Dinesh’s Stupid Movie
As much as I’m enjoying the January 6th committee’s careful assembly of evidence proving former President Trump is a douchebag, I wasn’t seeing much in the way of a criminal offense until this week’s underreported story about how Trump used his “STOP THE STEAL” fundraising appeals to grift his supporters out of $250 million, none of which was, in fact, used to fight election fraud.
It didn’t even go to the poor saps who got themselves arrested at the Capitol on Jan. 6. Instead, the $250 million seems to have been funneled exclusively to Trump businesses, family and friends.
And let’s not forget Steve Bannon’s “We Build the Wall” swindle; Trump sending out a fundraising appeal to raise funds for his new private plane; and a Trump-affiliated organization paying Kimberly Guilfoyle $60,000 to give a two-minute speech on Jan. 6 (introducing her fiance, Don Jr.). Every time you think you have your arms fully around Trump’s con, you realize it’s unfathomably more cynical and far-reaching than you could have imagined.
Is there anyone in Trump World who isn’t trying to fleece the Deplorables? Haven’t they suffered enough?
Which brings me to Dinesh D’Souza’s movie “2,000 Mules.” The movie tells Trump diehards (a dwindling crowd) that their man probably DID win the 2020 election!
Using cellphone tracking data obtained by “True the Vote” (which sounds like a group named by Melania Trump — “BE BEST!”) D’Souza claims to have proof that 2,000 people delivered multiple ballots to election drop boxes in the five crucial battleground states that Trump lost.
First, the movie doesn’t show what it says it shows.
— Cellphone tracking isn’t precise enough to distinguish between liberal activists stuffing drop boxes, and store owners, police officers, delivery men and others who have perfectly legitimate reasons to be within a few yards of the same drop box every day.
— In all five battleground states D’Souza considers, it is perfectly legal for third parties to drop off ballots for others, with varying degrees of lenience. Pennsylvania, for example, allows a grandparent, grandchild, uncle, aunt, niece, nephew, in-law, household member, caregiver or jailer to drop off someone else’s ballot.
— Even if every cellphone dot represented a left-wing organizer illegally dropping off another person’s ballot, that still wouldn’t make the ballot invalid. A legal ballot can be illegally delivered, although the guy who delivered it might be in trouble.
These flaws have already been well aired elsewhere.
The second problem — my problem with the movie — is the idea that Trump’s 2020 loss cries out for an explanation. We know for a fact that Trump was wildly popular, sailing to a landslide election on the love of a grateful nation. Only something nefarious could explain his defeat!
Hello? Trump lost only one demographic in 2020 compared to 2016. What was that demographic? …
Answer: WHITE MEN!
How did liberal activists pull off that?
In the five states where D’Souza deploys his hocus-pocus cellphone data — Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — Trump lost 8% of white voters compared to 2016. He lost 12% of white men.
That’s according to Trump’s own pollster, the highly respected Tony Fabrizio, as well as everyone else who’s looked at the 2020 election data. It was also predicted by anyone who supported Trump in 2016 — and then watched him piss away his presidency for four years by betraying his base.
True, lots of Deplorables clung to Trump as their last hope in a country that has betrayed them over and over again. But some of them noticed.
See if you can detect the subtle shift as Trump dumped ordinary Americans and adopted the prejudices of our ruling class:
During the 2016 campaign, Trump said of “Dreamers” (as illegal aliens call themselves): “I want ‘Dreamers’ to come from the United States. I want the people in the United States that have children, I want them to have dreams also. We’re always talking about ‘Dreamers’ for other people.”
One month in office, Trump said of the “Dreamers”: “We are gonna deal with them with heart … You have these incredible kids … some absolutely incredible kids.”
So much for getting illegals “out of here so fast, your head will spin.”
During the campaign, Trump sided with rural Americans, who like guns — and don’t live in opulent, lily-white redoubts where guns aren’t needed. He emphatically opposed “gun-free zones,” bans on “assault weapons” and expanded background checks, saying an armed citizenry prevents mass shootings.
One year into his presidency, Trump said: “I like taking the guns early. Take the guns first, go through due process second. … Some of you are petrified of the NRA. … They have great power over you people … they have less power over me. What do I need?”
What do you need? You needed Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, you cretinous moron. Anybody in those states care about guns?
Most stunningly, Trump blew off the signature promise of his campaign: the wall. While he was busy sucking up to Wall Street, Kim Kardashian, RINOs, Silicon Valley, the gun-grabbers and illegal aliens, not one mile of wall got built.
He finally got around to the wall his last year in office. Total new wall across a 2,000 mile border completed during the entire Trump presidency: 47 miles.
Yeah, it’s a total baffler how a president who spent four years ignoring his base could have lost.
Imagine if Ronald Reagan, after running in 1980 on winning the Cold War and slashing taxes, had gotten into office and started bleating about our “inordinate fear of communism,” instead of opposing the Soviets at every turn and driving The New York Times to fits of apoplexy? What if he’d left the top tax rate at 70% and suddenly started releasing criminals recommended by Kim Kardashian? And, for the cherry on top, suppose he’d turned his presidency over to his bimbo daughter and nimrod son-in-law?
Instead of a 49-state landslide and two decades of peace and prosperity, we’d have gotten a D’Souza conspiracy movie about how the Democrats cheated.
COPYRIGHT 2022 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY ANDREWS MCMEEL SYNDICATION
I can’t dispute what Anne Coulter says, yet it is still hard to believe that White men would vote for the alternative.
I was pretty sure that Trump’s jiggery-pokery with ‘Platinum Plan’s and other such melanin-worshiping BS had sunk him. I had no idea it was as bad his losses with White men were. Kinda warms my heart.
What did Zukerberg and other Jewish contributes @hundreds of millions want in return for fixing the election for Biden via the mules operation??
Jewish infiltration /dominance of the USA government? Done.
Installation of WOK/Frankfurt School ideology into the USA government and schools? Done.
Ability for Facebook et al to sensor conservative/white comment.Done
According to the Edison consortium of 2020 election exit polls, probably the most neutral and accurate count available, Trump won 60% of White men and 55% of White women nationally. In 2016 he won 63% of White men and only 53% of White women. So he was down 3% among White men and up 2% among White women, reducing the long persisting “gender gap” from 10% to 5%, the narrowest it’s been so far in this century. Coulter says he was down 12% among White men in the five states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, the very states where there is major evidence of election fraud against Trump. Why would Trump have lost four times as much support among White men in those suspect states than he did nationally? Can’t think of a reason for such a great discrepancy? Well, that just adds one more inexplicably great electoral discrepancy to the many others in those states. What is the more likely explanation? Multiple huge discrepancies that defy explanation or fraud? Perhaps Coulter should open her eyes and check her long-time anti-Trump biases.
Thanks, Richard M. I always appreciate your good sense and careful consideration of the underlying facts. Anne Coulter’s selectively chosen numbers cannot be trusted.
So his WHITE man base passed on him. So what’s one suppose to do now? Promote and endorse (((DeSanta)))? Buy up all the guns and ammo one can and move to the Green Mountains or Ruby Ridge? Solutions, we need solutions. Bought politicians have never been the solution. We’re approaching desperate times.Time for solutions and a plan. What say ye?
Agree.
But are you serious about Santis is a jew?
https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Florida-Gov-Ron-DeSantis-signs-legislation-against-antisemitism-into-law-591517
He may not be a heeb but we know who his master’s are.
This message should be spread far and wide. White nationalists can make sure no phony like Trump gets elected. Warn friends and families to keep their money and stop wasting it on cheap Trump trinkets!
Why did Zukerberg et al invest 400 million plus into the mule operations?What were the expectations?
I saw 2000 Mules.
It was a great film and credible.
By reading comments here it certainly appears that anything “credible” or even high quality is something to just be mocked or derided. It is hard to interpret that in any way other than being supportive of your (((opponent))).
Very good article by Ann Coulter; sometimes she may be off the mark but here she is spot on. Although I do not live in the US, as a “White supremacist” (LOL) I wanted Trump to win the 2016 elections desperately. Such was the hatred that the (((media))) showed for him that I believed (or I wanted to believe) there was something else about him that really terrified them. As it happened, it was all smoke & mirrors. The sleazy real-estate tycoon played his part very well.
Having said that, the option was Joe Biden’s mum (a.k.a. Hillary Clinton) so it was logical for every White American concerned with the future of his race and family to vote for the Orange Man. Now we know better and yet there are some people awfully misguided (to put it politely) who are still defending this bloody conman. Anyway, it is useless worrying about future elections as they will not solve anything. As a clever man once observed: “If elections could really change things, they will make them illegal”
Angelicus: “Although I do not live in the US, as a “White supremacist” (LOL) I wanted Trump to win the 2016 elections desperately.”
Thanks for that concession. You have no vote here; your opinion of our candidates carries no weight and never did. I’d estimate at least half of the anti-Trumpers who voice their hatred of Donald Trump on this site and others, are not Americans and cannot participate in elections. Your opinions should not affect us; therefore you should by rights keep them to yourself, or give full disclosure of your foreign status. Many of you are rabidly anti-American in general. This is harmful to the development of any genuine national feeling, and gives globalists a field day.
I can’t believe that the sanction for delivering a vote illegally isn’t the invalidation of that vote. Since most of the civilized world requires in person voting. (Places that are allowed to be “civilized” because Jews arent concerned about their proxies winning elections … like a central African nation or something).
The rest of the screed is just Ann’s excuse to levy her bill of indictment against Trump one more time … which I mostly agree with. But despite its length, her indictments don’t include Syria, Israel or Afghanistan. Hmmm.
Yes, I think you *can* deduce an electoral superiority from Trump’s popularity … when compared to a career politician who presented as a walking corpse.
The voting fraud issue is too diffuse. It’s not just “mules”, it’s many other things. It’s diffuseness is it’s very problem. The end result is, after 2020, we don’t have anything resembling a “functioning democracy” anymore … if we ever did.
ROY COHN & DONALD TRUMP
How Roy Cohn’s Shame Made Him – And Trump – Shameless
PJ GrisarSeptember 20, 2019
Everyone was afraid of Roy Cohn — until no one was.
A fixer, a liar, a self-loathing Jew and viciously homophobic homosexual, he seized on the Big Lie advanced by Adolf Hitler to advocate for his clients, smear his opponents and shield himself from a mountain of indictments. His first case to gain national attention sent Julius and Ethel Rosenberg to their deaths. Towards the end of his life, he was the consigliere of Donald Trump, pushing the young real estate scion to countersue the government in a housing discrimination case.
A physical and moral grotesque, called, in an extensive 1978 Esquire profile by Ken Auletta, “the personification of evil,” he relished his reputation as a prince of darkness.
Cohn was a walking picture of Dorian Gray. A scar on his nose — courtesy of a pediatric surgery that his image-conscious mother insisted on — would be joined by gill-like scars from a botched facelift in his middle age. While he maintained a 144-pound frame from a strict regime of sit-ups, performed in his home office facing a mirrored ceiling, his vanity couldn’t hide the ugliness that issued forth from his thin-lipped mouth.
His tongue, which was occupied at the tender age of 26 by smearing Communists and homosexuals as the chief counsel for Senator Joseph McCarthy, had a habit of peeking out in a reptilian fashion. It issued slanders, falsehoods and invective. Also: Charm.
While one might expect that Cohn’s involvement with McCarthy would have ruined his social life when he returned to New York from DC, that same venomous tongue dripped honeyed, scandalous — and largely erroneous — news items to columnists George Sokolsky and Leonard Lyons, establishing his relevance in Manhattan society. Top tier clients like his childhood friend and Conde Nast chair S.I. Newhouse, the Catholic Archdiocese and Yankees owner George Steinbrenner got him past velvet ropes and kept his social invitations coming.
A lifelong Democrat who, nonetheless, helped Reagan get to the White House, he managed to stay in the liberal whirl. His friends included Norman Mailer, CBS News President Fred Friendly (who was instrumental in exposing the evils of McCarthyism on the March 9, 1954 Murrow broadcast), Democratic mayor Abe Beame and Studio 54 regulars like Andy Warhol.
While working on his 2018 documentary “Studio 54” in 2016, filmmaker and journalist Matt Tyrnauer spotted Cohn in the archival footage. He was hard to miss. The club’s lawyer, Cohn “threw himself in front of the camera,” Tyrnauer recalled in a phone interview with the Forward.
“He was, I believe the scientific word for it is ‘Media Whore.’ I kept thinking to myself, ‘where’s the Roy Cohn documentary?’”
Tyrnauer soon dismissed the idea of a film about Cohn. The only new angle he could see for Cohn, who died in 1986 of AIDS, disbarred, in debt and no longer a threat, was his one-time protegé Donald Trump, who seemed primed for a historic loss in the 2016 presidential election.
How Cohn’s playbook failed to win Trump the presidency wouldn’t make for compelling storytelling, as much as it might signal a win for America’s better angels. But then, the first Tuesday of November passed. Donald Trump was the president elect. The next day, Tyrnauer wrote the film’s treatment.
The finished film, “Where’s My Roy Cohn?,” which takes its title from a reported quote from Trump, distraught that former Attorney General Jeff Sessions failed to meet Cohn’s standard of loyalty, premiered September 20.
To Tyrnauer, Trump’s unprecedented win marks Cohn’s greatest achievement.
“Cohn, in my opinion would have been a bold footnote to American history if it weren’t for the Electoral College victory of Donald Trump, when he is transformed into a modern Machiavelli who did the impossible: Created a president from beyond the grave.”
—
Others have noted how Roy Cohn’s ghost stage managed Trump’s campaign and presidency. Journalist Marie Brenner, a producer and collaborator on Tyrnauer’s film, who covered Trump in the early 1980s, pin-pointed the link in a 2017 piece for Vanity Fair. (Frank Rich concurred with his own piece nearly a year later.)
But Brenner thinks that Cohn, were he still around, would run the Oval Office differently.
“He would have been so much more a subtle inside player. He would not have had this chaos that was going on,” Brenner told the Forward.
Cohn was a savvy politico, born in the till of New York’s Favor Bank, the quid pro quo system on which the city ran. Both his mother, Dora, who came from a wealthy and well-connected family, and his father, Albert, a Democratic New York judge, knew how to get things done.
“They had every major politician around their dinner table,” Brenner said. “Roy was transactional from the age of 10.”
The origin story goes that Cohn’s first dalliance with bribery came when he fixed a parking ticket for his high school teacher — while he was still in high school.
At home he received lessons in backroom dealing; on the streets, he had an education in publicity, working as a runner for gossip columnist and right-wing demagogue Walter Winchell. Aware of how the law was flexible and public opinion was another court available to lawyers, Cohn pursued a legal career, graduating from Columbia Law School at 20. It was a conventional career path for the son of a jurist, but one taken for an unconventional reason.
“I very early in my life broke with tradition and left my Jewish upper-class-oriented life in New York and became a contradiction of everything I was supposed to stand for,” Cohn told Ken Auletta in a recording featured in the film.
The case that made him — the espionage trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg — was a prime example of Cohn’s law-skirting tactics, and the demons that propelled his career. Cohn saw the case as an opportunity to make his name as a ruthless prosecutor and recoup the status his family had lost.
“He had a score to settle,” Brenner said.
Bernard Marcus, Cohn’s uncle, was president of the Bank of the United States when the stock market crashed. The bank, whose clientele was primarily Jewish immigrants, was blamed for sparking the financial crisis — some believe the attribution was due to anti-Semitism — and Marcus was sent to Sing Sing. His uncle’s treatment became one of Cohn’s early obsessions.
“The family had been absolutely shamed when Bernard Marcus went to prison,” Brenner said. “Roy kept a scrapbook as a little boy of all the pictures of his uncle Bernie Marcus. He would show them to his babysitters. Once, his mother saw him doing this and she yelled and took the scrapbook away.”
When Cohn was vicious in pushing for Ethel and Julius Rosenberg’s execution — illegally communicating with Judge Irving Kaufman (who, ironically, called Cohn from a phone booth outside the Park Avenue Synagogue) — he may have been trying to lift the stigma of family shame. He was responding, his relatives suggest, not just to anti-Communist animus, but to its inevitable link to Jews like him.
“He was the definition of a self-hating Jew,” Cohn’s cousin Dave Marcus says in the film. “He wanted to show the world that he wasn’t Jewish.”
His work on the Rosenbergs got the attention of FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover, who Tyrnauer identifies as a prototype for what Cohn would become and, who some, including Tyrnauer, believe, was himself a closeted homosexual.
Cohn learned something of Hoover’s brand of red-baiting, and soon the FBI director introduced the young lawyer to McCarthy, with whom Cohn had a chance to hound more Communists — many of them Jews — and homosexuals. He was the voice in the senator’s ear as the witch trials mounted.
The quotable moment that sent McCarthyism crashing down comes from the televised Army-McCarthy hearings, when US Army Counsel Joseph Welch asked the senator, “At long last, have you no decency?”
Those hearings came about due to a personal vendetta — Cohn’s desire to “wreck the Army” for not favoring his friend, and purported object of his affections, G. David Schine. Brenner believes Schine returned to Cohn’s life in another form decades later.
“I was looking one day at pictures of young David Schine and young Donald Trump,” Brenner said. “I thought they were separated at birth. They were the same sort of physical type: Uber gentile, blond, Nordic.”
—
Cohn met Trump in 1973 at Le Club, a hot, member’s only discotheque and restaurant. He worked for the Trumps, until his death, taking no billable hours, according to Trump biographer and Village Voice reporter Wayne Barrett.
Both Trump and Cohn were Outer Borough boys — Cohn from the Bronx, Trump from Queens. They hit it off, with Cohn, already established in Manhattan, being Trump’s entree into a world his father’s real estate empire had yet to reach.
“Roy gave him a sense of who he could meet and how he could meet them,” Brenner said. “He took him to the right parties, introduced him to politicians, to celebrities. He introduced him to Barbara Walters and all of their friends.”
While Trump was Cohn’s physical opposite, he emulated him where he could, securing himself a Cadillac with “DJT” vanity plates, likely inspired by Cohn’s “RMC”-plated Rolls-Royce.
Trump admired Cohn’s pit bull demeanor, telling Auletta “The mere sending of a letter from Roy Cohn has saved us a lot of money.”
Cohn’s law partner, Stanley Friedman, who served simultaneously as Ed Koch’s Deputy Mayor, fast-tracked Trump’s plans to remodel the Commodore Hotel. The deal made Trump’s reputation and taught him how to grasp the levers of power in Manhattan. Cohn, knowing success was only as good as its publicity, also secured Trump puffy press coverage through The New York Post, an organ owned by his client, a new-to-the-city Australian expat named Rupert Murdoch.
For his part, Cohn enjoyed being needed.
“The first thing he said to me was, ‘Donald Trump cannot live without me. We speak on the phone, sometimes 30, 40 times a day,’” Brenner said.
While Cohn was boasting, she recalled, he was spinning his Rolodex and offering her Yankees tickets or a car to take her back to her apartment.
“I was surprised at how absolutely shameless he was about who he was. He had almost a kind of delight in being Roy Cohn,” Brenner said. “Underneath this social persona of needing to be liked, there was an absolute menace.”
There was also something puerile about the man. Cohn shared his townhouse with his mother until she died; he had a Disneyland sign reading “Roy’s Room” on his bedroom door; he liked exotic pets like llamas and dressing up for revels at Studio 54. He collected plush frogs and, also, people.
Cohn, who claimed to be engaged for some time to Barbara Walters, surrounded himself with young, male companions and players featured on Page Six. He was, by many accounts, loyal and generous to his friends. His clients valued him, because he went to great, and extra-legal, lengths to defend them. Sometimes, he would go to the same great lengths to take advantage of them.
Cohn was indicted in 1964 for obstructing justice in trying to get clients off for stock fraud and in 1970 for violating Illinois banking laws in an attempt to gain major shares in two Illinois banks.
Once, in 1969, he was brought in for bribing a city appraiser, on which occasion, his lawyer suffered a heart attack and he provided his own defense — with no notes — for seven hours over two days.
“He was a natural monologist of his own corruption,” Brenner said.
—
In the 1980s, Cohn was advising President Ronald Reagan, who arranged his treatment at the National Institute of Health for what might have been Cohn’s biggest lie: The AIDS that was killing him, and that he insisted, until the very end, was liver cancer.
This period of Cohn’s life has been immortalized in a work of drama: Tony Kushner’s Pulitzer-winning two-part play, “Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes.” In the play, Cohn is a central player, haunted by the ghost of Ethel Rosenberg and unable to accept himself for who he was, even as he deteriorated as a result of that identity.
Until Trump’s presidency went from pipe dream to reality, Tyrnauer argues, Kushner’s play might well have been the last word on Cohn’s legacy. Instead, “Angels,” set during the tail end of the Cold War, is perhaps more timely than when it premiered.
Trump’s desperate cry of “Where’s my Roy Cohn?” was used in advertising for Marianne Elliott’s 2017 revival of the play, accompanied by a picture of Nathan Lane, glowering in costume as the reviled fixer. Beneath him is the answer: “Here.”
The truth of where Roy Cohn is well-known to Trump, who all but abandoned him as he was dying, disbarred, and within a few weeks of losing his law license.
Cohn is reported to have said of Trump’s distance,
”I can’t believe he’s doing this to me. Donald pisses ice water.”
Trump can’t replace Cohn, the inimitable architect of his brand of Fake News, lies and manipulation of bald-faced facts. But many believe he’s been trying.
Trump may have begun with Cohn mentee Roger Stone — Cohn introduced them. For a moment, Michael Cohen seemed to some to fill the role. In May, Carl Bernstein, who exposed Stone’s old boss, Richard Nixon, said of William Barr, “Trump said he wanted his Roy Cohn; he’s got him now in the attorney general.” Just this week, Rudolph Giuliani, who took down Cohn’s mob clients, tried (and failed) to deploy Cohnian tactics while defending the president on CNN.
Brenner, who attributed Cohn’s eagerness to help Trump to his resemblance to David Schine, proposed another candidate: also Jewish, from a Democratic family, and another fan of Big Lie theory.
“When I first saw Stephen Miller’s face, immediately I thought, ‘Oh my God, Trump sees the young Roy Cohn. Seeing that face, it’s a comfort zone for him.’”
Roy Cohn and the Shocking Jewish Mentorship That Created Donald Trump
Grisar@Forward.com
.
On any TOO habitué’s list of “One Thousand Things Least Needed or Wanted,” a 2,300-word article from this country’s premier Jewish-supremacist rag in which Roy Cohn is denounced for being (1) insufficiently Jewish and (2) friends with Donald Trump is, I’m willing to bet, likely to rank in the top ten.
Others’ opinions may differ, of course, but when I see an article in the “Forward” that begins by describing a Jew as “a fixer, a liar, a self-loathing Jew and viciously homophobic homosexual,” my instinctive response is that here is a guy who might be worth having a drink and a chat with.
Is this Pip’s point? I certainly hope it is.
Thanks again. Although I would be stronger against all these type of “comments,” which aren’t comments at all. They’re beyond ridiculous and make the website look hard-up for content.
Both true and very aptly expressed. H/t!
What more can I say than that I agree with Mister Richard MCulloch about the White Vote and the Stolen Election. Miss Ann Coulter,is a highly intelligent woman, who unfortunately allows her emotions to derail her intellectual abilities, which she does have. One man as Head Of State anywhere can never accomplish everything in a Democracy. What’s more upon winning the presidency in 2016, Mister Donald John Trump had the entire federal parliament, The United States Congress, both Houses, Republican, and it was the Republicans who were his worst enemies from the top: Speaker Of the House Representative Paul Davis Ryan and Majority Whip in The United States Senate, Federal Senator Mitch McConnell. Where Miss Coulter is correct, is with regard to his son-law Mister Jared Kushner and his daughter Misses Ivanka Kushner-Trump. And, President Donald John Trump should have never ever appointed establishment globalist criminals like Mister John Bolton as National Security Advisor and Attorney-At-Law William Barr as United States Attorney General, and he should’ve listened to His Head Of The Trump Transition Team, of eradicating everyone from the Walker Bush and Obama administrations still in government. In my opinion we would’ve never had the persecutions of so many an innocents over a so-called non existent Russian Collusion, that even the Left of the likes of Avram Noam Chomsky, Gary Null and the Socialist Workers knew was complete rubbish . I agree with Mister Patrick Joseph Buchanan and Doctor Ron Paul that the treaty with Iran by President Barack Hussein Obama was positive, and President Trump played the American Zionist hand, reversing it, believing he had an undeniable ally with Israel but such was not the case, for Israel only cares about me, myself and I. President Trump often spoke of Christ Our Lord, a most difficult concept to fully embrace, yet he should’ve gone to the cross and pardoned Messers Julian Assange and Edward Joseph Snowden, the former truthfully not requiring any pardon.
Miss Coulter praises President Ronald Reagan!? Please study why Doctoress Charlotte Iserbyt-Thomson was fired, the only person in the Reagan government to be made redundant. All I can say to Miss Coulter, whom I deeply respect, and everyone, is other than the problem being Metaphysical, the main one as Father Charles Edward Coughlin and Mister Ezra Pound fully understood, is Money and the Banking System. This rules the game no matter who is in power. God Bless, Eric Galati
I’m skeptical of Team Trump and Dinesh because of their past track records, but just as skeptical of Ann Coulter’s negative analysis and the AJC for theirs. Does 2000 Mules nail the case for ballot fraud? I came away from the movie thinking I’d seen a lot of smoke but no smoking gun. Believers in Trump will be convinced Dinesh got the goods and now it can’t be denied, but his enemies won’t. As for disenchanted whites like myself, I see no reason to stir the embers over more post-election partisan hand-wringing.
Whatever became of last year’s block-chain, water mark promise? Chess master Trump had supposedly branded all those paper ballots so they couldn’t be falsified. That claim seemed to disappear as quickly as claims that Obama was an African/Indonesian, unAmerican president when Orly Taitz hightailed it back to Israel.
We’re dealing w/ well-funded conmen who count on our programmed short attention spans and innate gullibility towards authority.
Jeez, Ann. Whose side are you on? Bad as 45 may or may not have been, do you think we are better off now? No one would dispute Trump’s flaws, how could you? You don’t get that big w/o being corrupt. That’s a given. But wow, look at us now. What is your way forward? Would love to hear it.
I would assume Ann watched the film before writing about. What I cannot understand is how she can be so stupid to not comprehend what the researchers did. They spelled it out very clearly and repeatedly, yet Ann makes it clear she was unable to absorb it. If someone makes 10 or more trips to multiple boxes and makes multiple visits to “non-profit” organizations that are politically involved, they are obviously not cops, store owners or FedEx drivers. An absolutely laughably stupid ‘critique’.
And, she clearly is out of her depth on the useful precision of the cellular data. Use Uber and watch your driver approach on the app. Derp. Precise ti yard.
Anyway, I’m dumbfounded how I didn’t realize how low-functioning she was for so long.
When she wrote:
“Using cellphone tracking data obtained by “True the Vote” (which sounds like a group named by Melania Trump — “BE BEST!”) D’Souza claims to have proof that 2,000 people delivered multiple ballots to election drop boxes in the five crucial battleground states that Trump lost.”
I understood that it was just an anti-Trump rant. D’Souza didn’t claim to have proof, the people at “True the Vote” did. No mention of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin finding that laws were illegally changed, or the nursing home fraud. Nothing has been shown to be un-toward in Arizona, and the recent hand count in Georgia changing results.
Devvy Kidd has been writing about election fraud and computers for 30 years, noting that the people in power know what is happening, but choose to do nothing.
All fundraising has a “grift” aspect. A lot of times you’re actually raising money to retire previous debt so that you can go on and do the things that you’re representing to the donor you’re going to do. The Left does it too but the left doesn’t complain about it internally because they have more solidarity. Right wing fundraising is very hard to do. Most of the right wing money goes to libertarian think tanks only. When Trump was considered “our guy”, it should’ve been, “What’s good for Trump is good for us.” The fact that Trump reneged on a lot of his promises, I agree, makes that kind of blind faith look dumb. But it’s the way the game is played. If there was another guy that came along and was Our Guy and needed money, for his family or whatever, I hope that we wouldn’t be niggardly and deny him. The fundraising game is always a little bit slimy. So what, Ann? It takes money to run a movement.