Russia is Back, and so is History

Ukraine as it was before 2014, when it was neutral, independent and whole

I remember the Cuban Missile Crisis when I was thirteen and for the only time in my life nuclear war seemed like a very real and imminent possibility. I also remember the very different feelings I had in the spring of 1989 when we saw the first definite signs of the end of the Cold War that began before I was born. I remember expressing the hope that with the external distraction of the Cold War that had so engaged the thoughts, passions and energies of potential pro-Whites (“White” here meaning European) for so long coming to an end, our people would finally refocus their attention on the much more dangerous internal enemy. I also allowed myself to hope that Russia would join us in a Pan-European grand alliance.

Alas, that hope was not to be. Within the next several years the Soviet Union not only collapsed politically but the Russian successor state also suffered an economic collapse, largely engineered and exploited by U.S. and Russian Jewish actors, that wreaked more havoc and suffering on the people than the Great Depression of the 1930s did upon the United States, causing the Russian people to feel that the friendship and trust they had extended to America had been betrayed. This was followed by betrayal in international relations, as the assurances given by Western leaders that they would not take advantage of Russia’s weakness to expand the anti-Russian NATO alliance eastward was repeatedly violated, and subversive Western NGOs worked to promote color revolutions and regime change in several of the successor states, most notably and fatefully with the U.S. engineered anti-Russian coup in Ukraine in February 2014, when Russian President Vladimir Putin finally offered resistance and pushed back by annexing Crimea and supporting breakaway states in the Donbass.

In the quarter century since 1989, and especially after the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991, the United States had enjoyed the so-called “unipolar moment,” a period of military dominance and effective global hegemony, that lasted without noteworthy challenge until at least the Georgian-Ossetian conflict of August 2008. One could even describe this period as a Pax Americana except for the numerous military campaigns, nearly all conducted by the United States and its allies, that made it far from peaceful. Near the beginning of this epoch Francis Fukuyama heralded it with his much-celebrated book The End of History and the Last Man (1992) in which he maintained the world had evolved institutionally into a final human state of perpetual peace based on universal liberal democracy. Samuel P. Huntington’s The Clash of Civilizations (1996) and prominent neocon Robert Kagan’s The Return of History and the End of Dreams (2008) countered Fukuyama’s thesis, largely based on the continued existence of authoritarian and autocratic governments, but it still enjoyed broad acceptance. During this period, it was as if, as far as the West was concerned, Russia had exited the stage of history as an independent actor, and its interests and capabilities were generally ignored or dismissed as inconsequential. As a result, during this period, it seemed that events at the scale of Ossetia in 2008 and Crimea in 2014  were not sufficient to categorically refute the “end of history” idea. But with Russia’s current invasion or “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine there can no longer be any doubt or denial. History is definitely back, and in a very big way, in fact roaring back, and Russia is back with it as an independent actor of the first rank on history’s stage, shocking those who had remained so unwise as to continue to dismiss them.

International relations can be likened to a game of 3D chess. In this great game Putin, in the finest Russian tradition, or like Mr. Spock in Star Trek, is a grand master. I don’t believe the chess players in the U.S. State Department, such as Victoria Nuland (wife of the Robert Kagan mentioned above) and the other neocons who are at the helm, are quite at Putin’s level, but they had the great advantage of being able to make a series of aggressive moves (e.g., the series of NATO expansions and the 2014 Ukraine coup) before Putin was able (i.e., was strong enough) to make a counterplay in response. By comparison, the general run of media journalists, commentators and even supposed analysts are tiddlywinks players.

International relations occur and need to be seen and analyzed at different levels similar to the different levels of military affairs. In this context we can skip the lowest or tactical level. The level above the tactical is the operational level, and above this is the strategic level. Seen only from the operational level, the Russian “Special Operation” in Ukraine is an offensive or aggressive move, initiating the use of military force. But in strategic terms, seen from the perspective of the higher strategic level, it is a defensive move in reaction or response to a series of strategically offensive moves by the United States and NATO to turn Ukraine into what Putin regards as an existential threat to Russian security and independence.

In theory there are two major schools of international relations, the liberal idealist school and the realist school. The former, which was exemplified in Fukuyama’s “end of history” thesis, is based on the Enlightenment concepts of rights and values and since its inception has been preached much more than practiced, honored more in the breach than in the observance, with the realist approach actually applied in practice though often hypocritically disguised or cloaked under liberal idealist arguments and justifications. Realism is the tradition of Thucydides (“The strong do what they want. The weak suffer what they must.”), Machiavelli, Bismarck, George Kennan and Henry Kissinger, and is currently perhaps best represented academically by John Mearsheimer. Realism has always been dominant in the actual practice of international relations by the Great Powers, however dominant liberal idealism might be in academia and among philosophers, media talking heads, a deluded public, and the misleading politicians who help delude them. Col. Douglas Macgregor, although primarily a military analyst, is also firmly in the realist tradition in his analysis of international relations. The problem is that liberalism, in the words of Will Durant, is a luxury of security, and this is especially true in international relations. Where one’s security, one’s perceived existential interests, are at stake, liberalism is a luxury one cannot afford, and realism reigns.

John Mearsheimer (b. 1947) in 2007

It is futile to attempt to discuss the Ukraine matter in a useful way with those who are ignorant of its background or context, or of the Russian perspective, or who are intolerantly hyperpartisan or hypersubjective and thus unwilling or dangerously unable to understand the opponent’s position and motives. This would seem to include the great majority of the public, along with the media figures who pose as experts and presume to lecture us in the moralistic terms of liberal idealism. In this sense, John Mearsheimer (co-author of The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy) and Ray McGovern (former head of the Russia desk at the C.I.A.) are commendable for carefully and objectively providing the necessary background, context and facts before presenting their realist views, which would not be so understandable and justifiable otherwise. (See “Putin’s Invasion of Ukraine Salon” with Ray McGovern and John Mearsheimer, March 2, 2022).

By contrast, at least from what I’ve seen and heard, the mainstream media provides neither context nor the pre-2014 background, or the Russian perspective, but rather seeks to block or ban this information as it would tend to discredit the politically correct liberal idealist posturing that is being used to cloak the strictly realist and strategically offensive aggressive moves made by the U.S. and NATO. In this regard there is also a clear difference between military analysts Col. Douglas Macgregor and Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg. The latter, when asked what reasons or justifications Putin could have for invading Ukraine, could only — with the look of a deer caught in the headlights — profess complete bafflement, thus revealing his own uselessness as a serious analyst, because to admit any legitimate reason would be politically incorrect, and modern generals tend to be careful political animals, and colonels who are not careful political animals are unlikely to be promoted to general.

The United States and NATO are major players in the Ukraine crisis (with the U.S. leading). Their series of strategic offensive moves actually precipitated the event, so Russia clearly can’t trust them to act as honest brokers in peace negotiations. This provides an opportunity for France and Germany to step back onto the stage of history as independent actors, following-up on their role as mediators in the Minsk agreements, to again offer their good offices in peace negotiations. Failing this, it seems likely the war could continue for some time, with the Russians eventually imposing a de facto partition in which they occupy much more of Ukraine than would have been the case if the crisis had ended quickly by satisfying their demands. John Mearsheimer said that Russia didn’t want to occupy Ukraine as doing so would be like swallowing a porcupine. In the context of this analogy the densest concentration of quills is in the northwest, the ten northwestern Oblasts (administrative districts) that are the most anti-Russian part of the country. That is also the part of the country closest to Poland and the core NATO countries. It is therefore the part of Ukraine that Russia would be least likely to occupy. The rest of the country, including the entirety of its Black Sea coast, could end up on the Russian side of a partition, with a border perhaps running north to south along the eastern borders of the Oblasts of Zhytomyrs’ka and Vinnyts’ka that would be about 250 miles long compared to the previous 1,226 mile border.

Mearsheimer is an exponent of what he terms offensive realism. In this theory of international relations, states seek to maximize their power, wanting as much as they can get, with hegemony as their ultimate goal. This contrasts with defensive realism, which theorizes that states don’t want much more power than they already have if it is enough to give them security, in which case they concentrate on maintaining the balance of power rather than risk upsetting it by seeking more. In these terms I would tend to see the United States as primarily practicing defensive realism, in the form of George Kennan’s policy of containment, in the first several decades of the Cold War. Then, during the Reagan era and the rise of the Neocons, there was a shift in the direction of offensive realism, with this going into overdrive after the breakup of the Soviet Union when it enjoyed the “unipolar moment” as the world’s sole superpower and sought to prevent the rise of any challenger to peer status. Russia’s strategy throughout the Cold War tended to be more consistently and cautiously defensive (the Cuban Missile Crisis being a rare exception, and even this was more of a counter to the missiles already deployed by the U.S. in Turkey than a true offensive initiative) and this has remained true during the Putin era. In the nuclear arms race the U.S. took the initiative with the Russians following well behind and trying to catch up, not finally achieving parity until the beginning of the 1970s.

According to Mearsheimer, a cardinal tenet of offensive realism is that a smaller and weaker state, such as Ukraine, that borders a much larger and more powerful state, such as Russia, should seek to avoid being antagonistic toward or being a serious threat to—and certainly not existential threat to, the larger state. In this situation Ukraine is an abject lesson that should be a warning to others, as it persistently violated this tenet, whether by its own folly or as a U.S. puppet being led down the primrose path, for although it was not capable of posing a serious threat to Russia in itself, it was capable of being such a threat if they became a host and a platform for U.S. and NATO offensive power, a process which was already long underway even though it had not yet become a NATO member.

U.S. troops of a training mission on parade in Ukraine before Russia’s “Special Operation.” Does it mean the end of the Pax Americana?

The tenets of offensive realism have lessons for pro-Whites that apply not only to international relations but also to the dynamics of the relations between different races and ethnic groups with conflicting interests in a multiracial society. Seen in the context of realist international relations, the small ethnostate or secessionist concept is clearly not a credible option as its independence and even existence would be under constant threat from more powerful hostile actors. This means that the “National Premise” or grand partition ethnostate concept, with the European successor ethnostate remaining in the first rank of global powers, is the only credible option for European racial preservation and independence in realist terms. An example of this concept would be my proposal for a partition into European and non-European successor states, with the non-European population occupying the 669,000 sq. miles of the southwest between the Atchafalaya, Mississippi and Arkansas rivers in the east and the Pacific in the west, and the European population occupying the larger remaining part of 2,226,000 sq. miles.

Applying realist theory to interracial relations, where the different races have competing and conflicting interests and a resulting adversarial relationship, with each wanting to maximize its level of power and control, supports the necessity for a separation of the races into different countries or ethnostates with their own governments where each can be in control of its own existence.

What should be the stance of pro-Whites on the Ukraine issue? The realist answer would be whatever is best for the White (i.e., European) race in its current struggle for survival and liberation from the anti-White forces that are subjugating and destroying it. Obviously, we should seek to avoid any war between the kindred peoples of our race, which in Eastern Europe is complicated — as it was in Yugoslavia — by traditional but now petty intra-Slavic nationalism, ethnic ressentiment, and revanchism. But in terms of the interests of the White race, and of the racial interests of the Ukrainian people themselves, Ukraine has been moving in the wrong direction, as have almost all White countries. It has been following, or been put on, a Westernizing course, which now unfortunately means an anti-White course, for the West is now dominated by anti-White forces which have turned it against the White race, promoting White racial replacement and the global homogenization program (“globohomo”) of multiracialism and John Lennon’s Imagine, and will remain so unless and until its subjugated White populations, long ensnared in the Kumbaya delusion, somehow assert their racial interests and liberate themselves.

Russia, in stark contrast, has been the only major White state with both the power and the will to resist the anti-White tide, with Hungary being a minor White state which has also showed admirable resistance to the extent its lesser power allows it to do so. This makes Russia far more important to the interests of the White race than it has ever been before. Indeed, unless Whites in the West do liberate themselves, Russia may become the last remaining major White state upon which all hope for any White future, however tragically diminished, will depend. But to fulfill that hope and remain independent of globalist control and the New World Order Russia must have security and freedom of action. As Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov explained in a March 19 interview:

The West did not want equal cooperation and, as we can now see, has kept true to the “will and testament” of Zbigniew Brzezinski who said that Ukraine should not be allowed to side with Russia. With Ukraine, Russia is a great power, while without Ukraine, it is a regional player.

So what is at stake here is not just Ukraine but something much bigger — the power and independence of Russia and its ability to stand against the anti-White tide led by the anti-White-dominated United States. The Polish-born and deeply anti-Russian Brzezinski (1928–2017), a grand master of the Neocons, authored The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives (1998), described as follows in the Amazon blurb for the updated 2016 edition:

In The Grand Chessboard, renowned geostrategist Zbigniew Brzezinski delivers a brutally honest and provocative vision for American preeminence in the twenty-first century. The task facing the United States, he argues, is to become the sole political arbiter in Eurasian lands and to prevent the emergence of any rival power threatening our material and diplomatic interests. The Eurasian landmass, home to the greatest part of the globe’s population, natural resources, and economic activity, is the “grand chessboard” on which America’s supremacy will be ratified and challenged in the years to come. In this landmark work of public policy and political science, Brzezinski outlines a groundbreaking and powerful blueprint for America’s vital interests in the modern world.

Since 1965 the United States has been an effectively anti-White country in the most profound, meaningful and ultimate sense of the concept. It has been against the most vital (life-essential) and existential interests — the interests involving the conditions required for its continued existence and control of its own existence — of the White race, and it has set on an anti-White course culminating in White racial dispossession, subjugation, replacement and destruction. Within one or two decades after 1965, the same was true for Canada, Australia, Britain and the other countries of western Europe. After 1991 most of the countries of eastern Europe started on the same course. What Foreign Minister Lavrov said in a March 18 interview on Russia Today about Ukrainian cultural distortion and brainwashing since circa 1991, promoted by western governments and NGOs, can be multiplied by an order of magnitude for the U.S. and the other western countries.

The United States’ desire … to come back to a unipolar world… to take the melting pot concept from the United States soil and to make a melting pot of the entire world, and they will do the melting … . [T]he efforts of our Western colleagues [are] to make Ukraine Russophobic and an anti-Russian instrument, anti-Russia.”

For the anti-White forces in control of the West, with the globalists and Neocons in control of U.S. foreign policy, the ultimate goal, what they mean by the New World Order, is an anti-White (i.e., opposed to White existence and independence) global unipolar system, exercised through the U.S. acting as global hegemon. To reach that goal, the true end of history and end of any hope for White survival, they must first eliminate any White obstacles in their path. Putin has made Russia the foremost of those White obstacles, the one most capable of effective opposition, so they must pacify and subjugate Russia and bring it to heel, preferably through subversion and regime change, thus removing Russia as an independent actor from the stage of history and making it as subservient to U.S. will as Germany, France or Poland. Pro-Whites seek a collaborative relationship with Russia as part of a Pan-European grand alliance. Anti-Whites seek it by Russian subjugation to the Pax Americana. That is offensive realism with a vengeance.

Unfortunately for pro-Whites, the return of Russia and history includes the return of the external distraction from the far greater internal threats to our racial independence and survival. Indeed, that external distraction has also returned with a vengeance, serving the interests of the anti-White forces so well that one could almost suspect they wanted and intended this to happen. The conservatives who had rightly come to view Facebook and Twitter as enemies after their censorial banning of conservatives and subversive intentions and actions were made clear (actually banning pro-Russian speech), now rush to their defense when that same behavior in Russia caused Putin to reply in kind and ban the banners and subverters.

Our task, as always, requires our primary focus and attention to the internal threat that is destroying us. Russia and history are both back in action, and so is the external distraction, as they were before 1991. The internal threat we face now is the same we faced then, only much larger and more developed. The history we need to make is in our own countries. The conflict we face at home is far more dangerous to us than any that might threaten us from afar, so we should not go abroad to seek conflict but commit ourselves fully to winning the conflict at home. That is the epic historical victory we seek. The continued existence and independence of our race depends on it.

86 replies
  1. Paula
    Paula says:

    Russia has won Ukraine, but it’s lost nearly all of Europe to NATO.

    And more countries will probably join NATO.

    I don’t see how this can be considered a Russian victory.

    It’s a finger in the dike against NATO.

    Is Russia going to absorb members of NATO? No it is not.

    • hotrod31
      hotrod31 says:

      I agree with you Paula. The article is thought provoking and, by-and-large, offers a predominantly Eurocentric perspective to a Eurasian conundrum. The only thing that the Russians might have ‘won’ is TIME. It has become abundantly clear that US/NATO … Zio forces will not stop with the intended plan of ‘regime-change’ in Russia on their way to war with China. It stands out like the proverbial canine gonads.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      Why would anyone be afraid of NATO? The Afghanistan pull-out demonstrated for all the world the calibre of NATO.
      America hasn’t won a war since 1945. The UK capitulated to the IRA, a street gang, in 1998.
      All NATO member nations(ex Turkey, who won’t fight for them), are addicted to ‘fighting’ Third World nations, they’d collapse in a day against a peer competitor. We all saw how useless those NATO mercenaries were in Ukraine.
      Russia is already ahead of NATO in technology. Ignore the budgets, that’s just a visualisation of the corruption.
      Once, generals who’d never won any wars but were over decorated with ribbons, was a cliche for a banana Republic. Look at the leaders of the West, do they look like serious people?
      No Westen nation could survive a week in real wartime conditions, this isn’t the 1940’s. We are too fat, weak, corrupt, decadent and strung-out on meds to do anything other than panic, then crumble.
      Our leaders, our elite, deliberately made us this way. They thought we’d be easier to control, easier to exploit, that they’d be more secure in their illegitimate regime.
      True enough, but the other side of this coin is you can’t expect us to fight your wars for you.
      We volunteered in 1914 & 1939 because we loved our nations, and any leaders we had at least seemed from our perspective competent. At least they didn’t despise us.
      The idea that Westen populations will take privations and mass casualties for this current elite is unhinged.
      China and Russia could collapse the West in a day by simply withholding everything the West needs to exist. Why don’t they do it then? Because it would create unknown problems long term. Because they are still extracting the wealth our ancestors build up.
      They are quite happy to win this struggle smoothly long term.

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        Agreed. Older civilizations have a longer time spectrum or events and responses. Russia is 1000 year old civilization, China 3000, The fish on the other end of the line thinks he can escape by wild gyrations. The fisherman knows the outcome and patiently and smoothly reels in the line, exhausting the fish. A fish has a very small time line and cannot see moves and events ahead.

        • Zoltaiguszti
          Zoltaiguszti says:

          Russia? A 1000-year-old civilization?
          At best, we have been able to talk about some kind of Russia at all since the Grand Duke Vasily I of Moscow.
          In 1383 he visited Toktam, the khan of the Golden Horde, to ask his father, as Grand Duke of Vladimir, for a privilege to rule over the Russian lands.
          Golden Horde, do you still think something of the great Mongol invasion in 1241-42 will reach their Polish and Hungarian kingdoms? Descendants of Ginhis Khan. Genghis himself had appointed one of the warlords, Ogoye Khan.
          Kievan Rus and others may be of ancient Russian cultures but at least half of them are of Scandinavian Viking origin.
          They set up large commercial centers along the Russian-Ukrainian River on their way to the Byzantine and Arab-Turkish worlds.
          Hungary! Well the 1000 year old culture. The kingdom itself was founded in 1000, its first king is crowned eco and since then, whatever has happened, there has always been an icipici part that could be called the Kingdom of Hungary or Hungary! Constantly! And we speak the same language then. Anyone can read the Hungarian documents of the 1200s, just like the Chinese, but we do not write in Latin but in pictorial writing.
          What is before that I will not mention the HUN-Hungarian kinship … Scythian ancestors … Where were the Russians then?
          They were called Björn and sailed down the Volga to search for Central Asia.

          • Marko
            Marko says:

            Well, typically distorted view of history, what this all viking theory is. Russian society at that time was incomparably more advanced than most other European’s and of course incomparably more than Viking’s who called Russia Gardariki – the land of Cities. Especially Veliki Novgorod – a giant trading empire with the highest literacy rate in Europe at that time. Vikings were just “hired guns” all nobility and city folks were slavic (“Slovenci” in Veliki Novgorod). Riuriks were not of Scandinavian origin what latest genetic research clearly showed. It is true that mongol yoke lasted 2 centuries and a half but Russian state (Kiev) was established 150 years before Hungarian, if you count Veliki Novgorod (an empire itself) another couple of centuries earlier.

      • Gerry
        Gerry says:

        I find John Kennedy to be quite uneducated. I mean if anyone should have had a Kalashnikov for a paperweight on his desk it was surely him. America is a strange place politically. Again i mean why is it that anyone who tries to do the right thing politically winds up dead and this usually under very odd inexplicable circumstances? Kennedy should surely have understood this, heck his whole family but instead he drives around in a convertible. Who I would like to know advised him on that course of action? NATO?

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          JFK? Yeah, it’s weird, because he knew what he was dealing with, he knew the Jewish mafia killed fellow Irish Catholic and war hero Forrester.
          Perhaps the lesson is, if you are going to expose a secret cult, just do it, don’t broadcast your intentions in advance.

      • Waldheim
        Waldheim says:

        I agree with all your points. And…, wish to add that the D.C. neo-cons appear to be succeeding weakening (or destroying) the petrodollar, that is, the USD as the world reserve currency. Exactly how and when that will play out is hard to predict, but every economic transaction between nations that is settled not in USD is a step in that direction. As with any fiat currency, those wishing to use must remain convinced both of its current utility but also its capacity as a store of value. The willingness of India to trade in rubles should be a warning to D.C.
        Now, add to that the constantly declining standard of living in both Europe and the US. How should these populations show any loyalty to the elites who constantly make these peoples lives harder. Maybe(?) US citizens will be better able to withstand ever-increasing energy prices (this includes energy as an input to production, electric power, heating, and not merely the highly visible prices at the gas pump) but France, Germany, Poland and so on will not be able to find supply substitutes for Russian energy. What then? How bad can it get before major political unrest threatens these nations constitutions? Are the early decades of the 20th century that long ago?? (No)
        Perhaps Russia is well advised to not let the Ukraine conflict last into the autumn. In terms of economic warfare, it can wait while the ineptness of Western leaders destroys their several nations. What a joke.

      • Karl Haemers
        Karl Haemers says:

        Wilson and FDR didn’t despise us? Look again at the Federal Reserve and New Deal effects.

    • Eric Novak
      Eric Novak says:

      With 7000 nukes in its arsenal and 12 time zones of natural resources from which to trade with China and the rest of the non-Western world, NATO won’t be anything but a nuisance to Russia.

  2. Pip
    Pip says:

    YOUTUBE Proof Zelensky REJECTED Peace With Russia in 2019 and in 2022

    YOUTUBE Proof Zelensky REJECTED Peace With Russia in 2019 and in 2022
    Apr 5, 2022
    Reporting from the Wall Street Journal as well as recently unearthed video footage of an interview with a top lieutenant of President Zelensky reveal that Ukrainian leadership was not only well aware of the risk of a Russian invasion, but that Zelensky and company rejected a possible peace deal and instead allowed Russia to be pressured by the US and NATO to launch that invasion. Jimmy and The Grayzone’s Aaron Maté discuss the options faced by Ukraine prior to the Russian invasion.
    The Jimmy Dore Show

    Google: Klaus Schwab.
    This is the Nazi who is going around picking politicians to put into power.
    YOUTUBE: Video: Trudeau & Cabinet Trained By Global Economic Cabal – Admits WEF Chairman
    122,456 viewsFeb 19, 2022
    The Jimmy Dore Show

    Like Trudeau, Zelensky is an acolyte of the World Economic Forum.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said that Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was one of the reasons he got into politics.

    After leaving his career as a comedian and entertainer and becoming president of Ukraine in April 2019, Zelensky hailed Trudeau as “one of those leaders who inspired him” to join politics” when he became president of Ukraine in 2019.

    Although Zelensky has made a name for himself from relative obscurity from the West’s perspective since the Russian-Ukrainian conflict made international news last week, his admiration for Trudeau is less surprising when examining his past.

    Like Trudeau, Zelensky is an acolyte of Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum, the globalist organization behind the now infamous “Great Reset” program, which tells the world that in 2030 “you will have nothing and be happy…”

    The massive support for Zelensky by the elite, including support from “defund the police” and leftist mega-donor Black Lives Matter, George Soros, Trudeau, U.S. President Joe Biden, and the entire mainstream media, has led many to question the true motivation behind the West’s condemnation of Russia and the fear that another foreign war involving the West is underway.

    On Tuesday, for example, Ukrainian journalist Daria Kaleniuk made an emotional plea to British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, asking him to order NATO to go to war in Ukraine. After the event was hailed in the Western media, reports emerged that Kaleniuk was not only a journalist, but a member of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and leading Soros-backed initiatives across Eastern Europe.

    While many are skeptical of Russian President Vladimir Putin and his former ties to the KGB, treatment of the other side of the conflict seems to be absent in the media, which has many concerned given the radical nature of the WEF and its Great Reset goals.

    The Great Reset is a radical socialist plan designed by global elites to “reboot” the world economy and install a centralized, and heavily regulated, totalitarian international system similar to China’s Social Credit System.

    In fact, WEF founder and chairman Klaus Schwab has consistently praised China’s Communist President Xi Jinping, including a statement this year telling the Chinese leader that his dictatorial regime had made “significant social and economic achievements” under his “inclusive approach.” Schwab’s praise and reference to China as an “inclusive” country comes despite evidence that China commits genocide against its Uighur Muslim population, conducts a massive organ-harvesting program, and has been labeled by critics as a “first-world nightmare.” A truly totalitarian state.

    From a purely strategic point of view, with an emphasis on keeping deaths and injuries to a minimum, there are also those who reject the idea of Western involvement in the war, as this could serve to exacerbate the conflict, not end it.

    According to U.S. public affairs consultant J. Robert Smith, the West should reject U.S. and NATO military involvement in Ukraine at this time, which, in his view, would only worsen the already tumultuous and deadly situation.

    “The terrible impact of major wars at their inception is often underestimated. Take the Civil War, for example. Few people, South or North, imagined that the war would claim between 600,000 and 850,000 lives, according to estimates. At the outbreak of World War I, neither side foresaw a staggering 40 million casualties, military and civilian, in that pointless conflict,” Smith wrote.

    “Who really believes that a war between the U.S., NATO and Russia could be limited to Ukraine? Wars are inherently unpredictable; they have their own dynamics. Whether by design or by mistake, the consequences for NATO countries seem like a smart bet. Why wouldn’t Putin attack enemy targets beyond Ukraine’s borders? Why wouldn’t the U.S. and NATO retaliate, if they don’t start?”

    Michael McKibben of Leader Technologies and his group of researchers have done a DEEP dive into the history and the lineage of the World Economic Forum’s Klaus Schwab. He shares their shocking discoveries in this audio, with AIM4Truth’s Douglas Gabriel.
    Our discoveries about Klaus Schwab should prove beyond question that WEF is utterly fraudulent and an enemy of all humanity.
    WEF meets every year in early February in Davos, Switzerland to map out their dystopic plans. We will show below that they are criminal, inhuman frauds. We will also show that Klaus Schwab is a sociopath with pathological mommy issues.
    We have learned with these corruptocrat biographies that the information they hide is always highly instructive to their true characters.
    Schwab’s hometown—Ravensburg, Germany—was the first German city to practice eugenics (killing “useless eaters”)

    Ravensburg was a transport hub for stolen Nazi gold to the Swiss Bank for International Settlements run by Pilgrims Society spies Allan W. Dulles (later C.I.A. director, 1953-61), Edwin W. Pauley (Allied reparations) and William J. Donovan, director of the OSS (MI6-controlled precursor to the C.I.A.—Dulles’ boss)
    Schwab’s family company, Escher Wyss, exploited slave labor and Allied POWs, manufactured key nuclear bomb-making technologies for Adolf Hitler and South Africa, sold Swiss flame throwers to the Nazis, and was named a National Socialist Model Company by Adolf Hitler

    Schwab’s Escher Wyss company was protected not only by Hitler, but by Switzerland, Britain and America—making Schwab a criminal foreign meddler in every sense

    Klaus’ mainstream media and academia propagandists have hidden his Nazi past in a blizzard of awards, WEF programs, ghost-written books, speeches, interviews, honorary professorships and doctorates from all over the world.
    AFI researchers have dubbed Klaus “old sourpuss” because he almost never smiles. Now we know why. He knows he is a fraud—a circus barker who grew up with a silver spoon in his mouth whose heart has nothing good to share with the world.
    Klaus also hides that his biological mother was Jewish.
    In his just-published propaganda Stakeholder Capitalism (Wiley, NY: 2021), Klaus wrote on the dedication page that his mother was Erika Epprecht. (“To my parents, Eugen Wilhelm Schwab and Erika Epprecht who taught me firsthand the value of education, collaboration, and the stakeholder principle”). This is a boldface lie.

    Klaus and his older brother, Hans Ernst, were born to Eugen Wilhelm Schwab and Emma Gisela Tekelius Schwab (née Kilian) in Ravensburg (Mar. 30, 1938) and Karlsruhe (Oct. 13, 1927) respectively.

    Hans Ernst did not disown their Jewish mother Emma like his brother Klaus has. On Dec. 09, 1938, Emma Schwab emigrated to the United States as Gisela Schwab, leaving her suckling infant Klaus, presumably forever. Was she fleeing Hitler’s Jewish persecution? Possibly. Was Klaus’ 50% Jewish blood being buried and replaced by a pure Aryan persona? Probably, especially considering his and his father’s life-long silence about her.

    By contrast, wife Erika was of sturdy Aryan stock—acceptable to the Nazis. She was from Zurich, born Dec. 31, 1906, and like Vladimir Lenin, Erika lived just a ten-minute taxi ride from the Escher-Wyss turbine manufacturing campus in Zurich, according to the 1935 city directory.

    Klaus’ pretend-mother Erika worked in personnel recruiting in Zurich. Ravensburg registry officials were unhelpful with birth, marriage and divorce records for Eugen Wilhelm Schwab, so no records of a divorce from Emma or re-marriage to Erika were discovered.

    However, we do see Eugen and Erika traveling to Brazil in 1960, presumably to visit Hans Ernst and Escher-Wyss that Hans managed. Escher-Wyss, now Sulzer AG and Andritz AG, as well as Hilde’s Festo AG, all have large footprints in Brazilian industry, then and today.

    Since Klaus hides his Jewish mother Emma—never speaking of her—we can only surmise that he suffers deep-seated abandonment issues, even now. This begs the question how this life-long maternal abandonment has affected his moral and spiritual priorities. Evidently badly.

    Klaus’ father, Eugen Wilhelm Schwab, was the managing director of Escher-Wyss & Co. in 1938 when Klaus was born in Ravensburg, Germany, and continued with the company as President Emeritus until his death in 1982.
    Escher-Wyss was founded in 1805, and developed unique engineering, manufacturing and high-strength materials capabilities focused on gas turbines, compressors, power generation, heat pumps, hydraulics, ships, thermal and hydroelectric power, and related automation controls.
    Klaus has hidden Escher-Wyss Nazi sins his entire career. They are only now emerging. A few other researchers seem to have unearthed this evidence just recently as well. Much of it has been suppressed behind Top Secret archives in Switzerland, Germany, Britain and the United States—only recently released after 90+ years of in-human, diabolical suppression.
    First, at the time of Klaus’ birth in 1938, Escher-Wyss had already been helping the German government build compressors, turbines and other critical elements for an emerging nuclear industry (since 1929). So, it stands to reason that as Hitler came to power, he coddled Escher-Wyss and the Schwabs.
    The British 1965 propaganda film The Heroes of Telemark is about the Nazi heavy water manufacturing plant in Norway. That plant was built by Escher-Wyss.
    Second, as Klaus grew into the Escher-Wyss Schwab family business, he watched his father Eugen make top secret deals with South Africa to supply key components for a nuclear bomb.
    Then, when Klaus graduated from university in Zurich, funded by Escher-Wyss, he was immediately assigned to handle a 10,000-employee merger between Escher-Wyss and Sulzer AG. The merged company continued to supply nuclear bomb capabilities to South Africa with Klaus leading the effort, right up to 1971 when he started the European Management, and very probably afterwards.

    South Africa was busting U.S. nuclear armament sanctions (clearly a ruse to fool the world public) for Sulzer-Escher-Wyss using Marc Rich, the notorious Swiss fugitive who was famously pardoned by Bill Clinton on Jan. 20, 2001. This fact alone places Klaus Schwab on the list of aiding and abetting convicted criminals like Marc Rich.
    C.I.A. archive documents show that Escher-Wyss and Sulzer were being directed by the U.S. Department of Energy and the State Department. This would logically mean that Klaus Schwab was a triple-agent, working simultaneously for: (1) the CIA-MI6-UN British-Americans Pilgrims Society, (2) Nazis (now Germany) and (3) Switzerland.
    Do we really want a triple-agent lying spy running the “Great Reset” and “Build Back Better?”
    Third, Escher-Wyss was one of the largest employers in Ravensburg, Germany.
    Fourth, Escher-Wyss was the first city in Nazi German to practice eugenics principles to murder “useless eaters” emerging from the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute (something like the National Institute of Health in the US, or Tavistock Institute in the UK).
    Fifth, contrary to the propaganda stories about Ravensburg’s lack of war-making industries (as the reason why the Allies did not bomb the city and its Escher-Wyss industry), we discovered many Ravensburg unconfessed sins surrounding the Schwab’s and Escher-Wyss.

    Besides parts for ships, airplanes, submarines and power plants, Escher-Wyss brokered flame throwers built in their Zurich plant and sold to the Nazis. This information comes from the U.S. Archives. This would have been handled by Eugen Schwab with a then about 5-year old Klaus at his side. They also supplied turbines, compressors and propellers for Nazi ships and submarines, as well as gas turbines for powering the war machine, in addition to their nuclear technology.

    Escher-Wyss exploited slave labor (Jewish, Russian, Gypsy, homosexual, Hungarian, Romanian, Polish ), as well as Allied POWs. Being a National Socialists Model Company, this would certainly have included Dr. Josef Mengele’s biological war crimes (“The Angel of Death”).

    Escher Wyss today operates under numerous re branded names including Andritz AG and Sulzer AG. These companies are poised to profit enormously from the priorities reflected in Klaus Schwab’s so-called “Great Reset,” including hydropower, plasma turbines, nuclear power, materials science, nuclear weapons, oil and gas, coal, bio fuel, paper, food, robotics, artificial intelligence, financing, patents, pharmaceuticals and more.
    Historically, the first (IBM) punch card machine readers, sometimes called Hollerith machines, were first manufactured by companies like Escher-Wyss and Sulzer who specialized in textile machines in the 1880s. Punched cards were used to created different patters on textile machines, as well as in player pianos. Other names in this business were Semyon Korsakov (ca. 1805); Charles Babbage (ca. 1855); Herman Hollerith (ca. 1880); The Tabulating Machine Company (ca. 1910), including Dehomag (Deutsche Hollerith-Maschinen GmbH, IBM Germany); and Computing-Tabulating-Recording Company (1911, renamed IBM).

    Note: IBM International president Jacques G. Maisongroung was a feature speaker at Klaus M. Schwab’s first European Management Forum on Feb. 04-07, 1971, along with the black monarch and Fourth Reich heir apparent Otto von Habsburg.

    Klaus’s married Hilde Stoll in the weeks following the first Forum in 1971. This was an evident corporate marriage. Hilde’s family, to this day, owns an engineering, robotics, artificial intelligence and process controls manufacturer name FESTO with over 20,000 employees.

    It should be noted that the Escher and Sulzer families are interlocked with the Stolls, Schwabs and Bodmar families. The Bodmar family property in Cologny, Geneva Canton, Switzerland is the current site of The World Economic Forum headquarters as well as the Schwab residence—like a ritzy WACO-like compound.

    The Bodmar family is a 15th-century silk manufacturing family who purchased the WEF land from Fanny Moser-Sulzer (Sulzer AG). Hans von Schulthess-Bodmar was a director of Escher-Wyss & Co. and those interlocked engineering firms and exclusive private banks are still in operation today (Escher & Rahn renamed Rahn Bodmer).
    Indeed, none of these family businesses have lack funding. Given their close proximity to untold amounts of stolen Nazi-Japanese gold at the Bank for International Settlements, their “success” comes into focus. In fact, it was during the Marshall Plan that the British Pilgrims Society took control of these Second-Reich family corporate empires to serve their secular new world order scheme.
    Martin Bodmar was born the same year as Klaus’ father Eugen (1899). Martin was a vice-president of the International Red Cross (1940-71). Klaus is believed to have attended grade school in the Au suburb of Zurich (1945-47, ages 7-9) and lived in Bodmar castle during that posh primary schooling.

    Klaus had all of his schooling bankrolled by Escher-Wyss financiers in Zurich just as his father Eugen Schwab, as managing director of Escher-Wyss & Cie. (Co.) in Ravensburg was forming the Ravensburg Chamber of Commerce and Industry as vice-president (1945-46).

    Eugen formed the Ravensburg Chamber of Commerce at the behest of Sir Winthrop W. Aldrich (Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger’s and Paul Volcker’s boss), Allan W. Dulles (OSS/CIA Bern, Switzerland), and the Bank for International Settlements set up by MI6 and the CIA.

    The British Pilgrims Society had already begun to funnel dirty Marshall Plan funds to insider companies like Escher-Wyss and Festo and their interlocked private Swiss banking family companies, even before the war ended, in exchange for Ravensburg’s help in transporting the Nazi gold to Bill J. Donovan, Allan W. Dulles and Edwin Pauley (OSS cum MI6—the rogue C.I.A.), the British Pilgrims Society required Schwab fealty to the new world order being fronted by their newly-forming United Nations.
    Note: Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, the current Pilgrims Society chairman of SGO Smartmatic (with its masked OpTech ballot scanning software running in Dominion, ES&S, Hart InterCivic, Sequoia, Diebold, Premier), has served in almost every senior post at the United Nations: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in Thailand, Africa, Central America and Geneva; Reform of UN communications; UN Development Program (UNDP); London International Model UN; UN Millennium Summit; and Deputy Secretary-General.

    Note also: Sir Nigel Graham Knowles is Malloch-Brown’s fellow Pilgrim in SGO Smartmatic where he is director, chief trustee of Prince’s Trust America, and employed Kamala Harris newly-minted husband Doug Emhoff at DLA Piper LLP law.
    Starting even before the Germans surrendered on May 07, 1945—just two weeks after the famous “Link-Up” (Apr. 25, 1945) of the American 69th Infantry Division with the Soviet 58th Guards in Torgau—Ravensburg was a staging ground for shipping stolen Nazi gold to Switzerland. It has also been a processing hub for Allied POWs as evident cover for Ravensburg duplicities discussed herein.

    The looted Nazi gold was routed through Ravensburg, near the Swiss-Lichtenstein border, and sent to the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Bern and Zurich. Allen W. Dulles was the OSS spy director in Bern in charge of the Nazi gold for the Allies (Read: Pilgrims Society).

    After the war, Dulles became the first director of the C.I.A. and was the man who later covered up the Kennedy Assassination in the Warren Commission, after, many believe, he ordered President Kennedy’s assassination to protect his emerging Pilgrims Society global enterprise founded on the stolen Nazi and Japanese gold—the banking system that operates today, still named the Bank for International Settlements, Zurich that handles inter banking special drawing rights.

    President Kennedy was assassinated not long after he told a colleague: “I will splinter the CIA [Dulles’ creature] into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds.” (New York Times, Apr. 25, 1966).

    Escher-Wyss hosted numerous Sir Winthrop’s Chamber meetings in Zurich and Ravensburg sponsored by their father-son city fathers team of Eugen and Klaus Schwab.

    As the Escher-Wyss managing director, Eugen was a man whose favor was sought in both Germany, Switzerland, and the Pilgrims Society, and who was grooming son Klaus to take over their Escher-Wyss dynasty, now 216 years old.

    Today, Klaus Schwab’s Andritz AG auditor is KPMG who also audits SERCO (controlled by the British Crown) and SGO Smartmatic (aka Dominion etc.) Voting Systems (controlled by Lord Mark Malloch-Brown and Sir Nigel Knowles, Kamala Harris’ British handler.

    Klaus received a bachelor and PhD in engineering from Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zürich, Switzerland, co-founded by Alfred Escher (1855).
    Klaus also received overlapping masters and PhD degrees from the Jesuit University of Fribourg, Switzerland (1962-67). These Jesuits boast numerous Pilgrims Society globalists like British Zionist Chaim Azriel Weizmann; Basil Hume, archbishop of Canterbury; and, Juan Carlos, King of Spain.

    Weizmann developed acetone used in cordite explosives for the British war industry in WWI, along with fellow British Zionist Sir Alfred M. Mond, chairman of Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI) and gunpowder—a founding member of the Pilgrims Society (1902). He also founded the Weizmann Institute, funded by Lord Victor Rothschild, that coordinated biological research closely tied to the Coronavirus patent developer (U.S. Pat. No. No. 10,130,701, awarded Nov. 20, 2018)—The Pirbright Institute (UK). In fact, Pirbright tested many of biotechnology trials in Israel, according to newly-released Dr. Sydney Brenner Victor Rothschild correspondence.

    In 1966-67, Klaus was shuffled off to Boston for his Harvard grooming. He received a master’s in public administration from the John F. Kennedy School of Government. There he admits collaborating with Pilgrims Society inner circle gadabouts Henry Kissinger and John K. Galbraith. Galbraith and Kissinger came to play leading rolls in the World Economic Forum strategies and tactics.

    On the wings of Kissinger’s Pilgrims Society instructions, Klaus Schwab was assigned to organize the Europe Management Forum starting in 1971.

    Starting in 1965, the U.S. Department of Energy began funding the development of nuclear weapons capability in apartheid South Africa (read: British-controlled).
    Newly-discovered information for this most top secret program reveal that Sulzer-Escher-Wyss supplied critical components to the enrichment of triggering of a nuclear bomb, ostensibly for the South Africans. Apparently their prized elephant herds needed protecting.

    Klaus’s first job after university was managing a 10,000-employee merger of Escher-Wyss AG and Sulzer AG. Now we know that these companies and their families were interlocked and this was merely window dressing. This occurred just as Sulzer was shipping specialize compressor and turbine seals to South Africa. Later, Swiss fugitive Marc Rich ran sanctions against South Africa for this secret Pilgrims Society nuclear cabal.
    “Schwab’s Sulzer, Escher Wyss companies have been one of the world’s top suppliers of nuclear turbine and enrichment technologies”

    I made this past September, didn’t I?
    Who’s a Nazi now?
    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous readers and we want to keep this way.
    We hardly made it before, but this summer something’s going on, our audience stats show bizarre patterns, we’re severely under estimates and the last savings are gone. We’re not your responsibility, but if you find enough benefits in this work…
    Help survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!
    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them
    We gave up on our profit shares from masks, if you want to help us, please use the donation button!
    We think frequent mask use, even short term use can be bad for you, but if you have no way around them, at least send a message of consciousness.

    Klaus Schwab’s Youth is called “Young Global Leaders”, ready for regime change in unaligned countries
    9 Jun 2021
    In “angela merkel”

    7 little known facts about #TheGreatReset mastermind Klaus Schwab
    23 Nov 2020
    In “9/11”

    30 Oct 2021
    In “4ir”
    audioaudiobookaudioboybioclub of romeexposedfamilyhistoryKlaus SchwabNazisrevealedrootsTHE GREAT RESETtruthunlimited hangoutwefwho isWorld Economic Forum
    Post navigation
    Previous: Vaccines may actually end the pandemic by July, but not as you think
    Next: Microsoft, 2016: “We can program complex behaviors using DNA”. 3-strand DNA confirmed
    1. Pingback: 7 little known facts about #TheGreatReset mastermind Klaus Schwab –
    4. Pingback: Neonazi Jew Klaus Schwab, WEF cabal, microchip, Judeomasonic GreatReset – Piotr Bein’s blog Piotra Beina
    5. Pingback: When Pharmafia plays the “nazi” card to gaslight skeptical consumers, show them Jewish media –
    6. Pingback: Dr Charles Hoffe | alicespringstomind
    7. Pingback: The World Ambushed by the Jesuit Curse | The Greg Anthony Show & His Investigative Journal
    8. Pingback: The Vaccine Holocaust Is Well Underway With Globalists At War With 7.8 Billion People: They’ve Used Two Main Bioweapons On Us, A Lab Engineered Virus And Often Deadly ‘Vaccines’ – The Blogging Hounds
    9. Pingback: KLAUS SCHWABS 4. RIKE. Den store økonomiske tilbakestillingen. | Numerologen
    10. Pingback: Klaus Schwab’s Nazi roots – Verge Report
    11. Pingback: ••• WE WRITE NEW DNA USING RNA ONLY – STAR SCIENTIST FINANCED BY EPSTEIN, DARPA AND SCHWAB’S WYSS INSTITUTE ••• Reblogged from source with Thanks & All Credit to Source Via:




    “The plan for an overhaul of the world is the brainchild of an elite group of businessmen, politicians, and their intellectual entourage that meet in Davos, Switzerland, in January each year. Brought into existence in 1971, the World Economic Forum (WEF) has become a megaglobal event since then. More than three thousand leaders from all over the world attended the meeting in 2020.
    Under the guidance of the WEF, the agenda of the Great Reset says that the completion of the current industrial transformation requires a thorough overhaul of the economy, politics, and society.
    … The consensus has emerged at the annual Davos meetings that the world needs a revolution, and that reforms have taken too long. The members of the WEF envision a profound upheaval at short notice. The time span should be so brief that most people will hardly realize that a revolution is going on. The change must be so swift and dramatic that those who recognize that a revolution is happening do not have the time to mobilize against it.
    … Projects like the Great Reset leave unanswered the question of who rules the state. The state itself does not rule. It is an instrument of power. It is not the abstract state that decides, but the leaders of specific political parties and of certain social groups.
    Earlier totalitarian regimes needed mass executions and concentration camps to maintain their power. Now, with the help of new technologies, it is believed, dissenters can easily be identified and marginalized. The nonconformists will be silenced by disqualifying divergent opinions as morally despicable.
    … The 2020 lockdown worked as if it had been orchestrated – and perhaps it was. As if following a single command, the leaders of big and small nations – and of different stages of economic development – implemented almost identical measures. Not only did many governments act in unison, they also applied these measures with little regard for the horrific consequences of a global lockdown.
    Months of economic stillstand have destroyed the economic basis of millions of families. Together with social distancing, the lockdown has produced a mass of people unable to care for themselves. First, governments destroyed the livelihood, then the politicians showed up as the savior.
    … The lockdown and its consequences have brought a foretaste what is to come: a permanent state of fear, strict behavioral control, massive loss of jobs, and growing dependence on the state.”
    Anthony Mueller, 2020

    “The global elite who meet every year at Davos, Switzerland have little need for national loyalty. They view national boundries as obstacles, that are vanishing, and they see national governments as residues from the past, whose only useful function is to facilitate the elites global operations.”
    Samuel Huntington

    “The World Economic Forum’s (WEF) agenda matches goals set out by the United Nations Agenda 2030.
    In the future, the less-developed world will not rise to the developed, rather the other way, as advanced civilizations must go down to their living standards to become ‘sustainable’.”
    TOTT News, 2020

    “The lockdown in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic has accelerated the implementation of long-held plans to establish a new world order. Under the auspices of the World Economic Forum (WEF), global policymakers are advocating for a “Great Reset” with the intent of creating a global technocracy.
    A consensus has emerged at the annual WEF/Davos meetings that the world needs a revolution, and that reforms have taken too long. The members of the WEF envision a profound upheaval at short notice. The change must be so swift and dramatic that those who recognize that a revolution is happening do not have the time to mobilize against it.
    Earlier totalitarian regimes needed mass executions and concentration camps to maintain their power. Now, with the help of new technologies, dissenters can easily be identified and marginalized. The nonconformists will be silenced by disqualifying divergent opinions as morally despicable.
    The 2020 lockdowns offer a preview of how this system works. The lockdown worked as if it had been orchestrated. As if following a single command, the leaders of big and small nations implemented almost identical measures. Not only did many governments act in unison, they also applied these measures with little regard for the consequences of a global lockdown.
    Months of economic standstill have destroyed the economic basis of millions of families. Together with social distancing, the lockdown has produced a mass of people unable to care for themselves. First, governments destroyed the livelihood, then the politicians showed up as the savior.
    The lockdown and its consequences have brought a foretaste what is to come: a permanent state of fear, strict behavioral control, massive loss of jobs, and growing dependence on the state.”
    Anthony Mueller, 2020

    “The Global Power Elite works out policies to advance their interests with regard to the management and protection of global capital and the enforcement of debt collection worldwide They are strategically placed to impose these policies through their members’ positions within individual states and transnational state institutions. The enormous concentrations of economic power translate into enormous influence over global policymaking.
    The Global Power Elites of the Transnational Capitalist Class make efforts to protect their interests through global organizations like the World Bank, World Trade Organization, International Monetary Fund, the G20, G7, World Economic Forum, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Bank for International Settlements, and other transnational associations… Within this system, nation-states become little more than population containment zones, and the real power lies with the decision makers who control global capital.”
    Peter Phillips, 2018

    “Yearly the World Economic Forum (WEF)/Davos brings together the world’s most powerful CEO’s along with governmental policy decision-makers.
    … The World Economic Forum is a facilitator for the goals and objectives of the United Nations – which is world government.”
    Joan Veon,2005

    “The current crime against humanity has been unleashed worldwide by the “Big Money”, the globalists, foundations, Big Pharma and the WHO on the occasion of the “global corona false alarm”, together with the hypocritical promises of salvation of the World Economic Forum and the predatory International Monetary Fund, then we cannot assume a de-globalization and a turning away from inhuman neoliberalism. The ruling “elite” will use the meeting in Davos to further advance the global control by destroying nation states. ”
    Rudolf Hänsel, 2020

    “The Global Power Elite constitutes 6,000 to 7,000 people, or 0.0001 percent of the world’s population. They are the Davos-attending, Gulfstream/ private jet-flying, megacorporation-interlocked, policy-building elites of the world-people at the absolute peak of the global power pyramid. These are the people setting the agendas at the G8, (now the G7 after the exclusion of Russia), G20, NATO, the World Bank, and the WTO. They are from the highest levels of finance capital, transnational corporations, the government, the military, the academy, nongovernmental organizations, spiritual leaders, and even shadow elites. They represent the interests of several hundred thousand millionaires and billionaires who comprise the richest people in the top 1 percent of the world’s wealth hierarchy.”
    Peter Phillips, 2018

    “Think tanks are created with the intent to bring elite interests together from a wide array of institutions: financial, industrial, corporate, academic/intellectual, media, cultural, foreign policy and political spheres. In think tanks, top officials from these sectors are gathered in a single institution where they work together to plan strategies for economic and foreign policies, for establishing consensus between elites, and to serve as training and recruitment grounds for officials to enter the political and foreign policy establishment, where they are capable of enacting the very policies developed within the think tanks. Notable think tanks with immense influence – specifically in the United States – include the Council on Foreign Relations, the Brookings Institution, the Carnegie Endowment, and the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Larger, international think tanks have been increasingly common during the era of globalization, uniting respective elites from across the powerful western industrial states, instead of simply the elites within each respective state. Notable among these institutions are the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group and the World Economic Forum.”
    Andrew Gavin Marshall, 2014

    • Gerry
      Gerry says:

      @ PIP

      Nazi Gold? Take a boo at this:

      ln 1934, when legislation was passed prohibiting the American public from owning gold currency, the door was left wide open to the foreign holders of American dollars to claim gold in exchange for their paper. But even before
      this international stage was set, Representative Louis T. McFadden (R-Pa.), Chairman of the Committee on Banking
      and Currency, made statements on June 10 of 1932 which indicated America’s gold was already moving back
      to Europe. His statements were recorded in the Congressional Record and pages 140-174 in H. S. Kenan’s book
      entitled The Federal Reserve Bank. Representative McFadden speaks of those on the other side of the water with a strong banking “fence getting the currency of the Federal Reserve Banks-exchanging that currency for gold and transmitting the gold to the foreign confederates.”

      McFadden named the dates on which America’s gold was shipped to Germany:

      On April 27, 1932, $750 thousand in gold was sent to Germany. One week later another $300 thousand in gold was shipped to Germany the same way. In the middle of May of that year, $12 million in gold was shipped to Germany. . . . Almost every week there was a shipment of gold to Germany-these shipments are not made for profit.

      Representative McFadden referred also to the comments of Senator Elihu Root:

      Long before we wake up from our dreams of prosperity through an inflated currency, our gold which could have kept us from catastrophe will have vanished, and no rate of interest will tempt it to return.

      In his report to Congress, Louis McFadden asked the question, Why should our depositors and our government be
      forced to flnance the munition factories of Germanv and Soviet Russia?

      Representative McFadden continued,

      Gold was taken from the entrusting American people and was sent to Europe. In the last several months $1,300,000,000 in gold has been sent to Europe every dollar of that gold once belonged to the people of United States and was unlawfully taken from them.

      As I weighed the words of Louis McFadden and other Iawmakers, I also witnessed the fantastic scene of America’s vanishing gold. The record was unbelievable:

      1949 – $24,500,000,000
      1958 – $21 ,593,000,000
      1959 – $20,478,483,000
      1960- $19,420,997,000
      196l – $ 17,667,587,000
      1962-$15,997 ,647,000
      1965 – $ 13,733,000,000

      On and on the gold drain went, unabated. Then came the crisis in the spring of 1968. We were living in Europe
      at that particular time. On March 14, hysterical crowds of people crowded, screamed, and scrambled their ways to the windows of the banks of England, and to the bank windows of the sub-basements of Paris to exchange their paper for gold. On one single day, the crude and the cultured, the peer and the peasant, carried off 200 tons of the precious metal. They stored it in secret places of their homes and deposited it in various banks in strongboxes labeled with fictitious names.

      On that day Senator Everett Dirksen in conversation with Secretary of the Treasury Fowler, William McChesney
      Martin, and a dozen other senators said,

      We have reached the bottom of the barrel. It seemed like only yesterday when I spoke on monetary matters when America had $26 billion in gold in her treasuries. By June 30 of 1971, it had been reduced to $10.5

      from Willard Cantelon’s book The Day the Dollar Dies date of publication 1973

    • Gerry
      Gerry says:

      @ PIP

      By the way before Klaus Swabbi there was/is another name of great importance which everyone should/need know

      Pierre Paul Schweitzer and here some further juicy morsel of historical information to add to the above:

      Why did the people of Europe and Britain crowd hysterically into their banks on March 14,1968,to exchange $240
      million in paper for 200 tons of gold? They could not eat their gold for food They could not wear it for clothes. It was too heavy to carry on the streets as a legal tender or medium of exchange. Why did they prefer to have the precious
      metal in place of their paper money?

      The answer was extremely clear. They were afraid that their paper would be canceled with the stroke of a legislative pen. It would be as worthless as the German marks of 1923 when it took a wheelbarrow load to buy a simple sandwich or hot dog. The average man knew his paper money was becoming of less and less value. Americans
      could recall 1937 when $30 a month would put food on the table for a family of four. By 1947, the same food would cost $43. By 1957, it would cost $72. Then $100, and inflation continued unchecked.

      The British, too, looked at their paper with its diminishing value. The record was indeed far from encouraging. The monetary facts offered little hope for the survival of their paper. In 1930, the official value of the pound was $4.86. In 1952, $2.82; in 1967, $2.40. In May of 1973 on the streets of Tokyo, I stared with incredulity at the spectre of inflation in Japan. Ground beef that was selling in October for $1.40 per pound was now $2.87; orange juice was over $3.00 per glass; steak, $ 16.00 per pound. In less than a year the price of real estate had doubled, and wool had tripled. Hashimoto, Secretary General of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party tried in vain to reason with the flnancial giants of his country. He concluded that those in a position to affect the inflation were too strong and beyond control.
      The problem of inflation was worldwide. Since World War II, the currencies of over 100 nations had been devalued,
      some many times. I recalled a 1959 address by Robert Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury. He bluntly spelled out the technique of inflation:

      Suppose tomorrow morning I want to write a check for $100 million, and the treasury does not have the money. I call the Federal Reserve Bank and ask, “Will you loan us $100 million at 31/2% for six months if I send you over our note to that effect?” The officer of the Federal Reserve Bank would naturally say, “I will.” He would merely create that much money subject to Reserve requirements by crediting our account in the sum and accepting the government note as an asset. When I finished writing checks for $100 million, we would have added 100 million to the nation’s
      money supply. This, he added, is one of the principles by which the 1940 dollar has shrunken to 47% with a
      quadrupling of our money supply.

      Nations continuing programs of war and welfare and other costly programs, were forced to continue borrowing money. America increased her federal budget 84% in a five-year period. By going deeper in debt, she also increased
      her money supply 47%. Consequently, the buying power of the dollar continued to fall ever lower. In certain countries of the world, it was overwhelming. In Argentina, inflation increased 289% in a five-year period. In Brazil, over 500%. In Java, l000%. As the cry of inflation was heard around the world and received with genuine alarm, governmental leaders strove in vain to curb this economic disease that would spell death to all systems eventually.

      In September 29, 1972, the Dallas Times Herald showed that in that particular year inflation had increased

      Great Britain- 12.5%
      France – 5.7%
      West Germany – 6 %

      Ludwig Erhard, Germany’s Minister of Finance at the close of World War II, had said,

      Give us depression or problems, but not inflation, for it spells eventually certain death to any economy.

      Erhard knew that inflation, allowed to continue, was like sending a pilot across the ocean with a plane in which was
      insufficient fuel. There came unavoidably a point of no return when the pilot found he had insufficient fuel to take
      him to either shore.

      Too Much or Not Enough

      In spite of the fact that the U.S. government had in_creased its money supply 47% in a five_year period, and other nations were doing the same thing, still there were those who cried it was not enough. Between 1954 and 1965, world trade had doubled. I sat with a thousand delegates in the International Board of Trade in the Waldorf Astoria Hotel of New York listening to the speakers struggle with their unsolved problems. world trade had reached the
      staggering figure of $159.2 billion. The currencies and credits with which they had to carry on this volume of trade
      was little more than $67.3 billion. By 1973, the volume of trade in the free world was $367 billion. I talked with
      Mitchell Sharpe, then Minister of Finance for Canada, and some of the American leaders. These men realized that the currencies being used were outmoded and insufficient for the modern day. They pointed out that the system was
      medieval, serving acceptably in the olden days when communities were small and self-contained, but thoroughly in-
      adequate for the present. The leaders of the nations involved in trade spoke of the nightmarish task of trying daily to adjust the varying exchange rates between the currencies from country to country on a day-to-day basis. They clamored for a single system of standardized value large enough in volume to allow world trade to move forward in
      an orderly fashion.

      ln 1967, two years following that International Board of Trade meeting in New York, the world leaders met in Rio. In discussing the inadequacy of the present world money systems to carry on world trade, Guido Carli from Rome suggested ersatz money which would resemble paper gold which was to be presented to the world the following
      year. I was back in America when the announcement came.

      It was March 31, 1968. Most of the world reacted with amazement at the announcement that came from Europe
      stating that the nations of the world were ready to transact business with a new medium of exchange known as “paper gold.” But to all who follow the trend of monetary matters, the announcement was no surprise. For days there was a feeling in the air that something momentous was coming.

      An editor wrote in the Financial Times,

      Something sinister is going on.

      With great interest, I followed the comments and reactions of world leaders. Carl Schiller, Germany’s financier, stated,

      There’s a worm in the apple somewhere.

      Pierre Paul Schweitzer seemed pleased. Schweitzer, the nephew of Albert Schweitzer, was an elite Protestant,
      born in Alsace-Lorraine, who had served as number-three man in the Bank of France, and had been elected managing director of the International Monetary Fund. Some declared that when paper gold was presented to the world on that March morning, Schweitzer declared,

      Gentlemen, we are right on schedule.

      72% of the nations in the IMF were considered under_developed. Schweitzer seemed especially dedicated to the
      task or policy of taking from the rich to give to the poor. This naturally made him popular with the majority in the
      IMF, who were elated at the prospect of acquiring some of America’s wealth regardless of the measures.

      Why the Announcement from Europe?

      Many Americans, startled by the announcement of paper gold, were asking,

      “Why has this declaration come to us from the bankers of Europe? Why did we have to hear it first from the lips of the spokesmen representing the gold pool so integrated with the World Bank and the Inter_national Monetary Fund?”

      The attitude of the average man on the street was one of absolute helplessness. In olden days, banking had been a
      rather personal matter between himself and a trusted friend. It had changed with the passing of time until it was with an institution equally trusted and respected. The local banker was indeed his friend and would discuss with sincerity
      the personal financial needs of any of his clients. But banking had become much more than a localized or even nationalized institution. In a single lifetime it had seemingly taken on an ominous new form of world control.

      A question began to arise in the hearts of millions of Americans. “Why can’t we retain our financial destiny in our own hands? Why can’t banking be a personal matter between man and his banker as in the past? Why must it be in the international courts and the arenas of the world?”

      In searching for the answers to those questions, I seemed to find a twofold answer. Logic and wisdom could explain
      with clarity the reasons for a world bank. But there was a dark side, which, when properly considered, revealed an
      invisible government with an amazing power that planned world control in a sinister fashion. Cantelon 1973

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      Doesn’t the OTT atrocity propaganda about China’s Muslims remind you of anything? Bucha, perhaps the biggest cock-up false flag of all time? The train station carnage committed with a Ukranian missle? Assad gassing his own civilians? Gaddafi prescribing viagra for an upcoming rape spree in Benghazi? Saddam’s WMDS? Iraqi Republican Guards throwing babies out incubators? Doctored satellite pictures ‘showing’ mass graves in Serbia? All the horrors the North Koreans are (without evidence)accused of? Going all the way back to lies about Huns crucifing innocent nurses back in 1914?
      How many of these are proved beyond all doubt to be total lies? Who benefitted from all these tall tales?
      Why on earth should we believe ANYTHING they say about China?
      Have you see these Weeger atrocities with your own eyes? And if not, going by their 100% perfect historical record of shameless lying, isn’t it logical to not fall for this garbage?

    • Lucius Vanini
      Lucius Vanini says:

      That’s a pip of a comment, though a bit brief.

      Say, I counted about a dozen instances of your using the word “Nazi.” I rather think that Klaus is too young to have been a conscious participant in the National Socialism of the Third Reich. Dragged up in 1938, he’d have been seven when that great European regime tragically ended.

      But there’s one thing that Schwab certainly has been and is–and that’s a globalist. And globalists tend to be on the Left, not on the Right as the Germans of the Third Reich were.

      In any case, to employ “Nazi” to confirm that a person is bad, as you seem to do here, isn’t really in a Rightist’s best interests. You might consider this if, like me, you deem yourself to be on the Right.

      White advocates are on the Right; I know of none on the Left. And so were all the 20th-C. European Fascists. And, where ordinary Europeans were concerned, they were infinitely better than today’s European leaders (Orban excepted). Believe me, Pip, if Hitler and Mussolini and Franco dominated Europe today, there’d lol be NO invasion by Sub-Saharan Africans and Asian Muslims. There’d be no program of population replacement, no promotion of miscegenation. Nor would anybody tell children that they can join the opposite sex, that castration is a healthy choice. Nor would there exist a great many of the menaces now endangering Western Civ.

      So were the German Fascists actually evil–except to those who hate us?

      In its adjectival form, “Nazi” is used to characterize people and policies as evil, and that’s the meaning which people almost invariably take from it. As a noun it denotes a villain, a fanatical malefactor. But, again, the Fascists of the Third Reich were anything but worse than Western leaders today. Moreover, like us, they stressed ethnic/genetic heritage. Like us, they believed in racial pride, racial loyalty and partisanship. Hence our enemies habitually label us as “Nazis.”

      So to keep using “Nazi” (or “Fascist”) as a virtual synonym of “evil” and “political criminal” tends to bolster our enemies’ narrative. We seem to join in their condemnation of Whites who love and prefer their race. Perhaps it’s better to refer to slime like Schwab as “globalist,” or “aspiring totalitarian”? That’s what Schwab is, in any case–rather than a Third-Reich German.

      Beware of aiding your enemy by adopting his language, which is weaponized for his advantage, not yours. Cf. “Aid Not Thy Foe’s Narrative,”

  3. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    Thank you, sir, for your fine article. It is refreshing to see someone who has a grasp on reality regarding the Russia/Ukraine issue, or should I say the Russia/Zelenskyy & Co. issue.

    It is a sobering confirmation of the stranglehold a certain group has on Western mainstream media. Absolutely no mention of Zelenskyy pushing for free abortions and legalized prostitution, the US backed biolabs, that Ukraine (since the 2014 US backed coup) is the world hub for money laundering and child trafficking.

    Patrick Lancaster, an American reporter on Ukraine for the last eight years, was recently interviewed on the Russia/Ukraine issue. He reported that many Ukrainians are flying Russian flags, welcoming the Russians and desperately wish to be rid of the post 2014 ruling cabal of Ukraine.

    He also discusses the American backed coup in 2014, rightly pointing out that the war did not start last February but has been ongoing since 2014.

  4. Kckiw
    Kckiw says:

    Off topic but why do white nationalists hate me? I am a young white man who is red pilled on race and the JQ, and supports the idea of fighting for an ethnostate. However the alt-right hates me because I was born to a single teenage mother in poverty, and was in low-income housing and food stamps for most of my life. From what I see of their beliefs I would be considered “White trash” and excluded. In fact you guys even fantasize about putting me in a gas chamber, or at least cutting off my junk so I can’t spread my “dysgenics” into the population, all because of circumstances I didn’t choose. Why do you exclude people who want to support you?

      • Kckiw
        Kckiw says:

        I have seen numerous white nationalist comments that speak of “underclass” whites as a kind of genetic enemy, no better than non-whites, while I have virtually never seen a white nationalist stick up for them.

        Look at this for instance:

        • Kevin MacDonald
          Kevin MacDonald says:

          Are you referring to this?
          In this modern-day, White American tax dollars are aggressively obtained to be funneled into programs to benefit so-called minorities, criminals, and other unproductive members of society. The AFP will cut all programs that enable otherwise able citizens to be unproductive non-contributors. We see these programs as enabling spiritually degenerate behavior and incentivizing the proliferation of the least productive elements of our Nation. That being said, social safety nets are perfectly reasonable when implemented correctly, but these programs should be coupled with work for the good of the community, not just a handout.

          If so, your comment seems exaggerated to say the least.

          • Kckiw
            Kckiw says:

            you don’t see how that is saying that “the poors” are basically the enemy, the other? It is literally saying if you are poor we are going to punish you and make you suffer and you don’t deserve help.

            A real white nationalist should be saying that it is the poor white trash who suffer the most from our present society and need the movement the most and they are totally included in the White family but I don’t see many saying that. Instead they post garbage like I linked.

          • Kevin MacDonald
            Kevin MacDonald says:

            We have consistently supported the White working class and complained that the left (and GOP Chamber of Commerce conservatives) abandoned the White working class a long time ago in favor of diversity and multiculturalism–the worst thing possible for the White working class.

          • Emicho
            Emicho says:

            ” . . but these programs should be coupled with work for the good of the community, not just a handout.”
            You forgot to mention, these programs should be coupled with work **for the benefit of the recievers themselves**. This is far, far more important than any contribution these people may make towards the community, which in many cases is probably negligible.
            Just dumping people who the modern economy has no need for with money and forgetting about them, is one of the cruelest aspects of our current system. I promise you, I’ve seen this with my own eyes.
            As they have had their religion stripped from them as well, they mainly just lose their souls to drugs, or commit crimes out of boredom, which obviously negatively effects everyone else.
            As this foundation, we should bring back Victorian work houses, we don’t need to bring back all the horrors that went along with them, although obviously these were totally blown out of all proportion, just like the way our current elites always defame the past, to make us more content with the horrible mess they provide us with now.
            I don’t even believe you have to make the people in these workhouses do actual work. Sure, they must do a little for their keep, for the principle & their own benifit, but there is so much surplus wealth in a 21st century economy, there is more than enough to keep them without creating any wealth, obviously there is, because the state finds money pay for their accommodation and benefits now.
            But a good proportion of their time should be arts and craft, health and fitness, country excursions, work on the land, running kids clubs, organising social events and more.
            When they brought in feminism to dragoon woman into wage slavery, the community work these women did before that just got abandoned.
            It’s a huge part of why we don’t live in societies anymore, we’re just atomised drones.
            These ‘workhouses’ for the people whom the modern economy has no use for, their mission should be to reestablish the communities that were liquidated by feminism, and the collapse of the churches.
            They’d get fed, they’d get the opportunity to do all these productive things. It wouldn’t be a holiday camp, because they’d sleep in dorms, community dining etc, and they’d be forced to take part. Their schedule would be regulated as well.
            So it’s not like everyone would want to do it.
            But for those that don’t, then the alternative would be the street or jail. No more just handing people a flat and money then abandoning them. This is evil and cruel.

        • Liam Kernaghan
          Liam Kernaghan says:

          Listen – fella! How many people that most others would consider “White Trash” would actually take the time and effort to not only first and foremost, seek out this website, but secondly to post a coherent and thought provoking – if perhaps overly sensitive commentary. The answer – not many; because you’re obviously not “White Trash”. If you actually were “White Trash” then you wouldn’t be posting here in the first place!
          Please DO NOT buy into this narrative which is largely Left/Elitist in origin but taken up by some snobby rear guard action-fighting Rightists that just because you were perhaps born into materially restricted circumstances and didn’t go to a college to do some tin-pot non-STEMM degree course, then your concerns and sentiments aren’t worthy of consideration.
          Thanks for supporting this site. Yours in racial solidarity from the United Kingdom.

          Liam Kernaghan

        • Bobby
          Bobby says:

          Kckiw, I have spent more than my fair share of time living in rural New England. Many of the whites there, the “white trash,” are the result of years of our manufacturing jobs being sent over seas, drug addiction, the education system, deterioration of the family, etc. It was my experience, that many of them, are hopeless. They survive day-to-day, their only highlights cigarettes, junk food, the garbage on the constantly running TV’s, petty bickering with others, and the hope that their lawyer will call and announce that they have won their disability case. These are people who can barely read a local newspaper.

          May I suggest that you make them your cause. Gently introduce the things that you have learned to them. If you’re watching a basketball game with them, and Nate Silver (the NBA commissioner) is shown in the audience, say the them, “Jews run everything man. It’s unbelievable.” Or things like, “remember when you could get a job at one of the factories right out of high school? The Jewish globalists and their Shabez Goys sent our jobs away.” Things like that. And be able to back up what you say with facts. You will most likely not reach many of them. But even if you reach just a few, it’s worth it. You want them to do what they have rarely done most of their lives; think.

          What I do is reach out to the 80 million Trump supporters, the still working white class, and the upper white class. Now is the perfect time with all that’s going on. Look at what happened in Louden, country VA. The parents were home because of the scamdemic, saw what their children were being taught, freaked out, and took action and because of that, flipped the state back to red. Who was behind the CRT? Soros, the ADL, Mark Elias, Zuckerberg. I know for a fact that the parents knew it was the Jews destroying their children with the CRT. If they have other whites to support them and educate them, the more the better and as we saw, change is possible.

          You have to keep at it and be gentle. Anger will only make them turn from you.

          • Liam Kernaghan
            Liam Kernaghan says:

            Good ideas raised. But rather than naming those by the name that we all know about – just refer to them as “Big City Liberals”. Ordinary people are more sophisticated than a lot of people think. In a great many people minds, “Big City Liberals” and that other group of people we all know about are now synonymous. Don’t turn people off by overstating the obvious. Help your immediate community in small ways – join in; help; listen; respect – GIVE. Be social. Be somebody that can be relied upon in the difficult but temporary times that are coming. Don’t be a larper – you’ll never get to heaven if you wear a stahlhelm – be it plastic or steel!

    • Harald E Brandt
      Harald E Brandt says:

      > “… why do white nationalists hate me? I am a young white man who is red pilled on race and the JQ, and supports the idea of fighting for an ethnostate. However the alt-right hates me… …. I would be considered “White trash” and excluded”

      ?? If you are red pilled on race and the JQ and supports the idea of fighting for an ethnostate, you are a precious asset!

      “White trash” is a sinister epithet by liberal “up-nosed” lefties who lack arguments and who love to bully people. Ignore it! Alt-right has nothing to do with it (according to my view of alt-right – maybe some of “our” people may use that epithet to designate severe drug addicts etc., because they are rarely assets).

      Organisations such as National Justice Party (US), or Nordic Resistance Movement (Nordic countries such as Sweden), or Golden Dawn (Greece), or …. really work for people like you, and other people of the same race with the same insights as yours, but which may perhaps have had a more fortunate start in life.

      • Leon Haller
        Leon Haller says:

        “White trash” refers to something absolutely real, and those who deserve the label should be censured. However, the designation has nothing to do with financial status, but rather, behavior – specifically, whites aping the underclass behaviors of the ghetto. The rapper Eminem is vastly wealthier than I am, but am I wrong to call him “white trash”? Everything about his demeanor, language and behavior screams it.

  5. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    For the anti-White forces in control of the West, with the globalists and Neocons in control of U.S. foreign policy, the ultimate goal, what they mean by the New World Order, is an anti-White (i.e., opposed to White existence and independence) global unipolar system, exercised through the U.S. acting as global hegemon.

    Is it really about the white race?

    Since the creation of the Atomic Bomb there has existed in the minds of very powerful people essentially the international bankers who have made it clear that either the world finds a way to establish a One World Government or as they say New World Order the world is doomed. Two world wars accomplished or solved nothing economically or politically and it seems the ones who understood this best were the international bankers largely based out of America. Look at all the quotes by their kind:

    “We shall have a world government whether or not we like it. The only question is, whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”
    —James Warburg, February 17, 1950 before the U.S. Senate

    “It is necessary to discover a head capable of directing it, endowed with an intelligence surpassing the most elevated human level.”
    —H.G. Wells

    “Let that man be a military man or a layman, it matters not.”
    —Paul Henry Spaak, first president of the Council of Europe, planner of the European Common Market, president of the United Nations General Assembly, and one-time Secretary-General of NATO

    “Strong, one-man civilian control of America’s giant military establishment is vital to the nation’s wellbeing. The concentration of authority is inevitable.”
    —Roswell Gilpatrick, Deputy Secretary of Defence

    “In the field of atomic energy, there must be set up a world power.”
    —Robert J. Oppenheimer

    “World government has become inevitable.”
    —Arthur Compton Cantelon

    “One world Government is in the making. whether we like it or not, we are moving toward a one-world government.”
    —Dr. Ralph Barton Perry of Harvard

    “Either we will find a way to establish world government, or we will perish in a war of the atom.”
    —Raymond Swing to Albert Einstein

    “The secret of the bomb should be committed to a world government, and the USA should immediately announce its readiness to give it to a world government.”
    —Albert Einstein

    “Sovereignty must go, that means also the interests which sovereignty protects must be recognized as outmoded in character and dangerous in operation.”
    —Professor Laski of Oxford

    “The only escape from total destruction of civilization will be a world government, or we will perish in a war of the atom.”
    —Harold Urey

    Strange according to this comment by a Gary Littlejohn he says this:

    The recent annual meeting in Davos was renamed ‘The World Government Forum’ rather than ‘The World Economic Forum’. So we see the agenda trailed some years ago by the late David Rockefeller being implemented now. This will be an attempt to crush the developments being analyzed (and to some degree implemented) by Sergey Glazyev.

    Isn’t that interesting!!!! And wow won’t the readers here be interested in the comment that follow from me from of an old book i have re-posted from the jacket of Dr. Willard Cantelon’s book The Day the Dollar Dies pub. 1973:

    “In 1945 the coming of the computer paved the way for a worldwide system which would transform men and masses to digits and file cards.”

    “World War 2 produced a system of rationing where the number on the coupon took priority over man’s money as legal tender, or a medium of exchange.”

    “The author reminds his readers that the masses which accepted the ration system under the crisis of war will accept the new number system under a monetary crisis that will be purposely created by those wishing to establish world control.”

    Hmmmmm? Great Reset???????????

    The White Race? You can’t push the entire world into a globalist utopia without remaking the nations of the world into a multi ethnic conglomeration of nationalities. It seems in their minds the white race is far more responsible for all the bloodshed of the last 2-3 centuries so like Longshanks said in the movie Braveheart ‘we’ll breed them out?’ Could it be that simple?

    Ah, but technology what ultimate control such a system can implement and what a godsend it has been to the world of banking! Do they think by controlling our bread and conscience they will now succeed with their globalist dreams?

    Perhaps if what we read here is true?

    • Captainchaos
      Captainchaos says:

      The Saker knows that he’s full of shit. He is fully well aware that unless Germanic/Nordics throw off the Jewish yoke in the long run the Russian people are doomed. The Putinist way – walking the middle road between accommodating Jews, the wogs of the Caucasus and Russian ethnic self-interest – will in the end result in the racial mongrelization and extinction of the Russian people.

      Putin’s own daughter was married to a Jewish oligarch and had a child with him. You don’t think Putin could have used his power to prevent such an outcome? Of course he could have, but the cold truth of the matter is that he approved of the marriage. Putin has cast the very genetic future of his family line with Jewry. What should that tell you about Putin’s attitude towards the racial mongrelization of the Russian people?

      • Eric Novak
        Eric Novak says:

        Wouldn’t the marriage of Putin’s daughter to a Jewish oligarch put him in the same category as Trump, whose daughter he married off to a Jew as a means of consolidating power?

      • Gerry
        Gerry says:

        @ Captainchaos

        In reply i can only say or ask rather is her husband Jewish in the true sense of the word. 100% or a mix of? Does he love Russia ? Where does his loyalties lie? What do we really know?

        As for Oligarchs why is it…beginning with this quote for me which started me down the path of learning all i could about the why of so much?

        “The world lives in a fools paradise based upon fictitious wealth, rash promises and mad illusions. We must beware of booms based upon false prosperity which has its roots in inflated credits and prices.”

        I learned this quote, the author of it was none other than Paul Warburg? Wow, i thought too myself there is a great deal of truth in that statement and Warburg watching the disaster that would unfold the great depression became so full of indignation for the political class and their ineptitude that he lost all respect for them. So what then if he was in power he would have saved America from the Great Depression?

        And I looking about me here in the lower mainland of BC looking at real estate prices in the millions of dollars this quote comes roaring back. I have friends who own homes in the million dollar value range and it just blows my mind. Not one house is worth such money and none of my friends not even one makes the kind of income to support any of it. Paul Warburg if he saw our day and age what would he be saying? Maybe O good grief here we go again they learn nothing!

        That then took me to some other information which truly astounds and that is the name Carrol Quigley and his book Tragedy and Hope where he confesses after being given access to all of the secret knowledge and papers of the international bankers and what they really knew he says this on page 979-980:

        “I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years, and was permitted for two years in the early 1960’s to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it, nor to most of its aims, and have for much of my life been close to it and many of its instruments.

        and added to the above is this from a W. Cleon Skousen:

        “Dr. Quigley expresses the utmost contempt for members of the American middle class, who think they can preserve what he calls their “petty bourgeoisie” property rights and constitutional privileges.”

        It’s mindboggling to me that these men Warburg, Rothschild’s came from Rabbinical families?

  6. James Clayton
    James Clayton says:

    This morning, I arose to a post from a braying jackass via a “doctor” who has been exposing much inconvenient and unpleasant on the promoters of the pandemic as opportunity. That doctor who makes much of his money promoting various snake oils rebroadcast a video interview from high blood pressure poster boy Jones on the Nazis in Ukraine collaborating with the COVID improvement conspirators to holocaust patriots who subscribe and consume fat boy Jones his own brand of snake oil.

    If nothing else, try to become aware of literal speech impediments including saying, “You know” about every third sentence. THAT is a pandemic. And this “bioweapons” authority and Amnesty International law drafter, if you happen to view him, has an even worse one, getting high-centered repeating, “Ah, ah…”

    My estranged daughter married a young man reportedly Ukrainian, a refugee by way of Romania because– he claimed– to be a dispensationalist evangelist which made him a persecuted minority there for which there is case law and public policy allow him in. He apparently has a little money or at least a good credit rating and thought he could make more by capturing Zionist grant money to win Africans for the denomination and help them emigrate. His stated denomination are wannabe Jews and aggressively promoting immigrants to people the medical industry. There is no shortage of growing congregations praying for Jesus to return quickly and the instant craziness being evidence that that’s near.

    There’s a lot of drug and alcohol use, not to mention miscegenation. And Fred Reed also points out that there is a lot of degenerate birthing and raising the demonstrably challenged including creationists:

    And if any of them in that part of the world are persecuting any on the premise that anything that walks like a duck might as well be considered a duck and therefore persecuted for such quacking, then I’d consider them my people for wanting them out of my space. That’s our problem here which I wish we’d face.

    In haste: lunch is on the table and therefore I suppose I’m like everyone else here these days…

    • Gerry
      Gerry says:

      @ James Clayton

      I’ve read the Catholics argue that the ho,.locaust replaced the Crucifixion and such but I got to tell you what replaced all really is what is found here unfortunately.

      Cheers and good luck

  7. Karl
    Karl says:

    The author is correct about Russia’s forthcoming big win in Ukraine.

    But we should not cheer just yet.

    I say this because NATO member Turkey is besting Russia in the Caucasus and Central Asia, and NATO is very happy about this.

    Turkey is also holding its own in Syria and Libya against Russia.

    How is any of that good for Russia?

    It isn’t, and it shows that Russia is not winning in general.

    As we know, Jews here and abroad are behind a lot of what ails US foreign policy (and domestic policy too).

    So why doesn’t Putin say this? It seems he is as afraid of Jews as the West is.

    If he’s such a Super White Christian Man, let’s see him go up against Jews.

    Russia has rather good relations with Israel, while the latter is beating up Russia’s partner, Syria.

    Not good for Russia.

    Like I said, don’t break out the champagne yet and maybe never over Russia.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      “I say this because NATO member Turkey is besting Russia in the Caucasus and Central Asia, and NATO is very happy about this.”
      Putin is letting Armenia etc suffer a bit for insubordination, kinda saying: OK, go ahead, see how well you do without us. They aren’t doing very well.
      Put in is also frustrating Turkey’s ambitions in Syria & Lybia.
      “So why doesn’t Putin say this? It seems he is as afraid of Jews as the West is.”
      Because he isn’t emotionally incontinent. What would be the benefit of saying it, apart from the instant dopamine rush? Putin keeps his friends close, but his enemies closer.
      Putin’s KGB nationalist clique started out with an absolute shambles of a nation at the end of the 90’s, raped badly by Jews.
      He’s transformed it into something that can now block Israel’s ambitions in the ME, and GloboHomo in Eastern Europe. He’s also locked in tight with China, the superpower of the future.
      Seems to me he’s doing pretty well. He’s also, using the Judo concept of diplomacy, managed to benefit from all the dumb sanctions the West has thrown at him to strengthen Russia.
      Him and Xi are going to end the pedophile, Satanic Jewish empire for good. Two great men of history.
      All of us should be rooting for them, our enemies are the scum who rule us.

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        [ Putin ] “and Xi are going to end the pedophile, Satanic Jewish empire for good.”

        That quote is a good example of typical White Christian political thinking — pray to JC for him to get someone else to engage and settle a hazardous political issue . Otherwise , it is wishful thinking .

        According to the above comment by CaptainChaos and which was posted after your comment ___

        ” Putin’s own daughter was married to a Jewish oligarch and had a child with him.”

        • Lucius Vanini
          Lucius Vanini says:

          Re faith that Putin and Xi will destroy the “Satanic Jewish empire,” and its being “typical White Christian political thinking….wishful thinking.”

          You may have noticed in my comments here that, as one who’s worked on the grassroots level, I’ve come up against that sort of thing innumerable times. It’s yet another way in which Judeo-Chr. messianism handicaps Whites. For instance, after the “election” of Dementia Joe, White Christians of the American Conservative movement were SURE that Pence and/or Congress would decertify the vote, keeping Trump in office. They believed that their god willed it, and more than one quoted scripture to me in support of that notion.

          I believe that such Whites might’ve agitated with much more energy had they not believed that their god was on the job.

          Similarly, J-C messianism often impedes Whites’ participating at all in pro-White political efforts. Wish I had a buck for every time I’ve been told “These troubles are signs of the last days. They’re supposed to happen, and it’s good they are, because they mean that Jesus is returning, and he alone can make things right.” Obviously, troubles are acceptable if they herald the end of all trouble.

          Another thing (lol, yeah, yet another!). Can adults attached to kiddie stories actually be able to save their civilization?! If a 40-year-old still believes in a Satan, a Savior and a Second Coming, a Vicarious Atonement and a heaven, etc., has he the acumen to prevail in this desperate political struggle? Look at his adversary. The crack, elite troops of the juggernaut against White, Western Civ are ethno-cultural Jews. Such Jews aren’t bearded, chest-punching, Torah-revering Hasidim but agnostics and atheists focusing on what really works in the real world. I can’t see how bible-thumping Judeo-Christians can cope with them. And so far my apprehensions aren’t stultified, because in fact so many of these J-Cs even shill for Jews and their ethnostate, thinking them the Chosen People–and not without a semblance of reason, inasmuch as the founders of their religion and their very god were ethnic Jews.

          • John Alder
            John Alder says:

            Getting the bible thumpers to see that there is nothing supernatural ,holy or divine about the bible really helps to liberate them. The bible is a book of scribblings written by jews and filled with jewish myths, legends and superstitions. The christians in America are always launching another revival/crusade that draws a big crowd and lots of cash flow and the end result is exactly what America is today.They made zero difference and zero progress. Only we can save our race and not somebody who died over 2,000 years ago.

          • Emicho
            Emicho says:

            “I can’t see how bible-thumping Judeo-Christians can cope with them.”
            Judeo-Christians are just as much a problem for normal Christians as the are for anyone else.
            The word itself is an oxymoron, it might as well be Satano-Christians.
            “If a 40-year-old still believes in a Satan, a Savior and a Second Coming, a Vicarious Atonement and a heaven, etc”
            Folks who believed in all this created your Republic. They also specifically stated their system wouldn’t work unless the people were believing Christians.
            What have atheists ever created that’s been good?
            Yes there are lot’s of Judeo-Christians dummies, just like there are even more atheist dummies. This doesn’t prove anything.
            Would you say atheists are more likely to be on the left, opening borders, wrecking cities with crime, turning kids gay and confusing them with gender nonsense, or is it Christians doing these things?

          • moneytalks
            moneytalks says:

            Your insinuations regarding Christians are dismally and penetratingly correct .

            There does not seem to be enough Whites capable of objectively analyzing their Christianity and its implications and ramifications for Western civilization which appears to be doomed as a result of their intellectual incompetence .

            That doom should not prevent concerned USA Whites ( assuming there are enough capable ones still alive ) from attempting to establish a WN ethnostate and begin to build a new and improved Western civilization that would not be under the despotic totalitarian monopoly dominion of the ILLuminati NWO globalist cabalistic cartel of The RCC Vatican of Pope Francis , The Queen Liz of the Brits Commonwealth , and The Rothschild Ashkenazi financial tribe .

            Have no doubt , that globalist oligarchy cartel is not going to “let” Whites establish an ethnostate .

          • Emicho
            Emicho says:

            Judeo-Christian is an oxymoron, it’s two opposites, you might as well say Satano-Christian. Or black-white nationalism.
            Yes, these types exist, but they’re retards.
            “Another thing (lol, yeah, yet another!). Can adults attached to kiddie stories actually be able to save their civilization?! If a 40-year-old still believes in a Satan, a Savior and a Second Coming, a Vicarious Atonement and a heaven, etc., has he the acumen to prevail in this desperate political struggle?”
            Folks who thought like this built your Republic. They built the civilisation you talk about saving. They also won at Tours and Lepanto.
            Or what about those in the Balkans who kept what you value most, their white racial purity, through hundreds of years of Turk domination?
            Islam isn’t intelligent enough, isn’t deep enough, to sustain white people through tough times.
            Just like white nationalism will never be deep enough for multitudes to fight and die for.
            It’s this shallowness, in my opinion, why WN so often veers off into weirdness like homosexualism, bizarre paganism, Satanism, ultra nationalism & ridiculous hatred towards others.
            Look at Azov in Ukraine for a perfect example of all these factors.
            Instead of uniting with their Slavic brothers in their ancient faith, like their fathers and father’s fathers before them, they’ve turned into fetishists for ‘Ukrainianism’, have unhinged hatred for ‘Moskovites'(their racial twins), enthusiasim for bonkers, dark occultism and presumably, homosexualism.
            Compare this cult, with their Jewish leader, fighting for Jewish aims & for Jewish money, killing Jewish enemies, to the Christians under the Turks in the Balkans, or the horde in the same land.
            Their faith kept them white, which I thought you’d be glad of, because real Christianity, not the garbage Jewish-designed modern stuff, is a white people’s religion.
            Sure, other races adopt Christianity, but they don’t adopt the white people version. It’s always noticeably very different.
            Note – I don’t mean this as another boring argument over the truth of The Faith,(please can we have have truce on this? It’s so utterly pointless!) but about the very real and blazingly obvious positive EFFECTS of the faith on white people, in keeping them white and giving them purpose and something to live, fight and die for.
            You saying no-one over 40 can possibly believe in it, that means you’re saying everyone who does is a fool. And that’s not just a childish opinion, that is proveably, factually wrong. Actually, it’s bonkers.
            P.S. You decry the trouble all these Christians gave you with Trump, believing daft things, etc. No doubt, I believe you.
            But where were all the atheists? Oh yeah, they were all voting for Biden. Question: What’s a bigger challenge, getting Trump voting judeo-Christians to move towards your white nationalist ideas, or getting woke atheists to do so?

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          Putin & Xi will end ZOG for good because the Empire’s power is based on the petro-dollar, which India and everyone else in the world, except ZOG’s colonies in Europe, are going to replace under Putin & Xi’s direction.
          It’s just what everyone paying attention understands.
          Yes, I wish for it, but it isn’t “wishful thinking”. And I’ve no idea what how this is an example of “white Christian political thinking”.
          Let’s see if you can back up this assertion?
          Who cares if Putin’s daughter married a Jewish oligarch. Does this mean Putin works for Jews? You ever tried persuading a daughter not to marry who she wants to?
          You think Putin takes direction from his daughter, or his daughter’s Jew husband?
          And anyway, not all Jewish oligarchs are despicable nation destroyers, just most of them. I’ve always thought Abramovich doesn’t seem like a decent guy, well, as decent as a Jew could be who’d stole the state assets of the Russian people. He seems on good terms with Putin as well.

          • Lucius Vanini
            Lucius Vanini says:

            No, “Judeo-Christian” is no oxymoron. It’s an old term making perfect sense. You’d see that if you were better acquainted with the creed.

            First, it WAS founded by ethnic Jews, and its god is the Jewish god.

            Second, like Judaism, it’s messianic. Can you name another religion that’s messianic, involving belief in a Messiah, besides Judaism and Judeo-Christianity?

            Third, it draws from pre-Christian Judaic scriptures as well as from the NT. Don’t you remember when I said that the NT has no explicit prohibition of homosexuality, and you rhetorically asked why should it need to, since there’s LEVITICUS 18:22? That Judeo-Christians use the OT—indeed consider it among their sacred scriptures—implies that in some measure Judeo-Christianity is an extension of the older religion, such that much of the latter applies to adherents of the former.

            He who denies the OBVIOUS connection between the two religions is like a little kid lying on the ground and kicking it and punching it, crying “It ain’t so! It ain’t so! It just ain’t so!”

          • moneytalks
            moneytalks says:

            ” Who cares if Putin’s daughter married a Jewish oligarch. Does this mean Putin works for Jews? ”

            Do facts matter ?

            Trump’s daughter married a Lubavitcher and they are also associated with Putin .

            Clinton’s daughter also married a jew .

            British Prince William married the jewess Kate … and so on .

            There is a long list of jews marrying into political elite families . Do you see a pattern emerging from these facts ?

          • Lucius Vanini
            Lucius Vanini says:

            So you think TOO is about the JQ for its own sake? No, poor fella, Jews are a focus here because they pose a problem for White preservation and White well-being.

            No mystery that you’d fail to see something so obvious, because you don’t care about race, and dream that the name of the game to going back to church and being Jew-hating lovers of the Jewish god, though lol you yourself say you don’t go to church….

            But it’s great that you’re being so forthright in your contempt of “white race fetishists” and “retarded utopian white nationalist dreams” (another thing you recently said). I’m sure that all the White-race fetishists here—and that’s everyone here except for Christians—are grateful that a true-believing non-Christian (who says he doesn’t know much about the religion) has condescended to come here and tell us what’s really important and true.

            And you say “atheist”? WHO said I’m an atheist?!

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          How is it wishful thinking? Russia & China, Putin & Xi, are putting an end to the petrodollar, the basis of the Evil Empire’s power. Everyone switched on can see this. But also, how is it a specifically “White Christian” version of wishful thinking?

          • Emicho
            Emicho says:

            To Mr Vanini
            I’m sure I’d see loads of things truer if I was “better acquainted with the creed”.
            Now you see how little I know, maybe now you will believe me when I tell you I’m not a Christian, instead of accusing me of lying?
            All I know is the absolute basics I’ve absorbed by osmosis, reading about other things.
            So I cannot name another “messianic” religion off the top of my head, and I’m not going to bother trying to look one up. So you got me. Though what this proves I’ve no idea.
            But Jews don’t care about the OT, if you think they do, that just means you’ve fallen for their propaganda.
            Real Christianity is the OPPOSITE of what we mean by Jews, who are in rebellion against the laws of Moses.
            Yes, Jesus came to preach a New Covent, but also to uphold the old one. But this old one has NOTHING to do with the Talmudic cult of Satanic Jews.

          • moneytalks
            moneytalks says:

            Putin and Xi did not make the decision to scrap the US dollar . It was secretly made years ago in the City of London/Satan by the ILLuminati NWO global oligarchy cabalistic cartel dominated by The Vatican Pope , The Queen Liz of The Brits Commonwealth , and The Rothschilds .

            Reminder ___

            The USA dominion of White Christians , whom elected President Wilson , handed monopoly control of Westernworld money systems to the Rothschildean financial empire with the enactment of the 1913 Federal Reserve Act .

          • Lucius Vanini
            Lucius Vanini says:

            EMICHO, SJ–
            When I said “You’d see that if you were better acquainted with the creed” I was being satirical, pretending to believe what you say about your not being a Christian or of a church. I think you’re more likely a Jesuit than what you claim. You’ve probably complained to the General about having been given such a tough assignment as you have here.

            But if you really ARE under-acquainted with the creed, are you qualified to speak of it to us in ever glowing terms? Or even personally to retain such a reverent view of it? Shouldn’t you wait until you have enough knowledge of it, at which point you may decide that it isn’t so holy?

          • Emicho
            Emicho says:

            To Mr Moneytalks
            Yes facts matter, but they don’t prove an hypothesis on their own. Selected facts, like statistics, can be made to prove any old nonsense.
            I know all about Jews allying with elites, it goes back to the dark ages in Europe.
            But just because they can nab some bimbo daughter or (much preferably) an elite son, it doesn’t follow that from that moment on, all is lost, and the Kazarian Mafia or the Rothchilds or the Illuminaty now take over the brains of European leaders.
            P.S. I’m with you about Illuminati/Luciferians etc, but Queen Lizzy? Is this a joke?
            And Wilson was more gone in the head than Biden, before that, he was a snobby, arrogant fool. He didn’t represent anyone but himself and whoever bought him, which wasn’t the white Christian masses.
            Though he did admit he’d fckd his entire nation with the Fed, so credit where it’s due.
            -To Mr Vanini
            “I was being satirical”
            Well that’s a first, we normally get a heads up when you crack jokes, because you can’t help laughing at them yourself.
            ” . . pretending to believe what you say about your not being a Christian or of a church.”
            Where did you say you believed me, satirical or otherwise? I missed that. Did you write it or just think it? Hint- You didn’t write it.
            “I think you’re more likely a Jesuit than what you claim. You’ve probably complained to the General about having been given such a tough assignment as you have here.”
            Is this satirical? If I was a trained Jesuit, on assignment from the General, wouldn’t I know more than I do?
            You talk in tongues. Are you actually an Opuis Dies double agent?
            “But if you really ARE under-acquainted with the creed, are you qualified to speak of it to us in ever glowing terms? Or even personally to retain such a reverent view of it? Shouldn’t you wait until you have enough knowledge of it, at which point you may decide that it isn’t so holy?”
            Finally, you say something that is actually funny. Though when you said you were a “tough assignment” that was pretty funny too. See how charitable I am? Always give credit when it’s due, though that’s probably a Christian virtue.
            Are you touched? I can say whatever the hell I like!(subject to the mod)
            I specifically told you at the very start of this melodrama(and I know you remember what I write) that I’ve all the respect in the world for the theory that Christianity is a Jewish scam on the goyim. It’s a good case, and I wouldn’t dream of going up against the expert pushers of this theory. I’ve read loads of it, I just don’t buy it. The Christian case is better.
            Darwinian evolution is a good theory too, and though I don’t buy that either, I wouldn’t dream of engaging those experts in debate neither.
            What I will do though is point out the absurdities of the low IQ cartoon version of the atheist attack on Christianity that you push, a child could do this. You really have no idea how similar you sound to arrogant leftist 19 yo student trying to evangelise Godlessness because it hates it’s parents, with a mockery of what Christianity stands for.
            I was trying to help you, to stop you doing it, you were looking ridiculous, and soon someone much harder-hearted than me was going to come along and annihilate your nonsense.
            If I can do it, and I’m not even a Christian . . . look . . . . if i was, why would I deny it? Don’t you know Christians don’t do this? Don’t you remember Judas doing it?
            I’m probably free to slag you and be cheeky because I’m NOT a Christian.
            As for waiting(how long?) before being persuaded that Christianity is much closer to the truth(the only thing I care about), it’s been obvious to me for years. What else is there?
            You’re a white race fetishist, good for you, I’m not, what do you suggest, I take a course in it to become one?
            This site may ‘say’ it’s about white identity, interests, identity, I’ve nothing against that, I’m for it, but it’s not a philosophy.
            And we all know this site is really about the Jewish problem.
            McDonald’s books are about white iden. . . . wait a minute, no, they are actually about the Jewish problem.

          • Emicho
            Emicho says:

            Mr Vanini
            First, I’m amazed the mod is letting us carry on our personal bitch-fight,[Mod. Note: I’m also “amazed! Aren’t you bored with in-fighting over trivia yet?] I say we just keep at it until all the reply buttons disappear? I’m up for it if you are.
            “So you think TOO is about the JQ for its own sake? ”
            You really need to learn how to argue. I specifically stated TOO could be for whatever it likes, I’m not against it, I’m FOR the things it states. What I wrote is that is not all that important to *ME*, what brings me here is the way it tackles the JQ, which absolutely is at the bottom of all sorts of problems for all sorts of people.
            So there is what I wrote, spelled out two different ways, yet to you, because you are blinded by your bigotry, translate this as:
            “Jews are a focus here because they pose a problem for White preservation and White well-being.
            No mystery that you’d fail to see something so obvious, because you don’t care about race . .”
            You just cannot help putting your own spin on what I write. It’s you who needs a course, ‘How To Get Over ‘Strawmanning’ Everyone’s Arguments.
            I “don’t care about race”. No, I just don’t make a religion out of it. I think the mongrelisation of God’s races is sacrilegious. It’s another Jewish/Satanic attack on nature and God. But I care about other things too, and will not fetishise ‘whiteness’, it’s just too dumb.
            And not everyone here does fetishise whites. I’d say most are concerned about whites as well as many other things, it’s a different thing when you turn it into your obsession, your religion. You just end up acting and speaking in all these foolish, cultist ways, become bigoted, and it’s also I reckon got much to do with your inability to actually argue.
            You should be learning from how I do it. See how I take every point you make that I disagree with, break it down and point out what I believe is the correct version? That’s how it’s done. Not taking ONE aspect, out of about two dozen points, putting your own interpretation on it, then stating that this interpretation that’s all your own, is not correct. Argue what I say, not what YOU think I say.
            Look, I get you struggle with this, so just try and keep what I actually wrote in your head, don’t change it for what you wish I wrote. This comes to me naturally, but I understand not to everyone.
            Your last point stated I said you were an atheist. Did I say you were an atheist? Or did I simply say your arguments are atheistic? See how you even provide evidence of your mistakes in two paragraph answers?
            See how information goes in to your head one way and comes out another?
            Can you now understand why this is so frustrating to engage with? And do i not get any credit for, considering this annoyance, still always replying? Who else does this?
            It’s absurd, you’re the ‘movement’ person. You the one who claims he works “on the ground” to presumably force some change in the real world(I give you the credit you do it for altruistic reasons, not simply to fulfill your own ego or will to power). To organise, to lead people to where you want them to go.
            Yet first, they must be white purists. They also cannot be Christians. Actually, they cannot disagree with you in general. Brilliant. Good luck with that, you really have helped me to understand why white nationalism is such a miserable failure, that is toxic to normal people, hasn’t actually improved the life of one white person in 50 years, and attracts so many weird, anti-social kinds to it.
            I’ve no such lofty goals, I only come here as a hobby, my hobby is seeking truth.
            Yet here I am trying to help you see all you bigoted flaws, which would actually help you in your mission, and all I get is petulant abuse, and my own arguments coming back at me in an upside down, retarded form.
            I care for white people, I care for people who aren’t white. In general, if they are strangers, of course I prefer whites, and would always put them first. But not all whites, I’d put working class Latinos, blacks and Asians before I would leftist whites, or elite traitor whites. Not sure where you stand on this.
            So I am now quite disturbed to see that your kind are probably actually menace to working class Brits, my people, or working class whites of any kind.
            It’s for me just a hobby, but I will still take the time to try and improve you. Not because I envision you leading some new white Reich, but simply because it’s the Christian thing to do.
            P.S. I left you in my last comment an open goal, but of course it went right over your head. I meant Peter denied Christ, not Judas. So, maybe you should study more the thing you hate, before you decide it’s NOT holy, eh?

          • Lucius Vanini
            Lucius Vanini says:

            You say “First, I’m amazed that the mod is allowing us to carry on this bitch fight….” Yeah, you characterize it as a “bitch fight” when in fact it’s at the heart of the question of whether Western Civ shall endure. You merely want special consideration here. You want to spout garbage about the most damaging Jewish assault on Europe without getting refuted.

            Yes, if there’s freedom of speech, you can count on my gainsaying any defense or recommendation of Judeo-Christianity. Not only will we keep it up till the “reply buttons” disappear, but the only way you’ll see the last of me is if I die, or if you cease defending that which has inflicted, and still inflicts, incalculable damage on Europe and Euroamerica.

            I invited you a while back to take this elsewhere. You didn’t accept the challenge. Then, unaccountably, you said the same thing to me some weeks ago; and I accepted the challenge. I said click on my name and you’ll go to my site and be able to contact me, and we can proceed from there. But I’m still waiting.

            If you’re so worried about offending the “mod,” why don’t we take this to Gab where there’s almost perfect freedom of expression? Have you the gonads? I DOUBT IT. You’re complaining here—crying bloody murder in a wimpish way—because you can’t bear having your fallacies exposed.

            And apropos of that, instead of interminably saying you’re faring well in this lol bitch fight, why don’t you actually refute me. You sound pathetic, trying to assure yourself of what’s clearly not the case.

  8. John D. Alder
    John D. Alder says:

    I find it interesting that Zelensky has a 35 million dollar mansion in Florida and over one billion dollars in a Costa Rican bank. Not bad for a jewish comedian who is president of a very poor nation. He has a nice place to escape to doesn’t he? And foolish Americans are donating guns and money to the big phony !

  9. Sheba prithibi
    Sheba prithibi says:

    I have been wondering about all the money being raised for Ukraine. Something tells me it will all end up in zio pockets.

  10. Greg Johnson
    Greg Johnson says:

    Was this article written a month ago, before it became clear that Russia is losing this war?

    • Captainchaos
      Captainchaos says:

      The Russian army, despite its obvious advantages in terms superior equipment and manpower, has proven to be an under performing joke. The reason for that is simple, its soldiers are not of top-shelf Germanic/Nordic quality.

      Germanic/Nordics alone can be counted on to be kindly and just masters of the European house, not Russians. Greg’s ethnonationalist pose is really just his way of slipping Germanic/Nordic supremacy in the backdoor.

      This war must be leveraged to further Germanic/Nordic supremacy, tacitly or explicitly. Otherwise it will have gone to waste.

    • Richard McCulloch
      Richard McCulloch says:

      Russia’s “plan A” was based on the hope/possibility that the operation would be easy, with much more Ukrainian support and less resistance than they actually encountered, enabling them to seize Kiev and several other key points in a quick coup de main. That didn’t work so they’ve redeployed for “plan B” which will take much longer and be much more destructive. The first stage of “plan B” is the destruction of the circa 60,000 strong Ukrainian force effectively encircled in a “cauldron” in Donbass centered on the city of Kramatorsk, where the train station was recently struck by a missile claimed to be Russian although it is of a type no longer in the Russian inventory but still used by Ukrainian forces. This battle is now underway. The next stage will probably be against a smaller concentration of Ukrainian forces around Mykolayiv/Nikolaev, a city on the Upper Bug river that was a major shipbuilding center in the days of the USSR. The successful completion of this stage will include taking the important port of Odessa. The next stage, which might begin before the Mykolayiv battle is complete, would most likely involve the destruction of the remaining Ukrainian forces around Kharkiv/Kharkov. There is another 80,000-100,000 strong Ukrainian force concentrated around Kyiv/Kiev, but they’re immobilized by both lack of fuel and Russian air power so they’re effectively unable to intervene in the other battles, and unless the Russians return to the Kiev area they might not take much part in the future course of the war. After the successful conclusion of these battles Russia will be essentially in control of the country east of the Dneiper river and the coastal area west of the river, which at this point is probably the minimum the Russian people would accept to regard the operation as a success. How long it will take for the Russians to reach this point depends on how long the Ukrainian forces being destroyed are willing to continue fighting and dying. Whether the Russians would then stop the operation at this point or move on to take Kyiv/Kiev in another big battle I suppose depends on the future course of developments.

      • Captainchaos
        Captainchaos says:

        “Plan A” was to fumble around and fuck it up. That will be the tenor of every subsequent plan. Russians are not a competent Master Race. They are fit only to swing a hammer, not wield a scalpel. And as we have seen Russians are not even very good with hammers.

        Balts are a Nordic-adjacent people and hence not to be touched. If Russia decides to move against the Baltic states they will see how a true Master Race responds.

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          These are such weird comments they seem like a troll.
          Only fit to swing a hammer? Once upon a time they were more than fit to swing entire divisions to annihilate perhaps the greatest army of all time. The also swung their tanks is such a way as to chase these invaders all the way back to their capitle city, basically sacking it in the process.

          • Captainchaos
            Captainchaos says:

            NATO should be transformed into the Nordish Atlantic Treaty Alliance: a National Socialist millitary cooperative of Nordish nations committed to ensuring the global primacy of the Nordish race.

            As the Apostle Paul instructed: “Slaves, obey your earthly masters…” That was sound advice. The Nordish race is a Master Race.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            FYI, Captainchaos goes back a long way in our circles so is hardly a troll. I recall him from the good ole’ earlier days when the conversation was more intelligent and real, before extreme political correctness set in. I was pleased when he recently appeared here at TOO. He says what he thinks and offers solutions in blunt fashion rather than posting long treatises on religion and philosophy, or other people’s essays copied off the Internet.

          • Emicho
            Emicho says:

            To Mrs Yeager
            Ok he isn’t a troll, but those are trollish comments. I’m not complaining, I’m pro-trolling. I think they’re funny comments.
            Extreme political correctness set in where? Here? This site to you is extreme political correctness????? What does that make CNN or the BBC?
            Fair enough if you think that, but then why are you here? To just shit on us all and tell us how disappointed you are in us all? Thanks for that. It’s very female.
            I’m with you on not posting other people’s articles, I don’t see the point, a link would do, but it’s not my site.
            But no one posts long boring religious stuff unless they are in a debate with someone. No one is forcing you to read them.
            And as for a Nazi alliance of Nordics, wouldn’t bother me, sounds fun, but please, what exactly is this a “blunt solution” to, except perhaps schizophrenia?

  11. Emicho
    Emicho says:

    Peter Hitchens is the only MSM commenter I have seen alowed on British TV who isn’t a Zelenski fan-girl.
    So I read his Sunday bit this morning, and he’s praising Zelenski for ‘standing up’ to a ‘Right Sector’ ‘thug’ or hower he put it.
    I’ve seen the video, you can find it online, Zelenski is coked out his face, as he is in dozens of videos online, giving it aw the big man towards this young Ukrainian, who is actually putting his life on the line fighting for what he believes in.
    It’s incredible a President of a nation would take such a thuggish attitude towards a young soldier, acting like a kid-on, fake gangster.
    Peter Hitchens saw this video and thought this demonstrated bravery!?!?
    When Zelenski is surrounded by armed guards? When Zelenski has so much higher a rank? It’s really an amazing video.
    The young lad was polite the whole time, Zelenski was getting wide with him and getting in his face.
    And Peter Hitchens thought this was a demonstration of courage!
    It just shows you, Hitchens is a sucker & apologist for anyone of his own tribe, and he never ever shows sympathy for peasant goyim who are going to be the cannon fodder of Zelenski’s pointless war.

    • Richard McCulloch
      Richard McCulloch says:

      Please give me some credit. I would never go so far as to portray Russia as a white ethnostate. It is certainly not a de jure white ethnostate, which should be a requirement for a true ethnostate, not is it ideologically, which should also be a requirement. France, Sweden, the Netherlands, etc. were de facto white ethnostates a hundred years ago, but neither de jure nor ideologically, so there was nothing substantial to prevent their transformation into the multiracial states they have become. Russia was a de facto white ethnostate in 1600 but its subsequent eastward expansion across Siberia added scores of indigenous peoples that could certainly not be regarded as racially European, and therefore not as white. But it is totally wrong to compare the “multiracial” situation of modern Russia with that of the modern West. 70% of the current non-white population in the US, and over 95% of the non-white population in other Western countries, are immigrants, or descendants of immigrants, who entered those countries after 1950, and especially after 1965. The situation in Russia is the opposite. Over 95% of its non-white population consists of indigenous peoples whose lands were incorporated into the Russian empire during its eastward expansion. Very few, perhaps less than 1%, are descended from non-whites whose ancestors were not in the Russian empire in 1914. And most importantly the proportion of non-whites in Russia has not been increasing since then. In fact, the proportion of the white population in the Russian Federation itself increased from 78.1% in the 1926 census to 80.9% in the 2010 census. Also, two or three percent of the non-Russian population consists of various European minorities (e.g., Ukrainian and Belarussian) who add to the white total. Another very important difference is that the scores of different non-white indigenous minorities mostly continue to reside in their native territories in 22 semi-autonomous republics, in 13 of which Russians are a minority. This means a relatively small number of the Russian Federation’s non-white minorities are present in traditionally Russian lands. So while the West has been racially transformed in the last fifty years the racial makeup of Russia is essentially unchanged from what it was when Nicholas II was the Tsar.

      • Harald E Brandt
        Harald E Brandt says:

        Thanks Richard, I really do want to give you credit! I appreciate your comment. The numbers you presented clearly shows that Russia is in a very different, and much better, situation than the modern multiracial and multicultural West.

        However, there is undeniably a substantial race mixing going on that is not revealed by the numbers you presented. Moscow is today increasingly becoming a “melting pot” in similar ways as cities in the West (but to a lesser degree). But rather than a flood of immigrants from Somalia and what-not, the mixing is between all kinds of races within the Russian federation. Tjetjeniens are now abundant in Moscow, where they certainly do not belong if Moscow is to remain a slavic city of White people.

        I don’t see that Putin is doing any measures to make sure that all the non-white indigenous minorities stay in their native territories. On the contrary, he is very harsh against nationalistic groups. And the use of the Holohoax propaganda is extremely bad for us I think, because it is the primary weapon the international Jewry use to maintain their power and their anti-White agenda, and to repress all groups that promote nationalistic views.

        The biggest problems with empires is that they are usually not racially stable. They often seem to promote some variant of Kalergi plan within the empire. Stalin did that to an extremely large extent, with terrible results. It is much less so with Putin, but wherever there are Jews in control of media, the “Kalergi agenda” is promoted. I would appreciate the Russian empire much more if the nations within the empire preserved their ethnicity, and if there were substantially fewer Jewish oligarks.

        • Richard McCulloch
          Richard McCulloch says:

          Totally agree on your points. But unfortunately, as I stated, Russia is not de jure or ideologically an ethnostate, and until it is the Russian people are threatened with racial destruction, with the process already occurring although at a much slower pace than in the West and not promoted by the culture and government. So long as the Russian people and government reject the culture and ideology of globohomo there is far more hope for their survival than for any of the rapidly multiracializing Western countries.

      • Karl Haemers
        Karl Haemers says:

        Excellent response, and points well taken.
        The key ethnic demographic to examine in Russia is Jews.

  12. Heartland Separatist.
    Heartland Separatist. says:

    United Nations stats claim that China will surpass the United States both economically and militarily at some point past the midcentury. By the end of the century, Africa will have 4.5 billion people and Nigeria will become the third most populated nation on Earth behind China and India. Nigeria cannot even feed the people it already has. Where will these excess Nigerians go? To the EU to the nations of the Anglo-Sphere! Whites will be a minority in the United States by 2025 and in Canada by 2066. Two possibilities await us. Perhaps red-state America will separate from blue-state America and become an independent nation. If that happens it is not inconceivable that western Canada would join the new White Heartland Republic. Perhaps the best scenario is that all the nations of the Anglo-Sphere would form into one United White Commonwealth. Indeed this was once discussed under the name Federal Imperialism. Both of the scenarios are dependent upon the radicalization and racialization of a portion of the White population. As it stands now the United States is less a nation than it is an anti-nation in that it fights, both domestically and internationally, against all expressions of true nationalism. So what can we expect from the American anti-nation whose primary exports to the world are homosexuality and miscegenation? ( When is the last time you have seen commercials on TV?)

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      ” France, Sweden, the Netherlands, etc. were de facto white ethnostates a hundred years ago, but neither de jure nor ideologically, so there was nothing substantial to prevent their transformation into the multiracial states they have become. ”

      That is solid evidence of a most egregious lack of political foresight by Christians whom relied on an assumed future predetermined by self-fulfilling biblical prophesies . In other words , why should White cultures bother to make defensive political arrangements when God has pre-ordained all future eventualities regardless of any efforts made by man except the determinations made by the chosenhite jewmasterss ?

      • Gerry
        Gerry says:

        @ moneytalks and I guess Lucius Vanini

        Just because the Bible prophesies something doesn’t mean God wanted it that way!!!!!! Too many Christians unfortunately are deceived. This is especially the case where analogies are concerned. Take Ezekiel 37 for example which is taken to be an analogy of the rebirth of the nation of Israel in 1948. Nothing, and I mean nothing could be further from the truth. Who and how they came up with that nonsense is so unbelievable that it infuriates me to no end. This is not an analogy about that but about the literal resurrection of the dead by way of Christ Jesus who was the first and when he rose he brought with them those who were bound and set them free.

        At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth shook, the rocks split and the tombs broke open. The bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life. They came out of the tombs after Jesus’ resurrection and went into the holy city and appeared to many people.

        When the centurion and those with him who were guarding Jesus saw the earthquake and all that had happened, they were terrified, and exclaimed, “Surely he was the Son of God!” Mathew 27:51

        This right here is the fulfillment or the beginning of the fulfillment of Ezekiel 37 which will find its ultimate end when Christ returns!

        Now any Christian who doesn’t understand and follow this is a dupe period and not be be listened to!!!

        The errors, the errors of interpretation there truly are too many to list/find and why people like the two of you laugh and mock us in the Church.

        Let me just add to the errors about Gog and Magog being the current nations of Germany and Russia. O good grief this to is such unbelievable nonsense and i wrote the book the only book on the subject Lies, all Lies by Gerry Fox. Get the truth and learn it!

        Lastly, do you like being lied to about climate change? Do you know that industrial pollution has got nothing whatsoever to do with global warming? NOTHING!!!! how is that you say? Easy you can start your re-education by going here for starters:

      • Emicho
        Emicho says:

        “That is solid evidence of a most egregious lack of political foresight by Christians whom relied on an assumed future predetermined by self-fulfilling biblical prophesies”
        Yeah, you’re forgetting the white European elite had abandoned Christianity as something they seriously believed in, completely, everywhere, by about 1900.
        It’s a darned coincidence that everything has went to total shit since round about that time.
        Right when tthe leaders stopped believing in Christ, their entire civilisation stopped improving, and started to go to hell in a hand cart.
        Doesn’t this fact kinda put a hole in your theory?

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      “United Nations stats claim that China will surpass the United States both economically and militarily at some point past the midcentury.”

      This is delusional. China has already surpassed America economically, have you seen the average American city v a Chinese one? Then you have the most important resource of all, the people, America is at war with the only productive people they have, while over-promoting all their garbage.
      And militarily? I’d be amazed if America even remembered how to operate their nukes. It will be like NASA, losing the instructions of how to reach the moon. The USA is a total joke.
      It bases it’s ‘power projection’ around trillion dollar aircraft carriers, you really imagine America doesn’t possess people who understand this is cutting edge technology, for 1945?
      They say nowt because the graft is too tempting.
      Russia has the missiles to sink every US carrier group, all round the world, in an hour. Then what?
      The rest of the comment i second though.

  13. peter mcloughlin
    peter mcloughlin says:

    On reflection, it seems the Cold War was the peace, its end heralding a period of hostility that’s now leading to global conflict. In the Cuban Missile Crisis the two superpowers were in control; one could back down so the other could too. In the present crisis, nuclear states are losing control of the scenarios that could lead to nuclear holocaust. Without those controls Deterrence Doctrine cannot work.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      ” Without those controls Deterrence Doctrine cannot work.”

      That is pure disinformation .

      The MAD ( mutual assured destruction ) doctrine is the only viable one in the absence of “those controls”.

      The ILLuminati NWO despotic agenda to acquire dominion or monopoly control over the entire world , via central bank financially initiated , orchestrated and sponsored totalitarianism with commensurate depopulation genocides and population control genocides , is an unconscionable substitute for the venerable MAD doctrine which can only become unviable [ IF ] it fails and not before such an event
      [ IF ] it occurs .

      Histories of the world are littered from one end to the other with references to the multitudes of humanity slaughtered by powerful collectives whose leaders attempted to acquire “those controls” over humanity .

  14. bruno
    bruno says:

    It’s always a pleasure to read Richard’s mind. This is another very decent article. One wonders how many places he has resided and where he mixed with people. One also ponders about what languages he’s able to read in. If he doesn’t have a degree in PoliSci, he’s just as good as those that have such a sheepskin. In fact, he’s better than the vast majority.

    A decent percentage of those who replied have their knowledge only slightly above water. Most of us surely are on overload and don’t have time to give adequate replies. Thus, we type on the fly. As for me, I’m raising a beloved granddaughter. I’m very proud of her as she just made the high honor roll. Her lowest grade was a 96 in algebra. The point is that life is circumstantial and there’s a hell of a lot of luck involved. Just think of the people struggling to survive and not having the choice of sending their child to a decent school. Ruskis, overall, don’t have that classroom jungle problem of poor discipline, fatherless homes etc. etc..

    As for the ethno question, let’s spend a minute to touch it. Between Ukes and Russians, in all probability, about 25% are mixed with heritage on both sides. Z absolutely control Ukraine. Richard, is correct in his hypothesis. As for Nordics being decent, they have -this is politically incorrect— more good qualities than most. I recall years ago watching them with their lunch boxes marching off to work. Germans are not only high in IQ, but industrious.

    As for Nazis bombing cities and Russian revenge, that’s in the past. It’s like our Civil War. Of course, as noted in TOO, many are still fighting Erocide II. Without AH’s WWII there’s every possibility that today Germany would be leading the world. I recall when the German language was in most schools of higher education.

    As for the the innuendos of Russians being historically behind the 8 ball, let’s look at the historical perspective. Germans had hundreds of city states competing with one another; mainly, extensive competition. Russians, on the other hand, were vastly spread out. The city folk were similar in intellectually ability to those in the West. That was not the case for those in that vast land mass.

    Returning to the topic of mixing, after Eurocide II a plethora of Germans did not wish to suffer under the thumb of the Fr., Eng., Yankees or Ruskis in rebuilding. Consequently, since a great deal of Germans and Poles are similar in phenotypes, they were allowed in Canada, Amdom and Oz. Look, during the religious wars within the German states hundreds of thousands of Germans settled in peaceful Poland. As in the USA, after a few generations they amalgamated with the local population. In other words, they became Polonized. On the other side of this coin, millions of Polonians in Germany became assimilated. You can see this in names, etc. That’s just a brief and one could really expand on that if time permitted and there was a desire.

    Those of Euro heritage have had enough of killing one another. It needs to stop.

    Lastly, although large parts of Western Europe will be lost, at this writing that does not apply to Byelorussians, Poland and those east to the Ural mountains. As for Amdom, decades ago my friend Wilmot Robertson had it right; there needs to be ethno states.

    Oh, one more thing. Replies to Richard’s article have different dates. That implies that rather than send out articles at once, different dates are selected for different folks.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      ” Those of Euro heritage have had enough of killing one another. It needs to stop. ”

      It is not very difficult to understand why the winners of the last big slaughter are the first to call for an end to it .

      Unfortunately , when central bankers settle accounts they do so with payments in gold .

      Do you know how killing accounts are settled ?

      An unknown war veterans wisdom ___

      ” War There Will Always Be “… ask God about it .

      Good luck
      with your efforts to end
      humanity’s ritualistic deja vu religious/political slaughters .

Comments are closed.