Triumph of the (Well-Funded) Shrill: Exposing the Funding Networks of the Left

Months of sheltering-in-place have gone down the drain—along with tens of millions of jobs[1]—when rioters torched parts of dozens of American cities in response to media-generated outrage over the questionable killings of two black men (and one legitimate police phone call in Central Park). 1,288 public health professionals, infectious diseases professionals, and community stakeholders signed the following excerpted open letter showing at once that there are no adults in the room and where the real priorities lie:

A public health response to these demonstrations is also warranted, but this message must be wholly different from the response to White protestors resisting stay-home orders. Infectious disease and public health narratives adjacent to demonstrations against racism must be consciously anti-racist, and infectious disease experts must be clear and consistent in prioritizing an anti-racist message.

Right, because “racism” somehow has something to do with an artificially-generated global pandemic that could’ve easily been stopped in China. At the onset, it was apparently racist to prevent flights from infected areas, until the coronavirus reached Europe that is, as it had something to do with anti-Asian bias or some such vagary pushed by the media. Now not only is the virus itself “racist,” but it is somehow bound up in White supremacy. As the letter “educates” us:

White supremacy is a lethal public health issue that predates and contributes to COVID-19 (note: no evidence provided, obviously)…COVID-19 among Black patients is yet another lethal manifestation of white supremacy [note: notice how Black is capitalized but White is not]… In addressing demonstrations against White supremacy, our first statement must be one of unwavering support for those who would dismantle, uproot, or reform racist institutions…However, as public health advocates, we do not condemn these gatherings as risky for COVID-19 transmission. We support them as vital to the national public health and to the threatened health specifically of Black people in the United States.

This is out-of-control, completely irresponsible, and dangerously stupid, and yet medical professionals and supposed experts from places like Harvard Medical School, Cornell University, UCLA, USC, the University of Chicago, Columbia University, Northwestern University, and others co-signed this letter. Incidentally, all of those schools are part of the advancement of the transgender agenda, but that is a topic for another time. This is sadly totally expected at this point. We have “progressed” right off a cliff.

Regarding these “demonstrations,” it is worth looking into who has jumped to the aid of the looters and agitators. The Minnesota Freedom Fund was able to raise around $20 million over four days or so of unrest to free incarcerated rioters by paying their bail and pledging to cover subsequent legal fees. This is a prime example of what has been called the “Every Single Time” phenomenon, or also called Déjà Jew by Spencer Quinn, who writes: “For example, when someone with odd-sounding name goes on an unhinged liberal rant on the news or on social media, the tired, bitter cynic in you thinks, ‘Jew.’ Then you look him up to verify and discover, once again, that you are right.” In a similar vein, given the resources marshaled and the speed with which this was accomplished and for what purposes, I took it upon myself to look into the organization, and lo and behold names like Michael Friedman and Greg Lewin jumped right off the page! Unsurprisingly, Jewish celebrities such as Seth Rogen were very public about making donations to this organization.

Liberal ideology has been readily embraced by Jews for many reasons, but particularly germane here is that if it is racist or anti-Semitic or what have you to make group-level evaluative judgements or even simple statements of fact—unless it’s a negative directed toward Whites of course—understanding that obviously not every single person in that group fits that description, then it makes it virtually impossible for many Whites to accurately observe let alone voice that on a population level, Jews are congenitally subversive and harbor very clear anti-White animus. Europeans understood this for centuries, but only the relatively recent embrace of liberalism has cast past self-preservation methods distinctly in the “problematic” category. What is especially disconcerting is that the European Union has come to believe that its “values”—which are identical to those of the Anglosphere at present—supersede the right of each European ethnicity to have a homeland unencumbered by the world’s wretched refuse and by Jewish capitalists and various other denizens of the Island of Misfit Toys. In fact, the right of Europeans to exist at all is now “problematic.” The invocation of these esoteric and ever-shifting “values” recalls the 2017 policy paper authored by Helen Dempster and Karen Hargrave under the auspices of Chatham House and the Overseas Development Institute (ODI)’s Forum on Refugee and Migration Policy initiative: “Emotive and value-driven arguments may have more traction than facts and evidence. Successful strategies might highlight the manageability of the situation, while emphasising shared values.” Cue coronavirus advertisement that “we’re all in this together.” Right. They are all in this together, although I suppose in a way we—meaning European peoples—are, too, earmarked for destruction as we are.

The Ford Foundation has invested in the Black-Led Movement Fund (BLMF) and Soros’s Open Society Foundations provided funding to the Campaign for Black Male Achievement, which in turn supports BMAfunders. Both George Soros and Michael Bloomberg have been astroturfing these “grassroots” kinds of organizations for years, with just one instance being the $30 million each “for black and Latino men in New York City” in 2011. In 2007, after the Ford Foundation published “Why We Can’t Wait,” ABFE (“A Philanthropic Partnership for Black Communities”), Casey Family Programs, Ford, and the Open Society Foundations hosted a National Funders’ Dialogue on Black Males in Seattle to “discuss grantmaking for black males.” The following year, the Open Society Foundations launched the Campaign for Black Male Achievement and the Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity published a report funded by the WK Kellogg Foundation “designed to expand scholarship on black males.” In 2010, the American Values Institute, the Knight Foundation, and the Open Society Foundations hosted the Black Male Re-Imagined conference to “change media portrayals of black males.” In 2012, Open Society and its partners launched the Leadership and Sustainability Institute to “support nonprofit organizations working with black males” and the Open Society Foundations also hosted the Black Male Achievement Innovation & Impact Forum for foundation, government, business, and nonprofit leaders to “build on momentum in the field.” According to POLITICO, in late 2015:

Some of the biggest donors on the left plan to meet behind closed doors…with leaders of the Black Lives Matter movement and their allies. The meetings are taking place at the annual winter gathering of the Democracy Alliance major liberal donor club, which runs from Tuesday evening through Saturday morning and is expected to draw Democratic financial heavyweights, including Tom Steyer and Paul Egerman… The DA, as the club is known in Democratic circles, is recommending its donors step up check writing to a handful of endorsed groups that have supported the Black Lives Matter movement… The Democracy Alliance was created in 2005 by a handful of major donors, including billionaire financier George Soros and Taco Bell heir Rob McKay…Endorsed beneficiaries include the Center for American Progress think tank, the liberal attack dog Media Matters and the Democratic data firm Catalist, though members also give heavily to Democratic politicians and super PACs that are not part of the DA’s core portfolio…The Democracy Alliance last year voted to endorse a handful of groups focused on engaging African-Americans in politics ― some of which have helped facilitate the Black Lives movement.[2]

Black Lives Matter, Inc., “a global organization in the US, UK, and Canada, whose mission is to eradicate White supremacy” and which “affirm[s] the lives of Black queer and trans folks, disabled folks, undocumented folks, folks with records, women, and all Black lives along the gender spectrum” is underwritten by an NGO called Thousand Currents, whose major donors include: the MacArthur Foundation, Apple Computer Inc., International Planned Parenthood Federation, Zephyr Real Estate, Chevron Matching Gift Program, the JP Morgan Chase Foundation, the NoVo Foundation, Oracle Corporation, the Mills Family Foundation, the Horizons Foundation, the Clif Bar Family Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the WK Kellogg Foundation, Rita Brandeis Memorial Fund at the Tides Foundation, and the Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust.

Pilar Weiss, the director of Community Justice Exchange, which runs a directory of bail funds around the country called the National Bail Fund Network, spoke positively about the donations to free rioters and criminals in the midst of the post-George Floyd “unrest”; it will not surprise the reader to learn that Community Justice Exchange is bankrolled by the Left-wing organization the Tides Center. Another similar organization, the Brooklyn Community Bail Fund, which is “a radical intervention in a system that treats people differently based on wealth, skin color, immigration status and influence” (which is true, but not in the way they’re claiming), was initially helmed by Peter Goldberg, and focuses on bailing out “ethnic” criminals and illegal aliens held in detention. Some of its primary funders include the Ford Foundation, the Jewish JM Kaplan Fund, FJC – A Foundation of Philanthropic Funds (run by the Jewish Leonard Glickman), Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors, and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation Open Philanthropy Project Fund.

The Bail Project is yet another; its “advisors” include Danny Glover, Richard Branson, and John Legend. Incidentally, Legend’s wife Chrissy Teigen donated $200,000 to bail funds across the country in the midst of the civil unrest. The Bail Project’s CEO is Robin Steinberg and its Board members include people like Lili Lynton, member of the Advisory Council of The Hamilton Project, which promotes Third World immigrants to feed the furnace of neo-liberal economics organizations (covered in The Way Life Should Be?). Some of The Bail Project’s partners include TED (of TED Talks fame), the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, UCLA Law School, the University of Louisville’s Anne Braden Institute for Social Justice Research, and the EBONY Foundation. The Peoples City Council Freedom Fund (Los Angeles) posted the following on June 1st, 2020 (typos corrected):

People’s City Council Will Distribute Hundreds Of Thousands Of Dollars To Black Lives Matter LA And The National Lawyers Guild To Support Those Involved With The Ongoing Rebellion In Los Angeles…We are immediately transferring $300,000 to Black Lives Matter, Los Angeles (BLMLA), who of course have been one of the main organizations leading this struggle, not just this past weekend, but for years. We are also immediately transferring $300,000 to the National Lawyers Guild of Los Angeles (NLG-LA). NLG has defended the civil liberties of the most radical activists and demonstrators for nearly a century, and the LA chapter already has an army of volunteers working around the clock to do all they can to provide support for those arrested and detained in Los Angeles. In addition, at least $150,000 is currently being set aside strictly for bail; we are working with organizers from the Bail Project here in Los Angeles on this (though the Bail Project as an organization is not involved).

Vogue provided an extensive list of these groups to donate to, including:

  • Restoring Justice (Houston), which partners with the Houston Texans Social Justice Fund, the Baylor University Diana R. Garland School of Social Work, and Black Lives Matter Houston, among others;
  • the Richmond Community Bail Fund;
  • the Colorado Freedom Fund (Denver);
  • the Vegas Freedom Fund.

Many of these and similar groups receive support from the 501(c)(3) “charity” Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, of which Danny Glover is a trustee; its Board members include:

  • Jewish lesbian Randi Weingarten, President of the American Federation of Teachers;
  • Marvin S. Rosen of Greenberg Traurig LLP (“advises private equity firms, hedge funds, activist and distressed investors on special strategies”);
  • Martin Sheen;
  • Kenneth Goldman, former CFO of Yahoo! and President of Hillspire;
  • Cara Kennedy-Cuomo (“Associate at 17 Asset Management, a global firm that designs and manages investments aligned with the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). She is also a partner at Sahar Global Summits, where she leads the group’s diversity and inclusion division. Cara has also worked for Jeffrey Sachs on international development efforts.”);
  • Massachusetts Congressman Joe Kennedy III;
  • Harry Belafonte;
  • Claudio Grossman (“One of the top 25 most influential people in legal education. He has also received numerous awards for his work with human rights and international law, including the Harry LeRoy Jones Award from the Washington Foreign Law Society and the René Cassin Award from B’nai B’rith International in Chile”);
  • Michael Posner, former Obama administration official and Jerome Kohlberg professor of ethics and finance at NYU Stern School of Business; Posner is also Co-Director of the Center of Business and Human Rights at NYU;
  • Niclas Kjellström-Matseke, Founding Partner and Head of Europe & Africa for 17 Asset Management and former “Advisory Board Member of The Elders Foundation, which was set up by Nelson Mandela with the aim of getting global leaders to work together for peace and human rights”;
  • Betty Liu (“Chief Experience Officer at Intercontinental Exchange (NYSE: ICE) and Executive Vice Chairman for NYSE Group, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Exchange… Prior to joining the NYSE in 2018, Liu was an award-winning business journalist. She most recently anchored the Bloomberg Television ‘Daybreak Asia’ program.”);
  • Peter Edelman, former Counselor to HHS Secretary Donna Shalala (“I’ve been a friend of Israel for a long time”), former Law Clerk to Arthur J. Goldberg, Board member of the Center for American Progress Action Fund, and Board President Emeritus of the New Israel Fund.

The Philadelphia Community Bail Fund, “governed and driven by a group of volunteer Core Organizers who are mostly Black, women, queer and gender nonconforming folk including formerly incarcerated people bailed out by PCBF,” is financially-backed by organizations such as the Eagles Social Justice Fund (funded by the Philadelphia Eagles professional football franchise, owned by the Jewish Jeffrey Lurie[3]) and the Samuel S. Fels Fund, named after “the son of Jewish refugees who fled Bavaria, Germany in 1848 to escape the Revolutionary uprisings.” Fels, per the Foundation website:

helped found the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS-PA) in 1884 when Philadelphia was a major port of entry for Eastern European Jews fleeing persecution. Though a major funder and founder of Jewish organizations, Samuel believed in serving all, regardless of race or religion, wanting to build community and shared prosperity. In 1912, he began contributing to NAACP and in 1916, sent them funds to support their campaign opposing “Birth of a Nation.”

The Emergency Release Fund is a “mutual aid fund dedicated to getting LGBTQ+ and medically vulnerable individuals out of Rikers Island and ICE detention,” backed by people like Josh Goldfein; their would-be martyr, the preposterously-named Layleen Xtravaganza-Polanco, “a Black trans woman who died at Rikers Island during Pride month in 2019…illustrates a key tension within prisoner rights movements. Centering the experiences of transgender prisoners can motivate reform that fits within a broader fight for prison abolition.”

Prison. Abolition. We are talking about the inability of the government to incarcerate or detain any individuals from these protected classes because of “racism,” “transphobia,” and the familiar Cultural Marxist glossary. It all serves the purposes of the ruling class, uniform in its condemnation of “systemic racism” and tacit—sometimes explicit—support for globalized civil unrest. In a totally organic phenomenon that was in no way, shape, or form coordinated, not long after the riots kicked off in the US, reports came in of the same in the UK, France, New Zealand, and elsewhere, demonstrating against racism or something.

Naturally the coverage lauded the “protestors”—consider for example the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), which is funded by the likes of the Ford Foundation, the Open Society Foundations, the Swedish Postcode Foundation, the Dutch National Postcode Lottery, the Adessium Foundation, the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad), the Streisand Foundation, and the Omidyar Network, and from their website: “ICIJ is also a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.” Its media partners include:

  • SVT (Sweden)
  • Süddeutsche Zeitung (Germany)
  • Tempo (Indonesia)
  • The Asahi Shimbun (Japan)
  • The Australian Financial Review (Australia)
  • The Irish Times (Ireland)
  • The Malta Independent (Malta)
  • The Miami Herald (United States)
  • The Namibian (Namibia)
  • The New York Times (United States)
  • The Washington Post (United States)
  • ABC (Australia)
  • BBC Panorama (United Kingdom)
  • Fusion (USA)
  • Gazeta Wyborcza (Poland)
  • Guardian (United Kingdom)
  • Haaretz (Israel)
  • L’Espresso (Italy)
  • Le Monde (France)
  • TVNZ (New Zealand)
  • Univisión (United States)

Pretty comprehensive.

Further evidencing that the system is designed to oppress Black people, as Tim Dams wrote in Variety:

U.K. TV channels and radio stations are changing their programmes to mark “Blackout Tuesday”, following George Floyd’s death in police custody. Channel 4-owned 4 Music said it will pause its output once an hour throughout the day, and cease activity on its other platforms. “This a day to pause business as usual, take the time to reflect on recent events, and start a meaningful conversation around how to actively support and achieve progress for the whole black community,” said 4Music on Twitter today. ITV daytime show “This Morning” briefly went dark today, showing a black screen with the words “Black Lives Matter”. Host Phillip Schofield read out the message: “ITV say ‘We stand in solidarity with our black colleagues, storytellers and viewers around the world because #BlackLivesMatter #BlackOutTuesday.’” Meanwhile, ViacomCBS’s UK services MTV, BET, Comedy Central and Paramount Network will go dark across their platforms, including linear broadcast, at 7pm BST on Wednesday for 8 minutes and 46 seconds – the length of time it took for George Floyd to die.[4]

Speaking of which, the doctor hired by the family of George Floyd, the Jewish Michael Baden, did in fact conclude that his death was homicide; the medical examiner’s findings were that Floyd had fentanyl in his system and showed recent signs of methamphetamine usage when he died of a heart attack. That notwithstanding, how does this poor, voiceless, disadvantaged family get the money to hire Baden, who observed Jeffrey Epstein’s autopsy on his lawyers’ behalf, hosted an HBO show, testified for OJ Simpson’s defense, and contributed to examinations of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr., and John Belushi?

[1] Although predictably Congress was able to find billions of dollars to send to Israel, as Alison Weir reported for Mint Press on May 22nd, 2020: “The Senate Foreign Relations Committee quietly passed a bill…to give Israel a minimum of $38 billion over the next ten years despite the ongoing devastation to the U.S. economy caused by the coronavirus. The bill [S.3176] was passed by the committee under two unusual circumstances and with almost no public awareness. First, Senate Committee Chairman Jim Risch (R-Idaho) refused to allow a live stream of the meeting, despite the fact that the Senate Rules panel had recommended that extra efforts be taken to ensure public transparency while the Capitol is closed to the public and the presence of reporters is severely limited. The Senate’s Press Gallery Standing Committee of Correspondents had objected strongly to Risch’s decision. Second, the bill was passed without being named, debated, or even discussed, even though it would set into law the largest such aid package in U.S. history. There has been no mention of the bill by most media in the United States. The massive package is particularly noteworthy in light of the current devastation to the American taxpayers who will be footing the bill – over $10 million per day. In recent months approximately 30 million Americans have lost jobs, 100,000 small businesses have already closed forever, and over seven million are at risk of doing so. The bill was voted on as part of a package of 15 bills that were voted on “en bloc” (all together)…Neither did any Democrats on the committee object to requiring American taxpayers to give Israel what amounts to over $7,000 per minute when many Americans are suffering catastrophic financial difficulties.” Bipartisanship in action, folks!

[2] Vogel, Kenneth and Sarah Wheaton, “Major donors consider funding Black Lives Matter,” November 13, 2015. POLITICO.

[3] According to the January 2019 Atlanta Jewish Times article “Who’s in the Box? Jews!”: “Ten of 32 NFL owners have some publicly known Jewish heritage.”

[4] Dams, Tim, “UK Channels ITV, 4Music, MTV and Comedy Central Mark ‘Blackout Tuesday,’” June 2, 2020. Variety.

49 replies
    • Thomas j Daley
      Thomas j Daley says:

      “It appears that Western man has an auto-immune disease that he Might not survive” You must be referring to the Christian practice of forgiveness and of abhorring the Jew practice of vengeance? I don’t disagree

  1. Thomas Daley
    Thomas Daley says:

    astonishing and astounding revelation! I bow before Mr. John Q. Publius and his ability to uncover this encyclopedic List of malefactors! The best article yet,informative,very timely and much needed explanation of how all the seaming Coincidences of opinions from all Quarters are actually connected,This information must be disseminated as widely as possible as soon as possible!

  2. Panadechi
    Panadechi says:

    If there was a scale from 1 to 10, at what point do you think we are in the destruction and dismantling of the whites? .. I believe that in 7..

  3. tito perdue
    tito perdue says:

    When I was young and naive, I believed white people might choose to defend themselves. But any such possibility
    has now been replaced by a white racial death wish.

    • TheOtherGeorge
      TheOtherGeorge says:

      Even when young I was never that naive. When I used to hear phrases like “you can have my guns when you pry them from my cold dead hands” (thank you Charlton Heston- a member of the Tribe, btw) , I just rolled my eyes. In later years, Internet Warriors had boasted of their bravado and what they would do “when the balloon goes up”, yada, yada and so on. Well hell, the Communist color revolution is damn near in full swing and you can be certain that in spite of all those millions of firearms owned by White Americans, not a single shot will ever be fired in anger by any of them in response to or anticipation of their impending South African White Citizen equivalency.
      And while I am on a rant, I’d just like to say on a completely unrelated note, that we have the so called “Greatest Generation” of Whites to thank for most of this, since it was their destruction of Germany and willing participation in World War 2 that enabled the subsequent destruction of Western Civilization. Think about it. They gave up the futures of their children and grand children for 50 years of comfort and prosperity for themselves. Generation of heroes indeed .

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            No, I don’t think he was Jewish. Just did a google search on him.

            Read Studs Terkel’s “The Good War.”

            The “greatest generation” did not want to be dragged into WW II, any more than their fathers wanted to be dragged into WW II.

            They were hornswoggled.

            This happens when white Americans — and white people in general — don’t think of themselves as a distinct group, and therefore fail to see Jews (who controlled both Presidents Wilson and Roosevelt) as another distinct group. A group that hates white people who aren’t Jewish….

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            No, Heston wasn’t Jewish. A quick search on google confirms that fact.

            Read Studs Terkel’s “The Good War.” The greatest generation was conned into fighting it, just like their fathers had been conned into fighting WW I.

            Little did they know that Roosevelt and Wilson were Jewish puppets.

            Or if they knew, they didn’t understand the significance of that fact.

            Most whites still don’t understand it.

      • Richard B
        Richard B says:

        “Even when young I was never that naive.”

        There’s no way you can prove that.

        So there’s no reason why we should believe you.

        Especially when your entire comments reeks of the same kind of sanctimoniousness the hostile elite never tires of.

        In your anxiety to impress us you ended up embarrassing yourself.

        But that’s what unreflective thinkers do.

        A little relection and revision before sending will cure that.

  4. Bruce
    Bruce says:

    This is the beginning of the end of white civilization as we know it. Unless the whites in the suburbs rise the to fight; the caucasian man is already dead in the water. I am 64 years old and still have some fight left in me, and a ten year veteran of the Marines of service under my belt. I was accussed a few years ago of seeing a Jew under every rock; this article and many others like it confirms my suspicions.

  5. Bob Thonton
    Bob Thonton says:

    Lol imagine blaming National Socialist China for this- the country which has solved the problem, unlike the Jew-ridden UK and USA.

  6. Thomas j Daley
    Thomas j Daley says:

    I replied to a comment and was not posted what’s goin on at TOO? You site is not responding correctly! Is TOO still in business? Please respond

    (Mod. Note: TOO is very much ‘still in business’.)

  7. Junghans
    Junghans says:

    The power and clout of the anti-White establishment is astounding! This is what the unrepresented, voiceless general White population is up against. Like Allison Weir says, if only [White] Americans knew. Indeed!

  8. Bruno
    Bruno says:

    It is truly amazing. Is there anyone here who believe that this would be possible? When I was a kid inside Detroit burn I believed that the problem would be solved to the extent did American cities wouldn’t be burnt. Busing Was in bloom and people still believed that they were represented In the Institute called Congress. I took my children to an all white country so they could attend an all white school. And now we have the Revolution. Will evolve to include armies by queer elite billionaires . Wish I could record more but the light is about to change. God help EuroMan’s progeny…

  9. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    The jew side of my family are in the Club. My maternal grandfather was disowned for being a communist. During my youth I was contacted by someone called a useful peasant.
    The useful peasant told me that Lenin had been funded by the Bank of England. Trotsky was funded by Wall Street. The late Prof Sutton believed that the USA created communism in Tsarist Russia so the latter would not be a competitor.
    The banks own everything, including communism, but for how much longer? Bullets, Rope or the Guillotine?
    The Russians are Europeans with white faces, unlike the American (redacted).
    The USA is declining, so I am optimistic for the White Man and his Civilisation.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      “… so I am optimistic …”

      I wouldn’t be if I were you. A moody nuclear superpower in decline with several drinks under its belt and Jews at the steering wheel can create a whole lot of misery in a matter of moments.

  10. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    One reasonable response to JQP’s articles is overwhelm and demoralization.

    I often wonder after reading them if that isn’t the intention.

    Every now and then I have my doubts about TOO.

    Is it, as some say, a fly paper site?

    I don’t doubt that some of the writers are sincere, as far as they go.

    But there’s always a point where a little reflection raises doubts.

    I comfort myself in the knowledge that 1, doubt is healthy, or can be, and 2. that to the extent TOO is genuine it wouldn’t mind knowing that at least one reader/commenter has their doubts on ocassion, and, because TOO presumably believes in freedom of speech, it wouldn’t mind anyone sharing those doubts.

    Of course, I know I’m not alone in feeling this way and that, as a result, have decided not to visit this site anymore. But, obviously, I’m here to speak for myself.

    I do continue to visit the site. But am just as content expressing doubt as I am in expressing my gratitude.

    Returning to JQP, another response one can have to his articles is that the wide-ranging and in-depth research simply shows the extent of the disease that is Jewish Supremacy Inc.

    And it’s a disease that will kill the parasite as well.

    I’m more than prepared to go into detail as to why.

    But maybe another time.

    This ought to do it for now.

    Except to say that all of this doom and gloom is very unbecoming and, at times, a little suspicious.

    • Lucius Vanini
      Lucius Vanini says:

      RICHARD B. I too have such misgivings from time to time, and not only in relation to TOO. It’s far from inconceivable that the instilling of defeatism might come from unexpected quarters…. In any case, I believe that the opera ain’t over till the fat lady sings, and that this present onslaught against may be an extreme pendulum swing leading to an unprecedently powerful counter-swing.

      As for the parasite who won’t survive the demise of his host, I’m in complete agreement with your prognosis. What the Talmudic bigots are doing–a grand cutting off the nose to spite the face–is belying the lofty intelligence they sweat to believe they possess. As regards some dimensions of the boomerang that’s curving back in their direction:

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      Richard B
      Imagine you are in the castle and the enemy has set fire to the drawbridge and a huge enemy army will soon enter. What is the point of telling your side that “don’t worry, everything can turn around if we stay positive”?

      No, it cannot be turned round just by encouraging each other to be optimistic. It is appropriate at this stage for the leaders of our side to tell the people what is about to happen to them. Apart from anything else we are being pre-warned, so if we want we can prepare as we see fit and at least not be surprised by the next level.

      Basically what has happened in my opinion is that the left has achieved a few milestones and we have lurched suddenly in a few weeks to the next level. The milestones are (1) A new generation has largely replaced the previous one, and the new generation has been indoctrinated by TV & the education system for their whole lives, unlike the previous one (2) The MSM has been taken over to such an extent that there is no longer any attempt to be fair in news reporting, so our side no longer has a voice (this refers to the majority, who rely on the MSM for their information and views).

      Today in ‘Classic FM’ Radio news they announced the locations of today’s BLM protests in advance, ie giving advance publicity via the airwaves, ie acting as the promoters.

      The white majority can choose to be angry or they can submit to the dominant message of the MSM. It appears that the people are choosing submission. However, in the comments under today’s British Daily Mail article (largest circulation newspaper and online, once right-wing, now far-left posing as conservative), when the DM called the statue defenders ‘far-right’, 40,000 ‘likes’ were in favour of the top comment vs just 4,000 against, and the top comments was to tell the DM to stop labelling the statue defenders as ‘far-right’.

      1. The white people are only submitting as for now the majority are still rich and safe and pampered, and their main problem is whether to buy new trainers or a new phone. They are overwhelmed with material riches and entertainment, and overfed.

      Put it this way – the Germans would never have voted for Hitler if their economy was already doing fairly well without him. In other words, people can quickly change their minds when hardship arrives.

      2. I do not see how we can do worse than the previous generation in the West did – they sacrificed their best men to the cause of helping the Soviets in WWII to defeat the only nation looking after white interests, and they ushered in and embraced the H industry and invited foreign hostile third world racist tribes to share the land and wealth that they were supposed to look after and then pass on to their descendants, not to other races from the third world.

      • pterodactyl
        pterodactyl says:

        … and, to reply to myself, another positive is the alternative views to the MSM via the internet, for those who are prepared to be open minded and look. Imagine the distress of the left to discover that the people are able to bypass their control of information.

        The internet has enabled the message of the right to get across at a time when the left was gradually taking over the media and publishing. A huge number have been woken up as it is harder to control the internet by its very nature.

        For example, a few years ago I was a strong supporter of Israel and went on Breitbart quite often. I thought Israel was a right-wing country and friendly to the West, as they were civilised and surrounded by barbarians (re ‘civilised’ – I still maintain you can stay in one of the Jew’s hotels in Israel and feel safe, but would fear for your life as a westerner if you stayed in any hotel in an arab hotel in Palestine, so they are ‘civilised’. They carry out their attacks on us with the legal system and money and publishing, not with primitive violence).

        Then one comment appeared in Breitbart ‘Kevin MacDonald gets it’ that is all. I looked him up and all my views changed is a fairly short period of time.

        This is the impact of the internet. Prior to this I had heard a very filtered story all my life, including about the H and the War.

      • Lucius Vanini
        Lucius Vanini says:

        PTERODACTYL: Optimism is as mischievous a mind-game as pessimism. To strive for as much realism as possible is what is ever needful.

        But there’s no sense in struggling if the war is already lost or can’t be won. Of course, if the reality IS that the war can’t be won, it behooves us as men of intellectual integrity to accept that. Yet it begs the question of why a website, say, purporting to be a beacon of White-Nationalist struggle, would keep presenting articles whose purpose is ostensibly to help WNs proceed more intelligently and therefore effectively. Why wouldn’t it just say, “This is our last message, boys: we’re going fishing, and so should you!”

        UNLESS, of course, the war is NOT yet lost and the site is presenting articles to make us think it is….

        • pterodactyl
          pterodactyl says:

          Lucius Vanini – some interesting ideas.
          “would keep presenting articles whose purpose is ostensibly to help WNs proceed more intelligently and therefore effectively”

          Certainly this will be one of the aims of the site.

          It seems to me this site is for those who want to read scholarly works on the subject, and let that help our cause as it will. The audience is the thinking people who want to read what intellectual and intelligent authors have to say. There is an audience for this kind of material, but not many sites to cater for it as far as I know (Red Ice have some pretty good interviews also)

          It is astounding to me that there is such little serious debate generally on the reasons why the West is committing suicide, and Kevin MacDonald approaches it from the ‘human behaviour’ approach in which we are directed/influenced by our genes, and in my view this is the best approach that explains everything that is going on, including why white people readily allow things to happen against their own race.

          Without intellectual resources, the right ends up as coming across as having very strong views but no deep and strong foundation. They can come across as irrational conspiracy theorists in the same category as those who think aliens made crop circles, without intellectual arguments to back them up.

          Before discovering Kevin MacDonald and then this site (and then Red Ice), my only exposure to the right was when they wrote comments in Youtube mainly, and these are mainly aggression and swearing ‘debates’, and these put me off the Nationalists to be honest, especially when they seemed to spend half their time attacking other right wing people who had the nerve to not be as aware as they were, which warranted abuse and attacks more intense than they would deliver to the left, for example their main hate figure was Tommy Robinson.

          The right just saying, as they do on Youtube, ‘it’s all the Jews’ is no use when trying to recruit others to their cause. They would do better referring to informative sites rather than using aggression. And another mistake the Nationalists make is that they save most of their venom for the likes of Tommy Robinson, who is a major recruiter for the Right. It is true that he wants to embrace all races and never be racist and has been befriended by the jews, but this can actually useful as it means he appeals to the moderate right people (he puts them on a path to enlightenment even if he does not complete the journey himself).

          Anyway – if nothing else the Occidental Observer if nothing else catalogues and documents the white downfall in such a way that no intellectual person who makes a genuine effort to hear all sides of the debate, no such person can claim in the future that ‘it is not my fault as I had no idea what was going on’

          In other words, the site removes all excuses of those who will one day say ‘white downfall was not my fault as I never had access to the information I needed to form a balanced view.’

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        We need to be careful when judging other generations. The immigration act of 1965 was passed when I (a boomer) was 12 years old and when my father (Greatest Generation) was 33 years old. 12-year-olds and 33-year-olds were not commonly to be found in Congress in 1965.

        Forced integration (“desegregation”), discrimination against white males (“affirmative action”), the sexual and feminist revolutions, and the introduction of cultural Marxism into education at all levels took place in the 1950s and 1960s.

        The rot started much earlier. Take your pick: Lincoln tearing up the Constitution during the Civil War, President Wilson’s shadow cabinet of Jews, the Whiskey Rebellion put down by Alexander Hamilton, the Communist uprisings of 1871 and 1848, the Reformation, the Great Schism….

        • Eric
          Eric says:

          Correction: “…and when my father (Greatest Generation) was 43 years old.” (not 33 years old).

        • Richard B
          Richard B says:

          “We need to be careful when judging other generations.”


          Generational Shaming is just more Divide and Conquer.

          If the hostile elite didn’t flood comments sections with paid trolls to push things like Boomer Blame and Generational Shame, they might as well have.

          It’s so corny and dumb.

      • Richard B
        Richard B says:

        “Basically what has happened in my opinion is…”

        Well, at least you’re honest.

        Because that’s what your comment was, opinion, mixed with some undeniable facts and some questionable assumptions.

        Like assuming I encourage “optimism” simply because I questioned TOO.

        My assumption about TOO and JQP is that both are strong enough to engage in open debate without allowing any anxiety to interfere.

        My perspective is simply this.

        When it comes to responding to the world we live in I’m less interested in Right or Wrong and more interested in Healthy or Unhealthy.

        One is less wrong and a lot healthier the more they dedicate themselves to reality.

        Or, what Orwell once referred to as “the power of facing unpleasant facts.”

        And it is a power.

        And, there’s no question that, to a certain extent, TOO, JQP, and many of the commenters here, including you and myself, value that power.

        But none of us individually can ever account for all of reality. That’s why we need each other.

        To the extent we don’t do that others are here to help.

        As far as I can see that is what made European man so great.

        In any event, regarding my comment about TOO and JQP, another fact of life is that none of us can live without hope and demoralization is, well, demoralizing.

        If the constant barage of simply stated facts without any corresponding sense of hope – which has nothing to do with optimism – then one is justified in feeling suspicious.

        After all, if you, TOO, and JQP feel that all is lost, what are we doing here?

        More to the point, if all hope is lost how is warning us going to help?

        • pterodactyl
          pterodactyl says:

          @Richard B “After all, if you, TOO, and JQP feel that all is lost, what are we doing here?”
          The TOO enlightened me based on a single comment in Breitbart ‘Kevin MacDonald gets it’ which prompted me to look him up. Before then I thought Israel was right-wing and Jews were allies of the West.

          In addition to enlightening those with open minds and who like facts to back assertions, TOO also is an academic account of the willing and strange suicide of the white race, in articles that are of a high quality, and this at least can give the Right the satisfaction of removing the excuse that many thinking people will try and offer for themselves in coming years: “We (the majority who do not want national suicide yet
          vote for it) had no idea what was going regarding what the Left and the Jews were up to, as there was no information out there to contradict the official narrative, so it is not our fault that we did nothing to stop it (doing something could be donating money to the Right, voting for patriots, and stop defending Jews and calling them ‘our ally’)”.

          On a different note, nothing to do with this site, I am more at ease in the current stage of suicide than previous stages,as the frustration of seeing the whites being uninformed about the real options facing them has now gone, this frustration has gone now that the left have completely revealed their hand in the past few weeks by the Left siding with BLM, the left siding with anarchy, the left showing their hatred of whites, and the way that the lefty authorities of the proposed New World order will not be on the side of white people. The people can now see clearly with no more doubt that our MSM & govts side with anti-white criminals, and the white majority can clearly see the future that the left wants for whites – which involves total white submission. The whites can all see that the name ‘BLM’ is allowed and the name ‘WLM’ would never be allowed.

          The current stage in our decline now involves an *informed* white majority, one no longer in any doubt about their future if they continue on the present path, whereas previously the whites were uninformed about what was in store for them. Previously, the majority of whites thought if we were just nicer and nicer to other races, who are ‘fundamentally just the same as us’, then in the end all races could live in peace and harmony in white countries. Now that the left have shown their full hand, we have reached the stage where the white majority can surely see that this harmony is not obtainable.

          By ‘informed’ I do not mean informed about their history, as most whites still believe they are the villains of history (colonialism, slavery, racism) as per the narrative, rather I mean the whites are informed about the choice they have to make for their future – survive as a race or do not survive, to submit and be conquered, or to resist (by voting – no courage is required, just an ‘X’ in a different box at voting time is all the white majority has to do.)

          Let us divide whites into the following
          a) 15% – white hating whites who have lefty genes that make them hate the superior in any form – including whites, and this 15% are in league with many powerful Jews.
          b) 10% – the Right, eg readers of TOO
          c) 75% – the majority

          Just consider ‘c’ as they are the ones who will decide what happens next to white races. They have the power to decide our future by the way they vote. A typical member of ‘c’ generally believes the following are now our options:

          1. Whites were the villains of history, so now we must submit the third world.
          2. Whites are the villains of history, but we do not have to submit.

          Whites find ‘2’ problematic as it will involve a level of … wait for it….racism! (faint, swoon), ie favour whites over other races, including in immigration policy.

          (My own view is that whites are not actually villains of history, but that is beside the point)

          All the majority whites have to do at this stage if they choose to survive rather than to submit is to vote for patriots not traitors, so no courage or bravery is being asked of them, just change their voting habits, and the elections in the West, despite corruption, are still sufficiently free and fair for patriots to win via the voting system.

          The people were misinformed about what WWII was about before the war, so they entered that phase of self-destruction in total ignorance as they were deceived and their patriotism was manipulated to make them go to War against their own best interests, and to help their enemies (communists) but as for this stage of national suicide (importing the third world, and increasing govt control of our lives), unlike the last War, they are not ignorant regarding where the elite is leading them.

          I feel less frustrated as no-one is any longer in the dark about the agenda, so whites can now vote for their own futures. The choice is very clear to all whites now – vote to submit and be conquered by their own white-hating left (and Jews), and the third world tribes, or vote to survive.

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            pterodactyl: Excellent comment. Whites no longer have any excuses. If they go down, it’s their own fault.

  11. Realist
    Realist says:

    “It appears that western man has an auto-immune disease. He may not survive.”

    Correct you are.

  12. pterodactyl
    pterodactyl says:

    “Liberal ideology has been readily embraced by Jews for many reasons,”

    “…..Jews are congenitally subversive and harbor very clear anti-White animus.”

    The second quote is the overriding motive in my opinion, and originates from their genes. We can see how this animus, or to use their word that they use about us, ‘hatred’ , we can see how it might have served to give victories to warring desert tribes in the prehistoric past and more recent past, for example it enables you to surround Jericho and attack it and ransack it, and ‘God promised it to you’ so that’s okay then even if the people of Jericho never did anything against you to provoke the attack. Hatred permits/allows/validates in a ‘moral way’ such acts of aggression that are unprovoked, as you are attacking a ‘hated’ enemy rather than an innocent one. The hated one that you attack can never be the victim, ((you)) are always the victim.

    This explanation (animus from the racial genes) explains more of what the Jews do, than trying to work out how Jews must, in some way, be seeking self-interest. The bottom line is that with a strong white West the Jews are safe and can live off the West’s wealth, ie safe and rich. And in a collapsed West the Jews are no longer rich or safe. Other races are not interested in their H story. The Jews must know this (that they will no longer be rich and safe), but this obvious scenario for the future does not in any way lessen their efforts to destabalise and change the West, not one iota of difference does it make.

    It is like a lawyer telling a divorcing couple that if they continue to fight over the divorce assets in the courts, both parties will end up with zero due to lawyers fees, and yet they still are willing to carry on, knowing they will lose everything. This shows how self interest is trumped by hatred. They are prepared to lose everything they have just to defeat ‘the enemy’.

    Another example of being controlled by your genes that ultimately is bad for you, is the way some pampered cats are compelled by their genes to fight the pampered cat next door, even though both cats have plenty of food and nothing but stress and injury can result from fighting. We can see how this behaviour might have some benefit in another context – another time and place – but, moved out of original context the behaviour pattern is now harmful to the animal.

    Similarly, the white race’s obedience to the prevailing culture, and blindness to the genetic heritage/background of others, and to see the person rather than the race, a tendency arising from white genes, this ‘welcoming of others’ and obedience to culture, this behaviour might have conferred advantage in previous times, and led to uniting peoples, but in the modern world the same tendencies are our downfall, as we are attempting to hug and share our wealth with hostile racist foreign third world tribes, and we are doing this because we slavishly obey the culture (‘don’t be a white racist’) that is being set for us by our own enemy-within left ((and allies))

    • Canadian guy
      Canadian guy says:

      I have a hard time understanding if the white man’s problem is submission to the dominant culture or ignorance. The average white western person is simply confused. They don’t understand that Jews are a hostile outgroup and a historical enemy. They don’t understand that their civilization has been hijacked by a hostile enemy. They don’t understand that their Jewish enemy is very well organized and funded and that the demand that whites ignore race is an absurdity. They don’t understand that it is Jews that are writing the “we whites are evil” books as “fellow whites” – these are guys like Tim wise and noel ignatiev. They don’t understand that the ADL and Antifa are both Jewish ethnic organizations and that the anti-racism game that Jews play is a way of basically installing an auto-immune disease in our civilization.

      If the average person understood how the game works I think fewer whites would be interested in submitting to the system and more would want to figure out how we can secure the existence of our people.

      But, few of us know history. Because we are unorganized we have no way of educating our own people. So, we have a massive knowledge asymmetry where we are pushed around and parasitized but few of us can even figure out who the enemy is and why our civilization is suffering.

      In that sense knowledge power. With knowledge you can at least identify who the enemies are.

      • pterodactyl
        pterodactyl says:

        @Canadian guy
        I think this is a good post and all your points are valid. But this applies to the hidden Jews and not to the unhidden and in-the-open Left, who are in league with the more hidden jews insofar as the aim of bringing down the West goes, and making the West multiracial.

        The whites can see the TV ads for themselves over representing blacks. They can see the illegal immigrants from the 3rd world pouring in to all white countries and the government doing nothing, and instead actively encouraging it. Surely the most unthinking educated white (there are many who can think enough to write a good academic essay but are naive in politics) – surely the most unthinking educated white can see with his own eyes that blacks are more criminal and can therefore see that the MSM is lying to them and is anti-white when it always portrays them as the victim.

        They must have all heard the term ‘anti-white’ by now and must surely realise by now that it is true of our elite and authorities and schools.

        Therefore I suggest it is submission more than ignorance, a desire not to stick their neck out, when they know really that ‘BLM’ is allowed and ‘WLM’ is not, and so cannot fail to observe that their own race now sides with those who hate it.

        Furthermore, if you look at a youtube video on whites taking back slaves for example, you see amongst the whites commenting more than just, ‘Oh sorry, let us pay you reparations’ – this on its own would be a naive but understandable response of a young white person indoctrinated all his life via school and TV – in other words *ignorance* alone could explain such a response to these anti-white slavery videos. No, we get more than such a response as simply ‘sorry’ from many whites; in many of the comments there is a very intense anti-whiteness amongst many whites, an intense hatred.

        In my view these loud and lefty whites bully the unthinking white majority into silence at university and in the media, and the majority whites submit to these bully whites and are not ignorant about the anti-white agenda. But I cannot understand why they even support lefty whites who are anti-white when voting in secret. It is as if they have surrendered their whole hearts and minds and intellect to the left.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        It’s no secret that you and I agree much less often than we disagree, but I have always seen you as someone who makes his meaning admirably clear. Here, for once, I simply don’t understand what you are saying. Do you mean to say that the roots of action lie in instinct—surely this is virtually a truism—and that KM, in his books and comments, either (1) fails to adequately understand this notion or (2) gives it insufficient weight?

        Please be kind enough to expand a bit on what you wrote.

  13. Eric
    Eric says:

    I wrote a letter to the editor that was published in my local newspaper. My letter cast doubt on the official Covid-19 narrative. It was backed up with verifiable facts and statistics. Its tone was moderate, but pointed.

    The local newspaper, I should note, was recently bought out by USA Today, which — like the New York Times — is out to spread fear and panic over Covid-19.

    I didn’t expect my letter to be published, but it was.

    Then, one week later, a letter appeared in the editorial section of the paper that misstated what I had written in my original letter (in effect creating, and then knocking down, a straw man) and tried to discredit what I had said by throwing out a lot of numbers and claims that were not sourced or verifiable.

    I wrote another letter, pointing this out, and of course it wasn’t published.

    Will anyone be surprised to hear that the letter “refuting” my letter was written by a man (from a nearby town) named Friedman (cough, cough)?

    They are ever vigilant. Indeed, they are.

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      Eric – your first letter slipped through, as not all newspaper staff are fully aware of what they are meant to print or censor. I suppose their censoring skills develop over time, and the person who allowed your letter through was not fully expert yet, and still believed the paper was there to give both sides. Obviously those who do not pick up the unspoken rules ie the censoring rules, which are never actually spelled out but must be absorbed, such types simply never get promotion or are moved to the Sports or Used Cars section.

      Once K MacDonald got an ad published in a university magazine. Someone must have got into trouble for letting that one through!

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        I think their propaganda technique might be to publish the “undesirable” letter (in order to seem “fair and balanced”) and then publish any letter that comes in later and criticizes the first letter. That way they can claim to be innocent. “We’re just publishing what people out there submit to us.” I guess you could call this “indirect editing.”

        The test is whether they allow letters to be published that criticize other letters that support their editorial position. I’m trying to figure that out right now.

        I just thought it was funny that a man named Friedman (cough, cough) wrote the second letter. Every. Single. Time. LOL

        • pterodactyl
          pterodactyl says:

          @eric – good point, so in the end ‘right wing’ views are sometimes allowed but always with someone correcting them, with the discussion ending at that point.

  14. ATBOTL
    ATBOTL says:

    Grassroots white conservatives are not reacting to the riots by becoming more pro-white, but by trying to pander to blacks even more.

Comments are closed.