This article was originally published in Danish on January 20, 2020.

A Facebook friend of mine recently announced that he would be spending less time on Facebook in the future – simply because he couldn’t bear to read all the twisted nonsense national-minded people sometimes spout in this forum. I’ve known the person in question for 35 years, during which we’ve both fought for Denmark’s cause, both together and separately, so it’s something that must necessarily give you pause for thought. And unfortunately, he is right. It’s incredible how many rational people can suddenly get themselves to write posts that lack any inner connection with what they otherwise write.

The right wing simply needs to get its thoughts in order. It simply has no ideological basis – no fundamental idea from which it can take a sensible position on all the problems of our time in a coherent way. In addition, it submits to the enemy’s world of ideas and adopts the enemy’s definitions and enemy images – perhaps as an alibi reaction, but perhaps also because no thought has been given to the purpose of the enemy’s insults and values and the wider scope of these. The enemy’s tactics are, of course, entirely deliberate. They want to ensure that the right wing continues to wander around in all directions like a bunch of confused chickens, so that it accomplishes nothing. Only a unifying idea can unite the forces into an effective resistance movement, the creation of which the enemy will prevent with all its might. A truly national resistance movement means death to the traitors and consistent cleansing of the country of unwanted existences.

The overarching idea that unites national Danes is love of country and the belief that only a homogeneous society can ensure the survival of the people. But this necessary foundation lacks a philosophical, ideological and scientific underpinning that can make the world fit together in a meaningful way. It is partly because of this lack that conservatism has never and will never be able to win over other political ideas with a more powerful vision – or over all the crazy ideas of the time, from climate chaos to gender confusion. Conservatism lacks a real foundation of ideas that it struggles to realize. It is content to defend its positions as long as it can, and then make lukewarm compromises with its opponents in the hope of clinging to at least some vestiges of its positions. It is pathetic.

However, one unifying enemy image holds the right wing more or less together: the dislike of Islam. Of course, we can fully share this dislike. Islam is a primitive religion for primitive people and we don’t want it here, not today and not in a thousand years. But if primitive people choose a primitive religion, it is only natural. Why should we really interfere with that? If the people of today’s Muslim countries want to remain in the Middle Ages, stoning each other and cutting each other’s heads off, they should be allowed to do so, as long as they keep that religion to themselves, of course! We should not nurture universal ‘human rights’, because they do not and should not exist in the real world. Every society must define the rights of its citizens according to its norms and values. Anything else is a globalist invention designed to weaken us – and the authors are the usual culprits.

However, primitivity can also be a positive quality – to the extent that it serves to ensure the survival of the group at the expense of other groups that have become so refined, sophisticated and spiritual that they have lost the will and ability to defend themselves. And here we are at the heart of the matter. Everything the right criticizes about Islam is pretty much what makes Muslims strong – stronger than us!

We are busy criticizing their burqas, veils, scarves and social control of their girls and adult women. We may think it’s exaggerated – and perhaps to a certain extent also hypocritical – but we ourselves have until recently also had restraints on our girls – until we lost the will to live as a group, and until Jewish scientists gave us the Pill and their opinion makers convinced us that women can only realize themselves by not having and raising children – and that it is even okay to kill children before birth. Already in Manu’s Book of Laws, written around the beginning of our era but whose content is much older, the ancient Indians stated that the sure way to destroy a people is to destroy its women. It is the woman who bears the children – and it is she who must bring them up. The man provides for them. Since it is the woman who carries on the family line, it is also important to know that the children are the man’s. Men can probably have an average of 100 children a year – women usually only have 1 child during that period. In other words, the woman is far more important to the survival of the group than the man. The group can survive with very few men – but only with many fertile women. That’s why the man goes to war and gets killed – while the woman stays at home and gives birth. The man can be replaced, the woman cannot. She is simply too valuable to use as cannon fodder. This is also why monogamy is actually against nature. In a society living in the state of nature, there will be more women than men, and from a biological point of view it doesn’t matter much. But since we no longer live in the state of nature, monogamy has societal benefits as we do not have a large surplus of women. However, when monogamy is sometimes difficult to live up to, well, it’s nature that takes over. When Muslims have up to four wives, this results in many children in the family, but not necessarily a larger total number of children in the population, as today there is simply a surplus of men, which leads to a battle for women. However, this battle is also a selection factor that we have eliminated. In the past, it was women who had to fight over men, but it had the same effect. When you no longer have any selection factors, but live in a society where everything is equal and there is no difference between good and bad genetic material, you degenerate and eventually perish. Every breeder of dogs, horses and canaries knows this, and the same rules apply to humans, who are basically just animals with clothes on. However, it must be said that most of our guests don’t think about biology either – they only think about strengthening family ties – which is fine in principle, of course, but it leads to inbreeding and thus often to degeneration.

A woman only realizes herself by procreating and raising her children (and thus helping to possibly displace other groups). That’s the whole point of life – not to have a job at a checkout line or act as prime minister. It’s the man’s job when he’s not at war, and of course it’s also important because it ensures the economic existence of the family and the people, but it cannot replace the woman’s job. Feminists consider this to be a denigration and degradation of women. Nothing could be more wrong. The degradation of women is that they are not valued in themselves, but only as a slave of capital in the labor market on a par with men. She is worth much more in herself than the man. Women who are EU commissioners, prime ministers or CEOs of even the largest companies are essentially a biological waste – even though they may have had a few children that they have left for society to raise. The family is the building block of society, and women are the ones who must ensure the quality of these building blocks. Therefore, it is also important to give women a good education so that they have something to pass on to their children. Of course, this is especially true today, when women can’t be expected to bring anything from home. It should be emphasized that the Nordic woman was never oppressed. She ran the household and the entire family’s finances when they were away at war. The oppression of women first came with Christianity, which saw women as sin personified because of Eve’s love for the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge. However, this oppression was opposed by the Nordic man and disappeared over time, only to reappear with Jewish feminism, which wants to force women into a role that is not natural for them.

The destruction of the woman is very advanced here. The brainwashing has been violent. Today she thinks she is happier in her materialism than women were before, but the number of mental disorders has never been greater. Marriages have no lasting existence – children have no family. They are children in shared families and raised in multicultural institutions – essentially rootless, without a share in the common culture and without existential grounding. They have been taught no respect for the words of adults, there are no boundaries set for them, and they have been led to believe that they can create their own identity by changing their name, their gender, coloring their hair and disfiguring themselves with tattoos, rings in their ears or tongue, horns on their forehead and so on. Children now have to undergo psychiatric treatment if they don’t get enough “Likes” on Facebook. Scouts are no longer allowed to earn merit badges, because that could make some people feel inferior – and grades should of course be abolished. After all, everyone is equal. Their self-esteem is zero, they barely know their parents, let alone their grandparents. It is not part of their upbringing that they should be part of a community and that the good of the whole must necessarily take precedence over the individual’s immediate wishes. Suicide, self-harm, drugs etc. are the result. I have great respect for families who, against all odds, manage to raise healthy and well-functioning children, but as a whole we are a dying people and no one seems to want to change that – not even on the right wing.

With the foreigners, this is different. The families are far more robust. Girls don’t get drunk from the age of 14 and they don’t sell their bodies for a burger in a gate on Strøget. They don’t go around playing with boys and are therefore not disturbed in their schooling. Therefore, they often achieve good results in school, but suddenly they quit, get married and devote themselves to their true destiny. It’s just as it should be – it’s just a shame that they are not Danes and will never be able to become Danes. But Denmark will be theirs – they will conquer it with their abdomen, while Danish women are busy “realizing themselves” at the expense of the whole. This is one of the “Danish values”.

Another point of attack against Islam is the Muslim view on homosexuality. Here too, we bring our false values that weaken us. Sexuality really only has one purpose: reproduction to ensure the survival of the group. That it can also be very enjoyable is another matter. Homosexuality as such has no place in nature’s great household – which is why it is hated in both the Koran and the Bible and actively opposed by Islam, while the national church has long since renounced Christianity. For the same reason, it should not be supported by us. Of course, we do not think it is necessary to whip homosexuals and hang them from construction cranes. You could argue that they are handicapped to a mild degree and should therefore be pitied. They are missing out on the most important things in life, which is a shame for them – and not a reason to chase them through the streets like we used to do. We should be past that stage. However, homosexuals must accept that their practice may be abhorrent to normal people and that they must keep it within their own doors. Ordinary people also have a right not to be offended! There are no special rights associated with this disability, no marriage and certainly no adoption of children – it is simply a crime against the children and an attack on the healthy family as the cornerstone of society. If they won’t accept it, a healthy society will respond. We don’t want parades in the streets and we don’t think there is anything to be proud of in that regard – but nothing to be ashamed of either. However, homosexuality today has to some extent become a fad – a choice. It is a product of the general pornification of society, where sex has been made what it’s all about and a public issue, and that is unacceptable. It’s one thing to be born with a disability, it’s another to consciously choose it. It’s like sawing off your own leg, and society cannot accept that. This topic should not be part of the public debate. And it’s not just homosexuality, but sexual life in general that should be kept under wraps. If anything, it is a private matter!

In this respect, our guests may not differ much from the Danish population as far as the men are concerned, but not the women! As mentioned, they are too valuable. And sex is still not a public issue, just as there is no room in Muslim society for discussions about whether there are 50 or 70 “gender identities”, or for other egocentric identity-political discussions and the associated culture of violation and splitting the natural community into atoms. The Muslim community is centered on Allah. From him come the values, and you submit to him if you want to be part of the community. If you don’t, you will ultimately be killed. For Christian immigrant groups, the community works in much the same way – only without Allah. You are nothing – your people are everything.

This is not a bad attitude to have. It gives the group strength, and if the group is not strong, the individual will also be weak. Danish society today consists of weak individuals with no strong common group affiliation. This is the road to certain doom. This is another of the “Danish values”. It is one of the reasons why we stand to lose to Muslims and other foreigners.

For many on the right, it is these “values” that foreigners must adopt in order to become “Danish”. They must become as degenerate as we are. It will take some time before that happens, and by then we will have long since disappeared from the history books.

Another example of straying can be seen in the relationship with Iran, where large sections of the right were overjoyed by Trump’s assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani and full of support for American warfare in the Middle East, even grateful that they will “save” us from terrorism. However, let us be clear that we have no quarrel with Iran. If we have a terrorism problem in Europe, it is not primarily Iran’s fault – it is our own. We have let millions of foreigners into Europe and these foreigners have brought terrorism with them. A very large proportion of them do us no good – they want to take over our countries and destroy our civilization. If we didn’t have foreigners in the country, we wouldn’t have terrorism – it’s as simple as that. We would live as peacefully as we lived here 60 years ago and it is very difficult to see what benefits this multiculturalism has brought. This is one of those questions that is often asked but never answered – simply because it cannot be answered positively. Think of what we wouldn’t be able to do with our money if we didn’t have this burden – and think of all the time and attention this foreign element demands. What filled our newspapers before they arrived? It did things that concerned our lives and our culture.

The blame for having these foreigners, and with them terrorism, lies solely with politicians and the rest of the elite! And yet the Danes continue to elect them. They were the ones who should have been eliminated, not Soleimani. He is none of our business and the US has no business in the Middle East. The US intervention has been devastating and we have just seen in Syria how the US is ready to betray its allies, in this case the Kurds, at any time.

We can only repeat what we have said before: It is the destabilization of the Middle East by the US (and thus Israel) that has provoked mass immigration to Europe and set the whole of North Africa on fire. The only reasonably stable state left is Iran – and it too must be destroyed by any means necessary.

We have no special love affair with the regime in Tehran. However, that is none of our business, because we are not the ones who live there and the people who live there have to find out for themselves. Under no circumstances should they be granted asylum here.

It is perhaps worth repeating a little history. At the beginning of the last century, Iranians established a so-called democratic rule within the framework of a constitutional monarchy, but this was overthrown by Britain and the US in a coup in 1953 and replaced by an absolute rule under the Shah – but effectively controlled by the two powers that made Persia their main support in Western Asia along with Israel. The Shah’s rule was certainly not bad – it turned Persia into a modern Western-oriented state – but his dependence on foreign countries and especially on Israel gradually created a growing popular opposition to him. The people didn’t want secularization – they wanted Islam and they didn’t want to be allied with Israel. Ayatollah Khomeini filed for asylum in Paris, from where he directed an intense cassette tape propaganda for the creation of an Islamic terrorist state. It used to be good practice that you cannot actively engage in politics when you have political asylum. It would probably have been a very good idea to prevent him from doing so, and that was probably when the US should have supported the Shah, but they let him fall – and that’s why we have the regime we have today, and that it is strongly anti-American is probably no surprise to anyone.

It didn’t get any better when Iraq under Saddam Hussein, with American support, attacked Iran and inflicted a very bloody war on it in the 80s. However, they did not succeed in breaking Iran – and shortly afterwards, America also let Saddam Hussein fall, as it had let the Shah fall. As mentioned, the United States is not a faithful ally – only towards Israel does it never fail. One can’t help but wonder why the US prefers that small piece of land without oil or other important raw materials to the entire Arab and Muslim world. For anyone who knows America, the answer is self-evident. Jewish power in the US is so great and paramount that no one can become president or get elected to any other office – except maybe dog catcher – without the support of American Jews. Kennedy tried to prevent Israel from getting nuclear weapons – and look what happened to him. Significantly, this is the only angle of the Kennedy assassination that has never been thoroughly investigated. Both Clinton’s daughter and Trump’s adult children are married to Jews. The US is effectively an Israeli colony ruled from Jerusalem.

However, it is also a war of values, and we should be waging one against the US. American ‘values’ and the American way of life are deadly to any people who indulge in them – but it’s a first-class dance of death. Add to that the fact that it is from the US that the destructive ideas of human rights, queer theories, gender theories, rape culture, the fight against whiteness etc., etc. come. It is from American intellectuals (often of Jewish descent) that we learn to be ashamed of our history and culture because it is colonialist, fascist, racist, male chauvinist, etc. In Iran, English has reportedly been removed from the school curriculum on the grounds that the English language is only used as a medium of harmful influence. How true! We should follow suit.

Wherever you go in the world, you will find countless American academies, schools and universities that attract flocks of children and students – especially from the “upper class” who think it is smart, modern and progressive to have such an educational background. Unfortunately, the fact of the matter is that American education is largely worthless. The purpose of this American cultural imperialism is not to impart knowledge, but to destroy everything that is healthy in a people. Unfortunately, this is the system we have copied in the so-called Bologna Process.

It’s difficult to see how a nationally conscious Dane can support America and still keep his universe together. “Yes, but America saved us from Hitler!” Yes, and they gave us the world we have today. They gave us mass immigration and mass rape, the European Union and the free movement of fraud and other crime. They destroyed our education, our families, our peasantry and our business. They took away all our cultural values and gave us emptiness instead! Without the victory over Hitler, Europe today would still be populated by rooted white people with their cultural consciousness intact – and that is the most important thing. Political systems come and go, but as long as the people remain, civilization will live.

We must therefore also beware of adopting the language of the enemy and uncritically throwing around words like Nazi, fascist, racist, etc. as insults and to annoy Hitler whenever we need something negative to compare to. This is not the place to go into a lengthy showdown with Hitler, about whom much bad things can be said, but the same can be said about Stalin, Churchill, Truman and pretty much any other leader of a certain stature. The difference between them is that Hitler lost and was unable to defend himself, while the others have been allowed to write history as they want it to appear. And historians have not been given much freedom to correct that picture.

However, Hitler’s starting point was European culture and civilization and respect for the natural order. All these concepts had suffered damage after the First World War and he was now trying to repair this damage. The difference between his society and those of England and the United States was partly economic and partly rooted in German history and mentality. In terms of race, there was absolutely no difference – only that in Germany it was the Jews they concentrated on, as there were no others of a more alien race. There were in the US, and the racial laws in the southern states were somewhat stricter than the Nuremberg Laws. However, the National Socialist society lacked a braking device, and therefore the development was allowed to get out of control. Had Hitler been killed in the 1938 assassination attempt, he would have gone down in history as one of the greatest statesmen of all time – and the world would probably have been spared many disasters. Perhaps Europe would have been saved. I recently found a book in a bookstore in Baku with the translated title “History doesn’t like subjunctives, but …”. It is about the struggle for oil during the Second World War, but the title could also apply here. Counterfactual history is kind of pointless, but exciting.

Fascism is a political ideology that wants a strong state modeled after Mussolini’s Italy. Nazism is actually a term of abuse for National Socialism, an ideology that wants a strong people. For National Socialism, the people are more important than the state, but a strong people creates a strong state. Racism is simply love for Denmark or any other people you may belong to. Racism does not imply contempt for other peoples, but recognizes the differences between them. When you see right-wing writers throwing around words like red fascists or red Nazis, it makes no sense. The thugs and terrorists who today persecute and harass nationalist Danes and obstruct their meetings are the very same communist thugs who exercised the very same terror against the followers of Hitler and Mussolini – and who necessitated the creation of a defense against them, in Germany SA. The difference is that national-minded people then defended themselves, while today they bend their necks. I have always wondered why the right has not been able to create a response to Demos, Redox and other communist intelligence services. The only answer I’ve been able to find is incompetence and lack of focus.

However, the mistakes of the past and the shortcomings of the past must never divide today’s patriots. We cannot change the past, but we can learn from it if we will study it and think about it, instead of reacting like Pavlovian dogs. It is our mortal enemies who have written history. The fact that Hitler said something does not necessarily mean that it is wrong! Unfortunately, it is very often – but of course not always – right!

You could compare the right wing to a group of children trying to put together a puzzle. They have all the pieces, but they are missing the lid of the box where the picture of the assembled puzzle is. Therefore, they can’t put it together. That’s the picture we on this blog would like to help give them!

The first and most important realization, however, is this sad statement: It is our own fault that we are approaching extinction, not the fault of foreigners, not even of politicians and elites. It is Mr. and Mrs. Denmark’s own fault. Our opponents are only strong because we are weak. As long as we run in opposite directions and celebrate false values and false ideals, things will not change. As long as we do that, we are doing the enemy’s bidding and moving closer to the abyss day by day.

Translated from the Danish with the help of AI