrated was for crops to grow rather than children. Because the Hebrews used the Creation calendar which is based on a lunar cycle, day 14 would have been a full moon. When we go back to the time of Christs death on the cross and cover a 5 year period to see what day of the pagan week Day 14 of Abib was, it was not on the pagan “good Friday” as Rome claims. The full moon during that time period was earlier in the week, therefore Easter sunday is not the day of the Resurrection of Christ. That would be day 16 of Abib and what the Hebrews celebrated as Sheaf wave in the Old Testament. Day 15 was the Sabbath. At that time when Christ walked the Earth as a man, the julian calendar which did not exist before 45 BCE, had an eight-day week, that started on satyrday, then when Constantine created his Sunday law in the early 4th century AD, he made it a seven day a week calendar because he banned all other calendars on pain of death and it was because of this calendar change, that many Christians were fed to the lions or killed outright in pagan sacrifices fighting gladiators.

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:

        @ TRENCHANT
        It is more than disconcerting, that Pierre has not commented here; particularly on a topic so dear to him.

        Can we impose again by asking you to assure us of his wellbeing ?

  5. Charles Frey
    Charles Frey says:

    Why, if at all, give them anything for free ? They have at least a hundred times more blasphemies and gratuitous insults against Christianity than allegedly the other way around.

    If these revisionists of their own come aknocking in the future, present them with a long 100 to 1 list of counter-demands, but without consulting has-beens like Notre Dame, who may find no objection to their religious assertion, that Christ is eternally boiling in human excrement. Number One on my list. Followed by sex with toddlers and between mother and son. After that, we can discuss the remaining 92 pages of said list.

    A list that may well have started in Babylon, but was still very much alive at the death of that Idiot Savant Rabbi Ovadia Yosef in 2013; Israeli Chief Rabbi of the Sephardim, whom God made a better man by removing him from earth. Where is that other bullshitter Greenblatt of the ADL, which, after all, gallantly fights against all kinds of hatred, irrespective of its origin ?

    I would dearly love to see a copy of a letter from bullshitter Greenblatt reprimanding that other piece of pseudo intellectual trash Silverman ! Better still, a copy of filed charges by merely one of 330 million Americans.

  6. db
    db says:

    If people would just read the Holy Bible, they would not give either church any authority as both are against our Saviour.

  7. Sophie Johnson
    Sophie Johnson says:

    Yes: We have long known that the Vatican is raddled with Jews — converts among the clergy, in uncontrolled numbers since the limiting of access to the Spanish conversos fell by the wayside. The occupation of that great world power was knowing and systmatic. The Protocol of the Learned Elders Elders of Zion comes to mind.

  8. Jack Blake
    Jack Blake says:

    “Understandably, America was concerned and had disturbing contingency plans should the enemy win. […] [Italians knew] that a Communist state would resemble a convent or a prison. But they also knew that, if the Italian Communists won, they would quickly convert the convent into a brothel and the prison into a discotheque. That is, a change in name but not in substance.”

    What do these sentences mean? Just what “disturbing contingency plans” did we have? And what’s the point of this odd metaphor (?) of creating a convent-prison and changing it in name to a brothel-discotheque?

  9. Justwondering
    Justwondering says:

    It seems that Jewish ascendancy via their near absolute control of the US and European body politics, financial and elite educational institutions is leading to blatant revisionist history and in this case its downright manufacture. The end result: what actually happened in the past has never happened or at best happened according to revisionist narratives. In no time, such distortions will constitute new realities that are then integrated into the educational system and transmitted down the generations. The danger is the current tendency to disappear alternative narratives that are closer to factual events in order to appease Jewish sensibilities, to the extent that routine atrocities committed by Israel against Palestinians have become the blind spot of Western moral outrage. In the same vein, WMD did indeed exist in Iraq; Saddam Hussein, not Saudis or Zionist conspirators was responsible for 9/11 and only a handful of Iraqi civilians were murdered by American criminals, not nearly a million killed and 4 million more exiled. Speaking truth to power has now become a futile exercise because Power’s chief mission, abetted by a cheer-leading MSM, is to ram its own lies down our throats as the final word even if they defy logic and fact. To paraphrase the title of Fukuyama’s book “The End of History”, welcome to the era of the End of Truth, and with it the End of Resistance.

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      People seem to ignore the fact that Zionist perfidy is nothing new, and their ascent began long, long ago. Pearl Harbor was no surprise. The manner in which the British “mediated” the German Polish conflict was hardly balanced. The Treaty of Versailles was a natural, as were the Balfour Declaration, Disraeli getting involved in the Congress of Berlin.
      The beginnings are much older. Is there any wonder that Mein Kampf’s “Big Lie technique” has been distorted maintain the lie that the NSDAP relied on the technique, rather than the book stating that it was the Jews who had mastered the technique?

  10. Charlie
    Charlie says:

    It’s not that the Joo had profound affect against Catholicism, the Joo had devastating and lasting affect against Catholicism. The Joo has always had a hard-on for Christ’s Church and wanted Christ and the Catholic Church destroyed. In America it meant Joo bankers and WASPs forming the KKK to prevent Irish Catholic Immigration in to the US in order to try and stop Catholicism getting a foothold in the New World and thusly ending their plans to enslave the entire population. The early foundations of the New World Odor (odor of the vile Joo). The KKK employing mostly toothless Baptist white trash ultimately turned on the Joo and the Negro and then myth took over from the Joo to cover their tracks.

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      I suggest that you find real history of the formation of the KKK, originally known as the Ku Klos Society. It was vigilante justice, supported by whites and blacks, in a time of lawlessness in the Southern states. It was disbanded by it’s leader Nathan Bedford Forrest when its purpose was no longer needed. The resurrected Klan, unlike the original, was opposed to blacks having rights.
      As for Irish immigration to the US, Lincoln had no problem taking those Irish immigrant, right off the boat, and giving them employment by sending them into battle, where they perished by the thousands. Lincoln was assassinated for his plan to deport the freed slaves. Catholicism played an insignificant role.

  11. Sursum corda
    Sursum corda says:

    Vatican 2 was a disaster. It destroyed the faithful. The abuses suffered by so many Catholics all to appease the Jews who are no friend of Catholics. As St Paul said they are not pleasing to God and they are the enemies of all mankind.

  12. Lawrence Feinberg
    Lawrence Feinberg says:

    I thought this was a secular publication. It makes no sense for TOO to feature articles opposing Popes when they act to promote harmony between Catholic and Jew, especially where consistent with core Catholic doctrine. It’s possible Christ would approve.
    Both Jew and gentile should work together to oppose the ethnic cleansing of the white race from the US.

    • PaleoAtlantid
      PaleoAtlantid says:

      Tell me, how can Jew and Gentile “work together to oppose the ethnic cleansing of the White race from the US”? There is ample and convincing evidence of the role played by Jews in the formulation of policies to achieve the dispossession and displacement of White people in their homelands. Jews whatever their rank and status within Western societies are very happy with this genocidal development. I wish it were not so, but Jews chose to be the enemies of European civilization, we did not wish to be their enemy, that tragic part was forced upon us and is a drama of much conflict and only one victor.

    • Alan Blucher
      Alan Blucher says:

      “It’s possible Christ would approve.” I doubt it. “But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea.” Matthew xiix. 6. A “Jew,” by definition, is one that rejects Christ and it’s hard to see how they could “act to promote harmony between Catholics and Jews” when the two have such diametrically opposed worldviews. At the very least one must admit that as a historical matter this has basically never happened.

      “Core” Catholic doctrine pertaining to Jews led to such things as judensau being erected on top of Churches. The most authoritative Catholic statement on the Jews would come from the New Testament, which despite the backbending done by many today, is most certainly against Jews qua Jews. To be clear, the definition there would not be purely racial, but would also include the necessary element of rejecting Christ.

      • db
        db says:

        Catholics are denying Christ when they tell their flock to pray to Mary or to Catholic saints. Christ says the only way to His Father is through Him. Catholics worship Mary as the queen of heaven.

        They also do repetitive murmurings with the Rosary–a heathen form of prayer- also forbidden and they claim divine authority to be able to forgive sin. Both Jews and Catholics are anti-christian–the papal throne being the power behind Antichrist. There are many many clues to Antichrist and Rome with the Jews fits all of them.

        What is sad is both had and opportunity to repent and chose not to.

        • Alan Blucher
          Alan Blucher says:

          There are certainly reasonable critiques that can be made of Catholicism. But, this isn’t one of them. https://douglasbeaumont.com/2013/12/19/arguing-with-catholics/.

          Where in the Bible is it stated that the Faith is Bible only? Protestantism isn’t even internally consistent. You do realize what you call the Bible was decided by a Catholic council over 300 years after Christ, right?

          Egalitarianism, anti-hierarchial, everyone gets to be their own boss…..hmmm, sounds a lot like other subversive movements. See E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. Moreover, in practice, protestants do end up being hierarchial. The difference is that arguments come down to guys that may only have a HS education and have a vested interest in being right. That is, they don’t take a vow of poverty and they can marry. Put another way, they have a position of power and will be tempted to use that power to gain the things that men always fight over: material goods and women. In contrast, Catholic priests, get lots of power, but can’t even use it for the things that most would actually want power for in the first place.

          I’m sure next you’ll mention the current sex scandals. See Mike Rose, Good Bye Good Men. At the end of the day, the enemy certainly despises Christiandom, but, their most fervent hatred is for the Church. I don’t even see that as being debateable. Why is that?

          • db
            db says:

            Im not interested in arguing with anybody. People are either going to be lovers of the truth and will recognize it or at least want to research it, or they will prefer to believe lies. For those who are not lovers of the truth, my feeling is they are under curse with ears that cannot hear and eyes that cannot see for wanting to believe a lie–and I know many like that. I plant seeds and let my heavenly Father do the rest. I have several posts here in an attempt to shed some light on this situation. When it comes to Catholic hierarchy, they are either outright liars or deceived and deceiving. Christianity existed for 300 years before there was even a hint of a Catholic church and that is counting from Constantine who was high priest of the pagan Roman church when he claimed to have had his dream. For the rest of history Catholic priests have been killing Christians who refuse to bow to Rome and the popes authority as Rome uses religion of Babylon to rebuild her world government. Research the Jesuit order and their stated purpose and the only reason the church gave them permission to exist was to undo what the Reformers discovered 500+ years ago–that the seat (throne) of the papacy is the power behind Antichrist. Now it appears that power is controlled by Edom.

    • db
      db says:

      Rome’s objective has always been world government using “religion” as a control mechanism. The Protestant Reformation happened when men who finally had the Holy Bible in the common tongue translated from the ancient manuscripts discovered who antichrist is. All the clues in the Holy Bible at that time pointed to the seat of the papacy as the power behind antichrist. All popes including the jesuit general black popes are vessels of devils. Romes objective now is to unite all religions under the queen of heaven, Lucifer an androgynous being. Towards that end, her jesuits infiltrated all the Protestant seminaries hundreds of years ago to start the process of taking control of them, what is taught in them and who is placed as pastors in various churches.  They are now filled with false teachers which is why there are so many denominations. They use jesuit written corrupted Bible versions and have published corrupted dictionaries, Lexicons and false manuscripts to go with them. They create groups like the International Baptist Church, International Methodist Church, International Buddhism, etc, then put their disguised jesuits as heads of these groups to lead all groups in the direction of uniting by claiming the rules of religion are all just traditions of men rather than a government of Law handed down from a Kingdom not of this world. Today all churches that are in contract with the state via charters, 501c3 and 501c4 incorporations and like-contracts are legally attached to Rome and must follow the rules of the national governments who themselves are controlled in secret by Rome. This means if the state says you need to stop preaching “hate speech” then you remove that section of the Bible from your church. This is why they have to allow homosexual marriage. A contracted church’s law is the same as the state’s law, rather than the 10 Commandments. God the Creator, Father of all was kicked out of these buildings when the Pastors (jesuits or jesuit trained) took on the business of salvation. This means all contracted churches’ main goal is to fill the pews to make money and will change the WORD to accomplish that end. Its why they compromised. 100 years ago, Protestant churches did not practice the satan worshiping holiday of Saturnalia–that was a Catholic holy day disguised as Christmas.
      Rev 17:5  And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. 
      The Holy Roman Church is still the Roman Empire–a church and a state, a monarchy who rides a red beast (communist government) who creates a bunch of harlot daughter churches all teaching lies….

      And because Christians who attend these churches trust in these false teachers, teaching from jesuit-written-bible-versions, they are deceived and most likely are not saved. I can say that because if they read an uncorrupted Bible version or studied history from historical documents instead of school text books, they would know they are being lied to.

      There are some Christians in the Catholic church, but those who believe the many lies, one of which is that a man can forgive sin–are doomed to an eternal vacation lakeside.

      All Christians have to do to take our nation back is read the Bible–an older version like the KJV 1611 or Geneva 1560 and let the Reformers who discovered the truth of Rome expose what Father’s true instructions for us are.

      Communism is an invention of Edom pretending to be Jacob.

      2000 years ago, the unconverted Hebrews and the Christians kept time by a biblical calendar based on the lunar cycle. It had New Moon days, work days and Sabbath or Feast days. It was calculated by the hosts in heaven given at Creation for the purpose of our keeping the Sabbath. To be in covenant, we let Him know who our God or who we fear most as our highest authority by keeping the day He ordained for us to keep. That day can only be calculated via Father’s calendar. The calendar the world follows today is not of heaven. It is from the mind of men using mathematics and knowing a year is 365 days long. It took out the new moon days and created a series of endless weeks that are based on the zodiac–another false religion. People who give authority to the Gregorian (pope) Calendar to tell them when to work and when to worship, are bowing to a man who is a vessel for satan because all days on this Romish calendar honor false gods.

      This Creation calendar information is in the world now for you to find if you really want the truth.

      Finally, over 95% of those in the world today who call themselves “jew” are not of Hebrew blood, but are peoples who adopted the Babylonian religion of Talmudism, traditions of men for political reasons. These folks consist of Edomites, Canaanites and Ashanizi peoples who can trace their seed to Abraham/ Ishmael or Abraham/Issac/ Esau, and a very tiny remnant of Hebrews being lied to by false priests. They are not the chosen of God. Their god is Satan/Caesar and they have been in bed with Rome for 2000 years. The Chosen people of the God of the Bible are of the seed of Abraham, Issac and Jacob and are Christians having accepted the Son, Yehushua (who the jew hates) as Messiah. All others were told they were no longer Gods people unless they repent and accept Yehushua as Messiah.

    • Franklin Ryckaert
      Franklin Ryckaert says:

      @Lawrence Feinberg

      “I thought this was a secular publication.”

      It is, but a religious organization as big as the Church of Rome (more than one billion followers) does have an impact on secular society, therefore it is also our concern.

      “Both Jew and gentile should work together to oppose the ethnic cleansing of the white race from the US.”

      That would be ideal. Unfortunately the opposite is true.

      For the rest, I don’t think all Jews are eternally guilty of what a few of them have done 2000 years ago. That would be accepting the idea of collective inherited guilt, which is unreasonable. The relationship between Jews and Christians would however improve if the Jews would officially denounce the anti-Christian passages in the Talmud.

    • Michael Adkins
      Michael Adkins says:

      Lawrence Feinberg,

      The European people must determine their own genetic continuance and not depend on the Abrahamics.

    • Jerry
      Jerry says:

      Feinberg, there is no such dichotomy as jew verses gentile. The word jew is not in any ancient manuscripts, papyri, or any other Christian writings. Gentile and nation is the same word in Hebrew is goy and in Greek ethnos. Most of the time it is translated as nations and lesser times as gentiles. Nowhere in any scriptures is Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and his sons called jews. Jews are descendants of Esau as Paul tells us in Romans Chapter 9. That those in Israel are not all Israelites. The last prophet, Malachi, prophesying against Jerusalem and the priesthood that Shela the son of Judah’s Canaanite wife was in the priesthood in Jerusalem. John chapter 8 is where Christ contrasts the true children of Abraham and the false children of Abraham whose father is the devil. The jews are satan, Gog and Magog and Mystery Babylon of Revelation 17. The true 12 tribes of Israel are white Christendom that were scattered after the Assyrian and Babylonian captivity. Concerning that modern criminal state in Palestine today, Jeremiah in chapter 19 compared the old Jerusalem to a broken bottle that would never be put back together again. In 70AD the Romans totally destroyed the third temple built by the edomite Herod and Jerusalem was made desolate just as Christ told those edomite chief priest of his time. In Romans chapter 16:20 Paul told the Romans that the God of piece would bruise Satan under your feet shortly, hence you have the total destruction of the temple and Jerusalem and the jewish diaspora.

  13. Alfred
    Alfred says:

    LOOK magazine in 1962: How the Jews Changed Catholic thinking
    http://www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/actu/actu03/doc2003/vaticanII.html

    The POINT MAN for the Jews was himself Jewish, Malachi Martin. He was a whoremonger and worse.
    Wiki, OF COURSE, says that he was ASSUREDLY NOT a Jew.
    Well you can TRUST Wiki for questions of IMPORT to Jews or not, personally based upon reviews of “sensitive” topics on Wiki I know better.

    The Roman Catholic Church died in 1962. That is the plain fact.
    All so-called Christian Churches today are on board with the inventors of the culture of critique.

    In his 1926 book “Secret-World-Government” Russian General Arthur Cherep-Spiridovich wrote:
    ” A war is only a “legalized mass murder .” Thus CHRIST pointed out those, who arrange all wars and revolutions, and that their chief cause is Satan’s and his sons’ “lust of murder .” But “Christians” never seem to agree with CHRIST .

    And that is the truth. The Jews KNOW Christ was anti-semitic, to use their term, that the Gospels are FULL of it, and from the LIPS of Jesus.
    The New Testament has the following gem:
    1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 (King James Version)

    14For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:

    15Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

    16Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.

  14. anarchyst
    anarchyst says:

    The beginning of the end of traditional Catholicism was sealed with the infiltration of the Catholic Church Vatican II Ecumenical Council of the 1960s by Jews and Protestants who were involved in the “modernization” of the Catholic Church.
    Much Catholic ritual and doctrine was discarded or changed, in order to reflect the “age” that we live in, as well as the promotion of the absolution of the Jews for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death, despite vitriolic Jewish hatred of Jesus Christ and Christianity which exists to this day. The fact is, the Jews DID get the Romans to crucify Jesus Christ and DID accept full responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. As is the case today, they got others (Pontius Pilate) to do their “dirty work” for them…
    Abandoning the use of Latin in the Mass destroyed its universality. Previous to Vatican II, one could attend Mass anywhere in the Roman Catholic world and understand the meaning of the Mass.
    Prohibition of the celebration of the Tridentine Mass (except by special ecclesiastical permission) pushed many Catholics away from the new Modern Mass and the New Church, in general. It took a brave Archbishop Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X to push back” against Vatican II and re-legitimize the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass and other Catholic rites.
    In pre-Vatican II times, the priest (celebrant of the Mass) was considered to be a part of the congregation, and a representative of the people.
    By turning the priest around to face the congregation, the priest was no longer a representative, but an actor, diminishing his status and importance.
    One area where the Catholic Church could improve itself involves celibacy, which is NOT Church dogma or doctrine. Celibacy was put in place during the middle ages in order to keep Church property from being inherited by family and relatives of priests and bishops. Celibacy was based on purely financial considerations, nothing more. It is interesting to note that Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism can bring their families with them to the Church while Roman Catholic priests are denied marriage.
    It was a grave mistake by the Church to de-legitimize pre-Vatican II principles.
    Fortunately, there are Catholic organizations that subscribe to pre-Vatican II principles, one being the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX).

  15. Alphonsus Jr.
    Alphonsus Jr. says:

    The wretched Judas Council. Its poisonous fruits are boundless. I just spent a month in Rome. The people are spiritually impoverished. Utterly. The glorious churches are now basically museums.

    Such is the wretched aggiornamento of the Judas Council and all (ALL) of the post-conciliar popes.

    Related, see:

    Converts Who Changed the Church
    https://forward.com/opinion/159955/converts-who-changed-the-church/

    That article is full of lies and distortions–but also truth. It reeks of sulfur. O how the Jews love the Judas Council!

  16. Charlie
    Charlie says:

    Catholics are not “The Church”. ALL organized religion has been perversed by the Jew. It is the believers in Christ that are the ones who know. Those that follow the church follow other humans which is always a dead end street.

    • Alphonsus Jr.
      Alphonsus Jr. says:

      Charlie, the push against “organized” religion and towards disorganized “religion” is itself a Jewish push. And of course the Jews love the Protestant Revolt. Hence the protestantizing Judas Council of Vatican II.

      There is no “spiritual but not religious,” because true spirituality and true religion (which can only be “organized”) are inseparable.

Comments are closed.