Sorry I Murdered You With My ‘Hate Speech’
It’s not every day that I praise a book by the former head of the American Civil Liberties Union, let alone the longest-serving president of that organization.
But I was delighted to have Nadine Strossen on my Substack recently to talk about her book, “HATE: Why We Should Resist It With Free Speech, Not Censorship” — and not just because I am one of America’s leading “hate speakers.” (Oh, settle down, girls. That’s according to woke college liberals, the only humans more infantile and narcissistic than Donald Trump.)
Her book is a thoroughgoing, no-holds-barred defense of free speech. This makes her the rarest of creatures: a principled liberal. We should get her DNA in a lab and study it.
Being a liberal herself, Strossen pitches her argument to the left. That’s fortunate, I’d say: These days, the most enthusiastic advocates for censorship are liberals.
Thus, she repeatedly notes that censorship has historically been used by the powerful to crush the “marginalized.”
I couldn’t agree more! On the other hand, the two of us have very different ideas about who’s “marginalized.” Strossen means feminists, gays, Muslims, blacks, Hispanics, immigrants, transgenders, nonbinaries and so on, whereas I mean everybody else, to wit: “cisgendered” White Americans.
Every time I’d read a description of this or that “hate speech” ban in Strossen’s book, what leapt to mind wasn’t someone saying only women have two X chromosomes, but the nonstop venom that is directed at White people.
“Hate speech” has been defined as expression that is:
— “persecutorial, hateful and degrading”;
— “insulting [or] holding up to ridicule … specific groups”;
— “likely to expose” people to “hatred or contempt”: “unusually strong and deep-felt emotions of detestation, calumny and vilification” …
Throughout the country, White schoolchildren are being browbeaten about their “White privilege” and instructed to “unpack” their “White privilege knapsack.” Does that count?
How do you think it would go over if I wrote books with titles like: “Black Fragility,” “Dear Black People” and “The White Friend: On Being a Better Black Person.”
My guess is, not very well. And yet the Priests of High Culture at the Times have effusively — and repeatedly — praised books titled “White Fragility,” “Dear White People” and “The Black Friend: On Being a Better White Person.”
These, and dozens more with similar titles — “My Beautiful Black Hair,” “Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race,” “Black Girl Magic” and on and on and on — do not bring their authors into disrepute. To the contrary, they are rewarded with instant fame, unbridled praise and immense wealth. (Naturally, their books are assigned reading in college courses throughout the nation.)
Is all this loathing for white people simply the cry of the powerless against the powerful?
Here’s some power for you: Since at least 1973, when Allan Bakke was rejected from the University of California Medical School at Davis with grades and scores that would have won him a fast-track admission had he been Black, White Americans have been openly and aggressively discriminated against by the government — and with even greater zeal by corporate America.
White people, if I may call you that, you suck at oppression.
Making both my point and hers, Strossen says that wherever hate speech laws have been tried, it’s the “marginalized” — not the “oppressors” — who get nailed.
Duh. People who think it’s cool to publish books with titles like “Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race” don’t exactly exude sweetness and light when talking to actual White people.
Thanks to the University of Michigan being forced to release documents in response to an ACLU lawsuit challenging its “hate speech” code in the late 1980s, Strossen reveals that, during the brief time it was in effect, more than 20 cases were brought against Black people for racist speech.
The “irony” of hate speech laws being applied to the people who engage in most of the hate speech has led law professor Charles Lawrence to argue for “hate speech” codes that would apply only to those “in dominant majority groups,” i.e., White people.
See? To me, that sounds like the rule of an “oppressor.”
But like Strossen, I believe in free speech. It’s not the “hate speech” that bothers me; it’s the physical violence and intentional race discrimination against White Americans that’s beginning to get on my nerves.
COPYRIGHT 2022 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY ANDREWS MCMEEL SYNDICATION
1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106; 816-581-7500
If the author is the proverbial ‘peacemaker’ who wants to build bridges (does she really?) more power to her. It will be a rare liberal today who is interested in doing that. I would not support her or any liberal j with my money, though.
Martin, Ann Coulter is a brilliant wit and her writing is satirical. If literal-minded people read her they will not be able to understand her. I do encourage you to re-read this piece as you might read Moliere or Voltaire.
I’ve said it before and I will say it again: this woman is a national treasure. She reminds me of Dorothy Parker in her snarky wit, her succinct expressiveness, and her on-the-nose observations.
I enjoy Coulter’s to-the-point articles. You will find, through the link provided, a compilation of hate speech directed at, yes indeedy, Whites! Seen this way, it is a smack in the face and irrefutable confirmation Whites, particularly men, are in the crosshairs of the hate speech mob.
I will not even bother to read the article. I know Coulter. This hate speech witch hunt is of the Jews. Not liberals, not the left, not commies, not negroes, not metsicans…..
Ann Coulter is loved by Jews. Therefore, she is no help to us. All roads of censorship and antiEuro hatred lead to Jews. Jews created NAACP, ACLU, SPLC, BLM,, WEF…..on and on.
IT’S ALWAYS DA CHEWS…
All else is tinkling brass.
Hello Eric: Yes my friend, you are right. However I think that Ann Coulter can, and usually does, write some brilliant articles which combine wit and sarcasm in a way that other conservatives (Whites who are terrified to be seen as “nazis”) will never match.
Having said that, you are right, she NEVER mentioned the Jews (as far as I can remember) but has produced some great articles that can be used or quoted when analyzing the USA’s political or social scene. If a rifle works and I can use it against my enemies I do not care about its origin.
Cheers!
Darn, I thought I was over hitting the return key before being ready. Here is the link:
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/08/01/systemic-anti-white-bias-in-media/
“Hate” is just another in the long list of words that has been altered to suit a political agenda. The meaning for hundreds of years was: regard with extreme ill-will, have a passionate aversion to, treat as an enemy. In other words, the antonym of love. Today, it jumps right over dislike and means making an observation or statement that offends someone.
My standard word corruption example is “gay”, which until hi-jacked by the homosexuals about 60 years ago, meant full of joy, merry; light-hearted, carefree. I admit that for a brief time a millenium back, it also described the actions of one Philippus de Gay who was wanton, lewd, and lascivious. The hi-jacking crew insisted this did not apply to them.
Sixty years ago, homosexuals were called sodomites, which accurately described their actions. Today, anyone calling a homosexual, a sodomite, would be accused of “hate speech”. It doesn’t matter if it is true, it only matters that someone is offended. Hate speech, like racism, bigot (another altered word), Nazi, Fascist, and Auntie Shem-ite are shut down terms devoid of any real meaning.
Brilliant observation! I developed that idea in an article that I wrote exactly one year ago. Here is the link:
https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/07/a-war-of-words/
I am not a big fan of Ann Coulter but I think this is an excellent article. There is a brilliant sentence I would like to quote because it sums up the man beautifully:
“That’s according to woke college liberals, the only humans more infantile and narcissistic than Donald Trump” (LOL)
I found over the years that most liberals do not understand their own ideology. They do not support free speech. They do want censorship. They pie-in-the-sky projects and agenda cannot work without total conformity and censorship.
“Thus, she repeatedly notes that censorship has historically been used by the powerful to crush the “marginalized.””
“Thus, she repeatedly notes that censorship has historically been used by the powerful to crush the “marginalized.””
To a Jew like Strossen, “marginalized” will always mean *them*, even when they are, as Professor (((Amy Wax))) at Penn admits, in the Elites.
BTW, a good alternate definition of “marginalized” in my book is, “People who do shitty things that no one wants”.
I thought might have entered the Ann Coulter website again but alas, it’s still TOO. Don’t hate AC but is there a lack of other quality material?
Have tremendous respect for Kevin MacDonald, Joyce etc. but what is the plan…..
I agree with you. Still, Ann Coulter is infinitely better than that old “has been” called Patrick Buchanan. Conservatives are all the same, too fond of their social standing and wealth to name the Jews.
” Have tremendous respect for Kevin MacDonald, Joyce etc. but what is the plan…..”
That is sort of what I was wondering . Did Prof KMac not know that AC is an ally of zionists jews ?
Would be shocked if KMac does not know all about AC’s history and allegiances but that is what makes this so perplexing.
A possible move to attract more women readers or to try to more ‘mainstream’ the site? Who knows
IS THIS HATE SPEECH?
GENTILES IN HALACHA
Foreword — Daat Emet
For a long time we have been considering the necessity of informing our readers about Halacha’s real attitude towards non-Jews. Many untrue things are publicized on this issue and the facts should be made clear. But recently, we were presented with a diligently written article on the subject, authored by a scholar from the Merkaz HaRav yeshiva — so our job was done by others (though we have already discussed some aspects of this issue in the weekly portions of Balak and Matot; see there). Since there is almost no disagreement between us and the author of the article on this issue, we have chosen to bring the article “Jews Are Called ‘Men'” by R’ David Bar-Chayim (in Hebrew) so that the reader will be able to study and understand the attitude of the Halacha towards non-Jews.
In this article R’ Bar-Chayim discusses the attitude towards “Gentiles” in the Torah and in the Halacha and comes to an unambiguous conclusion:
“The Torah of Israel makes a clear distinction between a Jew, who is defined as ‘man,’ and a Gentile.”
That is to say, any notion of equality between human beings is irrelevant to the Halacha. R’ Bar-Chayim’s work is comprehensive, written with intellectual honesty, and deals with almost all the aspects of Halachic treatment of non-Jews. It also refutes the statements of those rabbis who speak out of wishful thinking and, influenced by concepts of modern society, claim that Judaism does not discriminate against people on religious grounds. R’ Bar-Chayim shows that all these people base their constructs not on the Torah but solely on the inclinations of their own hearts. He also shows that there are even rabbis who intentionally distort the Halachic attitude to Gentiles, misleading both themselves and the general public.
For the English readers’ convenience we will briefly mention the topics dealt with in R’ Bar-Chayim’s article:
1. Laws in regard to murder, which clearly state that there is Halachic difference between murder of a Jew and of a Gentile (the latter is considered a far less severe crime).
2. A ban on desecrating the Sabbath to save the life of a Gentile.
3. A Jew’s exemption from liability if his property (e. g. ox) causes damage to a Gentile’s property. But if a Gentile’s property causes damage to a Jew’s property, the Gentile is liable.
4. The question of whether robbery of a Gentile is forbidden by the Torah’s law or only by a Rabbinic decree.
5. A ban on returning a lost item to a Gentile if the reason for returning it is one’s sympathy towards the Gentile and compassion for him.
6. The sum which a Gentile overpays in a business transaction due to his own error is forfeit; whether a Jew is permitted to intentionally deceive a Gentile is also discussed.
7. One who kidnaps a Jew is liable to death, but one who kidnaps a Gentile is exempt.
8. A Jew who hurts or injures a Gentile is not liable for compensation of damage, but a Gentile who hurts a Jew is liable to death.
9. One who overcharges a Gentile ought not return him the sum that the Gentile overpaid.
10. A Gentile — or even a convert to Judaism — may not be appointed king or public official of any sort (e. g. a cabinet minister).
11. One who defames a female proselyte (claiming that she was not virgin at the time of her marriage) is liable to neither lashes nor fine.
12. The prohibition to hate applies only to Jews; one may hate a Gentile.
13. One may take revenge against or bear a grudge towards Gentiles; likewise, the commandment “love your neighbor” applies only to Jews, not to Gentiles.
14. One who sees Gentile graveyards should curse: “Your mother shall be greatly ashamed…”
15. Gentiles are likened to animals.
16. If an ox damaged a Gentile maidservant, it should be considered as though the ox damaged a she-ass.
17. The dead body of a Gentile does not bear ritual impurity, nor does a Gentile who touches the dead body of a Jew become impure — he is considered like an animal who touched a dead body.
18. One is forbidden to pour anointing oil on a Jew, but there is no ban on pouring that oil on a Gentile because Gentiles are likened to animals.
19. An animal slaughtered by a Gentile is forbidden, even if the ritual slaughter performed was technically correct, because Gentiles are deemed like animals. (Daat Emet does not agree that this is the Halachic reason for invalidating a Gentile’s ritual slaughter — but this is not the place to delve into the subject).
20. Their members(genitals) are like those of asses” — Gentiles are likened to animals.
21. Between the Jews and the Gentiles — In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought
R’ Bar-Chayim’s arguments and conclusions are clear, Halachically accurate, and supported by almost all the existent major Halachic works. It would be superfluous to say that R’ Bar-Chayim fully embraces this racist Halachic outlook as the word of the Living G-d, as he himself pointed out in the “Conclusion” of his article: “It is clear to every Jew who accepts the Torah as G-d’s word from Sinai, obligatory and valid for all generations, that it is impossible to introduce ‘compromises’ or ‘renovations’ into it.”
On the other hand, we want to make it clear that Daat Emet — as well as any reasonable people who do not embrace Halachic laws as the word of the Living G-d — are repulsed by such evil, racist discrimination.
In the Hebrew text we have abridged the second part of R’ Bar-Chayim’s article, “Between Jews and Gentiles — In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought,” because, in our view, the Halacha is the law which obligates every religious Jew while concepts of the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and Jewish thought are not binding on anyone, as our rabbis have already written: “And so the Aggadic constructs of the disciples of disciples, such as Rav Tanchuma and Rabbi Oshaya and their like — most are incorrect, and therefore we do not rely on the words of Aggadah” (Sefer HaEshkol, Laws of a Torah Scroll, p. 60a); we have expanded on this issue in the portion of Vayeshev.
http://www.come-and-hear.com
Read Michael A Hoffman II (Judaism’s Strange Gods) and Dr. E. Michael Jones (Jewish Revolutionary Spirit). Of course, Professor McDonald’s series on Jews. Jesus MST have known Jews personally. That is the ONLY way that he would know that Jews are of their father the devil
Come-and-hear is a great site. I downloaded tons of things from there over the last 20 years.
Thank you for reminding me of it Pip.
The Jew is the epitome of evil. That view I have acquired from many years of reading THEIR writings and dealing with them.
My opinion about the only possible way for the surviving of our group.
Firstly, define your group. In Germany it is done easily: We feel and see who is German and who not. Also we have the end-of-area-of belonging-together made not a sharp edge, but it is an unspoken broader range. For example towards eastern Europe the area ist extremely large. We say about the Russians: “If his grandfather had once fondled a “GermanShepherdDog”, this qualifies him to become a German.” On the other hand, a Pakistani, born in Europe, perfectly speaking German, is a foreigner. So you can see that the passport in Germany says little whether the holder is German or not, despite the text on the passport.
Secondly, we care about our own survival and nothing else. If in China a sack of rice falls to the ground: It is a problem for the Chinese, but we do not care. If in India a man has tooth pain and goes to the dentist: It is his personal problem und we have no pain at all about this.
The road with these two simple sentences will lead to sucess, other ways of behaviour will lead to our own death.
I am sorry Karlfried but I don’t see it that way. All I know (and I monitor the social and political situation across Europe at least twice a week) is that you the Germans are some of the most subservient people in Europe towards foreigners who spat upon you and rape your women. And what do you do? NOTHING.
A wonderful, heroic old lady (I think she is 90 years old) called Ursula Haverbeck has been sent to jail to probably die there. Did any of you have the decency and the guts to stage a huge mass demonstration against this infamy? NO!!!
Your glorious grandparents must be vomiting in their graves!!!
Hello Angelicus, thank you for your comment. I am German living not to far from Frankfurt am Main. What you describe ist 100% true, the foreigners spit into our face and we say thank you, please do more of it.
You describe the situation-as-it-is at-this-moment-of-time. 80 or 90% of the Germans are silly, selfish, cowards, cannot think 5 minutes in advance (I guess, in the USA the same situation). The rest, the remainig 10% are the ones who will bring the salvation. The 90% will follow in case that we have success.
I have met Ursula Haverbeck at an event in August 2016. I know her.
About mass demonstrations: we have done this in Frankfurt in 2015, our side with 100 people, the other side (counter-demontration) with 2000 aggressive people. After ten events we stopped it.
Grandparents: One of my grandfathers was in Flandern 1917, the other in White Russia 1943 and my father in Kurland 1945. None of them did tell anything negative about the former enemies, and in general they did tell allmost nothing about their time in war. The unspoken message was: war is bad.
I admire you by what you have done, you clearly are part of the (in my opinion) 5% of decent respectable Germans alive nowadays. I would like to explain why my judgement sounds (perhaps) so harsh.
I am an old man (63) and over the last 45 years I read lots of books about the life in the III Reich, the NSDAP, and the glorious, epic struggle of the German people between 1939-45. Therefore, the disgusting beahviour of the huge majority of the Germans towards their glorious ancestors makes me mad. How is it possible that with so many books telling the truth about Adolf Hitler and the Wehrmacht, these despicable traitors chose to believe their enemies instead of their gran dparents?
The story you told me about Ursula Haverbeck proves me right 100%. How is it possible that there were only 100 brave, honourable Germans ready to fight for this heroic lady? Anyway, I wish you and your noble friends well.
Angelicus
I am afraid that we are just as spineless in the US. Every year the Jews put their candlestick on our White House Lawn. We do nothing.
90% of Biden cabinet is Jew. No one says anything.
I am sure that Sean Hannity head would explode if Metsicans were 90 % of Budens cabinet.
Hello Eric: I got your point and you are right, as I said before, the whole White race seems to be afflicted by a death-wish and a disgusting self-hatred.
However my anger gainst the Germans is due to the fact that there were lots of WW2 survivors who could tell the truth to the younger generation. Furthermore in the 70s and 80s there were lots of excellent German books setting the record straight about Adolf Hitler and WW2. My point is, there was no lack of information; therefore, WHY these despicable bastards (95% of Germans) believe so passionately in their ancestors’ “cruelty and wickedness”?
That’s all. Regards!
Angelicus
After The Second War to destroy the West, Jews went to Germany from America and they were given Carte Blanche in the subversion of the German mind. The EuroAmerican Protestants were under Jew control and they did whatever Jews told them to do. (Protestantism is Judaism for Europeans).
Jews control the mind of the EuroChristian today.
Men degerated by Jews are exclusively “in the head”.
But the woman is closer to nature, she IS nature,
mother earth, always leads us back to nature.
“We are attracted by the eternal feminine,” is
the final sentence of Goethe’s Faust. What man
has ever had the delightful experience of making
love to a woman in a flower dress in the spring-
time in nature with chirping birds for company?
Nietzsche says, “If you go to the woman, do not forget
the whip!” One must ask oneself, which understanding
this “theorist” had of Mother Nature (probably none).
Our German understanding of the world will never
and can never rise above nature (which is why we
could never degrade women), but it can fight forces
directed against Mother Nature all the more effectively.
I can tell you exactly when a “man” needs
a “whip”: When he’s a beta cuck who does
in truth not “deserve” a woman he desires.
Many of these sick guys will now object, “But
these masochists want to be maltreated!”
These are not naturally evolved women! They
are abused individuals whose self-esteem is
so low that they even expect “appreciation”
from absolutely indisputable figures like you.
The question is, when will women respect men?
– when they are uncompromisingly heroically resolute and unyieldingly determined
– when they stake their lives to protect everything they own and have created
– when they are not disgusting degenerate pigs who have no decency, manners and morals whatsoever
It is interesting that especially young women like to ride the
Trakehner horses educated by military rigor. They regularly
say the same thing: “I feel safe and secure on him, he follows
me like a shadow, willing to perform, never lets me down.”
These young women are telling in truth how WE should be!
We not trample on women, we wear
our women as pride in our crown!
“You wear the women in your crown, hahaha!”
What are you “fighting” for? Please, explain it for all of us
so that we all understand your extraterrestrial “concern”!
“In our world, women are a target like Jews and Negroes!”
I think something in your psyche is in need of treatment.
The love for our women is indelibly imprinted in our ge-
netics. Whoever disrespects, seduces, or abuses (men-
tally or physically) our women shall feel all our hatred!
A German man endures blows and even scratches on
his face, caused by a woman, with stoic composure.
This woman is dedicated, and is now reaching her li-
mits. Never hate women, because women are life.
Convince her that she actually knows you are right!
These whole “mind-games” that non-men play
with women are a mystery to us Germans. The
woman wants to know what you are made of.
Women want to be important, and they are! A man
only notices that when they are no longer there.
Be confident and do everything you can to make this
woman who’s spending her time with you (and maybe
even sharing her body with you) feel comfortable.
These whole “mind-games” that non-men play
with women are a mystery to us Germans. The
woman wants to know what you are made of.
Women want to be important, and they are! A man
only notices that when they are no longer there.
A German man endures blows and even scratches on
his face, caused by a woman, with stoic composure.
This woman is dedicated, and is now reaching her li-
mits. Never hate women, because women are life.
Convince her that she actually knows you are right!
Men degerated by Jews are exclusively “in the head”.
But the woman is closer to nature, she IS nature,
mother earth, always leads us back to nature.
“We are attracted by the eternal feminine,” is
the final sentence of Goethe’s Faust. What man
has ever had the delightful experience of making
love to a woman in a flower dress in the spring-
time in nature with chirping birds for company?
Nietzsche says, “If you go to the woman, do not forget
the whip!” One must ask oneself, which understanding
this “theorist” had of Mother Nature (probably none).
Only all of us together, wife and husband, father and daughter, mother and son, will survive this evil. We together form our race. Whoever divides us is the enemy of us all!
We Germanic people have respect for the mother, her word
is law for us. Jesus is said to have driven his mother away in
the worst way. Was he gay? Who the f cares (except Anglin)?
It may well happen that the life experience and foresight
of a German mother correctly assesses the would-be daugh-
ter-in-law, and her son is grateful to her for it one day.
I myself have to admit at this point that my mo-
ther was always mercilessly right, but I complete
idiot believed that I knew everything better.
Probably this simple insight does not
even distinguish us from the Jews.
My son is a student and has an interview for a part-time job in a major multi-national clothing store. He has blonde hair and blue eyes. I do wonder whether young white men stand a chance against “the marginalized” in a major city when it comes to retail jobs.
https://worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video-c.php?v=wshhe39LxYs6JCSBw7ge
Who would have thought that this “typical American
crime scene” (which will also become more and more
“typical European”) has something to do with Hitler?
“Joshua was born on April 19, 1989, in Nerumburg, Germany,
to Harold James Richard, Jr. and Gail Melody Leak-Kavota.”
https://www.tributearchive.com/obituaries/25277666/joshua-demiguel-kavota
“Nerumburg” should probably mean Nuremberg, pre-
sumably the relatives of this creature are not even able
to spell their son’s birthplace correctly. Nuremberg was
once known to be the “City of the Reich Party Rallies”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honorary_city_titles_in_Nazi_Germany
https://summit.news/2022/07/19/green-party-erases-white-people-from-future-of-germany-promos/
As a German, however, one wonders who sets the American rules of police conduct. The German police would have proceeded completely differently:
First, they would not have sent a woman ahead to the knife attacker. Second, they would have kept their distance with their guns drawn. Third, they would have warned the perpetrator at a distance several times to pull the knife out of his pocket and throw it on the ground, otherwise make use of the firearm. Fourth, they would have initially targeted the legs of the perpetrator.
Disadvantages of the German approach: The Negro would still be alive and would spend his useless existence at the taxpayer’s expense (in prison), which he probably does anyway. Advantage of the German approach: No reason was created for “racist police violence” that ends up costing more than one more Negro in prison.
https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/07/uk-tories-battle-to-captain-sinking-ship/
German drunkard and loser speaks the truth
(“Dittsche” is alive! Diss iss ze real Dittsche!)
https://odysee.com/@sowhat:d/UK—Good-Bye:1
“Dittsche” is the name of a character on German te-
levision: a drunken unemployed alcoholic in a bath-
robe who, however, only babbles nonsensical rubbish.