Iran Fires Cluster Munitions At Tel Aviv

/12 Comments/in /by

Iran Fires Cluster Munitions At Tel Aviv| Multiple Impacts In Central Israel Right Now

12 replies
  1. Pierre de Craon
    Pierre de Craon says:

    Given that the United States and Israel have demonstrated that their war-making preference is to slaughter civilians, especially innocent children, en masse, I suppose that there is a certain amount of inevitability in Iran’s decision to employ weaponry that targets Israel’s civilian population. I am unpersuaded, however, that such an approach will do Iran more good than would be accomplished by striking more traditional—and, ipso facto, more morally defensible—targets: those that constitute Israel’s military, industrial, energy, and political infrastructure.

    The question that remains unanswered—to the extent that it is even asked—is this: if, in its turn, Israel retaliates with nuclear weapons, will it be allowed to get away with it by the rest of the world?

    • Baxter N
      Baxter N says:

      I don’t know if Iran’s exactly intentionally targeting civilians in Israel just because they’re using cluster munitions. The use of cluster munitions certainly makes civilian casualties more likely because the impact is now spread over a wider area (and because of the risk of unexploded ordinance), but Israeli military assets are embedded within civilian areas (exactly like Israel accused Hamas, Hezbollah, and now the IRGC of doing). I might be obtuse, but it seems like the primary reason to use these munitions is because they’re a cheap way of overwhelming Israel’s missile defenses. They might not care about civilian casualties, but even in this stage of the war they don’t seem to be trying to maximize them. Even now they’re showing remarkable restraint.

      In the end it doesn’t matter since as you’ve said, the Israeli and now US way of fighting war is to deliberately murder civilians, and Israel’s already used cluster munitions against Lebanon in 2006 and 2025. The US and Israel both manufactures, sells and uses cluster munitions, are not signatories of any treaties banning their use, so there’s a literal one-to-one hypocrisy on this matter. And Iran is already facing maximum ‘retribution’ anyway (unless nukes get involved), so there’s no reason for them to hold back.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        In the end it doesn’t matter …

        Oh, but it does matter, and for precisely the reasons I cited.

    • Elky
      Elky says:

      In your estimate, what percentage of the targets were intended to “slaughter civilians, especially innocent children, en masse”?

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        Surely there is something shockingly emblematic in the fact that one of the three initial targets of the US-Israeli attack was a girls’ school. The most recent count of which I am aware of the number of girls killed is 165. Furthermore, it has been established that the targeting of the school was deliberate—i.e., that the initial Israeli claim that the school was the victim of friendly fire, followed by the equally spurious claim that the destruction was accidental, was as false as the many similar claims made by the Israelis after they willfully destroyed schools, homes, and hospitals in Gaza and murdered children as they walked in the rubble, often as they simply tried to find food.

        There is nothing to be gained, whether from a military or a moral standpoint, by emulating the conduct of these Jewish monsters.

  2. Joe Webb
    Joe Webb says:

    Not to get emotional about these things, but Hot Damn, the NLF is gonna win! I mean Iran, hot damn Iran will win and thus destroy Trumpstein, the GOP, and the Israel Lobby in general also in the Dem party.

    Also, it is a blow for peace by partially disabling the US imperialists and Jew Tools in Congress. Now, gettin ‘ a bit sobered up, this puts the world and us in greater danger of Trumpian rage and Jew Revenge as in the Sampson Option.
    Dunno, but I wonder if The Jews have figured on world revenge on the Jews if Israel goes ballistic, like every Jew all over the world targeted for death. Happy endings you know, just like Jew Hollywood.

    I further wonder if ‘aid and comfort to the enemy’ can only apply if war has been legally declared. Yet, Dictator Trump has said that legal-smegel, it does not constrain Him.

  4. ganainm
    ganainm says:

    The comments section on that vid is 99% pro-Iran. Didn’t YouTube used to censor anti-israel sentiment? Not anymore! It is mainstream now.

  6. Julius Skoolafish
    Julius Skoolafish says:

    • Hilarious Compilation Of Trump Denouncing Middle East Wars as “”STUPID DISASTERS!” – The Jimmy Dore Show

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHCkG7HCJ7c

    Rabbi Weisberg explains why Trump will do whatever he is told/programmed to do by the jews

    • Rabbi Says Trump Is Anointed As G_d’s Messiah To Serve “israel”.
    https://odysee.com/@I-Rabbi-T:3/Rabbi-Says-Trump-Is-Anointed-As-God's-Messiah-To-Serve-Israel.:9

    featured here
    https://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/4609/Renowned-Jewish-Rabbi-Says-Trump-Is-Anointed-As-Gods-Non-Jewish-Messiah-To-Serve-Israel.aspx

  8. Paracelsus88
    Paracelsus88 says:

    Speaking of Joe Webb’s comment “…Happy endings you know, just like Jew Hollywood…”, one historic film that has a true “happy ending” is JUD SUSS: Here is an online link to the film that I found on Bitchute, I hope it opens alright for movie aficionados enamored of “happy endings”:
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/Yz6dwQG5oM0E

    Thank you.

Comments are closed.