Huge peaceful protests in UK over migration
Matt Goodwin: Labour is pushing the UK into civil unrest: Four astonishing things in one weekend
It’s not “the far right” that’s transforming the UK into a place where public protests and civil unrest are quickly becoming a regular feature of our national life; it is the establishment’s complete and utter failure to fulfil the very first duty of the state –to control its own borders, defend itself from invasions, and put its own people first.
It is hard, for example, to call a gathering of mainly women and girls wearing pink and performing a cheerful conga outside a hotel for asylum-seekers “right-wing extremism”….
Our hapless leaders are now importing tens of thousands of people from medieval societies and deeply misogynistic cultures that have been shown, through freedom of information requests submitted to UK police authorities, to produce people who are twenty timesmore likely than British nationals to commit rape and sexual assault. It’s not fashionable to point this out but then some facts are not fashionable.
https://www.mattgoodwin.org/p/labour-is-pushing-the-uk-into-civil
Keir Starmer and the Labour government are pushing the United Kingdom into a dark and dangerous place, a place where the social contract between the people and the politicians who are supposed to represent them is rapidly breaking down.
That’s the conclusion you’d reach were you to look at four things that happened over the weekend, all of which symbolise how volatile and febrile things are becoming.
First, though you won’t have heard much about it in legacy media, largely peaceful public protests against the country’s broken borders and Labour’s extreme policy of importing unvetted migrants into the heart of Britain’s communities have continued to spread across the country.
After starting in Epping, Essex, where an illegal migrant who arrived on the small boats “allegedly” sexually assaulted a 14-year-old schoolgirl, in recent days these protests spread to London, Manchester, Newcastle, Cannock, Portsmouth, Southampton, and Waterlooville, in Hampshire.
While those in power would like you to believe the protests reflect organised “far-right extremism”, and “misinformation” among an ignorant public, the reality of what is now unfolding is far more troubling for the elite class and the state.
On the whole, the protests have been organic and spontaneous, emerging among the people from the bottom-up, not orchestrated top-down by hardened extremists.
While certain newspapers are working overtime to try and portray the unrest as the work of “the far-right”, which in the UK remains fringe and amateurish, anybody who has actually been on the ground will immediately observe a very different reality.
It is hard, for example, to call a gathering of mainly women and girls wearing pink and performing a cheerful conga outside a hotel for asylum-seekers “right-wing extremism”.
Furthermore, as even the Financial Times was forced to note, this weekend, far from confined to white working-class estates that are routinely demonised by a London-based media, the protests now encompass “some of the most exclusive postcodes in the capital city”.
They are attracting mothers, fathers, grandparents and other concerned citizens, all of whom, in a country once famous for avoiding civil unrest, now feel they have no other option but to take to the streets to vent their entirely legitimate anger.
And what’s stoking this righteous anger? It is the Labour Party’s —and before them the Tory party’s— deliberate choice to allow open borders in this country, to think it is somehow acceptable to house illegal migrants in hotels and houses, in the heart of Britain’s communities, next to families and children, to then force the British people to pay £5.5 million every day for a policy they never voted for, and to even allow private firms like Serco to use the British people’s own money to rig the housing market so that landlords prioritise illegal migrants over tax-paying citizens.
So, let’s be clear.
It’s not “the far right” that’s transforming the UK into a place where public protests and civil unrest are quickly becoming a regular feature of our national life; it is the establishment’s complete and utter failure to fulfil the very first duty of the state –to control its own borders, defend itself from invasions, and put its own people first.
And then, secondly, this weekend also brought another truly shocking discovery that underlines exactly why so many people are now protesting in the streets.
On Saturday evening, the country learned that a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton, Warwickshire —a 12-year-old girl—was “allegedly” kidnapped and raped by two asylum-seekers, named Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir, staying in these taxpayer-funded homes.
Charged with kidnap, strangulation, and aiding and abetting the rape of a girl under 13 years of age, the two migrants, reportedly from Afghanistan, are merely the latest, sickening example of what the elite class would rather we not talk about.
How our hapless leaders are now importing tens of thousands of people from medieval societies and deeply misogynistic cultures that have been shown, through freedom of information requests submitted to UK police authorities, to produce people who are twenty times more likely than British nationals to commit rape and sexual assault. It’s not fashionable to point this out but then some facts are not fashionable.
And as if all that wasn’t enough, we then discovered, thirdly, something else which clearly shows how people in the corridors of power have still learned nothing at all from the equally hideous rape gang scandal, which is still rocking the country.
Shockingly, we not only learned about the rape of a child but that Warwickshire police, who oversaw the case, actually advised local politicians and officials not to reveal the fact that the alleged rapists and paedophiles were asylum-seekers for fear of, you guessed it, “inflaming community tensions”.
Taxpayer-funded authorities, in other words, are now more concerned about managing the possible reaction among the British majority than the horrifying fact that children are being raped by people who are being imported into our communities by our own government.
Was this not the exact same mindset, the exact same logic, that led to the decades-long cover-up of the rape gang scandal to begin with? A decision among out-of-touch and ideologically-motivated elites to prioritise “community relations” and the survival of the state-backed policy of multiculturalism over the need to tell people the truth about what is happening in their own communities and country?
What, exactly, is the logic here —just keep trying to cover stuff up, from the rape of our children to the state importing tens of thousands of Afghans, including members of the Taliban, in the hope nobody notices?
And have state officials learned nothing at all since not only the rape gang scandal but also Southport, when one politician after another similarly tried to suppress the truth from a people who can easily spot the truth from miles away?
Clearly not given the final thing we learned about this weekend, which is that rather than deal with what is actually causing all the chaos, carnage and civil unrest, rather than controlling our borders, our hapless Labour politicians, like those officials in Warwickshire, are far more interested in controlling our speech.
That’s right. Ever since Southport, we’ve had the pathetic sight of Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper doing what the left does best when it is losing an argument —trying to shut down free speech and free expression, impose a stifling regime of censorship, and control the supply of information.
Have you ever noticed how the very first thing to go in a leftist political religion that is now fully organised around ‘diversity’ is diversity of thought? This is because it is the thing the left cannot control.
Which is why, ever since Southport, we’ve seen the expansion of ‘non-crime hate incidents’. We’ve seen plans to impose a new, dodgy definition of ‘Islamophobia’. We’ve seen the arrival of the draconian Online Safety Act. We’ve seen Labour activists rushing off to America with plans to ‘kill’ Elon Musk’s X platform.
And now, this weekend, we discovered that the Labour government and the state are continuing to invest in a ‘disinformation unit’, using the very same tools that were created to fight ISIS online to now try and fight people who are critical of open borders, the ‘asylum hotels’, two-tier policing, and Labour’s policy of mass uncontrolled immigration.
According to documents seen by The Telegraph, the secretive unit, called the National Security and Online Information Team (NSOIT), is flagging “concerning” narratives about immigration and two-tier policing to big tech platforms, even prompting officials in the Trump White House, understandably, to say they are “greatly concerned” about these blatant efforts to restrict free speech.
As we all should be. Because today, worryingly, many of us are now living in a country in which our democratically elected leaders somehow think it is appropriate and acceptable to use the same tools that were used to try and prevent Muslims from “radicalising” online, from travelling to fight with Jihadists in Syria, and from carrying out Islamist terrorist attacks, to try and control and contain people who are critical of mass migration and having to live with open borders.
Sorry but no. No. No. No.
While Labour and the elite class appear to have forgotten this fact, let me remind them that we live in a democracy, in a free society, in the original home of individual liberty, where each and every one of us has the right to publicly criticise whatever policy we might want to criticise —especially policies that nobody in this country ever voted for, or asked for.
Nobody in Britain asked to live with open borders. Nobody ever voted for mass uncontrolled immigration. Nobody asked for schoolgirls and children to be raped and sexually assaulted by medieval men who should never have been in this country to begin with. And nobody asked for their elected leaders, for the very people who are supposed to represent them and keep them safe, to prioritise controlling their speech and opinions over the far more urgent need to control their borders and country.
Yet what is now crystal clear after this weekend is that it’s exactly posts and writing like this that are now being closely watched and monitored by the state.
And I have no doubt whatsoever that somewhere in Whitehall and Westminster somebody is putting a black mark next to my name, alongside thousands of others.
So let me just end by saying this.
It is precisely because of the truly dire state of our country, as symbolised by the deeply troubling events this weekend, that, like many of you, I will never, ever, ever stop calling out the chaos and incompetence that is now flowing out of Number 10 Downing Street, which is not only putting our people and our children at risk but is now pushing our country into civil unrest.
I will never stop explaining how and why we need to urgently and dramatically change course and nor should you —because, as I say, while our leaders might have forgotten it I still remember what lies in the beating heart of this nation.
They were not easily moved,
They were icily willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the English began to hate.
Kipling’s words best directed against the Woke Establishment and its politicians rather than the local Chinese takeaway or Mr Patel’s sweetshop.
https://sharetext.io/53b1593c
Idiotically cannot place this comment here.
I sum up my insight in one sen-
tence: Jews are the scapegoats
of the nations because they are
the destroyers of the nations.
Their suffering is the in-
evitable price they pay.
This means that they will continue to pay
this price even after they have been deci-
mated. Their goal of destroying all peoples
is so important and so ingrained in them.
If they gain the upper hand without our
resistance (which has long been the case),
they will abolish us under the pretext of
never being abolished themselves again.
The most pressing question is: Do we want
to (continue to) be friends of the Jews, or
do we want to survive as a species at all?
This question must be answered and ad-
dressed; it is not merely a thought experi-
ment or intellectual exercise, but concerns
us in our most fundamental desire to survive.
Why destroy people rather than successfully exploit them?
Why should 20 million people wish to be alone in the world after exterminating the other 99%?
Is that in the Tanakh or the Talmud? Or even in the “Protocols”.
How tenderly Mama Moose treats her child. And all because Papa Moose, who is always horny, stuck his dick in her pussy (it took about 3 seconds). A miracle of nature! White people are no longer willing or able to perform this feat. Is that really too much to ask? Mother Nature demands a minimum effort from us.
Here, Mama Moose proudly shows the entrance and exit of her fertilization anatomy. Human women should finally start practicing this shameless openness as well. Of course, it is completely inappropriate and politically unacceptable to ask the Swedes whether moose meat is unspeakably tasty.
Thousands of moose accidents occur in Sweden every year, which, due to their mass, which is definitely overwhelming for a windshield, leads to the death of the driver sitting behind them in about 10 cases. Moose kicks are also definitely no laughing matter for the recipient, but life-threatening.
What we do know is that they are useless as carcasses for further reproduction. This is actually moose porn, but only male moose find it irresistible. It’s a good thing for the shameless mama moose that we are not perverted animal fuckers, but that her genitals have the same effect on us as tree lichen.
Mama moose sniffs her baby’s ass: “Did you just shit or piss? This needs to be inspected more closely, because as a blind cow, I rely on pungent scent markers. Anyway, your ass full of shit smells just like me, so you can only be my own calf. Your intestinal products are clearly my dairy products.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60QY9VPlecU
Did you know that there are basically two global moose populations, the Eurasian and the American, which, like the white human species, separated long ago? However, it is said to still be genetically possible to crossbreed them. However, in America, so to speak, moose and baboons have long since mated among humanoids.
In hyperfeminist Sweden, male representatives of their own ethnic group are roughly on a par with cockroaches in the social hierarchy. Apparently out of sheer laziness, complacency, good nature, and lack of drive (today we would call it cuckoldry), Swedish boomers have allowed things to get this far and let them fall apart. No wonder that with this underdeveloped (or, compared to the former Vikings, massively regressed) and unreliable defense instinct, invading Arab-Muslim gangs find it extremely easy to take over the inviting, welcoming, unguarded territory of the “humanitarian world power” without resistance. An artificially constructed postmodern heroine like “Greta” could ultimately only come from Astrid Lindgren’s Sweden.
Species conservation in the animal world is practiced as a substitute for the lack of protection of one’s own race. This peculiar phenomenon can be observed throughout the Western world (“green movement,” “nature conservation,” etc.). As we learn from this shocking film document, Ludwig, the boss of a Swedish moose harem, is allowed to continue pulling all the strings and dominating the oppressed cows in a macho, patriarchal manner instead of sharing his power with them in equality / on an egalitarian basis. But that’s not all: Ludwig even humiliates the ladies by making them fight among themselves over which of them will be allowed to roll around in his urine-filled hollow. Discipline and order still reign here!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKYV9EBl4tk
There are no longer any moose in Germany, although every now and then some stray across the Neisse border from the country that today calls itself Poland (but in reality consists mainly of East Germany, which was stolen by the unholy plutocratic-Bolshevik pact known as the “Allies”). Some are even said to have made it as far as West Germany. In East Prussia (now divided between Poland and Russia), the moose had a long tradition. Many landscape painters immortalized these animals in their paintings, and in heraldry, the moose antler was the symbol of choice (still used today as the brand mark of the Trakehner horse breed).
However, there seems to be a fundamental confusion between the European and American terms for “moose” (German: Elch). An “elk” is something different in America than it is in Europe. In America, “elk” does not refer to moose, but to wapiti. These, in turn, are only found in America, where reindeer are also called “caribou.” Like Canada, Scandinavia is a region with relatively little variation in its landscape, but it is precisely this monotony that makes it so appealing. Deserts have a meditative, contemplative quality for the same reason. Here, the elements are reduced to absolute frugality.
As expected, the undisputed boss of “Glittersjå Fjellgård” (from min. 10:50) is, of course, an energetic woman, as Jürgen Heidon from Hamburg notes during his visit, making the question unnecessary. Heidorn (he got his first camera in 1962, as he proudly points out in his channel description) is one of those typical boomer creatures, defanged/neutered (deballed) to the point of ultimate harmlessness, who have corrupted the West with boundless individualism, ignorance and consumerism, and who, after their swan song, will statistically take the entire white race with them to the grave.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-e479dBAh8
Looking into the faces of such people, we get the message: “I don’t exist, no one should suffer, I have nothing to do with any of this, I only ever wanted good things for humanity!” This post-war generations conceal or disguises their cowardice particularly through demonstrative intellectualism, in an almost grotesque Woody Allen-esque manner. At the stake with Magnus Hirschfeld’s burning pornography, Goebbels said: “German men and women, the age of exaggerated Jewish intellectualism is now over!” And as a typical boomer, Heidorn’s main pastime consists of spending his well-invested money with his equally withering wife on endless trips, bored and weary of their own existence.
On such channels, one learns nothing about the future of Germany or evern Europe. But their extensive HD travel playlists are at least better suited as a sleep aid than the unbearable contributions of younger generations, which we are inescapably confronted with nowadays. This will even worsen with TikTok, Insta & Co for those who still have to exist in this hopeless clown world for a few more decades. How liberating and comforting for our ancestors not to have had to witness this horror and terror anymore. And ultimately, this is all about putting people to sleep. Apparently, even young people who “suffer from depression” (i.e., self-generated negative thought patterns) are now being euthanized.
Imagine your name is Geist, but you’re as dumb as a bag of screws. Pretty unlikely, according to nomen est omen. A man named Valerius was thus born with the gift of higher logic. Mr. Geist had an interesting biography and was also selective in his choice of life partner: he married a German biologist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerius_Geist
Due to the evil Nazi ideology, his considerations revolve around animals, but also allow certain conclusions to be drawn about humanoid populations. He does not consider hybrids to be viable in the long term. His “seven stages of habituation” about wolves, for example, can easily be applied to sub-Saharan Homo sapiens.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv_-VGgmuRw
AI says:
During the Nazi era, there were concerted efforts that intertwined ideology with wildlife and animal breeding, as discussed by Professor Valerius Geist in his research and interviews. One prominent example is Hermann Göring’s involvement in wildlife management at the Rominten Heath hunting grounds, where he influenced deer populations through the manipulation of sex ratios. By increasing the number of males in relation to females, Göring created a rutting pressure that resulted in younger males growing larger antlers, culminating in trophy specimens that were unparalleled in recent centuries. Geist uses this example to illustrate how human management, rather than only genetics or environment, can shape animal characteristics.
Additionally, Göring supported attempts to “resurrect” the extinct wild aurochs (Bos primigenius) through breeding programs led by the brothers Heinz and Lutz Heck. These involved selective back-breeding from domestic cattle to approximate the appearance and traits of the extinct wild ox, producing what became known as the “Heckrind.” While not truly restoring the species, this project was emblematic of Nazi efforts to create or preserve “ideal” Germanic animal types, often framed by the racist and nationalist ideology of the regime.
Beyond these projects, the Nazis engaged widely in applying their ideology of racial purity to animals, parallel to their human racial policies. This included breeding “heroic” animals like the Heckrind and other native species, dog breeding aimed at obedience and discipline symbolizing military virtues, and agricultural breeding programs reinforcing autarky and “blood and soil” principles. Zoos and wildlife preserves were curated to emphasize native German species and an idealized natural order aligned with Nazi values.
Valerius Geist’s work highlights how these Nazi wildlife management and breeding endeavors were deeply entwined with ideological goals, reflecting the regime’s attempt to impose their worldview not only on humans but on nature itself. This confluence of science, ideology, and politics exemplifies the regime’s broader racial and nationalistic ambitions as applied in diverse spheres including animal ecology and conservation.
Valerius Geist criticized Bergmann’s rule by arguing that its classical association of animal body size with temperature is incorrect. In a 1986 study, Geist found that instead of temperature, the body size of animals correlates more strongly with the length of the annual productivity period or food availability during the growth season. According to Geist, food resources and the duration animals can actively feed and grow are the main factors determining body size variation, rather than simply the ambient temperature or latitude as Bergmann’s rule suggests. His critique points out that many factors affect body size, and temperature is not the sole or even primary driver in all cases.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bergmann%27s_rule
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heck_cattle
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/what-did-george-de-mohrenschil-nKe8CEHISwmFm442qA2Y5g
(*Sautratten, not “Sauratten”)
peaceful whatever will change nothing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUTttRiDdkA