Moses, the First “Führer” in History: Jewish racial consciousness and supremacism
Jews deserve our respect for at least one thing: no other people, no other race, has survived and dominated so successfully. Whether rich or poor, stupid or smart, believers or atheists, when things turn sour, the children of Abraham organize, defend their interests, and destroy those who threaten their racial vitality.
You will not succeed in stigmatizing them because they unabashedly claim to belong to the Jewish race. Nor will you succeed in demonizing them because they insist on having a country where they can live among themselves as they please. We racially inhibited Whites should follow their example: it’s not a terrible crime to act in the interests of your race.
Oddly, no one calls them “racist” because in their Promised Land, race mixing is verboten. No one calls them “homophobic” or “sexist” because the Israeli Supreme Court has banned pornography (except in Palestinian areas), gay marriage and adoption, and restricted abortion. No one calls them “xenophobes” because only full-blooded Jews have the right to immigrate freely to Israel. No one calls them “Nazis” because Arabs (20%), Christians, and other minorities do not have the same rights as the majority.[1] No one calls them “macho” because it is the men, not the women, as in the West, who wear the pants. No one calls them “evil supremacists” because they are all armed to the teeth and are guilt-free practitioners of genocide. Finally, no one calls them “fascists” because their country practices economic nationalism and refuses to sign the UN Migration Compact on the basis that it would undermine their sovereignty.[2],[3]
In Israel, anti-immigration protesters don’t mind chanting in the streets, “niggers go home, niggers to Africa.” Such a lack of inclusion here in the US and elsewhere in the West would be severely punished, to say the least. But as Israel’s former Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked says in the February 13, 2018, issue of Haaretz: “if not for the fence erected some years ago on the Egyptian border, ‘We would be seeing here a kind of creeping conquest from Africa.’ […] There is place to maintain the Jewish majority even if it violates rights.” … Israel is a Jewish state. It isn’t a state of all its nations. That is, equal rights to all citizens but not equal national rights.” … [T]he argument over whether it’s all right for a Jewish community to, by definition, be only Jewish, I want the answer to be ‘yes, it’s all right.’”
Thus, Israel not only refuses to welcome the illegals (refugees) who invade it, but incarcerates them in concentration camps, before deporting them to their countries of origin, or even to Western countries with the blessing of their leaders and the media, which hides this astonishing reality from us while making us poor Westerners believe that nationalism is a sin and that diversity will take us straight to heaven without going to purgatory.
Beware, the men and women of the Jewish race are not choirboys; the rugged individualism, pathological empathy, and suicidal altruism that plague our race are foreign to their culture; at the slightest misstep, the soldiers of the Israeli Defense Force will slaughter, assassinate, torture, or rape anything that moves, without the slightest hesitation.
Ultimately, unabashed love of their race is one of the core strengths of the chosen people. They are Jewish and proud of it … deep in their DNA. They know, without a doubt, that the unity, strength and cohesion of a nation are rooted in its racial and ethnic homogeneity; they know for sure that racial and cultural diversity in the same country is not a strength, but a Trojan horse used to divide, fragment, and weaken those who succumb to its charms; they know, finally, that the ethno-nation is the only model of society capable of ensuring the security and happiness of men.
True democracy is only possible, said Aristotle, in ethnically homogeneous societies. Despots and tyrants have always ruled over highly fragmented societies such as today’s Western societies. A multi-ethnic society is therefore necessarily chaotic, because it is totally devoid of philia, a fundamental concept defined by Aristotle as a brotherhood of identity rooted in the blood and flesh of citizens. Thus, ethnic chaos prevents any expression of philia, the indispensable condition for the cohesion and sovereignty of a people.
To put it in a way that the self-righteous refuse to hear, race is indeed a biological reality, supported scientifically by numerous high-level genetic studies.[4] While we are theoretically equal before the law, we are not equal in talent, intelligence, merit, beauty, and physical ability. Women and men do not have the same capabilities. Racial, ethnic, sexual, individual, and cultural egalitarianism doesn’t exist in the real world. Those who claim otherwise are leading us to racial suicide.
In this respect, Israel and the Jews are leading the way. In order to protect the purity of the race, the Jewish state has the strictest race-mixing laws in the world. Israel does not allow civil marriage, even though a recent poll found the Zionist state to be the least religious country in the world. Marriages involving Jews can only take place in accordance with Jewish religious law and with the approval of the country’s rabbinical courts. Many Israelis considered Jewish by the civil authorities are not considered Jewish by the Chief Rabbinate. These “fake” Jews are not permitted to marry full-blooded “real” Jews.[5]
A Jewish person who wishes to marry a person who may be racially impure must submit that person to a DNA test in order to prove that he or she is a member of the Jewish race, thereby confirming that Jews are a race as Hitler correctly thought.[6],[7] Converts to Judaism such as Ethiopian Jews are banned from marriage. Moreover, 89% of Jews would refuse to allow their child to marry a gentile, and up to 97% if the partner in question is Muslim. While miscegenation is rare, the state nevertheless funds any initiative to prevent Jews from dating non-Jews. Lehava, an organization composed of Jewish men, patrols the most cosmopolitan neighborhoods in Jerusalem and physically attacks racially mixed couples.[8]
Al Jazeera journalist writes the following on Israel’s Nation-State Law:
More than 80 years after Nazi Germany enacted what came to be known as the Nuremberg Race Laws, Israeli legislators voted in favor of the so-called nation-state law. By doing so, they essentially codified “Jewish supremacy” into law, which effectively mirrors the Nazi-era legislation of ethno-religious stratification of German citizenry.
Israel’s “nation-state law” stipulates in its first clause that “actualization of the right of national self-determination in the state of Israel is unique to the Jewish people.”
In similar fashion, the first of the Nuremberg Laws, the Reich Citizenship Law, deemed citizenship a privilege exclusive to people of “German or kindred blood.” The remainder were classed as state subjects, without citizenship rights.
This brings us to the second Nuremberg Law: Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honour, which sought to prevent mixing of Aryan blood, dubbed “race defilement.”
The new “nation-state law” may not mention “race defilement” but in Israel, anti-miscegenation laws are already in place, masquerading as legislation meant to protect traditional values. Only religious officials can perform marriage, and the Orthodox rabbinate has exclusive purview over Jewish marriages. The law strictly forbids interreligious marriage within Israel.[9]
After reading the above, the reader will want to know why Jews outside of Israel are at the forefront of replacement immigration, multiculturalism, and forced race-mixing by deceitful propaganda?
Why are Jews living in Western countries constantly inflaming Blacks and minorities against Whites?
Why are Jews in the diaspora constantly promoting egalitarianism, feminism, pornography, race denial, homosexuality, gay marriage, abortion, anti-gun laws, and open borders?
Why are all leading Western politicians and media completely supportive of ethnic nationalism in Israel and totally against it in their own country?
By UN standards on human rights, Israel should be invaded by NATO for humanitarian reasons. Don’t Jews in Israel practice racism, apartheid, suprematism, terrorism, torture, rape, ethnic cleansing of the local indigenous population of Arabs and Christians, as well as slavery.[10]
Why this double standard?
Is it because Jews are the real leaders of the West?
Is it because Western leaders are mere puppets of the Jews?
In the end, is it because Jews are destined to rule over humanity as Mark Kogan states in the following tweet?
To all you racists and anti-Semites out there, consider this.
In 50 or 100 years, Israel will still be Jewish.
Your countries will NOT, however. Europe will be browner and blacker, and so will Asia. Chances are your grandchildren will not look like you and if they do, your great-grandchildren won’t. My descendants will rule your descendants who will learn to hate their own heritage and there is NOTHING you can do about it.
For Mark Kogan’s dream of a Jewish dominated world to come true, Jews must absolutely nip White ethnonationalism in the bud, in all White countries, Whites being their major obstacle. Any resurgence of nationalism and race consciousness, which they themselves shamelessly practice, is out of the question in countries they want to subjugate, as explained in the following quote taken from the great Hungarian journalist Louis Marschalko, a long forgotten credible individual whose views should be taken seriously:
The concept of racial superiority with its religious and political cults are not Hitler’s inventions. The Jewish laws of race protection and Jewish tribal nationalism go back to the time of Moses in the Old Testament (Pentateuch). These laws have been in existence for 3000 to 4000 years. […] During the reign of the “Führer” Moses, everything was the same in the totalitarian regime of Jahve. The laws for the protection of the Jewish race and Jewish nationalism have survived to this day. They are not Hitler’s inventions. Hitler, Goebbels and Rosenberg only used the weapons of the Jewish community against the Jewish community. […] The Jews hanged themselves at Nuremberg. The laws of racial segregation and superiority were first published in the books of the prophets Ezra and Nehemiah and not in the Nuremberg Race Protection Act. The first concentration camps were established not by Himmler, but by King Solomon. The motto of total extermination and annihilation of the defeated enemy first appeared in the orders of Moses, the first “Führer” in history. [Hitler had only proclaimed that the Germans were superior to the Jews. Moses went much further by announcing that the Jews were of direct divine origin and God’s chosen people, and therefore sacred] The Jewish laws regard racial purity as a commandment of the highest importance. The consciousness of being the master race burns in the Old Testament with the fierce glow of the most fanatical nationalism of all time. The first law of Moses concerns the preservation of racial purity. […] The Jews feel entitled to subjugate foreigners and to treat as slaves all those who fall into their power. The plans for the Soviet torture chambers and the forced labour camps of the Kaganovich empire were conceived in the land of Solomon. … The prophet Samuel tells us how in the ecstatic atmosphere of victory, the most humanitarian race in the world treated its vanquished enemies: “He brought out the people who were there (in the Ammonite city of Rabba) and put them under saws and harrows, and iron axes, and put them through the brick kiln, and so he did to all the cities of the children of Ammon” (II Samuel XII, 31). The first concentration camp, the first gas chamber (brick oven) in the world was in the land of Israel. And the first ghetto was established in Jerusalem, not in Europe.
This Jewish tribal nationalism never died out. It continued to kill neighbouring peoples and races. Every time it was defeated, it resurfaced. The Jewish race had suffered, but after the liberation from Babylon, it continued to build the New Jerusalem with the vehemence of a revived nationalism. The Jewish race had suffered but was waiting for the new Messiah, the Jewish nationalist liberator and political leader, the new Führer, who would place world power over all nations in the hands of the Jewish community. The Jewish people never abandoned this grand national dream. At the Zionist Congress of 1897 in Basel, Dr. Mandelstein, professor at the University of Kiev, in his opening address to the conference, stated categorically that: “The Jews will use all their influence and power to prevent the rise and prosperity of all other nations and are resolved to adhere to their historic hopes, i.e., the conquest of world power” (Le Temps, September 3, 1897). German National Socialism was ready and willing to cooperate with other peoples. It was hostile to only one race: Jewry. Whereas Nazism of the Jewish type is hostile to all races and all non-Jewish social and ruling castes.[11]
[1] Philip Weiss, “This Is What ‘Jewish Democracy’ Looks Like,” Mondoweiss, News about Palestine, Israel & the United States, March 26, 2021.
[2] Norman Dacey, “Democracy” in Israel, Noontide Press, 1976.
[3] Kerry R. Bolton, The Tyranny of Human Rights: From Jacobinism to the United Nations, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2022, p. 326.
[4] David Reich, Who We Are and How We Got There. Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past, Pantheon, 2018. See also David Reich, “How genetics is changing our understanding of ‘Race,’ The New York Times, March 28, 2018.
[5] Mark Weber, “Jews: A Religious Community, a People, or a Race?” The Journal of Historical Review, March-April 2000, vol. -19, No. 2, p. 63.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Jim Goad, “The Ultimate JQ: Religion or Race?” Taki’s Magazine, June 17, 2019.
[8] Eric Striker, “New Documentary Sheds Light on Israel’s Strict Prohibitions on Interracial Marriage,” National Justice, December 9, 2020.
[9] Susan Abulhawa, “Israel’s ‘Nation-State Law’ Parallels the Nazi Nuremberg Laws,” Al Jazeera, July 26, 2018.
[10] Kerry R. Bolton, book cited, p. 326.
[11] Louis Marschalko, The World Conquerors: The Real War Criminals, Britons Publishing Society, 1958, pp. 20-21.
Birthday-stream Mr. Collett https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6/PWR282:6
https://michaelpeinovich.substack.com/p/how-israel-created-the-european-refugee
Spot on, Pierre, thanks for the reminder! The hypocrisy and duplicity of these chronic and devious book cookers is absolutely surreal.
Louis Marschalko’s “The World Conquerors: The Real War Criminals”” (London: Joseph Sueli, 1958) crammed interesting information into 296 pages but its accuracy needs to be verified repeatedly; e.g. Lenin was a “typical Jew” (p.52) and also Mikoyan (an Armenian), plus his assumption throughout of the “authenticity” of “The Protocols…”
The protocols are authentic.
@ Pierre
If so, you should be able please to provide the actual name(s) of the lecturer(s) supposedly reported therein, the exact location and date of their delivery, their original language, and the mode of transmission to Gentile recipients, all with irrefutable evidence.
What are you doing here, you should be with your friends killing children and women in Gaza!
@Pierre
What a disappointing yet sadly self-exposing response from someone who had offered an interesting fairly well researched article. I have opposed the expansion of Israel and condemned the slaughter of Palestinians during the past 77 years, and do so again here and now. I just think that criticism of Jewish activities should be sane, and sound sane.
Try again to show the “Protocols” (in whatever recension) are a genuine record.
“The Protocols” are an important resource whoever wrote them. They contain much truth about the operation of the conspiracy against European civilization. Whether an explicit Jewish plot or a well-informed gentile imagining of such a plot, as Henry Ford said a century ago, they fit the facts.
@ What’s up Skip
Some facts (e.g. Ostjuden involvement in the sex-trade) but not others (e.g. mining underground railways, Chinese military threat).
It uses some genuinely Jewish and secret-society material, as noted a century ago by the doyenne of conspiracy theory Nesta Webster, who did not think it recorded a real-life meeting, as her loyal secretary posthumously confirmed. A suspicious aspect is the absence of any detail of names or places, but the inclusion of unlikely features like a Latin (rather than Jewish) tag. Perceptive passages on financial control and political corruptibility were plagiarised verbatim from previous publications.
There has been a considerable literature since Alexander Baron compiled his Bibliography (1996), notably the fresh annotated textual analyses by Cesare G. De Michelis and Michael Hagemeister, while a thorough internet search will disclose many new books, monographs and articles.
My guess is that it was a parodic “Christian” compilation hostile to the Jewish-Masonic alliance in France (e.g. Leon Bourgeois) at the close of the 19th-century, whose existence is confirmed by independent historians. It was not an attack on territorial Zionism but on global Jewry. There was a major masonic conference around the same time as the 1897 Basel Zionist congress.
Acerbic, articulate, and not unlike scratch, patch and especially intradermal screening. Guaranteed inflammation of one’s associates and therefore not without risk of even anaphylaxis. Excellent work.
“Henrik invites Dr. David Duke to discuss recent Events in the
middle east and Israel’s insane actions to escalate the war.”
https://odysee.com/@redicetv:1/israels-demented-middle-east-aspirations-david-duke:e
https://archive.org/details/the-world-conquerors-louis-marschalko
https://ia801903.us.archive.org/2/items/1948-bardeche-nuremberg/1948%20Bardeche%20Nuremberg.pdf
Mr. Midjord searches for roots on one of his treeless home islands, Faroer, which inspires him to profound reflections. A truly rugged area that nevertheless exudes a hidden charm. But you can’t really look at things in such a one-dimensional, simplistic and exclusive way as Mr. Midjord does if you care about the context. A few remarks on this:
Pagans cannot be devil worshippers because the devil, and especially his Hebrew name Satan, is a Judeo-Christian concept that tends to divide the world into good and evil. What this gives birth to is the tendency to always want to be “good”, which in turn creates evil in the end. The cause is the Christian conception of morality, which is basically unnatural, anti-natural, because there is no morality of this kind in nature. When Christians today, in their universalistic delusion, ensure that what they aim at and bring about does not benefit their own species, but the world as a whole, this is artificial anti-nature. Of course, pagans also had all kinds of superstitious and “supernatural” concepts, rites, etc.
According to the Bible, man sinned in “paradise” and is therefore condemned to be good if he wants to enter the imagined and promised kingdom of heaven. One must also object that the Nazis considered themselves to be revolutionaries, but not without referring to or reflecting on the root. Perhaps to a pathological degree. Ultimately, socialism and Christianity can only be realized within racial or local-national boundaries, otherwise they are eaten up by the universalist component. The practice of Christianity worked well as long as the races and religions were geographically almost inaccessible and insurmountably distant from each other, which is what gave rise to their form.
Furthermore, original Christianity should not be equated with its perverted and degenerated present-day version, which has ultimately become nothing more than a copy and reflection of the rampant and galloping left-wing, oh-so-“progressive” zeitgeist. This preached, for example, an abundance of children, obedience of the wife to her husband, and spoke out against homosexuality. In my opinion, Christianity as an institution has indeed had a decisive influence on the high culture of Europeans, not only on architecture (see cathedrals). But Christianity also says that you should not cast your pearls before sw*ne, because in the end they will trample you underfoot (see “development aid” and much more).
A striking proof for my thesis that Christianity as a religion does not have to be detrimental to one’s own ethnicity are the Amish and Mennonites in America, who are full of children, healthy and vital. Sure, they would never have reached the moon in a “space capsule”, but who knows for sure that we ever did? Regardless of what this “achievement”, financed with billions, has to do with the survival of our species. The money would have been better spent on developing cures for childhood cancer, which the Amish also fail to do. But presumably their children have far fewer diseases of civilization.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAAuiDc8LC0
The channel “Empirical Afterlife Research” [sic] introduces “Sam” Hess, a Swiss forester who has been able to perceive “spirit beings” since his youth. Spirit beings are out-of-body apparitions that can speak to him without a physical mouth.
This is not a satirical show, but is meant seriously. Is “Shaman Sam” himself also a spirit being? Empirical psychiatry was unable to find this out when it temporarily put Mr. Hess in a straitjacket, because this extremely restricted the medium “Sam” in his out-of-body perception.
The ritual of making extrasensory contact naturally also includes a deceptively real-looking substitute hair wig made from Afghan angora rabbit wool, which is intended to hide Sam’s severe baldness from the prying eyes of the spirits so as not to frighten them unnecessarily. Whether his magnificent beard is also just glued on is not immediately obvious to the attentive viewer.
However, plants (such as trees) also regularly talk to Sam. In the course of his career as a clairvoyant, it became increasingly difficult for him to carelessly ignore this empirical fact like all his non-sighted contemporaries who are insensitive to these ethereal signals. Sam knows practically all the local nature spirits by name, but has difficulty translating his profound discovery and experience into concrete descriptions.
Everything is alive, even doormats, stones, sanitary towels and horse droppings, but it takes the most sensitive patience to open the spirit beings addressed by Sam to more intimate communication. According to Sam’s competent expert information, there are even colors, shapes and sounds that do not exist in the physical world of ordinary people. So let us summarize his profound wisdom: Swiss lives matter too! Engl. subs available. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gd51SglQ-E
“That’s weird!” I have just learned from Mr. Storl (“Far out in America”) that the English word “weird” comes from the Anglo-Saxon “wyrd”, which in turn comes from the Old Norse Urðr, which has an interesting pre-Christian history. Presumably this is also related to the very important German prefix ur-, which is also found in Dutch oer- (as in “Oera Linda”).
Storl claims that our knowledge of natural processes is at best the tip of an iceberg, while everything else is hidden underneath. The man actually knows a lot about our collective unconscious and is also a good storyteller. One of his greatest teachers was a certain Arthur Hermes (1892-1985), he points out that the German name does not derive from the Greek deity, but from Irminsul.
Also interesting is his theory that National Socialism was an anthropological phenomenon called “revitalization movement”, which occurs at all times in all peoples when they are afflicted by mass deaths, diseases, wars and so on. Then those forces gain the upper hand that exercise a tightening, organizing function. Activate auto-subs and hope that they translate correctly. https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Revitalisierung_(Ethnologie)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpkUTBolreg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TMXeKWzewI
P.S. At least 78 Congolese will not be able to make their long journey to Europe for good reason. A cause for deep mourning also among the importers of black-colored replacement populations within our “governments”. https://apnews.com/video/drownings-democratic-republic-of-the-congo-boat-and-ship-accidents-international-a070eeb4fdb747e394fd068047b4dd71
Great. This is a keeper. Thanks Pierre.
I will definitely look into Mr. Marchalko’s writings.
Better Heidi Heido Heida than “Heidi”,
otherwise we will forever remain trap-
ped in the echo chamber of yodeling.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9fDMjv-dlw
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ein_Heller_und_ein_Batzen
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5dse7
But since we have internalized the “tall poppy
syndrome”, there will be no more elites anyway.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tall_poppy_syndrome
https://dailystormer.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/041024dailystormermeme21.jpg
It is also related to holy. While “kaputt” (the opposite) is is very possibly Yiddish.
The Germanic Roots of “Heil”: A Linguistic Journey
The German word “Heil” and its English cognates “health,” “whole,” and “holy” form just the tip of the iceberg in a vast network of related words that span the Germanic languages. This expanded essay will delve deeper into this linguistic family, exploring additional English words that share this ancient root.
Additional English Cognates
Several other English words trace their origins to the same Proto-Germanic root *hailaz:
Hale: Meaning “healthy, robust,” as in the phrase “hale and hearty.”
Wassail: From Old Norse “ves heill” (be healthy), a toast that evolved into a Christmas tradition.
Heal: Directly related to “health,” meaning to restore to wholeness or health.
Hallow: To make holy or sacred, as in “Halloween” (All Hallows’ Eve).
Hallelujah: Though borrowed from Hebrew, its adoption may have been influenced by its similarity to Germanic “holy” words.
These words further illustrate the pervasive influence of this root in English, spanning concepts of physical health, social customs, medical practices, and religious observances.
The Semantic Evolution
The semantic range of these related words reveals how concepts of physical wholeness, health, and spiritual well-being have been intertwined in Germanic cultures for millennia. This connection is evident in the way these words have evolved and been used:
Health and Wholeness
As previously mentioned, “health” and “whole” are closely related, both stemming from the idea of completeness. The addition of “hale” to this group reinforces the concept of robust health. The verb “heal” takes this a step further, implying the process of restoring wholeness, whether physical or metaphorical.
Holy and Sacred
The connection between “holy,” “hallow,” and the German “heilig” demonstrates how the concept of spiritual completeness or perfection became associated with the divine. This linguistic link suggests that in ancient Germanic thought, the sacred was viewed as something whole, complete, or perfect.
Social and Cultural Implications
The inclusion of “wassail” in this word family shows how deeply these concepts penetrated social customs. The act of wishing health to others became a ritualized part of celebrations, eventually evolving into specific traditions.
German “Heil” in Context
In German, the semantic field of “Heil” extends even further than in English, encompassing notions of salvation, well-being, and greeting. This broader usage is evident in compounds and derived words such as:
Heilsam: Wholesome or beneficial
Heilen: To heal or cure
Heilig: Holy or sacred
Unheil: Calamity or disaster (literally “un-wholeness”)
These examples demonstrate how the concept of “Heil” permeates various aspects of German language and culture, from medicine to religion to everyday expressions of well-being.
The Antithesis: Kaputt and Beyond
In contrast to the wholeness and health conveyed by “Heil” and its cognates, we find words like the German “kaputt,” meaning broken or ruined. As mentioned earlier, “kaputt” likely entered German through Yiddish, ultimately deriving from the Latin “caput” (head). Interestingly, English has its own antonyms to this word family, many of which come from different linguistic roots:
Broken: From Old English “brecan,” of Germanic origin
Ill: From Old Norse “illr,” possibly related to “evil”
Sick: From Old English “seoc,” of Germanic origin
The existence of these contrasting terms from various linguistic sources highlights the complex tapestry of language evolution and cultural exchange in both English and German.
Conclusion
The etymological journey from the Proto-Germanic *hailaz to modern German “Heil” and its numerous English relatives reveals a deep-rooted connection between physical, mental, and spiritual well-being in Germanic cultures. This expanded exploration of related words in English further illustrates the pervasive influence of this ancient root in our language and thought.
From “health” to “holy,” from “wassail” to “heal,” these words continue to shape our understanding of wholeness, well-being, and the sacred. They serve as linguistic fossils, preserving ancient concepts and beliefs while continuing to evolve in meaning and usage.
The contrast provided by words like “kaputt” and other antonyms reminds us of the dynamic nature of language evolution and the ongoing interplay between different linguistic and cultural traditions. As we use these words in our daily lives, we carry forward a linguistic legacy that spans thousands of years, connecting us to our cultural and linguistic ancestors in ways we might not always realize.
We think Pierre’s article is actually quite wonderful..helpful..constructive..not constricting or narrowing the narrative of
facts..not the idealized neoliberal and..idiotic current narratives and onerous false beliefs so popular with tmany gay Jews out there in the big Kamala la la land of today…by the way. Is this Mark Kogan jew churl living in the west bank..near Gaza Lebanon or in Miami?