Reparations for Slavery? It’s Not a One-Way Street.

Talk is in the air again about paying reparations to Blacks for slavery. I am all for it, but only if we can have a grand final reckoning. The two-way nature of this issue seems to escape most of those who advocate paying Blacks for their sufferings. If Blacks suffered in this country, and have theoretical credits to their account, they also have benefited in important ways, and I at least would have them acknowledge certain debts. Since the Civil War and the end of slavery, the White portion of this nation has poured out immense treasure upon the hapless Blacks. In addition, Blacks have steadily imposed various costs upon society. If all the accounts are perused and balanced, I am confident that Whites will be on the positive side of the ledger.

I would like to offer a few thoughts on the problem that I find interesting or overlooked. This will not be a full treatment of reparations and costs, or the pros and cons of paying them. I know there are very good arguments against paying reparations.

I will begin by saying that I think that the Blacks did suffer a very great injustice in being transported to a far-flung continent and kept in chattel slavery. I used to recount the ways that slavery wasn’t really all that bad, but that’s sort of beside the point, isn’t it? They were slaves. This is not to point the finger at the slave-owners, either, for the institution of slavery was as old as mankind, nearly universal, and socially and legally accepted until the nineteenth century when White people (and only White people) ended it. When the time came to decide their post-slavery fate, however, the government—Republicans, really—unfortunately made matters far worse by emancipating them in the worst possible manner. They were not sent back to their ancestral home, but rather thrown onto their own devices in this highly competitive (alien, one could say) Western society and economy. If they had to remain here, they should have been placed in some sort of special political status until they rose to a level from which they could participate in our system on roughly equal terms. (Of course, whether they could effect that rise, with what we know about race and IQ, is highly doubtful.) Throwing them into equality and independence did them and us no favors; they too often became wards of various sectors of society, or lapsed into poverty. Even worse, they also became prey to the revolutionary designs of the Jews.[1]

Thus, Whites shucked off all responsibility and launched the slaves into abrupt, stark independence — unjustly in my opinion. Therefore, I tentatively acknowledge a debt.

How much?

A recent study arrived at a figure of up to seventeen trillion dollars, which would include not only payment for their labor under slavery (with interest), but also their hardship since then. Even though this figure includes reimbursement for the spurious category of “lingering economic impact of Jim Crow and current discrimination that black people face,” I will credit them with the entire amount: seventeen trillion dollars. Seventeen thousand billions.

Let us now itemize the benefits that Blacks have enjoyed in this country. We will draw down their account.

There is the wide disparity between the races of contributing to the public treasury, versus drawing from the treasury. Whites fund the government at a far greater level than Blacks, and Blacks have a much greater dependence upon government benefits:

In the mid-1990s, Black use of AFDC was 518 percent higher than White; food stamps, 409 percent higher; housing assistance, 437 percent higher. “America Becoming: Racial Trends and Their Consequences.” (here)

As far as budgetary impact, one estimate (for 2014) has $4,529 billion in income tax paid by Whites and $486 billion paid by Blacks. When government services used is tallied, Whites had a budgetary surplus of $553 billion and the Blacks a deficit of $390 billion. (I rounded the numbers slightly.) “Fiscal Impact of Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics.” (here)

Ryan Faulk calculated that whites generate an annual $2,795 per person surplus for the government while blacks run an annual deficit of $10,016 per capita. In 1993 in Forbes, Peter Brimelow estimated the cost of affirmative action alone as 4 percent of GNP. That cost would presumably be far higher today, because there are far more people eligible for racial preferences. Quantifying such costs would be a very valuable service. I aim to liquidate the supposed debt, not the foundation for the claim.” (here)

Since the Great Handout began in the 1960s, the balance amounts to trillions of dollars in favor of the Blacks. I have seen three generations of hideously expensive public housing erected in Detroit, only to fall into ruin through neglect and outright destruction. This has also been the pattern throughout the country. Whites pay; Blacks destroy; repeat. In sum, a galactic geyser of cash, but all pissed away:

In 1962, two years before the passage of landmark civil-rights legislation and the Great Society program, the average wealth of white households was seven times greater than that of black households. Yet after decades of declining discrimination and the construction of a modern welfare state, that ratio remains the same [in 2019].

In the intellectual sphere, White society has censored and policed itself (at the behest of a shrill minority, as we know) to suppress the exploration of a vital and highly interesting topic: race and race differences, all so as not to “offend” or “damage” Blacks. This has resulted in a major loss to our common intellectual culture and prevented us from structuring our society in light of this knowledge. We have lost the potential to create social and political justice and stability in the arena of race, because we have committed ourselves to the denial of vitally important facts about human nature, and the distortion of many others. This is a tremendous loss.

Along similar lines comes the lowering of standards so that Blacks can participate in institutions made for Whites and White society. So-called “affirmative action” programs are officially mandated discrimination against Whites so that lesser-qualified minorities can slide into positions they would find very difficult to merit on their own. We have seriously degraded the armed forces, police, fire fighters, public service, and higher education. We have abandoned the merit-based system of advancement, a very grave error—one common to declining cultures—and endangered our entire society. Our nation would be significantly stronger and more cohesive had we avoided this course. How to calculate the financial value of that? It is immense.

The question must be broached, are Blacks really still suffering from slavery? There are strong indications that they are not. One activity they enjoy is procreation. A populace suffering genuine hardship procreates at a slower rate than normal, and commits suicide at a higher rate. In 1810, two years after the slave trade to this country was outlawed, there were 1,377,000 Blacks here. Now, there are roughly forty two million non-immigrant Black and part-Black people in this country. That is an increase of over 3,000 percent, much higher than the rate of increase for the White population. So, in this one pastime much savored by Blacks, there has been steady, robust activity. As for suicide, a good indicator of a population’s mental and emotional health, Blacks (according to one study) commit suicide at only 38.4 percent of the rate Whites do. These are indications—at a basic level—of a healthy populace.

It seems that the areas where Blacks “lag behind” coincide a great deal with areas in which they have not bothered to join the race: education, hard work, steady marriage and child-rearing, etc. Blacks seem to have no difficulty at all in obtaining, for example, drugs, which are expensive and illegal to boot; why do they have so much trouble finding a steady job? Why can’t they locate a marriage license? How have so many of them managed to acquire costly smartphones, but find it too hard get a diploma from free public schools?

Finally, the most precious gift we (rather, our rulers) have given Blacks is access to White women. I speak not only of legal marriage and procreation, but also of any intimate social contact. This was accomplished legally in 1967 (in the Supreme Court case Loving v Virginia)[2] and socially after decades of propaganda from Hollywood and the media.[3] The value of this gift is incalculable, and it will loom very large in the accounting.

Had Blacks simply intermarried with our women, the loss to Whites and the boon to Blacks would still have been enormous. However, they have not simply accepted this offering; they often mistreat or even destroy it. Here we move from a situation in which we charge them for an endowment, to charging them for something they have taken from us and destroyed. There are the myriad broken marriages[4] and women never married but saddled with multiple mulattos and abandoned, but the transgressions rise sharply from there: beatings, rape, sex slavery, and murder. (If Blacks committed these crimes at rates similar to the White rate, there would be no reason to discuss it, but their crime rate is so disproportionate that it demands attention.) The offense rises to a pitch when Blacks perform these crimes from motives of racial revenge or hatred. Blacks frequently admit or even proclaim this motivation. Remember the notorious Missy McLauchlin rape and murder in 1992, whose Black perpetrators claimed they desired vengeance for “four hundred years of oppression”? That was patently a claim on behalf of the Black group as a whole. They admit that they are drawing on their account, so we shall charge them.  A further consideration is the question of how many of their crimes have this unspoken motivation, or partial motivation. Surely, it is far more than those of which we have tangible evidence.

I will describe some horrifying episodes. The victims are the most precious and vulnerable possession of the White race: young girls and women. They are a nearly infinite treasure, for they are the ineffable, mystical source and root of the White race, its hallowed history, and especially—critically—its future. Unlike many other White victims of Black crime, they entered into the relationship voluntarily.

Our young women are an often maddening but always beguiling combination of blithe irrationality, beauty, and vulnerability. They share the creative potency of the Godhead: little White people miraculously emerge from their bodies. Every white person that ever existed was nurtured in the womb of a white woman. Let us pay homage to the victims, and let your blood boil at something we have allowed to go on far too long: the vile and brutal destruction of our women. Our society has let its innocent, young girls run free, ignorant of the danger. Nay, courting the danger.

White fathers especially will face a terrible reckoning in this regard. They have lazily but culpably accepted the modern assumptions of feminism, that most unnatural ideology: that White girls can and should do whatever they want in life, wherever they want, dressed as skimpily as they desire. (And they desire! Yet, heaven forbid anyone express concern for their female dignity and purity!) Then they send their girls off to integrated public schools and colleges. There they find young black men who struggle to control themselves amidst real-life, half-naked, attractive White girls.[5] Girls who seem tantalizingly easy. Moreover, the fathers never told these girls a single realistic word about Black men.

Chelsea Brooks     

Elgin Ray Robinson

This was Chelsea Brooks.[6] She was a seventh-grader in Wichita, Kansas, when she met Elgin Ray Robinson. He was nineteen, a high school dropout, but she “fell in love” with him. (For that to happen, how many internal defense mechanisms have to be short-circuited, through parental neglect and societal brainwashing?) Soon she was pregnant. Her parents allowed her enough freedom, apparently, to meet with him privately for trysts. Her parents were “involved,” but there is no way in hell I’d allow my preteen daughter to run the streets in an area with appreciable numbers of racial minorities. In any case, the pregnancy made Elgin fear prosecution for statutory rape, so he did the only thing he could think of—no, that’s not contacting a good lawyer. It is arranging the murder of the fourteen-year-old carrying his own near-term baby. Chelsea’s strangled body was found partially buried in a field. She had gotten into a car with two black men who promised to take her to meet Robinson. One of them was forty-nine years old; he was the strangler. Requiescat in pace, Chelsea.

Sarah Coit    

Raul Berrera

This was Sarah Coit. She had a Black boyfriend too. He was a decade older than she was, with a jealous, violent, and controlling personality. She finally broke up with him and began moving out of their apartment in Manhattan. In response, he initiated an argument that culminated in a prolonged and ghastly knife assault. Her agonized screams at 2:30 in the morning roused many neighbors who tragically couldn’t locate her in time to help. According to the New York Daily News,

The hotheaded Manhattan man accused of stabbing his girlfriend to death didn’t just try to cut off her head – he tried to destroy her face, too, police sources said.

“He didn’t want her to leave, and he didn’t want her to be beautiful for anyone else.”

Raul Barrera pulled several knives from a wooden butcher block early Sunday, cops said. Then, in a fit of rage, he used them to gouge Coit’s pretty face. He sliced her across the mouth and jaw, and with such force that one of the tips of the blades broke . . .

The blow that killed the 23-year-old blond was a stab to the left side of her back, an autopsy revealed. It left “a gaping stab wound to the left side of the torso from which internal organs were protruding . . .”

Sarah was left nearly decapitated, with a broken piece of knife blade lodged in her skull. Her chosen Black had spent half an hour sadistically slashing her face and torso, leaving the apartment littered with blood and broken kitchen knives. She died within the hour.

Stacey Beesley

Eric Knox

This was Stacey Beesley. She was engaged to Eric Knox, father of the child she was carrying. Police responded late one night to a disturbance at their suburban Oklahoma City apartment building. They found Knox outside naked to the waist and covered in blood. In a profound commentary on the depth of his feeling for her, he told them, “I just murdered someone — I call her the devil.” He confessed to punching and kicking her repeatedly in the face, choking her, and stabbing her. The blade of the knife was broken off in her mouth; the handle was entangled in her hair. News reports gave no indication of the reason for the attack. Stacey’s mother had been plagued by the fear that Knox would eventually kill her daughter. A court later found him not guilty by reason of insanity.

There are hundreds of such heart-wrenching cases in the past decade alone. My files bulge with them. (Blacks have murdered at least 5,000 White men, women, and children in the past decade.) I should like to memorialize all of them, for the loss and mourning must not be confined to the parents and family alone. They represent a loss to the entire White race. I demand gigantic reparations for every one of them.

This category of victimization—the abuse and murder of young White females—is, moreover, non-symmetrical. That is, there are very few incidents of Whites murdering young Black females. The debt is all on one side.

*   *   *

I hope I have demonstrated that, with all the considerations outlined above, Whites will enjoy a substantial dividend when we truly and justly allocate reparations. When we do, “reparations” will take on quite a different aspect than many expect.

I look forward to a detailed research effort by White patriots to identify, describe, and place a value on, the benefits afforded to Blacks by Whites in this country, and the depredations of Blacks that have damaged White interests. Perhaps it could garner some publicity, and serve to crystallize our thoughts and arguments on the issue. For better impact, it should honestly acknowledge our culpability and debt. It should be an earnest overall accounting, not simply a one-sided counter to their one-sided propaganda. History should be able to judge it a typically White endeavor: a sincere aspiration for truth and justice.


[1] “The Jews . . . have already leaped en mass upon the millions of liberated Negroes and have already taken a grip upon them in their, the Jews’ own way . . . by taking advantage of the inexperience and vices of the exploited tribe … the Negroes have been liberated from the slave owners, but that will not last because Jews . . . will jump at this new little victim.” Fyodor Dostoyevsky in 1867, quoted in E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History, p. 691. Many of the chapters in Jones’s book elaborate on this theme.

[2] “U.S. Attorney General Bobby Kennedy . . . referred Mildred Loving to the ACLU after she asked for help. The ACLU contacted two very young Alexandria attorneys, Phil Hirschkop . . . and Bernie Cohen. Working as volunteers for the ACLU, and representing the Lovings without charge, they took the case all the way to its inevitable conclusion.” From the Virginia state ACLU website: https://acluva.org/en/news/looking-back-loving-v-virginia-52-years-later

[3] 1967’s pro-race mixing propaganda movie Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner was produced and directed by Stanley Kramer, a Jew. American White women would come to find that the Blacks showing up at their door did not look or act like the genteel Mr. Poitier.

[4] Wikipedia, in “Interracial Marriage in the United States” (with a cited source): “White wife/Black husband marriages are twice as likely to divorce by the 10th year of marriage compared to White/White couples.”

[5] Remember the Baylor football recruiting scandal, which brought to light the decades-long practice of dangling young White college women in front of inner-city Black football players in order to recruit them? See Paul Kersey in VDare. The White son of the Baylor coach told Black players “Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor and they love football players.” That bastard, I assure you, is at the very top of my list. (Of course I have a list. Don’t you?)

[6] “A smart, smiling girl with a secret friends, teachers knew little about the older man Chelsea Brooks said was her unborn child’s father — a man now charged in her death.” Wichita Eagle:

http://www.kansas.com/2006/06/25/1754866/a-smart-smiling-girl-with-a-secret.html

“Robinson conviction upheld in 2006 murder of Wichita 14-year-old Chelsea Brooks.” Wichita Eagle: http://www.kansas.com/2012/03/02/2238558/elgin-robinson-conviction-upheld.html#storylink=misearch

 

37 replies
  1. anarchyst
    anarchyst says:

    I received this article some time ago without attribution. As I am not the author, I would appreciate clarification as to who wrote it. It is a good article, especially relevant to this conversation. I submit it in its entirety:

    For almost 150 years the United States has been conducting an interesting experiment. The subjects of the experiment: black people and working-class whites.

    The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?

    The whites were descendants of Europeans who had created a majestic civilization. The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements. Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord ever since.

    Decade after decade the problems persisted but the experimenters never gave up. They insisted that if they could find the right formula the experiment would work, and concocted program after program to get the result they wanted. They created the Freedman’s Bureau, passed civil rights laws, tried to build the Great Society, declared War on Poverty, ordered race preferences, built housing projects, and tried midnight basketball.

    Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association. Over the protests of parents, they put white children on buses and sent them to black schools and vice versa. They tried with money, special programs, relaxed standards, and endless handwringing to close the “achievement gap.” To keep white backlash in check they began punishing public and even private statements on race. They hung up Orwellian public banners that commanded whites to “Celebrate Diversity!” and “Say No to Racism.” Nothing was off limits if it might salvage the experiment.

    Some thought that what W.E.B. Du Bois called the Talented Tenth would lead the way for black people. A group of elite, educated blacks would knock down doors of opportunity and show the world what blacks were capable of. There is a Talented Tenth. They are the black Americans who have become entrepreneurs, lawyers, doctors and scientists. But ten percent is not enough. For the experiment to work, the ten percent has to be followed by a critical mass of people who can hold middle-class jobs and promote social stability. That is what is missing.

    Through the years, too many black people continue to show an inability to function and prosper in a culture unsuited to them. Detroit is bankrupt, the south side of Chicago is a war zone, and the vast majority of black cities all over America are beset by degeneracy and violence. And blacks never take responsibility for their failures. Instead, they lash out in anger and resentment.

    Across the generations and across the country, as we have seen in Detroit, Watts, Newark, Los Angeles, Cincinnati, and now Ferguson, rioting and looting are just one racial incident away. The white elite would tell us that this doesn’t mean the experiment has failed. We just have to try harder. We need more money, more time, more understanding, more programs, and more opportunities.

    But nothing changes no matter how much money is spent, no matter how many laws are passed, no matter how many black geniuses are portrayed on TV, and no matter who is president. Some argue it’s a problem of “culture,” as if culture creates people’s behavior instead of the other way around. Others blame “white privilege.”

    But since 1965, when the elites opened America’s doors to the Third World, immigrants from Asia and India-people who are not white, not rich, and not connected have quietly succeeded. While the children of these people are winning spelling bees and getting top scores on the SAT, black “youths” are committing half the country’s violent crime-crime, which includes viciously punching random white people on the street for the thrill of it that has nothing to do with poverty.

    The experiment has failed. Not because of culture, or white privilege, or racism. The fundamental problem is that white people and black people are different. They differ intellectually and temperamentally. These differences result in permanent social incompatibility.

    Our rulers don’t seem to understand just how tired their white subjects are with this experiment. They don’t understand that white people aren’t out to get black people; they are just exhausted with them. They are exhausted by the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints, and the blind racial solidarity, the bottomless pit of grievances, the excuses, and the reflexive animosity.

    The elites explain everything with “racism,” and refuse to believe that white frustration could soon reach the boiling point.,.,

    Reply
      • Bob
        Bob says:

        It should be noted that the author of the article that anarchyst simply reposted did not explicitly name the Jews – this is no indication of anarchyst’s compliance to their authority.

        The article he reposted does mention the “elites” and “our rulers”, which we all know as a common euphemism for the Jews. I find this euphemism useful when trying to educate those too deeply integrated with Jewish propaganda who would otherwise be put off with the full truth at first. People are not wired to handle the full truth at first. That’s why when we teach Physics we “lie” to our students and pretend the electron, proton and neutron are sort of “hard, solid” particles with definite an definable position and velocity – they aren’t ready to understand uncertainty at this level, and so pretending these “particles” are really particles is a useful lie. Soon enough they can handle the full truth. Given anarchyst is on this website and posting this article, he too is perfectly aware of who “the elites” and “the rulers” are.

        Reply
  2. George Kocan
    George Kocan says:

    Restitution must include restoration to the state before kidnapping and slavery–Repatriation. Anything else is a racist shakedown in the style of the REV. Jesse Jackson, Baptist minister who has no church but does have a beer distributorship.

    Reply
  3. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    This is a very courageous article. And, it makes one wonder, if reparations are going to be seriously addressed, then how will reparations to the descendants of Union soldiers be brokered? And, what of the descendants of the tens of thousands of Blacks who fought voluntarily for the Confederacy?

    Perhaps the real issue to discuss is not reparation, but repatriation.

    Reply
  4. Jeremiah Alphonsus
    Jeremiah Alphonsus says:

    “Any inequality today is a horror. For the Catholic Church [the actual Catholic Church, not the post-Second Vatican Council abomination represented by the perfidious likes of Pope Francis], it’s not at all a horror. God has designed everything unequal, practically everything: the flowers, the animals, the plants, the mountains, the nations, the peoples, the races, the sexes, the individuals, everything in God’s creation is unequal. What God plans is a great variety, and an order in the variety, with some things higher and some things lower. And St. Paul says in the Epistle to the Romans, ‘Don’t start questioning God on why he put this lower and put that higher.’ It’s like a building, that stone is lower than that stone and that stone is higher…. Compare blacks with whites, broadly speaking, blacks will be superior in some things and whites will be superior in others. But generally speaking, the blacks are lower down on the wall and the whites are meant to be higher up on the wall. That’s just the way it is. That’s the reality. When the whites stopped doing what they should be doing, which is leading the blacks, then….”

    -Bp. Richard Williamson (2008 lecture on The Sillon, No. 3 in the Stockholm Conferences 2008 audio series at the St. Marcel Initiative website)

    Reply
  5. Gilbert Huntly
    Gilbert Huntly says:

    Perhaps they’d have rather been left in Africa to suffer the fate or their black assailants?? (I know most of us whites would have avoided a lot of trouble!)

    Reply
  6. Pat Kittle
    Pat Kittle says:

    If anyone owes anyone reparations in this world, it’s the Terrorist Theocracy of Israel — which owes most of the world a staggering amount.

    We anticipate that glorious day when they will be assessed.

    Reply
  7. Manuel Sotil
    Manuel Sotil says:

    It should also be mentioned the disproportionate use (or waste) by blacks of public services: police, fire protection and hospitals. In public schools where they have a significant presence, their disruption of classes and special attention required by many black students who need to catch up cause additional expenditures that must be provided for in the school budget. Schools are expected to remedy and suffer the consequences of hopelessly dysfunctional black homes that impact negatively on the quality of education for the rest of the students. Teachers are pressured to give passing grades to students who do not even merit a failing grade, those who never attend classes but must be moved up the student ladder. And the hard-to-measure, but obvious cost associated with the lackadaisical performance of many black public office employees who are hired for political reasons and in private business life, to comply with EEOC statistics. In many places, young blacks practice “wilding” consisting of storming a business establishment, usually a store, quickly gathering whatever merchandise comes within their reach and running out without paying. Often the stores do nothing (too politically incorrect) and absorb the losses and passing the cost to the rest of the customers. And wanton vandalism. The list could go on.

    Reply
  8. Panadechi
    Panadechi says:

    TThe considerable damage caused by Jews and blacks to whites is already fully documented and verified. It is necessary to pass the next stage, how to face and solve the problem. The pathogen is already identified, it is necessary to antidote and [redacted]. Please give solutions and strategies of combat and defense against the common enemy.

    Reply
    • Karl Nemmersdorf
      Karl Nemmersdorf says:

      It is not “fully” documented yet. We must continue to propagandize the problems until Whites “get it.” This is important work, but I do agree with you that we must pass to action as well. Exactly what type of action, however, is pretty thorny. What are your suggestions?

      Reply
  9. Charles Frey
    Charles Frey says:

    Dear Karl, I had wondered what happened to you, and now only remain concerned about Pierre de Craon, who maintained radio silence on so many of his favorite subject matters. Let me number my usually disconnected responses in my not always successful attempt to keep them brief:

    01 I agree with every word and sentiment. My initial fall 57, Grade 12 attendance at [ CSA General ] Gordon Military College in Georgia, flung my tabula rasa head straight into politics. One room mate was a Georgian, the Yankee came from Pennsylvania. One conversation dealt with the cheap, pre-Civil War competitive price of cotton, at the Atlanta Cotton Exchange, with its primary exports to the mills in the western UK. And all the profits it garnered. Not yet dry behind my ears, I acknowledged the competitive going price for a standard bail of cotton in Atlanta at that time, but warned of the REAL price thirty or fifty years hence. Today I acknowledge, that even by my longer estimation, I was some ten years short.

    The REAL PRICE is upon us. Awaiting post-2020 legislation.

    02 We are in dire help of advice from the penultimate experts in questions of one-directional RESTITUTIONS: the several expert, multi-talented, ever inventive, generation-stretching and always successful Jewish organizations in New York.

    Israeli studies, published in their media, have ostensibly established, that successive, generational offspring of Holocaust victims, have been genetically damaged by traumatization. [ Achtung ! German, not yet born taxpayer ].

    Pursuant to their expert studies, should we ask them how many generations subsequent to the African slaves, bought in Africa, the Caribbean and Latin America, shipped in their boats and sold at their auctions in America, they would be prepared to compensate. Let them deduct all their documented, advertised Slave Auctions that did not take place after sundown on Fridays, to pray to their G-d who constantly supported killing of men, women, children and their live-stock, and taking non-Jewish slaves. We could also ask President Franklin Delano Campo di Rossi’s Secretary for War Acquisitions family of Baruch’s in Charleston, South Carolina, how much they will volunteer in reparations. Or all over Rhode Island, with its fine Newport harbor, where, additionally, the initially failed Fed rip-off was hatched.

    03 I ain’t no actuary; just tryin to be helpful with your proposed ledger sheet.

    Reply
    • Karl Nemmersdorf
      Karl Nemmersdorf says:

      Thank you, Charles. Good points. When I first read that the Jews were talking about the “trauma” to second-generation “Holocaust survivors” I thought to myself, “but of course!” They will never let the Germans off the hook.

      Reply
  10. JRM
    JRM says:

    Nice article, but in a sense, an exercise in redundancy. Reparations were paid in full by 1865, having begun being paid four years earlier in 1861- and I will include all post-1865 grievances such as “Jim Crow” era social restrictions on blacks- and going forward.

    Everything from the first black slave on the continent to the latest self-righteously offended member of “Black Twitter” was paid for dearly, and that extends in perpetuity for this mostly unaccomplished and non-contributing people. A few hundred thousand White lives were sacrificed in the course of the reparation-paying period of 1861-1865. The blacks weren’t worth that investment then, and they haven’t improved our nation much since.

    Reply
  11. TK
    TK says:

    “Tragically…”

    Not tragically.

    Jews have literally been creating anti-white porn for ages, which depicts black men dominating and humiliating white men by taking white women from them. At first, they created videos depicting white wives cheating on their white husbands with black men, with the husbands crying as they watched. Then it was fathers crying or complaining as their daughters had sex with black men, or videos of multiple black men having sex with one white woman with titles like “daddy’s worst nightmare”. Shortly after it was white sons with their mothers, same thing (“mother swallow’s black man’s [semen], son sees”, etc. (They push similar adverts, YouTube videos, movies, etc.) Speaking of reparations, the latest is a website called “black payback”, where black men rape white women.

    So far, bad enough, but each of these videos, like every other Jew hostility, require white traitors: the white porn actresses and the white male actors who play the “cuck” for money. The Jews do this to try and destroy the white psyche, i.e. to try and take away white peoples faith and make them lose hope of things ever changing, but the whites themselves in the videos are traitors who, should we survive and (re)create pro-white, Jew-yoke free white societies with death penalty, would surely have their lives swiftly ended after a trial, at best.

    Except in one case: fetuses. The ones where the white woman in anti-white porn is pregnant, getting paid for sex with (a) black man/men, with or without “talking about superior black [penis] before” or not. I’m referring specifically to where they are pregnant from a white man, i.e. a white fetus. Clearly, a white fetus unwittingly involved in anti-white Jew porn is not a traitor.

    So to sum up, not only blacks are allowed to have white women, not only they get away with the vilest anti-white things which they could never do without Jews, not only do little white kids grow up with all these things (sometimes in real life too) but a white person can actually be subjected to physical, sexual anti-white humiliation by non-white adults before they’re even born. (As if pregnant women being in porn wasn’t bad enough without the racial hostility – who, as an adult, would want a video of themselves being in their mother while she’s filmed being […]?)

    The point of my long-winded comment is that the death and torture of a white woman by a black man is only “tragic” if she wasn’t involved with him. Of course, the Jews know that nobody talks about what porn they saw (especially in real life) and that methods like this, where they try to make a group of men look weak, are extremely easy to re-frame to non Jew-aware people. But the second most obvious place where they push race-mixing is adverts, which are full of black men with white women, and even non Jew-aware, but racially identified white women are fed up with those ads. So there’s no excuse for miscegenation.

    The fact that this can happen and not only the system just keeps going on, but there are talks of “reparations” instead of white initiated ethnic freedom fights, is the single biggest testimony to the miraculous power of Jew-style verbal warfare. Who on earth would’ve envisioned this mere decades ago?

    Reply
    • Karl Nemmersdorf
      Karl Nemmersdorf says:

      The “death and torture” of a White woman at the hands of a Black she is involved with is hardly non-tragic. What White woman in this culture is fully cognizant of the issues surrounding race and miscegenation? To a very large extent such women have been let down by their families and culture, which is perhaps an even greater tragedy. I don’t understand the hatred directed against women involved with Blacks. They are still White, and we should have the attitude “no man (or woman) left behind.”

      I think you should leave behind your (ahem) “research” into these terrible porn sites, as well. They warp the mind.

      Reply
      • Miraglia
        Miraglia says:

        Haha lol. I agree with your points but you don’t need to be a porn junkie to see these things, every man/boy below a certain age sees them. I use tube sites maybe 2-3 times a month and I see plenty. It doesn’t demoralize anyone who knows about jews though, quite the opposite. The problem, somewhat related to your point above, is that there aren’t enough jew-aware people…

        In my opinion, what there isn’t any excuse for is a white watching this stuff. Addicts can watch stuff they don’t like according to the science related but still.

        Reply
      • Cam OT
        Cam OT says:

        While I don’t care about such women getting knifed etc. I agree that hatred is unnecessary, for two reasons:
        1. White men who get Asian women because they can’t get White ones means less weak men in the long run
        2. White women who go for non-White men means less hostile fathers, more self-discipline (fatties), less proles and degenerates in the long run

        As if Whites weren’t already superior enough, Jews score an own-goal by giving us some eugenics. The longer this goes on, the greater the effect. And the more necessary; should the anti-White coalition try to enslave us given majority numbers, we can’t rely on chumps and idiots to survive and defeat them.

        Reply
  12. Freedom Fighter
    Freedom Fighter says:

    Perfect demolition of pro-reparation arguments. MacDonald or whoever is responsible, please have multiple backup copies of this website and it’s every article before the jews try to take it down…

    [paragraph redacted]

    Reply
  13. Walter L
    Walter L says:

    From the NAACP: “From 1882-1968, 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States. Of these people that were lynched 3,446 were black.”
    Compare that to the “(Blacks have murdered at least 5,000 White men, women, and children in the PAST DECADE.)”
    And remember that many if not most of the Black lynching were done to Blacks that committed rapes and murders of White women, or other horrible crimes.
    The two infamous Black on White crimes were the Knoxville Horror and the Wichita Massacre..
    Knoxville Horror: from Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murders_of_Channon_Christian_and_Christopher_Newsom)

    Channon Gail Christian, 21, and Hugh Christopher Newsom, Jr., 23, from Knoxville, Tennessee were kidnapped on the evening of January 6, 2007 and taken to a rental house, where both of them were raped, tortured, and murdered.
    Four males and one female, Letalvis D. Cobbins, Lemaricus Davidson, George Thomas, and Vanessa Colemam, were arrested, charged, tried, and convicted of capital robbery, kidnapping, rape, and murder.
    All the convictions were overturned by the Tennessee State Supreme Court. In a subsequent trial they all were again convicted but with no death penalty.
    There were a number of horses’ rear ends on the police and prosecutors side that insisted no hate crime specification since all the murderers had White friends and Lemaricus Davidson was having sex and drugs with a White woman, Daphne Sutton.

    Wichita Massacre: from Wikipedia
    (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wichita_Massacre)
    The Wichita Massacre, was a spree of robberies, assaults, rapes, and murders perpetrated from December 7 to 14, 2000 by two Black brothers Reginald, 22, and Jonathan Carr, 20, killed five White people in Wichita, Kansas.

    The Carr brothers were tried and convicted on multiple counts, including for kidnapping, robbery, rape, four counts of capital murder, and one count of first-degree murder. They were both sentenced to death in October 2002, (which of course will never occur).
    .
    The Carr brothers had lengthy criminal records when they began their spree. On December 8, 2000, having recently arrived in Wichita, they robbed Andrew Schreiber, a 23-year-old assistant baseball coach. On December 11, three days later, they shot and mortally wounded 55-year-old cellist and librarian Ann Walenta.
    Their crime spree culminated on December 14, when the Carrs invaded the home at 12727 E Birchwood Drive and proceeded to rob and sexually abuse three men and two women, murdering four of them.
    The brothers broke into a house where Brad Heyka, Heather Muller, Aaron Sander, Jason Befort and his girlfriend, a young woman identified as “Holly G.
    The Carrs forced their hostages to strip naked and then bound them. They then repeatedly raped the two women, and forced the men to engage in sexual acts with the women and the women with each other. They drove the victims to ATMs to empty their bank accounts, before taking them to the deserted Stryker Soccer Complex on the outskirts of town. There they shot all five execution-style in the back of their heads. The Carr brothers drove Befort’s truck over the bodies and left them for dead.
    Holly G. survived her head wound at the soccer field because her plastic barrette deflected the bullet. After the killers left, she walked naked for more than a mile in freezing weather to seek first aid and shelter at a house.
    Before getting medical treatment, she reported the incident and descriptions of her attackers to the couple who took her in, before the police arrived.
    The Carrs had returned to the house to ransack it for more valuables, and while there killed Holly’s dog Nikki with a golf club. The next day the police captured the Carr brothers. Reginald was identified by both Schreiber and the dying Walenta. The District Attorney said that, based on evidence in the case, the Carrs’ motive was robbery.
    The District Attorney held that there was no prima facie evidence of a racial crime.

    Reply
  14. W. K. Jones
    W. K. Jones says:

    The core concept of the whole aspect of black slavery is that the slaves were captured and sold by other blacks – in Africa. Therefore, blacks should look to Africa for compensation. However, the descendants of the original slaves are fortunate that they live in the Western World rather than Africa. Some African leaders have pleaded that the descendants should return to Africa and, with their skills and education acquired in the West, help with progressing African development. The plea has fallen on the ears of those who realize their life is far better in the West than in Africa. That benefit (compensation) is enormous. They need not and should not ask for more.

    Reply
  15. milan
    milan says:

    I’m sorry but how can one talk and speak of reparations when a dear lady named Catherine Austin Fitts says “that what we were doing in the Afro-American community was genocide pure and simple!” go to the 37:10 mark here:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCeEzmmCd5c

    Further to this she mentions the Bushes and Clintons and what they did with their slave labor camps was no different than what Hitler did. Wow, just wow!!!!!!!!!

    Moreover, those words of Catherine’s rings so very true that where we are headed politically is livestock management of the populace black and white. If I were a white woman the last place I would want to be is in a black mans home.

    Lastly what about white slavery? Britain and the new colonies used white slaves and Hoffman does a masterful job of explaining the horrors of that.

    https://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot.com/2010/03/michael-hoffmans-online-revisionist.html

    What a horrific society we are living in today. Today folks, Today!

    Spells for me the beginning of the end really. The pollution of sin is reaching some frightening heights really hence climate change which is the work of God.

    https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/climate-change-the-work-of-god-gerry-fox/1127882524

    The lies never end from our Universities?

    Reply
  16. Cecil Henry
    Cecil Henry says:

    The most important reparation Whites need, and the most just, is simple.

    Separation and removal of blacks to a separate nations.

    Access to White people is not a human right.

    Freedom of association is a basic freedom:

    1.White people exist.
    2. White people have the RIGHT to exist.
    3. White people have the RIGHT to exist AS White people in White Communities and Nations.

    Reply
    • TJ
      TJ says:

      “. . .Access to White people is not a human right. . .”

      From each White Man, according to ability

      To each Negro, according to dis-ability

      Marx borrowed that from Acts Chapter 4 Verse 32

      Reply
  17. Michael Crew
    Michael Crew says:

    As David Lane said….”We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.” Preachers won’t preach it , Teachers won’t teach it and neighbors dare not repeat it. All at our peril.

    Reply
  18. milan
    milan says:

    You know instead of reparations and the UBI etc etc how about profit sharing? I mean look at what Alaska did a number of years ago? They sent out to every Alaskan a benefit of the oil wealth of the State. Wow, isn’t that something?

    https://www.reuters.com/article/alaska-payment-fund-idUSL1N11N03U20150917

    A nations wealth belongs to its citizens which for me brings up the story of the Promised Land. There was a very serious mention by God to the leaders of Israel to never allow the cry of the orphans and widows to reach His ears. Does not that make perfect sense? To give a people a beautiful land only to see widows and orphans suffer and by way of slavery would be a disastrous end and lo and behold if that isn’t exactly what occurred. Today however, it is taking on an even more insidious nature as Catherine Austin Fitts well spells out ‘livestock management’ where we will be chipped and mind-controlled ultimately. Again as usual the problem with mankind is the sin nature and to deal with it they want to legislate morality for all through what the Noahide Laws? Yep, if that isn’t the issue ultimately and for your coming sustenance you will be required to offer obeisance to a new type of demigod from of all places Jerusalem? This is what Christ referred to as the Abomination of Desolation. Banks and banking and the glorious invention of the computer. What glorious possibilities now exist to control and manipulate the masses and you want to what have a chip implanted in your hand?

    Reply
  19. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    This is all very well and good, but does not answer the question of reparations for White slaves, including those held by freed Black slaves. Neither does it address the freed Black slaves that owned black slaves. Further complicating that, is that relatively few people, White, Black, or Indian, owned slaves. Why should 98% of the White population in the US, whose families never owned slaves, and who may be descended from a White who was enslaved by a Black, pay reparations? This is no different than the Wall Street bailout, in that reparations will be paid by those who did not cause the problem.

    By the way, it has long been my opinion that Lincoln was assassinated because he would have repatriated Blacks to Africa.

    Reply
  20. Tom
    Tom says:

    Slavery of course is an economic and moral evil. That aside, I’d only consider the case for reparations if and when today’s Reparationists also petition the current African nations, or tribes, that historically colluded with slave traders. Otherwise, reparationists can go pound tar. The other issue is that today’s descendants of slaves are only alive precisely because of slavery. African slaves left as slaves in Africa would have been exterminated and today’s African Americans would not be in existence.

    Reply
  21. Forever Guilty
    Forever Guilty says:

    Its about time. How hard it was, If you were the small farmer who is working on his meager patch of land. You have some chicken, cows, dozen of black slaves. You are working hard to provide for your wife, children, elderly parents. Your livestock well maintained and healthy.

    And here they come, the cold, heartless Union bureaucrats and take away yours most prized possessions without any compensation.

    If successors of these farmers got at least $100000 for each head confiscated by US government in the past it would at last serve justice and bring Closure to their pain.

    Reply
  22. Deep North
    Deep North says:

    I feel like I can count on one hand the number of WM/BF couples. BM/WF is a different story. The majority of white girls who date blacks are obese, have daddy issues or have low self-esteem. There are white women who deliberately date blacks to spite their fathers. It amazes me that these women aren’t concerned that their children will not physically resemble them. When they miscegenate, they are erasing thousands of years of their ancestors DNA.

    Reply
  23. Pat Etheridge
    Pat Etheridge says:

    An estimated 600,000 military combatants died in America’s Civil War.
    With civilian fatalities, some estimates place the total number of deaths closer to one million people.
    For half a century, white Americans have carried the burden of the reverse discrimination embodied in Affirmative Action preferences, all in an attempt to raise blacks to parity with whites. The preferences are so commonplace, they are no longer even discussed.
    For sixty years, trillions of dollars have been spent in public welfare expenditures, to raise blacks to parity.

    Any debt owed has already been paid in full.

    Reply
  24. neil c
    neil c says:

    Dear Community
    I know this is off subject but I have to ask as I have been away from the OO for a while but come back.
    It is about the attack on two Lesbians on a London bus. Many are claiming that it was Muslim Youth and the only clue I got was on Channel 4 (Yes I know its lefty) news- the Girls mentioned when talking, they said something like ”us white women” (White women was definitely used) which I inferred meant that they were attacked by Non-whites. There has been a total lack of news. Anyone know anything or are there any discussions on OO, I have looked but found naught. Thanks

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.