The Globalist Game: Jewish Pornographers, English Soccer and the Ship of Theseus

I’m grateful to David Baddiel. Now there are five words I never thought I’d write. Baddiel is a repulsive and unfunny Jewish comedian who has, I’d say, relied on ethnic nepotism and astute self-promotion to earn a wholly undeserved prominence in the British media. I’ve never laughed at any of his so-called comedy. No, I’ve only felt repulsion at his appearance, tone and mannerisms.

The unfunny Jewish comedian David Baddiel, fan of porn and soccer (image from Wikipedia)

Nevertheless, I’m grateful to him. This is because he — or the thought of him, at least — helped me properly make some obvious but important connections. Baddiel used to be famous for two “passions,” you see. The first was his passion for pornography; the second was his passion for the London soccer-team called Chelsea. His passion for porn isn’t prominent in his public persona any more, but his passion for Chelsea still is. He’s an ugly, unathletic, once-overweight dweeb who enjoys watching fit young men running around after a ball. And one day the obvious belatedly struck me: hold on, isn’t there a parallel between his passions for porn and for soccer? Both those passions are passive and voyeuristic. He’s a spectator of other people’s intercourse or athleticism, watching them for a wholly self-centered buzz. And aren’t you yourself behaving like voyeuristic Baddiel, who repulses you, when you yourself continue to watch and be interested in soccer?

The Sporn Industry

The uncomfortable answer to that question was: Yes. I’ve never devoted much of my time or attention to sport, but I do still enjoy watching highlights of soccer games. I’ve never been overweight and unhealthy like Baddiel, but the thought of him has helped me become more detached and self-critical about my enjoyment of soccer. It’s also helped me properly grasp those obvious but important connections. In some important ways, men are interested in watching sport for the same reasons that they’re interested in watching porn. And like watching porn, watching sport captures and diverts male attention and energy. Marx said that religion was the opium of the people. He meant that religion was a consolation for the pains of existence, not that it was a stupefier cynically invented by the elite to keep the masses under control. But that misreading of Marx on religion may be accurate when we think about porn and sport. Porn and spectator sport are indeed the stupefying opium of the male sex.

And there’s good reason to believe that the elite — and in particular the hostile Jewish elite — have promoted both porn and sport as stupefiers. White nationalism would surely have triumphed by now if White men had given it a tenth of the energy and attention that they’ve given to watching porn and following sport. We talk about the “Porn Industry,” but we should also talk about the Sporn Industry. We should see sport and porn — sporn — as parallel stupefiers of White men. And another reason for that is a connection between porn and sport that isn’t so obvious. It’s a Jewish connection, something that has been brought home again to me by two things I’ve recently read. When I read a criticism of porn by the Jewish feminist Julie Bindel, I didn’t need to be told about the prominence of Jews in porn. And in fact Bindel didn’t mention Jews at all. Except that she did. She was effectively obeying a simple instruction: “Tell me that porn is Jewish without telling me that porn is Jewish.” Here’s some of what she wrote:

The annual XBiz Awards (this year renamed as the XMAs), which I attended as a journalist in Los Angeles, is regularly portrayed by its organisers as the ‘Oscars’ of the porn industry. And it has many of the trappings of the renowned Hollywood ceremony, including the long catalogue of nominations, the gushing acceptance speeches, the jokey host and the frequent movie clips.

There the similarity ends. Degrading, trashy and vulgar, the XBiz awards are not a celebration of any real creative achievement, but of the ruthless exploitation of women for financial gain. The sheen of respectability cannot disguise the reality that this is a sordid industry built on cruelty and abuse, no different to prostitution. The porn producers and distributors I saw strutting around are just pimps in bow ties. The entire event was a grotesque parody of a real awards ceremony. […]

But the obsession with profit means that the pornographers are incredibly mean, as reflected not just in the poor pay of performers but also in the penny-pinching ceremony. The XBiz Awards might call themselves the porn ‘Oscars’, but the organisers were so stingy that the tables in the room just had a few dips and bowls of peanuts, while a grossly over-priced cash bar operated throughout the evening. (“The Porn Oscars,” Julie Bindel Substack, 30th October 2025)

So the so-called Porn Oscars are “Degrading, trashy and vulgar.” They celebrate “the ruthless exploitation of [White] women for financial gain.” And the organizers are “incredibly mean.” Plus, the Porn Oscars have just been renamed the XMAs Awards. Does all of that sound Jewish to you? It does to me. The renaming sounds like a sardonic sneer at Christmas and Christianity (see “The War on Christmas Updated” for proven examples of Jewish sneering at Christmas).

Lord Triesman, ex-communist Jew and soccer gatekeeper (Wikipedia)

But what about the Jewish role in soccer? Well, Jews don’t dominate English soccer in the way they dominate the porn industry, but they are over-represented there. Not as players and managers, but as owners and administrators. And they seem keen to occupy gatekeeping roles in soccer just as they are in politics. A very Jewish-looking Jew called Lord Triesman, who was ennobled by Tony Blair, became the first independent Chairman of the English Football Association in 2008. Triesman’s parents were active communists and Triesman himself alternated between the Communist party and the Labour party. Now another leftist Jew has been appointed as a gatekeeper in English soccer. David Kogan, whose surname is a variant of Cohen, worked for England’s Premier League as “chief media rights adviser from 1998 to 2015.” He’s very rich and has regularly donated money to the Labour Party. In 2025 he seems to have claimed another part of his reward:

[The Labour politician] Lisa Nandy has been found to have “unknowingly” breached public appointment rules with her choice to be the boss of England’s new football watchdog. The culture secretary named sports rights executive David Kogan as the government’s preferred choice to run the new regulator in April. But she later stood back from the process, after establishing that Mr Kogan had donated £2,900 to her 2020 Labour leadership campaign, according to a report. Sir William Shawcross, the commissioner for public appointments, said Nandy should have checked beforehand and taken “any necessary consequential action”. (“Minister broke rules over football watchdog appointment,” BBC News, 6th November 2025)

I don’t think saying that Kogan “donated £2,900” to a Labour politician is the right way of putting it. I think “invested £2,900” in a Labour politician is more accurate. And I think his appointment as “boss of England’s new football watchdog” was part of the return on his investment. But why would a rich Jew want that role? Kogan is presumably a fan of soccer, but do he and other Jews recognize and value the role of soccer in stupefying — and corrupting — White men? I think the answer is yes: SoccerJoos like Kogan and Triesman do recognize and value soccer as an opium of White men.[1] And they want to ensure that soccer continues to stupefy and corrupt White men. It stupefies them by absorbing their attention and energy, and it corrupts them by training them to regard Blacks as heroic and valuable.

The Ship of Theseus

Paul Kersey has extensively documented how the same is true of football in America, but there’s another factor at work in English soccer. And that other factor is another reason for Jews like David Kogan and Lord Triesman to be attracted to soccer. What is it? It’s globalism. American football isn’t internationally popular and connected in the way that English soccer is. At its highest levels, English soccer is now thoroughly globalist and thoroughly capitalist. It’s dedicated to pursuing success and profit by treating teams and players as fungible business assets to be enhanced and traded without regard for any organic local connections. Okay, it would be impossible for any big English soccer team to suffer the grotesque fate of the Brooklyn Dodgers, the baseball team that was wrenched across a continent to become the Los Angeles Dodgers,[2] but all teams in the Premium League now remind me of a philosophical conundrum called the Ship of Theseus. In Greek legend, the ship of the hero Theseus was preserved in his honor, being repaired and renewed as the years passed. But the repairs and renewals meant that one day nothing remained of the original ship. Its wood, its sails, its ropes, everything had all been replaced. So was it still the same ship?

Philosophers have argued for centuries over that question. I’d say that no, it wasn’t the same ship, but it was a kind of shadow or child of the old ship and therefore entitled to the same name. If the design was the same and everything was made of the same materials in the same way by the same kind of craftsmen, then in some sense it was still the upper-case Ship of Theseus, even if it wasn’t the literal, lower-case ship of Theseus. In a similar way, soccer-teams in Britain remained the same teams for many decades after they were founded. The players, owners and fans slowly changed, retiring or dying and being replaced, but they were all White British, born and bred in Britain, steeped in the traditions of a sport invented by the White British. There was a continuity, a bond of blood and culture, which meant that teams founded in the 1870s were the same teams in the 1950s. And so they were still entitled to call themselves by the names they were founded under.

Right instinct, wrong execution

But I can’t say that of any modern soccer-team in the English Premier League. I think they retain the names of the original teams without retaining the essence or authenticity. When the players are foreign and the managers are foreign and the owners are foreign, in what sense but the geographic is the team still an English team? Well, a majority of the supporters are still English — properly English, in that they’re White and have deep ancestral roots in the British Isles. But I think those Whites are supporting simulacra, not the authentic and organic teams that their grandfathers and great-grandfathers supported.

It’s particularly grotesque to see White fans supporting so-called English teams with many or even mostly Black players. It’s the sporting equivalent of inter-racial cuckold porn, the pornographic sub-genre where White men gain perverted pleasure from watching Black men have sex with their White wives or girlfriends. Just as sex is a pleasure properly intended for the reproduction of children and the enhancement and celebration of a pair-bond, so spectator sport is a pleasure properly intended for the reproduction, enhancement and celebration of local community and culture.[3] But Blacks are — and are intended to be — the dissolvers of White communities and culture. They’re an acid, not an enhancer. Ordinary White soccer-fans instinctively understood that when Blacks began to enter English soccer prominently in the 1970s. Unfortunately, those fans protested in uncouth ways that must have pleased the hostile elite. Making monkey-noises and throwing bananas at skilful, stoical Black players did not help the White cause. The instincts were right; the execution was wrong. The uncouth protests helped the imposition of Blacks on the British Isles.

The sporting equivalent of racial cuckold porn: a White fan supporting an all-Black team

That’s part of why the sons and grandsons of the banana-throwers now cheer Black players rather than making monkey-noises at them. In effect, they’re cheering their own replacement. That certainly pleases the hostile elite and explains, I’d suggest, why Jews are attracted to gatekeeping roles in soccer. The sport has been deracinated, stripped of local connections and authenticity, converted into propaganda for globalism and negro-worship. Like porn, it truly is an opium of the male sex. And millions of White men are literally paying to be stupefied and sautéd in propaganda! What’s not to like for SoccerJoos like David Baddiel, David Kogan and Lord Triesman?

[1]  “SoccerJoos” is a play on “Socceroos,” the nickname of the national soccer-team for Australia.

[2]  The nearest equivalent to the Brooklyn Dodgers in British soccer has been Wimbledon, a small team in south-west London that was bought and relocated to a “new town” called Milton Keynes. Fans of the old Wimbledon refused to accept the loss of their team and started a new team, Wimbledon AFC, that eventually found its way back into the fully professional league. But this new Wimbledon is really the old Wimbledon, as the relocated team had already acknowledged by soon changing its name to Milton Keynes Dons and abandoning its claim to the original team’s history.

[3]  And just as pornography is a perversion of and parasite on genuine sex, so the Premier League is a perversion of and parasite on genuine English soccer and its history. In the past, it was routine for major English teams to have local heroes like Nat Lofthouse of Bolton Wanderers, Stanley Matthews of Stoke City and Tom Finney of Preston North End, all born and bred in the towns whose teams they starred for. Major English teams in the 2020s have un-local heroes recruited like mercenaries from all over the globe.