The other night, there was a fundraiser at the local Wendy’s. Ten percent of the evening’s proceeds went to the local library, so my wife and children headed over for some delicious greasiness. Not our usual dinner routine, but it was for a good cause.
Every person in the restaurant — including, believe it or not — the employees, was White (perhaps the library fundraiser skewed things). Compared to the typical ghetto-area fast-food restaurant experience, this one was delightful. The restaurant was clean. People were friendly. Families were interacting. There were older couples smiling at the babies crawling on the floor, mothers chatting with each other. It was as comfortable as a family dinner.
I reflected on all this after having listened to Rand Paul be grilled by Robert Siegel, a Jewish NPR host, about his views on the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Paul, as most know, is the son of Ron Paul, and has recently emerged the winner of the Republican primary for a U.S. Senate seat in Kentucky.
Whatever Paul’s real views, he of course has been taking the careful tack of insisting that he opposes “racism”. I trust Siegel relished needling him about whether he’d allow roadside barbecue joints to bar entry to Blacks.
I don’t know how I’d handle that one myself if I were serious about getting high elected office in America today. The legal distinction between government discrimination and private discrimination isn’t one most people grasp in dumbed-down America, so arguing Constitutional principles wouldn’t work.
How about this?
“Robert, the Civil Rights Act wasn’t about expanding rights, it was about taking them away — from Whites. Everyone’s got a right to decide whom they’ll associate with, and whom they won’t. This is probably the most fundamental right. The government has no business dictating who our associates will be. This may be awkward and painful at times, but that’s life. How would you feel if the government forced you to host three Ku Klux Klansmen at your condo in D.C.?”
Christopher Donovan is the pen name of an attorney and former journalist. Email him.
Facing the Future as a Minority
On MSNBC, Rand Paul was absolutely grilled on the same subject by Rachel Maddow and then Keith Olbermann went into a long tirade about it. Bank on a whole lot of money going to Paul’s opponent in the election, not only because of this but because he is strongly associated with the tea party movement. As you say, Constitutional principles are way beyond most people these days. It’s all about getting the “correct” result. Kevin M
“The legal distinction between government discrimination and private discrimination isn’t one most people grasp in dumbed-down America,”
Even those who can grasp the distinction would probably baulk at the more trenchant observation that individuals do not rightly possess the freedom, or the freedumb if you like, to associate with non-Whites at the expense of the volk. Individuals who do that are free-riders and have consequently betrayed the volk. They can then submit to punishment and remain a part of the volk, or be permanently expelled. Individuals who are truly a part of the volk are not free, as they belong to the volk.
The “distantly” Jewish Rachel Maddow introduced Rand Paul as someone ‘who can speak for himself’ and apologised for talking about the one subject over and over because she correctly understood the conversation was going to be so one sided it would get him sympathy. She destroyed him and it was so easy for her.
As much as I dislike Roman Catholic lesbian Rachel Maddow, who has obvious semite genetic roots, Paul & Paul Jr. are a couple of straw dogs.
It’s a mistake to see this in terms of how skilled Rand Paul was or wasn’t.
What matters is the money that will go to his opponent, and that wasn’t to be avoided by any amount of skill.
One man alone, faced with a mass media with a license to define him by homing in on one line of attack, can always be made to look bad or simply declared to be bad by other media figures. It will not help him much to answer a question perfectly once, or twice, or three or four times.
Even if it was possible to avoid both effects by practically supernatural political skill, while still signaling to potential supporters where you stand, a transformative political movement cannot be made only by people with great skill. Conditions have to be such that large numbers of candidates can thrive, and that means that most of them have to be able to survive without more than average gifts.
To create a winning environment, a lot of wealthy people have to spend their money steadily over the long term, buying a more favorable media, funding think tanks, and providing defense money, so that when the big money moves in to make an example of a politician who has given a taboo answer, equally big money or even greater money comes in to defend him or her. When that’s the case, “political courage” will be much more normal than it is.
the media both ‘conservative’ and liberal reaction to Ron and Rand Paul has been very telling. they are not even trying to hide their biases any longer- a constitutionalist – is the enemy if they do not believe in the ‘faith’ of diversity.
There may as well be a ritual article of faith everyone must profess:
a. belief in the holocast as the most tragic event in mankind’s history
b.belief that israel must always be defended and secured as a jewish state.
c. diversity in all areas of all facets of European and American society
d. open borders
e. Christianity and western civilzation are evil
f. all culturals and all peoples are equal, except when non-whites are superior.
that’s the nicean creed of the new establishment.
Rachel Maddow On Why Rand Paul Doesn’t Get It
There is something about Jewish ancestry which often confers an ability to bamboozle. Bruno Bettelheim, psychotic savant
Areas of psychotic savant expertise might be religious and political evangelism; literary and theatrical culture; litigation and the law; hypnosis, faith-healing, and psychotherapy; fashion, advertising, and public-relations; commerce, confidence-trickery, and fraud of all kinds. Such individuals would be expected to have superb social, political, and inter-personal skills which would explain why, despite their severely distorted cognitive profiles, they have escaped clinical attention and diagnosis. Autistic savants like Kim Peek stand out instantly thanks to their symptomatic mentalistic deficits and child-like, eccentric behaviour. Psychotic savants, by contrast, use their corresponding mentalistic skills to become central players in important social groups and are masters in the art of winning friends and influencing people as a result. Thanks to their supreme skills in managing and manipulating people they are seldom short of money, friends, or influence in high places, and they are probably to be found at the core of many critical social networks and at the heart of key social institutions
Last para of my previous coment was a quote, here.
The warnings and incitements have already started. The Jerusalem Post published a list of the World’s 50 most influential Jews Rand is already being called anti black by none blacks.
Bibi, is top man, second is Bernanke, #3 is Rahm Emanuel and even
Ms Kagan who claims she is not a lesbian is #10.
Can somebody out there in America land research the US Constitution and
show the 310 million Americans that they are required to have
allegiance not only to the USA but also to a state 8000 miles east of it?
http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishFeatures/Article.aspx?id=17
This site deines how anyone can be accused of “antisemitism.”
http://cifwatch.com/
Daybreaker, That is ‘one line of attack’ Paul should have anticipated.
http://spectator.org/blog/2010/04/22/rand-paul-and-israel
Sad how Americans are all expected to pay allegiance to Kosher Nostra. What is wrong with just being proud American?
|
I’m Elected By Jews:
http://vnnforum.com/video.php?do=viewdetails&videoid=24
|
OT, I was wondering why they have stopped creating comments threads for the articles. I just read the recently posted article, which was quite interesting. One point that stuck out in my mind was about the “small-pox blanket”, referring to the alleged distribution of small pox infected blankets among the American Indians by the Europeans settlers. I have noticed this factoid in several high school American history texts. I suspect this may be a myth that needs debunking. We don’t need slander written into our national mythology.
Of course, small pox eradicated much of the American indian population before they even directly encountered white Europeans, since the native peoples had no acquired inborn immunity to the disease. A similar phenomenon occured in Tasmania. So whites did not intentionally “genocide” the american indians. I suspect the story of these small pox infected blankets is an invention of the liberal mind, falling over itself to create an intentionist relationship between the small pox epidemic and the white settlers.
I suspect this for two reasons:
A) the said events antedate the germ theory of disease, so it seems unlikely that uneducated settlers would even have thought of this tactic. Germ theory of disease did not have wide spread acceptance until as late as 1900 in some parts. People thought disease was a punishment from god and stuff.
B) I don’t think that small pox would remain infectious if deposited on a blanket for any length of time. Small pox is a very large, fragile virus, that is typically spread by the air-born route, similar to the flu, not by absorption through the skin.
I
Actually, that’s how the colonists inoculated against smallpox in those days, by giving the bedding of smallpox victims to the healthy in hopes they would catch smallpox, and develop an immunity.
You can read accounts of this practice in the first hand accounts of the American Revolutionary war. In some ways the trial & error method of American medicine was superior to the well schooled British.
As far as the story about Sir Jeffry Amherst’s role, I would like to see the source documents. Sir Jeffery may have suggested buying the indians off with blankets, any old blankets. That may have gotten conflated to germ warfare. LOL.
Amherst suggested deliberately infection hostile Indians in a letter to Colonel Bouquet, during Pontiac’s war. If you are really interested, it is not hard to track down the documents at a library.
There is no evidence that I know of that the plan was ever actually put into practice. Bouquet defeated the Indians the old fasioned way at the battle of Bushy Run, thereby saving the lives of untold settlers on the frontier.
@ Whites Unite
The blanket story was used by Hollywood in an “Eastern” in the 1930′s; so I would caution anyone as to what real source documents may, or may not exist.
Why would the commander at Fort Pitt want to vaccinate the indians from smallpox?
The Jewish media is leading Rand Paul into a certain direction; away from anything substantial, like the Jewish controlled Federal Reserve, Rand Paul’s slavish support for Israel, or the Jewish ownership of the media, and instead pits Rand Paul against black and white film clips of Civil Rights marchers from 50 years ago.
It’s the same as what they did against Ron Paul; brought up newsletters from the 1980s about “sensitive speech” and ignored Ron Paul’s main platform against the Fed, wars for Israel, and the economy.
Jewish media spins the issues in a similar way with Kagan. It’s been framed as a religious issue, Catholics vs. Jews vs. Protestants. But the simply reality is that the majority of the Supreme Court is now non-White, non-traditional Americans. The majority is three Jews, a Black and a Hispanic, the minority is four Whites. Meanwhile, whiles are still 70% of the American population.
Just because they are Papists that makes ‘em White? LOL.
Papal infalibility, please…
Tom Watson, in case that was directed towards my comment:
“Just because they are Papists that makes ‘em White?”
Not at all. I counted Papist Sotomeyer and Papist Thomas as non-White. Do you disagree?
Tom Watson, you’re on all the websites, under numerous handles, talking about Catholics, and trying to join White Catholics with Jews. While everyone agrees with you about “Catholics” like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry, you’re not any sort of religious Protestant, so what is your angle exactly?
“Papal infalibility, please…”
What are you talking about? Who was even talking about religious doctrines? The Supreme Court is now majority non-White – three Jews, a Black and a Hispanic. It’s obvious this isn’t a religious issue. Since you aren’t religious, what bother? Other than the obvious I mean?
The Media immediately honed in on the weaknesses of the Libertarian Ideology. The strategy is so clear to those who know their game
The MSM flirted nice with paul because they new he would be easy to destroy. He might prove them wrong and win, but in so doing he may be forced to sell out most of what makes his dad unique.
I hope Libertarians are paying attention. It was in large part my study of this type of coordinated media attack that brought me out of the libertarian camp.
I hold to the Protestant Reformation.
The Roman Catholic & Jew alliance in Congress is a fact. You can’t argue with the votes.
I guess you know that even today there are anti-Protestant laws on the books in Italy aimed at criminalizing any Protestant organizing. LOL. They are seldom enforced, but, they do exist.
“I hold to the Protestant Reformation.”
Whatever, Tom Watson, you’re not religious, and whatever you “hold to” is certainly none of my business.
“The Roman Catholic & Jew alliance in Congress is a fact.”
Yes, we call that the Democratic party – the alliance between Jews and various liberal “Catholics” like John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, and the late Dead Kennedys.
“I guess you know that even today there are anti-Protestant laws on the books in Italy aimed at criminalizing any Protestant organizing.”
But you aren’t Protestant, nor Catholic, or religious at all, not Christian, but want to talk about Catholic vs. Protestants and laws that aren’t enforced?
It’s all rather silly isn’t it?
The Supreme Court is now majority non-White: Three Jews, one Black, one Hispanic, versus four Whites.
I think most readers here understand it’s not the Blacks and Hispanics that run things in the Democratic party.
Well, you obviously don’t know anything about me. LOL. I attend a Protestant church regularly, and I graduated years ago from a Protestant college. I’m a die hard Protestant
Don’t get me wrong, I tolerate, but I don’t like the Protestant church that I attend aping the Roman Catholics, which they unfortunately do too much of today.
Don’t expect me to jump up and down, and tell you how wonderful it is to have the two Italians, one Bohemian and one Irish Roman Catholic on the Supreme Court.
Tom Watson
“Don’t expect me to jump up and down, and tell you how wonderful it is to have the two Italians, one Bohemian and one Irish Roman Catholic on the Supreme Court.”
I certainly would not. I expect you to continue to post on all pro-White forums why it’s not important that the Supreme Court is now majority non-White: Three Jews, a Black and a Hispanic, against four Whites. Instead, you want to talk about some religious mumbo-jumbo that you don’t even believe.
Yes, I get it. Everyone gets it.
ed
I could not agree more, the Media is simply running the same sort of smear-job they do on any candidate that seems mildly pro-White – even when – like Rand Paul – they go out of their way to kiss *** for Israel and the Jewish lobby.
The Jewish media wants to destroy the small legacy Ron Paul is leaving to us. Whatever the ideology, he’ stood against the Jewish Federal Reserve and against wars for Israel. That’s why maximum pressure is on Rand Paul now.
Dick Cheney stated it clearly: “Rand Paul is not one of us.”
If that’s not the best endorsement for Rand Paul, I don’t know what could be.
@Amused
No. You now have 6 Roman Catholics, and will have 3 Jews on the Supreme Court. The 6 Roman Catholics will vote with the Jews, just like they do in the Congress.
One thing your Roman Catholics share with your Jew political allies is that odd concept of salvation by works, or as the Jews call it—tikkun olam. That really is the difference in thinking between Roman Catholics and Protestants.
Protestants believe in salvation by faith alone. We do not believe it is necessary to do good works in order to be saved. Matter of fact the Protestant viewpoint is that it maybe impossible for a human being to perform a good work. Whereas the Catholics and the Jews believe in good works or tikkun olam.
I’m not saying you are a bad person, but, you probably have never really thought about it.
Tom Watson
“Protestants believe in salvation by faith alone. We …”
Everyone knows you’re not a religious “Protestant” really. Your irrelevant pseudo-”religious” arguments are a transparent ploy.
Just search for “Tom Watson” and “Roman Catholic” on the internet, and you’ll find his consistent trolling of pro-White websites trying to cause division. He’s be outed under three or four names so far. It’s amusing how consistent it is. Search for “lady lurker” who outed him.
The spamming/disruption trolling is less and less effective. The Chinese are masters compared to pathetic Jew campaigns like Tom Watson’s.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party
@ Amused
You really are a Roman Catholic nut case…LOL.
Tom Watson
“You really are a Roman Catholic nut case…LOL.”
Nope – a WASP.
You can’t even get the basics right. You are transparent. Here is the list of various tribes that can see right through your silly Jew spam campaign:
WASPs
White atheists
Anglo-German Americans
White Catholics
Blacks
Chinese
Japanese
Koreans
There’s not a single Protestant Christian, nor Protestant organization, that buys anything you as “Tom Watson” nor your other handles, posts on all the pro-White websites.
Quite literally, no one actually buys your Jewish spam. Least of all, actual WASPs, Protestants, or anti-Catholics.
You’re an amateur. If Jews were smart, they would hire a Chinese in your place, who would do a more competent job with the Protestants.
Just to be clear – I’m sure no Catholics buy it either.
@ Amused
Sis, you should seek professional help. LOL.
Tom W. is right about the Pauls – Straw Men – like the rest of our Jew-controlled political class. But I have to disagree on any simple racio-religious analysis of an institution as discrete as the SC. The key issue is: instruments of violence, and who controls them. Very soon, in favor of upholding the 2nd Amendent – implicitely, the means of whites to effectively resist the coming genocide attempt – we will have a black and 4 white catholics; on the other side, 3 Hebrews and a Latina. While the construction of our enemies is clear enough, our “friends” form a more complex pattern. Let’s not make the Hitler mistake.
This passes for comedy in America. I’m not laughing and I note who’s show it is. I certainly don’t believe what I did when I was young and these children won’t either. He who laughs last, laughs best.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-may-7-2009/white-in-america—the-children
AmusedEuro, what are Watson’s other handles?
It’s the laughter of wolves at the lost sheep.
Tom…
“The Roman Catholic & Jew alliance in Congress is a fact. ” So are the mainline protestants and christian zionists -
IN many ways aspects of the Catholic church are the only bastions holding out against globalist marxism – look at traditional catholics like mel gibson.
For record book, I am Presbyterian.. and you know what my ‘people’ traditionally thought of Rome – the time for silly petty squabbling like that is long past.
@me
If you look at the votes in the US Senate, it is the main stream Protestants who vote against the Jew & Roman Catholic agenda items like illegal immigration amnesty, etc.
These TV preachers like Hagee don’t have any votes in Congress, unless you count guys like Hatch of Utah a Mormon, or Harry Reid of Nevada another Mormon as Christian Zionists or Graham of South Carolina.
Btw, Graham is listed as a Baptist, and he has been coming around lately under pressure for his pro-Israel, pro-amnesty stance in the past.
How about that crazy “enhanced” dna bill passed yesterday in the House. Without doing a real careful analysis it looks as though the only NO votes came from non-Catholics/Protestants. The Catholics & Jews supported it 100%. Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
@ CompassionateFascist
As far a “racio-religious” analysis of the Supreme Court goes, I don’t expect anyone to question Kagan on her view of “Tikkun olam”. LOL Even though Tikkun olam is at the root of many, if not most of our social-racial-foreign policy-political problems!
Bigoted Rachel Maddow and her institutionally racist Statist-liberalism are in no position to point fingers at Rand Paul
http://www.libertariantoday.com/2010/05/bigoted-rachel-maddow-and-her.html
If you look at the votes in the US Senate, it is the main stream Protestants who vote against the Jew & Roman Catholic agenda items like illegal immigration amnesty, etc.
what about voting for israel?
And, as i mentioned, look at the public figures taking a stand- Buchanan, Sobran, look at guys like Mel Gibson- , look at Thomas Woods, look at chronicles mag – all catholic… then compare that to the typical stance of a mainline protestant.
I think the reason you’ll see higher protestant skews on votes for say, immigration because they are coming from the (few and fast deteriorating) areas that have a traditional anglo-protestant core. really, is the righteous French catholic rising to the tradition of Charles Martel,or the Spanish Catholic, evoking Isabel and Ferdinand, to drive the EU menance and the flood of hostile ‘migrants’ into their lands an enemy?
and on immigration – look at the views of the mainline protestant demoniations – they are all equal or more liberal than Rome. Lutheran services is notorious for important Somalies and placing them in white majority states to ‘enrich them’ with diveristy.
“Dick Cheney stated it clearly: “Rand Paul is not one of us.”
The anti-war left and right have more in common than they realize. I thing the future lies in a great and beneficial cross-polination between these two groups.
We have been taught a false notion of “opposites” when in fact for the european peoples two parts can make a whole.
Libertarians are blind to the fact that Libertarianism only has appeal to white intellectuals and technologists, and that is about it. A multi-cult society naturally drifts towards totalitarian control, as that is what is needed to hold it together, NOT liberty.
Libertarianism, in other words, is an unworkable fraud.
Libertarianism is for those smoking the last puffs of a historically earned liberty while it is in the process of being stolen away.
Buchanan, Sobran, Mel Gibson, Tom Woods(?) have never been elected to any political office—let alone to the Congress. Gibson got drunk and shot his mouth off to the cop who arrested him—big deal. Pat Leahy, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Bob Casey, Dick Durbin, etc. etc. those are your Roman Catholic power politicians and they vote a straight Jew agenda for Israel & open borders, and the Republican Roman Catholics vote the Jew/Israel agenda too. Since they have been getting some heat a few Republican Roman Catholic politicians have started to pull there pro-amnesty horns in.
Charles Martel, Ferdinand & Isabella are ancient history. And anyway what have they done for us lately? LOL. Pushed Latinos North across the US border?
The largest Somali population in the US is in Columbus, Ohio. A trip to Columbus is like a trip to the third world. What the Lutheran social services had to do with it I don’t know? If you do know about Columbus, please enlighten us.
Unfortunately, you chose to pretend that Rand Paul is “secretly” on our side and therefore didn’t actually quote him on the subject.
So I’ll do it for you.
Rand Paul has said that “racism is bad for business.”
Does that sound like a guy who opposes racism?
He believes in and promotes a viciously anti-racist ideology.
Capitalism, even Paul’s fairy tale “libertarian” version, is inherently anti-racist.
The very logic of the system requires that its adherents oppose all boundaries and differences in the name of profit.
Tom Watson, while I’m atheist, I think you should pull John Kerry & Nancy Pelosi from your list of Roman Catholics. Kerry’s is actually “Kohn”, the family changed the name and “converted” (sure) for political reasons. There’s a lot of evidence to show Pelosi is another crypto, never mind her husband being Jewish and her children being raised as Jews. She’s an Argentinian Marrano of which there are many. I even work with one. It is almost as funny as all the silly people who take it at face value that Jews are 2 – 3% of the US population when that number is supplied by Jews themselves. Once the Jews have been circumvented, and their greed is pushing this that way as bad as it seems now, then we can worry about the troublemakers who are involved with other “religions”.
tom: do/think as you please. I don’t think it’s helpful. buchanan has been one of the staunchest voices defending old america – and the one most able to get exposure in MSM.
Lindsay Graham, BushII, Clinton, Mccain were all prods and open borders advocates and enablers. compare to tancredo (catholic) for example.
as for lutheran family services along with hebrew immigrant aid society are notoriously at the forefront of bringing somalis here and targeting high % white towns and ‘diversifying’ them. I am surprised you haven’t heard of this before ..
http://www.vdare.com/fulford/refugee_industry.htm
@me
I think “Tom Watson” is a troll.
@ Crypto
Right. I was told about Kerry’s Jewish ancestry back in the 1970′s long before it became public knowledge. The only thing is, the Jews are on Kerry’s father’s side of the family, and his mother side is as waspy as they come. So Kerry is not a member of the Jew’s cult by Jew rules.
As far as Pelosi goes, I’ve never seen anything credible that she is anything but, Italian. She has the Roman Catholic pulpit in California, and often holds her political meetings in Roman Catholic churches.
Roman Catholic’s need to come to grips with the fact that many of their co-religionists & clergy see the Mexicans/Latinos not as non-White foreign invaders, but as their fellow Roman Catholics.
@me
Tom Tancredo is a Protestant—a Presbyterian.
It’s true that under political pressure, and called on the Roman Catholic alliance & racial-religious aspects of these politics (those are not White Protestants streaming across our Southern border), Graham and McCain have been pulling their pro-amnesty horns in.
@Wandrin
Until the Roman Catholic & Jew alliance in Congress is busted up—things will only get worse.
Count on it.
USA constitution is the next step…they are akin to demolish your fine and revolutionary achievement that enabled these kind of people to thrive on…now at the sunlight they are showing the immense hatred and jealous thinking driven to your great invention..your magna carta..your wonderfully written ..I am a muslim…but I share your concerns..and I am terrified with your future…we had achieved for 8 centuries the skies and then as an old body came to the bottom..because all living things are meant too…but in your particlar case the outcome will be horrible…because the babbarians at your gates are fond of the low leveled people to fill the vacuum..a nihiilistic culture that need to exploit all the high cultures to the grave…so we have to help you to stand up and fight back…and this only be done by education…reviving the reasoning to get back what belongs to you…I have to say that a lot f muslims(white and non whites are cheering you …go and get your future back to your hands…
Heraclit says: …go and get your future back to your hands…
Thanks. We’ll try.
Tom, the ‘rules’ aren’t necessarily followed by the jews when it comes to one being considered jewish. In that these days the father can be a jew, the mother white, but the tribe will look at the kids as jews, even if the rabbis don’t. Believe me, the jews looked at Kerry as a jew.