July 14, 1555 – Creation of the Rome Ghetto by PAUL IV, Bull Cum nimis absurdum (Since it is absurd)
This is not a creation of Hitler or Goebbels, let alone Mussolini, who was not an anti-Semite and whose first mistress, Margherita Sarfatti, was Jewish. It is a bull published by Pope Paul IV on July 14, 1555, i.e., in the middle of the Renaissance and not in the darkness of the Middle Ages.
This bull does not come out of the blue. There were at least 24 anti-Semitic papal bulls before that of Paul IV and 38 after! To these bulls, it would be appropriate to add the statements of the Apostles and the Fathers of the Church.
The general position of the Church in the past seems to have been that it was necessary to discriminate against the Jews, to regulate their behavior vis-á-vis Christians, to designate them for opprobrium, but not to physically attack them: this is the doctrine of the “witness people” of Saint Augustine; the Jews must subsist so that everyone can see what happens to a people who do not recognize Christ. The declarations are clearly defensive in nature, aimed at protecting Christians against Jewish behavior.
The object of the bull revolves pretty much around the same discriminatory measures, one could say, of apartheid: wearing special clothes, expulsion or confinement in special quarters, prohibition to exercise certain public functions, prohibition of mixed marriages, encouraging forced conversions and special taxes to fund these conversions, prohibition of the Talmud and Autodafe, cancellation of Christian debts towards Jews, prohibition on Jews from having Christian servants or nannies etc.
The official justification is always the same, the Jewish people are cursed by God since they do not recognize their Son and are condemned to dispersion and wandering. Unofficially, however, a purely racial justification cannot be ruled out, as Pope Gregory I (540 – 604) put forward the doctrine of the Jews as a carnal people, in constrast to the Christian people, who are spiritual; this theme of the ‘carnal people’ could easily lead to the people of the ‘beast’, of the ‘antichrist’ and of ‘the Devil’.
In the Middle Ages, when popes received tribute from delegates of the Jewish-Roman community on the day of their coronation, they traditionally replied: “Legum Probo, sed improbo gentium” (“I approve of the law, but I disapprove of race”). We should also recall the existence in Spain, from 1449 onwards, of certificates of racial purity, in Spanish ‘estatuto de limpieza de sangre’ – ratified by PAUL III. Among the Jesuits, the requirement for this certificate, which had been instituted in 1593, was not lifted until 1946…
Returnig to the bull of Paul IV himself, in addition to confining the Jews in a district of Rome (now a very touristy area!), it imposed the wearing of a yellow pointed hat on men and a yellow headscarf on women. Jews were prohibited from owning real estate or practicing medicine with Christians (as a precaution!).
-
Lungotevere de’ Cenci (along the Tiber River)
-
Via del Portico d’Ottavia (its lively central street)
- Teatro Marcello and the nearby Capitol Hill
The neighborhood itself was surrounded by walls, with three doors locked at night. Only one synagogue per city was allowed. The successor of Paul IV, Pius IV extended the system of ghettos to other Italian cities, and the successor of the latter, Pius V, forbade the presence of Jews in his domains outside Rome and Ancona. Pius V is considered the most anti-Semitic Pope. He is canonized and his canonization has not been abrogated…
Here is the translation of Paul IV’s bull establishing the Roman ghetto, Cum nimis absurdum (Because it is so absurd)
Bull Cum Nimis Absurdum
Laws and ordinances to be followed by Jews living in the Holy See decreed by the Bishop Paul, servant of the servants of God, for future recollection.
As it is completely absurd and improper in the utmost that the Jews, who through their own fault were condemned by God to eternal servitude, can under the pretext that pious Christians must accept them and sustain their habitation, are so ungrateful to Christians, as, instead of thanks for gracious treatment, they return contumely, and among themselves, instead of the slavery, which they deserve, they manage to claim superiority: we, who newly learned that these very Jews have insolently invaded our City Rome and a number of the Papal States, territories and domains, their impudence increased so much that they dare not only to live amongst the Christian people, but also in the vicinity of the churches without any difference of dressing, and even that they rent houses in the main streets and squares, buy and hold immovable property, engage maids, nurses and other Christian servants, and commit other and numerous misdeeds with shame and contempt of the Christian name. Considering that the Church of Rome tolerates these very Jews evidence of the true Christian faith and to this end [we declare]: that they, won over by the piety and kindness of the See, should at long last recognize their erroneous ways, and should lose no time in seeing the true light of the Catholic faith, and thus to agree that while they persist in their errors, realizing that they are slaves because of their deeds, whereas Christians have been freed through our Lord God Jesus Christ, and that it is iniquitous for it to appear that the sons of free women serve the sons of maids.
§ 1. Desiring firstly, as much as we can with God, to beneficially provide, by this. that will forever be in force, we ordain that for the rest of time, in the City as well as in other states, territories and domains of the Church of Rome itself, all Jews are to live in one and if there is not that capacity in two or three or however many quarters may be enough; they should reside entirely side by side in designated streets and be thoroughly separate from the residences of Christians, by our authority in the City and by that of our representatives in other states, lands and domains noted above, and that there must be only one entrance and exit from this quarter.
§ 2. Furthermore, in each and every state, territory and domain in which they are living, they will have only one synagogue, in its customary location, and they will construct no other new ones, nor can they own buildings. Furthermore, all of their synagogues, besides the one allowed, are to be destroyed and demolished. And the properties, which they currently own, they must sell to Christians within a period of time to be determined by the magistrates themselves.
§ 3. Moreover, so that Jews should be distinguishable everywhere: men must wear a hat, women, indeed, some other evident sign, yellow in color, that must not be concealed or covered by any means, and must be tightly affixed; and furthermore, they cannot be absolved or excused from the obligation to wear the hat or other emblem of this type to any extent whatever and under any pretext whatsoever of their rank or prominence or of their ability to tolerate this adversity, either by a chamberlain of the Church, clerics of an Apostolic court, or their superiors, or by legates of the Holy See or their immediate subordinates.
§ 4. Also, they may not have nurses or maids or any other Christian domestic or service by Christian women in wet-nursing or feeding their children.
§ 5. They may not work or have work done on Sundays or on other public feast days declared by the Church.
§ 6. Nor may they incriminate Christians in any way or promulgate false or forged agreements.
§ 7. And they may not presume in any way to play, eat or fraternize with Christians.
§ 8. And they cannot use other than Latin or Italian words in short-term account books that they hold with Christians, and, if they should use them, such records would not be binding on Christians.
§ 9. Moreover, these Jews are to be limited to the trade of rag-picking, or “cencinariae” (as it is said in the vernacular), and they cannot trade in grain, barley or any other commodity essential to human welfare.
§ 10. And those among them who are physicians, even if summoned and inquired after, cannot attend or take part in the care of Christians.
§ 11. And they are not to be addressed as superiors [even] by poor Christians.
§ 12. And they are to close their [loan] accounts entirely every thirty days; should fewer than thirty days elapse, they shall not be counted as an entire month, but only as the actual number of days, and furthermore, they will terminate the reckoning as of this number of days and not for the term of an entire month. In addition, they are prohibited from selling [goods put up as] collateral, put up as temporary security for their money, unless [such goods were] put up a full eighteen months prior to the day on which such [collateral] would be forfeit; at the expiration of the aforementioned number of months, if Jews have sold a security deposit of this sort, they must sign over all money in excess of the principal of the loan to the owner of the collateral.
§ 13. And the statutes of states, territories and domains wherever they presently live, concerning primacy of Christians, are to be adhered to and followed without exception.
§ 14. And, should they, in any manner whatsoever, be deficient in the foregoing, it would be treated as a crime: in Rome, by us or by our clergy, or by others authorized by us, and in the aforementioned states, territories and domains by their respective magistrates, just as if they were rebels and criminals by the jurisdiction in which the offense takes place, they would be accused by all Christian people, by us and by our clergy, and could be punished at the discretion of the proper authorities and judges.
§ 15.Not to be confuted by conflicting decrees and apostolic rules, and regardless of any tolerance whatever or special rights and dispensation for these Jews of any Roman Pontiff prior to us and of the aforementioned See or of their legates, or by the courts of the Church of Rome and the clergy of the Apostolic courts, or by other of their officials, no matter their import and form, and with whatever, even with repeated derogations, and with other legally valid sub-clauses, and erasures and other decrees, even those that are “motu proprio” and from “certain knowledge” and have been repeatedly approved and renewed. By this document, even if, instead of their sufficient derogation, concerning them and their entire import, special, specific, expressed and individual, even word for word, moreover, not by means of general, even important passages, mention, or whatever other expression was favored, or whatever exquisite form had to be retained, matters of such import, and, if word for word, with nothing deleted, would be inserted into them in original form in the present document holding that rather than being sufficiently expressed, those things that would stay in effect in full force by this change alone, we specially and expressly derogate, as well as any others contrary to them.
Declared at St. Mark’s, Rome, in the one thousand five hundred fifty fifth year of the incarnation of our Lord, one day before the ides of July, in the first year of our Papacy.





What version of a Christian Bible do Catholics today use? The Kings James standard Protestant Bible always contains the OT.
The Catholic Church, to my limited understanding, still luvs the Jews. A Catholic exfriend states that his Catholic Church always incudes an OT reading for church services. This ex-friend loves to see the Jews kill Palestinians.
Would TOO please compile and put together an article answering the following question:
Was Paul a Semitic double agent who effectively established the early Christian church so as to create a Jewish god for western man to worship? What role did he and others play in subverting the gods of the people in Paul’s time and replacing paganism with Jesus Christ and the supernatural miracles such as walking on water, Yahweh impregnating a 13 year old Virgin Mary, resurrections, walking on water, turning water into wine etc etc etc?
Please invite me to write a well-researched article in answer to these questions for publication, if no one else is better qualified to do so, than myself.
It’s been discussed here. But please submit something,
I look forward to reading his ravings.
A must read (in English)
https://archive.org/details/JudaismAndTheVatican/page/n13/mode/2up
Léon de Poncin is a Frenchman (antisemite), but he wrote this book in English, he ofter quote a French Jew, Jules Isaac e.g.:
“To maintain the opposite viewpoint, one would have to be intractably and fanatically prejudiced, or have a blind belief in a tradition which, as we know, is not ‘normal’, and thus ought not to be laid down as a rule of thought for even the most docile sons of the Church — a tradition which, moreover, is infinitely noxious and murderous, and which, as I have said and shall repeat, leads to Auschwitz — Auschwitz and other places. Some six million Jews were liquidated solely because they were Jews and this brought shame not only upon the German people but upon the whole of Christianity, because without centuries of Christian teaching, preaching and vituperation, Hitler’s teaching, propaganda and vituperation would have been impossible.”
(Jules Isaac, Genèse de l’Antisémitisme, p. 508)
https://occidentaldissent.com/2025/12/16/nietzsche-and-rome/comment-page-1/#comment-3728994
“If you’re not Roman Catholic, you’re not Christian.”
Lol. To claim the exact opposite is an
equally (of course “Protestant”) lie.
https://archive.is/qJ958
AI responds to lies like this:
Core Definition of Christianity
Christianity centers on faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, not membership in any specific denomination. The term “Christian” first appears in Acts 11:26 for followers of Jesus in Antioch, long before the Roman Catholic Church formalized as a distinct entity around the 4th-11th centuries with events like the Edict of Milan (313 AD) and East-West Schism (1054 AD).
Historical Diversity
Early Christianity included diverse groups like Eastern Orthodox (split in 1054), Oriental Orthodox, and later Protestants (16th century Reformation), all tracing roots to the apostles and accepting core creeds like Nicene (325 AD). Roman Catholicism became the largest branch but never the sole one; for example, the Church of the East and others existed independently.
– Scriptural basis: Salvation comes through faith in Christ (John 3:16, Ephesians 2:8-9), not institutional affiliation—echoed across denominations.
– Denominational breadth: Over 2 billion Christians worldwide span Catholics (50%), Protestants (37%), Orthodox (12%), and others, per global estimates.
– No monopoly: The Bible warns against adding requirements to faith (Galatians 1:8); claiming exclusivity mirrors historical errors like Arianism, condemned at Nicaea.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPZ5kgzv6Dg
“Roman but Not Catholic” by Kenneth J. Collins and Jerry L. Walls argues that Roman Catholicism, while sharing core Christian beliefs, has added distinct Roman elements that prevent it from embodying true catholicity (universality).
Main Conclusions
The authors conclude that Protestant traditions better preserve the universal “catholic” faith of the early church, as Roman claims like papal supremacy and certain sacramental developments represent later innovations rather than apostolic essentials. They affirm unity on Trinitarian and Christological doctrines but highlight irreconcilable differences in authority (Scripture over tradition), ecclesiology (no exclusive Roman church), and soteriology (justification by faith alone).
Key Critiques
– Papacy and church structure: Rome’s exclusive ecclesial claims lack historical or biblical warrant, evolving from political influences rather than divine institution.[2]
– Tradition and Mary: Extra-biblical traditions elevate Mary and sacraments in ways that divide rather than unite Christians.
– Path forward: Despite disagreements, Protestants and Catholics can collaborate ecumenically on shared gospel witness without compromising convictions.
https://pdfhost.io/v/Khq9ZBDZp9_Roman_but_Not_Catholic
Nietzsche’s theory of a “Christian slave morality” cannot be completely dismissed, however. At least, that is the argument put forward by those who distinguish between the European culture of guilt and the East Asian culture of shame.
It has been discovered that Japanese people, for example, deal with the consequences of World War II in a completely unbiased manner, rather than internalizing them morally, and this is attributed to the Christian implementation of the concept of an alleged “original sin” through the Bible.
This Canadian living in China, who often minimizes, conceals, or ignores the contribution of Germany to the development of Western civilization, claims that the Vatican is based on pagan culture. It is clear that Christianity made a large-scale attempt to eradicate all traces of paganism in Europe wherever it could. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rGf0dCRRNk
This was not so easy to implement, so these old traditions were adapted or incorporated in a subtle way. Christmas and Easter are therefore not purely Christian holidays, and the Christmas tree and Easter egg are pagan symbols. Many churches were literally built on pagan places of worship such as hills.
Gutenberg’s printing press became widespread through the production of Luther’s translation of the Bible. The foundation of Western culture. Btw., 45 % of Americans are Protestant, only 22 % are Catholic (and they are mainly from Latin America). The Anglican Church is ultimately a variation of the Lutheran version.
Modern high-performance capitalism is a Protestant invention, not a Catholic one. One could say that East Asians have become economic Protestants without even knowing it.
Incidentally, it is interesting to note that “Maiorianus” is a German YouTuber. I asked AI: “Can the classic claim that the Germanic tribes were “barbarians” be upheld from a historical perspective?”
AI replies:
No, the classic claim that Germanic tribes were “barbarians” cannot be upheld from a purely historical perspective, as the term was largely a Roman rhetorical device rather than an objective descriptor.[1][4]
Term’s Origin
“Barbarian” derives from the Greek “barbaros,” mimicking the unintelligible speech of non-Greeks, and Romans applied it to Germanic peoples beyond their borders, like those east of the Rhine. Tacitus’s *Germania* portrayed them with mixed traits—praising virtues like chastity and bravery while decrying “wildness”—to critique Roman decadence more than to assess accurately. This label ignored evidence of Germanic sophistication, such as ironworking, trade networks, and runic writing from the Jastorf culture onward.
Cultural Achievements
Germanic tribes built complex societies with tribal assemblies, advanced metallurgy, and seafaring skills, evident in artifacts from Denmark and northern Germany dating to 500 BCE. They weren’t primitive; archaeology shows permeable borders, constant migrations, and cultural exchanges with Celts and Romans, challenging stereotypes of uniform savagery. Practices like possible human sacrifice were exaggerated or paralleled Roman brutality, such as gladiatorial games and slavery.
Roman Bias Exposed
Romans failed to conquer Germania fully after the Teutoburg Forest defeat in 9 CE, fueling propaganda that depicted tribes as fierce but uncivilized to justify borders. Later, during the Migration Period (375–568 CE), groups like Franks and Goths formed “barbarian kingdoms” within Roman territory, adopting laws, Christianity, and administration—proving adaptability over barbarism. Modern scholarship rejects the term’s validity, viewing it as ethnocentric rather than factual.
Here you need to activate the AI-
generated audio track of the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStkTdpRHWc
NNR-Nick, most likely due to my anti-Nazi criticism that I sent him, created a stream in which he justifies the brutality of the Nazi regime towards its critics as legitimate. There can be no talk of Christianity in such “thinking”; I would even argue that there is just as little talk of racial brotherhood.
https://rumble.com/v7348c6-nightnation.live-the-anti-hitler-resistence.html
https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Liste_von_im_Deutschen_Reich_hingerichteten_Personen
Although the Spanish do not consider themselves descendants of Germanic tribes, they are demanding the return of the Visigothic artifacts that Franco voluntarily handed over to Himmler. Of course, the submissive anti-Germans in the puppet-government, who are left-wing progressive globalists, will uncritically comply with this request.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3770767/Madrid-seeks-return-Visigoth-artefacts-handed-Heinrich-Himmler-1940-prove-Spain-s-Aryan-heritage-Nazis.html
Imagine if psychopathic mass murderer Anders Breivik could “legally” indulge his sadistic lust for murder. Then you get a beast like Willi Herold. Tyranny breeds glorification of violence. A terrifying document of total amorality, vigilante justice, and ultimately anarchy, disguised in the most perverse manner as “justice.”
Whether this story is an exaggeration or corresponds to the facts is difficult to ascertain. In any case, it seems very bizarre to me to believe a 19-year-old hiding in a uniform and to consider him the owner, because officially there were no 19-year-old captains in the Luftwaffe. Enable available English captions:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-3BtbjPw1k
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willi_Herold
Activate available English captions
https://tubitv.com/movies/722240/the-captain
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Captain_(2017_film)
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF8RqWDDBaHTGH4JG0Lhbyh0yqLy1Cn5X