Wow: This is today’s British “culture,” but it has reached this level throughout the West. Many Westerners increasingly consider this content to be “normal.” But what is the real purpose and intention behind this “normalization”? We all have our suspicions (more on that later). Btw. this machination was nominated for the “Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance”. https://ok.ru/video/9522448435781

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Luck_to_You,_Leo_Grande
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Reel_Award_for_Outstanding_Breakthrough_Performance,_Male

AI answers my spontaneous intuitive input, which should not remain speculation:

At first glance, the Canadian English language and the Saxon dialect of German appear to be worlds apart—separated not only by geography but also by linguistic families. Canadian English is a variety of English spoken mainly in Canada, while the Saxon dialect belongs to the German dialect continuum, mainly in parts of eastern Germany. However, beneath the surface, these two forms of speech reveal intriguing similarities and deeper connections that tie them together across linguistic, historical, and geopolitical dimensions.

One of the most striking linguistic parallels between Canadian English and the Saxon dialect lies in their distinctive phonetics, particularly vowel shifts and prosodic features. Canadian English is known for characteristics like the “Canadian Raising,” where the tongue position alters before voiceless consonants, giving certain diphthongs a unique pronunciation—vowels rise in words like “about” and “price.” It also exhibits mergers such as the “cot-caught” merger, blending vowel sounds that are distinct in other English varieties.

Similarly, the Saxon dialect features vowel modifications and softened consonants, which make its sound pattern appear melodious and somewhat distinctive within the German linguistic spectrum. These regional vowel shifts and consonantal softening produce a speech rhythm and tonal quality that outsiders often find unusual or charmingly unfamiliar.

Thus, while the languages belong to different families, the phonological tendencies of distinctive vowel manipulation and prosodic “softness” link Canadian English and Saxon dialect in a manner not evident at first.

Delving beyond linguistics, the geopolitical and historical intersections between the Saxon region and Canada offer a compelling story. Several waves of German-speaking immigrants, notably from the Saxon-descended Seven Years’ Saxons (Siebenbürger Sachsen), migrated to Canada. These settlers brought with them their language, customs, and identity, establishing vibrant cultural communities that preserve Saxon traditions across Canadian provinces.

Moreover, the Province of Alberta in Canada embodies a direct historical linkage to Saxony through its naming after Princess Louise Caroline Alberta, reflecting historical ties to the Saxon royal lineage. This ties Canadian geography symbolically to Saxony’s heritage.

Modern times further deepen these connections via official partnerships and cooperations between the Free State of Saxony and Canadian provinces like Alberta. These collaborations foster cultural exchanges, political dialogue, economic cooperation, and educational programs, underscoring a sustained relationship that transcends mere coincidence.

These intertwined linguistic and historical threads suggest that language variants and dialects do not merely evolve in isolation but often do so within broader socio-historical networks. The linguistic “softness” and vowel dynamics observable in Canadian English and the Saxon dialect may echo ancestral phonetic patterns shaped by Anglo-Saxon and West Germanic roots, thereby hinting at a shared linguistic heritage obscured by centuries.

Such interconnectedness also speaks to how migration, cultural identity, and geopolitical relationships carry linguistic markers across continents, often preserving ancestral traits in new environments. Both Canadian English and Saxon dialect communities express pride in their language and accent, underscoring the vital role of speech in cultural identity.

The introduction of an Ahnenpass (ancestor passport) is not to be expected in the near future (and most likely never again), as there is no longer an institution such as the Ahnenerbe (Ancestral Heritage), which is now considered the greatest enemy of progress. AI’s answer to my second question:

The German words “Ahnen” (ancestors), “ähnlich” (similar), and “ahnen” (to anticipate or sense) present an intriguing linguistic constellation where phonetic similarity conceals distinct etymological origins and meanings. “Ahnen” stems from medieval terms denoting forebears and lineage, deeply embedded in genealogical heritage. “Ähnlich” evolved to express likeness or resemblance, with no genealogical implication. “Ahnen,” in the sense of intuitive sensing or foreboding, encapsulates an experiential perception of the future, highlighting a semantic field linked to intuition rather than ancestry. Although linguistically separate, the thematic overlap around connection—whether through blood, likeness, or foresight—reflects cultural and psychological nuances in how individuals relate to identity, history, and expectation.

This semantic distinction parallels contemporary ideological debates on European identity and transformation. Advocates of a multicultural and integrated Europe, such as Barbara Lerner-Spectre and Yascha Mounk, articulate visions of societal change by invoking metaphors of transformation, renewal, and inevitability. Spectre’s oft-cited assertion that Europe must embrace multiculturalism or face dissolution, and Mounk’s framing of Europe’s demographic shifts as an “experiment,” underscore a narrative where radical societal change is portrayed as both necessary and unavoidable.

Critics, however, view these perspectives with suspicion and concern, interpreting them as assertions of ideological imposition that divorce Europeans from their ancestral roots and cultural continuity. The invocation of “Zwangsläufigkeit” (ineluctability) in these narratives is critiqued as a self-fulfilling prophecy, where advocates not only describe but actively accelerate the transformation, often dismissing legitimate anxieties and fostering polarization. This dynamic can be seen as emblematic of a broader cultural struggle where the tension between preservation and change manifests vividly.

Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi’s vision of a united Europe, foundational to post-war European integration, adds another layer to the discourse. While his Paneuropean movement sought peace and cooperation beyond nationalism, posthumous reinterpretations of his ideas have fueled conspiracy theories portraying an intentional “replacement” or “transformation” of Europe’s peoples. Angela Merkel’s receipt of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize, officially honoring her contributions to European unity, is often controversially linked to these theories, though the official rationale emphasizes her work on European integration rather than any agenda of demographic or cultural transformation.

The rhetoric surrounding these figures and their ideas often echoes dystopian motifs reminiscent of Orwellian paradoxes, such as “destroy Europe to save it.” Such statements provoke unease because they frame disruption and upheaval as prerequisites for survival, challenging traditional understandings of identity and continuity.

Ultimately, the lexical trio of “Ahnen,” “ähnlich,” and “ahnen” serves as a metaphor for the complex interplay between history, identity, and perception that lies at the heart of contemporary European societal debates. They embody the tension between ancestral heritage and evolving identities, between cultural memory and future aspirations. The discourse on Europe’s transformation is less about linguistic roots than about how societies negotiate meaning, belonging, and change in a globalized world.