From Farmers to Firepower: India’s War Drills, Israel’s Quiet Hand, and the BRICS Fault Line Nobody Is Watching

India is now airing war-preparation instructions on public television. Not in whispers, not buried in late-night newscasts, but in the middle of the day—on every channel. The message is explicit: here’s what to do if you’re attacked, how to find shelter, what to listen for. It’s no longer theory. It’s a warning dressed as instruction.

The subcontinent is not a stranger to tension, but this isn’t the usual border posturing. The official tone, the level of public dissemination, and the chilling normalcy with which these PSAs are presented suggest something far more serious. The Indian government is not merely preparing the military—it is preparing the population.

In recent days, the Line of Control in Kashmir lit up again with shelling and drone activity. According to Reuters, Pakistan reported that three of its air bases were targeted by Indian missiles. Yet, after this flare-up, calm returned. The Indian Army confirmed that border areas experienced a relatively quiet night following Operation Sindoor, which reportedly struck militant camps across the LoC (). While a ceasefire has been declared, this calm feels less like resolution and more like a pause between acts.

But to focus only on Kashmir is to misread the broader theater. The confrontation isn’t local—it’s global. This is the visible tip of an iceberg reshaping the post-Cold War order.

India’s growing alignment with the expanded BRICS bloc—now including Russia, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Brazil—is upending the unipolar model dominated by the West. What began as an economic forum has hardened into a multipolar counterweight, developing energy trade routes, alternative currency systems, and parallel intelligence-sharing networks. India, meanwhile, walks a precarious line—balancing deeper economic ties with Russia and China while relying on defense and surveillance support from Washington and Tel Aviv.

That’s where Israel enters the battlefield—as per usual. Though not a BRICS member, Israel has deeply integrated itself into India’s defense infrastructure. Since the 2008 Mumbai attacks, the two countries have forged a potent alliance around counterterrorism and digital warfare. Israeli Heron and Searcher drones patrol India’s northern borders. Spike anti-tank missiles are deployed across Indian forward posts . Real-time airborne radar systems, co-developed with Israel and Russia, surveil contested terrain.

Behind the scenes, Israeli advisors have trained Indian intelligence and urban combat units, and Israeli cybersecurity firms—some allegedly tied to NSO Group–grade spyware—have helped India track dissent, espionage threats, and insurgent networks. Israel, officially outside both NATO and BRICS, has become a central nervous system in the world’s most volatile flashpoints—from the Golan Heights to Gujarat.

Meanwhile, the China factor looms large. Pakistan has increasingly turned to Chinese military technology across domains—drones, missile systems, radar arrays. India, conversely, leans on Western and Israeli platforms. As U.S. Senator and former Navy SEAL Tim Sheehy recently stated: “Pakistan appears to have won all its partnerships so far with Chinese technology, as opposed to Western technology, which India uses mostly. This is not to our advantage. China is no longer a ‘near-peer competitor,’ but a ‘peer-to-peer competitor’ with the United States.”

Indeed, Hua Bin notes on Unz:

The world just witnesses a shockingly one-sided air war between Pakistan and India last week. Pakistan air force, equipped with Chinese weapon systems, took down a large number of India air combat assets while suffering zero loss.

The air battle featured Chinese-made J-10C fighters, PL-15 air to air missiles, HQ-9 air defense system, and ZDK-03 AWACS. Reported India losses included 3 French-made Rafale fighters, 1 Russia-made Su-30, 1 MiG-29, and 1 Israel-made Heron UAV.

What makes the outcome so shocking is that the Rafale fighter, sold to India at $240 million each, is often lauded as the most advanced European fighter jet, didn’t manage to put up any fight in the confrontation with J-10C. The Mica and Meteor air-to-air missiles carried by Rafale were discovered intact/unfired in the wreckage.

J-10C, by no means a backward fighter, is considered as well past its prime in the Chinese air force whose more advanced fighters include J-20, J-35 (both 5^th generation stealth fighters), J-16, J-15 (4.5^th generation multirole fighters), let alone the 6^th generation fighters (J-36 and J-50) that are being tested.

J-10C is mainly for exports these days. Pakistan has acquired them at $40 million per unit. A few Middle Eastern nations are also considering the jet, including Egypt. Typically Chinese military export is one or one and a half generation behind what the PLA equips itself.

In all fairness, Rafale would be a strong match against J-10C in a head-to-head dog fight. At $240 million, it is even for more expensive than F-35.

Then, how did the Indian air force suffer such a humiliating one-sided loss against a much smaller Pakistan air force?

The answer lies in the strength of the integrated Chinese weapon system used by Pakistan. 

Rather than using a hodgepodge of weapons sourced from France, Russia, Israel, and the US, as is the case with India, Pakistan utilized a full suite of highly integrated and synchronised air combat systems from China …

This geopolitical tech divergence isn’t just academic—it’s battlefield reality. In a world increasingly shaped by real-time cyberwarfare, energy flows, and AI-driven surveillance, the supplier matters as much as the strategy. And BRICS, flush with Chinese capital and Russian oil, is rapidly building the scaffolding of a new order.

But perhaps the earliest tremor of this multipolar conflict came not from the battlefield, but from a tweet.

In 2021, when Rihanna expressed support for Indian farmers protesting agricultural reforms, the Modi government reacted as if hit by an airstrike. Greta Thunberg followed. Delhi accused these figures of participating in an international conspiracy. A domestic labor protest had transformed into a global political fault line.

This hypersensitivity wasn’t just political theater—it was strategic paranoia. It revealed how India saw itself: a rising power under siege, not only by neighbors, but by ideas, images, and narratives. Rihanna’s tweet wasn’t merely seen as a PR headache—it was treated like a front in a war of perception.

And four years later, it seems prophetic.

India isn’t merely preparing for conventional war—it’s readying itself for a multi-domain crisis that spans physical borders, cyberspace, energy pipelines, satellite networks, and information flows. Kashmir is one front. Taiwan is another. The Red Sea, Gaza, the South China Sea—all fragments of an entangled system of friction.

This isn’t a world war in the 1940s sense. It’s a networked war—one where militaries, media, malware, and monetary systems clash across time zones and platforms.

And as BRICS fortifies itself against Western economic weapons, and Western proxies consolidate along Asia’s rim, the question isn’t if there will be a flashpoint.

It’s whether we’ll even recognize the war when it’s already well underway.

Wars no longer need declarations.

They just need normalization.

And when a government begins airing public instructions on how to survive an attack, that normalization has already begun.