Why Are Whites So Vulnerable?

A single lie is louder than a hundred truths
Georges Bernanos

Our ancestors, the Hunter-Gatherers of the North, evolved in the harsh environment of the Ice age. They formed small groups that tended for reasons of survival to isolate themselves socially instead of creating large cohesive communities, ethnocentrism being irrelevant in the battle against the elements, according to American professor of evolutionary psychology, Dr. Kevin MacDonald, the author of Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition. Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future.

Whites of European descent are therefore far less ethnocentric than the tricksters who have declared war on them. More inclined to individualism and moral universalism, they are vulnerable to strongly collectivist and ethnocentric groups that are by definition more cohesive and stronger.

Key genetically influenced traits of individualists include:

– More positive towards outsiders and more likely to behave in an altruistic manner;

– Less aware of differences between races and ethnic groups and have fewer negative attitudes towards outsiders, sometimes to the point of disagreeing with their own group’s policies towards outsiders;

– Show little commitment or loyalty to their group, and lack a sense of common destiny with its members;

– Less likely to assume that other groups are wrong;

– Create moderate attachments to other groups.[1]

What makes Whites even more vulnerable is the fact that they have guilt cultures rather than shame cultures (like the vast majority of the world) because in a cold and harsh environment if you don’t follow the rules of the group for survival, you can jeopardize everyone’s survival. If you don’t behave as expected, guilty feelings, to say it differently, will drive one to seek forgiveness and not to repeat any life-threatening behaviour that could endanger the group. “In the environments we evolved in, violating the moral sensibilities of the group was an evolutionary dead end,” as MacDonald puts it. Guilt, in other words, is a group evolutionary survival strategy.

However, in an artificial environment such as ours, this predisposition for guilt can be hijacked and used against Whites by predators who know how to manipulate people into doing things they would not normally do. Jews, for example, and minorities in general, who are much more ethnocentric than Whites, are very good at manipulating Whites into welcoming multiculturalism, race-mixing, and replacement immigration, for example, by making them feel guilty about the bad things their ancestors supposedly did to weaker and vulnerable people such as slavery, colonization, or the Holocaust. Most Whites who are made to feel guilty that way will tend to relinquish their normal survival instincts to seek forgiveness not only by opening wide their heart to invaders and their demands for equality and tolerance but also by punishing other Whites for not complying (altruistic punishment).[2] The following quote taken from the June 19, 2022, issue of White World Wrap sums up well the overall effects of this tendency to feel guilty and to seek forgiveness:

White people are basically battered housewives, whose better instincts have been used against them by predators who know how to construct consensus on a massive scale, basically a massive psychological warfare operation to turn weakened and dilute European countries until they can be integrated into a world slave state.[3]

This strong genetic predisposition for guilt which is no longer well adapted makes Whites prone to suicidal and punitive altruism as well as pathological compassion because they can be easily tricked into doing and believing things they would not normally have done or believed in the Evolutionary Environment of their Ancestors (EEA) where they lived for tens of thousands of years.

On top of the genetic factors, there has been a major softening up of the population because of domestication itself and various cultural measures, such as compulsory schooling, alphabetization, and the internalization of the law and religious principles; these measures were put in place along the way to curb our basic instincts in an environment to which they were no longer adapted when they left the EEA for reasons that are still not clear. These necessary steps of the civilization process are also part of a group evolutionary survival strategy. You don’t want people robbing, raping, eating, enslaving, or killing each other in the street. But this well-adapted strategy is not immune to being taken over and changed by hostile forces who have different interests at heart.

In fact, beginning with the French Revolution, native Western Christian elites, whose values were in sync with their populations, were gradually replaced by a Jewish elite that had different values. They were supposedly for universalism and the rejection of race consciousness while the natives were overwhelmingly for separatism and race consciousness. With the advent in the early 20th century of the fraudulent Jewish-led Boasian anthropology, which defined race as a social construct, race realism, Darwinism, and eugenics lost their popularity, except, paradoxically, with the Jews themselves, the very ones who imposed on Whites the values of universalism and race denial for political reasons. In other words, as we shall see further on, Jews are basically using universalism and race denial as a Jewish group evolutionary strategy to dominate the White race and eventually all races, while they themselves remain separate and racially conscious. As Kevin MacDonald says,

Jewish ethics is universalist, while at the same time maintaining that Israel must remain separate in order to present a moral beacon to the rest of humanity—a beacon of universalism and ethnic dissolution of non-Jews. One cannot underestimate the importance of the fact that the central pose of post Enlightenment Jewish intellectuals is a sense that Judaism represents a moral beacon to the rest of humanity. [4]

And this even after the Gaza genocide, and continuing on the West Bank.

As the Jewish elite was rising to the top of the social pyramid and in their mind approaching world conquest, criticizing Jewish influence gradually became more and more off-limits, to the point,

that even to openly use the word ‘Jew’ or to expose it nakedly to print is somehow improper. … There is an extreme sensitiveness about the public discussion of the Jewish question on the part of Gentiles. They would prefer to keep it in the hazy borderlands of their thought, shrouded in silence. … Anyone who essays to discuss the Jewish question in the United States or anywhere else must be fully prepared to be regarded as an antisemite in highbrow language, or in lowbrow language, a Jew-baiter.[5]

The situation though is not desperate yet because what is natural for all races is race consciousness and separatism, i.e., nationalism and territorial borders. These basic instincts implanted in our DNA for eternity can be subdued at gun point or massive propaganda but not for long. What is bred in the bone will come out in the flesh. So, if we fight back by debunking the lies or “tricks” that were implanted in the minds of Western populations to smother with guilt their racial identity and pride, it might be possible to trigger our collectivist instincts which lay dormant and to revitalize the facets of our character and temperament which allowed us to create the greatest and most unique civilization the world has ever known.[6]

Indeed, ethnic Europeans do not lack collectivist mechanism for group competition, notes Kevin MacDonald, but since these mechanisms are relatively less elaborated, they require a higher level of group conflict in order to trigger their expression.[7] Our racial competitors therefore go to great lengths to wage a low-key race war against us in order to avoid waking up a “sleeping giant.” They are a tiny minority holding a dog by the tail, and they’re scared stiff of losing their grip. So, they need to wage their racial war discreetly by hiding behind various masks, i.e., censorship, lies, or tricks, in broad daylight, you could say.

To unmask them, you need a special flashlight called “truth,” but in the end, it is useless to debunk the tricks with truth without naming at the same time the “trickster.” One must name this wolf in sheep’s clothing every time he shows his face behind one or the other of his tricks; attacking only the lie simply encourages him to invent another one, and ultimately to sharpen his will to power and control. This is perhaps the most demonic aspect of this low-key race war that is being waged on our race and eventually against all humanity: to make us contribute to our demise by not naming, systematically and publicly, our real enemies: the Jews and their non-Jewish allies.

Easier said than done in some cases as our enemies have learned over the centuries to disguise themselves by adopting the surnames, languages, and even the religion of their hosts. By impersonating, mimicking, cloning, copying the hosts’ culture and values, by being, in other words, indistinguishable and accepted, and therefore undetectable, they can with this clever trick bypass their hosts’ natural defense mechanisms against subversion. And the best way to hide in plain sight is to use as a pretext for stigmatizing Whites and destroying their civilization with some noble cause such as the liberal values of the left, i.e., democracy, anti-racism, humanism, universalism, tolerance, love, and egalitarianism, when in effect, you don’t yourself espouse these values. The following widely known citation falsely attributed to Roma Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 B.C.) stands as the best indictment of what has just been said:

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.[8]

As written in the Talmud, their holiest book, Jews are loyal to no nation except their own. They occupy nations and literally vampirize them. “Because their break with their native environment — the Arabian deserts — occurred at an early stage in their ethnogenetic cycle, the Jews,” according to famed Russian historian and ethnologist Lev Goumilev (1912–1992),

developed the ability to penetrate virtually any type of natural landscape, and even codified their strategies in the Talmud. Wherever they settled, they acted as a chimera towards the indigenous populations, deliberately promoting ‘skepticism and indifference’ in order to erode the spiritual and moral resistance of their hosts and to extend their domination over them. In ethnological terms, a chimera is a parasitic ethnos, which exploits the indigenous populations of the country as well as its flora, fauna, and subsoil riches. Like a population of bacteria or infusoria [a type of single-celled organism] that spreads through the internal organs of the person or animal, a chimeric ethnic invasion vamps the vital energies and resources of its host organism.[9]

Goumilev also compared the relationship between a chimera and its indigenous ethnic group to a cancerous tumour: “The latter can only grow with the organism, never outside it, and it lives only at the expense of the host organism. As a cancer, a chimerical ethnic antisystem draws its means of existence from the indigenous ethnos.”[10]

In so doing, concludes French author Laurent Guyénot who summarized Goumilev’s work from Imaginary Kingdom: The Legend of the Kingdom of Prester John, a book written by Jewish American scholar Mark Bassin:

it disrupts the vital processes of the [native people]. The invading ethnicity is also irreparably degraded, but in a way that strengthens rather than weakens it. Uprooted ethnicities survive precisely by developing traits that, although unnatural, give them decisive advantages over their cohabitants. Uprootedness, as a structural trait, itself becomes a selective advantage, in the sense that the invading ethnicity has internalized strategies that allow it to thrive virtually anywhere.[11]

In short, whenever you encounter an influencer who systematically destroys anything which is ethnic-European, try to identify who that person really is. Much of the time, it will be a Jew, even if he looks White and claims to be speaking in the name of Whites. On social media, there are hundreds of these Jewish “White” trolls busy demonizing Whites and making it seem like righteous Whites are at war with their own race when in reality it is the Jews who are at war with our race:

Because of their ability to often pass as White, one of the most effective strategies Jews have of infiltrating and subverting White Christian nations is to take on a White identity and then speak for their “fellow White people.”

This shape-shifting phenomenon has been going on for years on X/Twitter, and one astute observer has painstakingly cataloged over 1,100 examples of Jews pretending to be White while at the same time denigrating Whites for being White, and then switching back to their Jewish identity to shield themselves from any criticism.[12]

Moreover, in order to put an end to any criticism of Jews, Israel, and Jewish power, Jews introduce laws against incitement to hatred, but have no qualms about writing books with impunity that smear whites as something they are not.[13] But if White people do the same, they are immediately arrested and prosecuted for hate speech. Why this double standard? Is it because Jews are the real masters of the West?

Yes, of course, it’s pretty obvious.

[1] Kevin MacDonald, Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future, Kindle Direct Publication Edition, 2019.

[2] Ibid., p. 304.

[3] White World Wrap (2022-06-19): merchantHelios @merchant-Helios@poa.st interesting thoughts from /lit/ on why so much western media is blatantly anti-White.

[4] Kevin MacDonald, cited, p. 284.

[5] Ibid., pp. 299-300.

[6] Ricardo Duchesne, The Uniqueness of Western Civilization, Brill, 2012.

[7] Kevin MacDonald, book cited, p. 94.

[8] Citation taken from Greg Felton, The Host and the Parasite. How Israel’s Fifth Column Consumed America. Expanded Post-Obama Edition, Money Tree Publishing, p. 536.

[9] Laurent Guyénot, “Lev Goumilev et ‘la chimère khazar,’” E&R, December 1, 2022. This article is a review of the book by Mark Bassin, The Gumilev Mystique: Biopolitics, Eurasianism, and the Construction of Community in Modern Russia, Cornell University Press, 2016.

[10] Ibid.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Christians for Truth team, “Over 1,000 Shape-Shifting Jews Exposed For Pretending To Be White on X (formely Twitter),”August 19, 2019: https://christiansfortruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Shape-Shifting-Jews-on-Twitter-Exposed-.pdf

[13] Jewish Anti-White Books, https://www.thehardtruth.info/jewish-anti-white-books, The Hard Truth Files.