Conquered from Within: Lincoln’s Prediction

In his 1863 Gettysburg address, Abraham Lincoln said, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”  In another speech–Lyceum 1838– he emphasized that, given its size and geographical location far from foreign powers, the United States (very much similar to China’s privileged status today) could not be conquered from abroad but only from within.  To preserve national unity and harmony, the sensible choice was to work together towards a common beneficial goal or to die by suicide from rebellious forces within its boundaries.

To paraphrase the biblical verse: “He who lives by the sword dies by the sword”(Matthew 26:52), we could say in a different manner:  the country that willingly betrays its foundational principles in favor of false tenets will in time see the very nature of its society collapse.  In the same context, Polonius, counselor to the king, tells Hamlet in Shakespeare’s drama:  “To thine own self be true.”

That is an accepted axiom of political longevity.  Human communities are subject to varying means of governance as well as the laws of physics (entropy).  We are given birth (Declaration of Independence, 1776; Constitution in 1787), we reach an age of maturity and greatness, and then, in temporal segments since the War in Vietnam, we descend into senescence and eventual extinction as a dominant power.  This is the pattern that major countries throughout history have followed.

According to historians and modern-day pundits (Cal Thomas, Martin Armstrong, John Glover and others), all empires or major political powers are condemned to a pre-ordained death cycle within 250 years of their onset.  There are in the ancient world, notable exceptions: Persia, Greece, Rome, Egypt, and Carthage, et al. that survived longer.

America, in 2026 will be 250 years old (dating from the Declaration of Independence, 1776).  There are many objections by historians to this time line of self-destruction—although Lincoln rightly predicted that our downfall would come from within the country and not from hostile foreign powers.

The Greek, Roman, Persian, and Egyptian empires have long since passed away into historical oblivion.  Modern-day France (born in 1789 with the French Revolution) is a pale relic of the Napoleonic domination of Europe in the early nineteenth century. The prestige and economic prosperity it once enjoyed from its now defunct world-wide empire can no longer justify its aspirations to be a global power.

We are now, some 246 years after our birth as a nation, in a period of senescence.  To the extent that we never sought international dominance, we are poorly situated to maintain our role as the world’s most powerful country in foreign and economic affairs.

Democracy is also a tired and fragile system of government; autocracy and oligarchy are becoming more and more attractive to the modern politician.

Centralized government lets you bypass the will of the people; it permits leaders to resolve complicated issues without having to seek the approval of the common weal.  Dogmatism of this sort promotes single-party rule with its unfortunate consequences, as history has demonstrated time and again.

So the physicists say, our universe is condemned to extinction in the far, far distant future; if this is true and the earth’s immediate existence is compromised by global warming and other man-made abuses, we need to find alternative ways to escape the threat of planetary decline as predicted by scientists.

Our sacrificial attempts to purify the planet are mocked by foreign powers that pollute at will (China and India in particular with almost 2.7 billion inhabitants collectively) in an effort to pursue economic prosperity and political hegemony for their vast populations.

In Africa, animal species are disappearing as poor nations grant poachers free access to their sanctuaries to hunt elephants for their tusks and rhinos for their horns.  Brazil does little to prosecute or deter farmers from destroying trees to create arable land in the Amazon.

We need to view interstellar space as the new frontier—a pathway to the stars or planets such as Mars where human communities can be created as an escape venue from the inevitable dying of our planet.  It might be interesting to speculate about what Planet Earth will become one hundred or more years from now as millions of settlers leave our sphere to resettle on Mars—the new Wild West.

Will wars among the surviving countries on Earth be so devastating that life itself will be compromised?  Will nations, in a desperate effort to preserve their viability, make peace or at least sign a truce, putting aside highly destructive weaponry for the sake of survival?

Unfortunately, we are genetic victims of our origins more than a million years ago.  Waging war to preserve existence and national (or tribal) safety is engrained in our psychological nature.  The military-industrial complex promotes international conflicts to keep its industries profitable.  No era in human history has been without disastrous warfare and conflict.  The future will not be an era of Pax Americana.

The military hierarchy rewards those who have served valiantly in combat.  Without war, the officer corps becomes restless, knowing full well that only on the battle field could their promotions in rank be assured.

Intelligence agencies and law enforcement are being weaponized against dissenters.  Democracy or a representative form of government is now an inconvenience more than a necessity.

Talk shows, movies, and media programs are rife with discussions about how slow and inept true democratic procedures are.  In the eyes of current administrations, getting quick answers to thorny questions is more important than obtaining accurate results without rushing to conclusions.

The sanctuary cities and states (California) that welcome illegal immigrants act in willful contravention of federal laws.  No one in Congress will impose legal sanctions on these “blue” states or cities.

What if America, overwhelmed by millions of unvetted immigrants, abandons its traditions and becomes a compilation of warring tribes and ethnic groups?  As Lincoln predicted, suicide from inside will surely be a reality within a few decades.

America will continue to be a privileged geographical location, a massive presence in the Western world, but how can it once again become a player in the Eastern hemisphere? China is now the dominant force throughout this region. Any attempt to limit its military expansion within its sphere of influence would be met with strong resistance.

We are in a tenuous situation financially.  The dollar is still the world’s reserve currency.  However, according to current trends, China will eventually replace us as the major economic force in the world; as a result, they will demand that a basket of currencies, not the dollar, become the currency of world exchange.  This assault on the American dollar, once it is replaced or no longer enjoys its privileged status, will have a disastrous effect on our economy.  It will shift the equilibrium of political power throughout the world.

More than thirty trillion dollars in debt, the American economy cannot sustain its current rate of spending and the massive acquisition of debt.  In due time, its bonds will be marketed at a discount.  Social programs will not be able to be adequately funded; military expenditures will be reduced, economic incentives will be curtailed, etc.  The long-anticipated recession will occur and Americans of all stripes will struggle to adjust their lifestyles.

An increasing percentage of the national debt will be interest payments to foreign investors, in particular to countries that have regularly acquired our debt: Canada, Great Britain, China, and Japan.

None of the current spending programs will be implemented effectively with a corresponding lack of adequate funding.  The Treasury cannot keep on printing money (“funny money”) in an inflationary period.  But it does.

Sooner or later, the national debt will bring about a collapse of our economic safety net: the belief in the so-called unshakeable strength and durability of the American economy.

The uninhibited allocation of recent funds (the “Inflation Reduction Act”) and student loan forgiveness strain the imagination.  Much of the money set aside for infrastructure initiatives goes to programs that have nothing to do with roads or bridges.

For example, to encourage the purchase of more electric vehicles, the government has proposed offering a generous subsidy to consumers (~$7,500).  It has been reported that car manufacturers will then raise the price of their vehicles in keeping with the amount of the buyer’s subsidy, thus indirectly rewarding manufacturers to produce more electric cars at very high prices, especially compared to comparable gas-powered vehicles.

 

As stated above, the growth of the Asian population in America, especially Chinese, will provide a fifth column of sorts to undermine  American scientific achievements and eventually its world dominance in computer and technological innovation.

The Chinese are aggressively purchasing vast tracts of land for agricultural products and investing in American corporations that serve an economic or political purpose.  G-5 and Tic-Toc are prime examples of this incursion.  They have also invested in South American countries (Venezuela and others) in an effort to spread their influence throughout the world.  The Chinese have heavily invested in Canada, Africa, and Mexico as well.

While we are obsessed with feminism, critical race theory, and woke-dominated issues, the Chinese are methodically implementing their long-term plan of global domination.  We are not equipped to fight a land war in Asia, and our Navy is inferior to its Chinese counterpart.

We do not have a coherent plan of action if China invades Taiwan or attempts to take over some of the neighboring islands. The power vacuum created by weakness is always exploited in a political and military context.

All in all, there is nothing new in these comments.  President Biden is compromised by his family’s connection with Chinese business interests (via his son Hunter and his brother).  He is not respected in Asia.  If Japan perceives it cannot be protected by American military power, it will seek other means of defense in acquiring atomic weapons and rapidly expanding its military capabilities.  They will be tempted to enter into alliances with other major players in the Far Eastern zone to protect their interests.

If America does not show resolve to intervene on their behalf against Chinese aggression, Japan may demand that American troops be withdrawn from their territory.  South Korea may follow a similar path of autonomy if the United States doesn’t express the will to protect its peninsula from military threats from the Chinese and North Koreans.

A destabilized Far East will not bode well for American influence in the area.  It is foreseeable that major global corporations will side with the Chinese to preserve their massive economic presence on the Chinese mainland.  American stockholders, for the most part, will remain silent and not challenge corporations who portray the Chinese as reasonable and sensible business partners.

If he could survey the current ruptures in the American political scene, Abraham Lincoln would be appalled by the tribalism and identity politics that have severely divided our nation.  The coastal elites and the bureaucrats in the “Washington Swamp” are more and more convinced that the barriers of our Constitutional Republic can be breached with little or no opposition. We are entering by all measures a post-Constitutional phase of our governance.

Unless there is a political renaissance in the Republican Party, the Democrats will continue to exert an inordinate influence in the restructuring of America’s destiny.  The more conservative enclaves in the South and mid-West will be displaced or repressed by regulations and laws that go against their interests.

How long will the “forgotten” millions who supported Trump stay silent?

Revolutions seldom come from frustrated and enraged workers or lower middle-class malcontents, but from those in positions of power who see their influence blocked or bypassed by political entities that work to enhance their own quest for power.

America’s decline, both globally and domestically, will be the subject of major concerns in the decades to come.  Are we now on the cusp of a national and international fall from power as dictated by historical norms or can this trend be offset by a new policy of returning to the democratic principles of the past that were so successful in holding our nation together?

In the long run, what would Abraham Lincoln have said?

Could he have restored unity without a Civil War or military suppression of dissenting voices?

38 replies
  1. Weaver
    Weaver says:

    Lincoln was a traitor. After his disaster came the 14th Amendment. The US never made sense after the 14th. Calvin Coolidge attempted to glue things together. Coolidge gave us a new nation state that made some sense, if we could keep it. We couldn’t.

    However, what destroyed the US after Coolidge absolutely was not the passage of time. It’s the mass media. The media is vastly too powerful, and it was only the Internet that has changed things once again. I’m aware there are many causes, but the mass media was enormously powerful.

    No nation has a fixed age. The very idea is for tiny brains. It would be better to have a nation built for thousands of years rather than some goofy empire that goes out not with a whimper but with a humiliating “oops,” which is all we hear from US elites these days.

    • Luke
      Luke says:

      Ditto your labeling of Abe Lincoln as a traitor. In fact, I have a reminder app that kicks off every April 14th, which was the glorious day where Abe had his brains deservedly blown out of his evil, race traitorous skull so I can be reminded to raise a toast and savor the memory of his well earned disappearance from this Earth, followed by his rapid descent into Hell.

      I have no discernible clue as to why the author of this article decided to blow smoke up Abe Lincoln’s evil hind parts and use him as some kind of Wise Old Saint, as if Abe ever gave two hoots about the Whites of either the North or the South. Abe was an unprincipled, unscrupulous, egotistical, power mad, psychopath and ruthless tyrant who was responsible for the senseless deaths of close to 700,000 of the people of this nation and I for one, am sick and tired of hearing his name brought up as if he was anything other than the evil mass murdering monster than he proved himself to be.

      And, every time I read the latest FBI / Justice Department Uniform Crime Report statistics and stare in horror at the rapes, murders, and assaults being committed by blacks against Whites – I whisper a silent ‘thank you’ to John Wilkes Booth.

  2. Weaver
    Weaver says:

    The only way to defeat China and truly win all the pieces is to cut military spending to well below $100b, bring all troops home, and return to what Calvin Coolidge would have done. Following this path guarantees victory, but to make it more lasting, the US could donate its Neocon parasites to China.

    General Smedley Butler would say to nationalize the MIC, to ensure it be used for the national interest, not for personal profit. If Chinese purchase of the US is due to corruption in the US, then reducing that corruption would seem to be goal #1. No more Virginia mansions built on war profits. Virginia has too many mansions as it is.

    Richard Weaver argued that a worker might unknowingly be part of a terrible sin if working within a large, complex, opaque modern machine of a society. What that machine is actually used for, the worker doesn’t know. He can have faith in the machine, trust in the machine, but the machine is going to be controlled by others.

    • Chris murphy
      Chris murphy says:

      Always a glimmer of hope, when Richard weaver is quoted. Just finished “southern tradition at bay…”
      Intro and epilogue are heartrending. His hope!!!
      Cannot recommend r.w. too strongly

      Grace and peace

      • Weaver
        Weaver says:

        Mr. Murphy,

        It’s a pleasure to meet you.

        Two reasons to know hope:

        1. The Internet continues to develop in amazing ways. For example, I see some activists encouraging not only fitness but critical thinking skills and general self-independence. That’s how tyranny is thwarted and how even new elites are crafted.

        2. Dr. Fleming just wrote a new book.

        The great threat I’ve said for 20 years is genetic engineering. It’ll make ethics, civilization, even sanity impossible. But it’s better to have hope.

  3. Richard Sampson
    Richard Sampson says:

    In the 1960 census, there were NO Hispanics! There is a reason that Mexico is a third-world nation with a very low per capita GDP. The latest census indicates that Hispanics are 17% of the population and don’t have an average IQ above those of blacks! China will be the dominant world Hegeman thanks to the inner working of our newfound elites the Jews!

  4. Birhan Dargey
    Birhan Dargey says:

    The American Republic/EMPIRE is rather young of recent history..in fact no more than 250yrs old, compare that to the Roman Empire that lasted over 2Kyrs+. That is an astonishing life span for an empire whose NUCLEUS of power consisted of a tiny land aristocracy minority with “pure” Roman Patrician Lineage as the basis for its concept of CITIZENSHIP. The basis for the Roman Empire was NOT democracy (today?), The Roman world regime was an oligarchical landed Aristocracy with strong emphasis on Blood/Ancestry/Lineage (Latium). The main objective of Roman policies internally and EXTERNALLY was ALWAYS Roman INTERESTS, its economic resources, political military expansion/security and lastly Roman Culture. The Roman provinces must abide by two KEY principles q) Recognize the absolute authority of the Roman Caesar b) Pay your tributes/taxes timely without protests. IF any of those two rules were challenged..any foe had to confront the IRON will of the brutal Roman legions. BUT otrherswise given those two conditions the colonies/provincies were LEFT to their own customs/traditions/ even some political autonomy to keep their feudal lords/kings/religions etc. Today the American Empire does not act guided by American INTERESTS domesticaly or internationally..The Neocons since 1980s had been driving the USA into WARS/military coflicts/ and a foreign policy that responds to Zio/Jewish/israeli INTERESTS. The results had been catastrophic: a $40TRILLIONS national debt, economic stagnation, social/racial/ethnic multiculturalists strifes, rampant crime, alienatin key allies.The core of the WOKE regime is the progressive accelarating destrcution of the CONSTITUTIONAL democrataic order, which (historical) roots were the White Troika of Anglo political democracies/Christianity and Capitalism prevalent at those Historical times indepent of our current EMOTIONAL fashions/desires/racism. Part of the practical virtues of the FEDERAL constitutional order of Check and Balances, the system was/IS flexible to recognize natural.human, geographical, cultural vustoms of each STATE/region/Localities..and let them legisilate to govern accordingly. In fact the USA Civil War was caused by threathening STATES rights..could this trigger another Civil War today ??? BLUE DEM states trying to impose their WOKE policies on RED states?? like abortions/lgbt sexual mutilations/drag queen schools/OPEN borders/ CRT/ freetrade outsourcing/ in the process of developing a WOKE/Liberal/DEM superstate they are willing to destroy the USA Constitutional order, commit eletoral FRAUDs, turn fedral agencies into the regimes repressive/opressive/coersive/authoritarian partisan/ideological weapons..Can America survive such radical antihistorical mega teutonic sismic changes (politics/taxes/military/educacion/IMMIGRATION) in domestic policies??????? A house divided against its PEOPLE can not survive..

  5. Jake P.
    Jake P. says:

    You people need to let go of America. I know it’s hard. Perhaps the hardest thing you’ll ever do. But the evidence is there for all to see.

    America has some 47 million blacks. Think about it! Growing all the time, from domestic activity and from immigration from Africa. All coddled and supported by your own white leaders, who in fact want to ban the one method by which the race was controlled in numbers.

    America has between 7 to 15 million (who knows, really?) Jews and half Jews. And an infinitely increasing population of all manner of Latin American and Asian populations.

    Combine this with the worst financial inequality of any nation perhaps in history, and all manner of social degeneracy and rot, and you can see clearly that America is done. It was cool while it lasted, don’t weep too hard. All things change in time, and, as you know, history always favors strong monoracial systems in the long term.

  6. Weaver
    Weaver says:

    Blake Masters on Tucker Carlson was just talking about the need to protect our kids from “Maoist” policies in the US. So, I wanted to just mention that here. Foreign policy isn’t going to impact those domestic US Maoist policies.

    Separately, the US has angered much of Central and South America over the years with US foreign policy. We’re about to lose the one aspect of that policy which actually did serve US interests, the drug war. Colombia is legalizing cocaine farming. I assume others could follow.

    If wanting to serve US interests, one would assume the US would be neutral about or even pressure for more restrictive immigration policies in Latin America. However, the Americas continue to grow in population. The Dominican Republic, for example, is hindered in keeping out Haitians. As opportunities in the Dominican Republic decline, more will just move to the US. US policy is to make all of these lands into overpopulated wastelands.

    We have a very bad foreign policy. It not only doesn’t serve US interests; it makes matters worse for the US. As a start, the US could deport illegals. Such deportation would be aided by first ensuring illegal employment is made impossible. The US cannot even do that. The US fails at step 1, step 1.

  7. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    I am part Jewish. The Jews say I am a Jew because a Rabbi accepted me but I say that I am not a Jew because I do not have a Jewish mother.
    The Jew side of my family always called English people cabbages.
    What they called Americans was very abusive, but they would not tell me what it was. They would not tell me because I wanted to tell the Americans. I said that if I had any problems while telling the Americans (Yankees,not Confederates) I would simply tell them to get down on their hands and knees and kiss my feet because I am a Jew. My aunt said “What do you do if some big American won’t kiss your feet?” My aunt was right, although these days they would probably give me the knee. It is probably better to stay safe and laugh about those nice Americans behind their backs, like the fake Jews in Palestine and the USA.
    We were related to or friends of Trotsky’s family. He was one of the errand boys blackmailing and bribing the useful peasants to start WW1 on behalf of 5 rich men who met in 1904 and decided to have a World War. Trotsky arranged to have the Archduke and Archduchess murdered.
    The Yankees invaded the South to plunder the South and not to end slavery, which was ending anyway.
    One of my (sorry Jewish) uncles was valet to a Mr. Elsworthy. The family were blue bloods in England before they emigrated to America. His father and 4 of his uncles were killed by the Yankees. All wars are disgusting and nearly always unnecessary.
    In my humble opinion the plundering of the Confederacy was not necessary. Slavery would
    have ended ( thanks largely to the British) and then the Confederacy would have joined Yankeeland and the USA would be much better off than it is today.

    • Weaver
      Weaver says:

      Edward Harris,

      Jefferson described black slavery as having the wolf by the ears. You couldn’t let the wolf go, or he’d bite you. Everyone feared a repeat of Haiti, and blacks were known for criminality and for not managing their affairs well on their own.

      As Lincoln found out, it was too expensive to deport the slaves. Poor whites feared free slaves would harm their wages.

      I’m not arguing for slavery. I’m explaining the reasons I at least remember that Southerners defended slavery and might well have never given it up. The Arabs and maybe Turks were very late in giving up their slaves. There’s no “progress” in a direction, just circular change, similar to what Aristotle described, which I can probably find and link to easily if curious (at Perseus tufts).

      Slavery exists again today in Libya. Hillaire Belloc warned that socialism is a “return to slavery.” I want to say he described it as the natural state of man which only Christianity had changed.

      • Jonathan Chesterfield III
        Jonathan Chesterfield III says:

        Yes I assume slavery was motivated by industries and farming kinds that benefitted from it.

        And certainly one may argue that this was not “nice”.

        But given the primitive nature and aggressive behaviour of blacks and their underdeveloped regions and the like pairred with racial observation by the likes of Charles Darwin it is also I suppose to a degree understandable.

        Also PC politics and all this stuff was not as a common thing back in the days.

        But certainly, yes, capitalism was a factor with both slavery and imperialism of nations such as the old greek, the roman empire, the Brittish empire and the USA.

        So, yes let’s be honest greed as such was a factor. But then again, also cotton was a n important sector.

        But now we have invented machines for all this I suppose so why have blacks around. They tear up and destroy nations and civilization and their lowe on averege IQ makes it not optimal to larger mixture with, I suppose.

      • Hitler is our pal
        Hitler is our pal says:

        Why would it have been too expensive to deport the slaves? At any price it would’ve been a bargain. The slaves weren’t repatriated because powerful forced didn’t want them deported. Likely the same ones who brought them here in the first place.

    • Weaver
      Weaver says:

      I want to add a few additions to explain America’s history for any young readers:

      It is sometimes said that America would have freed its slaves, because slavery became far less profitable shortly after the war. Perhaps, but only whites could be citizens in the US. Those free black residents would not be integrated, would not own guns, would not be citizens.

      Slavery was often justified as a means of turning pagans into Christians, preparing them for civilized life. However, the South also saw the racial differences.

      The Amerindians very nearly destroyed Charleston, SC. You can look up the date, but they nearly got us. The primary difference here was again religious. Many Amerindians later fought with the South against the North; Amerindians had slaves.

      Even the North legalized slavery until the war’s end. Lincoln didn’t free a single slave under his control and promised many different groups permanent slavery if joining him.

      The North invaded the South to make the South part of the Union. The North wanted the South to pay trade tariffs. The South did not want to pay. The South feared that its slaves would be freed, yes, but Lincoln offered permanent slavery.

      RE Lee was against secession, but he would not attack his own state. A “state” back then could be thought of as a political state, a polity. We were not one state until the passage of the 14th.

      The North used total war against the South. This is why the South claimed to have won the “moral victory.” You could say in that regard that we were akin to the “Beautiful Losers” of right wing activists today who do the correct thing and lose doing it.

      The South was the richest part of the world at that point. It was industrializing and could have beaten the North if allowed 10 more years to develop. The South supposedly had too few railroads.

      After Sherman burned down Atlanta, and the war later ended, etc.; he focused on genociding Plains Amerindians. The North was not woke; most of it wasn’t anyway. I need to read a specific book on how the 14th passed to fully understand the history.

      • Liosnagcat
        Liosnagcat says:

        You are the victim of many commonly-held fallacies regarding the War Between the States. Recommend: “Blood Money: The Civil War and the Federal Reserve” by John Remington Graham.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      “the Confederacy would have joined Yankeeland and the USA would be much better off than it is today.”
      Not so. The North taking the South turned the old republic into just another ruthless empire, The rest of the continent came next, then the Philippines, leading to the out-of-control Globalist American Empire we see today.
      If you are an empire, it seems you can’t help having a class of maniacs in your capital playing real world Risk and causing mayhem abroad.
      A non-continental USA, if along with the CSA was just one of many states, would have stopped their catastrophic influence in Europe in WWI & II, which destroyed Western Civilisation.
      Europe would still squabble, but the wars would end the way wars ended in Europe for a thousand years previously, with negotiated settlements looking for a balance of power.
      Not cruel & unhinged American ideas of unconditional surrender, because your president believes he is channelling General Grant.
      Probably a similar situation would have prevailed with the nations of North America as well.

  8. Ed Ruffin
    Ed Ruffin says:

    “House divided” wasn’t from the Gettysburg Address. Far as the Lyceum speech goes, best way to read it is that Lincoln forecast the rise of a Napoleon that would conquer the U.S. from within. Lincoln hoped to be that Napoleon, and by damn, he certainly was, refounding the “nation” on the specious egalitarianism of the radical French enlightenment.

  9. willful knowledge
    willful knowledge says:

    One of the most brain dead assertions anyone with a public presence has ever made. “There are in the ancient world, notable exceptions: Persia, Greece, Rome, Egypt, and Carthage, et al. that survived longer.” Then by definition ALL empires or major political powers are NOT condemned to a pre-ordained death cycle within 250 years of their onset. The average male height in the US is 5’9″. How tall are you? Averages are meaningless without context. What is one standard deviation? Is the US within one standard deviation? An average is used for probabilities, not predictions. The United States, as a country, was founded in the late 1700s but it did not become a world power until much the early 1900s. If the “average” age of “empires” is true then the US has some time to go.

  10. Swaytonious
    Swaytonious says:

    I think the cycle of civilizations is really the cycle of Jewish infiltration, forced degeneracy, and financial extraction.

    Real political order within and between nations cannot occur as long as jews have any influence.

  11. Xavier F. Auburn
    Xavier F. Auburn says:

    Some points of relevance I suppose but also some mumbo jumbo.

    For example, white people could kick out all arabs and nogglies aka africans of subsaharian species so that is certainly a possible outcome.

    Another thing is we could repair and make the environment great again it was done with the ozon layer.

    And regarding Mars, I do’t think there is air there to breath or possibilities to grov stuff. Planet earth is like SUPERIOR to mars for us whites.

    As for the USA, maybe a small part of the usa to africans combined with moving them en masse on free will back to Africa, their natural habitat.

    Anyways, cheer up, if white males just killed like 10 non whites over ten years they would all be gone and it could easily be achieved with great planning and excecution. SO. like anarcho etno centrism in a hidden warfare could be a simple and effective solution.

    Why play within “the game” your anti white opponnents certainly aint anyways…

  12. Earthbound
    Earthbound says:

    Thank you for this article. A quibble:

    ‘We need to view interstellar space as the new frontier—a pathway to the stars or planets such as Mars where human communities can be created as an escape venue from the inevitable dying of our planet. ‘

    Compared to the inherent difficulty of terra-forming Mars, which has only the scantest quantity of water on its surface and an atmospheric pressure less than one per cent of the Earths’s and mainly due to unrespirable carbon dioxide, not to mention it’s average planetary temperature of minus eighty Fahrenheit, compared to Earth’s fifty-seven degrees, just about any political or environmental remediation programme attempted on Earth should properly be viewed as trivial.

    Inserting these sorts of throwaway references to pipedream projects, however much they have been promoted by the system, detracts from the message of an otherwise sensible article.

  13. Michael Moran
    Michael Moran says:

    This is typical neoconservative cold war 2.0 bullshit that could’ve been written by Steve Bannon, or another of the ZOG compradors. TOO going the way of Counter Currents in signalling to GOP traitors. You’ll be promoting benderism next with bylines from Greg Johnson.

  14. Karl Haemers
    Karl Haemers says:

    Lincoln’s plan was to repatriate America’s blacks back to Africa. This would have gone a long way toward preserving the American empire. Communists planned to incite race conflict in America as early as 1928. They gave us MLK. Most empires collapse due to race mixing, which was true of all those named and more. Now obviously the US empire is being deliberately imploded by a enormous race mixing policy.

    There is no climate change. That is another immense hoax, fraud, scam and Satanic joke. Resources on the Earth are still nearly inexhausted, but our Oligarch Overlords prevent us from using them. They create artificial scarcity. Any talk of colonizing other planets as a way to handle excess population or for any other reason, including the spirit of adventure and exploration, is pure fantasy. Science fiction, I should say. It’s just another grift and huge money-waster.

    We can read what Lincoln said about US blacks in Earnest Sevier Cox’s book White America.

    • Liosnagcat
      Liosnagcat says:

      I agree with the points you made in this post, with only two small reservations:

      “Communists planned to incite race conflict in America as early as 1928.”

      Why don’t you refer to the “communists” by their more accurate moniker: Jews.

      “Now obviously the US empire is being deliberately imploded by a enormous race mixing
      policy.”

      Lose the passive voice. If the U.S.”is being deliberately imploded”, someone’s doing the imploding. Call them by name: Jews

      • Karl Haemers
        Karl Haemers says:

        OK, fair enough: ““Now obviously Jews are deliberately imploded the US empire by an enormous race mixing policy.” Yes, that sounds better.

  15. Liosnagcat
    Liosnagcat says:

    “. . . Lincoln rightly predicted that our downfall would come from within the country and not from hostile foreign powers.”

    Lincoln was wrong. What looks to be coming from within is actually springing from (((hostile foreign powers))).

  16. Liosnagcat
    Liosnagcat says:

    “All in all, there is nothing new in these comments.”

    Yeah, no kidding. The entire article is one, big, fat collection of clichés and painfully tedious statements of the obvious.

  17. Liosnagcat
    Liosnagcat says:

    “. . . can this trend be offset by a new policy of returning to the democratic principles of the past that were so successful in holding our nation together?”

    I wish those of your ilk would quit nattering on about “democratic principles” and recognize that our founding principles are those of a republic, not a democracy.

  18. Emicho
    Emicho says:

    “Democracy is also a tired and fragile system of government; autocracy and oligarchy are becoming more and more attractive to the modern politician.”

    America hasn’t been a ‘democracy’ as in, a free people with liberty, deciding what direction policy goes, for a long time. It’s already an oligarchy.
    500 Odd congressmen, maybe one, MTG, represents right-wing rural America. Maybe one, AOC, represents idealistic leftist morons, and she has already sold them out.
    So 498 or whatever it is, represent the moneyed interests, or the oligarchy. Plus the 50 senators and the President.
    That’s some ‘people’s democracy’ you have there.

  19. SimpleMale
    SimpleMale says:

    Your words on the roughly 250 year cycle of civilization is biologically explained in Woodley of Menie’s book “At Our Wits’ End.” Lincoln seems to have had a layman’s understanding of this, noticing that if America falls, it will be because of internal division, or in other words, increasing genetic drift away from the historical norm, the result of a relaxation of rigorous Darwinian selection.

    Yes, China may temporarily hold out longer before collapse, when compared to the West, but they too are on the genetic path to collapse. Also, there is the saying that “Power comes from the end of the barrel of a gun.” China’s outright reluctance to militarily defend their interests in the South China Sea has provided its opponents with the evidence they needed to support an increasingly aggressive strategy to undermine China. China may have the weapons, but seemingly lack in the innate personality to be willing to go to war.

    Also, just like us, China also is extremely feministic. There are no traditional families there; the female gender role has been abolished and all females acquire full-time careers and have achieved full economic independence, no longer requiring husbands. As such, China’s fertility rate is now just one offspring per female.

    I don’t believe China will invade Taiwan, they don’t seem to have the innate personality to be willing to withstand the negative repercussions. Even RT had an article where they stated that Taiwan has enough missiles to sink around half of China’s invading navy.

    China can’t even innovate anything. There is talk about macro-innovations vs. micro-innovations. Well, China is at the level of nano-innovations. Here is a daily newspaper covering latest Chinese innovations: https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/scitech You can see the extremely minute incremental improvements their scientists make to the macro-innovations created by ethnic Europeans. Nothing new at all. And their already mediocre scientists barely even reproduce.

    No, I don’t think major Western corporations will sideline the Ashkenazim and take the side of China. Executives that do this may find themselves at the mercy of the Ashkenazi Deep State, I don’t think I have to reiterate the kinds of things they do.

  20. SimpleMale
    SimpleMale says:

    Your words on the roughly 250 year cycle of civilization is biologically explained in Woodley of Menie’s book “At Our Wits’ End.” Lincoln seems to have had a layman’s understanding of this, noticing that if America falls, it will be because of internal division, or in other words, increasing genetic drift away from the historical norm, the result of a relaxation of rigorous Darwinian selection.

    Yes, China may temporarily hold out longer before collapse, when compared to the West, but they too are on the genetic path to collapse. Also, there is the saying that “Power comes from the end of the barrel of a gun.” China’s outright reluctance to militarily defend their interests in the South China Sea has provided its opponents with the evidence they needed to support an increasingly aggressive strategy to undermine China. China may have the weapons, but seemingly lack in the innate personality to be willing to go to war.

    Also, just like us, China also is extremely feministic. There are no traditional families there; the female gender role has been abolished and all females acquire full-time careers and have achieved full economic independence, no longer requiring husbands. As such, China’s fertility rate is now just one offspring per female.

    I don’t believe China will invade Taiwan, they don’t seem to have the innate personality to be willing to withstand the negative repercussions. Even RT had an article where they stated that Taiwan has enough missiles to sink around half of China’s invading navy.

    China can’t even innovate anything. There is talk about macro-innovations vs. micro-innovations. Well, China is at the level of nano-innovations. Here is a daily newspaper covering latest Chinese innovations: https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/scitech You can see the extremely minute incremental improvements their scientists make to the macro-innovations created by ethnic Europeans. Nothing new at all. And their already mediocre scientists barely even reproduce.

    No, I don’t think major Western corporations will sideline the Ashkenazim and take the side of China. Executives that do this may find themselves at the mercy of the Ashkenazi Deep State, I don’t think I have to reiterate the kinds of things they do.

    Regards.

Comments are closed.