• MISSION STATEMENT
  • TERMS
  • PRIVACY
The Occidental Observer
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • SUBSCRIBE TOQ
  • CONTACT USPlease send all letters to the editor, manuscripts, promotional materials, and subscription questions to Editors@TheOccidentalObserver.net.
  • DONATE
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

General

Hollywood: “The ATM of the Democratic Party”

July 24, 2024/13 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald
Hollywood power brokers pushed for Biden to step down. Now they’re stepping up for Harris

Headshots of Jack Black, George Clooney, Jeffrey Katzenberg, Sheryl Lee Ralph, Julia Roberts and Barbra Streisand.
Clockwise from top left, Democrat-supporting celebrities Jack Black, George Clooney, Jeffrey Katzenberg, Barbra Streisand, Julia Roberts and Sheryl Lee Ralph.

Barely a month ago, a veritable who’s who of Hollywood A-listers turned out for President Joe Biden. The event, organized by former DreamWorks Animation Chief Executive Jeffrey Katzenberg, drew George Clooney, Barbra Streisand and Julia Roberts.

Jimmy Kimmel moderated an interview with Biden and former President Barack Obama at the gathering in downtown Los Angeles’ Peacock Theater. Sheryl Lee Ralph sang and Jack Black entertained the star-studded crowd wearing a pair of American flag overalls.

The evening raised more than $30 million, the largest one-night campaign haul in Democratic history.

But behind the fawning praise and laughs, cracks began to appear in the public façade.

Some of the most powerful members of Hollywood, who had steadfastly supported the president, harbored some serious reservations about the 81-year-old’s mental acuity.

…

At times during the event, Biden’s answers meandered and Obama occasionally jumped in to redirect the conversation.

Then came Biden’s disastrous debate performance. And those very same industry stalwarts who had just feted Biden began saying he should not seek reelection.

“Lost” co-creator Damon Lindelof, who attended the fundraiser, was one of the first to publicly call for Biden to step aside. “Biden has to go & the Dems need to wake up,” he wrote in a column for Deadline, adding that donors should withhold checks until he did so. Within days others followed suit. Netflix co-founder and major Democratic donor Reed Hastings also called on Biden to end his reelection bid.

The most damaging blow came a week later, when Clooney wrote a blistering Op-Ed for the New York Times, saying, “The Joe Biden I was with three weeks ago at the fundraiser was not the Joe ‘big F-ing deal’ Biden of 2010. He wasn’t even the Joe Biden of 2020. He was the same man we all witnessed at the debate.”

Clooney’s public excoriation proved to be a tipping point, creating a public relations disaster for the Biden campaign, said a confidant close to a senior Democratic leader who was not authorized to speak publicly. Soon others — including actor-filmmaker Rob Reiner — began airing similar sentiments, contributing to the pressure that culminated in the incumbent president’s extraordinary decision to drop out as the Democratic nominee.

The remarkable turn of events underlined the outsize role that Hollywood — long known as the “ATM of the Democratic Party” — plays in political campaigns and the money that fuels them.

“In the world of politics, money is what drives these things, and the fact that many in Hollywood closed up their checkbooks had a very big impact,” said Steve Caplan, adjunct instructor of public relations and advertising at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.

Now, entertainment heavyweights are putting their money behind Vice President Kamala Harris’ White House campaign. Hastings contributed $7 million to a super PAC supporting Harris, the largest donation that he has made to a single candidate, said a person close to the Netflix co-founder who was not authorized to comment. The Information first reported the donation.

“We are all in for Kamala and have been since the moment she announced,” said Andy Spahn, a Los Angeles political consultant to media moguls such as Katzenberg and Steven Spielberg. “Tremendous excitement and energy here around Kamala’s candidacy. We are all in.”

…

Many of those who had blasted Biden and his advisors are now galvanized around Harris, whose husband, Doug Emhoff, is a prominent Los Angeles entertainment attorney.

…

As the praise and endorsements rolled in, so has the money.

Spahn, the political consultant, noted that Harris raised $81 million in the first 24 hours after Biden announced he would not seek reelection, a record-breaking haul. “More to come,” Spahn said.

Diller told The Times that he and his wife, fashion designer Diane von Furstenberg, plan to give “the maximum” allowed under federal law to the new Democratic presidential nominee.

“I think it was inevitable,” he said of Biden stepping down, noting that his preferred Democratic candidate is Harris, calling her “qualified and competent.”

And Hollywood is gearing up for another glitzy star-studded fundraiser, likely to happen before the Democratic National Convention next month in Chicago, according to two individuals with knowledge of the event.

“The last 24 hours have been a lot of excitement — sign me up, where can I contribute, how do I get involved?” said Wendy Greuel, a former Los Angeles city controller who worked in President Bill Clinton’s administration and for the entertainment firm of DreamWorks SKG. “Whether it’s the entertainment industry, whether it’s activists, it has been a shot in the arm for people to engage or reengage.”

She added that Democrats were boosted by the fact a decision had been made and there is a goal to pursue.

“The sense of limbo was challenging,” Greuel said. “The excitement is we have a plan. We have a mission to defeat Donald Trump and we’re behind Vice President Kamala Harris for president of the United States. It’s a shot in the arm. People appreciate this is the pathway to have a Democratic nominee and everyone is rowing in the same direction.”

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2024-07-24 08:23:372024-07-24 08:23:37Hollywood: “The ATM of the Democratic Party”

Biden is still a sociopath

July 22, 2024/9 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Since I have called Biden a sociopath, I suppose I should say something about his dropping out. What we hear from the Democrats, of course, is that is shows that he is a great patriot who selflessly bailed out on the presidency for the good of the party and the country. The reality is that there was no path forward. The money had dried up and an increasing number of Democrats were urging him to resign. Biden’s still the same selfish, narcissistic politician that he has always been. Might as well retire in glory and with half the country thinking he’s a hero than get clobbered by Trump in the election.

And then there’s Kamala, the cackling super-airhead whose rise to fame and fortune started with having an affair with Willy Brown. Continuity of sociopathy. And she emulates Biden in uttering absolute jibberish—as Pelosi says she is “brilliantly astute.”

Being brilliantly astute, these are her thoughts on time:

As is often the case, Ann Coulter says it  best:

Joe Biden: American Hero!

The courage, the patriotism, the strength, the selflessness!

Following weeks of calling Biden a narcissistic, stubborn-ass dementia patient, the moment he acceded to demands that he drop out …. 

Biden’s withdrawal is an act of SUCH SELFLESSNESS AND PATRIOTISM that I’m not certain a spot on Mt Rushmore is quite sufficient. [She forgot ‘courageous’. But the NYTimes certainly didn’t: President Biden’s decision to exit the 2024 presidential election is a fitting coda for a man whose life has been devoted to public service. Mr. Biden has served the nation well as its president. By agreeing to step down when his term ends in January, he is greatly increasing the chance that his party is able to protect the nation from the dangers of returning Donald Trump to the presidency.]

Is it too early to talk about renaming the country Bidenia?

On Morning Joe, Jon Meacham is the neutral moderator for the debate on Biden’s greatness.

And somewhat to my surprise, even the scrupulously neutral Meacham, on considering the issue carefully, has concluded that Yes, America owes Joe Biden a debt of gratitude for being the FIRST to recognize Charlottesville as the gravest threat to our Republic in its 240 year plus history…

The rest of us were sleepwalking through history.

Mika: “the January 6 rioters who defecated ALL OVER THE CAPITOL.”

[Still waiting for photos of this claim, which rests exclusively on the word of “a source close to incoming Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer” and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries.]

 

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2024-07-22 11:21:242024-07-22 17:57:16Biden is still a sociopath

James Edwards Interviews Former Secret Service Agent Gary J. Byrne on the Assassination Attemnpt

July 21, 2024/2 Comments/in General/by James Edwards

The always important and interesting Political Cesspool show, this one on the attempt to assassinate Trump. The first 30 minutes are an introduction featuring the views of James and Keith, the last 30 minutes are the interview with Byrne. Mismanagement, under-resourced, incompetent, political appointments (Cheatle), ass-covering, Trump Derangement Syndrome. Why didn’t the SS secure the building even assuming the local police didn’t do their job?

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 James Edwards https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png James Edwards2024-07-21 09:00:042024-07-21 09:00:04James Edwards Interviews Former Secret Service Agent Gary J. Byrne on the Assassination Attemnpt

Commentary on What Really Happened in Butler, PA

July 19, 2024/18 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald
Okay, have at it with the “conspiracy theories” in the comments. The big thing for me is that there is nothing on the motive, even though they have his phone and presumably his social media. A media-induced hate-Trump narrative — not exactly uncommon — would be devastating to the left. What if they found something like approving of Joy Reid “screaming about Trump as a Hitlerian dictator (‘Then let me know who I got to vote for to keep Hitler out of the White House’)” or Rachel Maddow “bloviating about studying Hitler to understand Trump?”
What are they hiding if not that? We already know that the FBI is a left-activist organization and likely terrified of another Trump administration after what happened last time, such as lying to the FISA court about the Steele dossier. (Newly Declassified Document Indicates FB… | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary)  Might as well have Joy Reid do the investigation.
What they have announced is that the assassin posted a message on a video game platform: “July 13 will be my premiere. Watch as it unfolds,” suggesting a desire for his 15-minutes of fame. Nothing else to my knowledge. There must be more. 
But I really can’t buy that Crooks was part of some kind of conspiracy. Not the guy the globalists would choose for that. As Ron Unz notes below, they would choose someone much more professional. 
The other thing that bugs me is Kimberly Cheatle’s “sloped roof” excuse for not securing the area where the shooter fired because it was “dangerous” is ludicrous, but perhaps just a DEI-committed bureaucrat trying to cover her ass. Weakly. But I suppose it opens the door for darker theories. Did the FBI know that Crooks was planning this and inform the Secret Service? We’ll probably never know without a complete and independent investigation into Crooks’ social media and phone. The left-activist reputation of the FBI in recent years gives one little confidence that will happen.
                                                                                                          *   *   *
Ron Paul’s take, via The Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity,

Just days after the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, theories are flying from all directions. Many who ridiculed the “conspiracy theories” of conservatives are now suggesting the whole event was a set-up to boost Trump in the polls ahead of the election. Others suggest it was the “deep state” or even foreign actors who organized it.

Former US Navy Seal and founder of Blackwater, Erik Prince, claims that “The fact that [the Secret Service] allowed a rifle armed shooter within 150 yds to a preplanned event is either malice or massive incompetence.” He went on to observe that, “unaccountable bloated bureaucracies continue to fail us as Americans,” adding that “unserious and unworthy people in positions of authority got us to this near disaster. Merit and execution must be the only deciding factors in hiring and leadership, not the social engineering priority of the day.”

Video has emerged showing that for at least two minutes law enforcement knew someone with a gun was on a roof aiming at the former President and no one communicated the need to pull Trump from the stage. You can clearly hear the crowd warning law enforcement that someone was on the roof. Yet he was unhindered until the first shots rang out.

This is the same mainstream media that has been comparing Donald Trump to Hitler for years, and now pretends to be shocked that their vile rhetoric ended up in violence.

There is a good reason why the mainstream media is regarded by the American public with record levels of contempt.

The current Director of the Secret Service has been interviewed expressing her dedication to “diversity” in hiring agents.

What if her dedication to DEI goals led to an agency that is more “diverse” but fails at its core mission? Can we rely on the media to inform us of this? Or will they, as usual, just blame it all on the Second Amendment?

What if the problem with the Secret Service is that it was moved into the bloated, incompetent, and menacing Department  of Homeland Security, the creation of which I strongly opposed when I was in Congress?

We shouldn’t count on hearing the truth about the attempted assassination from the mainstream media.

No wonder the elites remain determined to censor social media sites like Twitter/X and TikTok.

We live in an empire of lies, propped up by the mainstream media. And seeking the truth in this empire of lies is the greatest challenge for us in the moral bankruptcy in which we live.


From Ron Unz  The Attempted Assassination of Donald Trump, by Ron Unz – The Unz Review

…

Assassinating a former president who is leading in the current polls is a very serious undertaking, and Trump’s lucky survival has drastically strengthened the support he enjoys both from the voters and from the billionaire donor class, while his security will surely be massively increased. I think it quite unlikely that any future sniper will have as easy a time gaining access to him at a rally or anywhere else. As Emerson said, “When you strike at a king, you must kill him.”

So if Trump’s enemies had decided to have him killed, I doubt they would have selected an untrained 20-year-old nursing home worker as their assassin [agreed] , a choice that resulted in the failure that occurred. Surely a far more professional sniper would have been employed, a sniper who never would have missed his target. Arranging for the Secret Service agents and the local police to stand down and provide an opening would have entailed enormous political risks, and what good would that do if the gunman selected couldn’t shoot straight? If any powerful organization or individual had been behind the assassination plot, Trump would be dead and Americans would be arguing about a successful rather than a botched assassination.

The dozens of security personnel who left Trump vulnerable are now being denounced as grossly negligent in the media, and if any of them had been given suspicious orders responsible for their debacle, they will surely soon come forward and defend themselves by explaining what had happened and implicating those responsible. If none of them do so, then the likelihood of any anti-Trump plot begins to dissipate, and the explanation of sheer incompetence becomes the most plausible theory.

One claim I’ve seen is that the gunman was wearing some sort of military-themed shirt and casually carrying his rifle in plain sight, leading most onlookers to assume that he was a member of one of the various different organizations tasked with ensuring Trump’s safety. This seems like exactly the sort of stupid bureaucratic mistake that can easily occur when multiple government agencies are involved in a common project.

Meanwhile, some anti-Trump circles have naturally promoted their own contrary conspiracy theories. They have suggested that the attack was a daring false-flag operation organized by Trump or his close allies, intended to only slightly wound the candidate and thereby greatly bolster his political campaign, just as has now happened.

However, I think this scenario is even less plausible than the other one. Once again, we must realize that the shooter selected for this dangerously lethal operation was an untrained 20-year-old firing from a distance of 300 feet, a sniper who hit Trump’s ear rather than his head. Thus, any such plan to boost Trump could very easily have ended up killing him instead, and it’s difficult to believe that any rational Trump supporter would have taken such a gigantic risk.

Perhaps some of these conspiracy advocates believe that the wound itself was somehow faked, and that all the Secret Service agents who saw the injury at close range and hustled Trump away were conspirators in the plot. But lacking any evidence, these sorts of theories grow ever more complex and unlikely.

My own reconstruction of what happened is different and much simpler.

When I first heard that Trump had survived an attempted assassination, my surprise was not that it had occurred but that there hadn’t already been a dozen or more previous attacks. I doubt that any political figure in modern American history has ever been so massively demonized by our mainstream media as Donald J. Trump during the last eight or nine years. He’s been vilified as a fascist, a Hitler, a traitor, a Russian stooge, a rapist, a racist, a swindler. Trump was endlessly portrayed as a fiend absolutely determined to destroy American freedom and democracy, someone who represented our country’s deadliest human enemy.

Our media creates our reality and for most of the last decade, hundreds of millions of Americans have been completely blanketed by these unrelenting waves of ferocious anti-Trump propaganda, so surely many thousands of them would have been unbalanced enough to consider saving our country by taking the law into their own hands and patriotically risking their own lives to remove that deadly human menace. The media had spent all these years painting a very bright target on Trump’s back, and I’ve been astonished that until a couple of days ago no American had yet taken aim at it.

Consider an analogous case from a few years ago. For many years, anti-immigration activists loudly proclaimed that our country was being “invaded” by hordes of hostile Mexican immigrants. Therefore, I was hardly too surprised that in 2019 a very patriotic but somewhat dim-witted 21-year-old named Patrick Wood Crusius took that heated political rhetoric a little too literally and decided to shoot as many of those foreign invaders as he could, killing a couple of dozen Hispanics at a Walmart store in El Paso, Texas. I strongly suspect that the young gunman who tried to kill Trump acted out of roughly similar motives.

Finally, I was generally pleased to see that Trump named Sen. J.D. Vance as his running mate. [Me too. Britain will be an Islamist country under Labour, claims JD Vance (telegraph.co.uk)] Although I’m not exactly thrilled with many of Vance’s positions, notably his extremely aggressive rhetoric regarding Iran and the Middle East, he seemed like the least bad choice among the several names under consideration, and we have to settle for what we can get.

Back in January 2013, Prof. Amy Chua and others had invited me to the Yale Law School to give a talk on my Meritocracy analysis of elite university admissions, and Vance, then using his previous name of Hamel, had been the young law school student who met me when I arrived and guided me around. Now, less than a dozen years later, he’s certainly come up a great deal in the world, being on the verge of becoming one of the youngest vice presidents in our national history, someone just a heartbeat away from sitting in the Oval Office. It’s very nice to know that he’s fully aware of some of the highly-controversial matters of great importance to our national future.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2024-07-19 10:14:412024-07-19 11:20:02Commentary on What Really Happened in Butler, PA

Update: They’ll have to drag Biden out of the White House to get him to quit

July 19, 2024/8 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Update: Called it. “Biden says he’s returning to campaign trail next week as calls grow for him to step aside.” I really thought—and many predicted—that he would drop out this weekend. I guess he’s not listening to all those urging to do it for the good of the country, or even for the good of the Democrats terrified of a Trump landslide. Shocking!! But that’s what narcissistic sociopaths do. Utterly predictable. I’ve even read reports that big donor Democrats in Congress have offered money to Democrat politicians to publicly reject Biden or said they will withhold money to politicians who stay in the Biden fold. To little avail.

It may happen eventually, but this is all about Biden and his ego and Jill’s desire to stay in the limelight a while longer. The sociopathy of our political class on full display.

The august New York Times is one of nearly the entire mainstream media freaking out over Biden’s performance in last night’s debate. Biden’s performance was entirely predictable. He is senile, and, as anyone who watches conservative news channels realizes, without a teleprompter he can’t put a decent sentence together and often wanders off the podium without seeming to know where to go or what to do. He was a different person in the State of the Union speech in March, and today he came out animated and energetic in North Carolina in the presence of a very friendly audience and (presumably) a teleprompter—and perhaps a change of meds.

The Times’ editorial board and many other left-leaning media outlets have come out asking him to resign—while also saying they will endorse him if he doesn’t. The Times even ran a column saying the Dems should endorse Kamala (“Kamala Harris Could Win This Election. Let her“). Here’s the editorial board on Biden:

The president appeared on Thursday night as the shadow of a great public servant. He struggled to explain what he would accomplish in a second term. He struggled to respond to Mr. Trump’s provocations. He struggled to hold Mr. Trump accountable for his lies, his failures and his chilling plans. More than once, he struggled to make it to the end of a sentence. …

As it stands, the president is engaged in a reckless gamble. There are Democratic leaders better equipped to present clear, compelling and energetic alternatives to a second Trump presidency. There is no reason for the party to risk the stability and security of the country by forcing voters to choose between Mr. Trump’s deficiencies and those of Mr. Biden. It’s too big a bet to simply hope Americans will overlook or discount Mr. Biden’s age and infirmity that they see with their own eyes.

If the race comes down to a choice between Mr. Trump and Mr. Biden, the sitting president would be this board’s unequivocal pick. That is how much of a danger Mr. Trump poses. But given that very danger, the stakes for the country and the uneven abilities of Mr. Biden, the United States needs a stronger opponent to the presumptive Republican nominee. To make a call for a new Democratic nominee this late in a campaign is a decision not taken lightly, but it reflects the scale and seriousness of Mr. Trump’s challenge to the values and institutions of this country and the inadequacy of Mr. Biden to confront him. …

Supporters of the president are already explaining away Thursday’s debate as one data point compared with three years of accomplishments. But the president’s performance cannot be written off as a bad night or blamed on a supposed cold, because it affirmed concerns that have been mounting for months or even years. Even when Mr. Biden tried to lay out his policy proposals, he stumbled. It cannot be outweighed by other public appearances because he has limited and carefully controlled his public appearances.

“Carefully controlled public appearances”—just like in 2020 when he spent almost the entire campaign in his basement with the covid excuse. The fact is that Biden has obviously lost it, and it’s been obvious for a long time, although not to liberals who only tune into the liberal media (the vast majority).

But that scarcely matters because virtually anyone can be president given the fact that the White House staff and the heads of the various cabinet posts can run the government credibly in the absence of a functioning brain in the president. That’s why the Times feels good about unequivocally endorsing him if it comes to that. They are just worried that he won’t be reelected.

But the reality is that Biden is a typical sociopathic American politician. It’s always been about him and his massive ego. I recall (but can’t find right now) an article on Biden meeting the editorial board of a prominent newsmagazine and rambling on and on, way off-topic, until people started walking out. And that was well before he was president. As a politician he’s changed his views time and again depending on what he thinks will keep him afloat. And in my opinion the case for Biden being corrupt in collusion with Hunter is very strong.

So the sociopath won’t drop out. And it’s hard to see how the Democrats can get rid of him if he doesn’t. The title of the Times‘ editorial is “To Serve His Country, President Biden Should Leave the Race.” Appealing to Biden’s sense of patriotism and the “good of the country” is about the most asinine thing imaginable. Like most American politicians of both parties, his allegiance is only to himself.

But like the Times editorial board, the Trump-hating left will vote for him anyway. That will leave a lot of independents and undecideds for the Dems to worry about. But I’m sure they have a Plan B like they did in 2020—things that make cheating easier, like mailing ballots to everyone, no-ID voting (don’t a racist and demand a state-issued photo ID), ballot harvesting, hacking the voting machines, and anything else they can come up with, knowing that just like last time, the media will label any objections a “conspiracy theory.” (See Patrick Cleburne’s column on Joe Fried’s debunking of all the claims about how the 2020 election was “the most secure election in American history.”)

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2024-07-19 05:00:082024-07-19 16:42:45Update: They’ll have to drag Biden out of the White House to get him to quit

Hey! Are Those Bullets In Your NPR Tote Bag?

July 18, 2024/1 Comment/in General/by Ann Coulter
Hey! Are Those Bullets in Your NPR Tote?

If you were worried that liberals would tone down the apocalyptic rhetoric about Donald Trump after Saturday’s assassination attempt — He’s an existential threat to democracy! a fascist! an aspiring dictator! an authoritarian! Hitler! — you can rest easy.

Apparently, the left has concluded that the best way to avoid political violence in the future is to ratchet up their dire warnings about the end of democracy presaged by a second Trump presidency. (That’s almost as good as their plan to lower deficits by spending more.)

Two days after the shooting, Vox announced in a headline, “Yes, it’s still fair to call Trump a threat to democracy.”

President Joe Biden agreed, telling NBC’s Lester Holt, “How do you talk about the threat to democracy, which is real, when [Trump] says things like he says.” (Otherwise, it was a great interview except that the president kept calling Lester “Bryant.” Amazingly, it’s necessary to add: That’s a joke.)

MSNBC’s Joy Reid called Trump “the greatest purveyor and promoter of political violence, really, since anyone can remember.” Pro tip for Biden defenders: Maybe don’t bring up people’s ability to remember things.

I’m not sure how to measure who the biggest “purveyor and promoter of political violence” is, but I can do a body count. And when it comes to political violence, the left beats the living daylights out of the right, so to speak.

Granted, we’re only 248 years into this experiment, but so far, every single shooting of a national politician in the U.S. has been committed by a person on the left — or someone even more deranged than a liberal.

A few would-be assassins were simply delusional nuts. Richard Lawrence, for example, was a house painter who thought he was King Richard III of England. He tried to shoot President Andrew Jackson because he thought the United States owed him money.

The rest were political activists who may have been crazy enough to be left-wingers but were not so crazy as to believe they were King Richard III.

Democrat, actor and peace activist John Wilkes Booth shot President Abraham Lincoln on April 14, 1865, because, as he explained in a letter to his family, he loved “peace more than life.” (But he really wanted to direct.)

Charles J. Guiteau, who shot President James Garfield in 1881, had a long relationship with a utopian commune, the Oneida Community, where free love and communal child-rearing were practiced — and this was before Hillary Clinton’s “It Takes a Village”!

Leon Czolgosz, who killed President William McKinley in 1901, was a socialist and anarchist inspired by socialist radical Emma Goldman.

Giuseppe Zangara plotted to kill both Republican President Herbert Hoover and President-elect Franklin Roosevelt, intending to assassinate “all capitalist presidents and kings.” He just missed Roosevelt, killing Chicago Mayor Anton Cermak instead.

Lee Harvey Oswald, who shot President John F. Kennedy on Nov. 22, 1963, was a stone-cold communist since reading Communist propaganda as a teenager. He moved to the USSR, and when his application for Soviet citizenship was denied, slit his wrists. He then moved with his Russian wife and child back to the U.S., planning to move to Cuba and biding his time passing out “Fair Play for Cuba” leaflets.

Inspired by Communist and Socialist Party literature, Oswald first tried to kill Maj. Gen. Edwin A. Walker, a John Bircher; then former Vice President Richard Nixon; and finally did kill President Kennedy — or so the mafia and the CIA would have us believe!

Upon his arrest, Oswald immediately called John Abt, lawyer for the American Communist Party, saying he wanted Abt to defend him so he could use the trial to showcase his Marxist beliefs.

Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme, who shot at President Gerald Ford in 1975, was part of Charles Manson’s countercultural hippie cult. She pulled a gun on Ford because she was upset about the plight of the California redwood — which put her on the shortlist for a MacArthur “genius” grant. Sadly, a woman has to do twice as much as a man …

Seventeen days later, Sara Jane Moore tried to kill Ford because, she said, “the government had declared war on the left.”

(Remarkably, these two assassination attempts on her husband didn’t lead Betty Ford into any sort of self-destructive behavior, thank goodness!)

In the entire history of the nation, only two senators and two congressmen have been assassinated. Three of the four were killed by “progressives” for political reasons.

The first member of Congress to be assassinated was Republican James M. Hinds of Arkansas. He was killed in 1868 by secretary of the Democratic Committee of Monroe County George A. Clark.

Sen. Robert Kennedy was killed on June 5, 1968, by Sirhan Sirhan, a Palestinian extremist angry with Kennedy for his support of Israel. (Luckily, that was the last recorded incident of extremist political violence by a Palestinian ever since, as far as I know.)

The most recent assassination of a member of Congress was in 1978, when Rep. Leo Ryan was killed by members of Jim Jones’ left-wing cult in Guyana.

There are other, less homicidal comparisons to be made.

No conservative has ever run at a secretary of State, waving bloody hands in her face (Code Pink’s Desiree Anita Ali-Fairooz at Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice when she was testifying before Congress).

No conservative has ever hit a Democratic politician in the face with a stupid sign, or attacked him as he mowed his lawn, breaking his ribs. (GOP Senate candidate Rand Paul in 2010; and again Sen. Paul in 2017).

No conservative has ever sneaked into a Democratic National Convention and heckled the speaker (Obama bundler Jodie Evans at Sarah Palin during the 2008 Republican National Convention).

No conservative has ever shot up the Democratic congressional baseball team to protest a Democratic president, as a Trump-hating Bernie Sanders supporter did to Republicans in 2017 (James T. Hodgkinson, wounding five, Rep. Steve Scalise critically).

Before you start wailing about how we “almost lost our democracy on Jan. 6,” that was the only right-wing mob violence in U.S. history. And we’ll never hear the end of it. Your grandchildren will be in nursing homes and Jan. 6 will still be at the top of the news feed.

Pretty weak tea, compared to the epic violence exhibited the previous year by BLM protesters, ginned up by the police-hating media.

Jan. 6 carnage: One person died — protester Ashley Babbitt, who was killed in cold blood by a black Capitol Police officer for trespassing; and $2.7 million in property damage.

BLM carnage: 25 deaths, thousands of injured law enforcement officers, hundreds more hospitalized, $2 billion worth of property damage, and torched stores, neighborhoods and police precincts.

Liberals accusing the former president of inciting political violence is factually incorrect, deeply ironic and slightly silly. (Other than that, good point!) Trump needs to hear Biden’s thoughts on political violence like he needs another hole in the head.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Ann Coulter https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Ann Coulter2024-07-18 12:33:462024-07-18 12:49:32Hey! Are Those Bullets In Your NPR Tote Bag?

Philip Weiss: Israel is falling apart, and American leaders are in denial

July 17, 2024/4 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Israel falling apart, by Philip Weiss, an American Jew who is on the left, but unlike most Jewish liberals, he deplores Israel’s conduct toward the Palestinians. I respect his opinions and have commented on his work many times.

Several left-wing voices have said lately that Israel is falling apart. The society is torn over the war, the government is dominated by brutal racists, and the country’s only answer to the fundamental question – half the population is Palestinian – is apartheid and rolling massacres.

Israeli political culture smacks of fascism. The latest slaughters of civilians in Gaza gain immediate approval by centrist politicians while right-wing ministers issue calls for execution of Palestinian prisoners. The whole society denounces the release of an innocent doctor abducted by Israeli forces in Gaza and embarks on (what Gideon Levy calls) “a hysterical campaign of panic, incrimination, hatred, dehumanization, lust for vengeance, thirst for blood.”

There is a sense that Israel has no way out. No wonder there are reports that hundreds of thousands of Israelis have fled the country since last October.

How does the United States deal with these realities? The answer for the last 20 years of anti-Palestinian hatred has been denial. The answer for this political cycle is also utter denial.

The U.S. establishment insists that Israel is a healthy democracy and it is capable of moving towards a two-state solution in which Palestinians live side by side with Israelis.

No expert on the situation believes as much; but these fictions sustain our political class, like Paul Begala saying on CNN last week that Biden has shown great leadership on Gaza. If our pundits had to confront the truth– Israel is a Jewish supremacist state that is only interested in more land with fewer Palestinians on it, and it kills young Palestinians without any hesitation– the U.S. would have to take action along with the rest of the world, to isolate Israel.

This is the lesson of the Jamaal Bowman defeat; the congressman saw the occupation up close in 2021 on a J Street trip to Israel and Palestine and according to excellent reporting by Calder McHugh in Politico, he could not lie about Israel’s dead end and war crimes.

“[The two-state solution] was the thing that you say so that everyone leaves you alone … so that at the very least you could satisfy both sides, Palestinian freedom and the Jewish state,” [Bowman] says. But what he took from five days of meetings and interviews, over boxed lunches and fancy dinners, was that there was no political will at the top of the Israeli government to pursue a two-state solution or engage in any sort of sustainable peace process — and that America’s willingness to send significant aid to Israel without any conditions attached was therefore unwise.

And after Bowman called Gaza a genocide, and said that boycott is legitimate, J Street stripped its endorsement.

Bowman had undercut the great lie of American foreign policy. That Israel is a robust democracy, and it’s moving toward a Palestinian state.

Telling the truth is politically impossible because of the Israel lobby. The Democratic Party is incapable of alienating forces that bring down nearly $20 million on the head of Jamaal Bowman in a few weeks and smear him as an antisemite for telling the truth. As Columbia deans were suspended for texting about pro-Israel donors.

So while Israel is in a freefall to which its only answer is unending massacres and famine that the world sees and hates, the U.S. crisis is simple. Our leaders must deny this reality to keep the lobby happy.

The good news is that some truthtellers in the U.S. mainstream are not afraid to speak out. There is of course the Squad, and a segment of communal Jews who have turned on Israel—IfNotNow [“We are a movement of American Jews organizing our community to end U.S. support for Israel’s apartheid system and demand equality, justice, and a thriving future for all Palestinians and Israelis”] and Peter Beinart [like Weiss, a liberal Jew critical of Israel].

Lately Megan Stack in the New York Times published an excellent report on the overwhelming “darkness” in Israel. Stack characterized Israeli society as one of official “Jewish supremacy,” repeatedly cited the apartheid reports, and said that Netanyahu had demolished the possibility of two states.

The piece quoted a mainstream columnist who responded to pictures of Palestinians on the beach in Gaza by calling for “rivers of blood.”

“We should have seen a lot more revenge there,” Mr. [Yehuda] Shlezinger unrepentantly added. “A lot more rivers of Gazans’ blood.”

Shlezinger is not a “fringe” figure, Stack said. The signs of the hardening are “in plain view.”

Dehumanizing language and promises of annihilation from military and political leaders. Polls that found wide support for the policies that have wreaked devastation and starvation in Gaza. Selfies of Israeli soldiers preening proudly in bomb-crushed Palestinian neighborhoods. A crackdown on even mild forms of dissent among Israelis.

The piece showed that when a society doubles down on apartheid, it becomes fascistic.

But the U.S. mainstream is still incapable of accepting this message. Stack is an outlier at the New York Times. It is verboten to name apartheid in the Democratic Party. The cable stations won’t touch this stuff.

Liberal Zionists play an essential role in the denial. Two years ago I reported that a J Street U leader supported BDS in a post for Americans for Peace Now. The liberal Zionist bloc responded decisively. Peace Now took the piece down and J Street issued a statement saying that the student did not endorse BDS. The student repudiated her own position. A red line had been crossed.

So the essential tool of anti-discrimination movements– from Montgomery bus boycott to the agricultural workers to South African apartheid – is quashed by a liberal organization. In fact, J Street has cast BDS as “antisemitic.”

The antisemitism charge plays a key role in the denial. Bowman was accused of antisemitism and being anti-Israel because he was bearing witness against apartheid. Columbia University has suspended two honorable Palestinian solidarity groups under the same smear– antisemitism– surely because of donor pressure. The direct mail coming to my mother’s house from the leading Jewish organizations says there is a giant surge in antisemitism in the country, and cites all the anti-Israel students and groups. No mention whatsoever of the 10s of thousands of civilian victims in Gaza.

So the witnesses must be destroyed so that the Establishment is allowed to persist in its view that Israel is a democracy pursuing a two state solution – “dreamcastle Israel,” in Max Blumenthal’s stinging phrase. Like this upcoming trip to Israel from a leading New York synagogue that denies anything is wrong.

Temple Emanu-El is sponsoring a tour of Israel titled "Rediscover Israel" that aims to stir American Jews' feelings for the "country we love." An 8-day trip in October 2024 "for the heart, mind and spirit," the trip features getaways to the desert, yoga sessions, and meetings with Israeli soldiers.
TEMPLE EMANU-EL IS SPONSORING A TOUR OF ISRAEL TITLED “REDISCOVER ISRAEL” THAT AIMS TO STIR AMERICAN JEWS’ FEELINGS FOR THE “COUNTRY WE LOVE.” AN 8-DAY TRIP IN OCTOBER 2024 “FOR THE HEART, MIND AND SPIRIT,” THE TRIP FEATURES GETAWAYS TO THE DESERT, YOGA SESSIONS, AND MEETINGS WITH ISRAELI SOLDIERS.

Seeing Israel for what it really is would expose the failure of Zionism. Its principal goal was to create Jewish safety. But Jews are unsafe in Israel because the society is oppressing an indigenous people, which resists. As my mother’s best friend assured me in Jerusalem 18 years ago, “There will be one war after another till they accept us.”

There are always pragmatic rationalizations for denial. If there is no illusion of a two-state solution to wave at people, then the most powerful country in the Middle East will be destabilized, and there will be a bloody and unending rollercoaster (as someone once put it) toward equal rights for all.

But we are plainly in such a savage reality now, and the U.S. establishment is siding with Jewish supremacists. And Palestinians are paying the terrible price for dishonesty and self-righteousness. Don’t say you didn’t know.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2024-07-17 08:59:312024-07-17 09:10:17Philip Weiss: Israel is falling apart, and American leaders are in denial
Page 136 of 234«‹134135136137138›»
Subscribeto RSS Feed

Kevin MacDonald on Mark Collett’s show reviewing Culture of Critique

James Edwards at the Counter-Currents Conference, Atlanta, 2022

Watch TOO Video Picks

video archives

DONATE

DONATE TO TOO

Follow us on Facebook

Keep Up To Date By Email

Subscribe to get our latest posts in your inbox twice a week.

Name

Email


Topics

Authors

Monthly Archives

RECENT TRANSLATIONS

All | Czech | Finnish | French | German | Greek | Italian | Polish | Portuguese | Russian | Spanish | Swedish

Blogroll

  • American Free Press
  • American Freedom Party
  • American Mercury
  • American Renaissance
  • Arktos Publishing
  • Candour Magazine
  • Center for Immigration Studies
  • Chronicles Magazine
  • Council of European Canadians
  • Counter-Currents
  • Curiales—Dutch nationalist-conservative website
  • Denmark's Freedom Council
  • Diversity Chronicle
  • Folktrove: Digital Library of the Third Way
  • Human Biodiversity Bibliography
  • Institute for Historical Review
  • Mondoweiss
  • Pat Buchanan
  • Paul Craig Roberts
  • Project Nova Europea
  • Red Ice
  • Richard Lynn
  • Rivers of Blood
  • Sobran's
  • The Occidental Quarterly Online
  • The Political Cesspool
  • The Raven's Call: A Reactionary Perspective
  • The Right Stuff
  • The Unz Review
  • VDare
  • XYZ: Australian Nationalist Site
NEW: Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Culture of Critique

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Separation and Its Discontents
A People That Shall Dwell Alone
© 2025 The Occidental Observer - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • X
  • Dribbble
Scroll to top

By continuing to browse the site, you are legally agreeing to our use of cookies and general site statistics plugins.

CloseLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only