Rogen & Silverman in Santa Inc. and Other Christmas Excrescences

Seth Rogen & Silverman in Santa Inc. and Other Christmas Excrescences. The trailer is below.

43 replies
  1. Jack McArthur
    Jack McArthur says:

    I have never heard of the poor whore before but coincidentally last week I came across her saying “I hope the Jews did kill Christ, I’d do it again. I’d Fucking do it again in a second!”

    The clip of the movie resulted in such a backlash in down votes and comments that Youtube, owned by the tribe, had to disable the down votes feature, across the entire site, and then disable the comments feature.

    • Birhan Dargey
      Birhan Dargey says:

      It is so ironic to hear about the Sarah Silverman Christmas Special wtf??? I was watching the Silverman/Rogen Santa Inc. as well as the Sacha Borat repugnant antichristian/anti white gentile sick trash. I wish had the power to counter/reply to these holocaust/paranoi antichristian fanatics. I would produce a show about a PETA activist attending the Kasparov JewishHoliday…or a Rabbi biting and swallowing a babies penis during circumcision and the parents demanding the penis back…or white deplorable gentile hick Cheerleaders dancing with no panties “The Flashing Pussies” among ultraorthodox hassidic jewish men….funny????..

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      “I hope the Jews did kill Christ, I’d do it again. I’d Fucking do it again in a second!”

      What do ordinary Jewish people think when they read such things?
      Are the proud of the dominance of their mafia, that Jews can say such things? Or still paranoid that they aren’t dominant enough, because they understand this is how their fellow Jews feel, so they will always express such things, so it follows they must oppress their hosts even more?
      Do they ever wonder why this hatred persists in them, even when all their material needs have been satisfied, far and beyond their imaginations?

      I’d bet the gamut of Jewish interpretations of things like this would take forever to write down, and if you think about it, would actually be infinite.
      This is the Jewish curse. To us it just appears as bizarre hostility and strange mental illnesses.
      At bottom it’s nervous restlessness that can never, ever be satiated.
      We should remind ourselves at this time of the year that as they hurt us, ruin what we love and drag our forefathers and beliefs through the dirt, it’s still better to be us than them.
      As much as they make us suffer, we know they suffer worse. And they know we know it.
      They are the damned. An accursed race, under a demonic religion.
      It’s not just silly, superstitious sentimentality to pray for your tormentors. In the end, it’s the only rational thing to do.

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        In all seriousness, I believe your time would be better spend on coming up with solutions and plans rather than descriptions and, quite honestly, inconsequential opinions. Endless descriptions-useful as they are for the neophyte and unknowledgable-do not move the needle. Looking at a mechanical or actual casualty and expositing on the perception is not actionable.

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          “Looking at a mechanical or actual casualty and expositing on the perception is not actionable.”

          Please tell me you don’t speak like this in real life?
          Also, if I ever sound as up my own back passage as this, will someone please shoot me in the head?

    • Harry Warren
      Harry Warren says:

      Has anyone bothered to ask her why, if she had the opportunity, she’d fall over herself to kill Christ again? The answer would be interesting. Who can we ask? Anyone got her email address?

    • Mark Collings
      Mark Collings says:

      The production code came about because church organizations, particularly the Catholic Church, advised their members to boycott Hollywood films. It worked. Hollywood saw a huge drop in income and capitulated. Time to do it again.

  2. Alan Donelson
    Alan Donelson says:

    SANTA is an anagram for SATAN. First Christ’s Mass became Christmas, joined later by Hanukkah, Rudolph, fancy-wrap gifts for all and sundry, then Boxing Day. It’s been down hill for an awfully long sled ride. ‘Nuf said. We’ve reached bottom.

    • Harry Warren
      Harry Warren says:

      ‘Santa’ is the Spanish word for ‘Saint’. In Spanish, ‘Santa’ is a contraction of ‘Santana’, both of them popular Spanish girls’ names meaning ‘holy’. But if you prefer to believe it secretly means ‘Satan’, that’s up to you.

      • Alan Donelson
        Alan Donelson says:

        Harry Warren, thank you for that. I myself have delighted my ears with the music of Santana for many, many years. Whatever other uses these letters may serve, whatever meanings they may have, open or occult, SANTA is and will always remain an anagram for SATAN. Make of it what you will.

          • Alan Donelson
            Alan Donelson says:

            Trusting that further growth of this tangential twig will not detract from the larger picture (this comment board’s Tree of Knowledge), I first point out that, in Spanish, SANTO is proper for a male saint, in contrast to, say Santa Maria, Santa Barbara, and Santa Clara, among others, all names of cities in Kalifornication. Claus is MALE, even if a LAME substitute for the “real thing” — and here I do not refer to Coca Cola!

            We have predictable exceptions now, don’t we? For example, “Santa Claus Is Gay and Falls in Love with a Man Named Harry in Sweet Norwegian Christmas Ad”. LINK:

            As an anagram for SATAN, SANTA fits the bill!

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      “Santa” may be an anagram for “Satan,” but for people who aren’t dime novelists, screenwriters, or addicts of cruciverbalism, the useful information to be found in this and most other anagrams is nil. Yes, we inhabit a world where crypsis and double meanings abound, but it is very, very seldom that the wielders of these weapons utilize the simpleminded anagram in their work of confusion and misdirection.

      That having been said, in the medieval Christmas carol usually identified by the clause that is its refrain, “Nova, nova! ‘Ave’ fit ex ‘Eva’,” the anonymous author of the words employs an anagram to communicate the “breaking news” of Christmas: that from the fallen mother of humanity has issued the immaculate mother of God. The “news” came as a cruel blow to Satan, in that ordinary men and women could now become “Santas”—with pardon begged for the macaronic plural form.

      Merry Christmas to all would-be Santas. We’ll get to the Satans in due course.

    • Alan Donelson
      Alan Donelson says:

      Thank you! I shall read with great interest your essay. I have had many copacetic thoughts along those lines for some time.

      You might consider looking into the Holy Order of MANS (HOOM) and, in particular, one Rev. Earl. W. Blighton, known as “Father Paul” and, along with other spiritual figures, founder of that Order. In a previous project (?), Rev. Blighton established “Science of Man”. Former students and members maintain websites memorializing these organizations, Father Paul’s writings and lectures. For many years, I myself participated in out-reach programs of HOOM (a vowed brotherhood accepting both men and women), called “Discipleship Movement” and “Christian Community Movement”.

      One reported statement of Father Paul stuck in my mind over the many years since the dissolution of HOOM. Father Paul claimed to be the reincarnation of Saul|Paul.

      At the risk of going overboard — from the web, a decent summary overview.
      Holy Order of MANS, Earl W. Blighton: Monastic New Age group that practiced esoteric, mystical religion blending biblical themes with reincarnation and other concepts from Eastern religions and the occult. Blighton, an ex-engineer who was once fined for practicing medicine without a license, began the order in 1968. “MANS” was an acronym for a phrase revealed only to initiates. After advancing through the order, men reached the status of Brown Brother of the Holy Light, while women might become an Immaculate Sister of Mary for Missionary Training. After the death of Blighton, the group underwent radical changes. The majority of followers converted to Eastern Orthodoxy and the order eventually was transformed into Christ the Savior Brotherhood, a sect of Eastern Orthodoxy. Several competing groups later formed claiming to preserve Blighton’s original purpose and message. They include the Gnostic Order of Christ, Science of Man, and the American Temple.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      Blacks aren’t the enemy of whites. That doesn’t make sense, the two races got on happily and productively in America for 400 odd years, until blacks were weaponised against whites. And first black society itself had to be ruined, so there are losers all round here.
      If a knife is picked up and weaponised against you, it doesn’t mean the problem lies in knifes. We all know who and what the real problem is.
      Yes, blacks are a problem, they annoy people, they are dangerous. But hating on them(not that I’m saying that’s what this guy is doing) is a distraction. Abortion is more than an issue of demography or numbers. Abortion is evil. It lives on as evil long after the event itself. Ask anyone who’s been involved with an abortion.
      Us using weapons of evil will rebound back on us. Nothing wrong with fighting your enemies or for survival. But evil is always wrong, morally and strategically, even if it sometimes seems tactically sound.
      But again, blacks aren’t the enemy.
      If the black population was 10x what the white population was in America, but it was the original, pre-1960’s, pre-koshar black population, the whites would be fine. They’d sleep soundly with thier doors unlocked.
      This is proved by whites living in similar relative numbers with blacks in Africa.
      The historical record *proves for all time* there is no issue between blacks and whites. No matter what anyone sais now, or in the future.
      The historical record also recommends separation between the races, not just because this is better for us, it’s also much farer to blacks. Just as it states the odd black can live amongst whites, just as the odd white can live amongst blacks.
      This stuff is very simple. We don’t need to abort their children. This is ghoulish beyond belief. When we start thinking this way, we really have lost the plot.
      The arguments for Christianity being a Jewish scam on Europeans given here are good, as they always are. We’ve all heard these arguments before, so instead of that, I’ll try an example: When you think like a Christian, you never imagine aborting other peoples’ babies is a good idea.

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        The Indo-European and the Asian cannot live in the same society with Blacks and other indigenous people. In the real world, there are examples of societies that are sufficiently homogenous. In Singapore the overwhelming percentage of ethnic majority are Chinese. It is the Confucian and other Chinese aspects of this heritage that have made Singapore successful and tranquil.

        Very few contemporaries have concrete ideas, plans, or strategies that are thought out and enumerated. The amount of observation, description, opinions, and nostalgia based palliatives are endless.

        Joseph Conrad’s novels and his personal live reveal essential differences in men. Specifically, is the Man Of Action, one who does something with Reality that is critical, concrete, and requires great intellectual, emotional, and physical skill. That type of person in our current zeitgeist of virtual realities, excesses of physical surpluses, and pushing buttons to make things happen.

        Men used to seek out adventure like sailing and communion with the Real World.

        • JM
          JM says:

          “The Indo-European and the Asian cannot live in the same society with Blacks and other indigenous people.”

          In the Pacific Islands, Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia, the native populations have problems living with the Chinese and numerous, periodic, “pogroms” and legislative “solutions” have occurred. Canada and Australia are getting a taste of the problem as well. Mass Chinese emigration to the West on the grounds of “over-population” or economic backwardness are no longer valid. The same applies to India.

          It seems that many Americans put so much emphasis on the “Black” problem, as real as it obviously is, that Asian migration gets a free pass.

      • Lucius Vanini
        Lucius Vanini says:

        To regard as non-inimical a demographic which inflicts 1480 to 1800 violent crimes on one’s people PER DAY, is possible only to a true-believing Christian–that is, someone accustomed to crediting asinine fables and the crazy idea that one does well to bless and pray for those who despitefully use us…. the latter idea no doubt an ingredient which Rabbi Saul of Tarsus intentionally included in the toxic cocktail he served to Europe.

        Whatever the reason for which U.S. blacks are particularly violent toward Euroamericans, the reality is that they are so, and the more of them who exist the more endangered Euroamericans are. Of course, YOU would be fine with America having as many blacks as there are in Brazil, the land with the most blacks outside of Africa–90 mill–and an average of about 60,000 homicides per year. By the way, did you know that high rates of black violence are all but global, that though the American black murder rate is stratospheric (staying at around 20 murders per 100,000, eight times the White rate and 16 times the Asian-American rate) it’s not high compared with South Africa’s (36 per 100k) or Jamaica’s (46)?

        Speaking of South Africa, don’t you know that there’s terrific black-on-White violence there? And that it’s anything but unheard-of in Kenya? In my other country, Italy, black-on-White violence is frequent relatively to the number of Sub-Saharan invaders there. No, true believer, blacks are a simpler phenomenon, a less advanced stage of humanity and typified by low intelligence and low impulse control, and accordingly their resentments oftener find expression in physical acts.

        Everything the Arabian scholar al-Jahiz (776-868 CE) said so long ago–“We know that blacks are the least intelligent and the least discerning of mankind, and the least capable of understanding the consequences of actions”–has since been corroborated by science and experience.

        And speaking of Asian-Americans, they see and hear the same demonization of Whites peddled by the neo-Marxist media and Hebrewwood movies; plus Chinese-Americans, who are the largest Asian-American group, knowingly descend from immigrants who were kicked around in every way when they came to America; but while it’s not uncommon of them to have a jaundiced eye for Euroamericans, they are much less violent even than Euroamericans are and if they seek revenge on us it’s by being supreme in scholastic achievement and having higher incomes on average than any other U.S. demographic. Not difficult for them with their stratospheric IQ.

        So abortion is evil, is it? Maybe killing enemies who invade one’s ancestral land is too? (Well, both propositions are certainly consonant with doctrinal–that is to say scriptural–Christianity.) That’s YOUR opinion. You’ve yet to see that morality is OPINION. Not intrinsically or objectively valid, but subjective and perspectivist. Well, the notion of morality as truth is part of Rabbi Saul’s scam, though not peculiar thereto and is part of every ideological-dope pusher’s arsenal.

        I don’t deal in good and evil. I’m a European and Euroamerican dominated by a passionate love of my heritage and extended family: I deeply desire their continuance and well-being, and am for anything that might shield them from damage, that might preclude the damage being greater, if some damage there must be.

        I don’t expect you to understand this, because your highest loyalty is to an absurd superstition, and whatever racial loyalty you might have can be checkmated by an appeal to that superstition. And you can’t see that that can hardly be an accident lol! You’d buy a talking dog from a ventriloquist. You’ve bought a bill of goods that not only has the effect of impairing your instincts of self-preservation but was peddled by someone, Rabbi Saul, who had every motive for endeavoring to impair those instincts!

        You don’t see it, and I suppose that’s to be expected in people who believe in sin, and congenital guilt (original sin), and Vicarious Atonements, and guys walking on water and getting born of virgins and raising the dead and rising from the dead and feeding a crowd with a little grub and turning water into wine lol, etc., etc.

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          Hi Lucius. Great reply. That is the spirit that is sorely lacking in these threads, it’s heartening to see. Most just roll over and die if you contradict them, or worse, act like total faggots and start insulting you personally, like pathetic little bitches.
          Actually I agree with what you say pretty much. The blacks just now, yeah, its mahem. No doubt.
          My point was simply that it wasn’t always like this in America. What it was before, two communities living alongside each other, each keeping to themselves, was what grew organically.
          Just like when white communities existed in Africa, if left alone, there really wasn’t any problem.
          It was beneficial for the Africans, and there was no shortage of whites coming out from Europe. It worked for all concerned.
          Blacks and whites can live together in the same area, if they live separately.
          All your examples just demonstrate what happens when you add Jews into the mix.
          I’m well aware of everything going on in South Africa etc just now, and the worse it gets, the more I’m struck by how seemingly idyllic it was in the past, pre-Jewish meddling.
          You surely cannot believe blacks in America, S Africa or Jamaica would be in the mess they are in now if the Jews hadn’t totally degenerated their culture? They simply were not like this before.

          Yes, abortion is evil, no, killing invaders is not. Of course this is my opinion, so of course this is my belief. I’m well aware of this.
          I state it so bluntly because no one does this anymore, and I know it gets a rise out of people. I’m well aware that just stating such and such is evil is not going to convince anyone of anything, but it does sometimes provoke a strong reaction, as you demonstrate.
          Morality is truth is part of Rabbi Saul’s scam? Do you have an article on this particular point, I’d like to read that, as I read your other one.
          I didn’t want to get into the debate over whether all of Christianity is a Jewish trick, for obvious reasons, that’s why I focused on the blacks part.
          Look, we both believe in such a thing as truth, yes? Well it’s my opinion Christianity is a surer way to truth than anything else.
          Yes you can make jokes about miracles, very good, I could do that too, any fool could. Though I’d have thought such things were beneath you.
          Half the point of being a real, true, believing Christian, of which I am definitely not sadly, is that it’s supposed to be beyond logic in some ways, because it demands FAITH. If you believe it and can explain it, then that’s just logic, not faith.
          We aren’t supposed to understand all of it, it’s not of this world. And to have faith we have to choose to have it.
          I choose to try(though often fail) to make myself believe in the supernatural parts because I believe it is true, and because it is good.

          You say you “are dominated by a passionate love” for etc etc. I could easily reply that that sounds like something a teenage girl would say, and don’t worry, you’ll grow out of it.
          It’s all too easy to make these cheep wise cracks, I could do it to what you choose to believe in my sleep, don’t worry about that.
          But what’s the point? We are both on the same side, it’s all been done a thousand times before and on this point, I ain’t gonna change your opinion nor you mine.
          You say you don’t deal in good and evil, I half guessed that, but I presumed you do in truth. Well it’s true, it’s a fact, in my opinion, that blacks are 100% absolutely not the problem at all, as I said.
          We do both want the same things pretty much, but I reckon it’s a mistake, that it’s bad for us, it’s against our interests using abortion as a weapon against innocent children, whatever colour they may be.
          We cannot become what we are fighting.
          To you it’s just a racial battle. To me it’s so much more than that, it’s a spiritual battle.
          If we win my battle, the racial thing takes care of itself.

          • Lucius Vanini
            Lucius Vanini says:

            “Yes, abortion is evil….” say you! That’s YOUR opinion, and only an opinion. For me, a fair trade would be the aborting of ALL black-American embryos to spare one lovely Euroamerican girl from having her nose broken or front tooth knocked out by a “random” hate-attack by a barely human biped.

            “Morality as truth”–yes, of course it’s part of your icon’s scam. Not only of his, though, as all peddlers of superstitions and cults must represent their snake oil as intrinsically and objectively correct. Do I believe in truth? Yes, and here’s an example: “Strawberry ice cream is a kind of food, consisting partly of a kind of berry and often used for dessert, that is widely used in Western Civilization.” However, “Strawberry ice cream is the best ice cream” is an opinion. A value judgment. Relative to, not independent of, the valuer.

            No, we are NOT on the same side at bottom, only marginally. I could never do what you do–e.g., go on about the Jews all day and then swallow utter shite concocted by Jews and most of all by a Rabbi who had every motive for endeavoring to harm Europeans. If it were not tragic for us all that such as you are in our ranks (though not really quite OF us), I’d be rolling on the ground guffawing at such inanity.

            Since your thing isn’t race, but escaping hell and gaining heaven, an appeal to your creed would prompt you to throw all of us over for the sake of blacks who are similarly deluded; and I’m convinced that your animus toward Jews isn’t based on their machinations which harm Euros but on their rejecting your lol Redeemer…. Since I don’t credit the historicity of Jesus, I don’t believe they rejected anybody; but you do, and you also believe that their handing him over to the Romans resulted in his death and therefore in a Vicarious Atonement, thanks to which you can be blissful forever! In which case you should be grateful to the Jews and to Judas most of all, as they were instruments of Divine Providence. But that’s logic, and crutchtianity has had very little to do with logic.

            Yes–I’ll repeat it for you: “I’m a European and Euroamerican dominated by a passionate love of my heritage and extended family….” You don’t know the half of it. I do believe I’m abnormal in this, but also think that that’s the problem. I could wish that such abnormality were normality among Whites.

            You of course don’t feel any such inconvenience. You have your sights upon sitting on Jesus’ right hand for all eternity (remember not to fart), not upon anything so mundane as seeing your extended family thrive and be well.

            That’s why you think the gestation of millions of black embryos is better than that millions of out-of-the-womb Whites of all ages are spared millions of violent hate-crimes inflicted by unaborted blacks. As I said in the article, but for abortion the black-American population might easily be twice what it is–80 mill+–and the 1480 to 1800 black-on-White violent crimes per day might be 2960 or 3600. While I’m grateful for any factors capable of precluding harm to my favored group, you are capable of favoring their abolition lol!

            Oh, so you might’ve thought that joking about your “miracles” was “beneath me”? Oh hell no, pilgrim! They’re so funny. My favorite is the one about the guy who lives to 950 and saves all the Earth’s land critters–in his boat lol! Say, I know a couple of other good books you’d like: those by The Brothers Grimm and Han Christian Andersen. Aesop is great too.

            Faith. The Eighth Deadly Sin. Believing for no better reason than that you want to. This is what a person of INTEGRITY does: believes what he must, not what he wants; bases belief on evidence and reason, and if there is not enough of either in connection with a proposition, suspends his judgment, says “I DON’T KNOW” (unless the evidence and reason are strongly against a proposition and impel him toward outright rejection). But this is Pagan, the stuff of Hellas and Rome, and your own orientation is toward Jerusalem, which, if memory serves me, is in the land of the Jews.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      If any other group of human beings on earth had an issue with STD’s in babies, you’d be surprised and bemused. When you hear Jewish babies often have this problem, you’re like “yeah. Sounds about right.”

  3. Chris
    Chris says:

    Behold the ADL, in levels of unfalsifiability previously thought impossible:

    “The number 109 is white supremacist numeric shorthand for an
    antisemitic claim that Jews have been expelled from 109
    different countries.”

    Why is the claim false? Is it only 108 or 107? Or is it zero and Christians have been exceedingly philo-Semitic? Who knows? The only thing we know for sure is that if you are someone Jews don’t like who makes the claim, then you will be banished from polite society.

    • eric smith
      eric smith says:

      Chris, I am currently reading “Jewish Policy in Medieval Europe” and it seems the anti jewish laws were about Jews not being allowed to own Christian slaves and converting Christians to Judaism more than anything else. They were usually ignored. The jews probably owned ALOT of Christian slaves. There was no horrific treatment to speak of. The laws were more or less window dressing.
      Also Kennedy’s PT boat the was cut in half by a Jap destroyer and broke his back was…
      PT109. Odd.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Why is the claim false?

      Note that the statement declares the claim anti-Semitic, not necessarily false. Indeed, truth and falsity are categories of merely incidental interest to our Jewish masters, especially when they sense that the walls of their house of cards are being probed.

      How much longer, I wonder, till truth itself is reflexively deemed anti-Semitic? If Rogen and Silverman—and God alone knows how many more of their malice-driven Tribe—had their way, the question might long since have been rendered moot.

      As Christmas is the holy day that celebrates the birth of the Incarnate Son of Truth, I sincerely wish Kevin and all contributors, commenters, and readers a truly joyous Christmas.

  4. Sanjay
    Sanjay says:

    My understanding is that this article provides insight into Ashkenazi ethnocentrism – gene-culture co-evolution. We have a religion that millennia ago incorporated religious rules that mandated extreme levels of Psychopathic actions against Gentiles, perhaps because the Rabbis who wrote these rules either truly believed that these protocols were the will their deity (high Religiosity or even schizophrenia), or they just fabricated these rules out of a secular belief that encouraging these Psychopathic behaviors would motivate co-religionists to ruthlessly extract resources from the Gentiles. Those co-religionists who simply did not have enough ethnocentrism to carry out these extreme behaviors towards Gentiles would defect or be ostracized from the community, leaving only the most ethnocentric people in the religion. These ethnocentrically enhanced people would then create even more Psychopathic rules of religion to be inflicted upon Gentiles, again filtering out those who did not have enough ethnocentrism to agree to engage in this higher level of out-group misanthropy, leaving even a more ethnocentric gene-pool behind – gene-culture co-evolution. The key point for me is how this article describes severely misanthropic rules of the religion, which gives an idea of just how extreme the level of ethnocentrism must have been consequentially selected for. Of course, the basis for my thoughts here are Prof. MacDonald’s research.

    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      The greatest basis and force for genetic selection of Europeons’ declining desirable traits however much based in genetics, are the genocidal, fratricidal wars of the past millennia. From the 1600s on, the utensils and weapons of war became more lethal, thus providing more thrilling and extensive slaughter of one’s people and adversaries. As Frank Salter once observed, the Australian men are washed up and washed out as far as manliness, which includes protection of their womenfolk, tribal and ethnic security and wellbeing. IOW, defense against common enemies.

      The sobering and unflattering facts are that YourRope has been going in, believing in, actions from ideas and ideals that were insupportable, self deceiving, and suicidal-if not actually masochistic.

      As for white virility, the multicultural reality across the West since the 1970s has been that the founding ethnic group is subordinated and reduced demographically. Crocodile Dundee was played by an Anglo Australian (Paul Hogan), and Anglos have been the big losers from large-scale indiscriminate immigration introduced from the 1970s. The same is true in the United States. For Americans, one of the attractions of the film is that Mr. Dundee reminded them of their frontier ancestors: rugged, direct, masculine. He even carried a knife that resembled the one made famous by Jim Bowie.

      The reality is that Australian Anglos, like American whites, are not virile, but henpecked by the nanny state. They are pecked by affirmative action. Their history is falsified in the movies. Their children are turned against them by PC history classes. They are vilified by the mainstream media. In England, their young women are raped en masse by immigrant Pakistanis. “Henpecked” is an inadequate metaphor; these pathetic nonentities are on their way to become minorities in their own homelands

      • Chris
        Chris says:

        “The greatest basis and force for genetic selection of Europeons’ declining desirable traits however much based in genetics, are the genocidal, fratricidal wars of the past millennia. From the 1600s on, the utensils and weapons of war became more lethal, thus providing more thrilling and extensive slaughter of one’s people and adversaries. ”

        Two early 20th-century Russian historians did a precise calculation of the severity of war by century. The most peaceful century was like the 11th, 12th or 13th (I can’t remember exactly ). If you read Jones’ Barren Metal it is easy to piece together why: the slow emancipation of the Jews which had its culmination in Napoleon and loosening the strictures against Usury beginning at the time of the Medici’s. Once there was a Jew whispering in a king’s ear to go to war, and showing him how to finance it with money tricks, there were more “fratricidal wars”. Before Jewish money and finance, you could only wage war in the seasons that the crop was in in the territory you were invading.

    • Al Ross
      Al Ross says:

      “Severely misanthropic” ? Surely not .

      Just racially “severely preferential,” No Indian could understand that concept, of course.

    • Al Ross
      Al Ross says:

      Some Indian festivals are not celebrated throughout India , e.g., Thaipusam , a pre – Vedic Dravidian Aboriginal celebration which is only a holiday in Tamil Nadu state .

      Of course , had not Gandhi been assassinated by a fellow Hindu , the Indian Constitution might have escaped its secular drafting .

      Gandhi was the finest hypocrite of his day . He preached non violence while also encouraging the Japanese to rid India ( which was never a country, just an agglomeration of mutually unintelligible territories ) of the British.

      In other words , ” I am a peace – lover and can’t kill the Brits , so please do it for me ,General Tojo ,”

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        I’ve written on other occasions that I frequent this site to learn things about which I am ignorant. Your first paragraph, Al, perfectly exemplifies why coming here is not a waste of my time. Thank you.

        As for your very apt comments about Gandhi, they demonstrate yet again that the less he is regarded as a plaster saint, the more three-dimensionally interesting he becomes. Cynicism about his legend (especially in the CIA/MI-5 sense of that term) is still insufficiently widespread.

  5. Old School Counselor
    Old School Counselor says:

    Authentic Europeans have much to celebrate this time of year with the amalgam of Pagan and Christian rituals. We are part of it all. Foreigners can join in or do their own things, but we own the season.

  6. Douglas Bridgebain
    Douglas Bridgebain says:

    And then they wonder why their detractors describe their tribe as being “the leading purveyors of filth.”

    Or why members of another blessed religion refer to them as “the world’s termites.”

  7. Pat Kittle
    Pat Kittle says:

    The (((shysters))) now feel emboldened enough to tell us what they really think of us — their mockery of Christianity is aimed at all Whites.

    Imagine them satirizing their fellow chicken-swinging kosher-torturing wall-humping eruv-stringing tribesclowns.

    OK, enough sleaze.

    How about some good news — the James Webb Space Telescope launched this morning, and everything’s A-OK (so far)!

  8. james ginn
    james ginn says:

    Sarah Silverman is the poster girl for a certain group of Jewish that are readily recognizable to anyone who has lived in cities having a large Jewish population. These Jewish are simply strange from the getgo in their temperament and style of speech. Their mindsets have been corrupted by the dysfunctional families wherein they were raised. They do not represent all Jewish. And they are much more of a danger to themselves than they would ever be to the Christian community.

Comments are closed.