Britain saved New France from the Cajuns’ fate and Canada built Quebec

Benjamin West The Death of General Wolfe

General James Wolfe, saviour of Quebec. (Benjamin West)

“It’s a question of survival for our nation,” said Quebec premier François Legault as he defended the additionally restrictive language legislation of Bill 96. “It may become a question of time before we become a Louisiana.”

Anglos can’t see this and Francos won’t, but the reference should actually acknowledge Quebec’s debt. Had the British not conquered New France, old France would have dumped the little colony onto the Americans along with the rest of its North American baggage. That would have turned embryonic Quebec into something comparable to a Cajun backwater, minus the music and cuisine.

But don’t expect acknowledgement from prominent Quebecois, let alone recognition from Anglo Canada’s historically ignorant, Quebec-deferential establishment.

Indeed General James Wolfe’s 1759 victory began a process that preserved a French-language culture, multiplied its territory exponentially and launched a revolutionary transfer of power that made Quebec a privileged state-within-a-state that treats Canada as a tribute-paying vassal.

The legacy of Wolfe might have been inadvertent, but not that of the first three post-conquest governors. James Murray, Guy Carleton (who served in Wolfe’s army at Quebec and later undertook a second governorship as Lord Dorchester) and Frederick Haldimand “fought to protect the interests and defend the customs of the French Canadians,” wrote Donald Creighton in his classic work Dominion of the North.

This crusade was a great credit to their tender hearts. It was also strong evidence of their class and professional prejudices…. With its fine military history, its tradition of absolute government, its accepted landed gentry, and its docile and respectful peasants, Quebec seemed like a delightful bit of Europe transplanted to the forests of the new continent — a refreshing oasis of the old régime in the howling wilderness of democratic America.


A 19th century Cornelius Krieghoff depiction

Abandoned by their mother country, the much romanticized
habitants transformed from peasant farmers to a parasitic ethnic elite.
(Cornelius Krieghoff)

Concessions made since 1763 preserved enough of New World French culture to guarantee its survival. Tolerance of Catholicism and the use of civil courts based on the Custom of Paris maintained those traditions which, along with education, gave French semi-official language status. These practices won confirmation in the 1774 Quebec Act. By Confederation, the 1867 British North America Act made French and English the languages of federal parliament as well as Quebec’s legislature, its government institutions and records, and its courts. French flourished in church, and in church-related institutions and traditions. French-language education eventually expanded at all levels, into virtually every occupational skill, profession and academic discipline. Meanwhile Louisiana French, banished from any official use, especially education, generally sunk to the level of debased rural dialects.

The continent’s French-culture catastrophe wasn’t Britain’s Quebec conquest but America’s Mississippi buy-out. The 1803 Louisiana Purchase gave the U.S. vastly more than the New Orleans port facilities requested by the new republic. Distracted by war and desperate for money, Napoleon’s regime unloaded all its North American possessions, holding onto only a few tiny islands like Saint-Pierre and Michelon, and the recently reinstated slave state of Haiti. Exempted by Wolfe’s conquest was that thin strip of land along the St. Lawrence disparaged by Voltaire as “a few acres of snow.”

Yet that semi-manorial turf, farmed by peasants perpetually scared of native attack, expanded far, far beyond its narrow shoreline.

In 1774, just over a decade after the conquest, Britain redefined Quebec to extend from the Gulf of St. Lawrence to the Mississippi Valley, including Montreal and what’s now southern Ontario. In 1791, following the loss of its American colonies, Britain divided what was left of Quebec into Upper and Lower Canada then, in 1841, united the two into the province of Canada. As pointed out by William F. Shaw and Lionel Albert in Partition: The Price of Quebec’s Independence, Quebec didn’t “enter” Confederation because no province of Quebec existed prior to 1867.

Whether it was part of a province called Quebec, Lower Canada or Canada, the land was by no means necessarily French-speaking. British, Irish and Americans first settled large parts of the St. Lawrence north and south shores, the western Montreal archipelago and Gaspé. Those regions were still mainly English-speaking by 1867, Partition notes.


Canadian generosity made Quebec the world’s 18th-largest nation

Thanks to massive land transfers from Canada,
Quebec ranks 18th globally for national territory.
(Image: Shutterstock)

The gargantuan territorial expansion—most of present-day Quebec—came from Rupert’s Land, granted by Britain to Canada in 1869. Canada bestowed Quebec with two huge parcels of the territory in 1898 and 1912, the second largely at the urging of Quebec’s then-mostly English-speaking senior civil service and “asked for by no one outside of a mainly Anglophone circle,” Partition states. Even then Quebec’s government, outside of the English-speaking resources ministries, took little interest in the new turf until 1960, during the rise of Quebec nationalism.

And Quebec nationalism went far beyond protecting a distinct society. In practice it subjugated non-Quebecois Canada politically and economically, also wrecking what was left of Anglo-Canadian culture. The revolutionary power grab began with official Bilingualism and Biculturalism, legislated in the Official Languages Act of 1968 to 1969, ostensibly extending federal use of English and French from Parliament and the courts to Canada’s entire federal bureaucracy and institutions. Further language laws passed in 1978, 1988 and onwards, while generous concessions came from legislatures in Anglo and mostly Anglo provinces. Quebec took the opposite approach, making French its sole official language in 1974 then crafting increasingly restrictive language laws. Legault’s Bill 96 is just the most recent.


Anglos built Montreal, Canada sustains it

Not exactly a Cajun backwater, Montreal owes
its prosperity to Anglo Canada. (Photo: iStock)

From the outset of official bilingualism, Quebecois (regardless of national loyalty) gained preference for all federal jobs, from senior ministries to the post office to the military, and with many private sector employers who had to deal with the feds. Senior and mid-level Anglos got replaced or otherwise displaced, while new positions in an enormously expanded federal leviathan prioritized Quebecois.

The social revolution applied to all parts of the country, no matter how small, remote or homogeneously Anglo. Every city, town, village and community gained a cadre of often arrogant Quebecois. Some of them worked for newly planted French-language TV and radio stations, part of a massive expansion of the government’s own media empire, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Beyond Quebec, the French-language CBC audience is generally limited to transplanted Quebecois. Their purpose is to provide French-language government services to other transplanted Quebecois whose purpose is to provide French-language government services.

For all that emphasis on bilingualism, French-language instruction for Anglos faltered. The contrast with bi- and multilingual European countries couldn’t be stronger. Such an abject failure gives the impression of a deliberate plan to prop up the Quebecois elite. Nevertheless when faced with fluently French-speaking Anglos, Quebecois will sometimes say, “It’s not enough to speak French.”

In the guise of bilingualism, Quebecois preference became legally mandatory and enforceable, policed by an official languages commissioner with an almost all-Quebecois staff and wielding the extraordinary powers of an advocate, cop, prosecutor, judge and jury.

Quebec nationalists flying flags fervently

Legislation, institutions, culture and social conditioning encourage
Quebec nationalism while vilifying any Canadian counterpart.
(Photo: Robert Skinner/La Presse)

Anglo MPs on all parties caved right in, disenfranchising their constituents. The process solidified the Anglo trend toward weak-willed political sell-outs dedicated only to personal advantage. That set up Anglo Canada for its economic pillaging by Quebec, the demographic revolution of mass immigration and the ideological revolution of political correctness. As a largely autonomous state, Quebec has shielded itself from much of the damage inflicted on Anglo Canada by Quebecois prime ministers and their collaborators. Anglo Canada, in contrast, presents an extreme example of Western decline.

As for the pillage, provincial transfer payments use an absurd formula that penalizes mostly Alberta to benefit an often much more prosperous Quebec. Quebec industry benefits from, often depends on, federal favouritism and outright corruption in tenders, procurement, contracts, grants, subsidies and tax breaks. But Quebec’s main economic advantage may well be the existence of all those artificially created French-speaking jobs. Or to put it another way, Quebec’s main industry is parasitic rent-seeking.

This was probably best explained in Peter Brimelow’s 1986 book The Patriot Game: Canada and the Canadian Question Revisited. Pro-Quebec discrimination got further scrutiny in Ron Leitch’s 1988 booklet Official Bilingualism: The Sell-out of English Canada. As an Anglo-Canadian, Leitch, like Partition authors Shaw and Albert, was unusual for recognizing the problem and taking a stand. Brimelow was a Brit on his way to becoming a naturalized American and founder of Anglo Canada produces few contrary voices, thanks to a culture of conformity combined with either complacency or apathy. That’s both a contributing factor and result of Quebec’s hegemony.

Regardless of Wolfe’s actual intentions, his victory saved French-speaking North America. Subsequent events sure screwed Anglo Canada, though.

Reposted from with permission.

5 replies
  1. Lancashire lad
    Lancashire lad says:

    Quebec is a welcome bit of cultural diversity in North America.
    It’s also a source of new French words, e.g. courriel for email.

  2. Barkingmad
    Barkingmad says:

    White Francophone “pure laine” Quebeckers (AKA “de souche”) are the most desperately, dismally ‘tarded bunch on planet Earth: they have welcomed 141,981 Haitians simply because they speak French – white Anglos be damned.

  3. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    I lived for a few years in North America. One day I was invited to visit a family in Trois Riviers (?) and had to be smuggled in and out of the town because I am English, Jewish, fake Jewish and bog Irish. Thankfully no Yankee.This was in the early 1970’s.
    The British and French did not get on well together but both liked the Negro, of course.
    In Queen Victoria’s glorious days NCO’s were given 100 acre farms in Canada but they had to have served in North America.
    The gentile side of my family were senior NCO’s for 3 generations but had never served in North America so they were not given a farm. Instead many farms were given to Ukrainians! I wonder which useful peasant worked that out?
    I have read that Prince Williams in laws are having Ukrainians to stay.They obviously prefer foreigners to their own people.
    Lord Louis Mountbatten’s wife liked foreigners. When the British were sitting on the beach at Dunkirk in WW2 she was giving birth to Paul Robeson’s bastard in Buckingham Palace.
    It was flown to Egypt and brought up there.
    But that is going too far.
    In India she couldn’t keep her hand out of Nehru’s trousers and her husband couldn’t keep young Indians out of his (redacted)
    These are the people who despise us!

  4. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    The author continues many of the lies about the political situation across Canada. For example, while far from perfect, the transfer payments are a per capita formula of have and have not provinces. Yes most comes from Alberta today, but until the Mulroney junta sold out to Reagan’s Free Trade Agreement, which decimated the manufacturing in Quebec and Ontario, Alberta paid little and was at one time a recipient. Newfoundland was the biggest recipient but the discovery of oil turned it into a paying in.
    There are more kids attending French immersion schools than there ever have been. Official bilingualism has been a failure, but not bilingualism itself.
    As for the Louisiana Purchase, the US understood full well that it was a swindle. They “purchased” land that was not Napoleon’s to sell, including areas around the Great Lakes, and a large chunk of both North Dakota and Minnesota as well as small parts of South Dakota and Montana which were part of Rupertsland owned by the Hudson’s Bay Company. The gift of land to Quebec was due to the Government’s purchase of Rupertsland.
    Unfortunately, the author of this piece won’t name names. The Communist spy Lester Pearson and his backers hated Canada. His successor Trudeau 1.0 hated Anglo Canada and his 1982 coup d’etat altered us forever. There hasn’t been a government formed in the past 60 years, irrespective of political stripe that hasn’t been a tool of the globalists, which includes corporate entities in both Quebec and Ontario.
    During my work life, I attended many conferences in Quebec and with Quebecois(es). Their issue wasn’t with the Anglos, it was the federal government intrusion that came with the coup d’etat. If this author thinks they are happy about the Haitians, he can think again. After the (illegal) 1995 referendum on Quebec separation, Jacques Parizeau blamed money and the ethnic vote for the loss. He wasn’t referring to the Anglos in Quebec. Telling the truth led to his resignation.

  5. bill
    bill says:

    Why does TOO post an article by a J criticizing the Quebecois, pretty much the only people in North America whose political, econ, and cultural institutions are not dominated by Js? Sure, non-liberal anglo Canadians have some reasons to complain when it comes to special favors their liberal co-citizens granted to Quebec, but by far their biggest concerns should be the flood of migrants from all over

Comments are closed.