From Diversity to the “Browning” of the White World: The White Replacement and Destruction Movement Becomes More Explicit

Robert Whitaker mantra: “Diversity is a code word for white genocide.”

Rachel Maddow mantra: “Diversity is a good thing.”

Something unprecedented is happening that will drastically change the course of the future. To appreciate it, imagine the last 3,000 years of human history without the European peoples, without the branch of humanity that for most of that time, and especially in the last 700 years, has been the primary source of human achievement and progress and the creator of the modern world, and then project that history into the future and imagine how the course of human existence will be changed if Europeans are removed from it. That is what is happening. The White or European peoples are being removed from the future by a process that will be referred to here as the “White Replacement and Destruction Movement,” abbreviated as WRDM. If this movement runs its course the White race will have no future, and the future will be without the White race. This removal by replacement and destruction of the most dynamic, creative and advanced major branch of humanity is a development on a scale unparalleled in human existence, yet it is never discussed, acknowledged or recognized, and the great majority of humanity, including the European or White peoples themselves, seem to be totally unaware of it, lacking all knowledge of it, to the extent that if someone informs them of it they do not believe it, and react with total incredulity.

The Wall of Obfuscation

The tactics and techniques used to maintain this general state of ignorance, while advancing the WRDM agenda, include obfuscation, dissimulation, evasion, misrepresentation, misdirection, distortion, deflection (changing the subject), deception, denial, euphemisms, minimization, falsification, misinformation, disinformation, suppression of knowledge or information (e.g., on racial demographics and statistics), suppression of contrary opinion, and censorship. The success of these tactics depends on near total dominance in the media, education, academic, corporate and political establishments enabling an extensive campaign that operates on different levels as required, from softer (e.g., the tactics listed above) to harder forms (e.g., persecution, retaliation, penalization and criminalization). For convenience, all of the above “softer” forms and techniques to suppress knowledge of the truth and reality with the deceptive purpose of causing and maintaining ignorance and misunderstanding will here be grouped together as forms of obfuscation.

Why this obfuscation? Simply put, to suppress White dissent and resistance to their dispossession, replacement and destruction by keeping them ignorant of it. This campaign of obfuscation and censorship has been highly successful in suppressing White awareness of their ongoing replacement and destruction, to the extent that its causes — e.g., multiracialism, non-White immigration and racial intermixture — enjoy general White support, or at least passive acquiescence.[1] Kevin MacDonald has cited studies that show when Whites are informed of demographic changes that are reducing them to a minority they become angry and more resistant to these changes:

Because the media is dominated by the left and because even the conservative media is terrified of appearing to advocate White interests, explicit messages that would encourage Whites to become angry and fearful about their future as a minority are rare. Indeed, the media rarely, if ever, mentions that Whites are well on their way to becoming a minority. And this for good reason: Whites in the United States and in Canada who are given explicit demographic projections of a time when Whites are no longer a majority tend to feel angry and fearful. They are also more likely to identify as Whites and have sympathy for other Whites. In other words, explicit messages indicating that one’s racial group is threatened are able to trigger ethnocentrism.[2]

The most basic interests of the “White” (i.e., European) racial group are its continued existence and control of its existence, i.e., its life, freedom and independence. It follows that being pro-White most basically means being for (or pro) the continued life and existence of the White race and for its independence or control of its own existence. It further follows that being anti-White most basically means being against (or anti) the continued existence and life of the White race and against its racial freedom and control of its own existence. The reverse of the above is also true, in that being pro-White also means being against or opposing that which causes (or is causing) the destruction of the White race and the loss of its racial freedom and independence, while being anti-White also means being for the causes of White racial destruction and subjugation. This permits an objective definition of the “Anti-White Coalition” (abbreviated as AWC) as the grouping, whether formal or informal, of those elements which promote the dispossession and replacement, subjugation and destruction, of the White or European racial group, or which support and promote the causes of White racial dispossession, replacement, subjugation and destruction, the chief among which being the racially destructive trio of multiracialism, non-White immigration and racial intermixture.[3]

The early stages of the WRDM can be traced back at least to the interwar beginnings of the Frankfurt School of sociology, the New School of Social Research, and the Franz Boas school of cultural anthropology, by the 1930s all based at Columbia University, and the initial rise of the AWC to a dominant position in the media and culture during the same period. Though few realized it at the time, or even now over 70 years later, the WRDM gained such momentum in the aftermath of the Second World War that it became institutionalized as the ruling power structure without effective opposition. This was accomplished by two means. First, by the consolidation of the AWC’s control of the media, academic, political and cultural establishments and the formation of the United Nations, whose founding documents promoted a “one-world, one-race” globalist New World Order. Second, by the purging of nationalist elements from positions of cultural and political influence in Europe (10,000-60,000 were executed in France) and the general discrediting and delegitimization (or even demonization) of the racial and national interests of White populations, including White racial protectionism and preservationism, which were equated with the recently defeated National Socialist regime in Germany. The 1950 UNESCO “Statement on Race,” with Boasian anthropologist “Ashley Montagu” (Israel Ehrenberg) as rapporteur, declared the new racial nihilist creed that race and racial differences are nihil, literally nothing, non-existent and meaningless, of no importance or value, and therefore not a legitimate matter for concern, consideration, protection or preservation. It was. and is, the perfect creed for opposing the continued existence of the White race, as it denies its very existence. It follows that from its inception the United Nations had been a strong promoter, and increasingly an enforcer, of multiracialism and invasion levels of non-White immigration into White countries.

The postwar period has seen a growing lexicon of weaponized words used by the AWC to promote the WRDM and silence or marginalize its opponents, starting with the noun “racism” and the adjective “racist,” which first gained currency in leftist circles in the 1930s. The use of these two words has continuously expanded to the extent that they are now used as descriptors for a wide variety of beliefs and positions at various levels from the micro to the macro.[4] Concerning the point of this discussion, they are commonly applied to any form or degree of White support for the preservation (continued existence) and independence (control of its own existence) of their race, or opposition to the WRDM agenda of multiracialism, non-White immigration and racial intermixture. As a tactic to portray them as purely negative, as being against or anti the interests of non-White races (e.g., their occupation of White countries) rather than for or pro the existential interests of the White race (e.g., continued existence and control of its own existence in its own countries), the AWC has increasingly conflated and confused racism with hatred of other races, and so defined it as “hate,” although love for one’s race would be the more natural and normal motive to protect and preserve it and want it to be free. Also, any support for White interests or opposition to the WRDM agenda is not just defined as racism, but also as “white supremacism,” following Marxist theory wherein “ethnocentrism [e.g., racism] is a tactic employed by one group in order to gain power over, and exploit, another group.”[5] Consistent with Marxist doctrine, no other motive or definition is permitted. The prevalence with which the term “white supremacism” is used among modern ideologues and journalists indicates the continued influence of doctrinaire Marxist thinking.

Not all the weaponized words in the AWC lexicon are negative, only those that describe pro-White ideas, values, policies and advocacy. Those that describe anti-White positions and values are portrayed as positive, usually in the form of obfuscatory euphemisms. For example, “diversity” and “inclusiveness” are used as euphemisms for multiracialism, the destroyer of races, so the common racial nihilist mantra that “diversity is our strength” really says that “multiracialism, the cause of White racial destruction, is our strength.” Tolerance (as used by the AWC) means acceptance of the causes (i.e., multiracialism, non-White immigration and racial intermixture) of White dispossession, replacement and destruction, combined with intolerance of opposition to those causes or advocacy for White racial interests (i.e., White existence and independence).

The Anti-White Racial Revolution

Spiro Agnew, vice-president under Richard Nixon, was, before Donald Trump, the politician most noted for his biting criticism of the “left-wing” media, and he and Nixon were the politicians most hated by that media. Perhaps his most memorable and mocked, although apt, phrase – seen on many bumper stickers – was “eschew obfuscation.” The discourse then, as now, was marked by obfuscation: using language as a tool to hide or distort reality, being evasive and unclear about facts and reasons, making issues confusing and unintelligible, with the deceptive purpose of causing and maintaining ignorance and misunderstanding.

The decade before this phrase was coined had seen a great deal of obfuscation on racial matters. The anti-White racial revolution that began in the 1960s, which included the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, was cloaked and obscured with multiple layers of dishonesty, deception and obfuscation to hide its true anti-White effects, so lessening White awareness and resistance, and providing plausible deniability to its supporters. The true effects were White racial dispossession, replacement and gradual destruction through mass non-White immigration and racial intermixture. But those effects were not recognized or acknowledged by the Anti-White Coalition (AWC) that had become the ruling power structure. Discussion of these effects was, with few exceptions, successfully evaded and suppressed as a forbidden subject, and in the exceptions strongly denied. Thus the agents of the AWC were able to explicitly promote the causes of White racial replacement and destruction, e.g., multiracialism, non-White immigration and racial intermixture, while the effects themselves, and the connections between the causes and the effects, were obfuscated and kept from mainstream recognition or consideration, with the purpose of keeping the White population as ignorant of them as possible, and so as submissive and unresisting as possible, for as long as possible. Unfortunately, in this purpose they have been generally successful. But as the rise of alternative media on the internet weakened their near monopoly on the flow of information and the effects of their policies have become ever more obvious – and difficult to hide or deny – in both the increase of the non-White population and the rate of intermixture; and as some anti-White activists have become more open and explicit in expressing their real feelings, intentions and goals; the smokescreen of obfuscation is becoming less effective in hiding the truth and their denials are becoming ever less plausible.

Yet persistent denials that multiracialism, massive non-White immigration and racial intermixture are causing, or even can or will cause, White racial replacement and destruction are still the norm in the mainstream culture. Claims to the contrary, however logically and sensibly explained, whatever facts, evidence, statistics and projections are marshalled as proof, or simply based on ordinary perception, are either ignored, disregarded as an improper (“politically incorrect”) subject of concern, denounced as racist agitation, or dismissed as a delusional fantasy promoted by an international (American, Canadian, Australian, British, French, German, Hungarian, etc.) conspiracy of White anti-multiracialists to provoke resistance to multiracialism/diversity and the agenda of the ruling class that promotes and enforces it. Across hundreds of Wikipedia pages a diligent researcher can amass statistics on multiple historically White countries providing overwhelming evidence to prove that those countries are being invaded by mass non-White immigration that is transforming or “browning” their populations from White to non-White, dispossessing and replacing the White populations, and subjecting them to a process of more or less gradual racial destruction. Yet one would search Wikipedia in vain for a page that describes this world-transforming, history changing, and future defining phenomenon whose effects will far exceed that of any other in recorded history. Instead one finds only a page describing this phenomenon as a “conspiracy theory,” with an opening stream of obfuscating anti-White invectives:

The white genocide conspiracy theory is a neo-Nazi, alt-right, white nationalist/supremacist conspiracy theory, which contends that any one of mass immigration, racial integration, miscegenation, low fertility rates, abortion, governmental land-confiscation from whites, organised violence or  eliminationism are being promoted in either predominantly white countries, or supposedly white-founded countries, to deliberately replace, remove, or liquidate white populations, dismantle white collective power, turn the countries minority-white, and hence cause white people to become extinct through forced assimilation or violent genocide.[6]

The Wikipedia page makes no attempt to refute or deny that the causes of White racial replacement and destruction/genocide (i.e., non-White immigration, multiracialism and racial intermixture), and essentially everything it describes, are happening, or that they are being openly promoted and enforced, and even celebrated by the ruling power structure as a great racial demographic transformation hailed as the “browning” of America and Europe. Nor does the page attempt to refute or deny the mass of proof, evidence, facts, etc., including official government statistics and projections (e.g., from the census bureau and CDC), showing the vast increase in the proportion of non-Whites in the populations of White countries, and their continued increase into the future with Whites becoming ever shrinking minorities, as well as comparable increases in the rates of racial intermixture and the proportions of persons of mixed race. It simply ignores and so avoids the central and determinative issue that White racial dispossession, replacement and destruction (i.e., the WRDM) is happening and obfuscates the matter by resorting to the ad hominem tactic of associating it with “neo-Nazi,” “white supremacist” conspiracy theorists to preclude discussion of the subject and dismiss it as unworthy of consideration. Yet if it is true, as all the facts and developments indicate, that “Europe is riddled with subversive elements in high positions determined to utterly destroy it…,”[7] it is also true that the anti-White activities of the ruling power structure are so general and open that they lack the requisite level of secrecy to qualify as a conspiracy, but they have the requisite level of power and control to make secrecy unnecessary, with obfuscation and suppression of opposition proving adequate for the task.

One of my early, and pre-Agnew, encounters with anti-White obfuscation is among my vivid memories of the day JFK was assassinated. That night, while visiting a relative in the hospital, I picked up the November 18, 1963 issue of U.S. News & World Report and read the collection of essays titled “Intermarriage and the Race Problem – As Leading Authorities See It.” Among the “leading authorities” were Gunnar Myrdal, Ernest van den Haag and, at that time, on this subject, the “must go to” ubiquitous Margaret Mead, one of the iniquitous disciples of Franz Boas. Although only fourteen at the time, I was already alerted to the long term “globalist” agenda of “one-world and one-race” from reading H.G. Wells’ The Outline of History, particularly the passage – so ominous to a White person who wants their race to live – where the author describes mankind as now engaged in a revolution to undo Creation itself by reversing the course of the last 100,000 years of human evolution from divergence to reconvergence, a prognosis perhaps partly based on wishful thinking, but also widely seen as the ultimate purpose and goal of the United Nations.

The word obfuscation had not yet entered my lexicon, but I remember thinking that the essay authors were being misleading and deceptive in suggesting there were no legitimate reasons for concern about racial intermixture, or for opposing integration on those grounds, and in minimizing the effect integration would have on the rate of racial intermarriage, which at that time was a less vulgar way of referring to racial intermixture (miscegenation) in general. After all, one of the primary motives for racial segregation, including the laws against intermarriage, was to prevent, or at least reduce, racial intermixture. This was not only logical and intuitive, but simple common sense, and a powerful factor in White resistance to racial integration. Yet the gist of this collection of essays seemed to be that there was no reason to be concerned that racial integration and the other goals of the racial or “Civil Rights” revolution would cause any significant change in the racial status quo, including the rate of intermixture, with the obvious intended purpose of reducing White concerns and resistance. This soothing message was expressed in convoluted academic jargon, assertions and arguments that a few years later, thanks to Agnew, I would recognize as obfuscation.

Mead’s essay was titled “We’ve Got a Blending of Races Right Now,” an example of the common pro-race-mixing tactic of delegitimizing opposition to racial intermixture on the grounds that the races are already mixed, even if the supposed mixture is of an invisible type or degree only evident to an “expert,” and based on the false premise that there is no meaningful difference between various degrees of intermixture, meaning any degree of intermixture, however minimal, equates with total intermixture, that one percent mixture, or less, is the equivalent of fifty percent mixture, or more. Fortunately, this tactic, which depended so much on “expert” assertions with little or no credible evidence to support it, is finally being conclusively discredited by modern autosomal genetic studies, such as the 2014 study by Bryc, et. al., which shows the White American population to be far less racially mixed or “blended” than the supposed “authorities” disingenuously claimed, with the average proportion of European genetic ancestry among non-Hispanic European-Americans being 98.6 percent, and with 94 percent of European-Americans having no genetically measurable non-European ancestry.[8] But increasing rates of racial intermarriage and intermixture, which the false claims and reassurances of these “experts” facilitated, are making their false claims, and probable wishful thinking, come true. In 1963, when Mead wrote that the races were already blended, the proportion of children born that year to White mothers who had non-White fathers was about 2 percent. By 2013,  according to CDC figures, that proportion had increased to at least 11.8 percent, an approximate 600 percent increase in fifty years.

The passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (also known as the Hart-Celler Act), which began the invasion levels of non-White immigration that have racially transformed America, was also smoothed by obfuscation and deception regarding its true consequences. Per Wikipedia:

During debate on the Senate floor, Senator [Ted] Kennedy, speaking of the effects of the act, said, “our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually…. Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset.”[9]

The Act was supported in Congress by 74 percent of Democrats and 85 percent of Republicans, with most of the no votes coming from Southerners, still strongly Democratic, who had a far greater sense of, and resistance to, its anti-White racial consequences than their Northern colleagues. And they were right. As Wikipedia admits: “In removing racial and national barriers the Act would significantly alter the demographic mix in the U.S.”

“Significantly alter” is an understatement. The 1965 Act transformed the racial identity of the country, later boosted by the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 which amnestied three million illegals and the Immigration Act of 1990, also fronted by Ted Kennedy, which increased the rate of non-White immigration still further, together causing an explosion of the non-White population. In 1970 the non-White population was 31 million (15 percent of the total population of 203 million). By 1986 it had increased to 52 million (21.3 percent of the total population of 244 million). In the thirty years from 1986 to 2016, under the Immigration Act of 1990, the non-White population increased by another 80 million, from 52 million in 1986 to 132 million (41 percent of the total population of 323 million) in 2016. By 2013 over half of the births in the country were to non-White mothers, and at least 11.8 percent of the births to White mothers were with non-White fathers. Non-Whites are now projected to become a majority by 2042, but if the actual number of illegal immigrants is 23-30 million as indicated by a 2018 Yale-MIT study,[10] instead of the semi-official figure of 11 million, that date, in the absence of mass deportations, could be moved up by a decade or more.

Diversity as a euphemism for the “Browning” of the White World

The anti-White revolutionary racial transformation of the country was justified by an accompanying and rationalizing revolutionary transformation of the national ideology, elevating “diversity,” which in practice meant racial diversity, to the highest national ideal and goal, an end in itself, the center of the national creed, the source of our strength, and the essence and meaning of our national purpose and destiny. But the real meaning, purpose and consequences of this diversity were obfuscated, as diversity itself was a term of obfuscation. It was clearly a euphemism for multiracialism, but its end-game or ideal state, where it was leading, where it would end up, was never discussed.

In his review of Diversity Explosion: How New Racial Demographics Are Remaking America, by William H. Frey (2014), titled “The Browning of America,”[11] Christopher Caldwell begins by addressing the mantra “Diversity is our strength/makes us stronger”:

Until half a century ago most serious historians would have called such an opinion ignorant or naïve. …Such, at least, is the traditional view, and history appears to vindicate it…. Yet “diversity” today is a sacred term…. While [Frey] never defines the word explicitly, he means the decline—in both population and vitality—of America’s European-descended population, and its replacement by more recently arrived population groups from everywhere in the non-European world. Frey sometimes describes this change as “the browning of America.”

By his inference of what Frey means by diversity, Caldwell finally eschews the obfuscation and tells us explicitly what it means: the “browning of America,” or the transformation of America from a White to a non-White country. So finally, without the obfuscation, deception and evasion, the meme of diversity that the dominant Anti-White Coalition has elevated to the highest national value, ideal and goal, the center of the national creed, the source of our greatest strength, and the ultimate meaning of our national purpose and destiny, is revealed as a euphemism, or code-word, for the replacement and destruction of the White population. Caldwell also makes clear that this “browning of America” is being caused by more than just non-White immigration, that another cause is racial intermixture, the actual browning of the White population itself, the accelerating cause of not just White racial replacement, but of actual White racial destruction, as: “A sixth of newly married whites are married to someone of another race…. [and] white-black marriages have been rising since the 1960s, by about 50% per decade.”

Now we know what “diversity” really means, what it has always meant to its proponents and those who have elevated it above the vision and values of the Founding Fathers. It means, and always meant, the “browning” of America, the transformation of America from a White country to a brown country, the replacement of White America by a brown America, by the dispossession, replacement and eventual destruction of its White population. The main driver of this anti-White process has been non-White immigration. The greater the rate of non-White immigration the faster the transformation from a White to a brown country. That is why the proponents of diversity and the “browning of America” favor the maximum amount of non-White immigration, whether legal or illegal, to bring about the fall, and seal the fate, of White America as fast as possible. And that is the real reason they are against anything that reduces, slows, obstructs, opposes or stands in the way of that transformation.

White interests and non-White interests are diametrically opposed and totally conflict. The non-White interest is in dispossessing and replacing Whites in their countries, so multiracialism/diversity and mass non-White immigration into White countries is in their interest. The White interest is in continued racial life/existence and control of their life/existence, i.e., racial liberty or independence, which requires their own country and government. Non-White immigration is an aggressive act of racial invasion, dispossession, replacement and destruction against the White race, and so totally against the most important of White interests: racial life and freedom.

The long war against racism is in actual practice a war against the White race: against its independence and freedom; its possession and ownership of its own countries; its power and control over its own existence; and ultimately against its very existence. According to the revolutionary anti-White ideology of anti-racism and diversity/multiracialism, racism will end only when the White race no longer exists, confirming Robert Whitaker’s mantras that “Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White” and “Diversity is a code word for White genocide.”

Riding the Tiger

The anti-White racial revolution is gaining momentum, is accelerating, with increasing rates of non-White immigration, racial intermixture, and increased displacement and replacement of Whites throughout the society and culture, even with the rewriting and falsification of history to include non-Whites and falsely portray historically all-White countries and societies as multiracial. This is now officially presented by the UN and EU as a never-ending process in which scores of millions of non-Whites will migrate to White countries during the remaining course of the century to submerge and drown the White race in an unending flood of non-White races.

As the momentum of the WRDM has accelerated there has been a semantic progression in levels of obfuscation versus explicitness as each succeeding terminology segues into the next, from “civil rights” to “diversity” to “browning” to destruction, with the real meaning of the progression becoming more explicit at each stage. We are now transitioning from the diversity stage to the browning stage. As NPR’s lead political editor explains: “The country is changing — it’s getting browner…. America is at a demographic inflection point. The crosscurrents of demographic and cultural change are upending traditional voting patterns and straining the fabric of what it means to be American.”[12]

According to Vox editor-at-large and MSNBC contributor Ezra Klein, in a browning America Whites are the threat, i.e., the threat (resistance, opposition, etc.) to the browning of America.[13] We are in a racial revolution in which non-Whites are overthrowing and replacing Whites, with the anti-White racial revolutionaries (previously mislabeled “liberals,” now mislabeled “progressives”) versus the pro-White counter-revolutionaries, reactionaries or “fascists” who oppose the anti-White racial revolution in which the White race will be dispossessed, replaced and destroyed. Whites, as the only natural opposition to the anti-White racial revolution, the “browning of America,” are seen as a “threat” to that revolution, the opposing counter-revolutionary element, as the aristocrat class was seen as a threat to the French Revolution and the bourgeoisie, “Whites,” kulaks, etc. were seen as a threat to the Bolshevik Communist Revolution. The Jacobin “Reign of Terror” against the aristocrats and other perceived “enemies of the revolution,” and the Soviet campaign of “dekulakization,” or “liquidation of the kulaks as a class,” could be seen as possible historical precedents and templates for the later stages of the anti-White racial revolution. Noel Ignatiev’s mantra “Abolish the White race” has long been a favorite anti-White meme. Its interpretation could easily shift from figurative to literal, as it already did in the earlier phase of the anti-White Racial Marxist radicalism from which Ignatiev emerged.[14]

According to an old Chinese proverb, “He who rides a tiger is afraid to dismount.” He cannot safely dismount as long as the tiger lives. The anti-White elements in high positions who have been riding the White race toward its death have gone too far for too long to dismount before reaching that destination. To live, the “tiger,” the White race, has to throw them off and free itself from their control. This would require a pro-White racial counter-revolution that will achieve the long overdue restoration of the natural racial order by annulling multiracialism, divorcing the incompatible races, and re-separating them into their own countries. Hopefully we will then have learned the correct and proper lessons of tolerance and intolerance: to never tolerate hostile riders again.

[1] Any expression of opposition to White replacement and destruction or its causes has long been strongly suppressed by various means, from restricting its publication to punitive actions against its authors. More recently any expression of support for White existence and independence, or consequent opposition to White replacement and destruction, has been labeled as “hate speech,” a Cultural Marxist concept used to justify its suppression, banning from social media and internet platforms, and criminalization as “hate crime” in many countries that do not enjoy the free speech protections of the First Amendment.

[2] Kevin MacDonald, “Psychological Mechanisms and White Interests, Part 2,” The Occidental Observer, April 29, 2019.

[3] For a more detailed description of the Anti-White Coalition see Richard McCulloch, “White Racial Interests and the Trump Candidacy,” The Occidental Quarterly 16, no. 2 (Summer 2016): 21-54. In brief, the AWC includes all those who oppose the fundamental White racial interests of continued existence and control of its own existence, which require that it have its own separate and independent countries and governments. It follows that it also includes all those who support White racial dispossession, replacement and destruction, or, less directly, support their causes, e.g., multiracialism, non-White immigration and racial intermixture. This includes essentially all non-Whites (i.e., non-Europeans) who are present in White countries as well as those Whites who support – however well or ill informed, knowing or unknowing – the WRDM and its causes.

[4] According to the Wikipedia page on racism (accessed June 14, 2019) “…there is not a wide agreement on a single definition of what racism is and what it is not. Today, some scholars of racism prefer to use the concept in the plural racisms, in order to emphasize its many different forms that do not easily fall under a single definition.”

[5] Andrew Joyce, “Review of Ed Dutton’s Race Differences in Ethnocentrism,” The Occidental Observer, May 23, 2019.


[7] Michael Walker, “Confronting the Ethnomasochists on the High Seas: Alexander Schleyer’s Defend Europe,” Counter-Currents Publishing, June 25, 2019.

[8] Katarzyna Bryc, Eric Y. Durand, et. al. (The Genetic Ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States) According to the Bryc study the European American population is genetically 98.6 percent European, 0.19 percent Sub-Saharan African (black), 0.18 percent Native American (Indian) and 1.03 percent various other non-European races. Compare this to the disingenuous agenda-advancing claims formerly made by so-called “experts” of a much higher proportion of black admixture in the White population. A typical example was Dr. Munro Edmonson, a professor of anthropology at Tulane University, who in 1982 testified at a trial as an expert witness that: “modern genetic studies show that blacks around the country average 25 percent white genes and Whites five percent black genes.” The Bryc study, per above, says the former figure is 24 percent, very similar to Edmonson’s, but the latter figure is 0.19 percent, which means Edmonson, while very accurate about the proportion of White genes in the black population, for some reason overstated the proportion of black mixture in the White population by 26 times, or 2,631 percent! Finally, thanks to modern genetic studies, the greatly exaggerated claims of White mixture, long a common fixture in the argument of the pro-mixture faction, has been conclusively discredited. Edmonson’s testimony is found in People Weekly, Dec. 6, 1982, page 156.



[11] Claremont Review of Books: Vol. XV, Number 1, Winter 2014-15.

[12] Domenico Montanaro, “How The Browning Of America Is Upending Both Political Parties,” NPR, October 12, 2016.

[13] Ezra Klein, “White Threat in a Browning America: How demographic change is fracturing our politics,” Vox, July 30, 2018.


[14] The Weather Underground faction of the New Left circa 1969-72 was already seriously discussing liquidating 25 million Whites as well as killing all newborn White babies:

….they estimated that they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these reeducation centers. And when I say eliminate I mean kill – 25 million people. I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people most of which have graduate degrees from Columbia and other well known educational centers and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people and they were dead serious.

I remember going to the last above ground Weatherman convention [December 26-31, 1969 in Flint, Michigan], and sitting in a room and the question that was debated was, “Was it or was it not the duty of every good revolutionary to kill all newborn white babies.” At that point it seemed like a relevant framing of an issue, the logic being, “Hey look, through no fault of their own these white kids were going to grow up to be part of an oppressive racial establishment internationally, and so really your duty is to kill newborn white babies.” I remember one guy kind of tentatively and apologetically suggesting that that seemed like it may be contradictory to the larger humanitarian aims of the movement, and being kind of booed down.

Doug McAdam interview in “Picking Up the Pieces,” Part 5 of the PBS documentary series Making Sense of the Sixties, televised January 23, 1991.


40 replies
  1. James Bowery
    James Bowery says:

    Making explicit the fact that civilization is a womb-war between females is a good thing. People will then come to realize that the foundation of civilization is a violent war between gangs of males and get their heads screwed on straight about politics as the continuation of war by other means.

    Of course, this means females will have to choose:

    Either expand the frontier of the womb-war into lifeless space (at least until there are on the order of a trillion people) or lose the gracious things of civilization they so-crave.

    The way things are set up at present, I would buy insurance covering the latter.

    Basically, civilization has a failure mode somewhat analogous to the presence of neuron opioid receptors:

    At the start of a civilization, the dividends are paid out to the males in the gang for their service in maintaining its the network effects. As some members of the gang accumulate wealth more than others, they change the tax base from wealth (which is protected by violence) to economic activity. That’s how you end up with private sector network effect giants like payment processing as well as content providers, censoring political speech with impunginity. Economists — particularly pseudo-libertarians such as “The Austrian School” — exist in order to deny the foundation of civilization so that private sector wealth can centralize until civilization collapses because female hypergamy in the womb war gives the males of the founding gang an incentive to take it all down to the ground state again.

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      Intense natural selection of women is happening all of a sudden that never happened in the past. Previously society guided all women into their role of mother and home-care, but now those women who do not want children and who have more masculine traits of ambition and career, such types are being removed from the gene pool, as are those who dislike men or who are lesbians. The question is, are the most intelligent genes also being removed at a higher rate at the same time, as the childless career women tend to include the most intelligent ones who see raising a family as beneath them.

      • James Bowery
        James Bowery says:

        There is reason to believe that as intelligence increases, there is increasing divergence between the mean and mode sexual activity of males. This should be verified and disaggregated as has Inductivist with the correlation between IQ and infidelity, where he disaggregated between whites and blacks.

        If disaggregated between Jews and non-Jewish non-Hispanic whites I suspect we’ll see yet another instance of niche competition where the high IQ Jewish males have differential group immunity to the toxic effects of trends urbanization — urbanization that is relentlessly increasing. Over time, this eliminates competition for that niche, and you have a more “manageable” population. No more KMacs to worry about for example.

  2. ChilledBee
    ChilledBee says:

    On the occasion I have happened to see a program about American prisons, of which there are many, they always stay within their own races, cultures, etc., I wonder how many of the good Jewish folks have attempted to enter these premises with the sole purpose of forcing them to change their racist behavior?

  3. Mark
    Mark says:

    Like a lion that is being nibbled on as it sleeps, by hungry mice, the pinching and biting of the mice awakens the lion and then … Not a good time to be a mouse or a parasite J ew.

  4. TJ
    TJ says:

    “Isn’t great that we have all this new genetic science! We can finally determine who is a jew!”

    Jared Diamond

    • William Gruff
      William Gruff says:

      It is great. Recently there was an item, on some news network, announcing the cure of some disease or condition using a genetically modified virus. I think we can see how the coming race war is going to be conducted.

  5. Pierre Simon
    Pierre Simon says:

    I couldn’t finish this great piece, the subject made me sick to my stomach to know what is happening to us and why, in such detail is unbearable. We need to react right now. We have enough information. We need to act on it while it is still time.

    • Achilles Wannabe
      Achilles Wannabe says:

      Passing information is ACTING. Getting more and more people informed and aware is our best strategy now. We still have enormous numbers and resources but without consciousness we are sitting ducks This is why Jew tube and amazon are trying to efface us. We need writers who will create and inspire speakers

      • Luke
        Luke says:

        I’ll tell you what sickens me even more – is listening to the voices within our pro-White survival movement who continually insist that Whites can bring this White Genocide Agenda of our ruling elites to an end without having to eventually resort to physical resistance.

        These voices keep peddling the foolish notion that, if Whites just complain and whine loudly and often enough, and stomp our feet and throw angry tantrums – this will eventually wear down the diabolically evil, premeditated, psychopaths who are behind this agenda and they will suddenly throw up their hands, and decide to cease and desist with this genocidal war being waged on White Europeans. That is a pipe dream.

        For as long as there is no direct penalty or fear of retribution, these psychopaths will continue doing what they have been doing. After all, these elites feel safe and secure from behind the walls which surround their gated and guarded communities – while the rest of the White race is left to be terrorized, raped, assaulted, and killed by the hordes of savage non-white predators who they have imported into White homelands.

        And, is there any other race of humans who have a higher percentage of race traitors within it than White Europeans? The jews could have never made this much progress on their White Genocide agenda were it not for the preponderance of White race traitors who have joined in with them.

        • pterodactyl
          pterodactyl says:

          “without having to eventually resort to physical resistance.”
          The whites in S Africa are using the tactic of giving them more and more, including the top jobs, and being nicer and nicer to them, and not complaining when a white person gets a heavy prison sentence for saying the N word after a traffic accident (it happened). Is the tactic of submission and appeasement working? No it is not. And neither will it work in the white West.

          However there is another route for Western nations as an alternative to violence and deportations to get rid of foreigners – bribe them to go. Give them benefits for life payable in a new African ‘colony city’ (in Liberia?) or payable in Mexico. There would be a stampede to go to their ‘homelands’ as they keep telling us they are. It would be well worth the cost in terms of the reduced crime bill apart from anything else.

          The main obstacle to this sort of solution is WHITE PEOPLE who hate white people and want to make us third world, and who control the MSM and politics. The Jews who are hostile certainly join in, but the main problem is white people, as if there were fewer white-hating whites, the Jews could easily be ‘told to desist’.

  6. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    Bravo! Excellent! And, even more importantly, Inspiring!

    This might sound like a non-sequitur but it isn’t.

    The template of Family Systems fits our dilema to a T.
    I’ll list Family System’s categories on the left and those we are familiar with on the right.

    Narcissistic, Shaming Parent – The Hostile Elite (Sacred Cow)
    The Golden Child (can do no wrong) – Non-Whites
    The Flying Monkies – Education, The MSM, etc.
    The Scapegoat (can do no right) – Whites

    Every competent professional in the field of Family Systems I’m familiar with, and every patient, or reader of its material who has suffered in the role of Scapegoat has confirmed something that took me quite some time to come around to and accept, though I since have. And that is, The Scapegoat must go No Contact!

    This, I think, is entirely consistent with the conclusion of this excellent article.

    I would love to see anyone from TOO and elsewhere research and comment on the similarities. It would be very useful because it offers easy to understand concepts and a straightforward easy to use vocabulary that will help us better understand our situation and identify the problem in the real world, which is a place the hostile elite is not very comfortable in. Hence the obfuscation.

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      Speaking of reality. For me, the real reason they hate us is exactly our relationship with and response to reality, as opposed to theirs.

      Whites have produced a critical mass of thinkers and doers who have demonstrated an unusual dedication to reality. And it is these men who have made us what we are. The men Nietzsche referred to as Higher Men.

      We thought so well of them that we invented, created and built universities and museums to understand what these geniuses had to teach us so that we could imporve the quality of life and better live in reality.

      That’s why the hostile elite have been referred to as predators and parasites, exactly because they couldn’t create a civilization of their own (it is for their reason their victory, if you want to call it that, will be Pyrrhic at best).

      Man has two fundamental drives, the drive to order and the drive to reality.

      The drive to order can be seen in religion and politics.
      The drive to reality can be seen in the arts and sciences.

      Whites, European man, has excelled in all of them but especially in the last two and in the last 700+ years, to use the time frame mentioned by Mr. McCulloch.

      But especially the last 500 and even more so in the last 200+ years, not with the coming of The French Revolution, but far – far – more importantly, in European man’s reaction to the failure of the Enlightenment and their disillusion with the consequences of the French Revolution.

      I’m referring to Romanticism. That sorely and sadly misunderstood period of European history. And, misunderstood by many of us, ie; those who absolutely need to understand it better than anyone.

      It was the most radical cultural transformation in the history of mankind. In spite of this it remains the most misunderstood, misrepresented and totally ignored period in our history.

      No time like the present to come to a better understanding of what it was, is, and how a knowledge of that period in our history might help us come up with some workable solutions to our current dilema.

  7. Andrew
    Andrew says:

    The UN includes in its definition of “genocide” the creation of conditions likely to lead, in whole or in part, to the elimination of a national, racial, ethnic or religious group. The counterargument that non-Jewish whites are “not a racial group” can be refuted both with DNA evidence and by pointing out the existence of concepts such as “white privilege” and “white supremacy” as well as the existence of affirmative action programs that discriminate against whites. Proof of “elimination” can be supported by the following facts: 1) without the explicit permission of whites, and often on the basis of deception, massive non-white immigration has been taking place into majority-white nations; 2) whites have been forced against their will to integrate with non-whites; 3) whites have been discriminated against in affirmative action programs that favor non-whites over whites in college admissions, corporate hiring, corporate promotion and government contracting; 4) non-whites are being encouraged,in tax-supported public universities, to hate and want to take revenge on whites; 5) media, licensed by government to use the airwaves in majority white countries, promote race mixing and intermarriage and portray white people as weak and ridiculous on the one hand, or evil on the other; 6) whites who speak out against these things are censored and retaliated against in the military, in public universities, and in corporations holding government contracts. We know that the UN is sympathetic to the plight of the Palestinian people. It might be a good idea to partner with the Palestinians and present a joint case for Palestinian and non-Jewish white dispossession to the UN Human Rights Commission. This would at least put our case on the record, and we might get a positive result as well. .

    • Robert Dolan
      Robert Dolan says:

      That is a great idea!
      Whites should file documents regarding the deliberate genocide of our people.
      We have a solid case.

      • Pat Etheridge
        Pat Etheridge says:

        Fifteen or twenty years ago, perhaps longer, an immigration restrictionist group actually did mail form letter complaints to the U.N., protesting the displacement of America’s founding European stock as being a form of genocide. I kid you not. These letters were ultimately sent by individuals across a broad spectrum of groups, the total number of letters being unclear. A sufficient number reached the U.N. to the point where it responded with a form letter of its own, stating it had no purview over the grievance being presented.


        I personally do not believe we have any recourse other than civil disobedience or militancy / radicalism. If this analysis is accurate, then the next question becomes: how do we precipitate these things? Endless jib-jab for half a century has achieved little. It makes me think of how some on the Titanic became aware of the ship’s collision with the iceberg, but then returned to their cabins to engage in chitchat and efforts to ring up room service.

          • Pat Etheridge
            Pat Etheridge says:

            A monthly tweet. A good idea, but I’m not sure that it would have the desired effect of building momentum. And what is the 30th Army to which it is referring? The Nationalist Times is reportedly about to print a piece about attempting a massive (albeit lawful) response. We don’t have many readily visible and effective options. Instead of intellectual ruminations about cause and effect, finding such options must be our primary goal. Implementing them must be our secondary goal. Why aren’t there demonstrations at highly visible naturalization ceremonies, which seldom consist of anything except a mob of expressionless nonwhite invaders? Why aren’t we attempting to push sticks into the spokes of the bureaucracies processing the invaders into our society? We have limited time to act, and the verbal cogitating is leading us nowhere.

            Your ideas are on the right track. We must get traction, or watch it all vanish.

          • James Bowery
            James Bowery says:

            I’m not sure that it would have the desired effect of building momentum.

            It’s the feeling of isolation that demoralizes people.

            Note the TL;DR’s all caps:


            The more individuals feel they are not alone, the more individuals will join in #The30thArmy.

            And what is the 30th Army to which it is referring?

            It is an insurgent force focused on remediating the impact of post-1965 immigration — by whatever means.

            Why isn’t that obvious?

            The Nationalist Times is reportedly about to print a piece about attempting a massive (albeit lawful) response.

            As #The30thArmy amasses, it becomes a resource to execute such proposals. There will be many. To be sure, there will be many proposed by the enemy.

            Instead of intellectual ruminations about cause and effect, finding such options must be our primary goal.

            That’s like saying there should be no investment in military intelligence.

            No, it is vitally important to discover the causal structures, so that resources, such as #The30thArmy, are optimally deployed in proposed actions.

  8. Panadechi
    Panadechi says:

    Very good article, but this is a war for biological control, ie the IQ, the largest IQ will govern the world and the idea is to eliminate competition, the next victim will be Asia for its high IQ.
    The one who opened the door of the henhouse for the fox to enter, is the Jew ..

  9. Vehmgericht
    Vehmgericht says:

    White people are not yet anathematised as a group — that would be too crass, and it is not necessary. Instead we are now hearing that Whiteness is ‘problematic’ and needs to be reformed or overcome.

    What is Whiteness? It is any cultural or policial expression that is traditionally, historically or implicitly the preserve of a white ethnos. Classical music, ballet, art and folk custom: all of these, it is insinuated, must be ‘diversified’ lest they fall into the hands of ‘racists’ or ‘white supremacists’. In practice that means deforming and polluting our art and culture with ideas and persons that do not belong and may be hostile. The upshot is ugliness and ruin.

    Why is this tolerated? It is not only because it is forced upon us, so that to get along in our daily lives we must turn a blind eye, but also because of another insinuation: that uniquely among mankind our ancestors brought great wickedness and injustice into the world: and for that we must pay the price.

    • Pat Etheridge
      Pat Etheridge says:

      Actually, on infrequent occasions I have encountered references to whites as being a “mutant” offshoot of mainstream humanity, due to our lack of melanin. This is accompanied by commentary to the effect that our group mindset is innately malevolent toward other groups and thus aberrant. No matter that our race is responsible for the vast majority of technological and scientific advancement of the human species.

      We can expect this vilification and demonizing language to increase as our social standing deteriorates.

  10. Arlene JOhnson
    Arlene JOhnson says:

    Much of this article has merit, but when you consider the Georgia Guidestone, only 500,000,000 out of a current population of 7.7+ billion, it makes you realize that it’s not just the White race that they want to genocide. See and
    Current World Population:
    What this means is that those who want this genocide will kill all races except their own. Take for example 5G. The state of Israel developed this fatal generation of technology, but don’t want it over their country. See Also, Trump doesn’t want 5G over Palm Beach, FL. See
    If you think that 5G is not fatal, watch this video quickly before it’s taken down: 11:05
    Also read:
    I have just returned from a two day course on the Scenar Healing technology (“Pain Genie”, accelerated healing) that the Russians developed for their astronauts whilst in space. This technology uses Natural frequency in which to heal rather than synthetic medicines which, as we know, merely damages health.
    At this course they spoke of WiFi and its detriment to humanity, which, when spelled out in detail is truly frightening. WiFi apparently, works on 2.4 Gigahertz, which is the exact frequency that breaks down the molecules of water, of which humans are made up of by 60%. This is why so many of us are getting ill.
    5G on the other hand (which is planned), works on the frequency of 6 Gigahertz which will destroy water molecules at an even faster rate. Add the fact that 6 Gigahertz is also the exact frequency range that destroys the molecules of Oxygen. 6 Gigahertz changes the Oxygen Molecule to an Ozone Molecule. The transference of Oxygen to Ozone needs no explanation as to how dangerous that will be. Add to that the fact that millions of trees are being cut down all over the UK does not bode well for the future of the British, either.
    I have just got off the phone to a scientist friend who confirms the facts and figures stated above are 100% correct. 5G must NOT be allowed to happen or humanity is finished. We must make known how dangerous this technology is, to all we know.
    Using microfiber is the non dangerous option which is just as effective, although a little more costly to install. The Deep State know exactly what they are doing and must have contingency plans for themselves.
    Get rid of your WiFi, mobile phones, wireless landline phones, Smart meters, and smart televisions; and encourage your neighbours to do the same. The above information MUST be made known to all.

    I have much more on the fatal effect of 5G which is just one aspect of how the powers-that-be want to kill all of us off regardless what color our skin is.

    Arlene Johnson
    To access my e-zine, click on the icon that says Magazine.

    • James Bowery
      James Bowery says:

      Be very careful when it comes to the controversy over 5G. Aside from the fact that 5G is being deployed in Israel according to the article cited by Arlene Johnson, there is a side-effect of 5G no one is talking about:

      5G may well put YouTube out of business with its inclusion of something called “Information-Centric Networking” (ICN) combined with “Edge Computing” (EC).

      Moreover, it could have a major negative impact on Twitter and even Facebook for the same reason.

      I am _very_ suspicious that the new media content monopolists are so worried about ICN/EC that they are promoting disinformation about 5G.

      So why isn’t anyone but me talking about this? What puts me in such a unique position that I’d bring up something of such profound importance to our people is being utterly ignored by everyone else?

      See my response to the SlashDot article “Why Didn’t the Internet Take off in 1983” for an idea of how far back my involvement with the foundations of the Internet go.

      Can I be trusted? Well, I’m no medical expert, but insofar as my credentials on behalf of our people are concerned:

      See Usenet Archives going back going back to the early 1990s for the sacrifice of that career position, with social connections to billionaires, so I could speak truth about Jews. Google Groups has made much of those archives effectively unsearchable (I can’t imagine why, can you?) but even so a simple search on “jim bowery jews” should take you back to the mid 1990s.

      • pterodactyl
        pterodactyl says:

        @James – why does it matter if youtube is number one or ICN is? Why would the replacement be any different politically?
        We had a few decades of free speech but now the left are gaining control again, which is quite an achievement, as by its very nature the internet is difficult to control, much harder than publishing and the TV media which can be controlled much more easily.

  11. Tom
    Tom says:

    A couple of points. Yeah, anytime a leftist speaks of equality, the goal is actually supremacy – whether that supremacy be non-Europid, female, homosexual, socialistic, or a combination thereof. The same goes for the cherished leftist concept of diversity, which in reality is simply a way for the left to achieve uniformity – of opinions, behaviors, habits, customs, and identity.

    The likely coming event is that European peoples will soon lose 50% of their numbers through miscegenation, migrant displacement, extinction birth rates and the practice of abortion. The remaining 50% will probably wake up to reality once they no longer are able to visually identify with anything that parallels their physical, psychological, intellectual, and artistic attributes. So I think that the European racial groupings will survive well into the future. The only problem with this latter scenario is that natural selection works best with large populations rather than shrinking populations – less genetic stuff for nature to work with.

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      “The only problem with this latter scenario is that natural selection works best with large populations rather than shrinking populations – less genetic stuff for nature to work with.”

      Humans have a long lifespan and few young, so survival is less dependent on the genetic qualities of the child, and more dependent on the family and society that the child lives in.
      You can contribute nothing to society these days and it might not impact on your capacity to breed. Think of all the wealthy lefties living off their parents. Also, others who are not wealthy can also do very well whilst contributing nothing, by living off the state, and the state tends to select the worst people to work for it and not the best.

      The effect of this is that for many characteristics, natural selection stops applying. For example, if you are a man who hates your own race and want to destroy it, and are cruel and lazy and do not like children, you would think that Nat Sele would ‘disapprove’ and stop you reproducing, or make it less likely that you pass on your genes. Especially compared with another man who is kind and stable and wants lots of children. In fact this is not the case at all. Assume the first man comes from a rich left-wing family and is socially successful, he can have several children by different women. Meanwhile the other man can these days be considered ‘a poor catch’ if he is no good at parties, as these days women have strange criteria when choosing a mate.

      What has happened is that our wealth and modern society where the state decides who gets the wealth, this has stopped natural selection from applying.

      The only way it can apply is when the entire population one day gets killed off due to being against itself. This is happening to whites in S.Africa, where their main aim seems to be to avoid being racist, and this seems to be more important to them than their own survival.

      The mechanism for the greatest changes to take place with humans is not gradual changes, it is when a small closely related subgroup emigrates from the main population to form a new colony.
      A variation of this for modern times would be if populations started to sort themselves out be geographical migration, like going with like.

  12. Panadechi
    Panadechi says:

    Homogeneity more, high IQ more Social Capitalism = Development, Prosperity, Stability, Identity. The introduced foreign corruptor parasite understands this and will try to break it. It will use the divisive tactic or cultural Marxism and political correction. Asymmetric, ethnic, social and cultural immigration, feminism, lgtbi, censorship and persecution. The ultimate goal of the parasite is Power, Money and Control. White genocide is only a consequence of the disease.

  13. pterodactyl
    pterodactyl says:

    “This was accomplished by two means. First, by the consolidation of the AWC’s control of the media…”

    Perhaps the attack on whites (by whites themselves in the main, plus hostile ((allies))) would still have occurred even in the absence of all these key individuals and organisations, and perhaps all they did was speed up a ‘natural process’. A bit like women getting the vote or mobile phones or the internet – these things would have happened anyway but perhaps a bit sooner or a bit later if certain key figures had never been involved, and with different names, eg ‘VD Media’ instead of ‘Virgin Media’.

    Maybe a big clue about what has happened to the West generally is the phenomenon of ‘gay rights’, which is no longer about tolerance of what people do in private, and now has now reached the level of teaching young children in school about ‘changing gender’ and drag queens in school, and the next level will be pedophilia being normalised.

    How has this happened, considering that the subsection of the population that wants transgender stuff being taught in school to young children can only be about 1% or less?

    What we observe with the transgender phenomenon is the 1% controlling the 99% over the LGBT agenda, in the sense that the 1% decide what the new mainstream culture is to be, then the 99% submit and follow it (actually, 10% do not submit, but we are then persecuted by the 90% and treated as the social outcasts and extremists).

    Maybe the same has happened with the current culture of white-hating which has now also become part of mainstream culture in the West. Maybe this is another case of the minority who keenly want something being able to set the culture for the rest to follow. Maybe all that has happened is that the 10 – 15% who strongly want this (they want the downfall of white people for being superior), perhaps the 15% of whites who want the downfall of whites, perhaps they have set the culture for the rest to follow, and the majority simply submit and follow, as they are programmed or wired to follow whatever culture is dominant, and are not wired to think of self-interest.

    How has it happened that the small minorities are able to set the mainstream culture? Perhaps the factors that enable it to happen are wealth, democracy and communication technology, including film and TV.

    Perhaps *wealth* allows us to pick and choose our career, and the left gravitate to politics and the media over the decades, in the same way that tiny stones in the road gravitate to the edges of the road or to traffic islands in the middle of the road. When we were poor a few hundred years ago our leaders and people of influence were drawn from a different type, namely those who could win land in battle and then defend land. This was the top of the triangle. Now they are drawn from the bottom of the triangle instead – those whose interest is wealth redistribution and a hatred of those at the top of the triangle. Not that the top of the triangle are always good for us either, as they took us into the disastrous cousin WWII in alliance with those at the bottom of the triangle, the communist-supporting Left.

    In addition to wealth changing the factors that select our people of influence, perhaps *democracy* has also resulted in a shift in who is in charge, and the people are simply not up to the job of selecting wisely, and in voting for wealth redistribution, they inadvertently vote for those who hate them from within their own race.

    Imagine going back 200 years and a person in the village standing up in the market place and saying, ‘Listen, everyone, we are bad people for being more successful than Africans, what we should do is bring some violent Africans over and give them our land and houses and top jobs’. If this took place, the person would be ignored or put in the stocks. But these days the people turn on their TVs and all these people from all the villages who were previously ignored, they have all assembled themselves together and now run the TV media, and when they say the same thing, the audience says ‘okay, if you say so’, as now the people do not see one crazy person shouting, what they see is a huge number of normal-looking people, as thousands of villages between them each sending a few white-haters can produce a huge crowd of white-haters, and from this crowd, the presentable and normal-looking ones are pushed to the front to appear on TV and set the culture.

    If the phenomenon of the white-haters taking over is a natural one and is due to our wealth and democracy and technology, and not due to key individuals, then the only way it can be stopped and reversed is when the factors change again, when something so major happens that our wealth and comforts disappear, such as war, economic collapse, or terrorism at a higher level involving radioactivity or disease or poisoning, something much bigger than 9/11.

  14. pterodactyl
    pterodactyl says:

    It is significant that the question of white replacement is hardly ever mentioned in the serious ‘public debate’, and is never mentioned in the MSM. Even in forums away from the MSM and academia, in places where there is no-one censoring the debate, still there is little interest in why white people seem intent on their own demise. This website and forum is the exception and is rare. There are only tens of people commenting here. The consensus of the rest seems to be ‘it is the only non-racist option’ and ‘we deserve it’.

    For every serious discussion like this one, there will be at least a million times more discussions about how hard done by is the LGBT community, or how hard done by the Jews are. This shows that white people are not designed or programmed in their thinking to think about matters such as self-interest or group interest. They are only programmed in their behaviour to identify and follow current culture.

    There is a sub-section in the white race that does think about self-interest and the survival of the white race, and they seek to steer the culture towards their way of thinking. You would think we would be many and would have huge financial backing, but this is not the case.

    There are other sections who think differently and who also seek to steer the culture their way, and at present they are winning. Some of these seek the demise of the white race as they hate any group that is better, and they have this hatred for genetic reasons, some are only interested in LGBT stuff, or feminism, and others are foreigners who follow Islam. What they tend to have in common is a hostility to the white race.

    So our side and the anti-white side are at the edges, and there is a huge majority of unthinking people in the middle who the groups on the edges seek to influence. The mass of sheeple could, under different conditions, go to our way of thinking or the other way, against self, which is how they are going at present. The majority decide which direction we will go in and what is our fate. They can listen those who are on their own side, or against themselves. At present they are listening and following those who are against themselves. When they are no longer rich and pampered, they might think differently.

    • Pat Etheridge
      Pat Etheridge says:

      When our neighbors are no longer rich and comfortable, they will be in an even lesser position to save themselves.

      “They plan only our extinction.” That should be both our mantra and a bumper sticker.

      You are absolutely right about who is controlling the “message.” I sent a copy of Ilana Mercer’s “Into the Cannibal’s Pot” to some relatives in Oregon. The relatives are intellectuals, one of whom has had her art shown at the Whitney. These “intellectuals” now shun me.

      • pterodactyl
        pterodactyl says:

        @Pat – who knows whether your ‘intellectual’ relatives actually support the white demise, or are simply not processing the information that (a) whites are soon to become a minority in white countries (b) The non-whites are going to be very racist against us, and perhaps your relatives cannot process this due to lack of ability to think about it, despite their academic level.

        Just suppose the TV media suddenly had a main channel that was for their own white people and culture rather than against it. Like a proper Fox News instead of the current one that lost so many listeners when they opposed Trump (eg the Jon Gibson show).

        I suspect that within a few months with a different MSM TV, the entire political landscape would change, and deportations would begin within 6 months. The new culture would take off because it would be in-line with self-interest rather than be against it. It is much harder for the MSM to persuade the people to be against themselves, however they are managing for the present and this shows just how sheep-like the white sheeple are – totally wired to follow culture.

        We assume that other races, because they support their own races, we assume they seek self-interest, including the Jews. But perhaps most they have no concept of self-interest either, just as whites do not. Evidence is that the blacks know that when blacks take over in S Africa their jobs will go and they will have war and starvation, but this does not deter them. It is the same with the Jews, they know that killing off ‘their greatest ally’ will result in the Jews being driven into the sea with no US to defend them, but this does not deter them in the slightest.

        • Pat Etheridge
          Pat Etheridge says:

          All of those are very excellent points.
          Let us do a recap.
          In an eye blink, whites are going to be a minority in the U.S.
          In an eye blink, the Democrats / Socialists are going to lock themselves into permanent power.
          Even if all nonwhite immigration was halted today, our fate is already determined for us.
          Nonwhites will continue to swell into a demographic and political majority.
          To derail our extinction, we will need to reinstate the race laws, halt all immigration, and have massive programs of resegregation and repatriation.
          To achieve these things, it will be necessary to impose nothing less than martial law.
          It will also be necessary to turn the existing order on its head.
          Getting to point B from point A by working within the existing power structure will not be possible.
          Things are too far devolved.
          Where then does that leave us in terms of meaningful recourse?
          Answer: in a very dark place indeed.

  15. Sutter
    Sutter says:

    The opening paragraph gave an argument against white genocide that would easily be interpreted by anyone outside of the alt-right as white supremacy or racism. The entire article is rendered worthless right there.

    The White or European peoples are being removed from the future by a process that will be referred to here as the “White Replacement and Destruction Movement,” abbreviated as WRDM. If this movement runs its course the White race will have no future, and the future will be without the White race. This removal by replacement and destruction of the most dynamic, creative and advanced major branch of humanity is a development on a scale unparalleled in human existence, ………

    Being inside our movement, I understand that you all think this is somehow an “objective” argument for why the rest of the world “needs” white people to survive, or at least, should want us.

    The argument just doesn’t hit. You have to trust me on this. I cannot stress enough how counterproductive such arguments for white survival are. They are the opposite; they are massively counterproductive, especially for decent, high-IQ people.

    Neither is white superiority really a big component of *our* worldviews. 99+% of us don’t need to believe that we are the leaders of the world, or the best and brightest, to want to survive and thrive. I personally believe strongly that Asians are “superior” in intelligence, disposition, and most everything that matters with respect to thriving in a modernized world.

    But it doesn’t make me less of a white advocate.
    Because I want to live.

    If we have this mindset that we must justify our Right To Life from the standpoint of “what is good for the world as a whole,” we are accepting that we cannot independently assert our Right To Life to our callous/ignorant enemies. In other words, we are accepting the moral precedence of “the whole world’s well-being” (i.e. non-European well-being). And as long as their “well-being” is allowed precedence over *even* our Right To Life, and as long as the “racist” argument doesn’t hit (*psst* it never will), they will continue moving freely to white countries and making babies with white people. This = white genocide. We already know this.

    So, at this point, we have to be able to assert ourselves. (always with respect and reason!) Right To Life is where the argument ends and we hit rock bottom. When we get to the point where we are talking about white survival, if our enemies happen to demand justifications for that, that is where must channel raw psychological dominance, apply pressure on them, and demand that they recognize our collective Right To Life.

    The buck stops there.

  16. Pat Etheridge
    Pat Etheridge says:

    Mr. Bowery, not to belabor any of your points, but nothing is “obvious” about “The 30th Army” until you provide such clarity. I never heard of this effort prior to your comments in response to this article. People of our mindset have examined “causal structures” and conducted similar research for over half a century. We’ve done enough intelligence gathering and analysis. We now need to find effective responses, and fast. The water is sinking our ship. We don’t need to do analyses about water pressure, the origins of the water, or salt content. We need to discover and implement methods to effectively bail. Your efforts are commendable, and you are on the right track. If Providence smiles on us, we will eventually get traction somehow in responding to the nightmare unfolding around us.

Comments are closed.