Jewish ethics: Non-Jews have no moral worth

I’ve often noted that at its core, Jewish ethics states that non-Jews have no moral worth. The below is from the Tucker Carlson Network daily email. It’s a great example of Jewish ethics (what’s good for the Jews), and it’s good that mainstream conservatives like Carlson understand  this. Now they have to apply it to the rest of Jewish activism.

These People Are Sick
A concerted effort is underway to paint those against America’s unconditional Israel support as radicals. But is that right? Consider this story:

A new documentary premiered this week. It’s called Breaking Ranks: Inside Israel’s War, and it features interviews with Israeli Defense Force soldiers on the “war” in Gaza.

That is an important point. Netanyahu supporters can’t play their usual game and cast these testimonies aside as biased, out of context, or antisemitic. They literally come from the IDF. And they are damning.

“There are no innocents in Gaza.”

That’s the philosophy the soldiers admitted to abiding by while executing their country’s “military operations.” In the eyes of the IDF, every single Gazan is appropriate to target because they’re all just a bunch of terrorists.

It doesn’t take a foreign affairs expert to know how absurd a view that is. They’re all terrorists? Really? It’s a laughable stance. Over half of the Gaza Strip’s October 7th population was under 18. They were children. But it didn’t matter. The Israeli government fired away.

“One time the Brigade Rabbi sat down next to me… [and said] that we must take revenge on all of them, including civilians,” IDF armored corps officer Yatom Vilik said in the film. “That we shouldn’t discriminate, and that this was the only way.”

We shouldn’t discriminate. Just kill them all. 

That is not a Western way of thinking. Collective punishment is an assault on the very “civilized world” Israel purports to represent. If all Palestinians are Hamas, then all U.S. citizens must be neocons. Would Iraqis be justified in murdering stadiums of people in Chicago and New York as revenge for George Bush’s invasion of their country? Of course not. Because the average American did nothing wrong. Neither did the typical Gazan civilian. But again, it didn’t matter.

“How many people is it legitimate to kill, to kill a Hamas battalion commander?” an IDF air force colonel was asked.

“There’s no limit,” he replied. “If you ask me, I would have pushed them all into the sea with D9 bulldozers after October 7th.”

Bulldoze the innocents? That’s Nazi talk. [More appropriately, Communist talk, as in the mass murders perpetrated by Jews in the early decades of the USSR.] So is this:

“If you want to shoot without restraint, you can,” an IDF tank unit commander said. “One time, there was a building that was being used for humanitarian purposes, [but] one of the commanders really, really wanted to target [it]. So he fired a shell at it anyway.”

Bombing a humanitarian aid facility is not the behavior of a moral army. It’s an act of terrorism. How would Benjamin Netanyahu react if Hamas did the exact same thing? What would Mark Levin say? What about Randy Fine? It’s easy to predict. They’d be out for blood. But when we criticize their side for doing it, they call us antisemites. It’s a joke.

One more quote for good measure:

“Multiple IDF commanders and soldiers admitted to the genocidal intent of the IDF, with one saying, ‘In the current political climate, in the state of Israel, there is no value to any human life that is not Israeli, or better still, Jewish Israeli.’”

These people are sick. No human is inherently more valuable than another because of their identity. God created everyone in His image. It doesn’t matter if you’re American, European, African, Middle Eastern, Australian, or from the North Pole. There is no such thing as blood superiority. Those who disagree, like the IDF’s leaders, have more in common with Adolf Eichmann than Jesus.

Remembering that American taxpayers fund this lunacy is enraging enough to cause a blood pressure spike. Each day it continues is a day of national humiliation. The United States government needs to grow a spine and free itself from this venomous “special alliance.” And that’s a moderate stance. The other side is the radicals.

14 replies
  1. PvtCharlieSlate
    PvtCharlieSlate says:

    Theodor Fritsch (1852-1933)
    The Riddle of the Jew’s Success
    published 1927

    All the motives and activities of the Jewish brain are directed towards obtaining advantage and material gain. And, in spite of this, the Jew imagines that, especially with regard to morality, he is a very exalted being. No one speaks more effusively about ethical values than the Jews, but whoever takes the trouble to examine what they understand by that expression, discovers that they mean the art of seeking their advantage by means of the understanding, under the pretext that they are engaged in some praise-worthy and unselfish effort. If one wished to sum up Jewish morality in one concise phrase, it would read as follows: “All is moral which brings advantage.” The Jew is incapable of applying a higher standard to the values in life than that of advantage or profit.
    /

  2. PvtCharlieSlate
    PvtCharlieSlate says:

    //
    1) “Against Our Better Judgment”
    by Alison Weir

    ISBN 9 781495 910920 
www.ifamericansknew.org

    The book has 90 pages of text and 90 pages of end notes. The notes are important. Read the notes as you encounter them.

    
2) “Judaism’s Strange Gods”
    by Michael Hoffman 

    ISBN 9 780970 378484 http://www.revisionisthistory.org

    This is a condensed version of a very much larger work. The author has three prefaces: one for the general reader, one for the Christian reader and one for the Jewish reader.
    From the back cover: “Liberating the reader from the accumulated shackles of decades of misinformation, this book shows that Judaism’s god is not the God of Israel, but the strange gods of Talmud and Kabbalah, and the racial self-worship they inculcate”.

    Take your blood pressure meds before reading.
    //

  3. Tim
    Tim says:

    “No human is inherently more valuable than another because of their identity.”

    An “unearthly” dream that has no equivalent in reality. One should try out this “argument” on a woman who has chosen another man. Then she will surely agree at least to a threesome. We know that this is remote from all truth. Btw, how much of his fortune does Carlson, a multimillionaire born into a wealthy family, donate to those in need?

    So the crucial question is: for whom or for what do all people have the same value? Perhaps for extremely altruistic monks, who may once have existed (at least in theory), and of course for God himself, who allows all this injustice to happen. And then there is this miserable “evil Nazi” babbling adopted from the Jews, as Prof. MacDonald has already correctly pointed out.

    But people seem to have VERY different values, we see it every day in our oh-so-Christian society: the homeless, drunks, junkies, and beggars in the pedestrian zone, etc. A university graduate is more valuable to a company than someone without a degree. Your child is more valuable to you than a stranger’s child.

    And whether the (of all things Jewish) God “created everyone in his own image” can certainly be understood as blasphemy when it comes to, for example, an Aborigine or a criminal. We can perhaps agree that every human being possesses a kind of inherent dignity (as long as they do not deny it themselves).

    An elderly person can contribute something through their wisdom and experience, more so in their field than a young person. But we consider those who do not contribute to our common good to be worthless. Today, it is forbidden to say this out loud. Instead, we simply ignore them and thereby convey their worthlessness.

    According to the universalist creed, which goes back directly to Judaism, it seems downright cynically anti-divine that Jews honor their vengeful God by slaughtering non-Jews. They do this out of unheard-of hubris, because in doing so they unconsciously create justification for their persecution, which they then implement again in their victim status.

  4. Tim
    Tim says:

    PS: It is obvious, of course, that even the goy, so despised by the Jews, can possess a kind of “value,” namely when he denies, harms, sabotages, and dismantles himself and his own kind in the service of the Jew.

  5. Stephan Blackford
    Stephan Blackford says:

    The idea that “God created everyone in his image”, is a statement of belief not fact (as far as I’m concerned). The Jews believe for whatever reason that the Gazans do not have the right to live in Gaza. Once again, a belief.
    I have a feeling that international law and human rights are only invoked when it serves the interests of the day. And are frequently discarded when they become cumbersome.
    They can help bring peace and stability to the world but ultimately some men will always seek power. The Jews know this. The rest of the world is too naive to realize it.
    There is no family of nations nor will there ever be. It was always a fantasy to placate those who believe in a good God by those who care nothing for goodness.

  6. Thomas Jefferson VII
    Thomas Jefferson VII says:

    The solution is fairly simple. Guys like Tucker and Fuentes need to compile a list of who has Israeli citizenship in the government and corporate hierarchies and blast it out constantly and everyone needs to demand they renounce their Israeli citizenship or be stripped of their US citizenship and deported to Israel.

  7. Joe
    Joe says:

    “It doesn’t matter if you’re American, European, African, Middle Eastern, Australian, or from the North Pole. There is no such thing as blood superiority.”

    Oh, really, Tucker? Where are the high-trust societies? Are they in India? Are they in Africa? Are they in the Middle East? No. They are (or were) in Europe and North America and Australia… when they were WHITE countries. I am not afraid to admit that there IS such a thing as “blood superiority”. That doesn’t mean that we should slaughter or enslave lesser-evolved peoples… but it DOES mean that we should proudly DEFEND our lands from mass hordes of these third worlders so as to maintain that high-trust environment. We owe it to our progeny and their posterity.

  8. Freddy
    Freddy says:

    With a broad smile, 18-year-old firehead and soyboy Lasse Stolley from Eckernförde in Schleswig-Holstein wins the sympathy of the international mainstream press and media. The young self-declated “train nomad” is unlikely to be short of offers of all kinds. https://news.google.com/search?q=lasse%20stolley&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

    With a few restrictions, he is living his quasi-propertyless/crypto-communist dream life. Every day, depending on the weather, he decides on his next destination, now across Europe. I recommend turning on the English subtitles, as the AI-generated audio translation filters out all ambient noise. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjV9CTM-j6Q

    At the end of the video, there is a message (as always from an ugly white woman) to support their “Peace Love & Om” channel in order to finance the construction of a school in sub-Saharan Africa. After all, all Africans should be able to read that a life at the expense of Western Europe’s and North America’s welfare system is much more worthwhile than living in self-generated garbage.

    • Freddy
      Freddy says:

      Lasse naturally deserves all our sympathy
      for constantly running away from himself.
      Will he ever become a patriot? Most likely
      not, because home means a “standpoint.”

      In a perverse role reversal, Lasse has taken on
      the place of the rootless eternally wandering
      Jew, lost in time & space; while the Jew is now
      defending his stolen rogue state with claws &
      teeth instead of Lasse. What a cohencidence!

Comments are closed.