Why are some people responding to the assassination of Charlie Kirk with the phrase “Nothing ever happens”?
I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the very same people who now tweet “Nothing ever happens” in response to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, will be tweeting that they always knew there’d be a civil war if one actually does break out. As the cliché has it, nothing ever happens . . . until it does.
A not uncommon response among right-wing “very online” people to the vicious assassination of Charlie Kirk has been three simple words: “Nothing ever happens.” On the one hand, this is, perhaps, an attempt to be a contrarian and seem deep and edgy accordingly. Many conservatives are reacting with understandable fury to the murder of the 31-year-old Trump ally and are arguing that this is a “turning point” and even that it is the first shot fired in some kind of civil of war.
But on the other, “Nothing ever happens” appears to reflect a common, evolved psychological bias. As a rule, our psychological biases evolved, in essence, on the Savannah, when we were still living in our evolutionary match. Now that we live in a very different environment — one where we regularly interact with strangers and even with people of different races — this bias may be more of hindrance than a help.
As Pascal Boyer pointed out in his book Religion Explained, we have many evolved cognitive biases. We over-detect causation. Show people dots moving at random on a screen and they will insist that they are moving in some kind of pattern and even that there is a process of causation behind this pattern, such as claiming that the blue dot starts it off, for example. It is adaptive to find patterns in the world such that we can better make sense of and control the world. If we over-detect patterns, then we won’t miss a pattern when there is one. This leads to a bias towards seeing everything as interconnected and, of course, towards conspiracy theories.
Similarly, we are evolved to over-detect agency. If we are in the primeval forest and we hear a sound then, if we wrongly believe it to be a wolf, we have lost nothing. But if we incorrectly assume it to be the wind, when it is in fact a wolf, we may have lost everything. So, it makes sense, it is adaptive, to assume that there is an agent behind events. This is why, when people are under stress and thus highly instinctive, the whole world may feel like an agent and the whole world may suddenly all appear interconnected and to make sense. And this leads us to certain kinds of religious experiences.
The “Nothing ever happens” response is likely to be a similar kind of adaptive bias. If you are right-wing, in the insane Clown World in which we find ourselves, it may be adaptive to be pessimistic in order to manage your own feelings — such can be the crushing nature of disappointment. According to the study “Defensive Mechanism: Harnessing Anxiety as Motivation,” an optimum level of pessimism motivates people to prepare and reduces anxiety about an uncertain world. It results in better academic performance; being able to think more logically.
Another study, “Pessimism, optimism and depressive symptoms,” found that mildly depressed individuals with pessimistic outlooks were better at assessing risks and avoiding unrealistic optimism (and thus crushing disappointment), aiding decision-making in uncertain environments. But, of course, the fact that you feel pessimistic does not mean that your predictions about the future are correct, as they have nothing to do with the nature of the evidence. You may be examining that evidence in a slightly more logical manner than the optimist, but this does not make your gut reaction inherently right. Your reaction, to use internet parlance, is a “cope.”
A second, broader, explanation behind the insistence that “Nothing ever happens” may well be Nomalcy Bias, which is that we tend to disbelieve or minimize warnings of serious threats. Let’s be clear, there will be nothing pleasant about a civil war, except, possibly, in the very long term, if the side we are on wins it. Telling yourself, in such a context, that “Nothing ever happens” will reduce immediate stress. Also, in pre-history, it may have been true that nothing much ever does happen, at least nothing out-of-the-ordinary. Accordingly, this cognitive bias means that we don’t waste energy thinking about or reacting to threats that are probably nothing to really worry about.
Naturally, this cognitive bias can have very serious consequences when something seriously out-of-the-ordinary actually does happen. In 79 AD, Mount Vesuvius erupted, destroying the city of Pompei and most of its inhabitants. The townsfolk ignored the signs, such as intense earthquakes in the build up to the eruption. People continued to bake bread and renovate their homes even as ash began to fall on the city. This is why so many of them were found buried in their houses, having made no attempt to escape. To give a more recent example, in summer 2022, there was a terrible heat wave in the UK. Many people downplayed its seriousness and ignored government warnings (possibly understandable, considering the lies recently told during Covid). The result was houses catching fire and 3000 excess deaths due to heat stroke and related issues.
The cry of “Nothing ever happens” may well, in part, reflect this cognitive bias, a bias which has been adaptive for most of our history. The bias likely explains why sudden changes — such as the collapse of the Eastern Bloc and of the Soviet Union — generally seem to take us by surprise. All of the signs of collapse are there but our reassuring normalcy bias means that we are adapted to not notice them and to not think about them. Then, when it does happen, another cognitive bias hits in, “hindsight bias,” where, in order to feel that your world makes sense and that you are perceptive, you tell yourself that it was all inevitable and even that you knew it was going to happen all along.
We vary in the degree to which we are instinctive. Intelligent people are better able to rise above their cognitive biases, meaning that they are less instinctive. Neurotic people, subject to constant anxiety, are less able to do so, so they may be more instinctive. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the very same people who now tweet “Nothing ever happens” in response to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, will be tweeting that they always knew there’d be a civil war if one actually does break out. As the cliché has it, nothing ever happens . . . until it does.





Nothing correct ever happens. Israel assasinated him. They arrest an actor and let the real assasin flee to Israel because they are all blackmailed by Israel via Epstein.
Well, George, let’s see what happens at the actor’s trial.
This is a great article. I’ve noted the psychological type over the years but never really unified my observations into a theory.
It’s amazing that there are no comments on it. Could this be due to embarrassment?
I think in this case the “nothing ever happens” line is intended in the same way as the “you won’t do shit” line we find online on 4 Chan, etc. The idea is to induce in the more suggestible members of the board adesire to go out into the world and “make something happen”. It’s a bit of reverse psychology from OP.
Thanks Edward.
Kevin Barrett has an interesting piece over at Unz; “Charlie Kirk and the Cult of Human Sacrifice.”
He makes the case that it was probably the Jews who took Kirk out since Kirk was beginning to change his stance on Gaza and Israel in general.
One thing that’s changing that many thought would never change is the worldwide wake-up in regards Jewish supremacy and how fast it seems to have happened because of Gaza and Palestine. Psychologically that makes me feel good. Will truth, goodness come? Will the bad guys be finally brought to justice…
Charlie Kirk pre death was a marginal figure; most common people had no idea who he was. Post death, his murder js being treated as if he was JFK. Let’s get a grip folks; most of his political career was being a good goy, claiming that Palestinians and Palestine never existed. To me there’s no net gain or loss here. Should he have been killed? No but he wasn’t a guy I would want to be in the same foxhole with….
“Nothing ever happens.” Well, if you listened to the weepy wife’s speech yesterday (Sept. 12th), by gum, she’s going to make it happen! “…the cries of this widow will echo around the world like a battle cry.” says Erika Kirk. She will continue, improve and increase her late husband’s cause/movement/organization. The gossip is that Ben Shapiro is going to be the brains behind the coming show. Hooo-boy. I can hardly wait.
Anyway, Mr. Dutton, this is a mighty interesting article you wrote.
How could his wife not be “weepy?”
Wow. I wasn’t a fan but I can understand a wife’s grief over her murdered young husband.
The deep sadness I feel is not just for Kirk but for the white man in general. The comments sections are filled with leftist ghouls celebrating his murder, and this is a celebration of white genocide…..and this is worth a tear or two.
Am I mistaken, or have I not heard or watched a video clip of Charlie Kirk where he said he met his wife on one of his shabez goy propaganda trips to Israel?
Would that not suggest that his wife, now his widow, is likely jewish?
Kirk’s wife is a cradle Catholic.
Mrs Kirk is a cradle Catholic.
Some people imagine that the only bad things that happen are caused by Jews, but the arrest and trial of the murder suspect on this occasion might actually not be a hologram contrived by Mossad mirage cybertronics.
I am not saying that he is not really dead, he is, but that whole scene in the funeral home strikes me as weird, to put it mildly. What kind of widow who’s recently experienced what she did decides to put on a mic and invite people to view, and listen to, her interactions with her husband’s body?
That video of Erika weeping over, and touching, the entity in the coffin – I have to say that based on the appearance of Charlie’s hands, they do look artificial.
Truly, I don’t give that much of a hoot about who did what to whom. I can see, though, that the killing of CK is being used as an excuse to ban “hate speech”. What rubbish. The trumpites can’t see that this will turn on them.
The purpose is a mental psyop. To say “nothing ever happens” when a critics of sionist behaviour is murdered, what they want to say is; “it’s not important, because one who died was a…critic of sionistic behaviour and ‘superiority’ and “we are the choosenits and above and beyond all that”
Ron’s new piece on the Kirk assassination is pretty good for those interested. It’s over at Unz.com of course.