Talk is in the air again about paying reparations to Blacks for slavery. I am all for it, but only if we can have a grand final reckoning. The two-way nature of this issue seems to escape most of those who advocate paying Blacks for their sufferings. If Blacks suffered in this country, and have theoretical credits to their account, they also have benefited in important ways, and I at least would have them acknowledge certain debts. Since the Civil War and the end of slavery, the White portion of this nation has poured out immense treasure upon the hapless Blacks. In addition, Blacks have steadily imposed various costs upon society. If all the accounts are perused and balanced, I am confident that Whites will be on the positive side of the ledger.
I would like to offer a few thoughts on the problem that I find interesting or overlooked. This will not be a full treatment of reparations and costs, or the pros and cons of paying them. I know there are very good arguments against paying reparations.
I will begin by saying that I think that the Blacks did suffer a very great injustice in being transported to a far-flung continent and kept in chattel slavery. I used to recount the ways that slavery wasn’t really all that bad, but that’s sort of beside the point, isn’t it? They were slaves. This is not to point the finger at the slave-owners, either, for the institution of slavery was as old as mankind, nearly universal, and socially and legally accepted until the nineteenth century when White people (and only White people) ended it. When the time came to decide their post-slavery fate, however, the government—Republicans, really—unfortunately made matters far worse by emancipating them in the worst possible manner. They were not sent back to their ancestral home, but rather thrown onto their own devices in this highly competitive (alien, one could say) Western society and economy. If they had to remain here, they should have been placed in some sort of special political status until they rose to a level from which they could participate in our system on roughly equal terms. (Of course, whether they could effect that rise, with what we know about race and IQ, is highly doubtful.) Throwing them into equality and independence did them and us no favors; they too often became wards of various sectors of society, or lapsed into poverty. Even worse, they also became prey to the revolutionary designs of the Jews.
Thus, Whites shucked off all responsibility and launched the slaves into abrupt, stark independence — unjustly in my opinion. Therefore, I tentatively acknowledge a debt.
A recent study arrived at a figure of up to seventeen trillion dollars, which would include not only payment for their labor under slavery (with interest), but also their hardship since then. Even though this figure includes reimbursement for the spurious category of “lingering economic impact of Jim Crow and current discrimination that black people face,” I will credit them with the entire amount: seventeen trillion dollars. Seventeen thousand billions.
Let us now itemize the benefits that Blacks have enjoyed in this country. We will draw down their account.
There is the wide disparity between the races of contributing to the public treasury, versus drawing from the treasury. Whites fund the government at a far greater level than Blacks, and Blacks have a much greater dependence upon government benefits:
In the mid-1990s, Black use of AFDC was 518 percent higher than White; food stamps, 409 percent higher; housing assistance, 437 percent higher. “America Becoming: Racial Trends and Their Consequences.” (here)
As far as budgetary impact, one estimate (for 2014) has $4,529 billion in income tax paid by Whites and $486 billion paid by Blacks. When government services used is tallied, Whites had a budgetary surplus of $553 billion and the Blacks a deficit of $390 billion. (I rounded the numbers slightly.) “Fiscal Impact of Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics.” (here)
Ryan Faulk calculated that whites generate an annual $2,795 per person surplus for the government while blacks run an annual deficit of $10,016 per capita. In 1993 in Forbes, Peter Brimelow estimated the cost of affirmative action alone as 4 percent of GNP. That cost would presumably be far higher today, because there are far more people eligible for racial preferences. Quantifying such costs would be a very valuable service. I aim to liquidate the supposed debt, not the foundation for the claim.” (here)
Since the Great Handout began in the 1960s, the balance amounts to trillions of dollars in favor of the Blacks. I have seen three generations of hideously expensive public housing erected in Detroit, only to fall into ruin through neglect and outright destruction. This has also been the pattern throughout the country. Whites pay; Blacks destroy; repeat. In sum, a galactic geyser of cash, but all pissed away:
In 1962, two years before the passage of landmark civil-rights legislation and the Great Society program, the average wealth of white households was seven times greater than that of black households. Yet after decades of declining discrimination and the construction of a modern welfare state, that ratio remains the same [in 2019].
In the intellectual sphere, White society has censored and policed itself (at the behest of a shrill minority, as we know) to suppress the exploration of a vital and highly interesting topic: race and race differences, all so as not to “offend” or “damage” Blacks. This has resulted in a major loss to our common intellectual culture and prevented us from structuring our society in light of this knowledge. We have lost the potential to create social and political justice and stability in the arena of race, because we have committed ourselves to the denial of vitally important facts about human nature, and the distortion of many others. This is a tremendous loss.
Along similar lines comes the lowering of standards so that Blacks can participate in institutions made for Whites and White society. So-called “affirmative action” programs are officially mandated discrimination against Whites so that lesser-qualified minorities can slide into positions they would find very difficult to merit on their own. We have seriously degraded the armed forces, police, fire fighters, public service, and higher education. We have abandoned the merit-based system of advancement, a very grave error—one common to declining cultures—and endangered our entire society. Our nation would be significantly stronger and more cohesive had we avoided this course. How to calculate the financial value of that? It is immense.
The question must be broached, are Blacks really still suffering from slavery? There are strong indications that they are not. One activity they enjoy is procreation. A populace suffering genuine hardship procreates at a slower rate than normal, and commits suicide at a higher rate. In 1810, two years after the slave trade to this country was outlawed, there were 1,377,000 Blacks here. Now, there are roughly forty two million non-immigrant Black and part-Black people in this country. That is an increase of over 3,000 percent, much higher than the rate of increase for the White population. So, in this one pastime much savored by Blacks, there has been steady, robust activity. As for suicide, a good indicator of a population’s mental and emotional health, Blacks (according to one study) commit suicide at only 38.4 percent of the rate Whites do. These are indications—at a basic level—of a healthy populace.
It seems that the areas where Blacks “lag behind” coincide a great deal with areas in which they have not bothered to join the race: education, hard work, steady marriage and child-rearing, etc. Blacks seem to have no difficulty at all in obtaining, for example, drugs, which are expensive and illegal to boot; why do they have so much trouble finding a steady job? Why can’t they locate a marriage license? How have so many of them managed to acquire costly smartphones, but find it too hard get a diploma from free public schools?
Finally, the most precious gift we (rather, our rulers) have given Blacks is access to White women. I speak not only of legal marriage and procreation, but also of any intimate social contact. This was accomplished legally in 1967 (in the Supreme Court case Loving v Virginia) and socially after decades of propaganda from Hollywood and the media. The value of this gift is incalculable, and it will loom very large in the accounting.
Had Blacks simply intermarried with our women, the loss to Whites and the boon to Blacks would still have been enormous. However, they have not simply accepted this offering; they often mistreat or even destroy it. Here we move from a situation in which we charge them for an endowment, to charging them for something they have taken from us and destroyed. There are the myriad broken marriages and women never married but saddled with multiple mulattos and abandoned, but the transgressions rise sharply from there: beatings, rape, sex slavery, and murder. (If Blacks committed these crimes at rates similar to the White rate, there would be no reason to discuss it, but their crime rate is so disproportionate that it demands attention.) The offense rises to a pitch when Blacks perform these crimes from motives of racial revenge or hatred. Blacks frequently admit or even proclaim this motivation. Remember the notorious Missy McLauchlin rape and murder in 1992, whose Black perpetrators claimed they desired vengeance for “four hundred years of oppression”? That was patently a claim on behalf of the Black group as a whole. They admit that they are drawing on their account, so we shall charge them. A further consideration is the question of how many of their crimes have this unspoken motivation, or partial motivation. Surely, it is far more than those of which we have tangible evidence.
I will describe some horrifying episodes. The victims are the most precious and vulnerable possession of the White race: young girls and women. They are a nearly infinite treasure, for they are the ineffable, mystical source and root of the White race, its hallowed history, and especially—critically—its future. Unlike many other White victims of Black crime, they entered into the relationship voluntarily.
Our young women are an often maddening but always beguiling combination of blithe irrationality, beauty, and vulnerability. They share the creative potency of the Godhead: little White people miraculously emerge from their bodies. Every white person that ever existed was nurtured in the womb of a white woman. Let us pay homage to the victims, and let your blood boil at something we have allowed to go on far too long: the vile and brutal destruction of our women. Our society has let its innocent, young girls run free, ignorant of the danger. Nay, courting the danger.
White fathers especially will face a terrible reckoning in this regard. They have lazily but culpably accepted the modern assumptions of feminism, that most unnatural ideology: that White girls can and should do whatever they want in life, wherever they want, dressed as skimpily as they desire. (And they desire! Yet, heaven forbid anyone express concern for their female dignity and purity!) Then they send their girls off to integrated public schools and colleges. There they find young black men who struggle to control themselves amidst real-life, half-naked, attractive White girls. Girls who seem tantalizingly easy. Moreover, the fathers never told these girls a single realistic word about Black men.
This was Chelsea Brooks. She was a seventh-grader in Wichita, Kansas, when she met Elgin Ray Robinson. He was nineteen, a high school dropout, but she “fell in love” with him. (For that to happen, how many internal defense mechanisms have to be short-circuited, through parental neglect and societal brainwashing?) Soon she was pregnant. Her parents allowed her enough freedom, apparently, to meet with him privately for trysts. Her parents were “involved,” but there is no way in hell I’d allow my preteen daughter to run the streets in an area with appreciable numbers of racial minorities. In any case, the pregnancy made Elgin fear prosecution for statutory rape, so he did the only thing he could think of—no, that’s not contacting a good lawyer. It is arranging the murder of the fourteen-year-old carrying his own near-term baby. Chelsea’s strangled body was found partially buried in a field. She had gotten into a car with two black men who promised to take her to meet Robinson. One of them was forty-nine years old; he was the strangler. Requiescat in pace, Chelsea.
This was Sarah Coit. She had a Black boyfriend too. He was a decade older than she was, with a jealous, violent, and controlling personality. She finally broke up with him and began moving out of their apartment in Manhattan. In response, he initiated an argument that culminated in a prolonged and ghastly knife assault. Her agonized screams at 2:30 in the morning roused many neighbors who tragically couldn’t locate her in time to help. According to the New York Daily News,
The hotheaded Manhattan man accused of stabbing his girlfriend to death didn’t just try to cut off her head – he tried to destroy her face, too, police sources said.
“He didn’t want her to leave, and he didn’t want her to be beautiful for anyone else.”
Raul Barrera pulled several knives from a wooden butcher block early Sunday, cops said. Then, in a fit of rage, he used them to gouge Coit’s pretty face. He sliced her across the mouth and jaw, and with such force that one of the tips of the blades broke . . .
The blow that killed the 23-year-old blond was a stab to the left side of her back, an autopsy revealed. It left “a gaping stab wound to the left side of the torso from which internal organs were protruding . . .”
Sarah was left nearly decapitated, with a broken piece of knife blade lodged in her skull. Her chosen Black had spent half an hour sadistically slashing her face and torso, leaving the apartment littered with blood and broken kitchen knives. She died within the hour.
This was Stacey Beesley. She was engaged to Eric Knox, father of the child she was carrying. Police responded late one night to a disturbance at their suburban Oklahoma City apartment building. They found Knox outside naked to the waist and covered in blood. In a profound commentary on the depth of his feeling for her, he told them, “I just murdered someone — I call her the devil.” He confessed to punching and kicking her repeatedly in the face, choking her, and stabbing her. The blade of the knife was broken off in her mouth; the handle was entangled in her hair. News reports gave no indication of the reason for the attack. Stacey’s mother had been plagued by the fear that Knox would eventually kill her daughter. A court later found him not guilty by reason of insanity.
There are hundreds of such heart-wrenching cases in the past decade alone. My files bulge with them. (Blacks have murdered at least 5,000 White men, women, and children in the past decade.) I should like to memorialize all of them, for the loss and mourning must not be confined to the parents and family alone. They represent a loss to the entire White race. I demand gigantic reparations for every one of them.
This category of victimization—the abuse and murder of young White females—is, moreover, non-symmetrical. That is, there are very few incidents of Whites murdering young Black females. The debt is all on one side.
* * *
I hope I have demonstrated that, with all the considerations outlined above, Whites will enjoy a substantial dividend when we truly and justly allocate reparations. When we do, “reparations” will take on quite a different aspect than many expect.
I look forward to a detailed research effort by White patriots to identify, describe, and place a value on, the benefits afforded to Blacks by Whites in this country, and the depredations of Blacks that have damaged White interests. Perhaps it could garner some publicity, and serve to crystallize our thoughts and arguments on the issue. For better impact, it should honestly acknowledge our culpability and debt. It should be an earnest overall accounting, not simply a one-sided counter to their one-sided propaganda. History should be able to judge it a typically White endeavor: a sincere aspiration for truth and justice.
 “The Jews . . . have already leaped en mass upon the millions of liberated Negroes and have already taken a grip upon them in their, the Jews’ own way . . . by taking advantage of the inexperience and vices of the exploited tribe … the Negroes have been liberated from the slave owners, but that will not last because Jews . . . will jump at this new little victim.” Fyodor Dostoyevsky in 1867, quoted in E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History, p. 691. Many of the chapters in Jones’s book elaborate on this theme.
 “U.S. Attorney General Bobby Kennedy . . . referred Mildred Loving to the ACLU after she asked for help. The ACLU contacted two very young Alexandria attorneys, Phil Hirschkop . . . and Bernie Cohen. Working as volunteers for the ACLU, and representing the Lovings without charge, they took the case all the way to its inevitable conclusion.” From the Virginia state ACLU website: https://acluva.org/en/news/looking-back-loving-v-virginia-52-years-later
 1967’s pro-race mixing propaganda movie Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner was produced and directed by Stanley Kramer, a Jew. American White women would come to find that the Blacks showing up at their door did not look or act like the genteel Mr. Poitier.
 Wikipedia, in “Interracial Marriage in the United States” (with a cited source): “White wife/Black husband marriages are twice as likely to divorce by the 10th year of marriage compared to White/White couples.”
 Remember the Baylor football recruiting scandal, which brought to light the decades-long practice of dangling young White college women in front of inner-city Black football players in order to recruit them? See Paul Kersey in VDare. The White son of the Baylor coach told Black players “Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor and they love football players.” That bastard, I assure you, is at the very top of my list. (Of course I have a list. Don’t you?)
 “A smart, smiling girl with a secret friends, teachers knew little about the older man Chelsea Brooks said was her unborn child’s father — a man now charged in her death.” Wichita Eagle:
“Robinson conviction upheld in 2006 murder of Wichita 14-year-old Chelsea Brooks.” Wichita Eagle: http://www.kansas.com/2012/03/02/2238558/elgin-robinson-conviction-upheld.html#storylink=misearch