Israel’s Man Inside the CIA Betrayed the US, New Files Show
Israel’s Man Inside the CIA Betrayed the US, New Files Show
CIA spymaster James Angleton shaped the US-Israeli relationship in secrecy. Newly unredacted files shed light on his wanton betrayal of his country to assist Israel’s theft of US nuclear material and global spying operations.
Veteran CIA counterintelligence chief James Angleton secretly oversaw a top-level spy ring involving Jewish émigrés and Israeli operatives without “any clearances” from Congress or Langley itself, according to recently declassified documents published as part of the Trump administration’s pledge to disclose all available information on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
The files provide a fresh and often disturbing look at a spy described by historian Jefferson Morley as “a leading architect of America’s strategic relationship with Israel,” detailing Angleton’s role in transforming the Mossad into a fearsome agency with global reach, while assisting Israel’s theft of US nuclear material and protecting Zionist terrorists.
Angleton established the Jewish emigre spying network in the aftermath of WWII, with the apparent goal of infiltrating the Soviet Union. But as the files show, the spymaster considered his “most important” task to be maintaining the supply of Jewish immigrants flowing from the Soviet Union towards the burgeoning Israeli state.
According to Angelton, his Jewish assets were responsible for 22,000 reports on the USSR, generating several intelligence masterstrokes. Chief among them was the publication of Soviet Prime Minister Nikita Kruschev’s famous 1956 secret speech denouncing Stalin, which the spymaster boasted “practically created revolutions in Hungary and Poland.” Elsewhere, Angleton bragged that his arrangement with Israel had produced “500 Polish intelligence officers who were Jewish” who “knew more about Polish intelligence than the Poles.”
Other passages appear to show Angleton taking credit for securing the “release” of several Zionist terrorists affiliated with the Irgun militia before they could be convicted for bombing the British embassy in Rome. Though the group had been captured by Italian authorities, the newly-disclosed files indicate the terror cell was freed on the orders of the CIA.
The information was originally divulged in 1975 to senators serving on the Church Committee, which probed widespread abuses by US intelligence in the decades prior. Congress was particularly interested in claims by New York Times foreign correspondent Tad Szulc, who testified under oath that Angleton had personally informed him that the US provided technical information on nuclear devices to Israel in the late 1950s. The new documents show that Angleton was deceptive under questioning, and evaded questions on Israel’s nuclear espionage efforts on the record.
Additional unsealed FBI documents, which refer to Israel’s Mossad as Angleton’s “primary source” of information, confirm that the CIA’s head of counterintelligence relied heavily on Tel Aviv to solidify his position within the Agency – and also add to the growing body of evidence that Angleton may not have been operating with US interests in mind throughout his 21-year tenure.
Other newly declassified files from the FBI have shown that Angleton maintained a wildly lopsided relationship with the Bureau, which saw federal agents deferring to the CIA counterintelligence chief after they caught him surveilling the correspondence of huge numbers of Americans. The files show Angleton openly admitting he would have been fired if Langley caught wind of his leaks to the Bureau.
A side-by-side analysis of the now-unredacted Church Committee files compared with their previously-released versions from 2018 demonstrates that even after 70 years, Washington felt compelled to conceal details of its real relationship with Israel’s founders. Over a dozen references to “Israel,” “Tel Aviv,” or descriptions of figures as “Jewish,” which were scrubbed from the 2018 release, can now be viewed on the National Archives site.
The documents on that page reveal that Angleton repeatedly lied to multiple Congressional bodies, including the Church Committee, which investigated CIA abuses, and the House Select Committee on Assassinations, which probed the murders of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. Angleton was similarly evasive when interrogated over Israel’s nuclear weapons program, and about CIA knowledge or complicity in the scheme.
Those documents also reveal that Angleton’s CIA counterintelligence staff ordered Lee Harvey Oswald’s removal from federal watchlists six weeks before Kennedy’s assassination, despite his classification as a high security risk. The surveillance of Oswald was personally overseen by a member of Angleton’s intelligence network of Jewish emigres, Reuben Efron, a CIA spy from Lithuania. Angleton had placed Efron in charge of an Agency program called HT/Lingual which intercepted and read correspondences between Oswald and his family.
Numerous historians have questioned why the CIA counterintelligence chief insisted for decades on personally overseeing what he described as the “Israeli account.” Though several off-the-record interactions remain impossible to parse, the documents show that when grilled about his “unusually close” connections to the Israeli Mossad, Angleton acknowledged forming an “arrangement” in which, “in most simplistic terms, [the Israelis] were informed that we would not work with them against the Arabs, [but] that we would work with them on Soviet bloc Intelligence and communism.”
Freeing Zionist terrorists
One of the earliest instances of Angleton’s cooperation with Zionist elements came as Zionist militants embarked on a terrorist campaign to pressure the British colonial authorities to leave Mandate Palestine.
In October 1946, three months after they bombed the British administrative headquarters at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, members of the right-wing Irgun militia planted explosives in the British embassy in Rome in a failed bid to assassinate the UK’s ambassador to Italy.
According to Angleton, after the Irgun “blew up the British embassy in Rome” in 1946, the CIA intervened to ensure they escaped Italy without prosecution.
“We had the members of the group, and then we had the dilemma again as to whether we turned them over to the British authorities,” noted Angleton, who had served as counterintelligence chief for the Italian branch of the Office of Strategic Services, the CIA’s predecessor. “And we were in a position to make the decision one way or the other. And eventually we came down on the side of releasing them.”
A secret deal with the Mossad
As Washington sought to manage the political ruptures caused by the creation of Israel, and monitor the wave of Soviet migrants pouring into the self-proclaimed Jewish state, Angleton framed his takeover of “the Israeli account” as a convenient way for US intelligence to kill two birds with one stone.
“The other side of the Israeli problem was that you had thousands coming from the Soviet Union and you had the Soviets making use of the immigration for the purpose of sending illegal agents into the West and breaking down all the travel control, identifications and so on. And so there was both a security problem and a political problem.”
To manage these “problems,” the US and Israelis brokered a deal involving the secret exchange of “papers and signals, communications intelligence, [and] the other products of intelligence action,” Angleton stated. The spy chief claimed the only records of the 1951 arrangement held by the US side would be in the possession of the Agency, and admitted US Congress had been left in the dark, telling senators, “I don’t think there were any clearances obtained from the Hill.”
Asked by one legislator how it was “possible for succeeding directors of the intelligence agency to understand what the agreements were between” US and Israeli intelligence, Angleton responded: “Very simple. They saw the production to begin with. And they met with directors or the head of Israeli intelligence. And they met with Ambassadors and prime ministers. And they were very much involved.”
Grooming Zionist spies “outside the structure” of the CIA
Angleton was especially protective of what he called “the fiduciary relationship” with Tel Aviv, assembling a close-knit clique of Jewish Americans with dubious loyalties to manage it as World War Two drew to a close. “I started from the south side with two Jewish men who worked with me during the war,” he explained. Having “sent them over as ordinary people under cover” to get their bearings in newly-formed Israel, Angleton “brought over six others and put them through some months of training, outside of the structure” of the CIA.
“To break down the fiduciary relationship – which is after all a personal business – all the men I have had, were men who stayed in it and came back to headquarters and went back to Tel Aviv, they went to the National Security Council, and went back to Tel Aviv, et cetera.”
“It was probably the most economical operation that has ever been devised in the U.S. Government,” Angleton crowed. “I don’t think there was [sic] more than 10 people that were hired in the same process.”
Having trained these spies “outside of the structure” of the CIA, it’s unclear how Angleton ensured they remained faithful to US national security objectives, or whether he ever intended to.
Enabling Israeli theft of US nuclear material, spying on America
Angleton’s role in enabling Israel’s wanton theft of nuclear material from an American facility is one of the more shocking episodes in the US-Israeli relationship. The scene of the crime was the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation, or NUMEC, a uranium processing facility in Apollo, Pennsylvania owned by a Zionist financier named David Lowenthal. In 1965, Zalman Shapiro, a fellow Zionist hired by Lowenthal to run the plant, illegally diverted hundreds of kilograms of nuclear fissile material to Israel. Posing as a scientist, the notorious Mossad spy Rafi Eitan visited NUMEC three years later to continue the heist.
As Jefferson Morley documented in his biography of Angleton, “The Ghost,” the late CIA counterintelligence chief made sure the CIA looked the other way as Israel constructed its first nuclear weapon out of the stolen fissile material. According to Morley, “Angleton, it is fair to say, thought collaboration with Israel was more important than U.S. non-proliferation policy.”
A 1977 investigation by the US Government Accountability Office found that the CIA withheld information about the NUMEC nuclear theft from the FBI and Department of Energy, and “found that certain key individuals had not been contacted by the FBI almost 2 years into the FBI’s current investigation.”
The latest batch of Church Committee files add new detail about Angleton’s compromising of US national security to benefit Israel, and his attempts to cover up his betrayal.
During his testimony before the Committee, Angleton was pressed about media reports alleging that he and his counterintelligence unit provided Israel with technical support for constructing nuclear weapons. He strenuously denied the charges, insisting the CIA had never played any role in providing Tel Aviv with nuclear materials. However, when questioned about whether “Israeli intelligence efforts” were ever conducted in the US “aimed at acquiring… nuclear technology,” Angleton equivocated.
First, he blustered, “there have been many efforts by many countries to acquire technical knowledge in this country, and that doesn’t exclude the Israelis.” Asked if CIA counterintelligence had “certain knowledge” of Israeli agents “trying to acquire nuclear secrets in the US,” Angleton pleaded, “Do I have to respond to that?”
The Committee then went “off record” at the senators’ request, making Angleton’s responses impossible to scrutinize.
In a secret 1975 memorandum to the FBI, the ousted CIA counterintelligence chief disclosed that he had “avoided any direct answers” during his Senate testimony on Israel’s spies carrying out “intelligence collection” to gather “nuclear information” in the United States.
Just days later, a Bureau report on “Israeli intelligence collection capabilities” revealed Angleton entertained “frequent personal liaison contacts” with Mossad representatives at Israel’s Washington DC embassy between February 1969 and October 1972. This “special relationship” involved “the exchange of extremely sensitive information.”
Further, the 1975 FBI memo on Angleton disclosed the Israeli embassy’s establishment of a “technical intelligence network” seven years earlier which was directed by an Israel scientist who worked on Tel Aviv’s nuclear program. This may explain why Angleton was so cagey under Senate questioning.
“Israeli matters” trigger Angleton’s downfall
The Church Committee files show Angleton bristled at then-CIA Director William Colby’s efforts to apply a modicum of transparency to the Agency’s activities, especially as they related to Israel. The spymaster warned that if the USSR ever caught wind of Langley’s use of the self-proclaimed Jewish state as a de facto halfway house for communist turncoats, they would almost certainly end their policy of encouraging Eastern European Jews to migrate to Israel:
“This idea of opening the doors and letting the light in, and breaking down compartmentation, and breaking down the need to know, would inevitably put in jeopardy the immigration, if the Soviets should learn the extent of the activities,” Angleton stated.
Colby fired Angleton in 1974 after the New York Times revealed that he devised an illegal program of domestic spying targeting antiwar American dissidents. In his testimony, Angleton framed their clash as an interpersonal conflict, describing Colby as “not my cup of tea professionally or in any other way.”
Yet Angleton also acknowledged to the Senate that a “dispute in connection with these Israeli matters” between himself and Colby contributed to his departure from the Agency. Was this a reference to the former spook’s involvement in Israeli theft of US nuclear secrets, enabling Israel to acquire the bomb?
Whatever the case, it was clear why Angleton would be remembered more fondly in Israel than inside the country he ostensibly served.
On December 4, 1987, the director of Israel’s Mossad and Shin Bet intelligence services gathered in secret on a hillside in Jerusalem to plant a tree in honor of Angleton. They were joined there by five former Israeli spy chiefs and three former military intelligence officers.
Despite attempts to keep the ceremony under wraps, two local reporters managed to evade the cordon to record the ceremony for the former CIA counter-intelligence director, who had died seven months prior. Together, the Israeli spooks laid a memorial stone that read, “In memory of a dear friend, James (Jim) Angleton.”
A CIA [Angleton]-Israel link was pretty obvious during his lifetime, so these details may be “shocking but not surprising” (as the saying goes). The advantages in counter-espionage against the USSR had of course their price, upping the ante by the usual suspects. Whether this contributes to the “Zionist Theory” of the assassination of JFK remains to be seen.
All of it is in MCP,s “Final Judgement”, written in 1993 and the last edition 2006, 750pages flat out truth about the murder of Jfk and the following coup d’etat in America. If one presuppose the rotschild and rockefeller clanes as the chief culprits, everything going on in the world today, is quit easy to understand. Take Fed away from them, and the sterlingpound of course, and theey aare history
Yes, there is a lot of circumstantial stuff around Jews, Mafia, Oilmen, JFK’s women, the CIA & even Roger Hollis of MI5. What matter first of all, however, are the ballistics and the role of the Oswalds.
arneld..arend..arsen…arson..whateverspector, ‘designed’ the ‘magicbullit’ bullshit, and the corrupt commission opend their greedy hole and swalloved. Oswald had absolutely nothing to do with the shootng, he was not even in the building but outside down at the entry (“Final Judgment”, photos).
The purpose of the murder, like with Martin Luther King (who first went into the talmudic trap, and later understood the agony of the Palestinians, and began critizising the murderers of the Semitic and Christian people) and Jrk, was to create the ground for a ‘smooth’ transision of ‘power’ but first they had to soften up the gullibles and then stiff by shock. All 3 began showing heavy reistance to the talmudic crime inc, and all officials doing that are to be eliminated. It,s in their psychowritings (the best of the gentiles shall die, we are the destroyers and so on of perversities), the sc protocols.
The 1960’s in the west, was a preplanned venture to shake up enough, to draw attention away from their criminal projects, like steeling weapons and nuclear materials for the buildup of the “hole in the wall”. Any official resisting, bang..
Like 119, any official catching the bastards in their lies..bang. No one was to stop them in their sincire efforts in destroying Middleeast, and then later rest of the world. And anyone believing it’s possible to negotiate with these entities, ought to rethink
@z
Sorry, but Lee and Marina, along with George de Mohrenschildt and George Joannides, and much else, have to fit into the total explanatory picture. You need to study all the relevant material more thoroughly, but it is clear that your mind is made up with half-baked stuff about the “sc protocols” expressed in semi-literate prose &c.
What a disgrace: Blackrock-Merz had a Nazi grampa.
(But for which Merz is probably the greater disgrace.)
https://libya360.wordpress.com/2025/06/16/the-nazi-heritage-of-germanys-chancellor/
Still puzzling to me is what motivated James Jesus (a middle name he ditched) Angleton to be such a devoted enabler, protector and servant of the Jews who helped Israel become a nuclear power.
It was not material gain, nor power, which in his case was not the goal but the means empowering him to carry out his life-long campaign of treason against his own nation.
Angleton was a patriot but also paranoid, a condition not unknown here. He linked with Israeli intelligence after the USSR attacked Zionists in what he saw as a mutually beneficial anti-Soviet activity. He had been taken in by Kim Philby and was conscious of this failing. He was justified in thinking that Harold Wilson was a GRU asset. To come to any even tentative conclusion about these matters it is necessary to study a considerable amount of relevant material, and to balance assertion with contrary argument.
@ Emma Smith
Angleton made friends with Jews at the end of WW2 – not later on.
As for the JFK assassination, there are scores of books with different angles published in the last ten years alone; an Augean stable. LHO was involved, but he was not “lone” or a “nut”. My guess: either KGB or Mossad, but much more likely the former, as Mr K had a motive, the Soviets obviously faked a “Hunt” letter.
@ Arnold Bannerman
The USSR & Red China appear in 1960 to have divided areas for global communisation: the “West” and the “Third World” respectively. Khrushchev’s “hare-brained scheme” to put nuclear missiles in Cuba was viewed askance by the Chinese, but it was a factor in the revenge he wanted on JFK. The Kremlin wanted to accelerate revolution in the USA by triggering civil conflict from the murder of the “liberal” President to be blamed on the “far right” and of General Walker to be blamed on the “far left”. Oswald’s failure to kill Walker and escape anonymously to Cuba further angered Khrushchev’s critics who removed him in 1964.
Angleton reportedly rushed to London to discredit as a KGB “plant” Oleg Lyalin who defected to MI5 with details of sabotage and assassination plans. Maybe he was The Mole all along.
Piper’s finally updated two volumes are impressive, but the question of who fired the fatal shot and the precise role of Oswald still require an answer.
All botanswers are proisraelanswers, shilling for that stolen ‘country’ or gatekeeping for it. Either way it is stolen territory and angleton definitely was not an American patriot, besides in a bots algoritms. He was an example of a perfect traitor, and the reason his ‘honorable’ funeral was in secrecy. I repeat, Everything is qait easy to understand when one know who is paying the bills…winkwink
Or as Ezra Pound said; “you do not know much about politics, economics, history or military strategy, until you know who is lending what to whom”. And as we know, he spent 14 years at st elisabeth sc hospital, or was it beteshda (does’nt matter, its their same shitt) because he disliked the sionists killing us off. As they are doing, still today, and ‘we’ fight their wars helping them killing us off. Is that realy very smart…
James Jesus Angleton was a crypto Jew. His mother was a Mexican Marrano (converso). He was a Jewish nationalist serving Jewish interests. This goes to show how easily Anglo Saxon intelligence can be infiltrated & sabotaged by crypto Jews.
Evidence?
Angleton’s lifelong anti-American Judaism was proved when his RC mum baptised him “Jesus” but didn’t have him circumcised. A typically cunning ploy. Never trust a Krypto-Jew.
Ole Ez was a poetic genius but he confessed to Noel Stock towards the end that he had not got it right on “usura” and the anti-Freudian Dr Fuller Torrey drew attention to his flaws.
But of course it’s all simple, isn’t it, the “jew” is behind everything. No other factors or facts need to be considered, or integrated into the explanation of events.
The sun obviously goes round an obviously flat earth – Columbus was a Sephardic jew, Galileo’s hook-nosed mother Jewlia the Cloaked was also jewish, and the Moon Landing was obviously faked by Hollywood which is run by jews. It all makes sense once you see the Light.
There are hundreds of books on Kennedy’s assassination, scores even since Vincent Bugliosi tried unsuccessfully to put a lid on the ever bubbling pot. All the old red-herrings reappear in mostly worthless “theories” – “grassy knoll smoke”, “magic bullet second assassin”, “three tramps”, “umbrella man”, etc. My reservation about Ion Pacepa’s (bungled) Kremlin plot, in contrast to a Mossad hypothesis, was prompted by the enthusiasm with which the recently deceased Zio-con “Vulcan” Michael Ledeen puffed the book.
However, I think the mass of evidence points to conscious involvement of Oswald, who asked for the communist lawyer John Abt to defend him after arrest, and also to Soviet/Cuba links. In brief, Oswald “had been allowed back with his Russian wife after spending two and a half years there…given some training in espionage methods because he possessed…spying equipment….known to have been in touch with Soviet agents in Washington and Mexico City…Johnson was keen to cover up any Soviet implication because…of a demand for vengeance from the American people” (Chapman Pincher, “The Secret Offensive” [1986], p.284-286).
MCP has written all about it. Case closed, after “Final Judgment”