A Short History of Hebrews, Jews, and Christians: How We Got to This Point

Let me begin by pointing out a few of the most common misconceptions and the truth that they miss:

• The Myth: Jews are the genetic and spiritual descendants of the Old Testament Hebrews/Israelites. The Truth: Neither the Jews’s religion nor their DNA traces cleanly back to the OT Israelites, but rather to the Phoenicians/Carthaginians, who were those Israelites’ spiritual and civilizational enemies.
• The Myth: Christianity teaches that Jews are God’s chosen people. The Truth: Christ, the genetic descendant of the old Hebrews (tracing line lineage back to David, Abraham, etc.) fulfilled OT messianic prophesy and ushered in the New Covenant, negating the Old under which the Hebrews were chosen by God to fulfill a limited role; if the genetic descendants of the Hebrews no longer retain their chosen status, those masquerading as them certainly don’t.
• The Myth: Christianity has long been a means of making Whites subservient to Jews. The Truth: the kind of cucking Christianity that we are now plagued with was only born in the 19th century as a Christian heresy and only really took off in the 20th; it was the secular Enlightenment’s race-neutral and antireligious principles that allowed Jews to go from a group of co-elites (whom the native elites would kick out once the pressure from their peoples became too great) to the overall de facto rulers of our time.

With that as a summary, let me get into the history of Hebrews, Christians, and Jews. First, let’s talk about the spiritual lineage of the Jews, which traces back to ancient Babylon. In the Old Testament we read that sometime after Solomon died, the monarchy ceased being unified and split between the Kingdom of Israel in the north and the Kingdom of Judah in the south. The north was destroyed by the powerful Assyrian Empire and its Hebrews scattered, their fate unknown (the Ten Lost Tribes). The southern kingdom lasted longer but was ultimately conquered by the even more powerful Babylonian Empire which conquered the old Assyrian Empire and large swaths of the Middle East.

Both empires had a policy of large-scale population transfers, based on the logic that if you are plopped down far from your homeland and among other, disparate peoples you are that much less likely to revolt (similar logic compels our tyrannical elites to import disparate peoples, making us strangers in a familiar land, as it were). The intellectual and skilled labor classes were often taken to Babylon itself to serve the empires’ elites. It was there that spiritual corruption entered the picture.

In Babylon, the Hebrew elites discovered pagan mysticism and a religion in which the priestly and prophetic classes were mouthpieces for the state and its ruling classes, in contrast to the way things tended to go in the Hebrew kingdoms, where prophets were likely as not to be killed by mobs and kings for chastising wicked rulers and commoners and demanding that they return to God’s ways. In Babylon they found priests who manipulated their ostensible gods’ words, prophesies, and edicts for their own (and their rulers’) ends—and the more corrupt among them loved what they saw. When they returned, those now-corrupted Hebrew elites began manipulating—in proto-Talmudic form—God’s word, replacing His laws with their own. This became the Tradition of the Elders, which Christ rebuked the scribes and Pharisees for following instead of God in Mark 7:1-8. That was one major source of spiritual corruption that would form the strain that became Talmudic Judaism; but there was another, one directly tied to the Jews’ true genetic lineage. To know that we must focus on a time between the Babylonian Exile and Christ’s time.

By the time of the Punic Wars between Rome and Carthage—which at its climax saw the city of Carthage destroyed in 146 BC—the latter had amassed a mighty (mostly seaborne) empire which spanned the Mediterranean. But in terms of their roots, they traced back to the Phoenician cities of Tyre and Sidon just north of Israel. Genetically and historically, those Phoenicians/Carthaginians are the descendants of the Canaanites that the Hebrews displaced and drove north. We hear in Judges 3:1-4 that the Canaanites were not fully annihilated but permitted to survive so that they could serve to test future Israelites in battle (not only militarily but spiritually, as we’ll later see). So by the time of their wars with Rome, there were about four million of those pagan, child-sacrificing Canaanites living in various cities and settlements around the Mediterranean. When Rome destroyed their empire, their old religion took a hard hit—during the siege of Carthage, they sacrificed hundreds of elite children to Baal but he still didn’t save them (go figure!)—and they were ripe for conversion.

In Matthew 23:15 we hear Christ say of the Pharisees: “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are.” It seems the already corrupted Hebrews followed the sea trade routes, making converts of the Carthaginians, their Semitic cousins, who were so devastated by their utter defeat by Rome that they were ready to hear their backwater cousins’ prophesies about a coming messiah who would make their nation great again. How we know this happened: as H. G. Wells and later Ron Unz (inspired by Wells) point out,[i] the point in the historical records at which the Phoenicians suddenly and mysteriously disappear is the very same at which we see large populations of Jews in the cities around the Mediterranean where the Phoenicians had been!

But why “twice as much a child of hell”? Well, because it seems that although the Carthaginians knew their old gods had failed them, they weren’t ready to abandon them entirely, even after conversion. Thus the religion that would evolve into Talmudic Judaism was essentially a corruption of a corruption. This is why during the Crusades, Jews fearing that the Christians were going to try to convert them and their children not only killed their children, but called on their god to accept their blood as a sacrifice to destroy the Christians: an atavistic reversion to the child sacrifice of their pagan days. Or why the Kabbalah tells how the chant “The Lord is one!” is not monotheistic but refers to the sexual union of a male and female deity: the Carthaginians had a chief god (Baal) and goddess (Tanit—equivalent to Ishtar), whose sexual union had cosmic significance.[ii]

So spiritually, not only are those we know as Jews following a corruption of an already corrupted Hebrew religion, but beyond that, what is essentially an anti-Christian religion and has been from its beginnings. The Greek Septuagint version of the Old Testament is the oldest full version of the OT that we have and is used for biblical scholarship since the true original—which was written in Paleo-Hebrew (which uses a script that looks nothing like the Hebrew most know)—is long lost, and the Masoretic Hebrew text was intentionally corrupted by the Talmudic Jews to make it appear that Christ wasn’t the messiah. Jews scorn the OT, with one of their most beloved Rabbis of any age Shimon ben Yohai writing: “He who occupies himself with Scripture [the Old Testament] gains merit that is no merit. . . . He who occupies himself with Mishnah gains merit for which there is a reward. . . . He who occupies himself with Talmud—there is no source of greater merit than this.”[iii] The Rabbis themselves even admit in the Mishnah that their holiest Talmud has only the most tenuous connection to the Old Testament: “The [Talmudic] laws concerning the Sabbath, Festal-offerings and acts of trespass are as mountains hanging by a hair, for they have scant Scriptural basis but many laws.”[iv]

What does the Talmud itself say about Christ?[v] Oh not much . . . beyond his having been a sorcerer who is now boiling in his own excrement for all eternity for trying to lead the Jewish people astray—well, that and his mother Mary was a whore. Their attitudes toward Christians follow directly from this. As the humanist Jew (who seems to have been a genuinely honest and well-meaning man: he wrote against Israel’s brutal treatment of non-Jews long before such things were well known, Israel Shahak shows in Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, religious Jews are literally commanded to oppose Christians in every way:[vi]

• While “the murder of a Jew is a capital offense . . . Jewish religious courts and secular authorities are commanded to punish, even beyond the limits of the ordinary administration of justice, anyone guilty of murdering a Jew.” However, “A Jew who murders a Gentile is guilty only of what talmudic Law calls a sin against the ‘laws of Heaven,’ to be punished by God rather than by man. . . . To cause indirectly the death of a Gentile is no sin at all.”
• ”Since even the minimal interdiction against murdering a Gentile outright applies only to ‘Gentiles with whom we [the Jews] are not at war,’ various rabbinical commentators in the past drew the logical conclusion that in wartime all Gentiles belonging to a hostile population may, or even should be killed.” In  other words, they should be Gazaed.
• “Sexual intercourse between a married Jewish woman and any man other than her husband is a capital offense for both parties, and one of the three most heinous sins. The status of Gentile women is very different. The Halakhah presumes Gentiles to be utterly promiscuous and the verse ‘whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue [of semen] is like the issue of horses’ is applied to them. Whether a Gentile woman is married or not makes no difference, since as far as Jews are concerned the very concept of matrimony does not apply to Gentiles (‘There is no matrimony for a heathen’). Therefore, the concept of adultery also does not apply to the intercourse between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman; rather, the Talmud equates such intercourse to the sin of bestiality.”
• “This does not imply that sexual intercourse between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman is permitted—quite the contrary. But the main punishment is inflicted on the Gentile woman; she must be executed, even if she was raped by the Jew.” (Explains Epstein’s ilk rather well, huh?)
• “According to the Halakhah, Jews must not (if they can help it) allow a Gentile to be appointed to any position of authority, however small, over Jews.”
• “The Talmud bluntly forbids giving a gift to a Gentile.”

And on and on and on like that.

For well over a thousand years, Jewish communities strongly practiced endogamy (breeding within your race or tribe) even as they lived in the lands of others, and kicked out any who did not conform to their wicked religion (Spinoza[vii] being an example: the Jews wanted to murder him for blasphemy; he was saved only by Christian authorities’ refusal to hand him over). Thus for that long they selectively bred for extreme ethnocentrism and a morality that was bifurcated: one set of moral rules for the in-group, another for the out-group. This is why they scream when you criticize them for killing and raping Palestinians: what we call hypocrisy is their morality—and has been since its being codified in the Babylonian Talmud.

As far as the actual term “Jew” goes, it comes from the Greek term (transliterated) Ioudaios, which in the Bible can mean two very different things. First, it can refer to Judahites—those belonging to the tribe of Judah—and their lineage. They were part of the southern kingdom, the one whose peoples did not disappear into the mists of time, as happened to the members of the northern tribes following the destruction of the Kingdom of Israel at the hands of the Assyrian Empire. Christ is of the line of Judah, that being the reason He uses the phrase intentionally mistranslated as “Salvation is of the Jews,” (John 4:22) which actually reads, “Salvation is of the line of Judah,” i.e., Christ. The ones we refer to as “Jews” are not of any Hebrew line, being Phoenicians. The reason we call them “Jews” is that the second meaning of Ioudaios is one from Judea, a Roman province in Christ’s time: that could mean anyone, regardless of ethnicity—it’s analogous to the term New Yorker, and it is true that many of those converted Carthaginians lived in Jerusalem and Judea at large in Christ’s time—hence they were “Jews” in that sense. Huge trouble has been caused by translating both those from Judea and Judahites as “Jews.”

For most of Christian history there was constant tension if not bloodshed between Christians and Phoenician-derived Jews (with the latter initiating more often than not). Early on these Jews used the pagan emperor Julian the Apostate to try to punish Christians and attempt to rebuild their Temple as a rebuke to Christ—which ended with them giving up after fires kept springing from the ground (that according to the pagan sources, who would have been inclined to use a nonsupernatural explanation if there had been one). When all of Rome became Christian these Jews then began to hate and try to subvert it as well. These Jews readily aided the Persian invasion of the Levant in 614 AD and ransomed captured Christian soldiers for the sole purpose of slaughtering them in the Massacre of Mamilla Pool.[viii]

In the Dark and Middle Ages, the Jews’s power was indirect as they worked with corrupt Christian elites, offering them loans and becoming tax farmers for them—while milking the commoners in every way possible. They became what you might call co-parasites, helping the native elites screw over the population at large. Take the example of England: The Jewish loan sharks granted usurous loans to the minor nobles, accepting their lands as collateral, and then passing the lands of those who defaulted onto the king in lieu of taxes; the king then got to increase his lands without taking them directly. In Eastern Europe they had a monopoly on the alcohol industries (distilleries and taverns) in the rural areas. In the parts of France that bordered Muslim Spain they had a pure monopoly on kidnapping Christian children, castrating them and then selling them as eunuchs across the border (the original Epsteins?). In all areas they had a virtual monopoly on tax farming and usury.

Back then, if their greed and harm to the population got too great, out they went, since unlike now there was no uniparty to keep shifting the blame among, only a king and his Jewish coconspirators: and that former knew that if he didn’t pin the blame on and exile the latter, he’d get blamed and suffer a revolt at best and overthrow (since the Jews were hosing minor nobles as well as peasants) at worst. Back then, the church, while not hostile to Jews for racial reasons, was not about to defend those who rejected Christ if they did too much harm to ordinary Christians. Often it was the king who wanted to defend the Jews and common church officials who wanted to defend the peasantry. The church was especially keen on maintaining the laws that kept Jews from becoming full citizens and prevented their abuses and power from going too far.

It was the Enlightenment that fundamentally altered the dynamic: with its belief in the tabula rasa (blank slate) view of human nature, its secularism and hatred of organized religion in all its parts (unfortunately, the good as well as the bad), and its civic nationalist ideas that uprooted the old laws and allowed the Jews to become full citizens—at which point they started virtually monopolizing the newspapers, taking control of the banking system, bribing government officials, etc. Democracy gave them the opportunity to pay off both sides and keep accumulating their power by using whichever party happened to be in power at the time. They blackmailed Woodrow Wilson with letters to his mistress into making Louis Brandeis a Supreme Court justice, and did something similar to Kennedy to make him take LBJ as his running mate. They used kompromat on the cross-dressing FBI director J. Edgar Hoover to keep the feds from opposing organized crime (which they dominated much more than the Italians). This kind of power would have been unthinkable in the pre-secular age.

The cucking that wasn’t a result of the Enlightenment’s secularism/blank slate ideas was mostly the result of two non-Jews and one Jewish financier. The original godfather of “Christian Zionism” was the dispensationalist John Nelson Darby. Darby appears to have been a Freemason (and possibly Satanist) masquerading as a Christian and making strange, subtle, and often evil alterations to the Bible via translation (e.g., he has Peter address Christ the way only demons do[ix]). He came up with the strange notion of dispensationalism, which has variations but most share these aspects:[x]

• Earthly time (from Adam to the new heavens and new earth) is divided into seven unequal periods of “dispensations,” during which God changes the way He deals with and judges humanity.
• Despite Christ’s admonition in John 14:6 that “No one comes to the father except through me,” Jews have a separate means of salvation despite having crucified and continuing to reject Him.
• The good are raptured to heaven before the seven-year tribulation begins and then return with the Lord seven years later, having skipped all the misery, death, etc. (Yes, this is the part that has otherwise good nominal Christians sitting on their lazy asses or cheering on evil times rather than trying with everything they’ve got to oppose those bringing about those times.)
• In Christ’s triumphant return He will preside over not all the nations as a universal messiah, but “a restored Jewish monarchy,” under which Gentiles will be “lesser human beings.”

Why would anyone other than Jews believe this tripe? Well, the non-Jewish man who originated it was allegedly a Satanist?

But how did it manage to spread as far as it did?

Well, although Darby planted the seeds of our current, genocidal Jews-worshiping madness, it only massively grew thanks to the Jewish Wall Street financier Samuel Untermyer who found a crooked goy conman and general scumbag named Cyrus Scofield—he was in and out of jail for various scams and even abandoned his first wife and kids—and apparently convinced him to use his fake preacher credentials to put his name on a 100% kosher Bible[xi] which offered Zionist-friendly commentary on every page along with the holy text (most real Christian intellectuals who did write commentaries thought it both tacky and semi-blasphemous to put their words so close to God’s). Untermyer and the other Jewish elites got it published by Oxford University Press (Jew-owned) and paid for its widespread distribution around the time of the Balfour Declaration and the beginning of the massive Jewish immigration to Palestine.

The post WWII cucking has much more to do with the churches not wanting to lose their tax-exempt status, Jewish media domination (they controlled all of the major networks and many of the radio stations), and their strategic use of the phony Holocaust legacy than Christian doctrine.

Beyond that, even earlier, around the beginning of the 20th century, communists in general and Jews in particular had made an effort to infiltrate the seminaries in the U.S. to subvert the Christian religion. This was concerted, intentional subversion, not by misguided do-gooders but by the open enemies of Christianity.

And as far as Catholics go, while in 1904 Pope Pius X may have told Theodor Herzl and the other Zionists where to shove it when they tried to get him to back their project to take over Palestine—a decision that made them more determined to make use of Protestants (hence, why Scofield and his phony Bible became even more important)—by the time of WWII the Vatican was cooperating with the OSS (precursor to the CIA) and there was enough internal rot to allow the Jews to rewrite salvation history via Vatican II, which added Catholics to the ranks of the Jews’s cucks: once seen as self-blinded fools who crucified Christ and continue to reject Him, the Jews now became “elder brothers in the faith,” which as I’ve shown earlier is dead wrong for a number of reasons. Vatican II was a textbook case of Jews pulling strings (albeit far less openly than Netanyahu does now): as Lawrence Erickson puts it, “Cardinal Bea, John XXIII’s choice for preparing the new Jewish documents, appears to have mostly outsourced this job to a leading Rabbi of the American Jewish Committee.”[xii] Again, this was the result of power translating into (heretical) doctrine rather than doctrine leading to power, with the power in question being that of the WWII triumvirate of the American deep state, organized crime (by that time dominated not by Italians but by Jews such as Meyer Lansky), and America’s economic oligarchs (who were both heavily Jewish and sporting deep state connections—e.g., General Electric, which had very strong CIA ties).

The cancer of elite world Jewry and their corrupt White coconspirators has continued to metastasize to this day, which is why we now have tens of trillions of debt, crumbling infrastructure, a military that spends 13 billion on ships with toilets that don’t work, etc., yet nobody gets sacked and prosecuted—while Jews enjoy the highest income per capita in the nation and we are forced to go to war for the puny, genocidal state of Israel. Nothing even remotely like this happened in the age when Europe was Christendom; rather, it happened when men abandoned their (always weak and often failing) devotion to Christ as their king and made idols out of “equality,” “Holocaustianity,” money (offshoring, anyone?), etc., and it became forbidden to notice, let alone punish, Jewry’s collective sins. As that misquote of Chesterton goes, when men cease believing in God they do not believe nothing, they believe anything. Transubstantiation might seem farfetched, but it’s got nothing in that regard on the modern sacrament of transgenderism—another mostly Jewish project, as Scott Howard has shown (somewhat unintentionally) in his book The Transgender-Industrial Complex.

Humans have to have faith in something. If not God, it will be something entirely stupid, even insane. The logic of atheism is anathema to long-term (that is, beyond one generation) planning, since no one will live that long and there are no consequences for saying “I’m taking what I can while I can—let someone else pick up the bill.” Rather, we should be pushing for a reformed Christianity dedicated to smashing all false idols (including ideologies such as negrolatry, Jew-worship, etc.) and demanding all earthly things be subjected to the acid test of reason; one that has people making sure their children and grandchildren have a country to grow up in that isn’t hostile to them.

[i]Unz, Ron. “American Pravda: Prof. John Beaty and the True Origin of the Jews.” The Unz Review, Ron Unz, 29 Jan. 2024, www.unz.com/runz/prof-john-beaty-and-the-true-origin-of-the-jews/.

[ii]Shahak, Israel. “Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years.” If Americans Knew: What Every American Needs to Know About Israel-Palestine, Professor Israel Shahak, 2002, ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/shahak.html?v=202602172144.

[iii]Hoffman, Michael. “What Does Rabbinic Judaism Say About What Makes Jews and Gentiles Different? The Unz Review.” The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection, Ron Unz, 21 Sept. 2020, www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/.

[iv]Hoffman, Michael. “What Does Rabbinic Judaism Say About What Makes Jews and Gentiles Different? The Unz Review.” The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection, Ron Unz, 21 Sept. 2020, www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/.

[v]Shahak, Israel. “Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years.” If Americans Knew: What Every American Needs to Know About Israel-Palestine, Professor Israel Shahak, 2002, ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/shahak.html?v=202602172144.

[vi]Shahak, Israel. “Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years.” If Americans Knew: What Every American Needs to Know About Israel-Palestine, Professor Israel Shahak, 2002, ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/shahak.html?v=202602172144.

[vii]Joyce, Andrew. “Pariah to Messiah: The Engineered Apotheosis of Baruch Spinoza, Part 1 of 3.” The Occidental Observer, 5 June 2019, www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/05/05/pariah-to-messiah-the-engineered-apotheosis-of-baruch-spinoza-part-1-of-3/.

[viii]“Mamilla Pool.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 4 Sept. 2025, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamilla_Pool.

[ix]“John Nelson Darby Version: Doctrinal Changes to the Holy Bible.” Liberty to the Captives, libertytothecaptives.net/darby_doctrinal_changes.html.

[x]“The Folly of Dispensationalism.” The Biblical Worldview Ministries, web.archive.org/web/20190731004215/www.thebiblicalworldview.org:80/folly-of-dispensationalism.

[xi]Perloff, James. “The War on Christianity, Part II: The Abomination and Blasphemy of Christian Zionism.” James Perloff, 31 Aug. 2016, jamesperloff.net/war-on-christianity-part-2/.

[xii]Erickson, Lawrence. “The Smoke of the Synagogue.” The Unz Review, Ron Unz, 20 Mar. 2024, www.unz.com/article/the-smoke-of-the-synagogue/.