The Peter Mandelson Scandal and Those Perennial “Schizophrenic” Conspiracy Theories
Ever since I started researching “controversial” topics, I have found myself irritated — whether at a certain conferences or on Twitter — by the same thing happening over and over again. No matter how logical my argument nor how much data I present in order to make sense of, for example, the reasons for the decline in IQ among natives of Western countries there is always somebody who will interject, “The Jew! The Jew! It’s all because of the Jew! Why do you never mention the Jew!”
I have mentioned Ashkenazi Jews and, indeed, I caused some controversy by cautiously defending some aspects of Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique in the journal Evolutionary Psychology in 2018. I noted that Jewish people are higher than Europeans in ethnocentrism, for example. However, for some people this is not enough. They insist that there is a Jewish conspiracy — at the hands of elite Jews — to destroy Western civilization and that this explains pretty much everything nefarious in the Western world: mass Third World immigration, sexual degeneracy and so on.
This idea is frequently mocked as being the worldview of right-wing schizophrenics. Sometimes, there is added to it the notion that the elite are not only Jewish-influenced but are sexual degenerates, as in Eyes Wide Shut. Unfortunately, recent revelations from the latest batch of Epstein Files give this right-wing schizophrenic a great deal more to contemplate, and worry about, than he previously had. What has come to light in the UK is almost unbelievable.
The key reason why the UK is a lawless tyranny is the proto-Woke revolution that was initiated by New Labour between 1997 and 2010. During this period, they deliberately flooded the country with non-white immigrants in order to “rub the right’s nose in diversity,” as one of their advisers put it. They reformed all public institutions — the universities, the civil service, the judiciary, the police and much more — making it the law that they must promote diversity, effectively politicising them; creating a permanent Woke Deep State. They introduced many anti-free speech laws and ramped up prosecutions under existing laws. Introducing positive discrimination in this deep state, White people became second class citizens in their own country, cementing left-wing influence further. The powers of parliament were farmed out to Quangos that were constitutionally pro-diversity. In effect, there had been a Gramscian march through the institutions; a cultural revolution.
The “architect” of “New Labour” — of a party obsessed with image pretending it wasn’t left-wing despite senior cabinet ministers being ex-Communists — was a Jewish spin doctor and later a cabinet minister called Peter Mandelson, himself a member of the Communist Party in the 1970s, according to MI5. Mandelson’s self-professed best friend was Jeffrey Epstein and Mandelson continued to be very friendly with Jeffrey Epstein even after Epstein was convicted of a paedophilia offence in 2008. Mandelson was twice fired from Tony Blair’s government for corruption, but by 2009 he was back in the cabinet as Business Secretary. In the financial chaos of 2009 — the so-called Economic Crisis — Mandelson forwarded emails to Epstein, sometimes almost immediately after receiving them, which revealed to Epstein state secrets via which he could enrich himself with inside information regarding the UK’s economic plans.
Epstein was clearly an ethnocentric Jew who dismissed White people as low intelligence “goyim” (an offensive term for all gentiles) and he was the central node in a social network of the super-elite — Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Prince Andrew and so on — and would hold debauched parties, seemingly involving young prostitutes with some of them being under-age, via which elite people could network with other elite people, rendering him extremely influential. Mandelson was clearly part of this network because the Epstein files included a photo of Mandelson in a shirt and underpants talking to a young woman, whose face is the usual black square. There is evidence that Epstein was acting as a spy for Israel given his very close connections to Ehud Barak, former Prime Minister and Director of Military Intelligence for Israel. It has also been suggested that he was a Russian spy, and the Polish Prime Minister — who presumably has good sources — has asserted that this is probably so. It would follow that whatever state secrets Mandelson leaked to Epstein would’ve ended up in the hands of the Kremlin. Mandelson also offered to help Epstein secure a Russian VISA.
Last year, MI5 made their concerns about Mandelson perfectly clear to the Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, but Starmer, whose wife and children are Jewish, nevertheless, ignored these concerns and appointed Mandelson the Ambassador to the US, Britain’s most senior diplomatic post. Starmer is now trying to victim-signal that he was lied to by Mandelson like everybody else. This is absurd, in that Mandelson was already a proven liar and it makes one wonder if Mandelson, who is gay, has compromat on the “family man” Starmer. It is widely suspected that Starmer is gay and, currently, 5 Ukrainian rent boys are being investigated for arson on assorted properties and former properties of Starmer’s, addresses that are not publicly known.
As I noted earlier, what has come to light is incredible and many Members of Parliament are simply stunned by it. This is certainly the worst scandal to hit British politics since the Profumo Affair in 1963 in which the Minister of War, John Profumo, was having an affair with a young model who was herself also having an affair with the naval attaché at the Soviet Embassy. Profumo lied to parliament about it and was forced to resign in disgrace.
In effect, the very heart of New Labour — its so-called architect — turns out to have been a literal traitor to his country who saw no problem taking a great deal of money from and remaining friends with a convicted paedophile and the Prime Minister either has amazingly poor judgement or is compromised in some way that the media daren’t discuss. Worse still, for the regime, the entire affair gives our schizophrenic right-wing friend what would seem to him like sound reasons to double down on his worldview.





I have read several books by Mr. Dutton. I think he lacks insight into dark triad personalities because he does have dark triad traits himself, or at least they don’t make up a strong component of his personality. Most normal people lack these traits, which makes them into easy prey for those who have them in abundance, like most politicians and other power people like Epstein. The “normies” think others have their basically good personalities and have trouble seeing that the scum always rise to the top. Take Trump for example, most can recognize him as a narcissist, but few, even smart people, don’t recognize his dominant trait of Machiavellianism. He conceals that by emphasizing his narcissism, while he keeps his enemies close and slowly betrays them.
I think you’re wrong about Edward Dutton. He’s brilliant anthropologist, researcher and writer. I detect nothing wrong with his personality.
However, you are right about Trump. He is an extreme narcissist and a degenerate. But is he also a Machiavellian? No, I don’t think so. That would be an insult to the memory of Niccolo Machiavelli.
Personally, I find Edward Dutton quite niave to the Jewish question all together.
Excellent balanced rebuttal..repartee to the wrongful slight on Mr.Dutton by..tkc..thank you K.M.**
This article summarizes well the British dimension to the Epstein scandal. Peter Mandelson, Keir Starmer, Tony Blair & comrades are the worst traitors in British history. They join Burgess, Philby and MacLean.
However, they will suffer no consequences, because the UK judiciary is totally corrupt, and controlled by perverts, druggies and Jews – the same as in New York, California and Minnesota.
I wonder if anything will come of this huge scandal. Will there be any radical changes to UK immigration policy, for example? Now more than ever, this proves that the USA (with its satellite regimes in Europe) is an Evil Empire. Russia is the good guy, because it resists, as do China and Iran. That explains Trump’s hostility to them all. Trump is an proven Israeli agent, who tried to conceal the Epstein files, to protect all his Jewish friends.
Churchill was the greatest traitor… bar none. How do we know this? He is the greatest hero of TODAY’S traitors.
“What would seem to him like sound reasons”? Surely, the data presented in Dr. Dutton’s essay might well strike any Brit, at least one whose mind isn’t hermetically sealed to the influence of “bad facts,” as being compelling enough—i.e., unschizophrenic enough—to suggest that Jews and Jewish influence aren’t as wholesome as his rulers insist they are.
Ever since the good old days of the 1950s Soviet Union, the leftist tactic of declaring that one’s opponents are mentally ill has held pride of place in their rhetorical arsenal. Yet despite the fact that throughout his career, Dutton has been hounded by Establishment critics who assault his character with veiled allusions and his publications with ad hominem attacks and straw-man argumentation, he here casually uses the expression “right-wing schizophrenics” without disavowing the phrase’s pose of physicianly solicitude, which masks an implication that the arguments of the right-wingers in question are simply too diseased to address with anything except medication or quarantine.
Dutton might be hailed as a genuinely iconoclastic thinker were he to be so bold as to call those with whom he disagrees mistaken rather than crazy and to challenge his interlocutors to do the same.
No-one is perfect. “Dotty” Dutton has done himself no favours with “jolly heretic” videos delivered in his weird voice. But a great deal of his published work, in itself, has been excellent and valuable. We now lack the calibre of minds like Raymond Cattell, J. P. Rushton, Richard Lynn, Hans Eysenck and Carleton Coon. Still, Charles Murray, Nicholas Wade, Vincent Sarich and Richard Dawkins have helped.
“They insist that there is a Jewish conspiracy — at the hands of elite Jews — to destroy Western civilization and that this explains pretty much everything nefarious in the Western world: mass Third World immigration, sexual degeneracy and so on.“
Do you live on under a rock? It seems so obvious to me that I think you need compelling arguments to argue the opposite. Begging the question is just boomerism.
To say that a Jewish elite is responsible for EVERYTHING nefarious is single-cause monomania, derided by JQ conspiracists from A K Chesterton to R P Oliver. Much and all are not synonyms.
Traitors. Traitors are worse than jews. Blaming a jew for his actions is the same as blaming water for being wet. A jew is going to jew and blaming him is not going to change his behaviour. We need to keep our traitors accountable. The likes of Starmer for instance – to keep it on topic.
Nice piece Ed. Thanks.
“ Worse still, for the regime, the entire affair gives our schizophrenic right-wing friend what would seem to him like sound reasons to double down on his worldview.”
I always hang on to hope but I basically doubled down years ago Ed. I haven’t read the part of the Epstein files where they keep talking about pizza, but it now seems that parts of QAnons‘ pizza gate theory are true. The back and forth between Ehud Barak, and Epstein is very telling and worth reading also.
What it will all change though…. I think it’s safe to say that we have come a long way to finally getting the Jewish question/problem into a large part of mass vernacular but even so, what will “that” change…. A lot I hope. I just hope that I’m here to see it.
I think there’s a chance.
http://grammarist.com/rhetoric/begging-the-question-fallacy/2
Begging the question, sometimes known by its Latin name petitio principii
(meaning assuming the initial point), is a logical fallacy in which the writer or
speaker assumes the statement under examination to be true. In other words,
begging the question involves using a premise to support itself. If the premise is
questionable, then the argument is bad.
The most basic instances of begging the question involve rephrasing. In these
examples, the statement following because just restates the initial proposition in
different or abstracted terms:
Freedom of speech is important because people should be able to speak
freely.
The death penalty is wrong because killing people is immoral.
Ghosts are real because I have had experiences with them myself.
The first example begs the question, Why is it important for everyone to have a
voice? The second begs the question, Why is killing people—and by extension the
death penalty, immoral? The third raises questions about the validity of the speaker’s
experience with ghosts. Even if she believes she’d had experiences with ghosts, she
still needs to prove that these experiences were real.
It fails my memory the name of the Anthropologists/DNA Researcher that proved that the reason that NON white anglo saxon races have lower IQs is because of HIGH frequency racial mixing among late hominids in the subtropical/SubSaharan populations. Unlike the early/late descendants of Neanderthals proto Northen Europeans hominids (Aryans) that spread mainly across the upper Northern regions of the planet, that evolved in isolation from lower IQ populations. These Aryan groups built the Great Empires of Europe,EuroAsia, with some importnat nucleus of Aryan/Caucasians that composed the higher Castes of the Indian/Iran/Mesopotamia Kingdoms. The THEORY was outright refused/denounced because IT also argues that global mas immigration racial mixing today is lowering the IQ of the native Anglo/saxon/Aryans in the Western Countries presently. Academic school testing shows downward trend in the IQ of mixed diverse students in USA, Canada, Europe, Australia etc…
What exactly is a non White Anglo Saxon? Saxony and Angleterre are two very tiny sections of what’s now north west Germany. Area has been White European since the ending of the ice age long before Germans arrived
Well in the USA Southern Italians are labeled WHITEs/anglos for general purposes, are they??? Now I have seen mix Asians/White as Anglos.JEWS as classified as WHITE/Anglos but they are neither white nor Anglos.. .?? I was surprised that some census statistical forms NO longer let people check the “Hispanic” box…It seems that they want to force Mexicans to check the WHITE box..why??? Redefining WHITE/Anglos ???
Is Mass migration of NON Whites into mostly Anglo White Christian Nations an accident??
At least it is conditional intent. “What would happen if we allow in millions of third worlders into Europe?”. The answer: genocide. The intention is clear.
Unfortunately, recent revelations from the latest batch of Epstein Files give this right-wing schizophrenic a great deal more to contemplate, and worry about, than he previously had. What has come to light in the UK is almost unbelievable.
“Almost unbelievable” to you, Mr Dutton, but not to the “right-wing schizophrenic.” So whose views on the Jooz have been closer to reality? Plus: have you ever considered how many people have kept quiet about their real views on Jooz? As Joe Sobran once said (I paraphrase): Jews are a powerless minority who will destroy anyone who suggests otherwise.
Absolutely. stellar..comment by Mr.R. W* Cheers!
Browningham: Mustache Man’s revenge. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l386CN3ENY4
https://www.gbnews.com/news/woke-madness-britain-countryside-less-white-government-diversity-plans
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoFUh2wPnVY
Pure Steincidence https://i.ibb.co/99GYcPfJ/Finkelstein.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamara_Finkelstein
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emzl7yqWuRk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcPdbjlinZc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5eieUsBPBs
Mr. Dutton IMHO often overdoes his “psychological analysis,” and draws conclusions that are a little too simplistic. Whether Hitler was an “antisocial sperg and sexual pervert,” as he concludes, is something we will probably never be able to confirm. But we do know that he had a need for social interaction with his closest circle. Even if this entourage was probably more of an audience for his monologues.
The claim that he dressed inappropriately on all kinds of occasions can only apply to the period before the 1920s, because after that he was even considered rather shy in private (avid opera-goer). His mostly deserted paintings could be interpreted as autism, but also as a keen sense of proportion and aesthetics. However, there are also sensitive portraits of people by him, which are withheld from us.
The claim that he could use his bed only in a very specific way is counteracted by the circumstances he was exposed to (traveling on his “Amerika” train, in bunkers, at the Berghof, in hotels after speeches, etc.). “Hitler needed structure because he himself was chaotic by nature.” However, it can be said that his obsession with order created a super-orderly structure out of a chaotic country.
The comparison to Napoleon (Hitler considered himself to be his reincarnation) is flawed in that there was no footage of Napoleon’s “crimes against humanity” that Hollywood could broadcast incessantly even in 100 years, and his gas chambers, which, according to a “Caribbean genocide researcher,” inspired Hitler, are categorically rejected by the suspicious guardians of the “Holocaust industry.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon%27s_Crimes
https://www.iconichistoricalphotos.com/hitler-visits-napoleons-grave/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tvf9louZhLw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuZcxQzPeFw
I have been down the mechanistic road, even writing a book on Evolutionary Psychology and politics, and I even bought some of the cover stories, like our problems were just crazy leftists who wanted to anger us by rubbing our nose in diversity.
But I saw through it all eventually because I saw what it appears you have yet to see – the surveillance assigned to you, which I have no doubt has bought a house next door to you, installed a family which looks like any other in it which is listening in your house, and which has real people following you through grocery stores, adding your purchases to your file, as seems some kind of important procedure to them. I ended up creating a whole new website at AmericanStasi.com to show all of our kind how to see that surveillance, because it is that important.
Once you see it, you realize there is a massive level of control applied to our societies, and there is no room in it for leftists to simply do something because they are having a tissy-fit. The right, the left, it is all under control and independent voices are never allowed to rise that high.
I cannot overemphasize how vital it is to understand the purposeful, strategizing underlying what you are seeing. Once you see your surveillance you will understand – these are very powerful forces we face, and they must be met head on. To look for an innocent reason things went the bad way they did, and to try and massage the environmental conditions around it to gently push against something, like the migrant flood, is to lose – and because you are losing to a fiercely powerful and capable enemy which is trying to kill you, that loss will be very costly.
If there is no conspiracy, but you formulate policy as if you face one and seek to resist, you will have at worst a slightly more aggressive policy which does what you want more powerfully. But if there is a conspiracy, and you do not act like there is one and seek to meet it and counter its strategy, it will be a real shame, for you will be the cause of the death of the White race, which in the grand scheme, does create good stuff in this world, like freedom and democracy.
Our future as a race on this planet, begins and ends with each reader of this opening their eyes to the coincidences of the surveillance when they travel out and about. Cars hitting intersections in the middle of nowhere just as you do, people entering empty shops right after you, people who pick up and move just as you do in the food court, and so on.
See the surveillance, and tell others about it, and you will be furthering the only way to save Western Civilization. Because we need that intel op outed first and foremost.
Don’t take it the wrong way, but what exactly
are you hoping to “conserve,” the status quo?
Fabulous extrapolation Mr.A.Conservative..right on point you are. Its. THE JEWS ..isreali -american or just garden variety gay jew billionaires inciting..fundibg the stench of super satanic-dystopian cyborg statism..”..no surprise there..but..we say it to kick THEM in the face with the last vestige of so -called free. speech and all..* its Not Over till the Fat Lady. sings….you all know..jimmy hoffa and the..Rome and Judas scenario…””
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx8TDnHdA14
It stands to reason that Mr. Dutton, for some unfathomable reason, has a very personal and individual connection to viewing everything through the lens of an amateur psychiatrist, which of course has absolutely nothing to do with him personally, not even at third glance.
Whether the top level of the National Socialists was a “gang of psychopaths” is still controversial today. For if this were the case, the German people would be absolved of the collective guilt necessary for reparations and a culture of eternal shame and remorse, and would thus be merely the suffering victims of a mentally ill system.
The question arises, however, whether nature cares one bit whether a dying society considers itself “mentally healthy” according to its own insane categories, or whether a vital, continuing society is “mentally disturbed” according to these categories.
We do not want to apply this “psychoanalytical” yardstick of “healthy/sick” to our Muslim fellow citizens in the first place, because then we could quickly be subjected to ‘treatment’ (of whatever kind) as mentally ill “Islamophobes.”
After all, the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not insane, but rather an act of mental health, as were the widespread bombing of German cities and the use of napalm and Agent Orange in Vietnam.
We would do well to take a closer look at who actually came up with characterizations such as “authoritarian personality” and whom they really serve. The same applies to the so-called “OSS report on Hitler’s mental health.”
Incidentally, it is also not true that Hitler only found structure in his life during World War I (probably meaning purpose). According to his classmates and his own sister, he already stood out at school for his dominant behavior, dividing his classmates into Aryans and non-Aryans.
A few afterthoughts on the subject “Dutton’s psychological excursions”:
Horst Mahler said that Jews are particularly likely to be found in historically young (or self-invented) faculties such as psychology and sociology, because these disciplines are concerned with exploring and manipulating the enemy.
Evolutionary biologist Ulrich Kutschera recently said something interesting that I thought about for a long time and ultimately had to agree with: “There is no such thing as a mentally healthy and spiritually normal person in this world.”
Presumably, over the course of our lives, we have developed a system within ourselves that establishes a general standard, so to speak, according to which norms and expectations members of our social environment can be classified as conspicuous and deviant.
We ourselves tend to blend in with the crowd as much as possible so as not to be rejected through labeling and attribution. We find people who are “more normal than normal,” i.e., who easily fulfill all social expectations, to be likable.
But according to whose standards, and who sets them? Who can claim to be and fulfill the standards in their entirety? We naturally do not reveal our dark sides to the outside world, nor do we expose them in public.
Ultimately, we perceive our own worldview as normal in others, and we perceive anything that deviates from it as mentally ill and use labels to describe, judge, and possibly condemn it. If any psychological functions are underdeveloped, overdeveloped, or completely absent, such as a lack of empathy, we call this psychopathic.
Are deeply religious people who believe in supernatural phenomena mentally ill according to purely medical criteria, and therefore acting delusionally? So is this a matter of unprovable superstition, i.e., an unwillingness to prove one’s assertions with facts (rather than with “Bible quotations”)?
Before the 1970s, homosexuals were still clearly considered mentally ill. And even today, anyone watching the “CSD parades” could get the impression that these are clearly mentally ill people who deviate from a healthy mental norm.
Are women affected by feminism mentally ill, whose function of subordination and submission to male dominance, long considered and perceived as normal and healthy before so-called “equality,” is disturbed?
Today, however, celebrating one’s abnormality is considered the norm and is imposed and enforced on everyone else. So-called liberals and leftists exhibit behavior that is clearly pathological and unhealthy, denying reality in a kind of indignant defensive reaction.
It is likely that millions of people today imagine themselves to be mentally ill in some way because this was instilled in them during childhood. It is probable that at least half of psychiatric wards are filled with “imaginary patients,” from whom the healthcare system profits as a service provider.
Let’s take the example of countless children who are diagnosed with ADHD because of their alleged excessive urge to move and therefore have to be “chemically treated” with Ritalin (actually cocaine).
However, the cause may lie in completely different circumstances, such as sensory overload from digital media, helicopter parents, not having siblings, physical underchallenge, isolation, learned helplessness, and social incompetence.
Kutchara, or whatever, is another screwball. Nobody is normal?? That only leaves stunning nutcases like Trumpstein to declare his Morality as normative.
I like Dutton’s material, his evolutionary psychology , etc. Whites were ok normal before jews/Freud hijacked at least part of our society and the wogs and beaners slipped in guided by the jews and subverted by Jews.
Take l950s America for example. I have recently been watching some Leave it to Beaver TV shows. Good stuff and before the jews took over Hollywood and the niggers subverted pop culture…like Elvis Presley. Niggers were shepherded into White Society, with their jungle shit music, fully developed in rap and hip-hop.
watch some TV shows for niggers…you will see what is ….z coming. White is normal , that is the touchstone. Then we get rid of some of the worst by jailing them…and the cops used to take care of the worst, before MLKL, etc. I was one of the Whites who was taken in by our Altruism insanity, but I am Swedish and English, and have an excuse I guess.
The enfeebled remedies offered by Taylor (an ex-friend) is whistling by the darkies and libs. It will take some kind of a catastrophe to change White minds, because in part, guys like me are\were smart enough to listen to our white prophets.
Taylor may be taking Jew money, but he is not being bought, I think, just naive and desperate. Big Depression is coming, which will break the bank on free money for niggers, etc. “minting free money” has already reduced the value of the US dollar by 10 % they say. Inflation will rage, and the wretcheds of the earth are coming after us Whites. They want our money and the Dems who are waiting to take over, will fuck it up even worse than Trumpstein.
Save your money and buy nothing especially with credit.
T
Yes, it’s quite clear: what Kutschera (spelling his name incorrectly out of sheer excitement does not necessarily demonstrate sobriety, the ability or willingness to engage with his arguments intellectually) means is intellectual freedom.
In other words, the ability to judge for oneself rather than accepting and copying the value judgments of others. Of course, not everyone will understand this immediately. Who do you mean by “Taylor,” Amren-Jared the eternal Judenknecht?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulrich_Kutschera
That you have responded in such detail deserves recognition. The idea that whites are the measure of all things can be refuted by pointing out that apples and pears are not comparable. Whites belong in civilization, blacks in the jungle.
I don’t see the point you’re trying to make. We need to realize that every innovation is “abnormal,” every invention, not to mention the alleged trip to the moon. Values and norms differ greatly throughout the ages, and what was considered normal back then may be considered sick today, and vice versa.
The only haven we have is nature itself: what does it demand? Procreation, of course. But also intellectual expansion, otherwise we would all be Amish and Mennonites with lots of children and no TOO meeting place. Where is the point of contention in this intellectual debate? I cannot see it.
Existence consists of nothing but apparent contradictions, and a mature mind is able to deal with them in a constructive way. We should therefore recognize deception when we encounter it, regardless of who it comes from.
We should fundamentally question all the “dogmas” of primitive humanoids who, due to their poor intellectual capacity, seek to hinder our further development, and expose them for what they are, otherwise we will have failed in our lives as “higher spiritual beings.”
Normality, norms, and values are therefore a social contract, a standard that has been decided and established by the majority for some reason.
Let’s take an example: Oriental and African invaders in the West (or also in East Asia) repeatedly stand out due to a particularly lively, loud form of “communication” that is perceived as very unpleasant by our accustomed standards.
But that doesn’t mean they are “ABNORMAL”; it just means that according to our norms, they are abnormal. So what can that mean? It means that these people don’t belong here, but cause stress. They belong solely in their home countries, where they developed this behavior that we find impertinent.
One must understand as a fundamental truth of life that one will always remain incomprehensible to everyone else. Everything else is an illusion. We can approach each other, build bridges, reach out our hands, but ultimately we remain alone on our island called the individual.
Attributions such as “I am eccentric,” “I am egocentric,” “I am impulsive,” “I am calm,” and so on are voluntary restrictions and limitations of personality. We can generally be anything, depending on the moment, the need, and the situation. That is why any discussion of this among mature people is superfluous.
For example, I don’t know why I am the way I am. Although photos of my parents with me as a child prove my genetic connection to them, I stand out completely. So, for some reason, I am capable of greater imaginable broadening of horizons and linguistic differentiation.
You could say I am more complex, but I also understand how to clothe complexity in linguistic simplicity. Kevin MacDonald is kindred spirit, but a bit shy. He shows me his affection through the freedom he grants me. However, you have to have antennae to perceive such “kinships.” at all!
Like me, Kevin rejects norms, yet he understands their necessity. There is more at work here, something that can be described in words but cannot be proven. Kevin is structured and focused, while I let my mind wander freely. He’s actually the father I never had. He is incapable of hating me.
The “crazy” thing is that it is his mere appearance in connection with everything his mind brought into the world. This man radiates an irresistible, sympathetic distance that allows other individuals to be themselves. He is a friend in the truest sense of the word, as a type of person. He’s open.
He is my guardian angel who guides and directs me, thereby offering me spiritual assurance of survival. I must not overburden him with overly personal demands and expectations, which can be somewhat disappointing, frustrating, irritating at times. He is a role model, but not one before whom I kneel.
Are you daft? I give a damn of the take-over in G.B. But in the U.S. you can direct your focus on the Jewish Mob advance in power mongering. No worry, even the break away of the Southern third and paying the bills of the vast and growing multitude of the North was controlled by our “first” Jewish owned President. It’s a big story and you are not invited.
This is my first time at this site. I am impressed with the author. The excellent writing has some interesting things in it.
Some random comments on “Petie” Mandelson & his “former” comrades.
1. UK journalist Dan Hodges reports that a Labour minister said that (along with Starmer chief of staff McSweeney) he was directly involved in selecting the first Cabinet.
2. He was closely involved with Blair’s rise to power.
3. Sacked from previous Cabinet over a loan from millionaire Geoffrey Robinson and a passport application from millionaire Srichand Hinduja, but still a close conspirator with Blair.
4. Epstein suggested he should run for top office with David Miliband on whose “identity” see Wikipedia.
5. Mandelson tried to get Epstein a Russian visa probably through billionaire friend Oleg Deripaska.
6. Epstein stood to make $millions from inside UK govt tips.
7. Ghislaine Maxwell met Epstein shortly after the mysterious death of her father, “a Russian asset from the 1970s when he worked to extradite Soviet Jews to Israel” with Mossad. “Maxwell laundered money into the West – with the help of Epstein…introduced to Maxwell and the KGB by an oil tycoon… Epstein had long-standing ties with Russian organised crime…a meeting scheduled with Putin in 2014…US billionaire named Reid Hoffman, co-founder of website LinkedIn, was unable to join” – London MAIL ON SUNDAY, Feb. 1.
8. Mandelson was a member of the Young Communist League and then the adult CP (whose card was destroyed by his mother), and as a minister in Blair’s government called successfully on MI5 to destroy all files on Cold War “subversives” – who then “fanned out into schools, newspapers, broadcasting studios, trade unions, law firms, local government, the Civil Service, the police….Blair and several members of his Cabinet…are known to have been 1960s or 1970s Marxists [who] wanted a new world of sex, drugs and rock & roll, plenty of immigration [to] change the country” Peter Hitchens, Feb. 8.
9. Tim Reilly, Cambridge Russian specialist, says Putin could finish the Royal Family “any time he likes with tales, photos and evidence he no doubt has on Andrew”.
10. Starmer aide and Mandelson pal McSweeney moved from California to Israel where he worked for Czech Jews, and worked against the BNP in Barking and later against Corbyn. “Urged on by Mandelson, McSweeney purged the Corbynites” and persuaded Keir to make Pete US Ambassador.
11. Starmer “has pledged to keep Holocaust education on the national curriculum ‘come what may'” (JC,
Sept. 20, 2024). Gaza, Katyn, Kolyma, Drapchi…. who knows, who cares?
12. PS. Don’t forget the Cash for Honours Scandal (Wiki) &C “incriminating” Blair’s New Labour lenders, like Levy, Caring, Garrard, Rosenfeld, &c. and Levy’s autobiography.