Christopher Donovan: Every so often, a tale from the world of current events manages to stand on its own as summation of the white genocide. The murder of Amy Biehl was one such tale. Biehl, a pretty, blonde Californian studying at Stanford, traipsed off to South Africa in the early 1990′s to assist blacks during the apartheid challenges. One day, she was surrounded by a group of blacks (unaware of her being ‘on the good side’, if you will) who stoned her to death.
To white advocates, the implications of the tale are obvious. But for those new to white consciousness, let me explain. First, Biehl was an attractive, well-off white woman, and obviously bright (she did make it into Stanford). As white advocates, we bemoan the fact that our best and brightest are so indoctrinated against their own race that they’d dive into dangerous situations to help non-whites — and worse, those in conflict with whites. They’ve been conditioned all their lives to believe that a virtuous life means running to a far-off land to “help” the non-whites, who suffer only because of colonialism or some other white-caused unfairness. They are not taught, by contrast, that becoming a wife and mother and helping their own race is virtuous. No, the opposite: those are contemptible courses.
So, that’s one level on which “Amy Biehl Syndrome” is a problem. The other is the sheer irony of the death: these women end up killed by the very “noble” non-whites they seek to help. To white advocates, what this shows is that these are ill-spent efforts: underlying the mission is an assumption that the non-whites will be grateful for the white help. But in truth, many of these non-whites are violence-prone and so lacking in discernment that they’d kill a white person willing to help them. This in turn reveals the deep-seated racial differences that make co-existence very difficult.
And on a third level, the parents of Amy Biehl actually forgave the black killers and shook their hands. White advocates see this as the Stockholm Syndrome of our dispossession — rather than react in a normal, healthy way by becoming angry, we actually get on bended knee to ask the forgiveness of the murderers of our race. We’ve become a race that wants to apologize for not dying off quickly enough. It boggles the mind.
Was the recent murder of a white girl who sought to be a “mule” for illegals an example of Amy Biehl Syndrome? Possibly — or this girl may have been acting out of cash-driven self-interest. But one element, at least, is there: a young white woman who’s been brainwashed by multiculturalism to the point that she doesn’t recognize the danger of venturing into Mexico on such a mission. She watched “Dora the Explorer” and thus believes that Hispanics are all nice people.
When I lived in Park Slope, Brooklyn, I’d read a story every few months in the New York tabloids about a young, idealistic white woman from the midwest who’d come to New York to work in the inner city public schools, only to be stabbed in the back (literally) by young black thugs. Another white life lost to multicultural lies, I would think. She was convinced by a hundred different propaganda points that this would be an “exciting” life (not that I was totally immune, since I was living there myself.)
The consequences of diversity propaganda are real. Whites — often the best whites — end up dead. We must teach them that true virtue today lies in defense of their race.
Christopher Donovan is the pen name of an attorney and former journalist. Email him.
Facing the Future as a Minority
I don’t believe Ms. Mandala was white. She appears to be a mestiza.
Is it just propaganda that makes white liberals eschew racial awareness? I get the impression that the affluent tend to have a certain docility in their temperament which leaves them vulnerable to anti white ideological aggression.
White girls from a well to do background are often keen on animal rights; they are against speciesism on the grounds that it is analogous to racism.
There is something about being economically successful – or just being from such a background – that seems to go with a suite of traits which militate against becoming a mother ( 50% of women in the highest paying jobs never have children), racial consciousness, or anger.
For people like this the argument has to be perceived as moral or they just won’t listen.
The middle class (“bourgeoisie”) obviously has a moralistic tendency, and their moral code is necessarily universalistic. They’re part of a moral economy in which altruism (e.g. in the form of adoption) is part of social advertising. The only exception I can think of is the German middle class in the 19th and early 20th century. The German “bourgeoisie” (the Bildungsbürgerschaft) internalized the traditional values of the aristocracy (i.e. honor instead of “moralism”).
Let us not forget this example of probably the highest status person hoist on her own petard:
Marike Willemse was born in Pretoria in 1937 into what was considered a privileged Afrikaner home. Her father, Wilhelm Willemse, was a distinguished academic and writer. As Professor of Social Pathology and Psychology at Pretoria University, he ensured that his children were raised in a “verligte” (enlightened) atmosphere and imbued with the spirit to respect and help others.
For most of her life, Marike de Klerk fulfilled the role of a dedicated wife to a man of destiny, helping him through a volatile political career as enlightened Afrikaners began to question the philosophy of apartheid, and eventually standing by his side as he shared the Nobel Peace Prize with Nelson Mandela.
Marike de Klerk remained loyal and loving, although her compassion had led her into supporting social work among South Africa’s black women whose plight, culturally rather than politically, horrified her. When F W de Klerk became South Africa’s state president in 1989, he appeared to move his government swiftly to the reformist centre, a switch which many close friends attributed in some measure to the influence of his wife.
In his first major speech, he startled his critics by calling for a non-racial South Africa and negotiations on the country’s future. In 1990, he lifted the ban on the African National Congress and other previously banned political organisations, and released Nelson Mandela.
Marike de Klerk expressed her “pride and joy” at being married to the man who had brought an end to apartheid and opened the way for a democratic nation based on a constitution which respected all human rights. She revelled in the world acclaim the peaceful transition brought to her husband and shared the country’s adulation of Nelson Mandela as South Africa’s first black leader. Initially de Klerk and Mandela had a warm relationship. De Klerk became an executive deputy president in the first government of national unity.
On 4 December 2001, Marike de Klerk was murdered, repeatedly stabbed and brutally strangled, in her Cape Town apartment.
In May 2003, former security guard, Luayanda Mboniswa was convicted of her murder. [1]
Her murder led to many high-profile figures speaking out. South African president Thabo Mbeki remarked that she was a “strong, charming and dignified woman”.. Winnie Madikizela-Mandela stated that “As a woman, I can identify with the exhaustion of her emotional resources in shaping her former husband’s career,”.
Her former husband, FW de Klerk released a statement: “I have learned with great shock and sorrow of the circumstances of the tragic death of my former wife Marike.”
Now who could have seen that coming? In the oft-repeated words of a hostile yet hand-wringing media, “What went wrong?”
The world can forgive anything, except a favour.
I have heard it said, and will repeat it here, that White liberalism is ultimately a racial death wish, full stop.
Is Knutsson the same person who has written articles for this site? I wish he would do some more–his were rather interesting for the most part.
“We must teach them that true virtue today lies in defense of their race.”
How to do it? I think parents should tell their children to hang around white comrades only. Also, it’s easy to tell children what they should think of racial traitors who marry non-whites. But it is difficult for parents to give thoughtful lectures to their children on the question of race loyalty. The job should be done by private schools, scouting organizations, magazines for the young…
If for the moment there are no magazines around that can help give a pro-white racial education to white children and young people, I think it will probably exist in the near future.
One can factor in a large dose of naivety to go along with the reams of propaganda when trying to understand these young girls thinking. I recall reading that the first Americans to leave the north-east and settle in the west had, at first, some romantic notions about the natives who lived there. Simple, noble, honest – primitive perhaps – but certainly susceptible to friendly entreaties from their civilized white brothers and sisters. And on first contact, the Indians were usually somewhat friendly, or curious at least. But boredom eventually set in and before long rape, torture, scalping and cannibalism ruled the day. Our forbearers were healthy enough to adjust their thinking and employ strategies that would keep them alive.
It is a supreme irony that a woman like Marike de Klerk would end her life in such a brutal and undignified manner.Liberal,pro black and anti apartheid her whole adult life and she ends up being brutally murdered by a noble black man.As an Afrikaner and a white nationalist I found it hard at the time to find simpathy for her,but nobody deserves to die like that.Liberalism will yet be the end of the white race.
Thanks, Finrod. Stay tuned.
Excellent article. Christopher Donovan is one of the best writers on the web.
That chick wasn’t white.
@tillman
I don’t believe Ms. Mandala was white. She appears to be a mestiza.
You’re right she ain’t white.
Looks a little neanderthal to me.
I believe I can explain why whites act this way. Most whites have been led to believe that the difference is mainly skin color, thus leading to such cliches as “you shouldn’t judge a man by his color” or “the differences are only skin deep”. But skin color is the least of the relevant differences. It’s important to repeat that the skin color alone is given as the reason that whites would discriminate and not bad behaviour. Blacks’ lack of civilized behaviour is then blamed on poverty, lack of education, or racism. These misguided whites believe that you can educate any black person and provide them with goods and money and that will make them behave like white people, for example, obeying laws and respecting others’ property and persons. But of course this rarely happens.
First, blacks on average are not only intellectually inferior, but in many cases are incapable of the same level of self-control and conscience, due to genetic and biological factors. It is beyond argument that blacks are from 15 to 30 points lower in IQ than whites, on average. Therefore they cannot in reality compete in a white society which leads to frustration and hopelessness, then to resentment and violent acting up. The official fantasy that they are equal sets them up for major disappointment and the only explanation they can accept is that it’s whites’ racism that keeps them down.
Secondly, it has been found that certain traits related to self-control and getting along with others, and committing crimes are heritable. This means that some groups could very possibly be more prone to violent behaviour and lack of self-control based on their genetics. In other words, you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink, because it’s not in him to do it.
To recap, the misguided whites liberals and progressives have been misled to believe that blacks are the same as us except for skin color, and this makes them think if they treat blacks with kindness and respect, that they will return the favor in kind. The differences go much deeper than skin color.
Amy Biehl would have likely met the same fate in just about any predominately black area in America. Any attractive white woman (or man, for that matter) alone and finding themselves surrounded by a group of blacks is more than likely to become a victim of violent crime.
On the other hand, an attractive black woman walking by a group of white men or through a white neighborhood is highly likely to be smiled at and treated with some courtesy (assuming they’re not a gutter whore, which might generate some disrespectful remarks but not violence). It’s telling that the cliche is that even a black person can walk in a white neighborhood at night, but neither white nor black is safe walking through the black area at night.
Duke, you are absolutely correct. You can take the negro out of the jungle, but you can’t take the jungle out of the negro.l
Thank you very much Christopher Donovan for this excellent commentary on the Amy Biehl Syndrome.
I had the misfortune of running in to Amy Biehl’s sister in a San Diego restaurant where I was meeting my daughter’s new boyfriend (another rough story there).
Amy Biehl’s sister had introduced herself as heading something or other called something like the “Amy Biehl Foundation” which continues the work that got her sister murdered. In an off handed way, she mentioned that her sister had unfortunately “been murdered”, then managed to move on to the work of the foundation, which I noted managed to have the sister back in La Jolla San Diego, instead of hanging out in the New South Africa.
Not wanting to cause a huge scene in front of my daughter and her new boy friend, I let the matter go until at dinner Amy BIehl’s sister came over to give us her card, where-upon I went off on her and the Am Biehl Foundation and told the entire restaurant that she was worse than the worst street whore in Tijuana!
I shouted: “What kind of sister embraces the murderers of her own sister?”
The sister didn’t want to argue the point and just retreated to her table, not having closed the sale for a new member to the Amy Biehl Foundation.
I’m afraid that I must disagree with Christopher’s characterization of Amy Biehl and her ilk as the “best whites”-if she is, Heaven help us. She seems instead to fall into the category of an “educated fool”. As someone once said, “You’d have to be highly educated to believe something that stupid”! I have little paitience with such people, and consider them the most dangerous animals in the forest. Heaven help the man that marries such a broad.
I believe we have a new Amy Biehl contestant:
Lara Logan Suffered ‘Brutal’ Sexual Assault In Egypt
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/15/lara-logan-suffered-bruta_n_823677.html