Jan. 6 Trial Dismantles Jeffersonian Democracy, Corrupts Rule of Law

Vestiges of Jeffersonian principles in our present out-of-touch and out-of-control federal government are rapidly being obliterated. No events signal their demise more dramatically than the recent shameful seditious conspiracy prosecutions of the Jan. 6 defendants.

In the first of these, brought against five members of the Oath Keepers including its founder Stewart Rhodes III, a District of Columbia jury on Nov. 29 found Rhodes and another Oath Keeper guilty of seditious conspiracy and acquitted three others. All five were also found guilty of other offenses, e.g., Conspiracy to Impede an Officer from Discharging His Duties.

Rhodes and the other convicted defendant now face up to 20 years in prison on the seditious conspiracy charge, plus additional time for the other offenses. Two other seditious conspiracy trials are scheduled, one against other members of the Oath Keepers and a second against the Proud Boys.

These prosecutions should never have been brought and would not have been brought if men such as Thomas Jefferson still held sway in our government.

The seditious conspiracy statute at the core of these prosecutions traces its origins to a law passed in 1861 during the Civil War but is similar to the seditious conspiracy section of the 1798 Alien and Sedition laws that caused such bitter discord between John Adams, who advocated them, and Thomas Jefferson, who vehemently opposed them, that the two Founding Fathers did not speak to each other for nearly 12 years until 1812 when they reconciled in a profound and remarkable series of letters.

When Jefferson became president in 1801, he allowed the Alien and Sedition laws to expire and pardoned those who had been convicted under them. Although Jefferson and Adams were locked in cold silence, Adams’s wife, Abigail, in 1804 sent Jefferson a letter chastising him for pardoning a man convicted under the law who had make scurrilous statements about Adams.

Here is Jefferson’s response:

I discharged every person under punishment or prosecution under the Sedition law, because I considered and now consider that law to be a nullity as absolute and as palpable as if Congress had ordered us to fall down and worship a golden image; and that it was as much my duty to arrest its execution in every stage as it would have been to have rescued from the fiery furnace those who should have been cast into it for refusing to worship their image.

Jefferson also condemned the sedition law as “palpably unconstitutional” in his Kentucky Resolutions, which he published anonymously in 1798, apparently fearing he himself might be prosecuted for sedition.

We can, accordingly, state with confidence that Jefferson would never have approved the prosecution under the Seditious Conspiracy Act of the Jan. 6 defendants. Jefferson knew all too well that linking the amorphous concept of sedition with the equally unbounded concept of conspiracy and then putting this combination into the hands of an intrusive and politically biased government was inimical to civil liberties.

The Biden administration, by contrast, through its Department of Justice (DOJ)—a title that has become as ironical as Orwell’s Ministry of Truth—and with massive assistance from the FBI, which is becoming more and more like a Praetorian Guard, devoted enormous resources to deploying the rarely used Seditious Conspiracy Act against the hapless and overwhelmed Jan. 6 defendants. To add insult to injury, the DOJ has employed numerous illicit and unfair tactics to justify its indictments and obtain convictions. Prominent among these improper tactics were the following:

FBI Informants

Credible reports indicate that several Oath Keepers were not indicted even though they were as involved in the Jan. 6 events as the Oath Keepers who were indicted. This supports an inference that many of the Oath Keepers were colluding with the government as informants or agents. Several docket entries in the Rhodes trial bolster this inference, including a Sept. 23 order from Judge Amit Mehta, granting the government’s ex parte motion to conceal from discovery “undisclosed civilian witness information.” Most tellingly is a Nov. 8 “Notice Regarding Potential Violation of Protective Order” that the government filed under seal (to prevent the public from reading it) but which, apparently by clerical error, was placed on the public access docket. In this notice, the government bitterly complains that information had been leaked (and picked up by The New York Times) about one of the FBI’s confidential human sources, one Greg McWhirter.

McWhirter, a black Montana deputy sheriff, had risen in the Oath Keepers organization to the rank of vice president. Rhodes often mentioned him as evidence that the Oath Keepers was not a racist organization. During all this time, however, it appears McWhirter was an FBI informant or agent. To add yet another layer of nefarious FBI conduct, and this a bizarre one,  Rhodes defense counsel were planning to call McWhirter as a witness, apparently  to expose his role as an agitator. Yet, as the FBI informant boarded the plane for his scheduled court appearance, he suffered heart trouble and could not testify. He is only 40 years old.

Intimidation of Defense Witnesses

It is undisputed that the FBI visited certain defense witnesses shortly before they were to testify, supposedly to apprise the witnesses of the consequences of testifying in certain ways, i.e., that the witnesses themselves might be prosecuted. The defense rightly objected to these FBI visits, but Judge Mehta seemed untroubled by them. But who among us would not be intimidated if before we were to testify in a highly charged political trial we were visited by the FBI, who warned us we could become targets for prosecution if we testified in certain ways?

Coerced Plea Agreements

Numerous reports from The Epoch Times, the Patriot Freedom Project, and other sources catalogue a long list of serious abuses inflicted on the Jan. 6 defendants while they were held without bail in pretrial detention. Physical beatings, deprivation of medical care, long periods in solitary confinement, deprivation of contact with family and the outside world, repeated verbal attacks—these are only some on the list of abuses.

In addition to these instances of misconduct by the DOJ and FBI, there is another important issue that hopefully the defense will raise on appeal, namely the court’s refusal to transfer venue out of the District of Columbia. The defense presented evidence showing that 71% of D.C. residents were predisposed to find the Jan. 6 defendants guilty, a number that actually seems an underestimate.

Moreover, the defense pointed out that the potential jurors were found qualified despite manifest indications of bias, including one who said they were so afraid of Jan. 6 protesters that he “cried all night, like watching 9/11 on TV” and another who had worked for Congress and was a lobbyist.

In his Kentucky Resolutions, Jefferson, a man often invoked by the Jan. 6 defendants, stated his reasons for opposing the 1798 Sedition law. Political freedom, he said, is founded not in confidence in government but in vigilant distrust of it, and therefore constitutions are necessary to bind down those we are obliged to trust with power.

The shameful Jan. 6 defendant seditious conspiracy prosecutions show how right we are to distrust our government and insist that it be bound down by our laws and Constitution.

Reprinted with the permission of American Free Press.

Glen Allen is an attorney and founder of the FREE EXPRESSION FOUNDATION, a 501(c)(3) charitable foundation dedicated to the defense of citizens denied their Constitutional right to free expression See more at Free Expression Foundation,org,  or write FEF, PO Box 65242, Baltimore, MD 21209-9998

29 replies
  1. Captainchaos
    Captainchaos says:

    I’m not going to shed anymore tears for the Oath Cuckers than I will for Alex Jones getting the shit sued out of him. They are controlled opposition one and all. Shilling for muh Jeffersonian cuckstitional republic is effectively controlled opposition as well. Just more horseshit that appeals to boomer nostalgia and offers no real solutions.

    A message for sheep-dipped boomers: muh constitution is dead. It is these days only so much toilet paper that the Jews use to wipe there asses with. ZOG is hopelessly, irredeemably corrupt and we must have a clean break with it.

    Red state secession is the only solution! Anyone who says differently is controlled opposition.

    • Bill White
      Bill White says:

      “Shilling for muh Jeffersonian cuckstitional republic is effectively controlled opposition… muh constitution is dead.”

      The Constitutional Republic is indeed very ill and dying, but not dead yet. Careful what you wish for. You might get your wish. The Jews would like nothing better than not to have to bother pretending to abide by the Constitution.

      The continued expectation of many Americans that the government must abide by the Constitution is one of the last remaining restraints on arbitrary state and corporate power. Once they no longer have to maintain even a ghost of the appearance of abiding by the Constitution, the Jews and their fellow Globalists can take the gloves off and behave in their favored hyper-fascist Judeo-Bolshevik manner.

      When the Constitution is openly acknowledged to be a dead letter then the last remnants of freedom of speech will vanish – and so will publications like the Occidental Observer. People like us will be put in gulags, liquidated, targeted for violence and other persecution or, at the very least, reduced to poverty and silence.

      The Constitutional Republic has much to recommend it but there were a few major lacunae. Especially:

      (1) Currency should have been required by the Constitution to be issued exclusively by the government rather than being created by private banks out of thin air as debt to themselves;
      (2) Citizenship should have Constitutionally been reserved exclusively for those of White European race;
      (3) Constitutional Rights like that to freedom of speech should have been exclusively reserved for citizens, not resident aliens.

      If we White European people manage to extricate ourselves (or are somehow saved due to circumstances beyond our control) from our current existential predicament and reestablish our own ethnostates, the Constitution with the above amendments would serve us well.

      We don’t need a King, Emperor or Fuhrer with arbitrary powers. Nor, looking at history, could we rely on such to protect us. Note that Jews were able to prosper in Europe from Roman times onward with only occasional “pogroms” and (partial, temporary) expulsions because they usually enjoyed the protection of kings, princes and nobles who exercised near arbitrary authority. The common people had no recourse when their “betters” chose to side with their court Jews. There is no guarantee that authoritarian regimes will serve the interests of the masses they rule over. Indeed, this is not what has usually happened. Including in Europe.

      That said, in a state of emergency, as in time of war, martial law is in order. Whatever force might be needed could be exercised under martial law without shredding the Constitution. The Constitution is for times of peace and safety. And the rights it promulgates should belong only to White citizens, not to ethnic and racial aliens.

      “Red state secession is the only solution!” At present, this is only a dream. The enemy will not likely let us secede if they think they can succeed in finishing us off by making us vanish into the Kalergian melting pot they are engineering into existence.

      • Emicho
        Emicho says:

        “We don’t need a King, Emperor or Fuhrer with arbitrary powers. Nor, looking at history, could we rely on such to protect us.”

        That’s true but not the whole truth. A less than stable authoritarian ruler would be moveable by us peasant masses as he’d fear us. Our job in such a regime would be to make ourselves fearsome. With oligarchic, cartel-ish rule the masses are totally impotent. No redress of any grievances, ever.
        So as there are only two options, one-man-dictator rule or rule by cliques of mafias, always dominated by Jewish ones, our only option is authoritarianism.

        ““Red state secession is the only solution!” At present, this is only a dream.”

        It may be a dream but it’s also the only possible alternative to continuing degeneration leading to eventual genocide.
        They didn’t let Nazi Germany free of their financial stranglehold, but the Germans gave them a run for their money and could have won that war, the odds were long, but with better luck defo not impossible.
        Imagine Hitler offered an armistice to Stalin in late 1941, or he’s managed to have Churchill assassinated?
        A whole load of things going the other way could have swung that war.

        • Bill White
          Bill White says:

          “as there are only two options, one-man-dictator rule or rule by cliques of mafias, always dominated by Jewish ones, our only option is authoritarianism.”

          That’s not true. There are other possibilities. For one, you can have both at the same time with a dictator who serves the cliques. Such a strongman is a lot easier to come by than a dictator who has integrity and devotes himself unselfishly to the good of his people. The latter type is… rare.

          I’ll grant you that IF there were a genuinely wise and loyal leader with a sound program and an uncorrupted movement to back him up, I’d join up and do what I could to help – in order to free ourselves from the Judeo-Globalist death trap. But once freedom and safety were regained I’d insist on returning to the moderately democratic republic of the Constitution. I don’t want to return to the bad old days of “nobles” and princes treating their “commoners” like shit. Nor to a modernized version of class tyranny with one-party-rule bigwigs playing the role of the old feudal nobility or our liberal capitalist era business moguls and banksters.

          There have always been serious problems with civilized societies – including European ones – beginning with the earliest proto-civilizations. I believe that America actually did achieve a modicum of progress toward achieving the ideal state of freedom and justice for all. I don’t expect that it will ever be possible to actually achieve, let alone sustain, this ideal, but it is possible to travel a certain distance in this direction. I think America did this before the Civil War at least and has provided more freedom for its masses than, say, 17th-19th century Britain.

          I haven’t given up on trying to build a society in which the vast majority at least might enjoy a high level of freedom with modest prosperity and the level of personal dignity their behavior earns them. That’s what I want for my people, not foolish dreams of empire and “glory.” So I will not be me-tooing those who are happy to consign America to the trash bin of history.

          “It [red state secession] may be a dream but it’s also the only possible alternative to continuing degeneration leading to eventual genocide.”

          I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for secession. The way things stand now is: (1) our enemy will not allow us to secede; and (2) we do not have the power to break free by force.

          Perhaps this will change. In the meantime all our people can do is build IRL relationships, start independent businesses, build families, learn history, learn useful skills, build a successful career if you can do so without compromising the essential, keep your eyes open and hang in there.

          • Emicho
            Emicho says:

            “For one, you can have both at the same time with a dictator who serves the cliques.”

            That’s not a third option, it’s just a different version of the second.
            But they could always put the wrong man in there(they aren’t infallible), and appealing to the masses for protection from the mafias is a strategy as old as government itself.
            It could go wrong for them in other ways too, the Russian mafias and their American bosses rigged Yeltsin’s election – he was rule by cartel.
            But he somewhat redeemed himself by choosing Putin as his successor, knowing he was an honest patriot, who swiftly appealed to the masses for protection & support.
            Result? Russia turns from a raped basket-case to a better nation that any of us live in, in less than a decade.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      I’ve more sympathy for the J6 peasants than the captain, but being persecuted by ZOG and appealing to the Founding Fathers borders on the mentally ill.

      • Bill White
        Bill White says:

        “being persecuted by ZOG and appealing to the Founding Fathers borders on the mentally ill.”

        You talk as if you thought ZOG were the same thing as the Constitutional Republic. But ZOG is high treason to the Constitutional Republic.

        The “J6 peasants” understood that traitors were at the helm and did what they could to protest it. I have some respect for them, naive as they are. At least they cared enough to do something. Of course, a lot of the apparent J6 protestors were really FBI agent provocateurs. J6 was a trap, just like Charlottesville.

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          I’ve got respect for them, many of your old school leftists have respect for them as well, if you don’t enjoy seeing the people on mass storming a symbol of tyranny there is something deeply wrong with you.
          My point was if they imagine an appeal to the Founding Fathers will save them, or that the Fathers have anything do do with anything in current era ZOG American Empire, that certainly qualifies as mentally ill in my book.
          I’d have more time for an argument the moon is made of green cheese than today’s USA has anything to do with Jefferson or Washington.

          • Bill White
            Bill White says:

            “I’d have more time for an argument the moon is made of green cheese than today’s USA has anything to do with Jefferson or Washington.”

            Basically, yes. Some bother is taken to appear to abide by the Constitution but the pretense grows more threadbare with every passing year.

            Looking back, the trajectory of the undermining of the Constitutional Republic:

            began with the Civil War;

            followed by the Gilded Age and the rise of monopoly capitalism, including America’s second great wave of mass immigration in 1880-1920 in which the Eastern European Jews (fatally!) poured into America like so many tiny pellets of slow-acting poison;

            then the 1913 creation of the Federal Reserve privately owned central bank and WWI;

            then the flowering of Jewish organized crime in the 1920s;

            then the New Deal and WWII;

            then the 1960s cultural revolution (JFK assassination, Vietnam War and anti-Vietnam War activism, Frankfort School mass indoctrination thanks to Samuel Flowerman’s mass communications clique cadres, hippie counterculture, the sex-drugs-and-rock ‘n roll mega-psyop, the “Civil Rights” movement, forced integration and the Hart-Celler Act, after which I believe the Jews first emerged as the dominant element among the US elites;

            then Hip-Hop, the crack epidemic and the explosion of Black criminality in the 1990s, along with globalization and the gathering flood of non-White immigration accumulating with time;

            then the Israeli false flag 9-11 op;

            and then, to bring us up to date, the acceleration of Judeo-Globalist tyranny of the last several years including the Covid false pandemic and push for the Great Reset as well as BLM/Antifa rioting and increasingly overt anti-Whiteness and Orwellianism of government and civil society institutions.

            It’s not too late to arrest the death process of the Constitutional Republic and restore Constitutional governance. Sadly, it does not seem realistic to expect this. To the extent that the analogy can be made, we seem to be at about the point the Roman Republic reached after Caesar crossed the Rubicon and established himself in Rome as dictator (with the backing of the already influential and prosperous Jewish community of Rome, by the way). It was never explicitly acknowledged that the Republic was over, not by Caesar, not by Octavian/Augustus, nor by Augustus’ successors. The Senate still met and Senators were still treated with a show of respect, but the power was no longer vested in the Senate.

            Having acknowledged that the Constitution is on its deathbed, I still see value in people demanding that the Constitution be abided by. Even if we can’t make this happen, it helps to make the truth plain to anyone who has eyes to see that we are no longer governed according to the Constitution. It is a mistake for pro-Whites to give up this ground without raising a hue and a cry. The patriotism of the J6 protestors provides an energy of concern and righteous anger that should be endorsed by pro-Whites.

            We should still insist on the Constitution being abided by. In particular, that freedom of speech be honored.

          • Emicho
            Emicho says:

            This is a reply to Bill White’s comment:
            I see the history pretty much the way you do.
            I disagree with any hope of a resurrection of your republic as for me it’s not on it’s death bed, it’s six feet under.

            A self governing republic of free men is impossible without a metaphysical moral basis agreed & acted upon. The American founders made this important point repeatedly.
            That idea that women could be involved is kooky.

            Whether we should still cling to the fiction we’re the free societies we once were is one of today’s most difficult political conundrums.

            There are good arguments for and against this, but unfortunately it’s not a question tackled very often by our leading thinking men.
            I lean towards towards admitting straight-out we’re now living in an unfree society and have done for as long as anyone can remember.
            Though there are many positives from your way – reminding everyone how we should be living and the great indignity of the reality, what our current status is proclaimed & advertised(loudly) to be, what our soldiers died for in the great moral war our elites take their ruling legitimacy from, making our enemies stand naked against liberty & our forefather’s struggles, and many other worthy points, But I’m for taking the opposite view from you because the above is not the Truth.
            Surely as well as all the utilitarian arguments for describing the true state of our affairs, which I’m sure you’re well aware of, sticking to what is true is a wiser course long term, no?

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      ” Red state secession is the only solution! ”

      I agree with that if it inevitably results in eventually establishing a WN ethnostate sanctuary .

      In any case , people would need the world’s gold standard protection against the historicly verified inevitable abuses of political power — USA Bill of Rights — no matter what kind of political entity is established nor what it is called .

  2. charles frey
    charles frey says:

    01 Yet, these sick jokers have the nerve to term the Right a danger to democracy.

    02 In Canada, the Law of Disclosure is simply but exactly summarized on less than a page, by a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Prosecutor is obliged to give to the Defendant, all information in their possession, whether or not they intend to use part of it. They are also obliged to disclose information which is or may prove to be exculpatory.

    03 That’s the ideal. Reality is quite a different matter, as I can attest.

    04 Wasn’t there another. tall, ca. 40 fellow with a MAGA cap and khakis, who gave directions to the intruders, who was also affiliated with the FBI: named but never even jailed, much less prosecuted ?

    05 What an amateur production by that Con mission with its cumulative IQ of 39. LOOK HERE – NOT THERE !!!

  3. Thaddeus Noble
    Thaddeus Noble says:

    The first thing everyone needs to recognize is the fact the number of Fed Informants in this entire scenario are literally unprecedented in number.

    Capital Police continue to bleat they were unprepared for the Rally even though they had over three weeks advance notice but during this three weeks the FBI, and other sources, were very busy coordinating agitation plants and informants.

    On Jan 6 “THEY” were ready. Then their “TOTALLY BOUGHT AND PAID FOR SHILL” Trump intentionally waltzed his loyal followers into the maw of the beast.

    That ANYBODY still fails to catch on here is mind boggling to say the
    least ! You have to look no further than the Whitmer kidnapping stunt to see how totally corrupt the FBI and DOJ really is.

    Republican response??? Dead Air !

    • K M Landis
      K M Landis says:

      The demonstration on January 6, 2021 was a mostly peaceful protest. If they had been Antifa or Black Lives Matter, then none of them would have been charged, jailed without bail, or convicted and sentenced. There is a blatant double standard in the US courts, based on political ideology.

      The FBI is not a real police force – it’s useless against real crime, for obvious reasons. They are purely political, as is the so-called DOJ. And you’re right about Trump. He’s a tool of the Jews.

  4. Strange World
    Strange World says:

    @kevin (comment not intended for publication)

    Have you ever noticed why people like us Aquarians? Because we represent friendship! “Friendship” is the healthy middle ground between submission and ingratiation. But also because our general knowledge is so enormous that we have access to everyone.

    We want to explode in the urge to finally enlighten the intellectually disadvantaged about their ignorance, but the short-term human encounter is never enough. They often feel deeply “understood” by us for the first time in their lives.

    Moreover, we have the ability to uncover any absurd contradiction and turn it into an “all-liberating” joke. The ideas just tumble out of our heads, every fool wants to participate in them. It is because we question really everything. The absolute “normality” for us, but apparently not for the rest.

  5. Strange World
    Strange World says:

    @kevin (comment not intended for publication)

    People feel that we are completely unpretentious and our intentions are absolutely righteous. That is why we live with them and through them, will be the last to attack us. We are their gem disguised as a clown or a clochard.

  6. Strange World
    Strange World says:

    Mr. Schrenk (born in 1953 and director of the Neanderthal Museum) says the Neandertaler still has the stigma of being a cultural chochard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATTlNZB52pQ

    “Johann & Johannis”. Krause came from Leinefelde, a small Catholic town in Thuringia. He extracted (and named) the genetic sequence of Denisova Man. Fuhlrott, who defined the Neandertaler as a species, came from the same small town! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Krause

    https://www.amren.com/videos/2022/12/how-the-races-got-that-way/
    https://www.amren.com/commentary/2022/12/whos-afraid-of-an-ancient-apocalypse/

    Maybe Vineta was Atlantis? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vineta

  7. Strange World
    Strange World says:

    @kevon (comment not intended for publication)

    Prof. Kevin: “Ingratiation is also a form of submission!”

    Dumb pupil: “Now that you say it, it strikes me.”

  8. Servenet
    Servenet says:

    Isn´t it clear that the introduction to these shores of the plague of black africans is the IMMEDIATE reason for the wave of madness sweeping over and polluting every. Single. Element. Of Western Civilization. Which started with the United States. Yes, of course, it was engineered, fostered, and brought to full effect by Jewish activism, influence, and pressure. But this (black) population that was already great early on and has grown to a staggering 47 million has proven to be a viral load that could never have been and certainly is not now something that can be withstood or recovered from. Unless they are removed from our presence altogether. Which is now unimaginable. But even if such a miracle could occur half the White population is irreversibly mentally and spiritually damaged by two generations, at least, of ¨civil rights¨ nation-wide struggle sessions (and had come to include a program of total cultural feculence) conducted by governments federal, then state, and finally local. All non-governmental institutions – literally ALL – and all corporate entities are by now fully on-board. And the great Greek tragedy of it all is that Jefferson and the Rest…knew it was impossible to live with this depraved and utterly destructive race…AND THEY DID NOTHING TO PRESERVE THE NEW AND VAST (WHITE) NATION. And IT WAS POSSIBLE to remove them at that time with much, MUCH less difficulty and expense (which means NOTHING if it means the very survival of an entire nation of people). They KNEW, they COULD HAVE, and…THEY DIDN´T.

    • Bob
      Bob says:

      I think that’s totally unfair…I admire the black man’s passionate spirituality and music. It could be they will save us all in the end by rioting and overthrowing the government…lol

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      How can it be black people’s fault if America(ignoring it’s mayhem abroad) was a pretty stable normal Christian nation that raised normal healthy families, after living with this ‘black plague’ for 400 odd years?
      It was only Jews destroying black communities then unleashing them against whites that began this misery 50-60 years ago.
      How is this black people’s fault? Blacks didn’t import the East European Hebrews on mass, whites did that.

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        ” How can it be black people’s fault “…

        It is not black’s fault anymore than the current global Covid-19 pandemic is the fault of a virus . In other words , the virus did not create the global pandemic hysteria . The globalist ILLuminati jewmasterss created the contagion and subsequent hysteria .

  9. Gary
    Gary says:

    Wow! A democracy?…Thomas Jefferson regarded the Federalist Papers as the best source of information on “the genuine meaning” of the U.S. Constitution…A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking. Let us examine the points in which it varies from pure democracy, and we shall comprehend both the nature of the cure and the efficacy which it must derive from the Union https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=3&psid=1273.

    If you ask 100 people on the street what kind of Government is America supposed to be 99 percent of them will tell you a democracy. America’s supposed to be a democracy. But that’s a lie. That’s an illusion…The Founding Father’s hated the idea of a democracy. America was founded as a Constitutional Republic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RewUP-Fdhqk.

    It is true that lawyers mainly contributed to the overthrow of the French monarchy in 1789…The government of democracy is favorable to the political power of lawyers…In America there are no nobles or men of letters, and the people is apt to mistrust the wealthy; lawyers consequently form the highest political class, and the most cultivated circle of society. They have therefore nothing to gain by innovation, which adds a conservative interest to their natural taste for public order. If I were asked where I place the American aristocracy, I should reply without hesitation that it is not composed of the rich, who are united together by no common tie, but that it occupies the judicial bench and the bar https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/de-tocqueville/democracy-america/ch16.htm.

    Why would anyone swear an oath?…Jesus Forbids Oaths 33“Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.’ 34But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, 35 or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. 36 And do not take an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. 37 Let what you say be simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything more than this comes from evil.” Matthew 5

    Sedition? How about insurrection and successful coup d’etat?…Jefferson also condemned the sedition law as “palpably unconstitutional” in his Kentucky Resolutions, which he published anonymously in 1798, apparently fearing he himself might be prosecuted for sedition…Jefferson then…and today, keeping in mind the above Federalist Papers…January 26, 2021 175 Attorneys in the 117th Congress https://www.americanbar.org/advocacy/governmental_legislative_work/publications/washingtonletter/january-2021-wl/attorneys-117thcongress/ what took place in between…Jan. 5, 1964 Of the 535 members of the 88th Con­gress, no less than 315 are lawyers. Sixty‐six of the 100 Senators have had legal training, as have 57 per cent, or 249, of those in the House https://www.nytimes.com/1964/01/05/are-there-too-many-lawyers-in-congress.html.

  10. K M Landis
    K M Landis says:

    I did an internet search for “judge” Amit Mehta. He is a commissar, not a judge. The idea of a “fair trial” is alien to him. He is typical of the kind of anti-American that rules the USA, with contempt for the law and the Constitution.

    The author is right. All of the J6 defendants are political prisoners. The legal processes against them are a scam. The trials against them are all a total farce. The name of the Department of Justice is an Orwellian inversion, like the Ministry of Truth to propagate lies.

    The Federal court system is mostly political, run by communist Jews like Merrick Garland. They outlaw all opposition to their degenerate ideology. They hate free speech, and love porn.

    • Gary
      Gary says:

      To compliment, specifically Matthew 5, my already above submission…Dare any of you, when he has a dispute with his brother, to judge before the evil and not before the holy? 1 Corinthians 6:1

      K M Landis…The legal processes against them are a scam…Seriously, a scam? A scam, like how the lawyer oligarch back then, today’s spiritual spawned Serpents, from that once Garden of Eden, constantly tried to trip up The Christ?
      Also, due to already legally established case law precedent template[s] it does not matter who legally…Nevertheless, the most direct and strait forward definition that I have ever found for the word LEGAL is, “THE UNDOING OF GOD’S LAW https://onlashuk.wordpress.com/2015/07/16/the-undoing-of-gods-law-can-you-see-it/ [it was actually an elected judge of the United States who shared this with me, told me to share it with other, through messaging], sits, and where, does it?

      Why do judges, on their appointment to the bench, swear an oath seeking the assistance of the Deity when promising to fulfill their judicial duties. Why do witnesses swear an oath that they will tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth before giving evidence in court proceedings?…A judge who was a very distinguished looking gentleman with a small white “goatee https://time.com/3972713/detroit-satanic-statue-baphomet/” was asking a little girl if she knew what an oath was and when the little girl answered “an oath is a promise to God to tell the truth” the judge then looked down and asked her, “and do you know who God is?” The little girl looked up at the impressive man in the red sash and replied, “you sir”? The Oath by Mr. Justice John deP. Wright [long ago, when I first started posting these, I took hard copies at the time, two paged articles disappeared quick through the net. I would like to share them here if I am able to upload them?].

      Is there a thinking person in this country that would say we have justice anymore? Can they really not say this country is going to hell in a hand basket at breakneck speed? Can they say that Yah reigns supreme here? I don’t think so. Could our problems stem from our refusing to hate? What does Yahweh say? HATE EVIL and love the good; remodel your courts into true halls of justice. Perhaps even yet Yahweh, God of Hosts will have mercy on his people who remain, (Amos 5:15, TLB).

      And if we refuse to begin to righteously hate? Yah’s Word says it better than I could ever say it, Therefore Yahweh God says this: ‘There will be crying in all the streets and every road. Call for the farmers to weep with you too; call for professional mourners to wail and lament,’ (Amos 5:16, TLB).

      No, you cannot be a Christian and not hate. To be a true follower of Yahweh, you must learn to not only hate evil, but the evil ones who hate Yah https://www.stormfront.org/posterity/ci/hate.html.

      If anyone is trying to fulfill any moral and spiritual obligation, again, why would those bind their soul to the realm of legalese?

      What happened to our simple grounded and gifted common sense as to who it is inflicting pain and suffering…A corrida bull sometimes attacks innocent horses and not so innocent picadors, without even trying to attack the main culprit – the toreador. Humans in extreme rage behave in a similar manner, smashing furniture, setting up fires or attacking innocent bystanders…Walking… Walking…On the tightrope of insanity. Walking… Walking…On the verge of losing mind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4A3gcDg5M3M, again, without even trying to attack their main abuser. This pattern is well known to psychologists and psychiatrists https://pyshnov.wordpress.com/karapetian/.

      [44 minutes] And now Patricia. – “The Six Senses”. – The subject was “The Five Senses”. I chose for my subject six senses. Go on, Patricia. The six senses: To see, to hear, to taste, to smell, to feel… to be. The most important is the last. The sixth sense is to be able to enjoy the five senses properly. To be. That’s what really matters. It’s up to us what we make of it. We see others, hear others, know others with our five senses. But how do we know ourselves? Through common sense. Common sense is an internal sense whose function is to differentiate between the senses’ reports or to reduce these reports to the unity of a common perception. Two great words: To be. Other words grow out of them. I am, you are, he is, we are, they are. That takes in everybody. As Shakespeare said, “To thine own self be true “And it shall follow, as the night the day, “Thou canst not then be false to any man https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uASPH_mJazM.”

      It might be that we within the West had better get a handle on this, and quick, before there are no longer natural born Westerners left, while those corrupt treasonous then put everyone on basic income, while also relying upon their automation, due to legal skimming…Skimming just 2% from your mutual fund holdings will cut your future investment value by half over the long term https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xfn9q5 [a short video leading right to those treasonous perps]?…To top it off, the coming decades will see Canada’s population swell from 38.2 million in 2021 to upwards of 52 million by 2043, according to Statistics Canada – and it is unclear if the country will be able to keep up [https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-housing-benefit-program-renters-apply/].

      PROTOCOL No. 17
      1. The practice of advocacy produces men cold, cruel, persistent, unprincipled, who in all cases take up an impersonal, purely legal standpoint. They have the inveterate habit to refer everything to its value for the defense and not to the public welfare of its results. They do not usually decline to undertake any defense whatever, they strive for an acquittal at all costs, caviling over every petty crux of jurisprudence and thereby they demoralize justice. For this reason we shall set this profession into narrow frames which will keep it inside this sphere of executive public service. Advocates, equally with judges, will be deprived of the right of communication with litigants; they will receive business only from the court and will study it by notes of report and documents, defending their clients after they have been interrogated in court on facts that have appeared. They will receive an honorarium without regard to the quality of the defense. This will render them mere reporters on law-business in the interests of justice and as counterpoise to the proctor who will be the reporter in the interests of prosecution; this will shorten business before the courts. In this way will be established a practice of honest unprejudiced defense conducted not from personal interest but by conviction. This will also, by the way, remove the present practice of corrupt bargain between advocation to agree only to let that side win which pays most . . .

      PROTOCOL No. 20
      3. Our rule, in which the king will enjoy the legal fiction that everything in his State belongs to him (which may easily be translated into fact), will be enabled to resort to the lawful confiscation of all sums of every kind for the regulation of their circulation in the State. From this follows that taxation will best be covered by a progressive tax on property. In this manner the dues will be paid without straitening or ruining anybody in the form of a percentage of the amount of property. The rich must be aware that it is their duty to place a part of their superfluities at the disposal of the State since the State guarantees them security of possession of the rest of their property and the right of honest gains, I say honest, for the control over property will do away with robbery on a legal basis http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion6.htm#Protocol%20%20No.%2017.

Comments are closed.