The “Seal Puppy” Hunt that’s Coming: The Ache of Envy and Other Obstacles to Change

One lie has the power to tarnish a thousand truths.
Al David

The first thing you need to know is that critical race theory (CRT) is only about White people. They are mean and cruel, those damn Whites. They’re always trying to crush other races. The whole system is rigged in their favor. Who do they think they are? It’s not fair to minorities, it has to change. And according to Jewish American author and historian, Dr. Noel Ignatiev of Harvard University, the only way to change this injustice in a profound way is to abolish the White race:

Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as “the white race” is destroyed—not “deconstructed” but destroyed. The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.[1]

Susan Sontag, born Rosenblatt, who felt, “as a Jew, a special responsibility to side with the oppressed and the weak”[2] agrees wholeheartedly with her coreligionist Mr. Ignatiev:

The truth is that Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Marx, Balanchine ballets, etc., don’t redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history: it is the white race and it alone—its ideologies and inventions—which eradicates autonomous civilizations wherever it spreads, which has upset the ecological balance of the planet, which now threatens the very existence of life itself.[3]

Ignatiev and Rosenblatt are dead, good riddance, but the Jewish war against Whites continues unabated. In books[4] and on social media, there are hundreds of Jewish “White” authors and trolls busy demonizing Whites and making it seem like righteous Whites are at war with their own race:

Because of their ability to often pass as White, one of the most effective strategies Jews have of infiltrating and subverting White Christian nations is to take on a White identity and then speak for their “fellow White people.

This shape-shifting phenomenon has been going on for years on X (formerly Twitter), and one astute observer has painstakingly catalogued over 1,100 examples of Jews pretending to be White while at the same time denigrating Whites for being White, and then switching back to their Jewish identity to shield themselves from any criticism.[5]

Jewish Anti-White Books

Jews pretending to be white on twitter pushing anti-white propaganda

Over a 1000 Shape-Shifting Jews Exposed for Pretending to Be White on Tweeter

Prominent antiracist author and activist Tim Wise, for example, who passes as White, but who identifies, as confirmed by Grok AI of X, as Jewish by heritage and ethnicity, “lectures and writes on how Whites have benefited from slavery, Jim Crow, colonialism, and ‘white privilege’ structures (e.g., land grants, citizenship laws favoring Europeans). He ties current White privilege directly to these histories and urges whites to acknowledge them without denial. In talks and books like Dear White America and White Like Me, he highlights reliance on slave labor for building American wealth and infrastructure, framing it as an enduring legacy that demands reckoning.”[6] Here is one of his most famous quotes:

You white people are on an endangered list. And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving. In forty years or so, maybe fewer, there won’t be any more white people around, and that’s a good thing. [7]

Unfortunately for Whites, a significant number of White “willful dupes and traitors” work hand in hand with Jews and other minorities to suicide their own race and civilization. To completely demoralize their own kind and lower their will for power, and competitiveness, they systematically diminish their cultural pride and self-esteem by denigrating their incomparable achievements and by guilt tripping them about the gas chambers, slavery, colonialism, and what not.

As a result, White children come to hate their parents, their culture, their history and its heroes. Disgusted, ashamed of their seal puppy skin color, they no longer want to mate with their fellow Whites in order to free humanity from their abject presence. To redeem themselves in the end, they deploy with a vengeance the weapons used to batter into oblivion their own race and the civilization it created.

Who Invented CRT?

In his article, “Critical Race Theory as a Jewish Intellectual Weapon,” published in the June 21, 2021, issue of The Occidental Observer, journalist Edmond Connelly writes the following:

It has long been a given that CRT is linked to the social engineering of our “hostile elite,” which in the language of the magazine, The Occidental Observer, means the powerful Jews and Jewish organizations that rule America and much of the West. CRT fits squarely into the mold of Dr. Kevin MacDonald’s “Culture of Critique” category in which Jewish “gurus” concoct a Talmudic verbal assault whose main goal is the further destruction of Gentiles—literally.

More specifically, CRT is an outgrowth of cultural Marxism that weapon of mass destruction concocted by the Jewish Frankfurt School as a final solution to the White problem. The idea is to exterminate every last White, not brutally in a Trotsky type hot genocide, but gently in a Gramsci cold genocide through various means of cultural subversion such as feminism, antiracist activism, extra-European mass immigration, multiculturalism, and forced race mixing by deceitful propaganda.

And according to Edmund Connelly don’t expect Whites to take their guns out soon, as they have been psychologically disarmed:

By carefully controlling and managing schools, universities, the media, and the press, this “foreign group” has succeeded in convincing the vast majority of our racial brothers and sisters that resistance is not only futile, but immoral, barbaric, depraved, and unworthy of a “thinking” individual. By promoting the stereotype of a “racist redneck resistance,” they have made the idea of a struggle for White identity a veritable sin in the minds of nearly all Whites.

In other words, this “foreign group” and their non-Jewish allies have in fact convinced Whites that prolonged suicide is preferable to the absolute evils of racism, nationalism, and supremacism, which lead straight to gas chambers, except in Israel, paradoxically, where state racism, apartheid, exacerbated nationalism, militarism, suprematism, torture, rape, and killing of babies and women in cold blood are the norm.

Moses, the First “Führer” in History: Jewish Racial Consciousness and Supremacism

The “Seal Puppy” Hunt That’s Coming

Now that the “racist rednecks” are morally and psychologically disarmed by fear of anathema, guilt, and noble sentiments such as antiracism, love, compassion, altruism, and tolerance, there is no doubt, claims White nationalist Andrew Anglin—quoted in the above article by Edmund Connelly—that “we are on the verge of a full-scale slaughter. We’ve talked about ‘white genocide’ in terms of mass immigration and using feminism to reduce our population growth—but this cold genocide is about to get hot. People should know about it. There are warning signs everywhere.” Get ready… there will be a bloodbath, the “seal puppy” hunt is coming, especially in the United States where violence against Whites has exploded.

Now, if we presuppose that Andrew Anglin is right, we better find out fast why disparities in academic performance and crime rates between races persist or are worsening in some cities? Why are we on the verge of a “seal puppy” hunt, i.e., civil war, despite the billions invested in CRT, DEI, and the massive antiracist campaigns, which have been so salient since the days of Jewish American anthropologist Franz Boas? Why so little progress has been made after roughly a hundred years of antiracist activity boggles the mind.

In this article, I will not explore the reasons for this dire situation. Before I do, we must first address a few obstacles that stand in the way. Change is never easy—it demands effort, commitment, and resilience. Yet in today’s fast-paced, convenience-driven world, few are willing to put in the hard work it truly requires.

Symbolic Capitalism

“Symbolic capitalism is a sociological concept describing an elite class that derives power and profit from the production and manipulation of symbols, narratives, and legitimacy rather than physical goods.”[8]

Former Jewish US Attorney General Merrick Garland, born Garfinkel, who criminalized parents of students who complained about CRT didn’t seem to mind that we are on the verge of a “seal puppy” war. His daughter and son-in-law were doing a brisk business selling anti-White education materials in US public schools (their highly controversial Panorama Education Company was funded in part by Marc Zuckerberg of Facebook). “The Garland family is fulfilling its sacred mission to genocide Whites (or Amalek as they sometimes call them) while making a tidy profit,” writes journalist Chris Menahan at the beginning of his article, “AG Merrick Garland’s Jewish Family Is Getting Rich Off Selling Anti-White CRT Material to Public Schools,” Renegade Tribune, October 7, 2021.

Antiracist books like the ones written by Tim Wise, cited above, have sold in the millions, primarily to American schools, universities, and public institutions (and increasingly in Europe). Lawyers, jurists, ethicians, professors, politicians, artists, DEI consultants and officers as well as human rights groups and the various Foundations and NGOs, all theoretically devoted to the cause of antiracism, regardless of their race, are all making a living or boosting their ego and status on the fight against racism.

Salaries, careers, grants, speaking gigs, and social status depend on perpetual crisis and the comforting illusion that “advocacy” equals progress. In our civilization, materialism is the ultimate good. Why then would social justice warriors want an end to the compassion or virtue signaling industry, aka woke or symbolic capitalism, that they thrive on? Will they ever see that their refusal to put an end to what benefits them financially is inadvertently reinforcing what they pretend to oppose? It’s possible, but doubtful.

Why? Because as Upton Sinclair famously said, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.” Indeed, financial incentives, i.e., symbolic capitalism, often overrides the pursuit of truth or change.

However, none of this and what follows proves that genuine love, altruism, and compassion don’t exist. But it does suggest that activists—like everyone else—would benefit from examining whether their “good feelings” toward the oppressed serve their own psychological and financial relief more than the oppressed themselves.

Cognitive dissonance

Individuals, groups and nations are frequently unable or unwilling to grasp new realities if acknowledging them threatens their psychological well-being. Humans have an ideological immunity that protects them from facts, which might upset their security or in some cases the victimhood status from which they derive their identity, financial reparations, and various social and political benefits.[9]

Research indicates that “victimhood is a constructed status that confers moral capital, recognition, and resources. Individuals or groups may cultivate this status to demand justice, reparations, or sympathy, effectively ‘thriving’ on the recognition of their suffering.”[10]

The high enrolment of Jews in elite universities, asserts Ron Unz of The Unz Review, depends a lot on their victim status.[11] Moreover, the Holocaust was instrumental in building political support for the creation of Israel in 1948 and “while Israel’s existence is not solely dependent on the historical fact of Jewish victimhood,” notes journalist Rami Khouri, “its ongoing political legitimacy and international support are significantly bolstered by the cultivation and recognition of that status.”[12]

In other words, it’s uncomfortable, to say the least, when your convictions or victimhood status conflict with reality or when you realize that your activism is motivated by all the wrong reasons and because of that, is making things worse.

You can solve the conflict in three ways:

1) You can double down and follow, for example, the advice of Donald Trump’s Jewish mentor Roy Cohen:

• Never admit guilt. Deny everything outright;
• Turn the tables by attacking your opponents in court;
• Work the media tirelessly. It doesn’t matter if you lose in court; what matters is winning in the media. Impose your narrative by demonizing your enemies.[13]

2) You can downplay reality by rationalizing the importance of your beliefs by convincing yourself that your actions are rooted in moral self-licensing.

3) You can face the fact that you were wrong about accepted truths and your core beliefs and you can live in truth in light of your new awareness.

Superficiality

Unlike the technical or material world, psychological change—and this is precisely what we are discussing— is not achieved through superficial activism or blind willpower alone, but it can be prepared for, through sustained and honest study. The actual shift—the moment of lucidity—is often sudden and unforced, but it rests on a foundation of careful self-examination. What blocks psychological change is fear, comfort, and the refusal to look honestly at our own motives and to examine critically opposing viewpoints.

The exact moment of lucidity is unpredictable and cannot be forced, but the practice of honest, critical examination of accepted truths and core beliefs makes it far more likely to occur. But it requires an intensity that excludes mediocrity. To put it in another way, unless you examine your core beliefs and accepted truths carefully, without compromise, from all angles, you will miss their significance and fall back into inaction.

Generally, those who clamor for ready-made solutions without having explored accepted truths and core beliefs don’t genuinely want to change. They only want to operate within the status quo. So, while they’re busy planning to change things later, at some unspecified date—usually as far into the future as possible—they continue to act as they always have. The goal isn’t change itself, but the hope of change, along with the cheap thrills it provides.

Change is necessarily a part of life; the strongest are not the most intelligent but the most flexible, and the more apt to change are those who are unafraid to dive into the rabbit hole. So, “Wherever you stand, dig deep,” says philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, “the spring is underneath! Let the grim yell: ‘That which lies underneath is always hell!’”

Ache of Envy

There is another important factor at the root of much of the unscrupulous and counterproductive antiracist activism now prevailing in modern Western societies, which is often overlooked, and to which conservative philosopher Anthony M. Ludovici was the first to have called attention: “the decisive role played by the harassing ache of Envy in prompting what Hallam in his Constitutional History termed ‘the blind eleemosynary spirit.’”

What is this eleemosynary spirit?

It is the intimate relation which, in most ordinary people’s minds — I speak of people not accustomed to be lucid concerning the nature of their feelings and the motivations of their conduct — exists between Pity and Envy. Because, wherever Envy is widespread, people’s peace of mind is naturally disturbed by the spectacle of any marked superiority — whether of health, wealth, personal gifts or merely situation — in a neighbor.

What brings relief to the ache of Envy?

Obviously, the spectacle of any inferior plight, any misfortune, in a neighbor! Every calamity assailing a human being necessarily appeases the ache of Envy.

How does this work?

In people not too clear about their mental processes, the sense of relief from Envy may insensibly prompt spontaneous feelings of gratification which incite to acts of generosity, and it often does so. They are ready, if not eager to display this half-conscious gratification by indulging in various kinds of indiscriminate and therefore often mischievous benevolence.

Thus, to paraphrase Mr. Ludovici, the idea or the sight of a poor Black person, a refugee, or a Jew, for example, who was himself or his ancestors presumably victim of systematic White racism, colonialism, antisemitism, or genocide may in some people afford some relief from Envy as to provoke good feelings towards that person and an irresistible need to help her or to get involved in antidiscrimination activity. To paraphrase Mr. Ludovici, the necessary corollary to all this would then be that where hate of Whites, DEI measures, or positive discrimination prevail, widespread Envy may be suspected in the population. [14]

Sentimentalism

Unless they can truly change, live in truth, and deal with the core issues of any problem, the actions of any type of activist can be an obstacle to change; what appears on the surface to be a quest for innocence is sometimes a comedy of innocence, a symbolic action responding to purely egocentric factors such as those described above.

This cultural manipulation serves, in particular, to resolve the moral tensions created by our lifestyle by cultivating the illusion that change is imminent. In exchange, the social justice warriors gain in self-esteem—and so does society, since they are its emissaries—in the spirit of this quote by Friedrich Nietzsche from The Antichrist:

When one is charged with sacred tasks, such as amending, saving, redeeming men, when one shelters divinity in one’s breast, when one is the spokesperson for imperatives from beyond, by the mere fact of this mission, one finds oneself immediately outside of purely intellectual evaluations, oneself already almost sanctified by this mission, oneself already the archetype of a higher order!

Thus, the issue is less about change than about the hope of change, along with the positive emotions it evokes at a low personal cost. Seventeenth-century cynics like La Rochefoucauld were well aware of this cultural trick, which they defined as “the homage that vice pays to virtue.”

This gap between appearances and reality generally goes unnoticed because in our culture, cruelty, violence, envy, greed, dishonesty, and the will for power are usually dissociated from apparent good intentions and good feelings.[15] In other words, the exploitation of antiracism or climate catastrophism, for the financial and psychological reasons just described is well perceived precisely because it often hides behind the deceptive mask of love, altruism, and compassion. These positive human qualities should theoretically lead us to paradise on earth, but since in our present civilization, they are oftentimes not genuine, they can lead us if we presuppose that Andrew Anglin cited above is right, to a “seal puppy” hunt, i.e. a civil war, if we don’t change our ways for good.

The Full Cycle

Symbolic Capitalism creates institutional incentives to sustain the appearance of change (e.g., DEI roles, antiracist publishing) — rewarding performance over transformation.

This system thrives because individuals experience Cognitive Dissonance when confronted with truths that threaten their identity, status, or worldview — leading them to deny, deflect, or rationalize.

To resolve dissonance without real change, people retreat into Superficiality — symbolic actions (e.g., reading, posting, protest) that feel productive but avoid deep inquiry or behavioral shift.

Underlying this is the Ache of Envy: the unconscious relief some feel when witnessing others’ misfortune—which fuels impulsive, indiscriminate activism (the “blind eleemosynary spirit”) as a form of psychological compensation.

All of this is masked by Sentimentalism—the conflation of good feelings with moral action—where compassion, love, and justice become emotional performances that inflate self-worth while preserving the status quo.

Institutional rewards (symbolic capitalism) → Threat to identity (dissonance) → Avoidance through shallow action (superficiality) → Motivated by hidden envy → Justified by sentimental moral self-image → No real change, but the illusion of progress is maintained.

Together, they describe not just resistance to change — but a system that profits from and perpetuates the very problems it claims to solve.

Lucidity

In the end, when you have removed these obstacles, when you have truly explored accepted truths and your core beliefs, you will clearly grasp the crux of the matter—how the pieces of the puzzle fit together—and you will see the Big Picture in a eureka way. Once you see it in this fashion, you cannot unsee it; and the solution will present itself to you, without anyone having to impose it.

This awareness is in itself the necessary condition for change. As such, what has just been described can act as a template for the exploration of ineffective or counterproductive activism in any field.

---

[1] Editorial, “Abolish the White Race,” Harvard Magazine, 2002.

[2] Avishay Artsy, “A life of ideas: Remembering Susan Sontag,” Jewish Journal, November 24, 2014.

[3] Susan Sontag, “What’s Happening in America?” (a response to a Partisan Review symposium questionnaire), Partisan Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, Winter 1967, pp. 57–58.

[4] Jewish Anti-White Books, https://www.thehardtruth.info/jewish-anti-white-books, The Hard Truth Files.

[5] This PDF by Christians for Truth has disappeared from the internet: “Over 1,000 Shape-Shifting Jews Exposed for Pretending to Be White on X (formerly Twitter),”August 19, 2019: https://christiansfortruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Shape-Shifting-Jews-on-Twitter-Exposed-.pdf

[6] Information obtained from Grok AI on X in response to the question: “Do you have examples of activists denigrating the achievements of Whites and guilt-tripping them for slavery and colonialism, for example?”

[7] Tim Wise, “An Open Letter to the White Right, On the Occasion of Your Recent, Successful Temper Tantrum,” originally posted on Daily Kos and his own site (timwise.org), November 3, 2010. “The quote aligns with his public record (e.g., lectures, books like White Like Me and Dear White America, and talks on privilege and population shifts). It is widely circulated in right-leaning and identitarian circles as evidence of anti-White sentiment.” From Grok AI on X.

[8] This definition is from Brave navigator AI. For a good overview of this type of capitalism see Musa al-Gharbi, We Have Never Been Woke: The Cultural Contradictions of a New Elite, Princeton University Press, 2025.

[9] Wikipedia.

[10] Alex Vandermaas-Peeler, Jelena Subotic, and Michael Barnett, “Constructing victims: Suffering and status in modern world order,” Cambridge University Press, December 22, 2022.

[11] Ron Unz, “Racial Discrimination at Harvard,” The Unz Review, 2016.

[12] Rami Khouri, “Zionism’s Perpetual Victimhood,” Harvard Kennedy School. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, April 18, 2010.

[13] Laurent Guyénot, « Fin de l’ivresse trumpiste : gueule de bois et auto-critique »,

Substack, 5 mai, 2026.

[14] Anthony M. Ludovivi, “The Universal Ache of Envy,” work cited, p. 174 to 176.

[15] Yi-Fu Tuan, PhD, Escapism, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.